Theta is not what the Chinese man is saying at all. The Chinese man is saying that all human groups split from each other much earlier than previpusly thought, when different human groups were still different apes.
They are saying that the tout of African theory has been proved false and that the theory of multi-regionalism seems to be the more plausable one.
Look at this scientific study. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/n7118/full/nature05329.html Look at the huge number of scientists and institutions that took part in this scientific study.
Here is an extract from the study above:
"We have constructed a first-generation CNV map of the human genome through the study of 270 individuals from FOUR POPULATIONS with ancestry in Europe, Africa or Asia (the HAPMAP collection). DNA from these individuals was screened for CNV using two complementary technologies: single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping arrays, and clone-based comparative genomic hybridization. A total of 1,447 copy number VARIABLE REGIONS (CNVRs), which can encompass overlapping or adjacent gains or losses, covering 360 megabases (12% OF THE GENOME) were identified in these populations." .............
A: a 12% CNV difference between the races.
Like I said before, MODERN GENETICS have proved that we are all very much less alike than the Human genome project initially thought back in the year 2001. The HGP never even looked at COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS (CNV) because it did not even know that CNV's existed.
Here is an easy example.
If one man has a banana and another man has 10 bananas, then the bananas between them are 99.9% identical. This was the logic of the human genome project, when it concluded that all humans are 99.9% identical.
BUT one man has more bananas than the other. This is a single "Copy number variation." CNV As you can see CNV differences are very important.
Now modern science tells us that 12% CNV exists between the races.
Here it is presented in graphical form. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/n7118/fig_tab/nature05329_F7.html
Then look at this scientific study. Go to the Hapmap here... http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Then go to publications, here... http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/publications.html.en
Then click on the publication entitled: "A SECOND GENERATION HUMAN HAPMAP with over 3.1mil SNP's" http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v449/n7164/abs/nature06258.html
Look at the huge number of institutions that took part (72) All the major genetic institutions from all over the world.
AND HERE are their findings:
"We describe the Phase II HapMap, which characterizes over 3.1 million human single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) genotyped in 270 individuals from four geographically diverse populations and includes 25–35% of common SNP variation in the populations surveyed."
So we know that 1) CNV differences between the races are 12% 2) SNP differences between the races are 25-35%.
The human genome project concluded that all humans are 99.9% identical based on SNP analysis. How they did this considering that they only had the genome of one person is beyond me.
The study above is a second generation study and it proves that the racial SNP difference is 25-35%.
If the human genome is likened to a book, then a single SNP difference is a single word spelt wrong and a single CNV is a whole page that is different.
This means that the different groups of humans branched off much earlier on the evolutionary path than previously thought.
Here it is presented in graphical form. http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/n7118/fig_tab/nature05329_F7.html
Then look at this scientific study. Go to the Hapmap here... http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Then go to publications, here... http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/publications.html.en
Then click on the publication entitled: "A SECOND GENERATION HUMAN HAPMAP with over 3.1mil SNP's" http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v449/n7164/abs/nature06258.html
Look at the huge number of institutions that took part (72) All the major genetic institutions from all over the world.
AND HERE are their findings:
"We describe the Phase II HapMap, which characterizes over 3.1 million human single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) genotyped in 270 individuals from four geographically diverse populations and includes 25–35% of common SNP variation in the populations surveyed."
So we know that 1) CNV differences between the races are 12% 2) SNP differences between the races are 20-33%.
The human genome project concluded that all humans are 99.9% identical based on SNP analysis. How they did this considering that they only had the genome of one person is beyond me.
The study above is a second generation study and it proves that the racial SNP difference is 25-35%.
If the human genome is likened to a book, then a single SNP difference is a single word spelt wrong and a single CNV is a whole page that is different.
6 comments:
We spit from the Asians 40,000 years ago, the Chinese man is saying 'We' evolved from Asians?
But I think the Chinese man is righton one point, why would we all come from Afria?
We evolved separately, there's nothing clearer.
We go for victory
Vote BNP!
Theta is not what the Chinese man is saying at all. The Chinese man is saying that all human groups split from each other much earlier than previpusly thought, when different human groups were still different apes.
They are saying that the tout of African theory has been proved false and that the theory of multi-regionalism seems to be the more plausable one.
Look at this scientific study.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/n7118/full/nature05329.html
Look at the huge number of scientists and institutions that took part in this scientific study.
Here is an extract from the study above:
"We have constructed a first-generation CNV map of the human genome through the study of 270 individuals from FOUR POPULATIONS with ancestry in Europe, Africa or Asia (the HAPMAP collection). DNA from these individuals was screened for CNV using two complementary technologies: single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping arrays, and clone-based comparative genomic hybridization. A total of 1,447 copy number VARIABLE REGIONS (CNVRs), which can encompass overlapping or adjacent gains or losses, covering 360 megabases (12% OF THE GENOME) were identified in these populations."
.............
A: a 12% CNV difference between the races.
Like I said before, MODERN GENETICS have proved that we are all very much less alike than the Human genome project initially thought back in the year 2001. The HGP never even looked at COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS (CNV) because it did not even know that CNV's existed.
Here is an easy example.
If one man has a banana and another man has 10 bananas, then the bananas between them are 99.9% identical. This was the logic of the human genome project, when it concluded that all humans are 99.9% identical.
BUT one man has more bananas than the other.
This is a single "Copy number variation." CNV
As you can see CNV differences are very important.
Now modern science tells us that 12% CNV exists between the races.
Here it is presented in graphical form.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/n7118/fig_tab/nature05329_F7.html
Then look at this scientific study.
Go to the Hapmap here...
http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Then go to publications, here...
http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/publications.html.en
Then click on the publication entitled:
"A SECOND GENERATION HUMAN HAPMAP with over 3.1mil SNP's"
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v449/n7164/abs/nature06258.html
Look at the huge number of institutions that took part (72) All the major genetic institutions from all over the world.
AND HERE are their findings:
"We describe the Phase II HapMap, which characterizes over 3.1 million human single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) genotyped in 270 individuals from four geographically diverse populations and includes 25–35% of common SNP variation in the populations surveyed."
So we know that
1) CNV differences between the races are 12%
2) SNP differences between the races are 25-35%.
The human genome project concluded that all humans are 99.9% identical based on SNP analysis.
How they did this considering that they only had the genome of one person is beyond me.
The study above is a second generation study and it proves that the racial SNP difference is 25-35%.
If the human genome is likened to a book, then a single SNP difference is a single word spelt wrong and a single CNV is a whole page that is different.
This means that the different groups of humans branched off much earlier on the evolutionary path than previously thought.
A4
Here it is presented in graphical form.
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v444/n7118/fig_tab/nature05329_F7.html
Then look at this scientific study.
Go to the Hapmap here...
http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
Then go to publications, here...
http://hapmap.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/publications.html.en
Then click on the publication entitled:
"A SECOND GENERATION HUMAN HAPMAP with over 3.1mil SNP's"
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v449/n7164/abs/nature06258.html
Look at the huge number of institutions that took part (72) All the major genetic institutions from all over the world.
AND HERE are their findings:
"We describe the Phase II HapMap, which characterizes over 3.1 million human single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) genotyped in 270 individuals from four geographically diverse populations and includes 25–35% of common SNP variation in the populations surveyed."
So we know that
1) CNV differences between the races are 12%
2) SNP differences between the races are 20-33%.
The human genome project concluded that all humans are 99.9% identical based on SNP analysis.
How they did this considering that they only had the genome of one person is beyond me.
The study above is a second generation study and it proves that the racial SNP difference is 25-35%.
If the human genome is likened to a book, then a single SNP difference is a single word spelt wrong and a single CNV is a whole page that is different.
So finally, the, "out of Africa" bullshit theory is proven to be a load of PC liberal multi culti horse crap.
Bwahahahaha, breaths, bwhahahahaha
Anonymous - your right.
Dam my spelling is bad when I'm drunk.
The out of Africa theory needs to be proven wrong on a larger scale however.
90% of people swallow the MSM version of everything unfortunately.
Post a Comment