Monday, 31 May 2010

Victims of the silence

Johan Strydom (South Africa) and Shane McClellan (USA)

A few days ago hundreds of mourners gathered to grieve following the death of Johan Strydom, who was murdered at his farm near Parys in South Africa's Free State on the 15th of May. Strydom's popularity in life was clear from the numbers attending his funeral, many standing in the doorway of the overcrowded Dutch Hervormd Church in Parys as there were insufficient chairs to seat them all.

Johan Strydom's funeral

Now further details of the violent nature of the amiable Afrikaner farmer's death after he was hijacked at his farm gate have been revealed. Strydom suffered a burst liver, damage to his skull, and extensive “dragging injuries", following being chained face down behind his truck and dragged around his farm by one ankle. Medical reports reveal that he was alive whilst being dragged.

This is the second incident this year where a white South African has been carjacked, tied behind his own vehicle and then dragged. A young man was the victim of just such an attack only a few moths ago in that increasingly violent country. He survived, but with injuries which will take years to recover, if they ever do.

Unless you live in South Africa, this is most probably the first you have heard of either of these cases, indeed few in South Africa know of the first incident, as it has gone virtually unreported. I only know of it because I was sent photographs of the young man's injuries, which I can not possibly publish here, and which I will probably never forget having seen.

However, as with so many of the horrors which have happened in South Africa in recent years, such as the ghastly, probably muti related, murders of 77 year old Alice Lotter and her 57 year old daughter Helen, who's horrific torture included their genitals being mutilated with shards of broken glass, before, whilst still alive their breasts were cut off and used to write anti-white hate slogans on the walls, news of anti-white hate crime continues to be suppressed.

Compare this with the case of James Byrd jnr. Who was tied to the back of a truck in Texas and dragged to his death in very similar circumstances to the two cases in South Africa this year, the only difference being that Byrd was black and his attackers were white. It was because of the colour combination Byrd's murder became a world wide news story, and “teachable event” in every school across America, and it is equally because of the colour combination that the South African hate crimes are being suppressed.

It is not just news from South Africa which is deliberately not reported, the press is also silent about anti-white hate crimes closer to home. Infamously within the Nationalist community, but almost unknown in the wider US population, the the savage 2007 rape and murder of Christopher Newsom and Channon Christian by five African Americans went almost unreported outside Knoxville where they took place, even while one by one their rapists and killers were tried and convicted, the most recent case ending this month. Similar limited reporting applied to the 2002 slaying of four young whites (a fifth escaped by playing dead) by African American brothers Jonathan and Reginald Carr, or more recently to the killings in Pearcy reported here by Vdare.com

However, these cases only scratch the surface of the epidemic of anti-white hate crimes across America, which the police are not permitted to prosecute as hate crimes, because the victims are from a group denied hate crime protection (white people), and which the media refuses to report outside the local news, if they report them at all.

Only this week Shane McClellan a 16 year old white youth was allegedly kidnapped and beaten for hours by a group of black men, who Shane claims used repeated racial slurs and told him they were doing it because he was white. Maybe that is why the case has hardly been reported outside the local Seattle news.

Shane's father, Tim McClellan said he barely recognized his son after the brutal assault, adding "I didn't know if he was alive or dead,"

Of course, at this stage, allegations remain allegations, however, can you just imagine how those two propaganda organs of which Joseph Goebbels would be proud, CNN and MSNBC, would be screaming had such allegations been made by a black person against a group of whites. (Remember Duke Lacrosse?)

Even when cases do make the national news, such as the carjacking and murder of North Carolina student Eve Carson by two black youths the race of her attackers is treated as incidental. (I wonder how many black women were carjacked let alone murdered by white gangs in recent years? None, I'd guess, otherwise we would certainly have heard of it.)

Likewise, when committed white Obama supporter Kirsten Brydum was shot dead whilst spreading the word of “Change” in a black neighbourhood of New Orleans, in 2008 she was reported as being "in the wrong place at the wrong time". No mainstream news organisation in America would dare to add that any time is the wrong time for a white person, let alone a white woman, to be in a black area – alone or otherwise.

If you lived on a remote Island in the South Atlantic and you read the crime news on the main US news websites, you could be forgiven for believing that violent crime in America was a multi-racial activity, with, if anything, whites being marginally more prone to criminal activity than other races. Indeed, if you ignored the news and formed your opinion of criminal perpetration on the basis of what you see in US Cop shows, you would be led to believe that crime in general is an overwhelmingly a white perpetrator activity.

However, the truth is very different from the carefully nurtured fiction. here are some figures:

In 2006, the incarceration rate in state or federal prison or jail for men was 1,384 per 100,000 residents, for women 134 per 100,000 residents. The rate for white men was 736 per 100,000, for black men 4,789 per 100,000, for Hispanic men 1,862 per 100,000. The rate for white women was 94 per 100,000, for black women 358 per 100,000, and for Hispanic women 152 per 100,000. (i)

Of the 249,400 state prison inmates serving time for drug offenses at year end 2004, 112,500 (45.1%) were black, 51,800 (20.8%) were Hispanic, and 65,900 (26.4%) were white. (ii)

At midyear 2006 more black men (836,800) were in custody in State or Federal prison or local jail than white men (718,100) or Hispanic men (426,900). Black men comprised 41% of the more than 2 million men in custody, and black men age 20 to 29 comprised 15.5% of all men in custody on June 30, 2006. my source, which I have quoted below, and which I am quoting verbatim states "Relative to their numbers in the general population, about 4.8% of all black men were in custody at midyear 2006, compared to about 0.7% of white men and 1.9% of Hispanic men. Overall, black men were incarcerated at 6.5 times the rate of white men. The incarceration rate for black men was highest among black men age 25 to 29. About 11.7% of black males in this age group were incarcerated on June 30, 2006. Across age groups black men were between 5.7 and 8.5 times more likely than white men to be incarcerated." (iii)

As you read that, you can almost hear the cry, “That is because of racism within the legal system and the fact that more blacks live in poverty and social deprivation!”

Wrong on both counts.

The reality is that politically correct law enforcement bends over backwards to avoid racial profiling, as shown by the shrieks of horror by various senior policemen following the new Arizona law requirements to merely check the legal status of suspects. Meanwhile courts in America go to great lengths not to disadvantage black or Hispanic defendants, whereas statistically, black and mixed race juries are significantly less likely to convict black defendants, especially if the victim was white, than white jurors are in the case of white defendants (iv)

The claim that poverty is the reason why more blacks offend also does not stand up to scrutiny. According to the most recent reliable figures (okay Wikipedia) the population of America stands at around 308,672,000 66% of whom (roughly 203,723,520) are white, 14% (about 43,214,080) are African American and 15% (46,300,800) are Hispanic, the remaining 5% being made up of groups such as Asians, Native Americans and Pacific Islanders.

When it comes to poverty the figures state that “only” 8.2% of the US white population live in poverty, compared to 24.7% of blacks. (v) This statistical imbalance is frequently used by liberals to excuse the higher numerical rates of offending amongst blacks and Hispanics. However, this is entirely misleading, and does not make any sense when you actually look at the ethnic make up of those living in poverty.

8.2% of 203,723,520 means that 16,705,328 white Americans are living in poverty, whereas despite the much quoted higher percentage rate 24.7% of 43,214,080 means that 10,673,877 are living in poverty, a significantly smaller number of people.

If poverty was the key to offending you would expect to see whites committing 16 crimes for every 10 committed by black people, however, outside the whacky parallel universe, as portrayed by CBS, that is not what we see.

Likewise, hate crimes are, to a massively disproportionate degree, something which happens to white people, that truth is merely hidden by legal system which refuses to call such crimes by their true name and by a media which fails to report them.

What we see in America we are seeing here in Europe, yet we are not allowed to say so.

We have reached a point in our society where the truth can not be acknowledged if it does not comply with an ideological narrative, despite the fact that the narrative is a lie. It is the silence of the reporters which gives succour to the lie and imperils its victims, for how many lives could have been saved had they had, at least been warned of the danger?

____________________

(i)Source: Sabol, William J., PhD, Minton, Todd D., and Harrison, Paige M., Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 2006 (Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, June 2007), NCJ217675, p. 9, Table 14.
(ii)Source: Sabol, William J., PhD, Couture, Heather, and Harrison, Paige M., Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prisoners in 2006 (Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, December 2007), NCJ219416, p. 24, Appendix Table 9.
(iii) Source: Sabol, William J., PhD, Minton, Todd D., and Harrison, Paige M., Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 2006 (Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, June 2007), NCJ217675, p. 9.
(iv)http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/19980807031456data_trunc_sys.shtml
(v) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_the_United_States

____________
Hat Tip: Censor Bugbear, Dina, Jenny and Anon

16 comments:

Dr.D said...

As I know that you know, Sarah, it is not poverty, lack of education, lack of jobs, etc, but culture that make the difference in the violence rates between the different ethnic groups. All the statistics in the world will never show white folk to be as violent as the colored people; it just does not come out that way. We have a very few violent white people, compared to large numbers of violent people of color in every case.

Ron Russell said...

Black on white crime is seldom reported on the same scale as the reverse here in the states. And the rate of black on white crime is far greater than white on black which is little to none. I personally believe that black racism is much more common than black racism and see it more and more in the deep south where I live.

Sarah, I'm happily linking to your blog here at TOTUS.

alanorei said...

Thank you for an enlightening article, Sarah

The following should be of interest.

In 1981, American researcher Wilmot Robertson published an informative work about the USA and race entitled The Dispossessed Majority.

At that time blacks were 12% of the population of the US and whites 80%, p 57. Robertson produced figures for black-on-white crime, pp 577-578.

Putting the crimes in context, he showed that 72% of violent crimes against whites were committed by whites, 20% by blacks and the remainder by other*, mixed or unknown.

*These days, Hispanic-on-white crime is a much more serious issue. The California Coalition for Immigration Reform has released some disturbing quotes from influential Mexicans in the US determined to oust white Americans of northern European ancestry. The Mexican aspirations are nothing short of genocide and they are being aided and abetted by both Democrats e.g. 'Bedroom' Bill (Clinton) and some Republicans.

Robertson's equivalent figures for black victims of violent crime are 81% committed by other blacks and the remaining 19% mostly by whites.

But the actual numbers are 1,052,320 violent attacks by blacks on whites and 132,990 by whites on blacks.

This gives a ratio, with the population figures Robertson gives of (1052320/132990)/(12/80) = 53

The US, like the UK, has a serious problem, not just with violent crime but with violent crime by the minority against the majority, which suffers from a very active 5th column.

It could have been headed off if the US had heeded the words of one of its foremost leaders of yesteryear. See next comment, to be forwarded.

alanorei said...

This is the statement from one of the USA's foremost national leaders of the past.

5 black ministers, all free men, are being addressed, on August 14th, 1862, at the White House.

"You and we are different races. We have between us a broader difference than exists between almost any other two races. Whether it is right or wrong I need not discuss, but this physical difference is a great disadvantage to us both, as I think your race suffers very greatly, many of them, by living among us, while ours suffers from your presence. In a word, we suffer on each side. If this is admitted, it affords a reason at least why we should be separated.

"...Even when you cease to be slaves, you are yet far removed from being placed on an equality with the white race... The aspiration of men is to enjoy equality with the best when free, but on this broad continent, not a single man of your race is made the equal of a single man of ours. Go where you are treated the best, and the ban is still upon you.

"...We look to our condition, owing to the existence of the two races on this continent. I need not recount to you the effects upon white men growing out of the institution of slavery. I believe in its general evil effects on the white race.

"See our present condition -- the country engaged in war! -- our white men cutting one another's throats, none knowing how far it will extend; and then consider what we know to be the truth. But for your race among us there could not be war, although many men engaged on either side do not care for you one way or the other. Nevertheless, I repeat, without the institution of slavery, and the colored race as a basis, the war would not have an existence.

"It is better for us both, therefore, to be separated"
- Abraham Lincoln.

alanorei said...

For information, Sarah. Hispanics are probably more intelligent than blacks as whole, better organised I suggest and therefore probably more of a menace. Part 1 follows.

From the California Coalition for Immigration Reform. I made a slight edit for language.

""You old white people. It is your duty to die." HISPANIC LEADERS SPEAK OUT Augustin Cebada, Brown Berets; "Go back to Boston! Go back to Plymouth Rock, Pilgrims! Get out! We are the future. You are old and tired. Go on. We have beaten you. Leave like beaten rats. You old white people. It is your duty to die . . Through love of having children, we are going to take over."

"Richard Alatorre, Los Angeles City Council. "They're afraid we're going to take over the governmental institutions and other institutions. They're right. We will take them over . . . We are here to stay."

"Excelsior, the national newspaper of Mexico, "The American Southwest seems to be slowly returning to the jurisdiction of Mexico without firing a single shot."

"Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, University of Texas; "We have an aging white America. They are not making babies. They are dying. The explosion is in our population . . . I love it. They are [defecating] in their pants with fear. I love it."

"Art Torres, Chairman of the California Democratic Party, "Remember 187--proposition to deny taxpayer funds for services to non- citizens--was the last gasp of white America in California."

"Gloria Molina, Los Angeles County Supervisor, "We are politicizing every single one of these new citizens that are becoming citizens of this country . . . I gotta tell you that a lot of people are saying, "I'm going to go out there and vote because I want to pay them back."

"Mario Obledo, California Coalition of Hispanic Organizations and California State Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare under Governor Jerry Brown, also awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom by President Bill Clinton, "California is going to be a Hispanic state. Anyone who doesn't like it should leave."

"Jose Pescador Osuna, Mexican Consul General, "We are practicing 'La Reconquista' in California."

"Professor Fernando Guerra, Loyola Marymount University; "We need to avoid a white backlash by using codes understood by Latinos . . . "

"Are these just the words of a few extremists? Consider that we could fill up many pages with such quotes. Also, consider that these are mainstream Mexican leaders."

alanorei said...

Part 2. It seems the problem has been festering for a long time.

"THE U.S. VS MEXICO: On February 15, 1998, the U.S. and Mexican soccer teams met at the Los Angeles Coliseum. The crowd was overwhelmingly pro-Mexican even though most lived in this country. They booed during the National Anthem and U.S. flags were held upside down. As the match progressed, supporters of the U.S. team were insulted, pelted with projectiles, punched and spat upon. Beer and trash were thrown at the U.S. players before and after the match. The coach of the U.S. team, Steve Sampson said, "This was the most painful experience I have ever had in this profession."

"Did you know that immigrants from Mexico and other non-European countries can come to this country and get preferences in jobs, education, and government contracts? It's called affirmative action or racial privilege. The Emperor of Japan or the President of Mexico could migrate here and immediately be eligible for special rights unavailable for Americans of European descent. Recently, a vote was taken in the U.S. Congress to end this practice. It was defeated. Every single Democratic senator except Ernest Hollings voted to maintain special privileges for Hispanic, Asian and African immigrants. They were joined by thirteen Republicans. Bill Clinton and Al Gore have repeatedly stated that they believe that massive immigration from countries like Mexico is good. They have also backed special privileges for these immigrants. Corporate America has signed on to the idea that minorities and third world immigrants should get special, privileged status. Some examples are Exxon, Texaco, Merrill Lynch, Boeing, Paine Weber, Starbucks and many more. DID YOU KNOW?: Did you know that Mexico regularly intercedes on the side of the defense in criminal cases involving Mexican nationals? Did you know that Mexico has NEVER extradited a Mexican national accused of murder in the U.S. in spite of agreements to do so? According to the L.A. Times, Orange County, California is home to 275 gangs with 17,000 members; 98% of which are Mexican and Asian. How's your county doing? According to a New York Times article dated May 19, 1994, 20 years after the great influx of legal immigrants from Southeast Asia, 30% are still on welfare compared to 8% of households n ationwide. A Wall Street Journal editorial dated December 5, 1994 quotes law enforcement officials as stating that Asian mobsters are the "greatest criminal challenge the country faces." Not bad for a group that is still under 5% of the population. Is education important to you? Here are the words of a teacher who spent over 20 years in the Los Angeles School system. "Imagine teachers in classes containing 30-40 students of widely varying attention spans and motivation, many of whom aren't fluent in English. Educators seek learning materials likely to reach the majority of students and that means fewer words and math problems and more pictures and multicultural references."

"WHEN I WAS YOUNG: When I was young, I remember hearing about the immigrants that came through Ellis Island. They wanted to learn English. They wanted to breathe free. They wanted to become Americans. Now too many immigrants come here with demands. They demand to be taught in their own language. They demand special privileges--They demand action. They demand ethnic studies that glorify their culture.

"HOW CAN YOU HELP?: Send copies of this letter to at least two other people, 100 would be even better. Help us get the word out. California Coalition for Immigration Reform 5942 Edinger, Suite 113-117 Huntington Beach, CA 92649 Phone 714.921.7142"

Dr.D said...

Alanorei, let me comment on your allegation that "Hispanics are probably more intelligent than blacks." This is only marginally true.

Hispanics for the most part are mestizos, that is predominantly American Indian ancestry, with only a relatively small amount, if any, of European Spanish blood. As such, their IQ is not much different from blacks.

Their culture is significantly different from that of the blacks, and that makes a difference. It is largely a Latin culture, with all of the good, and the bad, attributes that such implies. Into the Latin culture are mixed elements of native American culture to give a very unethical, immoral, primitive man.

I hear frequently about how they are "hard working, family values, Christian people," but from my own personal experience, this simply is not true. This does not describe the mexicans I knew growing up in South Texas.

"Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez, University of Texas; "We have an aging white America. They are not making babies. They are dying. The explosion is in our population . . . I love it.""

Dumb old Joe Angel does not realize that it does not take any brains at all to make babies. It takes a lot of brains to run a modern technological society, and mexicans simply do not have it. All they will be able to do is reduce every thing to the level of mexico, a grand achievement, something to really love! Idiot!!

alanorei said...

Thank you for the clarification, Dr D.

I think I had in mind the MS-13 gangs, who seem to be in the ascendency on the West Coast in particular. I understand that the FBI regards them as the USA's most dangerous gangs.

Your observations w.r.t.Professor Jose Angel Gutierrez encapsulate the problem as set out by the Coalition for Immigration Reform, I think.

Unrestricted immigration will reduce the US to a crime-ridden urban and suburban wilderness like Mexico City. I understand that, although via a different ethnic group, that has already happened to Detroit, where the once world-famous manufacturing base has been severely eroded by 'enrichment.'

Anonymous said...

We are the idiots, for:

a)failing to secure our borders, and b) failing to reproduce ourselves.

These comments apply all over the West.

Anon.

Greying Wanderer said...

Good work. It ties into somethig else as well.

Immigration is disproportionately young males and they tend to flock together. If you have an area with a normal demographic distribution and then suddenly dump a large number of foreign young males then you're going to get violence. Violence that gets censored from the national news and only allowed in the local papers.

People who can move away, move away from the violence leading to the original population gradually getting outnumbered. Eventaully after everyone has moved away who can, the surviving population gets swamped and submerged by the invaders.

This is violent ethnic cleansing by stealth. The majority of politicians responsible for inflicting these conditions on people may not realise what they're doing, because the filthy BBC censors it all, but what is going on under the blanket of secrecy provided by the BBC is ethnic cleansing.

From the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II

"(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;"

That is exactly what they've been doing to us for the last 50 years one patch at a time: slow, steady, secret immigration-genocide.

Dr.D said...

Both blacks and mestizos are largely dependent people in the sense that they are not able to provide for themselves in any way. They are not entrepreneurs, they do not start businesses, create new products, own their own businesses above the level of the local bar or cantina, corner grocery, or nightclub. They do not innovate, create business plans, raise capital, hire others, and develop major industries in all but the most rare instances. Instead, they rely on someone else to hire them, to provide them with employment where they can earn a living so that they can support themselves, or they simply live on welfare. This is why so very few of them ever make it into the middle class; they do not have the mindset to do middle class things.

Around 1980, the very small south Texas town of Crystal City, TX, elected a mestizo city government for the first time ever; they swept all the city offices. All the Anglo-Saxons were put out to pasture. For a few months things seemed to go all right. After about 9 months, the natural gas supply to the city was cut off by the supplier for nonpayment of the gas purchases. Normally, the city owned utility would purchase the gas from the supplier, distribute it to the individual homes from whom it would collect a fee, and the city would pay the supplier. The city was collecting from the individual homes as usual, but the mestizos had no idea they had to pay for the gas they were selling. The knew nothing at all about running a business (or a city).

Anonymous said...

Greying Wanderer

You are right and the only point I would make is that the politicians do know what they are doing; at least they must have realized very soon after they started this, ie, decades ago.

Anon.

Greying Wanderer said...

"the politicians do know what they are doing"

I think they know what they think they're doing i.e importing more Labour Party voters or importing cheaper workers but i don't think most of them have any idea how much blood has been spilt as a consequence of what they've done.

The truth of anti-white ethnic violence is so well censored by the news that the politicians never have to see the full consequences of their actions. The truth is only online and only if you look in certain places.

Anonymous said...

It is unimaginable they don't know what they have set in motion.

It is obvious even to casual observers.

AND someone is ordering the MSM to censor reality. Who else but the pols, or someone well known to them?

Anon.

Wandrin said...

"It is obvious even to casual observers."

The demographic change is visibly obvious. The fact that this demographic change involved a huge amount of bloodshed was hidden and apart from the internet is still hidden.

If you asked most people in the UK about inter ethnic violence in London the first thing they'd say would probably be Stephen Lawrence because they've heard about him a 1000 times while the 100s of English Stephen Lawrences were all censored.

"AND someone is ordering the MSM to censor reality. Who else but the pols, or someone well known to them?"

I'm being a bit pedantic maybe. I just think it's the other way round and the main villains are inside the media with the politicians second.

It comes to the same thing in the end.

kerdasi amaq said...

What will happen to his farm? Who gets it?