Thursday, 20 January 2011

Acts of War - part 2

By Mister Fox

The American pastor Terry Jones who recently threatened to burn a copy of the Koran has been banned from Britain. A Home Office spokesperson said the government opposes extremism in all its forms. This is a lie because there was a covenant between the British government and Muslim terrorists as I will show. They claim to believe in freedom of speech and democracy but only if you say and think what they want you to. If you think for yourself or dissent you will be oppressed by he state.

The term “racism” is used to pathologise people who oppose being pushed out of their communities by the masses of immigrants the elites are importing. It implies there is something wrong in our minds. It is as if we have caught a disease and they must stop it spreading. They use pejoratives to put us in quarantine, to keep others away from us and contain the spread of something considered dangerous. They are now investigating 3-year olds for signs of this illness developing. (1). They want to know how it we caught it and they warn others to take precautions against catching it.

The elites use words ideologically and label people as haters, racists – use words as weapons. They give opponents a bad name like warning people of a dog that bites so no one will touch it.

They have conflated hatred with prudence. If one does not want too many immigrants in they are accused of hating them. If you object to masses of foreigners immigrating they say its because you are xenophobic. This is to suggest you are some horrible person who hates them all. This cows people and instead of parents using their traditional inherited prejudices to warn their children to keep away from ethnic minorities in the wake of widespread Muslim gang rapes of young girls they condition them to think the ethics are all nice and benefiting their lives.

People should realise these definitions like “racist”, “xenophobe” or “hater” are not some objective truth but ideologically-loaded words coined by interest groups to get people to surrender to immigrants who are being used to undercut the wages of indigenous people and make the elites feel morally superior even though they themselves live apart from it. It works like a censor in the head to stop certain natural thoughts and behaviour traits. The term “racism” is used by people to control us or to silence our objections to being pushed out of our communities. It was made up by somebody.

The “experts” and Establishment intellectuals describe the violated girls as vulnerable to shift the focus on to the victims instead of the perpetrators - to exonerate Muslims; but these rapes of young girls are attacks on them, not self-inflicted. The focus must be kept on the attackers and not let the duplicitous elites pass it from their pets to raped young girls.

It is an indictment on us as a whole that these young girls are out wandering around and not being protected.

In a recent essay I referred to the academics who changed our ethnocentrism to other centrism: the shift of focus from ourselves to looking up to other ethnic groups and immigrants as bearers of virtue and cultural enrichment who are improving our lives or coming to look after us. This is at the root of this Act of War because to Muslims we are “other” or the “out group”. They dehumanise us with terms like infidel and kuffar.

These abuses would not happen if we had retained our traditional prejudices against foreigners and if we asserted ourselves. Instead all we have is girly and corrupt elites covering up for the alien child-rapists. Once this came out after years of covering it up the elites immediately started trying to deceive us by talking it away and trying to say “Whites" are as bad when this is actually ethnic guerrilla war on our communities by a rival community.

We have to work on regaining our confidence and value our selves, our culture, history and traditions not apologise to outsiders. Our customs, notions of right and wrong were inherited and passed down as moral guidance by the parents but have been taken out of their hands by the state. Where the parents should be advising their children to keep away from ethnics the schools are telling them to mix with them and there lives will be improved. That is why these children go with Muslim: they have been trained to think they are nice and bringing enrichment: the teachers are destroying the children's natural defences. The parents are unsure of themselves because the advice they get from “experts” contradicts their own common sense.

Some think we need a philosophy. Well, here is a brief interlude. We do not only have rights we have duties that go with them. The colloquial expression “by rights” retains this sense. People say “By rights you should receive or do so and so.” It means “By all that is right” which includes obligations. Rights did not just mean rights to do things it also included duty. These were passed down through the ancestors so we derive our rights and responsibilities from our ancestors as members of the British or, English, Scottish, Welsh and Ulster family of nations. These are not the universal abstractions that progressives use they are concrete and specific to us. They evolved with the nation like the language. Our ways, customs, mores were inherited from within our nation and are different from other European nations but run parallel with them. The universal idea that what suits us is applicable in Africa, say, is ludicrous because they have different ways, customs etc. In fact it insults them, as it implies there ways are inferior and they need ours.

The corollary to this arrogance is the way the elites want give to immigrants what is ours. They did not bring their own houses, money and maternity wards with them so they are being given what is ours by inherited right. They are also assuming authority over us in the police, law, and bureaucracy; this also takes our responsibility off us by giving them our roles.

The welfare of these young girls is being abandoned by those responsible for it like the police and social services and far from feeling guilty to immigrants, we we must assume responsibility and protect our young girls. When did the disgusting NSPCC speak for them?

These girls have been corrupted and sexualised by modern commerce; by the media.

Dereliction of duty applies in general and is a failure to fulfill our obligations to our own people.

There is another imported evil - the terror threat. The same type of people who are raping our girls are posing a threat of terror to us so what do the authorities do? They notify community leaders before they raid looking for explosives.

On 17th January 1999 The Sunday Times reported: That "around 2,000 Muslims attend training camps around Britain to study Holy War. They were held at weekends in Birmingham and London. Recruits were taught hand-to-hand combat and survival techniques for civil strife. For weapon training and military training in the Yemen and Afghanistan. How do the Security Services deal with this? They ignore it and harass the “far-right”.

The Daily Telegraph of August 10th 2010 revealed that the new security "strategy to tackle extremists is to focus on white racists.” Needless to say this was announced by Shalid Malik the Communities Minister. Scotland Yard warned last month that such groups could be planning a terrorist "spectacular" to stoke up racial tensions. This was a clear indication of the new tactics. Commander Shaun Sawyers, signalling the complicity of the security services with Muslim extremists and that they can carry on developing their terror structures because security services would focus on “Whites. (3) The impression given is that Muslims can carry on developing terror networks because we are equating "far-right extremists" with you to divert the public gaze.

The Met's counter-terrorism command has increased the number of officers in a special unit monitoring Right-wing extremists because of "the threat". Yet they have at least 8 members of al-Queda in the police service!

Just as blaming the violated girls by labelling them “vulnerable” the Security Services attack people as “racists” or “far-right extremists” to take the public eye off Muslim extremists. To put it bluntly they are supporting a war for the ownership of our homeland and excusing the violation of young White girls. (4)

Birmingham journalists covered up Muslim involvement in the Birmingham Street Battles of August 2009 after an EDL anti-extremist demo and blamed the EDL as “far-right extremists”. These Birmingham journalists also cover up terrorist cells in Birmingham.

Eight young Muslim terrorists from Birmingham, London and Luton on active service were arrested in Aden in December 1998, planning terror attacks against British targets. The security services then claimed they had no idea that Muslim street soldiers were being recruited in British mosques and trained in terror camps! Do we believe them?

The state alliance with Muslim terrorists.

Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga, told an Italian newspaper in 2008, that the government of Italy in the 1970s agreed to allow Arab terrorist groups freedom of movement in the country in exchange for immunity from attacks. The government of Prime Minister Aldo Moro reached a "secret non-belligerence pact between the Italian state and Palestinian resistance organizations, including terrorist groups." According to the former president, it was Moro himself who designed the terms of the agreement with the foreign Arab terrorists. "The terms of the agreement were that the Palestinian organizations could even maintain armed bases of operation in the country, and they had freedom of entry and exit without being subject to normal police controls, because they were 'handled' by the secret services." As Interior Minister, Cossiga said that he learned PLO members in Italy had diplomatic immunity as representatives of the Arab League. "The Palestinian organizations could even maintain armed bases of operation in the country."

The British had a similar deal with Muslim terrorists. In 1988, Omar Bakri Mohammed admitted there was a deal between British Secret Services and Muslim terrorists. He stated: “I work here in accordance with the covenant of peace which I made with the British government when I got asylum … " see Al-Sharq Al-Awsat of 22 August 1998.

The Bishop of Rochester related how at a dinner the Algerian foreign minister revealed that when the Algerians warned the government about the terrorists they were harbouring in London they were told they are “freedom fighters.”! (5)

Islamist ideas are spread through Islamic study centres attached to our universities. Professor Anthony Glees revealed eight universities — including Oxford and Cambridge — have accepted more than £233.5 million from Saudi and Muslim sources since 1995, spreading radicalism and creating two separate identities and sets of allegiance. The education system is being used to brainwash our children to excuse and encourage Muslim terrorism.

There are several examples of how the elites submit to the threat of Muslim terror. They abandoned the bribery investigation into the arms deal between Saudi Arabia and BAE systems when the Saudis threatened that, if the case was not dropped: ‘British lives on British streets’ would be at risk” - former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles. (6)

Muslim terrorists were welcomed into Britain and financed by state benefits. They needed to answer no questions and needed to show no papers and this began under Thatcher lived in a gated community. They got free education, free health care even when they openly developed terrorist cells and trained bombers for active service in other parts of the world. These are boosted by a deceitful system called “Asylum.”

Few have any legal entitlement to enter this country but are allowed to stay and provided extra benefits we do not get like free cars, mobile phones and decorated houses even after the London bombing of 7/7. Without this encouragement al-Queda could not have got into the West to launch bombing attacks like those in London and Madrid. It is truly ludicrous to think the authorities do not know what is going on.

We have people just strolling into the country. There are illegal immigrants driving round untaxed and the police allow them to. Our diabolical elites have given up controlling our country and protecting people and allow immigrants to do what they like to us. We have to look into ourselves to find the weakness, then draw strength and confront the terrorist communities and protect these young girls. The elites won't - they will form committees, appoint officials even a government minister to pretend they are doing something, but will not stop it. What is wrong with us to allow outsiders to come into our country, plant bombs, rape our children and do nothing about it?

We have been mislead by the elites to think everything is hunky dory but we are realising now that it is far from that. The elites are more “vulnerable” than ever now because so many of their machinations have been exposed.





(5) Melannie Phillips. (2008) Londonistan. p93



Anonymous said...

Michael Savage and Pastor Terry Jones are now banned from Britain.

I sit here in the USA and watch these proceedings with sadness. My Point of View has not been raised. I view these actions by the British Home Office as nothing short of war against the USA.


Our law states that our Constitution is the Supreme Law of the land. British law/English law is not controlling. What the Home Office is effectively doing is declaring that should we here in the States NOT abide with Home Office policy, we are to be punished by the refusal of admittance to the UK. If we DO abide by foreign law here in our own homeland, we are not punished. The de facto and de jure position of the Home Office is that British Law shall be Supreme over our own Constitution and our own laws here in the USA.

If your Home Office wants a war, we can give you one.

It probably has not been unnoticed by you Brits that you have complete loons in office.

But it remains that these bans are nothing less than Acts of War.

bluehorse9 said...

'The opportunity to secure ourselves against defeat lies in our own hands, but the opportunity of defeating the enemy is provided by the enemy himself.'

'Opportunities multiply as they are seized.'

'There has never been a protracted war from which a country has benefited.'

- Sun Tzu

The Time Is Now!

Macaw said...


Not only do the Brits have loons in office, the the USA as well. Not to mention my own country (SA), that has an entire army of loons stealing our taxes.

What about the USA denying entry to certain folks as well. I know for a fact that there is a 11 year old boy who's name is on the no-fly list. He is an American citizen.

Please understand that I am in no way attacking you or your country. You make some valid points, but saying that the actions are nothing short of war is going a bit over the top ?!?

notareargunner said...

There is an arrogance in Anonymous's comment that insists that US law is universal and supreme. It does not take into consideration that codified law is open to interpretation by an American Court and may be used in academic and legal argument here.
AV Dicey argued as early as 1885 that the law and constitution of THIS country had evolved with functions that protected as well as hindered Britain's form of democratic processes.
There has been a tremendous diminution of LAW in the UK by attempts to emulate this new system of written law -The US Constitution - from the evolved but still progressive sets of of laws of precedent . The writers arrogance is to assume that the US has been constructed in such a way that it is infallible and not subject to multiple interpretation. The so called declaration of war has to therefore be made by the USA on the entire world and all other legal systems if this cock-eyed view is to have any credibility.
The British Nemesis is that the average Joe is so unwilling to demand that the thieving wasters who resided in Westminster Village have the wit and wherewithal to confront the EVIL architects of modern British law making. Having allowed Lieber to formulate law without the proper scrutiny of Parliament is a charge that they need not plead to any way but guilty.

Anonymous said...

Anonymous, the US Constitution is irrelevant outside of the US territory. Last time I checked, the UK is a sovereign country who can make its own laws and ban anybody she wants to come on its soil. Just as you have a right to say whatever you want in the US, the UK has the right to not let you in for WHATEVER reason. Obviously, the problem is that this isn't applied to the real threats - all the mass immigrants.

What you pretty much say is that if you can't go to a country for whatever reason, it's an act of war, which is ridiculous beyond belief.

And you can't even win a war against Afghanistan or Iraq, let alone another country. Also, I'd like to point out that the UK still has nuclear weapons, as far as I know.

Now, related to Sarah's blog post, the problem is that the people are stupid and don't use equally charged words - ethnic cleansers, genocide and rape promoters and so on. If I was a politician in the UK, this is what I'd do. I'd openly say that the lives of every British person who was killed by immigrants is on the hands of the politicians who let them in.

I don't blame the Muslims for what they do at all. Any group of people who welcomes outsiders in its midst should expect behaviors like theirs. The problem is traitors on our part.

Anonymous said...

RV spot again girl.. are there any more of you there?

Nobody could have worded it better.

IMHO the same rule applies to someone like Robert Mugabe who the media (and handlers)adored until recently seemingly but do nothing about it? Who or what "created" Mugabe, Kaunda, Mandela et al.

They didn't get their education from a branch off a tree and their ancestors hadn't heard of the wheel until whitey came along.

I actually admire Mugabe for wiping his ass on the faces of white liberals and their media who kissed it in the past during his so called 'struggle' and having the balls to reject homosexuality wholesale. What white politician anywhere in the world has the balls to do the same?

noiseytappet said...

Anonymous said

'I actually admire Mugabe'

Tell that to the average Zimbabwean - come to think of it they would probably believe you, such is the level of lies and deceit - just like here in Europe really.

Mugabe has simply modelled himself on Europe's Marxist political elite, the only difference is that he achieved the goal of personally pocketing his Countries wealth in a decade instead of a sixty plus year lineage and his forty gold coins are Chinese Dollars - not Arab / Muslim Petrodollars.

Robert said...

Off topic a little:

Caring about American is a waste of time.