Three of the Tottenham gang rapistsAnyone who watched Monday night's Dispatches documentary on Channel 4 “Rape in the City”, will have been amazed, not so much by the contents, but by the fact that the guardians of the multicultural flame at Channel 4 allowed such contents to be broadcast. Admittedly the main reporter was the refreshingly professional, and, by Channel 4 standards comparatively honest Sorious Samura from Sierra Leone, who has been responsible for some excellent past reporting from African war zones, however the subject matter was highly sensitive and focused on issues which the establishment usually seeks to suppress.
The subject in question was gang rape, and the troubling fact that it is a crime for which young black men are disproportionately responsible, in fact from the series of gang rapes Channel four investigated, of the 93 young men involved, 13 were white, 66 black and the others mixed race or Asian. Although I suspect that Asians may have been under represented in the sample, possibly due to the well documented reluctance of the police to prosecute such crimes within that community, as there can be little doubt the community cohesion censors at Channel 4 will have gone to great efforts to find as many whites as possible, we can be sure that blacks have not been unfairly over represented.
Based on the Channel 4 investigation, young black men of Afro Caribbean origin are committing more than five times as many gang rapes as young white men. However, the discrepancy is far greater than that, given that people of Afro-Caribbean origin are estimated to make up around 6% of the population, whilst whites are around 80% (down from 90% in 1999) by these figures, which nobody has disputed, their propensity to commit gang rape exceeds that of white youths by thousands of percent. (Perhaps someone better at maths than I can provide an accurate percentage.)
Indeed, it doesn't stop there, as came out during the programme most if not all of those white boys who did feature in the figures, were not members of gangs of white rapists, but the minority white members of mixed race or primarily black gangs, such as the single white boy amongst the mostly black gang who poured caustic soda on their victim, in the well publicised Tottenham gang rape last year.
As the whites appear to be primarily junior foot soldiers in such gangs, those who have become involved in such crimes could well be more representative of the effect which exposure to black culture can have on impressionable white boys, rather than evidence of a similar propensity amongst the white community.
Further evidence of this influence, was sadly evident amongst a number of the victims appearing in the documentary, who, although they were filmed in shadow, were clearly mostly white girls. These young women, whilst describing what was done to them, referred to other abusive events and relationships, which fell just short of rape, as if they were a natural and expected feature of the female interaction with the male.
Various references were made to young girls who appeared willing to accommodate a series of young men with mostly oral sex, almost as if they felt that was expected of them. In response to which we have to ask what sort of society we have created, and why it was created. Did young white girls think that way 50 years ago?
Of course Dispatches chanted the obligatory “tiny minority” mantra, pointing out that there are many young black men who do not commit gang rape, however, that is not entirely encouraging given how many of their brothers are at least one thousand percent more likely to commit gang rape than the host community. Let us not forget that the majority of black South Africans are not child rapists, yet a child is raped in South Africa every three minutes. It takes only a violent minority to tip civilisation into a crime ridden anarchy.
We have already seen the disproportionate number of young black men who are involved in knife crime , and the fact we actually have a separate police force Operation Trident dedicated entirely to dealing with gun crime in the black community, even the most argent of multiculturalists, it they are honest, has to accept that there is an issue here.
We have a section of our community which is disproportionately prone to violent crime to a massive degree, we see evidence of this every day, and yet we are not supposed to acknowledge it, even when programmes such as Dispatches reluctantly admit the facts. Furthermore, our leaders are actively seeking to add massively to that already growing and disproportionately criminal section of the community.
Surely this is madness and there can be only one outcome.
The subject in question was gang rape, and the troubling fact that it is a crime for which young black men are disproportionately responsible, in fact from the series of gang rapes Channel four investigated, of the 93 young men involved, 13 were white, 66 black and the others mixed race or Asian. Although I suspect that Asians may have been under represented in the sample, possibly due to the well documented reluctance of the police to prosecute such crimes within that community, as there can be little doubt the community cohesion censors at Channel 4 will have gone to great efforts to find as many whites as possible, we can be sure that blacks have not been unfairly over represented.
Based on the Channel 4 investigation, young black men of Afro Caribbean origin are committing more than five times as many gang rapes as young white men. However, the discrepancy is far greater than that, given that people of Afro-Caribbean origin are estimated to make up around 6% of the population, whilst whites are around 80% (down from 90% in 1999) by these figures, which nobody has disputed, their propensity to commit gang rape exceeds that of white youths by thousands of percent. (Perhaps someone better at maths than I can provide an accurate percentage.)
Indeed, it doesn't stop there, as came out during the programme most if not all of those white boys who did feature in the figures, were not members of gangs of white rapists, but the minority white members of mixed race or primarily black gangs, such as the single white boy amongst the mostly black gang who poured caustic soda on their victim, in the well publicised Tottenham gang rape last year.
As the whites appear to be primarily junior foot soldiers in such gangs, those who have become involved in such crimes could well be more representative of the effect which exposure to black culture can have on impressionable white boys, rather than evidence of a similar propensity amongst the white community.
Further evidence of this influence, was sadly evident amongst a number of the victims appearing in the documentary, who, although they were filmed in shadow, were clearly mostly white girls. These young women, whilst describing what was done to them, referred to other abusive events and relationships, which fell just short of rape, as if they were a natural and expected feature of the female interaction with the male.
Various references were made to young girls who appeared willing to accommodate a series of young men with mostly oral sex, almost as if they felt that was expected of them. In response to which we have to ask what sort of society we have created, and why it was created. Did young white girls think that way 50 years ago?
Of course Dispatches chanted the obligatory “tiny minority” mantra, pointing out that there are many young black men who do not commit gang rape, however, that is not entirely encouraging given how many of their brothers are at least one thousand percent more likely to commit gang rape than the host community. Let us not forget that the majority of black South Africans are not child rapists, yet a child is raped in South Africa every three minutes. It takes only a violent minority to tip civilisation into a crime ridden anarchy.
We have already seen the disproportionate number of young black men who are involved in knife crime , and the fact we actually have a separate police force Operation Trident dedicated entirely to dealing with gun crime in the black community, even the most argent of multiculturalists, it they are honest, has to accept that there is an issue here.
We have a section of our community which is disproportionately prone to violent crime to a massive degree, we see evidence of this every day, and yet we are not supposed to acknowledge it, even when programmes such as Dispatches reluctantly admit the facts. Furthermore, our leaders are actively seeking to add massively to that already growing and disproportionately criminal section of the community.
Surely this is madness and there can be only one outcome.
10 comments:
Sarah said,
"Surely this is madness and there can be only one outcome."
I would add to that that there is only one solution. That solution is total separation, removal of all blacks from Britain.
Sure, some of them are not rapists. Some of them are not murderers. And so forth. But it seems that everyone of them carries the seed for these acts, and a large proportion of them act upon that seed. When you are pulling weeds in the garden, you do not only pull the ones that have gone to seed, you get them all. That is what must be done with the blacks.
The same thing applies to the muzlims as well.
Only when these measures are taken will the UK be restored to health as a sound, reasonable, Western nation.
Sarah - I'm interested in what that outcome is perceived to be by the struggling Brit citizen ?
Are you speaking of the obvious and continual degradation that will eventually bring total destruction upon the whites ?
Or is it that the whites will say - enough is enough, consequences be damned ... we're gonna clean house once and for all.
How does one propose to remove the blacks and other undesirables from our societies ? Do we really think our vote or voiced opinions will make any real differences ? Have they so far or has the spigot only been opened further ?
Forgive my language for I get really mad -what will it take to get the white man pissed off enough to start shedding the blood of those who have absolutely no qualms about spilling theirs ? Raping their women, preying on our elderly ?
In my opinion, there is no more horrible crime than rape. It is so invasive and degrading - the victim is left to suffer a lifetime. I'm still searching scripture for a torture clause, for if ever there was a reason ...
Yes, yes - let us not forget the vast array of armed police might that will be brought against us. But why is that so ? When it is a crime to survive, to right the wrongs that destroy our people ... you can call me an outlaw.
With no apologies.
So where in the scheme of things does that put the authority figures who will be "only doing their jobs" ? Stained with innocent blood guiltiness and no where to hide from that truth. There's no righteous justice in that lame excuse.
No one believes in "conspiracies" anymore so I guess the shakers 'n movers of this multicultural, anything goes NWO just happened to not be able to foresee where all this was heading when they first steered in this direction ?
Does anyone else believe that so many "chemicals" could be kept bottled up tight, shaken violently with no outlet or hope for release and no reaction would come of it ?
They aim for our destruction and think they can control the expected detonation and fully institute their worldly police state from the resultant chaos. It will not turn out as they planned.
Do we really believe that the kid gloves they use on other races now will be the same way they'll deal with whites ? These hate crimes and other means of control are aimed at us, not them.
We are the threat to their system.
Please explain just how we have benefitted over the years by "doing it by the systems way" ?
Stalled them a bit perhaps but look at our present conditions.
Violence understands and responds to only one thing - opposing violence. Soon our minds will come 'round.
Hard realities must be faced and that soon. But there is another possibility most have not investigated with earnest ... but they will when all else fails.
Assuming Sorious Samura from Sierra Leone is Black, then I would suggest the only reason this article passed muster with the editors is simply because of that fact.
Similar Black crime trends also occur in the U.S. with monotonous frequency, but again, the media is in business to brainwash and downplay the obvious -- not to report the news.
Go to this F.B.I. document under “Victims and Offenders” and download the pdf file for 2005.
"In Table 42, entitled “Personal crimes of violence, 2005, percent distribution of single-offender victimizations, based on race of victims, by type of crime and perceived race of offender,” we learn that there were 111,590 white victims and 36,620 black victims of rape or sexual assault in 2005.
In the 111,590 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was white, 44.5% of the offenders were white, and 33.6% of the offenders were black.
In the 36,620 cases in which the victim of rape or sexual assault was black, 100 percent of the offenders were black, and 0.0 percent of the offenders were white.
The table explains that 0.0 percent means that there were under 10 incidents nationally.
In the United States in the year 2005………. 37,460 WHITE females were sexually assaulted or raped by a BLACK man, while between zero and ten black females were sexually assaulted or raped by a white man.
What this means is that every day in the United States, over 100 White women are raped or sexually assaulted by a BLACK man."
I seem to recall reading somewhere in all this buried material that over 3000 gang rapes are committed against women every year, and again, the vast majority of perpetrators being Black men.
In response to Dr. D's suggestion, perhaps the pre-1954 southern segregationists had it right the first time.
Having the hands-on experience of interacting with this particular race can be a powerful teacher and Britain appears to be now moving through a learning phase as once did those 'old timers' from the previous American south.
It is hard to know what the solution is. However, I am not in any way suggesting that the indigenous community resort to violence.
Some of the damage can never be put right, which was the deliberate intention of those who set about creating the present situation.
However, we can achieve a result which stops the damage from getting worse, or at least slows down the process.
Halting any further immigration, and encouraging some of the immigrants who are already here to return to their countries of origin, would, at least help.
Also, we have a duty to be honest about what we have done to ourselves in the hope that others can learn from our huge mistake.
One sustained and increasing attack on Western civilisation
Here is some video of witch burnings in Kenya - Warning - not for the faint hearted.
http://www.wntube.net/play.php?vid=2785
We need to import thousands of these people who will bring vibrant new ideas to the UK — We all benefit when we are exposed to such diversity, especially if it is the ancient wisdom of the forest people, living in harmony with their natural surroundings.
Sarah, excellent post. It must be difficult to write about this subject but you did a great job of laying out the appalling facts while keeping your own voice calm and measured.
Just one thing, I'm not sure I know what you mean... "there can be only one outcome". What outcome do you expect?
**WARNING**
The video in the comment from Anonymous 01:27 is very graphic, and many will find it disturbing.
The outcome is to add to the crime and instability which we have been importing into this country for the last thirty years, until we turn in to another South Africa, Kingston Jamaica or Islamabad.
Right, get ya. Then the question is what'll be the outcome of that?
Surely two things: an increasing awareness of the harmful effects of immigration; but also more willingness to hand power to the pro-immigration state to control our lives.
Aren't we caught in a dilectical trap?
Post a Comment