Monday, 29 December 2008

A clarification - Update on an earlier post

This blog came in for some criticism elsewhere on the internet as a result of a short post I made last week regarding the banning of 1kewldude3 by You Tube. The post in question was much shorter than my usual posts. but I linked to a post on a US site regarding the fact that You Tube has teamed up with the Infamous Anti Deformation League in order to combat so called “hate speech”.

Unfortunately the US site I linked to includes some inflammatory statements in relation to what a number of US sites perceive as a “Jewish conspiracy” and, in addition, included its own links to other sites which promote that view.

Despite the fact that I have in my time included links on this blog to any number of sites from the New York times to the DEC Congo appeal, the link to that US site has been used as evidence that I am an anti Semite. Furthermore, given my links to BNP supporting sites, this has also been used in an attempt to smear the BNP with anti Semitism.

In view of this I am posting links to both Haaretz and the Jerusalem Post which confirm the ADL / You Tube arrangement, and, as such show that the claim I made is not some anti Jewish propaganda. However, it is interesting that it is only the Jewish press and the far right US media which has referred to this link, certainly I can find no mention of it in the mainstream media apart from this press release. (hat tip Bartholomew's notes)

Both Haaretz and the Jerusalem press appear to see this development in a very positive light. However, for anyone who believes in free speech it is more very troubling evidence of attempts to castrate and silence uncomfortable commentary on the internet.

I take the view that efforts to censor so called “Hate speech” are merely cynical attempts to stifle free speech, because it is inevitably the self appointed censors who determine what constitutes “hate speech” and equally importantly what does not, or, at least, who is entitled to use it with impunity and who is not.

The use of the term hate speech, like the multi purpose “R” words “racist” and “racism” are nothing more that political devices designed to intimidate people and silence any opposition to very political aims.

As I have stated here before I, for one, am no longer prepared to be bullied by such words.

However, I would also like to make my position with regard to the “Jewish issue” very clear.

As with any group which has an almost total monopoly on the sources of public information, I am concerned at the significant dominance of the news and entertainment media by what might be called the “Jewish lobby”. Especially as the media is so dishonest, so biased and so quick to censor anything which does not promote their agenda.

However, I attribute this less to a “Jewish conspiracy” than I do to a politically correct, multiculturalist conspiracy.

With regard to the Holocaust, I have not studied the subject sufficiently to question it, and certainly accept that very many Jews died in Concentration Camps during World War II. However, I consider that laws in countries such as Germany, Austria and Canada which criminalise Holocaust denial or “revisionism” are an abomination, and are effectively criminalising thought.

Also, as I think most people would accept, a significant number of Holocaust survivor testimonies challenge credibility and give substance to the claim that to be a good liar, one should never have too vivid an imagination. Hence there are legitimate questions to ask, even if you accept the basic historical facts. No fact is beyond questioning, and we should never stop questioning, provided we accept, whatever happened must never happen again.

As to the state of Israel, it is a sovereign state with a right to exist and to defend its citizens. Current events in Gaza are very distressing, but I really do not see what else Israel could do given the provocation they face.

Israel is under threat from Islam far more even than we are, and Islam is a far greater threat to all of us than is any so called “Zionist Conspiracy”.

I hope that makes my position on the subject clear.

Sunday, 28 December 2008

Imported Culture


The young girl begged for her life, “Please don't kill me, let me live!” she cried, but her pleas were in vain, as she was dragged into the centre of the stadium where she was to die a terrible death. To the jeering crowd she was guilty of the great sin of having sex outside marriage, and for that she must die, no matter that she was the victim of gang rape, no matter that she was a a thirteen year old child. (Not 23 as the news media bizarrely first tried to suggest)

The child's age aside, it was a scene unchanged from that described two millennia earlier, where, according to the Bible, Jesus Christ confronted a group of men about to stone a young woman to death, with the words “Let he who is without sin amongst you cast the first stone”. Such words would have fallen on deaf ears, had anyone dared to repeat them in that stadium in Somalia, where no less than fifty adult men picked up stones and set about their evil deed.

This girl was not tortured to death two thousand years ago, but two months ago, and it was no isolated incident, across the Muslim world young women and girls face a similar fate at the cruel hands of their culture. I have decided not to include any pictures from the scene as they are too violent. However, I have included some equally distressing images below

Similar horrors face young men who fail to comply with the strictures of Islam, and again age is no barrier to barbarity. The picture above shows two allegedly gay youths, one only sixteen who, in 2005, were led blindfolded through the streets of Tehran, their bodies showing the signs of earlier beatings, before they were lynched from cranes in front of cheering crowds of men, screaming for their blood.

Islamic apologists later attempted to claim that the boys had raped a younger boy, but such claims have been widely discredited, it is generally accepted that they were executed for having sex, and there is certainly no dispute that in the lands of Islam men and boys face similar deaths, often far crueller ones, merely for expressing their nature in a manner disapproved of by the cult of the dead paedophile.

I am aware that some of my readers have strong views on homosexuality, however, I am sure that despite those views, like all decent people they are horrified by such savagery, and grateful that our Western society long ago did away with the horror of officially sanctioned public executions, and the casual cruelties which are commonplace elsewhere.

Sharia law prescribes all sorts of imaginative and painful deaths and mutilations, for a variety of crimes, including many which are no longer crimes in our society. Hence it is even more disturbing to note that around 40% of British Muslims want Sharia law in the UK.

Whatever, the crimes of the child in the pictures above, I doubt they were sexual, and even the most persuasive of Islamofascists would have difficulty claiming that he was a rapist. However, clearly certain cultures believe that torturing a child in this manner is acceptable.

However, that is the crux of the issue, culture, and things which are viewed as acceptable within different cultures. The whole point of a multi-cultural society is to import different cultures into our society and pay them equal regard to our own long established cultures.

The question the supporters of multiculturalism fail to address is how do we prevent the sharper sides of foreign cultures from being imported together with the marginally less unattractive ones, because the answer is that you can not.

Many undesirable aspects of foreign cultures are already being seem within our British communities, just a few examples:

  • Instances of so called honour related violence, including frequent “honour killings” are now regular occurrences in the UK, as are arranged and forced marriages.
  • We have churches where children are accused of witchcraft and subject to violent abuse.
  • We have already seen one instance of Muti killing - aka medicine murder (an increasingly common phenomenon in sub Saharan Africa) and a disturbing number of “missing” black and Asian children.
  • Female circumsism is being practised in Britain and bush meat is being imported and consumed.
  • We have a special police force (Trident) which exclusively deals with gun crime in the black community, and we have seen acts of Islamic terrorism on our streets.
  • A new and far more vicious imported gang culture, has devastated communities in ways undreamed of back in the 50's and 60's, the Kray brothers not withstanding
These are not cultural benefits, and what else will follow.

There is no point in claiming that our laws will stop undesirable cultures from flourishing, because they patently are not doing so. Furthermore laws are frequently changed to accommodate newcomers or simply are not applied to them. Free speech was banned in Britain in the 1970's because of immigration, and as we have seen repeatedly, for instance with the Danish cartoon protests, only certain people now get prosecuted for incitement to murder.

As for grooming minors for sexual purposes, as we all know if the victim is white and the “groomer” is not, the police will not dare to touch it.

Year by year the ugly face of many foreign cultures are becoming part of every day life in Britain, and throughout Western Europe. It is only a matter of time before the very worst is here, much of it already is, gang rape was once all but unknown in Europe, it is now occurring with sickening regularity, and as events, such as the hideous (but unreported in Britain) 2006 death of Ilan Halimi show us, it does not take much to turn the streets of Paris into those of Baghdad.

Our leaders claim that we receive great benefits from immigration, but with escalating unemployment, stretched public services, and a health service beset by health tourism and third world standards of hygiene, that lie is gradually being exposed for what it is.

And what of the so called moral argument for immigration, that we should welcome people here so that they can enjoy a better life than in the third world hell holes they are escaping. This is self evidently madness in that, in the long run, it simply enables the despotic or criminal regimes from which those seeking asylum come, to perpetuate.

If you live near a school where the teachers are murdering the children, you do not solve the matter by offering sanctuary to those kiddies who are fortunate enough to escape. At some point, someone has to sort out the school.

Offering asylum to those who escape tyranny, can only ever be a humanitarian act in the short term, beyond that it serves only to aid and abet the tyrants. Unless you believe that the entire population of the third world can move here, whilst, Africa and huge swathes of Asia and the Middle East are handed back to nature, as maybe some on the lunatic fringes of multiculturalism probably do, the international community must aim to improve the lot of the third world, within their homelands.

The so called benefits of immigration extend to some individual immigrants, but certainly not their homelands, to some politicians seeking to add to their voters, and to a small number of ruthless businessmen who believe that an unending flow of low paid immigrants will forever keep wages low. For the rest up us, the benefits are far less easy to identify.

Even those cynical politicians and businessmen may soon find the benefits are not what they imagined. Across Europe new immigrant based parties are popping up, and we now face an economic crisis, fuelled in great part by politically correct politicians forcing banks to lend to immigrants and minority groups, which has caused immeasurable damage in the financial sector.

Is it too much to hope that, at last, even they will wake up to the madness of the multicultural dream?.

Saturday, 27 December 2008

An opportune Confinement

A heartwarming (for some) story entitled "Happiness Times Five" appeared in the Washington Post earlier this month. It tells how a heavily pregnant lady called Adwai Malual, from the popular tourist spot Sudan, flew to America to seek her Mother-in-Law's blessing for her pregnancy (yup! that's her story). However, once in America, she felt unwell, was rushed to hospital, and out popped five new automatic American citizens.

How very opportune!! Just think, if she hadn't happened to be visiting America, seeking mum in law's okay for getting knocked up, when she had her quintuplets, the poor little mites would have been Sudanese citizens rather than automatically Americans.

It appears there may be some issues of the bill, given that the happy mother does not have insurance, but the hospital is making various noises which suggest that they will "sort something out", and in any event, it is more than made up for by the fact that the family now have five little anchors in the land of the free.

Interestingly, if there hadn't been five babies, the story would not have made the news, so we will never know how many other world travelling mothers are in the same lucky situation. Reluctant as I am to paraphrase the ghastly Michael Howard, are you thinking what I'm thinking?

Of course, we should not forget that had Mrs Malual, been visiting relatives in Andover, Basingstoke or indeed Tower Hamlets, rather than Annapolis when her contractions started, exactly the same situation would have applied, and there would be five new British citizens anchoring their large and extended Sudanese families to our welfare state.

Naturally, given how desperate that authorities are to hide such information, there are no figures as to how many bulging foreign ladies arrive at Heathrow, grimly crossing their legs and clutching a guide to nearby maternity wards. However, is it just me who suspects they are not what you might call rarities?!!

__________________

Wednesday, 24 December 2008

Sunday, 21 December 2008

The end of an era - the censorship of YouTube


Two stories, one from America and the second from the UK herald the demise of what was once one of the last remaining mass access avenues of Free Speech, alas it is no more.

R.I.P. Free speech on YouTube.

I hope you will all sign the petition demanding the restoration of 1kewldude3's YouTube channel, otherwise it will be another victory for these people:


Monday, 15 December 2008

Victims of an agenda - why white boys may be failing



“White boys outclassed!!” shrieked Friday's London Metro as they gleefully revelled in a report that working class white boys were struggling to keep up with other groups in British schools.

The report in question seemed to rather appeal to many in the media, who enjoy portraying young white males as brutish lumpen inadequates, unable to compete with girls and, “more able”, immigrant students. It was also a further report in a series over the last decade which has suggested that white boys are experiencing difficulty within our education system, and one which should cause us considerable concern.

Those of us who do not share the anti white prejudice of those on the left, know that white boys are not automatically dimmer or less able than their contemporaries. These are not the results we would have seen twenty or even fifteen years ago, something has changed, and we have to ask what.

Blame has been aimed at families, the media and television, however, although I am sure these play a role, these influences are common to all, not just white boys. Whatever, it is that has happened has been happening in schools, where education is provided to our children by teachers. And it is teachers who appear to include some of the most politically correct and politically motivated members of our community.

Is there a connection?

One has to ask what they are teaching our children, particularly our white boys, and what effect that is having on their achievements.

Anyone with any knowledge of the education system in America is aware, that school life tends to be a twelve of fourteen year guilt trip for white children, particularly white boys, who find themselves at the sharp end of the race / gender divide. The politically correct attitude which permeates American schools holds whites responsible for the vast majority of of social ills, and white males, in particular are singled out for particular levels of condemnation.

In addition, the wide spread practice of Affirmative Action means that, non whites receive additional advantages and support, not available to whites, because they (non whites) are viewed as disadvantaged.

To what degree are similar unfair practices happening in our schools? We do not officially practice Affirmative Action, however, who can doubt that significant numbers of left wing, diversity supporting, teachers would automatically devote a significant amount of their effort to working for the success of those groups, such as girls, and immigrant groups which they view as more socially deserving, at the expense of those perceived as less deserving, namely white males.

Is it much of an extension to move from that point to, if only subconsciously seeking to disadvantage the less deserving group, so as to give the more deserving a better chance at winning?.

It is not just the male ego which is a delicate flower. As a mother, I know how fragile a young boy's confidence and view self worth can be, these are things which need to be nurtured, because they can be so easily damaged.

It goes without saying that many on the left are prejudiced against white males, and to survive within the current state school system it is all but essential for modern day teachers to come from the left. Are those prejudiced expressing themselves in the way that many teachers interact with white boys, and are white boys suffering because their teachers have an agenda, subconscious or otherwise, to promote other groups before them.

Could it be that our white boys are failing, because that is what they are being taught to do?

Who killed Jose Sucuzhanay?


Various news sources in America report the tragic death of Ecuadorian Jose Sucuzhanay in New York, as the result of what was allegedly a hate crime. Mr Sucuzhanay's death has caused hundreds of people to demonstrate against hate crimes and there are various reports of a growing number of racially motivated attacks on Hispanic migrants, including the Ecuadorian community in New York.

According to some reports, the hate involved in Mr Sucuzhanay's murder was both racist and homophobic, as various media outlets are consistent in reporting that the victim and his brother were walking arm in arm and were accosted by three males who seemingly mistook them for being gay and attacked the brothers shouting abusive remarks about both gays and Hispanics. The brother managed to escape, but Jose Sucuzanay was beaten to death.

If the facts as alleged are correct, it certainly sounds as if the murder meets the definition of a hate crime, and again the media is consistent in implying that this may be the case. However, most of them are also remarkably consistent in failing to provide any meaningful information about the suspects other than their gender.

For example CNN states that “several men approached [the brothers] in a car” that great institution of the blinkered left The New York Times reports that “Three men jumped out of a maroon or red sport utility vehicle and attacked the brothers”, a report which, at least, mentions the colour of the car, and indeed the NY Times goes on to say the police had “released a description of the attackers", and goes so far as to mention the colour of his (black) leather jacket. However, as to the colour of his skin, in common with almost everyone else, the so called American Newspaper of record remains silent.

Elsewhere the Associated press simply tells us that the Sucuzanay brothers were “accosted on a Brooklyn street by men”.

Certainly the news media all tell us that the attackers were “men”, which I suppose excludes women, children and, of course, Himalayan Yaks as potential suspects. Also, as they all seem to agree that the murder was probably racially motivated, I guess they are, by implication, excluding Hispanics, at least Ecuadorians, from the frame.

So what are we, as readers to think?, or should I say, what do they want us to think? I guess that those who read this blog could hazard quite an astute guess, but then, few of you are likely to be average readers of New York's prestigious “Grey Lady”.

The clue, of course is that no race is mentioned at all, and most certainly had the attackers been of European origin, that would have been prominently reported, and probably included in the headline.

CNN, to its unexpected credit, drops a hint as to the ethnicity of the suspects by stating that the victim had been racially inclusive and had employed “a diverse team, including four African-Americans”, although I imagine most of their readers would have missed the subtlety.

However it is not until we get to the far less prestigious publication, the New York Daily News do we find a news source prepared to describe the attackers as “three black men” and then goes so far as show us a police sketch of one of the suspects below:


At least the readers of the New York Daily News are unlikely to be wasting police time by reporting possible Japanese, Inuit or, for that matter, white suspects to them.

However, what about those who rely for their news on the major mainstream news sources, they presumably will remain in ignorance as to the race of the suspected murderers of Jose Sucuzhanay and, may indeed be unaware of the increasing levels of racial violence between blacks and Hispanics.

Indeed given the levels which so many main stream US media sources, such as for instance, CNN, the New York Times and the Associated press have gone to in recent decades to perpetuate the myth that hate crimes are exclusively perpetrated by whites, they could be forgiven for assuming that Jose Sucuzhanay's killers were white.

This is another example of what I Anne Coulter once referred to as “lying by omission”, also, I believe, in relation to the New York Times. It is clearly by deliberate act that so many media sources have omitted the words “black” or African American, from their reports. Their main motive for doing this is to disguise the level of racially motivated crime committed by non-whites in America. However, beyond that, by actively reporting the attack as a “hate crime”, whilst hiding the fact that the suspects are non white, they are effectively misleading their readers into thinking that the perpetrators were white.

That too, I suspect, is deliberate. A lie as Anne Coulter might put it, a cynical and dangerous lie, but, as we all know, from the MSM that is nothing new.

Friday, 12 December 2008

S.O.S. - A letter from Zimbabwe


Letter from Zimbabwe sent in by John Winter

I reckon that these are the last days of TKM and ZPF. The darkest hour is always before dawn.

We are all terrified at what they are going to destroy next........I mean they are actually ploughing down brick and mortar houses and one family with twin boys of 10 had no chance of salvaging anything when 100 riot police came in with AK47's and bulldozers and demolished their beautiful house - 5 bedrooms and pine ceilings - because it was 'too close to the airport', so we are feeling extremely insecure right now.

You know - I am aware that this does not help you sleep at night, but if you do not know - how can you help? Even if you put us in your own mental ring of light and send your guardian angels to be with us - that is a help -but I feel so cut off from you all knowing I cannot tell you what's going on here simply because you will feel uncomfortable. There is no ways we can leave here so that is not an option.
I ask that you all pray for us in the way that you know how, and let me know that you are thinking of us and sending out positive vibes... that's all. You can't just be in denial and pretend/believe it's not going on.

To be frank with you, it's genocide in the making and if you do not believe me, read the Genocide Report by Amnesty International which says we are - IN level 7 - (level 8 is after it's happened and everyone is in denial).

If you don't want me to tell you these things-how bad it is-then it means you have not dealt with your own fear, but it does not help me to think you are turning your back on our situation. We need you, please, to get the news OUT that we are all in a fearfully dangerous situation here. Too many people turn their backs and say - oh well, that's what happens in Africa

This Government has GONE MAD and you need to help us publicize our plight---or how can we be rescued? It's a reality! The petrol queues are a reality, the pall of smoke all around our city is a reality, the thousands of homeless people sleeping outside in 0 Celsius with no food, water, shelter and bedding are a reality. Today a family approached me, brother of the gardener's wife with two small children. Their home was trashed and they will have to sleep outside. We already support 8 adult people and a child on this property, and electricity is going up next month by 250% as is water.

How can I take on another family of 4 -----and yet how can I turn them away to sleep out in the open?

I am not asking you for money or a ticket out of here - I am asking you to FACE the fact that we are in deep and terrible danger and want you please to pass on our news and pictures. So PLEASE don't just press the delete button! Help best in the way that you know how.

Do face the reality of what is going on here and help us SEND OUT THE WORD.. The more people who know about it, the more chance we have of the United Nations coming to our aid. Please don't ignore or deny what's happening.Some would like to be protected from the truth BUT then, if we are eliminated, how would you feel? 'If only we knew how bad it really was we could have helped in some way'.

[I know we chose to stay here and that some feel we deserve what's coming to us]

For now,--- we ourselves have food, shelter, a little fuel and a bit of money for the next meal - but what is going to happen next? Will they start on our houses? All property is going to belong to the State now. I want to send out my Title Deeds to one of you because if they get a hold of those, I can't fight for my rights.

Censorship!----We no longer have SW radio [which told us everything that was happening] because the Government jammed it out of existence - we don't have any reporters, and no one is allowed to photograph. If we had reporters here, they would have an absolute field day. Even the pro-Government Herald has written that people are shocked, stunned, bewildered and blown mindless by the wanton destruction of many folks homes, which are supposed to be 'illegal' but for which a huge percentage actually do have licenses.

Please! - do have some compassion and HELP by sending out the articles and personal reports so that something can/may be done.

'I am one. I cannot do everything, ---but I can do something.. And because I cannot do everything, I will not refuse to do the something that I can do. What I can do, I should do. And what I should do, by the grace of God, I will do.'

Wednesday, 10 December 2008

True Crime - the mass rape of white women

The figures quoted in the this video from "A Conversation about Race" relate to America, but, as mas immigration continues to flood into Europe, we are seeing the same phenomenon here, most markedly in relation to gang rape. The media continues to try and hide the truth and refer to perpetrators as "youths", but we now all know what that means.
http://www.aconversationaboutrace.com/
also available here

Saturday, 22 November 2008

You gotta' love Pastor James Manning! :-))


http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=tJc6uczdhE0

A time for caution

Some of my non UK correspondents may not have fully appreciated what I was saying in my post earlier this week when I mentioned to repercussions of the leaking of the amended BNP membership list. However, this act of petty nastiness could have some serious consequences for some of the people on that list.

Orwellian as it may sound, in Britain membership of the British National Party means you are excluded from certain forms of employment, for instance in the police or prison service, and indeed one Liverpool policeman has already been suspended, because his name is on the list, and if he is found to be a member of the BNP, he will be sacked. The truth is that in Nu Labour Britain you can potentially lose your job and your livelihood if you belong to the wrong political party. That is to say that the sort of thing which went on in East Germany in the 1970's is happening in Britain in 2008.

A radio DJ has already been sacked on account of being named as a BNP member and there have been widespread calls for the various teachers who's names appear on the list to be sacked, and various Trades Unions are scouring the lists for the names of any members who will certainly be kicked out of the party.

It is not only on the employment front that things have turned nasty, across the country present and past BNP members who's names have appeared on the list have received abusive and threatening calls, and already one fire bombing has been linked to the release of these names.
Also, only yesterday, I read that my dear friend the Green Arrow has received death threats.

It can be without doubt that the BNP membership is under attack, and I suspect that it will get worse before it gets better.

Most BNP members are honourable and brave people, which is demonstrated by the fact that they have been prepared to stand up for what they believe in the face of outrageous media vilification, and they will certainly not be prepared to submit to the latest spate of attacks.

However, I urge any BNP member or sympathiser who is currently reading this to demonstrate ultimate restraint in the face of what is going on. I urge you not to let them provoke you, and even if you are the victim of violence yourself, respond only as necessary to defend life and limb, do not under any circumstances resort to violence yourselves because you will do great damage to the BNP's cause if you do so. Likewise, if you are threatened, do not make threats in return.

The media are waiting for to respond, and if you do, they will exploit it to make the BNP appear to be the aggressors. Do not play into their hands.

Look what happened in America, when the media exploited the ramblings of two groups of spaced out junkies to make it appear that Obama was at serious threat of assassination my "white supremacists", a claim which would have been laughable except that there were so many morons ready to believe it.

Over the next few weeks whilst the spotlight is on you efforts will be made to provoke BNP members, and it is vital that you do not fall for it, because it will be used against you.

Friday, 21 November 2008

News Management


After three failed attempts to upload this video, I decided to provide you with the link, and maybe try again later. I really recommend you watch it all, as it is quite fascinating.

The US public is ofter, perhaps unfairly characterised as being rather ignorant of current affairs, however as you will see, this group is very knowledgeable about the things the US media want them to know about. However, I suspect that the fault is now with the public, but with news media.

Wednesday, 19 November 2008

The fury of my silence


Some of you may have noticed that I have not posted for a few weeks, this has been partly the result of a family situation which I have had to deal with, but it was also partially due to anger. I had reached the point where I was becoming angry at was I was writing about, angry at what I was reading, angry at the blindness of those who refuse to see what I see and anger at the hypocrisy and basic dishonesty which accompanies so much of what is happening around us.

That hypocrisy was very evident in the reaction to the result of the US election, where the media wants us to believe that the nation had somehow elected the new Messiah. How can a serious commentator claim with a straight face that Obama had been elected “despite” his ethnicity, when it is so obvious that he was elected because of his ethnicity. The least experienced American president in a century was voted for by around 98% of the African American community is unbelievably praised for having “transcended” race and nobody jeers. Surely the fairy tale has replaced reality in the land of the allegedly free.

If the media can find a third black hero to enthrone next to Obama and Lewis Hamilton, they will have their new Holy Trinity to worship.

We will have to see how the media manages to rationalise the election result with their ongoing insistence that America is a overwhelmingly racist nation, however, I am sure they will find a way. What they will not acknowledge is that in their passionate efforts to get Kenya's favourite son elected to the most powerful position in the world, the defenders of equality resorted to the most outrageous levels of sexism we have seen in a very long time. The two, white, women who most threatened the ascendency of the chosen one, Hillary Clinton and Sarah Palin, were subjected to levels of vilification and unfair mockery, which we have seldom seen directed at a male politician, and certainly never at a black one.

Some would consider that dishonesty, however, to see real dishonesty we only need to look at the manner in which the international media, who, throughout the 1980's, fed us wall to wall news about the iniquities of Apartheid South Africa, continues to ignore the horrors of black rule in that blighted country. Tens of thousands upon tens of thousands of murders and almost twice as many rapes in 14 years and the ongoing genocide of the white Boer population continues to go unreported, and what news is allowed through is sanitised. When the inevitable collapse, and sadly, very likely bloodbath, finally happens, this will come as a huge shock to many in the West, who ignorantly continue to believe that the Rainbow nation is the success story the media likes to pretend it is.

But the media is seldom as dishonest as it gets when it is the British media and it is reporting on events at home. The censorship of the national news has now reached the point where it is little short of propaganda. Take for instance how quickly news of the recent murder of the “glamour model” with the taste for black men was dropped when one of those black men was charged with killing her. Another alleged black on white murder was not a story which the media wanted the nation to focus on. I would bet good money on the fact that the vast majority of those who read about her murder do not know the colour of her alleged killer. However, it is probably a similar majority to those who do not know that 90% of those charged over the spate of knife murders of teenagers across the country are non white.

A new McCarthyism?

The media does not only censor the news, the double standards it applies are quite shocking. Take for instance this week's news, which has been much reported on the Green Arrow blog, of the illegal publication of the, somewhat doctored, October 2007 BNP Membership list.

The modern media see themselves as the defenders of liberty and equality, and to a man or woman they recoil in horror at what they perceive as the evils of the McCarthyite, anti communist trials of 1950's America. Yet they are incapable with seeing the similarities of whatnow seems to be happening, which is to say that people are in danger of losing their employment and livelihood due to their political beliefs, as they would in a third world dictatorship, a totalitarian police state or in 1950's America.

What exactly is the difference between a police chief arguing that membership of the BNP is incompatible with policing a multiracial community and Joe McCarthy claiming that being a member of the Communist party is incompatible with being a good, Capitalist, American?Yet where is the media outrage, when it isn't their preferred groups which are being persecuted?. Indeed one radio station has already sacked one DJ who's name appeared on the list.

I repeat: In Britain in 2008 someone has already lost their job on account of their political views, and the media does not appear to care.

The fact that the media were amongst the first to reward the criminal who illegally published this list, shows us exactly who they are and where they really stand in terms of political freedom. They believe in freedom and protection for some, but certainly not for all.

As for our politicians, I am concious that some of you may have just eaten so I will not repeat here the semi fascist effluent which poured out of Harriet Harmon's twisted lips on Channel Four earlier this evening. However, in terms of hypocrisy and dishonesty. It would be hard to beat Home Secretary Jackie Smith when she commented that “BNP members appear ashamed”. No Ms Smith, they are not ashamed, but they are understandably nervous, because as you, as home secretary, know very well, there is not only a very real threat to them, their families and their property, but some may be the victims of political purges, in the fascist state which you and your ilk have created, you dishonest old woman.

And now I am angry again, it is an anger which I am sure many of you feel. It is an anger which our adversaries like to portray as hate. Yet, it is not hatred, it is righteous anger, combined with outrage, and I am afraid grief. Anger at their lies, outrage at their hypocrisy and grief at what those lies and hypocrisy has done to a once great nation.

Is it too much to home that enough others will become as angry as me, and we can turn things round even at this late hour?




Wednesday, 12 November 2008

Monday, 3 November 2008

A Lynching in America


Whilst the international news was full of stories about two white men who had a drug induced fantasy about attempting to assassinate Barrack Obama (apparently whilst wearing tuxedos ) another news story did not make the headlines.

Like so many of those buried news stories on both sides of the Atlantic, this one shared a common theme in that the victim was white, and as pictured below, the perpetrators were black.


However, the story also featured something which features strongly in US folk law, lynching. Until about 1970, lynching was remembered as something which mostly happened to white people, cattle rustlers and such in the wild west, however since the 70's it has been re-branded as something which was exclusively done to black people by white people.

Maybe it is because this story does not fit with the popular myth it has not become a major news story.

That said, I invite you if you will to imagine quite what proportions this story would have achieved in the unlikely event that the races had been reversed.

Monday, 20 October 2008

A typical white South African racist

Colin's latest recommendation

Sometime Republican Secretary of State Colin (Pronounced "Coal-in") Powell, has abandoned his friends and one time allies and publicly endorsed Democratic Presidential hopeful Barrack Obama. Now there's a surprise ...... not!

I guess one can't accuse Coal-in of lack of loyalty to his ethnicity, if not to his party. It is of course indicative of the double standards in American politics, that almost every African American in the US, from Louis Farrakhan to Chris Rock, can come out in support of Kenya's favourite son, yet it is the whites supporting the McCain / Palin ticket who are accused of racism.

This is the same Coal-in Powell who sold the world the argument for going to war in Iraq, and the certainty of Saddam Hussein's possession of weapons of mass destruction. (let us hope he did not confuse his Husseins).

The American people might wish to consider long and hard before they buy another of Coal-in's recommendations.

Obama WDMs?

Wednesday, 15 October 2008

Another sign of things to come?


Across the nation as a whole it has now risen by 164,000 to 1.79 million, the highest figure in 17 years, I wonder how the government will manage to convince us that we still need so many new immigrants?.

Tuesday, 14 October 2008

Today in Britain


Extracts from a couple of today's news stories:

1) Wood Green Crown Court, North London



A teenager with learning difficulties was gang raped by up to ten youths who then showered her 'head to toe' with burning caustic soda, a court heard
today.

The attackers left the girl 'naked, screaming, crying and in a desperate state' as they ran away laughing, it was alleged.

They had picked on the shy 16-year-old because they claimed she was a 'dirty ho who was asking for it', Wood Green Crown Court in North London heard.

The girl was left traumatised and severely disfigured by the attack.

Prosecutor Rosina Cottage said she may have been raped because she had recently slept with three men known to the gang.

'She was shy and insecure and with learning difficulties and thought that she would be liked by these boys if she had sex with them.

'Of course, the world can be an old-fashioned place and they did not like her.

'They thought she was, to use the words of a number of these defendants, ''dirty''.'

On January 9 this year Mark Hendricks, one of the men she had previously slept with, allegedly lured her to a unoccupied house in Tottenham, North London, where the other youths were waiting.

Miss Cottage said: 'She had no idea what was in store for her.


Continue reading here:

2) Alum Rock, Birmingham



A TEENAGER was today undergoing emergency surgery after being hunted down “like an animal” by a machete-wielding gang in a Birmingham street.

The slightly built 16-year-old fled in terror as he tried to escape from the 10-strong mob, who slashed him repeatedly across his neck and face when they finally trapped him.

The youngster begged for help from passers-by seconds before the savage attack in Alum Rock Road, Alum Rock.

Three of the gang, two armed with large machetes and a third with a wooden baton, caught up with the victim and rained down blows during the broad daylight attack at 5pm on Saturday.

Eyewitnesses saw the boy being chased from Woodwell Road by a gang of at least 10 youths in their late teens, who hit him indiscriminately as he pleaded for mercy.

It was only when shopworkers, neighbours and passers-by closed in on the gang that they fled towards the nearby park.

Interpreter Iftikhar Ahmed, who was cleaning his car when the attack unfolded, said: “The boy was only small and ran up to an old man in the street screaming ‘help me, help me please’.


Continue reading here:

The ethnicity of the victims in both stories is not clear, they could come from various communities. In both cases the media does not tell us the ethnicity of the perpetrators either, however, from the nature of the alleged crimes I think it can be safely assumed that they are not from the indigenous community.

Just two news stories from many similar ones on another average day in multi cultural Britain.

___________________________________
Hat Tip Green Arrow

Monday, 13 October 2008

October Surprise?

Amazing that although if you want to open a bank account (assuming you are brave enough) you have to prove who you are, however, the same does not apply if you aspire to be the most powerful man in the world.

Saturday, 11 October 2008

The Pursued and the Protected

“Oh my! What a surprise (not)” the much spun report into whether Republican Vice Presidential hopeful Sarah Palin abused her power as State governor of Alaska when she fired Walter. C. Monegan, the vengeful pen pusher who had refused to fire Palin's State Trooper brother in law, (the one who used a taser on his 11 year old sepson) has found that ...... wait for it .... she did ...er.. well .. sort of. To quote: “Public Safety Commissioner Walt Monegan's refusal to fire State Trooper Mike Wooten from the state police force was "likely a contributing factor" to Monegan's July dismissal” but the report goes on to say that Palin “had the authority to fire him” anyway.

The fact that a report, deliberately timed to reach its findings weeks before the election, has found against her (or as much as it could) is hardly surprising, in fact it would probably have more credibility had it been report conducted by Robert Mugabe into Morgan Tsvangirai. Do the people behind this really believe that the US public will really fall for it?, and those who were planning to vote Republican will say “Ah shucks! I really liked that Palin broad, but after that I guess I should vote for that nice Mr Obama, after all there ain't ever anything nasty about him on the news!”?

The American electorate can occasionally be gullible, bur even they are not that dumb (I hope).

Of course one part of such an analysis would be correct there never is anything nasty about Obama in the press. The media treat the man whom Louis Farrakhan apparently calls “The Messiah” as if he is some delicate Spring flower who should never be forced to deal with anything so taxing as a serious question.

On the other hand, as far as the media is concerned, it is open season on Sarah Palin, and it is a credit to her that she has stood up to the onslaught quite as well as she has.

The attack has been relentless, in the lead up to the US elections in November the US TV channels are falling over themselves to provide non-stop daily satire featuring Sarah Palin, day after day the satirical skits and impersonations are only exceeded by by carefully edited news stories accusing Mrs Palin of “gaffes”, inexperience, negative campaigning or just being an all round Religious “nut”.

I know there are a number of reasons to feel a bit concerned about Sarah Palin, and she has certain characteristics which are a gift to comedians and impersonators however, the same applies to her Democratic opponent Joe Biden and even so to Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama. Yet Joe Biden troubling characteristics are all but ignored, and, as for Obama, he is treated with a manner not that far removed from how the North Koreans treat their “Dear Leader”.

The lack of balance in the treatment of the two is outrageous, but only to be expected, given the deep bias of the US media.

If challenged, the funny people on Saturday Night Live and the Daily Show will probably claim that Mrs Palin is subject to excessive parody, because she is a “Religious nut”. However, that is the image they have chosen to present of her, but how close is it to the truth? Certainly there are a lot of leaders across the world who are far more deserving of the title "Religious nut" than she is, however, the politically correct conformists in the media would never think of mocking them in the same way as they do Palin.

Furthermore, is she really that much of a “nut” and are her views really that unusual?

She is allegedly a creationist, which is unusual in the Godless country which Britain has become, but actually not so unusual in America, where large sections of the population have deep Religious faith. Odd as it may sound to a Brit, versed as we are in secular certainties, whilst the origin of man remains unproven Creationism is one of a number of legitimate view points. Darwin's theory is compelling but remains a theory, Whatever Professor Dawkins may tell you, science has not yet proven conclusively how the universe was created, and many, many people across the planet believe in a creator, why is that okay if they are Arabs, Africans or Mexicans but not okay if they are Europeans or Americans?.

If we believe in a creator, then we believe in things beyond out understanding, and if that disqualifies someone from running a country then most world nations will be looking for new leaders, including secular Britain. Furthermore, how exactly does her belief in a God as the creator, which she shares with the vast majority of the inhabitants of our planet, and certainly with the founding fathers of America, effect her ability to be an effective vice president?

Another stick which is used to beat her with is that she is opposed to abortion. Well frankly I think she has a point. Don't misunderstand me, I accept that there are times when abortion is necessary, indeed vital, but they are in the minority of cases. A significant number of all abortions in America and Europe are carried out for the sake of convenience, and it is there that I part company with the advocates of choice.

She is also pro-gun ownership, I disagree with her, as I do with most Americans and half of the population of Finland on the issue, but she is entitled to that view, and it certainly does not disqualify from standing for high office.

She is opposed to gay marriage, I think she is wrong on the grounds that a law which declares some citizens less equal than others is a bad law and devalues all citizens. However, I would guess that most of you who are reading this agree more with her than with me, and I respect your right to do so. In any event she shares that view with the leaders of Turkey, Russia. Poland, most of Africa and South America and all of Asia, and the current incumbent of the White House, are they all Religious wackjobs?

Her soon to be son in law, Levi Johnson, declared “I'm a fucking Redneck” who “Can't keep my Johnson in my pants” and “I don't want kids” .... er... well no he didn't actually, but the media never bothered to correct the story when Levi's alleged facebook page turned to be a fake.

Of course a lot is made of Palin's lack of experience, but exactly the same applies to Obama, after all, having a Kenyan Daddy no more amounts to a knowledge of foreign affairs than being able to see Russia from your porch. As to experience of leadership, Palin has run a state, Obama was a "community leader" in Illinois how does that make him so much more experienced than her?

Obama's main claim to fame is that, he voted against the war in Iraq, which with the benefit of retrospect can be made to appear a wise and intelligent position. However, that ignores the fact that, at the time he actually voted, most politicians and every intelligence agency in the West, including the French, Russians and Germans believed that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction ready to use against her neighbours, and possibly against Europe, which puts a slightly different perspective on his vote. At the very least it leaves his motives open to question. Of course, when it comes to Obama the questions are never asked.

There are other questions, including:

Why won't he publish a full sized copy of his birth certificate?

What was his connection with convicted fraudster Tony Rezko, who allegedly helped him and his wife purchase their home?

How close was he really to Bill Ayres co founder of the 1960's left wing radical group The Weather Underground?

Is it true that, until it sanitised it's website nine month ago, the church he had belonged to for twenty years declared that its first loyalty was to Africa?

Barack Obama may have perfectly good answers to those questions, however the press never ask them, and the satirists hardly ever touch on them except to mock those who do. I have a lot of contempt for so called Comedians, who are happy to mock one side but not the other, or like Sarah Bernhard, say that Palin "should be gang raped by black brothers" but would not dare say anything disrespectful about Obama.

Of course these tactics are nothing new to the Obama loving pundits, during the Democratic primaries, Jon Stewart on the Daily Show, relentlessly mocked Hillary Clinton, but treated Obama as if he was untouchable.

It seems that to question or criticise Obama is to risk accusations of "racism" which is a risk no Western media personality will take. As we see across the world, leaders who can not be criticised or questioned are the most dangerous, and if this politically correct politeness follows Obama into the Oval Office then the world is in danger.

__________________

Imagine the idyllic land



Submitted by William Wallace

Imagine for a moment what life would be like in South Africa if the evil white man hadn't come to disturb the rustic idyll of the early black settlers.

Ignored by the Portuguese and Dutch, except as a convenient resting point en route to India. Shunned by the British, who had decided that their empire was already large enough and didn't need to include bits of Africa.

The vast mineral wealth lying undisturbed below the Highveld soil as simple tribesmen graze their cattle blissfully unaware that beneath them lies one of the richest gold seams in the world. But what would they want with gold?

There are no roads because no roads are needed because there are no cars. It's 2008 and no one has taken the slightest interest in South Africa, apart from a handful of botanists and zoologists who reckon that the country's flora and fauna rank as one of the largest unspoilt areas in a polluted world.

Because they have never been exposed to the sinful ways of the West, the various tribes of South Africa live healthy and peaceful lives, only occasionally indulging in a bit of ethnic cleansing.

Their children don't watch television because there is no television to watch. Instead they listen to their grandparents telling stories around a fire. They live in single-storey huts arranged to catch most of the day's sunshine and their animals are kept nearby.

Nobody has any more animals than his family needs and nobody grows more crops than he requires to feed his family and swap for other crops. Ostentation is unknown because what is the point of trying to impress your fellow citizens when they are not impressible?

The dreaded Internet doesn't exist in South Africa and cellphone companies have laughed off any hope of interesting the inhabitants in talking expensively into a piece of black plastic. There are no unsightly shopping malls selling expensive goods made by Asian slave workers and consequently there are no newspapers or magazines carrying articles comparing the relative merits of ladies' handbags.

Whisky, the curse of the white man, isn't known in this undeveloped land and neither are cigars. The locals brew a sort of beer out of vegetables and drink it out of shallow wooden bowls. Five-litre paint cans have yet to arrive in South Africa.

Every so often a child goes missing from the village, eaten either by a hungry lion or a crocodile. The family mourn for a week or so and then have another child. Life is, on the whole, pretty good but there is something vital missing. Being unaware of the temptations of the outside world, nobody knows what it is. Fire has been discovered and the development of the wheel is coming on nicely but the tribal elders are still aware of some essential happiness ingredient they still need to discover. Praying to the ancestors is no help because they are just as clueless.

Then something happens that will change this undisturbed South Africa forever. Huge metal ships land on the coast and big metal flying birds are sent to explore the sparsely populated hinterland. They are full of men from a place called China and they are looking for coal, metal, oil, platinum, farmland, fresh water and cheap labour and lots of it. Suddenly the indigenous population realise what they have been missing all along, their prayers had been answered : At last, someone to blame.

An Untimely death

As media reports come in regarding the tragic and untimely death of Joerg Haider, the leader of Austria's Alliance for the Future of Austria, I am sure that many will mourn the loss of an important politician and Influential voice from the European Right, whilst questioning the amazing coincidence of this death, following so closely on the heels of the most significant right wing gains in Austrian Politics since the end of World War II.

I recommend that members read my friend The Green Arrow's interesting take on this tragedy in in the post he made on the subject this morning. He has also posted this video of Haider.

I suspect that questions will continue to be asked about Haider's death for some while to come, but that convincing answers may be less easy to come by.

Friday, 10 October 2008

Vanishing American

The Vanishing American blog includes an interesting post entitled Remaking 'Womanhood' which explores the same themes I did last weekend with a post entitled "When the English Rose became the Common Ragwort".

Generously mentioning my post, Vanishing American goes on to say:

We in America might note the same phenomenon at work in our popular culture. We have only to watch the ''news'' channels, especially Fox News, or read the popular tabloid magazines to notice the ubiquitous images of women like Paris Hilton, or the late Anna Nicole Smith, or Britney Spears. The young people have "Hannah Montana"/Miley Cyrus, around whom there was a recent controversy over a photographic spread which sexualized her beyond what should be appropriate for her age and her audience.

Then there is the superannuated 'Material Girl', Madonna, who is one of the early examples of the pornification of the female image over the last couple of decades. ......

Continue reading here

It is an interesting post on an interesting blog which I recommend to you.

The site also has a forum which those interesting in the fate of what is truly a Vanishing America may find of interest.
____________________

Sweden: The Triumph of Cultural Marxism


From the Desk of Fjordman

Mona Sahlin, leader of the Swedish Social Democratic Party, confirmed that her party and the Greens want to form a coalition government in 2010. What kind of policy will such a government follow? Miljöpartiet de Gröna, the Swedish Green Party, state on their official website that the education system should start working for "gender equality" at an early age; children need counterweights to the gender roles which girls and boys are raised into. Therefore teachers and personnel in child care services must finish an education in equality before they are given their exams. They also want to abolish grades in schools:

"We want to do away with the grade system [in today's schools]. Grades contribute considerably to stress and are not a fair and objective system of measuring the individual's potential."

The Green Party favor ideological Globalism in its purest form. They want a "world citizenship" to replace the national citizenship, totally free migration on a global basis, global taxes and a strengthened United Nations to ensure a just world order:

"We do not believe in artificial borders. We have a vision of unrestricted immigration and emigration, where people have the right to live and work wherever they please… We want Sweden to become an international role model by producing a plan to implement unrestricted immigration."

Continue reading at the Brussels Journal

Tuesday, 7 October 2008

Sub Prime, a different perspective

For some reason this skit has been pulled from various channels, I wonder why?!!

http://www.transworldnews.com/NewsStory.aspx?id=63981&cat=2

Enjoy it, I doubt it will still be there in the morning

The problem continues

As I mentioned back in August, for some reason this blog has been flagged as a possible "Spam Blog"and I am required to do a word verification to prove that I am a human being every time I do a post. As you can see from the examples below some of combinations I am required to decipher are really quite difficult to make any sense of. Hence I often have to make numerous attempts before I am able to successfully post.


I have sent four requests to blogger asking them to check the blog so as to confirm that I am not a Spammer. However, after almost seven weeks, I am still in the same position.

Does anyone know how one can contact an real person at Blogger, so that I can find whether they are just being inefficient, or if I am being deliberately hindered from posting

Mr Phillips' flawed analysis

The ever hectoring Trevor Phillips, Chairman of the Commission for Equalities and Human Rights has announced, in a manner which might otherwise suggest that he has discovered the meaning of life, the universe and everything, that knife crime in Britain is fuelled by immigrants, whom he prefers to refer to as “brutalised refugees” from war torn parts of Africa. Information which will not have come as a huge surprise to many of us.

Of course, being the inveterate racist he is, old Trev can't resist the temptation to heap the blame for what black people do onto the shoulders of white people, who he accuses of “failing to integrate with refugee children who had witnessed untold horrors in their early lives.”

However, if I may be so bold as to draw attention to a flaw Phillips' argument, it should be noted that a significant majority of those who are involved in knife crime are the children or grandchildren of immigrants. That is to say young people who have never set a Nike shod foot in Africa and who's closest encounter with “untold horrors” will have been via their iPod, some shared happy slapping on their mobile phones, or those they have, themselves, inflicted on some unlucky victim.

Could it not follow, therefore, that what we are seeing is less the result of trauma or lack of integration but rather a cultural phenomenon? Many of those causing havoc on our streets do originate from war torn parts of the dark continent, but what was it that made those parts war torn, and why are they being replicated here?

Recently a lot of the knife crime has involved members of the Somali community, who do indeed originate from one of the most violent countries on the planet. However, what is it that makes Somalia so violent and dangerous, is it the sand flies?, the camel spiders? Odd Indian Ocean breezes? or the Somalis themselves? If not. why is it that the children of Somali immigrants, most of whom have never seen a war zone, still behave as if they are in one?.

Brutality is nothing new to that region, during World War II, allied troops involved in the East Africa campaign feared most being captured by the Somalis, who were at the time fighting on the Italian side, for it was well known that death at their hands would be neither quick or kind.

Somalia aside, Phillips makes a particular reference to the Congo, where certainly the atrocities there have been particularly gruesome, however, gruesome atrocities are nothing new to the Congo, the horrors of the 1960 uprising are often compared to the Cambodian Killing fields under Pol Pot. It is said that few white females escaped the Congo uprising without being raped multiple times, be she grandmother, nun or toddler, and they were lucky when compared to the indigenous Congolese who belonged to the wrong tribes and whose victimisation continues to this day.

“Ah tribal conflict!!” Trev would no doubt splutter if confronted with such an argument “That was all the fault of Colonialism!” which, of course, is what he and the other multi-cultural fanatics shriek whenever confronted with the reality of inter-tribal violence, such as that seen in Rwanda, the DRC, Kenya and Uganda to name but a few. “That was all the white man's fault!”. NOT SO! Ethiopia was never a colony, there are no arbitrary colonial frontiers drawn across Ethiopia, however, like most of Africa, the country has been beset by tribal conflict for centuries, the most recent example being the attempted genocide of the Anuak tribe in 2004

It seems that not everything is the white man's fault, and that ethnic culture can involve more than spicy food and a sense of rhythm.

Trevor and his cronies are only too ready to tell us how we can benefit from exposure to different cultures, yet what they fail to mention is that other cultures have their downside, sometimes it comes waving a machete and that side too can be and frequently is) imported too.

A further source of street crime, and ongoing conflict with the African community comes from members of the West Indian community, specifically Jamaica. Most Jamaicans of African origin have never been near Africa, neither have their parents, grandparents and even great grandparents, yet Kingston, like the majority African American cities of Detroit and New Orleans in the USA, ranks amongst those world cities most beset with with crime, violence, rape and murder.

It seems culture may travel down the generations, good or bad.

However, Africa is not alone in importing the less welcome aspects to their culture, in many areas the violence and conflict we see, but which the media avoids reporting, comes from members of the Asian community. This also is nothing new, read the history of Asia and you will find that it is a violent one, the Afghans, for instance, did not discover their talent for torture pnly by practising on young Russian soldiers in the 1980's, their cruelty was infamous for centuries before that. Equally, inter-ethnic violence across the subcontinent started long before the Raj, let alone patrician, and wasn't our fault either.

Cultural violence is not the only unwelcome result of opening our doors to all-comers, foreigners can have other bad habits. Recent allegations of electoral fraud, in for instance, Birmingham, primarily involved members of the Asian community whose origins are in nations where such practices are endemic. Likewise, when considering London, where millions of pounds of taxpayers money vanished in odd deals involving black and Asian businesses, it is not unreasonable to remember where African and Asian countries languish in the International corruption league tables.

This is not a message of hate, although some will portray it as such. I do not wish harm on anyone. However, there are many huge problems in Africa, Asia and the rest of the third world, which need to be addressed at their source, not just spread around so that everyone shares the bad luck. A problem does not cease to be a problem by relocating it, that simply creates a whole new set of victims.

It would be ludicrous to suggest that, crime and violence, and some forms of corruption, did not exist in Britain before such high levels of third world immigration was imposed upon us, or that we may not have had a few cultural flaws ourselves. However, we are importing new ones, reintroducing cruelties which we long put behind us, and in many respects they are far worse than anything which existed here before. Moreover, should not the aim be to solve the problems we had, rather than introduce new and worse ones.

It is often said that one has to take the rough with the smooth, but the British people may one day realise how few smooth features there are to mass immigration, and quite how rough the rough bits can be, and that those rough bits are not our fault whatever the likes of Trevor Phillips may accuse us of.

I pray the British wake up soon because we have not yet seen the worst.

Monday, 6 October 2008

Playing their cards

I suspect that it is not just those of us in the nationalist community who find the current claims of racism in the London Metropolitan police somewhat lacking in credibility.Given how desperate the Met is to boost ethnic recruitment and advancement within the ranks, only a few fanatics or Die hard McPherson supporters genuinely believe these tales of blocked promotions and the laughable claim recently made the black Chief Constable for Kent that black officers have to work twice as hard as whites.

When a white male is passed over for a promotion he believes he is entitled to, he will often feel he has been unfairly treated, but when the unpromoted one is a women or even more so if they are a member of an ethnic minority, there is inevitably the temptation to attribute those feelings of unfairness to something else. This is obviously even more tempting when there is the potential for one's grievance to be soothed by a large cheque for a life changing sum they could only otherwise expect if they won the lottery.

Speaking of lucky dips, I think most people have formed their own views as to the merits of the Met's most senior Muslim officer Tarique Ghaffur's claims of discrimination, and as for the sometime president of the Black Police association, Commander Ali Dizaei, if there is anyone out there who has not yet got his number, then they really should not be allowed out on their own.

However, the fact that we know what is happening is probably irrelevant, political correctness has reached the point where the truth no longer matters. In all likelihood, Ghaffur's complaint will pay dividends and he, together with the other two to three dozen ethnic minority officers currently consulting their lawyers, will soon be supplementing their early retirement funds with handsome amounts of tax payer's money. The alternative would be for the Met to say that none of their enthusiastically recruited ethnic appointees were sufficiently able to be promoted to higher positions, which we , the complaining policemen and their smug lawyers all know the Met will never do.

As for Dizari, given his oft displayed talent for dodging even the most compelling evidence against him, one would be a fool to not to rate his chances of wangling some additional compensation out of the latest developments as better than evens.

When those who have been appointed to positions of trust in law enforcement act so blatantly and with such obvious contempt for society, is it surprising when society begins to lose faith in law and order, and indeed respect for the law itself?

Sunday, 5 October 2008

When the English Rose became the Common Ragwort


Before anyone writes to correct me, I do know that Deborah Kerr was born in Helensburgh, and is therefore actually Scottish, however, over almost two decades, from the late 1940's until the early 1960's, for much of the world she was one of a select group of women who represented the ideal of cool English beauty.

More than most, Kerr personified what was popularly referred to as an English Rose. Many of her contemporaries, such as the violet eyed Elizabeth Taylor, or the sultry Joan Collins, although born in Britain, seem firmly located in the mid-Atlantic, whilst the likes of the lovely Audrey Hepburn, actually born in Belgium, exuded a European chic which would break its kitten heel on a Yorkshire moor, yet even they aspired repeatedly to play English Roses. At that time an English Rose was what most British girls, and many woman across the world wanted to be.

Englishness such as that portrayed by Kerr had a currency, and her predecessors, like Phyllis Calvert or the exquisite Margaret Lockwood, who were great stars in Britain despite making less impact in Hollywood, were quintessentially and passionately English whilst those who did make it big in Hollywood, such as Greer Garson and Anna Neagle occasionally seemed to overplay their Englishness to the point of caricature.

Another great British movie star, the troubled Vivien Leigh, the first Lady Olivier, who's heyday preceded Deborah Kerr's by about a decade is now primarily remembered as the feisty Southern Belle, of Irish Origin, Scarlett O'Hara, in “Gone With the Wind” or as the tragic Blanche DuBois, a role, perhaps too close for comfort, in "A Streetcar named Desire". However, at the zenith of her fame, and to her bedazzled fans at the time, she was nothing less than an iconic English Rose.

As a Scott, Deborah Kerr was perhaps playing a role when she donned the mantle of Englishness, but, actors play roles which suit the culture of their age and as a true Brit, she seems to have instinctively known what the role required. A grace and refinement, which transcended class, a reserved sensuality that is is never slatternly and most vitally, a sense of honour, kindness and decency which radiated from any rose worthy of the name. Although Kerr personally had physical beauty in abundance, great beauty is not an essential requirement of an English Rose, rather the English Rose had an inner beauty, which has a far longer lifespan than transitory physical beauty and travels into old age with those English women who possess it.

Kerr carried that grace and refinement into all her celluloid roles, even managing to play Karen Holmes in the famous beach scene in From Here to Eternity with a dignity which never came close to the down and dirty blatantness favoured by the Susanna Yorks Glenda Jacksons and Charlotte Ramplings who were to follow her.
Indeed, those who have seen the film will remember that it was Burt Lancaster's body which was primarily on display amongst the surf and not Kerr's.

Of a different, but equally famous role. I have occasionally heard people wrongly describe Deborah Kerr's great venture into musicals, lip-synching to Marni Nixon's voice in Rogers and Hammerstein's The King and I, as an early venture into interracial romance. However, even a cursory analysis of themes of the movie reveals the error of such an assessment, whilst demonstrating a respect for other cultures, the story clearly exposes the chasm which exists between races, and with the King's death demonstrates how damaging and indeed fatal, attempts to impose one culture upon another will inevitably be.

Kerr was a class act, and for almost two decades, she embodied how much of the world viewed English women, depite attempts by Diana Dors or Yvonne Mitchell to present an alternative image.

However, it is not my aim to celebrate the career of Deborah Kerr, who sadly died last year, but to question why an ideal she represented and which had existed for centuries, up to a generation ago, has now almost completely vanished, to be replaced by something which is it's complete antithesis. Why is it that, when our mother's generation aspired to become an English Rose our daughters seem to favour the common ragwort.

The female celebrities of our age are the likes of the slatternly Cheryl Cole, the tattooed and substance dependant Amy Winehouse and the largely bionic Katie Price, women whom a generation earlier would have been lucky to appear in the red lighted windows of Amsterdam or the Reeperbahn, if in Europe at all, rather than the front pages of children's magazines.

Today, little girls play with dolls called Bratz, which appear to represent mixed race, botox enhanced, re-pubescent sluts in minuscule, buttocks exposing, skirts, and nobody views that as unhealthy. From an early age, the next generation of women are being taught to admire females who are one step up from being backstreet hookers, some less than a step, and informed that the ultimate female ambition is to be a pelmet skirted executive at work, and a slapped up gangsta's Ho at home.

I used to think that the type of girl who fell for the “spread your legs and show your power” school of feminism were victims of cynical male voyeurs, but I now suspect that the aims behind it are more sinister than that, can it be that those who seek our downfall believe that by turning the sort of people who our parents would have viewed as the lowest of the low in to social icons, they can undermine the values which built our society.

Furthermore, by enticing young white women to behave as whores they will inevitably become more receptive to the sort of, frequently non white, men who will treat them as such. Is this really what those who campaigned for women's rights fought for?

As far as the women's movement is concerned many believe the rot set in during the late 60's, when those who aspired to parity with men were replaced by radical lesbians or fanatics who viewed all sex between men and women as acts of rape and scorned contemporary attitudes to femininity as subjugation. However, I doubt that even the most man hating of bull dykes ever thought they would see a day when women believe they can gain respect by exposing their bare bottoms.

It is as if feminism lost its way, fell asleep and woke up in a Bangkok cathouse.

What seems to be a desire to be demeaned extends well beyond young girls, visit the city any day and you will see women, old enough to know better, travelling to work in suits which are too short and too small to qualify as smart, and who no doubt wonder why there is still a glass ceiling.

In politics, similarly embarrassing spectacles can be seen, does our Home Secretary, Jackie Smith really believe she can be taken seriously, reading some statement on terrorism or social upheaval, when her exposed cleavage fills most of a wide angle TV screen, or do ambitious ministers like Caroline Flint really expect to be viewed as anything other than a token women when she wears skirts split to areas best left to the contemplation of one's gynaecologist?

I am certainly not suggesting that western women embrace the burkah, but how can society, let alone male society, respect women who do not respect themselves. The English Rose of yesterday had self respect, yet one has to wonder if today's common ragwort, dressed in what amounts to little more than two band aids and a pocket handkerchief, even understands the concept.

This is a subject I have touched on before, the propaganda aimed at young women is so relentless one has to wonder if there is a deliberate aim to it. Does a nation fall when its women become whores? If that the game plan? For that certainly seems to be what is happening.

The male role model is also changing, but not to the same degree as the female, for every Ashley Cole or Pete Doherty, our celebrity culture still embraces a few remaining chiselled jawed men who would not took out of place in the company of Cary Grant and David Niven. But where are the Ann Todds, the Margaret Lockwoods the Joan Greenwoods or indeed the Deborah Kerrs? How often does one see a female celebrity under 50 who could be fairly called a lady?. There may be some but there are not many left and they do not appear in the magazines our children read or the TV shows they watch.

In an age when the queen's own granddaughter (allegedly) cavorts in the nude and ogles black men we must sadly accept that the the English Rose has become an endangered species whilst the common ragwort thrives in plague like proportions.


________________________________________________
NB: This post should in no way be seen as a comment on the excellent English Rose blog which remains highly recommended