Saturday, 12 September 2009

From Titans to Lemmings - Part 6

By Reconquista

From Titans To Lemmings: The Suicide Of The White Race

6. Behind The Smiling Rainbow Mask

First published at The Home of the Green Arrow

Background

The title of this series of essays "From Titans To Lemmings - The Suicide of the White Race" reflects in a nutshell what I believe to be THE biggest problem facing Western civilisation at this moment in time, that being, the white race itself. Like it or not, since the end of World War II, the white race as a whole has willingly chosen to behave in ways that are self-destructive; flawed ways that fly in the face of Mother nature as I have been describing throughout the series, but one perhaps stands out as the most destructive of all:

An almost fanatical religious belief in the Marxist-created Multicultural ideology and the imposing of multi-racial societies throughout the West where various races will live together as equals in peace and harmony. This modern-day Godless religion has been adopted by the vast majority of whites in the Western world who are enthusiastically swallowing hook, line and sinker the blissful fantasy of a rainbow Shangri-la.

Towards the end of the previous essay, From Titans To Lemmings Part 5, I stated that the Multicutural ideology has been force-fed to our people at every level of our society. For the last fifty years, equality of the races has been widely promoted throughout the West as hordes of immigrants flooded into our lands. Along with equality of all, a demonising of the white man and a re-writing of his history to portray him as an evil tyrant who looted the wealth of other weaker races while enslaving and oppressing them has placed what I call "the Mother of all guilt trips" on our people to brainwash them into accepting the colonisation of their homelands.

Dissent simply isn't tolerated and those who dare resist the propaganda and speak out against Multiculturalism will then be de-humanised with a myriad of Orwellian thought and hate crimes: Fascist, Hater, Nazi, and of course the worst sin any disbeliever can commit against the Liberal church, Racist, the modern-day heretic of the Godless, Multicultural religion.

But something is rotten in Denmark, Sweden, France, Holland, USA, Great Britain - every Western nation. Whites throughout the West have now had fifty years of being brow-beaten with the Multicultural "all races are equal" ideology. Fifty long years of watching their nations become colonised by millions of aliens flooding into the West; fifty years since the end of colonial rule in Africa; fifty long years since the civil rights movement won equality for blacks in the United States and fifty years of a resurgent Islam with millions of Muslims bringing their retarded faith to our once mighty nations.

For British nationalists, we've had fifty years of enduring a pernicious social experiment being forcibly imposed by an elite who never gave their own people a choice in the matter and who demonised and vilified opponents whose only crime was to speak-out against the enforced colonisation of their nation.

So after fifty years, why don't we put this Multicultural social experiment and its claim of racial equality in the dock? Because behind the smiling rainbow mask lies millions of smashed lives mercilessly sacrificed for the Multicultural dream and in this essay, I want to expose one of the most destructive myths being vehemently asserted by deceitful Liberal/Multiculturalists:

That the black man is the equal of the white man. The ocean of evidence - much of which is deeply distressing - clearly demonstrates that this assertion is nothing more than an outright lie that is causing immense suffering to both whites and blacks alike. And it's way past tea for this lie and the enormous suffering it is causing to be exposed under the spotlight of uncomfortable truth. What follows is the horrific reality festering behind the rainbow mask, a barbaric, savage and brutal reality the Liberals and Multiculturalists deliberately ignore, a reality they'd rather you didn't see.

Dawn Of A New Man

In 1950, the United Nations Educational and Scientific Organisation - UNESCO - declared that "All men belong to the same species: Homo Sapiens". Thus the crux of Multiculturalism was spawned, the belief in equality of all races, that all humans are the same followed by the quite ridiculous assertion that race is purely a social construct. Talk about putting the cart before the horse.

In the sixty years since this declaration, the world has witnessed dramatic changes and in Africa, the "Dark Continent", these past sixty years have seen the end of white colonial rule with African nations now ruled and governed by the native black peoples. As Africa has moved towards self-rule, millions of African blacks have left their homelands to build new lives in the affluent West, a West that offers them equal status and equal opportunity and a share of its wealth within its now Multicultural rainbow societies.

Let's review then these sixty years to see just how equal the races truly are, in this case the black race and the white race by looking at the lands of the West AND the lands of Africa, in particular the former British crown colony of Southern Rhodesia and the former British dominion of South Africa.

Slaying A Titan

If you're old enough to remember the late Sixties and the early Seventies, cast your mind back and recall how the issue of apartheid in South Africa was a prominent news item. Reports about how blacks were forced to live in poverty and squalor in shacks in the townships and who were denied opportunity in their own land were embellished with accounts of Police brutality and government oppression. Depictions of racial segregation in public places further illustrated how the South African black was being oppressed by evil whites, with South African whites dehumanised as evil racists who were cruelly oppressing their fellow human beings.

Musicians refused to tour South Africa "I don't wanna play Sun City" they defiantly sang whilst sportsmen and women refused to take part in events in South Africa. Perhaps the most famous incident occurred in 1974, an incident that highlighted the nauseating greed and hypocrisy of politicians who had demanded that the British Lions cancel their tour of South Africa, citing apartheid as the reason.

The Lions ignored them, and with some magnificent displays of rugby became the first touring side to win a test series in South Africa in the 20th Century. Captained by Willie John McBride, the Lions refused to be intimidated by the normally effective "rough-house" approach of the Springboks and McBride's tactic of meeting aggression with outright violence through the call that defined the tour "99", whereby on hearing this each Lion was to hit the nearest Springbok gave the once invincible South Africans the biggest shock of their lives.

The Lions' victory was a truly magnificent achievement and the British politicians who had vilified the Lions for this tour suddenly changed their tune and made sure they welcomed back the triumphant Lions to bask in reflected glory. Such is the nature of the cunning, power-hungry politician.

Graphic reports of violence in the townships, especially Soweto, featured heavily in television news broadcasts and spawned the icons that defined the black struggle against apartheid, the main one being of course the black terrorist - make that Saint - Nelson Mandela.

All the time the emphasis was on portraying South Africa as a racist state that brutally oppressed blacks to make South Africa a pariah on the international stage. Finally, after much international pressure, 1994 saw the end of white rule in South Africa and under the black Saint the new "rainbow nation" was born.

Saint Nelson announced the new state to the world thus:

"We enter into a covenant that we shall build a society in which all South Africans, both black and white, will be able to walk tall, without any fear in their hearts, assured of their inalienable right to human dignity- a rainbow nation at peace with itself and the world."

Fine words. But that's all they are - words. What is the reality of the rainbow nation for both black and white and has it lived up to the lofty and noble goal of a rainbow nation at peace with itself?

Compare and Contrast

Before we look at today's South Africa, let's first remember what South Africa was like under white rule. Under white rule, South Africa was a prosperous, first-world country boasting magnificent cities such as Johannesburg, Cape Town and Durban, cities complete with first-class medical care, advanced transport systems, superb communications infrastructures and magnificent architecture.

South Africa also created a flourishing agricultural industry that not only fed its own people, South African farmers also helped feed the rest of Africa and South African wines earned a reputation as being among the very best wines available in the world. This is a nation blessed with an abundance of natural resources and South African gold and diamonds, again of the very highest quality, earned South Africa enormous wealth. Along with an excellent judicial system that kept crime firmly in check, the old South Africa stood out as the most advanced nation in Africa, a nation that compared favourably with ANY other first-world nation.

When the blacks came to power in 1994, they were handed on a platter this gem of Africa. Having watched the white man apply his ingenuity and his industry to solve the problems presented to him by Mother nature, the South African blacks inherited a superb, advanced nation without them having to build it. All they had to do was maintain it and if possible, build upon it and improve it to benefit all people, black and white alike.

Yet in just FIFTEEN years, black rule has turned the nation of South Africa into a crime ridden, degenerating, crumbling and stinking cesspit, whose cities are in decay, just take a look for yourself to see how two of the cities named above have fared under black rule:

Johannesburg Then And Now

In particular, check out the "A Tour Through Hillbrow" section and if you have time, read through the comments. Imagine how you'd feel if this was once your community. Many Britons will see the same thing happen to their communities, indeed, many have seen it already. Where black goes, Africa soon follows.

Durban Then And Now.

The webmaster there asserts: "Durban is now a filthy squatter camp". See the evidence he presents and judge for yourself.

These images - rarely if ever shown in the duplicitous Western media - are damning evidence of just how unequal the white and black race are. If you listen to Liberal apologists, they will tell you that blacks live in such filth and squalor in these cities because of the legacy of apartheid, yet again placing the blame at the door of the white man for the black man's abject failure. But let's get real here, we're all equal right?

No matter what has happened in the past how on earth does that excuse ANY race ANY people ANYWHERE for living in filth that they have created? We're talking about two of the finest cities created by man handed to blacks on a platter and that blacks have allowed them to decay and to become nothing more than garbage dumps where they raise their children casts a huge shadow of doubt on the belief in equality because if blacks can't manage basic cleanliness then the equality assertion falls at the first hurdle. And what price pride and dignity?

Such filth and decay aren't solely evident in South African cities. You could also see the same decay in Nairobi, London, Birmingham, Manchester, Los Angeles, New York, Philadelphia, and especially, Detroit. Many others too but I will leave you to investigate and discover for yourself but the mess in Detroit is particularly shocking.

What if we reversed the situation and forced whites out of their cities and into the townships to dwell in shacks? Do you think whites would make these townships decay - if that is possible - or do you think that there is a very good chance that whites would dramatically improve these places?

The hypocrisy of lilly-livered Liberals who blame whites for these conditions is sickening because when blacks lived in the shack-riddled townships, these bleeding heart Liberals castigated whites for their "criminal oppression". Whites have built fine cities, built a magnificent nation, handed it all to blacks and when blacks bring the squalor of the townships to these once first-class cities, whites are once again blamed for something that ended years ago, a lame excuse that has no bearing on how black people are CHOOSING to live in the present.

Such typically anti-white Liberal behaviour is yet more evidence of inequality. If the races are truly equal, then all should be judged by the same standards without exception. Of course, Liberals refuse to do so because if they did their whole claim of equality would lie in tatters as reality continually highlights the failures of the black race. The Liberal answer then is to blame it all on whites. How cute.

But the deterioration and squalor of South African cities is just the "ears of the hippo". The savage barbarity blacks are committing throughout the nation of South Africa, not just to whites but also to their own people, is a suppressed truth that needs to be spread to as many as possible. Because what is going on in South Africa is also creeping into the West and in fact, the root cause of what is destroying South Africa is also the same root cause that is destroying the West including Great Britain - Cultural Marxism.

Law Of The Jungle

During the time of apartheid, South Africa was depicted as the most racist and evil nation on planet earth. Once black rule became reality and signalled the end of apartheid you would think that peace and harmony would reign in the rainbow nation. Think again.

Let's get some facts down about apartheid. Apartheid was a system of racial and legal segregation introduced by the governing National Party in 1948 and it lasted until the end of white rule in 1994. During these 46 years, a total of 21,000 blacks were killed due to political violence but this figure doesn't paint a true picture. Because out of these 21,000 deaths, 14,000 of them occurred between 1990 and 1993 as the country transitioned towards black rule.

Of these 14,000, 92% of them, were due to black on black violence, mostly tribal for territory and only 514 of them were down to South African security forces. Further, between 1948 and 1989, 7000 blacks were killed, the majority of them as they committed criminal acts, namely armed robbery, rape or assaults.

Life for blacks under apartheid was a far cry from the unjust and oppressive picture painted by white-hating Liberal-Multiculturalists who never mention just how much blacks benefited under apartheid, check out this two minute video that busts the Liberal myths:

Myths of Apartheid

So surely, things must be better post-apartheid, right? Let's see.

Crime is now totally out of control with an unbelievable murder rate of between 50 - 140 murders EVERY DAY. Violent robberies committed against whites are an almost daily occurrence and the extreme levels of violence and brutality against the victims is absolutely appalling. From biting off fingers or cutting them off with scissors or shears to remove rings to torture with red-hot irons to obtain money, the brutality has no bounds. But what is even more alarming is that once the money or valuables have been obtained, many victims have either been badly beaten, raped - both husband and wife - repeatedly or executed with a bullet to the head or even tied up and burned alive.

Liberals assert that the rampant crime is caused by poverty but this begs the question: Why are whites battered, raped and murdered AFTER giving the robbers what they wanted? I suggest it isn't poverty that leads to these horrors being committed it is racial hatred that brokers no compassion for the victims whatsoever. And the media and the world's governments, so vehemently critical of apartheid, say nothing of this inhumane savagery.

They don't even report that in the shack-ridden townships, ALL crime is committed by blacks against blacks. These are townships policed by black vigilante groups whose punishments include whipping, beating and burning their fellow black brothers who they deem guilty of committing a crime.

In addition to the out-of-control crime levels, there is also an ongoing genocide against the Boer farming community with over 3000 Boers murdered by blacks since 1994 and to its shame, the world turns its back on these victims, preferring instead to perpertrate the myths of apartheid. This SKY news report shows how these farmers have to live and the horrific brutality they are suffering:

Boers Murdered In South Africa

If you listen very carefully to the black politician who dismisses the genocide of the Boers as the actions of criminal elements, you will hear him mention a word - a lie - that betrays the envious reason at the root of these vile atrocities. I will leave you to judge for yourself without giving any more away and you'll find more links to the right of the video providing more information about this diabolical crime against humanity.

No Place For Innocence

But perhaps the most shocking statistic of all concerns child abuse. In the rainbow nation of South Africa, 530 children are raped every day with a staggering 23,450 children raped in the last year alone, that is ONE CHILD RAPE EVERY THREE MINUTES. Over 1000 children were murdered and 20,870 were assaulted during this time, many of whom had body parts - lips, ears, genitalia and internal organs - removed for making traditional black African "Muti" medicine.

Here's a distressing report about child abuse in the rainbow nation over on the excellent South Africa Sucks blog, a blog that is revealing the truth about what is happening there. Warning: Some of the images on the page are graphic and disturbing:

Child Abuse In South Africa

When you then discover that there are over 10,000 child prostitutes on the streets of Johannesburg and that children are also being sold as sex slaves in Bloemfontein, Port Elizabeth, Durban and Cape Town, then the scale of child abuse in the rainbow nation is simply astronomical.

Just before I completed this essay, I read this report dated 9/9/09 over on WMD.COM and astonishingly, the heinous child abuse perpetrated by African blacks is plumbing new depths of depravity:

Babies Raped To Cure AIDS

How on earth any race that treats its young in such a savage, diabolical manner can be regarded as human never mind equal to other human races I have no idea.

Another Titan Falls

If things are bad and deteriorating daily in South Africa, then they are utterly catastrophic in Zimbabwe, the former British Colony of Southern Rhodesia. Since the end of white rule there in 1980 and the establishment of the black ruled nation of Zimbabwe, a once strong and advanced nation has totally imploded and the similarities with its neighbour South Africa are a damning indictment both on the African black and the self-righteous Liberal-Multiculturalists who blindly insist that the races are equal.

Did you know that Rhodesia used to be referred to as "The bread basket of Africa"? Here we had a nation whose white farmers were so industrious and so successful they not only fed ALL of Rhodesia's people, they created so much surplus they helped to feed an entire continent!

Look at it now. Under the rule of the dictator Robert Mugabe, a man who has no problem whatsoever with executing and persecuting blacks who oppose him - his own people -, the Zimbabwean economy has deteriorated into an absolute shambles.

The land reform program, the process by which land was stolen from white owners and handed over to blacks, has achieved the not-so-enviable feat of turning the country from a net exporter of food with an industry that employed 400,000 people into a net importer of food. This insanity has now lead to a severe famine in Zimbabwe with an estimated 5 million people now facing malnutrition and starvation. On top of this, water shortages are causing a cholera epidemic.

Due to the complete inability to effectively manage their own nation, Zimbabwe under black rule now suffers from hyper-inflation, with the dizzy height of 11.2 Million % being reached in 2008. From US$1 buying 80 Zimbabwean cents at the time black rule was established in 1980 to its current rate of around US$1 = Z$50 million with the desperate spectacle of a loaf of bread costing SEVEN MILLION Zimbabwean dollars, under black rule, Zimbabwe has collapsed into a dysfunctional state with devastating consequences for ALL of its people with yet more pain and suffering piling on the misery.

All underpinned by the Western Liberal-Multiculturalists who stood by and watched whites being ethnically cleansed from their homeland and who propagated the despicable lie that this was right and fitting because of the horrors inflicted on the African black under colonial rule. In typical arrogant and self-righteous Liberal style, once whitey has been kicked out of his land, these paragons of virtue completely ignore the devastating consequences being endured by black African people whose empty bellies know all too well the difference between living under white rule and black rule.

Not that your cappuccino drinking, sushi nibbling devout Liberal-Multiculturalist will ever take the rainbow glasses off and see the reality they've helped to create. For these naive well-fed dreamers, the Multicultural fantasy is their sole raison d' etre and when reality unfolds in stark contrast to the rainbow utopia, they will simply put their ideology first and disconnect from reality because they simply cannot bear to confront it. Truth hurts, especially when its brutal.

That these people are afforded the luxury of avoiding any responsibility or accountability for their misguided and irresponsible actions is an absolute disgrace. Yes I know many of them are acting with good intentions but you and I both know a certain road that's paved with them. South Africa and Zimbabwe are strewn with these roads and millions of people there are living in the harsh, brutal destination all of these roads lead to.

What is important to realise about this all-too short appraisal of black rule in South Africa and Zimbabwe is that the same game that destroyed these once mighty Titans is now being played throughout the West including our nation, Great Britain.

Besmirching Britannia

Just as the white South Africans were made to pay for the injustice of apartheid and just as white Rhodesians were ethnically cleansed from their land to right the wrongs of colonialism, so too are British whites made to feel guilty because of Britain's role in the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. Indeed, such is the determination of our Marxist enemies to deploy the guilt weapon, Britons who had nothing to do with slavery whatsoever were so bullied, intimidated and burdened by this guilt trip they marched in chains, led by a British politician, the rotund hypocritical Labour MP John "two Jags" Prescott. He certainly doesn't know what an empty belly feels like.

If the hypocrisy and cowardice doesn't make you vomit, here's the BBC report of this shameful event that happened in March 2007, a full two hundred years after the abolition of slavery:

Prescott's Apologists For Slavery

Note the organiser's risible "as we seek to undo the damage caused by the slave trade..." guilt-inducing nonsense, not missing the chance to hammer home the myths about the slave trade. What these self-hating dolts never mention is that African blacks were not just victims of the slave trade, they were actively involved in the slave trade by capturing and then selling their own. Nor is the fact that slavery is also rife in Africa itself, where albinos, dwarves and people from other tribes are enslaved by African blacks and always have been.

What rankles with me is pious Liberals banging on and on about how evil whites were for enslaving blacks but never mention the appalling conditions many of their forefathers were forced to work under at that time in their own country Great Britain. But as their forefathers were white, their exploitation is left in the cold shadows while the rainbow spotlight focuses on maximising the "injustice and horror" of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade.

But tellingly, those who continually remind us of the wrongs Britain committed during the Trans-Atlantic slave trade don't mention the fact that by far the worst enslavers of blacks isn't the white race it is the Arab race who enslaved blacks for the best part of 1400 years. Indeed, blacks who converted to Islam aided the Muslim Arabs to enslave their own people. Arabs refer to black slaves as "abid" and these slaves were treated barbarically, from castrating the males to using the women as sex-slaves, and a shocking 85% of these people would die as a result of slavery.

Contrast this with the fact that 90% of blacks captured during the Trans-Atlantic slave trade survived and it begs the question:

Why is it blacks, egged on by irrational Liberal-Multiculturalists, continually bleat about the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, using it as a brick-bat to portray the white man as inherently racist and to demand never-ending reparations for this injustice yet do not apply this to their brutal Arab slave-masters? The Trans-Atlantic slave trade lasted for the best part of 300 years and it was brought to an end by whites themselves, so why is it blacks don't have the same anger and sense of injustice about the Arab slave trade that they have towards whites?

Maybe the fact that you will never find Arabs marching in chains through their cities to apologise for enslaving blacks offers a little clue. Guilt won't work on the Arabs but blacks know it works like a charm on whites and blacks will blame whites as much as possible, from slavery to racism to apartheid to colonialism all to distract from their own severe shortcomings and to extract as much value from whites as is possible.

That whites are so easily manipulated by this insidious guilt weapon is further evidence to support my assertion that it is the white race that is behaving in self-destructive ways amounting to suicide of the species.

A Bitter Pill

It is time for whites to refrain from meekly accepting this guilt-trip, a guilt-trip that damages blacks as much as it damages the white race, and to stand up and speak the truth. Enough of the lies, enough of the deceit and the manipulation and enough of this naive and futile devotion to a seriously flawed, childish ideology that forces truth to be sacrificed on the altar of Multiculturalism in the pursuit of a fantasy that cannot ever become a reality: Racial equality, especially equality between whites and blacks.

If one studies history, it becomes clear that wherever the white man has taken root, he has used his ingenuity and his industry to assess and then solve the problems presented to him by Mother nature. History is cram-packed with innovations that have taken mankind forward in leaps and bounds: Agriculture, Science, Medicine, Engineering, Technology along with efficient systems of governance and the rule of law.

What is glaring is that there is absolutely nothing invented or created by the African black that has advanced mankind in any significant way. I cannot think of ONE single invention that has made my life much more comfortable, much more pleasant or made work much more efficient that has been invented by the African black.

In contrast, look at what the white man brought to Africa, from flourishing agriculture to vibrant commerce to medicines that helped the black man combat many of the illnesses that blight the dark continent - malaria, cholera, dysentery, yellow fever, typhoid fever - do you like me wonder how many black Africans have benefited from the wonders of the white man's medicine?

Indeed, the current disease blighting Africa, especially South Africa is HIV/AIDS and in what can only be described as a quite astonishing and grossly irresponsible action, the ruling black ANC government advised people to have a shower after sex so they didn't contract HIV/AIDS. Is this a sign of equality? Really?

I assert that blacks know all too well that they cannot compete as equals with the white race. They know full well - and many are finding out to their great cost - that left to themselves, black societies degenerate into chaos and catastrophe. Blacks know that whites produce the wealth they are wholly incapable of creating and this arouses an intense racial hatred for whites in the black race that manifests in violent crimes such as the robberies described above or in the repulsive and demeaning gang rape of white women.

Yet still these retarded incompetents blame it all on the white man because that's all blacks can think of. So bereft are they of any creativity at all, the only answer blacks can think of when asked as to why Africa remains a third-world sewer is "eiish, cuz da wyt stole everything and oppressed us, das why we got entitlemunt to everything." What utter nonsense.

Blacks will always blame whites for their many failures and they will always demand a share of what the white man creates because they just cannot sustain themselves otherwise. Should whitey refuse they scream "WAYCISS!" like little children scream "I hate you!" when Mummy refuses to give them sweets at the supermarket checkout.

Instead of giving them a share of its wealth in return for nothing the white race should demand that blacks to do something to earn a share or leave them to get on with it in their own dark continent and let Mother nature take care of them. Which she most certainly will if stupid, pious, bleeding heart white Liberals can resist the urge to interfere and stop treating the black to a title blacks can never earn: The white man's equal.

If the white race fails to understand that continually allowing itself to be manipulated into handing over its wealth then not only will it hasten its own demise, it will also continue to cause African blacks enormous suffering. Not just through black incompetence but also through violence because black not only bears a seething hatred for whites, a fierce tribal mentality leads blacks to inflicting even greater acts of savagery and horror on their own people. And this occurs wherever black goes as Londoners know all too well.

Sick Dependency

Here's a couple of examples that illustrate how handing over wealth to Africans who have not earned it and who believe they are entitled to it either because of colonial rule, slavery or merely for the fact they can manage to breathe air, actually causes more misery and suffering and just prolongs the problem. I could provide hundreds more and I am not exaggerating.

In 1984 & `85, Bob Geldof and Midge Ure highlighted the famine in Ethiopia and along with the major rock and pop stars of the time, launched an appeal to raise money for the victims. Band Aid and Live Aid literally rocked the world, it was an amazing feat but what did it achieve? In 1985 the population of Ethiopia was around 35 million, today, just 25 years later, it is at 70 million and growing. This in a country with very little arable land, a country blighted by political corruption, war and famine, yet Saint Bob screamed at us:

"Give us yer money people are f**king dying!"

No Bob, drop the word "dying" and then realise that for all your good intentions all that's been achieved is to line the pockets of the corrupt rulers there and instead of alleviating the suffering of the people, it's actually increased it.

Saint Bob isn't the only one. There are a myriad of charities that exist to improve the lot of the African people. Many find out the hard way that blacks have little appreciation or gratitude for it, a good example being the Irish charity Niall Mellon Township Trust who built basic brick houses for South African blacks, all funded by donations from the West, handed over the keys to people who had paid nothing for them and who did very little to aid in constructing them and who, once whitey had cleared off, rented them out to their own people and returned to the shacks and pocketed the cash.

Charity Homes Rented Out

Other Liberals pay a far higher price for placing fantasy before reality such as this poor woman here:

Missionary Meets Reality

Allowing people to believe they can have something for nothing creates a sick dependency and is certainly not a noble virtue because it does nothing to help the receiver, it just keeps them down with the giver feeling a misguided superior sense of moral piety and an inflated ego. The barbaric and savage events that occur each year in Africa demonstrate how badly flawed this approach is. Another question concerns what happens to people who are wholly dependent on handouts should the handouts stop?

Why is it that after all of the aid that has been donated to Africa through God-knows how many charities and after white colonial rule had created infrastructure, systems of governance, agriculture, wealth-generating and thriving commerce and introduced advanced medical care that has helped cure people of many of the diseases inherent to the continent, why why why are people in Africa still living in squalor and filth and committing so much barbarity?

Additionally and importantly we can also ask: Why are swarms of African blacks still leaving their homelands and their people to live in the West? Surely a better approach is to force Africans to do something to earn Western aid, aid which should focus on helping the Africans address and solve the problems nature presents them so they can build stronger nations in the long-term, that's real help, not just bailing them out when the proverbial hits the fan. Do you like me wonder what will it take to make Africa a peaceful, independent and just society where all Africans can enjoy a dignified life as promised by their blessed Saint Nelson?

Conclusion

Every time somebody dares to question Liberal-Multiculturalists who assert that the races are evil, they are demonised and dehumanised as racists. Yet it is now very clear to me that in fact, the Liberal-Multiculturalists are the true racists. In chasing their rainbow fantasy, they have destroyed South Africa and Zimbabwe with catastrophic consequences that have caused blacks to suffer enormously - famine, violent crime, government abuse and oppression, child abuse and murders of children for muti medicine and rampant HIV. They scream racist at their opponents but they care not a jot for what has happened to millions of African blacks.

Whites too have and are suffering from an escalating and brutal violent crime wave including a genocide of the Boer farmers. And at each turn Liberal-Multiculturalists blame whites for everything and reward other races with scant regard for the consequences. This is because Multiculturalism is anything but, it is about the total destruction of the affluent Western, first-world societies created by whites followed by the annihilation of the white race without any care or responsibility for the ensuing dreadful suffering that will be endured by blacks. All that matters is that whites and their societies are erased from every corner of the world.

There is a trite sound-bite regarding evil that is regularly trotted out in an attempt to explain how evil arises: "All that is required for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing."

It may have a grain of truth but that's about it. Because for evil to truly flourish it requires much more. It requires people to willingly place fantasy above reality, to knowingly accept falsities over truth and to place vanity and self-interest above all else along with avoiding any responsibility for the consequences of their actions and to knowingly disconnect from the realities they create.

South Africa and Zimbabwe show us the destiny that awaits Great Britain if we continually allow the evil that destroyed them to continue to thrive in our land.

______________________
Parts 1 to 5, together with other postings by Reconquista can be read by clicking here.


Victims of Racism - The Destitute Afrikaners in South Africa

Destitute Afrikaners desperately need your help

By Adriana Stuijt

I have been repeatedly asked by foreign friends where they could donate cash and goods to help alleviate the desperate poverty of the Afrikaner people in South Africa and which has been growing steadily worse since 1994. There are several accredited non-profit organisations which specifically assist homeless and desperate Afrikaans-speaking families -- mainly with private donations from the Afrikaner community itself. The South African government often refuses state-grants, food-aid and government housing to ‘whites’ who are described under the nomer ‘previously advantaged’ under ANC-laws, i.e. people who do not qualify for government-aid, even children who were born after the end of apartheid such as the ones in this squatter camp in this picture by Jan Lamprecht of AfricanCrisis.org.

The latest surveys by Volkshulp and the Helping Hand charity of the trade union Solidarity show that at least 660,000 Afrikaners have fallen into total destitution because of the ANC-government’s so-called ‘affirmative action’ and ‘black-economic’ programmes, which bars ‘whites’ all access to the entire labour market of South Africa.

Continue Reading here

EDF. UAF and the Media cover-up

You will have seen on the news, footage of 16 white 'Stop The Islamisation of Europe' members having a demonstration in Harrow. This group is not the EDL, this group is the British contingent of a Europe wide campaign group protesting against the Islamisation of Europe - their website here ;

http://sioe.wordpress.com/

This is a 'non-racist', non-sectarian, peaceful protest movement, who were faced with a mob of over 1000 rioting Islamist militia of the Tablighi Jaamet sect and their Stalinist allies in the UAF.

This group is closely linked with Islamic terrorists involved in the recent airplane bombing plot. Now the UAF are revealed as lackeys of this Islamist sect and the facilitators of Dhimmitude.

Continue reading at Lee Barnes' blog 21st Century British Nationalism


Yet another Muslim riot

Muslim rioters confront police

There has been yet another Muslim riot, that makes it the third weekend out of the last four, this has happened (unless I missed one last weekend) so it is starting to become a habit. First Birmingham, then Luton and now Harrow. The congenital liars at the craven BBC and a dishonest Government Minister, John Denham, (contact details here) are attempting to pretend the violence was provoked by"right wing" protesters, whereas there were actually about 20 people, from the Stop the Islamification of Europe(SIOE) organisation, peacefully and legally protesting against yet another of the hundreds of Mosques being built in Britain being attacked by over 1,000 out of control Asians.

Other Press organisations were even worse than the BBC, in particular, one discreditable little Islamic disinformation service calling themselves Press.TV actually stated that the anti-Islamic protests involved the British National Party, which they must have known to be untrue. The reporter also stated that the BNP were involved in earlier protests in Birmingham, which once again was untrue. He then went even further by seeking to link the BNP with the English Defence League, (EDF) whereas in fact the BNP have declared the EDF a proscribed organisation and forbidden they members from any involvement with them - see BNP statement here.

Even the otherwise reasonably balanced ITN report linked to at the top of this post made the misleading statement that the violence was an indication of "how much fear the right wing protests had caused in the Muslim community" - are they joking or what? Those Muslim thugs are not frightened, they are loving it, and they have a lot more where that came from.

The Green Arrow has an interesting post this morning, entitled "The Islamic Flag will fly over Downing Street", including a link to the Press.TV report I mentioned above, and also a chilling video featuring Anjem Choudray, an Islamic extremist and one time Chairman of the Society of Muslim lawyers which makes very clear what Islam's plans are for Britain. I recommend you read and watch by clicking here.

Friday, 11 September 2009

Wednesday, 9 September 2009

Disinformation News

Amongst the various items on last nights BBC2 Newsnight was a report by Nick Bryant on racial violence in Australia, aimed at Indian students. It appears that there have been at least 97 reported attacks on students from the sub-continent who are studying in Australia, which has resulted in demonstrations by Asian students demanding that the government take action to halt the violence.

The situation has become a serious issue in Australia, not only in terms of social order, but also due to the fact that there are considerable numbers of Asian students studying in Australia and the fees they pay allegedly have a significant impact on the Australian economy, at least that is what what the politicians and media claim. (Does that sound familiar to you?).

Apparently, Asian students are not only flooding into Britain to “study” at sundry institutions calling themselves “colleges”, but the same phenomenon exists in Australia, leaving one to wonder what exactly is being taught in the 300 universities and over 45,000 colleges in India.

The cringe beset (and indeed cringe inducing) Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has stepped into the issue, assuring the protesters that his children “absolutely love Bollywood movies” and adding the somewhat Anglophobic aside that, were it not for the “wonderful” cuisine of India, Australians would have been condemned to “100 years of eating English food”.

The item went on to interview a number of victims and victims advocates and covered the issue in some detail, however, one detail was noticeable by its absence, and that was any clear description of the actual perpetrators.

Despite this, Nick Bryant made what appeared to be a deliberate attempt to imply who they might be, by referring to the old “white Australia” policy, which existed up until the 1970's, and which he said left Australia with a historical reputation for racism. This reference was clearly intended to leave the viewer with the impression that these racist attacks were being perpetrated by those same “white Australians”, if that was not his intention, why make such a reference?.

However, if any Newsnight viewer did come away from the programme believing that these attacks were being carried out by blond Australian surfers, no doubt battering their victims with tinnies full of Amber nectar, as BBC2 apparently wanted them to believe, they would be sorely mistaken and indeed misled.

Unfortunately, had anyone not convinced by Nick Bryant’s broad hint wanted to find out the truth, the usual sources of information would not have been much help. Wikipedia, which includes a lengthy report on the attacks, is similarly bashful when describing the attackers. A single reference to “reports” of attackers being variously described as “white, Aboriginal, Asian, middle eastern and Pacific Islander” actually linked to an Australian news article which states amongst considerable liberal angst that overwhelmingly the attackers were, in fact not white.

Lets guess that Wikipedia doesn't expect people to check their links?

In fact to obtain any clear description of the perpetrators, it is necessary to turn to the foreign press, much of which is by no means as reticent. Here are a few examples:

Times of India 12 June 2009: Headline: Indians in Australia say Lebanese youths behind attacks
China Post 15 June 2009: “Indian students took to Sydney's streets in droves last week for three night-time protests sparked by a particularly vicious assault blamed on young Lebanese men”
Rediff News: 11 June 2009: headline “Indian students allege Lebanese students attack them”

No ambiguity, hints and innuendo there but that was not the Western Media.


Average media profile of non-white crime suspect

We have all become used to the news media trick, which Ann Coulter describes as “to lie by omission” most often used to describe a non-white crime suspect in a manner best illustrated by the picture above, or by the recent Daily Mail report on the race riots in US prisons where by the (deliberate?) failure to mention the words “black” or “Hispanic” the report leaves open the possibility that the racial violence was white on black. In fact, no whites were involved, but I wonder how many Mail readers realised that.

However, the Newsnight report went further, by introducing the irrelevant issue of the White Australia policy, without qualifying it as the Sydney Herald report did, the reporter, Nick Bryant, was linking what he would describe as “white racism” with these attacks, whist, as a reporter, he must have known that the perpetrators were overwhelmingly, and quite probably entirely, non-white. To suggest that he did this unconsciously, at the very least stretches credibility.

Most viewers are not like me, their ears are not attuned to what is not said, and they will bother to check the truth, or otherwise, of what they are being told, and that is what liars like the BBC depend on.

This is a further example of disinformation and misrepresentation by our leading, and state funded news organisation, in an honest society they would not be allowed to get away with it. Sadly, in our society, they will.

Tuesday, 8 September 2009

The Equalities Commission -v- The BNP

BNP Chairman Nick Griffin's statement on the forthcoming court battle.


Click on the image and scroll down to watch the statement at the BNP Website, alternatively, click here to view the clip at YouTube

British in name only

Were I to take a trip to Mexico and buy a Saguaro Cactus, which I then brought back to Britain and planted in my own garden, the cactus would not suddenly metamorphose into a British plant merely on account of its change of location, neither would it become so, were I to take a cutting and re-plant it in a different part of Britain. Indeed, were I to spread the seed of my imported cactus across the country from Bolton to Brighton via Blaenau Festiniog it would remain a Mexican cactus which I had imported to Britain.

Likewise, I would be roundly mocked were I to claim the sea hibiscus to be a British plant merely because I had successfully cultivated a couple of generations of it in a green house in Tring. I would face more than mere mockery in the case of certain other plants, such as the invasive Japanese knotweed, the Virginia Creeper or the South American water hyacinth (one of the fastest growing of plants currently choking rivers and waterways across the countries it has invaded) more likely I would be accused of environmental terrorism were I to bring it here, no matter how much it might thrive at the expense of the local population.

An elephant is not a British species, even if it is the third generation calf of a mother born in a travelling circus and now living in Regents Park Zoo. Tiger breeding programmes at Longleat do not claim to be producing “British Tigers”, neither are the giraffes and zebras which contentedly live out their days in the same “Safari Park” ever anything other than African animals.

Outside Zoos and Safari parks a number of foreign animal species run wild in the British countryside, mostly introduced unnaturally through the stupidity of man, and most cause havoc and devastation to the natural environment and indigenous fauna, such as in the case of the vicious and carnivorous mink, freed from fur farms by so called “animal lovers” in the 1980's, and which have spent the last twenty years eating the natural wildlife, such as the water vole, almost to the point of extinction. No environmentalist refers to the mink as a British species, neither do they the, north African love birds, accidentally released into Britain during the late 20th Century and now plaguing fruit growers across the country, the poisonous North American bullfrog, or the foreign crayfish which have so far killed over a fifth of the native varieties.

The reverse can apply, after many centuries, the rabbit, descendants of the European wild rabbit introduced to Britain by the Romans, but not recorded in the wild until the 12th Century, is now widely viewed as a native animal, but it remains a serious pest, although not to the extent it became when introduced to the truly alien environment of Australia.

A, thankfully dead, piranha was recently found in a Devon river and, if global warming is real and continues, it is more than possible that, crocodiles or alligators could survive in English rivers, were anyone crazy enough to import them, however, few would want to, and nobody would call them British.

Yet we grant the honour of being called British to far more dangerous, murderous and indeed no less alien creatures than crocodiles, we grant it unquestioningly to men and women who's only claim to Britishness is an accident of birth, but who's true inheritance, culture and, in most cases, if the truth be told, true national allegiance, lies far from our shores.

Last night, I lost count of the number of times that various newscasters referred to the men convicted of conspiracy to blow seven packed aircraft out of the sky, as “British”, yet they are not British in any true or natural sense. They have been granted British passports because their parents happened to be here when they were born, but location does not change a nationality, their nature, culture, race and inheritance has come down to them, through thousands of generations, from their ancestral homelands, and, as we saw from their pre-recorded suicide videos, that is where their hearts and souls belong also.

Their alleged handler Rashid Rauf (above) was also born in Britain, but left hurriedly after his uncle was stabbed to death. Rauf is believed to be a leading Al-Qaida operative behind terror attacks across the world, including the attacks in London of the 7th and 21st of July 2005. There are doubts as to whether Rauf is still alive, or, as the Americans claim he was killed by a bomb dropped from an unmanned “drone” in November 2008. However there are less doubts as to whether he considered himself “British” or where his loyalty lay, despite his accident of birth.

There are many like them, whilst one anchor baby gives a dynasty access to our country, the skies approaching Britain are full of pregnant women grasping entry visas long enough to get them in and out of the maternity wards. Yet the children, who by chance of Birth, have anchored their parents, and often their grandparents to our country, are no more part of the indigenous people of Britain than I would be Czech had I been born prematurely whilst my parents were enjoying a City break in Prague.

I would still be British had I been born on the open seas, for it is to Britain that I trace my genes and my bloodline. These men have no such claim, and to grant them one, is not only artificial but it denies them their true culture.

Commentators, speak of a “common British character” as if British genes are injected into arrivals at what is laughably called 'Immigration control'. A British character is no more something one develops by the act of getting off a plane at Heathrow than a French Character is something you gain by arriving at Paris Charles de Gaulle.

No matter how many laws the treacherous governments of this land may have written they can not change nature. An Englishman does not become Chinese by being born in Beijing and a Somali does not become British by being born in Telford. Location does not change genes, and to claim otherwise is all part of the fantasy world created by political correctness, where, to take it to its logical conclusion to become a horse, a sheep need only to be born in a stable.

Abdulla Ahmed Ali, Tanvir Hussain and Assad Sarwar owe their claim to Britishness to a piece of paper and the malevolence of politicians. It is merely ethnic cross dressing which can be locked away when the pantomime is over, and certainly will be when we are all called to take a stand. In their genes, hearts, souls and allegiance they are Pakistani, and that is what matters to them.

They are also not British Muslims, the only British Muslim involved was the convert Donald Stewart-Whyte, who was cleared of all involvement in the airliner bomb plot. The others are only British by dint of political whim. However, politics change only transitory perceptions, it does not change reality. To call these men “British” would be correct only if you define nationality in the narrow terms of geographical location at the point of birth, I do not accept that definition, and self evidently neither do they.

_________________________________

Wednesday, 2 September 2009

The rape of Scandinavia

SWEDEN

A Muslim rape epidemic in Sweden has ensured that it now tops the list as the European country with the most rapes per capita — 46 incidents per 100,000 residents.

The EU report, due to be officially released tomorrow, shows that the number of reported rapes in Sweden is twice as many as the UK which reports 23 cases per 100,000 and 20 times higher than certain countries in southern and eastern Europe.

The study, financed by the EU-funded Daphne II organisation, compared how the respective judicial systems managed rape cases across eleven EU countries.

According to the report, the Swedish rape rate “cannot be explained purely by an increased tendency to report rapes and other more minor sexual offences.”

Over 5,000 rapes are reported in Sweden per annum while reports in other countries of a comparable size amounted to only a few hundred.

The Muslim link to the rape epidemic was already evident several years ago. In July 2005, a study from the Swedish Crime Prevention Council, Brå, revealed that rapists in that country were four times more likely to be foreign born.

The report continues here

NORWAY

Every single rape and aggravated sexual assault committed in the Norwegian capital of Oslo over the past three years was committed by a Third World “immigrant” Norwegian Radio has reported.

According to an NRK report of 2 September 2009, the police in Oslo have investigated 41 cases of “aggravated sexual assault, which resulted in rape.”

According to NRK, “all of them were carried out by non-western immigrants to Norway.”

The police have, the report continues, “investigated all reported cases of aggravated sexual assault over the past three years, and have gained a clear impression of the offenders: Most of the rapists have a Kurdish or African background.”

Furthermore, the police said, the cases of aggravated sexual assaults all have “one thing in common, namely the use of gross violence.”

In typical liberal fashion, the Norwegian police fail to address the real cause of the problem — the mass Third World immigration invasion of Europe — and instead have urged that “more effort be put into preventive measures among men with immigrant background.”

Norway, with a population of 4.7 million, has long had a liberal immigration and asylum policy, and as a result became home to increasing numbers of immigrants, foreign workers and ‘asylum seekers’ from various parts of the world.

The report continues here

Future generations will look back on us with scorn and disgust for what we have allowed to happen.

Tuesday, 1 September 2009

Beslan - five years ago today


The survivors

On the eastern fringe of Europe, these were victims of a war, which has been declared, and which we will all one day be fighting.

What the media did not tell us about Beslan
___________________________________
Hat Tip : Up Pompeii

Monday, 31 August 2009

Asian Riot, Bury Park, Luton, 30/08/09



Thanks to Derby Patriot

More footage here, I have no idea why they are calling it a "BNP riot" there were no BNP there, in fact the only whites were amongst the police.

Why the ‘O’-ministration will implode in weeks


Is this wishful thinking or is it credible - read it and decide:

Why the ‘O’-ministration will implode in weeks

by Kevin McCullough

Never has an administration who had more firepower at their disposal, been set to so totally fail in the next six to eight weeks. It is nearly a foregone conclusion. It is nearly unavoidable. And it defies all logic given the sizable majority the administration has in both houses of Congress.

Since I was the first pundit to predict Obama’s presidency (Dec 2006) it behooves me to tell you the course I believe the next few weeks will take and effectively halt the radical transformation that the left appeared unstoppable with only months ago.

1. Health Care’s long and painful death.

Barring the existing possibility that the Democrats cram a reform bill down the throats of actively protesting Americans through an ultra-partisan process that would shut out conservatives and Republicans from even being allowed to contribute to the discussion, health care reform is dead. It actually died a good while back when the President decided to pivot and create a new issue that no one had been discussing–health insurance reform. The American people will want to know why we should spend $4 billion to cover everyone in America “efficiently,” when we already do so with inefficiencies like people using the emergency room as their general practitioner for $2.5 billion. Deep thinkers on the issue want to know why the President hasn’t entertained one item of tort reform–protecting his friends, the trial lawyers–yet is willing to claim that doctors are eager to lop off feet, tonsils, and foreskin just to make a buck.

2. Cap & Trade will be the largest tax increase in American history.

With the 2010 election cycle just around the corner, campaign ads are not far off from being drafted. With Cap & Trade still sitting in legislative limbo, with the President’s own advisor–Warren Buffet–now opposing it openly on media, with the 9.12 project in the works in which the largest gathering of anti-tax Americans from the left, right, and middle will be coming to Washington DC on September 12, and with blue dogs getting absolutely hammered in their home districts supporting it, the chance of single-party ram through victory on the matter is not wise. Cap & Trade, if passed, will contribute to unemployment, Wall Street stop and starts, and ultimately reduced treasury revenues. It would serve as the single largest tax increase on the average American in all of American history. Even President Obama admitted as much, predicting that electric bill prices, in his words, would, “skyrocket.” Those that have looked at the specifics tell us that the average utility bill in America will go from $167 to $307 per month, per family.

3. Unemployment to remain high.

Now several Washington organizations from left and right, and one of note consisting of both–the Congressional Budget Office, predicts that unemployment will not shrink from the predicted “Obama high” of 8%. Instead, nearly without fail, economists are predicting unemployment at or over 10% for up to the next 24 months. That is nearly 250% the increase in unemployment under Bush for nearly the duration of his two-term presidency. If people were working, higher taxes and possible new health care entitlements could be considered, but without them working it is political suicide for Democrats to even think of it.

4. Obama’s integrity tarnished in August.

Not a great deal has been made of the whoppers that the President has been spewing while the Federal Government has been in recess, but it is worth noting that many more people than I had previously realized have notice the President “exaggerating” badly in his talks on health care. For instance confusing he actual $500 physicians get to amputate a foot as opposed to the $50,000 that he claimed they got. He has shown an utter disregard for the reputation of those he talks about, the “facts” he uses to make his argument, and is highly overly optimistic about the results of his policies. Long story short, at the beginning of the summer Americans mostly trusted him, his passion index was at +10, he heads into the fall at -14.

5. A $3 trillion dollar budget.

New spending for this and that sure added up. And that brings me to number 6.

6. A coming middle class tax hike.

They will hem and haw. There will be an official, and ever arrogant Robert Gibbs explanation from the White House Press room as to why they must to do this to be “good stewards” and to be a “responsible administration” that, “pays as it goes.” But the truth is, in order to pay for everything they’ve promised and budgeted for, a tax is looming for small businesses and working families that President Obama promised would never come. And as an aside, he was going to break that promise all along. Because the minute the “Bush tax relief” runs out in 2010, middle class taxes would be going up in an “Obama administration.” Hence fundamentally Obama’s “not a single dime” pledge on the campaign trail was bollocks start to finish.

Of course the President, the Democrats, the left, and Congressional leadership could surprise me. They could show up in September and endorse the Coburn health care bill in the U.S. Senate and swipe the credit for it. They could show up next week and fight with all their might to not allow the tax rates to skyrocket in 2010. They could decide to scrap Cap & Trade and re-think the use of public money for true job-based economic stimulation.

But I’m not holding my breath, and I’d advise you against it as well.

They’ve awakened the American worker, the American small-business owner, and the American voter.

All three of which are now wondering aloud, “What on earth have we done?”

______________________
Source

Muslim Riots = Media silence

You would not know this from the mainstream media which appears to have suppressed this story, but Muslim gangs staged another riot in Luton yesterday.

Muslim Riots in Luton

By the Green Arrow

Moslem rioters took to the streets of Luton yesterday after rumours of a protest march by white people concerned with the Islamification of their Country.

The Dhimmi police who had done nothing to prevent the same moslems disrupting an homecoming parade of the Anglican regiment from Afghanistan earlier this year, reacted in a typically cowardly fashion by banning peaceful patriotic protesters from the town.

Then attempting to suck up to the Moslem Colonisers, they drafted in extra police to "protect them from far-right protestors". Notice how anyone who objects to having their land stolen from them is referred to as far-right? These days being called far-right is a complement.

Of course it all went wrong for thick plod. The moslems in Luton are now in sufficiently large numbers that they can determine who goes where and who rules the streets - promptly gave the Old Bill a slap by attacking them with missiles, including fireworks against the mounted police who were also deployed. Only the rapid arrival of more police and horses saved the day by all accounts.

Continue reading at The Home of the Green Arrow

That last refuge in the shires

Some have asked why I called my last post "A letter to Tory England". I did so, because it is aimed at those living in the villages and Market Towns of so called “Middle England” and because they are primarily white and primarily they vote for the Conservative party. Yes, there are Labour voters in the countryside, as there are Tories in the cities, however, if one were to strip away the large urban areas of Britain (dream on) and leave only those parts of it I am addressing there would a huge and permanent Tory majority, at least there would be until everything begins to crumble.

The “Tory England” in my earlier post has not yet suffered as a result of immigration to anything like the same degree as the rest of the country. The only immigrants who have ventured into the countryside in any great numbers have been the Eastern Europeans, such as Poles and Lithuanians, who are largely inoffensive and are more likely to integrate into an area rather than causing the area to adapt to suit them, although that may be changing with the arrival of those whom the media like to call “Romanians”.

Also, as they are white, unless one speaks to them, which can be avoided reasonably easily, it is even possible to pretend they are not immigrants at all. In any event those who are likely to be in competition with them for low paid jobs probably don't vote Tory.

On the other hand. most third world immigrants do not tend to be country lovers and have so far gravitated to the large cities and urban areas where they already have established communities, and, of course, there are larger stocks of public housing. In reality the only time you will see a black person in the countryside is in a dairy product commercial on the TV, in order to provide the requisite diversity before rushing back to the city as soon as the camera stops rolling.

Asian business is starting to make an appearance in the shire towns, in the form of curry restaurants, Asian shops or small businesses, and, even in the shire towns overseas qualified doctors are cutting swathes through the elderly population. However, these towns and villages are still massively white, and what diversity there is, is of a level most of us could live with, if we didn't all know where it inevitably leads.

That will not last of course, for a start the fanatics who run our country will not allow that sort of segregation to continue and they will find ways of importing diversity to the shires, but that campaign hasn't started yet, and so far the shires still provide a temporary refuge from what is to come.

Until the inevitable end does come, that flaw in the English character which would rather not make a fuss takes control, and whilst they do not have to confront a problem it is easier to ignore it. I don't think they are “Blissfully unaware of the problem”, after all many will have moved away from the urban areas because of the problem, but whilst they can't see it, it is easier not to think about it. Also, if they rely on the mainstream media they will know very little about what is really going on.

Some may even believe that mass third world immigration is a good thing and greet it with pompom waving enthusiasm in the way that only an ideological fanatic or one who is not forced live with its results can do. Some welcome it because they profit handsomely from it but they are a small cynical minority, The other 90% would rather not take a stand on a subject like immigration for the single reason that like most of Britain they have been cowed into obedience by the “R” word. They were conned into believing that talk of “Immigration” made the Tories the “nasty party”, a devastatingly clever trick which still effects Tory party thinking today.

I have never voted Tory, but I know how Tories think. It is because of that word, and because they do not yet have to confront the consequences of the greatest betrayal our nation has ever seen, they can contemplate voting for a man who would sack any member of his team expressing support for that great and rare Tory, Enoch Powell's views on immigration. This despite the fact that, within a generation from now, when Tory England has finally suffered the results of their actions, as they surely will, a Tory voter who does not support Powell's views on immigration will be a rarity indeed.

Of course, then it will be too late, and there will be no satisfaction in saying they got what they deserved, because we will all have paid the price.

Sunday, 30 August 2009

A letter to Tory England

I visited where you live this week. I took the train from Marylebone and travelled away from London through stations with names like Seer Green, Gerrard's Cross and Beaconsfield, and I watched the world around me change, becoming something I once remembered it to be. I know where you live very well, as it is where I come from, but ts a different world to where I live now, yet for how much longer?

The air is fresher where you live, the land is cleaner, prettier, older and when I visit I find I still can hope.

As I travelled through station after station not only the landscape and air began to change but so did the people, they became whiter, and seemed more at one with their world than those where I had left that morning. They seemed, more relaxed, more confident and certainly more friendly and I knew why, for they are English, this was still England and it felt as if it would last forever.

I left the train and walked through your world, past tea shops, antique markets, estate agents and village greens to the two hundred year old church where I joined those who had come to celebrate and bury a much loved old Englishman. As I looked around the church at the sea of white faces and heard them sing the hymns that Englishmen have sung for hundreds of years, I felt again that this was England and that it could last forever.

Yet, it is deceptive where you live, it is somewhere you can pretend what's happening isn't and can feel that all is well whilst still knowing deep down that it is not.

Not everyone there is white, there are some black and brown faces in Tory England, but only enough to add interest and a hint of the exotic, they are not amongst you in sufficient numbers to overwhelm or frighten you, or change the face of where you live forever, well not yet anyway.

Where you live multiculturalism can seem to mean little more than having easier access to chickpeas and couscous while watching that nice George Alagiah read you the news in the evening. It does not yet mean social decay, gang crime, gang rape and that crushing sense of alienation within your homeland which has become the lot of so many of your not so far away urban brothers. To you, ethnic mixing means Jemima Goldsmith in a designer Shalwar Kameez divorcing Imran Khan and still remaining a social princess, not a battered, hollow eyed white girl condemned to grinding welfare with an ochre coloured child in a borrowed stroller.

Those changes will come, but they have not quite reached you yet.

Maybe you really believe that it never will or that there still will be enough leafy glades and white avenue ghettos to outlast your grandchildren, provided that is they can cope with the commute.

Whilst you don't have to see the destruction or have to live amongst it you pretend it isn't there or believe the politicians who speak of urban enrichment. Those of you who work in town, need only bury your heads more deeply in your paper whilst the train carrying you to the still largely white financial heart of the city hurtles through those failed but fast expanding experiments like Ruislip, Neesden, New Cross and East Croydon. Yet, how much longer can you ignore them?, for they exist and are coming your way.

Others once felt like you, at other time and in other places, Malaya in the years before the war, the white highlands of Kenya in the 1950's or the white cockney East End of London must have once felt permanent, secure and as if they would be there forever, but they are gone, and will never come back. You live in that same dusk, but there is only so long that you can ignore the darkness to come.

*************************

After the funeral I mingled amongst the guests and mourners drinking Earl Grey tea and eating egg or cucumber sandwiches. The widow, a dying breed of lady, greeted me as “Darling” and and I marvelled at the beauty which so many seventy year old English woman of her type possess. It was beauty she had passed on to her lovely grandsons, charming, handsome young white men, one in the army, another a doctor, married to white women who don't yet see the need to dress as trash.

Do they know what they have lost, what has been stolen from them and their children? does their delightful grandmother know that the land of her birth is no more? If they do, they will not say so, as if, like the wolf at the door, to acknowledge it is there means it will finally come in.

That is the problem with where you live, it is an illusion, and one which is rapidly fading. With luck some parts of it may last another fifty years, but you have signed away your home by pretending it will last forever and ignoring the truth which is rushing your way.

Are you blind, are you foolish or just too afraid, for when night falls on Tory England where will you go?

****************************

When it came time for me to leave, I did not want to. I wanted so much to stay in the comfortable fantasy world you live in, where everything was familiar and I could pretend that England still existed and would be there for ever. I understand why you live there, why you choose to ignore reality while you still can, but it is just a dream.

When I left you I wondered if you would still be there when I returned, I could not be sure, for, if you continue to ignore the truth, as you do now, you will not be there forever.

-/-

Thursday, 27 August 2009

A vivid imagination

Noor Ramjanally and two smiling policemen

Who wants to bet that when this story turns out to be a hoax that the London Evening Standard will give that equally prominent coverage? .... nobody? ......hmmmm I don't blame you.

The media actually prints this rubbish and then expects us to take them seriously.

UPDATE

As expected, Mr Ramjanally has been arrested and charged with perverting the course of justice (also known as "making stuff up") When will the police and media accept that 98% of these alleged "hate crimes" are hoaxes?

In fairness to the Standard, they did publish the story reasonably prominently, however, I doubt they have learnt their lesson.