Saturday, 25 September 2010

The Persecution of Thought Criminals by the Tolerant

By Mister Fox

Western Liberal Democracies have been transformed into police states like Stalin’s Russia or Mao’s China to manage immigration or the importation of cheap labour for the elites. The persecution has been going on for over 50 years and did not begin with Political Correctness but is part of the multi-racialists outlook. It got much worse from the 1960s when the new elites have formed an “Ideological Caste” - membership depends not on blood, birth, or class, but holding the right opinions, and to rise in life one has to conform to their ideology.

What is important to look for in these few examples is how the “Caste” gang up on their victims and the Gestapo – KGB style methods they use.

They try to restructure people's thinking. A television programme “Gypsy Wars” contrasted a local woman and tinkers who had invaded her land reversing the roles as we experience them. They think our traditional view of the world is pathological until they correct it for us. They show us or a representative, in the role of what they think are our stereotypes - we are cast as the tinkers - to mould our views and change our attitudes. Of the Gypsies there were no young men shown, because they would be aggressive and they do not want to show them as a threat; village life was not shown because that is appealing and viewers would sympathise with the woman. The woman was selected because she is not typical of rural people but a bit eccentric and could be set up as the aggressor when she was the victim. This is Television re-structuring our thoughts in accordance with their ideology. It is Frankfurt School television. For years vacancies in television were only advertised in the Guardian to filter out the applicants with the wrong attitude. (1)

Dr James Watson 79-year-old geneticist who, with Francis Crick, had discovered the structure of DNA, who is regarded as one of the great scientists of his time, was persecuted for telling the Sunday Times that he was "inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa" because "all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really". He said there was a natural desire that all human beings should be equal but "people who have to deal with black employees find this not true". The British establishment's agency of Inquistion the Equality and Human Rights Commission, said it was studying Dr Watson's remarks "in full". Politicians moved in to persecute him: 'It is a shame that a man with a record of scientific distinction should see his work overshadowed by his own irrational prejudices,' said David Lammy, the Skills Minister. London mayor Ken Livingstone: 'Such ignorant comments...are utterly offensive and give succour to the most backward in our society.' The Science Museum cancelled a sell-out meeting it had planned to hold to honour 79-year-old Watson on the grounds that his remarks had gone 'beyond the point of acceptable debate'. Several other centres scheduled to host his talks followed suit. What a scientific argument! His employers, the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in Long Island suspended him as Chancellor. (2)

In the Commons debate of Notting Hill race battles of August 1958. A local Labour M.P. Frank Tomney made an honourable and noble speech the House of Commons in defence of his young constituents to show they had been stitched up by police and lawyers. Here is a precis:

“Nine young men were arrested. No one in the constituency takes the view that what they did was not severely wrong, but the sentences of 4 years imprisonment for boys of 17 - even coloured people are going round organizing petitions on their behalf. I wrote to the Home Secretary asking him to see me about this but he declined as it is sub judice. The case was subject to appeal a week ago and the sentences confirmed. I made sure none of these boys had a previous conviction. “When people read about comparable cases and find variations in the sentences they come to think that our law does not provide justice. In one case of alleged rioting which concerned coloured people, one man was sentenced to prison for a year and others were fined. The man who was sentenced to a year had a former conviction in 1948 for shooting a policeman which is a crime with intent to kill. Yet these boys with no convictions got 4 years. “I have here a letter from the Union of Post Office workers about a boy from Ellingham Road. It tells of his having just returned from serving in Cyprus yet he was taken from his bed at 2.a.m. and charged with rioting. He only pleaded guilty because he was foolishly advised to. Contrary to the bias of police evidence, he was in possession of no weapon, though he admits to being an occupant in the car that toured the district shouting slogans. A petition to me is in responsible language and from people I have known for nine years” (3)

The 1964 election in Smethwick shows where the persecutions can lead. An offensive slogan had been used during the election campaign and posted on walls “If you want a N***** for a neighbour, vote Labour”. Harold Wilson attributed this to Conservative candidate Peter Griffiths, when being interviewed by Robin Day on Panorama of 9th March 1964. After the Election, now Prime Minister, Wilson broke from his address on the Queen's speech to insult the victorious Griffiths by calling him a “Parliamentary Leper”, who would be shunned in the House. This breached the convention that new members be protected until after their Maiden speech. Just two weeks before polling Griffiths was de-humanised in the Birmingham Post, and the Times whose Midland correspondent wrote, ”It is abhorrent to all Conservatives and officials of stature to whom I have talked.” He did not say to whom he had talked! He headed his column of the 12th, “Vile – it's all in Black and White.” As the election result was announced the Marxist Bishop of Southwark, called the electorate “unchristian”, and the Bishop of Chelmsford attacked local voters yet this was a model of democracy - a local man fighting on a local issue elected by local people. The unelected Bishops lived far away in fabulous palaces insulted them on a priori ideological grounds. State broadcaster the BBC took American Black Power leader Malcolm X to Smethwick for current affairs programme “Tonight”. He told the world’s media,” I have come here because I am disturbed by reports that coloured people in Smethwick are being badly treated. I have heard they are being treated as the Jews under Hitler. I would not wait for the Fascist element in Smethwick to erect gas ovens.” That was what the BBC had told him! They denied having taken him there but Mayor C V Williams investigated: “I was most amazed at the finesse shown by the BBC. I was told the car was not a BBC car but it was owned by one of the directors.” Malcolm X told the Times that the BBC had taken him. This led to a bomb being planted outside Mr.Griffiths’ home on 26th October 1965. (4)

The persecution in 1984 of Ray Honeyford a head teacher at Manningham Middle School in Bradford shows the depths of intolerance for those who diverge even slightly from the orthodoxy because Mr Honeyford supported multi-racialism but warned of multi-culturalism. Just consider the Gestapo – Stasi style methods the tolerant ones used on him. The local education authority tried to have him removed from his school, and when he wrote about his efforts in the Salisbury Review he was de-humanised by the media, had a “rent a mob” screaming ‘Racist’ outside the school gates, the local education authority sent a psychiatrist to see him, and the Department for Education had Helena Kennedy QC subject him to an Inquisition and school inspectors persecuted him. He had to retire at 52! (5)

In May 2002 a Tory councillor was persecuted by Government minister Peter Hain who did so much to bring genocide on White South African farmers. Professor Geoffrey Samspon's website stated, 'There is overwhelming scientific evidence that races differ to some extent in their average intelligence levels - yellow-skinned Orientals tend to be rather brighter than whites, negroes tend to be rather less bright.” Hain, a founder member of the Anti Nazi League, raved on Breakfast with Frost, “Sampson is proud to be racist”. Prof Sampson was only given right to reply on Radio 4’s Today programme which is heard less than television. He explained Hain’s statement was untrue and “as far as I am concerned it would be daft to be proud of racism — what is there to be proud of?” But this was ignored in subsequent TV news broadcasts, which kept repeating Hain’s distortion. Special Branch warned him he was a marked man and advised him on safety precautions to reduce the risk of harm to him or his family. He was advised to look under his car before driving to check that nothing was attached - the result of a Labour government minister publicly persecuting him. (6)

In April 2006, Leeds university authorities subjected Dr Frank Ellis to an Inquisition after he had an interview published in “Leeds Student". Dr Ellis was sought out for the interview with political bias in mind because of his “peculiar and extreme views". He and his interviewer ranged over many topics but what ignited prejudice against him were his remarks that the average black has a lower IQ than the average white or Asian; that he believed we need to introduce a policy of humane repatriation. There were the usual demonstrations by Unite Against Fascism. The University's decision was purely to persecute a man for holding the wrong opinion: he treated his students fairly and impartially as the interviewer acknowledged Dr Ellis’s “excellent rapport with his students and colleagues". Further, Leeds have a system to prevent unfair marking as the candidate's paper is anonymous and each is marked by 3 different tutors. He was investigated by the West Yorkshire police for incitement to racial hatred. So what is the problem? Dr Ellis was not disciplined for his conduct towards his students, which was exemplary, but persecuted for not expressing the right thoughts on race. In an interview on Talk Sport Ian Collins screamed at Ellis, ”You're mad!” (7)

Robert Henderson was persecuted in July 1995, over an article in Wisden Cricket Monthly. He wrote that a reason for the bad performances of England’s cricket team was the mix of foreign and native players. However talented they lack the commitment to their side on which team success depends. He explains: “The common experience of mixed groups makes it immensely difficult to accept that a changing room comprised of say six Englishmen, two West Indians, two Southern Africans and a New Zealander is going to develop the same camaraderie as eleven unequivocal Englishmen". This was not racism as his example had two blacks and five people who are not English, three of whom are certainly white.

The media held an Inquisition. The journalists and public figures who denounced him did not attack what he had written but responded out of ideological correctness against what they thought his views were. Two of the black players, Devon Malcolm and Philip De Freitas, sued Wisden for libel but not him, which is unusual because the author is usually included in the suit. Malcolm and De Freitas had sought the advice of the Professional Cricketer's Association who took counsel's opinion which was that no libel existed.

Telegraph newspapers gave clues to his home address and refused to print an unedited reply. He was then turned on by Wisden whose following issue had five pages of vitriolic attack on him even though they printed the original article. Editor Mr Firth would not print a reply.

Mr Henderson contacted his M.P. Frank Dobson to complain of the way the media had treated him, and asked for an intervention on his behalf. On 3rd August 1995, Mr Henderson received a letter from the black Labour politician Diane Abbott, telling him he had "no appreciation of acceptable terminology. As an ex-journalist, and someone who still dabbles, I believe that we have a duty to write on subjects we know about". Later Ms Abbott objected to "blue-eyed blonde" nurses from Finland tending coloured patients in her East London constituency!

Mr Henderson wrote to Tony Blair about Mr Dobson. Mr Henderson wrote thirteen letters to the Blairs between March 1996 and February 1997. Finally, Blair summoned the Police to his Westminster office. The Police considered charging Mr Henderson with Common Assault and offences under the Malicious Communications and Race Relations Acts. They took the letters for examination by the Crown Prosecution Service. It was decided that the correspondence "fell short" of any criminal offence. But Blair was advised that the "sheer volume" of continued letters could justify criminal prosecution in the future.

The media de-humanised him but refused him right of reply. An interview he gave to the BBC was edited by splicing together different parts of his interview to produce the opposite of what he had said. The interview was 30 minutes but only 93 seconds were used.

To see how the BBC edits to destroy those who say the wrong things.

Mr Henderson actually said in the interview: “I take the Matthew Paris line on this. Matthew, says “that part of being an Englishman is being white. Now I think that's reasonable, not just from my own experience, but it seems to me that you don't get someone taking on the whole of a new culture when they come to a country. That doesn't of course mean that they cannot be British and of course if they are representing Britain there may not be the same problem that you've got if they are representing England, but if they are representing England they've got to feel that there isn't anything which spurns them, which thrusts them out from society, which I am absolutely certain that the majority of blacks and Asians do feel. I can sympathise with them because any minority anywhere is going to feel under stress.”

This is what the BBC broadcast after editing:

“...part of being an Englishman is being white. Now I think that's reasonable, not just from my own experience, but it seems to me you don't get someone taking on the whole of a new culture when they come to a country.” (8)

Famous journalist Mark Steyn was persecuted by the Canadian Human Rights Commission in 2006 after two complaints by the Islamic Congress against Maclean's magazine and its editor-in-chief, Kenneth Whyte for printing a chapter from his book: "America Alone”. The complainants said: “the article subjects Canadian Muslims to hatred and contempt". He had written: “The Muslim world has youth, numbers and global ambitions. The West is growing old and enfeebled, and lacks the will to rebuff those who would supplant it. It's the end of the world as we've known it. Sept. 11, 2001, was not 'the day everything changed,' but the day that revealed how much had already changed. On Sept. 10, how many journalists had the Council of American-Islamic Relations or the Canadian Islamic Congress or the Muslim Council of Britain in their Rolodexes? … the larger forces at play in the developed world that have left Europe too enfeebled to resist its remorseless transformation into Eurabia and that call into question the future of much of the rest of the world. The key factors are: demographic decline; the unsustainability of the social democratic state; and civilizational exhaustion." (9)

That we have been dragged down to the level of persecutory states rather than bastions of freedom look at the state persecution of Catholic priest Father Samuel. He had fled to Belgium to escape Muslim persecution of Christians in Turkey and was then persecuted by the Belgian state for “incitement to racist hatred” : the Government’s Inquisition agency, the Centre for Equal Opportunities and Opposition to Racism (CEOOR). He said in a 2002 television interview: “Every thoroughly Islamized Muslim child that is born in Europe is a time bomb for Western children in the future. The latter will be persecuted when they have become a minority".

The Belgian judiciary decided to try him before the penal court in Charleroi. He repeated his statement and that he would be honoured to go to jail for this. He added that Jesus too had been persecuted! In a sermon he called upon the faithful to accompany him to court. “We will turn this into an excursion, driving there in full buses.” The Aramaics are a Catholic minority in Syria and Turkey and speak an old Semitic language, which Jesus and the apostles used and so are a link with Christ. Mel Gibson used the language in “The Passion of the Christ". On his website and in sermons Father Samuel warns of “the islamic invasion” of the West and that Muslims are invading Europe and we face impending civil war. According to Father Samuel “so-called moderate Muslims do not exist". (10)

What we know as Eurabia is EU elites surrendering us to Islam by passing laws to oppress our attempts to defend our women and children, and allowing open immigration and making large donations to Palestinian groups like Hamas.



(3) Commons Hansard. The debate was in October 1958.


A Question of Colour. 1966. Peter Griffiths.(Leslie Frewin).


(6) ),9061,714247,00.html






Dr.D said...

So, what are you going to do about it, David?

PamelaJ said...

@ Dr. D

I think what David is doing is really all he, as an individual can do, he is exposing the truth.

It is almost impossible for one person or even a group of people to effect change on their own.

However, writers are very important because they change the perception of the masses, and that way they can effect change.

Anonymous said...

what do you suggest DrD

Anonymous said...

Isn't this racist?

misterfox said...

All I can do which, as the astute Pamela J points out, is try to change the political climate. It is the constant media propganda that is misguiding our people into acquiescing in their own dispossession and the disinheriting of their children. Most of my stuff is to expose the way the contemporary elites are acting against the interests of their own people. I also initiated a nationalist revision of our modern history.

Anonymous said...

This is an early version. it was not meant to excite the reader but provide a resource for students and other writers. I also did the original research on Churchill's opposition to mass immigration.

Dr.D said...

@ PamelaJ

You may be correct that David is doing all that he is able to do. I don't know the answer to that question.

But I can offer a few comments to you, and to Anonymous as well. Let me preface these comments by saying that I am an American, living roughly 4000 miles from you, so practically all of my information is what I read on the Internet. As such it is incomplete and in some cases in error. Even so, I can tell you what I see from this side of the pond.

PamelaJ said, "It is almost impossible for one person or even a group of people to effect change on their own." I do not think that is true, although I think it is a comfortable way to concede defeat. As a counterexample, let me mention the Tea Party movement that is currently remaking American politics. It is not a part of either major party, but it is having a serious impact on both of them. Two year ago, this did not exist at all, but it coalesced around a idea when one angry man stood up on the floor of the stock exchange and made an impromtu speech. It has taken off like wildfire across the whole nation and there is no stopping it.

I could cite some other similar American examples, such as the Texas Nationalist Movement, a secessionist movement in Texas. In every case, things happen, because somebody had an idea, a goal, that they are willing to commit to, and they make a strategy to pursue that goal.

That brings me to the main thrust of what I want to say here:

1) There is value in recounting past wrongs and grievances done against our people, but only up to a point. Past that point, it is simply whining and our people see themselves a losers.

2) There is a serious need for leaders (note that is plural). We need a number of able, well spoken, men of the very highest character to lead our people. There is no reason at all why White Nationalism should be considered intellectually disgraceful, only fit for the lower classes. We need men of the intellectual caliber of Daniel Hannan; where are they?

3) There needs to be a plan, a definite, workable, attractive, plan for retaking the nation. The plan presented by the BNP last year, with its roughly 90 points, was no plan at all; it was a wish list for somebody's fairy godmother. A plan needs to be realistic, recognizing that not all things can be achieved at once and some things will never be achieved. A plan needs to outline a way to get to a workable, vastly improved nation.

Somebody, several somebodies, have to do this.

misterfox said...

We do need to take action but the BNP kept talented people out of the centre presumably because the leaders are insecure or know they are not up to it. This and financial doubts has led to a split and we are trying to get going again.
I do not whine but there is a prior need to get the values articulated in a suitable vocabulary that will carry them. The orthodox Progressive or PC vocabulary does not do this.
As a matter of interest Dr.D what do you do for the cause?

Dr. D said...

@ PamelaJ

You may be correct when you say that David is doing all that he is capable of doing. I don't know the answer to that question.

I would, however, like to offer some comments to both PamelaJ and Anonymous. Let me preface these comments by saying that I am an American, living some 4000 miles away from you, so practically all of my information is what I read via the Internet. As such, it is often incomplete, sometimes simply wrong, and never has any first hand basis. I can, however, tell you how things look from this side of the pond.

PamelaJ says, "It is almost impossible for one person or even a group of people to effect change on their own." I would dispute that statement, and point as a counterexample to the Tea Party movement that is currently remaking American politics. Two years ago this movement did not exist at all, but today it is a major force in American politics, affecting both major parties. It came about because one angry man made an impromptu speech on the floor of the stock exchange, and it took off like wild fire from there because it struck a chord with the people.

I could point to other American examples such as the Texas Nationalist Movement, a secessionist movement within Texas. Here again, it started because a few people thought this was an important idea and they began talking it up and it has taken off.

This leads me to the main points that I want to make in this response:

1) Recounting injuries and injustices is useful up to a point, but only up to a point. Past that and it make our people see themselves as whining losers, rather than as people capable of controlling their own destiny. They need to feel inspired, but definitely not helpless.

2) There is a great need for leaders (note the plural!). There is a serious need for smart, intelligent, educated, well spoken, well mannered men and women to speak the message of Nationalism loud and clearly in an appealing way. It needs people who are graceful, quick on their feet, and truly dedicated to the cause. Two examples that come to mind, although in the wrong party, are Daniel Hannan and Nigel Farage; these men are extremely effective politicians. Where does Nationalism find men of this caliber? And not just one or two, but a number of them.
To be continued..

Anonymous said...

Another fine article. Keep your spirits up. We do what we can. Have faith the tide will turn. It will, and so our efforts are to accelerate it!

Ronbo said...

Excellent article by Mister Fox!

Someone asked, "So, what are you going to do about it, David?"

I take it from the tone the author really means, "You can't do anything about the situation, so quit crying in your beer."

This is exactly what the Ruling Class wants you to think - that you are powerless; that socialism and political correctness are inevitable; that even to have a chance of success you must enlist a majority of your side.


The reality is that all power belongs to the determined individual. This is the dirty little secret. I repeat: "ALL POWER BELONGS TO THE INDIVIDUAL."

Therefore, if even 10% of any given population in the West is willing to do whatever needs to be done to change the government, it can be done.

I'll tell you all another little secret the ruling class doesn't want you to know - they are scared to death of YOU! The Everyman and woman. They are afraid that you will wake up some fine morning and throw off the chains of oppression.

The West may not be awake yet, but one eye has opened...