The Price of European Immigration

 
By Fjordman

In his 2008 book Et Delt Folk (“A Nation Divided”), The Danish historian and writer Morten Uhrskov Jensen carefully went through publicly available sources. He demonstrated that the opening up of his country for mass immigration was arranged by just part of the population, sometimes in the face of considerable popular opposition.

Roughly speaking, those representing the political and media establishment and the upper classes were in favor of open borders, whereas those from the lower classes were often opposed. This divide is viewed by those from the upper segments of society as caused mainly by racism, prejudice, ignorance and xenophobia.

Since the educated classes enjoyed a virtual hegemony over public debate, they were able to define all opposition as hate and intolerance, exemplified by people such as Pia Kjærsgaard of the Danish People’s Party. The well-to-do themselves rarely lived in areas with many immigrants and could afford to move, at least for a while, if that was needed. They focused on the abstract and allegedly humanitarian aspects of mass migration.

Immigrants are simply referred to as “new countrymen,” who as if by magic always seem to enrich the natives with their presence. In Denmark, multiculturalists have successfully managed to establish the neologism nydansker or “new Danes,” a vibrant new breed of people currently displacing the tired and boring “old Danes.”

For poorer people, immigration was a concrete issue, as immigrants moved into their neighborhoods and went to school with their children. To put it bluntly, for those with money, globalization initially meant that they could travel on holidays to exotic lands and treat the world as their playground. For those who were less well off, it meant that the entire world suddenly moved into their street and took over their children’s local playground.

When the Titanic during her maiden voyage across the Atlantic Ocean struck an iceberg just before midnight on 14 April 1912, the first people who could see the water pouring in were the third-class passengers who happened to be situated closest to the waterline. Meanwhile, the richest passengers at the top were drinking fine cognac long after the ship had started sinking. They didn’t realize what was going on for quite some time, because they were further removed from the physical problem. The poor passengers still unfortunately suffered the highest fatality rates, because the wealthy benefitted from having privileged access to the lifeboats.

We see the same phenomenon on display today, on a much larger scale. Having Islamophobia in Europe today is just as rational as having icebergophobia on board the Titanic in 1912.

Uhrskov Jensen in 2012 published another book, Indvandringens Pris (“The Price of Immigration”) about how much money non-European mass immigration costs his native Denmark. His conclusion is that this cost is great in terms of welfare payments and rising crime combined with declining efficiency and technological innovation.

He shows through carefully researched statistics that only certain Asian immigrants are able to keep up with northern Europeans in the educational system. A few skilled immigrants from India or elsewhere can compete, but mainly those from East Asia: Japanese, Koreans, Chinese, and to some extent Vietnamese. All other non-Western immigrants show lower levels of skill and competence than Europeans, many of them a lot lower.

It should be mentioned here that these numbers correlate quite well with average IQ, where a few other Asians can compete with Europeans, but primarily East Asians. Other ethnic groups cannot do so. Although it has become taboo to say this in the modern Western world, it is well-documented fact that IQ correlates well with economic level, for individuals as well as for nations. The scholar Charles Murray has written much about this.

Former professor Helmuth Nyborg at Aarhus University in Denmark has conducted controversial research on the subject of the genetic inheritance of intelligence. His conclusion is that today’s mass immigration of non-Europeans will lead to an overall marked decline in the average intelligence of the population, and by extension a significant decline in social and economic competence, scientific progress, as well as technological innovation.

For decades Westerners have been told that immigration from less developed Third World countries is “good for the economy” and will “pay for future pensions.” Morten Uhrskov Jensen proves conclusively that this claim is fundamentally wrong, not just regarding Denmark or Scandinavia but for other Western countries, too.

Certain private companies may enjoy short-term benefits by having access to cheap labor and borderless export markets. Socialist parties can cynically import a reliable voter base of backward peoples who overwhelmingly vote for left-wing parties so they can receive generous welfare payments from the high tax payments extracted from the majority population, essentially forcing the white natives to fund their own colonization by foreign peoples.

For the country as a whole, however, non-European mass immigration will in the long run turn out to be an unmitigated social and economic disaster. The direct and indirect costs of today’s immigration policies through rising crime, increased corruption and higher welfare costs plus declining competitiveness, innovation and genetic intelligence add escalating costs to countries already in trouble due to rising deficits and mushrooming debt.

A Danish think tank has estimated that the net cost of immigration is as much as 50 billion kroner every year, and those were cautious estimates. A study from Denmark found that every second immigrant from the Third World – especially from Muslim countries – lacked the qualifications for even the most menial jobs on the labor market.

An ever-growing group of non-Western immigrants in Norway is dependent on welfare. This was the conclusion of a study by Tyra Ekhaugen of the Frisch Centre for Economic Research. Ekhaugen’s research contradicted the common assertion that the labor market depends increasingly on immigrants. The study indicated the reverse.

I have previously written about the costs of mass immigration several times, for instance in the essays When Danes Pay Danegeld:­ The End of the Scandinavian Model or What Does Muslim Immigration Cost Europe?

Yet Erling Lae, a politician for the Conservative Party and then the head of the Oslo city government, warned that the city desperately needs more immigrants and that there would be “complete chaos” without them. In 2005, Trygve G. Nordby, who has worked for the Socialist Left Party, as the director of the Norwegian Directorate of Immigration (UDI), claimed that the country needed more unskilled immigrants and should actively seek them out. It later emerged that UDI under Nordby’s rule had virtually run its own private immigration policy in violation of national law in order to give Iraqi immigrants the right to settle in Norway.

Journalist Halvor Tjønn from newspaper Aftenposten, one of the few genuinely critical journalists in Norway who later published a fairly realistic biography of Muhammed, in 2006 cited a report from NHO, the Confederation of Norwegian Enterprise. NHO warned that the current immigration policies constitute a serious threat to the country’s economy. Norway is one of the world’s largest exporters of oil and natural gas due to its offshore resources in the North Sea and elsewhere. Yet according to NHO, there is a risk that much of the profit Norway earns from selling oil could be spent on paying welfare for its rapidly growing immigrant population.

These warnings were left unheeded by political leaders, yet the problem hasn’t gone away. In 2012, the business daily Dagens Næringsliv reported that researcher Erling Holmøy from Statistics Norway together with senior advisor Birger Strøm studied how immigration affects government budgets. They concluded that in the long run it would prove to be very costly, stating that mass immigration bears certain similarities to a pyramid scheme.

Author Morten Uhrskov Jensen states that the basic trends are identical in Sweden, France, Germany and the USA. The only reasonable conclusion to be drawn from this is, in his view, to stop all non-Western mass immigration. Yet the Western political elites continue to promote such mass immigration, in spite of mounting evidence that this is greatly harmful to their own countries. This dangerous stubbornness could be due to ideological blindness, or may be because the political elites see their positions, prestige and personal privileges tied to maintaining the status quo.

In the end, the historian Uhrskov Jensen fears that only a massive traumatic event or a major shock to the system can change the direction the Western world is currently headed and reestablish reasonable and sensible immigration policies that are in line with the long-term interests of the European majority population.

Source

 

Three weeks in England

The following three trials have taken place in the last three weeks - spot the connections

March 14 2012:

A Tower Hamlets immigration adviser has been jailed for three and a half years after he was found guilty of helping people enter the country illegally using fake identity documents. Mujibur Rahman, 44, of Rounton Road, worked as a registered immigration adviser (cont)

18 March 2012:

A corrupt legal adviser from Hayes is facing a further three years in prison unless he hands over more than £245,000. Ravi Gupta, 41, of Carlyon Road, was jailed in August after admitting 14 charges of assisting illegal immigration and one of obtaining leave to remain by deception. As an accredited immigration law adviser, Gupta made thousands of pounds supplying clients with fake documents including certificates and pay slips that helped their immigration applications.(cont:)

4 April 2012

A Home Office-licensed immigration adviser exposed by Sky News for arranging a sham marriage has been sentenced to seven years in prison for another immigration fraud. Jayesh Patel, 35, was first arrested in May 2010 after he was secretly filmed offering to supply a groom to a Sky undercover reporter for £12,500. Information found on Patel's computer suggested he was also helping migrants obtain visas by inflating their real earnings with bogus salaries and he was re-arrested in September 2011. The Home Office highly skilled migrant scheme was designed to attract talented workers such as doctors or engineers who could contribute most to the UK economy. (Cont) 

Related

April 3 2012


A vicar who helped carry out nearly 250 sham  marriages, pocketing £30,000 in proceeds, was called  ‘disgraceful’ and ‘greedy’ by a judge yesterday. The Rev Brian Shipsides, 56, was jailed for four and a half years for arranging bogus  ceremonies for African nationals to marry European citizens so they could stay in Britain (cont)

The Sixty Year Experiment.

By Caratacus

Experiments on humans, animals and plants are highly regulated in civilised nations. Experimenters are bound by rules of morality and ethics. There must be agreement by the subjects. They must be carefully afforded "informed consent", with detailed descriptions of the risks and rewards.

The experimenters have the duty of declaring vested interests. Particularly they must reveal possible personally benefit from the outcome of the experiment.

Experiments are, by convention, given a restricted time frame, for review and reassessment. If it seems that the experiment is not going to be beneficial to humans, plants or animals, that experiment must be curtailed forthwith.

********************************************************************

Since the advent of Homo sapiens, strong biological forces have inexorably separated people into their different "types" by geographical area. 

An inherent quality of biology, beyond control, has generated this distinction between humans. These separating paths have lead to the genetic, racial, biochemical and the behavioural varieties of humans. 

Progressive separation of humans also drove the divergence which has created the thousands of human languages. Most are now so distant from each other to be mutually unintelligible. People will continue to form enclaves of similar genetic and language groups.

The creation of human bio-diversity has always been inevitable.

*******************************************************

Sixty years ago, the governments of Western Europe began an experiment on their entire human population. It was, and remains, the largest biological experiment ever conducted.

This experimental design was to attempt to reverse human bio-diversity. To do that governments brought, and allow to remain as a breeding sub-set, people of different genes, races, cultures and languages into the geographical boundaries of Britain and Europe. 

The political hypothesis was to test whether the distinctions between different varieties of humans, would progressively lessen if brought into Europe. It was guessed that ultimately these varied people (and their varied cultures) would amalgamate seamlessly, to the benefit of all.

The term “integration" was conjured.

 It soon became clear that conflict was probable. Aggressive rioting between the races occurred. Integration was not going to work.

Therefore the experiment was modified to test whether intuitive human behaviour could be changed under threat of law. The native populations were ordered not to reveal that they recognised (the obvious) distinctions between the existing inhabitants and the aliens. They were ordered to curtail any discourse amongst themselves, which might emphasise these distinctions.

The term “criminal racism” was invented

Since “integration” had failed the experimental basis was changed again. Instead of integrating, could these differing groups instead function along-side one with the other?

The term "multiculturalism" was coined.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Bizarrely, in an exact parallel, multiculturalism was attempted in South Africa, in an attempt to protect the cultural and genetic homogeny of resident Europeans. The description was "separate development".

The outcome was a cascade of inflamed, ruthless and hypocritical condemnation by the continental Europeans. This attempt at self-protection by a small, minority group was destroyed by bullying.
Ironically the “anti-apartheid movement” was later going to have important destructive sequelae in Europe.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The Governments of Europe could have only one moral justification this experimentation. That was to ensure the long term safety, well-being and contentment of their populations and their progeny.What mandate did the governments have to commence this experiment, which by its very design would bring disequilibrium and so fear to European Societies?

They had none. The population was not consulted.

Instead in an unbelievable arrogance and opinionated superiority these politicians, amateur scientists that they are, forced into place this massive, irreversible, naïve, rationally indefensible and highly dangerous idea.

***********************************************************************

Synchronous with this experiment on humans was another political experiment on a massive ecological system.

This “good idea” was to play manipulator of the living and to bring the Nile Perch into Lake Victoria Nyanza. That lake had one of the most diverse fish environments on earth.
 

The perch was surreptitiously introduced in 1954, and more official introductions occurred in 1962 and 1963.
 

The end result of that experiment was to destroy the highly refined and complex ecology of the second widest body of fresh water in the world.

The experiment so altered the freshwater ecosystem of Lake Victoria that several hundred species became extinct or near extinction.  This politically engineered event was likely the largest extinction event amongst vertebrates in the 20th century
 

The impact on the local economy was the subject of the documentary Darwin's Nightmare.

********************************************************
The analogy between the past destruction of the East African ecosystem and the impending destruction of the European Civilisation should be clear. 

Both were based on “Political Good Ideas”.
 

Both were philosophically and scientifically flawed from foundation.

Both were doomed.

********************************************************

Sixty years ago, the governments of Western Europe embarked on an experiment on their entire human population. It was, and remains, the largest biological experiment ever conducted.

It breaches the most fundamental guidelines of experimentation and transgresses every component of the rules and restraints experimentation.

It has been clear, from the outset that this was not going to afford the Europeans the benefit of greater contentment and greater safety.1

Was the population, the "experimental sample", informed of this? Were they told of the hazards and potential?

The short answer is no.

Was the experiment terminated when it became clear that it was failing?

No.

But there was a parallel subplot which allowed a small group of people, the politicians, to benefit themselves greatly. Immigration has been used to buy politicians power, and bolster their tenure.

This was scientific fraud at its worst, and by its magnitude the most despicable, condemnable and outrageous travesty of a political mandate, contrary to all understandings of democracy, morality and ethics.

This blind endeavour has as much chance of success as a king ordering the retreat of the tides.

For the sake humanity, the survival of the European and God’s wondrous diversity, this experiment must be curtailed forthwith.
_____________________________________________

(1) The Empire Windrush docked in Tilbury on 21 June 1948 becoming a landmark in the history of migration to the UK. On the 22 June 1948 11 MPs wrote to the Prime Minister, Clement Attlee. The letter was signed by JD Murray, CF Grey, James Harrison, Frank Mcleavy, RWG Mackay, T Reid, Louis Tolley, TJ Brooks, JR Leslie, Percey Holman and Meredith F Titterington. They expressed concern that large numbers of "coloured" immigrants might "impair the harmony, strength and cohesion of our public and social life and to cause discord and unhappiness among all concerned."

Michael Coren with Peter Brimelow (VDare): immigration

_______________
Hat tip: Mister Fox

The net sum of lies

According to figures just released, despite the government's promise to reduce net immigration into Britain to a somewhat undefined figure of “tens of thousands”, last year in fact saw the highest level of net immigration ever.  In total 252,000 more people immigrated into the country than those who emigrated out of it.

Clearly, at this stage the government is not showing any signs of keeping its promise, which, I doubt has come as a huge surprise to most of us.

However, bad as this appears, if one really considers these figures they are actually worse than they seem to be.

For instance, what do they always focus on the “net” figure?  The net total only tells us the increase in numbers resulting from immigration, after deducting from the total, those, many of them native Britons who have left the country, most probably because they can no longer stand living in the Multicultural hell hole it has become.

The net figure only matters to those who care only about numbers and who don't give a damn about the ethnic, cultural and racial demographic change which is being imposed on this country.

Of course, in politically correct totalitarian Britain we are not permitted to care about that change to our country, the only sop we are allowed is a limited licence to care about the numbers, not the composition.

In fact the demographic make up of our country did not change by a mere 252,000 in 2010, it changed by at least 591,000, because that is the true “official” number of non-British immigrants who arrived in this country last year.  In terms of the destructions of this countries racial heritage that is the figure which matters, or at least it is part of it.

In terms of the “net” figure, the government could well achieve their promise by not reducing immigration at all and merely encouraging half a million native Britons to leave the country each year.  That way “net” immigration would be under 100,00 a year. (not too difficult a task given the way things are going!)

The total official immigration figure of between 500,000 and 600,000 a year has remained constant over the last 14 odd years, resulting in a demographic change of well in excess of seven million, not counting the baby bomb which explodes shortly after each year's arrival.

Another interesting feature of the figures was the number of immigrants who allegedly came to Britain to “study”, that number is quoted as 238,000 yes, that is right, 238,000!!  Is anyone really dumb enough to believe that almost a quarter of a million people came into the country to study? The government is not that thick, the media is not that stupid, nobody is that dumb!  So why do they pretend they are?

An equally interesting figure is the one left after you deduct the number of immigrants who claim they came to “study” and those who claim they came to “work” from the total who came. The figure you are then left with is 179,000 who if they didn't come work or study must presumably have come as dependants, rather like the family of this guy, who's parents are currently being paid pensions by the British tax payer!

Yeah, who's dependants?  Ours!

This. In itself, is only part of the picture, the figures relate only to those who moved here officially. Given that the authorities long ago gave up checking that those who come here on short term visas ever get round to leaving, (and just how many do you think dod so?!) we really have no idea how many people are flooding into this country each year.   One thing is for certain, it is a lot more than we are told.

We are being lied to about immigration and the effect it is having on this country. Not only are we misled over the true figures, but, despite the evidence all around us, we are also constantly told that it is doing us good.

In which case, why are we broke?

In the face of social and economic collapse, shrill voices from “industry” keep insisting that immigration “benefits” our economy, and that the government's (apparently mythical) plans to cap it will “do damage”. This is of course total codswallop (to  use a milder word than I might otherwise have) in truth what curbing immigration might do is deprive “industry” of cheap labour. 

Are they saying that all the immigrants who have come in over the last few decades have ceased to be of benefit?  Or is it just that they are no longer prepared to work for the sort of wages one can only survive on by living ten to a bedroom, or sleeping in a garden shed in Southall. Hence there is forever a need of new migrants to exploit.

There isn't a politician, commentator or journalist with the courage or the honesty to admit the truth, and while they remain silent it just gets worse. They are pathetic.

Sometimes I just get so bloody angry

mongrel Island?

As a postscript to August’s excellent article on Liberal democrat candidate Sandy Walkington's deeply bigoted and ignorant comments about Britain, which was posted earlier, I think it is important to make clear that not only are Mr. Walkington’s views flawed and misguided for the reasons which August highlighted so well, but that Walkington's basic premise, that we, the British, are a nation of mongrels is blatantly untrue.

This claim is, of course, made frequently by liberals and multicultural zealots, but it is a lie based on ideological wish fulfillment and pure fantasy exposing a total ignorance of history.

Prior to 1950, Britain was, in fact, one of the most racially homogeneous nations on Earth, even today over 80% of the native population are able to trace their genetic ancestry back by means of DNA at least 15 thousand years, that is to say some sixteen times longer than the indigenous  Maori people of New Zealand and roughly as long as the Clovis people of North America.

The “mongrel claim” depends on the hypothesis that previous influxes of immigrants and refugees changed the ethnic make up of the British people.  This hypothesis if frankly incorrect.  In the main the groups involved were so small in number that they had no perceptible impact on the indigenous population.  For example, the very largest group, the French Huguenots, amounted in number to less than a fifth of the current Somali population and there are currently over one hundred times as many people originating from the Indian sub continent (India, Pakistan and Bangladesh) living in Britain today than all the Huguenots who came here in the 16th and 17th centuries. 

As the two main invasions of Britain, at least those which occurred prior to the second half of the 20th Century, these did not have the effect the multicultural fairy tale tellers would have us believe. Following the Norman conquest most Norman troops returned home and the only significant interbreeding with our ethnically identical kin the Normans was primarily restricted to our aristocracy.

Some limited interbreeding unquestionably took place following the Roman conquest  thousand years before, however, again, unlike today, this was insufficient to have any impact on the native population.

One can dismiss Bonnie Greer’s fanciful claims on the infamous Question Time edition with Nick Griffin, about platoons of Africans arriving with the Roman troops, this is the sort of dubious “history” which usually appears in books with large print, lots of colours and repeated references to “diversity”.

There is no firm historical evidence that African troops accompanied the Roman invaders in any significant numbers if any did at all. If such Africans actually existed, there is no evidence they were not castrated, as was the general fate of freed slaves in ancient Rome, or that they were “Africans” as we would understand the description today, the demographics of much of North Africa were very different than it is in our time. 

Finally, there is certainly no evidence any African were “left behind" to mate with the flan haired natives as the disingenuous Miss Greer whimsically suggests.

To be blunt Greer’s claims were laughable and devoid of any historical substance. It is a shameful indictment of our times that no mainstream historian had the guts or the honesty to challenge her.  

It may be true that over any milenia Britain became the home of a small number of other Northern European tribes  such as Angles, Saxons and Vikings but they were ethnically identical to the Picts and Celts who were before them.  Sharing the blood of a small number of identical Northern European tribes does not make us mixed race and most definitely does not make us “mongrels”.

The politically correct Mr.Walkington should remember that the population of Ethiopia, for instance is made up of no less than eighty North African tribes, meanwhile the people of Kenya include some forty ethnically identical East African tribes. If this hypocrite calls us mongrels on the basis that we are made up of half a dozen Nothern European tribes, he is clearly implying that Ethiopians and Kenyans are far more "mongrels" than we are.

How many times would hell have to freeze over before Walkington could bring himself to use a term, which trips so easily off his narrow lips in relation to white Europeans, when describing an African or Asian people?.

Lies such as those parroted by the unpleasant Mr. Walkington are repeated over and over again for ideological reasons, and in order to achieve a political goal. That goal is the destruction of Western Nations states by imposing an alien culture and finally an alien ethnicity upon once homogenous peoples.  They form part of an act of deliberate genocide by stealth, which I have described here before, and must be challenged every time they are told..

Walkington lies also when he says he has “no problem” with what he calls “the fact” that in 200 years we will all be coffee coloured.  In fact he glories in the prospect, as it is after all the outcome which the political masters he serves are determined to achieve.        

But a lie is a lie is a lie. Goebbels may have been correct that if you tell a lie often enough people will come to believe it, however, a lie can never become a truth no matter how often our enemies repeat it.        

               

The views of Sandy Walkington

Sandy Walkington (right) pictured with Business Minister Vince Cable

By August Pointneuf

Sandy Walkington, liberal democrat candidate for St Albans has said, “We are all mongrels.  I mean this country is the most mongrelled (sic) country in the world.  In 200 years we will all be coffee-coloured – and I have got no problem with that”.

This grandiloquence and cultured bravado is naïve.  Underlying this man’s thesis is a peculiar (in the sense that it is not consistent with the views of humans for millennia past) implied undercurrent of contentment.  This contentment seems to arise from the illusion that if there is genetic homogeneity, there will be less strife and consequently the population will be safer, more content, and “happier”.

He is mistaken in believing that stirring genes in a pot of miscegenation will produce a uniform product. At a genetic science level she is wrong, because there will still not be a homogeneity. This is because the different expressions of various gene pools in mulattos will repeatedly force out differences. 

Be that as it may, where Walkington’s true innocence lies is that he does not, perhaps cannot, understand that humans slowly acquire the equilibrium necessary for their contentment, dependent upon the context in which they live. 

Given similar genetics the prime facilitator to this is the culture that humans evolve around themselves. These are patterns of behaviour of exquisite finesse, which evolve, not over decades and not even over two centuries, but over millennia.  It is this common culture, which allows the harmony of understanding within homogenous groups, which permits common perceptions and establishes equilibriums of values. Some groups are highly successful in this cultural evolution. Others fail 

What heterogeneous immigration brings is not additional culture, but a vacuum, a tear and hiatus in the existing highly sophisticated and tightly woven culture of the host country.

The world is awash with conflicts; almost all are conflicts of culture, immiscible and unsolvable because each of those cultures has its own strengths, profundity and deeply ingrained evolution.  Juxtapose different cultures and conflict is inevitable.

Therefore if this man seeks a peaceful Britain he should be seek to preserve the unitary culture with which the British have been blessed. He should not be preaching a perfidy, and betraying the cultural about which he claims to proudly boast.

As the creators of the greatest empire the world has ever known, the sub-group of Europeans genetically and culturally isolated in their British island, had perfected a homogeneity which allowed them this extraordinary creativity. 

What earlier immigrants there were, for by far the greater part, were Europeans with a very similar gene stock.  Their ingress into Britain brought with them only a marginally different gene stock and culture, which was proximal enough to the British to harmonise.

The earlier European immigrants were very different from the current Negro and Asiatic immigrants into Britain. The new aliens’ gene pools and cultures are widely divergent from the consistent genotype and coherent culture which is (or was) the British.  That these immigrants come with an inherent inability to merge into a stable and successful society is there for all who wish to see.  Even the immigrants will be aware of this, which is why they are fleeing from failed nations and patently unsuccessful cultures

The very word homogeneity is derived from genetic consistency.  In advocating “multi-culturism” (whatever that might mean, perhaps apartheid?) these political quasi scientists/philosophers run an impoverished, simplified intellect.  Sandy Walkington’s intellectual subtlety sits at the level of the pre-school child, who has learned only that mixing all colours together consistently makes a dirty brown.

What bitter irony that the homogenous genetic and cultural equilibrium which was Britain’s is being destroyed by people of his limited insight, and inappropriate power. What an extraordinary, irreversible, experiment he is predicting. What a calamitous failure he is promoting.

Why the West is Broke?

Those still baffled as to why the West is sinking into financial crisis, and how it came to pass that all the the nations which were great and rich world powers just a few decades ago are now either bankrupt or deeply in debt to the likes of China, may find an answer in the screen shots below.  All of which I took this morning after entering the words "Sending Money Home" into the Google search engine:

Yes that really does say 979 Million results

Given the large number of immigrants who have difficulty with written English, I tried a further experiment.

The second screen shot shows the numbers of results I obtained when I reentered the same words with the assistance of the Google translate facility: 

 

  Could this be an answer which the politicians and economists have missed?

The jobs white folk won't do

One of the great myths of our age, one repeated constantly in every white Western nation, is that immigrants do the jobs which natives of the particular nation, in our case, the English, Welsh, Scottish or Irish, will not do. As such, the implication is given, is that immigrants are essential to the continued well being of the host  nation.

What must things have been like before we lazy, work shy, Brits opened our doors and started ushering all these millions of willing dirty job doers in?

Here in Britain, of course, the older readers amongst us will doubtless recall how difficult and unpleasant it was to walk down the pavement during the great street sweeper shortage of 1964. Their parents before them lived for years without tasting a gooseberry or a Cox's pippin during the fruit picker famine in the 1930's 

Of course in the early 1950's, most families lost poorly loved ones when thousands of hospital patients died unnecessarily from starvation and neglect, just because there were no nurses to take care of them before the immigrants arrived.

Another thing which I find completely amazing is that there were so many more public toilets in our cities back in the days when nobody was prepared to clean them! Gosh life must have been unpleasant when our grandfathers got caught short!

Of course, as we all know the “jobs white folk won't do” claim is another of the huge lies like “the economic benefits of immigration” and “only white people can be racist” which the promoters of multiculturalism have managed  to insert into our folklore.

The fact is that, for a short while after they arrive, some immigrants are forced to do the jobs which:

a) employers don't want to pay a living wage for
b) nobody can afford to do at the salary offered unless they are prepared to live nine people to a bedsit. (or moonlight at Uncle Raj's convenience store)
      
The other claim, of course, is that immigrants bring skills which the locals don't have. This is an even more dubious claim and often quite a dangerous one, particularly when it comes to the health service, where political correctness requires that we pretend to treat medical qualifications obtained in Kampala or Islamabad as if they are worth more than a diploma in woodwork. Meanwhile the government save money by not having to train our own doctors, as its  ministers quietly pay their BUPA subscription, and pray they never get treated by a doctor who qualified in Kampala.

Some of the claims have more merit, such as in relation to the indisputably invaluable Polish plumbers. However, this is only because they possess skills which we have given up teaching our  own youngsters.  A situation which could be turned round in a year if the government wanted to do so.

As for Indian trained IT workers being better qualified than their UK counterparts is concerned, as anyone who has spent an hour on the phone to Bangalore attempting to solve a Broadband problem knows, that's a joke, they're just  a lot cheaper.

In any event as mass immigration has shown us, soon after arrival, far from doing the jobs English workers wont do, immigrants quickly end up doing the vast majority of the new jobs which the growing numbers of Unemployed UK workers would dearly love to do!
  

The progressive destruction of “Change”

There he was on stage this week, that rather geeky little man with the disturbing stare who now leads the Labour Party, and he was chanting the same mantra they all keep repeating “I'm up for the fight to change Britain” he hooted in the unattractive nasal way he does, “Britain needs to change”.

They are all so addicted to that little word “change” aren’t they, they flourish it at every juncture and scatter it liberally through any speech, but what do they mean by it?

Look to the definitions of change in any dictionary and what will you find? – “alter, amend, transform, make different, transfer, substitute, replace” – not one of those words guarantees anything good will come from the process, just that it will not be the same when its done. 

Death brings change, disease and bad luck bring change, America's flawed Messiah promised “change” and that benighted nation is drowning in those changes as I write. For two generations or more Western politicians have promised change, indeed many have brought change, and how many of those changes are we any better for? Count the good ones on your hand and you'll find you still have fingers to spare.

Is it not true that the real “change” we need is the means of reversing all the ill thought through and many truly malevolent “changes” which have been forced upon us in recent decades.

Another word they all adore is “progressive”.  Politicians of all shades, red, yellow, green and blue all claim to be “progressive” and our media murmur the word as if with reverence, but has the “progress” they have brought been for good or ill?

Cancer is progressive, so is syphilis, woodworm, dry rot and dementia, and all of them bring friendlier changes than have the “progressive” politicians and reformers of our age.

But those people never were our friends.

Like the Communist revolutionaries and Frankfurt school plotters who came before them, the malevolent old men who came of age in the 1960's and 1970's and who rule us now, remain fixated with changing the world, and my God they have done so, although not for the better. Our betterment never was their plan. They have brought change in the form only of destruction, and that was, and remains, the whole point. What should replace that which they destroy is less relevant to them, in fact I doubt they even care, they remain obsessed with their all consuming hatred of the once great and powerful West, and that leaves little room for anything else.

It is a strange hatred these old men and women and their unattractive spawn feel for the history of the West inspired as it is by iconoclasm, a desire for anarchy and a deep self-loathing death wish. It is a hatred based on the myths, lies and calumny they have repeated so often they perhaps now even believe it themselves.

As the ugliest girl might hate the prettiest, not for her sins but for her beauty and her grace, they hate us not for our flaws but for our achievements.  We achieved what others could not, and in the eyes of the aging 60's revolutionaries that in itself means we are an evil they must destroy.

Theirs is a hatred entirely misplaced.  The West, and those of European, particularly Nordic and Anglo Saxon, origin has brought more benefit to humanity than any other group in the history of the world, in fact, by comparison with our contribution that of any other group is reduced to insignificance, assuming they indeed made any contribution at all.

If you look to the origins of any development or movement which has improved the general well being of mankind, you will almost certainly find at its core a white European male, or a white male of European ancestry, the same would not apply to any other group you may wish to name.

Those who hate the West point to the evil we have done, but by any standards the evil is minor when set against the good.

For every weapon which white men created they have made and distributed a million pills which have cured more diseases and saved more lives than died in all the wars in history.  For every slave which the white race once owned we were instrumental in the freedom of a hundred others, and every act of brutality we committed have been compensated for by a thousand acts of charity and benevolence.

No other group can even start to claim the same

To an overwhelming degree, white Westerners, especially white western males, have historically been a greater force for good than any other group.  However, it is white westerners, especially white men, who have been primarily undermined by the changes imposed upon our societies by, so called, progressives.   It is they, who have given so much, whom the progressives most hate.

Lesser men are marked for what they destroy, not for what they create, for more than half a century lesser men have ruled the West, and we see the trail of their destruction all around us.

The liars in the media tell us the Western Society is flawed and failing, yet it is not western society but its enemies which has brought us to where we are, our fault, if any, is our refusal to confront them or to call them on their lies.

And what lies they told us.

We were told that opening our borders to mass third world immigration would boost our economies and protect our pensions, how that lies has been exposed as the exact reverse has come to pass. Our economies are collapsing, they are in the worst state they have ever been and our once guaranteed pensions have become a fading and distant illusion.

Our services would collapse without immigration they told us, whereas in truth they are now collapsing beneath the ravenous influx which devours them.

We may, some of us feel briefly better off, but that is just an illusion, a temporary high bought on credit, money we borrowed, or which our government did, and its all about to fall around our ears. If you own nothing but debt, you own nothing.

The fabled benefits of immigration have been exposed for the lies they always were, and in the most devastating way. Yet our borders are still open, and still they come.  

Meanwhile, other states, the real and only beneficiaries of globalization, and the net exporters of immigrants, rather than importers, states Brazil, China and India boom and thrive at our expense.

We are the “racists” if we resist they chided, whilst they set about producing a hundred thousand books, movies and TV shows depicting us as vile and filled with hate, yet it is we who are the victims of race hate, we who are the main victims of race hate crimes and we who are being driven from our towns and cities, many, such as our capital, we have already all but surrendered.  It is we who are being ethnically cleansed.

The single greatest “change” they have brought about is the way they have forced us to give up our homelands to a massive third world invasion, and it is this, above all else, which is destroying us.  A few short decades ago all the great powers of this planet were Western powers, we now face a situation whereby it is expected that within twenty to thirty years only 25% of the planet's wealth will be held by the West. That is a great result if you believe in egalitarianism irrespective of merit, but not if you care about the future of the West, or indeed the future of our planet.

The great achievement of the egalitarian lobby will be to have placed 75% of the world's wealth in the hands of totalitarian governments and immensely rich third world plutocrats, for whom human rights is an alien and ludicrous concept.

This is a politically manufactured outcome achieved through the “changes” our leaders have forced down our unwilling throats and by their special brand of “progress” which they beguiled us into believing would improve our lot.

As the west crumbles and declines, how can they still claim that mass third immigration brings us benefit when clear evidence to the contrary is all around us. Yet they still claim it, and crazy as it seems, there are some who still believe it.

It's a lie, and, in most respects, it always was.

The super rich achieve a short term benefit from mass immigration because it depresses the wages they have to pay, a few politicians benefit by virtue of the votes which their imported constituency bring.  However, beyond that small and unattractive coterie of corruption and contempt, nobody else benefits in any way.

There is no widespread benefit from mass immigration, it is a vehicle for change that's all was intended for. But of a change which only brings destruction, and the only purpose of which is to replace what was already there, nothing more.  

That any good should come from that process was never the plan.               

The left is re-writing Britain's immigration History

Click here to read Philip Johnston on how Labour is trying to hide the truth about the explosion in non-EU immigration following the 1997 election.

Please circulate the link

Will Immigration bring down the EU?

An intelligent analysis can be read at the Alternative Right, by CLICKING HERE.

_____________

Hat Tip: Mister Fox

A visit to the Doctor

In Whitechaple East London

________________________
Hat tip: The Green Arrow

Living Space and Mixed-Race supremacy

By Mister Fox

The dominant ideology in the western nations is built around multi-racialism or anti-racism and is a variant of Nazism. What became known as “Identity Politics” after the 60s is an inversion of Nazi values only with Whites as the enemy. The motive is to push “whites” out of their communities and it is done by deceit and against democratic principles or rule of law.

More than 50 million African workers are being brought to Europe in a secret immigration agreement. This is the most evil plan against humanity hatched in Europe since the Nazis herded Jewish people into the gas chambers and the Soviets starved 5 million Kulaks and is likewise meant to destroy a people: the whole of western Europe and her people and has been implemented by the evil E.U.

This ideology is totalitarian with only one viewpoint allowed. It is very intolerant of any complaint about the cruelty and injustice of it and brands dissidents as “haters”, “bigots, “fascists” or “Nazis.” It is implemented by deceit and often in secret.

A “job centre” funded by money confiscated from tax-payers has been opened in Mali and was the beginning of “free movement of people in Africa and the EU”. The report is from the EU statistical agency Eurostat. It rationalises that vast numbers of migrants could be needed to meet the shortfall in two years if Europe is to have a hope of funding the pension and health needs of its growing elderly population.

EU economists is Britain and other EU states will “need” 56 million immigrant workers between them by 2050 to make up for the “demographic decline” due to falling birth rates and rising death rates across Europe. That is a lie!

If the Civil Service Pensions and in particular parliamentary pensions were scaled down to sensible levels more in line with every other pensioner receiving a pension from HM Government there would be greater equality after retirement.

People are paid for doing a job while they are doing it. But I don’t see why the taxpayer should be required to fund a pension which equates to a job when they have left. I know the private sector do that but that is private and driven by profits. It is entirely different.

Moreover, If we were not transferring billions of pounds in Aid to elites in the Third World, and billions as UK subscriptions to the UN and the EU, we might well be able to give our people a better pension.

The report for the EU, is by Moroccan-born French MEP Francoise Castex, who wants immigrants to be given legal rights and access to social welfare provision such as benefits. “Having sufficient people of working age is vital for the economy and for tax revenue.”

What they really mean is they want to destroy Europe and the people. Ms Castex said: “It is urgent that member states have a calm approach to immigration. To say ‘yes’, we need immigration … it is not a new development, we must accept it.” To ensure cheap labour for the elites.

The Portugal declaration urges the EU to assist African governments in setting up migration information centres “to better manage labour mobility between Africa and the EU”.The first job centre was opened in Bamako, capital of Mali, on Monday the 6th of October. More centres are to open soon in other west African states then in north Africa.

The media provide the justification by blaming us and people start to blame themselves. We are ruled by being made to feel ashamed of ourselves. The photograph illustrating this report shows a cue of Africans in western dress presumably waiting to come here.(1)

These immigrant African people are prepared for immigration with clothes and language lessons by The British Council. African lawyer Dele Oguntimojou wrote: ”(you) do not know how the youth in the poor African village is being seduced by lush advertising to shed his native dress for blue jeans; to retune his ears from the traditional hi-life to the drum and bass of hip-hop and Brit pop. Even now the British Council is busy across Africa training the next generation of immigrants in the language of the destination country.”(2)

There was an expose in November 2006 that the Government were advertising for immigrants in a Foreign Office pamphlet distributed from Embassies around the world. 'Multicultural Britain - A Land Of Immigrants' encourages immigrants to come here because of the Human Rights Act which gives them privileges over natives and well-paid jobs. Illustrated with photos of smiling non-whites, it is an invitation to people to immigrate here. (3)

Home Office minister Beverley Hughes was found to be approving visa claims from eastern Europe despite warnings they were using forged documents. She only resigned when she found a letter sent to her on 4 March last year by a junior Home Office minister, Mr Ainsworth, alerting her to potential immigration frauds.

There were also allegations about abuse of the European Community Association Agreement (ECAA) which had already been raised by James Cameron, the British consul in Romania who blew the gaff. Ms Hughes told BBC Two's Newsnight that Mr Cameron's claims were the first she knew of the alleged "scam". But it is now clear she sent letters in March and April 2003 in reply to Mr Ainsworth's concerns.

Here is an insight. Lin Homer was chief executive of Birmingham city council and presided over what investigator, Judge Mawrey, called "massive, systematic and organised fraud" in an election campaign. It made a mockery of the election and he ruled that not less than 1,500 votes had been cast fraudulently in the city. He the comments after he upheld allegations of postal fraud relating to six seats won by Labour in the June 2004 ballot. For this she was promoted to chief of the Immigration and Nationality Directorate.(4)

An excuse is "The Home Office is a shambles." Why so? How come politicians do well in other jobs but fail as Home Secretaries? The Home Office is brilliantly succesful: it has been infiltrating immigrants into the country without people realising for years! But as usual the ideologues have no practical grasp and think only of the utopia of a multi racial world and cheap labour for themselves and the corporations.

Hitler changed the concept of Lebensraum from colonisation to enlargement within Europe. “For it is not in colonial acquisitions that we must see the solution of this problem, but exclusively in the acquisition of a territory for settlement, which will enhance the area of the mother country, and hence not only keep the new settlers in the most intimate community with the land of their origin, but secure for the total area those advantages which lie in its unified magnitude.” (5) He added a racial bias to Lebensraum and claimed that the Soviet Union was run by Jews so Germany had a right to take Russian land in search of a unity between the German Volk and the land, Blood and Soil.

In a speech and interview with The Brussells Journal, Vladimir Bukovsky, the Russian dissident, who spent twelve years in Soviet psychiatric units, told of documents from secret Soviet files which he was allowed to study in 1992 as a reward for helping leader Boris Yeltsin. These documents confirm a “conspiracy” to turn the European Union into a socialist state and those who oppose further European integration will be regarded as xenophobes. I think Patricia Hewitt said this publicly” (6)

I would add to his otherwise accurate analysis, that when it comes to race, the dominant western ideology is a variant of Nazism. The importation of immigrants to enrich us, make us more vibrant etc. is a form of Lebensraum. It began as an understandable reaction to the barbarity of Hitler’s Nazis but has now itself become a cruel, tyranny.

The Nuremberg Trials exposed genocidal practices and prompted official policies of medical ethics and the 1950 UNESCO statement on race. Scientific societies made similar statements on "race " and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, was a response to abuses during the Second World War. It was adopted by the United Nations in 1948. It proclaimed: "Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family." This was extended in the 1978 UNESCO declaration on race and racial prejudice - the fundamental equality of all human beings is the ideal toward which ethics and science should converge but in practice racial theories are still used to justify improving the racial stock. In his three-part television series ”Mongrel nation” in June 2003, the Lebanese-born comedian Edie Izzard, claimed that Mongrel dogs are cleverer than pedigree dogs. This metaphor suggested that mongrel people are as a master race, genetically superior to the rest!

The definition of racism in the Macpherson report: “Racism in general terms consists of conduct, words or practices which disadvantage or advantage people because of their colour, culture or ethnic origin.”(Para, 6.4) Our rulers are discriminating against us because we are white! Where Hitler had proposed a “thousand –year Reich” inhabited by a “Master Race” of Pure Aryans, the inverted Multi-Racial idea is a perfect world made up of a new type of person: the Coffee-Coloured person.

Totalitarianism and oppression into the British legal system with the Commission for Racial Equality, in the 1976 Race Relations Act, of Home Secretary Roy Jenkins. His biographer, John Campbell (Weidenfield & Nicolson.1983) revealed, he believed: “That immigration was good for Britain and if people resisted they should be socially engineered into accepting it". Commonwealth immigrants like previous waves of immigrants from the Norman Conquest, to the refugees of the 30’s, could help overcome “our natural Island lethargy”. Roy Jenkins is probably the most evil British politician who ever lived.

This was the first time that Race had been used in British law and is similar to the Nazi race laws which compelled Jewish people to register their property and "Aryanized" Jewish businesses which replaced Jewish employees and ownership was taken by by Germans who bought them cheap.. Jewish doctors were forbidden to treat non-Jews, and Jewish lawyers were not permitted to practice law.

A similar law is being introduced by Harriet Harman, the Minister for Women. This so-called “Equality Law” is to stop white men getting jobs and to allow employers to give ethnic minority and female candidates preferential treatment. The “doublespeak” is “positive action" and prevents applicants with better job credentials getting the job if they are the wrong sex or race.(7)

People in Nazi Germany had to carry an identity cards, but Jews had special identifying marks: a red "J" stamped on them and new middle names for those who did not have obviously "Jewish" first names: "Israel" for males, "Sara" for females. The cards allowed the police to identify Jews easily.

The Daily Mail of 26th September reported on our new EU I.D.Cards. The Home Secretary claims “the cards would protect against identity fraud, illegal working, and help people prove their identity easily” but like the Nazi I.D.Cards foreigners will not have to show them to get a job or use the NHS and schools. The cards are covered in EU lettering and an EU symbol of a bull.

We have racial lists kept to ensure preferential treatment for other ethnic groups cynically known as equal Opportunities monitoring forms which help people give priority to other ethnic groups.

The term “Racist” is not descriptive but inhibitive. It is to cow us while our society is transformed from a natural society to a Multi-Racial state. After the Second World War Nazi and Fascist were more coercive, but as the war receded Racist became more effective as it was universally pejorative and not restricted to old-fashioned ideologies. It is corporate elites who want cheap labour imported as well as outsourcing and they operate within the “tender idealism” pushed by politicians.

Racial theories on improving the racial stock are used to justify immigration. In the second reading of the Commonwealth immigrants Bill (16/11/1961, Lord Royle said, “wouldn’t we be better off with a dash of darker blood?” The multi-racialist Fenner Brockway(later Lord) wrote glowingly of mixed race people which is similar reverence as Nazis had for pure Aryans, “Fifty years ago I read a book by Sir Sidney Olivier, who had been Governor of Jamaica, recording what splendid human specimens, physically and mentally, were the progeny of mixed marriages on that island. Many of us who know the sons and daughters of mixed marriages will bear out this judgement.” (8) There is an organisation ion Germany that promotes mixed marriages.

Eddie Izzard, the Lebanese born establishment clone, presented a television series celebrating the racial supremacy of mixed race people. This has the same structure as ideas of racial supremacy and has no superior morality but aims to destroy White people. 

 

Another foreign infiltrator Yasmin Alibhai-Brown is an anti-White enemy within who works against us from inside after being rescued after being kicked out of Uganda by Amin. She has been quoted as saying she wants the white race to die out. These ungrateful foreigners try to undermine us from within. (9)

Susan Sontag described the white race as the cancer of human history."

The group Hitler valued us, is the pariah, whereas the groups he persecuted are privileged. It is social engineering to give power to ethnics and displace whites. The Independent 21 April 2004 reported that “British school-leavers could be denied places leading universities for overseas students. Oxford University is to increase the number of overseas undergraduates, who pay higher fees, while freezing the total number of undergraduate places, thus cutting the number of places available to UK school-leavers.”

The large corporations expect their “diverse” work force to be loyal not to country but the company. This goes well with free markets, which have always been Utopian and supra national.

Racial Awareness Training is a method of brainwashing that local councils send their employers, employees and decision makers on to be conditioned in correct thinking: “to challenge individual prejudices and values and change them”. It stemmed from the ideas of the American Judith Katz who held that “racism is inherent in whites”.

There were examples in the USA of blonde haired people, usually women, being racially abused until they broke down and sobbed. The fact that it was done to blondes shows that we are victims of racism in the guise of anti-racism.

The “Commission on the Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain’s”(Runnymede Trust 2002) Parekh Report We are told the way forward is for the ”United Kingdom to formally declare itself to be a multi-cultural society” page xxi. (9)

We are inducted into our culture, community and our history and traditions, quite naturally, as we grow up. The abstract method though, requires a sort of schoolbook learning process as in the republican “Citizenship classes” which are supposed to make all foreigners British.

This process only acts on the surface, on the conscious minds of the pupils, whereas our natural traditional way imbues the very nature of the person as it is slowly internalised into the deep unconscious mind as a uniting bond. The totalitarian method advocated by Parekh has to be forced by brainwashing and politicised police. At the same time the immigrants are allowed to perpetuate the divisions by inducting their own children into their own traditions. They are exempt from Multi-Racialism!

 The police are being turned into a race-gestapo. Judge Macpherson (pictured left) began his investigation into the murder of Stephen Lawrence prejudiced against the police. With his mind already made up he used British law as social engineering to mould the police into an anti-racist thought force.

They know what we should think, from the start and the idea is not for fair and open enquiry to ascertain the facts of a case but to reach the right conclusion. This added more totalitarianism to law: Recommendation 12 states,” A racist incident is any incident, which is perceived to be racist by the victim, or any other person. Recommendation 13 adds, “That the term “racist incident” must be understood to include crimes and non-crimes in policing terms. Both must be investigated with equal commitment”. Now we can be investigated for committing non-crimes.

There are purges on the police as former chief of the Metropolitan police, Sir John Stevens introduced planted informers into police training classes to spy for and report on “racist” officers. An interim report into police handling of their own racism, which was established in 2004 after a television documentary, The Secret Policeman, showed racism at a police training centre in Warrington.

The report was produced by a panel led by Sir David Calvert-Smith, a former director of public prosecutions who, like Macpherson began from prejudice not an open mind.

The “enquiry” apparently looked at internal police attitudes to race, including monitoring of race policies and training, recruitment and grievance procedures, rather than operational policing. Like Macpherson this panel had decided the outcome before they started. Smith admitted that his team had decided before they started that police racism was a "major" problem. It was "commonly accepted", he said, and reinforced by The Secret Policeman, that "racism is still a major problem within the service. We have not set out to prove that it exists. We have taken it as a given".(10) This is discrimination against “white” police officers.

The labelling of innocent people as “racists”, “bigots”, “haters” etc. is dehumanisation setting us up for persecution for not conforming to establishment diktats. It is pure totalitarian thinking straight from Nazi Germany if any speak out against being dispossessed they are persecuted by the state.

No man survives when freedom fails,
The best men rot in filthy jails,
And those who cry 'appease, appease'
Are hanged by those they tried to please.

___________________________

(1) http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/6562....workers-into-EU
http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fabric/maliprof.htm; http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/6532....o-more-migrants http://appablog.wordpress.com/2008/09/15/inauguration-of-the-
migration-information-and-management-centre-cigem-in-bamako-mali-monday-6-october-2008/
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/thi....-uk-472164.html
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/artic....n+workers+over+'lazy+British',+says+CBI/article.do

(2)Salisbury Review. Spring 2003. Vol 21. No3. (www.salisbury-review.co.uk)
http://www.britishcouncil.org/new/

(3) http://ukinnl.fco.gov.uk/resources/en/pdf/3190535/insight-uk-ethnic-diversity

(4)http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3589131.stm; http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/newsnight/2006/09/the_great_immigration_scandal.html;
The Great Immigration Scandal by Steve Moxon
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4613997.stm

(5) Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1971)pp 646, 655

(6) http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/865/print

(7) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7474801.stm
http://www.lg-em.gov.uk/pp/gold/viewGold.asp?IDType=Page&ID=18233

(8) Immigration: what is the answer? (RKP.1965) pp83,84 Fenner Brockway and Norman Pannell

(9) http://www.hrmguide.co.uk/diversity/parekh_report.htm ; http://erc21.blogspot.com/2005/10/parekh-report-2.html
http://www.aml.org.uk/_islamophobia.php
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aWuAaw85Dwc

http://www.cuca.org.uk/2008/06/03/yasmin-alibhai-brown-racist/

(10) http://news.bbc.co.uk/vote2001/hi/englis....000/1190971.stm
http://83.137.212.42/sitearchive/cre/downloads/PoliceFI_interim.pdf

Article for Rule Britannia

I have written an article for the Rule Britannia site which can be read by clicking here.

In the wake of the scenes overnight in Tottenham, an essay entitled "The flawed Ideology destroying the West" may seem quite apt, however, in this instance I have focused on the economic damage being done to the West rather than the very obvious social damage which is also taking place. 

Failed State Colonisation - The Greatest Threat of Our Time

Thanks to Paul for drawing my attention to an interesting article which was published on the Sultan Knish site back in May.  The writer gives a frightening account of the outcome of mass immigration, from failed states into previously successful first world nations. which deserves a wider readership.  Click here for Failed State Colonisation - The Greatest Threat of Our times 

A worse truth hidden in the figures

The headlines in Today's papers and on TV announced that the results of a recent investigation had revealed that 28% of those involved in the sexual grooming of young, and predominantly white children, on our streets are Asian, more than “one in four”.  The report was widely accompanied by predictable urgings from politicians, police and media multicultural advocates that we should not place too much significance on the ethnicity of those involved.

However, are the headlines themselves actively under reporting the true scale of Asian involvement in this crime?

The report identified a total of 1,217 suspects, however, in the case of a significant number of those (464) the ethnicity of the perpetrator is recorded as "unknown", therefore they can not be included in any meaningful assessment of the composition of offenders. Every media outlet had attempted to pretend that those of "unknown race" must all be white, but the figures do not support that assumption.

The ethnicity is known in the case of 758 offenders and of these 346 are Asian (just under 46% of the total).

Given that those whose ethnicity is known is the only sample upon which the racial make up of offenders can be assessed, and as a further 40 of those who’s race was identified were either black or Chinese, the headlines could, with even greater accuracy have announced that "Less than half of all child sexual grooming suspects are white" (On the basis that whites who make up just under 90% of the population, amount for only 48.5% of those who’s ethnicity has been established)      

Even if all those whose race is currently unknown turned out to be white, Asians, who according to official figures make up less than 6% of the population, would be massively over represented in the figures.  However, as whites make up less than half of the known offenders, how likely is it they make up 100%, or even the majority, of the unknowns?

Multicultural advocates argue that the research is "poor and incomplete" and, therefore, misleading, but this is only true in that the manner in which it is being presented significantly under represents the disproportionate levels of offending on the part of non-white (primarily south Asian) offenders, whilst at the same time dishonestly over-represent the numbers of white offenders.

Another factor of note is the absence of any figures relating to Arabs, Turks, Albanians and East Europeans amongst the offenders. In view of the degree to which such groups feature amongst sex criminals, this inevitably leads one to speculate whether the researchers have followed the example of the FBI and included them under the single category “white”, so as to inflate the number they can pass off as native Britons.

The media will lie and lie and twist and squirm, however, the glaring fact is the research suggests that native white Britons are at least twenty times less likely to be involved in the disgusting crime of child sexual grooming than are the mass ranks of newcomers to our country.