Son murdered, father beaten, media censors.

"Between 1976-2005, blacks made up 13% of the US population, but committed 59% of felony murders. Overall, blacks are 9 times more likely to commit murder than whites." - Source: US Dept of Justice

Geraldo Antoniello, 29

Two black thugs broke into the home of a family in Queens. A 61 year old cancer stricken father was badly beaten and his 29 year old son was murdered.

Despite extensive media coverage in New York, no major media outlet has printed a description of the two monsters. They would rather leave the public at risk than tell them that the perpetrators were black.

This story was reported in all the major NYC papers, plus all the local Queens papers. Police released details on the suspects along with a hotline number.

The staff of CofCC.org had to look through 10 NYC articles before we found one that admitted the suspects were black males! Only a small neighborhood paper printed this (click here.) This newspaper was the first paper to post the story online, meaning that all the other papers had the same information when they posted their stories.

The New York Times, the New York Daily News, the New York Post, NBC New York, FOX New York, Queens Courier, CBS Radio New York, and others censored the race of the perpetrators. In many cases “police said two black males” was simply changed to “police said two males.”

Back in 2007, CofCC.org reported that the LA Times publicly admitted on their website that they censor information about the race of minority crime perpetrators.

From LA Times (June 6th, 2007)…

Racial information was once routinely included in news stories about crimes, but in recent decades, newspapers and other media outlets stopped mentioning suspects’ or victims’ race or ethnicity because of public criticism. Newspapers came to embrace the idea that such information is irrelevant to the reporting of crimes, and may unfairly stigmatize racial groups.

Between 1976-2005, blacks made up 13% of the US population, but committed 59% of felony murders. Overall, blacks are 9 times more likely to commit murder than whites. - Source: US DOJ

News Source National Policy Institute

Those were the days my friend

You absolutely must watch the brilliant video posted at the new Home of the Green Arrow today. Excellent new words to the Mary Hopkins classic.

Click here to watch the video before the YouTube thought gestapo get to it.

When the accademics are wrong (or just maybe dishonest?)

Last week some of South Africa's most prominent academics appended their signatures to an open letter protesting the granting of refugee status in Canada to a white South African, Brandon Huntley (see here). The refugee panel board apparently found (inter alia) that the ANC government was failing to protect the white minority from criminal violence perpetrated by black South Africans.

The 142 signatories included Melissa Steyn, Intercultural and Diversity Studies, University of Cape Town; Martin Hall, Vice-Chancellor, University of Salford; Max Price, Vice-Chancellor, UCT; Jonathan Jansen, Vice-Chancellor, University of the Free State; Thandi Sidzumo-Mazibuko, Acting Vice Principal, UNISA; Crain Soudien, Acting Deputy Vice-Chancellor, UCT; Adam Habib, Deputy Vice-Chancellor, University of Johannesburg; and, Arnold van Zyl, Deputy Vice Chancellor, University of Stellenbosch.

In the letter, addressed to the Charge d'Affaires of Canada in South Africa, the signatories protested that "it is simply untrue that white people are being targeted disproportionately. Black South Africans are much more likely to be victims of crime, largely because they are less able to afford the protections and security measures which most white South Africans, as still privileged citizens, are able to acquire."

Given the eminence of the signatories, their sheer weight in numbers, and its apparent plausibility, this assertion has gone largely unquestioned. But is it true? A number of crime victimisation surveys have been conducted over the past decade. Do they support, or contradict, the claims of this combination of learned academics?

Continue reading here
_______________________

Comment: Whether they knew they were lying or not (and cynical old me, I think every hate fueled one of them knew they were lying) we have to ask ourselves why those academics wrote that letter, and what they were trying to achieve, I'm afraid that none of the answers are very nice are they?

A letter to the BBC by Dr Frank Ellis

Aid convoy

By Frank Ellis

Re: BBC Radio 4 Iconoclasts/Corrupting Effects of Aid to Africa/16^th September 2009

Dear Mr Stourton

I heard the trailer advertising tonight’s broadcast. I harbour no illusions that my contribution will get through the BBC’s politically correct censorship. But you never know.

Only an individual who was hopelessly brainwashed by the relentless flood of multicultural propaganda could regard questioning the effectiveness of aid to Africa as in any way being iconoclastic. Why should the West simply give money to corrupt Africans or anyone else for that matter? Western aid to Africa should always be driven by narrow, ruthless, selfish interest.

One of the main drivers of aid to Sub-Saharan Africa has been the confused, sentimental belief that the West owes Africans something. The West has no moral or economic obligations to Africa whatsoever. Africa’s problems are caused by Africans. African leaders endlessly complain about Western racism and then come with the begging bowl.

In many ways colonialism was a blessing for a people who long before the arrival of the first colonizers showed themselves to be incapable of creating and sustaining the sort of technologically sophisticated civilizations that we in the West have long taken for granted. In the aftermath of colonial withdrawal Africa has reverted to type. The ANC is slowly and relentlessly reducing South Africa to an irreversible Third-World slum. The organization for which you work Mr Stourton totally ignores the ANC-sponsored genocide against whites in South Africa. Take it for granted: had over 3,000 black farmers seen their wives and children raped, tortured, sodomised, then shot and stabbed to death by white gangs, before suffering a similar, dreadful fate themselves, the BBC and your friends in the Guardian would never let us hear the end of it. The condition of Haiti, free of colonial rule for over 200 years, is the final, gruesome future of South Africa. Mugabe, a Marxist thug has more or less completed the task in Zimbabwe.

There are only three responses to the state of Sub-Saharan Africa. They are:

(i). Let Africans get on with it and let nature take it course (a very cost-effective solution and my favoured solution);

(ii). Continue to bleed Western taxpayers so that savages like Mugabe and their vile friends can continue to live their Western life-styles (unsustainable, even some lefties are getting impatient);

(iii). Recognise that Africans are not capable of running their own affairs (everyone knows it but most are too inhibited to say it out loud) then re-colonise Africa and impose firm and fair rule on Africans through white administrators in the mould of British colonial rule. The full costs to be carried by the efficient exploitation of Africa’s mineral wealth (workable but would the West want to take it on?)

Frank Ellis (via e.mail 16^th September 2009).

A flawed prosecution - for the sake of balance?

Ross McKnight and Matthew Swift - cleared by a jury in 45 minutes

Whoever decided to take this case to trial needs to be sacked. Anyone who seriously believed that 16 year old Ross McKnight and Matthew Swift, 18, were actually plotting a Columbine style massacre at their school in Manchester, on the strength of some childish fantasy, a gas mask an some blurry mobile phone film of firecrackers, should not be working for the CPS.

However, they will not be sacked for they are only carrying the instructions of those above. This case was brought for one reason and one reason only, and that was to show Muslims that we don't only prosecute Muslim terrorists.

I believe that the motives behind this trial were very sinister and that this was nothing more than a balancing prosecution designed to demonstrate that white non-Muslims are also plotting acts of terrorism. If our leaders had their way two imaginative teenagers would have been sacrificed for the sake of that demonstration.

They are not the first, we have already seen one, admittedly rather peculiar, so called "White Supremisist" being sent to prison on the basis that he possessed some tennis balls and a book about the Waffen SS. They certainly will not be the last, whilst the threat from Islamic terrorism continues, non-Muslim white citizens will remain at threat from similar contrived balancing prosecutions, it is the nature of the regime which currently rules us.

I shall write more on the subject of balancing prosecutions at the weekend, however, meanwhile let us just be grateful that a sensible jury saw through the ludicrous case they were presented with, and welcome the fact that two innocent young men are free. Be in no doubt had those in power and their controlled media got their way, Ross and Matthew would not be free tonight.

When the going gets tough, the not so tough shout ......

If there were awards being handed out for the most predictable allegation of 2009, this would just have to win. You can be sure that as it gets tougher the shouts will get louder.

They are now circling the wagons as they know the game is up, and that the only weapon they have left is the race card, and, oh my, will they use it!.

A NATION OF HALF-BREEDS - Part 2

By August Pointneuf

Continuing the analysis from Part One of the points made by the pro-mulattonists in support of the half breed society they are creating:

4. A Stronger Nation. The misconception that “crossbreeding invigorates human populations” seems to have been extrapolated from agriculture: reality is very different. Cross breeding produces unexpected results; the majority of crossbred cultivars are weakly, or die spontaneously or are slaughtered. Improvement of cultivars in agriculture is by the ruthless killing of all cultivars which are inferior. Whilst the idea of selective killing of humans repulses most, some of the very alien cultures which have seeped into Britain have advocated immolation of the weak child, the second twin or the older child who transgresses the lines of miscegenation or religious divide.

Agriculturalists protect new and successful cultivars assiduously. The breeder of high milk-producing cows would not dream of inviting a random bull into the herd. Seed growers protect desirable cultivars strictly to preserve the predictable quality of their product. Any thought of cross-pollination or contamination of the genetics is anathema.

The prediction of the characteristics of a cultivar is as important in society as it is in agriculture. This is because societies work on a finely tuned set of complex but intermeshed and interrelating mechanisms. Societies depend for their equilibrium and success on the predictability of people, and so it is necessary to be predictable about the next generation. Those who want to believe that genetics plays no part in behaviour, claiming that people are “blank slates” upon which culture is the only way to mould behaviour; are being progressively discredited. Genetic transmission of behavioural cultures (and their formalization into religions) may play a part, but that part played by genes is, quite simply, unknown.

Le pauvre mulatto. .A concept long recognised and perpetuated in literature, art and music, is that minority populations of crossbreeds and half-casts are seen as inferior.

No implication is intended here that all individuals of any given origin, culture or other persuasion are uniform. A foundation of this paper is to underscore the spreads of capacities and the fine differential balance between uniformity and individuality. Both have their important role to play – individuality for the person, uniformity for society - at times one in conflict with the other. But biology (and sociology) is a percentage game. Success, stability and happiness are the mid-portions of a sociological bell curve. The outliers might have a role, particularly if looked at from an evolutionary perspective. But evolution is an ultra long-term human temporal dimension which cannot influence our decisions within our lifetime.

Small groups such as Amerindian, Australian aboriginal, Inuit or Bushman retain their successful equilibrium when isolated from competing groups or cultures. But when inserted into a larger culture, notably that of the white civilisations (and perhaps other cultures), they do badly. These groups then fall disproportionately into the failure end of that bell-curve, and disproportionately add to the drunkards, prostitutes, layabouts and beggars of the world. . These people need society's compassion and understanding. But more important is recognising the damage done to both groups by forcible (or accidental) attempts to merge socially and racially distinct communities

The greatest of sympathy is due those crossbreeds who find that they are significantly more capable than their own genetic (and societal) group. Some lie well into the success end of the bell curve, but even so most will remain in societal disequilibrium because of their divergent heritage, and the absence of concordant support from a matching and integral community, culture and race.

Many (or most) mulattos are lost in confusion about their origin, status and cultural as well as familial alliances. They are the unhappy victims of failures in a decision tree that far preceded them. These failures might be those of their parents or grandparents. But in Britain the decision tree failure has been perverted dramatically by meddlesome, “know all” governments which, by forcing “integration”, have perpetrated what the knowledgeable and wise have long seen as a disastrous outcome . An irony is that nations which promoted segregation of societies and races so successfully (until their strategies were destroyed by Browns) was that segregation was intended, in part, to protect the identity, genetics and cultures of the indigenous people from exploitation (sexually and otherwise) by a more successful group. The main victim of the destruction of “separate development” by “Browns” has been the individualities of indigenous peoples.

Those governments which imposed immigration on their people an unmandated, irreversible, and unpredictable socio-biological experiment, owe their populations the greatest apologies and they need to be shamed and expelled.

"Social ratcheting". This misconception proposes that an alien inserted into a mature culture will have children who emulate their host culture, progressively more closely with each generation. There is no established biological foundation for this ambitious illusion nor can it distinguish mimicry from fundamental personality change. The reverse is the case, as expressed by the biological truism of 'reversion to type'. This is demonstrated in organisms which can regenerate – however mutilated, the original form re-establishes itself. Confused reasoning will claim that this principle contradicts evolutionary theory. This is not so, since biology preserves a winning design. Evolutionary change is a distinct mechanism, set in a far distant time-frame. Any potentially “evolutionarily successful design” needs to exist in competitive parallel with the established designs until it succeeds in displacing the prototype. This was shown by the parallel existence for a period of the pre-hominids with Homo sapiens. In sociological terms there are many examples of 'reversion to type'. It cannot be assumed that a National Health Service consultant of Pakistani origins will reproduce a child more culturally and socially kindred to the British host society. Instead the child will probably 'revert to type' in its thinking pattern. Despite even a Public School education that child might become a fanatical Muslim homicidal suicide-bomber.

When will it happen? The statistics of cross-breeding is that after a relatively slow beginning the change accelerates exponentially. Once a majority of cross-breeds is established the graph tails off in the familiar fashion of the sine curve, leaving a small “residual minority”. Historically these residues are rapidly destroyed by the population majority. Amongst many other examples are the minorities of Chinese in Malaysia and the white minority in South Africa are being selectively crushed by the majority.[2] The death of the race will then be sudden, unexpected and rapid as the small residual number of whites in Britain disappear.

Stubborn Britons continue to shout “it cannot happen here!” They lack imagination an intellect. They have not realized that an immigrant majority in Parliament can do exactly that. Historically majority groups have destroyed superior minorities, one assumes to delete the unfavourable comparison with their inferiority.

The current demography[3] is that the population rose by 408,000 in 2008 (immigration accounting for more than half of this growth), and immigrant mothers accounted for more than half the increased births, with 24% of births to mothers born abroad. Add to that births of previous generation non-white immigrants to understand the pace of this increase.

Younger mothers are making the generation turn-over faster.

395,000 people left Britain, predominantly whites, taking with them their culture and leaving the gap to be filled by non-European immigrants. The fertility of foreign-born women averages 2.5 per mother. UK born mothers (including) averaged 1.84 boosted by non-European, but UK born mothers.

The incidence of HIV is highest in non-European populations. Therefore mutant immunity is more likely to occur in non-Europeans, after which the residue of that race will be genetically protected and increase again. The Europeans will not, and will remain at risk, probably to succumb.

If these trends continue the irreversible destruction of the white British will be accomplished in three generations.

The tragedy. When measured by the creation of a complex culture, by the orderly structure of their society and by that universal ambition - protection from the entropic whim of the physical environment - the cultivar which became ‘the European’ has been, indisputably, the most successful and without parallel. And yet we have, within that population, European people who connive to destroy it, seeming not to be able to appreciate its value or irreparability. Strangely, it seems never to have occurred to these whites that they will soon be out-bred, outnumbered, and out-strategised politically, supplanted and so ultimately extinguished.

August Pointneuf

________________________________________

[2] “The comparison of Nazism with the ANC” http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2009/02/parallels-from-past.html

[3] Office of National Statistics

A NATION OF HALF-BREEDS - Part 1

By August Pointneuf

Currently 10% of the population of Britain is said to be racially cross-bred. This proportion will increase exponentially, not only because that is the statistical nature of breeding, but because increasing familiarity with miscegenation will diminish the existing constraints. Emigration of the white natives will speed the process.

Does this matter? After all, this is the aim of many vociferous British utopionists.

Ironically the “Pro-Mulattonists” (could they be called the “Browns”?) are often the very same “Greens” who ardently work to protect unique species from destruction, and extol species diversity. But then they say that they take pride in being colorblind.. Those who preach that "education, compassion and development" are all that is necessary to merge distinct races and communities are the same people who savagely condemned those well intentioned (but foolish) Australians who tried exactly that, trying to incorporate Aboriginal children into European culture. Loud voices, it seems, out of muddied minds

The motives of the pro-mulattonists are doubtful. Sadly the primary motive is more likely to be exhibitionism of their self-righteousness and less an objective and altruistic one, as they claim. Most of these assertive crusaders demonstrate no biological, sociological and genetic capability, and offer quasi-rationales which are exploited by governments. These Browns seem to preach that if all Britons are the same brown on the outside there would be:

1. A more colourful Britain

2. Economic boosting.

3. Less strife.

4. The population is decreasing

5. A “stronger nation”.

Let us dissect each reason

1. A more colourful Britain. Leaving aside word play, the prospect of being intrigued with exotic curiosities, which rapidly fade into the mundane, has been well addressed elsewhere as nonsensical. ^[1]

2. Economic boosting. This is the old saw by which government chose to hoodwink their population. This was the easiest of the subterfuges used to “sell” immigration because the man in the street could not measure this purported benefit. More probable is that the government wanted to move more supporters into their electorate, the same strategy that many nefarious regimes have used to pervert “democracy”, by shifting populations or voting boundaries to distort representation.
   In any event recent economic reports demonstrate that immigrants, rather than making Britain a more competitive country, have cost Britain much. This is no surprise where reproductive demography of immigrants favours large families, with high extractions from social services.

3. The Population is decreasing. The area occupied by Britain is significantly over populated by comparison with the rest of the world. There might be denser areas, like Hong Kong, but these should not be the comparators. The aim should be to provide the British with the “best possible life”. In part this depends upon the resources of the land area which can be utilized to the benefit of the population as a whole. The more people, the less the individual benefits from their hereditary resources. There is no simpler demographic equation. There are also the biological truisms of the need for space, for capacity to realize the partnership with nature. These are lost with overcrowding. But probably the most important factor which determins an ideal population in the biological determinant. Animal populations are widely self-regulated by sophisticated mechanisms. Some of these mechanisms might seem relatively crude, such as loss to predators in the nutritional chain. But this is far from a crude or random mechanism, as is demonstrated by the complex self regulation of the predatory chain itself, which in its turn is closely aligned and interdependent with other highly complex nutritional chains. So it is in humans where high population density decreases fertility and increases other methods of population reduction. In astonishing arrogance British governments have themselves decided “what the population should be”. This is no more than a crude stab in the dark, a blind experiment without foundation. By forcing immigration there are a number of factors which then cause a decrease in the native population. This concept requires a chapter in its own right, but includes factors such as increased stress on the natives and loss of their habitat with decreased fertility and an incentive to emigrate.

3. Less Strife. This is assumed to mean less interpersonal strife within communities. The smallest social component of community is the family; therefore let us look at marriage to see if less stress is likely at the foundation level.

Marriage is almost always requires difficult adjustments, and considerable (often life-long) compromise between the partners. If marriage partners have a foundation of similar interests and expectations as well as similar positions in society’s stratifications, they will have far more in common. Their friends, from each side of the marriage, are more likely to be similar,. Their extended families, also, will have a cohesive understanding of their values, customs, history and aspirations. This will make for greater similarity of requirements and less competitive conflict.In mixed racial marriages, particularly where there are extreme cultural differences, all of these unifying factors will be weakened or nullified.

It will be argued that many “British” of foreign origin have been “culturally converted”. Even if this were so the extended families are unlikely to have “socio-converted” and the children are subject to grandparents and others who are widely divergent in language, culture and appearance.

Strife and Children. Stable marriages and stable extended families are likely to raise stable, balanced children. There is considerable evidence that mixed race families are less stable, and produce less successful and less happy children. Amongst children considerable difficulties with respect to their sense of self- identity have been recorded, resulting in unstable, unhappy and social incompetent child-victims.

What is “normal”? Because it is so widespread, it seems that there is a foundation human trait (probably with strong evolutionary benefit) by which parents (and the societies within which they exist) wish their children to marry into groups which are highly similar to their own, particularly demanded by their religions. Miscegenation appears to be exceptional in well structured societies. It is supreme irony is that the migrants into Britain come from countries like Pakistan, India, Bangladesh where marriage into similar groups is not only strongly held, but often prescribed by arranged marriages. Yet it is these same Asian youths who are allowed by British parents to impregnate their daughters within marriage or without. No such thing as “honourable marriage” here in Britain (the honour killings occur only in immigrant communities). In many cases the Asiatic and other immigrant youths are simply playing dangerous sexual games with the young womanhood of Britain. These girls become cheap, disposable acquisitions, substitutes for their Asiatic women, whose genes, morals, and welfare are carefully protected while the bemused natives are ravaged. British women have become the prostitute-playmates of gangsters who have no intention of supporting them through life into their old age. They are despoiled and desecrated, and then unlikely to find respect from a British mate of quality. These poor girls have had pried from them the magic of their youth, the elation of their reproductive years and the majesty of their maturity. For them the exuberances of life have been ablated, irrecoverably and finitely, by an immigrant culture.

Responsibility. Have these British parents no sense of responsibility? No sense of concern or compassion for their offspring? Are they simply devoid of insight or frankly stupid?

As in all human affairs the causes of societal failure are multifactorial, with interrelating feedbacks and buffering mechanism making this too complex to model or fully understand. But what is indisputable is that parents, in all societies, have many stressors. They must survive successfully themselves, before they can begin making the necessary contributions – materially and in personal contact – towards their families. Historically, this was recognised by greater society (which of course includes the religions) and marriages were therefore carefully planned – most were delayed until the potential partners / parents had reached a point of economic and social stability.

Social engineering. What has destabilised this society of parents and potential parents? A significant perversion has been perpetrated by the governments of Britain which pretend that they (the governments) can supply an all-encompassing security. Government propaganda has given the population the impression that people now have no need to seek economic stability. Instead, the government promises that the out of work will be given an income, the ill will be returned s to health, and they have implanted the illusion that someone else will always be to blame and be held accountable if matters go wrong. Children have become “the State’s responsibility”. That unseen authority, “government”, will always rescue, is the implanted illusion.

All concerns about caution, frugality, responsibility, patrimony, and compassion are dormant or are destroyed by the replacement of patrimony by bureaucracy.

Even worse, British governments have confused parents by removing from them their capacities to discipline. They have removed from them the intimacy of the relationship with their children by forcing the children, in their most plastic years, into long hours of schooling. Not only that, but they have forced schooling which is intended to ablate individualities, which is the very distinction which allow a child the pride of success.. It is no surprise that antisocial behaviour is now an escapade into individuality and self-esteem for children smothered under bland gravy of uniformity.

By removing the parents’ capacity to discipline their child, children have successfully broken away from that fine equilibrium which balances parents’ insight against a child’s impulsiveness. The parents have become frightened of their children, frightened that their children may not “like” them, and frightened of the control that the “unseen authority” (such as the Departments of Social Services) could impose upon them with a ruthless hand. Visitations in the night to remove children or to arrest parents are events which happen in Britain now. Complexities of incomprehensible and unfathomable law cause parents to become perplexed, confused, frightened and parentally impotent. They dare not tell their 13 year-old-to stay at home, away from hooligans – because the child early learns manipulative techniques, brandishing the weapons of “racism” and “child abuse”. The more nefarious and manipulative find it easy to construct powerfully damaging fantasies of paedophiliac accusations. We have a parent population reduced to its knees. It is hardly surprising that they are failing their children.

Government as the unit of final accountability. Even amongst the current swirling chaos, the governments are unrepentant. Migrants continue to enter Europe, competing with the natives’ capacity to earn; inflicting waves of confusing dissimilarities on what had previously been well evolved, stable societies, the most creative in history. Black Zimbabwean immigrants have been accepted into New Zealand without checking of their HIV status. Lament with the many unsuspecting girls who are now infected in their homeland, and the irresponsibility of their government.

British governments have dragged their societies down like surreptitious trolls lurking in the jungles and undergrowths of jargon, legalese and bewildering complexity. These were the people who were trusted by the Anglo Saxons to protect them. But the outcome will be a race of Mulattos.

August Pointneuf

To be continued.
_________________________________
^[1] http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/search/label/Robin%20Hind

An inevitable consequence

Truths too big to hide

The trouble with lies is not only that there are a limit to the amount of times you can tell the same lie. but also, if that lie is about fact there will always be a number of people who know the truth and they will be less easy to lie to the next time. The more lies you tell, and the bigger they are, the more the numbers of such people will continue to grow.

For example, the British media have, of course, recently been lying about the Muslim riots, which have been occurring in Britain over the last few weeks. The lie in this instance is that the riots were caused by, white. right wing, extremists , and not the innocent cuddly Asian youths accidentally chucking bottles and bricks at the police. The truth, of course, is that in Birmingham and more recently in Harrow, small numbers of peaceful, white, anti-Islam protesters, exercising their historic right to demonstrate, (a right incidentally which the Left treat as sacrosanct when anyone else does it) were attacked and prevented from demonstrating by far greater numbers of aggressive young Muslims and UAF Thugs. Whereas in Luton two weeks before, the violence entirely involved Muslim and UAF thugs, again attacking the police, because no white “right wing” protesters even turned up.

Of course, the truth will never stop the media from telling a lie, but their problem is that each time they tell the lie there are a group of people who know that what they are being told is not true, on account of the fact that they were there and saw what really happened.

For instance, there were many people in Birmingham on August 8th, who witnessed events as they developed, and then will have been rather perplexed by the completely different version of events which they then saw reported on the TV news and in the newspapers. Those people will have been a lot more sceptical than they would have been previously, when the same misinformation was given out about Luton. In turn, those in Luton, who saw what actually happened there ,will join those from Birmingham in questioning the total bollocks which the press, together with the politicians, have been reporting about Harrow, and so it goes on.

As these events continue to happen, as they surely will, the numbers of of people who witness the truth, and, therefore, know that the media is not telling it will, grow. In time, hopefully, they may join those of us who have leant the truth via the internet or wider research and personal experience, in realising the shocking degree to which our news services in this country misrepresent facts.

Of course, as in so much else, our home grown news distorters are mere amateurs by comparison with their counterparts across the Atlantic. Those working for news agencies such as CNN and MSNBC in America can rival Pinocchio when it comes to lying, however, by some means, possibly resulting from the amount of cosmetic surgery they all, male and female, appear to have had, they have mastered the means of preventing their noses from growing when they do so.

Of course again, the lie is only as effective, as the number of people who do not know the truth, but unfortunately for them, as their lies get bigger so do the number of witnesses.

This weekend, at least on million, and most probably closer to two million, unhappy American taxpayers descended upon Washington to protest against various of the Obama administrations ill conceived and worse thought through policies. This was probably the largest of such demonstrations Washington has ever seen, exceeding the much hyped Million Man March and the Promise Keepers Rally. The numbers involved were not only filmed and reported on right wing blogs, but also in the UK Daily Mail, who presumably either didn't get the memo, or were too busy lying about the BNP or the Muslim riots, to realise they were also supposed to be lying about America.

Those who marched were there, those who saw the film, saw the film, so they know they were being lied to by CNN or ABC when the numbers who attended were reported to be in the tens of thousands, or, as I understand it, in one instance the marchers were referred to in terms of “scores” of people.

That means that at least a million Americans who marched on Washington, now know that the American media misrepresent the truth. (Hey Buddy, wake up and smell the coffee, how do you think Barry got elected?) Saddly, many amongst that million already know that, as they have attended so called “Tea Parties” and Town Hall meetings to express their concerns about Obama's policies in recent months and then heard the TV news report an entirely different event to the one they attended. However, it remains a significant number.

The media will continue to lie, we can't change that as it is in the nature of the beast. We can not save lost souls and it would be a waste of time to try. When the multi-cultural Hell they have helped create implodes, as it unquestionably will, they, the media, will be the last believers, staggering through the smoking ruins clutching microphones and croaking “Diversity is our strength!” through melting mascara, as everything collapses around them.

However, before that happens and as their lies get bigger and more desperate, the numbers who, for whatever reason, realise they are being lied to will grow, and maybe some of them will start to fight. That, at least, affords us some comfort and a little hope that there will be a future to come after the dark period which we will soon all have to face.

From Titans to Lemmings - Part 6

By Reconquista

From Titans To Lemmings: The Suicide Of The White Race

6. Behind The Smiling Rainbow Mask

First published at The Home of the Green Arrow

Background

The title of this series of essays "From Titans To Lemmings - The Suicide of the White Race" reflects in a nutshell what I believe to be THE biggest problem facing Western civilisation at this moment in time, that being, the white race itself. Like it or not, since the end of World War II, the white race as a whole has willingly chosen to behave in ways that are self-destructive; flawed ways that fly in the face of Mother nature as I have been describing throughout the series, but one perhaps stands out as the most destructive of all:

An almost fanatical religious belief in the Marxist-created Multicultural ideology and the imposing of multi-racial societies throughout the West where various races will live together as equals in peace and harmony. This modern-day Godless religion has been adopted by the vast majority of whites in the Western world who are enthusiastically swallowing hook, line and sinker the blissful fantasy of a rainbow Shangri-la.

Towards the end of the previous essay, From Titans To Lemmings Part 5, I stated that the Multicutural ideology has been force-fed to our people at every level of our society. For the last fifty years, equality of the races has been widely promoted throughout the West as hordes of immigrants flooded into our lands. Along with equality of all, a demonising of the white man and a re-writing of his history to portray him as an evil tyrant who looted the wealth of other weaker races while enslaving and oppressing them has placed what I call "the Mother of all guilt trips" on our people to brainwash them into accepting the colonisation of their homelands.

Dissent simply isn't tolerated and those who dare resist the propaganda and speak out against Multiculturalism will then be de-humanised with a myriad of Orwellian thought and hate crimes: Fascist, Hater, Nazi, and of course the worst sin any disbeliever can commit against the Liberal church, Racist, the modern-day heretic of the Godless, Multicultural religion.

But something is rotten in Denmark, Sweden, France, Holland, USA, Great Britain - every Western nation. Whites throughout the West have now had fifty years of being brow-beaten with the Multicultural "all races are equal" ideology. Fifty long years of watching their nations become colonised by millions of aliens flooding into the West; fifty years since the end of colonial rule in Africa; fifty long years since the civil rights movement won equality for blacks in the United States and fifty years of a resurgent Islam with millions of Muslims bringing their retarded faith to our once mighty nations.

For British nationalists, we've had fifty years of enduring a pernicious social experiment being forcibly imposed by an elite who never gave their own people a choice in the matter and who demonised and vilified opponents whose only crime was to speak-out against the enforced colonisation of their nation.

So after fifty years, why don't we put this Multicultural social experiment and its claim of racial equality in the dock? Because behind the smiling rainbow mask lies millions of smashed lives mercilessly sacrificed for the Multicultural dream and in this essay, I want to expose one of the most destructive myths being vehemently asserted by deceitful Liberal/Multiculturalists:

That the black man is the equal of the white man. The ocean of evidence - much of which is deeply distressing - clearly demonstrates that this assertion is nothing more than an outright lie that is causing immense suffering to both whites and blacks alike. And it's way past tea for this lie and the enormous suffering it is causing to be exposed under the spotlight of uncomfortable truth. What follows is the horrific reality festering behind the rainbow mask, a barbaric, savage and brutal reality the Liberals and Multiculturalists deliberately ignore, a reality they'd rather you didn't see.

Dawn Of A New Man

In 1950, the United Nations Educational and Scientific Organisation - UNESCO - declared that "All men belong to the same species: Homo Sapiens". Thus the crux of Multiculturalism was spawned, the belief in equality of all races, that all humans are the same followed by the quite ridiculous assertion that race is purely a social construct. Talk about putting the cart before the horse.

In the sixty years since this declaration, the world has witnessed dramatic changes and in Africa, the "Dark Continent", these past sixty years have seen the end of white colonial rule with African nations now ruled and governed by the native black peoples. As Africa has moved towards self-rule, millions of African blacks have left their homelands to build new lives in the affluent West, a West that offers them equal status and equal opportunity and a share of its wealth within its now Multicultural rainbow societies.

Let's review then these sixty years to see just how equal the races truly are, in this case the black race and the white race by looking at the lands of the West AND the lands of Africa, in particular the former British crown colony of Southern Rhodesia and the former British dominion of South Africa.

Slaying A Titan

If you're old enough to remember the late Sixties and the early Seventies, cast your mind back and recall how the issue of apartheid in South Africa was a prominent news item. Reports about how blacks were forced to live in poverty and squalor in shacks in the townships and who were denied opportunity in their own land were embellished with accounts of Police brutality and government oppression. Depictions of racial segregation in public places further illustrated how the South African black was being oppressed by evil whites, with South African whites dehumanised as evil racists who were cruelly oppressing their fellow human beings.

Musicians refused to tour South Africa "I don't wanna play Sun City" they defiantly sang whilst sportsmen and women refused to take part in events in South Africa. Perhaps the most famous incident occurred in 1974, an incident that highlighted the nauseating greed and hypocrisy of politicians who had demanded that the British Lions cancel their tour of South Africa, citing apartheid as the reason.

The Lions ignored them, and with some magnificent displays of rugby became the first touring side to win a test series in South Africa in the 20th Century. Captained by Willie John McBride, the Lions refused to be intimidated by the normally effective "rough-house" approach of the Springboks and McBride's tactic of meeting aggression with outright violence through the call that defined the tour "99", whereby on hearing this each Lion was to hit the nearest Springbok gave the once invincible South Africans the biggest shock of their lives.

The Lions' victory was a truly magnificent achievement and the British politicians who had vilified the Lions for this tour suddenly changed their tune and made sure they welcomed back the triumphant Lions to bask in reflected glory. Such is the nature of the cunning, power-hungry politician.

Graphic reports of violence in the townships, especially Soweto, featured heavily in television news broadcasts and spawned the icons that defined the black struggle against apartheid, the main one being of course the black terrorist - make that Saint - Nelson Mandela.

All the time the emphasis was on portraying South Africa as a racist state that brutally oppressed blacks to make South Africa a pariah on the international stage. Finally, after much international pressure, 1994 saw the end of white rule in South Africa and under the black Saint the new "rainbow nation" was born.

Saint Nelson announced the new state to the world thus:

"We enter into a covenant that we shall build a society in which all South Africans, both black and white, will be able to walk tall, without any fear in their hearts, assured of their inalienable right to human dignity- a rainbow nation at peace with itself and the world."

Fine words. But that's all they are - words. What is the reality of the rainbow nation for both black and white and has it lived up to the lofty and noble goal of a rainbow nation at peace with itself?

Compare and Contrast

Before we look at today's South Africa, let's first remember what South Africa was like under white rule. Under white rule, South Africa was a prosperous, first-world country boasting magnificent cities such as Johannesburg, Cape Town and Durban, cities complete with first-class medical care, advanced transport systems, superb communications infrastructures and magnificent architecture.

South Africa also created a flourishing agricultural industry that not only fed its own people, South African farmers also helped feed the rest of Africa and South African wines earned a reputation as being among the very best wines available in the world. This is a nation blessed with an abundance of natural resources and South African gold and diamonds, again of the very highest quality, earned South Africa enormous wealth. Along with an excellent judicial system that kept crime firmly in check, the old South Africa stood out as the most advanced nation in Africa, a nation that compared favourably with ANY other first-world nation.

When the blacks came to power in 1994, they were handed on a platter this gem of Africa. Having watched the white man apply his ingenuity and his industry to solve the problems presented to him by Mother nature, the South African blacks inherited a superb, advanced nation without them having to build it. All they had to do was maintain it and if possible, build upon it and improve it to benefit all people, black and white alike.

Yet in just FIFTEEN years, black rule has turned the nation of South Africa into a crime ridden, degenerating, crumbling and stinking cesspit, whose cities are in decay, just take a look for yourself to see how two of the cities named above have fared under black rule:

Johannesburg Then And Now

In particular, check out the "A Tour Through Hillbrow" section and if you have time, read through the comments. Imagine how you'd feel if this was once your community. Many Britons will see the same thing happen to their communities, indeed, many have seen it already. Where black goes, Africa soon follows.

Durban Then And Now.

The webmaster there asserts: "Durban is now a filthy squatter camp". See the evidence he presents and judge for yourself.

These images - rarely if ever shown in the duplicitous Western media - are damning evidence of just how unequal the white and black race are. If you listen to Liberal apologists, they will tell you that blacks live in such filth and squalor in these cities because of the legacy of apartheid, yet again placing the blame at the door of the white man for the black man's abject failure. But let's get real here, we're all equal right?

No matter what has happened in the past how on earth does that excuse ANY race ANY people ANYWHERE for living in filth that they have created? We're talking about two of the finest cities created by man handed to blacks on a platter and that blacks have allowed them to decay and to become nothing more than garbage dumps where they raise their children casts a huge shadow of doubt on the belief in equality because if blacks can't manage basic cleanliness then the equality assertion falls at the first hurdle. And what price pride and dignity?

Such filth and decay aren't solely evident in South African cities. You could also see the same decay in Nairobi, London, Birmingham, Manchester, Los Angeles, New York, Philadelphia, and especially, Detroit. Many others too but I will leave you to investigate and discover for yourself but the mess in Detroit is particularly shocking.

What if we reversed the situation and forced whites out of their cities and into the townships to dwell in shacks? Do you think whites would make these townships decay - if that is possible - or do you think that there is a very good chance that whites would dramatically improve these places?

The hypocrisy of lilly-livered Liberals who blame whites for these conditions is sickening because when blacks lived in the shack-riddled townships, these bleeding heart Liberals castigated whites for their "criminal oppression". Whites have built fine cities, built a magnificent nation, handed it all to blacks and when blacks bring the squalor of the townships to these once first-class cities, whites are once again blamed for something that ended years ago, a lame excuse that has no bearing on how black people are CHOOSING to live in the present.

Such typically anti-white Liberal behaviour is yet more evidence of inequality. If the races are truly equal, then all should be judged by the same standards without exception. Of course, Liberals refuse to do so because if they did their whole claim of equality would lie in tatters as reality continually highlights the failures of the black race. The Liberal answer then is to blame it all on whites. How cute.

But the deterioration and squalor of South African cities is just the "ears of the hippo". The savage barbarity blacks are committing throughout the nation of South Africa, not just to whites but also to their own people, is a suppressed truth that needs to be spread to as many as possible. Because what is going on in South Africa is also creeping into the West and in fact, the root cause of what is destroying South Africa is also the same root cause that is destroying the West including Great Britain - Cultural Marxism.

Law Of The Jungle

During the time of apartheid, South Africa was depicted as the most racist and evil nation on planet earth. Once black rule became reality and signalled the end of apartheid you would think that peace and harmony would reign in the rainbow nation. Think again.

Let's get some facts down about apartheid. Apartheid was a system of racial and legal segregation introduced by the governing National Party in 1948 and it lasted until the end of white rule in 1994. During these 46 years, a total of 21,000 blacks were killed due to political violence but this figure doesn't paint a true picture. Because out of these 21,000 deaths, 14,000 of them occurred between 1990 and 1993 as the country transitioned towards black rule.

Of these 14,000, 92% of them, were due to black on black violence, mostly tribal for territory and only 514 of them were down to South African security forces. Further, between 1948 and 1989, 7000 blacks were killed, the majority of them as they committed criminal acts, namely armed robbery, rape or assaults.

Life for blacks under apartheid was a far cry from the unjust and oppressive picture painted by white-hating Liberal-Multiculturalists who never mention just how much blacks benefited under apartheid, check out this two minute video that busts the Liberal myths:

Myths of Apartheid

So surely, things must be better post-apartheid, right? Let's see.

Crime is now totally out of control with an unbelievable murder rate of between 50 - 140 murders EVERY DAY. Violent robberies committed against whites are an almost daily occurrence and the extreme levels of violence and brutality against the victims is absolutely appalling. From biting off fingers or cutting them off with scissors or shears to remove rings to torture with red-hot irons to obtain money, the brutality has no bounds. But what is even more alarming is that once the money or valuables have been obtained, many victims have either been badly beaten, raped - both husband and wife - repeatedly or executed with a bullet to the head or even tied up and burned alive.

Liberals assert that the rampant crime is caused by poverty but this begs the question: Why are whites battered, raped and murdered AFTER giving the robbers what they wanted? I suggest it isn't poverty that leads to these horrors being committed it is racial hatred that brokers no compassion for the victims whatsoever. And the media and the world's governments, so vehemently critical of apartheid, say nothing of this inhumane savagery.

They don't even report that in the shack-ridden townships, ALL crime is committed by blacks against blacks. These are townships policed by black vigilante groups whose punishments include whipping, beating and burning their fellow black brothers who they deem guilty of committing a crime.

In addition to the out-of-control crime levels, there is also an ongoing genocide against the Boer farming community with over 3000 Boers murdered by blacks since 1994 and to its shame, the world turns its back on these victims, preferring instead to perpertrate the myths of apartheid. This SKY news report shows how these farmers have to live and the horrific brutality they are suffering:

Boers Murdered In South Africa

If you listen very carefully to the black politician who dismisses the genocide of the Boers as the actions of criminal elements, you will hear him mention a word - a lie - that betrays the envious reason at the root of these vile atrocities. I will leave you to judge for yourself without giving any more away and you'll find more links to the right of the video providing more information about this diabolical crime against humanity.

No Place For Innocence

But perhaps the most shocking statistic of all concerns child abuse. In the rainbow nation of South Africa, 530 children are raped every day with a staggering 23,450 children raped in the last year alone, that is ONE CHILD RAPE EVERY THREE MINUTES. Over 1000 children were murdered and 20,870 were assaulted during this time, many of whom had body parts - lips, ears, genitalia and internal organs - removed for making traditional black African "Muti" medicine.

Here's a distressing report about child abuse in the rainbow nation over on the excellent South Africa Sucks blog, a blog that is revealing the truth about what is happening there. Warning: Some of the images on the page are graphic and disturbing:

Child Abuse In South Africa

When you then discover that there are over 10,000 child prostitutes on the streets of Johannesburg and that children are also being sold as sex slaves in Bloemfontein, Port Elizabeth, Durban and Cape Town, then the scale of child abuse in the rainbow nation is simply astronomical.

Just before I completed this essay, I read this report dated 9/9/09 over on WMD.COM and astonishingly, the heinous child abuse perpetrated by African blacks is plumbing new depths of depravity:

Babies Raped To Cure AIDS

How on earth any race that treats its young in such a savage, diabolical manner can be regarded as human never mind equal to other human races I have no idea.

Another Titan Falls

If things are bad and deteriorating daily in South Africa, then they are utterly catastrophic in Zimbabwe, the former British Colony of Southern Rhodesia. Since the end of white rule there in 1980 and the establishment of the black ruled nation of Zimbabwe, a once strong and advanced nation has totally imploded and the similarities with its neighbour South Africa are a damning indictment both on the African black and the self-righteous Liberal-Multiculturalists who blindly insist that the races are equal.

Did you know that Rhodesia used to be referred to as "The bread basket of Africa"? Here we had a nation whose white farmers were so industrious and so successful they not only fed ALL of Rhodesia's people, they created so much surplus they helped to feed an entire continent!

Look at it now. Under the rule of the dictator Robert Mugabe, a man who has no problem whatsoever with executing and persecuting blacks who oppose him - his own people -, the Zimbabwean economy has deteriorated into an absolute shambles.

The land reform program, the process by which land was stolen from white owners and handed over to blacks, has achieved the not-so-enviable feat of turning the country from a net exporter of food with an industry that employed 400,000 people into a net importer of food. This insanity has now lead to a severe famine in Zimbabwe with an estimated 5 million people now facing malnutrition and starvation. On top of this, water shortages are causing a cholera epidemic.

Due to the complete inability to effectively manage their own nation, Zimbabwe under black rule now suffers from hyper-inflation, with the dizzy height of 11.2 Million % being reached in 2008. From US$1 buying 80 Zimbabwean cents at the time black rule was established in 1980 to its current rate of around US$1 = Z$50 million with the desperate spectacle of a loaf of bread costing SEVEN MILLION Zimbabwean dollars, under black rule, Zimbabwe has collapsed into a dysfunctional state with devastating consequences for ALL of its people with yet more pain and suffering piling on the misery.

All underpinned by the Western Liberal-Multiculturalists who stood by and watched whites being ethnically cleansed from their homeland and who propagated the despicable lie that this was right and fitting because of the horrors inflicted on the African black under colonial rule. In typical arrogant and self-righteous Liberal style, once whitey has been kicked out of his land, these paragons of virtue completely ignore the devastating consequences being endured by black African people whose empty bellies know all too well the difference between living under white rule and black rule.

Not that your cappuccino drinking, sushi nibbling devout Liberal-Multiculturalist will ever take the rainbow glasses off and see the reality they've helped to create. For these naive well-fed dreamers, the Multicultural fantasy is their sole raison d' etre and when reality unfolds in stark contrast to the rainbow utopia, they will simply put their ideology first and disconnect from reality because they simply cannot bear to confront it. Truth hurts, especially when its brutal.

That these people are afforded the luxury of avoiding any responsibility or accountability for their misguided and irresponsible actions is an absolute disgrace. Yes I know many of them are acting with good intentions but you and I both know a certain road that's paved with them. South Africa and Zimbabwe are strewn with these roads and millions of people there are living in the harsh, brutal destination all of these roads lead to.

What is important to realise about this all-too short appraisal of black rule in South Africa and Zimbabwe is that the same game that destroyed these once mighty Titans is now being played throughout the West including our nation, Great Britain.

Besmirching Britannia

Just as the white South Africans were made to pay for the injustice of apartheid and just as white Rhodesians were ethnically cleansed from their land to right the wrongs of colonialism, so too are British whites made to feel guilty because of Britain's role in the Trans-Atlantic slave trade. Indeed, such is the determination of our Marxist enemies to deploy the guilt weapon, Britons who had nothing to do with slavery whatsoever were so bullied, intimidated and burdened by this guilt trip they marched in chains, led by a British politician, the rotund hypocritical Labour MP John "two Jags" Prescott. He certainly doesn't know what an empty belly feels like.

If the hypocrisy and cowardice doesn't make you vomit, here's the BBC report of this shameful event that happened in March 2007, a full two hundred years after the abolition of slavery:

Prescott's Apologists For Slavery

Note the organiser's risible "as we seek to undo the damage caused by the slave trade..." guilt-inducing nonsense, not missing the chance to hammer home the myths about the slave trade. What these self-hating dolts never mention is that African blacks were not just victims of the slave trade, they were actively involved in the slave trade by capturing and then selling their own. Nor is the fact that slavery is also rife in Africa itself, where albinos, dwarves and people from other tribes are enslaved by African blacks and always have been.

What rankles with me is pious Liberals banging on and on about how evil whites were for enslaving blacks but never mention the appalling conditions many of their forefathers were forced to work under at that time in their own country Great Britain. But as their forefathers were white, their exploitation is left in the cold shadows while the rainbow spotlight focuses on maximising the "injustice and horror" of the Trans-Atlantic slave trade.

But tellingly, those who continually remind us of the wrongs Britain committed during the Trans-Atlantic slave trade don't mention the fact that by far the worst enslavers of blacks isn't the white race it is the Arab race who enslaved blacks for the best part of 1400 years. Indeed, blacks who converted to Islam aided the Muslim Arabs to enslave their own people. Arabs refer to black slaves as "abid" and these slaves were treated barbarically, from castrating the males to using the women as sex-slaves, and a shocking 85% of these people would die as a result of slavery.

Contrast this with the fact that 90% of blacks captured during the Trans-Atlantic slave trade survived and it begs the question:

Why is it blacks, egged on by irrational Liberal-Multiculturalists, continually bleat about the Trans-Atlantic slave trade, using it as a brick-bat to portray the white man as inherently racist and to demand never-ending reparations for this injustice yet do not apply this to their brutal Arab slave-masters? The Trans-Atlantic slave trade lasted for the best part of 300 years and it was brought to an end by whites themselves, so why is it blacks don't have the same anger and sense of injustice about the Arab slave trade that they have towards whites?

Maybe the fact that you will never find Arabs marching in chains through their cities to apologise for enslaving blacks offers a little clue. Guilt won't work on the Arabs but blacks know it works like a charm on whites and blacks will blame whites as much as possible, from slavery to racism to apartheid to colonialism all to distract from their own severe shortcomings and to extract as much value from whites as is possible.

That whites are so easily manipulated by this insidious guilt weapon is further evidence to support my assertion that it is the white race that is behaving in self-destructive ways amounting to suicide of the species.

A Bitter Pill

It is time for whites to refrain from meekly accepting this guilt-trip, a guilt-trip that damages blacks as much as it damages the white race, and to stand up and speak the truth. Enough of the lies, enough of the deceit and the manipulation and enough of this naive and futile devotion to a seriously flawed, childish ideology that forces truth to be sacrificed on the altar of Multiculturalism in the pursuit of a fantasy that cannot ever become a reality: Racial equality, especially equality between whites and blacks.

If one studies history, it becomes clear that wherever the white man has taken root, he has used his ingenuity and his industry to assess and then solve the problems presented to him by Mother nature. History is cram-packed with innovations that have taken mankind forward in leaps and bounds: Agriculture, Science, Medicine, Engineering, Technology along with efficient systems of governance and the rule of law.

What is glaring is that there is absolutely nothing invented or created by the African black that has advanced mankind in any significant way. I cannot think of ONE single invention that has made my life much more comfortable, much more pleasant or made work much more efficient that has been invented by the African black.

In contrast, look at what the white man brought to Africa, from flourishing agriculture to vibrant commerce to medicines that helped the black man combat many of the illnesses that blight the dark continent - malaria, cholera, dysentery, yellow fever, typhoid fever - do you like me wonder how many black Africans have benefited from the wonders of the white man's medicine?

Indeed, the current disease blighting Africa, especially South Africa is HIV/AIDS and in what can only be described as a quite astonishing and grossly irresponsible action, the ruling black ANC government advised people to have a shower after sex so they didn't contract HIV/AIDS. Is this a sign of equality? Really?

I assert that blacks know all too well that they cannot compete as equals with the white race. They know full well - and many are finding out to their great cost - that left to themselves, black societies degenerate into chaos and catastrophe. Blacks know that whites produce the wealth they are wholly incapable of creating and this arouses an intense racial hatred for whites in the black race that manifests in violent crimes such as the robberies described above or in the repulsive and demeaning gang rape of white women.

Yet still these retarded incompetents blame it all on the white man because that's all blacks can think of. So bereft are they of any creativity at all, the only answer blacks can think of when asked as to why Africa remains a third-world sewer is "eiish, cuz da wyt stole everything and oppressed us, das why we got entitlemunt to everything." What utter nonsense.

Blacks will always blame whites for their many failures and they will always demand a share of what the white man creates because they just cannot sustain themselves otherwise. Should whitey refuse they scream "WAYCISS!" like little children scream "I hate you!" when Mummy refuses to give them sweets at the supermarket checkout.

Instead of giving them a share of its wealth in return for nothing the white race should demand that blacks to do something to earn a share or leave them to get on with it in their own dark continent and let Mother nature take care of them. Which she most certainly will if stupid, pious, bleeding heart white Liberals can resist the urge to interfere and stop treating the black to a title blacks can never earn: The white man's equal.

If the white race fails to understand that continually allowing itself to be manipulated into handing over its wealth then not only will it hasten its own demise, it will also continue to cause African blacks enormous suffering. Not just through black incompetence but also through violence because black not only bears a seething hatred for whites, a fierce tribal mentality leads blacks to inflicting even greater acts of savagery and horror on their own people. And this occurs wherever black goes as Londoners know all too well.

Sick Dependency

Here's a couple of examples that illustrate how handing over wealth to Africans who have not earned it and who believe they are entitled to it either because of colonial rule, slavery or merely for the fact they can manage to breathe air, actually causes more misery and suffering and just prolongs the problem. I could provide hundreds more and I am not exaggerating.

In 1984 & `85, Bob Geldof and Midge Ure highlighted the famine in Ethiopia and along with the major rock and pop stars of the time, launched an appeal to raise money for the victims. Band Aid and Live Aid literally rocked the world, it was an amazing feat but what did it achieve? In 1985 the population of Ethiopia was around 35 million, today, just 25 years later, it is at 70 million and growing. This in a country with very little arable land, a country blighted by political corruption, war and famine, yet Saint Bob screamed at us:

"Give us yer money people are f**king dying!"

No Bob, drop the word "dying" and then realise that for all your good intentions all that's been achieved is to line the pockets of the corrupt rulers there and instead of alleviating the suffering of the people, it's actually increased it.

Saint Bob isn't the only one. There are a myriad of charities that exist to improve the lot of the African people. Many find out the hard way that blacks have little appreciation or gratitude for it, a good example being the Irish charity Niall Mellon Township Trust who built basic brick houses for South African blacks, all funded by donations from the West, handed over the keys to people who had paid nothing for them and who did very little to aid in constructing them and who, once whitey had cleared off, rented them out to their own people and returned to the shacks and pocketed the cash.

Charity Homes Rented Out

Other Liberals pay a far higher price for placing fantasy before reality such as this poor woman here:

Missionary Meets Reality

Allowing people to believe they can have something for nothing creates a sick dependency and is certainly not a noble virtue because it does nothing to help the receiver, it just keeps them down with the giver feeling a misguided superior sense of moral piety and an inflated ego. The barbaric and savage events that occur each year in Africa demonstrate how badly flawed this approach is. Another question concerns what happens to people who are wholly dependent on handouts should the handouts stop?

Why is it that after all of the aid that has been donated to Africa through God-knows how many charities and after white colonial rule had created infrastructure, systems of governance, agriculture, wealth-generating and thriving commerce and introduced advanced medical care that has helped cure people of many of the diseases inherent to the continent, why why why are people in Africa still living in squalor and filth and committing so much barbarity?

Additionally and importantly we can also ask: Why are swarms of African blacks still leaving their homelands and their people to live in the West? Surely a better approach is to force Africans to do something to earn Western aid, aid which should focus on helping the Africans address and solve the problems nature presents them so they can build stronger nations in the long-term, that's real help, not just bailing them out when the proverbial hits the fan. Do you like me wonder what will it take to make Africa a peaceful, independent and just society where all Africans can enjoy a dignified life as promised by their blessed Saint Nelson?

Conclusion

Every time somebody dares to question Liberal-Multiculturalists who assert that the races are evil, they are demonised and dehumanised as racists. Yet it is now very clear to me that in fact, the Liberal-Multiculturalists are the true racists. In chasing their rainbow fantasy, they have destroyed South Africa and Zimbabwe with catastrophic consequences that have caused blacks to suffer enormously - famine, violent crime, government abuse and oppression, child abuse and murders of children for muti medicine and rampant HIV. They scream racist at their opponents but they care not a jot for what has happened to millions of African blacks.

Whites too have and are suffering from an escalating and brutal violent crime wave including a genocide of the Boer farmers. And at each turn Liberal-Multiculturalists blame whites for everything and reward other races with scant regard for the consequences. This is because Multiculturalism is anything but, it is about the total destruction of the affluent Western, first-world societies created by whites followed by the annihilation of the white race without any care or responsibility for the ensuing dreadful suffering that will be endured by blacks. All that matters is that whites and their societies are erased from every corner of the world.

There is a trite sound-bite regarding evil that is regularly trotted out in an attempt to explain how evil arises: "All that is required for evil to prevail is for good men to do nothing."

It may have a grain of truth but that's about it. Because for evil to truly flourish it requires much more. It requires people to willingly place fantasy above reality, to knowingly accept falsities over truth and to place vanity and self-interest above all else along with avoiding any responsibility for the consequences of their actions and to knowingly disconnect from the realities they create.

South Africa and Zimbabwe show us the destiny that awaits Great Britain if we continually allow the evil that destroyed them to continue to thrive in our land.

______________________
Parts 1 to 5, together with other postings by Reconquista can be read by clicking here.

Victims of Racism - The Destitute Afrikaners in South Africa

Destitute Afrikaners desperately need your help

By Adriana Stuijt

I have been repeatedly asked by foreign friends where they could donate cash and goods to help alleviate the desperate poverty of the Afrikaner people in South Africa and which has been growing steadily worse since 1994. There are several accredited non-profit organisations which specifically assist homeless and desperate Afrikaans-speaking families -- mainly with private donations from the Afrikaner community itself. The South African government often refuses state-grants, food-aid and government housing to ‘whites’ who are described under the nomer ‘previously advantaged’ under ANC-laws, i.e. people who do not qualify for government-aid, even children who were born after the end of apartheid such as the ones in this squatter camp in this picture by Jan Lamprecht of AfricanCrisis.org.

The latest surveys by Volkshulp and the Helping Hand charity of the trade union Solidarity show that at least 660,000 Afrikaners have fallen into total destitution because of the ANC-government’s so-called ‘affirmative action’ and ‘black-economic’ programmes, which bars ‘whites’ all access to the entire labour market of South Africa.

Continue Reading here

EDF. UAF and the Media cover-up

You will have seen on the news, footage of 16 white 'Stop The Islamisation of Europe' members having a demonstration in Harrow. This group is not the EDL, this group is the British contingent of a Europe wide campaign group protesting against the Islamisation of Europe - their website here ;

http://sioe.wordpress.com/

This is a 'non-racist', non-sectarian, peaceful protest movement, who were faced with a mob of over 1000 rioting Islamist militia of the Tablighi Jaamet sect and their Stalinist allies in the UAF.

This group is closely linked with Islamic terrorists involved in the recent airplane bombing plot. Now the UAF are revealed as lackeys of this Islamist sect and the facilitators of Dhimmitude.

Continue reading at Lee Barnes' blog 21st Century British Nationalism