To Separate or Die?

On the 6^th of November 2012 the real purpose behind mass immigration into America became starkly clear, when the immigrants did what they were imported to do and re-elected an otherwise unelectable American president.

As Ann Coulter points out in here latest article “Demography is Destiny”, had the same nation called America which voted for Ronald Reagan in 1980 voted gone to the polls this month Romney would have won with a bigger landslide than Reagan achieved. In fact more white Americans voted for Romney than they did for Regan.

But America is no longer the same country it was in 1980, and it is one which has changed beyond recognition from the nation which voted John Kennedy into power in 1960.

America was not changed by nature, nor was it changed by evolution and certainly not by the will of its people. America was changed by a series of deliberate political acts, and the intention behind those acts is now clear for anyone to see, as it is now becoming clear throughout Europe, where similar deliberate acts of treason were committed.

Many millions of Americans will have greeted the US election result with a deep sense of sadness and dread for what is to come. There are so many implications to the election result, all of them achingly depressing. That some sixty three million voters would willingly re-elect a leader such as Obama, reveals a heartbreaking truth about what that country and much of the West has become.

And it didn't become that way by accident.

In fairness to many of those whites who voted for the incumbent, I doubt so many would have done so had the media allowed them to know the truth about the most incompetent, dangerous and vindictive president ever to have been elected. Most black voters would still have done so, they voted for his colour, not his record, and Hispanics, easily disproving the naïve claim that they are natural conservatives, voted as they always will for anyone but the white man. Others though may have thought twice had an honest press reported honest facts.

But they didn't. The media long ago gave up reporting truths without an agenda, so they were not told the truth.

Even if the press had told the truth, an act of which they are no longer capable, is doubtful that it would have made much difference, what we see in America today is a vote cast by a constituency which the American left began importing 50 years ago and who will soon make it impossible for a Republican, let alone a white man, to ever again be elected president of the same America which white men once made into the greatest power on Earth.

This, of course was the plan, and if there were any justice left in history, the mouldy corpses of Senator Edward Kennedy, Rep. Emanuel Cellar, Senator Philip Hart and others behind the 1965 Immigrationand Nationality act, which fundamentally changed what it meant to be an American would be dug up and hanged as they should have been at the time. Theirs was a deliberate and traitorous act with genocidal intent, and the deadly fruit of what they planted cast it's votes on November 6th.

The Labour party in Britain committed a similar act when they opened the floodgates to third world immigration believing they were creating an eternally dependant electorate who would deny the Conservatives the ability to ever again win a majority. It will be a bitter sweet irony if future Democrats find themselves losing votes to a la Razza political party in the same way that the Islamic 'Respect' party now challenge Labour in a growing number of Britain’s ghetto cities.

However, it is not all gloomy, in the long run, painful and depressing as this outcome is it may in fact be the first step in bringing about some form of salvation, which a Romney victory might well have delayed.

Mitt Romney is self evidently a very decent, honourable and able man, his running mate, Paul Ryan is also a highly intelligent, honourable and able man, but are they, is anybody, capable of repairing the damage which has been done to America, without the levels of pain, for which no politician would be forgiven?

Whoever takes power after this election will have to bear the consequences of what went before it, and they will be blamed for it. Had Romney won, the corrupt media would have ensured that he was blamed for all the pending disasters already set in place. Unlike Obama who has been permitted to blame his predecessor for all the bad news in his presidency, Romney would be held fully culpable from day one, whilst a defeated Obama would become even more a figure of veneration, portrayed as the saviour denied America by a white racist vote.

This matters because it is almost certain that within the next four years, possibly as soon as within the next few months the crumbling structures currently holding the American economy in place, and with it what social order remains, will collapse and America will face its greatest crisis since the civil war, a crisis which has been building now for 50 years. But which was exacerbated beyond measure during the last presidential term.

Given the election result, it will be Obama who presides over the disaster which is mostly of his own making. When that happens, only the most brainwashed or ideologically deluded will fail to see the truth, the damage which has been done and who did it.

Had Romney won on November 6^th the left would still have a fig leaf behind which to hide.

The Left will not succeed, as we have seen throughout to the twentieth century, it is not capable of succeeding, and the Obama administration will not change America in the manner it seeks to. They are too incompetent and their beliefs and policies too divorced from reality to succeed. However, they are more than capable of destroying the union, and I think they may succeed in that.

Would that be the disaster it at first appears? Across the world Unions and cobbled together nations are breaking up and forming closer more ethnically and culturally homogeneous nation states. Must the United states remain constant and unchangeable?, must it remain united even though parts of the union are no longer America in any form and, as they drown in their diversity, are dragging a great nation under with them.

Look at the US electoral map and between a fragmented blue periphery there is a vast and viable red nation with access to two Oceans* to Canada in the north and Mexico, beyond a border in the south. A Nation where, unlike the disparate blue states, and except in certain pockets, the vast majority of the population share a common culture and ancestry. That is a situation which will not be allowed to persist and should be grasped now before it too is gone.

Many of those now blue states which were once the engines of industry are now so swamped with the third world they are more liabilities than the benefits they once were, and America’s great red heart would thrive better now without them.

Scenic beauty aside, what more than nostalgia would lead anyone to believe the bloated drone which California has become brings benefits to America to equal what it costs? Is even Hollywood a benefit now? Silicone valley can be rebuilt in Utah or South Carolina and thrive without the political correctness and quotas currently stifling it.

California, once the embodiment of the American dream is now the ugly and dependant symbol of everything which has gone wrong with America in the last 50 years. If anyone truly believes that it can be saved, or that America can succeed with such a heavy parasite feeding on its gut, then they are far more optimistic than I.

California is not alone, does America really benefit from sharing nationhood with people quite so stupid as those in Massachusetts who voted for a creature such as Elizabeth Warren?. That little cluster of blue states in the North East, iconic for their early colonial status, are now, in their way, as damaging as California has become. Their liberal majorities crave nothing so much as to become another Sweden. Perhaps it is time to let them go their own way and share the same inevitable fate as that once great European nation.

I am not advocating the death of America, America has already been damaged beyond repair. Like a badly cracked vase, it's parts cling together now more by the power of failing will and a fear of the unknown rather than the cement of ancestry which once built a nation.

Already since November 6^th, over 700,000 Americans, so far mainly in the South, have signed petitions calling for their states to secede from the Union. “Just a spit in the Ocean” when compared to America's three hundred million population, as one left wing commentator sneered on a recent episode of the Late Show. But that 700,000 was achieved in just eight days, and the numbers will inevitably grow as the reality of what happened and the direction America is taking becomes clearer.

America has ceased to be a democracy, as, by entirely artificial means, small sections of the country, with imported and politically manufactured populations are able to defeat the political wishes of the rest of America.

The alternative options are to either to follow the current course into increased diversity, multiculturalism, decline and the Detroitisation of America, or to seek to undo the last 50 years worth of immigration, and send the newly imported Democrat voters home. Options which are either unthinkable or impossible.

Meanwhile there is no point in hoping that blacks and Hispanics will stop voting for their race, because they never will. If white America is to survive and prosper again then it must start to do the same. That could well mean that the only option is to separate or die. There is no Plan B.

Look again at the map, the answer is there, and there is much which can be saved. White America can choose survival or it can choose death, I believe it will choose survival. I pray it will choose survival.

We in Europe may also have to make a similar choice, sooner than many think.

________________

* Following the 2012 election Alaska may be the only Republican state with direct access to the North Pacific, but would the white population of  Oregon and Washington State choose to remain shackled to California is America split?

I suspect within 20 Years of separation the US map would look like this

 

Minority Feelings and Violent Facts

The Following article By John T Bennett appeared yesterday on the American Thinker Website

Minority Feelings and Violent Facts

By John T Bennett

What is the most important thing about mobs of black teens attacking and seriously injuring innocent pedestrians and businesses?  The feelings of teenagers who share the race of the attackers, according to Chicago's local CBS affiliate.

That's right: Mobs of teenagers have unleashed terror in the streets of Chicago and other cities in "flash mobs," and the best thing CBS in Chicago has to say about that is that black teenagers are worried about racial profiling.

George Orwell would shudder after reading this headline: "Some Worry Mob Attacks Are Encouraging Racial Profiling."  In the story, a journalist interviews young black teens hanging out at North Avenue Beach, the scene of one of the mob attacks.  We learn that some in this group "feel targeted as potential troublemakers because of recent attack mobs in the city."  No one is alleging that profiling has occurred as a result of the flash mobs, just that it might, and that possibility bothers some teenagers.  That's the subject matter of an entire news story in our post-racial America.

The subjective opinions of black teens matter as much as those of all other teens.  But do those feelings matter enough to warrant a news story?  Compare the triviality of that story with the full scope of flash mob attacks in Chicago:

In early June, witnesses reported that "gangbangers" were pushing people off their bikes at a Chicago beach.  One witness told NBC local that "[t]hey were being rude and abusive and throwing trash around and defecating" and beating people.  Also, in just one weekend in early June, twelve attacks involving large groups of "young men" were reported.  These attacks in the normally placid North Side gained attention.  The chosen victims: a 68-year-old white doctor, a 34-year-old white insurance salesman, a Thai man, a Filipino nursing student, and a 42-year-old Japanese doctor.  All were either beaten, robbed, or both.  Those arrested: three young black men, a fact we only know because of mugshots since it is the official policy of the Chicago Tribune to censor the race of criminal mobs in its journalism, if not its commentary section. 

These attacks might just seem like fun and games, but now some of the attackers are armed.  In two incidents the first weekend in June, 8 to 15 teens boarded a bus without paying and "began hitting people," according to the Chicago Tribune.  Three of those teens are charged with armed robbery, one with unlawful use of a weapon.  A week later, a boy with no race was attacked by "a group of seven male teens," all "black," according to news reports, and one with a handgun.

There were also flash mob robberies in January 2011 when mobs of teens raided and robbed at least three stores.  In February, Loyola University Chicago warned students and staff about "flash mob offenders" stealing from retail stores near campus.  In April 2011, a group of 70 "youths" invaded a McDonald's and "created a disturbance" according to a news report.  So there is a troubling trend towards mob violence perpetrated by black teens.  Despite all of this, of all the topics CBS Chicago could have chosen, they chose to ruminate about the feelings of young black teens.

The problem with the CBS story is that there will be no corresponding story about victims' feelings.  There certainly will be no similar story about the subjective opinions of non-blacks regarding predominantly black mobs.  It's not just that there is a double standard; it's that there is a suffocating level of deception involved in these news stories.

How did we reach the point where the only group whose feelings need to be consulted are minorities?  Liberalism.  Part of liberalism is the notion that minorities need special help, attention, and heightened sensitivity.  Along with that, liberalism promotes white guilt and the peculiar desire to "help people" at any cost.  The result is that the media gives credence and coverage to mere feelings when real people are being attacked.  Of course, the worse the violence gets, the more sensitive we'll have to be.  The flash mobs and mob attacks will require the utmost sensitivity from us, as they are only going to increase.  They've already occurred in Atlanta, Kansas City, Boston, Nashville, Charlotte, St. Paul, Minnesota, Washington, D.C., Las Vegas, Columbia, South Carolina, and even in Iowa on what was called "beat whitey night."

We face the nightmarish reality of low-level ethnic conflict.  If these violent mob attacks worsen, they will be a precursor to severe racial tension.  These flash mobs already constitute the worst acts of racist violence in recent American history.  Now, how do we go from that reality to a story about black teens' feelings?  The answer is that society has twisted priorities about race and social responsibility.  Given the white guilt saturation that young people receive in our educational system, it's easy to see why the media would give such frivolous treatment to flash mobs.  One of the great successes of modern liberalism is that it has constrained our public debate about racial issues.  A sheep-like media, craven politicians, and thoughtless academics have all failed in their duty to grapple with this social problem.  With enough layers of guilt piled upon us, we can't even see the problem staring us in the face.  The media is creating an atmosphere of passive ignorance towards racial violence, and that ignorance places all of us at risk.

If there was this level of racial tension and violence in a situation where the races were reversed, there would be a nationwide clamor for healing, compensation, and awareness. Instead, we're treated to sappy stories about teenagers' feelings. "Some Worry Mob Attacks Are Encouraging Racial Profiling," says the news. One waits for the article entitled "Some Worry Mob Attacks Are Encouraging Anti-white Violence."

__________________

Click here for the source article with 96 comments

Anybody but a Woman?

By M Catharine Evans

Sarah Palin recently told the media "It's time for a woman to be president." A few weeks before the governor's declaration, HBO'S Bill Maher called Palin a "dumb (expletive deleted)" as part of his comedy routine. After weeks of protest from all sides the National Organization for Women who ignored the hate speech finally issued this statement: "We're on to you, right-wingers. You're trying to take up our time getting us to defend your friend Sarah Palin." And so it goes.

By now it must be clear to most Americans how difficult it will be for a woman to get elected. Hearing the words "Madame President" may still be a long way off, and for proof we only need to look back at Clinton's run in '08 and now Palin's or Michele Bachmann's possible candidacy in 2012. Maybe it's time to take Eric Holder's advice and stop being "a nation of cowards" when it comes to discussing old-fashioned witch-hunting sexism right out of the Malleus Maleficarum playbook.

In a 2008 pre-election appearance Michelle Obama spoke to a crowd of her husband's supporters, the future first lady delighted the group with her malicious attack on Hillary Clinton. Referencing the Senator's inability to keep Bill from straying when he was president Mrs. Obama bitingly suggested that if she can't take care of her own house how can she take care of a country.

Tearing up Clinton became a bipartisan blood sport in 2008. When a female audience member asked Republican Senator John McCain "How do we beat the bitch?" he responded, "That's an excellent question." The exchange received more than a million online hits. Obama adviser Samantha Power told a Scottish newspaper that Hillary was "a monster...she is stooping to anything."

A Facebook group with more than 44,000 members called itself "Hillary Clinton: Stop Running for President and Make Me a Sandwich." Tucker Carlson MSNBC host stated that "there was just something about her [Clinton] that feels castrating, overbearing and scary."

When Clinton tried to cite sexism as the elephant in the room she was chastised by none other than fellow Yalie Camille Paglia and pundit Peggy Noonan. After Senator Clinton told a Washington Post reporter that the "mean-spiritedness and terrible insults" stemmed from "sexist" attitudes and misogyny the two women declared war on the former first lady.

Noonan admitted that the '08 election was quite a conundrum for Democrats. Being labeled "racist" was far worse than being tagged "sexist" with Hillary caught in the middle. Still Peggy couldn't resist pummeling Clinton for playing the sexism card calling it "insulting" and "manipulative." She advised Mrs. Clinton to stop "complaining" as her constant bellyaching would "only reinforce what your supporters already think" and fail to win over any converts.

Paglia went even further in her verbal attacks against Clinton:

Hillary has tried to have it both ways: to batten on her husband's nostalgic popularity while simultaneously claiming to be a victim of sexism....Hillary is positioning herself as the Crucified One, betrayed, mocked, flogged and shunted aside for the cause of ultimate womanhood.


The message from women like Paglia and others? You want to play with the big boys? Then learn to take it like a man. Stop whining, don't talk back, and don't dare play the misogyny card. These Gaddafi-esque female bodyguards who jealously guard the patriarchy they pretend to despise relished the opportunity to claw away at Clinton. On the political correctness scale overt sexism not only scores very low, some of its worst perpetrators are women.

For those worried about academic credentials, it doesn't matter if you have a degree from Yale, University of Idaho, or Oxford the bottom line for both the left and the right is gender. Secretary of State Clinton, Governor Palin, and Congresswoman Bachmann have been called "stupid," "crazy," "cold-hearted," "incompetent," and "whiny" in addition to the more unprintable pornographic terms seen on t-shirts in 2008.

As more and more women battle it out in political contests, the power elites will employ all kinds of special ops to maintain the status quo. Most of all, they must hide their aversion to having a woman in the White House. That takes a lot of pollsters, verbal engineers, and a complicit media. Both parties have demonstrated their willingness to stop a female candidate by any means necessary.

In an online 2009 interview Mark Thatcher, Margaret Thatcher's son, recalled his mother told him a woman would never lead the Conservative Party. It was only due to her right-hand man Airey Neave's "subtle psychological techniques and disinformation" that helped "convince the traditionally chauvinistic Tory MPs to dump the batchelor Heath in favour of a woman." In the end when asked how "his mother had managed, against all the odds, to reach the very top," he said, "She was the best man for the job."

That was the 1970's. Here we are in 2011 and a woman has not been even been nominated for the presidency. Within this political climate as soon as a female tries to get near the highest office, leaders in either party find a way to stop her. Politico reported in October 2010 that top Republican Party leaders "are fixated on the topic" of Sarah Palin, "especially on how to keep her from running or how to deny her the nomination if she does run."

In the past a woman who dared to step out of her strictly enforced social role and challenge the existing order might be burned, hanged, stoned, drowned, or killed in any number of ways. Heck, some still are. But politics requires a bit more finesse.

The political hating is often blanketed in light-hearted "fun" polls, comedy skits, photo-shopped pics, and double entendres. Other times the gloves come off and violent, vicious, sexualized images and slogans appear. The perpetrators cross gender, media, and party lines spewing vile rape, stoning, and incest jokes. With women vying for the top position nothing is off limits.

This kind of female-bashing is not a new phenomenon. Aristotle claimed women were "inferior," Augustine deemed them temptresses, and others questioned whether we just weren't "human." Slugging it out through the witch trials of the Middle Ages right up through the early 20th century we are only 91 years out from getting the vote. Unabashed sexism is still around: pervasive, insidious, and a national shame.

If a woman candidate gets media coverage, it's usually in a polarizing light. In this week's issue of Time Magazine, a constituent in Michele Bachmann's district is quoted as saying she's the equivalent of a "cheerleader -- she can whip up a frenzy but has nothing substantial to say..." He went on to say she would be an "embarrassment" to millions of Republicans.

For a strong woman candidate there appears to be no in-between; either she's castrating and scary or a bimbo. Even Thatcher the Iron Lady had the opposition yelling "Ditch the Bitch." Old misogyny dies hard and the Oval office won't become the ovum office without a fight.

Source

The Special Relationship and Realism

By Tim Haydon

The Real Reason for the End of Britain’s Special Relationship’ with the USA

The ‘Daily Mail; devoted a page of the 12th January edition to an article by Stephen Glover acknowledging the truth of President Obama’s clear attitude that, contrary to decades of Foreign Office Policy, Britain enjoys no special relationship with the USA.

Glover went into some detail about the fawning attitude of Britain towards the USA over the years, including the dog-like devotion of Tony Blair which as he pointed out, at best invites the USA to take this country for granted and at worst earns its contempt. But he did not touch on the real reason for Obama’s contemptuous dismissal of the special relationship idea which saw one of his first acts as President as being the removal of Churchill’s bust from the Oval Office.

Obama realised the true Nature of the ‘Special Relationship’

Obama was at a pains to deny any special relationship with Britain because as he, a black man, was quick to notice what our own Foreign Office, blinded by Political Correctness, failed to, that that relationship when it existed , though said to have been based on WW11 experience, was fundamentally racial and cultural in character.

The USA of course was founded by British people living in the colonies and its first century and more as an independent nation was dominated by ‘Wasps’ (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants). It was common until quite recently for the British to talk of the Americans as ‘our American Cousins’ and even during the credit crunch one could read about ‘Anglo –Saxon ‘ economics.

The ‘Special Relationship’ could not survive Multiculturalism and Multiracialism

Such a relationship is of course totally at variance with the idea of multiculturalism and multiracialism as espoused by Obama and our own political elites. But while the latter failed to notice this so that Gordon Brown could allow himself to snubbed no less than 5 times by Obama, again, the latter did not.

As it is, the racial and cultural affinities between the USA and Britain are fading fast as the mass immigration of third-word aliens transforms both countries. African- Americans and Hispanics now number in excess of 79 millions or 27% of the population of the USA and whites, so Bill Clinton asserted, are set to become a minority by 2050. In Britain of course, the native British are on the same path set by our self-hating political class of traitors.

The end of the ’special relationship’ is also the end of the USA and of Britain as we have known them.

___________

Hat Tip: British Resistance

Update on the Shane McClellan race hate attack

Last year I posted a couple of articles (here and here) regarding the case of white US teen Shane McClellan who was the victim of a vicious race attack during which he was kidnapped, beaten tortured and racially abused. Amazingly, given the racial element of the attack, one of his assailants has been convicted. However, predictably, the US media is struggling to find ways of excusing the brute for his behaviour.

The Following report comes from V-Dare

Guilty in Seattle: Somali Gets Hard Time for Anti-White Attack

By Brenda Walker

I suppose it was something of a victory for sanity and justice that a Somali immigrant was convicted of a hate crime against a white teenager, particularly since the victim was initially doubted by locals. After all, 16-year-old Shane McClellan (pictured) said he had been tortured for hours by two men who had shouted, “The white man has kept us down,” and “This is for enslaving our people.”

A crime like that runs counter to the liberal narrative. Immigrants are highly regarded as a victim group, incapable of racist hate, goes the stereotype.

On the contrary, Somalis residing in America have distinguished themselves as few others have for their extreme anti-social behavior, including gang crime, violent jihadism and constant demands for special treatment for their Islamic practices.

Local media struggled to frame the brutal crime in a way that would exonerate the convicted Somali perp. The Seattle Times chose the booze:

Man sentenced in W. Seattle attack on teen blames it on Four Loko, Seattle Times, January 21, 2011

The Four Loko made him do it.

Ahmed Mohamed, who was sentenced Friday to nearly six years in prison for the attack last year on a West Seattle teen, claimed the caffeine-infused energy beer he drank for the first time the night of the assault was partially to blame.

Continue reading this report at V-Dare by clicking here
__________
Hat Tip: Dr. D

Sarah Palin "America's Enduring Strength"

Sarah Palin: "America's Enduring Strength" from Sarah Palin on Vimeo.

Hate and (Media) Lies in America

The controlled media in America continue to exploit the attempted assassination of Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords at the weekend, during which six people died and a number more were injured. True to type the left have resorted to the politics of the gutter, with the aim of blaming the Tea Party for the shooting and getting a few cheap jibes at Sarah Palin, who they accuse of "creating a climate of hate".

Even Fox News has got in on the act with an attempt to link the shooter, a pot smoking, left wing American flag burner, to American Renaissance, albeit they are rapidly rowing back on that claim as it becomes more obvious that their "evidence" is not what it appears.

However, as usual with the controlled media, what they don't want you to know is covered up, such as the article below, which appeared on the Democrat supporting Daily Kos website just two days before the shooting, showing that, in fact sources on the left were guilty of stirring up feelings against Congresswoman Giffords in the days leading up to the attack.

Click on the image to see a larger version

The day the dollar died

Time for America to prove its enemies wrong

It has long been popular amongst left wing commentators and intellectuals both in Europe within the liberal rim of America, to view the average (white) American, that is to say those living in the bible belt or wider, “fly over” states as being dumb. The liberal media encourages us to laugh like drains at film of Americans questioned randomly in the street, who are unable to identify the location of Iraq, Afghanistan, or even Australia on the map, or who have no idea what country they celebrate becoming independent from on the 4th of July.

The alleged stupidity, racism and general lack of liberal values lurking at America's red heart simultaneously provides the opinion forming Left with both an unending source of hilarity and an army of stereotypes upon which to hang their ideological agendas.

In Europe, we have long become accustomed to watching documentaries filmed in places like Kentucky or Texas, where the locals, who speak in that slow drawl which the media long ago educated us to associate with ignorance and bigotry, have their comments and responses to questions edited and distorted, so that the politically correct interviewer, nodding conspiratorially at the camera, can expose them as ill educated, xenophobic, or, if the narrative requires it, as irredeemably hateful.

The American accent, together with the white South African accent, the German accent and to a lesser extent the Australian are the only accents we remain permitted to mock, and only the American, German and Afrikaner may now (together with upper class English) be reviled.

This, of course, only applies to white people who speak with American, South African or German accents. Colour, plays a huge role in how we have been conditioned to view an accent. For instance, the Southern Belle accent, hailing from places such as Georgia, Alabama and the Carolinas when spoken by a white woman evokes in out Pavlovian minds the frivolous arrogance of privilege, inbred racism, and of course stupidity. Yet, let that same musical voice come from the lips of a black woman and we hear poetry and the deep dignified echoes of a noble soul, perfected so successfully by Maya Angelou, and aspired to somewhat less successfully by Chicago born UK resident Bonnie Greer.

Of course it is a conditioned view, an attitude created by a thousand bad movies and though the constant propaganda pumped into our lives through the Stasi approved thought control device in the corner of most living rooms.

How could a country of stupid people become the richest, the most powerful and most successful nation in the world. Asia and Africa are larger in terms of land mass and population, Africa has more in terms of natural resources and, beneath the Sahara its land is no less fertile, yet for all the millennia of world history Europe alone rivals what America achieved in just four centuries (slightly more than two as an independent nation).

America's enemies point to its military power as the cause of America's greatness, but which came first, and was it military might which invented the aeroplane, the steamboat, the microprocessor, the pacemaker, air conditioning(1), a cure for polio, and put the first man on the moon?. It was not military might which achieved those, and so many other great advances from which we all benefit. It was the American people who achieved them together with the prosperity and comfort which they were able to extend to most of their population and who made the American dream a global aspiration by 1950.

The people who built America were not dumb, and they were not the hicks and hill billies which the obnoxious Bill Maher claims half his country men to be

However, from time to time, even the brightest of people can do some very dumb things, and in November 2008 the American people did something so dumb that it goes some considerable way towards proving true much of what their left wing critics say about them. Except that in this instance, their critics would not have considered what they did to be dumb.

In November 2008, the American people allowed a swooning media to persuade them into voting into the most powerful position on the planet a man with virtually no relevant experience, of whom they knew virtually nothing other than that he attended a fanatically racist church and had some very dubious associations. They entrusted the power to destroy the planet to a man who's career consisted of brief dalliance with the law, a period as a Chicago community organiser and an incomplete term in the US senate, where he had achieved nothing other than a reputation as the “most liberal” senator with one of the worst voting records.

Most people who voted for Barrack Obama knew absolutely nothing about him before he ran for president. The blacks voted for him because he was black, and, to some degree, so too did the whites, they voted for a black man to prove to themselves they were not racist, one of the worst sins in modern America, and because they wanted to believe a promise he never fully quantified.

It is now two year on, and it would take either a moron or a fully committed socialist not to realise what a terrible mistake they made. Not only is Obama clearly not up to the job but his every act and policy runs contrary to the best interests of the Average American and to the future of their nation.

In two day's time those same average Americans go to the polls when they have the opportunity to deliver a verdict on the current administration, and also to do something to make up for the damaging mistake they made in 2008. The polls suggest that the result may be devastating for the president and for his party.

However, nothing is certain until it is done, and there remains the possibility that the American electorate will prove that they are, after all, as dumb as their cynical European enemies and home grown liberal traitors always claimed they were. If their enemies are right, then on Tuesday the American voters could show that the greatness which was America has now been brainwashed and dumbed down to the point where they no longer have either the ability, or the will to save themselves.

There are troubling indicators, a US correspondent of mine wrote at the weekend, incredulous at the fact that some houses still proudly displayed Democrat signs. Commentators on TV have suggested that, despite how little attention the current Administration has paid to the nation's security, the latest security alert could influence events in the Democrat's favour, if Obama pretends to be tough enough.

Yesterday an estimated 150,000 people (or 215,000 if you believe the US media, which some dumb people still do) attended Jon Stewart's “Give Barry a second chance he might get better” rally, menacingly entitled “Rally to Restore Sanity and/or Fear", somehow missing the soviet style implication that anyone who does not agree with the ruling administration must necessarily be insane.

Things could go either way, and the presidents colour, and voter racism, may influence events, but not in the way the liars in the press pretend. We must never underestimate quite how racist the black and Latino electorate in America are or how strongly most white voters wish not to be racist. Whatever, their reasons for voting, they know they are delivering a verdict on America's first black president, can they deliver that verdict or will Obama's colour save him at the last moment?.

In the same way as we have been brainwashed about Americans, they also have been brainwashed about themselves. These are, alter all, a people who still believe that racism is a white on black affair, despite all the evidence around them, that lie could still win the day.

That fact, more than the inevitable mass voter fraud by the Democrats and lies the media will surely tell is the greatest threat in Tuesday's election.

America faces the greatest test they have faced in generations will they finally act against the forces determined to destroy them or is all too late?. In just over 48 hours we will know if America can still be saved, or if its people truly are as stupid as their enemies always said they were.


________________________________

(1) Contrary to the Black Inventions Myth that an African American called Frederick Jones invented air conditioning in 1949, in fact a white man Dr. Willis Carrier built the first machine to control both the temperature and humidity of indoor air. He received the first of many patents in 1906 (US patent #808897, for the "Apparatus for Treating Air"). In 1911 he published the formulae that became the scientific basis for air conditioning design, and four years later formed the Carrier Engineering Corporation to develop and manufacture AC systems.

A Danger for America

In the lead up to next Tuesday's Mid Term elections in the USA, American readers might wish to take note of this cautionary posting at The American Thinker.

The Democrats' Final Recourse: Massive Vote Fraud

By Selwyn Duke

The reports are rolling in from all over the country. A Craven County, NC resident attempts to vote a straight Republican ticket, but his choices come up straight Democrat four times, despite receiving assistance from poll workers. In NC's Lenoir County, registered Democrat Ervin Norville also tries to vote straight Republican but finds that his ballot has the names of several Democrat candidates selected. Boulder City, NV resident Joyce Ferrara says that when she and several others went to vote for Sharon Angle, they found that Senator Harry Reid's name was already checked off. In Dallas County, TX's congressional district 30, Democrat Eddie Bernice Johnson's name was the only one on the ballot in a few locations (no, she isn't running unopposed). And some states have been late in mailing out military absentee ballots, whose recipients, interestingly, are known for their Republican leanings.

These happenings are generally referred to as "mistakes" and "glitches," but if that's all they are, then we're witnessing a truly historic anomaly. Because either the mainstream media is now suppressing stories of mistakes and glitches benefiting Republicans, or the laws of probability have suddenly been rescinded and tossed coins are coming up donkey tails every time. Welcome to American elections, Venezuelan style.

Click here to continue reading at the American Thinker

The New American Depression

When the news pundits tell us that unemployment in America is at around 9.5%, what they don't tell us is, were the figures calculated in the same way as they are in Europe, the current figure would be closer to twice that number, especially in certain areas, such as California .

The official figures are based on those who are in receipt of unemployment benefit, however, unemployment benefits are only available for a set period of between 26 weeks up to one year, after that, they are classified as "Discouraged" and therefore no longer counted as seeking employment, whether they are or not.

Last year, because of the current financial situation Congress took the unprecedented step of extending unemployment to 99 weeks, at a cost of over $100 billion. However, time has now passed and many people are reaching the end of the 99 weeks with no prospect of a job and facing the abyss.

Click here to watch a report by the CBS 60 Minutes show which looks at the plight of those people.

Pan Atlantic Show trials - Part Two

Early last year I wrote an article entitled “Blood Sacrifice Denied”, in which I reported on the outcome of the trial of two white American teenagers charged with the racially motivated killing of a Mexican illegal immigrant. At the time I expressed the view that the verdict, both boys were acquitted of all charges, including murder and “ethnic intimidation” but convicted of simple assault, sat fairly with the evidence given in court, whilst denying a blood sacrifice to satisfy the various race hate groups and anti white media pundits who had laid siege to the court throughout the trial.

In saying this I had underestimated the vindictiveness and racism of the current US Department of Justice which, despite the jury’s verdict proceeded to bring federal civil rights charges against the two young men.

As a result, last week the race hate groups, such as the Hispanic “La Raza” (The Race) who had stood pumping the air with their fists outside the court, got what they wanted when Derrick Donchak and Brandon Piekarsky were convicted of what the media is predictably choosing to call a “hate crime”.

However, as evidence of the lengths to which the US department of Justice were prepared to go in order to obtain a conviction against Donchak and Piekarsky it should be noted that they have, in fact been convicted under a statute of the Federal Fair Housing act.

The particular statute in question makes it a crime to “use a person’s race, national origin or ethnicity as a basis to interfere, with violence or threats of violence, with a person’s right to live where he chooses to live”

One can only assume that this charge was based on the fact that one of the people involved in the two part brawl which led to Luis Ramerez death, not incidentally one of those convicted, told Ramerez to “go back to Mexico". A statement which, given that Ramerez was an illegal immigrant amounts to little more than advising a law breaker to stop breaking the law. How exactly does telling an illegal immigrant to return to his homeland differ from telling a robber to stop robbing?

This was an outrageous act on the part of the US Department of Justice, who, as you may recall recently dropped a case of illegal voter intimidation against the New Black Panther party, after the case had in fact been won. The DOJ under arch Obama crony Eric Holder have reacted in a manner which would be unthinkable had the races been reversed, as is so often the case, merely to placate left wing activists and illegal alien support groups.

Furthermore, for no other reason than pure visceral racial bias, have chosen to disregard the patent fairness of the original jury’s verdict.

The details of the incident during which Ramerez died, strongly mitigate against the original charge of murder and despite one statement, made by a third party, provide no conclusive evidence of racial bias on the part of either defendant, but, hey why let facts get in the way of a good “hate crime” prosecution?

Although there are some differences in the witness statements, they agree on the following:

• The defendants were part of a group, who had been drinking and who came across 25 year old Ramerez alone in a park with his girlfriend’s 13 year old sister.
• The group asked Ramerez what he was doing and this led to a brawl, during which the “Go back to Mexico" comment was made.
• The brawl ceased and the group of white boys began to walk away leaving Luis Ramerez in a sufficiently fit and uninjured state to make a number of cell phone calls.
• Ramerez then pursued the group of white boys and charged at them thus initiating a further brawl. It was during this second brawl that one of the group of white boys (again, not one of the defendants) punched Ramerez causing him to fall and hit his head on the sidewalk (pavement).

Forensic evidence confirmed that Ramerez’s injuries were consistent with a moving head colliding with a stationary object rather than by a moving object colliding with a stationary head as would have been the case had death resulted from kicks to the head as the prosecution alleged. (a more detailed account can be found in this excellent article )

The defendants were correctly convicted of assault during a drunken brawl, albeit they could have claimed that there was a significant degree of provocation on the part of Luis Ramerez.

However, it is inconceivable that a fair trial, as averse to this flagrant travesty of justice, would find that the evidence as produced in court supported either the charges or indeed the conviction.

Also explained in the report I linked to above, there are also questions as to the basis of the Federal Civil Rights charges which were brought, given that civil rights only apply to American citizens and not to illegal aliens, consequently Ramerez had no civil rights to be violated.

However, irrespective of technicalities, this was clearly a show trial leading to a demonstrably unjust outcome. Despite the contrived nature of this prosecution the boys could face life in prison, and that is certainly the sentence which the racists running the US Department of Justice will be pressing for.

Vast swathes of the American public have been bullied and brainwashed to the point where many may no longer be capable of feeling outrage on behalf of white males involved in conflict with non-whites irrespective of the circumstances.

However, in the highly unlikely event that the case were truthfully and fairly reported it should cause all Americans considerable concern at the degree to which the rights of that nations last remaining unprotected group have been eroded by the forces of progressive hatred.

Mexican Logic

A coalition of Mexican mayors has asked the United States to stop deporting illegal immigrants who have been convicted of serious crimes in the U.S. to Mexican border cities, saying the deportations are contributing to Mexican border violence.

The request was made at a recent San Diego conference in which the mayors of four Mexican border cities and one U.S. mayor, San Diego Mayor Jerry Sanders, gathered to discuss cross-border issues.

Ciudad Juarez Mayor Jose Reyes blamed U.S. deportation policy for contributing to his city's violence, saying that of the 80,000 people deported to Juarez in the past three years, 28,000 had U.S. criminal records -- including 7,000 convicted rapists and 2,000 convicted murderers.

Effectively the mayors are blaming Mexican crime levels on the fact that America is sending a few of the vast numbers of Mexican criminals illegally entering America back home.

Quite incredible!

Full news report

Obama and Holder taking on Arizona's Immigration Law

Go here to comment or rate this video

Oakland Blacks react to BART verdict

Discarded pictures of shooting victim Oscar Grant lie in the street next to a pair of trainers dropped by a fleeing looter

Click here to watch film of the black community of Oakland California reacting to an earlier jury verdict whereby a police officer had been found guilty of involuntary manslaughter in a contentious trial.

The violence was actively incited by "new" (sic) sources such as CNN who reported the case such provocative statements such as:

A former police officer who is white was found guilty of involuntary manslaughter Thursday in the killing of an unarmed black man

and:

Members of the jury, which included no African-Americans, said they were unanimous in their decision.

They got the reaction they were hoping for with the violent riots which followed the verdict, but then, in accordance with their standard practice, proceeded not to report the looting which always accompanies black protests, leaving this to the local and the foreign media.

I will not go into the rights and wrongs of the specific case, the policeman claimed he had intended to use a teaser on the victim but accidentally drew his gun, the jury believed him, the crowd wanted the blood of a white man and would have rioted whatever the verdict.

However the hypocrisy is shocking. Week after week we read of horrific acts of violence against white people, often policemen. 90 US policemen have died in the line of duty so far in this year alone (up from 70 in the same period last year) overwhelmingly they are white, and overwhelmingly their killers are black.

The media go to great lengths to hide the race of non-white criminals and even when they can't hide it the fact that the victim is white and the perpetrator black is hardly commented on. More white Americans have been murdered by black Americans since the Civil Rights period than the total number if US soldiers killed in Korea, but where are the protests? where are the angry editorials? where is the looting?.

To add insult to injury, we now here that the US Attorney General Eric Racebaiter, (pictured above) plans to carry out a federal investigation into the trial presumably because he and his boss do not consider the sentence severe enough. Of course, they would rather stick red hot needles into their eyes than they would investigate a "too lenient" sentence in a black perpetrator / white victim case.

this happens just after it has been revealed that under Racebaiter's control, the US Department of Justice will not be pursuing civil rights cases against blacks where the victims are white.

The current US Administration now no longer cares how obvious its blatant racism has become, it believes that nobody will dare even mention it.

Modern American Racists

Members of the New Black Panthers intimidating voters during the 2008 US Presidential Election

When film appeared following the 2008 US election day vote clearly showing members of the black supremacist New Black Panthers threatening voters outside a Philadelphia polling station, there appeared to be very compelling evidence of voter intimidation which is a criminal offense. The outgoing Bush administration certainly thought so, as they launched a prosecution.

Many were surprised, therefore, when the new US Attorney general Eric Holder (pictured above) announced that current US administration had dropped that prosecution.

When J Christian Adams, an Official at the US Department of Justice resigned earlier this year, accusing the administration of dropping the case as a result of racial bias it will have added to the growing suspicions many people now have about the racist attitudes of those currently running the United States of America.

These suspicious are shared by black Conservative commentator Eric Rush, who's excellent article on the subject I have pasted below:
__________________________________________

Barack Obama: Racist in chief

For months, Americans have been treated to wanton accusations of racism in the public square regarding our wish to secure our border with Mexico and misgivings vis-à-vis the Obama administration's handling of the Islamic terrorist threat, to name just two.

Now, we bear witness to an instance of racism and racial double standard on the part of this president and his administration that surpasses the surreal: This week, former Justice Department attorney J. Christian Adams testified before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights that the administration ordered attorneys in the Civil Rights Division to ignore cases involving black defendants and white victims. Adams further asserted that the department, headed by Attorney General Eric Holder, contrived to drop charges against members of the New Black Panther Party stemming from an incident of voter intimidation in 2008, a slam-dunk case over which Adams ultimately quit in disgust.

To American progressives and the establishment press (which has been complicit in every seditious machination devised by Barack Obama and his minions) the contention that our president and this administration are racists is practically incomprehensible – but that is precisely where I am going. Although it still eludes those who are either dedicated Obamanoids or profoundly dim, our president's antiwhite, anti-Christian, anti-American and anti-Semitic sentiments have been painfully evident for some time. The New Black Panther Party case is just the cherry on the topping.

Erik Rush's brand-new book is bold, daring and needed: "Negrophilia: From Slave Block to Pedestal - America's Racial Obsession"

While Justice contended that the Civil Rights Division determined that "the facts and the law did not support pursuing claims" in the New Black Panther case, and that it is "not uncommon for attorneys with the department to have good-faith disagreements about the appropriate course of action" in certain cases, Adams' claims and aggregate testimony bear out as well as clarify the tenor of the Holder Justice Department. This retrograde, black-nationalist comportment is the worst sort of policy held to by an administration since the days of segregation.

In short, it is abject racism.

Although this is part and parcel of the perverse racial sensibilities advanced by the political Left over the last several decades, its expanse and depth of insinuation have become nothing short of astounding. I have asserted previously that Obama gets a pass on account of this because he is black, but even astute observers didn't expect it to go this far. There is not one traditional national news outlet that is covering this atrocity, and, if they are forced to, there's little doubt that they will brand Adams a shill for the GOP and Fox News.

I suppose that such odious standards ought not be surprising coming from a man who spent 20 years listening to the bigoted ranting of a racist, anti-American pastor (in the personage of Rev. Jeremiah Wright), but the absolute refusal of the establishment press to acknowledge this phenomenon indicates that we have a larger long-term problem with them than we do with Obama. His decades-long dedication to radically subverting the very idea of America has manifested in congruent deeds. His actions (and inactions), which have exacerbated every difficulty that has presented itself, his racism, appeasement of our enemies and de facto abdication of his constitutional duties should have between 75 percent and 90 percent of Americans taking to the streets, screaming for his impeachment. Yet, they are not, largely because the Fourth Estate has become the fifth column.

One thing at a time, however.

I am quite certain that there will be a great deal of resistance, even on the part of Obama detractors, to pursue this issue to its logical conclusion. Even if the press is compelled to do its job regarding the Justice Department's criminal conduct, it is unlikely that the ripples will reach the White House. There are two reasons for this. One: That is the way this administration operates. Attorney General Holder will be sacrificed before Obama is implicated, even though it is evident that this administration is rife with racist, anti-American communists all the way to the top.

Two is that there are too many forces in play who are terrified of our president crashing and burning, even among those who detest him. If he is voted out in 2012, that's one thing, but if our celebrated "first black president" is forced to resign in shame – that is a completely different matter. Not only would every far-left faction mobilize en masse, but even more moderate rank-and-file black Obama supporters would be enraged. It would be perceived as the final "racist affront" of a white establishment that has already been demonized to the degree that many blacks perceive America to be as institutionally racist as it was five decades ago.

The long and short? We're stuck with a racist president. Well, we've survived those before; it's Obama's intention to transform our nation into a cross between China and Venezuela that I'm more concerned about.

________
Source

Sad Thoughts on American Independence Day 2010

By Dr. D

As I write this, it is the afternoon of July 4th, 2020, American Independence Day once again. I have seen many such celebrations come and go, and there is a definite change that has taken place over the years.

When I was very young, the US was embroiled in WW II, and Independence Day was observed with a sort of grim determination, reminding everyone that we were at war. It was a war that had to be won, we simply could not afford to loose that war. That war was won, and the Allies began the process of rebuilding themselves and the conquered nations of the Axis as well. Almost immediately they found themselves in the Cold War, the seemingly endless battle of wits with the Soviet Union and Red China. There was the idea that communism must be physically “contained.” This led to the Korean War, and later to the Vietnamese War.

Attitudes toward support for war were changing in the US throughout this period. During WW II, as far as I can tell, there was 100% support for the war effort. I am unable to find anyone who dissented, although people tell me that there were some. They must have been very few in number. By the time of the Korean War, Americans were war weary, and it was harder to generate support. Even so, they went, and there was very little objection or lack of support. I was personally familiar with a number of young men who were sacrificed to this war.

When the Vietnam War came around, there was much less support for the war. The way that American involvement was begun was considered by many to be illegitimate, with no clear entry point, but by having Americans simply serving as field advisors to the South Vietnamese Army who gradually got the US sucked into the battle. There was much question about why America should be involved, what US interests were in this area, and just why America should be expending lives there. Particularly on college campuses, the war was rather soundly rejected, and those who supported it were ostracized for their support. It was not seen as a matter of patriotism to support the Vietnamese War, but as simply war mongering. Of course, many of those doing the ostracizing were not very clear on the concept of patriotism either.

The military draft was ended and an all volunteer military was created which was supposed to solve many problems. Perhaps it did solve some, but it meant that the military now tended to come primarily from the segments of society that were otherwise unable to get ahead in life. They did put in place some educational requirements, but they have tended to look the other way on those requirements at times when recruitments have been difficult to achieve. This has led to a surge in number of minorities and women in the military, neither of them being good for the long term effectiveness of the military. This has been the US military that operated in Desert Storm in Kuwait in the early 1990s and again now in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Throughout this whole period, American education has been under a process of transformation, beginning in the 1960s. Prior to that time, American education had been heavily fact based, focusing the attainment of necessary skills and reasoning ability, with rather tight discipline in the school classrooms. This is not to imply that students were beaten or abused, but there was no foolishness in class; school was about learning, not acting out fantasies. There was little if any concern for “social promotion.” One great advantage, however, was that there were no special needs children in the classroom; they were provided for in separate facilities.

Beginning in the 1960s and continuing today, there was a move to integrate all children into the classroom, including the most disabled and disruptive right along with the well behaved and advanced students. This was thought to be “fair,” in the sense that it taught each of the students to get along with all of the others, both brighter and not so bright as themselves. The fact that it played havoc with the learning process was just passed over lightly. There were many other innovations in the way mathematics would be taught, Marxism would be worked into the curriculum through social studies and several other places, the study of traditional English literature would be gradually discarded in favor of contemporary authors with a Marxist flavor, etc.

One particularly critical area is that of history that would be gradually re–written to completely re–invent the history of our nation. Instead of the glorious true history of a modern nation carved from the wilderness which I was taught, today’s young people are taught that the nation was well developed already by peaceful, nature–loving native peoples who were slaughtered like animals at a packing house. With regard to the native American Indians, the truth is that many were killed fighting the white man just as they had traditionally fought among themselves. They were nomadic peoples, with the exception of the pueblo Indians, and they did little or nothing to develop North America. This is why, even as late as the early 20th century, there was new land to be broken, arable land that had never been plowed. The America built by white people has provided unparalleled opportunity for all of the people of North America, including the native American Indians and the American Blacks. What is taught, however, is that America is a land of oppression for these peoples, a place where they continue to suffer. This is true, to some extent, because they have been given the opportunity and encouraged by some to develop a mentality of entitlement, rather than seize the opportunity to work and achieve. Those who have worked have done well, but those who have felt entitled do suffer because there are never enough government handouts to satisfy them.

So our history has been corrupted in the mind of our young people, and many of our young people even disavow their own history. Too many of them do not even begin to know it. One of the popular late night comics, Jay Leno, has demonstrated this in a devastating way with some public interviews shown in this video: http://tinyurl.com/28e3cto

As Leno’s video shows, the minorities do not know American history, with the exception of the older black man. But even the white people do not know it either. These people with no sense of the history of this country certainly cannot claim any real sense of ownership of the country. It seems likely that this is why they have no objection to the vast hoards of illegal aliens streaming across the southern boarder. For these people, those aliens are not taking anything that belongs to them. These people do not see that they have a stake in America. America has never really belonged to these people at all.

Being much older, I do not see it in that way. I know where my family started out in the western Carolinas in the late 1700s, worked their way across Tennessee and Alabama in the early 1800s, and eventually wound up in south Texas by the time the Civil War ended. I know that my great–grandfather was a Superintendent on the King Ranch in south Texas and I know where my grandfather farmed and worked for the railroad. I have tried to pass this sense of ownership on to my children, the idea that we are Americans because our people came to this land and helped to build it into what it is today. Our blood is in this soil, and our bones will be in it some day soon. This is our land; it belongs to no one else.

The evidence seems to be that we are losing this land simply because we have not passed on the idea that it is ours. We have not taught the true history of America, but have allowed a pack of lies to be taught instead. We have not instilled a sense of ownership in our people, an understanding that it is up to each and every one of us to maintain this country. Our people think of the country as belonging to “them” and that everything is controlled by “them.” They fail to realize that “them” is actually “us,” that we the people are the ones who control this country. So they have no sense of ownership, so sense of wanting to protect what is their own. This country belongs to “them.” If we cannot turn this around, we have lost the battle.

Obama's Monstrous Regiment

If anyone was in any doubt, following the appointment of Sonia Sotomayor to the US Supreme Court, that Obama had an unfriendly agenda, will have been disabused of that doubt by the nomination of Solicitor General Elena Kagan to replace the retiring Justice John Paul Stephens.

After having first appointed a Hispanic feminist with a history of racist judgement and anti (white) male rhetoric, Obama now seeks to foist another radical feminist on the American public, this time one with a very unfriendly attitude towards the free speech provisions of the First Amendment to the US Constitution.

Elena Kagan is, of course, also politically correct right to the tips of her wide fitting pumps and served as White House Council during the Clinton administration. However, it is her attitude towards free speech and her writings on the subject which will give many pause for thought, Whilst a tenured professor at University of Chicago Law School she published amongst other things a law review article on the "Regulation of Hate Speech”, which she linked with pornography in the manner with which a dishonest politicians will link an agenda driven issue with an otherwise unconnected but emotive subject, so as to merge the two concepts in the public mind.

(We await the “Love immigration hate paedophiles” initiative with bated breath)

In this she wrote”"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."

Correct me if I am wrong, but isn't the vital importance of protecting free speech amplified when that speech goes against the popular orthodoxies of the day?

Of perhaps greater interest was "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," an article Kagan also wrote whist at Chicago. Obama's power base, discussing governmental regulation of speech in general. In that article Kagan went further and argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or indeed to the government.

Once can imagine Stalin nodding with approval at such an assertion

Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens,which chillingly states: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."

The US Supreme Court is the highest judicial court in America, it is the final appellate court, its decisions can impact upon US society and beyond for generations.

The fact that Obama's first two nominations for the Supreme court have been such extreme examples of radical feminist, anti male any white pro-affirmative action anti free speech repressive political correctness tells us as much about him and his mission as it does about these two rather unpleasant women.