Saturday 31 May 2008

A warning from South Africa

This essay by a writer calling herself WhiteNightshade was posted to various Internet blogs towards the end of last year. However, given recent events both in South Africa, and also closer to home, it is a chilling warning of what could be, hence, I think it deserves republishing:

A Warning for Americans (or the British): A Message from a South African

By WhiteNightshade

People used to say that South Africa was 20 years behind the rest of the Western world. Television, for example, came late to South Africa.

Today, however, South Africa may be the grim model of the future Western world, for events in America reveals trends chillingly similar to those that destroyed our country.

America's structures are Western. Your Congress, your lobbying groups, your free speech, and the way ordinary Americans either get involved or ignore politics are peculiarly Western, not the way most of the world operates. But the fact that only about a third of Americans deem it important to vote is horrifying in light of how close you are to losing your Western character.

Writing letters to the press, manning stands at county fairs, hosting fund-raising dinners, attending rallies, setting up conferences, writing your Congressman -- that is what you know, and what you are comfortable with. Those are the political methods you've created for yourselves to keep your country on track and to ensure political accountability.

But woe to you if -- or more likely, when -- the rules change. White Americans may soon find themselves unable or unwilling to stand up to challenge the new political methods that will be the inevitable result of the ethnic metamorphosis now taking place in America. Unable to cope with the new rules of the game -- violence, mob riots, intimidation through accusations of racism, demands for proportionality based on racial numbers, and all the other social and political weapons used by the have-nots to bludgeon treasure and power from the haves -- Americans, like others before them, will no doubt cave in. They will compromise away their independence and ultimately their way of life.

That is exactly what happened in South Africa. I know, because I was there and I saw it happen.

aced with revolution in the streets, strikes, civil unrest and the sheer terror and murder practiced by Nelson Mandela's African National Congress (ANC), the white government simply capitulated in order to achieve "peace." Westerners need peace. They need order and stability. They are builders and planners. But what we got was peace of the grave for our society.

The Third World is different -- different peoples with different pasts and different cultures. Yet Westerners continue to mistake the psychology of the Third World and its peoples. Sierra Leone and Zimbabwe are perfect examples of those mistakes. Sierra Leone is in perpetual civil war, and Zimbabwe -- once thriving, stable Rhodesia -- is looting the very people (the white men) who feed the country. Yet Westerners do not admit that the same kind of savagery could come to America when enough immigrants of the right type assert themselves. The fact is, Americans are sitting ducks for Third World exploitation of the Western conscience of compassion.

Those in the West who forced South Africa to surrender to the ANC and its leaders did not consider Africa to be the dangerous, corrupt, and savage place it is now in Zimbabwe and South Africa. Those Western politicians now have a similar problem on their own doorsteps: the demand for power and treasure from the non-Western peoples inside the realm.

It is already too late for South Africa, but not for America if enough people strengthen their spine and take on the race terrorists, the armies of the "politically correct" and, most dangerous of all, the craven politicians who believe "compassionate conservatism" will buy them a few more votes, a few more days of peace.

White South Africans, you should remember, have been in that part of Africa for the same amount of time whites have inhabited North America; yet ultimately South Africans voted for their own suicide. We are not so very different from you.

We lost our country through skillful propaganda, pressure from abroad (not least from the U.S.A.), unrelenting charges of "oppression" and "racism," and the shrewd assessment by African tyrants that the white man has many Achilles' heels, the most significant of which are his compassion, his belief in the "equality of man," and his "love your neighbor" philosophy --none of which are part of the Third World's history.

The mainline churches played a big role in the demise of Western influence throughout Africa, too; especially in South Africa. Today's tyrants were yesterday's mission-school protégés. Many dictators in Africa were men of the cloth. They knew their clerical collars would deflect criticism and obfuscate their real aims, which had nothing whatever to do with the "brotherhood of man."

Other tyrants, like the infamous Idi Amin, were trained and schooled by the whites themselves, at Oxford, Cambridge, and Harvard. After receiving the best from the West, they unleashed a resentful bloodlust against their benefactors.

From what I have seen and read thus far, I fear Americans will capitulate just as we did. Americans are, generally, a soft lot. They don't want to quarrel or obstruct the claims of those who believe they were wronged. They like peace and quiet, and they want to compromise and be nice.

A television program aired in South Africa showed a town meeting in Southern California where people met to complain about falling standards in the schools. Whites who politely spoke at the meeting clearly resented the influx of Mexican immigrants into their community. When a handful of Chicanos at the back of the hall shouted and waved their hands at them, the whites simply shrunk back into their seats rather than tell the noisemakers to shut up. They didn't want to quarrel.

In America, the courts are still the final arbiters of society's laws. But what will happen when your future majority refuses to abide by court rulings -- as in Zimbabwe? What will happen when the courts are filled with their people, or their sympathizers? In California, Proposition 187 has already been overturned.

What will you do when the future nonwhite majority decides to change the names of streets and cities? What will you do when they no longer want to use money that carries the portraits of old, dead white "racists" and slave owners? Will you cave in, like you did on flying the Confederate flag? What about the national anthem? Your official language?

Don't laugh. When the "majority" took over in South Africa, the first targets were our national symbols.

In another generation, America may well face what Africa is now experiencing -- invasions of private land by the "have-nots;" the decline in health care quality; roads and buildings in disrepair; the banishment of your history from the education of the young; the revolutionization of your justice system.

In South Africa today, only 9 percent of murders end up in jail. Court dockets are regularly purchased and simply disappear. Magistrates can be bribed as can the prison authorities, making escapes commonplace. Vehicle and airplane licenses are regularly purchased, and forged school and university certificates are routine.

What would you think of the ritual slaughter of animals in your neighbor's backyard? How do you clean up the blood and entrails that litter your suburban streets? How do you feel about the practice of witchcraft, in which the parts of young girls and boys are needed for "medicinal" purposes? How do you react to the burning of witches?

Don't laugh. All that is quite common in South Africa today.

Don't imagine that government officials caught with their fingers in the till will be punished. Excuses -- like the need to overcome generations of white racism -- will be found to exonerate the guilty.

In fact, known criminals will be voted into office because of a racial solidarity among the majority that doesn't exist among the whites. When Ian Smith of the old Rhodesia tried to stand up to the world, white South African politicians were among the Westerners pressuring him to surrender.

When Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe murders his political opponents, ignores unfavorable court decisions, terrorizes the population and siphons off millions from the state treasury for himself and his friend, South Africa's new President Thabo Mbeki holds his hand and declares his support. That just happened a few weeks ago.

Your tax dollars will go to those who don't earn and don't pay. In South Africa, organizations that used to have access to state funds such as old age homes, the arts, and veterans' services, are simply abandoned.

What will happen is that Western structures in America will be either destroyed from without, or transformed from within, used to suit the goals of the new rulers. And they will reign either through terror, as in Zimbabwe today, or exert other corrupt pressures to obtain, or buy votes. Once power is in the hands of aliens, don't expect loyalty or devotion to principle from those whose jobs are at stake. One of the most surprising and tragic components of the disaster in South Africa is how many previously anti-ANC whites simply moved to the other side.

Once you lose social, cultural, and political dominance, there is no getting it back again.

Unfortunately, your habits and values work against you. You cannot fight terror and street mobs with letters to your Congressmen. You cannot fight accusations of racism with prayer meetings. You cannot appeal to the goodness of your fellow man when the fellow man despises you for your weakness and hacks off the arms and legs of his political opponents.

To survive, Americans must never lose the power they now enjoy to people from alien cultures. Above all, don't put yourselves to the test of fighting only when your backs are against the wall. You will probably fail.

Millions around the world want your good life. But make no mistake: They care not for the high-minded ideals of Jefferson and Washington, and your Constitution. What they want are your possessions, your power, and your status.

And they already know that their allies among you, the "human rights activists," the skillful lawyers and the left-wing politicians will fight for them, and not for you. They will exploit your compassion and your Christian charity, and your good will.

They have studied you, Mr. and Mrs. America, and they know your weaknesses well.

They know what to do. Do you?

I also thought that it would NEVER HAPPEN

Tuesday 27 May 2008

Broken news

It has been a violent holiday weekend in London, following the tragic death of budding actor Rob Knox in Sidcup on Friday, two black teenagers were wounded after shootings in Camden and Archway, North London. A 19-year-old man was in a critical condition in hospital after being found stabbed outside East Ham Underground station on Sunday night, and a second man, also aged 19, was arrested after he was found near by with head injuries. In addition, two youths suffered knife wounds after gangs clashed outside a restaurant in Nottingham on Sunday evening, and on Friday night James Graham, 29, was beaten to death in Hendon, north west London.

Then yesterday the badly beaten body of 17 year old Amar Aslam was found in a park in a Dewsbury park, clearly the victim of a violent homicidal attack.

Whatever the circumstances, all such violent deaths are a tragedy and I have the deepest sympathy for young Amar's friends and family.

However, I would like to concentrate on the news coverage following the discovery of Amar's body, particularly on the 24 hour rolling news broadcasts given by BBC News24 and Sky News, because it was very enlightening.

Shortly after the news broke, reports started coming in of earlier racial tension in the Dewsbury area, including alleged clashes between Asians and whites. The effect on the newsrooms was electric, the killing suddenly became the main news story, with bright eyed and flushed reporters gushing excitedly, as they gripped their microphones just that little bit more tightly, that this might be a ..... racially motivated attack.

It was clear the Fourth Estate believed they had their prize, a racial crime with a white perpetrator, which could be used as a counterbalance against the endless stream of street murders and assaults, which have made the news over the last few years, in which the perpetrators have all been so inconveniently non-white.

It has been many long dry years for the media, since the killings of Stephen Lawrence and Anthony Walker gave them the opportunity to falsely portray race hate crimes as a white on black phenomenon. There are only so many shrines which can be built in the memory of the blessed Stephen, a new totem is required, and press have been growing progressively more disparate for an up to date non-white victim and white villain combo to splash across their front pages and lead their news broadcasts.

Frustratingly for the eager news hounds white thugs have so far been uncooperative, unlike non-whites who have been assaulting all and sundry with gusto in resent years, leaving the media struggling to find new and inventive means of describing the crimes, which did not include the word “racial”, or even mention the race of the attackers.

However, this time it seemed their long wait was over and they would soon be able to say and write those magic words “A racially motivated attack by a white gang” and be actually referring to events in this century. The newsrooms buzzed as Dewsbry residents were interviewed about racial tensions, and indeed one even quoted the legendary “white boy who stabbed an Asian” myth which so often mentioned in these circumstances, and then quietly dropped, when it is found on to be untrue.

But it was not too be, and to the obvious crushing disappointment of anchor men and on sight reporters alike, the show stopping news was revealed by Dewsbury MP, Shahid Malik, that the police had arrested and were questioning non white suspects, at which point one reporter appeared close to tears. The grim expressions in the newsrooms across the airwaves exposed quite clearly what a blow this revelation had been to those newsmen and women who, moments before had truly believed their wait was at an end.

To quote John of Gwent's comment on the Home of the Green Arrow article about this subject: A fascinating BBC News 24 bulletin not an hour ago revealed that three men have been detained in connection with this and all are Asian. In a half hearted attempt to put out the flames that various sources were wetting themselves after fanning, the BBC News Link Man asked their woman on the spot if she had any comment on the "clearly now discredited" reports that this was a racist murder.

The journo on site suddenly wore a face that suggested a lemon had just materialised in her throat, from thin air, minus its peel. 'Well, such matters are now best left to the police to report on as they continue their investigations' she said. Funny how a white kid whose neck was slashed by a Turk doesn't deserve the truth being told.”

Later, Channel Four News broadcast started by trumpeting accounts of the racial tension, before reluctantly admitting that this murder probably wasn't racially motivated, suggesting that they had prepared the item before news of the arrests broke, and could not quite let the fantasy go.

And so the media's long vigil continues, they carry on waiting, because they know one day their wait will be over, indeed it may be quite soon as tensions continue to rise, one day, maybe tomorrow, next week or next year, a white boy will kill a non white boy, and the press will have their prise.

No matter that they may have to clamber over the bodies of a hundred white boys, or even a thousand, they will grasp their trophy and, as with Johann Nel that in blood spattered centre of black crime South Africa, they will make it the definitive example of a race hate crime, and by constant repartition, use it In the hope of obscuring the daily toll of bloodshed which mass third world immigration has wrought upon our streets. They will use it as they have used Stephen Lawrence for the last fifteen years, and it will be no less of a lie, when they do.

However, the world has moved on, and we are all wiser now, so I wonder, when it happens, as it surely will, will the public buy the same old lie again?

Sunday 25 May 2008

Wafa Sultan - "Why I left Islam"

I urge any visitors who did not access this blog via the Home of the Green Arrow, or any who did but who skipped the excellent video of a talk given by a woman called Wafa Sultan explaining her decision to abandon her Islamic faith, to go straight to the Green Arrow blog and listen to this remarkable woman's harrowing story.

Wafa is an activist, but she is an activist in a good cause and I applaud her opposition to that oppressive and cruel dogma which calls itself a religion. As a woman born to the Muslim faith, Wafa Sultan's testimony is more powerful than anything which I, as a western Christian could say and I hope that many people will get to hear her.

The video can be viewed Here

The Green Arrow also has a very thought provoking post and video about the 1999 bombardment of Kosovo which may make many reevaluate their view of what happened.

Another Victim of the Maddness

Another mother has lost her much loved son, another boy his adored brother. How many more of our children must be sacrificed before this mad social experiment is brought to an end?

The situation is now out of control, and at this point we have to wonder if it can ever be put right.

Saturday 24 May 2008

A dangerously infectious condition

Ever since the identity of the man accused of attempting to set off a bomb in an Exeter restaurant was revealed, certain sections of the press have been announcing breathlessly that the suspect, Nicky Reilly, is a white convert to Islam.

The media always get overexcited when they can pretend that white Europeans are as likely to be terrorists as Asians, even if they have to bend the truth into impossible contortions to do so. Readers may recall how hard they tried to present Andrew Ibrahim, the young terror suspect arrested in Bristol in April as “white”, even after it was revealed that his father wa an Asian doctor called Nassif.

It seems that this time they are correct and that the suspect is a white English native, albeit one with a history of mental problems, who the police believe may have been radicalised.

Whatever the truth may be in this instance, I don't really know why the press get so excited on the rare occasion that a white convert gets involved in attempted atrocities, it proves nothing other than that radical Islam is a dangerously infectious condition. Nicky Reilly did not change Islam, Islam changed Nicky Reilly.

Dengue fever does not cease to be a tropical disease if an Englishman catches it, and and neither does the fact that a few vulnerable or weak minded individuals have been seduced into embracing its deadly doctrine make Islam a European faith.

The few small Muslim enclaves in the Balkans and Chechnya are the residue left from earlier attempts by Islam to colonise Europe, not to any European tradition. Islam is an alien philosophy, with its origins in a set of beliefs so different to those at the root of our own culture that most can either not comprehend it or refuse to acknowledge it.

There is no European tradition within Islam, it is a force from outside, which we have let in and the fact that it has captured or beguiled some of our children does not make it native to our land.

Like all infectious conditions, some will fall victim to it, as Nicky Reilly appears to have done, but all that tells us is that we need to take preventative measures before more succumb.

An American Double Standard

The next time some disingenuous commentator starts bemoaning the fact that 60% of “racist” whites are not voting for Obama, I hope someone points out that a much larger percentage, around 90%, of blacks are voting for for him and as such are not voting for the white woman, who, together with her husband, has done more for for the African American community than, just about any politician since the 60's.

Of course nobody will point out that the far more significant evidence of racial bias on the part part of the non-white community might be suggestive of a bit of black racism, to say such a thing would be viewed as political heresy.

The usually excellent Jon Stewart of the Daily Show mocked the white voters of West Virginia who voted overwhelmingly in favour of Hillary Clinton However, not even he has the honesty, courage or integrity to do anything similar about 90% of blacks in Mississippi who voted with their race or the 92% of blacks in North Carolina who did the same.

Furthermore, why has nobody asked the regiment of black celebrities who have abandoned their old friend in their rush to endorse the untried young senator from Illinois if their actions might have been a tad influenced by his race?

Of course the hypocrisy of political correctness is even more deeply ingrained into the American political psyche than it is (yet) in ours, and is revealed in all its malevolence when political pundits contemptuously dismiss Clinton's claim that she won the popular vote (if all the popular vote had been counted)

Can anyone doubt that if the situation were reversed, and had two major states which had voted overwhelmingly for Obama been excluded from the count on procedural grounds these same commentators would be screaming “foul” and making furious accusations about a racist fix. The Primaries in Florida and Michigan would no longer be referred to as “disqualified” but the word which would leap from every news column would be “disenfranchised”.

I hold no brief for Hillary Clinton, other than that I admire her tenacity, and would like to see a woman win. However, she and her supporters deserve fair treatment, meanwhile , a torch of truth needs to be shone upon the Obama campaign, and, at present neither is happening.

If it is racist for 60% of whites not to vote for a black man, surely it is far more so when 90% of blacks do!

Although I have yet to see a country which, after having been led by a black man, has emerged better off for the experience, my objection is not to the possibility of a black US president, blacks make up more than 13% of the American population and their numbers are growing, so that development is inevitable. However, the fact that a limp-wristed nonentity, such as Barack Obama looks set to defeat one of the most significant politicians in America, which, love her or hate her, Hillary Clinton certainly is, due to black racism and egalitarian fantasies, is a travesty which encapsulates the malaise of our age.

If, as seems very likely, Barack Obama is chosen as the Democratic candidate for president, this will certainly not be a result which transcends race, as many of his worshipers will rush to declare it, and many a Clinton supporter will have some justification in feeling robbed.

Wednesday 21 May 2008

Another requiem for Satire

Many, who have not get realised that the act of expressing a view which does not respect the laws of political correctness has become a prosecutable offence, will have heard the news that a British Teenager is facing possible charges for calling the Church of Scientology a "cult" with varying degrees of amazement.

I was not amongst them, in fact, I am just surprised it hasn't come sooner; enforcers always push the boundaries, hence the need for strict rules controlling them.

We now have anti-terrorist legislation (mis) used by town councils to see who is properly recycling their garbage bins, we have "9/11" legislation rushed through to protect the nation being used to extradite businessmen to America to be tried for crimes that the UK government are satisfied never took place, and now policemen are deciding what words peaceful public protesters may use on their signs.

I think there are three problems. Sloppily drafted legislation is the first problem, it all needs to be repealed and laws drafted by lawyers, (define 'glorifying terror') and a culture of lack of accountability the other (who was the policeman who decided it was a criminal offence to decide the Scientologists were a cult, given a British High Court Judge (and the German Justice Minister) have publicly said they are? Why hasn't he been named and his picture published? Is it an official secret? Is he himself a Scientologist? Will he be tried with any offence or disciplined in any way for infringing the right to peaceful protest, one of the most fundamental rights?

The third, and most serious concern though, is the British public may moan a bit but I am starting to believe that it would take nuclear war to stir them out onto the streets and kick a government out because of it.

I am afraid the point we have reached is not how low it will go. There will be more to come.

What this latest madness exposes is the fact if we didn't already know it, that we do not have the right of free speech in this country, and have not had it for over a generation.

The Witches of Kisii

In the face of insistence on the part of pursed lipped politicians and dog collared ANC apologists, that the recent anti immigrant violence in South Africa was somehow the fault of the pre-1994 white Apartheid government, which as one prelate stated, "schooled the nation in xenophobia", rather than further evidence of a savage and, deeply tribal, brutality running wild through sub Saharan Africa, I, shall pass on to you the news that at least 11 elderly women have been burnt alive in, Kenya, on account of them being witches.
The women were apparently dragged from their homes by a howling, machete wielding mob doused with petrol and set alight, before their homes were torched in turn.

The mob had won some local support because the victims were accused of making a list of people in the village they were bewitching and then ticking off their names as they died, which presumably was viewed as conclusive proof of guilt.

Villagers said earlier that the mob had killed 15 women.
Provincial police chief Anthony Kibuchi, however, confirmed that only 11 bodies, including those of three men, had been found up until now. "So far we have confirmed 11 suspects were killed and we are still checking through the burnt houses just in case there could be more bodies," he said.

The region, populated mainly by the Kisii tribe, has been dubbed Kenya's "sorcery belt" due to the number of mob attacks on women suspected of witchcraft.

Efforts by the authorities to clamp down on vigilante and mob justice have been unsuccessful.

Several cases have also been reported in recent months in neighbouring Tanzania, forcing President Jakaya Kikwete to order special protection for albinos, who were murdered and mutilated for good luck by witch-doctors.

Presumably the British government and press are confident that those Africans who seem willing to chop up their fellow citizens alive at the drop of a machete, and who believe that setting fire to old ladies and foreigners, and who have such a touchingly "ethnic" belief in sorcery, are far too busy chopping and burning to join the rush to enrich Britain.

I have to confess to a healthy scepticism.

Monday 19 May 2008

Strife beneath the rainbow

Violent racially motivated attacks against immigrants in South Africa have resulted in a large number of deaths and many rapes with rioters claiming foreigners are responsible for rising crime levels and low employment opportunities. A return to the horrific sight of the cynically named black on black practice of “Necklacing” which the BBC and the rest of the western media suppressed during the Apartheid where at least one man was set on fire after a tyre soaked in gasoline was put around his neck. There was no immediate word on his condition

Hundreds of foreigners have taken refuge in police stations and churches as the violence against them spread further across poor townships. Some South Africans, especially those living in poor areas of high unemployment, accuse Zimbabweans and other newcomers of fuelling the high crime rate and taking scarce jobs.The attacks have renewed the authorities' fears that xenophobia is on the rise in the country which was once portrayed in the west as one of the most welcoming to immigrants and asylum seekers, especially from Africa.

According to the BBC around 12 people have been killed so far however Reuters suggest that least 22 people have been killed since unrest started last week.

The targets are largely Zimbabwean immigrants who have flooded across the boarders fleeing Mugabbe's hell in recent years, however report that a number of Nigerians, another group who have immigrated to South Africa in recent years, have also been attacked

Below is a timeline of the troubles and facts and figures on some of the issues at play.

May 11 - A mob attacks a group of immigrants in Alexandra township outside Johannesburg, killing two and injuring 40.
May 15 - Police fire rubber bullets to quell anti-foreigner violence in Diepsloot, another township near Johannesburg, where youths threw stones, set up barricades and looted shops.
May 18 - Violence spreads to other areas, including the Johannesburg city centre. Among the dead are five people killed in the Cleveland area of Johannesburg, local media say. At least one immigrant is burned to death.
May 19 - Two people are killed and dozens of shacks are torched in the Tembisa township near Johannesburg. Police say at least 19 people have been killed since May 16.

Earlier on Channel 4 news Jon Snow pretended to be amazed that such a thing was happening in South Africa, however, he and every other commentator was certainly aware that the early optimism about the “Rainbow Nation” was misplaced by 1996.

Like the rest of the media, Channel 4 has been suppressing news of the almost 3,000 white farmers who have been tortured to death since 1994, dismissing this ongoing genocide as “crime”, but they can't hide young men being set on fire on the street. (Albeit I am sure they would try to had the victim been white)

Events in South Africa follow recent tribal violence in Kenya which graphically exposed the folly of attempting to impose Multiculturalism on people who do not want it. Yet, in the face of international evidence, our government continues with its policy of mass immigration.

I do not to explain the analogy I am making do I? Will we have to wait until we see similar scenes (again) on our own streets before our leaders realise what they are risking?


Also posted to The Home of the Green Arrow

Sunday 18 May 2008

Another race attack ignored by the media

Does anyone believe for one instant that if a young black man had fallen victim to a vicious knife attack by 10 white youths, been stabbed eight times and left in a serious condition, it would not have been one of the main news stories on all the news channels and National news papers, rather than languishing in the pages of the Barking and Dagenham Recorder ?.

Does anyone believe that had the victim been black and the attackers white the police would not have treated it as a hate crime or faced a public outcry?.

However, once again the victim was white, and as usual the attackers were not, so, as always, it just ain't news.

I guess we should not be surprised given all the other "non hate" and "non newsworthy" crimes against white victims which almost nobody ever heard about.

Full LOCAL news story here


Comment by Alanorei

The following has been added to the comments section by Alanorei, but as it is so well said, I have brought it forward to the main post so it gets the attention it deserves:

Some time ago, a contributor to the then BNP Forum said this:

"The BBC say that a 15 year old white child, who is kidnapped, physically tortured and set on fire whilst desperately clinging for his life, by a gang of sick Asian-Muslim thugs is not news worthy."

Absolutely true. The BBC is thereby acknowledging that non-white (or white foreign, i.e. East European) killings of white Britons are commonplace, while the reverse is uncommon and therefore "newsworthy," on the basis of the old editorial adage that "If a dog bites a man, that's not news. If a man bites a dog, that is news."

What follows is part of a reply the BBC sent to an enquirer asking why the murder of black teenager Anthony Walker in July 2005 received a huge amount of news coverage, while the fatal stabbing at about the same time of white Englishman Richard Whelan by a black assailant received almost no coverage.

The BBC respondent pointed out certain similarities in the crimes, i.e. both victims were young males etc.

The BBC person went on to state: "But in fact the two murders are very different. "As far as I know, from reading the Press Association wires, listening to the police and reading newspaper coverage, the police are not suggesting there was any racial motive in the killing of Richard Whelan."It is this racial element to the crime that makes it different. "Racially motivated murders, I'm sure we are all glad to say, are rare events. They are unheard of in this area of Liverpool. Unfortunately, senseless murders in London are comparatively more common."

Note the tacit admission in the last line quoted. It is certainly borne out by the facts, nationwide. Statistics derived from data on The Green Arrow's Fallen List from January 2005 to the present, show that, allowing for a 86/14 percentage split in the population of white British/others, a non-white or white foreigner is 60 times more likely to kill a white Briton than the reverse.

This result does not include the 27 white Britons murdered on July 7th 2005 by Muslim homicide bombers.

If these killings are included, as I believe they should be, the result is 74:1.

These results, which include accidental killings by dangerous driving and killings of white Britons by foreign whites, agree fairly well with Tony Shell's results for racial homicides over the period 1996-2005, inclusive, which give a 30:1 ratio, BME members against white Britons.

Such violent killings are at present only about 3-4% of all such killings but the percentage will no doubt increase unless government aims for enforced integration (e.g. white English school children having to pretend they are Muslims) are resisted.

Here are the full figures, from January 2005 to the present:

% White Britain 86
% Others 14

Source for the population breakdown is

Ratio, BME+white foreign killings of white Britons vs. the reverse: 60

Ratio, including 7/7: 74
Numbers killed excluding 7/7 117
(including 12 killings by foreign whites)
Numbers killed including 7/7 144

Number Non-Brits killed by white Britons 12

The Home Office figures show that
violent killings of all kinds work out at about roughly 1300 a year, so the killings where victim and killer are of a different race (including foreign white) are about 3-4% of the total.

But the statistics don't tell the real story, of the grief suffered by the victims' families. And the above figures do not include the vastly disproportionate plethora of horrible crimes committed against the host white population by BME etc. members that don't result in a death - or the alarming increase in BME on BME killings via gang-related stabbings and shootouts and the abominable 'honour' killings and beatings (making a current bad situation with many lawless whites out and about much worse).

I think my figures roughly accord with Tony Shell's, all things considered. His analysis focuses on actual homicides, rather than including, as I do, accidental deaths by dangerous driving etc. and he does not include the 7/7 deaths. Also, he uses population splits of 94/6 (1996) to 92/8 (2005) and does not include killings by foreign whites, though these are a relatively small number, so far.

All that said, I believe that both sets of figures show a serious, indeed alarming trend, which current government social and domestic policy, as indicated, can and will only make worse.

Saturday 17 May 2008

A bloodstained fantasy

I make no apology for returning to the subject of violent, gang related, street crime, as this is a phenomenon which even the most blinkered amongst us must now realise is becoming a bigger and more dangerous threat to our communities by the day. Despite government and police attempts to distort the figures by such tricks as highlighting falls in non-violent crime, redefining certain types of crimes, or simply not reporting others, even they can no longer remain deliberately blind to the bodies of dead and injured children littering our streets, whilst, internationally, London becomes known as Europe's capital of knife crime.

As the nation's eyes gradually begin to open, even some of the most outrageous dissemblers in the media have been forced to allow a small trickle of truth to creep into their writings. In Thursday's London Evening Standard for instance, even that stout standard bearer for the multicultural dream, the honour rejecting poseur, Yasmin Alibhai-Brown came close to admitting who the primary perpetrators of violent crime are when she wrote that today the “absolute injunction against stop-and-search make less and less sense” and that many within the black community are expressing support for more proactive policing of their own children.

However, Yasmin would not be Yasmin without the untruths and one can only marvel at her bare faced dishonesty when she writes “Times have changed. Race is no longer as clear a marker between victim and perpetrator or criminal and law enforcer” It may be true that there are now a small number more non-whites in the police force, however “the racial marker” in respect of the perpetrator's of street crime is now more marked than it ever was.

That the perpetrators now also victimise their own is no consolation their battered hosts and their blooded children.

The truth which dare not speak it's name, for fear of the "r" word, was exposed in all its enriching glory in the Evening Standard on the same day as Yasmin's column, in the front page report on the over 100 stabbings which have occurred in London so far this year and also by the previous day's report from that most enriched of areas, Peckham from which together with any list of the over 200 separate London gangs shows that the problem we face is most certainly not “white boys stabbing white boys”

Recent reports, towards the end of last year, revealed that one in every five crimes in Britain was perpetrated by “foreigners” however, these revelations in themselves were misleading and downplayed the truth about immigrant related crime, particularly that from outside Europe, by excluding from the list of “foreigners” all immigrants who had committed crimes after being granted British citizenship or any British born children of immigrants who commit crime (that is to say the majority of gang members). Can anyone doubt that if figures had been published including those groups, and exposed the true level of immigrant crime, even the most complacent native Briton would be outraged, and terrified, by what is going on.

True as ever to her agenda driven heart, Alibhai-Brown's article also evokes the old spectre of “racist white policemen” using stop and search powers to intimidate innocent black youths, and she urges the authorities to restrain their racist instincts in future. This cant is not only laughable, but it is the deliberate and cynical lie it always was. It was a lie in the 1970's and 80's and it is a lie again today, no less so than the dishonest con trick played on us by the travesty which was the Macphearson report when it invented the ludicrous and much exploited term “institutional racism”.

The entire premise behind the allegations of “institutional racism”, which were thrown at the police force and virtually every other “establishment body” in this country, is flawed and dishonest, not least as it suggests that attitudes, subconscious or otherwise, result from prejudice rather than experience, and the same implication applies to the alleged “discriminatory” use of stop and search.

These claims do not stand up to the minimum of scrutiny. It was not prejudice which led to the setting up of Operation Trident to deal with the growing problem of gun crime in the black community, it was the fact that black men are statistically more likely to carry and use guns. The same applies in relation to carrying knives and committing street crime, hence it is experience and not prejudice which made the police pay extra attention to black youths.

To suggest that they should behave otherwise because some white youths commit street crime is the equivalent of using the 1970's case of Joyce McKinney and her manacled Mormon to argue that the police should devote equal resources to tackling female rapists as they do to male.

Yes, it happens, but considerably less often.

Each crime is unique, and criminals differ so I don't (much)doubt that there are a small number of nuns and old age pensioners who commit acts of vandalism, however, the next time a brick is thrown through you window, I am sure you would expect the police to question the local teenagers before they raid the nearest rest home or convent in a crowd pleasing display of political correctness.

Profiling has been given a bad name, however, that is largely due to politics, and much to the chagrin of those who criticise it, the fact is we have yet to see a Norwegian grandmother, rather than a young Asian male, sitting in the dock at the Old Bailey on terrorism charges.

Despite all evidence, and the growing number of young victims of this predominantly black crime, Alibhai-Brown can still not resist playing politics and repeating the discredited claims about racist policemen targeting innocent black youths, which made it so difficult for the police to do their job, and, as such may have led in some measure to the deaths we have seen.

Yasmin sees no contradiction between admitting that stop and search could save lives, whilst, in the face of so many death which stop and search might have prevented, proudly trumpeting her earlier opposition to it. Likewise, no doubt she sees no connection between the open door immigration policy which she has for so long championed and London's new found status as the knife crime capital of Europe, however, the one led to the other as surely as night follows day.

Alibhai-Brown is by no means uniquely to blame, she is a well known supporter of the campaign to change a white nation into a multicultural social experiment, and by her own admission, hers was one of the voices opposing police efforts to keep our streets safe, but she is just one of the many who's actions brought us to this point.

We now face the bloodstained consequences of a multicultural fantasy for which an entire army of establishment and media have lied and conspired for decades, even though they must have known it would never work. Not only did they open the door and let the beast in, but they took away our defences against it by calling them racist, but it is we, not they who will pay the price.

Those who have done this to us will never admit their guilt but I wonder if they will ever be held to account.

Monday 12 May 2008

Unwelcome truths

On Sunday, following the tragic murder of 16 year old Jimmy Mizen, in Lee, South London, the day before, I visited the website of the local Newspaper the quaintly named News & Shopper and read the comments section beneath a news item about the case.

As one might expect with the case so recent, and with feelings regarding the loss of a much loved young man so raw a number of the comments were angry and emotional, in particular there was much anger and frustration at the fact that police and media had, up to that point, failed to release an adequate description of the suspect, beyond the fact that he was a “male youth”.

In these politically correct times, the community cohesion censors routinely use such terms as code for “black male”, in the belief that if the public do not read about non white crime they will not get upset about it, therefore, this odd omission led a number of correspondents to assume that the suspect’s race was being withheld for reasons of political correctness.

At this stage none of us who did not witness the attack can know for certain what colour Jimmy’s assailant was, however, it is a well known fact that if the press suppress a criminal's ethnic identity, and you assume the suppressed identity is non-white, nine times out of ten you will be correct, consequently, there was some justification for such an assumption.

I understand that, as of the time of posting the prime suspect is a Turkish youth who is known to the family. However, if Jimmy’s killer had turned out to be white, he would have been the first white assailant involved in any of the 40 most recent teenaged murders in London (68 killings if you include all those under 25).

As opinion from all sides of the political spectrum were represented on the News & Shopper site, the debate became quite heated, and sadly some political point scoring took place. A number of BNP supporters ventured their views in a restrained and respectful manner and were met with the predictable and unfair accusations of racism from the fanatical advocates of enrichment.

In addition some individuals who were clearly not BNP supporters, but who were posing as such posted strings of obscenities and UAF standard hate speech in order to portray the party in the manner which best suits its enemies at SearchLite and Common Purpose.

When I looked in again later in the evening both groups of protagonists were still batting away with some vigor.

Out of interest I visited the site again today to see what remained of the various exchanges after the moderator had pruned the unruly and rather passionate thread, and, as expected, a lot of messages had disappeared, including, thankfully, all the rubbish posted by the ludicrous BNP impersonators from the UAF.
Surprisingly, however, some quite strident comments from nationalists lamenting the state that the country was in. Also some quite abusive messages had been left, where contributors had called each other “idiots” or worse.

The fact that such messages had survived made some of the casualties all the more surprising.

I looked back for a number of rational non abusive messages I had read last night and they had gone.

One from a man who said that he did not wish to "criminalise all non whites", but if we are to solve the problem then we have to accept uncomfortable truths. In the last two years, he said, 40 teenagers have been murdered in London, but, on the basis of all available evidence, none of the killers were white.

Why had that message gone?, it was not abusive or racist, it was not BNP propaganda, it was a stark statement of the truth. But it was not a truth the moderator wanted read, so it did not pass muster.

In another message a woman had tried to explain why there was so much anger, as a locals, she said, most of those writing to the News Shopper know from experience that white boys are the primary victims of racial violence, whereas non-whites are the main aggressors. Yet, the press and the media ignore the fact and keep holding new and bigger ceremonies in memory of Stephen Lawrence, who, if he was a victim of racial violence, he was a rare exception to the rule.

Of course there was no chance that such sacrilege would survive a politically correct site moderator's wrath, no matter how true.

The moderator on one local Lewisham website is no different from those on any news site in this country, it seems they will allow you to squabble and you can snipe, but if you get close to telling the truth about racial violence in this country, you will be silenced.

Sunday 11 May 2008

Another Dubbya?

The possible next president of America speaks

Where did the extra nine states come from? Is there a secret plan within NAFTA to annex everything north of Panama?, if not it is kinda' scary if the next Commander in Chief does not know how many states there are!

Saturday 10 May 2008

Mogadishu on our Streets

Friday's news included two separate, but almost identical, stories regarding the sentencing of the gang member killers of teen aged murder victims. The cases, which were depressingly similar. featured two more of the rapidly growing number of of teenagers murdered on British streets in recent years. The victims, 14 year old Paul Erhahon and 16 year old Kodjo Yenga had a lot in common, they were both much loved young men, who's families claim that they had rejected gang culture and had bright futures, also, in each case five young men were convicted in relation to their deaths. Pictures of the victims and their killers are at the top of this page.

Today's papers are full of quotes from the judge, Christopher Moss QC who sentenced Kodjo Yenga's killers and called the crime “part of the gang culture that casts a dreadful influence over the youth of our cities”meanwhile, whilst sentencing Paul Erhahon's killers, Mr Justice Keith commented that "There is self-evidently a culture among boys of your age to do with the carrying of knives which needs to be changed."

Across the media, commentators continue to bewail this escalating slaughter of youth “society is to blame” they cry, “Our children are killing our children”. To a man, (and woman) the talking heads claim that they want to find the cause of this ongoing teenage massacre, and yet, to a man they persist in pretending that it is a problem which besets wider society rather than one which is restricted to one small section of the community.

The one aspect of these crimes which the newspapers and TV report about them studiously fail to acknowledge is that the one thing, apart from their age and sex, which both victims and all their killers share in common is that they are all non-white.

This fact is no aberration, we need only to look at the list of the victims of gang related murder in London last year, which included Kodjo and Paul, to see that the vast majority were black or Asian. This year we are only into May and already the death toll looks set to exceed 2007, and so far every single London victim is non white.

Furthermore, as each successive trial shows us, all the perpetrators are non-white as well. Even with the cases that have not yet come to trial, following the media volcanic reaction to alleged racial murder of the blessed Stephen of Eltham, given neither the Guardian or Channel four newsrooms have yet been declared slip hazard zones, we can be certain that there are no white boys suspected of killing black boys.

To my knowledge the only white suspects in any gang related killing carried out in Great Britain in either 2007 or 2008 are those charged with the death of Rhys Jones in Liverpool (If anyone knows of any others and writes to the comments section with details, I will correct this statement).

However, the facts clearly demonstrate that, although non-whites make up just over 10% of the population, they account for the vast majority of all victims of gang related murder and almost all the perpetrators, certainly over 90%.

This phenomenon is not unique to Britain, a study of the most violent cities in America show that the highest rates of violent crime occur in those cities which have large black and ethnic populations.

The figures speak for themselves:

Detroit – 81% black
Baltimore - 64% black
New Orleans - 70% black
Washington DC - 60% black
St Louis - 51% black
Atlanta - 59% black
Newark NJ - 53% black
Philadelphia - 43% black
Buffalo NY - 37% black
Oakland Calif - 30% black

(I believe that blacks account for 43% of the population of Cincinnati, - No:8 on the list - but could not find a reliable source for that figure)

African Americans make up around 13% of the overall US population, however, in those areas where they make up a larger percentage the level of violent crime inevitably also increases.

Some may argue that one can not compare the situation in America to that here as the two societies are so different, and maybe they have a point, the black community in America has existed for around 300 years and have lived as free men for almost 143 years, or some five generations depending upon one's definition, more than enough time, one would have thought to adopt the culture of their new homeland, however as events following Katrina showed us, culture is more ingrained than that.

Those coming to our shores on the other hand have not had generations to adopt our culture, they have had 40 or 50 years at the very most, and they are coming to us from some of the most dangerous, and crime ridden and unstable places on Earth, Somalia , Jamaica, Pakistan, Kenya, Algeria, and Nigeria to name just a few of the crime and murder hot spots from whence our new next door neighbours hail.

Our government welcomes them and says that they have left their dangerous and violent lands behind them, and that is true, however, it is not a location which causes people to act with violence, it is not soil which creates a propensity for crime, it is culture and mindset and those two travel with the migrant.

If I travel to France I do not instantly become French, I do not lose my Englishness as I alight from the train at Gare De Nord, or leave my culture behind at Charles De Gaul. As we see in British ex-patriots across the world most retain their essential culture and mindset to the bitter end.

The same applies to incoming cultures, they do not undergo colonic irrigation at Heathrow, they arrive as they left Karachi, and they stay that way. The Guardianistas acknowledge that when they claim that new and different cultures enrich ours and that we should embrace them. However, immigrant culture is not just beads and Bollywood, it has an underbelly, and it is naive to express surprise when the culture of Kingston, Johannesburg or Mogadishu appears on our streets.

The spate of Gang related teen aged murders on our streets are not “White boys stabbing white boys” as the dishonest, and thankfully now unemployed, Ken Livingstone tried to claim it is black boys stabbing black boys, Asians stabbing Asians and sometimes either group stabbing white boys if they get in the way.

What we are seeing on our streets is imported, it is a direct result of the uncontrolled immigration which successive governments have encouraged with criminal indifference to the well being of the native population they were elected to protect and serve.We are faced with a situation which was imposed upon us without democratic vote or accountability, it is a situation which is getting worse by the day and with which, we, our children and grandchildren will be dealing with for many years to come, however, we will not be able to deal with it until we call it by its real name.


Also posted to The Home of the Green Arrow

Sunday 4 May 2008

The Enemy within

I recall that, as a teenager, during the early 1980's, I, like many others was a huge fan of an American TV series called “V” where malevolent Aliens sought to take over the Earth, and consume its current inhabitants (literally). Initially, these ill intentioned space beings seemed kindly and benevolent, and indeed they looked so like us it was heard to tell who was earthling and who alien.

That was until some accident would rip away a section of their false skin revealing the green reptilian scales beneath, and exposing the invaders true monstrous intentions.

“V” was in a genre of mostly 'B' Horror movies, such as “The invasion of the Body Snatchers” They Live” and “The Thing” where mankind is either threatened or ruled over by creatures which look like men, behave like men but are actually extra terrestrial invaders intent on the destruction of humanity.

It is a compelling and terrifying thought to believe that dreadful beasts walk amongst us disguised as us and indistinguishable from our own, but committed to our demise. Indeed the idea of alien creatures, or different species, taking on the form of humans in order to achieve their wicked aims is an evocative one and exists in many cultures and legends .

More fantastically, the one time sports presenter and sometime, self proclaimed. son of God, David Icke has from time to time taken the legend (or fact?) of The Illuminati quite a few steps further down the evolutionary chain and claimed that the world is ruled by shape shifting reptiles, capable of adopting human form. According to Icke's version of reality, many prominent people, and all world leaders, from George Bush, Hillary Clinton to members of our own dear royal family are, when viewed in their natural form, huge Komodo dragon like lizards.

Why is it I wonder that this same concept is repeated so frequently in our entertainment, our myths and legends and in our conspiracy theories? What attracts us to this much repeated scenario where people who look like us, but who are out to harm us are, in truth, aliens who bear no similarity to us whatsoever physical or otherwise.

Could it be that it is altogether more comfortable to imagine that our foes are scaly green aliens or shape shifting lizards, than it is to accept that there are people within our own community, people who not only look like us, but who are like and yet who are working tirelessly towards the aim of our destruction, and that so many of these people are in positions of power and influence?.

In fact such people now so dominate positions of power and influence, and have such control over the media and of most means of communication, that they can all but silence any dissenting voice. I am sure that many BNP voters were over the moon with delight to see that for almost the first time ever someone they had voted for was allowed a tiny amount of coverage, when Richard Barnbrook won the BNP's first ever seat on the London assembly.

Usually anyone who does not share the politically correct ideology favoured by our masters in the nations newsrooms finds access to any public platform is barred to them, and it is almost impossible to get their message heard.

Don't be fooled, you can be assured that the status quo will be resumed shortly. Our media overlords had no option other than to give Richard air time after Thursday's election, but he would be a fool to believe that aberration will continue, or that he will not shortly find that his speeches, policies and initiatives will join the blooded legion of racially battered white boys in the news exclusion zone.

The media is not alone, all 24 of the other Assembly members have already decided to deny the almost 131,000 Londoners who voted for the BNP the representation to which our democracy allegedly entitles then, by agreeing to “shun” Richard Barnbrook. Which apparently is their idea of democracy!.

It seems that democratic rights extend only to those who voted for politicians with a Common Purpose stamp of approve on their behinds.

Why is the establishment so desperate to silence the voices calling out against mass immigration and for the fair treatment of the native British population?, why do they try and portray BNP voters and members as hate filled, jackbooted, fascists when a single visit to the BNP's website shows that could not be farther than the truth?

If, the BNP's message is so vile, and if, as is often said, “Sunlight is the best disinfectant” why are they so reluctant to shine any on the BNP and other white nationalist groups, surely if what they say about the Nationalists is true then the more they are exposed for what they are the more the public will reject them.... surely?.

In fact the reverse is true, just like the leaders of North Korea or the old Soviet Union knew that their subject peoples would no longer be so compliant if they learnt the truth about the outside world, the fat controllers who steer public perceptions have no wish for the public to know the truth about alternative viewpoints.

It is a cliché to say that they fear the truth, however, it is also a fact. They fear the truth because the truth would get in the way of the project (or Common Purpose), if the public knew the truth they might be less willing to accept the lies, and that would not suit the purposes of those who control our destiny. This very fact alone exposes their plan for what it is, if to succeed in their aims they must hide the truth from us, then their aims can not be in our best interests, and they know it.

There can be no question that they have defined aims, this is not about conspiracy theory, it is obvious to all that there is a project under way which is determined to change this country and this continent beyond recognition. The native peoples of Britain and mainland Europe are white, however, day by day they become less so, and it is our own governments, our own leaders, cheered on by our home grown press who are doing it, and not one of them has a slimy green scale under their skin (much as some may appear to have)

The only possible outcome from that campaign is that Europe's once proud status as the home of the white race will be gradually diminished and quite probably destroyed.

It is no coincidence that it is only our continent this is being done to, and there are no plans to change Africa's position as the (main) home of the black race, or Asia's much prized racial integrity. Those cultures will be preserved because it is they who are the vehicle of our abolition.

It is only the lands of the white race which are under siege, and it is white politicians who are primarily responsible.

Our establishment are doing this to us only half consciously, they are doing it because they are the product of a radical ideology designed for an entirely different purpose. They and the generation before them were created and indoctrinated by people who hoped to see the West overthrown by a Communist East. Although that purpose no longer exists the mindset has long been fixed, Western Culture must be destroyed, and if the Soviet Union is no longer there to do it, Islam and mixed marriage will work well enough. So, although the aims have changed, they carry the project forward, and indoctrinate new generations because they have been programmed to do so.

Nobody but a fool is ignorant of the threat we face from Islam, and yet, despite playing lip service to a war on terror, our white European leaders cheerfully preside over the, not so gradual, Islamification of Europe and plans are in place to speed up the process as the descendants of the vicious Ottoman empire lurk again at out gates.

We are kept in in ignorance of the truth of the racial violence being inflicted on our own people, and lied to be by politicians and journalists who do not care about their own people, worse, they actively campaign against their own people.

These same people encourage interracial relationships, in the full knowledge of their failure rate and the huge numbers mixed race children living in single families due to the disproportionately high numbers of absent black fathers not to mention the increased risk of violence and the inevitable genetic effect miscegenation has. It is not racist to point out that once a child is born of a mixed race couple, a genetic line is changed irretrievably. Given that the promotion of mixed race unions is just one of a vast series of assaults upon the racial integrity of white Europe, only those deliberately and stubbornly blind to what is going on can not detect a deliberate common purpose.

That purpose is most certainly not the survival of a safe majority white Europe, and again it is our own politicians from our own main stream stream political parties, and not extra terrestrials in human guise, who are behind it,

Like the embattled earthlings in “V” we, as a people, are under threat from people who seek to destroy us and our entire way of life but they are not green skinned aliens or poor David Icke's nine foot lizards, they look like us, because they are like us and hate us for it. They are the enemy within.