Tuesday 30 June 2009

More murder and torture in South Africa

I have updated the total number of victims of the ongoing genocide of white South African farmers to 3,061, to include the tragic death of 57 year old Eben Coetzee, shot to death when he and his wife Suretta were attacked at their small holding in Vanderbijlpark on June 24th.

The following day the Pretorius family from Katboschfontein, near Delmas survived a traumatic ordeal, when Wynand and Lydia Pretorius, together with two of their children, Mrs Pretorius's 72 year old mother and a family friend were held captive and tortured with boiling water. Full story here

NB: It should be noted that the tally I am keeping relates only to attacks on a specific group of white South Africans, those living on farms and smallholdings in rural areas, mostly Afrikaner speaking Boers. It does not include the thousands of town dwelling white South Africans who have also been murdered, and thousands more, of both sexes, who have been raped, as part of the massive crime wave which has gripped the country since the ANC took power in 1994.

Although the urban whites are also officially the victims of "crime", very many of them were also tortured in their final hours with a level of brutality suggesting other motives, and few could argue with any credibility that the genocidal attacks on South Africa's white population have not extended beyond the farming community. The tragic fact is that, were I to count urban white victims, the figure I would have to quote would be at least double of what it currently stands at.

Monday 29 June 2009

An Open Letter of Protest to Dr Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury

An Open Letter of Protest to Dr Rowan Williams, Archbishop of Canterbury, Concerning his Advice that Electors not Vote for the British National Party (BNP) in the European Elections to be held on 4th June 2009.

By Frank Ellis (written 27th May 2009)

Dear Dr Williams

I am writing to you to protest about your recent remarks in which you advised electors not to vote for the British National Party (BNP) in the forthcoming elections to the European Parliament.

The BNP is a properly constituted and law-abiding political party registered with the Electoral Commission of the United Kingdom. The core programmes of the BNP are rational, wholesome, morally sound and desirable. As such, and in the complete absence of any evidence to show that the BNP and its members are engaging in any unlawful activity whatsoever, I construe your advice to electors as direct and wholly unwarranted interference in the electoral process of the United Kingdom. Your statement was a clear ideological act – it had nothing to do with Christ’s teaching - in which you sought to exploit your position as head of the Church of England in order to undermine a political party engaging in proper and lawful activity.

The grotesque and by now well documented abuses of expenses perpetrated by Members of Parliament are, in fact, directly linked to the mass invasion of this country by legal and illegal immigrants and the vicious, anti-white, racist ideology of multiculturalism. Can politicians who have so relentlessly and consistently plundered the public purse over so many years and who have writhed and prevaricated in an attempt to escape censure when their porcine greed has been exposed in all its revolting ugliness be relied upon to tell the truth about the consequences for the United Kingdom of mass immigration? The answer is that far too many politicians are serial liars: and their lies are too obvious.

Politicians of the two main parties have endlessly lied about the consequences of mass immigration. Diversity is not a blessing: it is a curse. The racial, cultural and physical dispossession of the white indigenous population of the United Kingdom is not something I intend to celebrate. It fills me with dread, loathing and disgust: dread because I fear for the future of white people, my people, my land; loathing because of the way in which the prosperous, white, middle classes have betrayed their country; disgust because of the moral and intellectual cowardice of too many people who know perfectly well what is happening but stay silent. Public-sector agencies and all levels of our education system are full of such people.

Your view that the BNP’s “core ideology is about sowing division in our communities and hostility on grounds of race, creed and colour” typifies the Goebbels-style propaganda and organised lying to which any person or political party that objects to multiculturalism is routinely subjected. I see no evidence that you - or for that matter the rather confused John Sentamu - have ever given any consideration to the possibility that multiculturalism, based as it is on sentimental, wilfully ignorant and blatantly ideological assumptions about the nature of race, culture, nations and history, is itself the source of the anger, resentment and division which blight so many parts of the United Kingdom. The white, indigenous population of this country bitterly resent the way in which they are made to feel second-class citizens in their own country. That anger and resentment are fully justified. People like you have helped to create this situation.

Like politicians, you have prevaricated, dissembled and looked away from the truth rather than confront the ugly nature of multiculturalism head on. Whenever I hear the latest utterance from a Church of England official on some aspect of multiculturalism I ask myself whether this person serves Him or some secular body. I also smell the same sickly-sweet herbs that Pilate used to wash his hands. Moral cowardice is, of course, the real sin of the Church of England. Your Church actively ignores Biblical prohibitions against homosexuality and cravenly accepts the depraved lies of feminism with all the attendant misery and pain that have been inflicted on the institution of matrimony. How, then, can the Church of England be expected to tell the truth about multiculturalism when it has succumbed to the Satanic perversions of feminism, when it refuses to uphold Biblical teaching on heterosexual love and marriage?

In its desire to parade its left-liberal credentials, your Church has abandoned the nation and the Master it was called upon to serve. The Lord will deal with you in His own way and time. Meanwhile, you owe Mr Nick Griffin, the BNP and the very large numbers of people who will cast a vote for them on 4th June 2009 an unreserved apology.

Dr Frank Ellis, Ampleforth, England, 27th May 2009 A.D.


By August Pointneuf

Southern Africa has been used as a platform by those who have hoped to prove, and then impose upon all, their personal philosophies of “human homogeneity”.

These people intended that the destruction of white administrative control in Southern Africa would vindicate their aspirations and justify the terrorist killings of the “anti-apartheid movement”.

The final unhinging of “white colonist rule” was to become the triumphant demonstration that a multicultural, multiracial land (and world) would be happier, safer and devoid of ethnic tension. Expulsion of the white colonist was expected to release the saintly tolerance latent in the African native. Mandela’s hand, raised in benediction, would be all the assurance required.

But more important to these revolutionaries was that their intended success, modelled in South Africa and Rhodesia, would validate an ultimate aim to impose on all Europeans their self-proclaiming high moral philosophy. This would be an irreversible experiment (implanted by manipulative propaganda and forced by law) which has no exemplar in history, with an outcome which was pure supposition, existing only in their speculative fantasy.

Let us then look at the outcome of their meddling with South Africa. What follows happened years after white control was ablated and therefore could not be caused by any handicaps inflicted on the black man by white dominance.

It is trite history that white administrations in Southern Africa brought to an end the “Black Wars” of the 19th century. Marauding black impi bent on exterminating competing tribes, invading rustlers and rapine raids were, for all practical purposed, held in check by efficient colonial law.
The resulting peace and economic growth made the white administered colonies highly attractive destination for the populations of all sub-Saharan states.

However the civic orderliness created by a white presence was hurled into disarray by the “independence” of the Southern African nations. Administrations collapsed and the African National Congress became unable to control the borders of South Africa. Many millions of the most impoverished people in Africa flooded in, searching for a slice of the cake created earlier by white enterprise.

Perversely the most qualified, creative and productive potential immigrants who now apply for entry and residence into South African, via the formal bureaucratic structures, are obstructed and defeated by the notorious Department of Internal Affairs. The very people who could have enhanced the wealth of South Africa, its healthcare, and its capacity to better standards of living universally, are refused entry because, it seems, of their white, ethnic background.

Meanwhile large numbers of unskilled black refugees continue to enter South Africa covertly, their numbers unknown, stressing South Africa’s limited social resources*. Amongst the most successful economic refugees into South Africa are Somalis

These black Hamitic people are expert traders, and many opened small shops in the black townships to become more successful than their Bantu competitors (who had themselves invaded the land during the last millennium).

Somalis were able to provide a significant social service, sold more cheaply, and so benefited their new-found communities. In these poor areas, small margins make a great difference. The benchmark price of bread sold by Bantu was R7.00 (53p). This was reduced by the Somalis to R6.00 (45p).

The Bantu reacted to Somali success by aggressive destruction. Much the way the Bantu had set about destroying the success of the civilisation of the white colonists, so began the Bantu ethnocide against the Somali. Somali traders were shot, “necklaced” and burnt along with their families and stores.

Abdul Kadir Karakoos, a Somali leader in Cape Town, says that his community has buried, since 2002, over 600 of their countrymen, killed in anti-immigrant violence. ANC Security Minister Charles Nqakula admits that the police have no accurate numbers of Somalis killed.

Although the ANC government has attempted to pass this ethnocide off as “random violence” or “common robbery” the true reasons were shown by threatening letters from Bantu to the Somali ordering them to leave their domicile, or be killed. And they were killed.

In mid-June 2009 police arbitrators reduced tension by forcing the Somali traders to increase their prices to match their Bantu competitors. But Somalis continue to live in terror in South Africa.

This black on black ethnocide, re-appearing after a hundred years of white administered peace, demonstrates again the failures of “racial integration” and that “multiculturalism” and “poly-communities” will not succeed. It also demonstrates the immutable return to inherent, latent behaviour patterns, which have not been softened by “independence’, education, freedom of speech or “civilisation”,

Such patterns of black behaviour can now be expected to be transmitted to Europe, as trans-cultural migrants continue to move, domino like, into the first world.

With the indisputable failure of the hoped-for “African Model” of inter-racial harmony, how is it that governments in Europe continue to endanger the future of their own vulnerable native populations by gambling with counter-cultural immigration? How often, in how many ways, and in how many countries, does it need to be demonstrated that this forced fantasy of “communalism” and ‘human homogeneity” can only bring disharmony, impoverishment and violence?
* Black immigrants into South Africa since “independence” have been estimated at over 5 million.

Related Posts:
The Mandela Myth
Parallels from the past

One Man's icon

Is it just me, but can anyone else imagine any circumstances where the death of an aging white rock star would have become an event of international mourning if he had been accused of paedophilia twice and had admitted sharing his bed with pre-pubescent boys?

One person who the media have studiously avoided interviewing is the - now grown up - Jordy Chandler (above), I wonder what he makes of the current circus?

Wednesday 24 June 2009

Truths we are not supposed to tell

Three of the Tottenham gang rapists

Anyone who watched Monday night's Dispatches documentary on Channel 4 “Rape in the City”, will have been amazed, not so much by the contents, but by the fact that the guardians of the multicultural flame at Channel 4 allowed such contents to be broadcast. Admittedly the main reporter was the refreshingly professional, and, by Channel 4 standards comparatively honest Sorious Samura from Sierra Leone, who has been responsible for some excellent past reporting from African war zones, however the subject matter was highly sensitive and focused on issues which the establishment usually seeks to suppress.

The subject in question was gang rape, and the troubling fact that it is a crime for which young black men are disproportionately responsible, in fact from the series of gang rapes Channel four investigated, of the 93 young men involved, 13 were white, 66 black and the others mixed race or Asian. Although I suspect that Asians may have been under represented in the sample, possibly due to the well documented reluctance of the police to prosecute such crimes within that community, as there can be little doubt the community cohesion censors at Channel 4 will have gone to great efforts to find as many whites as possible, we can be sure that blacks have not been unfairly over represented.

Based on the Channel 4 investigation, young black men of Afro Caribbean origin are committing more than five times as many gang rapes as young white men. However, the discrepancy is far greater than that, given that people of Afro-Caribbean origin are estimated to make up around 6% of the population, whilst whites are around 80% (down from 90% in 1999) by these figures, which nobody has disputed, their propensity to commit gang rape exceeds that of white youths by thousands of percent. (Perhaps someone better at maths than I can provide an accurate percentage.)

Indeed, it doesn't stop there, as came out during the programme most if not all of those white boys who did feature in the figures, were not members of gangs of white rapists, but the minority white members of mixed race or primarily black gangs, such as the single white boy amongst the mostly black gang who poured caustic soda on their victim, in the well publicised Tottenham gang rape last year.

As the whites appear to be primarily junior foot soldiers in such gangs, those who have become involved in such crimes could well be more representative of the effect which exposure to black culture can have on impressionable white boys, rather than evidence of a similar propensity amongst the white community.

Further evidence of this influence, was sadly evident amongst a number of the victims appearing in the documentary, who, although they were filmed in shadow, were clearly mostly white girls. These young women, whilst describing what was done to them, referred to other abusive events and relationships, which fell just short of rape, as if they were a natural and expected feature of the female interaction with the male.

Various references were made to young girls who appeared willing to accommodate a series of young men with mostly oral sex, almost as if they felt that was expected of them. In response to which we have to ask what sort of society we have created, and why it was created. Did young white girls think that way 50 years ago?

Of course Dispatches chanted the obligatory “tiny minority” mantra, pointing out that there are many young black men who do not commit gang rape, however, that is not entirely encouraging given how many of their brothers are at least one thousand percent more likely to commit gang rape than the host community. Let us not forget that the majority of black South Africans are not child rapists, yet a child is raped in South Africa every three minutes. It takes only a violent minority to tip civilisation into a crime ridden anarchy.

We have already seen the disproportionate number of young black men who are involved in knife crime , and the fact we actually have a separate police force Operation Trident dedicated entirely to dealing with gun crime in the black community, even the most argent of multiculturalists, it they are honest, has to accept that there is an issue here.

We have a section of our community which is disproportionately prone to violent crime to a massive degree, we see evidence of this every day, and yet we are not supposed to acknowledge it, even when programmes such as Dispatches reluctantly admit the facts. Furthermore, our leaders are actively seeking to add massively to that already growing and disproportionately criminal section of the community.

Surely this is madness and there can be only one outcome.

Monday 22 June 2009

D-Day, Normandy, June 6th 1944 – 65 Years On

Sword Beach[1] - 07:25 a.m. June 6th 1944

Lord Lovat, CO of 1st Special Service Brigade, on the right of the column, wades through the water. in the foreground is Piper Bill Millin

By Alan O'Reilly


65 years ago the men of D-Day fought for deliverance from dictatorship. Their efforts should never be forgotten.

Hitler’s Empire

Chester Wilmot[2] writes that “In the summer of 1942 four hundred million people in Europe lay under the yoke of German rule. The empire of Adolph Hitler...stretched from the Mediterranean to the Arctic, from the English Channel to the Black Sea and almost to the Caspian.”

By the spring of 1944, most of continental Europe remained under the German yoke. However, the yoke was about to be broken, by means of D-Day.

Command Decision

But D-Day depended on the weather and a storm was raging. The invasion, scheduled for June 5th, was postponed for 24 hours. Transports underway were ordered back to harbour. Wilmot writes “As Sunday, the 4th, dragged on, the storm gathered in fury...A surging wind drove white breakers against the fog-bound beaches of Normandy...Out in the Channel, the recalled convoys, punching into a head sea, strove to reach the shelter of Weymouth bay...In the crowded harbours from Falmouth to Harwich the rest of the armada tossed uneasily and tugged at its anchors. Many of the hundred thousand troops who were packed in their ships had already needed their anti-sea-sickness pills.”

Cornelius Ryan[3] describes how on June 4th, the C-in-C, U.S. General Eisenhower, reached his fateful decision about the re-scheduled D-Day.

“Shortly before nine-thirty that night, Eisenhower’s senior commanders and their chiefs of staff gathered in the library of Southwick House [Allied HQ]...”

Eisenhower entered at 9:30 p.m. and with his commanders reviewed the weather forecast, “a barely tolerable period of fair conditions...would prevail for just a little more than twenty-four hours” for June 5th-6th. Eisenhower then made his decision. “Tuesday, June 6, would be D-Day.”

Assembled Armada

The Imperial War Museum[4] states that, “More than 7,000 warships, landing craft and merchant vessels were assembled to carry, escort and support five army divisions – some 130,000 British, US and Canadian troops – across the channel on the first day of the attack. Thousands more airborne troops were ready to seize and hold the flanks of the invasion beaches to prevent German counter-attacks in the critical hours following the landings. Air force bombers and fighters flew more than 14,000 missions on D-Day alone.”

D-Day is a vast subject[5] and can only be outlined here, specifically the British effort, beginning on the night of June 5th with the 6th Airborne Division.

6th Airborne Objectives

Wilmot describes 6th Airborne’s vital tasks, “that of seizing and holding the left flank of the bridgehead – the open flank against which the main weight of German counterattack was likely to fall as the panzer divisions moved in from their garrison areas south-east and east of Caen...”

Key objectives were the bridges across the Caen Canal and the Orne River and the Merville battery, east of the mouth of the Orne, which could fire on Sword Beach, the easternmost invasion beach. Glider-borne troops of D Company[6], 2nd Battalion, the Oxford and Buckinghamshire Light Infantry, commanded by Major John Howard, would capture the bridges. 9th Battalion, the Parachute Regiment, commanded by Lieutenant-Colonel Terence Otway, would capture the Merville battery.

The Bridges

Ryan writes that just after midnight on June 6th, “Like huge bats, the six gliders, each carrying approximately thirty men, swooped silently down...[heading] for two parallel waterways, shimmering in the moonlight, the Caen Canal and the Orne River...”

Three gliders aimed for each bridge. In one was 19-year-old Private Bill Gray.

“Private Bill Gray, a Bren gunner in one of the three gliders heading for the Caen Canal bridge, closed his eyes and braced himself for the crash...there was a splintering, rending crash. The undercarriage ripped off...the glider screeched across the ground throwing up a hail of sparks. With a sickening half-swing, the wrecked machine smashed to a halt, as Gray recalls, “with the nose buried in barbed wire and almost on the bridge.”

The other two gliders arrived seconds later and the assault began, as Ryan describes. “Someone yelled “Come on, lads!”...Now everybody stormed the bridge. There was bedlam. The Germans were shocked and disorganised. Grenades came hurtling into their dugouts and communication trenches. Some Germans...asleep in gun-pits woke to the blinding crash of explosions and found themselves gazing into the business ends of Sten guns...

“While teams mopped up resistance of the near side of the bridge, Gray and some forty men led by Lieutenant ‘Den’ Brotheridge charged across to seize the all important far bank...A few hundred yards ahead...the garrison [on the Orne bridge] had already been overrun... Stunned by the swiftness of the assault, the Germans were overwhelmed.” The battle lasted a mere 15 minutes.

But the attackers had suffered losses, including 28-year-old Lieutenant Brotheridge. Shot in the throat, he died shortly afterwards, the first Allied soldier killed in action on D-Day.

Awaiting reinforcements, the glider troops dug in to hold the bridges. They numbered only 150 but they had landed in the right place. Not so 9th Battalion.

The Merville Battery

As Ryan explains, the British paratroops suffered a scattered drop “over a huge area, victims of navigational errors, bucketing planes forced off course by flak fire, badly marked drop zones and gusty winds. Some were fortunate but hundreds fell anywhere from five to thirty-five miles from the drop zones.”

Colonel Otway could muster only 150 of his 700 men. A bombing attack on the battery had failed and gliders in support with demolition equipment and artillery pieces were lost. Moreover, Otway and his men “lay under heavy machine gun fire at the edge of the barbed wire and the minefields protecting the massive Merville battery...and, to take the battery with its garrison of two hundred, [Otway’s] soldiers had only their rifles, Sten guns, grenades, a few Bangalore torpedoes and one heavy machine gun...”

Undeterred, the paratroopers cut through the outer wire belt with wire-cutters. One group cleared a path through the outer minefield, crawling on their hands and knees under the moonlight, feeling for trip wires and prodding with their bayonets. The troopers then placed their Bangalore torpedoes against the inner belt of wire. Ryan describes the ensuing battle.

“With a blinding roar the Bangalore torpedoes blasted great gaps in the wire. Lieutenant Mike Dowling yelled, “Move up! Move up!”...Yelling and firing, Otway’s paratroopers plunged into the smoke of the explosions and through the wire...across the no-man’s land of minefields, manned trenches and gun-pits [to] the battery....machine-gun, Schmeisser and rifle fire poured out to meet them...Mines exploded...

“Now there were yells and screams and the flash of grenades as paratroopers piled into the trenches and fought hand to hand with the enemy...The battle was gory and wild.”

Overwhelming the Germans, Lieutenant Dowling’s party charged into the battery and disabled the guns, though not without cost. Ryan states “[Dowling] stood before the colonel, his right hand holding the left side of his chest. He said, “Battery taken as ordered, sir. Guns destroyed.”” In the short, 15-minute action, of his 150 men, Otway lost 70 killed or wounded, among them 21-year-old[7] Lieutenant Dowling. “He had been dying,” Ryan says, “at the time he made his report.” However, the Merville Battery was silenced. Now the seaborne invasion began, across beaches with names approved by the PM.

Sword, Juno and Gold – Churchill’s Choice

The Royal British Legion[8] states that, “Originally, the British and Canadian beaches had the codenames Goldfish, Swordfish and Jellyfish. For Prime Minister Winston Churchill, the names did not bear sufficient authority: ‘If men are being asked to die on and for these beaches, the names should be more dignified than “Jellyfish”.’ The names were changed, and for the last 65 years have been renowned as Gold, Sword [both British] and Juno [Canadian].”

Hobart’s ‘Funnies’ – Armoured Spearhead

The specialised 79th Armoured Division, known as “Hobo’s Funnies” after their commander, Major-General Sir P.C.S. Hobart, led the British and Canadian beach assaults. Its regiments included amphibious Sherman ‘Duplex Drive,’ DD tanks, with all-round canvas screens and propellers, enabling them to ‘swim’ from the landing craft, LCT-borne Sherman ‘Crab’ tanks with chain ‘flails’ for destroying mines and AVREs, Armoured Vehicles Royal Engineers, Churchill tanks modified to carry bridging, gapping and road-laying equipment and a 12-inch ‘Petard’ spigot mortar, firing 40 lb ‘dustbin’ charges up to 90 yards to shatter concrete gun emplacements. 79th Armoured would lose 12 of 50 Crabs and 22 of 120 AVREs on D-Day, and sustain 169 casualties but Hobart’s Funnies[9] were destined for “a magnificent first day in action.” They would assault at H-Hour, 0730 hours for the British and Canadian beaches.

Sword Beach – Frogmen and Skirl of the Pipes

Ryan states that all along the British beaches, “The first men in had been the frogmen – 120 underwater demolition experts whose job it was to cut thirty-yard gaps through the [beach] obstacles.” These included jagged pyramids of welded steel called ‘Tetrahedra’ and ‘Hedgehogs,’ huge welded lengths of protruding angle iron, many fitted with mines. The frogmen blew up such obstacles as they could but, says Ryan, “Even as they worked, amphibious tanks came swimming in among them, followed almost immediately by first wave troops...landing craft, turned sideways by the heavy seas, crashed into the obstacles. Mines exploded, steel spikes and hedgehogs ripped along the hulls...landing craft began to founder.”

But the assault pushed on, against mixed resistance. Ryan writes “For most of the men the obstacles proved to be the toughest part of the assault. Once they were through these defences, troops found the enemy opposition...spotty [but] in some sectors first-wave troops were heavily machine-gunned and mortared. In the Ouistreham half of Sword [the eastern half], men of 2nd East Yorkshire Regiment lay dead or dying from the water’s edge all the way up the beach...the East Yorks suffered most of their two hundred D-Day casualties in these first few minutes...[But] although bloody, the beach fight was brief. Except for initial losses, the assault on Sword went forward speedily.”

Among the troops landing at Sword were commandos of 1st Special Service Brigade, led by Lord Lovat, Chief of Clan Fraser. According to Ryan, “As...Lord Lovat’s piper, William Millin [see picture]...floundered towards the shore, Lovat shouted at him, “Give us ‘Highland Laddie,’ man!” Waist deep in the water, Millin put the mouthpiece to his lips and splashed on through the surf, the pipes keening crazily.” Lovat’s commandos had a vital objective; relieve Major Howard’s men at the bridges.

It was as well therefore that progress from Sword was steady. R.W. Thompson states that “By 0930 hours, Hobart’s armour...had cleared seven lanes through the [beach] exits. [Now], the squadrons were rallying...to aid Commandos fighting for possession of the Ouistreham locks and for Lion-sur-Mer [on the western half of Sword] [and] to spearhead the infantry on the road to Caen.”

Major Howard’s company, reinforced by 7th Parachute Battalion, had been beating off repeated counter-attacks. By early afternoon, the jaded troopers, says Ryan, “anxiously awaited the link-up from the sea,” Bill Gray and his friend Private John Wilkes among them. Suddenly, the pair heard bagpipes.

Ryan states “Down the road came Lord Lovat’s commandos, cocky in their green berets. Bill Millin marched at the head of the column, his pipes blaring out “Blue Bonnets over the Border”...Disregarding the heavy German fire, the [6th Airborne] troopers rushed out to greet the commandos...As the red and green berets intermingled, there was a sudden, perceptible lightening of spirits. Nineteen-year-old Bill Gray felt “years younger.””

Sword was secure. Gold, the other British beach, was being secured.

Gold Beach – The One D-Day Victoria Cross

R.W. Thompson describes Gold as “a shallow arc streaked with treacherous strands of soft clay.” Behind it lay “to the west the powerful...fortified villages of Arromanches and le Hamel, and to the east, la Rivière.” Near la Rivière stood the Mont Fleury battery, an objective of the 6th Battalion Green Howards[10], who would suffer 100 casualties on D-Day and scene of D-Day’s only Victoria Cross, won by 31-year-old Company Sergeant Major Stanley Hollis, tough Teessider and veteran of Dunkirk, North Africa and Sicily.

As at Sword, mines disabled some of the armour and as Thompson relates, “On-coming craft, driven like surf boats by the strong wind and heavy seas, fouled obstacles and armour, creating a sense of chaos on the edge of the sea.” At Gold, the sea was too rough for the D-Day tanks to ‘swim’ in so they would later be landed dry and therefore, “the spearhead role belonged to the flails and their supporting AVREs.” At le Hamel and la Rivière, “the flails and the AVREs...fought their way with infantry across the beaches in the face of intense mortar, anti-tank, and machine-gun fire directed from well-sited pillboxes, and [fortified] houses linked together in systems of strongpoints...While petard tanks supporting the infantry blasted the coastal crust of strongpoints with their giant mortars, like ancient cannon, the bobbins [modified Churchills] laid [artificial road] mattresses over patches of soft blue clay, AVREs filled craters and anti-tank ditches with fascines...bridged culverts, and bulldozed tracks for the host of vehicles and men coming in fast on the rising tide. Within the hour, armour and infantry were more than a mile inland...”

Bovington Tank Museum historian David Fletcher adds[11] “A team of three AVREs on the beach at la Rivière was busily demolishing pillboxes but the infantry were pinned down by German troops lurking behind the sea-wall., who were lobbing grenades, firing machine guns and generally being a nuisance. The team leader, Captain D.A. King RE, led his and another AVRE in a charge up and over the wall, crashing down a 1.2 metre (4-foot drop) to the road on the far side, thereby putting a stop to the defenders’ activities.”

By 1100 hours, 7 exit lanes had been cleared on Gold Beach and the strongpoints of Arromanches, le Hamel and la Rivière fell by the end of D-Day. However, the 6th Green Howards’ assault on the Mont Fleury battery was held up by machine gun fire from a hidden pillbox. CSM Hollis described what happened next, as recorded by historian Mike Morgan.

“Major Lofthouse said to me, “there is a pillbox there, Sergeant Major.” Well, when he said that, I saw it. It was very well camouflaged and I saw these guns moving around in the slits. So I got my Sten gun and I rushed at it...spraying it hosepipe fashion. They fired back at me and they missed. I don’t know whether they were more panic stricken than me, but they must have been, and I got on top of it and I threw a grenade through the slit and it must have sickened them. I went round the back and went inside and there were two dead, quite a lot of prisoners. They were quite willing to forget all about the war.”

Mont Fleury was captured and CSM Hollis won the VC. His CO, Lieutenant-Colonel Robin Hastings, said “[CSM Hollis] was absolutely dedicated to winning the war – one of the few men I ever met who felt like that.”

But others, too, were dedicated, like the British Army military nursing Sisters.

Queen Alexandra’s Military Nursing Service – Normandy Heroines

25-year-old Nursing Officer Brenda (n) McBryde[12], from Whitley Bay, served with the 75th British General Hospital and tended casualties on June 23rd, D+17.

“We entered the names of many famous regiments into the Admission Book that day: the Staffordshire Yeomanry, 4th Wilts, Dorsets, Green Howards, and East Yorks, men of the 7th Armoured Division and 50 (Northumbrian) Division. Most of their proud uniform, stiff with blood and caked in mud, had to be cut from them. We sliced through tough boots with razors to release shattered feet. The stretcher bearers came again and again until every trestle was occupied and the floor crammed so that there was barely room to put a foot or kneel between the stretchers...In the trauma of that first day, everything I had learnt during four hard years of training suddenly made sense...That tent, full of men, reeking of blood, was where I was needed. These men were my fulfilment...since they could no longer help themselves.”

The medical corps minimised the cost of D-Day but it was high, nevertheless.

Cost – and Retribution

The D-Day Museum[13] has a sobering revelation about the cost of D-Day. “The Allied casualties figures for D-Day have generally been estimated at 10,000, including 2500 dead... However recent painstaking research by the US National D-Day Memorial Foundation has achieved a more accurate - and much higher - figure for the Allied personnel who were killed on D-Day. They have recorded the names of individual Allied personnel killed on 6 June 1944 in Operation Overlord [D-Day], and so far they have verified 2499 American D-Day fatalities and 1915 from the other Allied nations, a total of 4414 dead (much higher than the traditional figure of 2500 dead).”

The Allied cost of D-Day would mount until May 1945, when, in the words of U.S. President Truman[14], “The flags of freedom fly all over Europe.” In Great Britain, those flags are being lowered. They will not fly again until the betrayal of our country is punished as treason. That is what D-Day is all about.

Alan O’Reilly
June 2009


[1] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sword_Beach

[2] The Struggle for Europe, Chester Wilmot

[3] The Longest Day, Cornelius Ryan

[4] www.culture24.org.uk/places+to+go/london/art21042

[5] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Normandy_Landings

[6] Pegasus Bridge 6 June 1944, Stephen E. Ambrose

[7] D-Day, The Great Gamble, R.W. Thompson

[8] www.britishlegion.org.uk/media/66297/poppypress.pdf

[9] Churchill’s Secret Weapons, Patrick Delaforce, Hale, 2000.

[10] D-Day Hero, CSM Stanley Hollis VC, Mike Morgan

[11] Vanguard of Victory, David Fletcher

[12] A Nurse's War, Brenda McBryde

[13] www.ddaymuseum.co.uk/faq.htm

[14] The Last Hundred Days, John Toland


Saturday 20 June 2009

The March Of The Dhimmis

By Reconquista
Jan 8 2009

After suffering more than 6000 HAMAS rocket attacks against its citizens and showing restraint that no other country in the world would ever contemplate, Israel finally struck back against HAMAS terrorists using the might of the IAF. The Israelis have made it clear that this is a war against the Iranian-sponsored HAMAS terrorist organisation and have gone to extra-ordinary lengths to ensure that non-combatants are not caught in the strikes. A task made near impossible as HAMAS uses its own women and children as human shields, a disgraceful, heartless war crime.

These are precautions that no other western nation would ever take in times of conflict, witness the criminal NATO air strikes deliberately targeting citizens in Serbia and Iraq, neither of whom had fired a single rocket at any NATO state.

But if the Israelis thought that this restraint and caution would win her support from the west, then predictably, they have been sadly mistaken.

Scores of protests in Europe and the United States attended by thousands upon thousands of so-called "peace protesters" are screaming hysterically for the "Israeli murdering nazionists" to
halt their "siege". These are "peace-loving people" whose raging hatred for Israel is being stoked by a duplicitous, treacherous media who have wasted no time at all to demonize Israel and portray once again those poor "Palestinians" as the oppressed victims of the ruthless Zionist occupiers.

Issues For British Nationalists

Many British nationalists are aware of the nature of the conflict but are stating quite clearly that it is a war between Palestinians and Israelis and is not of our concern. But if the events that have occurred this last week prove anything it is that it is very much a British Nationalist concern for two very striking reasons:

1. We are at war right now with the same enemy as Israel, that enemy being Islam. Not "radical Islam", not "Islamic extremists" or "Islamic terrorists" but Islam. Islamic jihad has been
declared upon us whether we like it or not. It is not a war restricted to Israel as the masters of Islamic jihad and its fanatical Muslim mujihadeen want you to think but a part of the
current global jihad that is being waged all over the world. We are in World War 3 make no mistake about it, checkout the number of countries involved in fighting Islamic jihad. Britain is most definitely one of them.

2. Our media and our politicians are using this conflict to condition our people as compliant dhimmis subservient to Islam who in turn are all combining to advance Islamic jihad in Great

Why Great Britain Is At War

There are very few people in Britain today who possess a clear understanding of Islam. Most believe it is one of the great religions, a religion like any other and that Muslims have their
good and bad just like other religions and that Islam is essentially a Religion of Peace. Sure it has its fanatics who misinterpret the Qu'ran, but that's no different to any other religion, right? I'll be honest and say this is pretty much what I believed Islam to be just four years ago.

Few of our citizens are aware of how Islam divides the entire world into 2 distinct houses: Dar al Islam - House of Islam, the lands of the believers and Dar al Harb - House of War, the lands of the unbelievers, the lowest of the low, the infidel.

This is such a seemingly simple point but it is at the very core of Islam. The duty of every single Muslim on this planet is to wage war against Dar al Harb until the whole world is Dar al Islam.

Even fewer are aware of how important and how revered the Prophet Mohammed is. He is regarded by Muslims as the ideal man, the perfect example for all time. He is the heart and soul of Islam. But this was no peace-loving Prophet. Mohammed lived his life waging war on the unbeliever, the infidel, spreading his faith by the sword and personally murdering, raping and enslaving infidels who refused to convert to Islam. In his own words:

"I was commanded by Allah to wage war against the infidel until fitna (unbelief) ceased to exist and the world belongs solely to Allah." - Prophet Mohammed

This division of believers and unbelievers is so important because it means that by its very nature, while Islam exists, the infidels - including we British - are at war with Islam. This is the reason why Muslims attack us. Not because of Iraq, Afghanistan, Israel or because we eat roast pork after a few beers down at the pub of a Sunday lunchtime. It is their duty to attack us because we are the infidel, the lowest of the low and they are waging jihad against us in a variety of ways including demographics, litigation, da'wa (call to Islam) building of mosques that dominate all other religious buildings and of course never-ending demands for ever more tolerance and acceptance of Islamic practices and Islamic sharia law.

Al Taqiyya - WMD of Islamic Jihad

Mohammed stated: War is deceit. A weapon Muslims deploy frequently against infidels is "Al Taqqiya" - lying to further the cause of Islam. The excuses that follow an Islamic terror attack are without exception Muslims or Muslim apologists stating that these atrocities occur in response to some perceived injustice such as poverty, Iraq, Israel or any of 100 other excuses. But very few of our people know that this is Al Taqqiya and that Muslim jihadists attack infidels because it is their duty, because their prophet personally set the example and because they are trying to conquer and subjugate us and create the single global ummeh. Not to mention enjoying the fruits of 72 "houris" who remain virgins forever no matter what in the after- life with Allah as a reward for their efforts.

In this current global Islamic jihad, the jihadists are greatly supported by the western media and the politicians who are working hand-in-hand with the jihadists to promote the myths about Islam and in doing so, are conditioning our people to be subservient to the cause of Islam.

Creating A Legion of Compliant Dhimmis

Cast your mind back to September 11th 2001. On that terrible day, jihadists murdered 3000 innocent people whose only crime was to board aeroplanes or get up and go to the office. The western world responded with respectful candlelight vigils, calls for peace and tolerance, and support for each other to come to terms with the shock and horror - the reality - of Islamic jihad

The politicians and the media re-assured us: Islam is a religion of peace, all Muslims are not terrorists and Islamic organisations voiced their deep concerns that innocent, law-abiding Muslims would be the unjustified victims of widespread revenge attacks - other than a handful of minor incidents, such widespread attacks simply never materialized. The leaders of theUS and the UK declared a "war on terror and those who harbour terrorists". War on terror? Just how does that work? Terror is a weapon of the enemy not an enemy by itself so who is committing the terror and for what purpose?

But it's not for dhimmis to ask such impertinent questions.

October 2002 saw the jihadists blow up another 200 people who had the front to go to a nightclub in Bali and the world again resorted to peaceful protests that were against terrorism and not against Islam or Muslims as they did again after Madrid in 2004 and again after London in 2005. Around the same time over 2000 Bhuddists - those violent, cruel, intolerant, war-mongering fascists - fell victim to the jihad being waged by murderous jihadists in Southern Thailand. More recently in Mumbai, jihadists killed another 173 people, with the Jewish victims also brutally tortured by their Muslim jihadist captors before being executed. More victims to add to the 80 million dead victims of the seemingly never-ending jihad against the Hindus and Sikhs in India that started way back in 638. The two-state solution certainly isn't appeasing the Pakistani jihadists - what a surprise.

And still we are told by our politicians and their media lackeys that Islam is a "religion of peace" and I wonder how many of our people are aware that since 9/11 jihadists have committed over 12,500 acts of Islamic terror?

In fact not once after any of these jihadist terrorist atrocities has the world held mass protests against Islam or Muslims calling for the Islamic world to be attacked. Anaesthetised by governments and the media as to the reality of Islam, should anyone dare to speak the truth about what Islam is really about they are vilified as Islamophobes or verbally abused with that
ever-so effective Orwellian thought-control weapon "racist".

Many have been prosecuted for inciting racial hatred - such as the BNP leader Nick Griffin experienced - for daring to exercise free speech and criticise a so-called religion that just cannot
tolerate non-believers as equals and murders infidels en masse wherever Islam takes root. Infidels such as Theo Van Gogh in Holland, executed in broad daylight in cold blood by an
unrepentant jihadist who stated clearly that he did is duty to Allah.

Al Taqiyya And The Jihad Against Israel

Contrast the western response to Islamic atrocities with the events of recent days. The quite justified response of Israel to to jihadist terror attacks on its citizens has seen the western
world react with outrage, lies and hate-filled invective that heaps shame on our nations. Governments urge Israel to show restraint, and the media has gone about its job of brainwashing the media-led sheeple by feeding them a constant stream of Al Taqqiya that portrays the Islamic jihadists as victims and the Israelis as Zionist Jewish occupiers who kicked out the Palestinians from their own land and took it over. In actual fact it was the Arab nations who told the Arabs living there to get their bags packed in 1948 because Jordan, Egypt, Lebanon and Syria were going to "drive the Jews into the sea." They were to return when the genocide of the Jews was complete. The best laid plans...

The lies come thick and fast. Israel is occupying Palestinian land. That there has never been a nation called Palestine is conveniently never mentioned nor is the somewhat inconvenient fact that there has been a Jewish presence in this area for 3500 years. That this land was just desert and swamp, a leftover desolate land from the defeated Ottoman Empire that the British had a mandate to administer is also not explained. Nor is the fact that the British reneged on their promise to make this a homeland for the Jewish people and instead gave 80% of it to the
Arabs - the land now known as Jordan. Cries for a two state solution seem somewhat ridiculous as Jordan would now be the "Palestinian" state, just compare the flag of Jordan with the
"Palestine" flag so abundantly flown at "peace" demonstrations this last week.

Other anti-Israeli buzzwords litter news copy. Israel is occupying the West Bank - that's what Jordan named it but it should be more accurately called Judea and Samaria but using these names would give the game away wouldn't it? How did Jordan name it the "West Bank"? Well they "held" the territory from 1948 to 1967. Not once were they referred to as "occupiers" and no attempt was made to create this territory as Palestine. But the western media don't like to go back beyond 1967. We don't want any dhimmis asking awkward questions, it's best to nip Islamophobia in the bud.

As ever, the press are reporting concerns of a "humanitarian crisis" that never quite manages to unfold largely because Israel continues to send aid into Gaza and because of aid from the EU and the US that has made Gaza one of the world's best countries for longevity - also not reported. Weaned on welfare viewed as jizya, a tribute tax that is the duty of Jews and Christians to pay their Muslim masters, the Gazans have a quality of life many in the world are denied and they receive it without producing anything for it. Nice work if you can get it.

Then there's the "disproportionate response" and the "collective punishment" accusations. Although what the proportionate response is to 6000 rocket attacks on innocent civilians, another war crime, isn't mentioned - 6000 rocket attacks on Gazan towns perhaps? Nor is the fact that the Gazan people exercised collective responsibility by electing the Islamic terrorist organisation HAMAS whose own charter states:

"Israel will exist and continue to exist until Islam obliterates it just as it obliterated all others before it."

If people are responsible enough to vote for Islamic terrorists in the full knowledge that their goal is to commit genocide then they are responsible enough to deal with the consequences. With
choices come responsibility and allowing the people of Gaza to avoid facing any consequences for their choices isn't just a disproportionate response it is crass irresponsibility that serves HAMAS and prolongs the conflict.

Isn't it odd that no such doublespeak applies to any Islamic atrocity, or to the HAMAS attacks? And talking of disproportionate response, isn't it also odd that when Serbia was bombed by NATO, no such term was applied to the 78 day raids and that no peace protests were held supporting the Christian Serbs and demonizing Bosnian Muslims or even the UK and the US? Yet we did see once again, hate-filled demonstrations when these two NATO nations gave Muslim Iraq "Shock and Awe" as I'm sure we all remember.

Isn't it also odd that after 12500 acts of Islamic terror, we do not see hate-filled demonstrations throughout the Muslim world against jihadists "who are hijacking and misinterpreting the
peaceful religion of Islam"? They're quick to take to the streets full of hate for the west over such atrocities as drawing cartoons of Mohammed though. Is that not somewhat disproportionate to the "peace protests" of the west?

There is something very obvious about these "disproportionate responses". It's now time we British Nationalists realise exactly what it is.

How The Gaza Conflict Advances The Jihad Against Britain

So you are now aware about the whole reason for the conflict in the Middle East. It is not about a struggle for Palestinian land against the Zionist Israeli occupation, it is all about the genocide of the Jewish people and the obliteration of the state of Israel. The media know it. The governments of the west know it. Yet the people of the west continue to be fed pro-Islamic propaganda that does nothing other than further the cause of Islamic jihad in the west resulting with some of the most sickening, shameful and hypocritical protests that are pro-Islam and firmly anti-Jewish and of course, anti-USA.

Yet the same pious, outraged style of protests never take place after an Islamic jihadist atrocity. Not even after 300,000 Darfurians were massacred by Muslims in the Sudan did we see such
hate-filled protests against Islamic jihad. These brutal massacres weren't enough to rouse the pious peace lovers onto the streets just as rocket attacks on kindergartens in Sderot are greeted with tumbleweed. Only when Israel has the affront to defend its citizens against the jihadists do these righteous moral beacons take to the streets in their droves to vent their offended spleens and proudly display their pro-Islamic anti-Jew hatred in the name of peace egged on by the jihadist collaborators in the western media.

It all amounts to a spectacle of dhimmitude never seen before in the west. What an incentive for the Islamic jihadists to pursue their vile, supremacist aims.

The nauseating spectacle of thousands and thousands of pro-HAMAS dhimmis in Dar al Harb marching through western cities flying the Palestinian flag, the Hizbollah flag and the HAMAS flag, many of them proudly wearing keffiyehs to further emphasise their hatred of Israel, vehemently chanting "we are all Palestinians" and the deplorable "from the river to the sea" is all a result of conditioning by the media and duplicity by governments who are brainwashing their own people into sympathizing with and serving the very fanatics whose sacred religious duty is to fight them and subjugate them until they convert to Islam or die.

These marches are supposed to be demonstrations about peace, about ending war to prevent yet more blood being spilled in a land already drenched with the blood of way too many victims -
Arab and Israeli alike - of just one more chapter of the global jihad against infidels. Pro-Islamic, HAMAS loving "peaceful protests" that include demonizing Jews as "Nazis who are conducting a holocaust against the Palestinians", that justify the use of such peace-promoting, tolerant phrases as "Jew scum", "death to all Jews" and "Go back to the ovens" such as this protest in would you believe it, former Nazi occupied Holland:


That a Dutch MP is present screaming for Intifada should send alarm bells ringing with Dutch - make that EU - citizens but don't hold your breath for this fascist traitor to be pilloried in the same way as his fellow MP Geert Wilders was after daring to make a film critical of the violent verses in the Qu'ran. And what a touching tribute to the 16,000 allied soldiers who gave their lives at Arnhem to free the Dutch from the real Nazis who sent many Dutch Jews to the gas chambers just 70 years ago.

The Betrayal Of The British

That video captures the whole reason why we as British Nationalists are involved in a war, not just against Islam but against those who are supposed to govern and protect us and those who are supposed to impartially inform us about important global issues but who instead, are furthering the cause of our enemies by turning our own people into compliant, subservient dhimmis who protest alongside Jew-hating fanatical Muslim jihadists leading them with cries of "Allahu akhbar" along with theatrical Islamic prayer ceremonies. Observed of course by their dhimmi audience with great respect and admiration. Mission "March of the Dhimmis" accomplished.

Dhimmis who not for one moment ever stop and think how their compliance is interpreted in the lands of Dar al Islam. Blinded by their own vanity and brainwashed by the media, it doesn't even occur to them. It is something we as British Nationalists should think about though.


To conclude, here are the two vitally important issues we as British Nationalists need to be fully aware of:

1. That the jihad against Israel is not a separate war but just one battleground of the current global jihad. We have to learn the lessons of how jihad is being waged against the Israelis, in particular that any concession given to jihadists as a gesture of peace will only lead to more and more demands for more and more concessions. We need to understand how the propaganda war is fought by the Arabs and start to use this to work for us and against Islam. We also need to learn how the Islamic world views aid donations - as a dhimmi jizya - and perhaps more importantly we need to understand how:

2. This conflict is being used to further the jihad against Britain. This means understanding the weapon of Al Taqiyya and how it is being used to brainwash our people into submissive dhimmitude who respond in Pavlovian style whenever Dar al Islam calls them. That the media and the politicians are collaborating with the enemy to further Islamic jihad in our land is treason and we must try and educate our people about their great betrayal.

What Israel faces every day is the fate that is being prepared for us and it is a fate that looms ever closer by the day. It is time for the unpalatable truth to be told about Islam and it is time for those who are supposed to serve and protect us to exercise their duty.

Failure to do these is suicidal.

Thought criminals returned to New World Sector 44x (formerly known as Great Britain) for punishment

Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle, two Britons, who foolishly imagined that the USA still believed in the first amendment to its constitution, and more foolishly still assumed that American asylum laws would ever, under any circumstances, be extended to White Europeans, have been returned to the oppressive Orwellian state, which holds both thought and the written word to subject to criminal sanction, from which they had fled in search of sanctury.

Let no white man ever assume that, unless he he follows to the letter the doctrine of the New Order, he, his words or thoughts will ever find protection in this world.

Friday 19 June 2009

What the BBC didn't want you to know about the Belfast "Romanians"

Sometimes working out what's going in Britain by listening to the BBC can be almost as confusing as working out what's going in Iran by relying on the official Islamic Republic News Agency. This morning's Today programme report on the 115 "Romanians" driven out of their homes in Belfast by racist threats was a perfect case in point.

Continue reading here

Wednesday 17 June 2009

Spot the difference

An Injured protester this week in Iran filmed by fellow protesters on their mobile phone

Clashes in Tehran between police and protesters, again filmed on mobile phones

Anti racist demonstrators in Belfast, who claim that shortly after this picture was taken they were attacked by thugs making Nazi Salutes and throwing bottles. Duh! pity nobody had brought their phone!

This week the world has watched the dramatic events in Iran as they happened, whilst images filmed by the protesters themselves have been instantly uploaded on to the internet and sent round the world. This is, after all, the internet age, when the public are now the journalists, all equipped with the latest mobile communications, enabling them to send images of everything from revolutions to pop concerts around the planet in seconds.

Isn't it odd, therefore, that when anti-BNP, or in this instance anti-racist, activists, who are usually the yuppies and students, groups who would normally have the latest technology immediately to hand, claim that they were attacked and abused by "Nazis", or "white racists" we have to take their word for it 'cos nobody thought to take a picture?!!


On a connected subject, here is a news story from last year which the media appears to have "forgotten"

Tuesday 16 June 2009

Suicide or homicide? Genocide can come slowly

Yesterday evening I posted a link to a posting by Reconquista regarding what he perceived as the suicide of the white race. I think Reconquista is an interesting writer, and whether our not you agree with what he writes, he certainly argues his case well.

I note that some of you felt that he was blaming Christianity for the destruction of the white race, which is not how I read what he wrote, albeit some of the attitudes he described might have their roots in certain Christian philosophy. Given the influence which Christianity has had, and still has, on all areas of Western culture, mostly for the good, it is entirely possible to find means of holding it accountable for almost anything, both good and bad.

To give an alternative explanation for what is going on, lets put suicide to one side and consider whether what we are, in fact seeing is a gradual homicide.

I am not sure whether I subscribe to either view, but would draw your attention to the following interesting fact:

In 1943, a legal scholar by the name of Raphael Lemkin coined the term “genocide”. He said the following:

"Generally speaking, genocide does not necessarily mean the immediate destruction of a nation, except when accomplished by mass killings of all members of a nation.

It is intended rather to signify a coordinated plan of different actions aiming at the destruction of essential foundations of the life of national groups, with the aim of annihilating the groups themselves.

The objectives of such a plan would be the disintegration of the political and social institutions, of culture, language, national feelings, religion, and the economic existence of national groups, and the destruction of personal security, liberty, health, dignity and lives of the members of such groups. "

"Genocide has two phases: one, destruction of the national pattern of the oppressed group; the other, the imposition of the national pattern of the oppressor. This imposition, in turn, may be made upon the oppressed population which is allowed to remain or upon the territory alone, after removal of the population and the colonization by the oppressor's own nationals."

He also outlined his various observed "techniques" on achieving genocide which included:

  • Political
  • Social
  • Cultural
  • Economic
  • Biological
  • Physical:
  • Endangering Health
  • Mass Killing
  • Religious
  • Moral


Hat Tim SA Sucks

Monday 15 June 2009

From Titans to Lemmings: The Suicide of the White Race

By Reconquista

How can a race that created the greatest and most advanced societies in human history, societies that held the highest hope for the whole of mankind, reach a point where its future survival is now threatened?

The Judeo-Christian religions played an important and influential role in building the once mighty West but we also discovered that these religions contained a serious flaw that has sewed the seeds of the suicidal demise of the white race. This flaw was identified by the brilliant German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche who described it as "an inversion of morality" whereby the weak, the poor, the meek, the oppressed and the wretched are virtuous and blessed by God whereas the strong, the wealthy, the noble and the powerful are the immoral and damned by the vengeful almighty Yahweh for eternity.

Nietzsche, with great insight and perception, stated that Christianity would be abandoned en masse in the twentieth century but that Westerners would still cling to this inversion of morality. I then described how Marxists and Liberals exploit this inversion of morality by creating large numbers of "victim groups", groups who form minorities in Western society but whose "victim status" is used to dictate morality to the majority. In Western - white - societies, the weak now lead the strong, indeed, the game being played in these societies is not to make the weak strong it is to make the strong weak.

Continue reading here


Sunday 14 June 2009

Kelly and the Cuddly Bunnies

Andrew Bron is, of course, entirely correct when he states that Dame Kelly Holmes can not be viewed as “entirely British”. Under the current law she is certainly a British citizen, however, part of her heritage passed on to her by her father, is Jamaican, of African origin, and I am sure that it is a part of her heritage of which she is immensely and equally proud.

To claim otherwise is to deny an vital part of her, which is surely far more offensive than the silly Telegraph article is pretending to find MEP Mr. Bron's statement.

It stands to reason, you can not make something other than what it is merely for the sake of political ideology. If I was born in China that fact alone would not make me Chinese, however, much I might, for whatever reason, wish to be Chinese. Even if my English father had married a Chinese woman rather than my English mother, I would still remain half English, as Kelly remains, no doubt proudly, half Jamaican.

The media always attempt to stress the “Britishness” of athletes and celebrities of immigrant origin, as if desperately trying to impose their new reality upon us, rather as the old soviets would stress the “gloriousness” of their crumbling republics.

It is a form of subliminal brainwashing, and it is amazing to see how widely the brain washing has taken effect. I think many of us must have been shocked at the basic ignorance of leading Political blogger Ian Dale, when he insisted to Simon Darby that second generation immigrants were “indigenous”. Clearly Mr Dale believes that, were he to import a Texan cactus, and then replant a cutting in his back garden, cactus would become indigenous to Sussex.

By Ian Dale's definition, Rudyard Kipling was probably an Indian. If someone in his position is so ignorant, why should we be surprised when ordinary people in the street parrot the same arrant nonsense?.

However, whatever the rights and wrongs of the argument over who is, or is not, fully British, we should not ignore the trick which the Telegraph is attempting to play, when they produce Kelly Holmes, and later various “Black British” footballers, as examples of what they are subliminally implying to he the “wonderful and valuable 'Britons' whom the 'nasty' BNP reject”.

This is the same trick which other Bronco substitutes, such as the Sun and Mirror have been playing for weeks, when they produce individual immigrants who are either attractive or who have made some individual contribution, as proof of the “wrongness” of the BNP position on immigration.

Like every other trick the media plays in this area, this is deeply dishonest, overwhelmingly, the British people do not (yet) have issues with individual immigrants, most of us, including the majority BNP supporters would agree that some have made a contribution to the country, however, this does not change the fact that the negative impact of mass immigration far outweighs any contribution made by the few individuals whom the media parade before us.

The contribution, and relative attractiveness, or otherwise of individual immigrants is not the issue, and the media is being shamefully disingenuous when they suggest it is. Nobody objects to immigrants, just because they are immigrants, and few would be concerned if immigration had been kept to moderate or reasonable levels. Even the numbers had only reached those which Enoch Powell had warned of in 1968 (a warning for which he was ridiculed and vilified) we would not be facing the crisis which we are. However, the numbers have so far exceeded Enoch's , by comparison, relatively modest predictions, that have reached the point where our nation is set to be overwhelmed within the next two generations, this is the issue which has brought us to where we are, not how nice individual runners, pop singers and footballers might be.

What the media is doing with Kelly Holmes and their randomly selected black footballers is the same as if they produced a sweet, cuddly, bunny rabbit and announcing “Isn't it cute? isn't it sweet? harmless and cuddly? how could anyone who is not really bad and really evil object to such a sweet cuddly bunny?!!”

Of course nobody would object to an individual cuddly bunny rabbit, because there is no problem with an individual cuddly bunny rabbit. Its when there are ten million cuddly bunnies, now that's when they become a problem.


Saturday 13 June 2009

All Stand together

Click on the image

Thousands against one

The following are a tiny proportion of the many, many thousands of groups and organisation which have been set up in Britain, many of the tax payer funded, to support and cater exclusively to the needs of various ethnic minority communities:

Black Women's Health and Family Support
Black-Jewish Forum City of London
Merseyside Black Police Association
Metropolitan Black police Association
Hindu Forum of Britain
Afghan Community Organisation of London
London Black Carers Workers
London Chinese Community Network
London Ethnic Minority Deaf Association
London Health Commission BME communities Forum
Muslim Association of Britain
National Council of Black Led Organisations
NAZ Project London
Sikhs in England
Akina Mama Wa Afrika
Camden BME Alliance
Confederation Of Indian Organisations (uk)
Consortium Of Bengali Associations
Council Of Ethnic Minority Voluntary Sector Organisations
Diverse Minds Unit
Evelyn Oldfield Unit
Joint Council For The Welfare Of Immigrants
Latin American Womens Rights Service
Operation Black Vote
Alif-Aleph UK:
Assembly for the Protection of the Hijab
Federation of Student Islamic Societies
NUS Black Students Campaign
Student Action for Refugees
BECON (Black Minority Ethnic Community Organisations Network)
Voice4Change England
Black Mental Health UK
StreetVibes Youth
Black Training and Enterprise Group
Nehanda Black Women's Organisation
Ale' Douvan!
Chinese Associations (numerous) this is the Islington one
Indymedia3 Productions
Nirmul Committee
Nzinga Dance
Soulfire Theatre
Swadhinata Trust
Third Dimension Ministries Of Music Education
Tower Hamlets African & Caribbean Mental Health Organisation (THACMHO)
Udichi Shilpi Gosthi XStream
Bangladesh-British chamber of commerce
Asian Association - Various - heres one on the Wirral
Acton Muslim Welfare Association
Afghan Association of London
African Women's Forum
Al-farazdaq Arabic School and Club
Al-Hudah Association
Angolan Civic Communities Alliance
An-Nisa Society
Arab Club of Britain
Arab Women Group
Arya Samaj London
Asian Family Counselling Service
Asian Music and Arts Academy
Cancer Black Care
Somali Welfare and Cultural Association
Eritrean Community in Hammersmith and Fulham
Ethiopian Refugee Association
Black Lawyers directort
Federation of Patidar Association
Friends of African-Caribbean Carers and Sufferers of Dementia
South London Somali Community - one of many London Somali groups
Hammersmith Bengali Association
India Welfare Society
Indian Worker's Association
Iranian Association
Iraqi Community Association
Iraqi Welfare Association
Jinah School of Urdu
Kenyan Society of London
Khalsa National Council
Tamil Sports and Social Club
Nav-Jeevan Asian Society
Naz Project
Pandit Ram Sahai Sangit Vidyalaya
Punjabi Theatre Academy
Refugee Art and Culture Enterprise (RACE)
Sikh Missionary Society UK
Society of Afghan Residents in UK
Somali Community Regeneration Project
Southall Black Sisters
Swahili Support Network
Tamil Refugee Action Group
United Anglo Caribbean Society
United Anglo Caribbean Society Elderly Lunchclub
Valam Brahmin Association
Hindu forum of Britain - over 100 organisations listed
UK West Indian Senior Citizens Organisation
West London Asian Society
+ thousands more

The following is a list of the groups and organisations set up to support and cater to the needs of the indigenous white people of Britain:

The British National party

Now guess which one our nations politicians and its obedient media accuse or "racism" and against whom they are seeking to change the law in order to make its constitution illegal?

And these fascists call us Nazis?

Hat tip dabex