Only hours after updating the figure representing the number of South African Farmers who have fallen victim top the on-going anti-white genocide in that benighted country, I have had to do so again as news of further death torture and cruelty has been brought to me.
In the early hours of this morning on their farm in Limpopo, 15 men tied up a 40 year old man and beat him to death before gang raping the man's wife before turning on the couple's four-year-old daughter and seriously assaulting her.
The farmer's widow and child were taken to a nearby hospital, where they are described as traumatised.
The motive of the attack remains unclear, and nothing was taken.
News report
_______________
Hat Tip: Johann, Jennifer and Nu Ultra
Tia Mysoa
21 comments:
Truly shocking to read. I havn't got words to express my sorrow and anger right now. Hopefully God can bless the mother and child.
CSA
Thank you for the blog and taking the time to make people aware of the problem.It is appreciated more than you know.
Arthur Kemp has said previously that the only hope for Whites in SA is to gather into a single, concentrated area with no blacks among them. There they would have to provide all of their own labor, but they might be able to defend themselves against the surrounding black hoards.
As long as Whites remain dispersed throughout the land, two or three here and there, they are sitting ducks to be picked off at leisure by the blacks. This is so painfully obvious I really do not know why it is not evident to the remaining Whites. Evidently they are attached to their possessions, their farms, houses, businesses, etc. to the point that they are unwilling to give them up. Also, there seems to be a lack of leadership directing such a gathering. This failure to gather together will be their eventual complete undoing.
Dr.D
You can not be more correct.How many more will die before we realize it.People wait for the killing to start according to a old boer prophet.(It is also of relevance to Europe and England and worth a read.)But the killing has started already and is underway how many more should die before we realize it.Prophet or no prophet unity is our only way to survive here and there.Van Rensburg made predictions about the foreign invasion of England and Europe by immigrants and predicted the same murder and chaos there.
It is very clear that this is underway.One only has to look at the internet to see the temperature rise in Europe the UK and the USA.I think Van Rensburg died in 1917 so his ramblings just seem too accurate to ignore.
The weakness of Boers is that they can not do without black labour. If they have several of these people living on their farms and working in heir houses a time of race war, what do they expect?
Ireally don't thhink they have a future. Their solid, stolid practical values are not helping them and their old fashioned style has blundered into the wrong era. Their tradition of employing Black labour has too. Its their undoing.
I admit that I have never been there and might not fully understand the situation but that bit seems very clear to me.
Anonymous, you really are getting interesting. Who is Van Rensberg? I had never heard of him.
Here is the link to what Wikipedia says about Siener van Rensburg
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siener_van_Rensburg
Mister Fox, I think you miss the point on one matter. South African Whites must give up their black labor all together, and that can be done. There is no reason that White people cannot do farm labor. It has been done in America, Australia, and elsewhere, and it is simply mistaken to think that White people cannot do it. There is a cultural bias amongst SA Whites against doing this work, but that must be overcome if they are to have any chance at all of survival.
White people in SA (and elsewhere in the world as well) must be prepared to do their own labor without the help of other races. We must live by ourselves, in isolation, as the only way we can survive. In mixed societies, we will be absorbed; miscegenation and murder will be the end of the White race.
Mr D you are correct , many of the Boers have done the work themselves.Unfortunately I think we got lazy and it might end up costing our lives, there is a afrikaans sayin "goedkoop is duurkoop" meaning that to buy cheaply will cost you later, and look at our cost now ?????
Amd Misterfox is right too, we are too old fashioned in many ways but i think that if a war breaks out those values might save us, because inherent in them is to fight and die for your children and your people and we also have a bit of old wordly discipline.And to this day most boers are good with guns.I hope we dont have to fight, enough of our people are dead already, but if we dont make a plan soon we will be in trouble.
Dr.D,
I expressed myself ambiguously. I meant that they don't think they can do without Black labour not that they can not.
Annonymous, I hope you are right and I think you are about the discipline and manliness of Boers. In a way you are like The Lions I recently wrote about but need to learn some cunning like foxes to win through your situation.
A similar figure, Ian Smith could not believe the deceit and dishonesty of the Fox Harold Wilson! We are in a cheats game.
@ misterfox
There is an angle that you never seem to follow when looking at farm labourers. Most South African farmers would love to stop employing labourers and actually go the mechanised route. However, the government does not allow them and makes them stick to labour intensive farming methods. Also, many South African farms are much bigger than their Northern Hemisphere counterparts. Therefore a necessity for labour or mechanisation.
With regard to laying off your workers and employing white farm workers. Just a quick question, Have you guys lived in South Africa post 1994? The labour laws specifically make it extremely difficult to lay off labourers without going through many hoops. If farmers suddenly had to just relieve all their workers of their jobs, there would be a massive uproar, both by government and the media. This would lead to many more farm murders than we are experiencing currently, as this seems to be the method used by the black populace to show their anger and hatred towards the farmer. I believe that for farmers safety they have to keep their cards extremely close to their chests and in the short term have to keep employing black farm workers to keep both the local communities happy and the people fed. While I morally don't agree with it, legally they are left with few other choices at the moment.
Please take these and many other issues faced by these farmers into account before making hasteful judgements on them. They do, through herioc measures, feed the population of South Africa while putting their lives at risk, day in and day out.
Thanks CSA
I think Mister Fox makes a very valid point. Were a farmer to only hire white workers (and there are plenty of poor whites in need of the work) they would be prosecuted for breaking black empowerment laws, (affirmative action)especially if they had first dismissed black workers.
Sorry I should have said that it was Concerned South African who made the point I referred to
"Motive for the attack is unknown"...utter bullsh*t.It is genocide and the whole bloody world knows it.
Siener Van Rensburg had visions. I am not going to get into a debate whether it is true or not, but to say (without getting into a debate) that a lot of what what he saw in the 1900's has come true in the past 10 years or so.
I don't know bout making "hastful" judgements I wrote an article in defencebof Boers around 18 months ago and would write more if I could get information.
It was people I talked to who told me the use of Black labour was a tradition they had become dependent on. I did not know it was law. As I acknowledged I have never been to SA but employing Blacks is not a recent development is it?
During apartheid and the Black fight for rights, when they were fighting you, you still had them in your houses and on your farms.
http://thegreenarrow.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=mrfox&action=display&thread=6041
@ misterfox
Thanks for the response mate. To make sense of the past in South Africa I think you have to draw a line between the moderate black of South Africa and the ANC militant side of the black.
Boers have employed blacks, coloureds and even whites to work for them. This issue is not in debate. When Boers first trekked out the Cape they brought some of their workers with them. They were not slaves and stayed willingly with their white employers. I call these moderate blacks or coloureds. They worked for white farmers as working atleast fed them and indeed payed them far better than if they worked for black farmers anywhere else in Southern Africa. This was most certainly true during Apartheid as well as currently in South Africa under ANC rule.
The militant black came about in the 1960s with the ANC founding its militant wing under Nelson Mandela. Remeber that during Apartheid, any black who may have had different ideas to the ANC was dealt with harshly(i.e. necklacing and torture). The difference between these two groups is fading as the racial tensions in South Africa grow, as seen in the news and on internet blogs such as this.
The reason I would like to draw your attention to this, is to try and show why it was to the benefit of Boers to employ blacks back in the day. Most blacks before 1960 were merely looking for work and pay. They could be bargained with and did not have the severe hate towards farmers as they seem to have today.
Back to the present, I believe that most white South African farmers would like to get rid of the workers that seem to hate them and employ white farm labourers or indeed, as previously stated in my last comment, mechanise their farms. It is now the ANC, Cosatu trade unions and also farm workers that stand in their way. Labour Law in South Africa has heavy emphasis placed on protection of workers and labourers. This is where my disagreement with your comments come in. I believe it is not that Boers cannot do farming without blacks. I believe that forces outside the Boers' control do not want them to use other methods to farm and thus maintain pressure on these farmers to keep them dependant on black labour.
With the current laws of South Africa and the current level of hate of black towards white, I believe it is prudent for white farmers to have a steady and slow effort to ween themselves off their reliance on black labour. Fast enough to get them off black labour in 10 years or less but slow enough not to bring too much of the spotlight on to them.
To finish off, in my opinion I feel that it is unnecessary and potentially dangerous to keep telling South African farmers to just dump their work force. While I agree that they should for their own safety, this should be done in an organised manner to inflict the least harm to these farmers and their families.
Thanks CSA
Birdman, i think only a fool will dispute that there are at least a uncomfortable amount of truth in Sieners visions, I walked into the office of a black high court judge once and he was reading a book about the prophet , he could not hide the book fast enough when he saw me.
Both concerned south african and misterfox is right , the farmers are aware of that and i have no doubt they could come up with a solution, i really dont think it is a matter of hasty judgemet as much as it is an expression of the whites(our real extended family) in other countries feeling our frustration and trying to help with their views, and face it we are going to need all the help we can get.
I would be very grateful to anyone for quotes or links to Siener Van Rensburg's visions of the invasion of Britain. That would be very useful.
MF
@ anon 18 April 2010 13:07
I am in complete agreement with you on this. We as South Africans need as many allies as we can get. My comments should in no way be thought of as not taking advice or criticism from misterfox. I take those glady, but when I think that some points are not taken into consideration, I will mention them. As I feel I have done with my previous comments on this article.
Thanks to Sarah for posting my thoughts on this matter as I hope they add some ideas to peoples minds.
CSA
If I Rememeber correctly Siener basically said that England will be trampled to mud by all the foreign feet, and she (England) will lose her power as a world player.Keep in mind that people that followed his advice or listened to his warnings usually escaped the danger, so it is not set in stone so to speak.I will get the exact quotation and leave a comment here.Also keep in mind that much of what he said is used by various people for advancement of their own agenda.
Why this point is so interesting to me is that I have a friend that lives in London for the past 6 years and he commented on the increase of foreigners there in the short time that he lived there, and how it is clear that the British just dont get African culture at all and are not able to see whats coming .My view is that England is a powerhouse of western culture and that the loss of English culture would be a very, very sad day to all white people.I am sure that the multicult cant wait to see a non white queen .
meanwhile...the German media shows us how French police men instruct the SA police how to face the biggest danger for the world cup and the visitors of SA:European Hooligans.
Post a Comment