Thursday, 31 December 2009

On the cusp of history


Well, here we are, 2010, the end of what must be the most disastrous decade to have hit our country in half a century. Maybe worse than that, in terms of the effect which the first decade of the 21st Century has had upon the native population of these Islands, the last ten years may have caused more lasting damage than any our people have ever lived through.

In the first decade of this century we came closer to being replaced within out homeland than we ever have before.

What has been done to us we allowed to be done. In the past, our people stood together and faced down war, plague and hardship. This time we neither stood together nor faced up the the threat before us, indeed, most of our people surrendered and laid down their children's future, their children's heritage, for temporary comfort and for fear of a word.

In the past we have always survived what our country faced, yet because this time we surrendered, for the first time in a thousand years, it is by no means certain that we will survive what has overtaken us in the last ten years.

We are a wounded people, we are an occupied people and most dangerously we are a disunited people.

Has it all been bad? For myself, this has been the first decade I spent as an orphan, and yet it was the first I spent entirely as a wife and mother, for it was only in the final years of the previous decade that I was either. Personally it was ten years which brought me unbearable grief, but also great joy. Yet I don't think my country felt much joy.

What of the future? We are embarking upon a decade during which our people will face what may be the greatest challenge we have ever faced, not only because the threat is so huge, but also because we have never before been so damaged. But we must face the challenge, and we must defeat it, for if we have not done so by the end on the next decade, then the chance may be lost forever.

I believe we can prevail, we are a brave, resourceful and determined people, when we decide to be. We have been lost for a while, yet we can still find our way back. There are signs that the slumbering lion within the souls of our people is stirring and he can still awake in time, it remains only for us to call to him.

I wish you all a peaceful and joyous new year, but remember, we stand on the cusp of history, where we stand in ten year from now will determine whether our history is over, or whether we as a people will have faced down a deadly foe and emerged, harmed certainly, scarred without question, wiser we hope, but still as a nation, intact and with a future.

Be brave, for we can, and must, succeed.

Tuesday, 29 December 2009

Monday, 28 December 2009

Unequal Science

If they can't raise the standard ............
Berkeley High School is considering a controversial proposal to eliminate science labs and the five science teachers who teach them to free up more resources to help struggling students.

The proposal to put the science-lab cuts on the table was approved recently by Berkeley High's School Governance Council, a body of teachers, parents, and students who oversee a plan to change the structure of the high school to address Berkeley's dismal racial achievement gap, where white students are doing far better than the state average while black and Latino students are doing worse.

Paul Gibson, an alternate parent representative on the School Governance Council, said that information presented at council meetings suggests that the science labs were largely classes for white students. He said the decision to consider cutting the labs in order to redirect resources to underperforming students was virtually unanimous.

...The full plan to close the racial achievement gap by altering the structure of the high school is known as the High School Redesign.

-source

The world it seems does not need more scientists - it needs more basketball players
____________________
Hat Tip: RR

News from the blood spattered rainbow

The following two news items, neither of which will appear in the western media give a glimpse of reality within the new South Africa following the end of the reviled Apartheid system and the ascendancy of the sainted Nelson Mandela and his successors.

Another farmer has died cruelly in South Africa, the news story has not yet reached the English speaking news outlets, however, Dina, one of my South African readers and a regular source of information has kindly translated the report in the Afrikaans news, which I have summarised as follows:

Farmer murdered in front of his family

Peter Snyman a farmer in his late 50's, who was left helpless with his hands tied behind his back, hanging from the bath handle, died in his wife's arms in their farm house near Mara. Mr Snyman had been attacked by four assailants and suffered several panga (machete) strikes to the head as well as being stabbed in the chest with a hunting knife. The attack took place in front of Peter Snyman's family.

The attackers, armed with hunting knives and a panga, had earlier overpowered Mrs Jeanine Snyman and the couple's 12 year old daughter daughter, Sharon (12) inside their house.

According to reports, the woman and child were repeatedly assaulted & tied up in the bathroom. When Mr Snyman, who had been working else where on the farm arrived he was also overpowered, tied up and dragged into the bathroom where his wife and daughter were being held. When the older daughter Tracy arrived she was also attacked and tied up with her family

The murderers demanded money & weapons, whilst repeatedly attacking Mr Snyman with the panga. They then locked the family in the bathroom and searched the house.

The three traumatised women eventually managed to free themselves and Mrs Snyman held her fatally injured husband in her arms until he died.

When the police arrived on the scene, they refused to enter the building, until after neighbouring farmers had checked the house to make sure it is safe.

Snyman's body was found in the bathroom with gaping wounds to the head. His hands were still tied.

News source

According to my calculations, Mr Snyman is the 3,080th white farmer to die since the end of Apartheid*

WARNING: readers may find the following story disturbing as it involves the torture and murder of a small child

Mutilated toddler: 2 arrested

Two men have been arrested in connection with the murder of a 3-year-old girl whose body was found mutilated in Thabong over the weekend, Free State police said on Sunday.

Inspector Malebo Khosana said the men, aged 28 and 40, were arrested following intensive investigations into the murder of Onele Galata whose body was found on Saturday.

The toddler went missing on Christmas Day and a case was opened on Saturday morning.

Her body was found with multiple stab wounds to her face and body on Saturday afternoon at B-Hostel in Masole Street.

The child's private parts had been removed while her intestines were left protruding out of her body.

The news item goes on disingenuously to state that “The motive for the killing is still unknown” whereas the reporter knows just as well as we do that this is a muti killing, where body parts were taken from the child, whilst she was alive and conscious, for use in tribal medicine.

News source

______________________
Hat Tip: Dina

* I am only able to report the number of deaths which I am made aware of and which I have been able to verify. Retired Dutch journalist Adriana Stuijt who runs the Censor Bugbear Reports and Afrikana Genocide Archives and who has researched the subject in considerable detail reports that the total number of such death is in fact 3,119. I highly recommend Ms Stuijt's two excellent sites to all my readers

Tory Welsh Assembly Member leads Islamic March through Welsh town

Click on the image to watch the video at the Home of the Green Arrow, and then please pass on the link.

Sunday, 27 December 2009

A Message to Hans from Zambia

Could Hans from Zambia, whi left a series of comments on my "Mandela the legend and the Legacy" article in August last year please contact me at sarahmaidofalbion@gmail.com as I have a message for you.

Oliver Skeete - Pride of the UAF

Two news reports:

Champion horseman Oliver Skeete yesterday warned the BNP is trying to turn back the clock on racism as our Hope not Hate bus reached the Midlands.

Oliver, 53, who met our bus in Leicester to back its message of tolerance, said: "I love this campaign.

"My dad was confronted by signs saying no dogs, no blacks, no Irish. Now you've got the BNP trying to turn back the clock. We should never go back to those days."

Having won "black Briton" Skeete's endorsement the Hype not hope bus trundles on to spread more lies and disinformation.

News source

The Sun 19 December 2009: Skeete on £2k rap

Showjumper Oliver Skeete has been charged with stealing �2,100 cash from his stables.

The dreadlocked dad of six - who once dated glamour girl Jordan - was arrested and bailed by police to appear before Bromley Magistrates' Court on Christmas Eve.

He is charged with two counts of theft from Ringlands Stables in Biggin Hill, Kent
News source

Kind of figures huh?

______________________

Hat Tip: Mister Fox

Yet again a "British" connection

Given how the terror attack at Fort Hood has been covered up and dressed as something entirely different than what it actually was, how long do you expect it will be before the news media are trying to persuade us that wearing explosive underwear is merely a fashion statement?

Was anyone surprised to discover that the 23 year old Nigerian who allegedly attempted to bring down a crowded aircraft landing at Detroit airport on Christmas day, by detonating his explosive packed Y-Fronts, had very recently been a British resident? A British resident, no less who lived at an address so exclusive that most British natives wouldn't have a hope of living there outside their dreams.

Of course he had lived in Britain, virtually every crazed terrorist, every genocidal maniac and every radicalised nutter on Planet Earth has lived in Britain at some point, or, in some cases, continue to do so. What our leaders refuse to admit is that if you open your doors to everyone some very unpleasant people will walk in.

At the present time the evil men whom we have permitted to make Britain their commant post mostly use our country as a base where they can plot acts of terrorism, or as a staging post when carrying out attacks elsewhere in the world. However, that will not last, and the day will come when we will reap the whirlwind for what we have allowed to happen.

Changing Reality - By Mister Fox

By Mister Fox

Two surprising articles about race and the First World recently appeared in the world’s media: the first in Britain and the other in Russia. Both revealed startling truths which are worth considering in detail.

In Britain, Rod Liddle wrote the wrong thing on his Spectator blog about two black youths who conspired to push a pregnant woman into a canal as part of a failed murder plot: “The overwhelming majority of street crime, knife crime, gun crime, robbery and crimes of sexual violence in London is carried out by young men from the African-Caribbean community. In return for all this crime, the black community has given Britain ‘rap music, goat curry and a far more vibrant and diverse understanding of cultures which were once alien to us’. For which, many thanks.”

The Thought Police immediately stepped in to suppress this way of thinking. The Thought Police have been described as an “ideological caste” because they are an elite who hold power and grant patronage to people who say the right things and destroy those who transgress. (Where is Ron Atkinson the former manager and TV football pundit?) To get into power say the right things; to stay in power, say the right things.

In response to Mr Liddle’s comments, Diane Abbott, MP for Hackney, retreated into history to try to denigrate his accurate comments by comparing him to fascist leader Oswald Mosley.

Yet on her blog, Ms Abbott once admitted: “Sadly 80 percent of gun crime in London is ‘black-on-black,’ often involving boys in their teens. As a black woman and the mother of a teenage son, this is frightening and wholly unacceptable.”

So frightening and unacceptable that Ms Abbot sent her children to a fee-paying school rather than to a local state secondary. In her own words, “too many black boys were unsuccessful within inner-city state schools.”

Ministry of Justice figures for 2007/2008 claim that only 2.2 percent of Britons aged ten or above are black, yet 14 percent of criminal cases tried in a crown court involve black suspects. For some crimes, the figures are even more alarming. One controversial report conducted by Scotland Yard last year found that more than half of teen knife crime offences in the capital involve black suspects.

Two years ago the Commons home affairs committee warned of a “serious crisis” among Britain’s young black community.

The public are given a false view of reality so that they cannot make a mature decision on the important topics of the day. Democracy is only possible when adults make mature decisions based on the facts.

Yet the Western media deny the public the facts and thereby have corrupted the political process. How many Europeans have ever heard of the Knoxville murders when a gang of blacks brutally murdered an innocent white couple? The case contained horrific details and if the races of the perpetrators and victims had been reversed, the whole world would know about it.

In that case, Hugh Christopher Newsom, Jr., 23, and Channon Gail Christian, 21, were both raped and murdered after being kidnapped early on the morning of January 7, 2007. Five blacks were arrested and a grand jury indicted four on counts of murder, robbery, kidnapping, rape and theft.

Three of those arrested, Letalvis D. Cobbins, Lemaricus Davidson and George Thomas, have been convicted on multiple charges including several counts of felony murder. Another has been convicted of federal charges as accessory after the fact to carjacking.

According to the testimony of the Knox County Acting Medical Examiner Dr Darinka Mileusnic-Polchan at the subsequent trial of Eric Boyd, Newsom was repeatedly raped with an object and then blindfolded, gagged, arms and feet bound and his head covered. Barefoot, he was either led or dragged outside the house to a set of nearby railroad tracks. He was shot in the back of the head, the neck, and the back, and his body then set on fire.

Christian’s death came only after hours of sexual torture, medical examiner Mileusnic-Polchan testified. Christian suffered horrific injuries to her vagina, anus and mouth. She was not only raped but savaged with “an object,” possibly a broken chair leg, the doctor testified. She was beaten in the head. Some type of chemical was poured down her throat, and her body, including her bleeding and battered genital area, likely scrubbed with the same solution – all while Christian was alive, the forensic expert said. She was then “hog-tied,” with curtains and strips of bedding, her face covered tightly with a small trash bag and her body stashed inside five large trash bags before being placed inside a large trash can and covered with sheets. Christian died slowly, suffocating, the medical examiner said.

Despite these horrific details, the international press, including CNN, have ignored the story. In Britain, only one paper, The Daily Mail, in Britain dared mention it: “Ironically, the case has now generated more publicity surrounding the furore over whether or not political correctness was behind the US media’s decision to largely ignore the story than it did for the murders themselves.” The same article quoted conservative commentator Michelle Malkin — herself of south east Asian extraction — as saying, “This case – an attractive white couple murdered by five black thugs – doesn’t fit any political agenda. It’s not a useful crime. Reverse the races and just imagine how the national media would cover the story of a young black couple murdered by five white assailants.”

The worst of it is that there have been similar cases in Tottenham, North London which were also hushed up by the media – “The savage path from Knoxville to Tottenham Hale.” Media blackouts such as these undermine democracy and prepare the way for a totalitarian society as they deny all people — black and white – the knowledge necessary to make correct political choices.

The Neo-Marxists are trying to change our perception of reality like the Soviet Union did to its subjects. The Soviets made a distinction between “Pravda,” the truth which is ideologically correct, and “Istina,” the objective truth. The multiracial ideologues view “Istina” as heresy and try to impose ideological truth on people who generally understand reality by common sense, experience and tradition from their parents and community.

The ideologues think they are pursuing a higher truth that leads to the multiracial utopia via the totalitarian doctrine called political correctness. As in Soviet Russia reality has to be described as they would like it to be, not as it is.

Jules Margoline lived through Soviet totalitarianism and is quoted in The Black Book of Communism: “It’s the need to tell an endless series of lies to save your life, to lie every day, to wear a mask for years and never say what you really think. In Soviet Russia, free (?) citizens have to do the same thing. Dissembling and lies become the only means of defence. Public meetings, business meetings, encounters on the street, conversations, even posters on the wall get wrapped up in an official language that does not contain a word of truth. People in the West can’t possibly understand what it is like to lose the right to say what you think for years on end . . .”

For years, people who have been oppressed or pushed out have cowed when expressing their grievance and begin: “I’m not a racist, but …” In other words, they are frightened to openly express their victimisation.

The persecution of Western patriots is prefigured in Vassily Grossman’s Everything Flows. A former party worker relates the media attacks on the Kulaks as “the enemies of the people … these words started to have an effect on me … at meetings and on special courses of instruction, and in radio broadcasts, at the cinema, writers and Stalin himself, all hammered home the same message: the Kulaks are parasites, they are burning brain and killing children … they must be exterminated … it was as if I was bewitched, and it seemed to me that all the world’s woes were the fault of the Kulaks and were they exterminated, the peasants would find happiness.”

Nowadays this process is being used against any patriot who does not want his or her country turned over to the Third World.

This reversal of reality — where the supposedly ‘Free West’ has become totalitarian and the former Soviet Union ‘free’ was aptly demonstrated by the second article under consideration.

In December 2009, Pravda, the former Soviet propaganda sheet, lamented the totalitarian state in which westerners live: “Throughout the totalitarian West, the Marxist internationalist elites, while busily flooding their countries with tens of millions of Third Worlders, have introduced specific measures to keep the native populations down and in check … Hate Crimes Laws. These laws state that a crime is not just a crime if we can find a deeper motive, such as hate of a specific race, sex, religion or sexual orientation … A murder is not just a murder if hate is involved and ‘minorities’ lives are worth more than whites! If the local jury trial is considered too lenient, then the globalist elites of the west can try the person again for ‘hate’ … In America, anti-white violence is exploding. An average of 12 people per day are killed by illegals and three times more whites and Asians are killed by blacks than vice versa. The same can be found in England ….

“When five blacks kidnapped a white couple, raped and murdered the man, than kept the woman for further rapes and poured bleach down her throat to kill her, there was no hate crime, even though those five became the idols of black racist groups in America. Nor when Mexican gangs ethnically cleanse one street after another. When Islamic Pakistanis in England beat an Anglican priest almost to death, in front of his church and screamed how they were going burn down the church … no hate crimes. When Islamic Turks murdered the white, Christian boyfriend of a Turkish girl, in Germany … not a hate crime. When Arabs and Pakistanis in Athens attack and burn Greek Orthodox businesses … not a hate crime. When the director van Gogh is brutally murdered by an Islamic assailant … not a hate crime. However, his Dutch film, showing the plight of the women under Islam, beat and abused, well, most definitely that is a hate crime … We must face the reality that those of us of European ethnic background who reside in the West are no longer living in free societies. We exist inside regimes that believe in our extermination, regimes that do not admit that we exist as a people.”

Like the Kurds in Turkey, we are forced to send our children to schools where the existence of our people as an independent entity is denied. If we do not do so, we run the risk of the government that hates us stealing our children and having them be brought up by strangers.” Family Courts often sit in camera!

In Florida, Teah Wimberly, 16, was recently charged with murdering Amanda Coll, a friend and classmate at Dillard High School in Fort Lauderdale. They were 15 at the time of the shooting. Ms. Wimberly, apparently wanted a lesbian relationship but was rebuffed. On 12 Nov of last year, police say, Wimberly took a .22-caliber handgun to school and shot Collette.

This case is being kept quiet, unlike when Matthew Shepard was murdered in Wyoming or when James Byrd was dragged to death in Jasper, Texas. The latter two incidents got massive publicity in the states. Why so? Because they belong to privileged identity groups. Shepard was homosexual and two men beat him to death for it; Byrd was black and three white supremacists chained him to a truck, and dragged him through the streets of Jasper and beheaded him.

The ‘hate crimes’ law signed recently by President Obama was called the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act. Like our oppressive Race Acts, this does not oppose hate, but “Whites.” It is part of the change from the individual rights of traditional liberals to the “group rights” of the “Cultural Marxist” which emerged in the 1960s. The law actually gives preferential treatment to other ethnic groups over whites by creating classes of victims and perpetrators, as if some victims of violent crime are better than others or some perpetrators worse.

Wimberly wasn’t charged with a hate crime because she’s the right sexual orientation — lesbian. Had she been a heterosexual teen who shot a lesbian, it would have publicised incessantly.

Type Kriss Donald into a search engine then, Stephen Lawrence then Damilola Taylor. We are being discriminated against by the law and the media. If people knew what was really going on in our countries there would be public demonstrations and that is why the crime figures have to be doctored: white crime is emphasised while ethnic attacks on whites are played down or not reported.

Trevor Phillips has admitted the facts. “…what we need to do is stop people being shot and ending up dead in gutters at the age of fourteen or fifteen. Who are the people to whom that is happening? Way, way disproportionately black people. I think you will find that amongst the black community in this country there is more keenness for tough and active measures to rein in the gunmen than amongst anybody else, because they are the victims.”

The failure to openly discuss this serious issue to which Mr Phillips alludes to is part of the multiracialists’ mentality. Suppression of truth, totalitarianism and a quest for a multiracial utopia go together. They are indivisible. Because it is so unnatural the truth has to be hidden.

The hiding of reality from the public began with multiracialism in 1948 and is part of the multiracialists’ outlook.


Two days after the Empire Windrush docked on the 22 July 1948 with 790 West Indians, J.D. Murray and ten other Labour MPs wrote to Labour Prime Minister Clement Atlee, asking for legislation to prevent an influx.

Atlee replied that he thought they would “make a genuine contribution to our labour difficulties at the present.” Yet in private Atlee’s cabinet held three discussions about immigration.

The first debate on immigration in the House of Commons on the 5th of November 1954 called by John Hynd, Labour MP for Sheffield (Attercliffe), show that these symptoms of social collapse had been evident for over 50 years.

“One day recently 700 embarked from Jamaica without any prospect of work, housing or anything else,” he noted. He also said the colour-bar in Sheffield dance halls because of knife fights was justified. Both Hynd and another Labour MP James Johnson called for a committee of enquiry to be set up.

Other speakers repeatedly asked the Government to take action. But Henry Hopkinson (C), Minister of State at the Colonial Office, fobbed them off by telling them “the matter is receiving urgent attention.” He did however admit that he had received many letters from worried MPs on both sides.

In around 1979 a Metropolitan police report on mugging was withdrawn to prevent a clamour for control of immigration or even a white backlash.

In 1959 a report from both the London Metropolitan Police and West Midlands Police expressed concern at the growing number of crimes of violence being carried out by some newly-arrived West Indians. The rate per head of population was four times that committed by indigenous people.

An excellent series in The Times during January 1965 titled “The Dark Million” showed what the official attitude was. The author wrote: “Back in June (1964) a senior civil servant talked to me about a particular aspect of the problem that has since taken some people by surprise. I had asked why figures were not available to give a nationwide picture of the problem.

“I was told: ‘We haven’t tried to find out. It may be as things get more critical, and they are getting more critical, it will be decided that we should do so. It will be a political decision. One of the things about statistics is that people asked what they are, then again in three months time what they are, and then you have a problem on your hands. People start to keep the score, and you have a crisis. If, as, a result, they know that such-and-such is happening in Wolverhampton, they say what is the Government doing about Wolverhampton. It is a matter of judgement as to when you start taking that line and say something should be done. It is a matter for central Government’.”

You only have to go three miles from an inner city and people do not know what is really happening. They believe the media and have the understanding of the world of children. Their reality has been changed.

Thursday, 24 December 2009

Merry Christmas

video

Sorry this is only a short snippet of the Vienna Boys Choir singing Silent Night, but I am having difficulty uploading a larger version. However, as they say, it the thought that counts and I wish you all a very merry Christmas. May 2010 fulfil your dreams and bring what you hope for.

Sarah

A diminished throne


This Christmas, the head of state of 16 nations will deliver her Christmas message to her subjects, as she has done every year since she ascended the throne in 1953, although she was queen of considerably more than 16 countries back then. That said, she will, in addition, be speaking directly to the 54 countries which make up the Commonwealth of Nations, of which she is the head. She will not, as many fondly imagine, be addressing only the peoples of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. This is a fact which should always to be remembered when considering the position, and loyalties, of our current monarch, Elizabeth II and those of her potential successors.

Her immediate successor, of course, is Charles, the Prince of Wales, and it was when he recently addressed the United Nations conference on climate change in Copenhagen, that one of the most regular, and respected, commentators at my blog, Dr. D, wrote to me and asked my opinion of the monarchy.

As I responded to Dr. D, I realised that he had asked a question which I had not given any thought to in a very long time, and that I was thinking about it now, in the light of attitudes and views which I didn't have when I last seriously thought about it. In recent years, my thoughts and my anger have been directed at elected politicians, at the controlled media, and those organisation within various western states, which seem to be there for the sole purpose of destroying us. Until now I had not considered the role of the woman during whose reign our leaders, at whose head she sits, have inflicted such irreparable damage on this progressively less united Kingdom.

I come from a family for whom loyalty to the crown has always been offered without question, indeed, so ingrained is that loyalty, that I now feel almost treacherous to be questioning it. Throughout my life, the Queen has always been there and I have instinctively accepted the rightness of that fact and my allegiance to the woman herself. Hence, it is with reluctance that I ask myself, do I still feel the same?

To answer that question, I need to separate the institution from the current incumbent, and, in that respect I am still a committed monarchist. I am no more impressed now by the arguments in favour of a republic than I ever was, and I remain in favour of a constitutional monarchy for a number of reasons. I accept the argument that because we have a Queen we can, in theory, never have a dictator. An unelected head of state means there is no individual in the nation, elected or otherwise, with ultimate power.

Blair, and Thatcher before him may have seemed all powerful, but once they ceased to please they were gone, and it did not take a revolution, or the trauma of impeachment, to do it. I think it was put quite well by the person who said that the main power vested in the monarch is the power she denies to anyone else.

The government might send the troops to war, but the troops do not swear allegiance to the government, they swear allegiance to the queen, as does Parliament. The queen does not declare war, but she has the power to sack the man, or woman, who does so.

In theory she can sack the government, as they are effectively working for her. It would cause a constitutional crisis if she did, as almost occurred in 1975 when she (through her governor general) removed the Australian government.

Oddly enough, despite that, Australia still retains her as head of state, as do Canada, New Zealand and a host of other countries despite a number of referendums aimed at turning them into republics. I suspect that is due to the same feelings that I have about the institution, that is to say, a respect for the individual and a distrust for the alternative.

The alternative is a presidency, which has all sorts of downsides, look at the examples, Obama, Jimmy Carter, Francois Mitterrand, Jacques Chirac, de Gaulle, Muggabe, Mandella the string of crooks who have run Italy, of whom Berlusconi is probably the least dishonest, would we want any of them? I think of the various politicians who would try to be elected president, if such a role existed here and I shudder. In Britain we could have had a President Thatcher, a President Callaghan, we be looking forward to the prospect of a President Blair, a President Brown, or, God preserve us, a President Mandelson, On the other hand we have total nonentities like the president of Germany, who's name I forget, or the, heavily shop soiled new president of Europe.

I may think very highly of the Czech President, Vaclav Klaus, but he is one honourable man amongst a battalion of charlatans.

I can understand why some would object to the hereditary principle, however, I have an instinctive distrust of politicians and don't want one of them as my head of state, which is what we would get. I far prefer someone who is there by accident of birth, at least they have a better chance of being a human being.

For those reasons, and because, we in Britain, have already lost too much of our heritage, I still support a constitutional monarchy

However, what of the individual currently in the role of monarch? You may find it strange that, as I said earlier, I have respect for the Queen herself, after all, many British nationalists believe she has betrayed her coronation oath, and her promise to her people. However, I think that view ignores what she actually said. The queen actually swore to serve the peoples of her empire, her coronation oath specifically mentioned countries such as Pakistan, South Africa and Ceylon (now Sri Lanka) and as Princess Elizabeth she promised to serve "this great imperial family, of whom we are all members" and, as is now quite clear, she meant the the people of Pakistan, Kenya, Fiji and Uganda just as much as she meant those of England, Scotland and Wales.

That is the way she thinks. Her father had once been king of almost a quarter of the earth's population, her parents were the last Emperor and Empress of India. Elizabeth never ruled India, but she inherited an Empire all the same, and, even though it has now gone, it all still means a great deal to her.

Elizabeth remains head of state of sixteen countries including places like Papua New Guinea, Belize, Jamaica and the Bahamas. As Head of the Commonwealth she has to serve the interests of people from across Asia, Africa and the Caribbean. These are the lands from which most of the immigrants to Britain come, and I believe the Queen feels great loyalty to them, even though that conflicts with the well being of her British subjects.

She has not betrayed her oath, people just do not understand what she actually said, or who she said it to. The Queen is as much a victim of the end of Empire as we are, just in a different way. After all can the Queen of Jamaica really deny her subjects access to her realm?

I may disagree with her, I may believe that she has presided silently over the greatest disaster this country has ever suffered, yet I can respect the woman for her loyalty to those she was born to rule, except of course, she wasn't always loyal to those of us in Britain.

Does her loyalty to the Commonwealth excuse her for standing by and allowing what has been done to this country, by her government? I will not make a judgement on that, other than to say that she also has been brought low, in comparison to where she was, by the post war catastrophe which has hit Britain since she was crowned.

In many respects everything which the young Princess Elizabeth was raised to inherit has gone, not only the Empire, think of the mighty church which she became head of in 1953, and then consider the diminished and shrunken sect which stands in its place.

This brings me to one other issue and that issue is Europe. The queen may be able to square mass immigration with the promises she made when first ascending the throne, but how does she square that with allowing the UK to be absorbed into the EU and to herself, our queen, becoming nothing more than citizen Elizabeth Windsor?

In answer to that, I don't know what the truth is. Maybe she is a true believer, maybe she really believes that Europe is good for Britain, as I once did. Alternatively, is it all true and is she part of an elite, happy to preside over the destruction of the nation state for a mad dream of a new world order? Then again, maybe the truth is that after fifty years of mutely watching as her birthright crumbles she views this as merely a further progression.

Only Elizabeth knows the secrets of her own soul.

Her son on the other hand, is much less of an enigma, we can see the truth of him far too clearly, and it is not pretty to behold.

Charles will be a disaster, he personifies the very worst aspects of the so called liberal elite, everything he believes in is fatal to the future of the nation he hopes, one day, to rule. However, I doubt he can do more damage than has already been done. Charles's own actions and bizarre pronouncements over the years have so reduced his stature that he would have less power even than the state allows a constitutional monarch, and, in any event, the country has survived idiot princes before. Conversely, I quite like his wife, Camilla, who I think will make a better queen than he will make a king, and certainly a better one than his enchanting and lovely but deeply disturbed first wife would have made. She seems a sensible woman, who apparently loves her husband and will probably keep him from going too far off the rails.

It is an irony that it may fall to that once so reviled woman, and not the son's of the sainted Diana, to save the monarchy, if only from itself.

There are some who would like the monarchy to skip a generation, but I think that is unfair to William, who is still young and still very much an unknown quantity, although his parentage on both sides does not auger well. Also, having waited so long it is unlikely that Charles would willingly abdicate.

If the Nationalist movement does not prevail then it matters not who sits on the diminished throne for, like everything else we once cherished it will become an irrelevance. If we do prevail, then it is a different story

Ultimately, I believe that we need to change the government, but if we can save this country we should not dispose of all its ancient institutions and one we should keep is the monarchy, for in the past it has served us well, even though those individuals currently in place have not always done so.

Wednesday, 23 December 2009

A death before Christmas

"Oh God, not again," said 43 year old Renier Lamprecht on Tuesday when he realised he'd been shot during the second home invasion in three years.

Renier was in the bedroom with his partner, Hannelie du Toit, when four men broke into the couple's house on a smallholding in Pumulani north east of Pretoria.

As the couple were attempting to hold the door shut against the intruders a shot rang out, and Lamprecht was hit in the torso. Du Toit only realised Lamprecht had been shot when she saw the bed was soaked in blood.

The wounded Lamprecht stood back and the invaders came into the room ordering the couple onto the bed where their hands and feet where tied.

The attackers eventually fled taking cigarettes, three cellphones, a laptop and Du Toit's handbag, a small price for a man's life

Du Toit heard the assailants driving off and managed to free herself and then freed her seriously injured partner before going to a neighbour's house to raise the alarm, she was still at the neighbours' house when the paramedics came to tell her they'd done everything they could, but were unable to save him.

Click here for the news report

According to my figures, Renier Lamprecht is at least the 3079th white farmer to have been murdered since the end of Apartheid in 1994

________________________
Hat Tip: Dina and Johann

Tuesday, 22 December 2009

Contempt for the people - a permitted invasion (just an hour from Dover)

Chairman of the Belgian Parliament Herman De Croo greets the Emir of Qatar

The following shocking example of a European government (run by the New President of the EU) ignoring the wishes and welfare of their own people in favour of illegal colonisers, was published on the Brussels Journal site yesterday.

_______________

Governments vs The People:
Replacing The Population By Another One


There are conspiracy theories that hold that Europe’s political establishment is deliberately attempting to replace the continent’s population by an entirely different one. Though conspiracy theories are rarely true, Europe’s political establishment is making it extremely hard for the sceptics to refute them. Take, for instance, the recent Belgian amnesty for illegal aliens.

Last July, the government of Belgium announced a collective amnesty for illegal aliens. It is Belgium’s second general amnesty in barely a decade. When the previous one was approved by the Belgian Parliament in 1999, the government promised Parliament that it would be the final one and that henceforward people who entered the country illegally would be sent back. Nevertheless, there has been no crack-down on illegal immigration in the past ten years and hardly any illegal aliens have been sent back.

Last July, immediately after the parliamentary recess had begun, the government of Prime Minister Herman Van Rompuy decided there should be a new amnesty to “regularize” illegal aliens who can demonstrate that they have “integrated sufficiently” into the country, e.g. by having children at school. The government took the decision unilaterally, without approval from the Parliament. This is against the law; the Belgian government cannot unilaterally grant a collective amnesty. Only Parliament has the power to do so.

The parties of Van Rompuy’s government coalition shrugged their shoulders. They refused to react against the usurpation of parliamentary powers because they did not want to open a public debate about immigration. Polls indicate that the overwhelming majority of the Belgians opposes the new round of regularizations. The Vlaams Belang, Belgium’s main opposition party, however, went to court. It requested the Council of State, Belgium’s highest administrative court, to annul the amnesty – which it did on December 11.

The government’s reaction to the annulment is astonishing. It announced that the court ruling would make no difference and that the illegal aliens need not worry. Mr. Melchior Wathelet, the Secretary of State for Immigration, said that, instead of collectively regularizing the 50,000 illegal aliens with one single signature, he will sign 50,000 individual regulations, granting each of them an individual amnesty.

Continue reading at the Brussels Journal

______________________
Understand this "amnesties" are a deceit, they are not amnesties, they are permitted invasions.

Also, are we to assume that those illegal immigrants granted amnesty in Belgium will now have an automatic right of access to Britain?

A continent insane

Either we, the people of Europe, have gone totally mad, or those who rule us are intent upon our destruction. Maybe both are true

Finland

video
"My husband was in prison in Togo for his political beliefs"
(my those prisons must have been full)


France

video

Sunday, 20 December 2009

Selective Justice

Back in May, I wrote an article entitled “A Blood Sacrifice Denied”, in which I reported the verdict of a trial in Shenandoah, Pennsylvania where two young white men were acquitted of the most serious of various multi-purpose “hate crime” charges, which had been lodged against them, resulting from the death of an illegal immigrant, and alleged paedophile, called Luis Ramirez.

At the time I commented that the media and the left wing establishment had been denied their blood sacrifice to the hungry Gods of political correctness. They had failed to secure another of that tiny, but much treasured, collection of white perpetrator hate crime convictions so essential to promoting public belief in a fantasy parallel world of white thugs and non-white victims, which hide the ugly reality of the multicultural society they have forced upon us.

I spoke too soon, back then I had not appreciated quite how deeply the blood lust runs within the new US administration. Indeed, it appears that America has dispensed with jury trials, or at least they will no longer allow a jury decision to stand if it does not deliver a verdict which suits the agenda, or should I say spin?, of those now running the country. Within months of the Not Guilty decision. the FBI have stepped in, refiled the charges, and even arrested various Shenandoah policemen who face charges of assisting the accused in a racially motivated cover up. (Remind me which season of CBS's Criminal Minds is that plot from?)

Can you imagine for one instant that the US Federal government would seek to overturn a trial verdict had the races been reversed? Hell would freeze over before the FBI, who still refuse to look into the attempted rail-roading of three white lacrosse players in Durham, North Carolina in 2006, took such action in relation to black or Hispanic defendants acquitted of killing a white man. Indeed, there would be riots in the streets if they did.

Newly appointed Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez

The FBI's actions are in line with a statement last week by the Obama administration's new civil rights chief, Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez who recently declared that he was “shocked” to learn how few hate-crime prosecutions there were during the Bush presidency and has vowed to pursue many more of such prosecutions in future. We all know exactly which groups this racially motivated little bigot will target, and to which groups he will grant a free pass, or indeed in some cases, such as the Jena 6, who kicked a white boy unconscious, reduce the original charges to a misdemeanor warranting no more than slap on the wrist.

The appointment of Perez as Assistant Attorney General was praised by the black racist pressure group NAACP, who are clearly confident that he will do their bidding, however, they can be equally confident that this most radical of US administrations in history, do not have the shrinking white majority's interests at heart.

I was not present in Shenandoah on the night that Luis Ramirez died, and did not witness what happened, however, what I do know is that Brandon Piekarsky, 18, and Derrick M. Donchak, 19, the boys accused of killing him, are being treated entirely differently than other defendants, merely because of the colour of their skin. They were tried by a jury of their peers and found not guilty, but that was not good enough for the FBI, who are demanding that they be retried, for no reason other than that they are white.

Meanwhile, the press are gleefully reporting the alleged facts, ignoring the real fact that the Feds are attempting to toss aside a jury verdict, again salivating in anticipation at being given a second chance of tasting young white male blood, whilst ignoring, or actively suppressing, details of thousands upon thousands of other far worse crimes, many clearly hate crimes, for the single reason the accused in those cases are inconveniently non-white.

What price double jeopardy? don't depend on it if you are white and your government, together with their lick spittle media servants, have an agenda to promote.

Of course, in Britain, the concept of double jeopardy, a protection which dates back to the Magna Cata, was effectively revoked by the present government in the 2003 Criminal Justice Act, which came into effect in April 2005, and expanded the number of circumstances where an accused can be tried twice for the same crime

Irrespective of what the government may claim, and the small number of re-trials we have seen, this centuries old protection offered by English law was discarded for one purpose, and for one purpose only, and that is to allow the Liberal establishment to have another crack at the white men who are popularly assumed to have murdered black student Stephen Lawrence in a “racially motivated” attack at a bus stop in Eltham, South London in April 1993.

A criminal trial, and a subsequent attempt at a private prosecution, have failed to establish the guilt of any one of the five men repeatedly accused of the Lawrence killing, but even now, seventeen years later, the authorities refuse to abandon their quest to prove their sacred narrative true.

They will not give up, only this week we read that more retired policemen have been arrested for allegedly suppressing evidence in 1993. How likely do you think it would be that similar arrests would still be taking place in the case of the 17 year old unsolved racist murder of a white man?

Make no mistake, the Lawrence carnival has not left town and we will be witnessing a show trial in the not too distant future.

It is not my wish that guilty men go free, but in the cases I am talking of, on both sides of the Atlantic, the men and boys in question have already been tried and acquitted. it is merely because of their race British and American governments are seeking a second bite at the cherry. Meanwhile, both governments are ignoring rows (or in the case of America, mountains) of white corpses while they do so.

Britain's streets are littered with the victims of non-white violence, whilst in America more whites have been killed by non-whites since then end of segregation than died in the Korean war. Yet it is these few, already tried, white defendants whom the governments consider their priority.

Further than that, they appear willing to repeatedly prosecute a tiny number of white men, over and over, until they achieve an outcome which suits their political beliefs. Any society run by such people is neither a safe or healthy place to be.

Guilty or innocent, they will eventually convict those boys in Shenandoah, even if they have to keep retrying them for the next decade, and the same will apply to the men whom the left believe killed Stephen Lawrence.

When they finally succeed, they will have their talisman, their trophy heads to stick on spikes outside their castles as evidence their lies are true.

Meanwhile, more and more white families will lose their children to the real scourge of our society, the one our governments refuse to acknowledge and which they use these dishonest show trials to disguise.

Saturday, 19 December 2009

Mending Broken Bones: Russian Nationalism and the Fate of Russia - by Frank Ellis

Frank Ellis's latest article is entitled Mending Broken Bones: Russian Nationalism and the Fate of Russia and is a fascinating, thought provoking and well researched exploration of Russia her identity, where she stands now in the 21st Century. and what her fate may be On account of its length I have posted this article to Sarah Maid of Albion II and highly recommend that visitors take the time to read it.

Click here to read Mending Broken Bones: Russian Nationalism and the Fate of Russia by Dr Frank Ellis

Copenhagen - differing perceptions

A Selection of quotes:

BARACK OBAMA, US PRESIDENT

A meaningful and unprecedented agreement

IE ZHENHUA, HEAD OF CHINA'S DELEGATION

The meeting has had a positive result, everyone should be happy.

IAN FRY, TUVALU'S LEAD NEGOTIATOR

It looks like we are being offered 30 pieces of silver to betray our people and our future.

MOHAMED NASHEED, MALDIVES' PRESIDENT

Anything above 1.5 degrees, the Maldives and many small islands and low-lying islands would vanish. It is for this reason that we tried very hard during the course of the last two days to have 1.5 degrees in the document. I am so sorry that this was blatantly obstructed by big-emitting countries.

CLAUDIA SALERNO CALDERA, VENEZUELAN DELEGATE

I ask whether - under the eye of the UN secretary general - you are going to endorse this coup d'etat against the authority of the United Nations.

NNIMMO BASSEY, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH INTERNATIONAL

Copenhagen has been an abject failure. Justice has not been done.

JOHN SAUVEN, GREENPEACE UK

The city of Copenhagen is a crime scene tonight, with the guilty men and women fleeing to the airport.

LUMUMBA STANISLAUS DI-APING, HEAD OF G-77 GROUP

[The draft text] asks Africa to sign a suicide pact, an incineration pact in order to maintain the economic dominance of a few countries. It is a solution based on values, the very same values in our opinion that funnelled six million people in Europe into furnaces. (Ed: Just a tad OTT there don't you think?)

GEORGE W BUSH, 43rd US PRESIDENT

HA HA!! Heh! Heh! “GAG...... Laura! ... gasp .... Pretzel ...Laura!!!
(I made up the last one)


Berlin and the Cold War Remembered - By Dr Frank Ellis

Berlin and the Cold War Remembered

© Frank Ellis 2009


Public announcements and presentations on television, radio, and in the newspapers were so ridiculously meaningless and empty, so obviously twisted and deceitful, so gross and primitive [...] that the country ought to burst out daily in a paroxysm of laughter or disgust. But nothing of the sort happened. One simply got used to the evil and the bad.

Hans Joachim-Maaz, Der Gefühlsstau: Ein Pyschogramm der DDR (1990)


Amid the justified and joyful celebrations that took place to mark the twentieth anniversary of the Berlin Wall’s coming down on 9th November 1989 we ought to pause and remind ourselves of the nature of the state known euphemistically as the German Democratic Republic (GDR). To begin with, the GDR was emphatically not a democracy. It was a one-party state ruled by a hard-line Stalinist party, the Socialist Unity Party (Sozialistische Einheitspartei Deutschlands). The sword and shield of the revolution – to use the language of the regime – was the Staatssicherheitsdienst, the state security organs known more widely as the Stasi. The Stasi’s mission was to know as much as possible about everything that happened in the GDR such that any incipient dissent or rebellion could be monitored and then eradicated at the appropriate time, and as discreetly as possible.

The GDR and all the other fraternal socialist states, Big Brother Soviet Union above all, confirm that socialism in all its forms means death: spiritual, economic, social and intellectual. Spiritual death ensues from the state’s policy of denying and attempting to crush any manifestation of individual freedom by imposing collectivism in all social and educational policy. In effect, there is no such thing as individual, private man. For the same reasons, and also because the state is based on the principle that the means of production shall be controlled by the state, the economy is doomed to stagnation so perpetuating squalor and penury because innovators and businessmen are regarded as parasites and speculators. Had Bill Gates been born in Leipzig and started to develop his personal computers in some high-rise workers’ block of flats, the Stasi would have arrested him as an anti-social element, an enemy of the people. Nor can full-blooded socialism exist without pervasive and ubiquitous censorship. Writers were obvious targets for the Stasi and so literature becomes chained to the state. Some writers fall silent; others discover that they rather like being vampire-informers on behalf of the Stasi. And for those citizens who tried to flee the workers’ paradise, the crime of Republikflucht, there was the risk of physical death since the border guards were under orders to kill anyone attempting to leave. Such was the GDR’s version of real-existing socialism.

Stationed in West Berlin during the early 1980s, and right through the emerging Solidarity crisis in Poland (December 1981), where I served as a Russian and German interpreter/analyst working under the auspices of the British Military Government, I had every opportunity to observe East Berlin and the German proletarian state. As the duty military interpreter you could be called out at any time of night and day to deal with all kinds of incidents: shootings of would-be escapees along the Wall; defectors (happened once); border violations; delivering official protests; and social functions. I learned to expect the unexpected. One night I was dragged out of bed and taken to checkpoint Bravo. Bravo was the Soviet checkpoint through which all road traffic leaving West Berlin had to pass en route for West Germany. The better known checkpoint Charlie is in the city. On arrival, the duty Soviet officer tells me that they have captured one of our soldiers. He takes me to the rear of the building where I am confronted with a half-naked soldier under armed guard. It is bitterly cold. The soldier is eighteen years old. Under the influence of strong German beer he has bet some mates that he can smash his way through the Soviet checkpoint in a Land Rover. He has no chance of course and is easily apprehended. In fact, he is lucky the Soviet guards did not open fire. While trying to keep a straight face, I tell this young lad that had it not been for the close professional relationship I enjoyed with the Soviet duty officer he would have been dragged off to the GULAG never to return.

Throughout the year the Soviet garrison would hold a number of parades at the Tiergarten war memorial which commemorates the Soviet troops who lost their lives taking Berlin in May 1945. The most important ceremonies were Den’ sovetskikh vooruzhennykh sil (Soviet Armed Forces Day, 23rd February), Den’ pobedy (Victory Day, 9th May), and one to mark the Velikaia Oktiabriaskaia Revoliutsia (Great October Revolution, 7th November). I enjoyed these parades, especially Victory Day since they gave me the opportunity to mix freely with Soviet officers and converse with them. Some were very reticent, whereas others were more than happy to talk about just about anything. I have no doubt that these parades with the opportunity to mix and even to socialise up to a point built trust and confidence and broke down barriers. One thing I can say is that all the Soviet officers with whom I spoke were mightily impressed by the performance of British Forces in the Falklands campaign. Some spouted the standard Soviet nonsense about colonialism but they recognised the grim determination of the Iron Lady and outstanding military effectiveness when they saw it.

Ever since Stalin tried to blockade West Berlin in 1948-1949, rights of access via air, road and rail remained crucial to West Berlin’s survival. These rights were jealously protected and vigorously asserted and exercised. To this end the British Military train would depart Charlottenburg Station and set off across the territory of the GDR towards West Germany every day of the year with the exception of Christmas day. The train always carried a duty interpreter. On arrival at Marienborn, a small station on the East German side of the inner-German border, the train would stop. Here, a Royal Corps of Transport warrant officer responsible for all the paperwork and carrying all the passports and train passes and accompanied by an interpreter would dismount the train. They would then march the length of the platform halt in front of the Soviet checkpoint officer (normally a lieutenant or captain) and exchange salutes. The duty Soviet officer would then invite them to enter his office where the Soviet clerk would process the paperwork. While the train was stationary East German border guards and dog handlers would search under the train to make sure that no hapless East German was attempting to flee to the West courtesy of the British Army. The train’s first stop the other side of the inner-German border would be Helmstedt and then on to Braunschweig. Some three hours later, having picked up another batch of passengers, crew and train would return to West Berlin via the same route.

Eventually my turn came for this duty and the moment of reckoning: the time to have my Russian tested for real. The Soviet officer and I exchange greetings and as the clerk deals with the travel documents (putevki) we start chatting. I cannot describe the sense of euphoria: Russians actually speak this language I have been studying for so long. The Soviet officer obviously knows something about British Army regiments, since he asks me how long I have been a desantnik (paratrooper): “Since I was sixteen years old”, I reply. “What”, he exclaims, “you joined the vozdushno-desantnye voiska (airborne forces) at sixteen”? “No, you can’t do your jumps and join the battalion until you’re eighteen, but I joined as a boy soldier and the brainwashing starts then”. “Really, how do they brainwash you?” He asks this with deadly seriousness, thinking that I going to give away some military secret: “Just like in the Red Army, love of country, hard training and lots of it”, I reply, touching my maroon beret to make my point. He smiles. The ice is broken.

Despite the regime’s attempts to make it something of a socialist showcase, East Berlin was grey and depressing. Orwell’s description of Oceania in 1984, with the run down buildings, cheap and shoddy goods and a general air of depression is a perfect match for East Berlin. By erotic and material contrast, West Berlin, with what Germans delicately refer to as Nachtleben (night life), had it all. Whenever we went there we wore uniform and the East Berliners would stare at us as if we were aliens. One day some kids chucked a load of stones at us accompanied by cries of “go home Soviet pigs”. I shouted back that we were British not Soviet and they came over and apologised. On another occasion I managed to have a lengthy discussion with some East German who bitterly complained about the regime and the shortages. The trouble with these sorts of conversations is that you have no way of knowing whether your interlocutors are genuine. One day in a large bookshop it turned to farce. I was browsing the Russian-literature section – Dostoevsky I recall – and some woman came up to me and asked me whether I liked Dostoevsky. She addressed me in Russian and eventually she suggested that we return to her flat and discuss Dostoevsky over some tea. She was a looker but it was so obviously an attempt to provoke some kind of incident that it was risible. It occurred to me later that perhaps in the very obvious and brazen nature of this encounter was where the cunning of the approach lay.

Twenty years later the Berlin Wall is a dreadful memory. Germany is reunited and powerful. Yet something seems to have gone very badly wrong among Western states, the states that demonstrated the manifest superiority of a political system based on the private ownership of the means of production and which found the will to resist the Soviet threat. The quintessential feature of a free-market system is individual freedom which includes, among other things, free speech, the right to associate with whomsoever one wishes, freedom from state oppression and the expectation that the state will protect our borders. Since 1989 Britain has not moved to consolidate individual freedoms under the rule of the law. On the contrary, we have moved inexorably towards a soft form of totalitarianism which would be instantly recognizable to the former citizens of the GDR. In the erosion of long-established freedoms, the influence of the virulently neo-Marxist Macpherson Report cannot be overstated.

In 2009, Britain is also divided by a wall. It is not a physical structure of bricks, mine fields, barbed wire and watch towers but it exists. This government-built wall is one of lies and censorship designed to prevent us from knowing the truth, not just, for example, about the Third-World savagery that blights so many of our cities but about the dire threat posed by the emerging United States of Europe. State agencies – universities are some of the worst and most despicable oppressors – collude with the BBC, the police and Church of England to mislead us. The worst thing about this wall is that it runs through our hearts, minds and souls. It marks the boundary between the politically correct views we are all expected to hold and what many of us privately know to be hideous lies but were we to voice our misgivings they would be condemned by politicians and equal-opportunity bullies as “inappropriate”, “offensive” or “unacceptable”. Publicly we accept that homosexuality is just another valid life-style choice (yet inwardly we shudder); we mouth the vile and mendacious slogan “diversity is our strength” (and avoid it all costs); we agree that race does not matter (yet we all know about white flight); when some serial liar in a university tells us that allegiance to our nation and past are bigotry we are hypnotised by the audacity of his ignorance (and privately some of us recall that between 1939-1945 fathers and mothers fought to save our land); and when the flat-screen tyrant hurls the freakish and perverted assertions of feminism at us we sit there like frightened rabbits. Today, I understand a little more of the monstrous, psychological torment inflicted on the thinking, rational, decent human beings that during the Cold War lived east of the old Berlin Wall - Leipzig, East Berlin, Moscow, Warsaw and Prague in the Lands of the Lie. Now I know how it feels to live under enemy occupation, to be surrounded and mocked by lying, strutting Quislings, to feel like a stranger in my own land.


Wednesday, 16 December 2009

Celtic women - the First Noel

video

Pravda - Western Race Hatred Laws: Keep the Caucasians Down


The following appeared on Pravda at the weekend:

Throughout the totalitarian West, the Marxist internationalist elites, while busily flooding their countries with tens of millions of third worlders, have introduced specific measures to keep the native populations down and in check.

These measures have come in the form of Hate Crimes Laws. The laws state that a crime is not just a crime if we can find a deeper motive, such as hate of a specific race, sex, religion or sexual orientation. Thus the Lords of Humanity have given themselves the power of God to know what is inside the hearts of men.

In practical terms, what this means is 1. A murder is not just a murder if hate is involved. Say again? This means certain lives are worth more than others, a protected class, another insult to Christ and justice. 2. If the local jury trial is considered to lenient, then those globalist elites of the West can try the person again for "hate" or rather in actuality for the same crime, twice. Again, an insult to justice that Western serfs bow, grin and bare.

But this gets worse, since in practice, the elites decide who is a racist and who is not, they use these laws sparingly to keep the native population down, shackled and paranoid of the knock on the door.

In America, anti white violence is exploding, an average of 12 people per day are killed by their illegals and three times more whites and Asians are killed by blacks than vice versa. The same can be found in England. The head of the Justice Department, Hader, even stated that he approved the double standard used on whites. He did this in front of a parliamentary committee, with no real out cry by the totalitarians. As if any should be expected.

When five blacks kidnapped a white couple, raped and murdered the man, than kept the woman for further rapes and poured bleach down her throat to kill her, there was no hate crime, even though those five became the idols of black racist groups in American. When blacks in Los Angeles target Koreans for robbery and murder, also nothing. Nor when Mexican gangs ethnically cleanse one street after another. When Islamic Pakistanis in England beat an Anglican priest almost to death, in front of his church and screamed how they were going burn down the church, or when other Islamics poured acid in the face of a raped school girl, nothing happened. No hate crimes. When Islamic Turks murdered the white, Christian boyfriend of a Turkish girl, in Germany, not a hate crime. When Arabs and Pakistanis in Athens attack and burn Greek Orthodox businesses, not a hate crime. When the director van Gogh is brutally murdered by an Islamic assailant, not a hate crime. However, his Dutch film, showing the plight of the women under Islam, beat and abused, well, most definitely that is a hate crime...the film, not the wife beating, that's just quaint multiculturalism, supported by the Western femiNazis, who have a secret lusting for this type of treatment.

Luckily, in Russia, Ukraine, Serbia and all none EU, none West Christian nations, this idiocy does not exist. Murder is murder, regardless of what is felt by the killer and defense of the local culture is paramount.

Westerners, truly I believe, you deserve this, since the vast majority of you take it and swallow it, like the good little castrated serfs you are. Enjoy your extinction, as you loaf around on your Chinese couches.

Stanislav Mishin

The article originally appears on Mr. Mishin's blog, Mat Rodina

___________________________________

Many readers will remember a time when Pravda was the heavily controlled voice of oppression, how things have changed.

Monday, 14 December 2009

Dear Ms Swiss - By August Pointneuf

Dear Ms,

You were piqued when your fellow Swiss gained a majority vote against the building of further minarets. To show your displeasure you put yourself on display with a notice which said “Swiss passport for sale “

Please would you tell me where you intend to live, once your otherwise highly sought-after passport has been sold?

Would you go to a country where there are no passports, because there is no paper to print them?

Perhaps you wish to be where the wait for new passports might be five years, or where passport are never given?

You might choose a land where you would need an exit visa each time you wish to leave. Not that would make much difference, because you probably would not be earning enough to pay for your passage out.

Would you like to find residence where there is none of the socialist trivia of Switzerland, and instead relish dubious health services, receive no social benefits, and find self-insurance un-affordable?

You could choose to be governed by those so corrupt and incapable that your life savings becomes worth less than a single wooden match – where brave men, reduced to abject penury, shoot their wives before they shoot themselves.

Would your choice be a country where only one eighth of the population provides the entire tax base, and your paid tax would be channelled away to support eight non-productive indigents, half with AIDS?

How about a land where you, as a white female, will be selectively targeted for a rape? Perhaps you might choose an arena where there is selective assassination of those who try and succeed in business?

You also have a wide choice of places where no one dares to walk out alone at night.

Perhaps you would prefer to go to a region where you would not be permitted to drive? Would you like being prohibited from walking outside your home, unless formally chaperoned?

Would you like to go where there are no Christian churches, and any symbolic reference to Christmas is a criminal offence?

Or you could go where you will be forced to wear an abaya and a gishwa whenever in public, throughout the hottest summers.

Would you think to choose somewhere where you could be married into a harem, and dispense with your privacy forever?

Alternatively you could go where your adultery would be rewarded by being stoned to death.

You might choose to be where everyone with any petty authority will capitalise on their trivial rank unmercifully, constantly demanding, at every turn, some form of favour, bribe or a ransom. You might find, if you succeed, that you are damaged as an overriding authority plays out its ruthless, manipulative agenda.

Would you instead prefer to live where crimes are not reported because the criminals will return and kill the complainer?

Perhaps you would choose a nation which has immovable, corrupt and authoritarian politicians who will suffocate any attempt at attaining human rights by immediate incarceration?

Is your choice to be where there is perversion of law at every level, from policeman to prosecutor to judge?

Would you like to be domiciled where you could be summarily dumped in stinking prisons, with no mechanisms of legal defence, appeal or cries for help? Of course you would have no need to bother the Swiss diplomats to extract you, but you would need friends to bring food and bedding, and then fight your savage inmates to retain a fraction of that food, or a space to sleep. You will need good friends if they are to support you for years on end.

Or instead will you search out one of the small residues of white success, such as Australia or Canada? You could then continue your campaign, aiming to destroy those cultures in the way you wish to destroy your patrimony. It should not be too difficult to succeed, since only 7% of the world's population is white.

Ignorance, arrogance, egocentricity, stupidity and zero insight and foresight form a related continuum, often resulting in the type of behaviour found in people like you: People who are unable to value what has been given to them. Have you any inkling of understanding of the striving that was demanded of your predecessors in their aim of creating a safe society, one which has provided you with security, warmth, shelter and an excess of food?

Are you making piffle of a nation which has proffered you a deep, entrenched, and rewarding culture, in the expectation that you would transmit it to the next generation? How unforgivably corrupt that you are working at destroying that heritage. What a shame that you are jeopardising your compatriots.

Perhaps those compatriots might forcibly remove the passport that you so despise.

Vous seriez fort amiables de nous répondre le plus tôt possible.


August Pointneuf

________________________
News story: 300 people protested outside the Parliament building in Berne. In front of a model of a minaret they held up signs saying: “This is not my Switzerland”. A young woman pinned to her jacket a piece of paper saying: “Swiss passport for sale”.