The enemies amongst us

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through...all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.

For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.” - Marcus Tullius Cicero January 3, 106 BC – December 7, 43 BC

-/-

Those words, first spoken more that twenty one centuries ago have been quoted often during the ensuing millennia, and are repeated frequently by nationalists in our own time. We need not question their longevity, for they remain as relevant and as apt today as they did when Cicero spoke them in the first century BC. In fact they are words never more pertinent than today, for our modern society has so blurred the line between honour and betrayal, between truth and between lies that traitors can move more freely, can spread their poison more widely and can have a more devastating effect than at almost any previous time in our history.

It was the traitor who told us we must question our old certainties, but he did so not for the sake of enlightenment but to undermine the bedrock and mortar which maintained our unity and our resolve. With those certainties went our beliefs and our values leaving us adrift and exposed to the dark shapes circling around us, and it was then that the traitor began his real work.

I speak of “the traitor” but he is, in fact legion and has swiftly infected almost every corner of our once great societies.  He comes in many forms, ranging from the true believer determined to destroy Western man for the sake of an ever evolving ideology, they are fanatics yet capable of changing their modus but not their aims following the collapse of the Soviet Union.  At the other end of the scale are effectively, drones, brainwashed into doing what they have been taught to believe is right.  

Between those two extremes are the cynics including politicians and the very rich who gain short term material gain from the joint enterprise, the third world racists who are doing it out of hate, and the white inverted racists, whom Pat Buchanan refers to as "ethno-masochist", people who delight in inflicting harm on their own ethnic group so as to earn what they view as moral credits.     

They are in our police forces, they proliferate in our judiciary and in our institutions, they sit in parliament and they dominate our schools and places of education where they teach lies and half truths in place of history and tell our children to feel shame for their race.

In this article I plan to focus of one of their most deadly manifestations the manner in which they have captured and transformed the Western media and imposed their deformed narrative upon all mainstream sources of information to the point where the media in all its mainstream forms has become one of the most deadly enemies of the West.  Deadly because it is they who inject the poisons and administer the sedatives which render us unable and unwilling to resist what is being done to use.

They are with us twenty four hours a day, creating false realities, forming out opinions and telling us what to think, whilst stealthily terrorizing and intimidating us until we become ashamed and frightened of our natural instincts and progressively secret views and anything which, in another age would have given us courage and prompted us to resist their campaign against us.

Our news men have long ago given up reporting the facts with anything approaching balance , they no longer inform, they indoctrinate.  They have ceased to be reporters and have become propagandists and even more so they have become censors.  Facts and events which if reported could undermine the official message are suppressed, silenced and hurled into the great silent shredder where uncomfortable truths now go to die.

Those events which can not be buried and hidden away are presented as something other than what they are, as with the true nature of the so called Arab “spring” the real ethnic make up of the “English” rioters or the reality of underage sexual grooming in Britain.

A few generations before our own, journalism could still be viewed as an honourable trade, when reporter still viewed their roles as seekers of truth and exposers of wrong doing. There is now no honour left in their murky trade. The truth is now the very last thing they seek and facts are not exposed, they are spun to suit an agenda or to act as modern fables essential to the ongoing indoctrination.

It has reached the point that there is no benefit to be gained from watching a television news broadcast or reading a newspaper unless you accept that a significant part of what is being laid before you is pure fiction and the rest, unless it is ideologically neutral, which very little is, will feature half truths and distortions.  

Briefly we are seeing a shadow of these liars true nature.  This very week the Leveson Inquiry into abuses by the media are beginning to expose the total contempt and disregard for the public endemic within the culture of our newsrooms, however, this is only scratching at the surface of the true iniquity and inherent treachery within the fourth estate.   

The inquiry will not go further than exposing phone hacking and lying about individual victims, it will not examine the role of these creatures in what has been done to our society.  We are only able to read about it because one section of the media are enjoying undermining Rupert Murdoch, who's Fox News organisation is likely to be the only section of the US media to oppose Obama's reelection in 2012.   In any event news reporting is only part of the brainwashing, and in many ways not the most insidious.

Although the vast majority of those reading at this site take an interest in news and current affairs, and many of us spend hours tracking down the truth behind news stories we are a tiny minority. Most of the public, especially the young, take little if any interest in “the news”, however, the media have other and far more powerful means of lying to them, through entertainment and popular drama.

Through TV screens, cinemas, DVDs even the music they listen to and the “popular” internet sites they visit an alternative reality is projected to them which complements and bolsters the fake reality which was taught to them in school.

The alternative reality is effectively a reverse reality where multicultural diversity is cool, desirable and benign, whereas nationalism and any opposition to the third world colonisation of the West is evil, malevolent and ugly.

Non-whites are eternally intelligent. honourable and desirable, or the innocent victims of European prejudice.  If they are not victims they doctors, teachers, scientists, policemen or in other ways heroic, whereas all paedophiles, rapists, serial killers bigots and, of course, all racists are white.

Then we have advertising which is beginning to take on a surreal element reminiscent of 1930’s style soviet Union style propaganda. For instance when happy white families spread Clover butter substitute on their sandwiches while gleefully applauding benign and elderly black musicians and when virtually every commercial for beauty products shampoo or slimming aids, as if by mandate have to feature three females “best friends” of politically correct differing ethnic shades, how do these differ from the images of happy peasants waving their scythes and sickles over a plentiful harvest, which were used by Russian propagandist to disguise a very different and far less attractive reality?.     

Beyond brainwashing the media has a more sinister role in spreading terror and encouraging obedience they do this by ensuring that any transgressors, and any who dare question the new orthodoxy are punished severely, humiliatingly and in public.  When the modern media exposes alleged “ra##ists” like Tiger Woods ex-caddy, or, they hope, John Terry, they are performing the same function as the stocks in medieval town squares, or the show trials behind the old Iron Curtain, their purpose being to scare the public into acquiescence.

To a monumental degree they have been extraordinarily successful in their malevolent scheme.

It has long been clear that the western media are among the greatest enemies of Western society, they are the traitors within our walls, it is they who are beaming their poison and their lies into our homes day after days, brainwashing, and terrorizing us, creating a false reality and hiding the truth from us.

Mass media has the means to create great good, however, it is being use to achieve great evil.

It is the agent which has brought us to where we are and it is the poison which will kill us.  We will not succeed, we will not survive unless be can break its deadly grip on our crippled and dying countries and expose the monsters lurking behind the toxic smokescreen they have created.           
                   
     

Toxic Media

So, after 168 years the new world media has destroyed that long established British Institution the News of the World, the final edition of which was published on Sunday. First launched in 1843, the News of the World has been part of British life for generations, and despite its reputation for sex and scandal it has many journalistic achievements to its name, albeit considerably less so in recent years, when, under its final management it changed from a saucy but campaigning tabloid, to something altogether more vindictive and malign.

I was only even an occasional News of the World reader myself, however, given its impressive sales figures, clearly millions of people were readers, and, in any event it is sad to see something which has been around so long being willfully destroyed by what can only be described as malevolence.

For, that, of course, is what happened, the News of the World did not follow the likes of Today or the Daily Sketch, failed news papers which closed due to collapsing circulation.  In terms of sales it was amongst the most successful of the main stream media. That is, it was successful, until the revelations of what its reporters, editors and some of its employees had been up to were revealed and turned the brand from popular to poisonous overnight.

If there is anyone left on the planet who does not know what had been going on at the News of the World the details are extremely distasteful.  When it first became known that some News of the World reporters, and individuals working under contract to the paper, had been hacking into the mobile phone voice mails of celebrities, politicians and royalty, few people apart from the victims themselves were particularly concerned. Rightly or wrongly, we have come to view public figures as fair game, and most people tend to subscribe to the flawed by compelling opinion that such individuals have placed themselves in the public eye, gained considerably from so doing, and therefore, deserve what they get.

However, that all changed when it became clear that the phone hacking extended to people who were not public figures. The mobile phones belonging to missing children were also hacked, the distraught messages from those missing children's parents were listened to and some even deleted in order to make room for more, an act which inevitably gave the parents of at least one missing girl hope their child was alive and listening to her messages, when she was in fact already dead.  The phone of the parents of other murdered children and fallen soldiers, were also being hacked  into, as were those belonging to survivors of terrorism, their private messages listened to in the hope some snippet of conversation could be exploited for news and profit.

For most of us it is hard to comprehend how people could be so callous, how they could have such contempt for the victims of such terrible crimes that they could cynically sit and listen to such tragic messages and then delete them to make room for more. Perhaps, even more cynical, even more heartless were those who paid others to do the hacking and deleting for them.

Tonight allegations of similar acts have been made against other newspapers, including ones which view themselves as more "up market" than the news of the world .  This is hardly a surprise, as one other recent incident confirms.  Whist the revelations about the News of the World were taking place, another story hit the headlines, one which may seem unconnected, but which I think was very much connected. 

29 year old Kia Abdullah is what one might call a westernised lipstick Muslim, she has written a couple of "controversial" novels and is a journalist who regularly contributes to the Guardian.  On July 1st Abdullah wrote a message to her followers on Twitter regarding the death of three young British men who had been killed in a bus accident in Thailand.  She stated that she was unable to feel any sympathy for anyone who had died whilst enjoying a “gap year”, and revealed she had grinned when noticing that two of the victims had “double barreled” names.

Abdullah has come in for a deal of criticism following that Tweet and has quickly issued a career defending apology, claiming she was guilty of ill advised “black humour”. However, Abdullah's real error was that she revealed in public, sentiments which would have elicited empathetic nods and even some laughter, had she instead expressed them within the elitist media circles into which her ideology, race and connections grant her access.

What do these two events reveal to us about the news media and the people who see it as their role to inform the public and form their opinions? Both examples demonstrate a complete lack of empathy with those outside the cozy media tepee.

It is hardly surprising that those working within the media lose any sense of empathy or fellowship for the wider public, a conman will soon learn to despise his victims and likewise a journalist will soon feel contempt for those he or she is employed to deceive.

When one is required to lie to and mislead a group of people on a regular ongoing basis it is inevitable that one will eventually begin to view that group as “the other” and then, eventually as “the enemy”.  It is human nature for people to lose all empathy or common feeling for a group they perceive as their enemies and eventually to cheer and applaud their destruction.

This is, I believe, how much of the Western media view the Western public for whom they write and perform.  How else is it that they can not only have such scant regard for the wellbeing of their readers and viewers, but actively seek to deceive them in ways which can only do harm to them?

The media, together with police and politicians, have for decades actively covered up the extraordinarily disproportionate level of violence perpetrated by newcomers to Britain against the host population, and they have done so in the full knowledge that their actions will lead, and have led, directly to the violent deaths of increasing numbers of indigenous white Britons.

In fact they have gone further than that they have distorted the truth, by means such as for example constantly resurrecting a single seventeen year old, alleged, white on black hate crime in order to portray, immigrants, who they know full well are the overwhelming perpetrators of hate crimes, as the primary victims of hate crimes.

This goes beyond ideology, this behavour reveals a reckless disregard for the well being of those they are slandering, bordering on hostility.

In the same way, for years the media, and their co-conspirators have covered up the abuse and sexual grooming of young white children by Asian males, and have conspired in the vilification and attempted prosecution of anyone seeking to expose these crimes.  Again they have done this bin the full knowledge that their very actions will lead, and have led, to the abuse of countless children, who might otherwise have been protected.

Even when they could no longer cover up the crimes, as I revealed recently the media, en mass, deliberately misrepresented the figures in order to downplay the involvement of the main perpetrators, whilst over exaggerating the involvement of the majority indigenous population.

Meanwhile trained economists working within the media, have actively suppressed evidence of the huge social and economic damage caused by mass immigration whilst promoting highly dubious “evidence” of benefits.

This is not unique to British media, at the present time the US press are deliberately failing to report growing levels of pre-arranged anti-white racial attacks by black mobs. Or when they are reported, all mention of race is omitted and efforts made to mislead reader and viewers into believing the attackers are white.  Meanwhile those rare genuine white perpetrator hate crimes receive coast to coast publicity.    

America, of course, is currently led by the least qualified and most incompetent presidents in living memory, yet he is ferociously protected by the media, who hide evidence of his shortcomings and savage anyone they perceive as a threat to him.

All questions about the president’s eligibility are ridiculed or suppressed by the media.  The White House recently published a document purporting to be the president’s birth certificate, this was accepted, without question by the media.  Since then numerous graphics experts have denounced the document as a fraud,  whilst the single expert wrongly quoted by the media as claiming it to be genuine has been actively prevented from publishing a correction.

However, those members of the public who still naively rely on the legacy media for their news are not permitted to know any of this.

Elsewhere in the world, extremely troubling and potentially dangerous developments are taking place in the Middle East, yet these are presented to a gullible public as optimistic signs of budding democracy, and laughably dubbed an Arab Spring, when little could in fact be further from the truth.

We are again being lulled into a false security, and we should ask ourselves why.  If those behind the microphones and in front of the cameras are supporting what is going on in the Middle East, experience tells us it can not be good for the West.

The Western Media is one of the most dangerous and malevolent forces currently threatening the Western World.  For many millions of people the mainstream media remain the primary source of news and information, and as such the media are the gatekeepers to knowledge. They control what the public are allowed to know, what they are not allowed to know and also what they can be led to believe.

If people are to make wise decisions, we need to know the truth, but if those controlling access to the truth do not have our best interests at heart them we are doomed.

Too many of those working in the media do not have our best interests at heart, they despise us, lie to us and view us with contempt. Many actively wish us ill. Recent revelations about the News of the World and Kia Abdullah’s vindictive tweet, gave us a glimpse of that uncomfortable truth.

An Old Evil Still Craving Blood

A group of octogenarian Kenyan ex-Mau-Mau terrorists have begun a legal action in London's high court, seeking compensation for alleged abuse they suffered in the 1950’s, when Britain was still the colonial rulers, and they were part of a Communist backed insurgency. As this case continues we can be sure there will be some very selective media reporting of details revealed in the high court.

Apart from the couple of left wing historians who are supporting the plaintiffs, and wilfully blind to any facts which conflict with their anti-British prejudice, anyone who has studied the uprising will be nauseated by the obscenity of any member of the Mau- Mau accusing anyone else of an atrocity.

The media sneer that only 32 whites were killed by the Mau-Mau, but fail to mention the tens of thousand of blacks they killed (estimates range from 11,000 to over 100,000) and how they were killed. It is hard to read of incidents such as the Lari massacre, where 120 Christian Kikuyu were either burnt alive or hacked to bits in a single act, which horrifyingly foreshadowed events in Rwanda almost 40 years later, without questioning the humanity of those capable of doing such things.

Of course, we will not hear of that, nor will be hear of the oath taking ceremonies, where the use of victims body parts, usually cut from victims whist they still lived, combined sorcery with a particularly African form of terror.

The Oath taking made the killers all the more deadly. A man who has swallowed the eye plucked from a living child whilst promising to kill for his God, Ngai, will not easily surrender or abandon his deadly cause, and regular exposure to such horrors will inure him to the savagery he must in turn commit.

It is also unlikely, we will hear that the Colonial government were faced with one of the first recorded instances of biological warfare being used by insurgents, when herds of cattle owned by loyal African tribes were poisoned by the insurgents in order intimidate their black owners and punish them from supporting the Colonial government.

In truth, the vast majority of the native Kenyans were loyal to the Colonial government, but every man woman and child was under threat from violent terrorists capable of the most unspeakable savagery.

There may have only been thirty two white victims, but their deaths were marked by inhuman levels of brutal cruelty

Dr Esme Ruck, well known for providing free medicine to Africans, had her unborn child ripped from her belly, her husband Roger was hacked to death with machetes and her six year old son Michael was dispatched amongst his toy trains and Teddy bears, his tiny body partially skinned.

One of Michael’s killers was a man who had worked for the Ruck’s for years, but who had joined in the slaughter knowing what would face him if he didn’t. An incentive reinforced by the fact that a Kikuyu house servant who did not participate was also killed. It is thus that terror begets terror.

Even younger than Michael Ruck was four year old Andrew Stevens who met a similar fate, chopped to death while playing in the family garden a few months later. Unless his parents still live, who still remembers that young life?

Other deaths were just as savage but their victims took longer to die. After being forced to watch the rape and murder of his wife Arundell Gray Leakey was force marched to the lower slopes of Mount Kenya, where the Kikuyu believe Ngai resides. He was then disembowelled and buried upside down, alive.

In another act of unspeakable barbarism, two teen aged boys Geoffrey Danby and Christopher Robin Twohey, 15 and 13 respectively were captured while out riding their bicycles and sexually tortured for some hours before they were killed. To the mau mau a young white boy was a prize to be enjoyed.

A now long neglected gravestone in Nairobi's City Park cemetery (pictured above) is all that now stands testimony to the short lives and cruel deaths of those children. It reads

“In proud and loving memory of two innocent victims, murdered by the mau mau on April 20th 1955, Geoffrey Danby aged 15 years and his friend Christopher Robin Twohey aged 13 years, suffer little children to come unto me”.

You can be sure there will no mention of those two boys or any of the Mau-Mau's other victims in the news reports you will hear about this case.

Thousands of Africans were killed in even crueller ways, the horrors inflicted upon them intended to punish them and terrify others.

What chance is there that the craven, lying, media will publish a word of that? This is not the truth they want to tell, these are not the facts they want the public to know.

When interviewing hate raddled Harvard educated “historian” Caroline Elkins, the author of Imperial Reckoning: The Untold Story of Britain's Gulag in Kenya (a title referenced in some of the pre-prepared signs carried by the plaintiffs) who is supporting the claims of atrocities, and who's "research" effectively led to this case being launched, Channel 4's Jon Snow behaved as if he was in the presence of some great authority on African history and not the politically driven hack many of her contemporaries (and betters) consider her to be.

Tellingly there was mention the serious criticism of Elkin's work has received, such as fellow historian James Mitchell's comment that Elkins “doesn't let facts stand in the way of a good rant.” or David Elstein assessment of her research that that her casualty figures are derived from an idiosyncratic reading of census figures and a tendentious interpretation of the fortified village scheme.

Elkins' Harvard colleague Niall Ferguson, who's acclaimed if chilling series “Civilisation – is the West History?” is currently running on Channel 4 politely described Elkin's book as a highly "sensationalist account of the rebellion". Meanwhile Rutger's university Professor Susan Carruthers accused Elkins of being excessively condescending towards the Kikuyu whilst casting the white settlers as “cartoonish grotesques”

There was of course no mention of that or that demographer John Blacker writing in African Affairs demonstrated in detail that Elkins' estimates of casualties were grossly over estimated.

No doubt both Snow and Elkins would view the attacks by white academics as inspired by racism, however, they are not alone Kenyan historian Bethwell Ogot, currently the chancellor of Moi University, accused Elkins of being ideologically “incapable of seeing atrocities on the part of the mau mau”. Ogot goes on to say of the mau mau:

“..assaulted old people, women and children. The horrors they practiced included the following: decapitation and general mutilation of civilians, torture before murder, bodies bound up in sacks and dropped in wells, burning the victims alive, gouging out of eyes, splitting open the stomachs of pregnant women. No war can justify such gruesome actions. In man’s inhumanity to man there is no race distinction. The Africans were practising it on themselves."

However, such facts will not appear in the media reporting of this case, and probably not in the increasingly truth free environment of a British Court

Yet it is on the politically motivated words of “historians” such as Caroline Elkins that this prosecution and the reporting of it is based.

The truth is that the colonial government were faced with one of the most brutal uprisings in British history, when thousands of innocent citizens under British protection were being slaughtered. However, far from the racist caricatures penned by Ms. Elkins, justice continued to be applied fairly the courts regularly threw out prosecution evidence in one instance 48 men facing the death penalty had their convictions overturned at just one appeal hearing.

Of course the approach taken was tough, it had to be, and there certainly was some mistreatment, however, here we come to another lie which the media and the pretend historians will tell, or more likely, allow to be perceived.

The media will find ways of suggesting that any brutality which captured Mau Mau terrorists did suffer was inflicted on them by white men. In fact the vast majority of all violence on both sides during the uprising was black on black. The mau mau had especially targeted the families of loyal black policemen and soldiers, and some retaliation may have been enacted when they were captured. However, the images of white men torturing blacks which the media is seeking to evoke are complete fantasy.

Of course this is not the first such trial, remember the lurid stories of British soldiers who had supposedly been raping hundreds of Kenyan woman? You perhaps will not remember how quietly those stories were dropped when it all turned out to be a pack of lies.

Our history is being rewritten by charlatanism and people who hate us, this includes the history of our empire, it is done to undermine, to damage and to destroy us. This in itself is a crime, but it is a crime which becomes an obscenity when truly evil men and women, such as those behind the Mau Mau atrocities can come forward claiming compensation and be treated as victims by corrupt historians and a by a debased and lying media.

The Media - a poem by Mike Wilson

The media controls our life,
Directs our thoughts, explores the strife
Of little things that don’t deserve
To be expanded with such verve.

The general public does its best
To sift the news and leave the rest
Inconsequentially to those
Whose income is from talk back shows.

We watch the programmes on TV
Like ACA and ABC
And wonder how they can survive
Exploring peoples troubles live.

They squeeze the utmost from the show,
The tragedies that we should know,
Of human suffering and despair,
Pathos and drama fill the air.

The show concludes with cheery chat
But you‘re upset, you kick the cat.
How can they play emotions so
Then have the gall to end the show?

The matter really is you see
That Today Tonight and ABC
Have found a way to make a buck
Exploiting those down on their luck.

The TV news can also make
A minor fray into a quake
Of epic size and moment ,then
Reverse it and go back again.

The poor old public never knows
Who tugs the ring that’s through their nose.
They’re fed the news with just a hint
That all is truth and light in print.

We see the policeman in the frame
Abusing some unfortunate dame.
We are not told, at least not loud,
That she is from the ‘Rent a Crowd’

The cameras click the presses run
We see the action as it’s done.
It fills the TV screen each night,
The journo’s think it’s dynamite.

Alas in truth it isn’t much,
A rented crowd, some toughs and such
Who gather round to make a noise
Which ends up sold by paper boys.

The people have a right to know
The truth and that it will be so.
Not facts embellished by the yard
Because the media think it’s hard

To sell their wares as they appear
Quite unattractive year by year.
Give us the means to be selective
Not half the truth that’s re-directed.

The people who control the press
Can easily create a mess
For politicians starting out
And wondering what to shout about.

A man elected by his peers
Is supposed to serve for years,
Doing his constituents proud
By voicing his opinions loud.

If he appears to be a leader
The papers want him for their reader,
But he must do as he is told
Or paper headlines scream and scold.

So it becomes a fight, the roughest
To see who can survive the toughest.
But in the end it can be seen
The deadly papers rule serene.

The media controls our lives,
Our politics, the cars we drive.
We must be careful in our reading-
Not let the papers do spoon feeding.

Read the papers once a day
And throw the trashy ones away.
Educate ourselves to think;
Refuse to follow gossips stink.

Base all our judgements on the truth
And give more credence to our youth.
Theirs is the future for this land,
Let’s hope they make the media grand