Tuesday, 29 April 2008

A vote against the liars



During the last century, the Russian people believed a lie for seventy years, and the citizens of those Eastern block countries, such as Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary and the various Baltic and Balkan states which were handed over to Russia in 1945 were lied to for almost 50 years. Although the soviet Union has since crumbled, and those nations are now free, there remain many countries in today's world where the people are fed lies by malevolent governments.

Obvious examples spring to mind, such as Cuba and North Korea, where the public are locked away from the world and told to believe every new fantasy dreamed up by the Dear leader

However, it is not only in isolated dictatorships or behind totalitarian iron curtains where governments deliberately, and persistently, lie to their public. Most Western European governments lie to their electorate on many issues and particularly on the subjects of immigration and race relations, and amongst the worst offenders, supported by a politically biased media, has been the governments of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of all political shades.

Most do not realise it but the British public had been subject to a campaign of disinformation for a period of almost half a century. We have been lied to, repeatedly and deliberately for a variety of motives, none of which had anything to do with the best interests of you or your country . They lied to hide the fact that they were allowing the largest alien invasion of this country in our Island's history and in order to keep you placidly obedient whilst they changed our country beyond all recognition.

They lied when they told you that immigration brought great benefits to Britain, whereas in truth its main benefit was to Labour's electoral support, and to their (and the Tories') unscrupulous chums in big business who want to exploit cheap immigration in order to keep wages artificially low.

Both labour and the Tories lied to for selfish and party political motives, and the Lib Dems went along with it because they are do infected with political correctness that they would rather be raped than admit the colour of their rapists.

Governments of all political parties lied to you when they said that the NHS would collapse without immigration, whereas in truth it is the third world's health service which is collapsing because of immigration,whilst ours is groaning under the strain. Anyone with eyes to see, and who lives in any major city, knows that whenever they use the health service, at least half the patients in the queue in front of them are Immigrants, many very recently arrived. It will only get worse, even if the Eastern Europeans may eventually go home as their countries' economies start to grow (IF you believe the Independant and the BBC's suspiciously timed reports), one can be sure that the Africans, the West Indians, and Asians are far less likely to leave our generous shores, and an ageing immigrant population will put even further pressure on our infrastructure.

The lies did not stop there, they lie when they pretend that that the main victims of racial violence are non-white immigrants, when any fair analysis of the figures shows that non-whites are in fact the main perpetrators, to a massively disproportionate degree, and that indigenous white population are the primary victims .

They lie when they build shrines and hold repeated commemorations of the death Stephen Lawrence for the sole purpose of hiding the truth about race crime in this country, and that, if indeed he was the victim of a race crime, their poster boy victim is in truth a rare exception.

They lie when they tell you Islam is a religion of peace they lie about our imperial past and our central role in ending the slave trade and they lie about everything which was once great about Britain. They lie because they know they can not tell us the truth and be forgiven.

If Britain is to survive and have a chance of being great again, the lies have got to stop, and that will only happen when we as a nation stop voting for the liars and start voting for the truth. Maybe we can start this Thursday.

Sunday, 27 April 2008

The Truth about Islam in Europe - an excellent essay

I have not posted here this week end as I have been dealing with various family matters back in the non-cyber world. However, anyone short of anything to read could do worse than re-visit this excellent essay by the incomparable fjordman in the Brussels Journal back in February.

Which I was reminded of when it was posted to the Green Arrow forum by Yorkielass earlier today

I am sure it has been round the internet before, but it deserves as wide an audience as possible, especially when our politicians claim that Islam is a religion of peace and that only a "tiny minority" are extremists.

In truth our Sharia loving visitors seem to be attempting to achieve by immigration what they didn't manage to accomplish through more warfare in previous centuries. The invasion and overthrow of Europe has been a central aim of Islam for over fourteen hundred years.

Poictiershas long since been forgotten, I suppose, along with the re conquests of such places as Sicily and Spain, but most Europeans seem to forget that Muslim armies were at the gates of Vienna and Budapest at the dawn of modern times, or that most of Eastern Europe only became free of Muslim oppression and the threat of further Islamic incursions within the past 200 years.

They are back, and this time they plan to stay.

As Fjordman says:

The Varangian Guard defended Constantinople against other Westerners during the Fourth Crusade in 1204. One of their most prominent members was the future king Harald Hardråde, "Hard-ruler," from 1035, whose story was told by Icelandic poet and historian Snorri Sturluson ca. 1230 in the Heimskringla. Harald participated in a number of battles against Muslims and returned to Norway with great wealth. He wasn't the only one to do so. Large quantities of Byzantine gold coins have been found in Scandinavia. He is most remembered, however, for his invasion of England in 1066 with several hundred longships. Harald Hardråde was killed at the Battle of Stamford Bridge in England on 25 September 1066, a date which is often seen to mark the end of the Viking Age. The victor Harold Godwinson was himself soon defeated by William the Conqueror at the Battle of Hastings the same year. This remarkable story has been immortalized in the beautiful Bayeux Tapestry.

It is interesting to notice, though, that much of the contact that did take place between the Byzantine Empire and north-western Europe at this point happened through backdoor channels like the rivers of Eastern Europe, linking the Baltic Sea to the Black Sea. The Mediterranean was still plagued by Muslim pirates.


Read The whole article here

Friday, 25 April 2008

Persecuting the truth – the silencing of an Icon


At the 1960 obscenity trial of the D H Lawrence novel Lady Chatterley's Lover, the chief prosecutor, Mervyn Griffith-Jones, asked if it were the kind of book "you would wish your wife or servants to read". Griffith- Jones, was much ridiculed for the statement, however, establishment figures such as he, and indeed much of the establishment, have long believed that there are various details which should be kept from the public, because such knowledge might lead them astray.

However, it is an indictment of the times that something else has joined Mellors' unusual uses for daisies in the list of things of which the masses must be kept in ignorance lest it affects their behaviour, and sadly, that thing, is any truth which clashes with the politically correct, multi-culti mantras of our age.

As John of Gwent pointed out in a recent post at the Home of the Green Arrow, organisations such as the UAF (Unite against Freedom) and SearchLite, are so afraid of free speech that they will do anything to silence those who refuse to chant the politically correct lies which they are desperate to present as a form of truth, despite all evidence to the contrary. If they had their way, they would demand that the government, behave like the one party states which are their natural home, and ban parties such as the BNP from speaking out at all


However as the 2006 attempted political trials of Nick Griffin and Mark Collett showed us, Governments face particular problems when they seek to use legislation to punish people for speaking the truth.

This is not the case everywhere and it is not only in Britain where so called “Race hate” legislation is used in attempt to silence those who come too close to revealing the truth and elsewhere in the world the forces of political correctness are having more success. The outrages of the likes of the vicious Canadian Human Rights tribunal in its attempts to stifle all dissent have been well documented elsewhere, however, successful attacks upon free speech can be observed much closer to home, on the other side of the channel for instance.

Right now in France, a one time super star who is also a great lady and a French patriot, is facing yet another in a long string of establishment attempts to silence her from speaking out against the ongoing Islamic colonisation of Europe.

In the last eleven years, the one time French Movie star and word acclaimed sex symbol Brigitte Bardot, who retired from movies in 1973, and who has since worked tirelessly for animal welfare charities, has been sued in the French courts four times on charges of “inciting racial hatred” against Muslims.

In 1997 Bardot was dragged to court on account of an interview she gave to le Figaro and said that France was becoming over-run by "sheep-slaughtering Muslims."

1n 1998 she was again found guilty of incitement, over comments she made about the killing of civilians in Algeria. She had also complained about the growing number of mosques in France, "while our church-bells fall silent for want of priests."

A further conviction followed in June 2000 and resulted from statements she had written in 1999 in a book called "Le Carre de Pluton" (Pluto's Square). Here she complained about sheep slaughter by Muslims. Here she penned a section entitled "Open Letter to my Lost France". She wrote: "my country, France, my homeland, my land is again invaded by an overpopulation of foreigners, especially Muslims."

In 2003 she published a book called "A Scream in the Silence" which landed her in court once again. On June 10, 2004, a French court ruled that she "presents Muslims as barbaric and cruel invaders, responsible for terrorist acts and eager to dominate the French to the extent of wanting to exterminate them."

In the introduction to that book, she wrote "I do not hold religious Muslims in high esteem." She also wrote: "For 20 years we have submitted to a dangerous and uncontrolled underground infiltration. Not only does it fail to give way to our laws and customs. Quite the contrary, as time goes by it tries to impose its own laws on us. We were disturbed by their barbaric practices; we went to court; we condemned their unacceptable behaviour which left homes covered in blood, and filled rubbish chutes with skin, bone and oozing brains. To no avail!"

Given her love of animals it was not surprising that the formidable Mme Bardot railed particularly against the cruelty involved in the sacrifice of sheep at Eid celebrations and the wider issues of Halal slaughter.

However, she also called the 9/11 attackers "monstrous, satanic men" and wrote: "All those 'youths' who terrorise the population, rape young girls, train pit-bulls for attack ... spit on the police -- they are the ones who at the smallest signal from their chiefs will suddenly put us through the same kind of thing that happened in a Moscow theatre." statements which, many of us may view as fair comment.

This month Bardot is back in Court facing a possible prison sentence and a fine of nearly $24,000 on account of a letter she wrote to the current French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, in which she wrote: "I am fed up with being under the thumb of this population which is destroying us, destroying our country and imposing its acts."

The outcome of this, the fifth instalment of the Gallic persecution of one of their few remaining patriots is expected shortly, however, whatever the result I doubt it will force the excellent Mme Bardot to stop speaking her mind, or persuade the authorities to give up their attempts to gag her.

Let us salute Brigitte Bardot, at 73, her once stunning beauty may have long faded, but she retains a beautiful soul and the heart of a lion. Would that there were more like her.

However, let us also not forget that what is being done to Brigitte Bardot in France is exactly what the real fascists in the government funded UAF and SearchLite would love to see happen here, and is exactly what our government would be doing here had home grown heroes such as Nick Griffin and Mark Collett not stood up to them in 2006, and defeated them.

___________

Also posted to The Home of the Green Arrow
Hat Tip: Western Resistance


Thursday, 24 April 2008

Father of 100 recommends contraception


In a wicked parody of the scene on almost every sink estate in this country, 56 year old Mr Ayattu Nure, an Ethiopian who lives in Giwe Abossa village - about 120 miles from Addis Ababa - with his eleven wives and seventy-seven surviving children, blames Ethiopia's government for not doing more to help him ....


Sound scarily like a warning for the future? read more on John of Gwent's blog

“Scholars” Want MECCA to replace Greenwich as the reference point for the world's time


Those who believe that the central goal of Islam is to create a global Caliphate which will eventually conquer and rule the world, certainly appear to have cause to for concern. Many scholars and commentators have chronicled the steady invasion of the UK, Europe and elsewhere by Muslims and the atrocities committed in the name of Islam. A relatively new Muslim movement is to create an internationally enforceable "legal instrument" by which mu slims can stifle any type of free speech, in the Western world, against Islam. Currently Muslims are being encouraged to file lawsuits against anyone they deem to be offensive to Islam often using Human Rights legislation to do the dirty work as in the famous Ezra Levant case.

Many may find the very idea of the supporters of Islam resorting to legislation designed to defend and respect Human Rights laughable, if not hypocritical to the extreme, but then again, the followers of Aisha's elderly husband have never been slow to exploit that which they would otherwise condemn, and many are happy to take advantage of the Western taxpayer's generosity whilst condemning the west and all its works.

Now Islamic "scholars" have decided there is yet another way to implement their Global Caliphate. Insisting that "Mecca is the center of the world's land" they want to change the reference point for world time from Greenwich, England (Greenwich Mean Time) to, where else, but Mecca.

It seems the have even invented the Mecca watch so much do Muslims balk at what they feel is the Western world inflicting Greenwich upon them. (Gosh that must be the first new Muslim invention, interesting new means of torture aside, since 600 AD)

If this were an isolated example, I would perhaps join with the Politically Correct commentators who seek to portray this as little more a cultural issue, but given the long line of examples of Islam seeking to impose itself on the West only a fool could be so naive. For those who continue to keep their heads in the sand and refuse to believe in Muslims desire for world domination I suggest it is now time for such dhimwits to wake up, as the time (GMT or Mecca) for such self delusion may soon be running out.
____________________

Also posted to The Home of the Green Arrow
Hat tip: The Opinionator

Wednesday, 23 April 2008

Congratulations to Beyonce and Jay-Z

I am sure many blog readers would like to join me in wishing the singer Beyonce and her fiance Jay-Z our warmest congratulation following today's announcement of their forthcoming wedding. It is always a delight when a young couple, especially those who are in the public spotlight, resist media pressure and chose to marry within their own race.

I congratulate them and wish them every success and happiness in the future.

Cross postings


Whilst my good friend and fellow blogger the Green Arrow is unwell, over the next week or so I plan to do a number of cross postings both here and at the Home of the Green Arrow, some posts will appear there which may not be posted here, and likewise a number of posts made here will not be posted there.

The reason for this is that the two blogs have different purposes. The primary function of the Home of the Green Arrow is to support the British national Party (BNP), this blog on the other hand has no such defined political purposes, and exists merely as a place where I can express my thoughts, views and feelings.

Although, as I have stated below, I do plan to vote for the BNP in the forthcoming May elections, however, I am not currently a member of the BNP, nor do I share all their official views. I will be voting for the BNP, because, whatever form of words the other parties may choose, none of them will do anything to address the uncontrolled level of mass immigration which Britain is currently experiencing, and which I consider to be the greatest single threat to face our nation.

In a number of other areas I may differ from the BNP, for instance I am more positively inclined towards the European Union than is the official BNP position. My views are also more socially liberal, on issues such as gay rights or censorship than the average BNP voters appear to be.

I am also aware that many on the right are not convinced by the science of man made climate change, whereas I am far more inclined to believe in it, and that it is a huge global threat.

That said, I suspect that I will not be alone amongst ex-New Labour (or Tory) voters who will decide that, give what we are currently facing, the BNP is the only game in town.

As a grown up, I accept that there is no political party with policies which match all my concerns, therefore I have chosen the one which I consider to be the best of those on offer, and will give my support to the BNP because they are the only party which is brave enough to stand up against the most serious threats facing our nation.

However, as a free thinking person,do not be surprised if on this blog I may, from time to time express views which might not find their way into any political manifesto.

The truth behind my vote, and its' not the "Guardian's" truth



An article in yesterday's Guardian dares to contemplate the dread possibility (to Guardian readers) that the British National party (BNP) might achieve some significant electoral gains in the forthcoming local elections, and ponders the reaction of young potential voters to such an outcome, saying:

“London may be heading for a big wake-up call as a poor turnout in the London assembly election next month could lead to the election of its first British National party members. The shockwaves of installing rightwing extremists into the government of a world capital would reflect on the country as a whole, as well as giving the party what it craves - acceptance.

Focusing on the rise of the BNP will help students to face the consequences of political choice within a democracy, as well as giving insight into the workings, impact and implications of extreme political groups. It's an intriguing, if challenging, topic, but with sensitive handling could provide a gritty topical issue, suitable for cross-curricular study in subject areas such as English, history and citizenship.”

The automatic assumption of the writer is that electoral success for the BNP would be a bad thing, that all BNP members are self evidently “bad people” and that anyone voting for the BNP is either bad, or deluded, or both. Of course, most Guardian readers will share this opinion, but when was it that the opinion of a bunch of Highgate liberals and trendy Dalston radicals become a doctrine or an eternally accepted truth?.

Where are the tablets of stone upon which it is written:

“Thou shalt not love thy country”

“Thou shalt value all other customs more highly than thine own”

“Thou must embrace multiculturalism and never morn the loss of thy national identity”

“Thou, thy children and their children's children must welcome all who would come to thy land, no matter what they may bring with them and irrespective of what they may demand upon arrival”

“Any amongst you who fails to to hold the above statements to be sacred truth shall forever be cast as evil, fascist Scumbags, to be shunned by all good man, and in particular the MTV generation”

Although these commandment may be carved into the hearts of many an Islington resident they remain no less than the same form of false propaganda which has been used against dissenting voices and disfavoured groups for centuries.

In Nazi Germany during the 1930's the official view, accepted across the land and taught in schools was that Jews were evil, dishonest and perverted.

Behind the Iron Curtain, prior to 1990, the accepted view was that the West was decadent and warlike.

To this day in many Arab countries any number of lies about the west, about America and Israeli are accepted as proven an unquestionable fact.

The North Koreans are led to believe that everyone who is not North Korean is out to get them.

In Britain and in much of Western Europe the orthodoxy taught to our children is that Nationalism is akin to fascism and thrives on hatred, and that the BNP is a force for evil, and many of them believe it because it is what the thought police tell them they should believe. Are they really any less brainwashed than the most committed member of the Hitler youth or devotees of the Dear leader? and is the doctrine they are being fed any less of a pack of lies?

To quote Yorkielass, a contributor to the Green Arrow Forum "Our entire education system is now based on brainwashing instead of the Hitler youth we now have Common purpose stalking the UKs classroom's."

The orthodox view is that, when, on May 1st, I, for the first time in my life, pick up a pen and place my vote next to the name of the BNP candidates in the Local and mayoral elections my actions will be motivated by hate, whereas nothing could be further from the truth.

I will be voting for the BNP because I love my country, because I love my culture and because so much that I hold dear is under threat to a degree which is almost unprecedented. (Some might say that it is unprecedented, given that, even in 1939, we did not have six million Nazi Germans living amongst us)

As I have said in previous posts, I hate nobody, I wish success, happiness and prosperity to every other race and ethnic group, however, I wish it to them in their own lands.

There is only so much diversity which any nation can take before its very essence and identity is lost and irrevocably so. The British identity and culture is one which has brought incalculable levels of good to our world, and far more than most other cultures have, and I will not stand by and watch its loss without attempting to stop it.

I will be voting BNP, yet I am not evil, I am not a Nazi, I am not deluded and I hate nobody, no matter what the UAF, Search'Lite' or any number of op-ed writers at the Guardian may claim about me.

I will vote BNP because nobody else is listening.


________________

Also posted to The Home of the Green Arrow

Hat tip: Brighton Rock

Lynchings in Congo as penis theft panic hits capital


Police in Congo have arrested 13 suspected sorcerers accused of using black magic to steal or shrink men's penises after a wave of panic and attempted lynchings triggered by the alleged witchcraft. Reports of so-called penis snatching are not uncommon in West Africa, where belief in traditional religions and witchcraft remains widespread, and where ritual killings to obtain blood or body parts still occur.

Rumours of penis theft began circulating last week in Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo's sprawling capital of some 8 million inhabitants. They quickly dominated radio call-in shows, with listeners advised to beware of fellow passengers in communal taxis wearing gold rings.

Purported victims, 14 of whom were also detained by police, claimed that sorcerers simply touched them to make their genitals shrink or disappear, in what some residents said was an attempt to extort cash with the promise of a cure.

"You just have to be accused of that, and people come after you. We've had a number of attempted lynchings. ... You see them covered in marks after being beaten,"

Kinshasa's police chief, Jean-Dieudonne Oleko, told Reuters on Tuesday. Police arrested the accused sorcerers and their victims in an effort to avoid the sort of bloodshed seen in Ghana a decade ago, when 12 suspected penis snatchers were beaten to death by angry mobs. The 27 men have since been released.


Cultural sensitivity



Imagine if you will, a patriotic or cultural parade, march or festival in an Islamic country, you know, one of those affairs where they fire their AK-47s into the air, yelling traditional chants about Jihad and great Satans, whilst a group of their even more zealous brethren promenade along in front of them flagellating themselves, and sometimes each other, until they are all bloody, in the manner Christian monks thought better of in about 1500 AD.

Have you got that jolly little scene fixed in your mind? It shouldn't be too difficult, we see it on TV often enough.

Now imagine that the local authorities demand that they call the march off, because it "might offend" the Christian community, who might go so far as to riot. Can you just imagine what the reaction would be to that?

That is more difficult to imagine, I know, because it just would not happen.

However, when the boot is on the other foot, just guess what happened to the St George's day march in Bradford.

________________________________________________

Also posted to The Home of the Green Arrow

Tuesday, 22 April 2008

And the pantomime goes on


Failed politician poses with housewife super star

At yet another of the unending series of commemorations of the death of Stephen Lawrence

Will they never give it a rest? or will we get a 16th anniversary Commemoration of Stephen's passing, then further commemorations each in perpetuity whilst more and more shrines are built in his memory each year until the whole of South East London is covered in painted glass?

Clearly no other murder victim. at least no white one, will ever be valued as highly by the media and establishment as Stephen Lawrence is. Be assured that if your child is white and he or she is the victim of racial violence, no matter how awful, no politician will ever attend memorial services in their memory, or make speeches about them. If your child is murdered by a person from an ethnic minority, the media and the establishment will immediately seek to bury their memory and deny their suffering, whilst they continue to worship at the shrine of the blessed Stephen. (who may, or may not have been the victim of racial violence)

Remember that in the eyes of the media and the Politicians from most of the main political parties, as a white person, you and your children of of little value in your own land.

Monday, 21 April 2008

News from Bizarro world



Channel four has just finished a three part series of doccumentaries, entitiled "Immigration, the inconvenient truth", focusing on the problems caused by immigration 40 years after Enoch Powell's famous "Rivers of Blood" speech

It was presented by a Somali called Omaar, who was supposed to be presenting the "British" perspective and who spent most of the time talking to people called Ichbal and Ramesh, who were complaining about all the Poles coming in and taking their jobs or second generation West Indians who complained about not being understood in their own country (on account of the Poles you understand).

At least that was what he was doing when he wasn't finding reasons to blame white people for the fact that West Indian boys keep stabbing African boys, and Asian boys keep stabbing everyone.

Mr Omaar then seemed to conclude that immigration was largely Mrs Thatcher's fault, because the 1980's boom resulted in the fact that 30% of City financiers are foreign, and anyway, immigration is the problem we think it is, given that most of the Irish have now gone home, and the Poles are already starting to do the same.

Despite this, he ended the series, with a vision of the future, where the whole workforce became international immigrants, travelling the world following the jobs. A prospect which takes the end of the nation state to a point which even Enoch Powell didn't envisage!

Sigh! I think I need a drink!

Update on the Knoxville murder case

As indicated on the earlier post regarding the murder of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom, in the first of a series of trials Eric Boyd was found guilty last week of being an accessory before the fact and of assisting an offender. Boyd faces up to 15 years in prison when sentenced.

A video of the victims' families reactions to the verdicts can be viewed here I can not start imagine how Chris Newsom's mother could have felt as she acknowledges the degree to which her handsome young son was tortured.

Main trial scheduled for new year


Boyd was only a bit player in this case and four other defendants are expected to stand trial next year, almost two years after the actual killings.

Cruel Allegations in Court

Earlier, during Boyd's trial a witness claimed that Channon had been forced to shoot Christopher, a claim which the media pounced on perhaps as a means of shifting some of the blame onto the victims?

Here Channon's clearly distraught father responds to that claim .

I will update the blog when Boyd is sentenced

The lies of Mayor Livingstone


At another of the never ending string of so called "Anti-Racist" events organised by the current London Mayor Ken Livingstone, (Chairman of the ludicrous UAF) he was asked about the teenage violence that had plagued London in 2007.

The reporter put the following question to the Mayor:

"Are you worried about this recent spate of teenage violence is it something new and alarming?... Tony Blair said, not long ago, that this was a black, cultural thing, do you agree?"


To which the mayor replied:


"There is an element of that, particularly around the drug trade but NO! IT’S A LOT OF WHITE KIDS STABBING OTHER WHITE KIDS!"

That is as a blatant Lie! and Livingstone knows it is a lie

(And here he is telling it)

video


According to the honorable Mayor of London these are "white kids stabbed by white kids"


(Faces of the teenagers murdered in London in 2007)

In fact three of the 26 teen aged murder victims in London during 2007 were white, however, all the murderers and suspected murderers are non white.

Again Ken Livingstone shows as that political correctness and the truth are not the same thing.

If Ken will lie so blatantly about something as important as the murders of young children, what will he not lie about?

Already in 2008 more teenagers are being killed on our streets, and the 2007 patten is continuing, and it will continue until our politicians start to tell the truth.



Hat tip: UK Tabloid

Sunday, 20 April 2008

A man of whom we know so little


This video raises some interesting and troubling questions about would be US Democratic presidential candidate Barack Hussein Obama and I recommend it to anyone who is not totally convinced by the hype about affirmatively assisted rise of the ambitions senator from Illinois.

Clearly anyone can string a number of disconnected facts, ill worded statements and unusual, if not to say unfortunate, associations together and make an unflattering video. However, when there are so many troubling facts and largely unasked questions, one has to ask if we should be so ready to trust what we are being sold.

Obama has a better than one in three chance of becoming the next President of the USA, the most powerful man in the world, and someone who will impact on all our lives, is it not time that he is asked the tough questions which a white candidate would have had to answer a year ago?

Saturday, 19 April 2008

The hoary old stereotype sold to us as "New"


It's the same image we see over and over again in magazines, in TV adverts and in so many different situations, the mixed race couple which is always, always, always a black male and a white female (BM/WF), but almost never the other way round. I wonder why.

Frequently they will go out of their way to pick the blackest man they can find, and pair him with the blondest woman, so they are clearly making a statement, but it is the same one they have been making for almost two generations

Incredibly they still attempt to portray it as somehow, fashionable, trendy and new. NEW? Give me a break! The BM/WF combo is becoming almost the oldest racial stereotype in the book, it has been around for decades, and is probably older than a lot of the people reading this blog (it is older than the one writing it). Lets not forget that it was Sidney Pottier who was taken home for dinner in 1967, not Dorothy Dandridge, and that was deliberate.

Yet still the young and impressionable fall for it. Young girls are not genetically more stupid and easily led than young boys, but it is they who tend to end up as women living in poverty as single mothers raising a disproportionately high number of mixed race children, if they have not suffered an even worse fate.

I am sure anyone living in Britain has seen the series of adverts encouraging people to become teachers, including the one with the white girl holding hands with a black boy, with the commentary which says something to the effect that children are free thinking beings who don't think the way they are supposed to think. What a joke, what a lie! by snogging a black man the poor deluded little twit is doing exactly what her teachers, the TV and the magazines she reads have been telling her what to do and what to think.

The wannabe opinion formers have been trying to sell this hoary old combo as modern and cutting edge for over 40 years now. When they first started Enoch Powell was still thought of as a potential future Prime minister, TV came in two channels, both black and white, Ronnie and Reggie ran the East End and Vesta beef curry was considered exotic and sophisticated, surely there comes a point when something ceases to be innovative and becomes a failed and discredited dogma.

However, this dogma only preaches a single orthodoxy, and in all those years, the number of instances where the unending bombardment of images of interracial sex appearing in the media have included a white man and a black woman have been negligible. In fact I suspect that most of us would be hard pressed to think of a handful, other than those involving poor old Boris Becker

So why is this? Why does it only go one way?, if interracial sex is a good thing, why is it so seldom promoted between black women and white men, and why is that on those rare occasions where an ad agency generated mixed race couples is made up of a white man and a black woman they are invariably selling organic tomatoes or lounge furniture, never anything romantic, or, perish the thought, erotic.

Why is that, and what is the difference?

After some consideration I have come to the conclusion that there are at least two main reasons why the cheerleaders for interracial coupling are so much fonder of the black man/white woman combo than they are of the virtual taboo of depicting interaction between black women and white men.

Firstly, the PC brigade view BM/WF images as “provocative”, they know that pictures of white women with black men, piss off quite a number of white men, which, from the perspective of the PC marketeers is just fine, in fact they probably view pissing off white men to be a bonus. However, by the same token, pictures of black women with white men really piss off black men, (I mean REALLY) and no guardian of the multicoloured flame would ever intentionally piss off a black person.

More importantly, any public acknowledgement that blacks or Asian men might object to “their” women mixing with other races, would not support the cause of diversity, so why risk it?.

Objections from white men can be easily dismissed as “more evil white racism”, and even sighted as a reason why race mixing should be encouraged. Objections from blacks or Asians, however, could not be dismissed in the same manner, without admitting that, what they call racism, exists in all communities, not just amongst those nasty whites.

The cowardice of our enemies is exposed by the fact that they seek to provoke only safe white discomfort, but not the more dangerous kind. The Single Muslim dating site Singlemuslim.com used to be promoted by an advert featuring a grinning Asian man and a smug looking white woman in a hijab. I imagine the ad agency trendsetter who came up with that idea considered it to be brave and provocative, however, it was not that brave.


Imagine the howls of fury they would have provoked from amongst the ranks of the bearded and perpetually offended had the advert featured an Asian woman and a white male convert to Islam?. Now that would be brave and provocative, it would also be educational.

Again, as in so much else, what is presented as “diversity” is no such thing, it is a new set of rules, and those rules only go one way. A mixed race society is supposed to be the panacea for the alleged evils of racism, but whenever a torch is shone too brightly on the xenophobia and racism within the non-white community, it is invariably far more violent, bigoted and visceral than that exhibited by the whites. As the multicultural marketeers have not yet resolved that dilemma, they choose not shine their torches on it or provoke unwanted displays of real life diversity.

A second reason behind the favoured race and gender stereotypes is, I believe, a darker one, with its roots in a sexism and racism, the full implications of which those promoting it may not even fully understand, or at least they would deny it if confronted with it. However, at its heart it symbolises invasion.

Over the centuries, invading armies have habitually sought to possess, ravage and despoil the enemy's womenfolk, as a means of humiliating and breaking an adversary or celebrating a victory over him. This may sound far fetched, but just look around at the various conflicts which are happening at the moment, such as in Sudan, Uganda and the Democratic Republic of Congo, in all of these horrors the invading armies invariably target the indigenous tribe's womenfolk. Rape has become a weapon of war, however, it is not just the act of rape which makes it such and effective and popular weapon, it is the psychology behind it which is so devastating.

I am not suggesting that all depictions of interracial sex is meant to symbolise rape, as such, the symbolism is more subtle than that. However, it amounts to something very similar to the manner in which armies use the subjugation of their enemies' woman as a means of achieving their war aims, and its motives are not dissimilar.

Although the balance of power may be more ambivalent in the Albion household, in general the act of sex between a man and a woman involves the submission of the female to the dominant male, which is why some feminists claim that, when it occurs in isolation from the affection and tenderness, which makes it an act of love, it becomes an expression of power, in which, in the symbolism at least, the man is the most powerful.



This, I think, is why the advocates of racial mixing are far less comfortable with the image a white male and a black woman, than they are with the reverse. What they are presenting is dominant blackness and submissive whiteness, and exploiting not only racial stereotypes but also gender in a manner which, as a woman, I actually find quite offensive.

However, the subliminal message is an offensive one, and it is meant to be. Why else are they so reluctant to present mixed race couples as anything other than a black male and a white female if they do not view it in terms of invasion and possession, which, as we know, they only approve of when it is blacks doing it to whites.

Make no mistake the promotion of interacial sex is an act of aggression, and is used as such by our media in the ongoing propaganda war against the integrity of our nation and our future as a race.

Sunday, 13 April 2008

The folly of optimism


From the reconstructed "South Africa Sucks"


Zimbabwe today South Africa tomorrow

The events that have unfolded north of the Limpopo in Zimbabwe during the past couple weeks portend an ominous future for South Africa. Robert Mugabe faces the gravest challenge to his twenty-eight year misrule. Consequently, Mugabe has employed the customary measures other African leaders employ whenever they are in a bind, which is to find a successful minority scapegoat, vilify and dehumanize it, and then steal from it and annihilate it. Mugabe has decided to scapegoat the remaining white farmers in Zimbabwe by launching farm invasions as he did in 2000. Mugabe will assuredly remain in power until the day he dies regardless of the words emanating from London, Washington, and Canberra.

Continues here

I particularly recommend the second video down which is a 1994 report by the eternally gullible Dan Rather from South Africa which is so afflicted with false optimism that it would be hilarious if it was not so tragically sad.

Saturday, 12 April 2008

The lost boys




In his latest election broadcast earlier this week, Liberal Democrat London mayoral candidate Brian Paddick joined a long line of politicians and dug up the 15 year old corpse of Stephen Lawrence to use as a totem to support his political ambitions. By doing so, Paddick has succeeded in winning the rather dubious endorsement of Lawrence's “best friend" Duwayne Brooks who was showering Brian with praise in Wednesday's Evening Standard. This, following Stephen's mother Doreen Laurence's recent intervention on behalf of her old chum Ken Livingstone was evidence enough, if such were needed, that the Lawrence industry still retains significant grip on the balls of British politics.

Whilst watching the pantomime, I was reminded of another lost boy, but one who's name seldom if ever crosses the lips of and mainstream politician or Media pundit. A boy with a shy, but compelling, smile a loving family, and a life time of possibilities ahead of him, and one who, unlike Stephen Lawrence, has been proven by a court of law, to have been the actual victim of a brutal racially motivated murder.

The boy I was reminded of was one whom the media would prefer we did not mention, who's family do not have our nations leaders' private numbers on speed-dial, and who's tragic loss, although an embarrassment to those who wish to form our opinions, far more accurately sums up the truth about racial violence in this country, than does much exploited death of Stephen Lawrence.

That boy is Kriss Donald

Kriss Donald died on a cold March day in 2004, on a patch of waste ground, near a walkway, behind Celtic Supporters club in the Pollockshields area of Glasgow, and his last hours on this earth were not kind ones.

As was later described in court, this defenceless, slightly built, 15 year old schoolboy experienced extreme terror and pain, before his young life was snuffed out by the violent men who had randomly selected him the victim of their ugly racial hatred.

It was Kriss' fatal bad luck that he innocently crossed the path of racially motivated Asian killers Daanish Zahid, Imran Shahid, Zeeshan Shahid, Mohammed Mustaq, and their accomplice Zahid Mohammed (who later told the court that, seeing revenge for some earlier slight by a white person, the gang of thugs drove around the area looking for anyone young and white in order to "chop them up and take their eyes out and stab them"). Kriss was out walking with his friend Jamie Wallace, when a group of Asians leapt out of a Mercedes, attacked them both, dragged Kris into the car, and drove off. As Jamie escaped, he heard one the kidnappers say. "You'll be next".

As he was being driven away, Kriss, who was a mere child, was heard to call out “what have I done? I'm only 15!” and we can only imagine the terror that 15 year old youngster experienced whilst held captive, and presumably threatened and abused, over the following hours while he was taken on a 200 mile journey before being brought back to Glasgow. When his assailants were unable to find a suitable house to take him to, they pulled up on waste land where they would take his life. Dragging their slight and terrified prey out of the car, Kriss's killers beat him, causing internal injuries, including damaged organs and at least one smashed rib, before holding him over a log and stabbing him 13 times, dousing him with petrol, and then whilst he was still alive set him alight before leaving him to burn to death.

Kriss died a terrible death, apart from the internal injuries and stab wounds, his young body suffered 70% burns, and for no reason other than because he was white. It has been established beyond question that Kriss was an entirely innocent victim, chosen randomly because of the colour of his skin.

The racial motive was made quite clear in court when Advocate deputy, Mark Stewart, asked Mohammed, if it was it an Asian boy, a Chinese boy, a black boy they sought? Mohammed replied "A white boy".

Kriss Donald's death must rank as one of the most brutal in recent years, albeit certainly not the only one of its type . However, one other thing which makes Kriss's murder stand out is the muted and begrudging reaction it caused amongst the media and politicians. If we feel contempt and revulsion for Kriss's killers, what should we feel for elected politicians such as Gordon Jackson, the Member of the Scottish Parliament with responsibility for the area where Kriss was killed if he, as is alleged, sought to belittle the seriousness of the event by commenting that young men got into "bother" from time to time in every city.

The media is no different in it's indifference to white male victims, it has been mentioned before, but if you go to the BBC news web site and put the name of Kriss Donald, the victim of one of the most brutal, and sadistic race hate crimes to have occurred in Britain in recent decades, into the search engine, you will get a total of 4 results, put in the name of Stephen Lawrence, and you will get 122.

So silent has the media been about the killing of Kris Donald, that in all likelihood were you to ask ten randomly chosen members of the public who he was, you would be lucky if one out of the ten had ever heard of him. Yet ask the same ten who the most famous victim of racial violence in the UK, and almost certainly they will all say Stephen Lawrence.

However, let us be clear, apart from a coroner's jury, no court of law has ever found that Stephen Lawrence was killed by racially motivated whites. That Lawrence was the victim of a racist murder is mainly the verdict of the media, a bunch of politicians and the usual suspects in the race industry. They may claim it is true, because they say it is, but that is not the way justice works in this, or any other civilised country. Under British justice a person remains innocent until proven guilty, whatever Billy Bragg, Ken Livingstone or the editor of the Daily mail may think.

The verdict of an inquest jury is compelling, but, in law, it does not constitute a finding of guilt, and in the knowledge that their verdict will not convict, inquest juries have been known to arrive at some unusual and crowd pleasing decisions.

Likewise a newspaper headlines declaring “Murderers” may be dramatic, but they prove only that the Daily Mail wants to sell more copies. The Mail was particularly dishonest when they published the suspect photos under the headline, “Murderers” followed by the line “sue us if we are wrong”, given that even the most innocent would need at least a £1million in the bank before they could even to think about suing a newspaper.



I hold no brief for the five men accused of murdering Stephen Lawrence, they may well be guilty, and they certainly do not seem very pleasant people. However, under British law being unpleasant is not evidence of guilt. Various trials and a private prosecution have failed to achieve a conviction and, even though the government gone so far as to abandon the double jeopardy protection we have had since Magna Carter (almost certainly with this case in mind) the verdict of racially motivated homicide remains nothing more that an allegation.

This is not so, in the case of Kriss Donald where that verdict of racially aggrivated murder was proven beyond reasonable doubt. Yet it is the alleged crime, not the proven one which is used to define racial violence in this country. Why could this be? Let us consider the possibilities:

Cases often gain more notoriety because of the brutality involved, however, in this again the Lawrence murder does not even compare to the Donald killing in terms of the savagery involved. All accounts of the attack on Stephen Lawrence describe a swift and sudden attack, involving two fatal stab wounds, which was over very quickly. All three witnesses at the bus stop at the time of the alleged attack said in statements that it was sudden and short; none was later able to identify any of the suspects.

All murders are awful acts of barbarity, and nobody deserves to die, however, in terms of the cruelty of the act, Stephen's murder was over in moments, whilst Kriss's killing dragged on over hours and involved horrific suffering and torture.

Yet it is Stephen, not Kriss who is granted premier victim status, it is Stephen's family who receive the honours it is to Stephen for whom the shrines are built and it is the memory of Stephen Lawrence our cynical politicians evoke when they want to become elected.

The Murder of Stephen Lawrence resulted in national soul searching, countless enquiries and reports, not to mentions allegations of so called institutional racism (a condition probably best defined as being slightly more suspicious of black people because of their disproportionate involvement in crime) and the expenditure of many £millions of public money.

Meanwhile the name of Kriss Donald fades from the public conciousness.

Some might try to argue that it is the unsolved nature of the Lawrence case and indeed the acquittals which makes it a cause célèbre, but that can not stand up to scrutiny, given the number of other unsolved inter-racial murders there have been, or those with unexpected acquittals, such as in the case of 19 year old Terry Gregory who was murdered in Woolwich in 2003, for the crime of picking up a brolly, full details of which can be read, together very detailed accounts of race crime and race criminals in Britain over the last few decades on the excellent I am an Englishman blog.

No, Stephen Lawrence did not become the most famous British murder victim since Earl Mountbatten merely because his murder is unsolved, and politicians do not worship the shrine of St Stephen or grovel at the feet of the blessed Doreen because the cases against those accused of killing her son kept collapsing

The Lawrence case became the phenomenon it did for no other reason than the fact that he fitted the requisite profile of a politically correct race crime victim and his alleged killers were the media's wet dream stereotype white racist thugs. To put it another way, those accused of killing Lawrence are “Perfect offenders” ,to quote African American Duke University professor Wahneema Lubiano in relation to the wrongly charged, and very white, defendants in the Duke lacrosse false rape case which got PC America's knickers in such a twist in 2006 until they were exonerated the following year.

There are marked similarities between the way the UK media use the Stephen Lawrence case and the US media tried to use the Duke lacrosse case, until that pesky little word “innocent” spoilt all their fun, and the truth had nothing to do with it.

The murder of Kriss Donald on the other hand reveals a truth which those who shout most loudly about racial violence do not wish to admit, hence it is a case they try to hide and hope we will forget.

The truth which innocent young Kriss's murder exposes is the all too often the victims of race hate crimes are the young white males whom it is so fashionable to portray as villainous racists whilst the main perpetrators are those whom the community cohesion monitors would have us believe are the eternal victims.

It was not white Englishmen who tore a frightened 15 year old child from his friends and his loving family, it was Asian immigrants who did that and who put him through hours of terror and inflicted tortures on his young body which we can only start to imagine. To satisfy their hatred, his future was stolen, Kriss will never become a lover, a husband, a father, a grandfather or anything else that shyly handsome innocent young boy ever dreamed of or hoped to be, and they did it to him for no other reason than that he was white.

We must not allow the lies of political correctness to hide that truth, or as importantly, ever cause us ever to forget Kriss Donald.

___________

Hat Tip: I am an Englishman

Friday, 11 April 2008

Thought for the day


The fact that evil men oppose what we do does not necessarily mean that what we do is wrong.

Graphic details emerge in Christian-Newsom killings

The first of the trials of those alleged to have been involved in the brutal racist 2007 murder of 21 year old University of Tennessee student Channon Christian and her 23-year-old boyfriend, Christopher Newsom and already gruesome details are emerging which suggest that the early stories relating to the horrors involved in the murder the US media is trying to suppress, were not as far fetched as the defenders of diversity attempted to claim they were.

It appears after Channon Christian was gang-raped, choked and bound she was stuffed inside a trash can while still alive, a federal prosecutor told jurors in opening court statements today.

“The evidence will be when she went into that trash can, she was alive,” Assistant U.S. Attorney David Jennings said this afternoon in U.S. District Court. “Probably, mercifully, Channon Christian died (later that evening).”

Jennings revealed details about the killings of Christian and her 23-year-old boyfriend, Christopher Newsom, as a jury was seated in the trial of Eric Dewayne “E” Boyd.

Boyd is charged with helping hide out Lemaricus “Slim” Davidson, the alleged ringleader in the carjacking and killing of Christian and Newsom. Jennings also told jurors that Newsom, who had been raped by his assailants, was shot three times.

“These people tie him up, gag him, wrap him in cloth material … shot him in the back, shot him in the neck, and they shot a kill shot to his head. Then, his body was doused with gasoline and set on fire.” (we must pray that, unlike Channon, and unlike Kris Donald the British victim of a similarly brutal racist murder , Chris Newsom was in a kinder place before this final part of his awful ordeal began)

Christian’s body was later found in a trash can in a house on Chipman Street. Newsom’s body was found nearby along railroad tracks.

Further details of the opening of the case can be read here on a local Knoxville news site, the story has, so far only been reported locally, while the main US news channels studiously seek to ignore it.

Although the vicious killing of these two young people occurred in America, the manner in which the news souses in the USA are seeking to limit of all coverage of it has marked similarity to the activities of the Community cohesion censors ion the UK. Therefore, I plan to provide updates on this, and on similar cases in future.

Update: Eric Boyd was found guilty of being an accessory in this case on the April 16th, after the jury had deliberated for five hours. Boyd was not charged in connection with the actual murders, for which four other defendants will stand trial next year.

Hat Tip: Newsnet14

The silencing begins?






Google has deleted the blog Why South Africa Sucks, apparently for a Terms of Service violation.

Why South Africa Sucks was one of the largest blogs defending the rights of those of European origin on the web and had received more than 1 million hits.

The blog authors have temporarily set up an alternative blog. Here is the link to the new blog. http://southafricanhell.blogspot.com/ Why South Africa Sucks was an irreverent and spiky blog which often ventured very close to the edge. All of us who run blogs, sign up to Google's Terms of Service, and I certainly seek to respect them.

However, there are very many edgy blogs out there and we can only wonder whether a blog addressing the plight of any other minority suffering at the hand of a oppressive and racist government would be treated in the same way.

Wednesday, 9 April 2008

The failed policies of the Keborian Candidates



Labour politicians and activists have recently been instructed not to refer to the Tory candidate for London mayor by the the single name Boris, which they feel confers an undeserved celebrity status on the ebullient Boris Johnson. I am not sure whether they are right about the celebrity status, however, the three, so called “main” candidates for the role of London Mayor have policies and attitudes which are so similar on some of the most serious issues currently facing London, and indeed the whole of Britain, that, having so little to distinguish between them, that we might as well refer to these policy clones by a single word or name.

Yes, like you I can think of several very fitting names for them, however for family friendly purposes I shall stick to the composite of their names and call them Keborian. After all, it would save so much time and news print, instead of having to repeat over and over again, “Ken shared Boris's policy on...” “Boris agreed with Ken on ...” and “'Me too' said Brian” they could just say:

Keborian want an amnesty for illegal immigrants

Keborian attack the BNP

Keborian will be mayor for all of London says Keborian

or, even more fittingly:

Keborian has nothing to offer me, anyone else who cares about the embattled indigenous population of London, or anyone who is concerned about the uncontrolled levels of murder and violent crime committed by immigrant gangs.

A vote for Keborian is a wasted vote for anyone worried about the growing threat from militant Islam, and the progressive erosion of free speech, and indeed the erosion of freedom itself.

A vote for Keborian is a vote for more of the same, and more of the same is what has bought us to the state we are in. It has brought us to the point where our national and ethnic culture is being smothered by an alien invasion we were never given the chance to vote for, or against, and where our very chances of surviving into the next century as a distinguishable race is actually under threat.

Keborian holds the view that opposition to uncontrolled non-European immigration is racism and that love of ones' people is an act of hate

What Keborian stand for is the discredited claim that uncontrolled immigration (and seemingly even illegal immigration) is beneficial, and for the belief that the white European race, alone amongst all other races, must be denied the right to be proud of our race, to love our people or seek to protect our unique and vibrant culture.

Keborian stands for the politics of a sad and mad yesterday, not of a tomorrow which offers us any hope.

However, I have hope, and for that reason in three weeks time I will do something which, even two years ago, would have been inconceivable to me, on the 1st of May 2008, I shall vote for the British National party in the London election, and I shall also vote for the BNP mayoral candidate Richard Barnbrook as my first preference for the role of London mayor. I will do so because I can see no other option, as it is quite evident none of the other candidates, and none of the main parties will address the most serious issue currently facing London, Britain and indeed Europe as a whole.

I hope that others will at last see through the failed policies and aspirations of the Keborian candidates and do the same.

Tuesday, 8 April 2008

The threat facing Europe

A Norwegian calling himself Fjordman has written a fantastic article for the Brussels journal regarding the threat currently facing Europe and the suggestion of creating a movement aimed at preserving the indigenous people of Europe.

Speaking of the ongoing Islamic Colonisation of Europe Fjordman says "The next time EU leaders complain about China's treatment of minorities, I suggest the Chinese answer the following: "Yes, we represent an anti-democratic organization dedicated to subduing the indigenous people of Tibet, but you represent an anti-democratic organization dedicated to displacing the indigenous peoples of an entire continent." There is no love lost between me and the Chinese Communist Party, an organization responsible for the deaths of tens of millions of its citizens, but even Chinese authorities do not actively seek to displace their own people with violent Muslims. European authorities do.

In decadent societies of the past, the authorities didn't open the gates to hostile nations and ban opposition to this as intolerance and barbarophobia. What we are dealing with in the modern West is not merely decadence; it's one of the greatest betrayals in history. Our so-called leaders pass laws banning the opposition to our dispossession as "racism and hate speech." To native Europeans, when listening to our media and our leaders, it's as if we don't even exist, as if it were normal for them to put the interests of other nations over their own. Despite having "democratic" governments, many Western countries have authorities that are more hostile to their own people than dictators in some developing countries. Why?"
You can read more here

I urge everyone who is concerned about the future of our race and our continent to read Fjordman's article and circulate it as widely as possible.

Sunday, 6 April 2008

Comments worth repeating

Although I don't consider myself a "conservative" in the traditional sense, I read this on the "Why South Africa Sucks" blog this morning. I liked it so I thought I'd include a link to it.


The thing I like best about being a conservative is that I don't have to lie. I don't have to pretend that men and women are the same. I don't have to declare that failed or oppressive cultures are as good as mine. I don't have to say that everyone's special or that the rich cause poverty or that all religions are a path to God. I don't have to claim that a bad writer like Alice Walker is a good one or that a good writer like Toni Morrison is a great one. I don't have to pretend that Islam means peace.

Read the rest here

NOTE
I am afraid that since I posted this message the "Why South Africa Sucks" blog has been deleted, more details and a new link are available here but I am afraid the rest of the post I was quoting from is no longer available.

That one line is still a good one though.

Saturday, 5 April 2008

Politically Correct Racism (BBC Approved)



Well! it seems that our politically correct friends at the BBC, and numerous other news and media organisations, have given us permission to hate the Poles, and to a slightly lesser extent, other immigrants from the various, previously Eastern block, European countries who gained access to the UK, and some other EU employment markets, in 2004 and 2007.

How else do you explain the fact that, in the last couple of years, whenever, there is a negative story about Immigration, such as the recent Lords report on the minimal benefit immigrants have brought to Britain, contrary to Government claims, we are immediately presented with images of white, Slavic, faces queuing up for work, Polish shops in the East End of London, or little white Lithuanian Children arriving at over stretched schools in Crewe or Exeter.

Strangely absent are the gangs of Asian, or black, men, not queuing for work, but just hanging around street corners, Asian shops and curry houses or any film from the growing number of schools where the faces of one or two white children peer out from amongst a sea of hijabs.

Of course, there is no mystery to this omission, the BBC is still the politically correct monolith it always was, and it, therefore, remains forbidden to focus on any of the negative effects of immigration from the non-European world. Immigrants from Africa, Arabia the Caribbean and Asia continue to be a protected and untouchable group, who, it must be regularly demonstrated have enriched and benefited our society.

Poles on the other hand are fair game.

It is the 2004 and 2007 EU accession countries' bad luck that they joined the EU at just about the same time as the monstrous multicultural experiment which various European governments, especially our own, have been conducted for the last 40 years, began to expose itself as the terrible and destructive mistake it has been. Whereas public concerns over earlier influxes of immigrants could once have been dismissed as racism, even when Spain, Greece and Portugal joined the EU in the 1980's, by the early 2000's such an argument was becoming harder to sustain, and the supporters of mass migration realised they needed some new camouflage.

It was, therefore, also the immigrants from the Eastern European accession countries bad luck that they happened to be white.

To the politically correct opinion formers in our press, amongst our leaders, and on our TV, anti-white racism is far more acceptable than the fabled anti-black form, in fact one could go so far as to say amongst some of them it is mandatory. For them, immigrants from Eastern European arrived in the nick of time, and provided the opportunity to divert attention from the fact that their dream of diversity was turning into a nightmare.

"Yes” they cried as one “there is a problem with immigration ... but only with white immigrants”.

The powers who like to control what the public think realised that the unprecedented levels of immigration had begun to alarm the public. However, they were certainly not about to let anyone suggest that arrivals from places such as Somalia, Nigeria, Jamaica, Algeria or Pakistan brought anything other than a welcome enrichment to our shores. Therefore, like the Ancient Roman emperors threw Christian to the lions in their arena, to keep the citizens entertained (and divert attention from their own excesses), the guardians of the multi coloured flame have thrown us a few white Polish plumbers and pale skinned Lithuanian builders to distract us from the realities of their multi racial project.

Of course, many of the cowed and easily controlled amongst us, having been taught from the cradle that to question the rightness of third world immigration, or to suggest that anyone who's skin is darker than our own is anything other than a welcome and valued addition to our community was a crime akin to murder, paedophilia or rape, have fallen for the Guardian's trick and turned on the Baltic scapegoats. For the more easily led Britons, the new immigrants from Eastern Europe are a group upon whom they could blame their anxieties, without the sense of guilt which years of indoctrination would have made them feel, had Poles come in darker shades.

Just as positive images of non-European immigrants abound in our newspapers and on our TV screens, hardly a week goes by without a negative story appearing about European immigrants.

“Poles sending £1.8 billion home” scream the headlines, well, maybe they are, however, even if true, that is just a smokescreen, being used to hide a far larger problem. Does anyone really believe that the Poles are the only ones sending part of their earnings home to their families. Type the words “sending money home” into a Google search engine and you get over 42 million options and not many of them are in Polish.

Of course every other immigrant group is doing the same thing and sending money to their home countries. However, it is only when the Poles do it that it hits the headlines, why should that be?.

I will tell you why, they dare not admit that what the Eastern Europeans send home is a pittance compared to the sums actually leaving the country. If the Polish community can send home $1.8 billion, from their wages as plumbers, builders and cleaners, how much more do you think the Asian doctors, shopkeepers, businessmen, and multiple property owning landlords are sending back? And there are at least five times as many of them as there are Poles.

I know that many of those who read the Home of the Green Arrow and Sarah Maid of Albion blogs are sceptical about Europe, and don't get me wrong, I accept that there are problems with the EU and with the levels of Eastern European immigration we have experienced.

However, unlike other groups of immigrants, who import their own unique problems to our country, the main problem with eastern Europeans is not what they bring, it is the manner in which cynical politicians and businessmen are exploiting them in order to exploit and control the home grown working classes. Because of cheap Eastern European immigration, there are many communities in this country forced to survive on a derisory minimum wage, unable to do anything about it because they know that, if they complain they will be swept away by a further tide of immigrants, happy to work for even less than they are earning.

However, the wrong doers in that respect are not the Eastern Europeans, it is with the politicians and cheapskate businessmen who, when they are not outsourcing to India, are using cheap European labour to keep wages down and profits up.

Be in no doubt that, in ten of fifteen years, when the current group of Eastern Europeans have decided that they deserve a living wage and a home they can afford without having to share with four other couples, the same people now telling us how lazy the English are and how desperately we need Eastern European immigrants, will be arguing in favour of increased immigration from Kyrgyzstan and Uzbekistan, to do the jobs (at the wages) which the (lazy) Bulgarians will no longer do.

Using immigration in a cynical attempt to keep wages unnaturally low is certainly wrong, but the Eastern Europeans are the victims of that wrong, in the same way as they are the victims of the media's current efforts to make white Europeans take the blame for the problems caused by mass third world immigration.

There needs to be curbs on the number of immigrants entering this country, including those from Eastern Europe, and I am certainly not arguing in favour of uncontrolled immigration from Europe or anywhere else.

However, whatever ones views on the European Union, let us be fair about our European cousins, and let us not allow them to be used to disguise the real threats to our communities and our way of life.

It is not Eastern Europeans who are grooming, raping and exploiting under-aged white girls in cities across Britain.

Eastern Europeans are none of the main players behind the drugs trade blighting the lives of so many of out young people, nor are they amongst the gangs terrorising, mugging and steaming in our inner cities.

The ever rising numbers of gang rapes are not being committed Eastern Europeans (or any Europeans apparently)

Scotland yard has not yet had to set up a special task force to address gun crime in the Polish, Czech or Hungarian communities, and those communities are not behind the growing numbers of murders on out streets.

Eastern Europeans have not brought mass death and terror to our beloved land, neither are they currently living amongst us whilst plotting further mass casualty outrages

Long eradicated diseases are not being reintroduced into our country by Eastern Europeans, nor are eastern Europeans importing bushmeat, superstition and barbaric traditions into our land.

Eastern Europeans are not demanding that we change our culture and laws to suit them, they are not insisting in the right to torture animals to death or wear masks when teaching or children.

Indeed, apart from accepting low paid work and talking loudly into mobile phones, the Eastern Europeans are certainly amongst the least objectionable of the new arrivals on our shores, and we have far more in common with them. We share a common ethnicity and a common heritage with our European cousins, and, as the third world and Islam march towards us, we share a common threat.

I hope that this article will not alienate many of my readers, I wrote it knowing I might unfortunately offend some. Although I am personally not a so called “Euro-sceptic” I respect the right of those who are to have that view. However, I felt it was important to highlight the racism and cynicism of many, in organisations such as the BBC, who are prepared to victimise, and even provoke hatred towards white Europeans whilst claiming the mantle of multiculturalism for themselves.

Many may not like the numbers of Eastern Europeans coming to Britain seeking work, but, even the staunchest of Euro sceptics must surely acknowledge they are a minor problem, when compared to the alien invasion currently overwhelming our native land. The next time the BBC start a news item about immigration with pictures of Polish shops and Bulgarian fruit pickers, do not be fooled, they are merely putting up a white smokescreen to hide the dark forces which really threaten us.