The lies of frightened men

Anyone who has not spent the last few months out of radio range either in a submarine beneath the ice caps, searching for signs of global warming, or making a wild life documentary about Amazonian termites, will have noticed that for the first time which anyone not currently drawing their pensions can remember, senior politicians have actually started to talk about immigration at a time when a general election may be less than six months away.

Conservative leader David (call me Dave) Cameron has recently announced that the Tories will introduce a cap on immigration, which would reduce the number allowed in each year to “Tens of thousands”. Tens of thousands of immigrants would of course be an improvement on the current situation, (if Cameron really meant it – which he doesn't) but only in so far that, instead of allowing in numbers equivalent to the population of Newcastle each year (I say Newcastle based on “official figures” - the population of Bristol is closer to reality) we would still be “welcoming” a new Carlisle, Wigan or Grimsby year after year after year, not to forget the anchor babies they would immediately start breeding after they arrive.

It is a mark of how out of touch politicians, such as Cameron, are that he seems to think people will believe that such tinkering would even come close to solving the problem.

In the red corner, Labour Communities Secretary John Denham attempted to reassure the public by cooing disingenuously that "We don't think population is going to go to 70 million, so there is a bit of a straw man there".

Of course, most experts agree a rise to over 70 million is inevitable unless something is done to fundamentally change current policy, however, Denham continued his fairytale by adding "We have got tight immigration control - the points-based system that is now in place means that people can only come here if what they are going to give to this country is something we need."

However, Denham then argued against Cameron's cap saying, with the dishonesty which only a trained politician can achieve with a straight face: "Suppose the first person after the cap was an international heart specialist?" suggesting that Britain should act rather like the gambler who keeps buying the same lottery numbers in the hope that now and then they might win a tenner back.

According to Denhem's logic the country should continue to take in thousands upon thousands upon millions of immigrants in the hope that one or two of them might benefit the country. Has it not occurred to the pureed brained zealot that billions of pounds would be saved, and untold levels of social damage avoided, had we trained a few home grown heart specialists instead of importing millions of people in the hope of finding a few foreign trained ones among them?

Deceiving the electorate is clearly John Denham's latest brief, as he even went so far as to make a pretence of expressing concern for the white working classes, stating that, sometimes the white working classes suffered more from discrimination than many ethnic minorities, as if this was some new phenomenon, which only he had noticed.

Given NuLabour's visceral hatred and contempt for the white working class, who's interests so often conflicts with those now much preferred groups, many observers would have assumed that Denham was either making a bad joke and had forgotten the punchline, or was suffering from some catastrophic mental breakdown, had they, that is, not realised that an election is imminent.

Attempting to sooth the electorate's concern over the third world masses engulfing our boarders with a few half hearted lies, appears to be the latest wheeze plucked from the NuLabour lexicon of spin and deception, as they seem to be all at it.

Back in November, Home Secretary Alan Johnson went so far as to admit that “Labour has made mistakes on immigration” yet, against all the evidence, Johnson then went on to claim that Labour had not operated an open door immigration policy ( Ed: lets put it this way, if they occasionally closed the door, they certainly didn't lock any windows) and went so far as to say “I do believe that the UK is now far more successful at tackling immigration than most of its European and North American neighbours".

He followed this by wittering on about “the introduction of biometric visas, ID cards for foreign nationals and dealing with new asylum applications within six months, including" (yes he actually said it) “returning failed applicants”, on the apparently deluded assumption that anyone with a quota of brain cells necessary to master their remote control would believe that any of that had the slightest effect on the tsunami of immigrants which has swamped our homeland in the last thirteen years.

This was, of course, the same Home Secretary, who only months before had refused to contemplate a cap on immigration and chortled that he did not “lie awake worrying about a population of 70 million”

His arrogance and contempt for the public steaming like a newly dropped cow pat on a winter morning, Johnson actually seemed to believe that a mere admission that the government had been “maladroit” would convince the potential electorate that any administration in which he served, or, if he gets his wish, ran, had any intention of doing any better in future.

The most recent politician to come out of his corner with the “we will do something about immigration” lie was the pugnacious and aptly named Schools Minister Ed Balls who has this week been accused of campaigning in the vulnerable constituency of Morley West Yorkshire using letters, leaflets and surveys to portray Labour as tough on immigration. a proposition so ludicrous that it would be laughable were it not for the fact that there are some out there who might actually believe such twaddle.

For decades now the main parties have had an unwritten pact not to mention immigration anywhere near an elections, it has been the one subject politicians have deliberately prevented the public from voting on. There is a reason for this, were democracy to to impinge on the project, then the project might not succeed, and, therefore, democracy must be denied.

However, this time it is different, and we all know why that is. For the first time the public might just have the chance to vote about immigration, and the politicians have begun to realise the eggs they have laid over the last 40 years may soon begin to hatch and release something very dangerous indeed, dangerous to them that is.

The new strength of the BNP could mean that the men and women who have done so much to destroy this country and her people over the last half century, and particularly in the last 13 years, might get their comeuppance, and their project might fail, they will do anything in their power to prevent that.

To prevent it they, together with their apparatchiks and ideological catamites in the controlled media, are combating the threat with a two pronged approach. Firstly they slander and vilify the BNP and anyone who supports them, and secondly they will lie and lie and lie to disguise their own true policies and position.

Be under no illusion, any claim which the shower of crooks and charlatans currently in government or in the two main opposition parties make, suggesting that they will do anything to control immigration into this country or any other western nation, is a lie which will be forgotten and denied the day after the votes are counted.

For a member of any of the main political parties to promise they will do anything about about immigration is no different than a serial rapist claiming he's gone gay and can now be trusted with your daughter, their past actions expose the dishonesty and cynicism of their lie.

Their credibility of those within the LibLabCon troika died with their honour many years ago, and these promises of action are the handkerchiefs behind which they struggle to hide their gross and unappealing nudity.

These are the same multiculturalist zealots and cynical globalists who have spent decade undermining our country and our people, these are the same ideological gangsters who have stolen our history, robbed us of our land and denied our children their heritage. They hate us now no less than they ever did, they have not changed.

They lie out of fear that they may be found our and that their malevolent plans for us may be thwarted. Do not believe them, or you may have a lifetime to regret it.