Thursday 10 February 2011

A Response to Cameron by Dr. Frank Ellis

From: Dr Frank Ellis
To: An Open Letter to the Prime Minister, Mr David Cameron MP
Date: 9th February 2011 A.D.

Re: The Prime Minister’s Speech at the Munich Security Conference February 2011 Concerning the Threat to Western Liberal Democracies by Islam and Islamic-Sponsored Terrorism

Dear Mr Cameron

I am writing to you in connection with the speech you delivered at the Munich Security Conference last week since its subject matter pertains not just to the security of the United Kingdom and other Western European states but also to the long-term survival of the indigenous population of this country itself: the ultimate security question.

You begin your speech by seeking to reassure fellow member NATO states that despite the dire condition of the UK economy Britain will continue to meet the NATO 2% defence-spending target. In general terms that is good. However, the standard government line notwithstanding – Labour as well as Tory – Britain is not made safer nor is our national security enhanced by the presence of NATO troops in Afghanistan. The NATO presence in Afghanistan has, I believe, more to do with the nuclear ambitions of Iran.

Now, you begin your discussion of the terrorist threat in the UK by saying that some of these attacks are carried out ‘by our own citizens’ and that the perpetrators, Muslims, ‘are prepared to blow themselves up and kill their fellow citizens’ (my emphasis). But these Muslim terrorists do not regard me, us, as ‘their fellow citizens’. Indeed, they are correct: I am not one of ‘their fellow citizens’. Nor do I wish to be. Formally these people may have acquired a British passport but in what way can these people be regarded as ‘our own citizens’ when they live in parallel societies paid for by the white indigenous population and are at best indifferent to, and at worst murderously hostile, to the interests of the host indigenous population? If I went to live in Munich and started to make demands of indigenous Germans that they adapt to my folkways, habits and customs and threatened to kill them, would Germans regard me as one of their own? I doubt it.

True, Europe has suffered from terrorism before the arrival of Al Qaeda and its imitators. The key difference is however that groups such as The Angry Brigade (England) IRA (Northern Ireland), The Red Brigades (Italy), Direct Action (France) and Baader-Meinhof & RAF (West Germany) were all home-grown groups. People who were active in the IRA belong to the tribes of the British Isles. Muslims have no such claim. They are alien. Islamic terrorism would not be a problem in the United Kingdom had we maintained strict control over our borders and not permitted the huge influx of immigrants from Pakistan, Sub-Saharan Africa, the Middle East, Turkey and Somalia. This was and remains a direct consequence of the cult of multiculturalism, a cult that preaches the poisonous view that, for example, sub-Saharan Africans have as much right to live in Britain as the white indigenous population.

You say that: ‘Europe needs to wake up to what is happening in our own countries’. Who exactly needs to wake up? Millions of people throughout Europe who over the last 40 years have seen their cities turned into Third World slums, who have witnessed, and suffered from, the relentless influx of immigrants, Muslim or otherwise, who have seen their institutions – police, armed forces, health services – corrupted by multiculturalism, who have seen their primary and secondary schools and universities turned into centres of politically correct indoctrination, where to be white, middle class, heterosexual and Christian is to suffer a constant stream of insults and barely concealed hatred, where, on the other hand, to be black or non-white is to enjoy special, protected-species status since non-whites are supposed to be bearers of some wonderful gift (referred to as diversity) and a source of great wisdom. Those of us all over Europe need no lectures from you Mr Cameron on what has been happening. If they are not exceptionally wealthy and have no choice but to endure the daily grind of commuting into our large cities or may actually have to live there, white people are confronted every day of their lives with the consequences of ‘vibrant multicultural diversity’ and have been for a long time. Take it from me they hate it and where possible they will avoid it all costs (white flight). If they work in the public sector and have large mortgages they will endure the consequences of the cult in silence, confiding their fears only to a trusted few.

All over Europe an unaccountable class of political-functionaries has sought to impose the alien cult of multiculturalism on the white indigenous populations. Your call that we need to stand up to Muslims - and it is not just Muslims – comes far too late and is, in any case, thoroughly dishonest. The danger to the white indigenous population posed by mass non-white immigration has been evident for a long time and politicians of all parties have either encouraged this process of dispossession or have been too cowardly to speak out in public. When, in his famous speech, Enoch Powell warned of what was to come he was mocked, derided and abandoned by people like you. The damage done to the indigenous population, its history, culture and future may now be irreversible. I pray to God that I am wrong; that it is not too late to save our nation.

Your attempts to distinguish between Islam as a religion of peace and Islamic terrorism are doomed to failure. Such is the overwhelming collectivist ethos of Islam and the complete absence of any respect for the dissenting individual that Muslims resident in this country who do not take part in acts of terrorism are not going to break ranks with the extremists. For Muslims the rule of law, free speech and liberal democracy are alien Western abstractions that mean very little. Given the choice between the rule of law, free speech and the civil society and Islam - in any shape or form - Muslims resident in this country will support the cause of Islam. There is no love for the British: we are just a source of welfare payments and material provision that would be impossible in Pakistan and Somalia (the reason immigrants come here).

You state the following: ‘It is vital that we make the distinction between religion on the one hand, and political ideology on the other. Time and again people equate the two’. Again, your attempt to separate religion from ideology is doomed to failure for the obvious reason that Islam, the ideology-religion, recognises no lay principle: it is all or nothing; it is Islam for the believers; Dhimmitude for the rest. Consequently, whatever action Western governments take to neutralise what they believe to be the purely political, ideological aspect of Islam, will always be interpreted as an attack on Islam as a whole. Indeed, such measures will be an attack on Islam as a whole since Islam does not recognise the division between state and civil society; the right of the individual to resist its collectivist ethos (just like communism incidentally).

The other factor that makes Islam a threat to the Christian West is the birth rate among Islamic immigrants resident in the West. The huge increase in the Muslim population throughout the West may well turn out to be the decisive factor that overwhelms the white indigenous population in their ancient lands, reducing them to a suppressed minority. In all the discussions about rising food prices, metals, access to water and productive farm land no one wishes to identify the real problem: specifically the reckless and unsustainable breeding of Third World Populations either in the Third World itself or in the Third World estates that Third-Worlders have been allowed to create in the First World.

You cite what has happened on the streets of Tunis and Cairo as an example of the compatibility of Western values and Islam: ‘hundreds of thousands of people demanding the universal right to free elections and democracy’. Middle-class, English-speaking protesters might well press the right buttons when interviewed by some BBC reporter but the underlying problem of Arab states and Sub-Saharan Africa is massive, out-of-control and unsustainable population growth. This is the Malthusian nightmare writ large and it is being played out all over the Third World. Egypt’s unemployed will remain unemployed (many of them are unemployable in any case). Hunger and hopelessness will gnaw at them. The results are predictable. Democracy and civil society are preposterous and irrelevant abstractions outside of Western Europe and will not feed people, certainly not in Egypt and Sub-Saharan Africa. Where populations spiral out of control, as they are doing in so many parts of the world, violence, exacerbated by religious/ideological fanaticism, is inevitable.

Concerning multiculturalism in the United Kingdom you state the following:

Under the doctrine of state multiculturalism, we have encouraged different cultures to live separate lives, apart from each other and apart from the mainstream. We’ve failed to provide a vision of society to which they feel they want to belong. We’ve even tolerated these segregated communities behaving in ways that run completely counter to our values.

For the avoidance of any doubt your repeated exculpatory use of “we” does not include me and, I suspect, millions of other Britons. Your use of ‘we’ refers to the last Labour government and the xenophiles who sought to impose the anti-white racist cult of multiculturalism on the indigenous population. It is emphatically not the responsibility of the indigenous population ‘to provide a vision of a society to which they [immigrants] feel they want to belong’. If, according to you, the ‘we’ failed to provide this vision, then why did millions of Islamic immigrants join the first wave who could not find this ‘vision’? If they have no ‘vision of society to which they feel they want to belong’ why do they stay? Why not go home to Somalia, Waziristan and Sub-Saharan Africa? That these millions of immigrants have no ‘vision of society to which they feel they want to belong’ yet still stay in the Christian-infidel-infested wasteland of Britain suggests to me that their continued presence in Britain has everything to do with the fantastically generous welfare provision they receive (all the wives included) and absolutely nothing at all to do with any lack of ‘vision of society’.

You have been reported as saying that multiculturalism has failed. I see no clear statement of that in your speech at all. In fact, you claim that it is the indigenous population that has driven Muslims into their parallel societies. That you are still advocating some form of the cult is clear when you argue that ‘instead of encouraging people to live apart, we need a clear sense of shared national identity that is open to everyone’. National identity by its very nature is exclusive, partial and narrow. A national identity that is ‘open to everyone’ is not a national identity. National identity is determined by a combination of genetic, racial, cultural, psychological, geographical, linguistic and mental factors, tempered by the blows of history, by shared suffering in war and peace, by humiliation and glory, by the memory of those gone before. How can my English national identity be open to everyone? The answer is that it cannot. National identity that is open to everyone ceases to be a national identity; national identity that is open to everyone is just another way of promoting multiculturalism without using the m-word. In other words, it is a deceit, a ploy to disarm the critics of multiculturalism who have instinctively and rationally apprehended the cult’s national-identity-hating agenda all along. As an Englishman who still values his national identity I have no desire at all to share it with others. Do Pakistanis, Indians, Chinese, Japanese and Zulus want to share their national identity with me? Of course not: and why should they? It is their exclusive property.

Nor do immigrants wish to share their identity with white Europeans. When, in 2008, he addressed a large Turkish audience in Cologne, the Turkish Prime Minister, Reccep Erdogan was quite clear by what he understood on the question of integration. He told his audience: ‘I understand the sensitivity you show towards the question of assimilation. Nobody can expect that you tolerate assimilation. Nobody can expect that you submit yourself to assimilation. Then assimilation is a crime against humanity.’ Erdogan’s vision of how he expects Turks to behave in Europe is just one of a number of reasons why a Muslim non-European state such as Turkey can have no place at all in the EU.

You argue that Muslims are attracted to extremism from a sense of not belonging. Again you claim that this is the failure of ‘the wider society’. You might like to ask yourself why indigenous Britons - ‘the wider society’ - do not wish to engage with Muslims. Here are some of the reasons why indigenous, white Christian (or heathen) Britons want nothing to do with Islam: Tuesday 11th September 2001; Thursday 7th July 2005; suicide-homicide bombers; sharia; jihad; the obscene practice of female circumcision; so-called honour killings; stoning women to death; polygamy, the sexual grooming of white girls; extreme censorship; hatred of free speech; welfare parasitism; mosques; continuing, active terroristic hatred of white European host societies; and the cruel murders of Christians in the Middle East (and Turkey).

I am not convinced that you are serious about combatting the damage done by multiculturalism. If you are then the following measures should be taken:

(i). in the interests of clarity and in order to remove any remaining ambiguities you shall publicly state that multiculturalism has failed in the United Kingdom and that it shall no longer be promoted as policy, above all in education, so that white indigenous children are not denied their history, culture and national pride to which they are entitled and that where such subjects are taught they are not taught in away that denigrates the great achievements of Britain across the entire spectrum of human endeavour;

(ii). the government shall acknowledge that the Macpherson Report (1999) has had a disastrous effect on policing especially in large cities with large black populations and shall publicly disown the report’s central conclusions and recommendations;

(iii). the Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000 shall be repealed along with all other legislation which aims to stifle free speech under the banner of preventing ‘hate speech’ and which leads to the persecution of white critics of multiculturalism;

(iv). the Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC), the successor body to the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE), shall be disbanded immediately;

(v). the government shall set a limit on the number of immigrants skilled or otherwise, who are permitted to work in this country. The option of working in this country implies no right to citizenship;

(vi). the government shall make it clear in a statement that there shall be no amnesty for illegal immigrants currently resident in the United Kingdom;

(vii). the government shall issue a personal apology to Mr Ray Honeyford, the former Bradford headmaster who warned of the dangers of multiculturalism in1982 and who for his honesty and professional decency was vilified by xenophile extremists and abandoned;

(viii). with immediate effect the government shall ensure that efficient and relentless border control and surveillance (entry and departure) shall be implemented. Such measures will include the explicit use of racial profiling;

(ix). the government shall take all necessary measures to ensure that illegal immigrants are hunted down, rounded up and immediately deported. Where possible the government shall aggressively seek to recover the costs associated with the deportation from the illegal immigrants themselves: property, bank accounts, valuable metals (gold, platinum), cars and so on;

(x). those employers who employ illegal immigrants shall be subject to severe financial penalties and where judged appropriate terms of imprisonment;

(xi). the government shall remove all welfare payments from the huge underclass so that the recipients of state benefits are obliged to work (this removes or weakens the incentive from employers to hire illegal immigrants);

(xii). the government of the United Kingdom shall declare that under no circumstances will the creation of an independent Islamic/Muslim state ever be permitted within the territory of the United Kingdom;

(xiii). the government of the United Kingdom shall declare that the provisions of Sharia are incompatible with the legal, political and cultural traditions of the United Kingdom and that the exercise of Sharia shall not be permitted within the United Kingdom and that any of judgements as may be made by Sharia courts shall enjoy no legal or special cultural status;

(xiv) the government shall initiate an International Church and Mosque Comparison Study (ICMCS). The aim of ICMCS shall be to ascertain the status of Christian churches, artifacts and believers in all Muslim states and the degree to which Christians endure persecution and terror. ICMCS will pay very close attention to the status of Christianity in those states that provide the main Muslim immigrants currently resident in the United Kingdom. A key part of ICMCS will be to ascertain whether the number of mosques existing or planned in the United Kingdom is too high relative to the number of immigrants themselves and whether the number of Christian churches in the immigrant homelands is too low.

Finally, I challenge the Prime Minister David Cameron MP or a senior member of the government to debate multiculturalism and the challenge posed by Islam, immigration and related problems with me on prime time live television. The terms and conditions of any debate (time, format, audience selection; lighting, citing of cameras, among other things) shall be a matter of discussion and formal written agreement between Ellis, Cameron and the television broadcaster.

Yours sincerely

Frank Ellis


Anonymous said...


Anonymous said...

May I be the first to say what a fan bloody tastic letter you've written Frank.

You've done something very special for our kinfolk and I thank you.


bupkiss o'toole said...


Dr.D said...

Sadly, I think it is perfectly obvious that Dave did not mean a word of it. It was all "just politics."

As long as we credit Cameron with having an IQ above room temperature (either Celsius or Fahrenheit), it is patently obvious that his call to "wake up" is phony; he knows what has been going on, and he knows that everyone else knows as well. He is urinating on your leg and telling you that it is raining. Will you believe him, or will someone call him on it?

Anonymous said...

These so called leaders are supposed to be representative of the people that elected them. this is however not the case, as these people are representatives of the global elite.

They are in fact non representative representatives.

The agenda of the global elite is to create a uniform classless, raceless society world wide and they can only this through the application of multiculturalism.

This is the reason why food aid has been given to Africa for decades, as it enables them to multiply.

Mass immigration is the tool that enables multiculturalism. Ask any white African and he will tell you the intricate process of emigrating. For blacks it is easier to emigrate, due to the political agenda.

Cultural Marxism was created because the white middle class proved to difficult to mobilize.

The cultural Marxist revolutionaries are in place in the Western countries and whites will have to wake up to the fact that they are going to need to mobilize if they want to ensure the survival of their race.

What we need is some men of old. Egypt should be a good example. These non representative representatives should be eliminated/replaced via rolling mass action.

Bastion said...

I have read this three times and it is more powerful on each reading.

What Dr. Ellis says is indisputable, which is why the establishment will not respond

bluehorse9 said...

Outreach -

Great work, Sarah. The word is spreading. Make the hits count.

Meanwhile -

Perhaps you should give your namesake a call for a feature :-)

Best wishes.

Waes Hael said...

Cameron is just telling people what they want to hear.

He is folding under pressure from nationalists, as the national movement is growing throughout Europe and in some countries already have power.

What he says now and what he does will be two completely different things.

Average Joe said...

Actually the people who were active in the IRA belong to the tribes of Ireland rather than the British Isles. The English are more closely related to the Germans than they are to the Irish since they are descended from Anglo-Saxon invaders who came to Britain around 1500 years ago. While "British Isles" makes sense as a geographic term it does not make sense as a genetic one since the Irish are a Celtic people - like the Welsh - while the English are a Germanic one.

Anonymous said...

The upper class in gov are systematically taking apart the welfare state bit by bit with it the working class culture. The credit crunch/global warming all tactics to confuse while they carry out there nefarious agenda. The trades union are well aware of it and are holding token marches, the truth is the leaders of the union are upper class scum and they are well looked after in real terms they are doing nothing, except lead he members up a blind ally. The head of the unite union was in Poland recruiting workers into his union knowing full well they would be taking jobs of British workers How underhanded and two faced is that. Once we loose the welfare state. Then no one gets rent paid. No one gets benefits. No one gets medical care unless you can pay. Like in other countries you pay try charity or die. No pensions. No jobs. Only the BNP will stop this.
What have the axis of evil done for Britain in 60 years?? What have they invested in manufacturing? Soon hospitals that they have used taxpayer’s money to modernise will be sold off and become private, that’s why they call you a customer.
Tax tax tax . With most being given away in foreign aid. The upper class scum has robbed us yet people still vote for them WHY?
You can never rise above a certain level ever wonder why? Its to keep you in your place.
They took us into the E/U so they could make more money denying us a referendum because they new we would reject it.
They have flooded our land with foreigners without consulting us because they see it as there land not ours.
They have invested in India. China. etc; to make money for them nothing for Britain and the working class.
They have taken away on purpose our jobs. Clothing. Docks. Fishing. Mines. These things built our nation using child labour now gone with the sole intention of destroying the working class and its power. It is simply they and we.
Saudi Arabia one of the richest nations in the world. Gives nothing to its lower caste. They starve live in 1890 style poverty and get no access to medical care unless it’s charity, so much for your fellow man. The same can be said for many nations in the world. Britain was the envy of everyone. Within 15year’s we will be the same as India. Pakistan GOD HELP OUR CHILDREN. Grandchildren..
The new world order will be one of billionaires and dire poverty, where do you and your family fit in this.
Time to ask why you vote for them? What have they done for you?
They have taken us from the richest nation on the planet by sheer incompetence or on purpose to a third world state; I believe it’s on purpose.
The local councils have to save money, are any taking a wage cut out of the millions they are pocketing. No why not /every one else is. Are the politicians taking a cut of any kind I mean a real cut NO why not, I thought we where in this together they are really taking the pi**? Out of the working class.
These people are ripping us off why vote for them?
Time to look after our children’s future. Have the guts stand up and be counted while we still have a chance.
They have lied with every word. Iraq. Afghanistan WAR . for gas and oil .Its our kids being killed not the cotton wool upper class kids living in mansions flying around the world.
Man made global warming. Credit crunch We pay them they take from us

VOTE BNP before it’s to late

misterfox said...

This Pat Condell on "The Taste of MultiCulturalism" which supports Frank's outstanding article.

misterfox said...

People have been asking about what happened to the American Renaissance conference. Those who paid $10 dollars for NPITV's proposed live streaming are receiving downloads and later DVD's. Because it had to be cancelled they made arrangements and got a room where the speakers could give their addresses.
I don't know whether you can get this or not but I am sending the link in case. It is Filip Dewinter on "The New Muslim Invasion of Europe."

Lisel said...

1. The Government must reveal the truth about the population decline of indigenous Britains.

2. It must dispel the absurd contradiction of overpopulation of the world but underpopulation of Britain that is used as an argument for a massive influx of immigrants.

3. It must support culturally and financially the repopulation of Britain by its indigenous people. This may include the fast tracking of returning indigenous Britains from other countries such as Canada and the United States.

4. It must give real support to Ireland & Scotland with the goal of a rock solid united Britain. It can do this by standing with them and encouraging them to reject EU slavery and demanding greedy banks and bondholders wear the consequences of their own actions.

5. It must publically accept responsiblity for its actions in South Africa during the Boer War and immediately issue all White South Africans with a British passport and put them at the head of the queue for immigrantion.

Valeofignorance said...

Excellent article! I hope your challenge is accepted - the people of Britain and Europe deserve to know their fate. But in all probability they will be ignored - as usual.

Laager said...

If anyone wants a real live example of the failure of a mult-culti society today, look no further than South Africa.

Unlike the USA, Canada, Australia and New Zealand where immigrants from Europe turned the indigenous populations into a minority in the land of their birth, South African settlers have always lived with the reality if being the minority.

Like the other 4 nations the white settlers built a viable nation with a thriving economy which benefitted everyone - settler and native alike.

The Apartheid policy - Seperate Development in English - was the name given by the National Party in 1948 to the existing status quo. A plethora of laws beginning with the British Crown Colony of the Cape in 1806 prescribed the co-existance of settler and native.

The ultimate objective of the Apartheid policies was to create self sustaining independent states for the 9 southern African black nations. A federal system similar to the United Kingdom was envisaged. To this end 56% of the nations tax revenue was being invested in black infrastructural development.

The United Nations passed a resolution describing this policy as a "crime against humanity".

The black population bred at a rate 7 times greater than the white population (thanks to white health care, stable food supply and nutrition) thus ensuring that objectives could never be attained. All the visible poverty was constantly blamed on apartheid and not the reality that black South African's were not behaving reponsibly by limiting their numbers, getting educated and contributing to society in meaningful jobs.

The liberal western media ensured that this truth was never revealed to the world and that the minority white population was blamed for all the problems. The west actively participated in the removal of a Christian, democratic, capitalist government which supported the west.

Today, 20 years after the end of apartheid and 16 years after black majority rule, what do we see?

The most developed country on the African continent sliding into the same abyss as Zimbabwe.

Worse, we see an open hunting season on white citizens who created the prosperity for all in the first place. Approximately 40,000+ white citizens have been randomly slain and brutally butchered since "freedom" in 1994

I urge all European citizens who have read Dr Ellis' open letter to heed the issues he is raising.

White Europe has abandoned their decendents in South Africa. The day of reckoning for Europe is fast approaching as a result of the open gates immigration and political asylum policies of the European and Scandinavian countries.

If you value white civilisation and want to save it, then it is time to pull up the drawbridge.

Like their counterparts in Zimbabwe, white South Africans must now face the reality of multculturism as the majority black population seek their removal from all aspects of life.