The Henry Webster case and the BBC Censors (Liars)

Attack victim Henry Webster with his mother

Unlike the wider public, most readers of this site will be aware of the case of Henry Webster, the schoolboy from Wiltshire who was left brain damaged and suffering from life threatening injuries following a an attack on him by a gang of Asian youths, most of them students from his school. and at least one of whom used a claw hammer on him.

Henry is now suing his school for negligence in allowing the attack to take place. A significant aspect of Henry's case against the school is that they ignored the behaviour of Asian students out of political correctness. Henry and his family also believe that the assault was racially motivated. Therefore, the race of his attackers is relevant both to the attack and to Henry Webster's legal action.

However, this is how the BBC describe the attack in a report today on proceedings in court:

The assault on Mr Webster, who was then 15, involved a group of schoolboys and three car-loads of men who came on to school premises after being summoned by the boys on mobile phones.

Thirteen teenagers, and a man who did not attend the 1,400-pupil school, were convicted for their parts in the attack at Bristol Crown Court last year.

The BBC know that, given how the media in general limited the reporting of the actual criminal case, the majority of the public will know nothing of it, and from this report will have no idea that there was a racial element to what took place. Deliberately misleading and deliberately dishonest.

News censorship in this country is now all but absolute, and it is becoming frightening.

World Cup 2010 - the hidden dangers

Did any of you know that there has been serious outbreaks of rioting and violence in South Africa over the last week? In fact, it has been going on for months. Missed it on the news did you? That is not surprising it didn't make the TV news and the BBC website only ran one small brief item, hidden away in the Africa section, where few football fans tend to venture.

I am sure most of you thought that the so called "xenophobic" violence which flared up last year, and resulted in a number of immigrants being burnt alive, was an isolated incident which has now been resolved. If so, you were wrong.

News of the growing dangers are being suppressed, because the media want to keep pretending the rainbow nation is a multicultural paradise. It is not, and in a few months time we will be sending thousands of young men and women into harms way without warning them what they could face.

__________________

Hat Tip: Dina

Rageh on Race

Although most readers will be focused on BNP Chairman Nick Griffin's appearance on the BBC's Question Time tomorrow evening, another TV item may provide a diversion in the coming week. On Monday evening Channel four will be broadcasting a documentary under the heading “Race and Intelligence: Science's last taboo”

The show will be fronted by the Somali born reporter Rageh Omaar, the one time BBC news reporter who many in Britain will recall for his somewhat idiosyncratic reporting of the Invasion of Iraq, and his various documentary reports such as “An Islamic History of Europe” for the BBC, “Immigration – the inconvenient truth” for Channel Four and “Islam in America” broadcast last year by his new employers, Al Jazeera. Seems to have a theme, doesn't he?

As evidence of his credentials in what now passes for journalism, in 2003, Omar was the recipient of an EMMA (Ethnic Multicultural Media Academy) award for best TV journalist

The documentary promises to “examine and expose” the numerous myths about race, and Rageh will, amongst other things, interview various academics including supporters of the Bell Curve theory in relation to relative intelligence. WOW! I wonder how those interviews will be presented and what conclusions they will reach?

We all of course know without bothering to watch what approach this so called “documentary” will take and what its findings will be. Anything which fails to comply with the attitudes and beliefs of the multicultural maniacs in our media, or upset their latest darlings would be unthinkable and anyone involved would be instantly unemployable.

The advance publicity for the programme refers to the comments made by the father of DNA James Watson, (a man who won a Nobel Prize when it still meant something) on a recent visit to Britain, suggesting a difference in IQ levels between Africans and Europeans, and effectively destroying his International reputation. No doubt Rageh and Channel 4 will ensure that his reputation is further trashed.

Will it be worth watching? Probably not, but I may do so out of a morbid fascination in how far TV documentary in this country has sunk.

It would be quite hilarious to think that the makers of a program fronted by a Somali reporter, with a track record for making racially attitudinal statements and racially subjective television documentaries (now employed by the voice of Islam) and broadcast on a television channel so politically correct it makes the Guardian seem almost balanced, could imagine for one moment that any viewers will take it seriously.

It is however, a testament to the state which this country has reached that there will be people out there who will watch it and actually believe that Rageh is presenting a balanced, honest and accurate report, and that is really rather sad.

Response to Mary Riddell and General Jackson by Dr Frank Ellis

Dr Frank Ellis gives us his responses to two recent articles in the Daily Telegraph:

From: Frank Ellis
To: The Daily Telegraph
Re: Mary Riddell, ‘Killing off the Cancerous Spread of the BNP is within our Grasp’, Daily Telegraph, online, 19th October 2009

Riddell permits herself the sort of language which had it been used by Griffin in just about any context would have been cited as evidence of extremism. She refers to the ‘cancerous spread of the BNP’, implying that the people who support or vote for the BNP are some kind of disease to be exterminated. In her language she echoes the remarks of Jeremy Hardy who some 5 years ago told the nation that life in Britain would be better if every member of the BNP or anyone who voted for the BNP were shot in the back of the neck. Who are the real fascists/Nazis here? Riddell then calls Griffin a ‘swivel-eyed zealot’ so mocking a medical condition which she would not have mocked in any other person. So much for her call for tolerance.

Riddell’s tirade about the alleged benefits of mass legal/illegal immigration in Boston (and elsewhere in the UK) reveals her to be economically and demographically illiterate. Legal/illegal immigration is destroying this country. There are too many people here already: we are full up.

Riddell’s solutions to the problems presented by legal/illegal immigration are pitiful. Mass legal/illegal immigration is most certainly the enemy of social cohesion. How in the name of God does Islam promote social cohesion when Islamic terrorists murder people in London? How is the white indigenous majority supposed to react to blacks in London (and other cities) when blacks are a major cause of gun and knife crime? The sensible and rational policy is to avoid blacks altogether. It was a Labour government with the full support of William Hague who accepted the conclusions of The Macpherson Report in 1999. This disgusting report has undoubtedly caused lives to be lost because the Police are too frightened to clamp down on black crime for fear of incurring accusations of racism. A high government priority must be the immediate deportation of the approximately 2,000,000 illegal immigrants in this country. There must be no amnesty which will merely encourage another wave of illegals. There are too many people in this country and legal/illegal immigration has been the main cause of this recent, huge increase. As for social housing, more accurately anti-social housing, how does covering the English countryside in concrete promote cohesion? More cheap, shoddily-built, high-density council houses which is what social housing is, will have the same outcome as an amnesty: it will encourage more immigrants to enter this country in the knowledge that a dwelling of some sort will be provided for them, so creating further huge settlements full of people who hate us.

BNP success is overwhelmingly due to the fact that people like Riddell, Labour and Conservative parties, the Guardian-reading classes, the BBC and the public sector have all conspired to lie about the consequences of mass legal/illegal immigration. Again, the same people who insist that diversity is a good thing flee it at every opportunity. No inner-city, bog-standard schools full of immigrants for their children. Good God no: they hypocritically make every effort to flee the hell of diversity while preaching its joys and spitting abuse at anyone who argues against it.

Writing in a paper that is not what it used to be, Riddell is an ignorant cheerleader for things she does not understand. She is clearly unable psychologically to face up to the disastrous consequences of multiculturalism and mass legal/illegal immigration. Her tirade against Griffin is cowardly and spiteful. She reminds me of some nasty little hack in Pravda who denounced Solzhenitsyn and Sakharov to order.

I note that Riddell lives in Boston in Lincolnshire. In that case, since she is a propagandist for the joys of diversity, she should relocate to some inner-city slum and send her children to schools where whites are a minority: better still go and live in South Africa Then she can preach the joys of xenophilia with a clear conscience. Stupid, wretched woman.
__________________________

Re: Generals attack BNP for seeking to 'hijack' Armed Forces

Daily Telegraph, online, Date: 20th October 2009

Towards the end of his biography, Soldier, General Jackson argues that: ‘At home, we should make greater efforts to ensure that a clear national identity and a multicultural approach can sit more comfortably together’ (p.375). So far any such attempt has failed. Worldwide, multiculturalism has been a dreadful failure. For how much longer must we be expected to smash our head against a wall and pretend that we like it? Moreover, based on evidence and history, it is a failure that was predictable and predicted. Multiculturalism fails, inter alia, because it is predicated on the ignorant and empirically false view that all races and cultures are the same and interchangeable; that very large numbers of non-Europeans can simply enter the UK legally/illegally and that the cultural and political landscape of the UK will remain unchanged, or at least not changed in ways that are detrimental to the indigenous population. Jackson gives no sign at all that he has grasped this brutal and unchanging human reality. In fact, his urgings are inherently contradictory. He tells us that we should ‘make greater efforts to ensure that a clear national identity and a multicultural approach can sit more comfortable together’ (p.375) and two lines later informs the reader: ‘I am a great believer in live and let live, but not at the expense of my British way of life’ (p.375).

I fully concur sir, but don’t you realise that it is the very ‘British way of life’ which multiculturalists and xenophiles are trying to destroy and to subvert because they know that a strong sense of British identity is hostile to the multicultural agenda. The policies of what used to be the Commission for Racial Equality and a great deal of the legal system hate the idea of ‘live and let live’ which is why millions of pounds are spent in denying the gruesome Third World savagery that makes many British cities unbearable and vilifying any individual who points out what is going on. This explains the concerted campaign to destroy Griffin and the BNP. Yugoslavia was and remains a warning of what happens when coercive, multicultural policies start to fail. The BNP has been pointing out the obvious for some time.

With Sir Richard Dannat’s throwing his lot in with the spiv party and both Jackson and he speaking out against a lawful, political party, it seems to me that a line in British politics has been crossed for good. These officers have done themselves no favours at all and their ill-judged intervention has brought the British Army into disrepute.

More deaths at the Cape

I have again had to update the total number of South African farmers murdered since the end of Apartheid in 1994 to 3071 to include the double murder of 53 year old farmer Willem Le Roux and his 50 year old wife Julie, which occurred last week. Mr and Mrs Le Roux were killed at their farm in Plettenberg Bay, Western Cape .

Both of them had sustained bullet wounds to the forehead and their hands were tied behind their backs.

News source here

In other news a couple were attacked by two men on a farm near Fouriesburg in the Free State.

The 81 year old farmer and his wife were watching television when the attackers stormed in through a back door and demanded firearms & jewellery. The elderly female was raped and is being treated at Hoogland Medi-Clinic in Bethlehem Mophiring. Police are looking for the men between approximately 30 & 50 years of age who fled in a stolen white Citroen.

As we see the South African media is equally descriptive when it comes to details of the suspects.

News source here

South Africa’s Ominous message to Europe - Part Two

By August Pointneuf

Delusions and deluding.

Were the ambitions of the missionaries fulfilled, 15 years after the pomp and panoply of South African independence? Was the vision of the European exponents of “open house to all cultures” fulfilled? Were the arguments of those who advocated “give them a chance and they will melt into European culture seamlessly” justified? Has Black South Africa succeeded? Has Europe succeeded?

The European bitter-end protagonists of multi-culturism will say. “Yes. Some have” or “if not, this is just a matter of time, compassion, support, understanding” and advocate what is usually reserved for the mendicant or the child, further handouts of largesse. I have heard the same words spoken by parents whose wayward children are corrupt, manipulative, and extractive addicts. These failures of their children nevertheless still evoked in their parents that persisting, and instinctive delusion that all will come right eventually. They failed to see that the child was intrinsic flawed. They could not see their delusions. Instead those children not only eroded their parents’ lives but continued to gnaw destructively at a society which had not the reserves to continue to appease them indefinitely.

If we were to choose an “independent” South Africa as the design model for an ultra liberal society of the future, how should we measure the current moral strength of that nation? Surely the best we can do is to look for efficient and frugal governance and qualities of conscious care of society by those elected “democratically”? Surely me must assess the people who claim to be the most successful, the most evolved, those who believe that they are the most capable of demonstrating that black South Africa is successful. Are they?.

Rather than distribute critical analysis over a range of variables, let us look at a single aspect of the behaviour of a selection of ANC politicians. An array of travel and other benefits of office are available to South African Parliamentarians. It would be expected that the availing of these implied a prudence and selectivity, with discrimination based on honesty. Have these “leaders” fulfilled the same expectations of honesty that the missionaries had hoped to inculcate into their prodigies?

How did these politicians, given the potential to cheat and exploit, reveal their anticipated morality and virtue?

Click to enlarge

[With acknowledgements to the Democratic Alliance website]

What a sad tale of failed expectation. What a reflection on those who appoint ANC candidates for parliament.

The Black Power Propaganda industry.

Should it be argued that politicians cannot be regarded as a representative, let us look instead at individuals who are or were expected to achieve their positions by merit and endeavour.

The National Police Commissioner should exemplify critical selection for dispassionate honesty and unswerving compliance with the law. The Western world acclaimed Jacob Selebi in this role, and as part of the mission to defer to the Black African capability, he was also appointed President of Interpol. In 1998 he received a Human Rights Award for International Service for Human Rights

Currently Selebi is now on trial charged with many offences, including corruption and defeating the ends of Justice. In evidence, it is claimed inter alia, that he had revealed secret UK correspondence to international criminals.

As much as the delusional expectations of the Europeans about Africa’s potential were formulated and executed by Europeans, so a parallel industry of Black Propaganda contrives to capitalise and exploit the European delusions. The aim seems to have been to demonstrate that Black Africans could compete on equal terms with the European in achievement and creativity. Sadly most of the claims promoted were fabrications , calculated to deceive.

If the above examples remain unacceptable examples, let us look at a contemporary example from sport, in which the Black Africans’ capability is unquestioned. Castor Semenya won the 800 m at the world championship in Berlin in 2009. An earlier commentary aimed at putting the subsequent furore into objective context.

However ANC high-rankers, which include the infamous Winnie Mandela and Parliamentary Ministers, instead of recognising that errors, misjudgement, and deception had occurred and that it would be appropriately prudent to withdraw and apologise to the world at large, chose to go into combat against the world in an even more astonishing ranting against Europeans and their “racism”. A desperate attempt to create a delusion of African competence via Black Power propaganda.

The Message

Europe, at least in the form of political assertions, wants its successful and often overcrowded populations to dilute their creative capacity with counter-cultural immigrants from failed nations.

European, look now and carefully at Africa if you wish to know your future, should the politicians’ aims be allowed to succeed.

Geert Wilders speech at the Four Seasons New York

To celebrate Dutch Party for Freedom Chairman Geert Wilders victory over the British Governments attempts to prevent any discussion of the uncomfortable truth about Islam, resulting in the lifting of the ban against him entering the UK, I am taking the opportunity to repeat the transcript of the speech he made in New York in September 2008. I am sure that anyone reading his words will understand why our disgraceful leaders would want this intelligent and brave man silenced.

Geert Wilders Speech

Dear friends,

Thank you very much for inviting me.

I come to America with a mission. All is not well in the old world. There is a tremendous danger looming, and it is very difficult to be optimistic. We might be in the final stages of the Islamization of Europe . This not only is a clear and present danger to the future of Europe itself, it is a threat to America and the sheer survival of the West. The United States as the last bastion of Western civilization, facing an Islamic Europe .

First I will describe the situation on the ground in Europe . Then, I will say a few things about Islam. To close I will tell you about a meeting in Jerusalem .

The Europe you know is changing.

You have probably seen the landmarks.. But in all of these cities, sometimes a few blocks away from your tourist destination, there is another world. It is the world of the parallel society created by?Muslim mass-migration.

All throughout Europe a new reality is rising: entire Muslim neighborhoods where very few indigenous people reside or are even seen. And if they are, they might regret it. This goes for the police as well. It's the world of head scarves, where women walk around in figureless tents, with baby strollers and a group of children. Their husbands, or slaveholders if you prefer, walk three steps ahead. With mosques on many street corners. The shops have signs you and I cannot read. You will be hard-pressed to find any economic activity. These are Muslim ghettos controlled by religious fanatics. These are Muslim neighborhoods, and they are mushrooming in every city across Europe . These are the building-blocks for territorial control of increasingly larger portions of Europe , street by street, neighborhood by neighborhood, city by city.

There are now thousands of mosques throughout Europe . With larger congregations than there are in churches. And in every European city there are plans to build super-mosques that will dwarf every church in the region. Clearly, the signal is: we rule.

Many European cities are already one-quarter Muslim: just take Amsterdam , Marseille and Malmo in Sweden.In many cities the majority of the under-18 population is Muslim. Paris is now surrounded by a ring of Muslim neighborhoods. Mohammed is the most popular name among boys in many cities.

In some elementary schools in Amsterdam the farm can no longer be mentioned, because that would also mean mentioning the pig, and that would be an insult to Muslims.

Many state schools in Belgium and Denmark only serve halal food to all pupils.. In once-tolerant Amsterdam gays are beaten up almost exclusively by Muslims. Non-Muslim women routinely hear 'whore, whore'. Satellite dishes are not pointed to local TV stations, but to stations in the country of origin.

In France school teachers are advised to avoid authors deemed offensive to Muslims, including Voltaire and Diderot; the same is increasingly true of Darwin . The history of the Holocaust can no longer be taught because of Muslim sensitivity.

In England Sharia courts are now officially part of the British legal system. Many neighborhoods in France are no-go areas for women without head scarves. Last week a man almost died after being beaten up by Muslims in Brussels , because he was drinking during the Ramadan.

Jews are fleeing France in record numbers, on the run for the worst wave of anti-Semitism since World War II.. French is now commonly spoken on the streets of Tel Aviv and Netanya, Israel . I could go on forever with stories like this. Stories about Islamization.

A total of fifty-four million Muslims now live in Europe . San Diego University recently calculated that a staggering 25 percent of the population in Europe will be Muslim just 12 years from now. Bernhard Lewis has predicted a Muslim majority by the end of this century.

Now these are just numbers. And the numbers would not be threatening if the Muslim-immigrants had a strong desire to assimilate. But there are few signs of that. The Pew Research Center reported that half of French Muslims see their loyalty to Islam as greater than their loyalty to France . One-third of French Muslims do not object to suicide attacks. The British Centre for Social Cohesion reported that one-third of British Muslim students are in favor of a worldwide caliphate. Muslims demand what they call 'respect'. And this is how we give them respect. We have Muslim official state holidays.

The Christian-Democratic attorney general is willing to accept Sharia in the Netherlands if there is a Muslim majority. We have cabinet members with passports from Morocco and Turkey .

Muslim demands are supported by unlawful behavior, ranging from petty crimes and random violence, for example against ambulance workers and bus drivers, to small-scale riots. Paris has seen its uprising in the low-income suburbs, the banlieus. I call the perpetrators 'settlers'. Because that is what they are. They do not come to integrate into our societies, they come to integrate our society into their Dar-al-Islam. Therefore, they are settlers.

Much of this street violence I mentioned is directed exclusively against non-Muslims, forcing many native people to leave their neighborhoods, their cities, their countries. Moreover, Muslims are now a swing vote not to be ignored.

The second thing you need to know is the importance of Mohammed the prophet. His behavior is an example to all Muslims and cannot be criticized. Now, if Mohammed had been a man of peace, let us say like Ghandi and Mother Theresa wrapped in one, there would be no problem. But Mohammed was a warlord, a mass murderer, a pedophile, and had several marriages - at the same time. Islamic tradition tells us how he fought in battles, how he had his enemies murdered and even had prisoners of war executed. Mohammed himself slaughtered the Jewish tribe of Banu Qurayza. If it is good for Islam, it is good. If it is bad for Islam, it is bad.

Let no one fool you about Islam being a religion. Sure, it has a god, and a here-after, and 72 virgins. But in its essence Islam is a political ideology.. It is a system that lays down detailed rules for society and the life of every person. Islam wants to dictate every aspect of life. Islam means 'submission'. Islam is not compatible with freedom and democracy, because what it strives for is Sharia. If you want to compare Islam to anything, compare it to communism or national-socialism, these are all totalitarian ideologies.

Now you know why Winston Churchill called Islam 'the most retrograde force in the world', and why he compared Mein Kampf to the Quran. The public has wholeheartedly accepted the Palestinian narrative, and sees Israel as the aggressor. I have lived in this country and visited it dozens of times. I support Israel . First, because it is the Jewish homeland after two thousand years of exile up to and including Auschwitz, second because it is a democracy, and third because Israel is our first line of defense.

This tiny country is situated on the fault line of jihad, frustrating Islam's territorial advance. Israel is facing the front lines of jihad, like Kashmir, Kosovo, the Philippines, Southern Thailand, Darfur in Sudan, Lebanon, and Aceh in Indonesia . Israel is simply in the way. The same way West-Berlin was during the Cold War.

The war against Israel is not a war against Israel . It is a war against the West. It is jihad. Israel is simply receiving the blows that are meant for all of us. If there would have been no Israel , Islamic imperialism would have found other venues to release its energy and its desire for conquest. Thanks to Israeli parents who send their children to the army and lay awake at night, parents in Europe and America can sleep well and dream, unaware of the dangers looming.

Many in Europe argue in favor of abandoning Israel in order to address the grievances of our Muslim minorities. But if Israel were, God forbid, to go down, it would not bring any solace to the West It would not mean our Muslim minorities would all of a sudden change their behavior, and accept our values. On the contrary, the end of Israel would give enormous encouragement to the forces of Islam. They would, and rightly so, see the demise of Israel as proof that the West is weak, and doomed. The end of Israel would not mean the end of our problems with Islam, but only the beginning. It would mean the start of the final battle for world domination. If they can get Israel , they can get everything. So-called journalists volunteer to label any and all critics of Islamization as a 'right-wing extremists' or 'racists'. In my country, the Netherlands , 60 percent of the population now sees the mass immigration of Muslims as the number one policy mistake since World War II. And another 60 percent sees Islam as the biggest threat. Yet there is a danger greater danger than terrorist attacks, the scenario of America as the last man standing. The lights may go out in Europe faster than you can imagine. An Islamic Europe means a Europe without freedom and democracy, an economic wasteland, an intellectual nightmare, and a loss of military might for America - as its allies will turn into enemies, enemies with atomic bombs. With an Islamic Europe, it would be up to America alone to preserve the heritage of Rome , Athens and Jerusalem .

Dear friends, liberty is the most precious of gifts. My generation never had to fight for this freedom, it was offered to us on a silver platter, by people who fought for it with their lives. All throughout Europe American cemeteries remind us of the young boys who never made it home, and whose memory we cherish. My generation does not own this freedom; we are merely its custodians. We can only hand over this hard won liberty to Europe 's children in the same state in which it was offered to us. We cannot strike a deal with mullahs and imams. Future generations would never forgive us.. We cannot squander our liberties. We simply do not have the right to do so.
_______________
Hat Tip: Peter M

South Africa’s Ominous message to Europe - Part One

By August Pointneuf

The ANC had everything when it came to power: It was gifted a fully functioning nation, which had a respectable income. It was carried on the shoulders of the world’s moral endorsement, with a surplus of extraordinary international good will. It was to be the “Rainbow Nation”, the trumpet triumphal of Black success and capability. It was to be the final eclipse of “white exploitation”, and the mould for the world of the future. It was set to justify the “racial integration” of all the nations of the world, and the symbolic success of “multiculturalism”. It proclaimed a final defeat of the stratification of unique societies, and had succeeded in destroying the boundaries of societal identity expressed by culture and race.

How could that be? The ANC had no track record, no hard evidence of capability or moral commitment. Indeed, without exception, all black governed precursor societies in Africa had failed as economic and social entities

A perception constructed.

The European construct of a future South Africa as a highly desirable and successful society was a perception created entirely by Europeans. It was created by those who wanted to believe. Europeans structured a delusion, fuelled by an intrinsic belief in the ultimate triumph of Black Africa. The assumption was that “Africans are suppressed peoples” who, once released from their oppressors could only blossom into a new spring.

How did it start, this belief that Black Africa would eventually grow, prosper and blossom?

A stage set by missionaries.

This expectation has been present for centuries, as shown by the zeal and extraordinary endeavours of the European missionaries. The missionaries’ belief had been that Africa was made up of nascent societies and all that was necessary to invigorate Africans was to feed the intrinsic capabilities, to teach counting, writing and language. They believed they could inculcate into their aspiring pupils (as they perceived them) those rich virtues which the Europeans had established over centuries to be the keystones of a workable, satisfying society.

The missionaries’ qualities reflected the source of their recruitment (Christian institutions). Although the overt theme may have been to convert to Christianity underlying this, and reflected by the establishment of thousands of schools, the aim was far broader. It was spoken aloud that the missionaries wanted to “civilise savages”. Read another way, they planned to replicate their own society,

Part of their motivation was probably to assure themselves that they too would be recognised as possessing Christian virtues.

The Parenting Imperative

What were the incentives that drove the missionaries (and colonialists) to attempt to convert alien people to be become “like themselves “?

The answer requires taking a further step back, and to acknowledge one of the powerful imperatives which direct human behaviour - the parental commitment to the development of the child, that all-pervasive contribution to the societal structure of the succeeding generation.

Humans have a constant, unrelenting and at times unflinchingly need to have their offspring grow up to be “just like themselves” (or an improved version of themselves). Whatever the inadequacies of the child, and however far that child might fall short of its sought-for destination as a wholesome member of future society the optimism of the parents will prevail supremely.

There are other entrenched behaviours, of course, such as charity, compassion and “fairness”. However it is when these inherent (and distinct behavioural mechanisms) directives become muddled, one with the other, that the human “social psyche” fails its possessors.

Given this powerful and all-prevailing predetermination to parent, the strongest likelihood must be that when the Europeans were confronted with societies which they viewed as socially juvenile, those parental emotions surged to the forefront.

The Europeans therefore, and uniquely, set about the parenting those whom they regarded as inferior on the assumption and hope that if they could exercise “good parenting’” the subject societies would become “is just like theirs”.

Many will confidently interject in support of civic proselytising of “undeveloped and poor” societies, saying “That is expected” or “That is just natural” or the rhetorical “How can anyone think otherwise?” Becoming more aggressive the assertions will become “That is heartless” or “If you do not believe in this (or that) you are deviant, or a monster, or execrable”.

Those with a smug moral superiority soon discover that they have a powerful weapon to force their beliefs on others, via yet another powerful inherent directive - the need of people to evade criticism and sustain social acceptance.

The prodding and emotive phrases listed above are, however, merely word shifts, synonyms for instinctive or inherent or intrinsic or intuitive. Said another way these self-righteous people are demonstrating (perhaps without recognising it) that their behaviour is not governed by reason, but is a fixed, instinctive response. Since there is no rationale, the behaviour of the sententious cannot take account of context or probable outcomes. Because it is narrowly blinkered with much room for unintended consequences, such rigid self-assurance is therefore highly dangerous

Necessary Delusions.

For aspirations, motivation, and tenacity .to succeed, a favourable outcome must be assumed. It is the imagined outcome – when contradictory information is ignored, - which sustains most human affairs. Endeavours are wrapped in delusions. Humans cannot function without these delusions, be they delusions of immortality or the certainty that an intended outcome will be successful. If these are stripped away the psycho-personality collapses.

Politicisation of Missionary Zeal

The narrow aspirations of the missionaries broadened into the 20th and 21st centuries. and paternalism strengthened. In both metaphorically and literal senses as the cry went out “bring these alien people into our homes They need encouragement, understanding, maturing, compassion. They need to be protected from criticism and from any reference to their racial background.” It became necessary to begin suppressing those foundational human instincts of self-preservation, demarcation of domain and the fear of alien intrusion.

In what then seemed to be a self –congratulating confirmation of their delusions Europeans began to precipitously proffer awards to those Africans who seemed to bear out their faith of their own evangelism. Robert Mugabe, for example, was awarded The Africa Prize for Leadership for the Sustainable End of Hunger in 1988 with the comment that his agricultural programs "Pointed the way not only for Zimbabwe but for the entire African continent.”

Mandela was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, and a plethora of other awards were made to Africans – often awarded so precipitously as to exsanguinate all value and status from what had previously been prestigious awards

The Politician Supreme.

Catastrophically, and simultaneous with what individuals were doing to “integrate” aliens into their own cultures by destroying sociological (and racial) barriers, European governments were gaining unparalleled, seemingly unlimited, power over their populations. From being gentlemen Civil Servants, politicians began to see themselves in a role of grandiosity. Those in governing authority began to evolve an autonomy of their own, which served their personal ambitions, and sustained their tenure. It became practice for governments to begin manipulating their society, and to progressively suppress human instincts when these interfered with their security of authority and economic status. These governments began to appease one another in what Solzhenitsyn described as “The United Governments of the World" They began to mutually gloat by displaying that they were non-racial, non-sectarian, and combined in reducing migration barriers.

The suppression of their populations increased too slowly for the people to realise how powerful was to be the strangling of their instinctive behaviours. The British government forced upon the population the cult of “non-racism” with a stronger propaganda than the Nazis would have dared to use with their cult of “non-Judaism”. To force the behaviour of their population into subservient complacency the British governments imposed a more severe and extensive legal infrastructure than the Nazis ever had. The British population was indoctrinated as to what it must think, and disciplined into what it could not say and how it must make value judgements. Expression of intuitive behaviour could be heavily and ruthlessly punished, notably where an instinctive response to the fear of an invading alien population spilled out.

When governments force onto people a behaviour which is contrary to their intuitive and highly sophisticated inherent patterns, that is tyranny. This may not the dictionary definition, but it is a more tangible and qualitative measure of tyranny.

_______________
To be continued ....

When medals become baubles

Farmer murdered in front of his wife, 13 year old daughter and paraplegic son

Another South African farmer died last weekend, this time in front of his disabled son and young daughter. On Sunday night Henry Locke (39), of Elands game farm near Cullinan, north east of Pretoria, was shot through the heart in front of his paralysed son, Dawie (23), who prayed out loud and begged his father's killers not to do the same to his mother and sister.

Mr Locke's daughter, 13 year old Monique, a grade 7 student at Cullinan school, recalled how she, her brother and their mother Mrs. Amanda Locke (43), sat in the living room until after 11.00pm talking until the dogs started barking furiously. Her father was asleep.

“My mother initially tried to quiet the dogs through the window. When she couldn’t quiet them down she took a flashlight and went outside. Just as my mother went through the door, a man who apparently was hiding behind the wall by the front door, grabbed her,” Monique said. At that stage she was right behind her mother and saw how the attacker grabbed her mother and noticed two other attackers rushing upon her.

“I ran into the house to go and wake my dad. When my dad came out of the living room door they shot him in the heart. “He collapsed by the couch. I sat next to my dad and held him tightly,” Monique said. “My brother asked the robbers not to take us away or to harm us.My mom told the robbers that my brother is paralyzed and that they must not hurt him. She told them that they could take everything. They took my mother and brother’s cellphones, a laptop and my mother’s wedding rings from her finger."

The attackers then fled.

News sources in Afrikkans and in English
________________________
Hat Tip Dina, Brian, SA Sucks, Afrikaner Genocide Archive

California: Dreaming to Destruction

1970 was the year in which I was born, that event aside, it was not a particularly momentous year, the Beatles released the album “Let it be” and then split up, Edward Heath was elected prime minister of Britain and Jimmy Carter Governor of Georgia (or was that '71?), Dana won the Eurovision Song Contest with “All kinds of Everything”, whilst both Janis Joplin and Jimmy Hendrix over dosed and died, in addition, first Tonga and then Fiji became independent and Rhodesia declared itself a republic.

Also in 1970, non-Hispanic whites made up 80% of the population of the US state of California.

Back then, and justifiably called “The Golden State”, California was the epitome of the American Dream and the place where everyone wanted to be. It was the state where dreams came true and life was easy, if you were unlucky enough not to be there the songs told you to dream of California on a winters day, and people across America and beyond did dream.

It was also the place to make money, California in 1970 was booming, it, as a single state was to become the world's eighth largest economy, it was the home of the Beach Boys, Silicone Valley and the Dream factories, it was where people went to become successful and the successful went to become more so.

It's cities were places people wanted to be. Los Angeles, the City of Angels, had only glimpsed the first hint of the escalating homicide, and wider crime, rate which over the following decades would turn it into the crime ridden realm of gangsters it has become. San Francisco, despite the fruits and nuts who had already arrived, and who were painted so beautifully by Amstead Maupin in his enchanting, but unreal, Tales of the City, was still the glittering city with the golden gate. Another of those clean, prosperous and once safe cities which we, white people, built.

But that was 1970, and how things have changed.

In the time it took a girl to grow to womanhood and raise a child to his teens, California changed from a land of dreams to a place which is starting to resemble a nightmare.

In 39 years non-Hispanic whites went from 80% of the population to just 43%, in percentage terms they have been cut all but by half. Meanwhile, the once golden economy has all but collapsed, it it billions of dollars in debt and the state has now started paying its bills, including some wage bills in IOU's, which it has very little idea when, or if. it will honour. It is said that, were California a company, it would be declared bankrupt, and even some Left wing papers such as The Guardian have begun to speculate as to whether California will become the first failed US state

So how did this happen? What brought about this total reversal in fortune? How did the state which had everything come to this? Was it a failure of Capitalism? A symptom of excess, or just more evidence of what our friends at the Guardian like to see, and greet with delight, as the inevitable decline of Western civilisation? Or does the answer lie in the first sentence of the paragraph above. Is the answer that a successful 80% white state has become a 57% non-white basket case because of that staggering demographic change.

Immigration into California, both legal and illegal, has gone out of control over the past four decades. The amazing fact is that of the 100.7 million members of ethnic minorities living in the USA, 21% of them live in California.

Didn't someone tell us that immigrants were supposed to be good for the economy?.

Of course California is not the only place which refuses to acknowledge what is so patently obvious. In Britain we have also seen decades of out of control immigration, escalating massively over the last ten years , and this year our economy reached a low which it had only ever reached once before in history, and that was at the end of World War II. It has never before, in peace time, been in such a bad state, and we have never been in no much debt. We now face the largest budget deficit in history.

Today in Manchester, the opposition Conservative party, the people who hope to form our next government, were left with no option other than to lay out plans of almost unequalled austerity including numerous cuts and freezes, plus the fact that anyone now aged less than 57, will now have to work an extra year before they are eligible for a pension. They acknowledge the state we are in, but they will not acknowledge why.

We have no idea how we will carry on paying future pensions, yet we continue to import future pensioners. we await the next unemployment figures in trepidation, yet we import more competition for a dwindling number of jobs. As Enoch Powell said, those whom the Gods wish to destroy they first make mad, he was right and the madness continues.

California may have gone mad earlier than us, and their madness may have been even more acute, but we are not far behind. Sadly I believe that California's fate is sealed, for those driving that crammed wagon train to Hell are in such ideological bondage they will willingly embrace failure before they embrace the truth. However, will we follow them? Will our leaders, and most of our people, admit the truth that we are welcoming our destruction into our country by the thousands every day, before we become a failed European state? There are times when I struggle to be optimistic.

Breaking their own people down for dispossession.

By Mister Fox

(Article first posted at the BNP site )

In his review of “The Memoirs of Granville Sharp” in The Edinburgh Review, “Capital Punishments”, of July 1821, William Hazlitt rehearsed an anecdote about Prince Naimbanna: “If a man should try to kill me, or should try to sell me and my family for slaves, he would do an injury to as many as he might kill or sell; but if any one takes away the character of Black people, that man injures Black people all over the world; and when he has once taken away their character, there is nothing that he may not do to Black people ever after. That man, for instance, will beat Black people and, and say “Oh, it is only a Black man, why should I not beat him?” That man will make slaves of Black people; for when he has taken away their character, he will say,” Oh, they are only Black people, why should I not make them slaves?”

The word which is used to dehumanise us is “racists”, with today’s teacher trainees being told that “only whites can be racist.” It is not to make us slaves as the prince feared for his people, but is a way of excusing the importation of cheap labour or allowing Muslims to take over our country.

In June 2000, Sir David Calvert-Smith, former head of the Crown Prosecution Service, did that which had so alarmed Prince Naimbanna. He “took away the character” of white people by describing nearly all white people as racist. He was head of the CPS from 1988 till 3rd November 2003 and is heavily responsible for turning the police into a totalitarian force policing opinions instead of crime. In 2005 he led an inquiry for the Commission for Racial Equality into how the police forces of England and Wales dealt with racism within their ranks. The report on the inquiry was given in March 2005. At a press conference Calvert-Smith said they would not be investigating “racism” because it was a “given.” There his prejudice was laid bare.

When the Establishment attack those they hate, they generalize, but when corruption is widespread amongst the Establishment parties as with the expenses scandals, they treat it as an individual matter. Although it is clear that the expenses scandal affects the parties as a whole, the media focus on individuals.

In an article entitled “Why Sir Ian Blair was right in his fight against racism,” in The First Post 3rd December 2008, novelist William Self repeated mindless ideology and slandered a whole people: “The outgoing Metropolitan Police commissioner had the courage to call wider society out on its more revolting prejudices … he confesses to regretting two or three things that he said to the press, his infamous remarks concerning the Soham murders are not among them. According to Blair, his contention that he couldn’t see what ‘all the fuss was about’ — referring to the media circus that got going in the aftermath of Holly and Jessica’s deaths — is something he’s determined to stand by.

“What Blair meant by this — and he was happy to elaborate — was that a disproportionate amount of attention was paid to these particular murders because the victims were young, white girl children, while the media are considerably less exercised by the death of young, black males.”

Has Self not heard of Stephen Lawrence or Damilola Taylor? Well, more than he has Kriss Donald. When it comes to the unfashionable issues, these writers talk in mindless clichés. There is no creativity, no pushing back boundaries when it comes to the Establishment ideology, just robotic repetition.

As for Blair — you would expect that sort of talk from a psychopath who would have an excuse, but these media elites have none. Ian Huntley’s murder of two young girls is not as bad as the imaginary prejudice against ethnics by whites! The elites are prejudiced against whites but that is not “disgusting”? Police Chief Colin Cramphorn once said concerning Muslim child-rape of young white girls that we must learn to live with it! These comments show the underlying hatred the elites have for white people.

The Telegraph of 10th November 2008 shows how these base minded people prop each other up. Sir Ian Blair will receive a pay-off worth up to £400,000 when he stands down as Metropolitan Police Commissioner in three weeks’ time. The additional sum is on top of the estimated £3.5 million pension pot, worth £160,000 a year, which he is set to receive after 30 years’ service as a policeman.
The traditional elites: the Archbishop of Canterbury, Judge Butler-Sloss and Stephan Hickman, QC, are calling for the introduction of Sharia Law. Consider that we’re told that Islam is a ‘Religion of Peace’ — both Tony Blair and Boris Johnson have asserted as much. If you care about the future for women under Islam in the west look up The Despatches programme filmed inside mosques.
A sick judge sentenced Stuart Wood, with previous convictions for violence and indecent assault on young girls, to just seven years for a vicious rape, then praised him for converting to Islam: “You have turned to Islam and this promises well for your future, particularly as you are now an adherent of a religion which respects women and self-discipline.”

Under Sharia Law, rape can only be proven if the rapist confesses or if there are four male witnesses. Women who allege rape, without the benefit of the act having been witnessed by four men who subsequently develop a conscience, are taken as confessing to having sex.

A consequence of the Macpherson Report is the reduction in legal protection for those under suspicion. Ostensibly, the repeal of Double Jeopardy in 2005 followed a marathon campaign by Ann Ming after her daughter was murdered in 1989. This was a convenient case to use because the removal of Double Jeopardy was a recommendation of the Macpherson Report into the murder of Stephen Lawrence and would enable the state to repeatedly try “racists” until they can get a conviction.

Many Labour ministers have extremist links and pasts but the media cover that up. If the media had wanted, they could have exposed Labour, but because they share the same idealogy, they did not. Don’t blindly trust the media but question every statement and look things up for yourselves in search engines.

The Times, in 1954, gives evidence that even then we were being cleansed from our communities. There were 200 a month arriving without work or accommodation which was causing concern in London, Liverpool and Birmingham.

“On Merseyside, where 121 disembarked on Tuesday from the liner Ascania, there is a coloured population of about 10,000. It is estimated that 2,000 of them are receiving public assistance … all the Government departments concerned say they have no means of assessing how many of the immigrants from the West Indies and to a small extent from the African colonies, are drawing welfare allowances. This is because all the immigrants are recorded as British subjects, and have equal claims.”

When public figures make the usual biased pronouncements on us and racial issues, research their hidden agendas. On Radio Four, Simon Hughes stated that they would have to start exposing the BNP’s argument such as exploding their ‘myth’ that asylum seekers get new houses, etc. He claimed this was not true. Not only is it true, but ‘asylum seekers’ get massively preferential treatment. Hughes was deceiving the public and behind his apparently reasonable words wants to submit us to Islam.

Andrew Marr tells us what he thinks should be done to Britons if we object to being dispossessed: “Only people who understand the economic forces changing their world, threatening them but also creating new opportunities, have a chance of being immune to the old tribal chants.

“And the final answer, frankly, is the vigorous use of state power to coerce and repress. It may be my Presbyterian background, but I firmly believe that repression can be a great, civilising instrument for good. Stamp hard on certain ‘natural’ beliefs for long enough and you can almost kill them off. The police are first in line to be burdened further, but a new Race Relations Act will impose the will of the state on millions of other lives too.”

Marr is advocating fascism and “ethnocide.” The present bunch of elites are the most selfish crowd of beggars on horseback ever to attain influence. They browbeat ordinary people into having their communities taken off them but keep asylum centres out of their countryside paradises! David Dimbleby's home was recently described as”palatial” by an interviewer who was only allowed into the converted barn.

Where do Paxman and Andrews Neill and Marr live? Not in the middle of Southall or Brixton! Sometimes they do when they are young like Billy Bragg but when it comes to bringing their children up they move to nice areas.

Urban Planning and Identity

By Mister Fox

(Article first posted at the BNP site )

The collective hatred of our nation’s past by the leftist ruling elite takes practical form in their drive to erase all aspects of our culture, traditions and physical history — and is best illustrated by their physical erasure of our traditional architectural forms and its replacement with drab soviet-style ‘accommodation’.

This destruction of all forms of our national identity is engendered by a sense of shame which has been developed and perfected by the ruling elite during the course of the last century. They view all our previous cultural achievements as ‘bad’ or gained immorally at some other nation’s expense. As a result, they wish to eradicate our collective identity and deculturalise us from our roots.

A classic example was taking London Bridge to Lake Havasu, Arizona. It now crosses the Bridgewater Channel from the mainland to a small island on the Colorado River, is world-famous and draws visitors from all over the world. The bridge was sinking into the River Thames and should have been corrected but instead was sold to America. Robert P. McCulloch had the bridge dismantled and sent by barge to the California coast where it was loaded and taken by lorry to Lake Havasu and rebuilt ‘brick’ by ‘brick’. The bridge is a focal point for the city.

Near the bridge is an ‘English Village’ which pays respect to our culture. It has Tudor style architecture, and the shops and restaurants create the atmosphere of old England, with tree-lined walkways and local breweries for hand-brewed ale. There is an English pub in San Francisco — but in England they are being replaced by continental café bars!

For more than 140 years, London Bridge served as a crossing over the River Thames. It survived both world wars and a terrorist attack in 1884. If an American entrepreneur could do all that, then why could London council not conserve it? Because Americans have more respect for our traditions than our local authorities. American tourists constantly ask locals, “Why are you ruining your culture?” We are not — local authorities are imposing this on us.

There is also the eradication of our culture and its replacement by almost any other culture. We have seen the destruction of the traditional British pub, a centre of community and so much admired by tourists, for continental café bars. We see ‘Social Engineering’ by design, in schemes throughout the country whereby our towns and cities are having European style piazzas built to make us feel more European and thus less British. There was an attempt by the council to turn famous London landmark Sloane Square into a European piazza but a strong local opposition stopped it. People are born with an emotional need for community with their own kind and are not units to be re-organised to suit inorganic plans.

It is impossible to love cold, unnatural tower blocks or office buildings built along these lines, or places dominated by such buildings. But this is not just aesthetics; it is about our very identity, which is reinforced by the reciprocal relationship between people and the places in which they live. Building on what we have in a similar scale and style maintains continuity and helps to focus culture and identity. National and local governments alike are destroying places that are sanctioned by time and use, where communities have grown up and grown together instinctively. People’s natural bonding instincts are thwarted by high-rise buildings that separate them from one another and are not physically conducive to developing community spirit — the sense of belonging and of knowing with whom you belong.

Social engineering was to change the physical and mental environment, and thereby change people, who were seen as malleable. But people are not malleable — human nature needs familiar surroundings to develop and be happy. People react aggressively and destructively if this is denied.

Canadian Plains Indians, the Innu, were moved by the Canadian government into specially built estates. They were effectively forcibly transformed into Canadians, just as Britons are being forcibly transformed into ‘citizens of the world’. Like us, the Innu are having their past erased and are being offered nothing for the future — despair has set in, as it is setting in on Britain’s sink estates. A superficial difference is that the Innu were dispossessed by a different ethnic group (Canadian globalists), whereas we are being dispossessed by our own elected representatives (British globalists). But it is the same global movement. In the young Innu, deculturalisation manifests in drug and alcohol abuse and petty crime.

A parallel process is imposed here. In the same deculturalising vein, John Prescott issued a Government directive to destroy 40,000 terrace houses in England by dictat. Twenty thousand habitable homes in Liverpool were to be demolished and replaced by homes outside the range of the dispossessed locals. This is not the first time that ‘Scousers’ have been moved without thought for where they belong and uprooted and forced onto estates modelled on schemes in the Soviet Union.

A parallel with the Innu in England was moving ‘Scousers’ from their root in Liverpool to new towns like Skelmersdale. They should have followed on from traditional estates. Instead they were designed to separate vehicles from pedestrians with a system of courtyard layouts and cul-de-sacs emerging off spine streets, which led to disproportionate costs in street cleaning, refuse collection, ground and street furniture maintenance and, particularly, policing. Skelmersdale was built on an old coalfield and around a series of deep clefts in the moor side that go down into the middle of the town, which meant that extensive ground remediation and stabilisation was required for any construction.

It was built using innovative and experimental techniques — but these were deeply flawed, requiring expensive remedies. Many houses had central heating outlets in the ceiling. The fact that heat rises was ignored, so the bedrooms were heated moderately well but not the downstairs rooms. And one can punch a hand through walls because the houses’ metal frames are corroded and the concrete slabs have collapsed.

More and more of Britain’s young people are aimless, lacking in self-respect, without tradition or a sense of being part of something significant. They are being denied the inheritance of their forbears. There have always been people at the bottom of the pile, but they used to develop within a cultural tradition to which they belonged. Most young people do not misbehave out of endemic wickedness, but because they have been deculturalised. Thanks to a combination of social, cultural, political and environmental pressures, many young people in this country have been estranged from Britishness and severed from structures that helped civilise their ancestors. Buildings need to develop from traditions. We must renew those familiar traditions to civilise young people and minimise the vicious crimes we now have. These are often caused by unnatural and inorganic developments.

Walk along Eccleshall Road ‘Golden Mile’ and through St. Mary’s Gate subway, in Sheffield, and you will see pedestrians averting their eyes in fear, too frightened to look at anyone approaching. I went through recently and was appalled when a young Chinese woman who was walking towards me averted her eyes with terror on her face. “Well,” you might say, “Why not run over the dual carriageway as people in Birmingham do to avoid being mugged in subways?” Because the council put railings inside the hedge along the strip between the two roads to force people through the underpass.

We must restore our town and city centres and historical buildings to the way they were before councillors and developers began destroying them.

A plethora of radical new municipal building swept across the country from the 1950s onwards — schools, hospitals, offices, civic centres, entertainment and sports venues, shopping parades, shopping malls, new road schemes and street furniture, and apartment tower blocks to house tenants whose “slums” had been bombed or condemned as unfit for habitation.

Historic towns such as Peterborough were changed by vast, bland new housing estates for ex-slum-dwellers. These schemes looked exciting in the plans but in practice were ugly, expensive and inefficient.

You only have to look at pictures of old Birmingham, which show a fine Victorian city with buildings like Snow Hill station, which was like a cathedral in its proportions; the Woodman, a glorious Victorian pub; and the old library, to see the wanton destruction so often perpetrated by local authorities. The Bull Ring shopping area was redeveloped in the 1960s, and was so ugly, so unpopular and so badly constructed that it has since been redeveloped.

The local authorities have no respect for local history. A pub called the Railway in Birmingham was knocked down, despite its local importance as the venue where Ozzy Osborne began his career. After all, it is only local history! A little pub called the City Tavern, the only Victorian one left in Birmingham’s deculturalised city centre, was to be knocked down for a car park until a protest saved it. The Yorkshire Grey in Sheffield was demolished for a car park. Originally the Minerva, it was where Joe Cocker made his first public appearance. The leader of the council wants to look to the city’s future apparently. What an appalling lack of respect for a city, its people and their heritage! Then, of course, the cavern was demolished by business people in Liverpool.

One of the examples sent to me is that of the little Black Country town, Cradley. It recently had one side of its main High Street demolished for a by-pass. It has made the town look ridiculous and odd. This folly was proposed to the council by unelected planners and, in this case, authorised by just one councilor. I rang Sandwell council several times but none of the planners were ever available and the calls were not returned.

On the demolished side of the road a new Tesco was built. Although it is a convenience for shoppers from the surrounding areas, the local traders have suffered greatly. This typifies a serious problem with local councils. They stand for election promising to represent local people but often act against their interests once elected.

A combination of social, cultural, political and now environmental pressures with the underlying shame of what we have achieved, has deculturalised native people leaving them estranged from Englishness, severed from all the civilizing structures that their ancestors could take for granted. A serious and sustained programme of architectural reconstruction, rebuilding our traditional buildings and re-linking to our history could help people reconnect with their roots, and feel proud of their towns and cities.

Local councillors are elected by only a minority of voters, on average 20 percent of people over 18 — but not those younger who inherit the mess local councils are causing — and are not representative of the public. We need to appoint a network of independent officers who have both the responsibility and the resources to preserve or represent the local communities rather than sectional interests. We also need planning law reform to make it harder for councillors, who act as agents for developers, to destroy old buildings.

Former councillors from various areas have told me about corruption and backhanders and this is what we must expose. Those who can be shown to have taken bribes to demolish buildings and redevelop our towns and cities must be exposed.

We need housing policies which encourage the creation of buildings that fit into the traditional milieu, and which seek to rebuild much of what has been destroyed by local governments.

As curried as a parakeet

The authorities have finally declared that the growing flocks of Himalayan green parakeets, which have taken over vast areas London, Kent and Surrey in recent decades, to be a pest. The distinctly coloured birds, descendants of a small flock of around twenty which escaped from Shepperton Film Studios during the making of "The African Queen", starring Humphrey Bogart and Katharine Hepburn, in 1951, have thrived, and bred rapidly, until their numbers have now reached tens of thousands and they have become both a nuisance and a threat to indigenous species. (any analogies spring to mind?)

Certainly in the area where I live, they have made their presence known in the parks and local squares, in numbers far larger than the home grown thrushes, blue tits and robins who used predominate. As for the famous cockney sparrow they, rather like their human namesakes, have all but vanished from the London scene, to be replaced by these more gaudy coloured foreigners.

A cull was first muted in 2007, and has recently been given the go-ahead in order to control their numbers. Of course immediately and predictably, so called experts jump up and start shouting the "R" word. According to them, seeking to control the numbers of foreign invaders, or even objecting to the damage they do, is ..... you guessed it,... RACIST.

Once again that, surely now most devalued, word is being used to bully and intimidate people and prevent any attempt to preserve Britain's natural history and it's native inhabitants.

Also, as usual, the same old misleading platitudes are produced designed to demonstrate what our enemies like to present as the fait accompli of a multicultural Britain, the favourite one of which is used here again. The Green Parakeets are apparently now "as British as curry." We must surely have all by now have lost count of how often that trite misleading old saying is rolled out to show how useless it is to complain about immigration. The implication being that merely because a significant number of Britons enjoy a visit to one of the countless curry restaurants, which can be found in their dozens in every town in Britain, on a Saturday night, we have no option other than to welcome millions of migrants from the Indian sub continent.

It might be worth responding to the next left wing mult-culti junkie who comes out with that tired old line, that, per head of population, we probably eat more hamburgers and drink more cocacola than we eat curries, does that mean we should be invaded by America?

Indeed, given that the one thing which more Britains seem to have a taste for than just about anything else is larger, does that we should not not have fought World War II?

Another helping of curried parakeet anyone?

Two more Victims of the South African Farm Genocide (and a 77 year rape victim)

I have updated the total number of victims of the ongoing farm murders in South Africa to 3068 to include two further victims who died violently during a violent 24 hour period at the end of September, these were:

On Friday September 26, 18-year-old Sheun Anderson was shot dead by two black assailants at his parents small holding at Wag-'n-bietjieskop, outside Bronkhorstspruit which is some 50 km east of Pretoria. Sheun's 47 year old father Robert was shot twice in the stomach and is now in a critical condition. Both men were shot in front of Sheun's horrified mother Jeanine.

The following day 55 year old Isabel Schonken was shot dead in a separate attack at Killkop. also east of Pretoria. Her 56 year old husband Lars was also assaulted and is currently recovering. Mrs. Schinken's sister, Héléne Rumsey, said the assailants had cut through an electric fence which stretches all around the smallholding. They were able to get into the house through an open sliding door.

"They attacked Lars in the bedroom," Rumsey related. "It seems as if my sister had fallen asleep in front of the television in the living room and woke up when they shot Lars.

"Shortly thereafter she was shot through the heart."

News sources here and here

Meanwhile, also on Saturday and again in the same area a 77 year-old woman was raped in her home in a retirement complex. According to news reports she was restrained for over an hour, and raped twice. She was also choked many times until she nearly lost consciousness. Her attacker fled with a small amount of cash and a radio. Police spokesperson Sergeant Lynnette Erasmus, said the woman was overpowered while she was sitting on her stoep, feeding bread to her birds.

News Source here (Hat tip Dina)

From Titans To Lemmings Part 7

From Titans To Lemmings - The Suicide Of The White Race

7. Dancing With Dragons

By Reconquista

Background

Part Six of Titans To Lemmings focused on Africa and in particular, the former British colonies of South Africa and Rhodesia. I described how those once strong nations have deteriorated badly since the end of colonial rule and the establishment of black governance and I presented evidence to counter the myths of colonialism and apartheid, two barb-encrusted sticks used to inflict a guilt trip on the white race and to justify the looting, land grabs and ethnic cleansing all being conducted against whites in these once advanced and prosperous nations.

As these nations implode catastrophically, enormous suffering is inflicted upon both the white people AND native black peoples whilst those responsible for creating the mess - namely the traitorous Marxist-Liberals in the West - turn a blind eye and avoid any responsibility for their malicious interference which had nothing to do with the welfare and the future of the black peoples and everything to do with destroying the whites, the very people who had built the strongest nations in Africa.

As well as building these Titans of Africa, the white man also brought his medical expertise to the dark continent and as well as helping black people to combat killer illnesses endemic there - yellow fever, malaria, cholera etc. - systems of medical care constructed by whites dramatically reduced the infant mortality rate and significantly increased the life expectancy rate. Not that your average self-righteous Liberal will ever be aware of these things.

Africa isn't the only continent that has seen dramatic changes in the last fifty years. Great Britain - in fact the entire West but for the purpose of this essay I wish to focus mainly on Britain - the country whose vast empire did more than any other nation to bring the advances of Western civilisation to the whole world, has seen its empire crumble. Now the world comes to Britain, with millions of Africans, Pakistanis, Indians and many more immigrants all flocking to Great Britain.

Just as the white man introduced aspects of Western culture to the third world, so now are immigrants into Britain introducing their culture here. Much of what is being introduced is having a corrosive effect upon British society and I assert this is not happening by chance. In fact, I believe a war is being waged upon the British people deliberately with the aim to destroy Great Britain and the British people. The scale of what is being done to our people is absolutely staggering, the consequences are heart-breaking and devastating and the saddest part of all is that the British people - and many others throughout the West - are knowingly choosing to behave in seriously flawed ways, all contributing to the collapse of the West and the eventual extinction of the white race.

It's now time to bring attention to one aspect of the war against Britain to expose its enormous scale and the destructive impact it is having on our nation. In this part of the Titans series, I want to focus on narcotics and in particular, the trade in one of the most potent narcotics, cocaine and its highly-addictive derivative, crack.

Continue Reading here