Tuesday, 6 July 2010

Defined for convenience

In a speech which Barak Obama made last week, he, the president of America, defined being American as follows. "Being an American" he said "is not a matter of blood or birth; it's a matter of faith."

Given the questions which have still not been answered regarding the president's claim to be a "natural born American" and thus eligible to hold the position of US president, one is tempted to say that is a very convenient definition. The implication being the American people should believe that Obama is eligible to serve as their president not on the basis of proof of eligibility but on the basis of faith, which is another word for a belief which does not rest on logical proof or material evidence.

Belief that "the one" was born in Hawaii because he says so, and belief that a "Certification of Live Birth" is the same thing as a birth certificate because he says it is.

However, Obama's definition of American is even more convenient, and flexible, than that, it is not only the definition which enables him to claim he is eligible for the job be holds, but it is one which, if he is very lucky and very devious, may just enable him to stay in the job.

What Obama was talking about, of course, were the millions of illegal immigrants currently in America, the illegal immigrants he disingenuously continues to claim amount to only 11 million but who's numbers most analysts place closer to 40 million, and those same illegal immigrants who offer Obama his only possible chance of being reelected in 2012.

In less than two years the president has lost the support of the whites who fell for his undefined message of hope and change (you can "believe" in) in 2008, and although, as the recent election of Alivin Greene in South Carolina proves, black voters will vote for a black candidate irrespective of merit, there are not yet enough legal non-white voters in America to guarantee an abject presidential failure a second term in office. That is why Obama, and the Democrats, need the illegal ones, who are statistically far more likely to vote Democrat.

This is why, unless the current US administration has hit upon some other means of circumventing democracy, there will almost certainly be an attempt at an amnesty, otherwise known as "comprehensive immigration reform" within the next two years, possibly before the crucial mid-term elections this coming November.

Some believe that the president may even attempt to pardon millions of illegal aliens by Executive order, thus granting them citizenship, and more importantly, voting rights.

Whatever means is attempted, if the current incumbent of the White House has his way, before the US presidential elections in 2012, tens of millions of illegal aliens will become Americans on the basis of faith, Barak Obama's faith that he has a right to the job he is so self evidently unqualified for.


Dr.D said...

Unfortunately for The Won, the definition of an American is already made, and he has no lee way at all to redefine it. His definition is clearing asinine to any thinking person, and is rejected out of hand by all sentient people.

In making his pseudo-definition, he is also trying to give himself a pass, since it is becoming more and more widely accepted that he is not a natural born citizen as required by the Constitution in order to serve as President of the US. To redefine things is a classic Left/Liberal ploy, to try to change the meaning of words and phrases so that they say something other than they originally said. He fails utterly here, and it could scarcely be more obvious.

He brought in the word "faith," a term he has been using more and more which is very strange for a man who shows little to none. This is going to turn and bite him, because his muzlim sympathies are becoming more and more evident, and izlam does not play well at all with the majority of Americans. The more he turns this in to a religious matter, the more it will turn against him, which is just fine.

Anonymous said...

If he does, then there will be a MASSIVE States' revolt. Arizona is the tip of the iceberg.

INCOMING!!!!!!! said...

His handlers do this over and over again to societies they rob. Whilst fomenting civil war they steal the loot and ship it overseas. The break up of USofA corp. is their hearts desire, just watch for something in the military sphere where a unit or part of one of the forces goes rogue. That's the handlers at work.

Birdman said...

Seeing as I am not up to speed with US politics, how would the states revolt? Via the ballot?

Anonymous said...

Classic Orwellian double-speak!

I must find time to re-read that great novel - "1984" to re-affirm what the future holds for us.

Anonymous said...

Mr O, irrespective of where he was born, is not, in any real sense of the word, an American.


Lucinda said...

@birdman: Yes, through the ballot. Congressmen are elected every two years, senators every six, and governors (depending on state) every four or six years. This November the presidency is not up for contest, but the congressional elections will hopefully be a huge vote of "no confidence" in the Muslim in Chief. Many of his enablers will be seeking employment early next year. Armed revolt is decades away and may not be necessary if the people regain control by ordinary means. Gun ownership is relatively high in conservative areas, almost nil (except for criminals) in liberal areas. However, violence is lower in conservative communities.

Anonymous said...

The problem at the crux of the matter is the total lack of ethnocentrism (and this pertains to Whites only- they are alone in this vital characteristic). You will hear constant talk from them of how "I am a Polish-American", or " I am a German-American" or substitute any nationality you like, only Whites do this, this hyphenated nationalism thing; as though the imaginary boundaries (which is what a map is) is meaningful in any way.
Contrast this with all other peoples of the earth, and you will see that their race comes first-ALWAYS. You will hear Mexicans talk of "La Raza" or blacks referring to themselves as such: black. Nationalism is meaningless nonsense. Though the Jewish people live everywhere in the world, their tribe, their race is the only meaningful thing to them. Perhaps we can learn something from these masters of ethnocentrism?

Anonymous said...

Yes. When did you last hear anyone call themselves a 'White American'?


Anonymous said...

In the UK and Europe proper, mass unfettered Third World immigration and the rush to legitimize and reward such colonisers with citizenship and voting rights for purely political reasons as in the US, is also being played out by the Far Left camp, too.

In the case of the US, however, the greater source of Third World invasion emanates predominately from Mexico and other developing South American countries.

We know also that the social outlook of these same countries is inclined to be racist, often overt directed at darker-skinned peoples as a general rule although currently, in the case of at least some of these countries, for example, Brazil, Marxist zealots have now started cultivating and propagating hate-crime and racial discrimination directed at White and light-skinned mixed-race citizens.

However, the present phenomenon of Black political ascendancy is only a passing and temporary development since Latinos and other non-White invaders from whatever part of the world they originate, are not going to accept continued Black authority and dominance across the political and judicial spheres also all too often manifested in near or outright control of the general social infrastructure in increasing numbers of US states as well.

These non-Black ethnicities are each looking at taking control of initially individual states and ousting Blacks and Whites from the corridors of power and influence altogether.

When they've established sufficient presence of their kind in each, this will automatically keep being reflected in the racial makeup of those running for election across the US.

Where expedient, each will align with closely related ethnicities in order to enchance the prospects of their respective aims, ie, eventual total takeover of the North American continent via multi-state control.

Anonymous said...

William Guy Carr RCN (a true British and Canadian partiot) had it right, when he described the intention of the powers that be to create "UNESCO MAN" - a mixed race miscegeny designed to herald the arrival of a one world system of government.

Looks like the PTB are succeeding, when an Afro-American of Kenyan extraction is nominally the U.S. President.

Anonymous said...

Wonderful blog! I definitely love how it’s easy on my eyes and also the data are well written. I am wondering how I might be notified whenever a new post has been made. I have subscribed to your rss feed which need to do the trick! Have a nice day!

Anonymous said...

Hi, very interesting post, greetings from Greece!