A Week in England

A series of events occurred this week which reveal with chilling clarity quite how far down the green brick road to Khalifah we have skipped, encouraged on by a motley assortment of straw-headed morons, moral cowards and a fair few wicked witches.

The first of these events was the decision by the Church of England synod to join the UK Stasi - that is to say the British Police - in banning its employees from membership of a legal and legitimate political party, the BNP. The fact that this received, scant, fourth to sixth news item, coverage in the media, and probably passed unnoticed by the majority of the population, demonstrates how irrelevant the once mighty Church of England has become, and how little most people now care about the waffling, bleating and bickering at what progressively resembles a gathering of dodgy piano teachers in frocks.

However, I care, I was brought up in the Church of England, christened and later confirmed into the church during my early teens, after having first gone into retreat in a beautiful old Abbey to prepare myself for what was, even then, as recently as the 1980's, considered a big deal.

My parents, whilst being an amusing and sophisticated couple, were quite religious people, who were committed members of the C of E. My father in particular was very active in the church, for at least a decade acting as Sidesman, every Sunday handing out prayer books to the congregation or taking the collection. A man who could talk at length on any subject, from politics to art culture and sport would spend hours speaking of scripture, philosophy and of the church, subjects which he dearly loved. Meanwhile, my mother would take her turn every six weeks or so, in preparing the flowers in the Church or delivering the parish news letter, and it was she who taught us the prayers of her own childhood in our infancy, which I then taught to my son in his.

Both, having left us recently, now lie buried in the shadow of their church, and are remembered with affection among the congregation to which they belonged, in a corner of old England which is still clinging on.

I may not be as involved in the church as my parents were, but I was married there, my son was christened in church, and throughout my life I have never gone more than a month without taking holy communion. The Church means a lot to me, it has been part of my life, and I have been more a part of it than the vast majority if my fellow Britons can now claim to be.

However, the church in which I was raised has rejected me, and when they did so they threw lies about me in my face. One of the befrocked old liars stated that the BNP, a party I have voted for, supported the "forcible eviction of people of different faiths and races". He lied, forcible repatriation is not BNP policy, and has not been for many years, if it ever was. Voluntary repatriation, funded by the taxpayer, certainly is, it is much cheaper in the long run than having them stay, but certainly no law abiding citizen, who is here legally would be thrown out by the BNP. What the BNP would do is halt the relentless tide of new immigrants, and it is that which the deceitful old cleric could not stomach.

However, as proof that they are united in their campaign of distortion, not one of his peers stood up and shouted "That is untrue you dishonest old git!" although they must surely all have known it was.

The Church may not (yet) have banned BNP supporters from its pews, but how can I, with honour, remain with a Church which has told me that what I believe in and what I am fighting for is a sin? My church has forced me to make a choice, I have done so, and I have not chosen them.

My faith will have to sustain me for a while. The Church of Rome has embarked upon its own campaign against thought and, as such, offers no alternative. However, something will emerge, as through history other churches have sprung up to offer a home to previous victims of other bigotry. As more eyes are opened, more people will move away from the shameful, cringing, irrelevance the established church has become.

We who have been rejected will move on, we will become stronger and we will still worship a Christian God, meanwhile the Church of England which has long only paid limited lip service to such an act, will continue its inevitable decline to something only suited, or relevant, to the mad black bigots of sub Saharan Africa.

******************************

A second thing which occurred this week was the announcement that Prince Harry would be sent for re-education, disingenuously referred to as "diversity awareness training", but which might be more accurately described as Multicultural brainwashing.

To our media, leaders and thought controllers, it matters not that, unlike many of his critics such as the deeply unattractive Keith Vaz or the unfunny comedian Stephen K Amos, Harry has spent time working tirelessly in Africa, to make life better for Africans, and can be seem affectionately cuddling black children in scores of photographs taken during his time in Africa. In a land where a man's actions are meaningless when compared to his utterance of an ideologically impure word, our controllers have judged young Harry guilty of the unspeakable heinous and unforgivably evil act of failing to be sufficiently politically correct when making a private video, or engaging in a private conversation.

As punishment for his breach of party rules, a grovelling apology not withstanding, Harry must suffer public humiliation, and submit to political retraining.

Is it just me, or do images from life within the Soviet sector of East Berlin circa 1961 spring to your minds as well?. Are we to assume that if Harry were to "re-offend" he will then be banished to some goulag north of Strathclyde?.

I guess it should not surprise us that so much in Britain today has overtones echoing, at the very least, the psychology of life within the GDR between 1950 and 1990. It is after all the beliefs and teachings of those same people who applauded the Soviet Empire, the drawing of the iron curtain, and the thought control imposed on half of Europe, for the better part of a century, which have brought us to where we are. For it is their prize winning students who are now running our lives and dictating our language.

******************************************

Finally, in my account of this week I shall turn to the shameful decision to ban film maker and elected Dutch politician Geert Wilders from Britain, where he was planning to attend the screening of his documentary FITNA. By a single, and deeply contemptible act of capitulation Britain was exposed not only as a country no longer possessed of the spirit needed to face down intimidation, but a land where freedom of conscience is no longer safe.

That a country which once ruled half the surface of the earth has been reduced to a cringing submissive before the advance of a crusading Islam, came as no surprise to those of us who have watched and railed at our nations rapid surrender, but it must have come as a shock to those who had been looking the other way and imagined brave Albion retained some vestige of the courage it once had.

Much as been said about how, by banning Wilders, the United Kingdom has renounced any remaining pretence to a belief in free speech, and indeed, how can we deny that we have now abandoned the Universal Declaration of Human Rights , which clearly states: "a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief is the highest aspiration of the common people".

I have already made my views clear on that, and frankly any honourable person will realise that what was done was an act of cowardice and a betrayal of free speech, even if their political agendas prevent them from admitting to it. Therefore, I shall let others comment on these aspects, and shall instead focus not on the cowardice and betrayal which was involved, but on the lies and deceit which was used in support of it.

First there is the official justification given for banning Mr Wilders, namely that his presence would be a threat to social harmony and likely to incite racial hatred. This implication being that Wilders and his supporters would act in a disharmonious manner, and commit acts of racial hatred, this certainly was what Lord Ahmed and his government sought to suggest. However, of course, nothing could be further from the truth. It was rioting Muslim protesters, such as those Ahmed threatened us with, and the racial hatred which they would perpetrate against Wilders and his supporters which the government feared.

However, on account of the warped doctrine which now rules us, it was he, the potential victim, and not they , the potential aggressors, our government chose to ban! How exactly does such a policy differ from one which seeks to prevent rape by banning women from going out?!

Turning from the act to its supporters brings us to a second vaudevillian performance from the thankfully, inimitable Keith Vaz. Vaz is a man famous for his inability to appreciate his own ludicrousness, but he must have exceeded even himself in lack of personal awareness on Thursday night. Anyone watching BBC2's Newsnight must have surely sensed the smell of old lavender and the flutter of purple chiffon, while the ghost of Mary Whitehouse rode once more, as Vaz announced, without apparent irony that he "did not have to see FITNA to know it was racist".

The evening before and on a different channel , a toad like creature mascaraing as a reporter for More4 news accused Wilders of "selectively quoting" from the Qur'an. This was from a member of a profession which bases its entire output upon selective quotations in order to tell a story or to report on an issue. In effect the toad-like reporter was criticising Wilders for doing exactly the same thing as his employers pay him to do, except that there is probably more truth in FITNA than in the average week's Channel 4 news output.

Given that Geert Wilders does not belong to that select circle with "journalist" on their CV, who are apparently permitted by some by-law to quote selectively, did the More4 toad expect him to sit in front of the camera and read out the entire Qur'an for the sake of balance? That smacks of the agenda behind those attempting to impose that oppressive (some might say fascist) and most certainly misnamed "Fairness doctrine" on US talk radio, which is designed to achieve censorship through boredom, and hide facts under a mountain of irrelevance.

Clearly those sections of the Qur'an urging its followers to throw homosexuals off mountains, or not to pay interest on loans, have no direct relevance to why Muslims might decide to blow up trains and disco bars, or fly aeroplanes into tall buildings, and I am sure Wilders does not suggest they do. However, the bits which call upon followers of Islam to carry out acts of violence against non-believers just might have some relevance, and that is what Wilder's film is about.

Finally we get to the main lie about Geert Wilders and about FITNA, which is the allegation that the film distorts or misrepresents the Qur'an's teachings. This claim takes media misinformation to a new level, and needs to be exposed for what it is.

Wilder's film shows us words from the holy text, it then shows us those same words being used by preachers when calling for acts of violence and finally it shows us acts of violence committed by followers of that same holy text. What FITNA shows us is a sequence leading from cause, through application, to effect. If there is an act of dishonesty being perpetrated within the sequence it is by the preachers who use the words to incite the violence, not by Wilder in reporting them doing so.

You can argue, as some try to, that the words in themselves are innocent, but you can not argue that the words are being used to incite acts of terrible brutality, because they self evidently are, whether or not that is the intent of the author. By reporting that fact Wilders is distorting nothing and misrepresenting no-one.

We can choose to decide whether it is the words which are at fault or the people using them. What we should not be doing is pretending that these questions do not exist. But that is exactly what our media or our leaders want, they don't report the facts, because without them, we can't ask the questions, and that is why Wilders was banned.

Thus we passed through another week on this crowded, near bankrupt and Orwellian little island.

____________________________________

Some recent US Mugshots

Notice the connection? :-)

The speech GEERT WILDERS would have made, had Britain still believed in freedom

Can be read here

Spread the truth about Islam

Click on this link to read a message from my good friend the Green Arrow

Britain renounces freedom of speech and thought

I would have said that this was a particularly sad day had I retained any fleeting illusion that Britain remained a free country which still held dear those values of free speech and conscience which we once treasured. However, I no longer believe that, and therefore see this is one of many sad days.

Today differs only in so far that our country's renunciation of the freedom of thought and word has now been announced to the rest if the world, much of which will, with some justification, now hold us in contempt.

It also has the effect of openly revealing quite how rapidly we, as a nation, are capitulating to forces which wish us only ill, as such it is a frightening day. By each act of appeasement we come closer to abject surrender, and when that happens it will be for the victors to do with us as they will, and do not cling to any comfortable fantasy that they will be kind.

No Briton with a mind and with eyes to see can feel proud of our county today.

I shall write further in this subject at the weekend.

Ignoring the cracks

When a great structure or edifice begins to crumble, be it a towering rock face, a mighty building or a huge and imposing statue, the early warnings of imminent disaster are often small, and easy to miss or to ignore. A distant rumble, a shifting rock or a small cascade of pebbles are ominous signs of what is to come, but frequently only spotted by those who are truly prepared to look. Thus it can be for a sovereign nation state, and is how it has been with Britain.

Those who wish to undermine a society are most effective when they embark on their campaign of sabotage in small ways, so that their dark work remains undetected for as long as possible by those they seek to destroy, until the foundation upon which they stand is so weakened that it cannot withstand the final push which will send all which it once supported hurtling to oblivion.

Some have been warning us for years that there are forces within this land which are committed to destroying everything which is great about Great Britain. For a long time they were lonely voices calling to deaf ears, although more recently others, including one time New Labour voters, such as myself, have begun to see the truth in what they are have been telling us, and to appreciate the growing threat which we, as a nation, face.

However, for many the erosion of our culture has been so gradual and piecemeal that, even many of those who suspect that something is happening, do not yet realise how far it has gone and how narrow are the remaining planks on which they stand.

Commenting at the Green Arrow blog on an earlier post of mine which focused on the recent protests against the employment of foreign workers, a very aptly named blogger calling himself “Not my Granddad's Labour party” wrote:

The reason that this dispute has woken the British people is because it's a sudden change rather than a gradual, almost imperceptible attrition. If you look at the way that 'enrichment' has been implemented up to now, it has been a gradual destruction of our way of life - a death by a thousand cuts.

Each cut has been a minor annoyance, but not enough to bring people out on the streets.

- Nobody's actually rioted about the banning of 'Three Little Pigs' or crucifixes.

- People haven't been willing to die in a ditch about the gradual extension of the definition of Politically Incorrect speech.

- Nobody has taken to the barricades when the Union Jack and Flag of St George were deemed 'inappropriate'.

- Families have just had to grin and bear it when they've been pushed to the back of housing waiting-lists to make way for vibrant fast-breeders and their multiple wives.

But losing your job, and then inevitably your house, is hardly a minor annoyance. The EUrabians have made a major tactical error here. They have awoken a sleeping giant.

Not My Granddad's Labour is correct that the average Briton is less likely to fully grasp what they are loosing if it is chopped away gradually and by stealth, especially when there are so many deliberate and carefully placed distractions put in his way.

The enemy has, of course, been less cautious where they are unobserved, or, more accurately observed only by the innocent, be in little doubt that were hidden cameras secreted in many classrooms, and people were able to see the lies, disinformation, historical inaccuracies and blatant propaganda being fed to our children they would at last grasp what is being done. Of course, a corrupt media own the cameras, and they would not tell us the truth, so away from the public gaze, the next generation continue to receive an education which is little more than multicultural propaganda, hate and lies.

I wonder though whether the terrorists amongst us do believe them made a tactical error over the foreign workers dispute, or whether they believe that their work has been so successful that they no longer need to hide and that their years of work have brought our society to the point where a final push will send what remains of a once great culture tumbling into the historical void.

If they did think that, it would be hard to fault their logic, for look at where we are, and look at where we came from.

It is hard to think of another culture which has become quite as diminished as ours has and which has done so quite so rapidly. With our culture, our once rich language has been reduced to dumbed down politically correct mush. Words and phrases which tripped off the tongues of our mother's generation, and many before, have been condemned and silenced for fear that they might offend cultures which a hundred years ago struggled to master the wheel.

Members of a legitimate political party are banned from working in our police force, and now in our churches, but nobody dares to say “Hey this is what happened in East Germany in the 1960 's (or indeed Nazi Germany in the 1930's)”.

Pictures of the Boxing day crowds in Oxford street, appear in the news papers and on TV, and nobody has the courage to point out that there is not an indigenous, white, face amongst them.

Day after day we see clear evidence of the totally disproportionate levels of murder, rape, and mayhem committed against us by ethnic minorities, yet we remain silent when our lying media and politicians tell us that they, the ethnic minorities, are our victims.

The moment a single European voice, such as Geert Wilders' is raised against what is being done to us and our European brothers across our continent, he is banned from our shores (albeit that may be reversed if in dawns on David Silly-Bland that was a tactical error). Yet a days before a Muslim Peer makes a totally undemocratic threat and our legislators fawningly and instantly submit.

Earlier generations of Britons would have died fighting before they allowed this to happen, but we cringe and submit to it like beaten mutts. Yet, what is it we cringe before? A bunch of ill educated or hate filled communists, a dishonest media and a regiment of alleged human rights lawyers, who defend only the human rights of a selected few, together with a few lying, soul selling, politicians and above all the terrorism of a single word. We cringe because if we do otherwise we might be called “racists” or we might offend people from cultures, where wife beating, infanticide, honour killing, female genital mutilation, gang-rape, homophobia, murder, torture and corruption are endemic, - some indeed where ritual killing, cannibalism and slavery still occur, - and people we have granted sanctuary to and yet whom we are taught to feel indebted – and often inferior - to.

How have we, the British, come to this?

We have reached this point through the gradual, drip, drip, drip erosion of our culture and or national self esteem. In many ways Briton has come to resemble the brave soldier who would once have taken on and bettered any foe, but who now submits, childlike, to his hectoring wife, because after years of nagging, she has broken his spirit.

That analogy, albeit sexist (there are many men who nag their wives) sums up quite well how this has been achieved. By a process of first making us feel uncomfortable, then guilty, followed by telling us repeatedly that we are in the wrong, they have brought us to a point where what they say is the commonly accepted truth and what tell us has become the dogma of the state.

Is it any surprise that our enemies believe that we are vanquished, that they have won and as such no longer have to take their time and stealthily kill us by a thousand cuts?. That they have become bolder and more blatant and have moved to the next phase. You need not take my word for it, look around you and you will see it happening.

It is not over, but my God we have left it late to fight back, and there will be damage which can not be repaired. However, much can still be saved, if we decide to save it. In the dark days of World War II it looked as if all was lost, but it was not. A few hundred years before that the enemy appeared set to breach the walls of Vienna, but they were forced back. We have come back from the edge before, and we can do so again, but the window will not remain open forever.

The edifice crumbles slowly and can be repaired, but there comes a point where the fall will be fast and inevitable. Let us as a people awake before we reach that point.

Pictures of a "racist" prince

As some affirmatively assisted z-list comedian scrabbles to gain publicity by attempting to reignite the "Prince Harry is a racist" allegations, by repeating a throw away line from a brief conversation, I suggest that readers take a look at the pictures below, and contemplate as to who the real racists in our society are.

Time was that a man would be judged by his actions, in the thought police state in which we now live, it is a casual or ill chosen word which will be used against us.

Below, on the other hand, is the accuser

Parallels from the past

By guest contributor: August Pointneuf

Parallels of Nazism with the ANC

Nazism is a benchmark against which ruthless human control had been measured and as a demonstration of “evil” political behaviour. So great and so unfettered by external criticism was the political power allowed to it that Germany destroyed itself and much more.

The following describes aspects of the evolution of the Nazi party prior to the Second World War

A cascading adulation of the masses voted in what they were lead to believe was a heroic and charismatic leader: Having had a military history and been imprisoned he was seen as a “person of the people”, capable of bringing great changes. Acquiring overwhelmingly power, supported by the unemployed youth, he was in the position to overcome the constitution, abolish all controls and restraints on this power, and so entrench that party into seemingly permanent control.

However, the intellectuals had grave reservations both about leader’s intelligence, and about the unconstrained direction he seemed to be taking. Sadly their limited numbers made them irrelevant. Many of these outstandingly capable people, with a foresight, left the country.

In Germany the government began to target the vibrant, creatively and financially successful minority.

The minority was then selectively and progressively excluded from earning a living. The rationale was that the majority had been prejudiced by the success of this group, and the population had been “disadvantaged” by the creative skills of this minority. There was to be an enforced (and legislated) transfer of property and wealth away those who had created it. Businesses were to be taken over by the majority race, whose members were to be awarded (by law) shareholdings which they had not earned. This minority was progressively deprived of their land, even when the title holders depended upon the land for their livelihood.

The minority had their entry to the professions restricted, via a stranglehold on university admissions, where selection was by race, not merit.

The majority race was pushed by propaganda into a “consciousness” of their “superiority”. The success of isolated individuals was projected, promoting any petty successes, which were minimal in relation to their numbers. Money was pored into projects designed to “prove” the superiority of the majority race. The propaganda machine began to emphasise examples of the success of selected individuals, claiming that they “represented” the capabilities of the majority race.

An attempt was made to convince the world of the capabilities of Germany by putting it on the international stage. Sport was recruited, and the Olympic Games was pursued as a potential grandstand.

The ultimate goal of this selective prejudice against a minority race was to appease an electorate in times of economic stress, and ultimately ensured the political “success” of the party in power, (which meant ensconcing that political party into permanent power).

Large arms and other industrial manufacturers funded both politicians and the party in power initially, notably Thyssen, in the belief that they were protecting their interests.

The world outside Germany was impressed. “This is a country going someplace!” was heard. “This is a model for the capitalist world! A place to invest! This is a country aware of its moral high ground!”

Eminent persons visited and then expressed their favourable impressions. The most senior ambassadors were dispatched to Germany. It was visited by Royalty.

However there were sceptics who comprehended the underlying dangers.

One result was the silent but eventually massive loss of the unique creative skills possessed by the minority which had proven itself by its success but was now so threatened. Emigration was propelled, leaving large skill vacuums: those emigrants subsequently added mightily to the capacities of their host countries.

The parallels of Nazism with the ANC.
Now read this again, changing two words, Germany to South Africa and Olympic Games to Soccer World Cup.

Posts Script:

The last election gave the ANC an 80% majority, well over the threshold allowing it to change the constitution and entrench it in power

Comment on SABC news 19.00h 17 January 2007 “Makhaya Ntini, South Africa’s greatest sportsman, was given a Keiser Chiefs jersey”

Jan Christian Smuts, internationally famous as a leader of the Western world, politician, Field-Marshal, jurist, scholar, classicist, botanist, philosopher, and author, was remembered by naming South Africa’s main airport.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jan_Smuts

The ANC removed Smuts’ name, and replaced it with Oliver Tambo Airport.

Thyssen-Krupp and the South African arms deal.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/South_African_Arms_Deal

Purged by the thought police

It seems that ex-Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher's daughter Carol has made the mistake of making an ideologically impure comment in a private conversation, with potentially disastrous consequences to her future career.

As we saw recently with the attacks on Prince Harry over another private comment, the Stasi are alive and well, ad they are looking to make examples of anyone in the public eye who speaks out of line or does not obey the party rules.

The new order

Who censors the censors?

He who controls what people can see and think is a power in the land.

A view from Zimbabwe

By a son of Zimbabwe

The importance of the Zimbabwean catastrophe, I believe, is the relationship that this loss of civilisation has to the civilisation which you (and I) wish to protect.

The Zimbabwean tragedy is not the aberrant result of a single loose cannon – not a bizarre individual's idiosyncrasy. It is a model of how the counter-culture of parts of the globe will destroy. This is a model of black incompetence wrapped in the delusions of capability. It is the exemplification of the ruthless power as it develops within primitive communities. It is the expression of a social personality which is so askance to that which created Western Society. It is a society which cannot conceive the type of social relationship mechanism which allowed the evolution of the culture which we inherited.

I am not prepared to heed those who say "given time, education, compassion, tolerance, and leadership, these people will come right". I am not concerned because there is no time. Education and all else has been given to excess. Indeed these people were supplied with a fully functioning nation to demonstrate their capabilities. Like children playing with a complex toy which they could not appreciate or understand, that nation was dismembered, and rapidly left in fragments.

About 7% of the world is white (extrapolated from Economist figures of about 10 years ago). Therefore there is not only no time, but there is no space. The prospects of large invasions by those on intent on stripping assets is real – made so much more probable by the apparent social suicide of the Western politicians.

Large invasions will be made more likely by the West’s economic bust, again engineered by politicians of such crass stupidity that the word "politician" requires re-defining. The primary purpose of wealth should be self protection. The national wealth has and continues to be squandered in a political make-believe. As one result of this impending impoverishment, the West will soon not be in a position to defend itself against invading hoards. There will be no time, no space and no money to protect the civilisation. The invading masses will not come as conventional armies; instead they will arrive as masses of people in unstoppable numbers. Initially the "rights activists", "processes" and "humanitarian recognition", EU directives and government inertia will stall a response. "Sleepers" in these countries (like Britain) will allow an easy and irreversible infiltration. Indeed that process is well advanced. But the White Briton, like the frog which is slowly heated, remains unaware of the threat they face. It might take someone like me, from an arms length, to visualise the full danger.

Incidentally the opinions of those who opposed Enoch Powell, with the same trashy rhetoric we still have, are now demonstrated to have been so wrong. Powell's figures in relation to immigration, so sneered at, at that time, were well exceeded by 2000, the last year for which Powell gave his predictions. Is it time for an "Enoch Powell Remembrance Day"?

Has the penny finally dropped?

“Racist Scum!” snarled an Unite Union apparatchik, “Not defendable” grumbled Gordon Brown, “A huge mistake!” wittered Peter Mandelson, all of them condemning the series of strikes occurring across in protest at the employment of foreign labour in preference to UK workers.

What they are really saying is “How dare you?” ....“You have no right!” ... “There is nothing you can do about it, as indigenous Britons you are supposed to bend over and take it just like you have done for the last forty years!!”.

To their mind this is not what British workers are supposed to do, our leaders have spent years training and intimidating us with the 'R' word to the point where we no longer dare to question their great scheme. We are supposed to sit at home cheering for black football players and voting for non whites to represent Britain in the Eurovision song contest and to accept without complaint whatever ordure the great and good chose to pour on us in the furtherance of their aim of irrevocably changing our homeland.

The Union leaders are just as irritated by what is happening as are the politicians, even those craggy old Stalinists who are better at hiding their true feelings that the chap who lost it in South Wales, can not totally disguise the fact that they would be far happier were British workers to protest in favour of handing over more jobs to foreign workers. For make no mistake, they are fellow travellers with NuLabour and they are no less committed to multiculturalism and all that it entails.

However, what is happening? have the British people at last started to grasp what is being done to them?, have they at last begun to realise that their politicians and most of their union leaders do not have their best interests at heart and have not had for decades?. Does this mean that the penny has finally started to drop?

If so, it is about bloody time, and let us hope it is not too late.

This is just the latest in a long line of assaults against the British people which must have told people what was happening, but which they have tried to ignore, because of that damn British fear of making a fuss, which used to be a strength, but is now a potentially fatal flaw. Be in no doubt that, if we don't make a fuss now, the next thing they do to us will be even worse, and will not be the last.

If the knowledge that there is no longer such a thing as “British Jobs for British workers” has not yet brought the truth home to you, then what will?.

What really pisses me off, is that it has taken until now for the people of this once great nation to take a stand, and that the stand is being taken against white, Christian Europeans. If, instead of Italian and Polish workers, these jobs had been given to non-European immigrants from Africa, Asia or the Caribbean would the Politically correct brain washing have kicked in, and would those now protesting stayed at home to watch “Hustle” or some other Common Purpose approved propaganda with a take away curry. I hope not, but I fear so.

You may now see the threat to your jobs, but what about the threats to your culture, your saftey amd your children's future, which, until now you have ignored?.

You should have been protesting when the Somalis and Jamaicans fist began to arrive and turn our streets into blood spatterd gang war zones, when Islamic mullahs and extremists (which the lying media call a “tiny minority”) first started attacking the culture which had given them sanctuary and forming ghettos of hatred in once white cities across our land. It was time to shout “enough” when media social engineers started indoctrinating your daughters into the potentially fatal belief that it is cool and fashionable to have sex with black men, or when the Stephen Lawrence industry started spreading their lies and distortions, in order to hide the truth about racial violence in this country and who are the real victims, you and your children.

I say this, not to condemn or belittle the indigenous British people, but in the hope that enough of you will at last realise how far down the road to disaster we are, and how close we are to that tipping point from which there will be no return.

This threat to British jobs is not an isolated or unconnected event, it is just just a further stage in an ongoing process, the ultimate end of which will see the British people disinherited in their own land.

We are at the eleventh hour, it is time to take a stand. I thank God that some have begun to do so, I pray that they will not falter, that others will join then and that this is just the beginning.

The truth about crime

My scanner has decided to stop working, so if anyone has a copy of tonight's West End Final issue of the London Evening Standard (Tonight being January 19 2008) and a functioning scanner, I would be grateful if they would scan the table on page 18 headed “Homicides in 2008 by Ethnicity and Age” and send a copy to me at sarahmaidofalbion@gmail.com

The table gives interesting figures, which reveal more than perhaps the Evening Standard meant them to. Apparently in 2008 there were 154 homicides in London of which 59 were white Europeans the remaining 95 were from other non white races. In 2007 the total of homicides were slightly higher, totalling 161 overall of which 63 were white Europeans and 98 were from non-white races.

As, the breakdown appears to relate to homicide victims, I assume that the Standard believes that their figures prove nothing more than that the majority of victims were non-white, however, they forget to take their own behaviour and that of the rest of the media into account when making that assumption.

As we all know, when a member of an ethnic minority is killed by a white European or even if white Europeans are suspected, this becomes front page news and is the subject of outraged debate on the TV and in the news papers for days on end. As, to my recollection. no such media frenzy has occurred in the last two years, we can be confident that if any of the non-white victims were killed by whites, they are a truly tiny minority, which the media have inexplicably omitted to tell us about. Whereas we know for a fact that some of the white victims were killed by non-whites, and in other cases, such as the murders of Robert Knox and Ben Kinsella, non-whites have been charged.

What the figures published in tonight's Evening Standard do demonstrate is that non-white Londoners, whilst still in the minority, are overwhelmingly more likely to commit murder than white Londoners are, a fact proved day after day by the convictions which we see in our courts.

Which shows the recent complaints by the Black Police Association that high numbers of black youths are being stopped and searched to be the dishonest cant that they are.

What you didn't see on the BBC

If you click on this link will take you to an article on the BNP web site by Nick Griffin on the efforts of the far-left to spark a Muslim intifada on our streets. The article and the accompanying videos are highly disturbing and certainly newsworthy, and it is legitimate to ask why the the UK news media chose to suppress them.

Outstanding Investigative journalism at the Green Arrow

I urge everyone to read this superb expose of Searchlight at the Green Arrow forum. It certainly reveals what is going on in Britain together with the dirty tricks, dishonesty and maybe illegal behaviour, of an organisation which boasts the support of many leading UK politicians. It will open some eyes.

Please read it and pass the link on

The Silent Messiah

It is probably unkind of me, however, I can not help but chuckle at the obvious bemusement of the right on Obama worshipers in the British media and equally devout commentators in the press at the fact that the chosen one has been totally silent over the situation in Gaza. Surly the bringer of "change" would use his significant influence and popularity to speak out against what they to an anchorman or woman perceive as outrageous Israeli brutality against the innocent Palestinians.

For days now they have been expecting him to do so, indeed the London Evening Standard ran an editorial last week announcing that it was now time for the President Elect to speak out. But alas his silence is deafening.

The Obama faithful had better get used to disappointment, no American President can govern without the good will of the supporters of Israel, and not one of them, the messiah elect included ,would dare speak out against them. (It is also possible that someone in the Knesset has possession of a document marked "Barcak's real Birth Certificate").

My personal view is that Israel has no option other than to take action against the constant rocket attacks launched from Hamas run territory, however, not for the first time, my views do not coincide with those of the main stream media, who seem to believe that lobbing missiles across the boarder is an Arab human right .

If it wasn't so funny, and if they were not such awful people, I might feel sorry for them, they have invested so much hope, and so many lies into their Icon, they have ignored so many stories and buried so many inconvenient facts in order to pave the beloved leaders path to the White House, and now, when it is too late it begins to dawn that he just might not be what they thought he was.

As Oscar Wilde might have said, you would need a heart of stone not to laugh.

More from Pastor Manning

What the heck, it's worth a try!! Click on the picture, or here to listen to James Manning's appeal (and maybe send on the link?)

______________________

News Management

(I posted this earlier at the Home of the Green Arrow)

Various news sources are reporting a very unpleasant attack on a young girl in Manchester , who was apparently shot in the face with a pellet gun by three "males". However, as further evidence of the continued news suppression in Britain, I have attached below screen shots of the account of the crime which currently appears on the Greater Manchester Police Website (screen shot at 05:30 GMT) and a further screen shot showing how the story has been reported by the BBC.

Note the significant detail missing from the BBC account. Anyone who still believes that our news media tells us the truth is too naive to be allowed out on their own.

Greater Manchester Police Website 17:30 pm 03/01/2009

BBC News Website at 17:30 PM 03/01/2009

(screen shots were taken as experience has shown us that website copy can change!!)

________________________________________________