Tuesday, 13 April 2010

Even the pets are not spared


They say that one of the early signs of a potential sadistic serial killer is that they start by torturing and killing domestic pets. That is why a largely unreported phenomenon which has been going on in South Africa for some while.

If the British people can not find it in their hearts to care about the terrible deaths inflicted on white human beings, will they instead care for the vast numbers of white people's pets who are being sadistically killed? Or will they consider them, as they seem to consider the slaughtered and tortured white children responsible by birth for the sins of Apartheid?

The following are a random sample of news stories have appeared in the South African press over the last year:

Over 500 dogs poisoned this year.

Over 500 dogs have been poisoned since January in Gauteng town, Heidelberg …. This is only one vet’s figures alone, and of the 500 he was able to save only 40.

Angry residents, at a community meeting, threatened to deal those responsible themselves. They complain that police do nothing about criminals and to protect the community.

The local police chief did not attend the meeting

Full report
16 dogs poisoned

A family from Randfontein is shocked after their 3 dogs were poisoned over the weekend, and near Parys, an animal lover is receiving trauma counseling after 11 of her dogs died. (A Ford Bantam utility vehicle was found to be stolen around when they wanted to rush the 11 dogs to the vet)

Willem Post (41) of Randfontein said on Monday that no one in his family can sleep at night since their dogs were killed. His neighbour saw 3 boys giving bread to the dogs around 06:00. Post saw the dogs around 07:30 they were still alive. 20 minutes later, the smaller dogs were dead and the bigger dog was foaming at the mouth. He took the bigger dog to the vet, but she didn’t make it.

Full report


15 dogs poisoned

15 dogs were found dead by residents of Princess road in Claremont, Johannesburg. All were poisoned in the early hours of the morning, presumably by whoever broke into 2 vehicles to steal the sound systems, in that street.

52 year old Chrissie Vermaak, was first to discover the slaughter and described the poisoning as barbaric and cruel.
Full report

Dog killed with spade in what was called "barbaric cruelty" - details

I know some will say that these were only animals, but many were much loved pets, and it adds to an overall picture of cruelty and savagery which is very troubling

_________________________
Hat Tip: Dina

This man

This man says what he truly believes, whilst knowing as he does so that he will be vilified and slandered for it. He speaks the truth knowing that he will be called a liar and that he will be lied about.

In fact, this man has had more lies told against him than probably any other native figure in our island history. This is because the union to which the journalists telling the lies about him belong has rules instructing those very journalists that they must lie, and must uniquely lie, about him.

This man goes out every day knowing that as he does so there are organised and state funded thugs determined to stop him. He knows those thugs may use violence, and if they do, the police will not protect him, they stood by and watched him being attacked on College Green and will do so again. Meanwhile the bigots at the Crown Prosecution Service will ignore clear evidence and refuse to prosecute his assailants.

Indeed, this man goes out every day knowing it could be his last, for he would not be the fist European patriot leader to be murdered for his beliefs.

Yet, this man has, himself, been prosecuted twice for the crime of telling truths which were demonstrably true and which the media, the government and the very courts trying him knew to be true.

He is not only prosecuted by the courts, but he faces daily trial by media. When this man went on to the state broadcaster's flagship political debate show, it was to find that, for the first time in its history its format had been deliberately changed so that it became a bear pit, with him as the bear, yet he held his own against the dogs.

This man leads a political party which various state and tax payer funded pressure groups, quangos and arms of the state have been set up deliberately to destroy. A party whom the lying media accuse of inciting violence, when, the party and its members have, in fact, only ever been the victims of that violence.

This is the man whom the state, the controlled media and the mob seek to silence, and yet he still speaks out.

He does all this in the knowledge that the benefits to himself are few, whilst the dangers are great and many. At the very least, this man deserves to be heard.

Ignore the lies told about this man by his enemies, his enemies may be many, but they are your enemies too.

This man is Nick Griffin, the bravest and the most honourable politician in our land today.

When dead men cannot answer

It did not take them long to start the lies, when did it ever? Whilst media commentators pretend to believe the claims coming out of South Africa that AWB leader Eugene Terre'Blanche was murdered whilst attempting to rape a black youth, who is now one of the two men charged with his murder, readers may wish to recall the recent violent death of another far Right leader.

Within days of Austrian Freedom Party leader Joerg Haider's death in an apparent car accident in October 2008, claims of his alleged homosexuality and visits to gay bars started appearing in the press.

How convenient that, as both men are dead and can not deny these allegations. It should be noted that Haider's wife successfully fought a legal action against various newspapers and won a court order preventing them from repeating the claims. However, I suspect that will be less easy to silence the lies this time, given the nature of the allegations against Terre'Blanche and the increasing anti-white racism of the South African courts. Hence, it is likely that the media will have the delight of repeating the allegations for some time to come.

It may even be that a racist South African jury will pretend to believe them as well, making the acquittal of the killers even more likely than it already is.

We can leave aside the hypocrisy of a liberal media using the allegation of homosexuality as a smear tactic, as it has long been clear that there are few forces on earth more homophobic, more misogynistic or more racist than a Liberal defending a black man. There is no depth to which the liberal media will not stoop, and we should never be surprised when they start digging at the bottom of the sewer.

The trouble is that once again it seems that the media believe their own propaganda and actually think we are the bigots which they claim we are. They assume all they need to do is raise the spectre of homosexuality in order to forever besmirch the memory of great men. However, that is their prejudice not ours.

As regular readers of this blog will be aware, I do not share the anti-gay sentiments of some within the nationalist community. As being potentially the first victims of what is to come, gays will become the natural allies of Nationalism as they start to realise the degree to which the liberal establishment has betrayed them. I believe when that happens we should welcome them.

However, even those who do not share that view, will see this calumny for what it is. We know the media lies, we know the establishment lies, we know the courts lie, for they also lie about us as well.

The lies of a lying media, will not change how we think of these men, it will not diminish their memory in our eyes. We are beyond that now, for we all know what is going on.

Even as the black crowds cheer Terre'Blanche's killers, should a jury of their peers acquit them, we will know the truth, and it will exist no more in those cheers than it will be in the news or TV reports which will accompany them.

In the ugly age we have been born in to we are all the victims of the lies which dead men cannot answer, but now we know the truth we can at least answer for them.

___________________________

Footnote:

From what I have gathered the initial investigation team was white with a white investigating officer and a white white spokeswoman. when the spokewoman was approached about the rape and condom story she said that it was "total nonsense".

Apparently the new "investigation" team is made up of black officers who report directly to Bheke Cele the National Commissioner of the South African Police Force and an ANC member

Apparently the rape story had already been thoroughly debunked in South Africa by the police, the paramedic that removed him from the scene of his death. However, suddenly it is back on the table

It is of interest to note that at least one of the defense lawyers Zola Majavu is one of the leading criminal lawyers in in the country so how can an unemployed 15 year old who murdered someone for non payment of wages afford a top lawyer like that? oh yes, of course, the ANC are paying the defence costs.

_____________
Thanks to Dina and JP for help with this article

“Die white man! Viva Malema!”


"Die white man! Viva Malema!”

Shouted 4 armed robbers whilst attacking a white family during a farm attack East of Pretoria at the weekend.

39 year old Capt. Leon Johan Koekemoer, his wife, Annelie (37), and their 3 children together with their lodger were the victims of a terrifying home invasion when intruders broke in through a window in the lounge after forcing open the burglar bars.

The intruders fled when the family fought back shooting one of the number dead

The attack which the police are investigating as attempted murder, follows a well publicised incident where ANC youth leader Julius Malema, defied a court order and sang the ANC battle song “kill the Boer”
______________________

Oddly enough news stories relating to this attack on both Bleed and News 24 seem to have vanished, however, Censor Bugbear has a full version of the original news story, together wuth evidence of additional calls for genocide against the Boers, which can read by clicking here

_______________

Hat Tip: Dina

Monday, 12 April 2010

Conservative Party Cowardice - An analysis by Frank Ellis

Treacherous, Cowardly, Dishonest
and Destroying Our Nation:


Nothing British or Conservative about
David Cameron’s Party


You treated your conscience to a dose of guilt and then prayed to someone or other that things would stay the way they were as long as they could. That’s where you went wrong. You should have held fast to your Western contempt. It might have steeled you against disaster. Because that’s what’s brewing for you now, my friend, and you can’t do anything about it. When all is said and done, it will serve you right, and no one will stand up and fight it. Not even your own. Which just goes to show what a decadent lot you really are.

Jean Raspail, The Camp of the Saints (1973)


Frank Ellis © 2010


Until very recently the Conservative Party used to believe that its elected members of parliament were charged with a solemn duty to advance Britain’s interests and to protect Britain’s territorial, economic, racial, legislative and political integrity from hostile forces, internal and external. That is no longer the case. What is now quite clear is that the Conservative Party, in pursuit of some Neo-Marxist multiracial utopia, has abandoned its allegiance to the British nation state, the monarchy, the nuclear family, the parochial, and above all to the idea that Britain as a white, north-west European nation is worth preserving. The Conservative Party’s open espousal of the viciously anti-white, racist doctrine of multiculturalism is in fact the most obvious and striking symptom of its moral and intellectual decay. Given that one of the central fallacies on which multiculturalism is based is that all races and cultures are the same then, according to this doctrine, no primacy or superiority can be attached to any indigenous population (only applies to white people): all are equal in ability and potential (though non-whites are recognised to be the bearers of unique spiritual and other intangible benefits which whites are duty bound to accept); all are to be globalised and standardised (though non-white indigenous peoples must be protected and nurtured, whereas whites are to become globalized helots). If you believe in the cult of multiculturalism you are: (i) not a conservative in any tradition, certainly not in any tradition derived from the thought of Burke, Disraeli, Salisbury and Powell; and (ii) you are unfit for any high office let alone worthy of becoming the Queen’s First Minister.

One consequence of multiculturalism is that the white population, the people who can rightly claim this land as theirs, are now expected to act and to speak in ways that demonstrate their support and commitment to multiculturalism. In other words, whites, as victims of these ugly policies, policies espoused by Labour and which will be continued if the Conservative Party wins the general election, must show support for something which actively encourages their racial and cultural dispossession. If they cannot bring themselves to state the vile lie – “diversity is our strength” – they must at the very least eschew any public criticism of the ethnic cleansing of whites, especially if they work in the Macphersonised public sector.

Click here to continue reading at Sarah Maid of Albion II

Wednesday, 7 April 2010

USA - Farmer murdered - will he be the last?

Immigration? No. Invasion

By Barbara Simpson (a.k.a. The Babe in the Bunker)

You've probably never heard of Rob Krentz.

Before March 27, there really wasn't any reason you would have.

Since then, however, there's every reason you should know the name and the man and the circumstances of his death.

But unless you read local Arizona news or ranching publications, you'll know nothing about what happened to Rob Krentz on his ranch that day.

The reason you know nothing is because there's a concerted effort by pro-illegal immigration advocates in government and media to keep silent on this story.

Think about it. Did you see any headlines about an innocent American rancher gunned down on his own property?

The truth is, even the cold-blooded murder of an American citizen on his own land by an illegal alien doesn't bother them because they're hell bent for leather to keep our borders open, allow illegals to cross with impunity and to give those already here illegally the precious gift of American citizenship.

If you're a patriotic, law-abiding American and this doesn't make you livid, you are more than a fool.

Robert Krentz operated the 35,000-acre family ranch with 1,000 head of cattle located some 12 miles from the Mexican border and near the city of Douglas, Ariz. He worked with his wife, Sue, and their three children on land that's been in his family since 1907.

That's three generations, 103 years of blood, sweat and tears to maintain a business that is nothing, if not tough.

Krentz had a reputation of generosity and was known for helping anyone in need, including illegals needing water or medical aid.

His eldest son, Andy, told Fox News that his "father was a very good family man. He supported his kids, supported his family. He went out of his way to help anybody we could … it didn't matter who they were."

So what happened that Saturday?

Krentz was checking fencing and water lines on the ranch and mid morning, he radioed his brother Phil that he'd encountered an illegal on the property.

A neighbor told the Arizona Daily Star that she heard that transmission on the area radio network. Wendy Glenn said Rob Krentz told his brother, "There's an illegal alien here that needs help. … I'm out on such and such windmill … Please call the Border Patrol." The brother replied, "I can't hear you."

When Krentz didn't show up for a noon appointment, Phil Krentz called the police.

A search was launched and late that night, Robert Krentz was found slumped over in his ATV, shot to death. His dog had also been shot and was so badly injured, it had to be put down.

The Cochise County sheriff's office told the Arizona Daily Star that the body was found 1,000 feet from where the shooting occurred. The ATV had its lights on and the engine running.

Sheriff Larry Dever said there were spinout marks in the dirt, indicating Krantz was trying to get away from his attacker. Deputies and tracking dogs followed a single set of footprints south to the U.S.-Mexico border. It's assumed the killer crossed that border. Mexican authorities have been notified.

The chances of finding the murderer are slim to none.

Dever told the Daily Star they don't have a motive but retaliation might be a factor. The day before the shooting, Phil Krentz reported drug smuggling activity on the ranch to the Border Patrol.

Approximately 290 pounds of marijuana were found, and tracks led to eight illegal aliens who were arrested. The Border Patrol said none were prosecuted because of lack of evidence. All were in custody at the time of Rob Krentz' murder.

Cochise County is a hotbed of illegal aliens crossing the border as well as drug running and human trafficking. Former Rep. Tom Tancredo said he saw live video from one Cochise County hidden camera in March. It showed 500 to 1,000 illegals every day!

That's one camera in one county in one state. The totals are staggering.

The Krentz ranch, and others in the area, are constantly on guard against intrusions by illegals with repeated calls to authorities about property damage, livestock theft and killing, theft, carjackings and home invasions.

In 2002, two illegals who'd butchered a calf on the Krentz ranch were tried, found guilty, served 51 days in jail and ordered to pay $200 in restitution. Not a cent was paid. The men were released.

In 2005, Krentz told KOLD-TV they were being overrun and that in the prior five years, it had cost them more than $5 million in damages.

Every ranch owner repeatedly asks the Border Patrol for more surveillance and increased protection – to no avail.

There's always a reason it can't be done. It's always money. The county blames the state; the state blames the feds; the feds ignore it and tap dance about border security.

But the buck does stop, and it stops in Washington in the Oval Office. Ultimately, the responsibility for protecting the borders of this country rests with Washington.

The feds have the power and the constitutional duty to protect American citizens and their property from a foreign invasion.

That is exactly what this is.

Mexicans, and others from scores of countries, are invading the United States. It's daily and ongoing and our own government ignores it, tolerates it and allows it.

Even worse, they want to make it legal and reward the millions of lawbreakers already here.

We have the ludicrous "negotiations" by Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., and Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., to devise an amnesty plan the president has said he'll sign.

Meanwhile three border governors want the National Guard sent to the border.

Hello? Washington? Anyone home? Anyone care?

If not, why not? Americans are dying, and it's your fault.

Meanwhile, Robert Krentz is still dead.

Source

The New South Africa - 16 years on

SAIRR Today : Press Release : Statement by the South African Institute of Race Relations on the ramifications of the killing of Eugène Terre'Blanche - 6th April 2010

The Institute desisted from issuing a formal statement in the immediate aftermath of the killing of Mr Terre'Blanche in order to first gauge the broader social, political, and international reaction to the killing. The Institute is now in a position to make the following points.

Racial tensions in the country appear to have increased significantly in recent weeks. This appears to be chiefly as a result of incitement by the ruling African National Congress to ‘shoot and kill’ the Afrikaner ethnic minority in the country. The anxiety around this incitement may well have influenced opinions across the broader white community. What appears to be the case is that much of the racial rapprochement that characterised the first 15 years of South Africa’s democracy is being undone. This rapprochement saw both black and white South Africans come to occupy a middle ground on race relations upon which the maintenance of future stable race relations depends.

Since 1994 the number of white farmers and their families murdered in South Africa is conservatively put at around 1 000. It may very well be much higher. There are currently an estimated 40 000 commercial farmers in the country. Over this same period in the region 250 000 South Africans out of a total current population of approximately 47 million have been murdered. Criminal violence can therefore be described as ‘rampant’ and has done considerable damage to the social fabric of the country. However, this is not to say that all murders in the country are a function of simple criminal banditry. In an environment where law and order has largely collapsed the consequences of incitement by political leaders to commit murder must be taken seriously.

Over the same period the policy measures put in place by the Government to raise the living standards of the black majority have failed to meet expectations. The key interventions of affirmative action and black economic empowerment have been exploited by the African National Congress to build a network of patronage that has made elements of its leadership extremely wealthy. The party also appears to have been so overwhelmed by corrupt tendencies that it is no longer able to act decisively against corrupt behaviour.

It has also through incompetence and poor policy been unable to address failures in the education system which are now the primary factor retarding the economic advancement of black South Africans.

At the same time the party is acutely aware that its support base of poor black South Africans has begun to turn against it. Violent protest action against the ruling party is now commonplace around the country.

In order to shore up support in the black community the ANC increasingly appears to be seeking to shift the blame for its delivery failures onto the small white ethnic minority, which today comprises well under 10% of the total population of South Africa. Here parallels may be read to the behaviour of Zanu-PF in Zimbabwe when that party realised that its political future was in peril. The ANC Youth League’s recent visit to Zanu-PF which saw it endorse that party’s ruinous polices are pertinent here.

In such an environment it is plausible to consider that the ANC’s exhortations to violence may be a contributing factor to the killing of Mr Terre'Blanche. Certainly the ANC’s protestations to the contrary seem ridiculous as the party is in effect saying that its followers pay no attention to what it says - this from a party that routinely claims that it is the manifestation of the will of all black South Africans. This is not to say that a labour dispute or some other matter could not have inflamed tensions on the Terre'Blanche farm. Rather it is to say that a number of different matters should be considered in determining the motivation for the crime.

The rest of the SAIRR Press release can be read by clicking here

_____________________________


The following, somewhat article was republished in just days before the Terre'Blanche killing

Careful not to be mistaken for boers

This is not a news article and was originally published on a satirical news website, www.hayibo.com

As the ANC continues to defend a song calling for whites to be killed, the South African government has appealed to white visitors at this year's World Cup not to drive beige diesel Mercedeses, collect angel- or clown-themed art or do anything else that might make the Youth League mistake them for boers and kill them.

In a startling failure to see the irony in going to the Constitutional Court to defend its right to call for genocide, the ANC confirmed last week that it would appeal against a finding that its 'Kill the Boer' song was hate-speech and incitement to murder.

This morning the government defended the song again, saying that it was essential for the ANC's 16-year-old program of invoking the liberation struggle to avoid having to do any actual service delivery.

But, said the ANC's Commissar for Racial Profiling, Hitler Mazibuko, South Africa was committed to killing as few foreign tourists and soccer stars as possible, and appealed to them not to imitate boers in any way.

He said boors would not be harmed as they comprised 98 percent of the players coming to South Africa this year. But, he said, even such famous "honky crackers" as Wayne Rooney and Ronaldo could be gunned down by over-zealous ANC Youth League members if they did not take precautions.

"Obviously we can't guarantee 100 percent that we won't blow away the wrong people," said Mazibuko. "I mean, this is South Africa."

But, he said, there were certain common-sense precautions visiting whites could take to make sure they weren't mistaken for boers and massacred.

"First up, the beige diesel Mercedes from the mid-1980s ? that's a big no-no," he said.

"That's got failed Bophuthatswana putsch fifth-columnist written all over it."

He said the next biggest giveaway of "boer sensibilities" was a penchant for large acrylic paintings of angels or crying clowns, and extremely expensive bronze sculptures of the Big Five.

Finally, he said, female visitors in their 40s should steer clear of wearing long red velvet multi-layered skirts while claiming to be "free spirits" or "artists", as they would be shot on sight as the daughters of boers.

A spokesman for boer art dealers said he would release a statement as soon as he got back from delivering a shipment of bronze cheetahs to ?migr?s in Mauritius, but said that the news made him feel like "a crying child harlequin holding a dead rose on a rainy Parisian street".

Source

____________
Hat Tip: TVJ

A slip of the first tongue?

Saturday, 3 April 2010

Breaking News - Eugene Terreblanche Latest Farm Murder Victim


South African white nationalist leader Eugene Terreblanche has been murdered, local media reports say.

Mr Terreblanche was beaten to death on his farm in the north-west of the country, the reports said.

Mr Terreblanche and his Afrikaner Weerstandsbeweging (Afrikaner Resistance Movement - AWB) came to prominence in the early 1980s.

He became the champion of a minority determined to stop the process that was bringing apartheid to an end.

Mr Terreblanche is the 3,100th white South African farm genocide victim to be murdered since the end of Apatheid in 1994.

Source

Developing news and commentary at My South Africa Sucks
___________

Related Link: Malema sings "Kill the Boer" ... yesterday

____________________________

UPDATE

The unspeakably vile BBC and CNN continue to refer to Terreblanche as a White "Supremacist", that word they always use to mislead the public about Nationalist and Separatist leaders.

Apparently two of Terreblanche's workers have been arrested, the police claim that they killed him because they had not been paid, which seems rather a convenient explanation.

News 24

Rome under siege

Is it just me who finds more than just a coincidence in the fact that, just at the time when the leaders of Europe and indeed America, together with their controlled media, are gleefully cheering on the invasion of previously Christian lands by the Muslim hoards, the Catholic Church finds itself under the most concerted and vicious attack it has faced in centuries?

Child abuse is a terrible crime, and it appears to be without question that some Catholic Priests were guilty of that terrible crime. However, are we being given a fair or accurate picture of what has happened in the church and how this differs the wider society, and other situations where adults have authority over children?

The doors to the madrassas remain sealed, and figures are not easy to obtain as to what goes on there, although the widespread grooming of under aged white girls by Muslim gangs across Britain might lead one to speculate.

However, figures are more available elsewhere, but only to those prepared to look, which the media choose not to.

The following article by
Selwyn Duke at the American thinker gives a very different perspective on the matter than the one which is currently being presented to us:

-/-

The Scandal Driving the Church Sex Scandal

By Selwyn Duke

We've all heard the story. Hundreds of young sexual abuse victims long afraid to come forward for fear of embarrassment and scorn, abusers escaping prosecution and quietly moving to different jurisdictions, authorities covering up the crimes to avoid scandal and litigation. It's a saga of grave, grave sin.

Of course, you would assume that I'm talking about the Catholic Church sexual abuse scandal.

And you would be wrong.

I'm describing the situation in America's schools -- something that, although mirroring the problems dogging the Church, is strangely ignored.

Let's examine the similarities using statistics from the United States. According to the John Jay Report, 10,667 people made allegations of child sexual abuse (not all were substantiated) committed by priests between 1950 and 2002; according to an AP investigation, at least 1,801 educators committed sexual misconduct involving minors between 2001 and 2005. So the per annum tally is:

Number of people making allegations against priests - 205

Criminal educators - 360

Now, since it's logical to assume that numerous individuals made accusations against the same priests, the number of clerical transgressors is no doubt less than 205. Yet even if we use the 205 figure, the number of offenders appears to be approximately 76 percent greater among educators. But that doesn't even begin to tell the whole story.

While it's obvious that a certain percentage of cases must have gone unreported in both education and the Church, the latter has been subjected to intense media scrutiny while the former has remained off the radar screen. Thus, it's reasonable to assume that the percentage is higher in education. As to this, the AP tells us about a Congress-mandated study placing the number of students sexually abused by an education worker at some point between kindergarten and 12th grade at 4.5 million. Furthermore, the AP found that most of this sexual abuse is never reported and that even when it does come to light, often no action is taken.

Of course, the other side of the coin is that the number of teachers nationwide is greater than that of priests, so a raw-numbers analysis may be deceptive. So let's examine the rate. Wapedia reports the following: "A Perspective on Clergy Sexual Abuse by Dr. Thomas Plante of Stanford University and Santa Clara University states that 'available research suggests that approximately 2 to 5% of priests have had a sexual experience with a minor' which ‘is lower than the general adult male population that is best estimated to be closer to 8%.'"

Continue reading at the American Thinker

_______________

Hat Tip: Dr. D

Friday, 2 April 2010

Have You Tried the BBC Race Bias Test Yet?

Kriss Donald and Stephen Lawrence
BBC Bias in Black and white

From the BNP WEbsite

The BBC has an appalling record for anti-white racist bias in its reporting, particularly when it comes to race hate crime against white Britons — a fact easily and conclusively proven using the BBC website.

The most appalling race hate murder committed in Britain in modern times was undoubtedly that of Kriss Donald in 2004.

Kriss was 16-years old when a Muslim race hate gang snatched him at random from a Glasgow street.

He was taken to an isolated spot where he was sadistically tortured.

He didn’t die from the mutilations inflicted on him with knives but from being set alight.

His murderers were later convicted and sentenced to long terms of imprisonment.

Yet despite the obvious fact that this was Britain’s most appalling racist murder, the BBC all but ignored it — something it most certainly would not have done had the victim been Asian or black.

This is far from being the only racist murder of a white person that the BBC has either censored or ignored.

To establish the extent of the BBC’s racist anti-white bias we invite you to do the BBC Bias Test:

  1. Go to the BBC website’s home page here
  2. Input the name “Kriss Donald” into the search facility towards the top of the page.
  3. Count the number of references to “Kriss Donald” returned.
  4. Repeat steps 2 and 3, this time inputting the name “Stephen Lawrence”.
  5. Then ask yourself why does the BBC consider one murder so much more newsworthy than the other?

An account of the Kriss Donald murder may be read here

Unlike the BBC, the British National Party believes that crime should be reported impartially, irrespective of the ethnicity of the victim.

First Time Ever BBC Mentions White Murder Victims Is to Attack BNP

BBC reporter Michelle Gribbon accuses BNP of exploiting her cousin's racially motivated murder and then exploits her cousin's racially motivated murder in order to attack the BNP

Click here to read the report on the BBC's distorted and politically exploitative report at the Home the Home of the Green Arrow

_______________________
Related Link:

Racism Cuts Both Ways

Thursday, 1 April 2010

The Exquisite Cultivar

By August Pointneuf

The British, the “Island Race”, was pivotal in the development of the modern civilised world, in an evolution of abilities ranging from literature and art to industry and science, which was unique in the history of mankind.

It is true, also, that much of this evolution had its foundation in the broader Western European culture as Europeans became progressively compressed by aliens into the north-western corner of Europe’s continent.

But there are those who are averse to this view, primarily because it is in their interests to pretend that this superiority does not exist. They argue that past invasions make the British no more than a cluttered melange of mixed origins. Therefore, they opine, since the British are not a discrete entity they have no right to claim intrinsic superiority. Those who chose not to accept the unequivocal say much about themselves, notably their blindness to objectivity. Ultimately the necessary defending substantiation lies firmly with the historian.

Others counter, and perhaps demonstrate, that the British are genetically highly homogeneous, and that most of the so-called “invaders”, whether Angles, Saxons, Normans, or Romans have close genetic origins. The Celts are considered to have been positive contributors and Jews powerful catalytic benefactors.

But all these debates are frivolous and pointless. The end-point of these arguments must always be that a relatively small group, which historically defended the ingress of strangers and protected by geographic isolation, became the creators of the greatest civilisation ever.
It matters nil what their origins are. The reality is in what they succeeded in creating. Whatever their blend, this group did it. This people displayed unique superiority, so much so that it enabled them to create the largest Empire ever known, and stamp their brand across the entire world.

Biological success is measured by its instance. Who contests the beauty or scent of a plant because its origins are obscure? Does one debate the benefits of a superior cultivar of wheat, or the flavour of the trout because each has evolved from distant cross-breeding or unknown primordial origins?
It is demonstrable reality which counts. This isolated group, the British, had the blend which succeeded, and we should care about their origins not one jot.

However, like all cultivars, the British as a race are not infinitely robust. The British will not continue to function as a superior breed if they are bred out. Just as superior breeds of cattle, or dogs, or rare alpines, or dolphins will lose their places in the fine balance of biology if cross-bred, so also is the British cultivar highly vulnerable. What insanity would encourage into a herd of Highland cattle, carefully protected and cosseted for centuries to preserve their unparalleled qualities, a contaminating Black Angus bull?

Ironically, it is often those who do recognise fine biological distinctions and who seek to protect species diversity, that have tried to destroy the unequalled capabilities of the British. It has been those who protect and defend the rare plant or animal, that have been promoting the cross-breeding which will breed out the unique qualities of the European.

This group of busybodies preens itself indulgently as “liberals” with the connotation that this makes them advanced intellectually and morally, superior purveyors of distillate compassion, foresight and wisdom.

Instead they have become malevolent jesters, whose delusions are destroying that exquisite cultivar which has been the People of Britain.

August Pointneuf


Copyright 2010. Reproduction with permission.

Eugenics 2010

As regular readers of my blog will be aware, I have a weakness for American cop shows, despite the, diversity quota approved, parallel universe of evil white criminals and honest, law abiding, black victims in which they are set. We all have our own foibles and vices and late evenings will often find me, my Albion knight and a bottle of Shiraz in front of of the TV watching the mindless pap that is CSI, Law and Order or the ludicrous twaddle the Mentalist.

As a result, last weekend I watched an episode of NBC's Law and Order entitled “Birthright”.

I don't know how far we are behind America, but this was part of series 16 with Police Officers Green and Fontana rather than Lupo and Bernard who I understand are this season's black and white detectives.

Whatever the series. anyone who is a regular viewer of Law and Order will be aware that each episode follows a set formula, a crime is committed and is investigated for the first part of the show by mixed race detectives from the New York Police department under the control of the sturdy and black authority figure Lt. Anita Van Buren. After Lt. Van Buren's boys have made their arrest the action moves on to the court case where the accused perpetrator is prosecuted by the indescribably irritating Jack McCoy (Sam Waterston) and the relevant season's interchangeable foxy chick.

Invariably as the show develops some social issue is addressed from a resolutely politically correct standpoint.

However. “Birthright” did not initially appear to be following the usual pattern. What first struck me was that it actually portrayed black people as criminals, committing crimes and actually killing people without some white person pulling the strings. Admittedly the victims were also black rather than white, but this was still revolutionary stuff for NBC.

Of course, the revolution only lasted for the first five minutes of the show, after which we were swiftly jerked back into more familiar territory when the real, and predictably white, villainess made her appearance.

A black female murder suspect died in police custody and the autopsy revealed that she has been sterilised, at which point the story jumped swiftly from, instantly forgotten, black crime to more standard white fascism.

It turned out that a white nurse had been secretly sterilising black women to prevent them from producing unwanted babies. In the eyes of irritating Jack, the latest foxy chick and the Manhattan DA (played bizarrely by US Senator Fred Thompson who appears on screen for about 48 seconds each week saying something profound and politically correct – and on the strength of which tried to stand for president) this was nothing short of eugenics, as practised by the Nazis and an unmitigated evil.

I forget whether the nurse was found guilty or acquitted, I had rather lost interest by that point, and, in any even, it hardly mattered she had already been cast as the irredeemably vile disciple of a morally indefensible doctrine.

It is interesting how often the subject of eugenics pops up in movies, from Gregory Peck's snarling Meggele creating various teenaged Hitler clones, all suitably obnoxious and played by the subsequently unemployable Jeremy Black, in the 1978 movie “The Boys from Brazil” to the futuristic designer babies of “Gattaca”.

In movies, literature and popular culture, eugenics is an easily identifiable symbol of an evil and discredited ideology, and in so far as history is concerned, any hint of a flirtation with that ideology, whether true or not, is guaranteed to destroy the reputation of any historical figure.

The media and Hollywood delight in portraying a belief in eugenics as malevolent and without merit. Which is odd, given that Hollywood and the media are amongst the most fanatical protagonists of modern eugenics.

Eugenics, after all is the study and practice of selective breeding when applied to humans, with the aim of improving the species or changing human genetic qualities. To actively seek to change the racial characteristics of a people for the sake of a political aim is eugenics, irrespective of whether it is achieved by petri-dish or by propaganda.

Where exactly is the difference between the goal of creating a mono-race and that of creating a master race? I submit to you that there is none. Yet it is those who are so ready to decry the master race creating eugenicists of the 1930's who are the primary mono-race engineering fanatics of our age

When, for instance, France's President Sarcozy demanded last year that the French people should intermarry with other races he became in effect Monsieur Eugenics.

Television presenter Andrew Marr may look like a harmless goofy Doofus with his Shrek like ears and amphibian features but he is no friend of his native people. When he stated that widespread and vigorous miscegenation was the best answer for the British people
he was advocating selective inter-breeding as such he was advocating eugenics.

Day after day we are beset with propaganda promoting the joys of interracial sex, especially the tedious stereotype of the black man and the white tart, which I have addressed here before.

Much of it is crude and obnoxious. I, for one, will never buy a bed from “Dreams”after watching all those adverts showing mixed race couple in bed together exchanging jewelry and lustful glances. (I hope others will join me in that boycott.)

However, Dreams adverts are only slightly more offensive than all the other inter-racial sex promotions which are deliberately pumped into our lives day after day, and a lot of it is more subtle.

Mixed race couples are presented as role models to our children. Does anyone really believe that a woman, such as Cheryl Cole, who's tiny chin and huge forehead make her resemble nothing so much as a praying mantis, would have reached such an elevated celebrity status had she not jumped into bed with a black football player and thus become the nation's sweetheart?

Klum and Seal's White trash wedding

Why is it always the likes of Heidi Klum who are wheeled out to climb all over her black husband, seemingly frantic to the point of psychosis to prove how sexy she finds him, if not as more of the same mixed race marketing? (Klum's motives and prejudices were rather exposed when she and Seal decided upon a “white trash” theme to their wedding, and I suspect that there is some white man in her past whom she is desperate to hurt)

It is not just the media, Hollywood movies and commercial advertising which constantly thrust a fake mixed race ideal down the throat of an impressionable public. Walk into any local government office, branch of the health service or educational facility, pick up a leaflet and in nine out of ten a mixed race couple will beam out at you, whilst the child model of choice will be the interbred product of such a union.

Within our schools the proselytising is unremitting, as a female teenager in the 1980's I can testify that, even back then, the pressure to sleep with a black or brown man just to prove you were not racist was intense, and I am sure that it is now ten times worse. I personally did not capitulate, but there were many who did, and I don't think it was always by choice.

The pressure did not only come from black and brown students, sleeping with a member of a different race was presented, by those tasked with guiding our minds, as an act of free thinking rebellion, whereas, in fact, it was the new conformity.

Anyone who fails to appreciate that interracial sex is being actively encouraged by the establishment, by politicians, by the media and by those educating our children is deluding themselves. That it is happening is undeniable and it is happening for a political purpose.

Were I to be charitable I would suggest that those advocating mass inter-breeding share the demented belief that by genetically engineering a huge homogeneous mono-race we will irradiate conflict, others might suggest that their motives are far less benevolent and that they are fully aware of the disaster they are inciting.

World history shows how flawed is the belief a racial melting pot will end conflict. Look to Northern Ireland, to Rwanda, to Kenya, to the seething hatred between Middle Eastern factions, indeed to World War II and you can see that removing race from the equation does not remove conflict.

However, it was ever the mark of the political zealot to ignore reality in favour of an ideological dream.

If you were to mention eugenics to the average man or woman in the street today, most will think of the Nazis or maybe white supremacists, the better informed might refer to the social theories propounded in the 1930, and maybe mention Margaret Sanger, Marie Stopes, H.G. Wells or George Bernhard Shaw and other long dead supporters of a long discredited science. Few, if any, will speak of it as something impacting on their own lives today.

However, the active promotion of selective breeding in order to achieve a political and racial outcome is alive and well today, and now, in 2010, it assails us on all sides. The proponents of 21st Century eugenics are the most powerful pressure groups of our age. They seek to change us biologically and ethnically. Their aims are no longer achieved in the laboratory but through the tools of the propagandist and the might of the state, and, so far, their success has been phenomenal.

We are living now through the second age of eugenics but this time the damage will be far less easy to repair.

__________________

Invasion USA

Border Invasion Pics is an interesting, if disturbing site documenting the invasion of America through its porous Southern border.
"Thousands of individuals from foreign countries walk unchallenged across our southern border every day. We don't know who they are, where they come from, or their intentions. It is an invasion by definition, and our government condones it.

This website presents current and undeniable documentation."

_____________
Hat Tip: Davy

The legion of white victims

Elderly couple survive Farm attack

An 85-year-old grandfather from Soutpansdrift in the North-West fought with his bare hands with three armed intruders to protect his life partner, even after they shot and stabbed him.

Dawie Meintjes and his life partner, Maria de Beer, 81, were attacked at 01:00 on Monday morning in their farm outside Brits.

De Beer was struck by shrapnel from the bullet on three places on her right leg, Mr. Meintje was shot in the hand and also stabbed in the arm

Full report

Thankfully Dawier and Maria survived their ordeal, and for once it has not been necessary for me to update the tragic figure at the top right hand of this blog.

Elderly woman dies in grisly attack

However, in another incident police are investigating the murder of 80 year old Helina Kotze after her body was found with her wrists and knees tied up at her home in Potchefstroom on Tuesday.

Ms. Kotze's throat had been slit and her wrists and knees were tied up with kitchen napkins and sellotape.

New report

As Ms. Kotze was not a member of the farming community I can not legitimately include her murder amongst the farm killings, she is another of the many urban whites who are raped and murdered in South Africa each year, but of whom no accurate count is available.

___________
Reports supplied by Dina

______________
Comment: People often write to me and ask why whites stay in South Africa given the increasing violence being perpetrated against them. However, as with the cases above, a significant number of the victims are elderly people in their 70's and 80's, frail vulnerable people in their twilight years who have known no other home and have no remaining contacts outside South Africa. Most are no longer in a position to start a new life in a foreign land.

Also, at least 10% of the white South African population, some 450,000 people, now live in dire poverty as a direct result of black favouring affirmative action which has deprived them of their jobs and their homes. These whites struggle to feed their children on a daily basis, not only is the price of the air fair out of the country beyond their means, but no Western country would take them in.

Thanks to TVJ for sending me to a link to this item in Business Report regarding the growing number of white squatter camps in South Africa.

Meanwhile that remarkable lady Adriana Stuijt who runs the Censor Bugbear blog continues to report on the plight of whites in South Africa, including those now living in poverty. Here are links two of her recent postings on this subject:

I highly recommend Adriana Stuijt's two blogs Censor Bugbear Reports and Afrikana Genocide Archives for the prolific and well researched reporting of news which the Western media actively seeks to hide.

New Parliament Votes

By Robin Hind

Today saw the long anticipated first vote of the new Black Majority parliament.

The motion, which now will be drafted into law, was passed by a comfortable margin.

It is not anticipated that there will be any obstruction from the House of Lords, which has long exhibited a sympathy towards black majority rule.

The new legislation directs that the British population be adjusted to conform to the Proportionality Concept. This means that the population demography will be adjusted to reflect the demography of race as it is distributed world-wide. The legislation will ensure that immigration policy will be directed at accelerating the black population immigration selectively. The correct proportion for the white population (seven percent, which is the current percentage of whites in the world population) will be achieved by the assisted passage of members of the white population group to “over-dense” nations. An assurance was given that these Assisted Emigrants will have nothing to fear, as their presence in creating multicultural societies has been established as being of universal benefit.

The Speaker gave praise to the South African Government for their assistance. The South African government had pioneered the concept of Proportional Representation, beginning when sports team selections were obliged to reflect the national racial proportionate demography.

An additional motion which was successfully adopted, was that the significance of this achievement be celebrated in perpetuity as a bank holiday to be named British True Freedom Day.

Robin Hind

Tuesday, 30 March 2010

Bloodless Genocide


The above picture is the home page for the British Home Office Identity and Passport Service. As you can see the British passport office (and British identity?) is now represented by a picture of an Asian male.

Progressively native Britons are being replaced in the very imagery of our nation. This is deliberate, this is political and this is an act of aggression. This is a bloodless genocide, and our nation is being ethnically cleansed .