By Tim Haydon
‘No Part of this book may be reproduced in any form … The only exception is by a reviewer, who may quote excerpts in a review’. So runs the first page of ‘White Girl Bleed A Lot’, the explosive book by the award-winning American Journalist, Colin Flaherty.
As this is a Review, here is an Extract:
‘Race riots are back.
‘Along with widespread racial crime and violence.
‘In hundreds of episodes in more than 50 cities since 2010, groups of black people are roaming the streets of America – assaulting, intimidating, stalking, threatening, vandalizing, stealing, shooting, stabbing, even raping and killing.’
Flaherty makes this point by detailing many of these episodes. One
of his chief complaints is that they aren’t normally reported by the
media, not in the national media or even in the local media in the
cities or areas where they occur. Or if they are, the story is that
there was nothing much to worry about because
‘Flash mobs, young people, gangs, people with no direction or good parents, they did it’
But as for race? Nobody knew nuttin about nuttin’ see?’
Or if they did, it was ‘racist’ to mention it.
For example, a sopping wet journalist apologist for black violence, one Emily Guendelsberger
was seriously hurt when a black crowd of thousands roamed Philadelphia
(where the previous two years had seen dozens of episodes of racial mob
violence, all with same characteristics).
In the Guendelsberger incident they had descended on ‘an urban
enclave of upscale bars and restaurants and shops with mayhem on their
minds. Running through the streets, assaulting people in restaurants,
stealing their phones and purses, pulling people off bicycles, and
always violence, lots of violence.’
But it wasn’t racist violence when they attacked Guendelberger
because her brown boyfriend was also assaulted, although’ not as badly
as she was. This ‘proved’ her point that race had nothing to do with it. Anyone who thought differently was ‘racist’ and ‘creepy,’ she said.
A Racist Fact
Several on-line commentators wondered why she couldn’t acknowledge
the racial component of the mob. Replied one: ‘Unless you’re pointing
that out to show how whites have oppressed blacks, acknowledging that
fact is racist.’
They weren’t riots – some other description is used – and/or they were ‘traditional’.
Thus in Peoria, Illinois, once a byword for middle America (hence the famous phrase, ‘will it play in Peoria?) when on the 4th of July a black mob of thousands in a housing ‘project’
(ie publically owned housing estate) blocked a fire truck’s access to a
fire and threw exploding, industrial –type fireworks and bottles at
police and firemen; when 60-70 African-American youths marched down one
of the side streets to the 4-lane main drag, yelling threats to white
residents, such as ‘we need to kill all the white people around here’;
when 20 black women threw rocks at houses and attacked a man, according
to the information officer, these were not race riots because as
Flaherty puts it, ‘the people doing the rioting did not say it was. Or something like that.’
The police had to fire nearly 200 pepper balls in order to gain
control of the crowd and ‘every officer said pretty much the same thing –
that it was chaotic and like a riot….every officer received bruises and
burn marks.’ But the Police Information Officer said that ‘Revellers
there have traditionally held private fireworks displays on the fourth
and previously made targets of the police and passers by’.
A Beef about this Book
Oh. ‘Revellers’ attacking the police and passers by is traditional. So that’s all right then. As Flaherty says, ‘I say rioters. You say revellers.’ ‘But’, Flaherty goes on, ‘the video tells another story’. And here we have a beef about this book.
In the absence of news reports, or truthful ones, Flaherty backs up
his undeniable case that there are widespread black-instigated race
riots in the USA by referring to videos on You Tube and
elsewhere on the internet which tell the real story. (How the power of
the internet is undermining the lies and distortions of the traditional
MSM!!!!). But until you buy the book you are unlikely to find this out,
which is a great shame. As is stated in the opening pages, ‘Because links to videos and pictures are such an important part of this book, this book is best viewed on E-reader.’
Never mind though. Such is such is the power of the rata-tat-tat of
so many incidents of shocking proportions detailed all over the USA,
representing untold numbers of others, that one puts up with the
inconvenience of finding the videos in question on line. But be warned.
Attacking the Weak
Flaherty identifies a disturbing characteristic of these riots. They
focus on the weak. Lone White Men, Women, Gays and others. The
upscale Philadelphia area mentioned above is a favourite of Gays. While
the White weak are especially at risk, others also suffer. South
Philadelphia High School is 70% black and 18 % Asian (In USA terms this
means mostly orientals like Chinese, Vietnamese etc)
A Department of Justice report found that a
contingent of largely black school officials dismissed ignored and even
encouraged attacks on Asian students by Black students.
For years, Black students systematically beat and harassed Asian
students on a daily basis. In December 2009, 30 Asians were attacked
sending 13 of them for emergency treatment. School officials told local
news outlets that the attacks were in no way racial. The (mostly
black) school authorities handed pamphlets to the Asians instructing them how to avoid antagonising their black schoolmates with racist behaviour - !!!
A Descriptive, not an Explanatory Book
Flaherty does not intend this book to be explanatory. He merely
presents a picture of what is happening. But explanations for the
explosion in race riots are implicit. In particular there is the power
of modern communications. Not only does the Internet carry reports and
videos of the race riots which the liberals who run the newspapers and
TV and Radio Channels choose to ignore, downplay, minimise or
misrepresent, but the riots including the black flash mobs which are
terrorising and robbing the citizenry, stores and restaurants of the USA
are organised using their new social networking tools such as Twitter and Facebook.
Modern communications which have enabled tendencies to crystallise in
mob form are probably at least part of the explanation as to why these
phenomena have surfaced in recent years in such spectacular fashion.
The same thing happened with the Riots in Britain recently.
Moral Collapse and the Victim Culture
Other implied causes include the malign and manifold influences of
the post-1960’s moral collapse (eg illegitimacy among blacks is now
70%.) Then there is the growth of the victim culture which has been
encouraged by guilt–ridden liberal /left whites and which has fostered a
sense of grievance and entitlement. This is despite the fact that blacks in America have been favoured over whites for nearly half a century with ‘quotas,
set–asides, lower standards for blacks, training reserved for blacks,
efforts to recruit blacks not matched by efforts to recruit whites,
race-norming of tests, banding and recentering.’ (Michael Levin, ‘Why Race Matters’, 2005, P232).
Left/Liberal ‘Anti-Racism’ Denies, Excuses and Encourages Black Wrong Doing
Linked with the victim culture is the tolerance of black wrong-doing
which Flaherty decribes. It is born of the belief that it is the
product of social ie white ‘oppression’. Obviously, if you
have a weak personal moral compass in a secular environment where right
and wrong are relative, are told that you are oppressed and that your
bad behaviour is the fault of others, you will find no great internal
impediment to indulging in that same bad behaviour. As for external
constraints; these are non-existent for all practical purposes. White
leftist /liberals will excuse your behaviour and hysteria about ‘racist’
thinking, will help you to get away with it. Somehow leftists /
liberals excuse it on racial grounds whilst at the same time managing
to deny that it has anything to do with race.
Poverty is to blame? Not Really
A further implicit reason, often quoted by leftists, is ‘poverty’.
But poverty is not of itself a cause of criminal behaviour. Nor is the
gap between rich and poor. Crime was virtually non-existent by modern
standards in England and Wales in the early 20th century although there
was widespread poverty and the gap between rich and poor was infinitely
higher than it is today. (In 1921 there were 103,000 recorded crimes,
pop. 37,886,689; In 2001 there were 5,200,000 recorded crimes, pop.
53,137,000. Quoted by Peter Hichens, 2003 p 14: A Brief History of Crime).
If in general Blacks, who have been the beneficiaries of the racial discrimination (‘affirmative action’) in their favour for generations as noted above have not heaved themselves out of ‘poverty’,
this is because use with a mean IQ of 85 (Whites 100) and other
characteristics they are not capable of anything else and have only
themselves to blame.
It’s Easier to Blame Whitey than to confront the Truth
This though is an uncomfortable fact that blacks would for
understandable reasons rather not confront, preferring to blame Whitey.
Whitey of course, or its cringing, dominant left-liberal political
class, is only too happy to agree with this fiction. (Who are Blacks
going to blame when Whites are in a minority in the USA? The Jews?).
Other ethnic minorities though, such as the Jews (also heavily
discriminated against historically) and the East Asians whom Blacks are
inclined to torment and who started off in the USA in the 19th Century
as indentured labourers with a social standing not much above slaves, do
very well socio-economically. In any case, the poverty of Blacks is
entirely relative, consisting of a standard of living which would be
thought of as great wealth by most of the world’s population.
The Black Poor will always be with us and so will Black Resentment and Violence - if Liberals do not see Reason
Jesus said ‘the poor are always with us’.
And because on average they lack the intellectual wherewithal and other
personal characteristics necessary to succeed in a modern economy,
blacks in general will always be poor, relatively speaking. Or, if you
like, the poor will always include a hugely disproportionate number of
blacks.
Thus in the unlikely event that they learn to accept the realities of
their condition, as we all have to, there will always exist a capacity
for black resentment of more successful ethnic groups and so black
violence. Lies and excuses on their behalf will only succeed in
deepening their frustration and distress.
The racially -determinedl socio-economic hierarchies that naturally
develop in racially mixed societies with all their attendant social
stresses is one of the key arguments against the existence of such
societies.
