The Leo McKinstry Article

Thanks to those who drew my attention to the faulty link I posted with yesterday's article.

Here is a better one

A little truth amongst the lies

I know that Express journalist Leo McKinstry is not universally popular amongst the nationalist community on account of his frequent condemnations of parties such as the BNP (he'd be unemployable if he didn't). However, I think many of us will find a lot to agree with in his latest article.

DENYING AN ETHNIC LINK IN SEX GANGS CASE IS BLINKERED

By Leo McKinstry

THE hypocrisy of the politically correct brigade is truly nauseating. These noisy zealots constantly trumpet their commitment to women’s rights, anti-racism and the protection of the vulnerable.

Yet, suddenly, when confronted with the reality of vicious sexual exploitation of young white girls by Asian men, they drop their supposedly cherished principles.

Instead they either deny the existence of the issue or, even worse, they collude with abusers by attacking those who tell the truth.

In recent days these grotesque double standards have been fully on display in the wake of new evidence about the prevalence of Asian sex gangs within our society.

Last week two Muslim men from Derby, Mohammed Liaqat and Abid Saddique, were jailed for raping several young girls after plying them with drugs and alcohol. The conviction of these two vile predators came on top of a new report from the Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, which warned of the growing incidence of this kind of systematic abuse by Pakistani offenders.

Another study last week, based on an analysis of 17 major prosecutions since 1997 for grooming and sexual exploitation of girls aged 11 to 16, showed that of the 56 men found guilty, 53 were Asian.

Responding to these revelations, the former Home Secretary Jack Straw abandoned the usual conspiracy of denial from the political establishment. In refreshingly frank language, he told the BBC that there was a “specific problem” with some Pakistani men who prey on young white girls because “they think they are easy meat”.

Predictably, Straw’s comments caused a huge storm. Muslim groups called his views “deeply offensive” while MP Keith Vaz said the remarks were “pretty dangerous”. The chief executive of the children’s charity Barnardo’s Martin Narey warned in hand wringing tones about the potential stereotyping of Pakistani men.

Clearly, morality should not be inverted by the dogma of political correctness. In this twisted ideological world, it would seem that the hypersensitivities of an ethnic minority are more keenly protected than the rights of abused girls.

The greatest crime is not the sexual brutality itself but daring to mention the ethnicity of the predators.

Read more

Hat Tip: Runic

Updates to South of The Zambizi

A Special Kind of Stupidity

RW Johnson on the South African govt's draft Land Tenure Security Bill

The Arrogance of Reflected Power

Winnie Mandela has been offended

The 400th Anniversary of the King James Bible - Prologue

"That Book accounts for the supremacy of England” – Queen Victoria

This post is an outline of an article by Alan O’Reilly written in keeping with this year as the 400th Anniversary of the publication of the King James Bible, http://www.kingjamesbibletrust.org/. The remainder of the article will follow in instalments. It is aimed essentially at Christians but hopefully will be of general interest.

-/-

By Alan O'Reilly

The KJB Story – 1611 to 2011

Overview:

Introduction

Why this Message – on a 400 year-old Book?

To inform, edify and provide for possible witness opportunities

Why this Story – about a 400 year-old Book?

Because of the effect on the nation’s leaders, life, enemies

The Learned Men

The Hampton Harrier - The King that played the Puritan

High Church, Low Church - White male C of E Protestants

“Hebrew at his fingers’ ends”- Unparalleled scholars

The Critics’ Den

The Huffing King - Tyrant, Freemason, scoundrel, intriguer and worse?

The Awful Apocrypha – in the 1611 1611 Holy Bible (repetition is deliberate)

The PC C of E? - The Anglican compromise – or the Baptist builder?

The KJB or not the KJB? - That is the question – on different KJB Editions

“Understandest…what thou readest?” - Acts 8:30 (No :( )

The Word of a King, Ecclesiastes 8:4

“Give me that Book” - Bunyan, Wesley, Spurgeon, Ryle, Shaw

“God save the king!” - The national anthem and a paratrooper’s farewell

Gone into all the world

• English time, English longitude, English empire, English text
• The Book That Changed The World – on DVD
• The Queen that Challenged the World – a magnificent painting

“That Book accounts for the supremacy of England” – Queen Victoria

________________
The articles will follow shortly

The Gentle Left

Sarah Palin "America's Enduring Strength"

Sarah Palin: "America's Enduring Strength" from Sarah Palin on Vimeo.

The politics of Vitriol

Should a crackdown on language include Obama?

“They Bring a Knife…We Bring a Gun”

“I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I’m angry!”

“Punish your enemies.”

“Get in Their Faces!”

Republican victory would mean “hand to hand combat”

“Hit Back Twice As Hard”

“I’m itching for a fight.”

"I know who's a## to kick!"

Hate and (Media) Lies in America

The controlled media in America continue to exploit the attempted assassination of Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords at the weekend, during which six people died and a number more were injured. True to type the left have resorted to the politics of the gutter, with the aim of blaming the Tea Party for the shooting and getting a few cheap jibes at Sarah Palin, who they accuse of "creating a climate of hate".

Even Fox News has got in on the act with an attempt to link the shooter, a pot smoking, left wing American flag burner, to American Renaissance, albeit they are rapidly rowing back on that claim as it becomes more obvious that their "evidence" is not what it appears.

However, as usual with the controlled media, what they don't want you to know is covered up, such as the article below, which appeared on the Democrat supporting Daily Kos website just two days before the shooting, showing that, in fact sources on the left were guilty of stirring up feelings against Congresswoman Giffords in the days leading up to the attack.

Click on the image to see a larger version

Genocide by stealth - Part 3

Part 1
Part 2

In the first two parts of this essay I set out to demonstrate that acts have been committed against the white European race, over the last half century or more, which meet at least two of the definitions of genocide as laid out under Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

Measures have been put in place intended to prevent births amongst white Europeans and which have resulted in the termination or prevention of the birth of, at the very least, tens of millions of white children. Taken altogether across the western world, the number of potential births amongst our ethnic group which have been prevented either by chemical means or by active physical intervention is in the hundreds of millions.

Meanwhile, conditions of life have been inflicted upon us which are already leading to our destruction, at least in part.

That these acts have been committed, that they were deliberate and are resulting in the outcomes I described in parts one and two is self evidently true. Furthermore, the fact that, in combination theses acts, measures and policies have brought us to the brink of a tipping point beyond which, we cannot, as a people, recover, is also beyond question. They have.

It also can not be denied that, although as a people we, native Europeans, have faced war, famine pestilence and catastrophe we have never before come so close to our own annihilation.

What is, however, open to question is why is it happening, who is doing it and what they are actually seeking to achieve.

Up until now I have laid facts before you, however, in an attempt to make sense of those facts I can now only give you my own view, my analysis if you prefer, of what has happened and why.

To the question “Is there a conspiracy to destroy the white race?”, I have to say in my view the answer is considerably more complex than some of my fellow travellers would like to believe. What we face is not a single malevolent conspiracy, but a many headed hydra formed of any number aims ambitions, hatreds and ideologies, all of differing degrees of malevolence, which have come together, on the coat tails of a historical conspiracy, to attack us at a time when we are at the least able to defend ourselves.

Not all which has been done has been with malevolent intent, I rather placed my credibility on the line by linking the contraceptive pill to genocide in an earlier part of this essay, and I know that, on at least one of the other sites where my earlier articles have been republished, some people who have not done what I asked, and viewed these things in context, have mocked me for it. I do not necessarily believe that, in isolation, the pill was developed or legalised with the deliberate intention of damaging the native European race. However, I submit that it has done so, and as I stated previously, its introduction on the scene coincided with other factors which in combination have been unremittingly negative.

The pill, together with abortion, and what one might call “breeding unfriendly” changes to the economic model, have not only speeded up the pace of our decline but they have provided succour to attitudes which were most certainly encouraged with malevolent intent. The pill has been used far less to regulate the size of families as it has been used to put off childbirth, often altogether, and that has been of inestimable damage to us, collectively, as a people.

Some of my critics may wish to argue that the decline of the greatest civilisation the world has ever seen is a worthwhile sacrifice in order to enable a rapidly reducing number of individuals to enjoy the transitory pleasures of a child free lifestyle. However, it is for them to make that case, but at this point I do not buy it.

However, in other areas there is no doubt as to the malevolence of the forces ranged against us. Some of the most savagely malign of those forces exist within the arts and academia, where many do not even attempt to disguise their genocidal intent. Who can forget the words of Harvard Professor Noel Ignatiev, (1) author of “When the Irish became White” and co-editor of the “Race Traitor” magazine, when he said: “The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.” or “The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race.” and of course: “we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed--not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.”

Ignatiev is not alone, his brand of poison pervades learning institutions throughout the West. Anyone who followed the attempts to rail-road three innocent lacrosse players at North Carolina's Duke University, following the false rape claims of black “exotic dancer” in 2006 as closely as I did, could not fail to be shocked by the levels of mindless, visceral hatred towards white males which exists within American academia. It would be hard to exaggerate how passionately so many eminent members of the Duke faculty, journalists, media talking heads and so called “community organisers” wanted those boys to be guilty. For many, guilt or innocence was not an issue, they simply craved blood in order to slake their hatred.

However, how is it that the views of such unattractive and ideologically diseased individuals such as Noel Ignatiev and so many members of the Duke faculty have gained such purchase and become so all pervading within Western culture? To find an answer to that question we need ton go back a century and a half, or even more, and there we do find a conspiracy.

The conspiracy against Western Christian / capitalist society began in the 19th Century, if not before. It did not start as a conscious attack on white, Europeans, however, it inevitably became one, initially for no other reason than that Western society was white, European, society.

It is at this point in the narrative that I must nod in the direction of those of my critics who accuse me of being an apologist for Zionism, and admit that it is impossible to ignore the Jewish role in the early efforts to undermine Western Society. Jews featured disproportionately amongst those who took Marxist theory forward and set up the great and deadly Communist monoliths which crushed vast sections of humanity, throughout the twentieth century. A significant majority of those who formed the subversive Frankfurt School of thinking in the 1930's, those who developed critical theory and that most evil and damaging of all ideologies, political correctness were Jewish academics and Jewish political thinkers.

It was by no means exclusively Jewish, but it was overwhelmingly so. It is also impossible to dismiss the current role of Jews within academia not to mention the Jewish anti-white propagandists within the media and, of course Hollywood.

However, although it would be ignorant and dishonest to dismiss the role Jews played in the early efforts to undermine Western society and the role which many eminent Jews still play within the massed ranks ranged against us, it is also possible to overestimate their role. When those within the Nationalist community blame all the attacks on the white European race on the Jews and on some vast Zionist conspiracy they are addressing a single, historical and rapidly shrinking foe, while ignoring many far more vicious and, now more dangerous adversaries.

Marxism is at the root of all our problems and it was those early Marxists, Trotskyites, Stalinists, Maoists and sundry Socialists of the late 19th and early 20th centuries in general certainly who set the great ball of anti-white genocide in motion when they set out to destroy Western Capitalism. However, we are certainly not, today, where they once planned to take us.

I would liken the early communist conspirators, malevolent as they may have been, to a deluded scientist who created a faulty chemical weapon, which once injected into its victim takes on a life of its own, driven on mindlessly by the flaws within its design and independent of the plans of its designer.

Those, including many Jews who conspired against our grandfathers imagined that we would today be living under universal Marxist rule, not that we would be facing the prospect of a Universal Islamic caliphate.

I suspect that were those who first sowed the seeds of our destruction alive today, they would look on in horror at the monster they have created, for it will devour them, and their plans no less ravenously than it will destroy us. At the risk of reigniting the anger of my critics against me, I would argue that, whatever, past difference there may have been, now is the time for Jews, together with gays and true feminists to join with White Nationalists, for it is we, not what is coming to ensure their protection, freedom and very existence.

As I say, the aim was to destroy Western capitalism, but with the demise of what was intended to replace it, the agenda has morphed into the destruction of the European race, and without any other ambition, the destruction has become the purpose rather than merely the agent of change.

Before the fall of the Soviet Union the Marxist cause had made huge advances. Nobody living in the 1950's or 1960's would have been accused of being a conspiracy theorist had they claimed that there were people within our society working for its destruction, because there were. Communism made no secret of its sworn aim to dominate the world and, unlike with Islam today, there were no politically correct scruples against acknowledging it.

Marxist theory exercises a powerful pull on the hearts and minds of elite Western Intellectuals. Through their compliance over the decades the Soviet system's tentacles gradually infiltrated the West, gaining control within many of our most powerful institutions, most spectacularly within the media and within education, two areas in which they correctly assessed they could do the most damage to the system they were seeking to overthrow.

Having gained control within the two most powerful means of forming opinion, they set about, first gradually, but later more rapidly, indoctrinating the western public with the aim of making them less willing or able to resist their eventual overthrow, whilst simultaneously removing anyone within the targeted organisation who did not share the approved ideology.

The indoctrination was aimed at undermining senses of patriotism and national identity essential to preserving a culture and it took many forms such as the debasing and re-writing of European history, the debasing and trivialising of our culture.

As first this was viewed as a form of class war, where the original targets were the middle and upper classes who would be annihilated when the workers rose against them, as occurred in Russia.

However, outside Russia the class war was abandoned when the white working classes failed to play the role allotted to them and joined the middle classes as targets for destruction. Race became the new weapon in undermining a culture through national guilt. Anti-racism aimed exclusively at the target race and intent upon instilling a sense of of shame and guilt for a past which had, in fact never taken place, exploited a weakness within a tolerant and benevolent people always anxious to do the right thing and protect the underdog. As a consequence, the dishonest drum beat of “white oppressor”, “black victim” accompanied by the altogether more sensuous “black sexy”, “white surrender” became the constant theme music behind popular culture, throughout the 1960's, 70's and 80's.

This was an even more deadly poison, our enemies knew from history that nothing undermines a society as effectively as does multiculturalism. Hence they cynically recast the melting pot as grail of our age.

Other “isms” were deployed, such as a deceptive form of feminism designed, in the guise of “liberation”, to undermine the family whilst imposing a new sexualised slavery upon women, which sold us aspirations which could only be achieved spread legged and child free. At the same time siren voices convinced young women that a life of unnaturally induced sterility, with abortion as a back up, offered the means of achieving fulfilment. It was in this way that developments such as oral contraception, abortion and social change began to become instruments of genocide.

In few areas has the indoctrination designed at the destruction of Western Society been more cruelly effective than what it has done to women. In a few generations a sex which once valued honour, virtue and motherhood, now finds themselves either grasping at the Muslim veil of their own subjugation or, tragically with some merit, viewed as “easy meat” by our nations new colonisers, leaving many of the most vulnerable in huge danger.

The damage done to the white male was perhaps even crueler, however, I have addressed that subject often in my previous writing, links to which I will add at the bottom of this posting. (2)

Enemies of the West also infiltrated various other areas, such as the law, politics and the security services, but it was within education and within the popular media that they seized their most powerful weapons, and they have used them against us relentlessly for at least half a century

The people responsible for this did not go away when Communism fell, the aim of overthrowing the West and replacing it with a soviet style utopia was no longer an option, but that did not change the aim of overthrowing the West. Indeed, as the years had past a new more anarchistic breed had joined the old Stalinist, for whom the destruction of the West was more important than any subsequent reconstruction.

They had been well schooled in the belief that the West was evil and needed to be destroyed and they saw nothing within the demise of communism to change that belief.

Hence they have continued with their mission of undermining our culture, indoctrinating our people and nurturing new generations of indoctrinators. However, the emphasis had changed, Western society could no longer be destroyed by soviet communism, so anti-racism, multiculturalism and immigration, tools so long used as a means of softening up the culture for its eventual take over, would now become the means of its destruction.

However, we have still but touched on half the picture, acts have consequences which are not always anticipated. A one hundred and fifty year old conspiracy aimed at the converting the capitalist West to Marxism had developed into an exercise of ethnic and cultural cleansing.

In the process Western society's resolve and sense of its own identity had become so undermined that other groups with other even less wholesome aims and agendas began to smell blood in the water, and they in turn began to close in on a weakening prey.

--------------
I had intended this to be the final part of this essay, but I find that I have so much more to say, hence, I will post the final part, together with my conclusions later this week.
__________

(1)
Harvard hates the white race (VDare)
(2)
White boys in the Jungle
The Lost Boys

Sexual Jihad

An intelligent and alarming posting at Trencherbone

Is Diversity a Strength?

Is Diversity a Strength? from AltRightTV on Vimeo.

Changing Attitudes – Changing Races

By Mister Fox

From the early 1950s a new intellectual orthodoxy was being introduced through the culture. and it was dominated by the Neo-Marxists and Freudian in the US. Dissenters were pathalogised as paranoid or racists with connotations of mental illness. Thus began a move to dehumanise “Whites” so that no evil done to us is wrong, and there are many evils being done to us. (1)

The influential academic books beginning in the early 1950s attributed the blame for everyone not combining as a whole to us and begun their research from that prejudice. They assumed that people like me are prejudiced, yet they are not; people like me they thought jump to conclusions, but they do not; our way of thinking has no evidence, theirs was reason; we were frightened of change, they were ushering it in.

They think that in life you get to know people and find that some will be alright, some will not. They think we are terribly unjust and that if we were tolerant we should get to know the “other”and get on with them which we do in our personal lives. However, in heavily mixed areas this line of reasoning is not valid and only applies in limited circumstances because the “other” stick with their own kind.

We are supposed to pretend that the “other” are not different, but their different features betoken a different heritage; a different heritage betokens a different culture; and a different culture betokens a different mental furniture. Blacks know they are descended from slaves and this informs their outlook, their behaviour, their attitudes towards us. The wise and experienced judge people on their appearance,body language and how they are looking at you and deal with them accordingly.

They addressed "human kind" as two different species: wicked racist Whites and the saintly “other”, bearers of virtue and diligence. Attributing virtue to the “other”excuses our rulers fawning on them; Pretending the “other” are harmless makes people feel safe.

In his introduction to the 1998 reprint of the 1948 study Negroes in Britain by Kenneth Little, Leonard Bloom declared: Little wrote “... they are rejected by the host population and that causes ambivalence about the self, with personal and social maladjustment.”. There from the beginning was the bias against the host population (Whites) for harming the “other”. This now being done to us. (2)

There is a lot of peculiar sexual behaviour now which relates to my first point as well as the second. Our manners are degraded and we are becoming lawless. We have to value ourselves. Its not so much feeling good about ourselves as having a sense of responsibility for what we have inherited. We see the symptoms that are around us in public social life in conquered peoples. Native Indians and Aborigines went to pieces. We are becoming maladjusted.

The Picture Post of 2nd July 1949 popularised this attack on our communal integrity in an article: "Is there a British Colour Bar?” The titular rhetorical question was answered with a simile from a popular film: Invisible, but like Wells' Invisible Man it is hard and real to the touch … and it is when you get lower down the scale you find that it hits the hardest Yet despite the insignificant proportion of people from overseas, prejudice and discrimination existed.” The post thought this was because of ignorance.

The title of “Colour Prejudice in Britain” by Anthony Richmond proclaims the author's prejudices and “Under Siege”, with an introduction by John Pilger, castigates us as wicked racists for trying to conserve our communal integrity. These malicious academics were denying us our need to have territory

Changing our attitude of looking down on other racial groups has caused the opposite and now Muslims look down on our women as recent exposes In The Times and The Mail of Muslims gang raping young White girls show: ” Police and social services have fuelled a “culture of silence” which has “allowed hundreds of young white girls to be exploited by Asian men for sex … prosecutions for grooming young White girls aged between 11 and 16 were used by “men of Pakistani heritage.” The police and social workers have been aiding and abetting Muslims to rape young White girls.

In 17 court cases since 1997 where groups of men were prosecuted, 53 of the 56 people found guilty were Asian, 50 of them Muslim, while just three were white.

Experts were quoted as saying that the statistics “represent a mere fraction of a tidal wave of offending” in counties across the Midlands and the north of England which has been going on for more than a decade.

Chief Inspector Alan Edwards of West Mercia police was quoted saying: "White girls are being passed around and used as meat …. stop this type of crime you need to start everyone talking about it but everyone's been too scared to address the ethnicity factor …". No one wants to stand up and say that Pakistani guys in some parts of the country are recruiting young white girls and passing them around their relatives for sex, but we need to stop being worried about the racial complication." In Wrexham raping young White is carried out by by Iraqis.

Parents must gather their courage and teach their children to avoid people from ethnic groups to save their children. It is state education that sets the children up for this by constantly praising ethnics. (3)

This will get much worse as the evil elites import ever more Muslims. In 2000 The Guardian predicted a white minority Britain by 2100, thus tacitly accepting our replacement. Around 8 years ago The Birmingham Post quoted a former senior Central TV official as saying we must prepare people for Muslims to become the majority. In a radio interview Jans Orbeck former Swedish PM admitted Muslims would take over.

It’s when one enters Africa and Asia in Britain that one walks into the academics dream - “race replacement”. One gets a clear view of the future as Enoch and Chris Pary saw it. (4) Some areas are 25 to 30% vibrant though it’s much more in some areas. They are changing our territory to suit their cultural prejudices. Within a few yards on Spittal Hill in Sheffield there are two shops named after Malcolm X! It is this ceding of territory to the colonialists that demonstrates to them the weakness and effeteness of our rulers. Alternating governments are but aspects of one elite and have been acting illegally under the UN Genocide Act which nullifies any obligation to maintain the multi-racial state.

Trainee teacher are taught that only whites are racist and White children labelled as “racists” as young as five. The thing that really is socially constructed in Britain today is the school subject of history. A fifteen-year old correspondent had this to say about state education :

"In Year 3 we learnt about the Great Fire of London and Henry the 8th with his array of wives. Besides, it was nothing serious as you're only 8 years olds in Year 3. Throughout my time in secondary school I've heard many the history teacher denounce the BNP and British patriotism whilst proclaiming that "communism works in small communities".

Of course it's not on the syllabus, but the teachers are left unburdened to make their wild remarks which go unchallenged - that's where most of the anti-British sentiment comes from. Apart from that, none of the GCSE exams in the course I'm taking are anything to do with Britain, we look at America mostly, with a slight twinge of the Russian Revolution and Hitler's rise to power, which, as you can imagine, portrays Trotsky and Lenin as saviours come to liberate their country from the boundless tyranny of Tsar Nicholas II (it's all Stalin apparently, without him we'd be living in a one-world stateless utopia by now!), whilst illustrating Hitler as some sort of Nationalist lunatic blaming the immigrants for all of Germany's woes, foaming from the mouth as he personally beheads and thereafter eats Jewish children for fun."

The consistent underlying theme is to render “Whites” a non-people with this ideological interpretation presented as fact: “Vikings come from a similar racial background, but the Britons of the period had already been interbreeding with Europeans, Moors and probably a good few Arabs, so the Vikings, on their separate branch of development would have had a bit of spice to add to the genetic mix.”

So what? What is that supposed to suggest that it is alright to dispossess us now? I use no scientific supports for my views. My arguments are based on the common human nature - of all peoples, throughout all time: the need to belong to a people have territory to call one's own and the instinct to put their own people first.

It is a natural part of human being and arises from emotion. This has been broken down by elites who are against their own people. A quick example of outside groups being given priority over the indigenous people, is the recent decision to give gypsies preferential service for unemployment benefits. Many, like students, go along with the hegemonic ideology and don't questioned it.

What pupils and students are programmed to do is oppose new British-revivalist thinking with the standard orthodox ideology they are taught. People imbibe it without being aware and use it to stop new ideas. Whether they know it or not they are protecting the "hegemonic" elites from criticism and demonstrations.

You can see the ideology is out of kilter with reality by going round places like Brixton or Bradford but these programmed people believe what they are told by the elites through education and the media. This new patriotic thinking requires independence of mind, thinking for oneself and collating the evidence from field study and that is scary.

Ideology is a political system of abstractions which lead to a goal(utopia) and have an enemy who are held to the cause of the problems that the ideologues want to solve. to the Nazis it was jews, to multi-racialists it is us Whites.

If, for example, a White employer wanted to sack a recalcitrant "ethnic" worker that employes could be prosecuted and fined for "racism". Is that is building equality?

I make no scientific claims as they just start a debate not answer the question. We have beliefs to guide us on conserving our homogeneity and our ethnicity - shared culture, religion and ancestors. I believe we have a duty to conserve what we inherit from our ancestors and a responsibility to pass it on to our descents. At present our children are being dispossessed and disinherited and that is morally evil.

The basis on which elites take large sums of money in tax and pay it out in benefits is that those who benefit are people like us. When society becomes diverse, lifestyles become more differentiated, then it becomes immoral to sustain the universal welfare state, as it loses its legitimacy. People ask, ‘Why should I pay for them when they are not like me and do not belong here by ancestral prescription and inherited shared values? Progressives want diversity but they undermine the moral consensus on which sustains a welfare state.”

This is not some innocent move to multi-racial heaven on earth but a permanent scapegoating of Whites and we have to defend ourselves. Even if we were once immigrants that does not mean we should sit back and allow new immigrants to push us out. The Anglo Saxon ethnic-cleansing of Celts is a historical lesson on what the elites are inflicting on our children. To prevent us saving our people we are demonised as racists. That is not socially constructing reality but persecuting innocent people in the homeland they have emotionally bonded with over 1500 years.

To an extent "Reality" is determined by ruling elites but when they directly try to change inbuilt human nature we get the evil genocides as with Pol Pot, Mao, Stalin etc.

We must ask ourselves with whom do I belong? With whom do I share mutual obligations? Our affinities extend out from our families and communities, to the nation, Europe then the Anglosphere but not beyond. That view is opposed to the orthodox universalist one which sees us as obligated to all human beings and misappropriates tax payers money for their fellow elites in the third-world. We have natural bonds with our families, a responsibility for them and a duty to them. We also have a duty to pass on what we have inherited to our children, as they, in turn, will have a duty to their children. We owe a debt to our ancestors who bequeathed to us our nation and culture, and we must honour that.

Our loyalties begin with affection within families and this emanates outward to neighbourhood and nation. Men and women are distinctive sexual beings within their inherited collective identity. We belong to our kin, above strangers, and this affects the type of community we create.

The family, community and nation, are parts of a natural, organic state as opposed to an artificial one based on planning. The modern world is dominated by artificial empires, Global corporations and bureaucracies, which treat human beings as abstract entities. However, tribalism is re-emerging and the future belongs to these human scale structures which develop over time, not instant and artificial creations. Each man and woman are part of a continuity. The individual dies, but descendants live on.

We must keep our land because we are emotionally bonded with it and it contains the remains of many of our ancestors. That makes it sacred to us, but our nation is our people and one of the earliest definitions of a nation, as defined by the Romans who called the various Germanic travelling tribes "nations" - is that a nation is a people that can move from place to place and still be who they are. The Goths lived in north Africa at one time - but they were still the integral Germanic nation.

We need to re-sacrilise our territory by burying our people in our soil as it strengthens our emotional bonds with our territory. There was a suburb article “How can we honour the dead?” by Dr.John Casey in the third edition of The Salisbury Review in 1983.

We have to be public spirited and do things for our group. Its alright to object to ethnics getting preferential treatment but we have to go beyond moaning and break ground, become the driving force behind a new and powerful movement on the front line. People don't vote for moaners but the confident with a vision of a better future for their people. It is natural to follow the stronger more dominant force and that is why we need to project confidence in ourselves and what we have to offer.

We have to recover aspects of our past and reconstitute ourselves: what traditions to be continued, what rejected; which to re-link to, what to create.

We are morally obliged to put our people first, as we do with our families, even when foreigners are more in need of our help. Supporting outsiders against our own people is morally wrong.
________________

(1)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/8237330/Poor-white-boys-score-worse-grades-than-deprived-black-Chinese-and-Asian-classmates.html

(2)

http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/crer/

http://www.gold.ac.uk/media-communications/staff/ahmed/

http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/routledge/01419870.html

http://www.leeds.ac.uk/history/race.htm

(3)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1344218/Asian-sex-gangs-Culture-silence-allows-grooming-white-girls-fear-racist.html

http://shropshirepatriot.blogspot.com/2010/12/claim-60-victims-of-muslim-paedophile.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-12137400

(4)

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article673612.ece

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HP7fETsKYkA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fw0rUJbE9k

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-433497/Widow-Enoch-Powells-Rivers-Blood-speech-really-did-exist.html

English Children being passed around and used like meat

Commentary on Simon Darby's blog - Click Here

The Times article he refers to is Subscription Only (Click here if you are a subscriber or wish to pay £1 to read it) alternatively Click here to read a similar report in the Daily Mail.

Genocide by stealth - Part 2

In the first part of this essay I argued that vast social changes resulting from deliberate acts by the governments of Europe and all other, one time white, Western nations have succeeded in meeting at least one of the United Nations definitions of what constitutes an act of genocide against an ethnic group.

Easy, free, and officially encouraged access to oral contraception, the legalisation of abortion, effectively on demand, and changes to the economic structure which have forced the average family unit to cease consisting of one breadwinner and one child carer, but instead to become formed of two breadwinners, have resulted directly in a catastrophic reduction in the birth rate among whites of native European origin.

All three changes have resulted directly from deliberate social or economic engineering on the part of post war governments, and it is impossible to argue that a reduction in births was not a primary aim, at least of the first two or that a reduction in births has been a direct result of the third.

Therefore, I would submit for your consideration the fact that, whether through ill will or otherwise, measures have been put in place intended to prevent births within the targeted group. That targeted group being white native Europeans. This means of Genocide is clearly defined in Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

Meanwhile, as I argued in part one, during the same period, monumental efforts have been made, by those same western governments to increase the birth rate amongst other races and ethnic groups.

Some may argue that counter measures, such as welfare benefits, and, indeed child benefit itself, have been put in place which actively encourage childbirth. However, as the figures clearly demonstrate, they have not had this effect, at least, they have not done so amongst the target group. White wage earners may welcome child benefit, but it is only those whites at the very lowest social levels who might consider welfare benefits an incentive to breed.

On the other hand, given that the welfare state in Britain and similar welfare arrangements Europe are among of the primary incentives for mass inward migration and that it is primarily amongst immigrant families in receipt of welfare and child benefits that a significant growth in birth rates has been seen, far from counterbalancing that damaging effect of other policies, this has, if anything, in fact added to the damage done to the native European people.

That is because, the inward migration honey pot created by a free for all Welfare state is one of the many ways by which a further act fitting the description of genocide has been committed. That is the deliberate infliction on the targeted group of conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.

I would contend that the mass third world immigration into every single Western nation has created conditions which will lead to the destruction of the native European peoples, at very least in part.

How do you destroy a people if not by starving them, shooting them or marching them to death? There are many ways, but you can start by outnumbering them and forcing them out of their homelands. When it happens to other races in other places we call it ethnic cleansing, it is only when it happens to us, here that we call it progress.

Whatever you call it, it is happening, even the media have now been forced to admit that the native white population of Britain will have become an ethnic minority in their ancestral homeland by 2066. Many suspect that estimate is a conservative one, and that is likely to be much sooner than that, in much of England it most certainly will be sooner.

We should not forget that the annual “net” immigration figure, which the government publishes, does not take into account how many of those leaving the country are indigenous Britons who are replaced by immigrants, and the numbers classified as British born who are of foreign ancestry. As a consequence the official figure seriously underestimates the overall demographic change.

London only remains a majority white city if you include the furthest outer suburbs and the fact that non-Europeans are less likely to register on census forms. There is compelling evidence that in reality London has already passed the tipping point and that the native population are already a minority. Whether that is true or not it is certain that it soon will be and that without a shadow of a doubt, with one hundred years of the end of World War II, the descendants of those, the blitz generation, who flocked the streets to celebrate VE day, will be a racial minority in the city they fought to defend.

This will have resulted from a deliberate policy, which was never put to a vote. How is this not ethnic cleansing? How does this not equate to the other great displacements which history now condemns?.

In Birmingham, a city with one of the smallest remaining white majorities in Britain, the change may come even sooner. Certainly the native population have long ago been driven out of vast swathes of that city, as they have in many UK cities, including London.

It is often lamented that the sparrows are vanishing from London, but who dare admit so are the Cockneys?.

If the indigenous population of any other region of the word were being deliberately replaced, the word “genocide” would be on the tofu stained lips of every liberal. The UN security council would be in session and Hoxton high street would echo to the shrieks of horror, as Giles and Penelope recounted tales of vacations in Cairo or Bangkok where the locals had been forced out and replaced by people from Porthcawl and Billericay. However, as it is the people of European origin who are being supplanted its considered acceptable.

The same situation extends across the Western World. In fact European nations, such as Sweden, which have smaller native populations may well become majority non-white before we do. Even in the larger countries the problems associated with mass immigration are becoming obvious, however, their leaders do not see the solution to the problem as stopping immigration, but rather by getting rid of a homogeneous native population. This was made clear by French President Nicolas Sarkozy when he said "the only way to stop the violence and hatred of a multicultural society is through inter breeding between the races", what else was he calling for other than the irradication of the original French people?

This view echoed those expressed by so many of the social elite, and those who see themselves as opinion formers, such as journalist, political commentator and over-paid television personality Andrew Marr when, in a 1999 Guardian article, he encouraged "widespread and vigorous miscegenation”, or race mixing, to make the British public to accept the multicultural 'Utopia' he, and his kind are seeking to force upon us. Marr admitted that this might be “tricky to achieve as public policy”, however, the fact that he viewed miscegenation as the “best option” reveals a great deal about the attitudes of such people. (1)

There is a vast difference between a free society permitting interracial sex and the active promotion of mass miscegenation for a political aim, yet Sarkozy, Marr and the other mixed race proselytisers are too blinded by ideology to that what they are in fact advocating is ethnic cleansing. Or am I being to generous to them?

So, what caused this attitude? A view which would have been so alien to every generation before the 1960's? Why is it considered as acceptable to do to us what would cause shock and outcry were it done to anyone else? The reason is clear, Europeans have been taught to think differently about themselves, and make no mistake, they have been deliberately taught to view themselves in the way they now do.

It may sound bizarre to claim that our media and our educators have created a fake history and then set about brainwashing us into feeling guilt about things which never happened, or which did not happen in the manner in which our children, and indeed most of the post 1960 generations are taught, but that is actually what is happening.

What out children are being taught in school about our history and our society are lies, pure and simple, and that has been the case now for decades.

This is accompanied throughout childhood and into adulthood by a constant barrage of propaganda forced upon us day and night through our entertainment and news media. Not only are we relentlessly confronted with depictions of the same fake history with which our children are being indoctrinated, but also a fake present, depicted in popular drama, entertainment and through the heavily sanitised and selective spin which now passes for news.

The news is arguably more shameful even than the drama, because it pretends to be objective and truthful when it is the exact reverse. Anything which can be spun to support the fantasy of a multicultural Utopia, the perpetual narrative of non-white victimhood or intrinsic white badness is highlighted with great prominence. Meanwhile anything which could undermine the multicultural dream, reveals whites as victims or exposes badness amongst non-whites is distorted, lied about or suppressed altogether.

I could go into great detail on this aspect, but wish to avoid this article becoming overly long, however, it is a subject I have addressed frequently, with numerous articles in previous posting which can be found in the blog archives. However, I have added links to a number of my previous posting on the subject of media propaganda and misinformation at the bottom of this article (2).

Once one appreciates what is happening you are confronted with it relentlessly, but sadly very few actually realise what is happening, it is, after all, what they have always known and what they have been taught to believe. They hardly even notice when they see themselves being replaced, not least in TV commercials, where progressively the average Briton is portrayed not by a white person, or indeed a black person, but by someone of mixed race, with the subliminal message that this is the new reality they should aspire to.

The outcome is the a flabby, bovine, nation of people who care only for trivia and possessions, who actively believe that the history of their race is shameful, that their country owes a debt of guilt to other nations, and crucially, who do not care if their people were to vanish from the face of the earth.

Worse than that, for many, something in their subconscious tells them it might even be racist to care.

And here I have mentioned the word which has become one of the most deadly weapons used against the European race and the most poisonous agent of their destruction.

"Racist", that dishonest, multi-purpose, multiple application little word has been used to bully, intimidate and hector our people for decades now as a means of forcing a cynical political agenda upon us which they would never have achieved democratically. We, the most tolerant and benevolent race on Earth, the people least guilty of racial, tribal or xenophobic animus on the planet, have, exclusively, been so terrorised by that little word to the point where we would rather see our own race destroyed than dare be called it.

If any of us do overcome the terror and speak out against the lies, then laws have been set in place enabling the authorities to hunt them down and prosecute them, cheered on by a baying controlled media.

In Britain, and elsewhere in Europe it has now been established in law that telling the truth can be a criminal offence (and we laughably still call ourselves a free society)

It is all now stacked against us. We are the victims of hate don't you see, we are not, and have never been the main perpetrators.

This is a huge subject, and there is so much more to say. We are assailed on all sides by so many different forces, all seemingly calculated to undermine us as a homogeneous race of people. I could continue for a dozen more postings and still not have covered all issues.

However, I hope that, in these two postings I have been able to demonstrate that over the last half century, measures have been imposed upon the native people of Europe, and, worldwide, upon those of European origin, which fit the internationally accepted definitions of genocide, and which are inextricably leading to the destruction of us as a race. (In some areas, such as South Africa, as I have explained in previous postings we are even further down the blood stained road)

As pointed out in part one of is essay those definitions of genocide are:

• Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the targeted group

As I have stated, deliberate measures have been put in place intended to prevent births amongst us, and which have successfully prevented many millions of births amongst our people. At the same time, deliberate measures, taken by the same governments, have increased the birthrate of non-Europeans by billions (four billion since 1950).

Whilst their numbers grow, ours are shrinking, taken across the western world this has led to the loss of potential lives among those of European origin greater than any previous world war and previous natural disaster other than possibly the black death in the 14th Century, and certainly greater than any previous genocide.

• Deliberately inflicting on the targeted group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.

Mass immigration, never in any state agreed to by democratic vote, is replacing the native peoples of Europe and those of European origin across the planet. Britain and North America are predicted to become majority non-white states at some point between 2050 and 2066, and the same will apply to the rest of Europe, with the possible exception of northern Russia, by the end of the century.

Some would argue that the very replacement of one race or culture with another is an act of genocide in itself. However, in addition, the inevitable mass displacement and interbreeding which is already occurring will further undermine Europeans as a homogeneous ethnic group. (an outcome, some so brainwashed and mired in their foetid ideology actually view as a desirable outcome)

Furthermore, given the evidence that significant numbers of immigrants are actively hostile to the native population and its culture, the effect on the native population when those groups become a majority can only be guessed at .

Meanwhile, for decades now our people have been subject to unremitting indoctrination, propaganda and, many would argue, brainwashing. They have been fed lies and disinformation designed to undermine their sense of identity, their pride in their identity, and ultimately their will to survive as a people.

By means of the above, and many other examples I could point to, conditions have been inflicted upon us which can not fail to bring about our destruction in whole or in part, and, in fact are already doing so.

It is happening, that cannot be denied. I have not made any of this up, I have merely laid the facts before you and the conclusion screams its own name without any prompting from me.

Only two questions remain:

why is it happening? To be truly genocide there needs to be intent. Is there really a mass conspiracy by evil people determined to destroy the white race? The acts are deliberate, but is their inevitable outcome their purpose? Or are there other factors, other agendas and other motives which have brought us to where we are?

It makes little difference to us of course, if you are killed by murder or by manslaughter you are still dead. However, it does change how one judges the perpetrators.

And the most difficult question, what, if anything can be done to change course on what appears to the inevitable road to our destruction?.

I will seek to explore these two questions in the third and final part of this essay.

____________________

(1) http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/pdf/Archive/Uk/uk.politics.misc/2008-07/msg00247.pdf

(2) Prior articles touching on media lies, disinformation and propaganda
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2008/04/ripped-from-headlines-and-ethnically.html
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2008/05/broken-news.html
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2008/09/age-of-disinformation.html
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2008/04/hoary-old-stereotype-sold-to-us-as-new.html
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2009/09/disinformation-news.html
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2009/09/guess-those-missing-words.html
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2010/08/lies-of-political-correctness.html
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2010/06/bloody-liars.html
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2008/03/lies-damn-lies-and-statistics.html
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2010/03/claims-reported-as-facts-again.html

Did it take the near collapse of their economy for them to see the truth?

And will it take the same for us?

Greeks build barrier on border with Turkey to keep out migrants

Honoring One of the Perpetrators at Duke

Peter Wood Duke (Hate 88) Faculty member

By KC Johnson

Each year, the American Historical Association---the nation's leading professional organization of historians---confers the Eugene Asher Distinguished Teaching Award, which "recognizes inspiring teachers whose techniques and mastery of subject matter made a lasting impression and substantial difference to students of history." At the 2011 annual conference (held January 4-7 week in Boston), the AHA will add recently-retired Duke professor Peter Wood to the Asher Award's list of "inspiring" teachers of history.

For those who followed the lacrosse case, Wood needs no introduction; he was among the most outspoken anti-lacrosse members of the Duke faculty. Wood's commentary, however, differed from that of other anti-lacrosse extremists, most of whose public remarks focused on assumptions of guilt about the criminal case (the Group of 88's statement) or race-baiting demagoguery. Wood, on the other hand, tended to use the lacrosse case to speak out about the character of students in his classes. He did so through a string of statements that contained stereotyped, malicious, or evidence-free things about his own students. That such a figure could subsequently win an award specifically designed for "inspiring" students in his classes is nothing short of astonishing.

Read the whole article at Minding the Campus

_____________

KC Johnson's blog on the Duke Lacrosse hoax is "Durham in Wonderland"

A request for help from Adriana Stuijt of Censorbugbear

From Adriana Stuijt of Censorbugbear

I am posting this urgent request for help in organising and saving all my documentation on Censor Bugbear http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com and the Afrikaner Genocide Archives http://afrikaner-genocide-achives.blogspot.com in easily-retrievable documents in a better organised way than I am currently using. I need advice from skilled IT-experts and if it’s at all possible, people who would also be willing to back ALL those files up on their own websites. I was thinking of using an Adobe-filing system so that each individual case could be retrieved easily with its original documentation, URLs and pictures. However any advice you can give me on which programmes would be most suitable, would be very very welcome.

Best wishes to all of you.

Adriana Stuijt

Any responses should be sent to Mike Smith at South Africa Sucks - e-mail:
uc.mikesmith@googlemail.com

_______________________

Note from Sarah

I do hope that someone with the necessary IT skills / knowledge or facility can assist Adriana. She has spent years documenting the ongoing savagery and human rights abuses being committed against the white population of South Africa, and has created an extraordinarily valuable resource which needs to be made accessible to as wider number of people as possible so that the world can no longer ignore what is going on.

I frequently receive kind messages thanking me for reporting on the attacks on South African farmers for which I an very grateful, however what I do is very little when compared to the magnificent and dedicated work Adriana Stuijt is doing, she deserves our praise and our support.

I urge all my readers to visit her sites.

Sarah

Mugabe and the White African

If Good men do nothing, evil will prevail

Mugabe and the White African

Mugabe and the White African can be downloaded from Netflix

___________________
Hat Tip Council of Conservative Citizens