Thursday, 30 June 2011

A worse truth hidden in the figures

The headlines in Today's papers and on TV announced that the results of a recent investigation had revealed that 28% of those involved in the sexual grooming of young, and predominantly white children, on our streets are Asian, more than “one in four”.  The report was widely accompanied by predictable urgings from politicians, police and media multicultural advocates that we should not place too much significance on the ethnicity of those involved.

However, are the headlines themselves actively under reporting the true scale of Asian involvement in this crime?

The report identified a total of 1,217 suspects, however, in the case of a significant number of those (464) the ethnicity of the perpetrator is recorded as "unknown", therefore they can not be included in any meaningful assessment of the composition of offenders. Every media outlet had attempted to pretend that those of "unknown race" must all be white, but the figures do not support that assumption.

The ethnicity is known in the case of 758 offenders and of these 346 are Asian (just under 46% of the total).

Given that those whose ethnicity is known is the only sample upon which the racial make up of offenders can be assessed, and as a further 40 of those who’s race was identified were either black or Chinese, the headlines could, with even greater accuracy have announced that "Less than half of all child sexual grooming suspects are white" (On the basis that whites who make up just under 90% of the population, amount for only 48.5% of those who’s ethnicity has been established)      

Even if all those whose race is currently unknown turned out to be white, Asians, who according to official figures make up less than 6% of the population, would be massively over represented in the figures.  However, as whites make up less than half of the known offenders, how likely is it they make up 100%, or even the majority, of the unknowns?

Multicultural advocates argue that the research is "poor and incomplete" and, therefore, misleading, but this is only true in that the manner in which it is being presented significantly under represents the disproportionate levels of offending on the part of non-white (primarily south Asian) offenders, whilst at the same time dishonestly over-represent the numbers of white offenders.

Another factor of note is the absence of any figures relating to Arabs, Turks, Albanians and East Europeans amongst the offenders. In view of the degree to which such groups feature amongst sex criminals, this inevitably leads one to speculate whether the researchers have followed the example of the FBI and included them under the single category “white”, so as to inflate the number they can pass off as native Britons.

The media will lie and lie and twist and squirm, however, the glaring fact is the research suggests that native white Britons are at least twenty times less likely to be involved in the disgusting crime of child sexual grooming than are the mass ranks of newcomers to our country.

Wednesday, 29 June 2011

Who will notice?

In advance of tomorrow's mass strike by Public servants, apparently immigration workers will be the first to walk out, do you really think it will make much difference?

Poll - 60% of Jamaicans believe Jamaica would be better off as a British colony

and this is supposed to be a "shock result"

Monday, 27 June 2011

The end of an era for Zimbabwe's last white farmers?

Click here for the Telegraph report

_____________
Hat Tip: Bryan K

Disrespecting the Dead Kafir

A disturbing video at the Gates of Vienna - click here

______________
Hat Tip Runic

Sunday, 26 June 2011

Biggest trial since Nuremberg completely ignored by MSM

Nationalists over 50 will I am sure remember the atrocities committed by the Khmer Rouge in Cambogia during the 1970′s.

It’s a shame that school children are being kept in the dark about this heinous crime against humanity, but maybe not so surprising as the Marxists who run the education system are in denial about any atrocities committed by communists.

Continue reading at the London Patriot

_________________
Thanks to Runic

The Duke Lacrosse Three


There have been some recent comments to two linked articles I posted in 2009 Balancing Prosecutions- Rape, Lies  and Academia and Balancing Prosecutions - revisiting Duke Lacrosse, which most readers may have missed unless they subscribed to those threads, but which I felt deserved a wider readership. The Duke Lacrosse case was a very important event because the forces ranged against the white race, and in particular white males, exposed their true agenda.  They bared their teeth and, albeit only briefly were forced into the open, we saw their nakedness, we saw their hate, and it was an ugly sight.

The media, the law and academia attempted the blood sacrifice of three innocent young men on the alter of their genocidal agenda, they almost succeeded, but for once they were caught in the act.  

It happened in America, but it could have happened anywhere in the besieged western world.  We should remember the Duke Lacrosse case, because it shows us how much they hate us, and what we are really up against.  This is the reason I return to it so often:

The following comments were received earlier this week

Anonymous: June 24 16:23
Mangum, the hoaxer, was charged with attempted murder in 2010.

In 2011 she did manage to murder someone.

"It's Crystal Magnum. THE Crystal Magnum," he told the emergency operator. "I told him she was trouble from the damn beginning."

Much of the media still cannot be bothered to get her name right.

She'd been involved with the courts before. One night in 2002, she lifted a taxi driver's keys while giving him a lap dance. With a blood alcohol level twice the legal limit, Mangum then stole the cab. Police chased her through the city; she was eventually arrested, but not before nearly running over a cop as he approached her car.

 At 17, she told police that three men had raped her when she was 14, but the case was dropped when she didn't follow through with the authorities. Her father later told reporters that he didn't believe that she'd been raped then.

Also of interest is Tara Levicy.

Tara Levicy, the nurse who reported on the condition of Crystal Mangum after the alleged rape, shrugged off the absence of physical evidence of assault and the lack of lacrosse-player DNA with a feminist slogan: "Rape is about power, not passion."

She was also a Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner in training. She was not qualified to do the job she was asked to do.

For example she could not explain why if the perpetrators had not used condoms she had none of their semen in her but she had semen from other men.

False rape claims are not about justice but power.

Michael Nifong, whose parents had gone to Duke, was known for his hatred of Duke University and its students. According to Patsy McDonald, a law school classmate, he also had a "deep-seated antipathy to lacrosse players."

The Lacrosse season was cancelled and the coach was sacked before being reinstated.

Collin Finnerty and Reade Seligmann are indicted for the sexual assault and kidnapping of Crystal Mangum. They turn themselves into authorities at the back of the Durham County Jail. They were handcuffed and driven 15 yards to the front of the jail, where they were then paraded in front of waiting camera crews.

Richard Brodhead makes an appearance at the Durham Chamber of Commerce meeting, two days after Reade Seligmann and Collin Finnerty are arrested. WRAL-TV quotes Brodhead as saying, “If our students did what is alleged, it is appalling to the worst degree. If they didn’t do it, whatever they did is bad enough." So not committing a crime is .. a crime?

A black guy sacked from a TV programme (was it because he did not toe the line?) and Selena Roberts (who was part of the misleaders) got his job.

How many of these rentamob protesters had heard of Rakheem Bolton?

Where were the slutwalkers, the sloganeers, the group of 88, and other "concerned citizens" complaining that someone said that his victim "made him rape her"?

"Rape is about power, not passion." (But will be ignored when white devil woman is the victim?)

Anonymous: June 25th 11:18 

"so called feminists, for whom the protection of women was clearly not a priority."

As we see in the Hilaire S. case in Texas where nobody has criticised a school for kicking a cheerleader off the squad who refused to cheer for her rapist.

Selena Roberts et al must have been very busy not to notice this.
________________
The three part Balancing Prosecutions series can be read here.

TRYING TO PULL IT ALL TOGETHER. - By Mike Wilson


I have posted regular blog contributor Mike Wilson's latest article at Sarah Maid of Albion II, where it can be read by clicking here.

The reason I have decided to publish it on the second site is due to the controversial and sensitive nature of the subject matter, which readers will appreciate when they see the image accompanying the essay.

Mike sent me the article earlier in the week, and I have taken some time to think about it before I decided to publish it.  However, it is an interesting article, and in the interests of free speech I think it deserves to be published.

By publishing Mike Wilson's article I do not endorse the views he has expressed, neither do I reject them by putting them on the second site.

I have not taken a view on the issues in question and do not know whether the documents Mike refers to are genuine or not.  This is why I felt it necessary to place the article in context.

Please click here to read Mike Wilsons essay "Trying to Pull it All Together".

"Colour blind" double standards

They would never do this

Anthony Hopkins as Martin Luther King Jnr

and Hell would have frozen over before they did this ...
Brad Pitt and Angelina Joli as Nelson and Winnie Mandela

King and the Mandelas were/are, of course, real people, however what are the chances of this casting choice ......??
Welsh Comedienne Ruth Jones as fictional Botswanan lady Detective Mma Precious Ramotswe in "The Number 1 Ladies Detective agency".

They even insist in casting black actors as the animal characters from the Lion King on account of them being "African" animals, and, of course,  there would be outrage if a 21st Century white actor played a character from African or Asian legend. - Daniel Craig as the Kikuyu god Ngai or Rene Zellwegger as the Hindu goddess Shiva perhaps?

  So why is this acceptable....?
Idris Elba playing Heimdall "the whitest of the Gods" from Nordic legend in the movie "Thor"

Chipo Chung (left) playing Vivian in the new TV version of "Camelot"

Vivian is a new character created especially for this production of Camelot, she is effectively a Medieval PA to Arthur's evil half sister Morgan le Fey.

In the Arthurian legend the name Vivian (or Vivienne) is occasionally the name attributed to the Lady in the Lake* or of a woman who seduces Merlin, nowhere are either described as a black and tattooed woman of multiple ethnic origins.  This is not  "colour blind" casting either as Vivan's ethnicity was explained when she arrived, in that she claimed to be "descended from slaves brought to Britain by the Romans," thus promoting the myth that Britain has been multicultural since the Roman times.

It will be interesting to see how much propaganda capital is wrung out of this deliberate casting decision.

This is not the first time the legend of Camelot has been used for propaganda (or brain washing) purposes.  British readers may of course recall that in the recent (2008 -2010) children's TV series "Merlin" Arthur didn't fall for Guinevere but for ..ahem ...Gwen (above)

Other characters from English folklore have also been ethnically cleansed. Who can forget the casting of Friar Tuck in the recent television adaptation of Robin Hood (the cast also included Anjali Jay as a feisty Muslim feminist amongst Robin's Merry ... persons) - like Merlin, this early evening show was primarily aimed at children.

In defence of this type of casting, its supporters point to Ben Kingsley playing Ghandi and Elizabeth Taylor playing Cleopatra, however those movies were made many years ago (almost half a century in the case of Cleopatra) and of course Ben Kingsley is half Indian, being born Krishna Pandit Bhanji, whereas Cleopatra was in reality of Caucasian, Greek, ancestry, so Taylor's casting was not inappropriate (unlike those above).

In any event such things would never occur now. In the 21st century it is unthinkable that movie makers would cast white actors in the role of characters, real or legendary from any other race.  However, when it comes to our history, and our legends then anything goes.         

_________________________________

(*in this version of Camelot they decided to call the lady in the lake "Excalibur" - you know, after the sword)  


________________________________________
Foot Note


Idris Elba who plays Heimdall in Thor, also stars as the "highly intelligent" black cop Luther in the TV series of the same name (together with that actress with the odd mouth who first played Jane Eyre but has since dedicated her career to portraying what the readers of Stormfront politely term 'mud sharks').  The second series of Luther is running at the moment, the first series was a ratings disaster, however, the BBC re-commissioned it all the same - they clearly intend to keep forcing their multicultural propaganda down our throats whether we like it or not.   

Friday, 24 June 2011

A culture debased

There was a trailer for a new TV show on earlier, it is a US import called Keeping Up with the Kardashians  It felt somewhat surreal in that it seemed it should have been narrated by someone like David Attenbrough a man who has dedicated his career to reporting  on the more bizarre zoological phenomenon.

Its a sad fact of life that whenever you think that our celebrity culture can not sink any lower, something comes along to prove you wrong.  However, surely this has to be the very bottom of the trench.
 
This is life Jim, but not as we know it. Suddenly the late Anna Nicole Smith seems to have been so much more refined than I remembered.
 
 

A Northern Agenda


I am not sure what the Latin is for “you get what you vote for” however, I suspect the Scottish electorate will soon be discovering the political meaning of caveat emptor (buyer beware). Having voted the Scottish National party a surprise commanding victory at the Scottish Parliamentary elections in May they may soon find out, to their cost, exactly what the SNP stand for.

The SNP are rather unique amongst parties who call themselves “Nationalist” in that they apparently couldn’t give a toss about their nation’s nationals. Indeed they tend to take the view that a Scottish person, if such a creature exists, can be anyone from any part of the planet who has happened to land at Glasgow airport, arrived on the East Coast line from Newcastle or swum ashore at Carnoustie.

It would appear that their stated desire to break away from the united Kingdom has less to do with the Sovereignty of the native Scots as it is about creating a left wing fantasy multi-cultural melting pot to the  north of Hadrian’s Wall.

In pursuit of this aim, and not content to play lip service to the Coalition government’s mythical immigration cap, the SNP Leader Alex Salmond insisted earlier this week that Scotland should be exempt from immigration controls and be allowed to open its boarders to thousands upon thousands on non-European immigrants, and that a wave of non-EU nationals should be allowed to settle north of the Border.

Mr Salmond also put forward plans to allow thousands of jobless students from abroad to remain in the country.

Meanwhile the SNP External Affairs Minister, a plump, and seemingly very drunk woman called Hyslop argued that Scotland should be given an exception from the what she referred to as a 'damaging' and 'negative' migration cap ("damaging" to what one wonders, an agenda perhaps?).

Despite the evidence from across Western World where economies such as Greece, Portugal, Ireland Spain and Italy are struggling and collapsing under the weight of immigration, whilst closer to home where after decades of immigration at previously unseen levels the British economy is in the worst state it has ever been and immigrant swamped America is plummeting towards bankruptcy, Alex and his little band of socialists appear to be labouring under the belief that uncontrolled immigration will somehow “boost” the Scottish economy.

Can people quite so stupid have actually been voted into even limited regional power, and be seriously aspiring to run an independent nation?. How could this possibly have happened? How could voters have trusted such people to run the Scottish parliament? Recent news reports confirming that Scotland leads the world in cocaine use may offer some clues.

However, maybe I am being too generous to little Mr. Salmond and his band of pretend nationalists. Could it be that what I am characterising as stupidity is actually something more malevolent. They are arguing for uncontrolled immigration at a time when joblessness in Scotland is at its highest in and when the economy is suffering from the worst recession generations. They surely must know what damage their proposals would cause.

Furthermore, they are fully aware that whilst Scotland remains part of the Union, and even if they left the Union but remained within the EU, there is no legal or practical way by which immigrants arriving in Scotland can be prevented from moving to any other part of the country, thus spreading that damage as widely as possible.

There is no benign explanation for this latest political lunacy, yet are these people really lunatics? So what is the plan?

As politicians continue to put pursue ever more insane and damaging policies, there comes a time when one has to question their motives and what it is they are trying to achieve.

The SNP make no pretense over their ultimate goal of breaking up the United Kingdom, but do they really intend to do so in order to put a viable alternative in its place, or is the break up, the destruction of the nation, in itself, the ultimate aim?

Given the SNP appear committed to the creation of an independent Scotland which is no longer Scottish, such a conclusion is hard to resist.


Thursday, 23 June 2011

Putting Political Correctness before Children

A government minister believes a combination of political correctness and racial sensitivities have kept many cases of child sex grooming "under the radar". Report

_______________
Hat Tip: Pym Pernell : It is official.  It is more important NOT to upset someone from an ethnic background than it is to protect OUR children from sexual abuse and murder (Charlene Downes / Paige Chivers who are both missing)

Wilders Acquitted - Muslims not happy


Minorities groups said today they would now take the case against Geert Wilders to the United Nations Human Rights Committee, arguing this morning's court ruling meant the Netherlands had failed to protect ethnic minorities from discrimination.

Their fury followed Mr Wilders' acquittal on all charges of inciting hatred against Muslims after he described Islam as fascist and compared the Quran to Hitler's Mein Kampf.  Amsterdam judge Marcel van Oosten accepted the Freedom Party leader's statements were directed at Islam and not at Muslim believers. They were, therefore the judge ruled, "acceptable within the context of public debate".

After a trial which has lasted many months, Wilders left court to cheers and applause from his supporters, but their delight was not shared by Muslim groups "The acquittal means that the right of minorities to remain free of hate speech has been breached. We are going to claim our rights at the U.N.," said Mohamed Rabbae of the National Council for Moroccans  Meanwhile Ties Prakken, the lawyer for the minority groups who had campaigned for this prosecution expressed "deep disappointment".

Outside the courtroom, the 47-year-old politician said he was "incredibly happy" with the verdict."It's not only an acquittal for me, but a victory for freedom of expression in the Netherlands," he said.

The outcome is expected to significantly strengthen Geert Wilders position in the Netherlands despite the expected posturing by Multicultural zealots and and anti-Western groups at the United Nations.

Monday, 20 June 2011

Mogadishu then and now

 Mogadishu Somalia as the capital of the Italian colony of Somaliland in the 1950's
 
 

Independent Mogadishu 2011, the most dangerous city on Earth
________________________________

Related: Postcards from Colonial Eritrea

Sunday, 19 June 2011

Losing things of value

Often pleasure can be gained from the simplest of things. A weekend breakfast treat I have enjoyed for most of my life is a soft boiled egg together with, what most people refer to as “soldiers”, but which my mother always called “dip fingers”, that is to say buttered toast, or sometimes bread, cut into finger like strips which can be dipped into the soft yellow yolk.

Personally I find the best results are achieved if you part boil the egg and then coddle it in hot water. To do this I bring the water to the boil, carefully drop the egg in to it, and leave it to to boil at full heat for one minute, before turning the heat off and allowing the egg to rest (coddle) in the hot water for between five and eight minutes depending upon the size of the egg and how runny or not one likes the yoke to be.  For my taste a five minutes and ten second coddle produces a perfect egg, whereas my husband, who I suspect, as a teenager, may have been scared by Edwina Currie prefers a firmer yolk, so his eggs receive a seven minute coddle.

One of the simplest breakfast dishes possible, certainly one of the simplest ways to cook an egg, but one which, for those of us who like eggs, is unfailingly a pleasure to eat.

Boiled eggs are, of course, eaten all over the world, in Singapore, soft boiled eggs are known as “half boiled eggs” but they are eaten in a very different way, tipped out of their shell's into bowls and mixed with Soy sauce.  The Swedish on the other hand cook their eggs until they are hard and serve them with “kalles kaviar” - otherwise known as cod's roe.

However, a boiled egg served in its shell, with the top sliced off, sitting in a china egg cup, and served with buttered toast soldiers strikes one as being quintessentially English. Certainly it is a breakfast dish which has been served to British children, and secretly enjoyed by British adults, for many decades, maybe centuries, and has signified the breaking of the night fast in Britain and in every corner of what was once her Empire for generations.

Egg and soldiers, buttered scones, Yorkshire pudding, crumble, custard roast beef or muffins. The simple pleasure of such simple treats, enjoyed before us by generations of English men and women is something we can share with those who went before us, even if was are no longer permitted to share their certainty of their role within the world or their pride in what we are as a people.

However, much has changed, not only in the way we are required to perceive ourselves, but also in how we view our food.

Although, in recent years, some of the better chefs began to rediscover the forgotten glory of English cuisine, in the last forty years or so it has become fashionable to mock English food and and portray it as amounting to little more than a dried up pork chop served with soggy cabbage and boiled potato. Of course, the reality is in fact very different, even if  we ignore some of the delicious regional dishes which food critics are beginning to revisit and enjoy, but concentrate upon the most derided of British recipes they include some of the most ultimately successful comfort food ever invented.

Created in a world before central heating when for nine months out of twelve a family needed warmth and substance to sustain them, there is little in the world as comforting and appetising as food like Shepard's pie, steak and kidney (or steak and ale if you prefer), rhubarb crumble or bangers and mash.  Such food may now be viewed as “heavy” but in a different time, before cars and sedentary lifestyles, that is what was required, in the same way the more exotic flavours from far away places such as Asia or Mexico were designed to hide the taste of putrid meat, much of British food was designed to get one through a British winter, and were massively successful in doing so.

Traditional British food can be as appetising as any nations, with flavours and ingredients which can easily adapt to a health conscious, centrally heated modern life style, but it is not "cool" to say so.  

Multicultural zealots crow that the British now love curry, the subliminal propaganda in their message being that curry is a benefit only possible due to mass immigration, an assertion which ignores the fact Britain was a nation of tea drinkers for centuries before we thought it necessary to import the half the Indian sub-continent to live amongst us.  Furthermore, do the same fanatics ever suggest that the international popularity of hamburgers and Coca-cola means that America should invade the world?

The denigration of simple English food is but a part of a far larger and more sinister campaign, to downgrade all things traditionally viewed as British, or even European, whilst promoting all things imported.  It is a malevolent campaign which exploits the natural instinct to enjoy the exotic, with the implicit suggestion that the “the other”, the foreign and the exotic is “better”.

When it comes to music, for instance, we are told that music which appeals to the baser instincts is somehow more democratic and less elitist than that which touches other instincts, which are less easy to define.  For centuries European musicians and composers have strived to appeal to the heart and to touch the soul, yet in this age their music has been eclipsed by rhythms which caresses gyrating loins and lyrics which worship the posturing, gangster, aggressions of other cultures.   

Even songs of love are now viewed as being of less value than those which celebrate other emotions.

It is of course easier to teach the lazy and the stupid to enjoy what pleasures their groin rather than their soul, but is it better?

In few areas has beauty been so starkly rejected in favour of ugliness as it has in art. When we look at the great art of our forebears what are the feelings and emotions the images create? Are they similar in any way to the feelings and emotions evoked by paintings made with dung, crucifixes in urine, unmade beds or animal corpses in formaldehyde? I don't think so.

Why is beauty no longer considered appropriate to art?.

The same applies to our architecture. In a thousand years from now will people flock to view the glass, steel and plastic architecture of our age as we still flock to view the great cathedrals of Rome the triumphal Viennese palaces  or the stately homes and castles of England?

Are any of these changes really for the better, and is that really the point? Is the whole purpose to create something new or is the destruction of what went before what its really all about?

Like our heritage, so much within our culture is now actively denied.  Speak of British culture and some baying moron will jump in with some mocking sarcastic quip about morris dancing or cheese rolling.  To hear them speak is as if Tallis and Elgar never existed, as if English choirs never sang as if Shakespeare, Chaucer, Dickens and Austin never wrote and as if haunting folk songs never echoed along our coasts.

To respect other cultures it is not necessary to disrespect or deny our own, but that is what is happening, so maybe respecting other cultures is not the point at all.

The point is to so devalue our culture in our eyes that we will not care what happens to it.  After all, a man will only fight to defend that which he loves whilst he still loves it, if he ceases to love it why would he fight for it? Of course, if he is never taught what he has he will not miss it when its taken from him, and if he's never seen the stars he will never know their beauty and will not care if they cease to be.

You can only miss what you know, or what you can remember.  If I was never allowed another boiled egg on Sunday morning, I would miss them, but if I had never had one I would not know what I missed, and it I was told that they were nasty, why wouldn't I believe it? On a more mundane level if instead of boiling my egg, I had broken it into an omelet and mixed it with fried onions, pepper herbs and spices, it might be nice, but it wouldn't be the same.

That may sound a tiny issue, but there are a million different different experiences, feelings thoughts and objects which come together to create a national identity, we can lose them one by one until we lose them all.  

Our enemies seek to take away what we value by changing how we view it. The louder they play the music the less easy it is to hear the words and the spicier they make our food the less we realise what we are really being fed.

As the music around us gets louder and our food is more exotic, we are told that its better, but it isn't better, its merely different.  However, if it carries on long enough we won't know that any more.

The Land of make believe

Stand by for this story to suddenly go very quite!!

Thursday, 16 June 2011

Tesco’s Profit Fall signals the Beginning of the End of Globalisation


The Globalised Utopia

The Globalised Utopia envisaged by ‘Progressives’ requires the integration of the world through trade as encourage by new technologies.  Thanks to the powerful universal solvent of computerisation and the internet, we will all become so interdependent through the mutually beneficial exchange of goods and services and so deracinated through the free flow of Capital and Labour, that all the apparent differences of race, culture and religion will disappear.  The people of the world will live in harmony forever in a state of total  sameness. This dream is of Utopia for some. For the more realistic it is not so much a vision as a nightmare of never ending, inescapable tedium and cultural atrophy.

The Reality of Tesco

Well, so much for this essentially Marxoid theory.  What is the reality? For the Utopian Globalisers there was a chilling foretaste of a far more likely future in the news this week from Tesco’s that like-for-like sales over its first quarter fell by 0.1% excluding VAT and petrol.

The Daily Telegraph (14th June) reported a Tesco spokesman as explaining these results thusly: ‘High fuel costs continue to mean that customers have to direct some of their spending to petrol at the expense of their normal shopping and this remains a drag on both industry and our own like-for-like growth’.
According to Laurie McIlwee, Tesco’s finance director, 70% of the company’s customers say that the high price of petrol is their biggest concern. Of these 30% are trying to cut down on car usage.

Chronicle of a Death Foretold:  Out -of - Town Mega Markets and Shopping Malls

The Daily Mail (14th June) reported that, ‘Tesco said that spiralling cost of fuel was changing the way consumers shopped with many making more frequent trips to smaller city centre stores rather than using the car for one weekly shopping trip’.

Significantly, one line which saw increased sales was bicycles. Sales of these rose by 15%  as ’customers looked for cheaper ways of getting about.’

Fuel Costs and a Change in the Way we Live

We can see  that escalating fuel prices are rapidly  changing people’s way of living.  Shopping Malls and supermarkets depend on the motor car. The huge car parks with which they are invariably surrounded underline this fact. And it is not just the supermarkets but what’s in them that depends on oil. High –value produce such as flowers from Kenya  depend on cheap air transport  but as has often been pointed out, everything else depends on some form of oil-fuelled transport . And oil –based  fertilisers and  pesticides are of course essential in the production of  just about all the food most people eat.

The Long-Term Implications

Oil prices in the international markets are subject to a great deal of  manipulation. But the long-term term trend is clear –  a rapid move upwards. The impact of exorbitantly high transport costs signals the end of the ’era of mobility.’ This is already dealing a death blow not just to the way of shopping we have come to take for granted in recent decades but to the current urban landscapes and expansive ways of living based on personal motor vehicle ownership and cheap fuel. We are already witnessing the beginnings of a retreat into much more compact, almost pre-industrial communities where everything will have to be within easy reach, quite possibly on foot or by bicycle.

Nuclear Power the Answer?

Nuclear power is thought of as the solution to the oil conundrum. But most of our needs are for things that electricity can’t do very well, if at all. For example, you can’t fly aeroplanes on electricity or make the fertilisers and pesticides we currently make out of hydrocarbons with it. Nor can electricity replace the diesel-powered industrial scale farming we currently enjoy. In any case, many of the items used in nuclear power – and the goods that use electricity such as computers and other electrical goods, including batteries, depend heavily on oil – based components in their production.

Local and  Global

This already –occurring shrinkage of people’s personal horizons will be projected globally. As international trade and travel atrophy, so too will the drive to One World by the Globalising Visionaries and International Big Business. Thanks to rising oil and food prices the world of the future and we in particular will be lot poorer than has been hoped. And instead of a global village we will have a world of villages.

It’s an ill wind…

Saturday, 11 June 2011

Feeding Frenzy in Alaska

US Media descend on Wasilla Alaska

The media feeding frenzy in America over the release of 24,000 e-mails written by Sarah Palin during her period as governor of Alaska has certainly been unedifying.

At a time when the US economy is on the brink of going into free fall, where the true level of unemployment is at least twice the official figure of 9.1% and the country, not unlike our own, has been getting involved in some very unwise conflicts in the Middle East, the American News media is scurrying to Alaska in order to search through thousands of pages in the hope of finding something .... anything ... which they can use to either mock Mrs. Palin, or, if they strike gold, to prove she is a bad person.

Sarah Palin is, of course. a private citizen, she holds no official office and has not declared herself a candidate for any political race. Yet the rapidly shrinking titans of American journalism are frantic to destroy her.

This same media who have refused to investigate the myriad inconsistencies in the current US president's background, who have actively withheld material which might show him in an unfavourable light,* studiously ignored any number of gaffes and blunders he has committed, and accepted without the merest hesitation the highly dubious proof of birth he recently released, is prepared to go to any lengths to investigate and expose every typographical error and unscripted aside committed to e-mail by a woman whom they insist is too dumb to threaten their big eared darling in a future electoral contest.

So afraid are they that they that they might miss the “Gotcha!”e-mail that both the New York Times and the Washington Post have asked their readers to assist them in searching through this treasure trove of electronic trivia in the hope of spotting a Palin tongue slip.   

It isn't only in America where the anticipation is unrestrained. NewsNight's Emily Maitlis giggled like an excited schoolgirl last night when discussing with a US colleague by satellite what potential gems might come to light.

Twenty four hours later, and if this report is anything to go by, things are not looking so rosy for the Palin hating media. So far no smoking gun has been unearthed but instead only evidence of a hard working Governor, who was empathetic towards her staff and generally a pleasant and decent person.  To his credit the Journalist reporting from Wasilla had the good grace to look ashamed. (or is he just grieving for his career?)

Of course, they will find something they can distort and exploit. After all how many of us could survive quite such close scrutiny of two to three years worth of our private e-ail exchanges.

However, this episode together the ongoing, and almost unprecedented campaign of vilification, mockery and blatant distortion which has been waged against Sarah Palin since McCain announced she would be his running mate in 2008, says a great deal more about the US media and the American left wing than it does about Sarah Palin.

It also tells us a lot about the current occupier of the White House, a man who has never had to fight his own battles and who has been protected and shielded by an obedient and entirely dishonest media ever since he stepped onto the political stage. Their determination to crush Sarah Palin is motivated entirely by the threat which they perceive she may pose to him, and they will not stop their search and destroy mission as long as she continues to pose that threat.

At present no other potential challenger is viewed as a threat to Obama, however, should one appear on the scene, they will be treated in exactly the same way.

However, it may be the media has over played its hand and that, finally the American public have started to see through what they are doing.  Let us hope so, if not for Sarah Palin's sake, for America's.     

______________________________

*The Los Angeles Times refused to make public videotape in its possession of Obama speaking at a dinner honouring radical Palestinian Jew-hater Khalid Rashidi (a tape which potentially could have alienated many Jewish Obama supporters and donors in 2008, and in 2012).  Meanwhile John Romano of Yes But However documents CBS's refusal to make public the entire hot mic recordings of Obama talking to donors (what could it be they did not want the public to hear?
_____
Hat Tip Thomas Lifson at American Thinker

Weekend reading - Three Excellent posts at the Gates of Vienna


I recommend you take the time this weekend to read the following recent posts at The Gates of Vienna blog

Panic at the Home office - what really happened when Teressa met Tommy?!

The Ideology of Pestilence - the ongoing invasion of Europe

When Treason Becomes The Norm: Why The Proposition Nation, Not Islam, Is Our Primary Enemy - by the noted blogger Fjordman

Friday, 10 June 2011

And the next one (s) ........

Serial rapist, Lawrence Dugbazah, 31, who came to Britain from Ghana in 1999 and who violently attacked a number of women walking home in the early hours of the morning, has been jailed indefinitely for public protection.

In addition to the rapes Dugbazah was guilty of a series of other crimes including theft from his employers, identity theft, fraud and passport offences.  




In other news Police in Greater Manchester are hunting Nigerian born suspected child rapist Henry Akhigbe (above) who vanished after being granted bail

Report

___________
Hat Tip: Runic

Thursday, 9 June 2011

And its not only the children who are at risk

An 18-year-old man has been sentenced indefinitely for the knife point rape of a pensioner in her Lancashire home.

Farhan Ahmed of Park Avenue, Barrowford, was found guilty at Burnley Crown Court of raping the 64-year-old.

The court heard he broke into her home in Nelson in the early hours of 28 October 2010 and threatened her with a knife while raping her.

Wednesday, 8 June 2011

Rochdale child 'prostitution ring' charges


Eight men have been remanded in custody over allegations of grooming* and committing sexual activity with teenage girls in Rochdale, Greater Manchester. The charges against them include rape, paying for sexual services of a child, trafficking a child and controlling child prostitution.

 The charged men are:
  • Abdul Rauf, 42,charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16, sexual activity and paying for the sexual services of a child and trafficking a child within the UK
  • Mohammed Ikhlaq, 41 , charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16
  • Adil Khan, 41, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16, two offences of sexual activity, and trafficking a child within the UK
  • Liaquat Shah, 41, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16 and two counts of rape
  • Mohammed Sajid, 34, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with a girl under 16, three offences of sexual activity and attempting to pay for the sexual services of a child
  • Qamar Shahzad, 29, charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16 and rape
  • Mohammed Amin, 44,  charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16, sexual assault and sexual activity
  • Abdul Aziz, 40,  charged with conspiracy to commit sexual activity with girls under 16, trafficking girls, rape and controlling child prostitution
 Meanwhile, three men aged between 34 and 43 answered bail on Tuesday and were re-bailed to later dates.
A further five men are due to answer bail on 21 June 2011. Police said one man had been handed over to the UK Border Agency. Hamid Safi, 21, of Kensington Street, Rochdale, failed to answer bail and is now wanted by police.

Try not to blink before the news story vanishes
____________________________
*Wikipedia definition of grooming here

Tuesday, 7 June 2011

Traitors amongst us

As I indicated in a series of essays I wrote earlier this year, entitled Genocide by Stealth, when evil forces set out to erase or “ethnically cleanse” a race of people it is not always necessary to use gas chambers, armies or weapons of mass destruction.  There are other more subtle and gradual means by which an ethnic group can, by a mixture cajoling and encouragement, be made to shift, inch by inch towards the precipice beyond the rim of which lies their destruction.

Although all genocide is evil, genocide by stealth, albeit less bloody in the immediate sense, requires true malevolence to carry it off. For it is a crime not committed in hot blood but in cold, and it is committed over a protracted period which may take many decades to complete.  Also, unlike most other genocides, the perpetrators of genocide by stealth, clearly do not consider their victims to be a threat to them, neither do they have cause for any personal desire for revenge, which might explain, if not excuse what they do.  It is genocide committed merely for the sake of an agenda.

As such, these perpetrators are perhaps even more heinous of other such monsters. They have no redeeming features, no excuse for what they do.  They were not caught up in a crazy moment of history, they have no bereavements unhealed wounds or historical grievances to avenge. They have had all the time in the world to contemplate what they are doing without being driven by any emotional trigger or sense of unbearable loss and pain. They are without compassion without morals and without redemption

They have lived their whole lives amongst their intended victims and have benefited greatly from doing so.  They are children of the same culture yet they have complete contempt for it and have spent their adulthood working for its destruction.

Some of them take the roles of propagandists and create new fake worlds of lies designed to misrepresent and undermine the civilisation they hate, that is to say, our civilisation.  They are the journalists, the movie makers, the commentators and general effluent better known as the media. A new book by a young writer called Benjamin Shapiro entitled Primetime Propaganda The true Hollywood story of how the Left took over your TV exposes the degree of misrepresentation which goes on in America.  (yes the writer is Jewish I know that matters to some of you – but this young man appears to be on our side, and we would be fools to allow his religion to blind us to the truth he has exposed.)

For instance in this telephone interview with John Langley the creator of the US TV show “Cops” which claims to portray street crime in America, Langley freely admits he deliberately over represents white crime levels and under represents that committed by “people of colour” by approximately 100% in each direction.
I have written a number of articles on the subject myself and I recommend Ben Shapiro's book.

It would be interesting to read a similar expose in Britain, can anyone doubt for instance that the BBC struggle to balance the ethnic make up of the crimes they portray on Crimewatch or how selective they have to be to ensure that there are at least 50% white villains amongst the "wanted faces" reported on by their BBC approved mixed race policeman come D list, and occasionally half nude, celebrity Rav Wilding.

However, the media are merely the spin doctors, they have a lot of influence but to do real damage you need real power, and over the last half century we have consistently granted power to politicians who are committed to the destruction of our society, and us along with it. 

Throughout the western world, we have voted for men and women who actively hate us and who will stop and nothing to inflict as much harm as they can upon us.  The American public have not yet realised quite how malevolent the man currently occupying the White House and his administration are, however, we in Britain were, this time well ahead of them in electing our own political assassins.   

Amongst the most evil of those politicians elected to power in Britain were those who made up the New Labour party who we voted into power in 1997, and kept there for thirteen long years.  It is gradually becoming clear that in those thirteen years New Labour did more deliberate damage to our nation, and to our people than any enemy we have ever faced before.

This brings me to the point of this item, in a superb article published on the Gates of Vienna blog last month writer Paul Weston shone a light on the level of treachery the New Labour party under was guilty of.  Paul's Weston's article  in case you missed it (as I might have done, had Mister Fox and blog reader Dawn not drawn it to my attention) is pasted below, and I recommend you circulate it widely:
_________
Hat Tip: Mister Fox and Dawn

Why Is This Not Treason?
by Paul Weston


    A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague. — Cicero
On the 3rd of January 1946, William Joyce, better known as Lord Haw-Haw, was the last man in Britain to be hanged for the ancient crime of treason. Unless a future government changes the law it is unlikely that traitors will ever dangle again, after Tony Blair rather conveniently repealed the death penalty for such a crime in 1998.

That is not to say treason no longer exists. Now the full extent of Labour’s thirteen-year rule has become apparent, an increasing number of Britons are volubly accusing the Labour Party of wilfully and cold-bloodedly betraying Britain and deliberately jeopardising our children’s future.

Lord Haw-Haw of course sided with the Nazis during the hot war of 1939-1945. The recent Labour government might not have been operating in a hot-war theatre, but they certainly carried out a warm-war against the British (principally the English) via mass immigration from one of the most hostile and anti-Western countries in the world, Pakistan.

Consider some of the following statistics:
  • Only nineteen percent of Pakistanis have a negative view of Al Qaeda and by default the Taliban, whilst seventy-five percent wish to see Sharia law implemented. British-born Muslims make an estimated four hundred thousand trips a year to Pakistan, where as many as thirty threats against Britain are being monitored at any given time.
  • Thirty-three percent of Muslim students in Britain think killing in the name of Islam is permissible. Only thirty-seven percent oppose the introduction of Sharia law and only twenty-five percent oppose the creation of a worldwide Muslim caliphate.
  • MI5 believe there are up to four thousand potential terrorists and thirteen thousand Al Qaeda sympathisers living in Britain. The CIA devotes an astonishing forty percent of their anti-terrorist homeland security operations against suspects not in Afghanistan or Waziristan, but in Britain itself — a country described by one CIA operative as “a swamp of Jihadis.”
  • Barack Obama’s counter-terrorist advisor Bruce Riedel recently stated: “The British Pakistani community is recognised as probably Al Qaeda’s best mechanism for launching an attack against North America.”
All in all then, it would seem less than prudent to allow any more bearded ideologues into Britain, yet the Labour government — and this must sound quite insane to most people — actually went to the extraordinary lengths of advertising for foreign colonisers from the very same country the Home Office was paying Danegeld to in a typically limp-wristed appeal to stop it from blowing us up.

The British Embassy in Pakistan distributed glossy pamphlets entitled “Multicultural Britain — a Land of Immigrants” which gave a raft of arguments as to the benefits of living in Britain such as well paid jobs, plain old welfare, and the prospect of inviting over the entire extended family (sans goat) once a British passport had been acquired.

And of course there was the rather unpleasant — nay, treacherous — implication that there was no such thing as a homogenous Britain, no such place as an English homeland, just an indeterminate area of land settled by a vague mongrel collection of disparate peoples including any number of rag-tag colonial racists awaiting divine racial redemption from those they once oppressed.

So desperate were the Labour traitors to destroy Britain that, having secured power, they immediately carried out two political acts which could only place our peaceful future in doubt. The Human Rights Convention was immediately incorporated into British law and immigration rules were relaxed to allow an open-door policy of mass Muslim immigration.

A few thousand people who could gently assimilate were of little use to the Labour government. To ensure the success of their revolutionary plan, they urgently needed inassimilable millions and were quite prepared to deceive the British public about the real number of Muslim immigrants — and the real reasons Tony Blair wanted them in Britain.

Click here to continue reading at The Gates of Vienna

Monday, 6 June 2011

Britain's First – Practical Campaigning


By Mister Fox

How do we defend ourselves against discrimination by the local authorities?

The Sky News website told of the effective amnesty which has been granted to a quarter of a million bogus asylum seekers and there were hundreds of comments that criticise this action by a clique of elites against the interests of our communities. Most commenters agree with our political and moral outlook but have been turned against us not only by media propaganda but inept nationalist leadership and apparently dishonest financial practices.

These comments tell us that there is a generally favourable political climate building up in a natural reaction to the destruction of our people, our culture and our communities by the dominant elites – political, financial, academic and cultural. But our people lack representation, a voice. There is a vacuum and a need for practical activism for the one unrepresented group who suffer constant discrimination from the authorities - White people!

An issue that shows how little our rulers care about us is foreign aid and this demands a campaign group to fight for Whites. Several issues have the potential to split the Establishment coalition. However, Dave and his anti-White colleagues in the coalition want to continue transferring taxpayers money to the third-world while making people in this country unemployed and cutting back on welfare and services. All across the country community centers are being closed, but those in inner cities are privileged.

Melanie Phillips of the Daily Mail wrote that after she appeared on QT making this point about overseas aid that she was flooded with letters of support from the public. We must state boldly that multi-racialism is inverted Nazism and promotes the interests of every identity group apart from heterosexual Whites who are scapegoats for everything that goes wrong.

Cameron recently made a speech trying to justify excessive overseas aid, apparently in response to large numbers contacting MP's. There is clear public anger. Another campaign could be on car insurance. Premiums have gone up by about 40-50% in many cases this year. Foreign gangs committing motor vehicle related fraud is costing millions and about £50 of what motorists now pay in insurance is to cover this. People need to know that mass immigration is costing them dear, something which voters care most about.

At this rate of immigration, we, the native Britons, will be outnumbered in half a century. The Conservatives promised to reduce the numbers but they have no intention of doing so, they actually want this situation. Immigration is higher now than under Labour. All the ruling parties are variations on the same theme.

Progressives see no danger in this because they have convinced themselves that immigrants are nice, harmless people who want to be like us. This patronising view, denies newcommers their humanity and pretends their human nature is different from ours. We are potentially evil; within every White, progressives think, is a Hitler waiting to get out. Why do they treat at us differently? - prejudice!” They are prejudiced against us and prejudiced in favour of ethnics. Underlying this prejudice is fear.

They are frightened of seeking to curb ethnic behaviour so firstly, they pretend it isn't happening and, secondly, then they use Whites as scapegoats. They can do so because they take our compliance for granted. They may be right, it is happening throughout Europe.

The white community is the only racial group in Britain without any political representation as a community. We have to organise to defend our communities because nothing is being distributed to us apart from just enough to bribe us to support a political party and to keep us quiet while we are dispossessed.

In order for Whites to have representation in our multi-cultural and multi-racial society then recognition of a common ethnic bond is required. It is by race that our dispossession is being carried out.

The multi-racial society has been imposed from the top; unless whites start to organise to protect white racial interests then we will suffer as ethnic communities take more and more. They can do so because they are organised and have official support. Meanwhile, they are growing in numbers and gaining more and more strength and power over us.

 
What can we do now to help our people and redress the imbalance of local power?

First of all, remember that the successful campaign groups like Green Peace, Gay Rights pushed certain orthodox issues forward albeit against other interest groups but they are not rebelling against the whole system of the elites and this demands certain key preliminaries.

We must have high standards of morality and conduct and act decisively against members who’s actions damage our cause, such as those who promote Nazi race hate, which enables state assets, such as the hostile media and Searchlight agents to discredit opposition to Globalism. These are issues which the establishment media have constantly used to beat previous movements: Nazism and thuggery. This behaviour is rightly unacceptable to the public which is why by using these antics infiltrators who pose as Nazis, commit or urge acts of violence which give the media “evidence” that we are like that. Another type to be watched for are those who foment internal discord and dissatisfaction which can destroy groups and damage the organisation through whole regions.

These  people must be brought before an appropriate committee and democratically examined and if found guilty, then they should be expelled. A proper disciplined organisation is imperative. But it must be democratic, open and above board.

Groups of campaigners or leafletters must always be of say five in number and always carry camera phones to record physical attacks because the politicians will use the UAF to carry out physical intimidation. Assailants must be photographed and prosecuted.

We must avoid the BNP's cry baby approach:” Boo Hoo, they won't give us democracy.” If they deny us a platform, tell them straight: “You are frightened of us. You know how much latent support we have and you are terrified!”

Multi-Racialism is itself based on race, but racism that centres round attacking and even persecuting Whites. Race is real not just as a genetic reality also as a Social Reality. The neo-Marxist elites have created a multi-racial society that denies the existence of race as a genetic reality, whilst simultaneously asserting the existence of race as a social construct and then impose laws that discriminate against all Whites on the basis of their race. A classic example was the prejudiced attacks against Dr. James Watson by semi-educated bigots like David Lammy and Ken Livingstone.

The politicians and media will still try to smear us as “haters” and “Nazis” but wait! Multi-Racialism is justified by reference to the holocaust but is now itself bringing about a new European persecution of Jews by Muslims. In Europe, especially France and Sweden, Jewish people are being persecuted by Muslims yet the media and politicians who decry us as “haters” and “racists” cover it up. Explain that to the population on a few leaflets and the faux saintliness of the elites will crumble before their eyes.

We need to be active in communities like Southall, Tower Hamlets, Bradford and Handsworth, anywhere where Whites are a minority, or soon to be racial minority. We must help them organise community and political structures that allow them to fight for their share of social resources where they are being treated less favourably than the privileged ethnic groups. If we can attract people with legal knowledge we could open community advice centres.

There is not one community centre in any London inner city borough for the white families who live in those areas – yet there are many for Black, Chinese, Muslim, Sikh, Hindu or Jewish community centres and charities. We are entitled to equal representation. The disparity is obvious.

There is a proven need to start using resources on community outreach programmes in inner city areas to assist the white community to come together so as to enable them to obtain the same rights as ethnic communities do.

That means parity of social facilities - youth clubs, sports centres, community centres etc and if requests for equal white rights and facilities are refused and our bids for those facilties turned down then not only does this expose the anti-White racist double standards of the authorities, it creates grounds for legal challenge as it demonstrates the discrimination against White people of the local authorities. It also galvanises the oppressed local White populations in developing actions for equal racial treatment.
This is an opportunity after years of inept political leaders to become, in contemporary political language:

1) The voice of white rights

2) a civil justice campaign for white rights

3) a social justice campaign for white social justice

Election campaigns waste millions in fighting loaded elections when we it could be spent them on developing community networks that allow us to have power at the level of the community. That is apart from developing a network of parish councillors until we have a significant number which will generate success from success because we will have something to show to the voters – its like an impressive port folio.

We have to face the reality that even in the most appalling situations the police will take the side of ethnics against us so we need to build local representation networks with proper legal advice. The issue of White rights has become of paramount political importance to defend our oppressed people from :

a) the systematic racist gang-raping of young White girls by Muslim rape gangs,

b) The state anti-white racism in the guise of affirmative action and political discrimination programmes,

c) the one-sided allocation of funds from councils and community groups to immigrant, asylum seeker, race based groups that discriminate directly and indirectly

d) The growth of failure by Whites in education

e) White working class unemployment in order to import cheap labour

f) integrating white Eastern European communities into a white nationalist political movement

g) social justice and equal rights for whites in the context of social housing, education, the NHS, council housing and community centres for kids etc etc

These have never been taken up but our people who are discriminated against and given second-class treatment deserve better. They need a campaign organisation to fight for them and reinvigorate a dispossessed and abandoned White electorate.

Refuse to change our beliefs to those of the self-seeking and corrupt neo-Marxist elites. Why give up our beliefs in the vain hope that the media will go easy on us - they will not. They can not because they need us as a bogey group to convince themselves that they are morally right when they are obviously immoral and prejudiced against White people.

We need to fill the vacuum at the local community level.

Our unifying belief should be in a racial civil defence group for the forgotten people: our people. We must not sink to race hate like the Establishment who have tried to eradicate us; nor should we try to compromise with the evil ideology of the neo-Marxists which is race replacement of white British people by immigrants from the Third-World. We take up the cause of fighting for white people to exist as a people, as an ethnic group, and to stop them from being discriminated against in their own country by politicians who pretended to be their representatives to gain power and personal wealth.

We as the British part of the White race are being racially discriminated against and this provides us with the moral justification to act in defence of our people. We occupy the moral high ground. In Blackpool the police suppressed a report that showed 11 Muslim fast food outlets were being used as “honey traps” to lure young White girls as young as 11 and 12 into sex and then prostitution. That is an act of war on our people by a rival community.

The Director of Media Prosecutions Jeremy Paxman, who aggressively cross examines dissidents, uses foreign au pair girls as cheap labour. No wonder he likes immigration! These morally corrupt, hypocrites are actively harming the white community.

Every rape in Oslo over the past year was committed by a non-White man. Of 86 rapes in Oslo over the last five years, all 83 in which the perpetrator was identified were committed we can assume that almost all of these non-Western men were Muslims. We're also told that "almost all" the victims of these rapes have been ethnically Norwegian women..."

Sweden has been described as the rape capital of Europe or, more properly, for White women being raped by Muslims. We have similar problems here. A campaign to protect young White girls from foreign child-rapists appeals to the male protective instinct and the female instinct to care and nurture. It shows local authorities to be cruel, callous and biased against our people even in suffering.

The only community without representation is the white community - Blacks, Asians etc have organisations to represent their interests. They are encouraged to practice and develop their religions. They have lobby groups, legal groups, community centres special charities etc to represent and support them as ethnic, racial and religious communities in Britain – Whites have none. We must redress that and actively defend our people.

I have written on tactics before but the above is for present action not later when Race War has broken out.

I wish to acknowledge that this essay was inspired by a recent essay from Lee Barnes.

___________________
Click here for the reference notes relating to this article

Sunday, 5 June 2011

Death of Johannesburg


Click the image, or here to view the death of what was once ine of the world's great modern and cosmopolitan  cities

An Open letter from Dr. Frank Ellis to the Times Higher Education

To: Times Higher Education
Date: 4th June 2011, A.D.
Re: My Response to the Open Letter Published in the Times Higher Education 2ndJune 2011 signed by Alvergne et al in which Dr Satoshi Kanazawa is attacked for allegedly Sub-standard Research.

The signatories to this circular-letter to the Times Higher Education make much of the fact that Dr Kanazawa refuses to address criticism of his work and that he will not engage with his critics. There are two problems here. First, why is Dr Kanazawa expected to become involved in lengthy and time-consuming correspondence with people who object to his published work? If he wishes to do so that is a matter for him. If, however, he decides that his time can be more profitably spent by doing his research, rather than talking about it that is also a matter for him. I should also point out that when I challenged Bhikhu Parekh to provide sources for his claim, made in The Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain: Report of the Commission on the Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain (2000) that ‘Race, as is now widely acknowledged, is a social and political construct, not a biological or genetic fact. It cannot be used scientifically to account for the wide range of differences among peoples’ (Parekh, para 5.10, p.63), he just ignored me.

Second, the signatories begin their letter by referring to hostile comments made about Dr Kanazawa’s article (‘Why are Black Women Less Physically Attractive than other Women?’) in various fora. At no stage do they address the assertions and arguments of the article. Even if Dr Kanazawa’s question reflects some racial bias against blacks that itself does not automatically disqualify the search for an answer to a question that arises from bias against blacks. All research begins with a bias: the bias of interest. In any case, I thought that the pursuit of knowledge and ideas for its own sake was one of the founding principles of a university and other institutions of higher learning. Or am I to understand that this principle must be jettisoned when dealing with race?

Moreover, how can it be the case that Dr Kanazawa ‘rarely engages with his scientific critics’ if he submits articles for publication in journals? In the politically correct world of what purports to be higher education any researcher who submits an article in which he uses low mean black IQ to explain black failure is most emphatically engaging with his scientific critics: he serves notice that he rejects the current explanations for black failure (white racism, the legacy of colonialism and so on). Nor does Dr Kanazawa sin against academic convention, as asserted, when he has not published ‘corrections to the papers for which doubt has been cast on his conclusions’. In the academic world today, one which is dominated by various multiracial/multicultural orthodoxies, any researcher who concludes that low mean IQ can explain a great of black failure will have his conclusions subjected to ‘doubt’. Doubt does not constitute evidence of hard error. In fact ‘doubt’ is too polite a word. Any academic who rejects the cosy, sentimental assumptions of the left regarding race and racism can expect to be subjected to vicious ad hominem attacks. I experienced such attacks at Leeds University in 2006. Members of the faculty who agreed with me in private nevertheless maintained a cowardly public silence.

An answer to the question posed by Dr Kanazawa on the lack of black female attractiveness may have implications for understanding the weak family structures of blacks, their greater sexual promiscuity (the implications for the spread of AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases are obvious) and the high levels of black on white rape. Far more threateningly, the premise of Dr Kanazawa’s question implicitly posits the view that skin colour or any other visible racial characteristic is or may be a primary criterion in any hierarchy of racial beauty. In other words, Dr Kanazawa’s article is a direct challenge to the fallacious view that race is a social and political construct and that desirable qualities, such as sexual attractiveness and high IQ are uniformly and equally distributed among and between populations or that these evolutionary valuable assets should be so distributed. Is it this that provokes the hatred of what the signatories call ‘the evolutionary behavioural science community’ instead of a reasoned response? By ignoring the challenge thrown down by Dr Kanazawa the signatories to this letter are guilty of the very thing of which they accuse Dr Kanazawa: silence in the face of his trenchant criticism. They remain silent because they are frightened of race (as a genetic and biological reality) and they know that if they argue for or against Dr Kanazawa’s assertions they enter into the forbidden realm that race is in fact a genetic and biological reality.

The signatories then warn: ‘we feel compelled to state publicly that Kanazawa’s research should not be taken as representative of the evolutionary behavioural science community’. Well, I am compelled to state publicly that many scientific discoveries, inventions, technological advances and intellectual shifts in the status quo were not representative of any established community or group when they were first made. Innovation, discovery and invention are by their very nature outside the known and the expected and typically the work of individuals who are, happily for them, not part of any collective or ‘community’. Discoveries great and small, shock, offend or inspire awe, precisely because they are unknown, unexpected and often challenge reputations and powerful vested interests: they dislocate our expectations of the world about us. Socrates, Plato, Pythagoras, Heraclitus Kepler, Galileo, Darwin, Mendel, Leibnitz, Heisenberg, Einstein, Nietzsche, Rand, Solzhenitsyn, and the greatest mind of them all - Sir Isaac Newton – exemplify the historical trend, the path away from obscurantism towards knowledge and this elusive thing called Truth.

The signatories make much of the fact that the London School of Economics (LSE) will host a debate under the heading of ‘Is Evolutionary Psychology Racist?’ In the West, anything that challenges or undermines multiculturalism is deemed to be racist. For example, the following assertions are deemed to be racist in British universities: (i). race is a genetic and biological reality; (ii). all races and cultures are not equal; and (iii). mean black IQ is lower that mean white IQ (in the case of Sub-Saharan blacks, significantly lower), and this discrepancy has major consequences for real-existing multiculturalism in First-World states with large non-white populations.

The signatories to this letter betray their politically-correct credentials and their agenda when they write that a great deal of the research in the field of evolutionary psychology is ‘nuanced’ and ‘culturally-sensitive’. In plain English, if one regards low mean black IQ as a powerful and consistent explanation of black failure worldwide one is not demonstrating a ‘nuanced’ or ‘culturally-sensitive’ interpretation of the data if one makes those points. Ad hoc, ‘culturally- sensitive’ explanations have to be provided – colonialism, white racism, capitalism, multinationals, or in the case of Macpherson, institutional racism – anything will suffice, provided that it is not directly attributable to blacks and the way they behave.

When it comes to peer-reviewed articles in journals the critics of Dr Kanazawa want it both ways. Articles by Dr Kanazawa in peer-reviewed journals are deemed to be suspect yet articles in peer-reviewed journals which attack Dr Kanazawa are somehow above reproach. In fact the signatories admit as much when they write: ‘The peer review process is not perfect and appears to have failed when dealing with Kanazawa’s poor quality work’. Did anyone review the letter to the Times Higher Education attacking Dr Kanazawa?

The attacks on Dr Kanazawa reveal something of a war between journals. So: ‘Those of us who have reviewed his papers have had experiences where we have rejected papers of his for certain journals on scientific grounds, only to see the papers appear virtually unaltered in print in other journals, despite the detailed critiques of the papers given to Kanazawa by the reviewers and editors of the journals that rejected his papers’. Could it be that the scientific grounds alone, on which the signatories claim the reviewers rejected Dr Kanazawa’s articles, were not accepted by the editors of the journals in which the original unaltered articles were eventually published? One editor of a journal rejects an article for publication; another accepts the article. That an article is rejected by one journal (with reasons for rejection) does not mean that the author of the rejected article has to make changes before he submits the article to another journal. I thought diversity of scientific opinion was supposed to be a good thing. I hope that the editors of the journals in which Dr Kanazawa’s work has been published, editors who are now being criticised, will respond robustly to these accusations of academic incompetence.

It is a rule that the author of an article should not know the names of those who review his article; yet here we have signatories to an open letter to the Times Higher Education who claim to have reviewed Dr Kanazawa’s articles and found them to be inadequate on scientific grounds alone (of course) and are now openly violating the ethical code which requires that their assessment of an academic’s work be kept private. They publicly violate the ethical code required in the peer-review process by informing the world that they had earlier found Dr Kanazawa’s articles to be inadequate on scientific grounds (of course), and now, having violated that ethical code to attack Dr Kanazawa, they exploit the anonymity of the code so as to hide among a list of names. Who are these people that claimed to have reviewed Dr Kanazawa’s work? Why do they hide among others, protected by ‘we’? This blatant violation of the ethical code that governs peer review and which now serves as the basis for mounting these scurrilous attacks on Dr Kanazawa may well be actionable.

Highlighted here is that the whole process of peer review is wide open to abuse, and will be abused in areas such as global warming, race and IQ and sex differences. Another massive potential for abuse arises from the fact that nepotism and cliques are rife. If there is money, status and media adulation to be derived from telling the world that black failure is not due to low mean IQ but is caused by white racism then those who dissent from these evasions can expect to be ostracised and denied publication in the relevant journals. They also run the risk of losing their posts. The signatories to this letter know these outcomes full well. In the USA and in the UK there are countless examples of academics’ being harassed and threatened with loss of employment for attacking the cult of multiculturalism.

That the signatories to the letter attacking Kanazawa signal their support for academic freedom is, in this instance, cynical and tactically opportunistic on two counts. First, they write: ‘Academics who publish work that may be unpopular with some sections of the media or general public should not be condemned on those grounds’. The trouble with this is that it rather conveniently arrogates a special status to academic opinion, the much-vaunted peer-review process, as being decisive in rejecting Dr Kanazawa’s work. This process is massively flawed and wide open to abuse. Second, in writing this letter to the Times Higher Education the authors are manifestly reacting to the attention of the electronic and broadcast media, ignorant student activists, black special-interest groups and some members of the general public. The masses, as it were, having created an atmosphere of outrage against Dr Kanazawa, have prepared the way for the authors who now judge that the time is right for them to inflict the coup de grĂ¢ce on the hapless and isolated Dr Kanazawa.

The timing of the letter to the Times Higher Education in which Dr Kanazawa is attacked in this way is also rather convenient. Dr Kanazawa is, we are informed, currently the subject of an internal LSE investigation. The letter to the Times Higher Education, alongside the provisional findings of the investigation, could be used by some in the LSE as justification for suspending Dr Kanazawa pending an internal inquiry. Suspension at this stage would create the impression among the gullible that Dr Kanazawa is not being suspended for challenging the anti-intellectual orthodoxies mandated by political correctness in British universities - and so there can be no question that academic freedom and the institution of free speech are being violated – but because he has transgressed the conventions and codes of rigorous scientific method, as defined by the signatories to the letter to the Times Higher Education. According to this view he would be an impostor who should be expelled from ‘the evolutionary behavioural science community’ and lose his post at LSE. The LSE must not permit itself to be influenced by external rivalries and feuds.

I have no doubt that should Dr Kanazawa be suspended the delay between his suspension and any internal hearing will be used to examine all his published work with a view to citing any errors against him in the hearing. His work will be subjected to a level of scrutiny and criticism beyond that used in peer-review and will also be expected to meet higher standards of evidence than that used in the original peer-review process. Were this to happen it would amount to an academic version of double jeopardy and would represent a clear violation of due process. The signatories to this letter and other critics should ask themselves whether their own published work would survive full, open, heightened and post-publication scrutiny.

None of these attacks would have been made on Dr Kanazawa were he black or brown. Black or brown academics are able to make nonsensical, bizarre and often virulently anti-white racist statements without any sanction at all yet whites (and now Japanese) can expect to be chastised for anything that violates multicultural orthodoxy and especially for dissenting from the view that all races and cultures are the same. The evidence for a double standard here, a clear and obvious violation of scientific method, never mind the hypocrisy, is overwhelming and well documented.

As I have indicated in an earlier email to Professor Rees, the director of LSE, if Dr Kanazawa is suspended pending an internal hearing, others and I will offer our services and expertise as witnesses for the defence.


Frank Ellis