A bumpy road ahead

Earlier today, one of my correspondents asked me to remove all links to the British Resistance site and the Green Arrow, on account of some of the comments which have recently been made there regarding the British National Party and its leadership. However, I would like to make clear why I intend to retain links with the British Resistance, and indeed continue to be an occasional poster there.

I am aware that many readers will be very concerned by the criticism of the BNP leadership at the British Resistance site, and also by some postings which I have allowed to be published at this site, in particular Mister Fox's recent posting This Honourable and Noble Cause.

Although I do not entirely share the views of either the Green Arrow or of Mister Fox on this issue, I have considerable respect for the honour and integrity of both, and I accept that they and other commentators, such as Paul Golding, who has written a number of articles on the subject at the British Resistance, are acting in what they believe to be the best interests of British Nationalism.

I also can not ignore the debate which is going on regarding the BNP leadership and the future of the party.

Furthermore, I strongly believe that the BNP leadership should engage with the debate, as many of the allegations which have been made are very troubling, and need to be answered.

We can no longer pretend that this debate is not going on, for it is not going to go away, it needs to be addressed otherwise it will continue to fester and it will get worse.

We must also remember that whilst this is going on, we are giving our enemies deadly weapons which they will use against us for years to come, This is why I believe we need to address this issue swiftly, resolve it, close it down and move on.

We should not forget there are many people who have given a great deal to the BNP in terms of both their hard earned money and their efforts, and we owe it to them to ensure their efforts were worthwhile. It is therefore vital that all our contributions are positive and defend the cause of nationalism.

I still hope the BNP will achieve electoral success as I truly believe the nationalist cause offers the only chance this country has of salvation. This is why, whatever, side we may take in the current debate we must all work to ensure that British Nationalism survives and that there is party for us to unite around and move forward with when this difficult matter is resolved.

A Nail in the Fuse Box: The Persecution of the British National Party

By Sean Gabb

The suppression of political parties is becoming an interesting feature of life in the managerial superstate known as the European Union It happened six years ago in Belgium, to the anti-immigration Vlaams Blok. And in London, High Court hearings have just (November 8^th and 9^th) that will determine the fate of the British National Party. Since judgment was reserved, we do not yet know whether BNP assets will be seized and whether party leader Nick Griffin, who is an elected Member of the European Parliament, will be sent to prison. We do know what has become of England: it is now a soft totalitarian police state.

For those who may be unaware of it, the British National Party is what its name says it is. It opposes immigration and the associated political correctness and attacks on freedom of speech and association. It also opposes British membership of the European Union and British involvement in wars of military aggression that do nothing to secure the peace and prosperity of the British people. And it is contemptuous of the claims about man-made climate change that are an excuse for the massive enrichment of ruling classes everywhere.

Not surprisingly, the BNP is not popular with the British ruling class. This has been hard at work for at least two generations on destroying a constitution that, since the High Middle Ages, had been uniquely effective at restraining power. This is a ruling class that rejoices in having put common law protections through a shredding machine; and in alienating sovereignty to a mass of foreign and even unknown organisations, to the point where democracy has become a joke; and in sponsoring the mass immigration needed to reduce working class living standards and to justify totalitarian “anti-racist” witch-hunts.

Yes, not surprisingly, the BNP is a witch that must be hunted. It is described as a “racist” party, and its members as violent and even psychopathic criminals. Its leader, Nick Griffin, is remarkable for his ability to assemble softly-spoken persons of quality into something like a baying mob.

To describe all the ways in which Mr. Griffin and his party are persecuted would take an essay which would also be a dissertation on the growth of the British police state. I have not the space to write such an essay. Therefore, I will look at the two chief current persecutions.

Continue reading at VDARE.COM

__________
Hat Tip: KW

Discretion is the better part of Valour

As most British readers will be aware, it appears that there may well be a challenge to the leadership of the BNP. This is regrettable, however, given the result of the general election, when, despite more than tripling the party’s vote the deeply undemocratic voting system prevented the BNP from winning any seats, there was always a possibility that this would happen.

My own view is that a healthy democratic party can and must allow debate over the direction it takes, however, the party should not forget the debt of gratitude it owes to Nick Griffin who has built the party from what it was a decade ago, to the position where it now has elected members of the European Parliament and won over half a million votes at the last election.

Unfortunately, as often happens with these situations people have taken sides and the debate has become acrimonious. Some, including dear friends of mine, for whom I have considerable respect have made statements and published information which I fear we may all live to regret.

We do not have the luxury to indulge in public in-fighting, look at the damage that did to the labour party in the 1980’s and the Tories after they betrayed Thatcher, and we are more exposed than they are. We do not have sympathetic friends in the media to cover for us or write supportive articles. Whatever we say, whatever we reveal will be used against us at the next election.

I agree with a lot of what Lee Barnes said about this in a posting he made at 21st Century British Nationalism a week or so ago on this subject. click here to read it.

We must not forget that we are addressing a wider audience, and they will not appreciate the nuances in the same way that party members will do. There will just see BNP members saying nasty things about each other.

Our enemies are ruthless, whatever we say, or reveal about individual party members now, will be used against the party at the next election. The context will be forgotten and all that will be reported is “BNP man said X” or “BNP man filmed doing Y”

Only our enemies benefit when we fight, and any mud we throw now will be thrown right back at us.

The Morning After

If there is good news to be had from last night it is the fact that the British National Party's share of the vote increased more than any other party other than the Conservatives. However, despite all the work it was nowhere near enough. With 615 of the 650 seats counted, it is clear that the BNP will not be sending any MP's to Parliament after this election.

It may be true that, as Nick Griffin puts it, the BNP is no longer a large small party, it is a small large party, however, it is difficult to put a positive spin on yesterday's results, we are moving in the right direction, but we have a long way to climb, and time is short.

The unfairness of our system is exposed by the fact that the BNP have won more than twice as many votes as the Greens, yet it is they, not us, who have their first member of Parliament.

Beyond the fortunes of the BNP what is most striking about this election is how the Conservatives seem to have failed to achieve a majority, despite the almost total non-appearance of the anticipated boost to Liberal Democrat support, it is quite possible that Clegg's crew could end up with less seats than they went in with.

I wonder how many Tories will be secretly contemplating the manner in which they have complacently stood by over the last 13 years and allowed the Labour party to import an socialist friendly third world electorate and indulge in outrageous levels of social engineering both of which may prevent any party other than Labour from ever achieving anything approaching a landslide majority again.

Labour almost certainly avoided the humiliation of coming third, as they surely should have done after their disastrous period in government, on the strength of the immigrant vote. As that demographic grows, a day may dawn when a future socialist party with be kept in office purely by the will of non-white voters.

Readers from other countries, such as the USA, may wish to consider how similar pr-immigration policies followed by their own governments may have a similar impact on the future of democracy in your own country.

It also remains to be seen (if it is ever exposed) to what extent electoral fraud effected the outcome, it was certainly a huge problem in parts of London and Birmingham, together with Barking, where BNP leader Nick Griffin sadly failed to dislodge multi-millionairess Marxist Margaret Hodge.

It was also disturbing to hear of irregularities at various counts, such as the fact that voters in an area with high proportions of immigrant voters, such as Lewisham, were allowed extra time to vote, whereas queues of voters in other (whiter) areas were turned away.

To be fair, the BNP did not always help themselves, for instance, allowing a dispute with the hyper-sensitive webmaster of their website, the most popular political website in the country, to boil over on the day before the election, resulting in it being taken down and replaced with a list of sensational, and somewhat dyspeptic allegations, on the night before the poll did not help. Neither did widely circulated film of a senior BNP candidate exchanging blows with a group of Asian youths, no matter how much he was provoked (which I fully accept he was).

As for the event in the weeks before the election when a well known writer of fiction for the Times was violently ejected from a meeting in front of a malevolent, camera lens flashing ,media, I can not start to tell you how damaging that was, or how angry it made many of those who had been working so hard for a BNP victory. I did not allude to it at the time, as I was incapable of doing so in a temperate manner.

However, even without those events the BNP was seriously hampered my a controlled and maliciously dishonest media who spent the entire campaign inventing blatant lies about the BNP and misreporting the truth. In the face of a criminal dishonest media onslaught, to have increased its vote was a significant achievement for the party.

However, as I said at the beginning, it was not enough, and this was not the result any of us hoped to wake up to.

A Polling Ditty

Over the last few days, as I make my way to or from work, or wonder around Sainsbury’s pushing my trolley, I have been singing a little song to myself. It is a simple little ditty, sung to the tune of the old Cockney pub song “Knees up Mother Brown”.

Usually I just sing the first verse which goes as follows:

I’m voting BNP
I’m voting BNP
I don’t give a toss what you think
I’m voting BNP

The second verse enables me to improvise, usually by singing something unkind but apt about the other parties and their leaders. Examples being:

Clegg’s a little teaser
With Tofu in his freezer
I’m voting BNP

Or

Brown’s a total bigot
I’m telling him to fr### it
And voting BNP

I am sure you can all make one up about Cameron given that there are so many rhyming options which go with twit.

I plan to sing as I vote tomorrow, as I truly believe we have every reason for optimism, and that tomorrow will see a significant breakthrough and set us on course to take back our country. Most of the work has now been done, what remains is to go and put a bold ‘X’ in a box and make sure that anyone you know who is considering voting BNP damn well does so.

Do not fall for the media tricks, the election may or may not be on a knife edge, but whatever you do, do not vote tactically. Those encouraging you to do so are only trying to get you to vote for the lesser of three evils. Do you really think a hung parliament run by Baroness Wasi's buddy Cameron would be better than one run by Bigot Brown?

It doesn’t matter if you are in a target seat or not, if there is a BNP candidate standing in your seat, vote for them. This is a psychological game as much as it is anything else, and the size of the BNP vote is as important as the number of seats won.

It is the size of the vote the media and the Lib/lab/Con politicians will be looking at. The fact that we ended up with two MEPs in the Euro elections worried them, that almost a million people voted for us terrified them.

That was a European election, if we can do the same at a general election (and we will) and if we can do even better then we will really scare them. Their fear is our power, and it will make people sit up and notice us.

The time has come my friends, go out and do your duty, we have a country to take back.

_______________________________

Update: Those in constituencies with no BNP candidate should vote in whatever way is required to punish Labour, for Labour must be punished.

A statement of truth

There is one statement in the BNP's 2010 election manifesto which the party and every one of its supporters must ensure is made known to the wider public at every possible opportunity. It is a statement which I urge the BNP to find space for in their forthcoming election broadcast and repeat every time they are given airtime on any major TV or radio outlet, particularly when they are being broadcast live, so that it can not be easily edited out, as the controlled media will certainly seek to do.

They must repeat it on door steps and shout it out at hustings, for it is a truth which must be spoken.

That statement is:

At current immigration and birth rates, indigenous British people are set to become a minority well within 50 years. This will result in the extinction of the British people, culture, heritage and identity.

It is a statement of truth which the wider public must be made to confront. It is also a truth which the establishment does not want to be told.

Do not forget how Nick Griffin was immediately attacked and silenced by the other panellists when he attempted to reveal the truth on Question time, and, in any event, it would certainly have been edited out of the broadcast version of the show had he managed to say it.

They don't want it said because they have no answer to it, they can not deny it, and even they can recognise the truth it describes for the act of evil which it is. That is why they refuse to acknowledge it, they know that, to succeed, their victims must remain ignorant of their fate until it is too late for them to save themselves from it.

However, the white majority must be made aware that they and their children will become a minority in their native land by the middle of this century and what that will mean to them and to their children.

We, who gather here, tend to think they must all know what is happening because we know it so well, but, in fact, they do not know. It is a truth never spoken when they gather, it is not mentioned on the TV shows they watch, the websites they visit or in the newspapers they read, so why would they know?

Some may suspect it, but whilst it remains a secret they need not acknowledge it, as to do so might seem racist, and also very scary.

However, they must be made to acknowledge it, for otherwise it will destroy them.

Sadly some may think it fine, as democrats we must accept there are those who will cheerfully welcome the day upon which their race is disinherited in their homeland, that is their choice, but it a choice which they must be allowed to make for themselves, not one which is imposed upon them.

Until now none of us have been given the choice.

Our leaders have, for their own political ends, taken up down a path which must inevitably lead to the the day when our people will become a minority in the islands where our forefathers have lived, and which they have defended with their lives for millennia, yet they have never given us the chance to say “No” (or indeed, for that matter even to say “Yes”)

It is not scaremongering to acknowledge the inevitable outcome of what is being done, it is certainly not racist, it is a mere statement of truth, a truth the public must be told.

What is being done to us if of far greater significance than our membership of the EU, or who rules us for the next five years, for when this comes to pass, at a date which is ever more rapidly rushing towards us, it will be forever and there will be no going back.

The unavoidable result of our leaders treachery, embodied within that truth, has never before been acknowledged, and we have never before been allowed to vote on it.

This time we have a vote but the people must be made to know what they are voting for and what will happen if they don't.

The BNP Election Manifesto

A breaking dawn

The BNP launched their election manifesto today, and it is an extraordinarily powerful document. I really hope that people will copy and paste the main points, which are listed below, and e-mail or send them to everyone they know. Because I suspect that most people will struggle to find anything they disagree with.

This is the most radical manifesto released by any political party in decades, and yet it is all common sense.

The manifesto’s key pledges are:

Defending Britain: BNP Defence Policy

• The BNP will end the involvement of British troops in the Afghanistan war

• The BNP will not allow British forces to become involved in a war against Iran

• The BNP will withdraw our troops from Germany

• The BNP will renegotiate our presence in NATO

• The BNP will raise Defence spending by one percent over the rate of inflation for the next five years

• The BNP will institute a Community Award Scheme for young people

Immigration: An Unparalleled Crisis Which Only the BNP Can Solve

• At current immigration and birth rates, indigenous British people are set to become a minority well within 50 years. This will result in the extinction of the British people, culture, heritage and identity.

• The BNP will take all steps necessary to halt and reverse this process. These steps will include a halt to all further immigration, the deportation of all illegal immigrants, a halt to the “asylum” swindle and the promotion of the already existing voluntary repatriation scheme.

• The BNP recognises the right of legally settled and law-abiding minorities to remain in the UK and enjoy the full protection of the law, on the understanding that the indigenous population of Britain has the right to remain the majority population of our nation.

• The BNP will deport all foreigners convicted of crimes in Britain, regardless of their immigration status.

• The BNP will review all citizenship grants awarded since Labour entered government in 1997, based on that party’s admission that they orchestrated mass immigration to change forcibly Britain’s demographics and to gerrymander elections.

• The BNP will repeal the Race Relations Act and all other far leftist social engineering projects, such as the Equalities and Human Rights Commission aimed at enforcing multiculturalism.

• The BNP will regain sovereign control of our borders by increasing funding to the UK Border Agency.

Environmental Protection and the “Climate Change” Theory

• The BNP demands an end to the destruction of Britain’s green belt, caused primarily by housing demand fuelled through mass immigration.

• The BNP will launch a “polluter pays” policy in the fight against environmental damage.

• The BNP will encourage the use of existing “brown sites” for all new building or industrial developments.

• The BNP rejects the “climate change” theory which holds that all western nations need to be stripped of their manufacturing base and pay untold billions to the Third World to build up their industries.

Leaving the European Union

• The BNP loves Europe but hates the EU.

• The BNP demands an immediate withdrawal from the European Union, which is an organisation dedicated to usurping British sovereignty and to destroying our nationhood and national identity.

• The BNP will end the annual multibillion cash haemorrhage Britain pays out to the EU in membership fees and regulatory costs. This money will be spent on building infrastructure in Britain and alleviating poverty and unemployment at home.

Counter Jihad: Confronting the Islamic Colonisation of Britain

• The BNP is implacably opposed to the Labour/Tory regime’s mass immigration policies which, if left unchecked, will see Britain and most of Europe colonised by Islam within a few decades.

• The BNP believes that the historical record shows that Islam is by its very nature incompatible with modern secular western democracy.

• The BNP will ban the burka, ritual slaughter and the building of further mosques in Britain.

• The BNP believes that there should be absolutely no further immigration from any Muslim countries, as it presents one of the most deadly threats yet to the survival of our nation.

• We propose the immediate deportation of all radical Islamist preachers, those proven to have attended any of their inflammatory sermons, and any other members of their community who object to these reasonable security measures.

• The BNP is the only party to identify correctly the twin causes of Islamist terrorism in Britain: (a) mass immigration and (b) a biased British foreign policy which serves to incite Muslims living in Britain.

Renationalising the Welfare State

• The BNP will halt the handout of benefits, housing, education and pensions to foreigners who have not paid into the system.

• The BNP will ensure that the National Health Service is used to serve British people and not used as an International Health Service.

• The BNP will provide education and training for the unemployed to enable them to get back into work.

• The BNP will institute a workfare-not-welfare policy for those who refuse to get back to work.

Freedom for All: The Restoration of Our Civil Liberties

• The BNP will repeal all legislation enacted by successive Labour and Tory regimes which have usurped the British people’s basic civil liberties.

• The BNP will circumvent the erosion of our liberties by the old gang parties under the guise of “fighting terrorism” by dealing with the root causes of Islamist extremism in Britain, namely mass immigration and Britain’s biased foreign policy.

• The BNP will repeal all laws aimed at restricting freedom of speech, including those relating to race relations and religion.

• The BNP rejects ID cards as an undesirable manifestation of the surveillance society.

• The BNP will repeal the 1998 Human Rights Act and withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights, both of which are exploited to abuse Britain’s hospitality by the world’s scroungers.

• By withdrawing from the EU, the BNP will not permit British courts to be subservient to international bodies or courts which override the law of the British parliament.

Constitutional Change: Protecting and Enhancing Our Heritage

• The BNP will devolve all powers properly capable of exercise to local level and revived county council government.

• The BNP will create an English parliament in Westminster.

• The BNP will create a pan-British parliament to oversee those policy areas currently determined by Westminster and invite the Irish Republic to join as an equal partner.

• The BNP will reform the House of Lords to include non-party political experts and individuals chosen on the grounds of talent and service.

• The BNP will introduce citizens’ initiative referenda to force government to adhere to the will of the voters on specific subjects.

• The BNP will introduce a new Bill of Rights which will guarantee certain basic civil liberties.

• The BNP will enact legislation forbidding interference in the electoral process by third parties not partaking in an election.

• The BNP will restrict the use of postal voting only to those incapable of getting to the polling station on election day.

Democracy and the Media

• The BNP will enact legislation which will hold journalists and their media outlets criminally liable for knowingly publishing falsehoods.

• The BNP will create a media complaints body which will have the power to grant slandered persons or institutions the right of reply with equal prominence plus financial compensation in serious cases.

Culture, Traditions and Civil Society

• The BNP will take steps to promote the traditional British concepts of civility and courteousness by ensuring that they are taught in schools.

• The BNP will oppose the intrusion of non-British and alien cultural influences which undermine our traditional value systems.

• The BNP will encourage the teaching of British history, culture and traditions in schools.

• The BNP will seek to promote the traditional high-street shopping environment over the out-of-town shopping centre.

• The BNP will ensure that National Lottery funding is spent on projects which enhance British culture, rather than degrade it.

• The BNP will introduce formal bank holidays for all of our nations’ patron saints.

• The BNP will take legislative steps to protect Britain’s pubs, which will include tax concessions, smoking rooms under strict supervision and a lowering of tax on alcohol served in public houses.

Time to Get Tough on Crime and Criminals

• The BNP will end the culture where criminals’ rights are placed above those of victims of crime.

• The BNP will abolish political correctness from the police service in favour of real crime fighting.

• The BNP will review the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) in order to remove unnecessary bureaucracy from the police service’s duties.

• The BNP will reintroduce capital punishment for drug dealers, child murderers, multiple murderers, murderers of policemen on duty and terrorists where guilt is proven beyond all doubt.

• The BNP will reintroduce the right of householders to defend themselves and their property using whatever means they deem necessary.

• The BNP will establish a penal station for extremely dangerous/violent repeat criminals (including rapists) on the British island of South Georgia.

A Healthy Nation: Public Health and the NHS

• The BNP will end the scandalous situation of NHS underfunding by reallocating money from the foreign aid budget. The reported NHS deficit is £620 million and the current foreign aid budget is £9.1 billion.

• The BNP will increase spending on front line staff while cutting back bureaucracy in the NHS.

• The BNP will end the £2 billion per year “health tourism” scandal.

• The BNP will give priority to employing British people at affordable wages in the NHS and halt the recruitment of Third World-origin staff who are needed in their own nations.

• The BNP will cut waiting times and service difficulties by relieving the immigration burden upon the NHS.

Education for a British Future

• The BNP will reverse the budget cuts on education and prioritise this sector as vital to the rebuilding of our nation.

• The BNP will bring back traditional syllabi and teaching methods to replace the current and obviously failed systems currently being used.

• The BNP will bring back streaming and grammar schools.

• The BNP will bring back academic and sporting competition at all levels of education.

• The BNP will offer free university education to deserving students who have completed their period of Community Service.

Transport: Getting Britain Moving Again

• The BNP will make rail travel affordable once again by reversing the disastrous privatisation process which has grossly inflated ticket prices.

• The BNP will reduce traffic congestion by bringing the immigration invasion under control.

• The BNP will invest in a high speed 200 mph magnetic levitation inter-city rail network.

• The BNP will seek to decrease the price of fuel which is already comprised of at least 63 percent government tax.

• The BNP will charge foreign trucks for the right to use Britain’s road network, as other European nations already do.

• The BNP will encourage and support the development of alternative transportation technologies to ultimately replace the internal combustion engine.

Agriculture: Food and Fisheries

• The BNP will promote British agriculture by gradually phasing out the EU’s CAP subsidies and replacing them with a viable UK system.

• The BNP will forbid the development and importation of genetically modified produce.

• The BNP will encourage the regeneration of the family farm as the core structure of Britain’s agricultural sector.

• The BNP will investigate the need for a massive soil reinvigoration scheme.

• The BNP will outlaw non-stunned ritual slaughter of animals.

• The BNP will bring back our nation’s traditional 200 mile coastal fishing exclusivity zone.

Energy: Fuelling the Nation’s Growth

• The BNP is committed to research into renewable and quasi-renewable energy sources and transmission systems, such as wave power, hydrogen fuel, and nuclear energy.

• The BNP rejects the notion that our nation’s nuclear power stations should be owned by foreign investors.

• The BNP opposes the punitive taxation mandated by the other parties’ adherence to the global warming theory and the “carbon credit” racket.

• The BNP will stop the building of wind turbines which are inefficient and blight the landscape.

• The BNP will investigate clean-burning coal-fired power plants as another method of dealing with increased energy demands.

Foreign Policy: Putting British Interests First

• The BNP will realign British foreign policy to put our nation’s interests first.

• The BNP will undertake not to interfere with the sovereignty of any other nation, and those in the Middle East in particular.

• The BNP would only deploy British armed forces in a conflict in which Britain’s interests were directly involved.

• The BNP will end the foreign aid swindle and reallocate the money saved to help British people.

Housing: Sheltering the Nation

• The BNP will allow local authorities to borrow on the open market to provide housing in their locality.

• The BNP will abolish the Homes and Community and Regional Development agencies and transfer regeneration and housing functions to local councils.

• The BNP will place each local council under a legal duty to build a number of homes set to a percentage of the waiting list total each year. These would only be available to British citizens.

• The BNP will introduce a “local connection test” for any applicant seeking social housing in terms of which they would need to demonstrate a positive and historical link to the area.

• The BNP will create a national infrastructure bank to promote regeneration and national infrastructure renewal.

• The BNP will relieve part of the housing crisis by halting and reversing the immigration invasion.

The Economy: Putting Britain Back on the Road to Recovery

• A BNP government would tackle the national debt problem by cutting expenditure on all projects which do not serve British interests.

• These expenditures which will be cut include the annual costs of £18 billion spent on “global warming,” the £13 billion spent on immigration, the £4 billion spent on asylum, the £15 billion spent on EU membership, the £9.1 billion spent on foreign aid, the billions spent fighting illegal and immoral foreign wars, and the billions spent on “politically correct” social engineering projects.

• The BNP undertakes not to reduce front-line public services while billions of pounds continue to flow out of the country to foreign interests. British people must benefit first from British tax income.

• The BNP aims to relieve the tax burden by raising the personal non-taxable allowance to £12,500.

• The BNP will encourage the family unit by reintroducing the married man’s allowance by as much as £2,500, depending upon the presence of children.

• The BNP will raise the inheritance tax level to £1 million.

• The BNP will work for a reduction in council tax through the slashing of all politically correct council functions and “diversity” schemes.

• The BNP would take some of these savings and invest them in rebuilding British industry and skills through an active protectionist policy as many other European nations already do.

• The BNP will rebuild Britain’s skills base — lost through decades of deindustrialisation caused by successive Tory and Labour regimes — by offering generous subsidies to students who study engineering and science and to institutions offering such education.

• The BNP will ensure that globalist corporations pay their fair share of the tax burden. We will close down the legal loopholes which allow tax evasion through Transfer Pricing and the outsourcing of jobs to foreign nations.

• The BNP will therefore introduce legislation to ensure that a foreign acquisition of any significantly-sized British company is judged to be in the public and national interest before it can proceed.

• The BNP will pass legislation to separate utility (high street) banks from the investment banking sector to prevent a repeat of the credit crisis.

• The BNP will oppose the privatisation of natural monopolies such as Royal Mail.

Creating Local Economies

• The BNP would support local economies by creating a national network of autonomous credit unions.

• The BNP would investigate the viability of voluntary local currencies as a means of assisting local economies.

Pensions: Looking After Our Old People

• The BNP aims to increase the state pension to £150 per week within the duration of the first Parliament.

• The BNP will link the state pension to earnings which will ensure that pensioner incomes keep pace with the cost of living.

• The BNP will reduce the current annual allowance for tax relief on pension contributions from the present amount of approximately £230,000 to £75,000.

• A solution to the public sector pensions crisis must be found through a national conference with all the players — employers and workers’ representatives.

• Part of the solution lies in raising the age of retirement to 68 over a period of years.

• The BNP will enact legislation to ensure that pensions are eligible only to Britons and those who have fully paid into the system.

• The BNP will vigorously oppose the UK taxpayer being called upon to subsidise any pension underfunding crisis elsewhere in the EU.

IT and the Digital Revolution: The BNP’s Vision

• The BNP will reinvigorate the IT sector in Britain with massive investments in technology universities.

• The BNP will institute a policy of protectionism for the local IT industry and jobs.

• The BNP will nationalise the telecoms infrastructure to enable the creation of a not-for-profit 100Mbps broadband service across the country.

• The BNP will invest in technology universities to provide the skills to our people to take their rightful place as world leaders in the IT industry.

-/-

You can view the full 94 page document and watch film the manifesto launch at the Home of the Green Arrow

Why you must vote BNP

Glimpsing the beasts

I recommend an article written this morning by my good friend and ideological brother the Green Arrow, entitled “The BNP are Open for Business”, in which he analyses the outcome of the legal action brought against the BNP by the state funded and quite clearly Stasi inspired quango the Orwellianly named Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC).

I find the Green Arrow's view that the outcome was pre-planned, and that the judge was merely delivering the judgement required of him very compelling. It was an outcome which those behind the EHRC prosecution, and most likely behind the judge himself, believed would throw the BNP into internal turmoil at a time when unity was most vital. It was no coincidence that this case occurred now, weeks before a general election where, following the success in the European poll, the party is expected to make gains.

The BNP have had the same membership rules for almost 30 years, yet it is only now that the establishment noticed they are discriminatory? I think not.

This was a deliberate attempt by the establishment, with their tame judge on side, to drain the party financially and cause internal conflict, so as to damage its chances right before the upcoming vote.

How they misjudged the BNP. One can imagine their disbelieving horror when, as a result of the earlier hearing, the resolution to change the party's constitution in order to admit non-whites as members, was passed almost unopposed. That was supposed to split the party in two and alienate its core supporters. What a miscalculation by the EHRC, who had clearly made the mistake of believing their own propaganda and expected the party to behave like the dimwitted racist thugs they and their chums in the controlled media like to pretend they are.

How they must have panicked when that did not result in blood on the floor and an irreparable schism within the party as they had expected.

You can just imagine little weasel Wadham rushing from shyster lawyer to shyster lawyer patching together a rear guard attack and coming up with the ludicrous claim that it was discriminatory for a political party to expect its member's to support it's aims.

In an honest society nobody would have expected a judge to buy such an argument, however, Britain long ago ceased to be an honest society, and any recently awoken coma patient, who still believes it is has not encountered the likes of the obedient Judge Paul Collins, a man who would no doubt have judged yellow to be pink had his bosses told him to do so.

However, once again the BNP's enemies had underestimated it, they had not expected Nick Griffin to act so decisively and even more so, they had not reckoned with the BNP's supporters who know exactly what they are up to and are not going to play their games.

Certainly there have been some mutterings at the elephant's graveyard otherwise known as the Stormfront forum. However, like the UAF before them, the EHRC would be fools to think that Stormfront is representative of the BNP. There are many on Stormfront who care more about descending to Valhala in fiery glory than they do about winning elections, and, in any event, would would be more likely to vote for George Galloway or even Islam4UK than the BNP merely because there is a greater chance the first two will say something nasty about the Jews.

The average BNP supporter knows what type of enemy we are up against, understand its tricks and are standing firm.

I also agree with the Green Arrow that this judgement may in fact have done the BNP a considerable amount of good. If nothing else it has exposed what is really happening in this country to anyone honest enough to look, and has shown to be true much of what has been dismissed as conspiracy theory.

If you examine this judgement, its malevolence is quite shocking.

The following are the passages from the BNP constitution which the EHRC considered to be discriminatory a view supported by the court who have ordered the BNP that they can not require its members to sign up to:

Section 3.2.1.: Our party is a party of British Nationalism, both ethnic and civic, and we are committed to the principle of national sovereignty in all our British Homeland affairs and of self determination and sovereignty in all Indigenous British affairs.
We are pledged to the continued creation, fostering, maintenance and existence of the unity and of the integrity of the Indigenous British and of the government of the countries of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, and of Eire, which together, and as further expanded in Schedule 1 (“Interpretation Rules”), are referred to in this, our constitution, as our “British Homeland.”

and

Section 3.2.3. : We are pledged to stemming and reversing the immigration into our British Homeland that has, without the express consent of the Indigenous British, taken place since 1948, and to restoring and maintaining, by legal changes, negotiation and consent, the Indigenous British as the overwhelming majority in the make-up of the population and expression of culture in each part of our British Homeland.

In effect, the law of our land is now saying that it is illegal for a political party to seek to preserve the culture, identity and indeed very existence of the native peoples of these islands, and that it is illegal for a political party to oppose immigration.

That is the message which Friday's judgement sent out to the British people, and when they understand it, which they will, there are many who will not like it.

The widdling little whippet speaking on Sky News on Friday night may find the term “indigenous Briton” offensive, but most Britons do not feel quite the same.

This prosecution and this judgement is the clearest evidence for the British people that the British establishment is determined to destroy them and to replace them. Anyone who does not see that is either mad or deliberately and maliciously blind.

Many will not care, some will never care, but, just maybe there are enough who will care.

So what now?

Many believe that this judgement will enable non-whites to join the party and seek to destroy it from within. Sadly, that is absolutely true, they can indeed seek to do that. However, the threat is actually no greater than it has ever been. Throughout the BNP's history it has had far more white enemies than it has had non-white ones. It has always been possible for the BNPs many many thousands of white enemies to join the party and seek to destroy it from within, many believe some have already tried, yet the party is still here, and it is getting stronger.

Certainly in the short term some will try, and there will inevitably be attempts to claim bias and discrimination, but that is a fact of modern Britain and not exclusive to the BNP.

I do not deny there are downsides to what has happened. However, patriots in a land ruled by traitors must face up to many challenges and this judgement will just add a few more to the many challenges we must, and will, overcome.

However, this court case has also presented the BNP with great opportunities if it is prepared to grasp them.

There are those within Britain's ethnic minorities who wish us well. There are those with the Hindu, Sikh and Chinese communities who have great affection for the British, and who, most importantly, do not seek to take our country from us. If the BNP embrace those who support our cause and wish us no harm, then our enemy's loudest weapons loose their power.

Furthermore in the short term this attack on the BNP has won us publicity, and some sympathy, albeit some of it grudging.

However, there is one unintended consequence of what has happened from the BNP could benefit tremendously and which will last. The one thing this malevolent, vicious and hate fuelled attempt to destroy us has proved is that we were right and that we always have been.

The rulers of our land have briefly lifted a veil and, for a moment, an ugly, snarling face was revealed, many glimpsed the beasts behind the EHRC, and those who understood what they saw will not forget.

Media continues to lie

Independent- Saturday March 13

Court Bans BNP from taking on new members

"Until the far-right party complies with the judgment it is barred from taking on any new members...."

Mirror - Saturday 13 March 2010

Judge Ban over BNP Members

"The bnp has been barred from taking new members until it overturns admission rules on non-whites....."

Irish Times Saturday 13 March 2010

Court Orders BNP to cease recruitment

"THE BRITISH National Party (BNP) was ordered to stop recruiting new members following a court ruling yesterday ........"

HOWEVER

BNP Website - Undated Friday 12 March

MEMBERSHIP IS NOW OPEN - JOIN NOW

__________

Will you ever believe anything you read in the press again?

(Screenshots taken in case changes are made later - as they often are)

Update on the BNP Court case

BNP Press release
BNP Membership Reopens despite Race Gestapo’s Attempt to Subvert Democracy

Membership applications to join the British National Party are now again open despite the state’s best efforts to subvert the party and democracy, Nick Griffin MEP has announced.

Speaking after the conclusion of the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) court case today, Mr Griffin said the court had in effect ruled that political parties could not ask its members to endorse policies which oppose mass immigration. “The court ruled that sections 3.2.1 and 3.2.3 of the BNP’s new constitution could not be set as conditions for membership of the party as they would discriminate against ethnics,” Mr Griffin said.

“The court has ruled that these clauses, which are part of the membership conditions as stated in section 4 of the constitution, makes it impossible for ethnics to join the BNP,” Mr Griffin said. “We, of course, disagree with the court’s opinion.

“There is no correlation between being opposed to mass immigration and the opening of membership of the party,” Mr Griffin said, adding that he knew members of ethnic minorities who were just as opposed to mass immigration as any indigenous British member of the party.

“Section 3 of the BNP constitution is protected and cannot be changed except by an extraordinary general meeting (EGM) of the party,” Mr Griffin went on. “The new constitution grants the party’s leader the power to change all non-protected parts of that document to comply with the law, without the need for EGMs. “Section 4, which deals with the requirements for membership and includes the demand that members support all the principles of the party, is not protected. “I have, therefore, with immediate effect changed the section 4 requirements, as I am entitled to do, to comply with the court order,” Mr Griffin continued.

“I have, therefore, with immediate effect changed the section 4 requirements, as I am entitled to do, to comply with the court order,” Mr Griffin continued. “What this means is that people can apply to join the BNP without having to endorse and support the principles of the party. “Everyone knows this is a mad situation, and it has set an astonishing and extremely dangerous precedent for all parties. “It is a complete subversion of democracy and is in reality an attempt by the state to order the citizenry what policies they can or cannot believe in. “The bottom line is that the BNP’s policies remain exactly as they were, particularly the demand for an end to mass immigration.

“I have changed the non-write protected constitution to comply with the court order and the amended version will be published online well within the 30 days set our constitution. “Membership applications are therefore are now open and the 7000-strong backlog will be processed in the order in which they applied,” Mr Griffin said, adding that any ethnic who had applied to join the party would wait in turn like anyone else to have their applications processed.

____________________

NOTE: Readers shoud ignore continuing press and TV reports claiming that the party is still unable to recruit now members, this is incorrect, the ban was lifted this afternoon, the media know it but, as usual, they are lying

BNP Press Statement: “Membership Rule” Court Case Postponed as Judge Throws Out Two Thirds of EHRC Case

From BNP Chairman Nick Griffin

The malicious court case against the British National Party over its membership rules has been postponed for final judgement to Friday after the presiding judge threw out two thirds of the Equalities and Human Rights Commissions’ case today. “The EHRC's argument was in two sections,” said BNP leader Nick Griffin MEP. “The first was that the new constitution was not in force because the BNP had not followed the correct procedures in setting it up.

“The judge has decisively rejected that and ruled that the BNP’s new constitution is valid and has been constituted in a correct and legal manner,” Mr Griffin said. “The only remaining part upon which the judge still has to decide is the EHRC’s allegation that the BNP’s new constitution constitutes a form of indirect discrimination. He will give his opinion at 10:30 on Friday morning.”

Mr Griffin said the EHRC’s argument was based on an attempt to use the word “policies” in the Act to mean to refer to aims and objectives of any party or group, rather than about application and recruitment policies.

“The EHRC of course claims otherwise, but it is patently obvious this is what they are trying to do,” he said. “If their argument was followed through, it would open up a can of worms which would be absolutely absurd. “It would mean, for example, that a party which stood for abortion on demand could be accused of discriminating against Catholics, or vegetarian parties could be accused of discriminating against meat eaters,” Mr Griffin said. “This would set a terrible precedent and we would hope that the judge would not go down this road.

“It is a very promising sign that the judge has already seen fit to strike down most of the EHRC’s pathetic arguments over procedural issues. We would hope that this consistency and logic is followed through on Friday.” Mr Griffin added that the BNP’s new constitution has empowered him to make any changes if so ordered by the court without having to go through an extended procedure once again.

“As a result, I intend to end this waste of time, money and blatant political persecution one way or another on Friday,” Mr Griffin concluded.

Source

BNP Vote to change constitution

The BNP have voted to change the party's constitution in order to allow non-whites to join the party - further details can be read at the home of the Green Arrow

Although some will see this as a sad day, and it is certainly true that the change is not one I welcome without reservation, this vote was a victory for common sense.

Right now our country is run by a totalitarian group of anti white bigots who's instincts and methods are akin to that which ran Eastern Germany in the cold war years. They have put what remains of the resorces of the state behind the vile and agenda driven Equality and Human Rights Commission (the name shrieks Stasi doesn't it?) who are intent on destroying the party and at this present time the BNP does not have the means of defeating them. It would be madness to bankrupt the party, or risk being declared illegal for the sake of a principle and a battle which can not be won at this time.

The BNP is the last hope this country has, it can save the country, but it must remain in existence to do so.

This is not defeat, it is pragmatism. People forget that Margaret Thatcher conceded to the miner's union in 1980 because she could not defeat them then, she bided her time, she prepared and when she was ready she crushed them in 1984. Some of you will cringe at that analogy, however, successful politics is the art of the possible.

Our time will come, and then things can be put right, until then we must not risk our future when the cards are in our enemy's hands.

Many will feel sad at today's vote but it was the right one.

____________________________

Foot note:

I note that times reporter and compulsive liar Dominic Kennedy left the meeting in rather a hurry!!

Dr Frank Ellis gives an analysis of Question Time

A personal view by Frank Ellis

Nick Griffin on Question Time, BBC 1, 2235 hrs, Thursday 22^nd October 2009

Chairman, David Dimbleby

Panellists: Bonnie Greer, Nick Griffin MEP, Chris Huhne MP, Jack Straw MP & Baroness Warsi

Strange it is, that men should admit the validity of the arguments for free discussion, but object to their being “pushed to an extreme”; not seeing that unless the reasons are good for an extreme case, they are not good for any case. Strange that they should imagine that they are not assuming infallibility, when they acknowledge that there should be free discussion on all subjects which can possibly be doubtful, but think that some particular principle or doctrine should be forbidden to be questioned because it is so certain, that is, because they are certain that it is certain. To call any proposition certain, while there is any one who would deny its certainty if permitted, but who is not permitted, is to assume that we ourselves, and those who agree with us, are the judges of certainty, and judges without hearing the other side.

John Stuart Mill, On Liberty (1859)

© Frank Ellis 2009

As the leader of a party that has local councillors, county councillors and 2 MEPs, it was entirely proper that Nick Griffin MEP, the leader of the British National Party (BNP), be invited on Question Time. The attempts to apply pressure to the BBC to cancel the invitation say a great deal about the left and indeed the Conservative Party. You cannot deny your political opponents free speech and then insist on your own rights to same.

One of the first questions put to the panel was whether it was right and proper that a party like the BNP used Churchill in its campaign literature given that Churchill had led Britain in a war against a racist and oppressive regime. The assumption is that the BNP is a racist party therefore it must be wrong for the BNP to use Churchillian iconography. It must be made clear that Britain did not got to war against Nazi Germany because the Hitler state was racist or even oppressive. Had Germany not attacked Poland Britain would not have declared war, though given the aggressive expansionism of Germany war would have come sooner or later. In the summer of 1940 after the disastrous performance of the British Army in France, Britain was fighting for her survival. Freeing the world of racism was not a consideration. The obsession with racism comes after 1945. True, Asians fought in both world wars, so did Australians, New Zealanders, Canadians and Americans. Does this mean that all these soldiers (Asian or white) have a right of residence in the UK? Griffin made the excellent point that in World War Two we went to war to protect British sovereignty: we did not go war to allow our country to be transformed by legal/illegal immigration. Griffin’s point – addressed to Straw – that his father served in the Royal Air Force, while Straw’s father was in prison as a conscientious objector was a powerful blow against Straw. Griffin also pointed out that many of Churchill’s views on immigration and Islam were somewhat politically incorrect (indeed they were).

Ignorance or obmutescence regarding the crimes against humanity and the genocide committed by communist regimes worldwide are a characteristic of the print and broadcast media, and the left. Straw, for example, made much of the importance of race for the BNP, implying that the BNP was simply a clone of the German Nazi party. What he failed to point out is that race is deemed to be a very good thing for blacks who on both sides of the Atlantic are encouraged to celebrate their being black to the point of making all kinds of bizarre claims about black achievements. In the UK there is an organization called the Metropolitan Police Service Black Police Association. Now, it is not clear to me why blacks working in the public sector can create an organisation membership of which is explicitly racial whereas a political party, the BNP, must open its membership to non-whites. If blacks can celebrate being black, why are whites vilified when they seek to promote and to protect their own interests?

Straw also failed to point out that class war so beloved of communist fanatics and white middle-class revolutionaries in the National Union of Students (no platform for fascists, etc) has been responsible for millions more deaths than the Nazis managed to kill in World War Two. Stalin’s Final Solution of the Peasant Question led to the extermination of about 11,000,000 peasants six million of whom were Ukrainians cruelly put to death by starvation on Stalin’s orders. This genocide was completed 10 years before Heydrich and Eichmann convened the Wannsee conference in January 1942 during which they finalised the plans for the extermination of Europe’s Jewish population. Hitler was not the most terrible mass murderer in history but it clearly suits the left (Jack Straw) and many other establishment figures to have people believe that Hitler was uniquely evil because any opposition to mass legal/illegal immigration can be shouted down as racist when it fact it is rational, morally sound and quite normal.

When we examine the way communist traitors and supporters of the most genocidal and bloody party in man’s history are received by the BBC and other media organisations we cannot help but notice yet another glaring double standard. The former terrorist, Mandela enjoys saint status and the fact that the Labour Party was heavily penetrated by the KGB, Stasi and the Czech StB has not resulted in prosecutions. Ten years ago Robin Pearson, a lecturer at Hull University was exposed as a Stasi spy. MI5 concluded that Pearson had damaged British interests and that there was a very strong case for prosecuting him. Jack Straw – that man again – was Home Secretary at the time and rejected MI5’s recommendations to proceed against Pearson. Ten years later, as far as I am aware, Pearson is still in post. Somebody reading this piece might like to check out the Hull University web site and then ask the university secretary what is going on. One wonders whether Straw’s ideological allegiances informed his decision not to prosecute Pearson. Again, the same people who campaigned to stop Griffin from appearing on Question Time do not seem to mind Gerry Adams and colleagues who have now renounced their terrorist past. As far as I am aware, the BNP was not responsible for the deaths of 3,000 soldiers, civilians and members of what used to be known as the Royal Ulster Constabulary. The left prostrate themselves before Mandela, ignoring his terrorist past, whereas the Holy Father is the target of constant snide attacks because of his membership of the Hitler Youth.

Bonnie Greer made little contribution to the debate. Her attempts to undermine the notion that there were any indigenous British were grossly incompetent. Speaking as an Englishman, I found her attempts to deny the existence of my people insulting and, to ape the language of The Macpherson Report, unwittingly racist. She clearly has no idea of the evolutionary and geological history of Western Europe. Even if early humans first appeared in Africa – the out-of-Africa theory – the expectation that we should celebrate any African ancestry is sentimental and bizarre. There may well have been a time when we were all Africans, as it were but evolutionary pressures and natural selection have ensured that the basic African blueprint, if the early humans did indeed come from Africa, has changed at the superficial and deep structural level. Blacks and whites are now not the same: there are important psychological, physiological and intellectual differences, and these differences have real world consequences. She also failed to realise that Rome’s multiculturalism was one of the factors for its downfall. America may yet go the same way.

Griffin landed further telling blows on the rather lacklustre Straw when he pointed out that Straw denied the English the use of “English” as a category on the census form. Griffin landed yet another blow when he told Straw that he, Straw, would not go to New Zealand and tell the Maoris that they were not the indigenous people of New Zealand.

The audience had clearly been selected to be as hostile as possible to Griffin. Black and Asians, along with white PC types, were overrepresented and many of them came to shout Griffin down rather than to argue. One of the first to have a go at Griffin was a very emotional black. He was wearing glasses and sitting to the right of the panellists. One of the main themes of his tirade was that Griffin should accept the contributions that immigrants have made. The trouble with this of course is that none of us - the benighted, non-existing English - was asked whether we wanted these “contributions”. Immigrants can kindly offer them but we the owners of this land have the right to decline the offer. In any case the talk of contributions is a debating ploy. It removes discussion of whether these immigrants, or some of them, should be here in the first place and whether they have entered the country illegally so as to make these contributions. If the price of these contributions, whatever they are, is the racial and cultural dispossession of whites, the reduction of whites to a minority in some of our bigger cities, near permanent racial unrest and tension in many other towns and the desire on the part of what the BBC likes to call “British muslims” to kill us, then I suggest that the price is too high.

However, there were members of the audience who supported Griffin. One man pointed out that Griffin was saying the same things as Enoch Powell. Straw pointed out that when Powell was Health Minister he advertised for nurses in the West Indies to come to Britain. Subject to proper visa controls (in and out), an upper limit population control policy and a strictly enforced immigration policy driven by national self-interest, foreigners are welcome. A work permit must not be seen as conferring an automatic right of residence. Foreigners who lied on visa applications forms must be subject to immediate deportation

One member of the audience asked Griffin whether he had travelled. This bone-headed question was presumably intended to show that Griffin’s presumed lack of travelling was what supposedly made him such a bigoted individual. Travel does not necessarily broaden the mind. During the 1930s many admirers of Stalin and hordes of wealthy socialists made the pilgrimage to the Soviet Union. These Terror-Famine Deniers then retuned to the prosperous West and extolled the joys of socialism at the very moment when Stalin was engaging in genocide. A generation later the same types went to pay homage to Mao and came back with all kinds of nonsense about the joys of Maoism. Note, however, that these leftists returned to the West: they decided not to stay in the workers’ paradise. I am reminded here of the diversophiles among us who insist that “diversity is our strength” and then flee it at the first opportunity.

The panel were asked to consider whether a misguided immigration policy has contributed to the BNP’s electoral success. Straw refused to answer the question. He then came out with the slogan that “diversity is our strength”. Straw should ask the Serbs, Croats and Bosnians whether they believe – whether they ever believed – that nonsense. For good measure he should also ask the ANC whether they appreciate the presence of white people in multiracial South Africa. This question prompted other panellists (Warsi and Huhne) to lay into Straw. There was a consensus that the Labour government’s immigration policy had been and still is a disastrous failure. Huhne pointed out the huge discrepancy between the Labour government’s estimates about the number of migrants that would come to Britain from the Eastern European states newly-acceded to the EU and the vast flood that actually came. When Straw tried to evade government responsibility and said that the government had introduced an Australian points-based system and were going to do this and that, one member of the audience shouted out: “Just do it” (indeed). During this phase of the programme it turned out that when visas are issued to foreigners to come to the UK the government does not know whether the visa holder has left the country when the visa has expired. One can assume that applicants intending to violate the conditions of the visa are aware of this lack of control as well. One black member of the audience (not the emotionally incontinent one noted above) made the measured and rational point that immigration has to be tackled. The failure to control immigration and the very high birth rate of immigrants is the main factor contributing to the dramatic rise in population. It was pointed out by Dimbleby that Frank Field had called for a population limit to be set and maintained. Straw argued that you could not stop people having children. Well, as a first phase you can cease to provide generous incentives. Here are some suggestions. First, stop all child benefits. Those who want large families have no right to expect those who are sexually responsible to subsidize their procreation experiments. Second, consider the compulsory sterilization of a man who deserts a woman he has inseminated and who has earlier refused when demanded to make financial contributions to the upkeep of his child. Women who decide quite deliberately to lead a life based on welfare by having children with multiple fathers should have to live in custodial hostels and be subject to a strict control regime. Third, immigrants who come from countries with a tradition of large extended families (polygamy) shall not be permitted to bring them to the UK and shall receive no financial assistance from the public purse. Fourth, recognise that in a country in an earlier age where the population was 8 million and the mean life expectancy was about 50 years, having lots of children was not a problem. In the same country with a population of 60,000,000 and an increased life expectancy, aggressive breeding, exacerbated by uncontrolled immigration is unsustainable. Having children under these conditions is no longer a right it has become a privilege. Governments can do something. If they do not act nature will impose her own solution. The outcome will be collapse and the descent into something very nasty and Hobbesian.

There is no doubt that the standard procedure for the conduct of Question Time was abandoned and that Dimbleby and the other panellists ganged up on Griffin. They may even have colluded with one another in advance. It was not a pretty sight; the BBC has some explaining to do. I was left with the impression that too many of the audience – the tree-huggers and save-the-whale types – would have been quite happy to see Griffin murdered. The BNP, often in the face of violence and vicious media lying, has consistently championed the cause of the white indigenous majority who are quite rightly alarmed – and should be – about the scale of legal/illegal immigration into the United Kingdom. This issue is now critical to the survival of the United Kingdom. For having doggedly exposed the catastrophic immigration policy of this Labour government (and previous Conservative governments as well) or rather the lack thereof and the damage this policy has inflicted on the indigenous population Nick Griffin and the BNP deserve our gratitude. However, Griffin was very obviously and clumsily evasive when challenged about the Holocaust. His answers to accusations of Holocaust denial were patently insincere. It may well be illegal in Germany and France to say anything controversial about the Holocaust but Britain, fortunately, has no such laws and Griffin should have come clean and apologised about having denied the Holocaust. Dimbleby was right to have reproached him for smirking. The Jewish lad who challenged Griffin was hurt and could not understand why Griffin wanted to deny what Hitler had done. It is a wicked thing to deny suffering on such a scale. The evidence for what the Nazis did is overwhelming: we know it happened; what good comes from denying the Satanic purposes of Hitler’s Final Solution? As a matter of urgency Griffin needs to issue an unreserved and sincere apology for past denials (BNP web site). So play the man, master Griffin and do it.

How do we rate the performance of the other panellists? Jack Straw looked and sounded nervous, even frightened. He was fatally wounded by Griffin’s devastating aside about his father and never fully recovered his composure. Chris Huhne’s was an average performance, no more. He seemed more concerned to demonstrate the purity of his anti-racist credentials and lacked the grasp of detail. The same can be said of Baroness Warsi, the affirmative action appointee. As for the delightful and engaging Bonnie Greer, she set a low standard and conspicuously failed to achieve it.

Frank Ellis
______________________

Editor's note: I am honoured that Dr Ellis is a contributor to Sarah Maid of Albion. As many will ba aware Dr Ellis was an eminent lecturer at Leeds University (now retired) who received considerable press coverage in 2006 on account of the outrageous way he was treated, and the efforts which were made to destroy him and his career, merely for having the courage to express unpopular and politically incorrect views.

Dr Ellis's review of Qustion time is reproduced here in full out of respect for Dr Ellis and for his right to free speech. I am also in strong agreement with the majority of what he has to say, however, this is a personal view, and Dr Ellis's views do not, in their entirety, represent the opinion of this blog.

Sarah: Maid of Albion

Revelations from a bear pit - Part three

The fact that the liberal elite have completely lost touch with the heart of this country and its people could hardly have been exposed more clearly than on Thursday night by the jeers of derision which greeted any reference to a native race of Britons, and the cheers of delight awarded to anyone who claimed that no such thing as an indigenous Briton existed. I am sure that such new world orthodoxy was welcomed with with Champers cork popping glee, in the wine bars of Hoxton, and the aromatherapy scented drawing rooms of Hampstead, however, I doubt it played so well in Preston, Burnley or Porthcawl.

The official line of the red clawed multiculturalists, currently holding prominent positions in our country is that the British Islands have no indigenous people and that we are a shifting race of intermingling immigrants with no ancestral roots into into the soil of our homeland. Similar arguments are made against the claims of many native people's across Europe, for instance , as Dr. D a regular commentator at Sarah Maid of Albion recently put it, it is now all but official policy in Sweden that “there is no Swedish identity, no Swedish history, no Swedish way of life. Everything is given over to the Other, the Other that is superior to all things native.” Sweden is an extreme case but the same is happening in country after country across the continent.

In the main, what is said about Britain is that as we have in the past taken in groups of foreign refugees from violence and oppression, we have somehow surrendered our right to sovereignty, rather in the same way that if you invite a vampire across your threshold, he has then the right to take your soul.

Furthermore, the impression given is that, just like the present, wave upon wave of immigrants have arrived on our shores, continually mixing their blood with the local population until there is no defined ethnicity or heritage. This is the official story, but, of course, being such it is not the truth.

Yes, we have taken in refugees, we are good, charitable. people, and now we are paying the price for that charity. However, contrary to the impression which is given, until the human tsunami of the last forty years, the numbers involved were relatively small, certainly not enough to change the bloodline of a nation.

The largest single group of refugees and the closest to compare with the current situation, were the French Huguenots, who arrived here in the 16th Century following persecution by the Catholics and incidents such as the Massacre of St Bartholomew. The Huguenot refugees dispersed across Europe, with some 50 thousand coming to Britain and 10 thousand going to Ireland.

50,000 people may seem a lot but it is less than a quarter of the current Somali population, and the Somalis, which are by no means one of the largest immigrant groups, have only been coming for the last ten years or so.

Furthermore, the French Huguenots were white. Christian, Europeans with strong ethnic and genetic blood ties to the people of Britain, it was certainly not as if a group from an ethnically separate culture had settled here. An equivalent might be for a group of Sioux Indians taking refuge with the Comanche following a tribal war with the Apache, they are people of the same ethnic origin, and nobody would expect either group to surrender their indigenous rights on account of an act of human kindness.

Prior to the 20th Century, the Huguenots and before them the Normans, who once again are part of the same ethnic and cultural groupings as the British people were the only people from across the channel to settle in Britain in any significant numbers in the last thousand years, yet, in terms of numbers percentage of the population they bore no comparison to what is occurring today.

The other groups which came were relatively tiny. The Jewish population of Britain is often used as an example of immigrants to our country, ignoring the fact that Jewishness in itself is not an ethnicity. There have certainly been Jews in this country for at least 1,000 years, give or take three centuries of expulsion, however, the numbers involved were relatively small, sixteen thousand souls when they were expelled in 1290 . Even today, despite being resident for over ten centuries and including those Polish and Lithuanian Jews who are alleged to have arrived in such multitudes in the 19th Century, their numbers do not even match one tenth of the current official Asian population (let alone the real Asian population) and the Asians have only been coming here in significant numbers for the last forty to fifty years.

In any event, the Jews have long held strong and admirable cultural beliefs against mixing their line with non-believers, hence their presence here has had little effect on the genetic heritage of the indigenous population.

There are many claims made that there have been Africans in Britain for many centuries, because some appear in paintings in stately homes, but, these were tiny numbers brought back as servants by Aristocrats who had travelled abroad, and one might as well claim that peacocks are indigenous to Britain because a couple of toffs had a few in their gardens.

Certainly despite the 19th century appearance small pockets of Africa immigrants in places like Cardiff's Tiger Bay or the East End of London, prior to the 20th century the numbers of non-Europeans residing in this country were insignificant, despite the impression which our overlords seek to present. In any event, a claim to indigenous status is not dependant on the fact that no other ethnic group ever visited your land, if it were, the indigenous peoples of Australia and America would have lost their status long ago.

We are being denied our claim to our native land because we have at times in the last few centuries been hospitable to people in need and that is an outrage.

However, let us go back even further into our past, and there we encounter the bizarre ramblings and weird fantasies of Question Time panellist Bonny Greer, in respect of whom I must take issue with Nick Griffin, who apparently believes that, unlike the other panel members, Ms. Greer acted with decency and integrity. In response to this I will merely say that only a man could fail to see the poison and two faced deceit in Bonnie Greer.

This Chicago born playwright and, Gordon Brown appointed. Deputy chairman of the British Museum, who has lived in England since the 1980's but speaks with voice resonating in mint juleps and Acacia blossom, in the apparent belief that an Antebellum note might give her the credibility of a Maya Angelou, whilst at the same time evoking images of slavery, is as fake as is her accent.

This third rate story teller and quango appointee sought to pose as a historian on the basis of an affirmative action appointment and lecture Nick and the audience on the subject of Ancient history, a subject she apparently learnt from a multicultural propaganda pop-up book for under fives.

I will not pay this charlatan the respect of addressing her assertion that Britain has no indigenous population because “the Neanderthals got here first” other than to say that so did the Velociraptors and what the hell have Neanderthals got to do with indigenous human beings you stupid fake?

Bonnie then rushed forward a few thousand years to state that Rome was a multiracial society (oh yeah?, and look where that got them!!) and that the Romans bought battalions of Asians and Africans here, many of whom were left behind to mate with the local population. On the basis of this statement she asserted that there was no such thing as an indigenous race of Britons, and that what there is some global blend of all humanity. (Click here to watch Bonnie speak of the Romans)

I have seen similar claims before, usually in large print and bright colours in publications praising the glories of diversity, and I have no doubt that there is a display of lifelike dolls at the British museum showing Rastafarian Romans arriving in Londinium. However, I have yet to find a serious historical source supporting Bonnie's version of British history. It may be therefore that she is relying on a source which applies a similar degree of poetic licence to British history as they does to black history.

However, let us give Bonnie G the benefit of the doubt and assume that her tale of African and Asian Romans is true and then lets consider the ramifications of this. To take Bonnie's analysis to its logical conclusion, there must also be no such thing as an indigenous African, after all, although it might not suit Bonnie's narrative to admit it, the Arab slave traders got to Africa long before the Romans got here, and they stayed a damn sight longer (in fact they were still there well into the 20th century) they most certainly raped and mixed their genes with the locals. Why doesn't the melodious Ms. Greer pop over to Kenya, Uganda, Zaire and Tanzania and tell them they are not indigenous?

Similarly, I seem to recall that Alexander the Great invaded India, and that he took himself an Asian bride. His lonely soldiers had been away from home for twelve years, so you can be damn sure they mixed with the locals. I am sure we would have a whip round to fly Bonnie out to the Punjab so she can tell the Punjabis they have to give up any claim to their homeland because they are part Macedonian. However, I suggest she makes sure her medical insurance, and will, are up to date first.

Oh my, young Alex got to Afghanistan too didn't he, they will really enjoy being told their country ain't their own!!

However, lets drop these ludicrous claims that a native people can cease to be so on account of rape and hospitality, it is all a smoke screen designed to hide the true agendas of the likes of Bonnie Greer and Jack Straw. They know damn well who the indigenous population of Britain are, because they have sent an adult lifetime conspiring against them.

The indigenous, native, population of Britain are the ones not protected by the race relations act, they are the ones who Greer and others have built entire careers on calling racists. The indigenous population are the ones who any other ethnic group can beat to a pulp whilst phoning three car loads of cousins as reinforcements, after which the police will say “Hate crime? what hate crime?”. They are the people who can be murdered by thugs who shout “That will teach a white man to interfere in our business” but who's killers are not charged with a racially aggravated crime.

The indigenous people of this country are the ones whom the establishment, the media and those behind that shambles on Thursday night have spent the last fifty years discriminating against and seeking to dispossess.

You know who we are Ms. Greer, we know who you are, we know what you are doing, and hear me now, we are not going to let you do it any longer.