Invitation to a Nationalist Leaders’ Meeting to Find a Way to Power

By Richard Barnbrook Independent Nationalist Member of the GLA

We share a number of common values and a heartfelt commitment to saving our nation and sovereignty, and wresting power back from the liberal elite. It is a tragedy that we are divided.

The results of the recent elections were uninspiring for the various Nationalist parties of either British or English persuasion. No meaningful gains were made by any party. At best it was stagnation, at worst it was decline.

Nationalism is little short of an irrelevance in British/English politics, because we lack any real political clout, which is why the media can afford to ignore us. A look at the votes of various elections, monies raised and activists fielded shows clearly that only by uniting and pooling our abilities, experience and resources do we have any viable hope of forming a government in our own life-time.

Self interest, petty rivalries and dislikes and minor points of manifesto detail have to be subjugated to the best interests of our common cause. If we were to succeed in doing this, we would have the prospect of real, tangible power in sight. There are enough seats and positions out there to be won that would satisfy most people’s ambitions. By being one strong, united and cohesive force we can attain them.

Patriotic causes in the course of history have always floundered and died, due to internal battles caused by the inability of individuals to recognise that a that one united force is far stronger than a collection of smaller disparate entities. Since the last war, every patriotic and nationalist group has collapsed which has prevented there being any real alternative to the 2-3 main parties and this has assisted the opposition.

For too long different parties have squabbled accusing each other of various faults which helps no one except our enemies; each hoping to emerge as the big nationalist party we all want. However, time is running out. The General Election after the next will arrive in some 6 years. It will be upon us in the comparative blink of an eye. During that time if we allow all the deleterious trends apparent today to continue, our cause will be lost. Very soon it will be too late. As leaders of your respective parties you each bear responsibility for taking the action that will lead to the salvation of our country. Or not.

It would be presumptuous of me to make suggestions as to how any of you, as existing leaders, would take authority in this possible new, agreed coalition of nationalist parties. It would be for the leaders (and members) themselves to discuss the practicalities and how a fair and equable distribution of roles could be attained so that everyone’s expectations and concerns could be addressed.

Possibly the best way would be, if you are agreeable, to appoint a deputy to discuss the feasibility of talks, with a view to seeing what might be on the agenda, anticipated problems and so on. I do not have a personal axe to grind in all of this as it my intention to take a back seat in politics once my term at the GLA is completed. But I would like to be instrumental in opening the doors to change which will hopefully lead the way to nationalism becoming a major, dynamic, political force with the exciting prospect of attaining real power within its grasp.

It is simply a matter of common sense. We’ve all tried to go it alone and we are getting nowhere. But by working together and uniting we can set the political scene alight.

I look forward to hearing from you.


Yours sincerely

Richard Barnbrook
Independent Nationalist Member of the GLA

Greater London Authority

City Hall

The Queen’s Walk

London SE1 2AA

Rhonda Robinson Geert Wilders Presents: 5 Steps Americans Must Take to Avoid the Fate of Islamized Europe

CLICK HERE for a report on a speech by Geert Wilders gave recently in Nashville, Tennessee. 

UPDATE

The full text of Wilder's speech, which was delivered in a CHRISTIAN church can be read at the Breussels Journal by CLICKING HERE
 

Today in Britain

Today in a British court, and in a highly politicised case, a judge quashed a "Not Guilty" verdict in order to allow the state to have another go at convicting a man cleared of murder 15 years ago. 

In so doing he showed us that the protection granted to Englishmen by the Magna Carta in 1215 AD no longer applies in this land. Again we see that, today in Britain, none of us are safe.

Conflict in the Cradle of the West

More and more it is becoming clear that the root causes of the financial collapse in parts of the Eurozone such as in Ireland and in Greece is not quite as the media would have us believe.  Yes, it is true, especially in the case of Greece, that unrealistic social policies and the payment of benefit levels which the country can not afford has been part of the problem.  However, other factors have also been at play, in particular the countries whose economies are now collapsing, have been exposed to unprecedented levels of mass Immigration in recent years resulting in major social and economic problems. All of this has been cheered on by left wing anarchists whose goal is to see the collapse of Western Nations, and cynically supported by socialist parties, who anticipate gaining electoral advantage as a result of the demographic change.

Whilst the IMF (in the absence of their head, who is currently retained in Rikers Island) and the EU debate extending a further bail out to Greece, the following article at the Alternative Right  gives a troubling account of what is currently going on there:

Conflict in the Cradle of the West

By Demetris Demopoulos

The University of Athens, in the heart of the city, is a building of great emotional significance to Greeks. It was built in 1837 during the reign of King Otto (1815-1867), to celebrate Greece’s liberation from almost four centuries (1453-1821) of Turkish occupation and oppression.

Designed by the Danish architect Christian Hansen, it has an imposing Ionic portico of great beauty and simplicity. The Austrian painter Carl Rahl (1812-1865) executed a large patriotic composition inside the portico representing the regeneration of arts and sciences under Otto. In front of the gateway are statues of two national heroes—the Ecumenical Patriarch Gregory V, hanged by the Turks on Easter Day in 1821, and the poet-martyr Rigas Ferraios, strangled in Belgrade in 1798 on the orders of the Ottomans. At the top of the external staircase is a statue of the Greek-French scholar Adamantios Korais (1746-1833, whose linguistic work bolstered Greek self-awareness), in the garden a statue of the British statesman William Gladstone and nearby a pillar in memory of the young students who died during the liberation struggles.

But on 16 November, this iconic setting was marred by a strikingly incongruous sight, as over 1,000 Muslims held public prayers inside the portico on the first day of the Muslim festival of Eid.

Continue reading at the alternative right

________________
hat tip: JP

On-Going Debate

Readers may be interested in the ongoing debate which has been taking place in the Comments tread beneath the recent Colonial Inheritance posting.  You can view the exchanges by clicking here and scrolling down to the comments.

Problem with Blogger

There appears to be a problem with Blogger, and as a result recent postings and comments have disappeared, hopefully things will be back to normal soon.

The Fates of Evil Men

I am going to start this article by believing the premise that a team of US army SEALS, acting under president Obama’s specific instructions, did indeed raid a compound in Pakistan last Monday and shot the world’s most wanted terrorist, when the elderly invalid was unarmed and eminently capturable.

I am going to accept that the soldiers took photographs of the corpse, to prove he was dead but that these were later considered too gruesome to release, because they might antagonise his supporters even more than their tender sensibilities might be inflamed by widely circulated film of Infidel youth celebrating the assassination of an unarmed middle aged cleric. (what other explanation could there be?!)

Going further, and for the purpose of argument, I will believe that DNA tests were carried out which showed a direct link with one of the bin Laden’s sisters. The authorities were, no doubt, able to conclusively rule out the possibility they had accidentally shot one of the many other bin Laden brothers instead of Osama.

I will not question the claim that the US administration assumed that quickly chucking the body of the FBI’s most wanted felon into the sea within 24 hours of his death, and before announcing that death to the world, would not raise any suspicions whatsoever.  I am sure that they truly believed that burial at sea was “in accordance with Islamic tradition” (whereas, in fact, burial at sea is only permissible when it is not possible to bury the body in earth before decomposition sets in – which was not a factor in this case)

I will even struggle to accept that the al Quada leader did indeed make home movies of the back of his own head as he watched himself on TV, from time to time zooming in on his own ear as he did so. It follows that the dishevelled and rather pathetic looking figure in the videos released a few days ago was indeed OBL and not some lookie-likie Arab-American from Battle Creek, Nebraska, flown in specially.

Whilst I am in the mood to extend credibility to lengths which would challenge Ping the Elastic Man, I will also believe that it is merely coincidence that the successful climax of the nine and a half year search for Osama bin Laden coincided so closely with President Obama being forced to publish a rather dubious looking document purporting to be his Hawaian birth certificate, whilst the President’s approval ratings were heading below sea level, and that extremely suspicious conflict in Libya was starting to settle into an uncomfortable and very long stalemate.
                                                                 
More difficult for me is accepting the word of the current US Attorney General Eric Holder, a man who makes Alberto Gonzalez appear a paragon of truth and honesty, when he assures us that the killing was not an “assassination”, but heck, if I’ve gone this far, I may as well go the whole hog, as they say.

Not everybody is rejoicing at the death. Various, Mullahs, jihadis and tenured university professors aside, the arch Bishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams confesses to a degree of queasiness over the shooting of an unarmed man. However, Rowan has a queasy reaction to so many things it is hard to take his moralising very seriously.

Despite Rowan’s nervous stomach, and any quibbling over the legal definition of what took place, the American government takes the view that they were entirely justified in taking out Osama bin Laden. Assuming, as I have for the purpose of this article, that rather than blowing him to smithereens in Tora Bora in 2002, they really did take him out last week, and then chuck him in the sea, bizarre as that may sound.

In that case, many might conclude that they were justified in that view, and I certainly find myself feeling sympathetic to that argument. Bin laden was the self confessed mastermind of violent acts of terrorism which left many American citizens dead, a man who embraced the ideology of violent insurrection against those he viewed as the oppressors of his people, and someone who was the inspiration for others who went on to commit acts of terrible cruelty and barbarism.

Of course, one might be able to argue the something similar about individuals currently employed, on an elected basis, within the Northern Ireland Assembly, and of course, even more so, about one internationally revered elder statesman, currently enjoying a luxurious retirement in South Africa.

It is true many thousands more died in the World trade centre in 2001 than were killed in the Church Street bombing in 1983, which Mandela freely admits he approved.  However, the victims of Church Street were no less dead, and neither were the 130 left with varying degrees of horrific injury any less the victims of terrorism just because they were attacked in Pretoria rather than New York.

If numbers of victims are anything to go by, although worldwide al Quada has killed more, the ANC, under Nelson Mandela’s leadership were responsible for the violent deaths of far greater numbers of South African citizens, mostly black, than the number of American citizens killed by a bin Laden led al Quada. By the most conservative estimate the ratio is almost seven to one. (and the killing still continues)

Hence if the US government is justified in “taking out” Osama bin-laden in 2011, why would the pre-1990 National government of South Africa not have been justified in “taking out” Nelson Mandela?  Both men led terrorist organisations both were equally guilty of orchestrating acts of violent terrorism against states which they perceived as oppressors, resulting in the deaths of many thousands of innocent citizens.

These are men of blood with much blood on their hands, it is only the fashionable prejudice of the world, and the outcomes which they faced which differentiates the two.  One, reviled by the West, and dead at 54, now, allegedly, feeds the fishes of the Pakistani coast, the other, still thriving and applauded in his 10th decade, is held up to our children a some form of living saint.       

When I wrote the article “Mandela the legend and the legacy” I started by saying that one man’s terrorist is another’s freedom fighter, very little illustrates that point more clearly than the differing fates of Osama bin Laden and Nelson Mandela.

 

Mishal Husain: BBC Race Hypocrite

By Tim Heydon

Mishal Husain the Female Asian BBC autocue reader was involved in an incident in a supermarket where she claims her children were ‘racially abused’ to the extent that she felt the need to call the manager of the supermarket to make a complaint, demanding that the perpetrator of this heinous offence be ‘confronted’. What did this ‘offence’ consist of? Well, it seems that an elderly native Briton took exception to the behaviour of Husain’s children and told her that they should ‘behave like proper English children’.

In a sensible world most people would regard an elderly person telling off a parent for the behaviour of his /her children in this manner as what happens in life. The behaviour of the children might well have richly merited it in which case all credit to the elderly citizen. But this is of course not a sensible world.

It’s ‘racist’ if an ethnic say it is

In the Soviet-Style era of oppression in which we now live, the law is undoubtedly on Husain’s side. When she went running to authority in the expectation that it would spring to her side against the native Briton in this piffling incident, she was correct. According to the 1986 Association of Chief Police Officers definition, a ‘racist incident’ under the various Race Relations Acts is:-

 'any incident in which it appeared to the reporting or investigating officer that the complaint involves an element of racial motivation or any incident which includes an allegation of racial motivation made by any person as being one that should be classified as racist’.

 Recommendation 12 of the 1999 Macpherson Report the said that the definition of a racist incident should be 'any incident that is perceived to be racist by the victim or any other person'.
 

(Ethnics of course cannot be guilty of ‘racism’ because according to its Marxist definition, as members of minorities they do not have social power, an essential ingredient apparently).

Super –Sensitivity Encouraged by the Law

That Hussein thinks this citizens’ remarks amounted to ‘racial abuse’ reveals nothing so much as  super sensitivity on her part on the one hand and a total lack of sensitivity towards the feelings of the native British on the other.

She seems on one level to be oblivious to or chooses to ignore the resentment that the people of the country rightly feel about the way they are being dispossessed of it by their political class through the importation of millions of aliens like herself.

On another she is probably very much aware of it. For all the ‘authority’ which she is said to convey on screen, her sensitivity almost certainly derives from a deep sense of insecurity. Insecurity in herself as a parent and the way she is bringing up her children and insecurity originating in the fact that those children, like herself will never be regarded by the bulk of the population as English.

Hussein’s BBC Career. Racial and Sexual Discrimination is OK when it’s in your Favour.

But let’s look at her career in the BBC. Whatever her capabilities – and it doesn’t take much to read off an autocue or indeed to ask people questions (It’s answering which is difficult) she was quite clearly chosen for her present position for three main reasons:-

1) She is Asian. The BBC quite clearly has a policy of slotting ethnics into high profile, up-front positions of this kind in order to propagandise a sense of establishment, authority and of ‘belonging’ for ethnics. Ethnics are also given jobs in programmes dealing with British cultural and historical matters for the same reasons, thus discriminating against whites.

2) She is Female. Having an Asian and Female as a news presenter is killing two birds with one stone since both ethnics and females score high points on the hierarchy of Political Correctness as ‘oppressed’ groups. White males are discriminated against wherever possible.

3) She is a good-looking in a European sort of way and for an Asian quite light-skinned. In the minefield which is the lexicon of Politically Correct sins (there are so many, aren’t there?) this of course is ‘lookist’ and also quite possibly ‘sexist’ as well as ‘racist’. However BBC apparatchiks seem to have concluded that there are limits beyond which the viewers will not go.

So we see that in the incident in the supermarket and when it comes to her career, Hussein is apparently more than willing to accept racial and sexual discrimination – when it is in her favour. There is only one word to describe this attitude: Hypocrisy.

BBC Lies of Omission

BBC's report of EDL Leader Tommy Robinson's trial omits certain key details.

Click here to read the details at the New English Review

___________

Hat Tip Mister Fox

Meanwhile in Amsterdam ......

Written by Diana West

... Geert Wilders made his final statement in court yesterday where he is still on trial for telling the truth about Islam. This, as often noted, is a judicial outrage, a public nightmare, and an existential threat to liberty as we have known it which doesn't end because bin Laden is dead. There is a raw, ugly fear of Islam in the non-Islamic world, and the grotesque reflex of the frightened power classes is to side with the raw, ugly power of Islam, which, never let it be forgotten, is derived solely from their own fear. The results are to be seen in the travesties around us from the Netherlands' campaign to silence, penalize and make an example of the courageous Wilders, to the USA's grotesque staging of a dignified, Islamically correct "funeral at sea" for a mass murderer whose corpse should have been disposed of as the human trash that it was.

Reading Geert's words is a sobering experience, spoken as they are in the face of a thoroughly craven but still powerful establishment-machine. In this desperate hour for free speech, they sound an SOS we seem powerless to answer. But they are inspiring, too, for the example they set. Here in the 21st century is a man whose allegiance to liberty is paramount.

Geert Wilders:

Mister President, members of the Court. I recently tried to have Your Honors removed from the case for your refusal to register a statement of perjury against Mr. Hendriks. My challenge of the court did not succeed. I must accept that. I do wish to say, however, that I was more annoyed by another declaration of the President of the Court on the day of the official hearing of Mr. Jansen. He said that I was a free man, that I could not be compared to Mr. Nekschot because I was a free man.

Mister President, you could not be more wrong. For almost seven years now, I have not been a free man. I lost my freedom in 2004. I live as a prisoner with guards without you having convicted me. Without protection I am even less certain of my life than I am now. Mister President, you would not use the words “free man” if you could change places with me for one week.

Mister President, members of the court, I am here as a suspect again today. I have said so before: This penal case is a political trial. An attempt is being made here to silence a politician who speaks on behalf of one and a half million people and who already pays a heavy price for that every single day. Formally, only I stand on trial here, but in practice the freedom of speech of millions of Dutchmen is on trial.

This trial is not merely a political trial. It is also an unjust trial. When you look at the order of the court (to prosecute me) it is clear that the verdict has already been passed. The court has issued an order to prosecute me in which it concludes that I am guilty of incitement to hatred. The court has concluded that my statements as such are of an insulting nature. The court has concluded that I am guilty of the most serious charge: the incitement to hatred and discrimination. The court has concluded that it expects that the criminal prosecution will indeed lead to a conviction. Mister President, members of the court, the court has already done your job. Long before I was brought to trial before you, I was found guilty and was condemned. Hence my right to a just trial has been violated.

Alas, this is but the tip of the iceberg. Without any doubt, the judges who presided this case have conveyed a semblance of partiality. I have been denied 15 of the 18 witnesses whom I wanted to call. Every high representative of the judicial power has given his view on this case, and often to my disadvantage. But Counselor Schalken was the worst.

Counselor Schalken, who co-authored the decision to prosecute me, makes a habit of discussing my trial and arguing his case at elegant dinner parties for intellectuals. Counselor Schalken dined with my witness, Mr Jansen – note that he was one of the only three witnesses whom I was allowed to call – three days before Mr. Jansen was to be interrogated by the court. During this dinner Mr. Schalken TRIED to influence Mr Jansen. The fact that he did not succeed is irrelevant.

Mr. President, members of the court, stop this unfair, political trial. Respect our Dutch freedoms. If this trial continues, despite the fact that the principle of the presumption of innocence has been violated, and if I am convicted, not only my freedom will be infringed, but also the right of all Dutch people to hear the truth. The 19th century black American politician Frederick Douglass, the son of a slave, put it as follows: “To suppress free speech is a double wrong. It violates the rights of the hearer as well as those of the speaker.”

Mr. President, members of the court, I end with a quote of George Washington, who said: “If the freedom of speech is taken away then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter.” Mr. President, members of the court, do not let this warning become reality. Stop this charade, this political trial where I have already been convicted by the court even before I was a suspect. Stop it now. If you do so, and I passionately hope you will, this will benefit freedom of speech as well as the respectability of the judicial power and the rule of law.

Source
________________________________

Note: Here is a further example of the Dutch approach to free speech, an article on Dutch News.nl regarding the judge's refusal to investigate one of the prosecution witnesses for perjury, has the following footnote: 

"Comments have been disallowed for this article. We know from experience that some subjects generate a massive stream of comments which conflict with our guidelines for submissions and this is one of them. 

Translation:  "We don't like what you might say, so we won't let you say it!!"

 _____________________

 Dutch judges discuss the Wilders trial

An Interview with Muhammad Ali

White destitution in South Africa

Here is a story to warm the hearts of any white hating liberal, who no doubt think "those evil white Afrikaners  are getting a taste of their own medicine", except this isn't their own medicine.  Under Apartheid blacks were fed, they had homes, jobs and were eligible for welfare if they became unemployed.  Under the racist ANC government destitute whites have no such Luxury:

 __________________

From Adriana Stuijt at CensorBugbear

The streets of Pretoria bear all the evidence of a very serious decline.  Amongst the rubbish-strewn streets many homeless white people are begging for food-handouts with their children. These working-class Afrikaner artisans – the people whose forebears founded the city of Pretoria - were forced into grinding destitution and homelessness because the ANC-regime’s laws are barring the whites from the labour market.

ANC-regime wants to dump thousands of destitute Afrikaner families in the streets of Pretoria:

Employers who dare to hire these Afrikaners for their often highly-skilled artisan and Western-technological excellence,  face being targetted by the ANC regime’s army of militant inspectors. They threaten to take away their businesses’  black-economic-empowerment- certificates if they don’t rid themselves of all the white faces on the shopfloors.

And without a BEE-certificate no business can keep its doors open for very long. Consumers can even keep track of the steady empoverishment of the Afrikaners: their cash-register slips show the growing percentage of black labour which has gone into making each item. (picture far right). And as the percentage of black-labourers on those cash-slips rise, each percentage point upwards also represents the growing poverty and homelessness of the country’s large number of skilled Afrikaners.

Temporary white contract workers don’t qualify for government unemployment benefits:

The only way skilled Afrikaners now still can be hired is on a temporary year-long contract basis negotiated through labour-brokers: and when their contracts end, they don’t qualify for unemployment-benefits either, so the government unemployment statistics do not accurately reflect ‘white unemployment’. The government has recently made a new law to close this ‘loop-hole’ by barring these labour-brokers.

The Afrikaners now are becoming just as poor, suppressed and destitute as their Boer forebears were under British rule – except that under the ANC-regime, they now also are very deliberately barred from the job market… by law:
 
Afrikaners used to employ millions of blacks before 1994:

Before 1994, these Afrikaners however also were the single-largest group of employers of blacks in the country: so for every fired Afrikaner today, at least two black families also immediately lose their incomes: their maid and their gardener. And the average black household represents eight family members each… with 800,000 of the 3million Afrikaners now destitute, they represent 1,6-million black workers who also lost their jobs in Afrikaner households.

Continue reading at Censorbugbear

Marine Le Pen: We fight for French identity

Richard Spencer: 'Bin Laden a useful bogeyman'

Truths, half truths and lies, who now can tell the difference?

It is troubling that within days of reading news stories which told us that al Qaeda had a nuclear device hidden somewhere in Europe, which they plan to use if Osama bin Laden to be killed by the Americans, we read the dramatic news that Osama bin Laden has been killed by the Americans.

Equally troubling in other ways is the fact that the first alleged photographic evidence to appear which supports the claim (click here to see it) is a very obvious fake.

The terrorist mastermind's body has apparently already buried at sea.

We have reached a point where we have been lied to to such a degree it is impossible to know if anything we are told is the truth.

   

How I became a ‘Racist’ - By Tim Heydon

Trafalgar Square of VE Day

You know, nowadays I find that I am a ‘racist’ and that I ‘hate’ Blacks, Asians and other ethnic minorities who have come to live in this country. But it is an interesting fact that in my youth I was not a ‘racist’, nor was it said that I ‘hated’ anyone..; Indeed my views would have been thought by the bulk of the population to be highly moral.. So why have I changed so radically into someone who belongs to this despised and vilified class of people, the ’racists’ and the ’haters’?

Living with a Moslem Family

When in the mid 60’s I arrived from the provinces to become an articled clerk in the City of London, I took lodgings until I could afford my own place. It didn’t worry me in the least that the family that I had a room with were Moslem Asians. Not obviously Moslem, mind you – that came much later as the Moslem population grew – but Moslem nonetheless.

Hardly a ‘Racist’ or a ’Hater’ ?

I lived with this family for several years and saw their children grow up. Indeed I was almost one of the family myself.. I babysat for them, had family meals with them, socialised with their friends and relations and went everywhere with them – to restaurants, family occasions, weddings. ... None of this would suggest that. I am a ‘racist’ and a ’hater’,. would it? In fact, I dare say that I have been more closely acquainted with a section of the immigrant population than a goodly proportion of those who use these terms.

And Yet I was a Patriot Briton

And yet I was a native Briton, well aware of the differences between my people and those Asians. Whilst for the time being I found their customs and attitudes interesting and sometimes amusing, they were not those I would have chosen for myself. They were, I thought, not just different, but distinctly inferior to the culture of my own people, the British. I would never have considered having a relationship with the daughter of the house, even if I had been welcome in that direction, which I wasn’t .

Pride in ‘won first Prize in the Lottery of Life’ (Kipling):.To be born British

For I was. as proud of my country and of my people as could be - just like the bulk of the population, in fact..

At that time, the Second World War was fresh in the memory of the nation. Britain was still bursting with justifiable pride at having stood alone for years against those who wished to invade and take over our country and the world and having won through to the end.. The victories of the Battle of Britain, the Battle of the Atlantic, of Alamein, of Burma and the rest - these triumphs spoke volumes about the mettle of the British - my people.

It was Pride in their Country and the Achievements. of our Ancestors which gave the British the Will to Fight

That the nation had summoned up the will and the courage to bring it all about was due largely to the pride the British had in themselves. Pride in the superiority of their way of life, the glorious achievements of their ancestors and the long-lived stability and humanity of their institutions, built up over centuries which provided such contrast with those almost everywhere else. Pride in their huge Empire, then still the greatest the world had ever known.. Pride.; in the magnificent men of history who had built it.  Pride in the fact that they had administered it with (for the times) remarkable and increasing justice. Pride that they had brought to it not just standards of probity it had never known before (or for much of it, since) but also the idea of democracy and the possibility of progress.

The Fierce Desire to protect the Homeland of our Ancestors

It was pride in all of this and the fierce desire to protect the beloved homeland of their ancestors; heart –felt feelings rather than attachment to some continental-style ideology or anything else which motivated them to victory.. We did not fight Nazism, although we despised it. That we did so is a Politically Correct. re-writing of history.. The nation knew it was fighting the Germans.. The huge banner over Trafalgar Square on VE Day did not read ‘Victory over Nazism’ or ‘Fascism’.. It read ‘Victory over Germany’.

So What Changed?

And here I am, a ‘racist’ who ‘hates’.. So what has changed?. Why am I now a ‘nationalist’ and ergo a repellent, evil individual, according to the BBC, the Guardian newspaper, the Cameroonian ‘conservatives’ and others of the liberal-left political class, while before I was patriot and  exhibited all those qualities of loyalty to my country and its people which had brought us through the War and which were thought of by all except a few leftist screwballs as the epitome of good citizenship?  The answer is simple.  It is not I who has changed. Although I am now infinitely better informed than I was then, my views are much the same as they always were.

The Asian Immigrant Takeover of Ilford and Elsewhere in London.

It is the country and the attitudes of its political class which have changed.  When I first lived in the Ilford area of East London / Essex, there were some black and brown faces to be seen, the family I lodged with being among them. But London was still very much a British - I mean truly British –city.  And although there were undercurrents of what became the 60’s revolution, the country was still essentially the Britain it always had been - the national home of the British people. But the family I lodged with were only the forward scouts for an invading army which gradually followed and is now in the process of swallowing up the area.

Enoch Powell and the BBC’s attack on Him

I gradually became aware of what was happening to the land I loved at the behest of creepy politicians who certainly did not represent the people of the country.. But the latter, because of the ’liberal consensus ‘of the political class had no opportunity to stop it. And I did not like it one bit. Enoch Powell’s ‘Rivers of Blood Speech’ which he made at that time put into words what I was feeling. (I recall that it was attacked – that is the only word one can use – by the BBC the next day, a fact which for the first time made me aware of that organisation’s alliance with left - liberalism, which has continued to this day).

A Country changed out of all Recognition

Most of the betrayed war-time generation hated what has been done to the country they loved and fought for. Indeed, an opinion poll a few years ago suggested they would not have fought if they had known what was to happen to it at the hands of the pygmy post-war politicians.

We are Losing our Sense of Ownership of our own Country

I have lived to see this country change out of all recognition, and for the worse. As the culture and the nature of the population has changed, so too has the character, the flavour of life here, expressed in all manner of subtle and not so subtle ways. The British people’s sense of ownership of their own country is disappearing and with it, pride; for how can one be proud of and care about something – anything – that is said to belong to anyone and everyone? This is the deliberate effect of socialism on a national scale.

The Failure of Leftism is the Failure to understand Human Nature

But, like that other failure of ‘everyone and anyone (and therefore no one) owns it’ socialism, the typical council –owned property, the country is gradually deteriorating because people care about it less and less. People care less for anything- anything at all - that they don’t feel they own.. And if they don’t feel they ‘own’ other people, because they have no bonds of shared history, race, culture, religion and morality with them, the sad fact is that they care less about them as people.

The Royal Wedding - The Last Hurrah of the British.

The crowds at the Royal Wedding were largely white; evidence that there is still a sense of community amongst the native British but little with the rapidly expanding immigrant population. The Wedding is on present trends likely to be one of the last hurrahs of the native people of the country as their dispossession gathers momentum and the sense of national community and trust continue to decline, surviving only in still-white small towns, villages and urban enclaves.

The Funerals of the Queen and of Prince Phillip will also be the Funerals of Britain

The funerals of the present Queen and Prince Phillip will also signal the end of Britain, as the new, multi racial, multi –faith country which it is becoming is consecrated with the Coronation of the multi-culti Prince Charles, quite possibly the last British monarch. For regardless of efforts to appease them, the largely moslem population of the future will not tolerate a monarchy or a constitution rooted in Christian traditions and redolent of this country’s white history.

Turning into an Immigrant Myself – in my own Country

It’s one thing to be on friendly terms, or more than friendly terms with an immigrant family. It’s quite another to live in an area which has in all essentials ceased to be one’s country. Then it is you who are effectively the immigrant among aliens..But - and here is the great difference – an unwilling one.

Straining Tolerance to its Limits

Tolerance is strained to its human limits and beyond when, because of the seemingly unending increase in their numbers, the previously tolerated begin to be seen as a threat – because they are a threat - to what one holds dear. When because of our sham of democracy there seems to be nothing that anyone can do about the loss to a people of the homeland of their ancestors and when any protest is vilified, criminalised or otherwise punished by the powerful..

With these People in charge, Britain would have been Nothing

If the political class responsible for this, or the type of creeps who comprise it had been in charge throughout our history, one thing’s certain. Instead of being, despite its blemishes, the overwhelming force for good and for advance that it was, this country would never have achieved anything. It would never have amounted to anything. It would have had as much impact on the history of the world as Laos or Iceland. And the world would have been so much the poorer without it.

That is why I am now a ’Racist and a ‘Hater’

‘Change’ is not always for the better, as ‘progressives’ like to think. ‘Progressives’ are generally wrong about most things, often terribly. That is why, although I have not changed much and am quite capable of liking individual immigrants, I do not like their numbers. Like almost all the war –time generation, I was a patriotic Briton in the mould of Enoch Powell. I still am, but now, like them, according to the ‘progressive’ left –liberal. political class who now run this country, without shifting I have moved from being a ‘patriot’ to becoming a ‘racist. and a ‘hater’. The lie is that loving your own people means that you must hate others.. A logical nonsense;. a complete non sequitur.

And so our great nation and the magnificent generations. who built it and who fought the Second World War are condemned by those who consider themselves their moral superiors but who feed on the struggles and sacrifices of our forebears like parasitic worms on their bodies;. adding nothing and bringing only destruction and decay.

By Tim Heydon

Snapshot on a blood stained month

Death and violence in South African police custody 

In my posting yesterday regarding the murder of South African farmer Andre van der Merwe, I also mentioned the killing of Jeanette Odendaal who was shot in the head by a black South African policeman whilst sitting in her parked car outside a police station.

Apparently Jeanette Odendaal was not the only member of the minority Afrikaner community to come to grief when coming into contact with South African Police in April.

On April 5th Frederick Olivier, a young Afrikaner man who was looking forward to his hoped-for first job at the local gold-mine, was arrested  when ‘police alegedly received a complaint of disturbing the peace.’
He was dumped in the holding cells of Westonaria police station, this was, according to the police for ‘public drunkenness’, the young man was later “discovered hanging in his cell when police officers checked on him.”  The police did not say whether Olivier was in the cell alone that night.

According to Olivier's father Ollie, this version of events makes no sense. His son had bruises on his face which looked as if he had been beaten up. He didn't have those bruises when he was taken into custody by the Westonaria police.  “My son had a bright future ahead of him,” says Olivier. “He was hopeful of getting a job on the mine, where he recently applied, and was supposed to get engaged in September. Why would he do something like this?”

Later that month, on April 21 33-year-old Afrikaner Theuns Potgieter of Silverton went to get two tyres fixed at a Gezina fuel-station he carried his legal handgun In his back pocket. While at the fuel station, a number of police officers arrived. Potgieter was kicked repeatedly in the stomach, handcuffed, his legally-registered gun confiscated. He needed treatment at hospital after his ordeal, which was recorded on CCTV... He was arrested for ‘resisting arrest’ and ‘having an illegal firearm’ .   Images from the CCT Camera shown below, give no indication that Potgieter resisted arrest in any way.

 

Meanwhile on the 27th of April, the day before the shooting of Jeanette Odendaal Morné Pieterse an Afrikaner resident of Welkom  went to Welkom police station, together with his girlfriend to talk to a detective to help with a crime-investigation. Instead he was cursed and beaten instead leaving him with two black eyes.

 A black female clerk in civilian clothes cursed Pieterse's girlfriend, shouting that they would have to contact the detective themselves, and to ‘fkoff’ out of her police station. Then a male uniformed police officer jumped over the counter and beat Pieterse in the face several times. The couple state they then asked other police officials at the station to help them lodge a formal complaint against the cop who had assaulted him – but nobody wanted to help. Eventually the detective they’d enquired after, came to the police station. And then Pieterse was beaten by the same cop again – in front of the detective, who intervened.

Pieterse has lodged a formal complaint at the Virginia SAPS against the Welkom police man.

Other deaths which occurred in April, albeit not with police involvement, included that of Juan de Villiers,  who died protecting his partner Jenny Wilson from attack by intruders at their home in Mayberry Park, Alberton on April 1 2011.  Mr. de Villiers, pictured above with his son Devan, was overpowered and rendered harmless by being tied up, however, the attackers still proceeded to shoot him dead.  Full report at the Afrikaner Genocide archives

As none of the above are members of the South African farming community, these acts of violence will not be  included amongst attacks on farmers, but they serve as further evidence, if any were needed of the ongoing violence against the white South African community.

Full reporting on the above can be found at Censorbugbear and The Long Walk Since Freedom.

___________________________

UPDATE

Censorbugber reports that André van der Merwe may have been alive when dragged behind his truck http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/2011/05/farmer-andre-vd-merwe-dragged-12km.html

Murder South African Farmer Named

Johannesburg - The Freedom Front Plus on Sunday afternoon identified the farmer who was murdered  last night (Saturday) and his body dragged behind his bakkie (South African truck) outside Ottosdal on Saturday night, as 49-year-old Andre van der Merwe.

The FF Plus expressed shock at the cruelty of the murder and said the government should help ensure the safety of farming communities.

In a statement FF+ MP Pieter Groenewald said "The government and minister of police are slow to act against farm attackers, and the rural safety plan still exists only in theory,"

According to police three suspects had entered Van der Merwe's house at about 20:00.

"They held him at gunpoint while they ransacked the house for money, then shot him in the chest, the back, and in the head, then used his own bakkie to drag him for about 1.2km before the bakkie rolled."

According to police's Brigadier Thulani Ngubane the victim's body was still tied to the Toyota LDV when police arrived on the scene on the Ottosdal-Delareyville road.

Full report here

Let up pray that unlike farmer Johan Strydom last year, and 29 year old car jacking victim Rozier van Blerk, (photos far too graphic to link to) Mr. van der Merwe was dead, or at least unconscious before before he was dragged behind the truck.

In other News from the multicultural paradise south of Zimbabwe, and Afrikaner woman Jeanette Odendaal was shot dead by a policemen as she sat in a parked car making an emergency telephone call outside a police station in Kempton Park, Gauteng last Tuesday (Full report at Censorbugbear)