Sunday, 27 February 2011

Anonymous comments

Over the last few months this blog has been targeted by spammers, who use the anonymous poster facility to attempt to post spam, much of it pornographic. I suspect quite a lot of it is automated as we get multiple attacks all of the same message.

As this blog is moderated, I am able to stop it getting through, however, it is becoming rather time consuming and often quite distasteful as some of it is quite "graphic".

Another problem with the Anonymous poster facility is that threads become quite confusing, in the same way as would happen if half a dozen people called Brian all started posting at the same time.

I am therefore considering withdrawing the Anonymous poster option from comments. People without Blogger identities will still be able to post, but they will need to give themselves screen names. Please let me know if anyone would find this an inconvenience, or would prevent them from commenting.



Speech by president Nelson Mandela at a luncheon in honour of Muamar Gaddafi


Cape Town, 13 June 1999

Your Excellencies
Distinguished Guests
And My Dear Brother Leader

Those who dedicate themselves to causes affecting the lives of millions ought to have a clear understanding of history. They should plan their actions with a sense of their impact on those for whom they believe they act.

I know, My Brother Leader, that you and I, who have both been privileged and obliged by circumstance to be in such positions, have each in our own way tried to be true to that responsibility. Even so, we could not have planned things in such a way that you would be the last head of state I would officially receive on a bilateral basis before retiring from public office.

I am happy that it did, by chance, transpire this way.

The relationship between our two selves and between Libya and democratic South Africa has not been without controversy and therefore some special significance in world affairs.

As a responsible member of the international community of nations, South Africa would never defy predominant international opinion deliberately and merely for effect. This is a particular responsibility in a world that is fraught with possibilities of misunderstanding and consequent conflict and conflagration.

We remain convinced that respect for our multilateral bodies and compliance with their decisions, is crucial to stability, development and progress in a world still marked by tension, inequality and backwardness. This is so even where we may disagree as individual nations with those decisions.

In a world where the strong may seek to impose upon the more vulnerable; and where particular nations or groups of nations may still seek to decide the fate of the planet - in such a world respect for multilateralism, moderation of public discourse and a patient search for compromise become even more imperative to save the world from debilitating conflict and enduring inequality.

When we dismissed criticism of our friendship with yourself, My Brother Leader, and of the relationship between South Africa and Libya, it was precisely in defence of those values.

There must be a kernel of morality also to international behaviour. Of course, nations must place their own interests high on the list of considerations informing their international relations. But the amorality which decrees that might is right can not be the basis on which the world conducts itself in the next century.

It was pure expediency to call on democratic South Africa to turn its back on Libya and Qaddafi, who had assisted us in obtaining democracy at a time when those who now made that call were the friends of the enemies of democracy in South Africa.

Had we heeded those demands, we would have betrayed the very values and attitudes that allowed us as a nation to have adversaries sitting down and negotiating in a spirit of compromise. It would have meant denying that the South African experience could be a model and example for international behaviour.

In many ways, our modest contribution to resolving the Lockerbie issue will remain a highlight of the international aspects of our Presidency. No one can deny that the friendship and trust between South Africa and Libya played a significant part in arriving at this solution. If that be so, it vindicates our view that talking to one another and searching for peaceful solutions remain the surest way to resolve differences and advance peace and progress in the world.

We look forward with joy and anticipation to the full re-entry of Libya into the affairs of our continent and the world.

We have already seen Libya take up its role as an important actor on the African continent to help advance the peace process in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

South Africa is proud to acknowledge the coincidence between its own position and SADC's, on the one hand, and that of Libya on the other. We share the view that peace in the DRC can only be achieved through the withdrawal of all foreign forces and an inclusive political process of Congolese groups.

We appreciate very much Libya's indication that its own efforts will be co-ordinated with those of our regional organisation, SADC. This approach confounds those who suggest that Libya is less than fully committed to multilateralism. My Brother Leader is involved in the Congolese process as a facilitator of the SADC process, just as we were involved in the Lockerbie issue as facilitators for the United Nations. In such ways we advance the ideals of multilateral co-operation and discipline. And for that we thank our Brother Leader and the Libyan people.

It was with much appreciation that I received reports from my Minister of Trade and Industry about our recent trade delegation to Libya. The friendly political relations between our two countries are now being consolidated and deepened through trade. We look forward to South African companies and Libyan entities bridging our continent from North to South in concrete expressions of African unity.

My Brother Leader, I know that in the abstemious conditions of the North African desert it is not the custom to propose a toast. We are, however, overwhelmed by at last having here on this southern tip of Africa one of the revolutionary icons of our times.

I shall therefore take the liberty to invite our guests to rise and raise their glasses with me in salute to Muamar Qaddafi, our Brother Leader of the Revolution of the Libyan Jamahariya, and to growing friendship between the people of our two countries.

Issued by the Office of the President, June 13 1999


Hat Tip: JP

Saturday, 26 February 2011

Genocide - a poem by Mike Wilson


By Mile Wilson

The restless shadows flit across the scene

And from within a shout, a cry - a scream.

And figures black across the dark of night

Merge back into the shadows and take flight.

The morning brings the grim and grisly find-

The death and horror that the night has left behind.

The Afrikaner farmer and his wife

Both maimed and butchered with no sign of life.

All these lives taken make us cringe inside

Because we know that this is genocide.

The death and strangulation of a nation

In truth is nothing but abomination.

The deaths of farmers daily just mounts higher

As politicians keep fuelling the fire.

One Boer one bullet is the mindless shout

And daily this becomes a bloody rout.

The black police are rarely to the fore

When all their brethren knock at whitey’s door.

Shout justice for the farmers – there is none

Except the cold hard fact to own a gun.

These farms supported all – both white and black

But now these farmers have to face attack –

Not just from peasants with an eye for land

But from the politicians grubby hand.

The land must be divided for common good”

(This is why Zimbabwe imports food.)

Attacks on whites will never really stop

And Africans will never learn to crop.

Whilst politicians keep their brethren poor

The black distrust of whites will grow the more.

For whites, the harmony which they once had

With their own land is now gone bad.

For their future’s sake and that of all their kids

They must make plans and very soon to rid

Themselves of this ongoing evil –

And find some place where justice will prevail!


More White South Africans murdered

The ongoing carnage of South African whites, which some would have us believe is not happening, continued this week with at least a further three deaths. All the killings were officially blamed on robbery, but there is scant evidence to support such assumptions:

Man dies at Cape Small Holding

A 42-year-old man was found murdered in his home in Kraaifontein on this morning. Police were called by neighbours to a Joostenbergvlakte small holding in Kraaifontein, where the body was found around 05:30, said Captain Gerhard Niemand.

The man's body was found on a couch in his lounge with his hands tied with an electric cord and a stab wound to his chest.

According t the man's young children where asleep inside the house when what appeared to have been a robbery happened. The children were not harmed.

The murdered man's Toyota Tazz, which was stolen during the robbery, was found abandoned near Fisantekraal.

A case of murder and robbery was being investigated.

News report:

Question: if this was a "robbery" why was the only item "stolen" then abandoned?

Deaths at Family Barbecue

Two more white men were murdered earlier in the week, Edenvale residents Philip Jackson, 53, and Dillon Ensley, 21, were gunned down by armed black men while the victims were having a family barbecue in the backyard. There seemed no motive to justify for such excessive violence against an unarmed family: the so called ‘robbers’ only looted a few cellphones and some cash (the "robbery").

Present at the barbeque were Dillon Ensley, his girlfriend Stacey Jackson, 20, and her parents Pillip and Janet Jackson. Edenvale police said that while the four whites were being tied up in the kitchen, the men attempted to resist at which point Jackson was shot dead while Ensley was shot in the stomach. Mr Jackson died at the scene while Dillon Ensley died later in hospital.

The entire Afrikaans report can be read at:

Hat tip Jenny W

Tuesday, 22 February 2011

Dumbing Down of Youth - a poem by Mike Wilson

By Mike Wilson

We stare across the vacant face of youth
And in this mood see nothing but the truth.
The truth behind the dumbing down of thought.
The deed that drugs and untold vice has brought.

Our world is shaped by what has gone before,
The hands that beckon youth behind the door,
Entice the young to try this thing that’s new
And never care just what these drugs will do.

I well remember music just sublime
That evoked such thoughts of another time.
But that has passed and in its place we see
The rapper with his bold cacophony.

No music here but sing song voices bold
Exclaiming how their life has made them old.
The trouble is these groups are now so rife
That youngsters feel that this is now their life.

The gentler days we knew and loved have gone
Replaced by the ignoramus and his song.
The alcohol that fuels the party fire
Is adding fuel to youths very own pyre.

The mistakes we made in bringing up our young
Has brought an age that’s only just begun.
With no accountability for redress
Or fear of retribution none the less.

Our age was taught to respect law and order
And in this way our lives had shape and border.
Today our youth ignore the shape of law
And carry on regardless, as before.

Can we be proud of how we’ve shaped our youth
Without them ever knowing the real truth.
Whatever you shall sow then shall you reap
And nothing that is worthwhile comes so cheap.

A life worth living must be paid in full
And those who go before don’t have it all
Unless they are prepared to work and stint
Their graceless lives will be as hard as flint.

So come on now, wake up and be aware
That there are riches in this world for all to share.
Leave off your drugs and other mindless things
And launch into your future with widespread wings!

More on the Viennese Show Trial

Further to yesterday’s posting regarding the hate crime conviction against Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff for the crime of denigration of the teachings of a legally recognized religion, the Brussels journal has posted an analysis of the judgment and its implications, which makes interesting and indeed entertaining reading.

It should be noted that the offence for which Sabaditsch-Wolff was convicted did not initially feature amongst the charges originally brought against her. The religious denigration charge was in fact added by judge Bettina Neubauer (pictured above) late in the proceedings when it became clear the original charge of Incitement of racial hatred was not going to succeed.

Austrian law allows a judge to bring additional charges during a case, but this is rarely done, and the fact that the judge did so in this case is clear evidence that the Austrian authorities were determined to achieve a conviction against Sabaditsch-Wolff, whatever the cost.

The charge was based on one statement which the lecturer made when she described how the prophet Mohamed married his wife Aisha when she was six years of age and consummated the marriage three years later when the child was nine, adding "If this does not constitute paedophilia, what does?”

The basis of the judgment makes fascinating reading. Judge Neubauer found that it was not legally acceptable to apply the label ‘paedophile’ to Muhammad, for two distinct reasons:

1) Apart from the marriage to Aisha, which was formalized when she was 6 and consummated at the age of 9, Muhammad had many other women, in wedlock, as mistresses, or as war booty. This documents the fact that Muhammad did not have a primary sexual attraction directed towards minors.

2) The marriage, and thus the sexual relations with Aisha, did not end when she reached puberty, but continued until she was 18 and Muhammad died. This further underscores the fact that Muhammad was not attracted to her primarily due to her being a minor.

You can make of that quite incredible logic what you will. However, on the face of it this verdict Would arguably enable a rapist to deny rape on the basis that he usually has consensual sex.

The judgment also means that the claim that prophet Mohamed had sexual intercourse with a pre-pubescent girl, is no longer merely stated in holy text, such as the Hadith, it is also now a legally declared fact which has been confirmed by the courts of a major European nation.

I somehow doubt that's what was intended


The whole article can be read here, and is recommended. Further developments in this case are best followed at This is also where it is possible to support Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff financially. This is urgently needed, for in contrast to the prosecution, which is funded by the state, she has to foot all her expenses personally.

Monday, 21 February 2011

When the truth becomes the crime

Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff and Geert Wilders

Last Thursday a court in Vienna found lecturer and human rights activist Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff guilty of one count of “denigration of religious beliefs of a legally recognized religion” and she was fined the sum of €480. A relatively small sum, but she now has a hate crime conviction against her name.

Sabaditsch-Wolff's crime was to state, at a series of seminars about political Islam, that the Prophet Mohamed had sex with a child, his nine year old wife Aisha. Although acquitted of the more serious charge of inciting racial hatred, she was also convicted of being a “serial offender” despite this being her first offence.

Elizabeth is a regular writer at the Gates of Vienna who have written extensively about her case, links to their various articles can be found here, meanwhile American writer Diana West who runs the Death of the Grown Up blog has addressed the case in a recent posting “Willkomen to the Caliphate”, where she effectively argues that the conviction was in fact on the basis of Sharia law, not European law or what still passes for Austrian law.

It is interesting to note that the court did not find that the defendant had lied, at one point the judge stated that Aisha was 18 but later acknowledged that she had in fact attained that age at the time of Mohamed's death. Indeed the fact that Mohamed married Aisha while she was a child is largely undisputed and accepted as fact by most Islamic scholars. Marriage between an older man and a pre-pubescent girl was not unusual in Islamic culture during the prophet's life and remains so today in some Islamic countries.

The truth of the claim was irrelevant to the court. To convict Sabaditsch-Wolff, it was not necessary to demonstrate her claims were untrue, they were true, but merely to prove, as the court did, that she told a truth which some Muslims found offensive.

This was by no means an isolated case. Also last week French journalist Éric Zemmour was found guilty of incitement to racial hatred after telling a TV chat show that drug dealers were mostly "blacks and Arabs".

Once again, the truth or otherwise of Zemmour's claim was irrelevant to his conviction for he spoke a truth which French law bars him from speaking. It is illegal in France to reveal the race of criminal offenders, or to report rates of ethnic offending, presumably because to do so would be to reveal the truth of Monsieur Zemmour's illegal words.

Meanwhile in Holland it has been announced that the trial against PVV leader Gerrt Wilders for discrimination and inciting hatred will recommence on March 14th. As in the other cases mentioned, the truth or otherwise of Mr Wilders' words will have no bearing on his prosecution, all that matters is that they have offended Muslims and questioned the state dogma of multiculturalism.

Like Sabaditsch-Wolff and Zemmour, Wilders could join the growing group of people convicted of, and punished for, telling the truth.

In Britain, as we all know BNP leader Nick Griffin was subjected to a politically motivated criminal prosecution for making statements which have since been proven to be true. Mr. Griffin's claims that gangs of Muslim paedophiles have been grooming white girls for sex, have been echoed by ex-Justice secretary Jack Straw, and confirmed by various journalists and leading police officers. However, as Judge Norman Jones informed Nick Griffin at his trial, that he was telling the truth was no defence against race hate charges.

Indeed, had it not been for the wisdom of a jury, who acquitted Griffin against the judge's advice, he would have gone to prison for the New World Order offence of telling the truth.

In fact the situation is worse than the judge implied, Judge Jones understated the truth, for we in Europe have gone beyond the point where the truth is merely no defence against race hate charges, the truth itself is now the crime.

The mad Orwellian creed of multiculturalism, which our rulers have imposed upon us has produced a reality where, when addressing the subject of race and religion the only act left to us, which is legal and permissible, is to lie.

Update: South Africa Sucks

The latest news I have regarding South Africa Sucks is that, as many of us had assumed, the new temporary site was briefly hijacked by people seeking to discredit the bloggers. If their enemies will go to such lengths to damage them for merely exposing the truth, the guys at SAS must have been doing something right.

After the previous sites were deleted Uhuru Guru was seeking to set up a new site on a secure server, but has now decided not to proceed. Hence, unless any of the other SAS blogger decide to try setting something else up, at the moment it looks as if South Africa Sucks bay have reached the end of the road.

If I hear differently I will, of course, let you know.

I did not always agree with South Africa Sucks, I found many of their scatological posting very unpleasant and offensive, I also felt they often crossed boundaries of taste and decency and behaved with an adolescent recklessness which was potentially damaging to all of us who supported them.

However, they also performed a very valuable service by exposing truths which a wicked world would rather keep hidden, they opposed a great evil and are a very brave group of men and women.

For that I salute them and wish them well.

Sunday, 20 February 2011

Denied by the World, The Unspoken Genocide Continues

In my mailbox this morning there was a further e-mail from a young white South African who has been writing to me recently seeking to convince me that the genocide of white South African farmers is not actually happening, that the figures have been exaggerated and that there isn't really a problem. He (or maybe they are a she) sends me links to a blog which appears to have been set up for the sole purpose of undermining Brandon Huntley's claim for asylum in Canada, and another one which quibbles over the list of victim names compiled by Adriana Stuijt at Censor Bugbear.

Why would anyone seek such a goal, why would anyone conspire to pretend this ghastly carnage is not happening?

Such people as my correspondent would rather have every tooth in their bigoted heads removed without anesthetic than question the claims of a non-white asylum seeker or cast doubt on other genocides, yet they are desperate to deny what is being done to the whites in South Africa. How is it that we have raised so many children who so hate their own kind that they would rather see them slaughtered than admit that they are victims.

Ironically, the e-mail next to that from my rainbow nation fantasist, self hating, correspondent, brought me news of another white south African farmer murdered in the relentless bloody genocide he so craves to deny.

Only two days ago, on Friday, I reported the last killing, the victim of which is now named as Alberto Costa, and now I must update my figures and name another.

The latest victim was Mr. Helgard Muller of Frankfort in the Free State, who turned 66 during the week. He died of his injuries in an ambulance on the way to hospital.

The incident took place on the farm Mara, about 15 km outside Frankfort. Mrs. Marietjie Muller and a domestic worker were alone when two men in their early twenties, armed with a gun entered the house and asked for money. Mrs. Muller, who is confined to a wheelchair, told the men she didn't have the key to the safe and her husband was not there. The men tied them up with shoelaces and rope and left them in different rooms.

An hour later Mr. Muller returned and was overpowered and shot in his head. The men made off with his truck which was later found on a gravel road nearby Frankfort. Mrs. Muller and the domestic worker were able to free themselves with a knife, and, although not hurt, were treated for shock.

News Report

I am told that there are additional reports stating that arrests have been made, and the weapon which killed Mr. Muller has been recovered, however, I am unable to find that story.

In a separate news report, South Africa's News 24 state that there has been a farm attack every day since President Jacob Zuma made his State of the Nation address in which he claimed that certain categories of crime were falling. I imagine some will accuse News 24 of "exaggerating the problem" as well.
Hat Tip: Heather C

Prophets of Doom: The Triumph and Freedom of the Will

Two parts of an essay by Tim Heydon

Prophets of Doom:
David Bentley Hart and the Triumph of the Will

Part 1: Radical Individualism and Opening the Road to State Terror

Modern Freedom means the Limitless Freedom to Will. Unleashed from the Guiding Hand of Christianity and Tradition, the Freedom to Will can Mean the Freedom to Will Terror

Christianity Has Made Us – So How Can We Imagine a Non-Christian World?

It is difficult for us, living as we are at the end of nearly two millennia of Christian Civilisation, fully to grasp quite how revolutionary Christianity was in the transformation of attitudes in the ancient world, or to imagine what it might mean if those attitudes were to disappear, as disappearing they are in the West.

The World of Rome and the Christian Revolution

In his book ‘Atheist Delusions; The Christian Revolution and Its Fashionable Enemies’ the theologian David Bentley Hart does a terrific job of bringing out the impact of Christianity on the ancients, transforming a world in which an individual’s worth was predicated on his or her power or lack of it to one in which every individual has intrinsic worth. Roman society was built on a rather Nietzschean hierarchy of power in which the most powerful of all, the Roman Emperor, could be worshipped as a god while the lower orders were of little account individually and slaves had no personhood whatsoever. The latter were powerless things, like Christ before the powerful Roman Procurator Pontius Pilate.

Hart says , ‘the new world we see being brought into being in the Gospels is one in which the whole grand cosmic architecture of prerogative , power and eminence has been shaken and superseded by a new positively anarchic order; an order in which we see the glory of God revealed in a crucified slave’.

Hart’s Answer to Christopher Hitchens and his Ilk: Western Civilisation

The title of Christopher Hitchens’ book ‘God is not Great’ is subtitled ‘How Religion Poisons Everything. ’ After a remarkably entertaining exposure, touched with more than a soupcon of asperity, of the paucity of Hitchen’s intellectual capabilities (and those of Dawkins), Hart asks, ‘Does he (Hitchens) really mean precisely everything?"

Would that apply then – confining ourselves just to things Christian – to ancient and medieval hospitals, leper asylums, orphanages, almshouses and hostels? To the golden rule, ‘Love thine enemies’? ‘Judge not lest ye be judged’? Prophetic admonitions against oppressing the poor, and commands to feed and clothe and comfort those in need? To the music of Palestrina and Bach, Michelangleo’s Pieta, ‘ah bright wings’; San Marco’s mosaics, the Bible of Amiens and all the gorgeous blue stained glass at Chartres? To the abolitionist movement and contemporary efforts to liberate Sudanese slaves? And so on and so on? Surely it cannot be the case that if only purged of faith these things would be even better than they are; were it not for faith it seems fairly obvious, most of them would have no existence at all.’

Our Future: the Idea of the Sunny Uplands of ‘Progress’ is Likely to Lead to a Totalitarian Hell.

Hart holds out little hope for the West in the dawning age of secularism. He asks, ‘What evidence is there for the idea that secular reason, if finally allowed to move forward free of the constraining hand of archaic faith will naturally make society more free, more humane and more rational than it has been? It is rather difficult… to vest a great deal of hope in modernity, however radiantly enchanting its promises, when one considers how many innocent lives (‘an unprecedentedly vast collection of corpses’) have already been swallowed up in the flames of ‘Progress.’ The best ideals to which we moderns continue to cling long antedate modernity. For the most part all we can claim as truly, distinctively our own are our atrocities… The process of secularisation was marked from the first by the magnificent limitlessness of its violence.’

Radical Individualism and the Triumph of the Will

The tale of the modern nation-state’s struggle for liberation from the ‘shackles’ of religion and tradition should be located within the larger narrative of the triumph of the will.

Like most of the defining ideas in our culture, perverted though they may have been in the modern era, the emphasis on freedom of the will has its origins in Christian theology, but Descartes, the father of modern philosophy, spoke both as the heir of the late Scholastic tradition and for modernity when he said that the true image of god within human beings is the godlike liberty and incomprehensibility of the will.

Modern Ideas of Freedom are Nihilistic

Hart argues that the modern notion of freedom is essentially nihilistic, ie freedom is to be found in the individual subject’s power of choice, rather than in what is actually chosen. Neither God nor nature nor reason provides the measure of an act’s true liberty, for an act is free only when it is done in defiance of all three.

The Degradation of the Idea of Liberty. Freedom as Consumerism

Where is the ascendancy of the modern Idea of Freedom as Pure Spontaneity of the Will leading our Culture, Hart asks? At an ordinary, everyday level, it obviously leads to a degradation of the very idea of freedom, its reduction in the public imagination to a fairly banal kind of liberty, no more –though no less- significant than a consumer’s freedom to choose among different kinds of breads, shoes, televisions, drugs, drinks, sexual activities and relationships, political parties or religions.

The Death of Shared Obligations and Common Cause - the Decay of ‘Community ‘ (and therefore National Sentiment)

At the level of conventional social behaviours it leads perhaps towards a decay of a shared sense of social obligation or common cause, or towards an increasingly insipid and self-absorbed private culture, or towards a tendency in society at large less to judge the laudability of particular choices by reference to the worthiness of their objects than to judge objects worthy solely because they have been chosen. (eg ’a woman’s right to choose’)

From the Banal to the Terrible

All this is both obvious and rather vague, but the modern concept of Freedom can lead to other more terrible things as well. For what the will may will, when it is subordinate only to its own native exuberance, is practically without limit.
Although pure spontaneity of the will is an illusion (we must actually will something), something dangerously novel entered our culture when we began to believe that the proper end of the will might simply to be willing as such. Nor does the truly liberated have to confine itself to the adventure of discovering and inventing itself. Collective will is so much more exciting than an individual’s will, at least if it can be disciplined and marshalled for some collective purpose.

With no Transcendent Source of the Good, the Capacity for Evil is Limitless

Furthermore if there is no transcendent source of the good to which the will is drawn but only the power of the will to decide what ends it desires, then no human project can be said to be inherently irrational or abominable. If freedom of the will is our supreme value, after all, then it is to all intents and purposes our god.

And certain kinds of gods (as our pagan ancestors understood) need to be fed.

Part 2 will show how radical individualism leads to state control.

The Freedom of the Will - Part Two

‘As political and economic freedom diminishes, sexual freedom tends correspondingly to increase. And the dictator … will do well to encourage that freedom. In conjunction with the freedom to daydream under the influence of dope, the movies and the radio, it will help to reconcile his subjects to the servitude which is their fate.’ Aldous Huxley: ‘Introduction to ‘Brave New World’.

In Part One, we saw how the Triumph of the Will, increasingly unconstrained by religion and tradition, leads to a ‘society’ - our society, if society it can be called - which instils deep prejudices in favour of the self and the ego and its freedom to Will.

In this nihilising, individualising world, there is a diminishing sense of ultimate purpose. Meaning is evaporating leaving a residue consisting of what is immediately self-indulgent and the practicalities of achieving self-indulgence in food, sex, relationships, social status (power) – in anything and everything. Life is thought of as merely an extended version of a trawl round the shops, the ‘existential supermarket’ from which lifestyles can be selected like soap powders and without much deeper or more meaningful consequences. Such trends as the destruction of the character of the country through mass immigration and cultural relativism are of subsidiary or little concern.

The Triumph of the Will can lead to State Terror

We saw how in the Triumph of the Will, because the freedom to Will takes absolute precedence over any of what many think of as moral considerations (the example was given of ‘a woman’s right to choose’ to have an abortion) could lead to terror of the kind practiced in the last century by tyrants such as Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot and Mao as well as to more beneficent scenarios. (If one is a pessimist about human nature and believes in the existence of the human capacity for evil or Original Sin, as Christians call it, for which the existence of the aforementioned individuals and their regimes is surely ample proof, one is likely to believe that the eventual outcome is probably the evil one). But what is the mechanism by which individuals’ freedom to Will is translated into State Oppression and thus opens the way to state terror?

The Great Irony: How Radical Individualism Leads to State Control

David Bentley Hart does not go into this but the writer Theodore Dalrymple sets out the means very succinctly in his book ‘In Praise of Prejudice’:-

‘What starts out as search for increased if not total individualism ends up by increasing the power of governments over individuals. It does not do so by the totalitarian method of rendering compulsory all that is not forbidden – a process that in all human history has gone farthest, perhaps, in North Korea – but in destroying all moral authority that intervenes between individual human will and governmental power. Everything that is not forbidden by law is, ipso facto, permissible. ‘There is no law against it’ becomes an unanswerable justification for conduct that is selfish and egotistical.

The Politicians and Judges become the Moral Arbiters

Thus it is the law, and those who make it and who administer it who are the moral arbiters of society. It is they who decide what is permissible and what is not. And so all stigmas are removed from conduct that is too expressly and actively forbidden by religious belief and by custom and we are asked to acquiesce in Political Correctness.

Politicians and Judges become Gods, at least in their own Eyes

But that is not the end of it. Human Nature being what it is, the law givers (think that lying egomaniac Tony Blair, the insanely arrogant and incompetent Gordon Brown, the evil bully and liar Alistair Campbell and the harridan, half-mad obsessive Harriet Harman), and the judges to whom is delegated the task of deciding what constitutes good and bad behaviour and attitudes, enjoy their power. They actually come to believe that they deserve it. Because there is no other source of effective collective authority, such as the Church, they believe that they have been chosen for their task because they possess rare qualities of insight into how people should live their lives. And since their power it is infinite and they think themselves infinitely responsible for the welfare of the people, they come to regard themselves as infinitely good. They become god-like in their own eyes at least.

The Drug of Power and Creeping Centralised Authority

Radical Individualism - the Freedom of the Will – is thus not just compatible with the radical centralisation of authority but is a product of it. The individual is free to get on with his life as his whim dictates, but, however, within increasingly narrow limits. The ability to wield prescriptive power is one of the most powerful of drugs. Since there is no buffering, intervening power between the individual and the state, the power of the governing elites is free and they have the motive to insinuate it into every nook and cranny of an individual’s life. So decision –making in life is divided into two spheres: the one being about the serious business which is left to the sovereign power of the state, the other the increasingly narrow sphere of private affairs.

The State’s Attack on the Institutions which limit its Power

The State, meaning the horrible creatures who have managed to insinuate themselves into political office, (You have to be very odd to have a driving ambition to order others around in the way our present Politicians do), citing the drive to the untrammelled Freedom of the Will of Radical Individualism in the context of secularised nihilism, launched an attack on all the intervening authorities which stood in the way of its power to control our lives such as the family, the church and to a lesser extent the professional organisations. All organisations such as these, (and this applies to some Political Parties also) have in any case been melting away as secularism drains meaning and purpose and radical Individualism destroys collectivity. In the absence of their mediating influence, we have become accustomed to expect and to accept the central direction of our lives.

What is the Future for Our Country?

What is the future for our country in the light of these trends? Can it survive its nihilism and creeping Fascism ? Heidegger, who held out little hope for Western Civilisation is the subject of the next edition of ‘Prophets of Doom’.

This is part 2 of Tim's Prophets of Doom Series
No 1: ‘Pitirim Sorokin’ and ‘A Christmas Message of Hope’ Parts 1&2

The Media - a poem by Mike Wilson

The media controls our life,
Directs our thoughts, explores the strife
Of little things that don’t deserve
To be expanded with such verve.

The general public does its best
To sift the news and leave the rest
Inconsequentially to those
Whose income is from talk back shows.

We watch the programmes on TV
Like ACA and ABC
And wonder how they can survive
Exploring peoples troubles live.

They squeeze the utmost from the show,
The tragedies that we should know,
Of human suffering and despair,
Pathos and drama fill the air.

The show concludes with cheery chat
But you‘re upset, you kick the cat.
How can they play emotions so
Then have the gall to end the show?

The matter really is you see
That Today Tonight and ABC
Have found a way to make a buck
Exploiting those down on their luck.

The TV news can also make
A minor fray into a quake
Of epic size and moment ,then
Reverse it and go back again.

The poor old public never knows
Who tugs the ring that’s through their nose.
They’re fed the news with just a hint
That all is truth and light in print.

We see the policeman in the frame
Abusing some unfortunate dame.
We are not told, at least not loud,
That she is from the ‘Rent a Crowd’

The cameras click the presses run
We see the action as it’s done.
It fills the TV screen each night,
The journo’s think it’s dynamite.

Alas in truth it isn’t much,
A rented crowd, some toughs and such
Who gather round to make a noise
Which ends up sold by paper boys.

The people have a right to know
The truth and that it will be so.
Not facts embellished by the yard
Because the media think it’s hard

To sell their wares as they appear
Quite unattractive year by year.
Give us the means to be selective
Not half the truth that’s re-directed.

The people who control the press
Can easily create a mess
For politicians starting out
And wondering what to shout about.

A man elected by his peers
Is supposed to serve for years,
Doing his constituents proud
By voicing his opinions loud.

If he appears to be a leader
The papers want him for their reader,
But he must do as he is told
Or paper headlines scream and scold.

So it becomes a fight, the roughest
To see who can survive the toughest.
But in the end it can be seen
The deadly papers rule serene.

The media controls our lives,
Our politics, the cars we drive.
We must be careful in our reading-
Not let the papers do spoon feeding.

Read the papers once a day
And throw the trashy ones away.
Educate ourselves to think;
Refuse to follow gossips stink.

Base all our judgements on the truth
And give more credence to our youth.
Theirs is the future for this land,
Let’s hope they make the media grand

Europe's Multiculturalism Leading to Civil War?

Saturday, 19 February 2011

Africans - a poem by Mike Wilson


The African and all his tribe are waiting at the door-

Waiting for a handout – for the world to give them more.

We’ve given so much in the past, we cannot count the cost,

Yet still they come and gather – a race that’s somehow lost.

We gave to Ethiopia at least 30 years ago,

But in that time what have they done to help themselves to know?

They sat back in their compounds and made babies every day –

Instead of rolling up their sleeves and learning to make hay.

Now a score or more years later, the population’s spread

It’s almost twice now what it was – around 40 million head.

And still the tribes are gathering – their needs are just the same-

How come they haven’t learned to act - to work and play the game?

The suffering children that we see with civil libs and on TV

Just carries on without a break, a tribute to our empathy.

They don’t have the ability to work or plan ahead –

They only know they’ll take what’s mine, especially if I’m dead!

Why must we keep repeating the same old lessons through

The years and not learn by our mistakes, just what we never knew –

That Africans are not the same as western whites – it’s true,

And until some start believing this, there’s really nothing we can do!

More of Mike's poems will be posted over the next few days

Friday, 18 February 2011

South African farmer dies in shooting

An, as yet unnamed, farmer in the hamlet of Cloetesville in South Africa's Western Cape was shot and killed during a shoot-out with a group of men who had broken into his house.

The attack took place when he went investigate a noise at 03:00 am this morning (Friday 18th Feb) and confronted two armed men in his home, at which point a shoot out occurred.

The 44 year old victim, he succumbed as a result of a gunshot wound to his chest. Mercifully his wife and two children escaped the ordeal unscathed.

The intruders left the property empty-handed though police believe a blood trail on the scene suggests one of them could have been injured.

Report at Censor Bugbear

Wednesday, 16 February 2011

Time to Defend the West

By Robert Weissberg

Europe finally appears to be waking up to the dangers of multiculturalism. Last October German Chancellor Angela Merkel confessed that multiculturalism was "a total failure" and British Prime Minister David Cameron more recently agreed, even linking "state multiculturalism" to Islamic terrorism. French President Nicolas Sarkozy is the latest to join this chorus and France now has a Ministry of Immigration and National Identity. Anti-immigration political parties in the Netherlands, Belgium, Denmark, Sweden, Switzerland and France have raised similar qualms.

Though welcome news for defenders of Western civilization, this new awareness only begins reversing years of misguided policy. Far more is involved than requiring immigrants to speak Dutch or insisting that Mahomet treat Fatima as an equal. More painful will be altering the thinking of proper Europeans (and Americans) about what the multicultural threat entails, and without this altered perspective, turning the tide is futile. It takes two to tango, and this also applies to reversing the multicultural damage -- we, too, have to change.

Chancellor Merkel, Prime Minister Cameron and President Sarkozy, among many others, misdiagnose the problem. All speak as if cultural/ethnic separatism were the chief culprit. Not entirely true. That incomplete assimilation co-exists with Islamic terrorism does not mean that imposing assimilation will cool the urge to dominate host nations. Undigested ethnic and religious enclaves do not necessarily threaten national survival. In the United States, for example, the Amish and Ultra-Orthodox Jews consciously reject much of the outside world while applying religious law within their communities. Countless European nations have flourished despite permanent undigested "foreigners" living within their borders. Finns are not worried by ethnic Swedes residing in their ancestral homeland.

The problem is boiling hatred of the west and a willingness to pursue this hatred, not physical or cultural separatism per se. Lack of cultural assimilation does not breed terrorism; rather, the urge to destroy the host nation impedes assimilation. Assimilation is a choice, not a permanent condition created by inadequate opportunities to fit in. Nor will economic integration via affirmative action-like policies necessarily quell the hatred. During the Cold War many American treasonous communists were home-grown and more than a few had graduated from elite universities and enjoyed all the bounties of American capitalism. Recall that UK terrorists were more assimilated second-generation immigrants, even doctors, not just-off-the-boat impoverished Pakistanis. Moreover, upping involuntary nationalist instruction -- a modern Kulturkampf -- might be interpreted as an assault on one's heritage and may well exacerbate hostility. Heightened nationalistic indoctrination is, at best, a crude scattershot solution whose chief benefit may be only the therapeutic feeling that we, finally, "doing something."

So, if assimilation campaigns are incomplete answers, where does the counter-attack begin? It begins by identifying the toxin that lies at the heart of multiculturalism -- the dogmatic belief that all cultures are equally "valid" and worthy for believers, a view construing culture as a choice no different than preferring vanilla over pistachio at the local Baskin Robbins. Rejecting this equivalence of cultures is a change for us, not them -- Islamic fanatics hardly embrace cultural relativism. It is this wooly-headed cultural relativism permeating the west that permits the triumph of zealots against those who barely lift a finger to protect their own culture. The battle is a mismatch if one side refuses to defend forcefully its own heritage. Multiculturalism is political AIDS -- nobody dies of AIDS, they die of something else since AIDS "only" destroys the immunity system.

This understanding means that we must be free to defend our values as superior and this inescapably means offending our enemies. There is no "polite" way to accomplish this defense, so say goodbye to a political correctness (PC) whose first commandment is "Thou Shall Not Offend." To continue the AIDS parallel, PC prevents the AIDS-infected patient from strengthening their immunity system since fighting back might "offend" deadly microbes (who can say what life form is better than any other?"). This "we are better than you" is the first line of defense against a rival convinced of their own cultural superiority. People will not die defending diversity, speech codes and unconditional inclusion but they are pushovers for those who reject those values.

Unfortunately, David Cameron and untold others focusing on physical assimilation fail to understand this reality. In his "wake-up" speech he said, "So, when a white person holds objectionable views, racist views for instance, we rightly condemn them. But when equally unacceptable views or practices come from someone who isn't white, we've been too cautious frankly -- frankly, even fearful -- to stand up to them." His approach -- which he labeled "muscular liberalism" -- is that we can now, at long last, criticize our enemies when they attack our values, but, if our rejoinders are racist (or otherwise "offensive,") we still must keep silent.

This approach invites disaster given how "racism" has become so effortlessly leveled. Try imagining a rejoinder to militant Muslims that escapes charges of "racism," "ethnic stereotypes" "hate speech," "Islamophobia," and all the rest? Cameron offers a weak arsenal to defend the west. Our enemies already shout "racism" and all the rest at every criticism, and since political correctness is based exclusively on victim feelings, our defeat is foregone. Cameron's advice is a limp strategy suitable to polite drawing room debate.

We must convince our enemies that there is a new Sherriff in town who will crush enemies of western civilization, not just offer inoffensive verbal rejoinders to threats. Rather than push assimilation on those reluctant to embrace western values, just let it be known that you better assimilate since your old non-western ways have no future. My way or the highway, as the old cliché goes. This shift is just a matter of political will and far cheaper, and much more effective, than trying to entice Kurds to master German so as to become "good Germans." Let me suggest that the British Prime Minister make the following points in his next public speech. Note well, everything he would say is well-known, factually accurate so the point of saying the obvious only serves to announce that the days of passive acquiescence are over.

Western societies have lower rates of crime than Third World societies populated by "people of color" and Third World arrivals bring their crime with them, and this criminality persists across generations. This criminal proclivity will no longer be tolerated as "a cultural difference." We have one law and this applies equally to everyone.

Third World immigrants come to the west to enjoy the benefits of western civilization -- superior health care, a modern economy, first-rate education, democracy, law and order, among countless other virtues. You are here to partake of these advantages not re-create the tribulations you left behind.

If you insist on blasphemy laws, Sharia, female genital mutilation, honor killings and wish to behead those who insult the Prophet, just stay home in Pakistan. If here already, we will help you return home so you can better practice your cherished culture. Otherwise, you're in England now and behave like a proper Englishman.

These politically incorrect statements send a powerful message: we are no longer afraid to offend when protecting the west and so the days of politely looking the other way are over. Moreover, we will not be intimidated if called racists, right-wing-Nazis extremist and all the rest. If you feel that you can't live among "racist Nazis," return home. Ironically, this strategy mimics the "in-your-face" militant gay liberation movement -- we're here and we're Queer, get used to it.

To repeat, being terrified of the "racist" label," the refusal to defend one's own civilization so as not to offend those who hate us only emboldens the miscreants. Who wants to assimilate to a civilization too scared to defend itself? What a terrible investment for the future. Far better to let our adversaries know that they are up against a strong people who love their civilization and will go to any length to defend it. The message must be unequivocal: we really are superior and are not embarrassed to admit it. Don't mess with the west. Machiavelli put it succinctly, "Since it is difficult to join them together, it is safer to be feared than to be loved when one of the two must be lacking," and nobody fears those who will not defend their own civilization. Time to take the gloves off.


South Africa Sucks - temporary site


I am very concerned by the material which has been appearing on the new temporary site, hence I am taking down all links to South Africa Sucks until I get a clearer picture of what is going on, or until some grown ups get back in charge.

Tuesday, 15 February 2011

Elderly woman left chained after brutal beating

2011-02-15 Zastron, Free State, South Africa. 62-year-old widow Annetjie Smith was attacked by two black men in her home on Sunday, beaten brutally, dragged around threatened that her throat would be cut before an attempt was made to smother her to death. When she told them she had nothing left to steal after four break-ins, they tied her up with ropes and chains and left behind for dead.Her maid discovered her 25 hours later.

Report at Censor Bugbear

The NHS Report

By Tim Heydon

The Report by the Health Service Ombudsman Anne Abrahams which has revealed shocking instances of the gross lack of basic care for the elderly in NHS Hospitals has spurred a rash of heart –searching along the lines of ‘How, why, can this happen? What can we do to ensure that elderly people are given the care and respect they deserve?’ Etc.

Additional Training is Required? Not Really

The line coming out so far is that ‘additional training’ of Nursing Staff is required. But the reasons for the appalling third – world conditions to which our father and mothers, grandfathers and grandmothers are so often condemned in state hospitals go far deeper than mere lack of ‘training.’ How much training do you need after all, to know that old, sick people must to be fed and kept clean? How much training is required for anyone to treat old, dependent people with compassion and respect?

The Decline in the Grip of Christianity

Chief among the causes for the collapse of caring standards is the decline of the grip of Christianity. When the elderly who now go to hospital at the end of their lives were young, Nursing was still thought of, not just as a profession as it increasingly now is, but also as a ‘calling.’ This is a word one almost never hears these days, but in the context of nursing (and medicine) it means a career to which one is drawn because one is a truly caring person and because one feels a Christian need to care for the sick. That sense of a religious duty of care seems to have faded away in nursing. The same remarks could be made of doctors.

The Drive to Radical Individualism and ‘Equality’

Then there is the decline in a sense of community (NationaI Identity). The National Health Service was set up by a nation always united by virtue of its racial, religious and cultural homogeneity, which had just won a huge war against its enemies who wanted to invade and take over their country. It was now more than ever united across the social classes and wanted to reward its people for their patriotism and sacrifice. That strong sense of community, of a national family looking after its own, including its parents and grandparents, has been undermined by the ongoing drive to a radical individualism whose effect is to alienate people from each other by breaking down those very same bonds of race culture and religion, justify the insidiously evil agenda of the imposition of a false ‘equality’ and encourage egotism and selfishness.

Immigrants Don’t Care

The malign effects of Radical Individualism and its evil partner, ‘equality' in breaking down the strong sense of community which made the NHS possible in the first place and which helped to give it its ethos of care in its early years have of course been spurred on in synergistic fashion by the importation of large numbers of foreigners into the country and into the NHS. These people who are in any case often underqualified by our standards cannot share the cultural and religious assumptions which underpinned the NHS and which are fading fast even among the indigenous population. Importantly, they can feel no great connection on human terms with the patients they are allocated.

Why should they? Elderly patients who in particular need attention are not the parents or grandparents of their national /racial family. So too many of these immigrants are even more likely than individualised indigenous staff simply not to care much emotionally and this lack of feeling is easily translated into a practical lack of care. For them, nursing is just a job for money with not much more emotional content or satisfactions than working in a factory or office and if they can shirk it, many of them will.

The Rejection of Authority

But there is yet another aspect of the cultural revolution which has helped to bring about the collapse in caring standards we are witnessing in the NHS. The rejection of authority which lay at the root of that revolution led to the disappearance of the Hospital Matron, a terrifying figure who was in overall control of nursing and the state of the wards in her Hospital. When she went (it was almost invariably a woman) her responsibilities were fractured in a way which worked against the patients’ interests. And the running of the hospitals has been handed over to tiers of management who are more interested in figures than in people.

The Cult of Youth

Part of the rejection of authority is the disappearance of respect for the old simply because they are old; because they have lived a life and seen and often suffered much. There is now little sense that the old have something to offer because the wisdom of their years. Hand in hand with the gradually loss of respect for life which is part and parcel of the decline of the Christian ethos, the old are increasingly seen as of less value and therefore of less concern than the young.

The More ‘Caring’ our ‘Society’ Thinks Itself, the Less Caring it actually Is

Fascinating, isn’t it, the way in which a society that fancies itself as morally superior, more ‘caring’ than ever before is in fact less and less so when it comes to the nitty gritty of actual hands-on care.

‘Care’ in the Leftist, Liberal sense is not personal; it is outsourced to the state so that ‘caring’ Leftists and Liberals can get on with their selfish egotisms with what remains of their consciences clear. But when those who are supposed to ‘care’ in the NHS also lack the motivations for nitty-gritty hands-on care, the results are as we see them in our hospitals as elsewhere in the State Apparatus.

Monday, 14 February 2011

More Benefits of Diversity

I see that China, a country which is famously a net exporter of immigrants, has become the second largest economy rapidly catching up on America, a nation now drowning in debt and immigration. Meanwhile, the immigrant friendly UK has plummeted from fourth place to sixth in the world ranking and is still falling. At the same time, India, a country which is probably the greatest net exporter of immigrants on the planet, whilst fiercely restricting inward migration, has risen to 11th place rivalling both Russia and Canada for a place in the top 10.

Despite this we are forever told that that immigration benefits our economies and our national well being. Yet, those who make such claims tend to be less explicit when asked to substantiate or quantify their assertions.

This is hardly surprising, for as Britain struggles to recover from the worst recession in our history, and one which hit us following a decade of inward immigration at levels unseen in any European country in history, is it not legitimate to ask where exactly is this much vaunted benefit.

Inward migration to both China and India is all but non-existent, yet while our economies are in free fall their economies are soaring.

By comparison, both Greece and Ireland the two earliest casualties (so far) of the so called global economic crisis, both experienced massive levels of inward immigration, before the whole thing fell apart. This same story is being repeated throughout Europe and North America. With the single exception of Germany, we are all in a state of rapid economic decline, despite enthusiastically importing the mass I which was supposed to be out salvation.

“We all benefit from our vibrant m society” the great and the good keep telling us, “Divesity is our strength” but the evidence supporting this claims becomes less credible by the day.

It is not only countries which are suffering the consequences of this delusion, it is also not doing corporations much good either.

Two of the largest casualties of the 2008 economic collapse were A, which required a bailout from the US government eventually totalling $150 billion and RBS which ended up 60% owned by the UK taxpayers, Previously both companies appeared to be booming, however, I would draw your attention to these two new stories which appeared in the three years leading up to the crisis:

14 February 2005 – RBS Appoints new Head of Diversity


12 January 2007 – AIG names first chief diversity officer

Makes you think doesn’t it? Diversity is our strength huh? I think not.

Saturday, 12 February 2011

The State Dispossession and Persecution of Whites

By Mister Fox

What began as naïve, idealism, has turned into the racial persecution of Whites in their own countries. On 15 January 1846, free trade campaigner Richard Cobden told Manchester Free Trade Hall:

”I believe that the physical gain will be the smallest gain to humanity from the success of this principle I look farther; I see in the Free Trade principle that which shall act on the moral world as the principle of gravitation in the universe – drawing men together, thrusting aside the antagonism of race, and creed, and language, and uniting us in the bonds of eternal peace.”

The dominant ideology in the western nations is built around multi-racialism or anti-racism and is a variant of Nazism. The motive is to push “whites” out of their communities and it is done by deceit and against democratic principles or rule of law.

More than 50 million African workers are being brought to Europe in a secret immigration agreement. This is the most evil plan against humanity hatched in Europe since the Nazis herded Jewish people into the gas chambers and the Soviets starved 5 million Kulaks and is likewise meant to destroy a people: the whole of western Europe and her people and has been implemented by the evil E.U.

This ideology is totalitarian with only one viewpoint allowed. It is very intolerant of any complaint about the cruelty and injustice of it and brands dissidents as “haters”, “bigots, “fascists” or “Nazis” which dehumanises the victims and so the authorities can harass and push Whites out without any conscience because we are all “racists”.

A “job centre” funded by money misappropriated from tax-payers has been opened in Mali and was the beginning of “free movement of people in Africa and the EU”.

EU economists claim Britain and other EU states will “need” 56 million immigrant workers between them by 2050 to make up for the “demographic decline” due to falling birth rates and rising death rates across Europe. This is the betyrayel of British people whose jobs are being sent abroad and whose children are facing unjust competition from imported labour.

Moreover, If we were not transferring billions of pounds in Aid to elites in the Third World, and billions as UK subscriptions to the UN and the EU, we might well be able to give our own people a better pension which are due to be cut.

The report for the EU, was by Moroccan-born French MEP Francoise Castex, who wants immigrants to be given legal rights and access to social welfare provision such as benefits. “Having sufficient people of working age is vital for the economy and for tax revenue.”

The Portugal Declaration urges the EU to assist African governments in setting up migration information centres “to better manage labour mobility between Africa and the EU”.The first job centre was opened in Bamako, capital of Mali, on Monday the 6th of October. More centers are to open soon in other west African states then in north Africa.

The large corporations expect their “diverse” work force to be loyal not to country but the company. This goes well with free markets, which have always been Utopian and supra national.

Sections of the media provide the justification by blaming us and people start to blame themselves:” We won't do the dirty jobs!”. We are ruled and manipulated by being made to feel ashamed of ourselves. (1)

These immigrant African people are prepared for immigration with clothes and language lessons by The British Council. African lawyer Dele Oguntimojou wrote: ”(you) do not know how the youth in the poor African village is being seduced by lush advertising to shed his native dress for blue jeans; to retune his ears from the traditional hi-life to the drum and bass of hip-hop and Brit pop. Even now the British Council is busy across Africa training the next generation of immigrants in the language of the destination country.”(2)

There was an expose in November 2006 that the Government were advertising for immigrants in a Foreign Office pamphlet distributed from Embassies around the world. 'Multicultural Britain - A Land Of Immigrants' encourages immigrants to come here because of the Human Rights Act which gives them privileges over natives and well-paid jobs. Illustrated with photos of smiling non-whites, it is an invitation to people to immigrate here. (3)

Home Office minister Beverley Hughes was found to be approving visa claims from eastern Europe despite warnings they were using forged documents. She only resigned when she found a letter sent to her on 4 March last year by a junior Home Office minister, Mr Ainsworth, alerting her to potential immigration frauds.

There were also allegations about abuse of the European Community Association Agreement (ECAA) which had already been raised by James Cameron, the British consul in Romania, who blew the gaff. Ms Hughes told BBC Two's Newsnight that Mr Cameron's claims were the first she knew of the alleged "scam". But it is now clear she sent letters in March and April 2003 in reply to Mr Ainsworth's concerns.

Here is an insight. Lin Homer was chief executive of Birmingham city council and presided over what investigator, Judge Mawrey, called "massive, systematic and organised fraud" in an election campaign. He ruled that not less than 1,500 votes had been cast fraudulently in the city. He the comments after he upheld allegations of postal fraud relating to six seats won by Labour in the June 2004 ballot. For this she was promoted to chief of the Immigration and Nationality Directorate.(4)

An excuse is "The Home Office is a shambles." The Home Office is brilliantly successful: it has been infiltrating immigrants into the country without people realising for years! But as usual the ideologues have no practical grasp and think only of the utopia of a multi racial world and cheap labour for themselves and the corporations.

Vladimir Bukovsky, the Russian dissident, who spent twelve years in Soviet psychiatric units, told The Brussels Journal, he was allowed to study to study documents from secret Soviet files. These documents confirm a “conspiracy” to turn the European Union into a socialist state and those who oppose further European integration will be regarded as xenophobes. (6)

I would add to his otherwise accurate analysis, that when it comes to race, the dominant western ideology is a variant of Nazism introduced through the culture – Cultural Nazism driven by Global capitalism. The importation of immigrants to replace Whites is inverted Lebensraum. It began as a reaction against Nazis but has become a cruel, tyranny.

The Universal Declaration of Human Rights, was adopted by the United Nations in 1948. It proclaimed: "Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family." This was extended in the 1978 UNESCO declaration on race and racial prejudice - the fundamental equality of all human beings is the ideal toward which ethics and science should converge but in practice racial theories are still used to justify improving the racial stock.

The definition of racism in the Macpherson report: “Racism in general terms consists of conduct, words or practices which disadvantage or advantage people because of their colour, culture or ethnic origin.”(Para, 6.4) Our rulers are discriminating against us because we are white!

Totalitarianism and oppression of White Britons was introduced into the British legal system with the Commission for Racial Equality, in the 1976 Race Relations Act, of Home Secretary Roy Jenkins. This followed evil Judge Salmon's vicious sentencing of four years to young White lads after the Notting Hill Race Battle of 1958. His biographer, John Campbell (Weidenfield & Nicolson.1983) revealed, he believed: “That immigration was good for Britain and if people resisted they should be socially engineered into accepting it".

This was the first time that Race had been used in British law and is similar to the Nazi race laws. A similar law, the anti-White “Equality Law”, is being introduced by Theresa May a Conservative minister which was drawn up by her Labour predecessor Harriet Harman. On the major ideological issues the elites are of one mind. This is to stop white men getting jobs and to allow employers to give ethnic minority and female candidates preferential treatment. The “doublespeak” is “positive action" and prevents applicants with better job credentials getting the job if they are the wrong sex or race.(7)

We have racial lists kept to ensure preferential treatment for other ethnic groups cynically known as equal Opportunities monitoring forms which help people give priority to other ethnic groups.

The term “Racist” is not descriptive but inhibitive. It is to cow dissent while our society is transformed from a natural society to a Multi-Racial state. After the Second World War Nazi and Fascist were used but with the rise of the New Left, who now dominate, Racist replaced them. Cheap labour is imported and jobs are exported within the “tender idealism” pushed by politicians and this word is used to silence objections.

Racial theories on improving the racial stock are turned around to justify immigration. In the second reading of the Commonwealth immigrants Bill (16/11/1961, Lord Royle said, “wouldn’t we be better off with a dash of darker blood?” The multi-racialist Fenner Brockway(later Lord) wrote glowingly of mixed race people which is similar reverence as Nazis had for pure Aryans, “Fifty years ago I read a book by Sir Sidney Olivier, who had been Governer of Jamaica, recording what splendid human specimens, physically and mentally, were the progeny of mixed marriages on that island. Many of us who know the sons and daughters of mixed marriages will bear out this judgement.” (8)

In his three-part television series ”Mongrel nation” of June 2003, the Lebanese-born comedian Edie Izzard, claimed that Mongrel dogs are cleverer than pedigree dogs. This metaphor suggested that mongrel people are as a master race, genetically superior to the rest!

Group Rights are the inverse of Hitler's race and untermenchen views with Rights afforded to all ethnic groups at the expense of Whites. The Independent 21 April 2004 reported that “British school-leavers could be denied places leading universities for overseas students. Oxford University is to increase the number of overseas undergraduates, who pay higher fees, while freezing the total number of undergraduate places, thus cutting the number of places available to UK school-leavers.”

Racial Awareness Training is a method of brainwashing that local councils send their employers, employees and decision makers on to be conditioned in correct thinking: “to challenge individual prejudices and values and change them”. It stemmed from the ideas of the American Judith Katz who held that “racism is inherent in whites”.

In the USA blonde haired people, usually women, are filmed being racially abused until they break down and sobbed. This is only done to Whites and is a racist attack in the guise of anti-racism. Anti-Racism is the Orwellian term for displacing and disinheriting Whites in their own countries.

The “Commission on the Future of Multi-Ethnic Britain’s”(Runnymede Trust 2002) Parekh Report We are told the way forward is for the ”United Kingdom to formally declare itself to be a multi-cultural society” page xxi. (9). The state is also destroying our identity.

We are inducted into our culture, community and our history and traditions, quite naturally, as we grow up. The abstract method though, requires a sort of schoolbook learning process as in the republican “Citizenship classes” which are supposed to make all foreigners British.

This process only acts on the surface, on the conscious minds of the pupils, whereas our natural traditional way imbues the very nature of the person as it is slowly internalised into the deep unconscious mind as a uniting bond. The totalitarian method advocated by Parekh has to be forced by brainwashing and politicised police. At the same time the immigrants are allowed to perpetuate the divisions by inducting their own children into their own traditions. They are exempt from Multi-Racialism!

The police are being turned into a race-gestapo. Judge Mapherson began his investigation into the murder of Stephen Lawrence prejudiced against the police. With his mind already made up he used British law as social engineering to mould the police into an anti-racist thought-police.

They knew what their conclusion was going to be and the idea was not to ascertain the facts of a case but to reach the right conclusion. This further made our law totalitarian: Recommendation 12 states,” A racist incident is any incident, which is perceived to be racist by the victim, or any other person. Recommendation 13 adds, “That the term “racist incident” must be understood to include crimes and non-crimes in policing terms. Both must be investigated with equal commitment”. Now we can be investigated for committing non-crimes.

There are purges on the police. Former chief of the Metropolitan police, Sir John Stevens introduced planted informers into police training classes to spy for and report on “racist” officers. An interim report into police handling of their own racism, which was established in 2004 after a television documentary, The Secret Policeman, showed racism at a police training centre in Warrington.

The report was produced by a panel led by Sir David Calvert-Smith, a former director of public prosecutions who, like Macpherson began from prejudice not an open mind.

The “enquiry” apparently looked at internal police attitudes to race, including monitoring of race policies and training, recruitment and grievance procedures, rather than operational policing. Like Macpherson this panel had decided the outcome before they started.

Smith admitted that his team had decided before they looked at evidence that police racism was a "major" problem. It was "commonly accepted". This is prejudice against Whites because they had prejudged the people they were discussing without any evidence apart from the BBC television programme The Secret Policeman, that "racism is still a major problem within the service. We have not set out to prove that it exists. We have taken it as a given".(10) The people who run the media are part of the “Power Elites” and act in concert with other branches on this issue so it is not fair and unprejudiced.

The labelling of dissidents as “racists”, “bigots”, “haters” etc is dehumanisation setting us up for persecution for not conforming to establishment diktats. It is pure totalitarian thinking straight from Nazi Germany or the Soviet Union: if any speak out against being dispossessed they are persecuted by the state.

These extreme and totalitarian measures are necessary to keep the lid on. So what will it lead to? We have advice from our greatest ever poet, one of the greatest philosophers in human history and the Son of God himself.

Shakespeare: All's Well That Ends Well, act2,sc.3:

Strange is it that our bloods
Of colour, weight, and heat, poured all together,
Would quite confound distinction, yet stand off,
In differences so mighty.

Aristotle wrote in The Politics. BK V, Ch.iii (p.196) Benjamin Jowett translation: Then there is difference of race or nation, which remains a source of dissension until such time as the two groups learn to live together. This may be a long process; for just as a state cannot be made out of any and every collection of people, so neither can it be made at any time at will. Hence, civil strife is exceedingly common when the population includes an extraneous element, whether these have joined in the founding or have been taken on later ...

Another cause of revolution is difference of races which do not at once acquire a common spirit; for a state is not the growth of a day, any more than it grows out of a multitude brought together by accident. Hence the reception of strangers in colonies, either at the time of their foundation or afterwards, has generally produced revolution.

Matthew 12:25:
"And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand".

Reference Notes for The State Dispossession and Persecution of Whites by Mister Fox:


Salisbury Review. Spring 2003. Vol 21. No3. (


(4) ; ;

The Great Immigration Scandal by Steve Moxon



Immigration: what is the answer? (RKP.1965) pp83,84 Fenner Brockway and Norman Pannell

(9) ;

The large corporations expect their “diverse” work force to be loyal not to country but the company. This goes well with free markets, which have always been Utopian and supra national.