State of the Union

As the American Authorities frantically seek to suggest a white supremacist link to yesterday's attempted car bombing in Times Square based on the fact that a middle aged white man was apparently seen taking off an over-shirt in the street on a humid April day in New York City, certain events are occurring on that side of the Atlantic which suggest that the greatest threat to civilisation as we know it may not come from any form of terrorist threat.

Readers should click here to view a piece of film taken last week during a visit by President Obama to the city of Quincy, Illinois. What occurred was a clear attempt to intimidate peaceful protesters in a manner one would expect to see in a totalitarian state or a third world dictatorship. It is really quite scary, and I wonder when it was that our society became so perverted that it started to perceive middle aged couples and schoolchildren singing patriotic songs as enemies of the state.

I also wonder how large a step it is from Quincy to Tiananmen Square?

The people singing "God Bless America" were members of the Tea Party, named after the events in Boston which led to the American war of independence.

The Tea Party movement is the most significant grass roots phenomenon to appear on the American scene in decades. Tea part supporters may not be enemies of the state however, the state is petrified of them. The Tea Party movement has the support and the passion to bring Obama down, and it remains to be seen what he and his supporters will do about it.

It would be a fool who underestimates the pure ruthlessness of this administration,

Suggestions that Obama will declare some form of state of emergency, on some pretext, within the next two years are no longer confined to the usual suspect conspiracy theorists. Some even suggest that it is not beyond the realms of possibility that the 2012 US Presidential election will not even take place.

That may not be as fanciful as it first sounds, as more and more states are amending their election requirements so that a presidential candidate will have to produce documented evidence that he or she is eligible to stand in accordance with the terms of the Constitution, there is a distinct possibility that the standing president of America may seek a second term whilst not standing for election in all of the 50 states.

However, that is another issue and two and a half years away, whereas something needs to be done about the Tea Party now, before November, when its effect on the Mid term elections could render Obama a lame duck Messiah half way through his second term.

This is why we must look at anything which happens with cynicism, yesterday's events in Times Square may be genuine, in fact they might even be the work of a white nut, but other events will happen which will not be what they seem.

However, the first weapon they will use is the one they always use, it may not be as effective as it once was, but it is still formidable. It is the modern west's equivalent of cold war vintage Pravda or the fanatically joyful newsreaders of North Korea's one television channel. It is in America, as in Britain, the controlled media, the likes of CNN, CBS, MSNBC, the New York Times, and even Fox News, which has also begun to sell its soul. The craven organs which claim to provide news but in reality serve only as PR for their masters.

The same media which still repeats the long disproven lie that Tea Party supporters shouted racial slurs at black congressmen on their way to vote for the Health Care Bill, will continue to claim there are swastika wearing Nazis, child molesters, and tattooed, shaven headed, Supremacists amongst the flag waving Middle Americans of the Tea Party. With their methods, they may find some, whether they exist or not.

To get an idea what the media will do to the Tea Party, we need only look at what they did to the last person to pose a real threat to Obama.

In the last few days I have read a lot of news items regarding the growing environmental disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, following the huge and fatal fire on an Oil rig. What struck me was how often a particular name kept appearing in the reader comments under the news stories. That name was Sarah Palin. As you may recall Sarah Palin who repeated the Slogan coined by (African American) RNC Chairman Michael Steele “Drill Baby Drill” during the 2008 Vice Presidential debate. A number or readers seemed to have extrapolated from this that Sarah Palin, who in fact supported (wrongly in my view) opening up parts of the Alaskan wildlife reserve to drilling, was somehow responsible for the fact that drilling was going on in the Gulf of Mexico.

This of course demonstrated how dumb so much of the public is and how little was reported of the backroom deals made by the Obama administration, which were the real reason why drilling was allowed in the Gulf, but it also demonstrated how complete the demonisation of Sara Palin has become.

The attacks on Palin started because, in 2008, the media judged that after the defeat of Hilary Clinton she was the only person could prevent the ascendency of Barack the beatified to the Whitehouse. The attacks continue because rightly or wrongly she is still perceived as a threat.

Please do not write in and tell me that Palin is a “Jewish plant”, or an “establishment stooge”, the point of this posting is not whether Mrs. Palin is, or is not, the right leader for Conservative America, it is about what was done to her so as to protect Obama, and what was done was devastating.

Sarah Palin is not the President of America, she is not in congress, she is not in the Senate, we was until recently the Governor of Alaska, which is the other end of the country, so there are quite a few people who are a tad more responsible for what has happened in the Gulf than she is, yet brainwashed commentators on news blogs blame her before they blame the people who are in power.

Of course if the press can find a way of blaming her they will do so, however ludicrous it may be. That is unless they can hang it on Senator Michele Bachmann, often called "the second most hated woman in America" right after Palin. Michelle just happens to be another attractive right wing female politician who opposes Obama and who is also pilloried in the press, what a coincidence, anyone notice a pattern here?

Palin may be loved by the Tea Party movement, however, elsewhere in America, and in the wider world, she is viewed as a joke, or worse, a monster.

How did Palin become so hated? What are her great sins? She opposes abortion, well so do I and given that 95% of abortions in America rather fall into the "culling for convenience" category, maybe we have a point. She hunts, big deal, she is a creationist, so are more than half the Christians on the planet. She made a couple of gaffes on the campaign trail, Obama said he'd visited 57 states and that he was a Muslim, but as the world's media were in the process of carrying him cheering over the finish line, that didn't matter.

Palin was asked about her experience with foreign affairs so she pointed out that as Mayor of Alaska she had to work closely with Russia part of which was visible from Alaska, which some over paid and not particularly funny comedienne translated to "I can see Russia from my house" and which 90% of the morons Frank mentioned who comment on news stories believe to this day Palin said herself.

I can think of many many thousands of politicians more deserving of derision and scorn than Sarah Palin, who's real crime was that she had enough personal charisma to take votes away from the chosen one, or at least she could have done unless the "independent" media could destroy her first, which, of course, they did

The media will seek to do to the Tea party what they did to Sarah Palin. If you don't think they can do it to a popular and benign political force, just look across the Atlantic to see what was done to the BNP. You do not yet know what you face, but you soon will do.

Very similar forces are at work in both Britain and America, the same evil is abroad, and it will do what it needs to do to destroy us. Whether they succeed depends upon whether we are prepared to fight

Images from Quincy Illinois

____________________
UPDATE: Man of Pakistani origin arrested in relation to Times Square bomb plot
________________
Hat Tip: Dr D

Bigots exposed

This week's events involving Prime Minister Gordon Brown's encounter with Rochdale pensioner and life long Labour voter Gilian Duffy, when he at first spoke to her ion a friendly, and, for him, affable manner, but was recorded calling her a “bigoted woman” as he drove away, were revealing in a number of ways.

Firstly they revealed a lot about the man himself. Insincerity is nothing new in politicians, but seldom has it been revealed quite so blatantly, and even the most passionate of Labour supporters must have cringed at the contrast between the flattering and friendly lies he told to the woman's face and what he said about her, and her views, behind her back when he thought he was no longer being recorded. However, there was more than just hypocrisy revealed immediately the car door closed

The fake, "stuck in a wind tunnel", grin dropped from his face and the real Gordon Brown raised his ugly head.

His first act was to blame someone else (his adviser, Sue Nye, a woman who will surly double lock her doors and windows and jump at the slightest creaking floorboard for many years to come) for 'letting' him meet 'someone like that'

he then accused the elderly voter of being a bigot merely because she dared, ever so mildly, to express some concern about migration. This was despite the fact that the poor old duck had even obeyed the BBC approved immigration debate requirement by specifically referring to “Eastern European” immigrants rather than the large numbers of Asians who have moved into Rochdale in recent decades.

In response Brown had disingenuously attempted to dismiss her concerns by claiming that the “million” foreigners were 'just replacing' a million Brits who were deserting the place. This was in fact a lie, as there are actually considerably more Europeans in Britain than there are Britons in Europe (let alone the millions upon millions of non-Europeans in Britain).

Furthermore, most of the Britons in Europe are spending their British earned, and British paid, pensions in places like France, Spain and Greece, not competing with Europeans for jobs and forcing down European wages.

When confronted with a tape of what he had said he put his head in his hands (forgetting there was TV in the studio). When the head came up the tried to say HE was misunderstood. Of course he was not 'misunderstood', he was just 'caught'. He wined that he had not been able to respond to the question about immigration because of the media – he had obviously forgotten the fib about all those Brits in Europe

He then blamed some other minders for forgetting to take his microphone off. It was all somebody else (perhaps several somebody else's) fault, to Brown the fault lay with the recording, not with what was recorded. None of the blame was his.

As the panic began to set in he dropping everything else and rushed back to Rochdale in search of the deeply hurt but still feisty pensioner's home and disappeared indoors for 45 minute, emerging to say that in fact HE had misunderstood her, he had apologised (now) and she had accepted his apology, and that he was a repentant sinner, all delivered with a nervous smirk/grin throughout. See my reference to sincerity and politicians above.

Throughout we never saw the woman, she stayed indoors. I didn't count how many bodyguards went in with him or how may came out, but when he stressed she had accepted his apology (the same woman who was giving him a Northern tongue-lashing a few hours earlier when the TV people relayed his remarks about her) I was left with the feeling the reason she wasn't by his side (it was on her doorstep after all) was because two of them had her in the kitchen holding her down until Gordon was out of range of domestic missiles.

By Friday in his interview with over employed Jeremy Paxman he had come up with a new excuse for calling a voter a bigot, apparently they were having one conversation and he was hearing a completely different one
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/172480/Brown-defends-bigoted-woman-jibe

However, it revealed a lot more than just the psychological and moral flaws of our sociopathic Prime minister.
Had the so called “gaffe” related to any other subject the Cameron and Clegg double act would have been screaming it from the roof tops and probably used it as their mobile phone ring tones. However, in this instance their silence was almost eerie. Certainly they commented, and were suitably critical of Brown's slur on Mrs. Duffy however, in both cases their comments were made with the frowning and serious faced reserve of one listening to the words “there but fir the grace of God” echoing at the backs of their heads.

Let us be in no doubt that, although both Cameron and Clegg are both sufficiently media savvy to remember to take off their microphones before making private comments, both of them would have taken exactly the same view as Brown did of Mrs. Duffy and her views.

To our political leaders and other residents of the Westminster bubble, common people who say things like “You can't say anything about the immigrants, other wise you're a r.........” or “And what about all these Eastern Europeans, where are they all flocking from?” as Mrs. Duffy did, are bigots. In fact, at any time other than during an election, when they are required to pretend to empathise with the plebs, many of our politicians would view such statements as proof that the speaker was a hate fuelled, jack booted, Nazis.

Gordon Brown we not alone in his view of ordinary people like Mrs. Duffy, he was just the only one who got caught expressing it.

Young journalists and junior political party apparatchiks must have been rather confused, after years of being taught to accuse people who expressed the views Mrs. Duffy did of racism and assorted hate crimes, they were suddenly being required to treat her as an “ordinary person” who was merely expressing “concerns shared by many ordinary people”, an approach which would never be permitted at any other time.

However, there is an election on, and the establishment has been forced to accept that the previously unmentionable topic of immigration is an issue of serious concern to many of those common white proles who, for the time being, still have votes. Therefore, they have to spend a month pretending that understand ordinary people and care about ordinary people's concerns, otherwise ordinary people might go off and vote for the BNP.

Once the election is over, everything will go back to normal, the politicians will forget any promises they made about resolving immigration, and it will once again be okay to call Mrs. Duffy a bigot.

That is, of course, unless enough people vote BNP to ensure our rulers stay as scared as they are right now

Mandela - The truths he never told

By Robin Hind

On 11 February 1990 Nelson Mandela was released from prison, and gave a speech, now well known, from the Town Hall in the City of Cape Town, which heralded much about subsequent events.

He subsequently received many accolades and tributes which deemed him to be a great statesman, wise, forgiving and an engineer of peace. He has been described as exemplifying compassion, courage, integrity and hope and was awarded the Nobel Prize for peace.

If he were to justify his praise-singers, if he were sincere in his compassion about the conditions of all peoples in Africa, if he were the messenger who could change the attitudes of entire societies and so better the lot of the misfortunate and unsuccessful, if he were to clearly distinguish and separate himself from the criminal political tyrants of Africa, his speech might have taken this form:



********************************************************************

Friends, comrades and fellow South Africans.

I greet you all in the name of peace, democracy and freedom for all.

I stand here before you not as a prophet but as a humble servant of you, the people. Your tireless and heroic sacrifices have made it possible for me to be here today. I therefore place the remaining years of my life in your hands.

On this day of my release, I extend my sincere and warmest gratitude to the millions of my compatriots and those in every corner of the globe who have campaigned tirelessly for my release.

I have therefore been chosen to act as spokesperson for my people. I speak not only on their behalf, but I speak to them in the hope that they will recognise the value of the country of which they will inherit a mandate via the electoral process.

The adverse anti-white propaganda which has infested Africa and which eventually began to infect South Africa has had the great danger of causing discontent among many in the population. It has afflicted many, from academics to the least educated of the population, and with so many dangerous possibilities, it exists as the greatest threat to the future of South Africa.

At the outset I wish to apologise to the nation for my involvement in the brutality with which I had been compliant, directly or indirectly, in the past. But I wish to salute, and am grateful for, the fair and forgiving judicial system which characterised South Africa and for which I recognise, in retrospect, my personal indebtedness.

I am grateful for my education, and the capacity which it gave me to become a leader, given my humble of origins. I'm grateful to the culture provided to me by white civilisation and which allowed this education to reach me, as little removed as I was, by my accident of birth; from my origins which were so close to elemental man.

I wish to remind the black population of the benefits they received under white administration. South Africa has become, in not more than three generations, the leading Nation in the entire continent of Africa. It must be obvious to all that is solely the result of the capabilities of the white race, and we must remember forever the contribution of the whites to the well being of black South Africa. It is not by chance that millions of people in the impoverished regions of Africa have clamoured to enter South Africa, whilst it was under white rule, and to benefit from the presence of that unique quality of administration, leadership, orderliness and creativity which the white race brought into this small part of this continent.

We are grateful for what has been created in this wild continent within half a century and the economic success which we are inheriting.

We recognise an extraordinary infrastructure, ranging from transportation on land air and sea, through to the industrial giant which has led black South Africans to a wealth which could not possibly have achieved without the presence of the white race. We must recognise, with appreciation, the costs borne by the white race and that tiny group of taxpayers, at all times only a small fraction of the population -- who offered their support to the black population.

My great fear is that the white race will not forgive me, and my people, for what, as the black race, we have done to them in the way of wars and crimes, inflicted on this small and isolated minority, by a greatly outnumbering majority. We, as I stand here, are grateful for their magnanimity.

I wish to make it clear to the black population the magnitude and importance of the white creators, and request that is never be forgotten.

I also wish the black population to understand that the future success of South Africa is bound to the preservation of the white population, with their expertise, skills, and unique understanding of the land, its challengers, and demands.

I wish to thank the past government for their endeavour and great achievement in creating the Bantustans, with the economic development and incentives which the white race promoted. This availed the black race of an instructional pathway towards an understanding of a democratic and capitalist capability. Let us never forget that as a black race we had never been capable of creating this level of sophistication in the past.

I realise, naturally, that separated development was equally important to the white race. This was understandable given the hope that the white race had that the majority of people in South Africa could take their place with the world’s most productive, to the benefit of all. It has to be recognised, also, that the white race required some means of protecting of their complex civilisation and its material manifestations. The only practical way to do this was to ensure that black productivity and creativity caught up with that of the whites. This was the only pathway towards overcoming the destructive effects of that inequality which birth, heritage, chance and circumstances had inflicted upon the black races throughout the world.

We, in South Africa, are totally dependent on the white race to continue to lead us into the 21st century with that prospect of an increasing prosperity for the entire nation.

We are fortunate to be colonised by the white race and their capacity for patronage which was designed to lead the black race ahead towards incorporation as legitimate members into the first world. It was this which made the black races of South Africa uniquely different. In South Africa we are the most fortunate black groups in the whole of Africa, let alone the Caribbean and South-Central America, to have this patronage. Others have had the opportunity of white beneficiation in their counties before, only to mindlessly destroy their prospects by short term greed and long term foolhardiness.

Never make the mistake of regarding the white race as your enemy. They are you greatest allies in the context of the world as a whole, and allies in the commercial competition which South Africa will face in the future. To turn on the white race would be like a snake eating its tail, with the excuse that it is hungry. Remember, by the power of your numbers you are regarded as the jaws of the snake – so powerful and important if used correctly – so destructive if used mindlessly.

A goal which has always been acknowledged, and which has always been the ultimate aim of all South Africans, is that the black race was to evolve and prosper. But we need the guidance of a civilisation far, far older than that of the black races.

If you wish to preserve out superbly successful system of justice, law and social order: if you wish to preserve the academic triumphs of South African education: if you wish to ensure the future of the health, shelter and nutrition of our people, and to approach the standards of living parallel with that of the best in the world, you must ensure that nothing interferes with the desire of the white race to continue to live safely and productively in South Africa.

We must do everything possible to encourage the white race to stay. To that end the new government will enact legislation to prevent any jeopardy to the employment of members of the white race. We must recognise that the vast achievements of this extraordinary minority will not make them immune to the lure of greater and wealthier nations, which will be only too willing to recruit their many arms of expertises. We will encourage those white South Africans, currently abroad to return by assisting them with passages and offering special tax benefits. This should be looked at as an investment in the future of the black races, and an inexpensive investment at that.

I emphasise that there must never and absolutely never be discrimination against our white South African partners, if South Africa is to maintain its position on the very brink of the first world. Nothing must threaten the investments by the first world, and the unique bridge provided by white South Africans in linking the first world to South Africa by their associations, financial links and their language heritage with Europe.

There must never be a place for boasting about past military success or terrorising a population. There is no place for triumphalism: There is no place for gloating over battles in which thousands of young lives were lost.

There is no place for capitalising upon or parading the diversionary issues in the world, such as the communist capitalist divide, praising the causes of rigid and inflexible personalities, or praising those individuals who took a stubborn stances in promoting their cults obsessively and immutably.

Remember that equality begins with the individual. If respect and dignity are required every individual must demonstrate himself or herself as being equally capable to those whose respect is demanded. No one can expect dignity and respect if they remain inferior. The inferior will beget themselves tolerance, compassion and assistance, but it is unreasonable for the inferior to expect to be treated as equals. Each of you, as individuals, will need to generate the responses that you receive reflected back from societies, in the building your self-esteem. But you cannot demand: You get back what you give out. It is now up to you, Black South Africa, to demonstrate that you are up to it. Create your own esteem.

In conclusion I wish to quote my own words during my trial in 1964. They are true today as they were then:

'I have fought against white domination and I have fought against black domination. I have cherished the ideal of a democratic and free society in which all persons live together in harmony and with equal opportunities. It is an ideal which I hope to live for and to achieve.’

There will never be a need for any of you to sacrifice yourselves, unless you are foolish enough to let haste, greed, arrogance, aggression, intolerance, lack of humility and avarice become your destructive masters.

Robin Hind

The High Court Demonstration has been canceled

Please note that the planned BNP demonstration at the high court in London today has been canceled.

Farmer dies in Boschkop attack

A man in his 40s was killed on a farm in Boschkop, Pretoria on Wednesday morning, paramedics said.

The farm owner who is said to have been attacked with a sharp object was found lying in a pool of blood at around 07:45

Paramedics attempted to resuscitate him, but he died from his wounds on the scene.

A police spokesperson was unable to immediately provide further details on the incident.

Source

____________
Thanks to Johann and Jennifer

Thirty One years of "Provocation"

Scotland Yard have finally released the 31 year old report into the death of so called anti-racist protester Blair Peach in 1979. Given the report reveals that Peach almost certainly died as the result of blows he received from a police baton we will no doubt hear much more about the report in coming days. The left in this country, which includes the controlled media, is nothing if not tribal and Peach, a martyr of the anti-racist movement is very much one of their own.

However, looking at the wider circumstances surrounding Peach's death shows us that not much has changed in the last 31 years. He died whilst he and hundreds of other “anti-racist” protesters were involved in a violent confrontation with the police when protesting against a “provocative” meeting which the National Front were holding in Southall. The National Front's meeting was viewed as “provocative” because Southall is an area with a lot of immigrants, which, of course, begs the question, where exactly in London would not be provocative?

The violent anti-racist protest in Southall followed a number of earlier violent incidents, such as that in Lewisham in 1977, where, when the National Front staged a “provocative”march through another area with a lot of immigrants, this seemingly provoked anti-racists to throw paving stones at them.

Odd isn't it that although it was the National Front who did the marching and the anti-racists who threw the paving stones, to this day the media still blames the violence on the National Front. The NF, of course, were being “provocative” by protesting against an issue of concern to them in an area where the issue in question had made a significant impact.

Peach and the other “anti-racist” protesters of the 1970's were part of the same movement which went on to form the modern day UAF, and they are still employing the exactly the same tactics , except that they now largely ignore the National Front and instead instigate violent confrontation with new and more successful nationalist organisations such as the BNP. Only last year on College Green, in front of the Houses of Parliament, we saw UAF violently attacking Nick Griffin's “provocative” press conference, and then the mass violent attack at the BBC, when Nick Griffin made his “provocative” appearance on question time.

Also in Preston we saw the organised violence by the “anti-racist” UAF against the peaceful, but presumably “provocative” anti-Islam march by the English Defence League.

This same thing has now been going on for almost 40 years, the same violent forces have been using the same tactics of violence and intimidation against anyone who objects to the mass invasion of our country, whist blaming the victims for “provoking” the violence.

Meanwhile, the media, the police and various governments continue to also blame the victims of the violence for binging it upon themselves by daring to object to a deliberate government policy.

They call this country a democracy, but it has been no such thing for decades!

Cleggmania has consequences

As Nick Clegg has, today, confirmed that he would be prepared to support a Labour leader , other than Gordon Brown, even if they had not stood for election, the above statement could be true in mores senses than one.

(By the same token, an alternative, I didn't dare to illustrate was “Vote Clegg – Get Harman”)

_______________________
For non-UK readers, Ed Ball is currently Schools minister and a protegee of Gordon Brown, he is rumoured to be one of the most unpleasant and brutish members of the government. Harriet Harman in deputy prime minister and a (white) man hating feminist

Another court case - another humour bypass

This Thursday BNP Chairman Nick Griffin will be defending the party at London High Court against top lawyers for the Marmite producers and former Margaret Hodge employers, Unilever. This is due to the fact the humourless prats are miffed because a pot of their sticky brown spread appeared in a spoof BNP broadcast.

If you are in London, please go and support Mr Griffin and show the media that you love Britain, whatever you might think of Marmite.

THIS EVENT HAS NOW BEEN CANCELED

Democracy - By Channel 4

The Guide to Cameron's "Big Society"

On March 31 David Cameron unveiled his “Big Society” plan, listing a set of policies which he claims are designed to build a ‘Big Society’ based on responsibility and respect.

The very first of these is a proposal for “a neighbourhood army of 5,000 full-time, professional community organisers who will be trained with the skills they need to identify local community leaders, bring communities together, help people start their own neighbourhood groups, and give communities the help they need to take control and tackle their problems”, in relation to which he goes on to say:

“This plan is directly based on the successful community organising movement established by Saul Alinsky in the United States and has successfully trained generations of community organisers, including President Obama.”

It may be that the disingenuous Mr Cameron is attempting here to capitalise on the still widely held belief in Britain that Obama is a a successful and hugely popular American president. This might be a reasonable assumption, given that due to media censorship, although the British public are aware that Obama was swept to victory on a tilde of popularity and optimism in November 2008, very few are aware that, within months of taking office Obama's poll ratings were languishing amongst those of history's least popular presidents.

(Did anyone else notice the note of panic in the voice of Asian news reader Krishan Guru-Murthy, when Michael Heseltine alluded to that secret fact on last night's Channel 4 news?)

However, it remains rather bizarre that a European Conservative leader would pay such a fulsome tribute to a figure such as Saul Alinsky the author of “Rules for Radicals” considered my many to be a guidebook to modern communist revolution. Published in 1971, is a bible for many on the left and a significant tool in bringing about some of the worst aspects of our modern Orwellian society.

In the opening paragraph of Rules for Radicals Alinsky says: "What follows is for those who want to change the world from what it is to what they believe it should be. The Prince was written by Machiavelli for the Haves on how to hold power. Rules for Radicals is written for the Have-Nots on how to take it away"

He goes on to say:

Any revolutionary change must be preceded by a passive, affirmative, non-challenging attitude toward change among the mass of our people. They must feel so frustrated, so defeated, so lost, so future less in the prevailing system that they are willing to let go of the past and change the future. This acceptance is the reformation essential to any revolution.

Does this sound familiar? Can you see how Alinsky's guidance has been applied within our own society to replace so much that was good with so much that is so damaging.

Elsewhere, Alinsky says 'Pick the Target, Freeze It, Personalize It and Polarize It.' “It” of course is a human being, but, as we have seen, the disciples of Alinsky are skilled dehumanisers.

Speaking of Saul Alinsky a respected commentator and friend of mine said: “This man was an aggressive communist, one for whom there was no right or wrong, only power, there was no morality only the will to dominate others. He is an absolute horror when you view the way he wants to break down society, destroy the Church and families, etc. He followed the Gramsci line of thinking, rather than the Stalin brute force approach, and therefore avoided direct confrontations. But he was constantly fomenting divisions, creating a sense of grievance, class envy, us versus them attitudes, the sorts of things that absolutely wreck society he saw as very useful. He was a destroyer.”

When challenged, Alinsky denied that he was a communist, but his writings, and the manner in which they have been used belie that denial.

A writer calling themselves “Jessie James” in an article entitled “Know your enemy” published on Western Front America said: The long term goal of Saul Alinsky and the socialist revolutionaries is to openly overturn the traditional order of society by taking power from the “Haves” and giving it to the “Have- Nots” of the world.

This goal of radical redistribution of wealth and power is the only “constant” ideology that an Alinsky trained “community disorganizer” is taught to accept. That the ultimate implementation of this redistribution on a global level would destroy each and every advanced white western country is either not understood by the the mostly white middle class disciples of Alinsky or they are so twisted that they see our destruction as desirable and justified.

Alinsky wrote his Rules for Radicals in 1971 for the specific purpose of harnessing the unfocused chaotic discontent of the 1960’s youth rebellion into a long term tool for the destruction of the current American system from the inside out. His goal was to produce a generation of “Realistic Radicals” who would worm their way into our churches, our government, our schools, our businesses, our labor unions and our media.”

This may be written from a partisan perspective, however, it remains beyond question that Saul Alinsky was no friend either of the white race or of the forces of conservatism.

The fact that the leader of a major European conservative party would choose not only to heap praise on such a figure, but to formulate policies based on his teachings leaves one with a troubling sense of unease. Are Cameron and his party acting through stupidity and ignorance, or is their motivation significantly more sinister?

Is the Conservative leader a fool, or is he something very different to what he would have us believe? Let us hope that it is the former and not the latter.

__________
Hat Tip: Dr. D

One year old baby beaten into a coma by armed gang

Another report from South Africa at Censor Bugbear

The Huguenot Lie

In his interview with Nick Griffin last night, the congenitally supercilious Jeremy Paxman attempted to question the existence of such a creature as a native or indigenous Briton, by seeking to exaggerate the number of immigrants who have come to Britain over the centuries, and as ever, he raised what he and the other Historical deceivers believe is their trump card the Huguenot refugees who arrived here after 1571.

However, let us look at this claim that Britain is a nation of immigrants, and that what is happening to day is no different to what went before. Does the fact that, as an act of charity we took in a group of of persecuted French protestants 430 years ago invalidate our claim to be an indigenous people. Let us look at the truth of the Huguenot lie.

French Queen Catherine de' Medici 'exults over the dead bodies of the Huguenots'

In the late 16th Century, following persecution in France, most famously on the Eve of St. Bartholomew, when many thousands of their numbers were massacred in Paris, around 200,000 Huguenots fled from France and were dispersed widely throughout Europe, and even further afield, Some even traveling as far as South Africa where their descendants can be found amongst the Afrikaner community (odd we have never heard Paxman claiming there is no indigenous South African people) others went to the newly found colonies in Canada and North America (does that mean Native Americans are not indigenous?). Within Europe, Huguenots refugees settled in Holland, Germany (mostly what was then Prussia) Switzerland, Scandinavia and Russia.

Some came to Britain, and it is true that prior to 1948, the white, European, Christian Huguenots were the single largest immigrant group to come to Britain. However, at even the most generous estimate of their numbers, 50,000, amounted to less than a fifth of the current Somali population, which, estimated at a quarter of a million, is certainly not even one of the largest immigrant groups in the country

As to the Eastern European Jews, the other group mentioned by Paxman, they were a few thousand at most, less in numbers probably than the current Melanesian population. Prior to that you have to go back a thousand years to find any significant numbers of invaders, and even then, the Normans, and the Danes before largely sent their soldiers home after they had done their pillaging and in any event they were tiny numbers by comparison with what we see today.

Before 1948 Britain was not a "Nation of Immigrants" as the media liars try to pretend. As acts of charity for which our enemies now seek to punish us, we took in immigrants and refugees, but, as with the Huguenots, we did in relatively small numbers who were easy to assimilate and which did not overwhelm the native population or change the genetic DNA of our nation. What we are seeing now bears no comparison to what went before. It might as well be a completely different universe and is as close as you can come to the bloodless genocide of a people

_______________
Footnote: From Wikipedia: Jeremy Paxman has been publicly criticised over his and his partner's home help arrangements. Having advertised on a Romanian website, they hired two people at below minimum wage without a written contract. While this is not illegal in the UK if employees live in, Paxman, known for grilling interviewees on workers' rights issues, was criticised when his employees went public, claiming to have been paid "the bare minimum. - Perhaps Mr. Paxman should declare an interest when discussing immigration

What even Mr Paxman might understand

It seems that despite adjudicating over University challenge in his spare time, Newsnight anchor Jeremy Paxman (pictured above) struggles for a definition of an indigenous or native Briton, or so the disingenuous and obscenely over compensated old poser tried to pretend in his unsuccessful attempts to discomfort Nick Griffin during his interview with him this evening.

Well, in that case, lets give him a fact which will not challenge his Panten Super Hold spray addled brain and one which will not even require him to grasp a definition of either native or indigenous which would be quite clear to 99% of the population. Indeed it will not even be necessarily for him to pontificate superciliously about a tiny group of French Huguenots or an even smaller group of Lithuanian Jews, but which might just give him an inkling of the size of problem we are facing.

It is an indisputable fact that, if current immigration and immigrant birth rate numbers continue, within less than 50 years, the descendants of those British born people who celebrated VE day in 1945 will be in the minority within the British Isles.

Is that clear enough, even for you Mr. Paxman?

An undemocratic aliance

The man striking what I assume he imagines is a suitably arrogant pose for a British land-owner is Jamaican born farmer and businessman Wilfred Emanuel-Jones, otherwise known as the black farmer behind the "Black Farmer" range of food products. Despite the immigrant invasion of Britain, black farmers remain very rare in this country (as they once were in America until the government decided to compensate black farmers for the "racist" reluctance of banks to lend them money, at which point their numbers increased by many thousands) and Mr. Emanuel-Jones gained some celebrity status, together with his own Channel 4 TV series, which saw him taking a group of inner city school leavers from ethnic minorities to work on a scholarship program on his Devon farm.

It would of course have led to a Channel 4 exposé, and probable police action, had a white farmer offered a scholarship program exclusively to native whites. However, that is the way "equality" works in these Orwellian islands.

Emanuel-Jones is also one of the ethnic minority candidates, which Tory leader David Cameron is so excited to be fielding in this year's general election and is standing as the Conservative candidate for rural Chippenham in Witshire.

However, it seems that both Emmanuel-Jones and his Labour counterpart Greg Lovell have some difficulty understanding the concept of democracy and demanded that the BNP candidate
for Chippenam Michael Simpkins be excluded from any hustings event they attend.

Sadly, those organising the Hustings event at Corsham on Friday, Corsham Community Area Network (CCAN), appeared to share the Emmanuel-Jones / Lovell Soviet style approach to democracy, and banned the BNP from attending the first half of the event, when the other candidates would be speaking. The BNP were invited to attend the second half, at which stage, those not wishing to share the stage could leave.

Naturally at half time Emmanuel-Jones and Lovell departed like a pair of ugly sisters rustling their crinoline and waving their fans in disgust at being in the presence of the lower orders.

To his credit the Liberal Democrat candidate Duncan Hames did not join in with the Tory and Labour histrionics and demonstrated respect for democracy by remaining on stage. Let us hope, that, if the BNP do not win Chippenham themselves (it is a rural seat and not one of the party's main targets) Mr. Hames is one Liberal Democrat who does benefit from the Cleggmania currently stirring up the British electorate.

Meanwhile with luck Emmanuel-Jones can return quietly to making sausages I will never buy, and Lovell can return to running his ethical "free trade" shop, just so long as neither of them get anywhere near a democratic process which they clearly find difficult to understand.

In the mind of the deluded and deeply stupid

Raped by a black man and its still the white man's fault, this woman is so stupid she is dangerous.

This level of stupidity just makes me angry

Armenian Genocide 1915

Armenian Genocide Remembrance day 24th April

A statement of truth

There is one statement in the BNP's 2010 election manifesto which the party and every one of its supporters must ensure is made known to the wider public at every possible opportunity. It is a statement which I urge the BNP to find space for in their forthcoming election broadcast and repeat every time they are given airtime on any major TV or radio outlet, particularly when they are being broadcast live, so that it can not be easily edited out, as the controlled media will certainly seek to do.

They must repeat it on door steps and shout it out at hustings, for it is a truth which must be spoken.

That statement is:

At current immigration and birth rates, indigenous British people are set to become a minority well within 50 years. This will result in the extinction of the British people, culture, heritage and identity.

It is a statement of truth which the wider public must be made to confront. It is also a truth which the establishment does not want to be told.

Do not forget how Nick Griffin was immediately attacked and silenced by the other panellists when he attempted to reveal the truth on Question time, and, in any event, it would certainly have been edited out of the broadcast version of the show had he managed to say it.

They don't want it said because they have no answer to it, they can not deny it, and even they can recognise the truth it describes for the act of evil which it is. That is why they refuse to acknowledge it, they know that, to succeed, their victims must remain ignorant of their fate until it is too late for them to save themselves from it.

However, the white majority must be made aware that they and their children will become a minority in their native land by the middle of this century and what that will mean to them and to their children.

We, who gather here, tend to think they must all know what is happening because we know it so well, but, in fact, they do not know. It is a truth never spoken when they gather, it is not mentioned on the TV shows they watch, the websites they visit or in the newspapers they read, so why would they know?

Some may suspect it, but whilst it remains a secret they need not acknowledge it, as to do so might seem racist, and also very scary.

However, they must be made to acknowledge it, for otherwise it will destroy them.

Sadly some may think it fine, as democrats we must accept there are those who will cheerfully welcome the day upon which their race is disinherited in their homeland, that is their choice, but it a choice which they must be allowed to make for themselves, not one which is imposed upon them.

Until now none of us have been given the choice.

Our leaders have, for their own political ends, taken up down a path which must inevitably lead to the the day when our people will become a minority in the islands where our forefathers have lived, and which they have defended with their lives for millennia, yet they have never given us the chance to say “No” (or indeed, for that matter even to say “Yes”)

It is not scaremongering to acknowledge the inevitable outcome of what is being done, it is certainly not racist, it is a mere statement of truth, a truth the public must be told.

What is being done to us if of far greater significance than our membership of the EU, or who rules us for the next five years, for when this comes to pass, at a date which is ever more rapidly rushing towards us, it will be forever and there will be no going back.

The unavoidable result of our leaders treachery, embodied within that truth, has never before been acknowledged, and we have never before been allowed to vote on it.

This time we have a vote but the people must be made to know what they are voting for and what will happen if they don't.

The BNP Election Manifesto

A breaking dawn

The BNP launched their election manifesto today, and it is an extraordinarily powerful document. I really hope that people will copy and paste the main points, which are listed below, and e-mail or send them to everyone they know. Because I suspect that most people will struggle to find anything they disagree with.

This is the most radical manifesto released by any political party in decades, and yet it is all common sense.

The manifesto’s key pledges are:

Defending Britain: BNP Defence Policy

• The BNP will end the involvement of British troops in the Afghanistan war

• The BNP will not allow British forces to become involved in a war against Iran

• The BNP will withdraw our troops from Germany

• The BNP will renegotiate our presence in NATO

• The BNP will raise Defence spending by one percent over the rate of inflation for the next five years

• The BNP will institute a Community Award Scheme for young people

Immigration: An Unparalleled Crisis Which Only the BNP Can Solve

• At current immigration and birth rates, indigenous British people are set to become a minority well within 50 years. This will result in the extinction of the British people, culture, heritage and identity.

• The BNP will take all steps necessary to halt and reverse this process. These steps will include a halt to all further immigration, the deportation of all illegal immigrants, a halt to the “asylum” swindle and the promotion of the already existing voluntary repatriation scheme.

• The BNP recognises the right of legally settled and law-abiding minorities to remain in the UK and enjoy the full protection of the law, on the understanding that the indigenous population of Britain has the right to remain the majority population of our nation.

• The BNP will deport all foreigners convicted of crimes in Britain, regardless of their immigration status.

• The BNP will review all citizenship grants awarded since Labour entered government in 1997, based on that party’s admission that they orchestrated mass immigration to change forcibly Britain’s demographics and to gerrymander elections.

• The BNP will repeal the Race Relations Act and all other far leftist social engineering projects, such as the Equalities and Human Rights Commission aimed at enforcing multiculturalism.

• The BNP will regain sovereign control of our borders by increasing funding to the UK Border Agency.

Environmental Protection and the “Climate Change” Theory

• The BNP demands an end to the destruction of Britain’s green belt, caused primarily by housing demand fuelled through mass immigration.

• The BNP will launch a “polluter pays” policy in the fight against environmental damage.

• The BNP will encourage the use of existing “brown sites” for all new building or industrial developments.

• The BNP rejects the “climate change” theory which holds that all western nations need to be stripped of their manufacturing base and pay untold billions to the Third World to build up their industries.

Leaving the European Union

• The BNP loves Europe but hates the EU.

• The BNP demands an immediate withdrawal from the European Union, which is an organisation dedicated to usurping British sovereignty and to destroying our nationhood and national identity.

• The BNP will end the annual multibillion cash haemorrhage Britain pays out to the EU in membership fees and regulatory costs. This money will be spent on building infrastructure in Britain and alleviating poverty and unemployment at home.

Counter Jihad: Confronting the Islamic Colonisation of Britain

• The BNP is implacably opposed to the Labour/Tory regime’s mass immigration policies which, if left unchecked, will see Britain and most of Europe colonised by Islam within a few decades.

• The BNP believes that the historical record shows that Islam is by its very nature incompatible with modern secular western democracy.

• The BNP will ban the burka, ritual slaughter and the building of further mosques in Britain.

• The BNP believes that there should be absolutely no further immigration from any Muslim countries, as it presents one of the most deadly threats yet to the survival of our nation.

• We propose the immediate deportation of all radical Islamist preachers, those proven to have attended any of their inflammatory sermons, and any other members of their community who object to these reasonable security measures.

• The BNP is the only party to identify correctly the twin causes of Islamist terrorism in Britain: (a) mass immigration and (b) a biased British foreign policy which serves to incite Muslims living in Britain.

Renationalising the Welfare State

• The BNP will halt the handout of benefits, housing, education and pensions to foreigners who have not paid into the system.

• The BNP will ensure that the National Health Service is used to serve British people and not used as an International Health Service.

• The BNP will provide education and training for the unemployed to enable them to get back into work.

• The BNP will institute a workfare-not-welfare policy for those who refuse to get back to work.

Freedom for All: The Restoration of Our Civil Liberties

• The BNP will repeal all legislation enacted by successive Labour and Tory regimes which have usurped the British people’s basic civil liberties.

• The BNP will circumvent the erosion of our liberties by the old gang parties under the guise of “fighting terrorism” by dealing with the root causes of Islamist extremism in Britain, namely mass immigration and Britain’s biased foreign policy.

• The BNP will repeal all laws aimed at restricting freedom of speech, including those relating to race relations and religion.

• The BNP rejects ID cards as an undesirable manifestation of the surveillance society.

• The BNP will repeal the 1998 Human Rights Act and withdraw from the European Convention on Human Rights, both of which are exploited to abuse Britain’s hospitality by the world’s scroungers.

• By withdrawing from the EU, the BNP will not permit British courts to be subservient to international bodies or courts which override the law of the British parliament.

Constitutional Change: Protecting and Enhancing Our Heritage

• The BNP will devolve all powers properly capable of exercise to local level and revived county council government.

• The BNP will create an English parliament in Westminster.

• The BNP will create a pan-British parliament to oversee those policy areas currently determined by Westminster and invite the Irish Republic to join as an equal partner.

• The BNP will reform the House of Lords to include non-party political experts and individuals chosen on the grounds of talent and service.

• The BNP will introduce citizens’ initiative referenda to force government to adhere to the will of the voters on specific subjects.

• The BNP will introduce a new Bill of Rights which will guarantee certain basic civil liberties.

• The BNP will enact legislation forbidding interference in the electoral process by third parties not partaking in an election.

• The BNP will restrict the use of postal voting only to those incapable of getting to the polling station on election day.

Democracy and the Media

• The BNP will enact legislation which will hold journalists and their media outlets criminally liable for knowingly publishing falsehoods.

• The BNP will create a media complaints body which will have the power to grant slandered persons or institutions the right of reply with equal prominence plus financial compensation in serious cases.

Culture, Traditions and Civil Society

• The BNP will take steps to promote the traditional British concepts of civility and courteousness by ensuring that they are taught in schools.

• The BNP will oppose the intrusion of non-British and alien cultural influences which undermine our traditional value systems.

• The BNP will encourage the teaching of British history, culture and traditions in schools.

• The BNP will seek to promote the traditional high-street shopping environment over the out-of-town shopping centre.

• The BNP will ensure that National Lottery funding is spent on projects which enhance British culture, rather than degrade it.

• The BNP will introduce formal bank holidays for all of our nations’ patron saints.

• The BNP will take legislative steps to protect Britain’s pubs, which will include tax concessions, smoking rooms under strict supervision and a lowering of tax on alcohol served in public houses.

Time to Get Tough on Crime and Criminals

• The BNP will end the culture where criminals’ rights are placed above those of victims of crime.

• The BNP will abolish political correctness from the police service in favour of real crime fighting.

• The BNP will review the Police and Criminal Evidence Act (PACE) in order to remove unnecessary bureaucracy from the police service’s duties.

• The BNP will reintroduce capital punishment for drug dealers, child murderers, multiple murderers, murderers of policemen on duty and terrorists where guilt is proven beyond all doubt.

• The BNP will reintroduce the right of householders to defend themselves and their property using whatever means they deem necessary.

• The BNP will establish a penal station for extremely dangerous/violent repeat criminals (including rapists) on the British island of South Georgia.

A Healthy Nation: Public Health and the NHS

• The BNP will end the scandalous situation of NHS underfunding by reallocating money from the foreign aid budget. The reported NHS deficit is £620 million and the current foreign aid budget is £9.1 billion.

• The BNP will increase spending on front line staff while cutting back bureaucracy in the NHS.

• The BNP will end the £2 billion per year “health tourism” scandal.

• The BNP will give priority to employing British people at affordable wages in the NHS and halt the recruitment of Third World-origin staff who are needed in their own nations.

• The BNP will cut waiting times and service difficulties by relieving the immigration burden upon the NHS.

Education for a British Future

• The BNP will reverse the budget cuts on education and prioritise this sector as vital to the rebuilding of our nation.

• The BNP will bring back traditional syllabi and teaching methods to replace the current and obviously failed systems currently being used.

• The BNP will bring back streaming and grammar schools.

• The BNP will bring back academic and sporting competition at all levels of education.

• The BNP will offer free university education to deserving students who have completed their period of Community Service.

Transport: Getting Britain Moving Again

• The BNP will make rail travel affordable once again by reversing the disastrous privatisation process which has grossly inflated ticket prices.

• The BNP will reduce traffic congestion by bringing the immigration invasion under control.

• The BNP will invest in a high speed 200 mph magnetic levitation inter-city rail network.

• The BNP will seek to decrease the price of fuel which is already comprised of at least 63 percent government tax.

• The BNP will charge foreign trucks for the right to use Britain’s road network, as other European nations already do.

• The BNP will encourage and support the development of alternative transportation technologies to ultimately replace the internal combustion engine.

Agriculture: Food and Fisheries

• The BNP will promote British agriculture by gradually phasing out the EU’s CAP subsidies and replacing them with a viable UK system.

• The BNP will forbid the development and importation of genetically modified produce.

• The BNP will encourage the regeneration of the family farm as the core structure of Britain’s agricultural sector.

• The BNP will investigate the need for a massive soil reinvigoration scheme.

• The BNP will outlaw non-stunned ritual slaughter of animals.

• The BNP will bring back our nation’s traditional 200 mile coastal fishing exclusivity zone.

Energy: Fuelling the Nation’s Growth

• The BNP is committed to research into renewable and quasi-renewable energy sources and transmission systems, such as wave power, hydrogen fuel, and nuclear energy.

• The BNP rejects the notion that our nation’s nuclear power stations should be owned by foreign investors.

• The BNP opposes the punitive taxation mandated by the other parties’ adherence to the global warming theory and the “carbon credit” racket.

• The BNP will stop the building of wind turbines which are inefficient and blight the landscape.

• The BNP will investigate clean-burning coal-fired power plants as another method of dealing with increased energy demands.

Foreign Policy: Putting British Interests First

• The BNP will realign British foreign policy to put our nation’s interests first.

• The BNP will undertake not to interfere with the sovereignty of any other nation, and those in the Middle East in particular.

• The BNP would only deploy British armed forces in a conflict in which Britain’s interests were directly involved.

• The BNP will end the foreign aid swindle and reallocate the money saved to help British people.

Housing: Sheltering the Nation

• The BNP will allow local authorities to borrow on the open market to provide housing in their locality.

• The BNP will abolish the Homes and Community and Regional Development agencies and transfer regeneration and housing functions to local councils.

• The BNP will place each local council under a legal duty to build a number of homes set to a percentage of the waiting list total each year. These would only be available to British citizens.

• The BNP will introduce a “local connection test” for any applicant seeking social housing in terms of which they would need to demonstrate a positive and historical link to the area.

• The BNP will create a national infrastructure bank to promote regeneration and national infrastructure renewal.

• The BNP will relieve part of the housing crisis by halting and reversing the immigration invasion.

The Economy: Putting Britain Back on the Road to Recovery

• A BNP government would tackle the national debt problem by cutting expenditure on all projects which do not serve British interests.

• These expenditures which will be cut include the annual costs of £18 billion spent on “global warming,” the £13 billion spent on immigration, the £4 billion spent on asylum, the £15 billion spent on EU membership, the £9.1 billion spent on foreign aid, the billions spent fighting illegal and immoral foreign wars, and the billions spent on “politically correct” social engineering projects.

• The BNP undertakes not to reduce front-line public services while billions of pounds continue to flow out of the country to foreign interests. British people must benefit first from British tax income.

• The BNP aims to relieve the tax burden by raising the personal non-taxable allowance to £12,500.

• The BNP will encourage the family unit by reintroducing the married man’s allowance by as much as £2,500, depending upon the presence of children.

• The BNP will raise the inheritance tax level to £1 million.

• The BNP will work for a reduction in council tax through the slashing of all politically correct council functions and “diversity” schemes.

• The BNP would take some of these savings and invest them in rebuilding British industry and skills through an active protectionist policy as many other European nations already do.

• The BNP will rebuild Britain’s skills base — lost through decades of deindustrialisation caused by successive Tory and Labour regimes — by offering generous subsidies to students who study engineering and science and to institutions offering such education.

• The BNP will ensure that globalist corporations pay their fair share of the tax burden. We will close down the legal loopholes which allow tax evasion through Transfer Pricing and the outsourcing of jobs to foreign nations.

• The BNP will therefore introduce legislation to ensure that a foreign acquisition of any significantly-sized British company is judged to be in the public and national interest before it can proceed.

• The BNP will pass legislation to separate utility (high street) banks from the investment banking sector to prevent a repeat of the credit crisis.

• The BNP will oppose the privatisation of natural monopolies such as Royal Mail.

Creating Local Economies

• The BNP would support local economies by creating a national network of autonomous credit unions.

• The BNP would investigate the viability of voluntary local currencies as a means of assisting local economies.

Pensions: Looking After Our Old People

• The BNP aims to increase the state pension to £150 per week within the duration of the first Parliament.

• The BNP will link the state pension to earnings which will ensure that pensioner incomes keep pace with the cost of living.

• The BNP will reduce the current annual allowance for tax relief on pension contributions from the present amount of approximately £230,000 to £75,000.

• A solution to the public sector pensions crisis must be found through a national conference with all the players — employers and workers’ representatives.

• Part of the solution lies in raising the age of retirement to 68 over a period of years.

• The BNP will enact legislation to ensure that pensions are eligible only to Britons and those who have fully paid into the system.

• The BNP will vigorously oppose the UK taxpayer being called upon to subsidise any pension underfunding crisis elsewhere in the EU.

IT and the Digital Revolution: The BNP’s Vision

• The BNP will reinvigorate the IT sector in Britain with massive investments in technology universities.

• The BNP will institute a policy of protectionism for the local IT industry and jobs.

• The BNP will nationalise the telecoms infrastructure to enable the creation of a not-for-profit 100Mbps broadband service across the country.

• The BNP will invest in technology universities to provide the skills to our people to take their rightful place as world leaders in the IT industry.

-/-

You can view the full 94 page document and watch film the manifesto launch at the Home of the Green Arrow