Monday, 23 August 2010

The Right Standpoint

By Mister Fox


There is an ideological muddle which impedes the protection of our people and we must find the right standpoint. Some influenced by university conditioning think it is is a rationalist formula written down in a book like Das Kapital or Mein Kampf but our patriotic way of thinking grows out of emotion and the need for numinous things in life rather than universal abstractions. The way to develop a new world view is to gather examples from the world around us, of what is really happening as a result of, say, immigration, then collate it and our version of reality begins to form.

We must link to our patriotic traditions and develop from there, but with a more suitable economic system to give our people priority in their own country. Many patriotic Conservatives, social and cultural, fought against mass immigration throughout the 50s and 60s. M.P.s like Cyril Osborne who began his campaign against open - door immigration in 1954 and Norman Pannell in 1956. Even Churchill prepared a Bill to control immigration but it was dropped when he had to relinquish the premiership because of deteriorating health. He also wanted the Tories to fight the General Election with the slogan ”Keep England White.” We have the famous example of Enoch Powell.(1)

The Conservative party was a “National” Conservative party which put the national interest first, not the Global economy. We are their natural successors and must position ourselves as such. This would give supporters a secure base to argue from with abundant role models and quotes from our history and that would strengthen their conviction which would impress their hearers more. People follow the dominant elites. Even those who agree with us vote for one of the dominant parties and a renewed conviction on our part would counter that. It is a mistake to lament they have not woken up when we are not putting our case with enough confidence. This is a starting point and would be adapted to deal with contemporary circumstances.

I have written before that we need to make an accommodation with Jewish communities and other groups who are in danger like Hindus and Sikhs but we must make it clear that this is our country and our people take priority. We are being invaded by a common enemy and the elites have adopted anti-Semitism as part of their surrender. Jewish people tend to regard “White Christians as a danger to them but must transcend the Ghetto Mentality and understand that the Muslims hate them first and they are under attack in France and Malmo, Sweden and when emasculated pricks like Cameron and Milliband get Turkey in the EU Jews will be openly persecuted! Mass immigration has changed everything and old enmities are no longer feasible. About 1 in 8 of the population of Southern Ireland are asylum seekers so the internecine wars in the North are not appropriate during an invasion. (2)

Do not think everyone in the media or the Conservative Party is an implacable enemy. Many agree with us and even have useful information about what the elites in politics and the media have planned but they stay away because of the Holocaust denying leaders.

The elites use the media and Equalities Commission to makes us like them or destroy us and we have to allow ethnics in but not adopt civic nationalism. There is a tendency for those who lament our lack of progress to think the situation hopeless and think conforming to the ideology of the elites but you do not win by capitulation. This shows they misunderstand the aims of the elites which is to replace Whites with immigrants. (3)

Simple or self-loathing people say “So what?”. “It doesn't matter if different people take over!” This shows a failure to understand how people behave. They think it will be painless like handing the baton on in a relay race.

It was common to hear liberals say:” We did it to them, now they can do it to us” though they did not themselves live in it. That submissive attitude still dominates the elites.”(4)

We must convey the urgency of this situation not try to be nice. We must respond in kind to the anti British propagandists in the media and be more urgent in our defending our children.

The vile abuse and the police and media cover-up of the murder of Charlene Downes shows how the elites are surrendering our young people to Muslims. She was a 14 year-old Blackpool schoolgirl who went missing in 2003. It is thought that older Muslim men who were illegally having sex with her murdered her, chopped her up and sold her to Blackpool people in kebabs!A trial in 2007 collapsed. The Independent Police Complaint Commissions decided covert surveillance was "handled poorly and unprofessionally", and police were forced to apologise.(5)

In Rochdale Nine men were jailed after a 14-year-old White girl was preyed upon and forced into prostitution. The child was fed vodka after she was found wandering the streets and repeatedly raped by gangs of Muslim men.

The convictions for various offences, including sexual activity with a child, controlling a child prostitute, facilitating child prostitution and paying for sexual services with a child. She had to testify in separate trials involving the men and was eventually excused further evidence after a third hearing when psychologists ruled there were fears for her mental and physical well-being.

The submissive attitude of children to Muslim predators is inculcated by the state at school. Harrop Fold High School in Worsley, Greater Manchester, persecuted Jodie Stott, a 14-year old schoolgirl, who was arrested by police for “racism.” She had wisely refused to sit with a group of Asian students because three, who had recently immigrated here, could not speak English. She was kept in a police cell for three-and-a-half hours after being reported by her teachers: "They told me to take my laces out of my shoes and remove my jewellery, and I had my fingerprints and photograph taken," said Codie.

Totalitarian headteacher Dr Antony Edkins: "An allegation of a serious nature was made concerning a racially motivated remark by one student towards a group of Asian students new to the school and new to the country." We aim to ensure a caring and tolerant attitude towards people and pupils of all ethnic backgrounds and will not stand for racism in any form." Edkins and the other teachers are persecuting this young girl in her own country for wanting to be able to understand her school companions.

The same Education Authority had a ten-year-old boy prosecuted for allegedly calling an 11-year-old mixed race pupil a 'Paki' and 'Bin Laden' in a playground argument at a primary school in Irlam.

District Judge Jonathan Finestein said the decision to prosecute showed "how stupid the whole system is getting" and was himself attacked by teaching union leaders for "feeding a pernicious agenda" that aided the BNP.

In 1965 Peter Griffiths Conservative MP for Smethwick showed great wisdom when he called for special classes to teach immigrants English and was accused by progressives of wanting to start apartheid in schools!

The Daily Mail reported that a Catholic schoolgirl was labelled ‘truant’ by her teachers for refusing to dress as a Muslim for a school field trip to a mosque. Staff the 14-year-old pupils to dress in headscarf, wear trousers or leggings and keep her arms covered for the compulsory visit to the mosque after it was arranged to promote ‘community cohesion.’ Amy Owen refused.

Totalitarian headmaster Peter Lee wrote the visit was “as compulsory as a geography field trip. There are two reasons for these visits. One is that the scheme of work in religious studies REQUIRES children to have knowledge and understanding of other world religions.”

‘The second is that the school is REQUIRED to promote tolerance respect and understanding. This is known as community cohesion. A failure to do this could result in an unwelcome inspection judgement”. Around ten others in year 9 classes refused to dress as Muslims and were marked down in the truanting register. It is clear from this how the word tolerance is used in an ideological rather than grammatical sense.: the state through its institutions is trying to enforce submission to Islam.

We must start highlighting the religious apartheids enshrined in Islamic Sharia law and what would happen to British women if decadent elites like Dame Butler-Sloss and Prince Charles succeed in introducing it and, especially, the legalised sexual abuse of children; the cruelty to animals.

The surrender to Islam and the new anti-Semitism is taught in schools. A Government funded study in April 2007 found that Schools are abandoning teaching the Holocaust in history lessons to avoid offending Muslim pupils whose do not believe the Holocaust happened and are frightened to teach the 11th century Crusades when Christians armies fought Muslim armies for Jerusalem because a different version is taught in mosques. They also teach a version of the development of slavery, which omits the much longer and harsher Muslim slave trade.

MPs also want children given relationship advice 'in context' to make informed decisions about when to have sex. Many Muslims will opt out of this as it will be teaching homosexuality as equal to heterosexual relations. This ignores the essential human duty to re-produce. Propagandising homosexuality is a threat to our demographics.

The State collects DNA records of children as young as five, and has been secretly taking their fingerprints since 2001. Schools take their fingerprints which is replacing library cards. When working on a crime police have access to the children’s fingerprints but parents are not told. To remove the prints takes professional cleansing. The schools, education authorities and the Government say it is difficult to convert this code back though not impossible and a computer technie could re- create the original fingerprints for identity theft.

In July 2006 The Observer reported that British children, possibly as young as six, will be subjected to compulsory fingerprinting under European Union rules being drawn up in secret. The prints will be stored on a database which could be shared with countries around the world. Under proposed laws being drawn up secretly by the European Commission’s ‘Article Six’ committee, which is composed of representatives of the European Union’s 25 member states, all children will have to attend a finger-printing centre to obtain an EU passport. The Home Office wants to include children in its biometric passport scheme and automatically transfer their details and fingerprints to the new national identity database when they are 16. The Government is underhandedly building a genetic database. Data has been used for genetic research without consent, including attempts to predict "ethnic appearance" from DNA profiles.

A nation's manners, morals, religions, political institutions and social structure, are inherited from ancestors and develop from the character of the people at that time.

Government from Brussels, economic control by global corporations and Afro-Asian colonization is part of the progressives' new dream for an ideal future, but in practice it disinherits our children of community and association with their own kind which we are duty bound to preserve for them.

Throughout history wars have been fought for territory and by allowing newcomers to stake claims, our emasculated ‘elite’ are encouraging them to fight for yet more. In The Territorial Imperative Robert Ardry explains how much having a country of their own has boosted the confidence of Israelis, but our rulers are handing our ancestral homeland to invaders and protecting their welfare over and above that of our own people.

Our views derive from an emotional and instinctive relationship with our people and our territory. It is more profound than rationalising or adopting an artificial blueprint for a Utopian world because it grows from natural, human instinct and emotion.

To give favourable treatment to aliens over our own people, as the fifth Marquess of Salisbury described them “our kith and kin,” is morally evil.

Look at data from the Office of National Statistics (which doesn’t take into account the births to mothers born here) then look at your sons and daughters and ask, ”Am I betraying my own children? Where will they live and work?”

We have natural bonds with our families, a responsibility for them and a duty to them. We also have a duty to pass on what we have inherited to our children, as they, in turn, will have a duty to their children. We owe a debt to our ancestors who bequeathed to us our nation and culture, and we must honour that.

Our loyalties begin with affection within families and this emanates outward to neighbourhood and nation. Men and women are distinctive sexual beings within their inherited collective identity. We belong to our kin, above strangers, and this affects the type of community we create.

Edmund Burke’s famous definition of society is that it is a continuous community of the living, the dead and those who are yet to be born. Each man and woman is part of a larger body. The individual dies, but descendants live on.

We have positive benefits to offer our people: preferential treatment in their own country, better education, priority in housing and employment for our children and protection from child-rape by older members of a rival community. You only need look at the names of graduates from medical and law schools to see how our young are being dispossessed. We would offer British children more opportunities and a better future without unfair competition from outsiders.

-/-

(1) http://davidmartin-hamilton.blogspot.com/2009/12/in-defence-of-natural-society.html

http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2009/11/what-did-churchill-really-think-about.html

(2)http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1297906/Turkey-join-EU-says-Cameron-Those-playing-fears-Islam.html

(3)http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1249797/Labour-threw-open-doors-mass-migration-secret-plot-make-multicultural-UK.html

(4) http://gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/2009/07/we-need-you-to-lead-our-politics.html

(5)http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-445996/Police-send-police-officers-tackle-boy-11-called-schoolmate-gay.html

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article1968964.ece

23 comments:

Sean77 said...

Another excellent essay by one of British Nationalism's most impressive writers.

misterfox said...

Thank you Sean, its very gratifying for one's efforts to be appreciated.

Curt said...

"She had wisely refused to sit with a group of Asian students because three, who had recently immigrated here, could not speak English. She was kept in a police cell for three-and-a-half hours after being reported by her teachers: "They told me to take my laces out of my shoes and remove my jewellery, and I had my fingerprints and photograph taken," said Codie."

- Incredible! And I thought things were bad here in the US. I cannot imagine a child being arrested for refusing to associate with people she is not interested in being with. I guess that will be the next step here- to try to force association with those of another ethnicity or race against our will. This would ALMOST be understandable if she had used racial epithets against them or otherwise encouraged animosity, but just because she did not want to sit with them? This is beyond despicable.

Curt said...

Well, I had missed this bit before submitting my previous post: "Totalitarian headteacher Dr Antony Edkins: "An allegation of a serious nature was made concerning a racially motivated remark by one student towards a group of Asian students new to the school and new to the country."
Even so, I stand behind my previous remarks that this treatment, in spite of her "alleged remarks" is out of line. This is a child, for heaven's sake! And further in the article is the mention of the 11 year old boy being prosecuted (perhaps "persecuted" might be a better term?) for an abusive verbal remark to a Pakistani boy? Children go through phases like this and it is an unavoidable fact of nature. It makes one wonder whether these idiotic egalitarian school teachers and politicians somehow imagine in their incredible hubris that they can legislate human nature and perhaps Nature itself into some new form and force both to obey their wishes.

Dr.D said...

At some point it becomes necessary to recognize that the rulers have divorced themselves from the nation. They now see themselves as separate, above, and in conflict with the nation that they were called to serve.

It is necessary, therefore, for the common people of the land to oust those rulers, to physically remove them from their posts, and if necessary end their lives, because they have betrayed the trust that was given to them to serve the nation. The great difficulty, of course, is that the common people are disorganized and do not have the force of law on their side. Even so, they must overcome these disabilities and rise up, seize the government, and throw out the traitors. No nation can continue that is being progressively sold-out by its leaders. This is true for the UK, the USA, and every other nation. We must all rise up and throw the rascals out, and none to gently!

misterfox said...

Curt, I think an "alleged racially motivated remark" would be merely to ask not to sit with people who she could not communicate with!

misterfox said...

Dr.D, I am in full agreement. I have planned to do an article which shows the symptoms of conquest, usually associated with invasion, present in native Britons; but caused by our own rulers.

jacobite said...

Iam afraid its game over for the indiginous peoples of these islands, the progressives control all politcal parties and democracy is dying, everything is done by those controlling us to suit the long term objective, anyone who has a differnt opinion is demonised. We get the ridiculous argument that everyone is an immigrant totally discounting the fact it took thousands of years to make up the cultural mix that made britain a proud people.

Anonymous said...

From Sweden.
This is fore dead frets against Lars Vilks
If muslims kill Sweden artists, is it self defense to kill muslims?
Help to cure muslim children from islam and send this info to there internet HOME page.
"prophet" mohammed and islam is haram.
When "prophet" mohammed was 50 year old he marry Aisha a 6 year old child, when Aisha was 9 year old "prophet" mohammed rape Aisha so he was a fucking pedophile and a slave owner so fuck him.
Girls read quran sura bina 60.
Watch and read mohammed T-shirt art from Sweden at,
http://www.mohammedt-shirt.com
Not mine ip nr
T-shirt aut of stock

Curt said...

"Curt, I think an "alleged racially motivated remark" would be merely to ask not to sit with people who she could not communicate with!"

Misterfox, I have no doubt that that is so in Britain, but so far, here in the US that would be an unacceptably broad definition of "racially motivated remark". You poor people are now living under the rule of despots. No doubt we will be there soon enough, but I am hoping that there will be enough citizens here with the necessary backbone to revolt when we get to the extreme that our children are persecuted for exercising their God-given right to associate with whom they will. We still have the means...

Anonymous said...

Dr D, the leaders have not just divorced themselves from society, they have declared war on it.

Anon.

Ronbo said...

Blogger Dr.D said...

At some point it becomes necessary to recognize that the rulers have divorced themselves from the nation. They now see themselves as separate, above, and in conflict with the nation that they were called to serve.

It is necessary, therefore, for the common people of the land to oust those rulers, to physically remove them from their posts, and if necessary end their lives, because they have betrayed the trust that was given to them to serve the nation. The great difficulty, of course, is that the common people are disorganized and do not have the force of law on their side. Even so, they must overcome these disabilities and rise up, seize the government, and throw out the traitors. No nation can continue that is being progressively sold-out by its leaders. This is true for the UK, the USA, and every other nation. We must all rise up and throw the rascals out, and none to gently!


Many of us in the USA believe that the tipping point for civil war will be economic collapse which many will believe to have been done to the country by design of the Obama Regime.

Anonymous said...

Sarah off the topic i saved this yesterday from sky news about the genocide in South Africa.

http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/South-Africa-Is-Accused-Of-Genocide-By-A-White-Farmer-In-A-Petition-To-The-United-Nations/Article/201008415704894?lpos=World_News_Carousel_Region_2&lid=ARTICLE_15704894_South_Africa_Is_Accused_Of_Genocide_By_A_White_Farmer_In_A_Petition_To_The_United_Nations_

tigeroc said...

Great article Mister Fox and I love the comments DrD; exactly what I have been advocating for ages.
How about following the French and organise a knitting party on the green outside Parliament and have a guillotine for entertainment with our honourable MP's as the entertainers.

Jokes and threats of treason aside what really concerns me most is the none too subtle way the mind control of the nation by the elite is being implemented through the media.

Watch any national news broadcast and one would truly believe that the majority of the nation was of Negroid or Asian origin. The carefully constructed footage showing a majority of ethnic minorities. Majority opinions always sought from minority groups. Adverts carefully ensuring that ethnic minorities special position and roles.

This nation has faced and resisted invasion for hundreds of years but is now happy to welcome those who come here to enjoy the wealth, freedom and hospitality of a polite and tolerant people. Not only do they seek to take their share of that wealth but they also want to live by their own codes of conduct, impose their religion and laws on us.

They bring their drugs, guns, knives, gang violence and international criminal activity into our cities. They wish to bring this country to the same 3rd World level as their own and expect us to provide them with special protection in the process!

This has to stop. All Britons need to realise that their heritage and culture is being destroyed in front of their eyes and they need to confront this head on. The sad part is that the only party confronting anything along this line is the BNP and they are lead by clowns.

misterfox said...

I agree with everything tigeroc says. We need to reming our people that they have a moral duty to provide for their children and grandchildren not abandon them to having no work or homes. It is their birthright as British people and our duty to ensure they get it.

Anonymous said...

All sounds great but whuy the appeals to concern about the jews. Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs they can only dream of the power, wealth and influence the jews have.

If jews are concerned about Islamic immiration - tough shit - they, more than anyone, bear a responsibility for that.

The BNP and EDL have both fawned over jews and Israel and where does that get them? Nowhere.

Imagine a white, nationalist state with its jewish population denied their power. How long would it take to remove African, asian, muslim invaders etc? About 15 minutes tops.

Anonymous said...

A white state should be able to pursue the right policies without trying to appease jews. If they dont like it we will know where their true loyalties lie (as if we didnt already) they can sling their hook along ith other unwanted non-whites.

Of course jews as individuals can and have been assimilated by whites, no reason that cant continue.

fellist said...

What I most like about David Hamilton’s writing is the citations, you know: ‘such and such being said by whowasit in 1968.’

While ’most every ‘challenge’ and eventual ‘victory’ of the invader is recorded in detail somewhere or other, to be brandished as moral weapon, our own history of dispossession and resistance is generally buried. DH redresses that balance.

fellist said...

I have planned to do an article which shows the symptoms of conquest, usually associated with invasion, present in native Britons; but caused by our own rulers.

The classic book on ethnic conflict is Pierre L. van den Berghe's The Ethnic Phenomenon. Some relevant quotes from that work:

[T]he ethny is a corporation of related men seeking to enhance each others’ fitness by retaining a monopoly of sexual access to the women of their own group. This, however, does not preclude men from further enhancing their reproductive success by making the most of every opportunity to inseminate women from other groups. In fact, the whole history of ethnic relations powerfully confirms this interpretation. Men jealously ‘protect’ ‘their’ women from men of other groups, deeply resenting ethnic exogamy on the part of women, while at the same time seeking access to women from other groups. […]

Between ethnies, men use power and violence to secure access to women from other groups, and this reduces the level of inbreeding. When the ethnies in presence are equally matched, male competition for foreign women takes the form of interethnic raids. After an ethnic hierarchy has been established, subordinate-group men loose all or part of their control of ‘their’ women and their reproductive success is curtailed, while upper-group men are polygynous and incorporate subordinate-group women. An ethnic hierarchy, therefore, generally results in a reduced fitness for subordinate-group males. The classical scenario for conquest is to rape the women and kill, castrate or enslave the men. [p.26]

Even when conquest is relatively mild and not openly genocidal, the subordinate group in an ethnic hierarchy almost invariably ‘loses’ more women to males of the dominant group than vice versa. Hypergamy (mating upward for women) is a fitness-enhancing strategy for women, and, therefore, subordinate-group women do not always resist being ‘taken over’ by dominant-group men. But subordinate-group men lose fitness by losing potential mates from their group without any hope of access to dominant-group females. It is not accidental that the most explosive aspect of interethnic relations is sexual contact across ethnic (or racial) lines; nor is the asymmetry of the resentment surprising. No group is concerned about gaining women; every group resents losing women.

Conquest and domination mean, in the first instance, a fitness loss. The loss is felt both at the individual and at the collective level. Collectively, since the offspring of subordinate-group women who mate with dominant. group men are generally ‘lost’ to their maternal group, the subordinate group suffers a decrement of reproductive power. Over several generations, this loss can be reflected in serious demographic changes in ethnic group ratios. Dominant groups tend to grow disproportionately. Individually, there is only a fitness reduction if the circulation of women between groups is asymmetrical, as it almost invariably is. Through the suction of women into the upper group (without getting women in return), the pool of mates for lower-group males is correspondingly reduced and, therefore, so is their fitness. Females of the subordinate group also indirectly lose fitness through the lowered fitness of their male relatives. Individual females who choose the hypergamous strategy, however, can gain fitness if their children become assimilated to the ruling group and gain access to upper-group privileges (including polygyny). This sex asymmetry in fitness strategies in ethnically stratified societies often creates tension between the sexes, within subordinate groups. The female option of fitness maximization through hypergamy is deeply resented by subordinate-group males. [p.75-76]

fellist said...

It's a touchy subject but some part of that article you intend to write should look at the issue of English girls and women opting out of the community by choosing relationships with men from immigrant groups. At my webpage I have up a few excerpts from a book about Pakistanis in Britain by a female British academic. Some of the quotes from Pakistani men about the English are very strongly worded but not easy to dismiss as not true. Example, beginning with Shaw's commentary:

/quote

Moreover, many second-generation men, like the first generation before them, believe that because most English women do not share Islamic moral values, there is no contradiction between upholding the Muslim community’s moral values on one hand and taking advantage of women who do not share these moral codes on the other. Izhar, for instance, is an unmarried twenty-two year old who has recently applied for his father’s brother’s daughter to come to England as his fiancee. Unknown to his family, he has had a number of English girlfriends:

"The point is, English girls don’t mind; there’s no restriction for them. In fact, they chase you and laugh at you if you don’t go with them. It was like that at school: the girls chasing men. I know I shouldn’t have, it’s against our religion, but how could I refuse? It’s natural for a man to feel like that; you can’t really avoid it. I blame the western system. I was in a mixed school and it was too free - all the boys thought about was the girls, and all the girls thought about was the boys."

Izhar is not unusual in his attitudes and behaviour. Almost all of the unmarried men among the young adults surveyed above have had clandestine relationships with English girls, yet do not feel that this contradicts their acceptance of an arranged marriage or the Islamic moral code. It is tacitly accepted by most men and women that men will have girlfriends because ‘men are like that’ and because English girls are easily available, yet parents avoid discussing the subject of pre-marital sex, unless to condemn it, and the sons keep their relationships hidden from relatives and people who know them in the community. However, one mother, unusual for her bluntness, admitted that she had encouraged her son to find a girlfriend:

"When he first started at university, he kept on asking us to arrange his marriage as soon as possible. I was worried, because I thought it would be better for him to wait about five years, until he was qualified and had got a job. After all, he is only twenty, and when you marry, it’s for life. We talked about it, and it seemed that he was worried about sex. All his friends had girlfriends or were married or getting married. So I told him he should enjoy himself first, before he gets married. A boy should have some experience, and there are plenty of English girls around."

[and later]:

When I [Shaw] suggested that the speaker was just as guilty because the English girl he went out with was also someone's sister or daughter, he said:

"That’s different. The difference is, English people don’t care. The girls don’t mind; you tell them you can’t marry them, you’re just passing your time, and they don’t bother. They’re just passing their time too. If their brothers or fathers got angry, we would understand, but they don’t bother. Mostly, they are not even living in the same place. How can you respect men like that? They just say it’s the girl’s choice, it’s her life, and that’s what the girls say too."

/endquote

misterfox said...

Anonymous, how do you suggest we get out of this situation to give our children a future? You won't be able give a realistic solution so why carp at others?

misterfox said...

Fellist, There is an interesting little book "The Deculturation of the English people by John Lovejoy. He makes the mistake of thinking that culture does not grow out of the genes iof the people but makes some excllent points.
The most interesting is hat themost destructive thing to a people is when the men lose their women. He had lived and worked closely in Australia with Aborigines and shows what the sheep shearers taking their women did to them.

The Swiss psychologist Carl Jung regarded things expressed in art as the groups collective unconscious express what is happening to it in these out pictures. From the dreams of patients he predicted "The blonde beast risibng" in pre war Germany. I think we see from adverts and other cultural productions where White women are obligatorially shown with Black men that our elites are wiping us out!

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Deculturalisation-English-People-John-Lovejoy/dp/1903313007/ref=sr_1_fkmr0_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1282940027&sr=1-1-fkmr0

fellist said...

Thank you for the recommendation, misterfox. I will check that out.