Click here to sign a petition supporting the prosecution of ANC Youth leader Julius Malema under international law for inciting genocide against the Afrikaner minority of South Africa
Friday, 22 April 2011
Prosecute Malema
Click here to sign a petition supporting the prosecution of ANC Youth leader Julius Malema under international law for inciting genocide against the Afrikaner minority of South Africa
Thursday, 21 April 2011
Purging non believers
Under the new Stalinism which, in true Orwelian style, our leaders persist in assuring us is a free society, it is not just political affiliation to a nationalist party such as the BNP, which can lose you your job and means of supporting your family. The use of an unwisely chosen word or the expression of a non-compliant opinion can result in an individual being instantly purged and cast into the ranks of the unemployed.A recent article by Tim Heydon detailed the actions taken against those in academia, who have dared to contradict the current, rigidly enforced, orthodoxies and lies being taught to our young as facts. (Including, of course, Dr. Frank Ellis who generously contributes his work to this site.)
Similar purges take place across society and within the entertainment industry, Andy Gray, for instance was secretly taped in a private, off air, conversation and paid for his politically incorrect views with his job and reputation. Meanwhile ITV have announced that Brian True May the producer of Midsummer Murders will be "stepping down" from his position following politically naïve revelations made in an interview with Radio Times. Readers will recall that Mr. True-May admitted that the programe avoided casting ethnic minorities as residents of the fictional village of Midsummer, in order to maintain the “quintessential Englishmess” which the series' viewers so enjoy.
Naturally such blasphemy led to Mr. True-May's immediate suspension, and, as announced by ITV his subsequent purging.
True-May's punishment will not end here. We can be sure that in the same way as those who offended their rulers behind the old iron curtain where banished from their chosen professions, Brian True-May will never work, or even be permitted to socialise, within the entertainment industry in this country again. Let us hope he has made enough money in his career to date to cushion his landing in the outer-darkness.
It seems that not much has changed behind what was once the old iron curtain either. Reuters are reporting the fate of Konstantin Poltoranin, the Russian Federal Migration Service's chief spokesman. During an interview with the BBC Russian Service, Mr Poltoranin stated that he could not understand why Europe imported so many immigrants from Africa and the Middle East, adding that Russia needed to more cautious about "mixing bloods," as “the future of the white race was at stake”.
Poltoranin, who had been in his job since 2005, was, of course, unemployed within hours of voicing the truth which date not speak its name. According to Reuters:
The head of the Federal Migration Service, Konstantin Romadanovsky, called the comments "unacceptable" and confirmed they had cost the spokesman his job, the state-run Itar-tass news agency reported.
The Kremlin added Poltoranin's interview had raised a red flag at the presidential administration and his sacking was a "logical and necessary step," a spokesman said. (full report here)
Brian True-May and Konstantin Romadanovsky by failing to embrace enforced multiculturalism with the fervour of a teen-aged girl screaming at a boy band, were both guilty of one of the ultimate sins of the modern world.
True-May sought only to preserve an illusion of homogeneous whiteness in a tiny, fictional corner of a once white land, for this he was suspended, pilloried in the press, and swiftly forced out of the profession in which he had spent his working life. No doubt he will be ostracised by his one time colleagues and peers, none of them wishing to have their own reputations sullied by association or, indeed, their abject submission to the cult questioned by their masters.
By caring for the reality of the white race and for its very survival Romadanovsky was, of course, guilty of the greater crime, and the entire weight of the Russian state descended upon him.
Yes, that was Russia, but does anyone imagine an official would survive making such a statement in Britain, France, Germany or anywhere in the West. Could a line which would trip without consequence from non-white lips if applied to any other race, be spoken publicly by a white man, about his own, anywhere, and that white man that man retain his job?
Reuters automatically labels the unfortunate Mr. Romandanovsky a racist, for that is where we have been brought. To be a racist on the 21st Century, it is no longer necessary to hate anyone, you can be destroyed for merely loving that which you are no longer permitted to love.
In the modern world when it comes to the subject of race the only permissible position for a white person, who is not actively seeking the destruction of their own race, to take is to be entirely indifferent to as whether or not our people survive. We are required to embrace, applaud and encourage our own destruction, or look the other way whilst we die. For to resist in any way is racist, to care at all is racist, and to love your own people is racism of the first order.
Racists must be destroyed, they must be purged, and it is for those in power to determine and redefine what racism is.
Ever louder come the calls to ban those who do not think in the permitted way, they cannot join the police, they should not teach, they may not worship in our churches, and, as we have seen, those who fail to recite the mantra will lose their jobs. How does this differ from what went on behind the iron curtain, or what goes on now in the darkest and dirtiest dictatorships of the third world?
For some, their very liberty is at risk, as I write people languish in jail for the crime of writing words, meanwhile, in Carlisle earlier this week an ex-soldier, Andrew Ryan, was sentenced to 70 days in prison for burning paper (a Koran) such a sentence would be unthinkable had a Muslim burnt a bible - imagine the outcry.
For seventy years in Europe mere words could destroy a man's life, he and all around him could be purged, banished, imprisoned, or worse, for the thoughts within his head. Then a wall came down and they told us we were free. But what has really changed?
We are not free. We do not live in free societies. How can we be free if we can still be condemned for our thoughts and punished for our words?
Monday, 18 April 2011
Anybody but a Woman?
By M Catharine EvansSarah Palin recently told the media "It's time for a woman to be president." A few weeks before the governor's declaration, HBO'S Bill Maher called Palin a "dumb (expletive deleted)" as part of his comedy routine. After weeks of protest from all sides the National Organization for Women who ignored the hate speech finally issued this statement: "We're on to you, right-wingers. You're trying to take up our time getting us to defend your friend Sarah Palin." And so it goes.
By now it must be clear to most Americans how difficult it will be for a woman to get elected. Hearing the words "Madame President" may still be a long way off, and for proof we only need to look back at Clinton's run in '08 and now Palin's or Michele Bachmann's possible candidacy in 2012. Maybe it's time to take Eric Holder's advice and stop being "a nation of cowards" when it comes to discussing old-fashioned witch-hunting sexism right out of the Malleus Maleficarum playbook.
In a 2008 pre-election appearance Michelle Obama spoke to a crowd of her husband's supporters, the future first lady delighted the group with her malicious attack on Hillary Clinton. Referencing the Senator's inability to keep Bill from straying when he was president Mrs. Obama bitingly suggested that if she can't take care of her own house how can she take care of a country.
Tearing up Clinton became a bipartisan blood sport in 2008. When a female audience member asked Republican Senator John McCain "How do we beat the bitch?" he responded, "That's an excellent question." The exchange received more than a million online hits. Obama adviser Samantha Power told a Scottish newspaper that Hillary was "a monster...she is stooping to anything."
A Facebook group with more than 44,000 members called itself "Hillary Clinton: Stop Running for President and Make Me a Sandwich." Tucker Carlson MSNBC host stated that "there was just something about her [Clinton] that feels castrating, overbearing and scary."
When Clinton tried to cite sexism as the elephant in the room she was chastised by none other than fellow Yalie Camille Paglia and pundit Peggy Noonan. After Senator Clinton told a Washington Post reporter that the "mean-spiritedness and terrible insults" stemmed from "sexist" attitudes and misogyny the two women declared war on the former first lady.
Noonan admitted that the '08 election was quite a conundrum for Democrats. Being labeled "racist" was far worse than being tagged "sexist" with Hillary caught in the middle. Still Peggy couldn't resist pummeling Clinton for playing the sexism card calling it "insulting" and "manipulative." She advised Mrs. Clinton to stop "complaining" as her constant bellyaching would "only reinforce what your supporters already think" and fail to win over any converts.
Paglia went even further in her verbal attacks against Clinton:
Hillary has tried to have it both ways: to batten on her husband's nostalgic popularity while simultaneously claiming to be a victim of sexism....Hillary is positioning herself as the Crucified One, betrayed, mocked, flogged and shunted aside for the cause of ultimate womanhood.
The message from women like Paglia and others? You want to play with the big boys? Then learn to take it like a man. Stop whining, don't talk back, and don't dare play the misogyny card. These Gaddafi-esque female bodyguards who jealously guard the patriarchy they pretend to despise relished the opportunity to claw away at Clinton. On the political correctness scale overt sexism not only scores very low, some of its worst perpetrators are women.
For those worried about academic credentials, it doesn't matter if you have a degree from Yale, University of Idaho, or Oxford the bottom line for both the left and the right is gender. Secretary of State Clinton, Governor Palin, and Congresswoman Bachmann have been called "stupid," "crazy," "cold-hearted," "incompetent," and "whiny" in addition to the more unprintable pornographic terms seen on t-shirts in 2008.
As more and more women battle it out in political contests, the power elites will employ all kinds of special ops to maintain the status quo. Most of all, they must hide their aversion to having a woman in the White House. That takes a lot of pollsters, verbal engineers, and a complicit media. Both parties have demonstrated their willingness to stop a female candidate by any means necessary.
In an online 2009 interview Mark Thatcher, Margaret Thatcher's son, recalled his mother told him a woman would never lead the Conservative Party. It was only due to her right-hand man Airey Neave's "subtle psychological techniques and disinformation" that helped "convince the traditionally chauvinistic Tory MPs to dump the batchelor Heath in favour of a woman." In the end when asked how "his mother had managed, against all the odds, to reach the very top," he said, "She was the best man for the job."
That was the 1970's. Here we are in 2011 and a woman has not been even been nominated for the presidency. Within this political climate as soon as a female tries to get near the highest office, leaders in either party find a way to stop her. Politico reported in October 2010 that top Republican Party leaders "are fixated on the topic" of Sarah Palin, "especially on how to keep her from running or how to deny her the nomination if she does run."
In the past a woman who dared to step out of her strictly enforced social role and challenge the existing order might be burned, hanged, stoned, drowned, or killed in any number of ways. Heck, some still are. But politics requires a bit more finesse.
The political hating is often blanketed in light-hearted "fun" polls, comedy skits, photo-shopped pics, and double entendres. Other times the gloves come off and violent, vicious, sexualized images and slogans appear. The perpetrators cross gender, media, and party lines spewing vile rape, stoning, and incest jokes. With women vying for the top position nothing is off limits.
This kind of female-bashing is not a new phenomenon. Aristotle claimed women were "inferior," Augustine deemed them temptresses, and others questioned whether we just weren't "human." Slugging it out through the witch trials of the Middle Ages right up through the early 20th century we are only 91 years out from getting the vote. Unabashed sexism is still around: pervasive, insidious, and a national shame.
If a woman candidate gets media coverage, it's usually in a polarizing light. In this week's issue of Time Magazine, a constituent in Michele Bachmann's district is quoted as saying she's the equivalent of a "cheerleader -- she can whip up a frenzy but has nothing substantial to say..." He went on to say she would be an "embarrassment" to millions of Republicans.
For a strong woman candidate there appears to be no in-between; either she's castrating and scary or a bimbo. Even Thatcher the Iron Lady had the opposition yelling "Ditch the Bitch." Old misogyny dies hard and the Oval office won't become the ovum office without a fight.
By now it must be clear to most Americans how difficult it will be for a woman to get elected. Hearing the words "Madame President" may still be a long way off, and for proof we only need to look back at Clinton's run in '08 and now Palin's or Michele Bachmann's possible candidacy in 2012. Maybe it's time to take Eric Holder's advice and stop being "a nation of cowards" when it comes to discussing old-fashioned witch-hunting sexism right out of the Malleus Maleficarum playbook.
In a 2008 pre-election appearance Michelle Obama spoke to a crowd of her husband's supporters, the future first lady delighted the group with her malicious attack on Hillary Clinton. Referencing the Senator's inability to keep Bill from straying when he was president Mrs. Obama bitingly suggested that if she can't take care of her own house how can she take care of a country.
Tearing up Clinton became a bipartisan blood sport in 2008. When a female audience member asked Republican Senator John McCain "How do we beat the bitch?" he responded, "That's an excellent question." The exchange received more than a million online hits. Obama adviser Samantha Power told a Scottish newspaper that Hillary was "a monster...she is stooping to anything."
A Facebook group with more than 44,000 members called itself "Hillary Clinton: Stop Running for President and Make Me a Sandwich." Tucker Carlson MSNBC host stated that "there was just something about her [Clinton] that feels castrating, overbearing and scary."
When Clinton tried to cite sexism as the elephant in the room she was chastised by none other than fellow Yalie Camille Paglia and pundit Peggy Noonan. After Senator Clinton told a Washington Post reporter that the "mean-spiritedness and terrible insults" stemmed from "sexist" attitudes and misogyny the two women declared war on the former first lady.
Noonan admitted that the '08 election was quite a conundrum for Democrats. Being labeled "racist" was far worse than being tagged "sexist" with Hillary caught in the middle. Still Peggy couldn't resist pummeling Clinton for playing the sexism card calling it "insulting" and "manipulative." She advised Mrs. Clinton to stop "complaining" as her constant bellyaching would "only reinforce what your supporters already think" and fail to win over any converts.
Paglia went even further in her verbal attacks against Clinton:
Hillary has tried to have it both ways: to batten on her husband's nostalgic popularity while simultaneously claiming to be a victim of sexism....Hillary is positioning herself as the Crucified One, betrayed, mocked, flogged and shunted aside for the cause of ultimate womanhood.
The message from women like Paglia and others? You want to play with the big boys? Then learn to take it like a man. Stop whining, don't talk back, and don't dare play the misogyny card. These Gaddafi-esque female bodyguards who jealously guard the patriarchy they pretend to despise relished the opportunity to claw away at Clinton. On the political correctness scale overt sexism not only scores very low, some of its worst perpetrators are women.
For those worried about academic credentials, it doesn't matter if you have a degree from Yale, University of Idaho, or Oxford the bottom line for both the left and the right is gender. Secretary of State Clinton, Governor Palin, and Congresswoman Bachmann have been called "stupid," "crazy," "cold-hearted," "incompetent," and "whiny" in addition to the more unprintable pornographic terms seen on t-shirts in 2008.
As more and more women battle it out in political contests, the power elites will employ all kinds of special ops to maintain the status quo. Most of all, they must hide their aversion to having a woman in the White House. That takes a lot of pollsters, verbal engineers, and a complicit media. Both parties have demonstrated their willingness to stop a female candidate by any means necessary.
In an online 2009 interview Mark Thatcher, Margaret Thatcher's son, recalled his mother told him a woman would never lead the Conservative Party. It was only due to her right-hand man Airey Neave's "subtle psychological techniques and disinformation" that helped "convince the traditionally chauvinistic Tory MPs to dump the batchelor Heath in favour of a woman." In the end when asked how "his mother had managed, against all the odds, to reach the very top," he said, "She was the best man for the job."
That was the 1970's. Here we are in 2011 and a woman has not been even been nominated for the presidency. Within this political climate as soon as a female tries to get near the highest office, leaders in either party find a way to stop her. Politico reported in October 2010 that top Republican Party leaders "are fixated on the topic" of Sarah Palin, "especially on how to keep her from running or how to deny her the nomination if she does run."
In the past a woman who dared to step out of her strictly enforced social role and challenge the existing order might be burned, hanged, stoned, drowned, or killed in any number of ways. Heck, some still are. But politics requires a bit more finesse.
The political hating is often blanketed in light-hearted "fun" polls, comedy skits, photo-shopped pics, and double entendres. Other times the gloves come off and violent, vicious, sexualized images and slogans appear. The perpetrators cross gender, media, and party lines spewing vile rape, stoning, and incest jokes. With women vying for the top position nothing is off limits.
This kind of female-bashing is not a new phenomenon. Aristotle claimed women were "inferior," Augustine deemed them temptresses, and others questioned whether we just weren't "human." Slugging it out through the witch trials of the Middle Ages right up through the early 20th century we are only 91 years out from getting the vote. Unabashed sexism is still around: pervasive, insidious, and a national shame.
If a woman candidate gets media coverage, it's usually in a polarizing light. In this week's issue of Time Magazine, a constituent in Michele Bachmann's district is quoted as saying she's the equivalent of a "cheerleader -- she can whip up a frenzy but has nothing substantial to say..." He went on to say she would be an "embarrassment" to millions of Republicans.
For a strong woman candidate there appears to be no in-between; either she's castrating and scary or a bimbo. Even Thatcher the Iron Lady had the opposition yelling "Ditch the Bitch." Old misogyny dies hard and the Oval office won't become the ovum office without a fight.
Source
Another kind of "friendly"
Just when you thought the world could not get any more surreal, something will come along and show your that when it comes to Political correctness there is no no outer limit of the absurd to which some brainwashed, white guilt raddled or ideologically driven individual or groups will go in order to prove how non-racist they are, or to affirm their total commitment to the new religion of multiculturalism. Such an event occurred this week when Forbes Magazine listed South Africa as the third friendliest country in the world.One can only assume that Forbes have developed an entirely new definition of the term “friendly”, which is compatible with rivalling only Columbia in having one of the highest murder rate on the planet. Either that or someone should tell the Forbes researcher that acts of rape, for which the rainbow nation excels all others, is not an act of friendship.
This report in this weekends News24, focusing on that chummy little chap Julius Malema, the president of thw ANC Youth league, gives an example of how friendly the new post Apartheid South Africa can be:
The media is the ANC's main opposition, the party’s youth league president Julius Malema told hundreds of supporters outside the South Gauteng High Court on Friday.
"The main opposition of the ANC is the media... do not feed the opposition," Malema told the cheering crowd, repeating comments made by ANC secretary general Gwede Mantashe on Tuesday.
He urged them not to give the media "negative material".
"You don't have to explain to anyone why you are here."
He told them the trial in which he faces hate speech charges was about "burning" the struggle song "shoot the boer" (awudubhule ibhunu) and was not just about an individual on trial.
Singing and machine guns
Malema told the crowd never to retreat.
"We are here to defend a revolutionary song," Malema said before singing "shoot to kill, kill our, shoot to kill, kill our... kiss the boer, the farmer, kiss the boer, the farmer".
He then mimicked the sound of a machine gun while making the sign of a gun with his hand and concluded with the word "attention", at which the crowd cheered......
Continue reading
Maybe the Forbes team heard Malema singing and missed the irony of inserting the word “kiss” instead of “shoot” or “kill”, and imagined this was some song or friendly reconciliation.
Saturday, 16 April 2011
Rap Crap by Mike Wilson
RAP CRAP.By Mike Wilson
Gyrate to the music man
And let me show to all my fans
That rappin’ is a way of life
And helps avoid the daily strife.
Watch me as I spin around
Moving to the tribal sound.
Come on man, this is really cool
But don’t anyone take me for a fool.
My words all rhyme, there ain’t a doubt
And this is what it’s all about.
No sense in wasting years for learning
When I buy cars with what I’m earning.
I never bothered with ABC
And school has never been good for me
But what I’ve got is mine for keeps
A talent that’s admired heaps.
The kids they try and copy me
And watch my gigs on free TV.
I’m not concerned they give up school
And yes they think it’s very cool.
As long as I can spell my name
I’ll sign the contract once again.
See, I’m a rap star, that’s the thing
See what I’m wearing, that’s my bling.
I couldn’t care about the nation
And what’s all this about inflation?
Man, buy my records won’t you please
I’m getting used to this life of ease.
You guys out there are quite a pain
If you think I’m getting on the dole again.
You hear my words, you buy the disc
This life is easy man, no risk.
Just give me money round the clock
And I will give you rap that rocks.
And in ten years when I’m all done
I’ll just spend money havin’ fun.
So sure I got more stuff than you
But that’s what you’ve all made me do.
You want to see me spend my money
The papers say I’m kind of funny.
I’m a star, the kids all know it-
And as a star I got to show it.
Big house, big car and girlfriend too
Man, as a rapper there’s nothing I can’t do.
A nine to five job, that’s a laugh;
I’ve got 5 people on my staff.
So come on kids give up on culture
Become a rap star – life is ultra.
Interracial Marriage
This contribution from Alan O'Reilly:All right-thinking Britons who love their country should oppose interracial marriage. The implications of race-mixing are much more sinister than is commonly understood - individual objections notwithstanding. Integrationists by definition are far too blinkered to see the big picture.
It is common knowledge that the mainstream media and many leading politicians exert considerable pressure in favour of race-mixing and scream 'racist!' whenever any sane individual protests against this kind of coercion.
Such pressure is mainly directed towards blacks and whites. In spite of the abominable practice of Muslim 'grooming' of mainly vulnerable white adolescent girls, Asians will almost exclusively favour their own kind for longer-term relationships regardless of any outside pressure. Muslim women risk so-called 'honour' beatings and even killings if they don't [like Banaz Mahmod, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6733919.stm ]. Heinous as this cruelty is, it simply reinforces the point.
Large-scale white and black liaisons are of course unlikely to occur in spite of media and political pressure. They could, however, be enforced by the EU, via Europol and the Euro-army, when Britain is fully absorbed into the EU Superstate or ['golden garrotte'] concentration camp following the treason of Gordon Brown in May 2009, compounded, sadly, by royal assent. The aim, as always, is to destroy white Anglo-Saxon Celtic Britain, both as a nation and as a people.
(The USA attempted much the same with Germany after WW2, by sending large numbers of black troops to make up the occupation forces.)
Enforced race-mixing is one of the most effective ways of so doing. The black race in Britain would be destroyed in the process but that would be of no consequence to our European masters, i.e. gauleiters.
Paul Broca published a study in 1864 on hybridity in the human race. He found that, in South Carolina, where white Anglo-Saxon males had cohabited with negresses, the mulatto offspring were "little prolific and short-lived." See
http://campus.udayton.edu/~hume/Broca/broca.htm
He also reported that "the union of the Caucasian women with negroes is very frequently non-productive."
J.H. Van Evrie, M.D. reached the same conclusions after studying "several thousand cases of mixed blood" and published the results of his research in 1868. A CD entitled Vatican Assassins 3rd Edition, by American Baptist writer Eric Jon Phelps, summarises Van Evrie's work and is obtainable via Eric’s site http://www.vaticanassassins.org/store/ .
Van Evrie concludes that the mulatto progeny of white males and negresses, who then inter-breed with other hybrids, are by the 4th generation "as absolutely sterile as muleism...it may be assumed as the natural and impassable barrier of this abnormal and exceptional being."
He adds that "it is in the female hybrid that this tendency to decay...is most apparent. Many of them are incapable of nourishing or taking care of their offspring, and together with miscarriages and the numerous forms of disease connected with maternity, they are often found to have had a large number of children, not one of whom reached maturity."
An additional burden for our already overstretched NHS, I suggest, should the EU force this strategy on Britain.
Broca found that mulatto offspring of Southern European whites and negroes were more successful in reproduction but where this happened on an appreciable scale, as in Portugal, the result was disastrous after little more than 100 years.
In Racial Realities in Europe, Lothrop Stoddard describes how Portugal was a major sea power in the 16th century.
He then describes how she experienced a drift of her population away from rural areas to the cities, lured by wealth, a constant drain on her manpower by foreign wars and "racial impoverishment...with negro blood," as great landowners imported large gangs of Africans to work the half-deserted countryside and who inevitably intermingled with what remained of the indigenous population.
In little over a century, Portugal degenerated into a minor nation as a direct result of these combined trends.
Britain is degenerating in the same way. 5,500,000 or at least 10% of white Britons now live abroad. Britain continues to haemorrhage her white indigenous population at the rate of over 100,000 a year, to be replaced in over abundance by 300,000 foreign incomers annually. See
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6210358.stm
Her available employment, including rural work, is progressively being taken over by foreigners, especially Poles.
Though obviously not of African descent, Poles and other Eastern Europeans are nevertheless not equivalent to the native peoples of the British Isles. They are largely, i.e. 90%+, Alpine Caucasians, not Anglo-Saxon Celtic, or Nordic Caucasians (the Nordic distinction applies to all so-called 'immigrants' to these isles up until and including the Norman i.e. 'North-man,' conquest) and clearly cannot be assimilated without a deleterious effect on Britain's indigenous racial character.
And incomers of African or Afro-Caribbean descent to Britain now number well over 1,000,000 and they are continuing to arrive in large numbers, e.g. Congolese to Norfolk, Somalis to the south-east etc.
This is sufficient for the EU to further its strategy of Britain's ultimate destruction as a nation and a people as outlined above.
Given that white Britons could be a minority in their own country by the year 2066 if present trends continue, the EU could achieve its aim by about the year 2100, or not much later.
Remember Portugal - and that, like Portugal in its final decline, Britain is no longer a major sea power, so the EU destruction of Britain is off to a running start.
Alan O'Reilly
N. Yorks.
It is common knowledge that the mainstream media and many leading politicians exert considerable pressure in favour of race-mixing and scream 'racist!' whenever any sane individual protests against this kind of coercion.
Such pressure is mainly directed towards blacks and whites. In spite of the abominable practice of Muslim 'grooming' of mainly vulnerable white adolescent girls, Asians will almost exclusively favour their own kind for longer-term relationships regardless of any outside pressure. Muslim women risk so-called 'honour' beatings and even killings if they don't [like Banaz Mahmod, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/6733919.stm ]. Heinous as this cruelty is, it simply reinforces the point.
Large-scale white and black liaisons are of course unlikely to occur in spite of media and political pressure. They could, however, be enforced by the EU, via Europol and the Euro-army, when Britain is fully absorbed into the EU Superstate or ['golden garrotte'] concentration camp following the treason of Gordon Brown in May 2009, compounded, sadly, by royal assent. The aim, as always, is to destroy white Anglo-Saxon Celtic Britain, both as a nation and as a people.
(The USA attempted much the same with Germany after WW2, by sending large numbers of black troops to make up the occupation forces.)
Enforced race-mixing is one of the most effective ways of so doing. The black race in Britain would be destroyed in the process but that would be of no consequence to our European masters, i.e. gauleiters.
Paul Broca published a study in 1864 on hybridity in the human race. He found that, in South Carolina, where white Anglo-Saxon males had cohabited with negresses, the mulatto offspring were "little prolific and short-lived." See
http://campus.udayton.edu/~hume/Broca/broca.htm
He also reported that "the union of the Caucasian women with negroes is very frequently non-productive."
J.H. Van Evrie, M.D. reached the same conclusions after studying "several thousand cases of mixed blood" and published the results of his research in 1868. A CD entitled Vatican Assassins 3rd Edition, by American Baptist writer Eric Jon Phelps, summarises Van Evrie's work and is obtainable via Eric’s site http://www.vaticanassassins.org/store/ .
Van Evrie concludes that the mulatto progeny of white males and negresses, who then inter-breed with other hybrids, are by the 4th generation "as absolutely sterile as muleism...it may be assumed as the natural and impassable barrier of this abnormal and exceptional being."
He adds that "it is in the female hybrid that this tendency to decay...is most apparent. Many of them are incapable of nourishing or taking care of their offspring, and together with miscarriages and the numerous forms of disease connected with maternity, they are often found to have had a large number of children, not one of whom reached maturity."
An additional burden for our already overstretched NHS, I suggest, should the EU force this strategy on Britain.
Broca found that mulatto offspring of Southern European whites and negroes were more successful in reproduction but where this happened on an appreciable scale, as in Portugal, the result was disastrous after little more than 100 years.
In Racial Realities in Europe, Lothrop Stoddard describes how Portugal was a major sea power in the 16th century.
He then describes how she experienced a drift of her population away from rural areas to the cities, lured by wealth, a constant drain on her manpower by foreign wars and "racial impoverishment...with negro blood," as great landowners imported large gangs of Africans to work the half-deserted countryside and who inevitably intermingled with what remained of the indigenous population.
In little over a century, Portugal degenerated into a minor nation as a direct result of these combined trends.
Britain is degenerating in the same way. 5,500,000 or at least 10% of white Britons now live abroad. Britain continues to haemorrhage her white indigenous population at the rate of over 100,000 a year, to be replaced in over abundance by 300,000 foreign incomers annually. See
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/6210358.stm
Her available employment, including rural work, is progressively being taken over by foreigners, especially Poles.
Though obviously not of African descent, Poles and other Eastern Europeans are nevertheless not equivalent to the native peoples of the British Isles. They are largely, i.e. 90%+, Alpine Caucasians, not Anglo-Saxon Celtic, or Nordic Caucasians (the Nordic distinction applies to all so-called 'immigrants' to these isles up until and including the Norman i.e. 'North-man,' conquest) and clearly cannot be assimilated without a deleterious effect on Britain's indigenous racial character.
And incomers of African or Afro-Caribbean descent to Britain now number well over 1,000,000 and they are continuing to arrive in large numbers, e.g. Congolese to Norfolk, Somalis to the south-east etc.
This is sufficient for the EU to further its strategy of Britain's ultimate destruction as a nation and a people as outlined above.
Given that white Britons could be a minority in their own country by the year 2066 if present trends continue, the EU could achieve its aim by about the year 2100, or not much later.
Remember Portugal - and that, like Portugal in its final decline, Britain is no longer a major sea power, so the EU destruction of Britain is off to a running start.
Alan O'Reilly
N. Yorks.
Police Betrayal in Blackpool
Paige Chivers, victim of Muslim rape gang in Blackpool and missing,suspected murdered like Charlene Downes
By Mister Fox
The Telegraph recently revealed that a report into to the gang rapes of young White girls by Muslims in the Blackpool area was covered up for 8 years by the local police(1). There is a pattern to the grooming and abuse of these 60 girls. The Telegraph:
How many children suffered because the authorities and the police and the authorities hid what was going on? In a just society those responsible would pay with their jobs, their pensions and their reputations for what they have done, but we are not in a just society and that will not happen.
The police and the courts act under Home Office orders so to be fair the order to cover up for mass child- rapists will have come from the top. This is government, possibly EU, policy. However, whoever gave the orders, it was senior police officers who put it into practice, thus actively aiding and abetting the execution of crimes they were hiding.
The police now cover up more crime than they prosecute. In Blackpool they not only hid the truth but even sabotaged one particularly horrific case, the trial of the two Muslims suspected of murdering a local girl, Charlene Downs, butchering her corpse, and then literally feeding her body to the local community as kebab meat.
Charlene was one of many young girls being groomed, sexually abused, and often raped by members of Blackpools Muslim community. Yet, even now these senior police officers refuse to warn parents about what is happening or who are doing this to local girls – in effect, they are still covering up serious crime.(2) How could this happen? How can Lancashire, Chief Constable Steve Finnigan justify what was effectively criminal behaviour by himself and his force?
Don't forget that while this and the cover ups were going on governments were massively increasing the immigration of Muslims. No wonder Finnigan was awarded a CBE.
He and his force have allowed, and to all extent and purposes abetted, the systematic rape of young ethnic English girls in towns such as Blackpool, Blackburn and Burnley. It has also been going on in Derby, Rotherham and Keighley and Telford by people from similar ethnic backgrounds. In fact this is now so widespread and directed so exclusively at our children that this amounts to an act of war as sure as if they had planted a bomb.
Our cowardly and treacherous elites refuse to acknowledge what is happening so we must rise to the challenge and the likes of the heroic EDL are already leading the way
The EDL have arranged another demo for Charlene in Blackpool on May 28th, supported by her family. Where we can again expect to see plenty of film of the police attacking the demonstrators while allowing the protected groups of Muslims to do what they like, as they usually do.(3) They and the compliant media will then blame any violence on the EDL, as they always do.
I suggested in “Surviving Enoch's Prophecy” that we should form Community Defence Groups. If the authorities side with aliens who rape young girls then the authorities are also the enemy of our people and we have to defend our people. (4) This is not a call for violence but for unity, others have taken sides against us and we must stand together against them. It is clear whose side the authorities are on. The Muslim who burnt poppies on Armistice Day was given a derisory £50 fine by a traitorous magistrate while the soldier who burnt a copy of the Koran in Carlisle was told by a political judge he could expect a custodial sentence. (5)
What is being done to these young girls is of course child molesting not “paedophilia” which is an ideological term designed to make it sound less evil than it is. The violated White girls were all aged between 13 and 15, the same age group as Charlene, whom, as I stated earlier is alleged to have been raped, murdered, minced up into kebabs and sold to customers on the Blackpool seafront.
Those accused of this crime have not only had the case against them sabotaged, but the anti-White establishment have now given them £250,000 as “compensation” while at the same time innocent parents suffer misery and have had their lives ruined.
Compensation payouts while a case is still open are unheard of what if there is a retrial and they are convicted? will the taxpayers get to ask for the money back? Our political class have made it clear that they do not care and are prepared to allow the routine raping of young White girls to continue. As a further insult Cameron has just given Pakistan £650 million of British taxpayers money in order to buy Muslim votes here.
As I wrote earlier these are acts of war on our people by a rival and homogeneous community which has been imported into our nation by those who wish to harm us.
If parents, knew the truth they would not let children anywhere near Muslim run takeaways, restaurants or taxis. They should teach them to avoid Muslims, but warn them not to tell this to their teachers who now behave like Stasi agents and would report them to the thought police for corrective training. They are already quizzing young White children for signs of “racism”. It is this imposed ideology that makes young girls believe it is okay to go with Muslims.
The truth is deliberately censored.
The Daily Mail reported: ‘A former senior officer with Lancashire police told The Times that the report was hushed up because of fears about 'upsetting community cohesion'. (6) ‘Community cohesion”? What ‘community cohesion’? Can the authorities and the media not see that, by suppressing the truth without solving the problem, they are merely putting off the day when like a pressure cooker this will all explode in their faces.
The priority must be for us to work to reverse the mass importation of muslims into Britain and to form links with other defenders of the continent across Europe, together with the many victims of Multiculturalism. Don't forget Islam is also persecuting Jewish communities in Europe.
We must also confront, face on, the traitors amongst our ruling classes who can not contain their hatred for White British people. Even the worthless nobody Sally Bercow (emphasis not on the “ber”) who is married to the equally worthless speaker of the House of Commons, showed her true face on Anna Botting's programme discussing the Charlene Downes case. When asked by Botting: “What’s the lesson from this?” Bercow smirked: “I guess the lesson is, don’t go for a takeaway in Blackpool.”
The likes of BerCOW hate the British and cannot resist slandering our people, and treating them with contempt. Can you imagine this disgusting woman mocking the disappearance and presumed brutal murder of a young Muslim? Of course you can’t! She never would. She like the rest of the elites shows us contempt in our own country. You can always tell a White-hater: they always try to silence our attempts to survive as a people by labelling us “Nazis”, “racists” etc. (6) We must make it clear that we will no longer stand for this hatred of us from such people in our country.
A particularly vile example of elite propaganda comes from Libby Brooks of the Guardian when she wrote that we, the British, “have a history of racialising crime”(7) . This simple view is based on the false idea of the equality of crime and the natural evil of Whites in criminalising the innocent 'other'. The repulsive apologist for child rapists was wrong and should publicly apologise to the innocent white girls she wronged. What a fool she now looks! Yet the bigoted old trout would rather die before she did so. No doubt Brooks views herself as a “feminist”, yet ignores the fact that in particular, the groups she chamions treat women like dirt. You only have to consider (dis) honour killings and genital mutilation of young girls and forced marriages.
Of course, these attacks on young white girls are a racial as well as a religious - the religion is adapted to the racial characteristics. Aside from a disproportionately small minority of white offenders, the disproportionate majority of the criminals are Muslims.
Our enemies must not think we are as weak and wet as the elites who side with them are. Mick Gradwell, a former detective superintendent with Lancashire Police, told newspaper reporters: that our girls were“passed around like toys for sexual gratification” but officers could not do anything to stop it as investigations were blocked over political concerns.”
The shop where Charlene Downes was "allegedly" raped, murdered, butchered and sold to the public is still open and being patronised by thick British People who, if they are aware of what happened, show contempt for their children and people. It was at that time known as Funny Boyz, a pun on the bar Funny Girlz whose staff were all transsexuals. This is a key to how our degenerate society signals our worthlessness and what we consider White women are only good for. Although that does not excuse what was done.
The Kriss Donald, Mary Ann Leneghan cases are more evidence of the war against us in our own country.
The police have a duty of care to protect the public but as the Blackpool case shows they are in dereliction of their duty. The parents should sue the police for this.
The Times of 6th April reported more insights into this war on us from within:
The ironically named Awaken:
Some think we need to portion the country and give these aliens some of our territory. This is weak and lacks courage. To partition the country is firstly, cowardly, secondly, it creates a hostile border between two states in one historical country.
There are a many example, none successful, Cyprus, Ireland. The biggest mistake you can make is to surrender territory in advance because wars are fought for territory and that encourages the enemy to fight harder. The ideas is to become strong and remove the enemy not give in.
Remember the old values of nobility, honour and courage? That is what is needed not surrender in advance.
The eleven takeaway shops that are known to the police should be closed down until a full investigation into them and those that work within them as taken place and tell the people of Blackpool police must tell parents which shops are used to mass rape young White girls so parents may ensure their children are kept away from them. Then if evidence is found the authorities must press charges and stop protecting the criminals. It is surely unacceptable for the police to continue to protect gangs of child rapists. It would be professional of them to tell local people just how many of their young children go missing each year. It also cries out for us to demand who is murdering our children.
We can all start by boycotting these filthy restaurants everywhere were the staff probably routinely spit in our curries. People in the areas where the police protect those who rape their daughters must form defence committees and picket them until they are closed - the police are complicit in the rapes as they refuse to warn parents what is happening and therefore encourage it to continue. The police are acting directly against the interests of the community who they swore to protect! They betray local parents when withholding information needed to protect their children. Do these police officers have daughters? If so I bet they keep them away from such places.
In previous cases of the police protecting child-rapists in Blackburm parents thought of suing the police. Parents in Blackpool: you must sue the police and you must protect your children from this horror being done to them.
_______________________"An unpublished police report identified 11 takeaway shops in the town centre which were being used as "honeypots" where the non-white men preyed on young white victims, who were given food, alcohol and cigarettes in return for sex.Yet all this was hidden
The report said: "Young people were being groomed and sexually assaulted both inside and outside of premises by a number of takeaway owners and workers.”
Earlier this year a Home Office inquiry was launched amid reports of a similar trend of crime across the north of England and the Midlands involving gangs of mainly Muslim men and young girls."
How many children suffered because the authorities and the police and the authorities hid what was going on? In a just society those responsible would pay with their jobs, their pensions and their reputations for what they have done, but we are not in a just society and that will not happen.
The police and the courts act under Home Office orders so to be fair the order to cover up for mass child- rapists will have come from the top. This is government, possibly EU, policy. However, whoever gave the orders, it was senior police officers who put it into practice, thus actively aiding and abetting the execution of crimes they were hiding.
The police now cover up more crime than they prosecute. In Blackpool they not only hid the truth but even sabotaged one particularly horrific case, the trial of the two Muslims suspected of murdering a local girl, Charlene Downs, butchering her corpse, and then literally feeding her body to the local community as kebab meat.
Charlene was one of many young girls being groomed, sexually abused, and often raped by members of Blackpools Muslim community. Yet, even now these senior police officers refuse to warn parents about what is happening or who are doing this to local girls – in effect, they are still covering up serious crime.(2) How could this happen? How can Lancashire, Chief Constable Steve Finnigan justify what was effectively criminal behaviour by himself and his force?
Don't forget that while this and the cover ups were going on governments were massively increasing the immigration of Muslims. No wonder Finnigan was awarded a CBE.
He and his force have allowed, and to all extent and purposes abetted, the systematic rape of young ethnic English girls in towns such as Blackpool, Blackburn and Burnley. It has also been going on in Derby, Rotherham and Keighley and Telford by people from similar ethnic backgrounds. In fact this is now so widespread and directed so exclusively at our children that this amounts to an act of war as sure as if they had planted a bomb.
Our cowardly and treacherous elites refuse to acknowledge what is happening so we must rise to the challenge and the likes of the heroic EDL are already leading the way
The EDL have arranged another demo for Charlene in Blackpool on May 28th, supported by her family. Where we can again expect to see plenty of film of the police attacking the demonstrators while allowing the protected groups of Muslims to do what they like, as they usually do.(3) They and the compliant media will then blame any violence on the EDL, as they always do.
I suggested in “Surviving Enoch's Prophecy” that we should form Community Defence Groups. If the authorities side with aliens who rape young girls then the authorities are also the enemy of our people and we have to defend our people. (4) This is not a call for violence but for unity, others have taken sides against us and we must stand together against them. It is clear whose side the authorities are on. The Muslim who burnt poppies on Armistice Day was given a derisory £50 fine by a traitorous magistrate while the soldier who burnt a copy of the Koran in Carlisle was told by a political judge he could expect a custodial sentence. (5)
What is being done to these young girls is of course child molesting not “paedophilia” which is an ideological term designed to make it sound less evil than it is. The violated White girls were all aged between 13 and 15, the same age group as Charlene, whom, as I stated earlier is alleged to have been raped, murdered, minced up into kebabs and sold to customers on the Blackpool seafront.
Those accused of this crime have not only had the case against them sabotaged, but the anti-White establishment have now given them £250,000 as “compensation” while at the same time innocent parents suffer misery and have had their lives ruined.
Compensation payouts while a case is still open are unheard of what if there is a retrial and they are convicted? will the taxpayers get to ask for the money back? Our political class have made it clear that they do not care and are prepared to allow the routine raping of young White girls to continue. As a further insult Cameron has just given Pakistan £650 million of British taxpayers money in order to buy Muslim votes here.
As I wrote earlier these are acts of war on our people by a rival and homogeneous community which has been imported into our nation by those who wish to harm us.
If parents, knew the truth they would not let children anywhere near Muslim run takeaways, restaurants or taxis. They should teach them to avoid Muslims, but warn them not to tell this to their teachers who now behave like Stasi agents and would report them to the thought police for corrective training. They are already quizzing young White children for signs of “racism”. It is this imposed ideology that makes young girls believe it is okay to go with Muslims.
The truth is deliberately censored.
The Daily Mail reported: ‘A former senior officer with Lancashire police told The Times that the report was hushed up because of fears about 'upsetting community cohesion'. (6) ‘Community cohesion”? What ‘community cohesion’? Can the authorities and the media not see that, by suppressing the truth without solving the problem, they are merely putting off the day when like a pressure cooker this will all explode in their faces.
The priority must be for us to work to reverse the mass importation of muslims into Britain and to form links with other defenders of the continent across Europe, together with the many victims of Multiculturalism. Don't forget Islam is also persecuting Jewish communities in Europe.
We must also confront, face on, the traitors amongst our ruling classes who can not contain their hatred for White British people. Even the worthless nobody Sally Bercow (emphasis not on the “ber”) who is married to the equally worthless speaker of the House of Commons, showed her true face on Anna Botting's programme discussing the Charlene Downes case. When asked by Botting: “What’s the lesson from this?” Bercow smirked: “I guess the lesson is, don’t go for a takeaway in Blackpool.”
The likes of BerCOW hate the British and cannot resist slandering our people, and treating them with contempt. Can you imagine this disgusting woman mocking the disappearance and presumed brutal murder of a young Muslim? Of course you can’t! She never would. She like the rest of the elites shows us contempt in our own country. You can always tell a White-hater: they always try to silence our attempts to survive as a people by labelling us “Nazis”, “racists” etc. (6) We must make it clear that we will no longer stand for this hatred of us from such people in our country.
A particularly vile example of elite propaganda comes from Libby Brooks of the Guardian when she wrote that we, the British, “have a history of racialising crime”(7) . This simple view is based on the false idea of the equality of crime and the natural evil of Whites in criminalising the innocent 'other'. The repulsive apologist for child rapists was wrong and should publicly apologise to the innocent white girls she wronged. What a fool she now looks! Yet the bigoted old trout would rather die before she did so. No doubt Brooks views herself as a “feminist”, yet ignores the fact that in particular, the groups she chamions treat women like dirt. You only have to consider (dis) honour killings and genital mutilation of young girls and forced marriages.
Of course, these attacks on young white girls are a racial as well as a religious - the religion is adapted to the racial characteristics. Aside from a disproportionately small minority of white offenders, the disproportionate majority of the criminals are Muslims.
Our enemies must not think we are as weak and wet as the elites who side with them are. Mick Gradwell, a former detective superintendent with Lancashire Police, told newspaper reporters: that our girls were“passed around like toys for sexual gratification” but officers could not do anything to stop it as investigations were blocked over political concerns.”
The shop where Charlene Downes was "allegedly" raped, murdered, butchered and sold to the public is still open and being patronised by thick British People who, if they are aware of what happened, show contempt for their children and people. It was at that time known as Funny Boyz, a pun on the bar Funny Girlz whose staff were all transsexuals. This is a key to how our degenerate society signals our worthlessness and what we consider White women are only good for. Although that does not excuse what was done.
The Kriss Donald, Mary Ann Leneghan cases are more evidence of the war against us in our own country.
The police have a duty of care to protect the public but as the Blackpool case shows they are in dereliction of their duty. The parents should sue the police for this.
The Times of 6th April reported more insights into this war on us from within:
"Charlene Downes and her friends called it “Paki Alley”. When they were hungry, wanted cigarettes or alcohol, or needed top-up credit for their mobile phones, they knew where to go because you could find almost anything down the alleyway. For a price.
What Lancashire Constabulary uncovered when Charlene went missing from home in 2003, however, was almost a factory production line of child abuse involving the systematic grooming and sexual exploitation of dozens of young girls by a closely linked group of men
The force’s initial “problem scan” identified more than 60 local girls, the youngest aged 11 but most aged from 13 to 15, as being “exposed and vulnerable” to men operating from a cluster of “honey-pot” locations in the town centre, all takeaway food premises.
The ironically named Awaken:
“Children, many from troubled homes or in the care system, had been befriended by older men who flattered their desire to be treated as adults, showering them with gifts and affection before using them for sex both inside and outside the takeaway outlets.
The scale of the criminality was so disturbing that one of Britain’s first multi-agency child sexual exploitation projects, Awaken, was swiftly established in Blackpool to target offenders and offer support to vulnerable girls.
A decision seems to have been taken at an early stage that one aspect of the abuse made the police findings too sensitive to be revealed publicly. In 2007, an unpublished report by police and local authority representatives from Awaken stated: “Analysis showed that in relation to the takeaways, non-white adult males working alone or within friendship groups were principally perpetrating the exploitation.”
Some think we need to portion the country and give these aliens some of our territory. This is weak and lacks courage. To partition the country is firstly, cowardly, secondly, it creates a hostile border between two states in one historical country.
There are a many example, none successful, Cyprus, Ireland. The biggest mistake you can make is to surrender territory in advance because wars are fought for territory and that encourages the enemy to fight harder. The ideas is to become strong and remove the enemy not give in.
Remember the old values of nobility, honour and courage? That is what is needed not surrender in advance.
The eleven takeaway shops that are known to the police should be closed down until a full investigation into them and those that work within them as taken place and tell the people of Blackpool police must tell parents which shops are used to mass rape young White girls so parents may ensure their children are kept away from them. Then if evidence is found the authorities must press charges and stop protecting the criminals. It is surely unacceptable for the police to continue to protect gangs of child rapists. It would be professional of them to tell local people just how many of their young children go missing each year. It also cries out for us to demand who is murdering our children.
We can all start by boycotting these filthy restaurants everywhere were the staff probably routinely spit in our curries. People in the areas where the police protect those who rape their daughters must form defence committees and picket them until they are closed - the police are complicit in the rapes as they refuse to warn parents what is happening and therefore encourage it to continue. The police are acting directly against the interests of the community who they swore to protect! They betray local parents when withholding information needed to protect their children. Do these police officers have daughters? If so I bet they keep them away from such places.
In previous cases of the police protecting child-rapists in Blackburm parents thought of suing the police. Parents in Blackpool: you must sue the police and you must protect your children from this horror being done to them.
Reference notes for Police Betrayal in Blackpool
(1) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/8433887/60-girls-groomed-for-sex-at-takeaway-shops-in-Blackpool.html
(2) http://www.lancashire.police.uk/about-us/whos-who/chief-constable
(3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X-_an-h4jg0
http://casualsunited.wordpress.com/2011/04/08/full-edl-demo-in-blackpool-may-14th-justice-for-charlene-downes/
(4) http://www.thegreenarrow.co.uk/component/content/article/9-mister-fox/2008-surviving-enochs-prophesy
(5) http://casualsunited.wordpress.com/2011/04/16/show-of-support-for-andrew-ryan-carlisle-edl/
(6) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1374443/Police-hid-abuse-60-girls-Asian-takeaway-workers-linked-Charlene-Downes-murder.html
(7) http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jan/07/grooming-racialising-crime-tradition
(8)http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/the-staggers/2010/10/sky-news-comments-threatened
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jan/07/grooming-racialising-crime-tradition
I recommend the very powerful writings and advice on Lee Barne's blog 21st Century British Nationalism.
http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/2011/04/time-for-charlenes-law.html
Other relevant references
http://www.guardian.co.uk/theobserver/2006/jul/09/society
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jan/07/grooming-racialising-crime-tradition
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article1838029.ece
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rHejc7HwwM&NR=1
http://www.metro.co.uk/news/753313-police-failed-murdered-charlene-downs-14
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1220815/Police-disciplined-blunders-murder-case-girl-turned-kebabs.html
http://www.iol.co.za/news/world/schoolgirls-groomed-for-sex-1.1054095
EDL March Blacpool May 28th
* Demonstration date changed to the bank holiday weekend* The EDL demand justice for Charlene Downes
* Another peaceful protest against the spread of radical Islam
Friday, 15 April 2011
An Open Letter to the Prime Minister, Mr David Cameron MP
From: Dr Frank Ellis
To: An Open Letter to the Prime Minister, Mr David Cameron MP
Date: 15th April 2011 A.D.
Re: The Prime Minister’s Speech on Immigration to Conservative Party Members in Hampshire, 14th April 2011
Dear Mr Cameron
Once again I am compelled to write to you on the subject of immigration and the related ills which are gnawing away at the fabric of British society and destroying us. Having read your speech, I can say that there are parts which show some awareness of the immigration threat, for example, the connection with the welfare state. Whether of course you act is another matter. The long-suffering, white indigenous population has heard the cry of “It’s time to get tough on immigration” so many times before and on each occasion nothing has happened. Once any election is out of the way the immigration assault on our way life continues its relentless path. Nothing is done to stop the invasion. Whole neighbourhoods are taken over by immigrants and we whites are supposed to pretend that we are being blessed when in fact we are being dispossessed.
You begin your speech by pointing out that last year we were in the middle of a general election campaign. The highlight of that election campaign directly pertains to your Hampshire speech. Let me refresh your memory. When Gordon Brown took part in a choreographed visit to Rochdale last year he, thinking his microphone was switched off, referred to a life-long Labour Party activist as a “bigot” because she had earlier complained about high levels of immigration to Britain. Brown’s grovelling after his remarks were broadcast did him no good at all. His cowardice and disgusting duplicity were there for all to see and hear. His private response to a perfectly honourable concern about mass immigration reveals not just his horrible, cynical dishonesty but the huge gulf that separates the professional political caste in this country from the electorate. It confirms my suspicion that you and your politician colleagues despise people like me and others who object to mass immigration. You despise us because we categorically reject your hideous multiracial fantasy; you hate us because we see through your lies; you seek to punish us and humiliate us because we resist the Lie; and you long for the day when we are overwhelmed by immigrants and reduced to a cowed racial minority in our ancient lands.
You note the following:
Now, immigration is a hugely emotive subject and it’s a debate too often in the past shaped by assertions rather than substantive arguments. We’ve all heard them. The assertion that mass immigration is unalloyed good and that controlling it is economic madness, the view that Britain is a soft touch and immigrants are out to take whatever they can get. I believe the role of politicians is to cut through the extremes of this debate and approach the subject sensibly and reasonably.
The reason that ‘immigration is a hugely emotive subject’ is because any attempt to criticize mass immigration has been portrayed by the political caste to which you belong, the BBC, the Guardian-reading classes, the universities and what is erroneously referred to as the teaching profession, as something too dreadful even to contemplate. The implicit, often quite explicit, assumption has been that any person who criticizes the level of immigration or who resents the changes that have been imposed on Britain without the consent of the indigenous population, is some kind of Nazi, hell bent on mass murder. Those of us who have attacked the insane levels of immigration have not just made assertions: we have offered compelling arguments to which the BBC, to take just one example, has responded with hysteria and vitriol. Your party has contributed to ‘the extremes of the debate’ by denying Conservative MPs the opportunity to resist. When Patrick Mercer pointed out, please note, pointed out, some obvious home truths about race and the British Army you removed his shadow defence portfolio in order to be able to grandstand and make a display of your commitment to “anti-racism”. William Hague accepted the findings of the viciously, anti-white, racist Macpherson Report without so much of a high-pitched squeak and attacked the East Yorkshire MP John Townend in the 2001 election campaign merely because Townend sympathised with the concerns of his constituents regarding mass immigration.
The filters of BBC censorship and of other monopoly stream media outlets through which anything to do with race, multiculturalism, immigration and crimes carried out by immigrants must pass before anything is broadcast or put in print mean that the grim truth is never fully placed in the public domain or only hinted at, as for example when the BBC reports violent black behaviour in London. You say that public debate was affected because public discussion was closed down and that: ‘It created the space for extremist parties to flourish, as they could tell people that mainstream politicians weren’t listening to their concerns or doing anything about them’. What are you trying to say here, Mr Cameron and what are you trying not to say, to acknowledge? So the last Labour government with the support of your party demonised any individual or individuals who pointed out the failures of multiculturalism. It was left to small parties such as the BNP and non-affiliated individuals to state that ‘mainstream politicians are not listening to your concerns or doing anything about them’ for the simple, painfully obvious reason, Mr Cameron, that mainstream politicians were not listening to our concerns or doing anything about them. In other words, Mr Cameron, when the silence of cowardly, careerist politicians was broken by some lone voices, you denigrate them as the mouth pieces of extremist parties whose arguments are not to be heard, even when these supposed extremist parties and individuals are telling the truth and articulating the justified fears of a large majority. And you expect me to trust you and your call for a sensible and reasonable debate on this subject? You want this debate to be on the basis of your ideological assumptions; primarily that multiculturalism and mass non-white immigration are inherently beneficial. Those who object are cast as ‘extremists’, as somehow incorrigibly wicked.
Again, you say that you want ‘to starve extremist parties of the oxygen of public anxiety they thrive on and extinguish them once and for all’. You acknowledge the public anxiety over the immigration issue so what exactly are these extremist parties doing or saying that is wrong and which warrants their being called ‘extremist’? If there is massive anxiety about immigration (more accurately fear, loathing and disgust), why does it exist? Who or what is to blame? The answer Mr Cameron is: cowardly and lying politicians x cowardly and lying politicians x cowardly and lying politicians = masses of cowardly and lying politicians. Ever since 1948 immigration has been an issue in Britain, punctuated by race riots and culminating in the Islamic terrorist attacks of Thursday 7th July 2005. Successive governments have tried to ram race-is-a fiction, we-are-the-world and multiculturalism down our throats and when we have retched and vomited this poison out of our bodies, politicians have then resorted to legal and administrative sanctions against us; they have indoctrinated our children to hate their country, its heroes, its past; they have turned children against their parents; they preach hatred of whites; they encourage immigrants to mock us and to take over our towns, cities and neighbourhoods; and our men returning from Iraq and Afghanistan are spat at and reviled by immigrants as war criminals. And in the UN-sponsored world view of multiculturalism which you seem to have totally internalised, we, the white indigenous population, are somehow reduced to the level of extremists because we have had enough of being lied to and because we resent our country being overrun by aliens.
You say that you want ‘to get the policy right: good immigration, not mass immigration’. To begin with you need to deal, as matter of national priority, with the vast numbers of illegal immigrants currently in the United Kingdom. There must be absolutely no amnesty. Your mission is straightforward: hunt them down, round them up and deport them. What stops you from acting? When the indigenous electorate actually sees wailing illegals being deported, along with all the wives and hordes of other dependents; when the indigenous electorate starts to see that its neighbourhoods are being reclaimed, you might merit some trust: but not before since your credit is exhausted.
As for what you call ‘good immigration’ you claim – politicians always do – that ‘Our country has benefitted immeasurably from immigration’. That is news to me. When I go through large parts of Britain – Bradford, Slough, Leicester, Birmingham, Leeds and whole swathes of London - I am assailed by sights and sounds that might be appropriate in the Third World but do not belong in England. Third World immigrants recreate the Third World in First World countries. When I go to large parts of England I do not wish to see masses of black and brown faces, bizarre clothing, hordes of immigrant children, freakish behaviour, to hear the invasive cacophony of non-European languages and to see whole streets that look as if they belong in Islamabad or Mogadishu. I do not feel enriched by “diversity” or multiculturalism. My reactions are fear, disgust and a horrible nausea. I am of course angry at people like you who have done nothing to prevent this from happening, even when warned of what would happen.
What are people from Uganda, India and Pakistan doing in large numbers in British hospitals? Britain is quiet capable of providing enough staff from the indigenous population. Our training is superior as well. The countries you mention are not exactly known for high standards and good training. The Indian examination system is corrupt and riddled with cheating such that fake degrees and other professional qualifications are easily obtainable at the right price. Pakistan is a Third World slum whose sole export to this country has been terrorism, welfare parasitism and immigrant invaders. Uganda is a sub-Saharan, Third World basket case. Do you really expect me to believe that any training such as it is in Uganda meets First World standards and that lives are not being put at risk by employing Africans?
The case of Daniel Ubani, the Nigerian with a German passport, is just one horrifying example of what can happen when First World standards are jettisoned in the name of multiculturalism and ‘good immigration’. One Primary Care Trust rejected Ubani because his command of English was so weak. Eventually he secured – somehow – a post and on his first day managed to kill one patient and nearly killed another. The chances are this Nigerian could not read or not very well and that he simply did not understand the correct doses of drugs required. Shortly thereafter he fled back to his ‘native’ Germany. The presence in small numbers of highly qualified immigrants form Europe in intellectually demanding jobs is not the problem (please note that Daniel Ubani is not European). However, if the numbers rose dramatically it would become a problem. The real problem is the mass influx of poorly or dubiously qualified or unqualified Indians, Pakistanis, sub-Saharan Africans, Somalis and Turks and others whose sole contribution is to overpopulate Britain and whose customs, religion and high levels of welfare dependency represent a massive drain on the public purse. When one takes into account the social, economic and displacement costs borne by the white indigenous population and the huge emotional and psychological stress inflicted on whites by the presence of large numbers of non-white aliens in their country, there are no substantial benefits at all from mass immigration, especially from India, Pakistan, Sub-Saharan Africa, Somalia and the Middle East. Mass, non-white immigration is a curse.
Your admission that the last government allowed the mass invasion of immigrants into Britain comes far too late: so much damage has already been done. Why did the Conservative Party not highlight this invasion when in opposition? You had every opportunity. Why during this period was it left to non-affiliated individuals and so-called extremists to highlight the dreadful consequences of mass, non-white immigration? By staying silent on the mass immigration invasion between 1997 and 2010 your party colluded with the Labour Party’s policy of allowing mass immigration. The Conservative Party therefore bears a great deal of responsibility for what has happened. Too many of your cowardly MPs who knew perfectly well what was happening, failed to stand up and be counted. This is why the Conservative Party can no longer be trusted on anything to do with immigration.
You say that ‘real communities aren’t just collections of public service users living in the same space’ and that ‘Real communities are bound by common experiences, forged by friendships and conversation, knitted together by all the rituals of the neighbourhood, from the school run to the chat down the pub. And these bonds can take time. So real integration takes time’.
When you say that ‘real communities aren’t just collections of public service users living in the same space’ whom exactly are you trying to deceive? Your point is so obvious (it has been recognised for a long time) and your reasons for stating it so patently insincere that I am at a loss to identify the target audience. This is just cynical and utterly insincere posturing on your part. The only community that matters Mr Cameron is the nation, in my case the English nation, not the fantasy multiracial communities which you have in mind. The common experiences of the English nation cannot be open to all.
You say that ‘real integration takes time’. In America they have been trying since 1865 and they have still failed. Large numbers of different racial groups in the same territory is a design for strife, violence, unhappiness, discord and the destruction of individual freedom. For how much longer are you and Trevor Phillips going to tell us that more time is needed so that integration can work or should I say be made to work at the expense of the white, indigenous population? Integration can never work because most of us have a healthy and wholesome sense of who we are and what we cannot be or become. The natural resistance we manifest frustrates the ambition of the diversophiles, so harsh and repressive legislation must be enacted so that opposition can be bullied and intimidated into silence. In opposition your party, Mr Cameron, raised no substantial objections to the recommendations of The Macpherson Report (1999), Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000 and all the other rules and restrictions on intellectual freedom that the last Labour government sought to impose on the white, indigenous population. At every opportunity your party has connived and colluded with the Labour Party and the emissaries of the European Union in order to silence, to humiliate and to crush dissenters from multiracial orthodoxy. And now you plead for more time so that the hellish designs of multiracialism can be brought to fruition.
Our membership of the European Union is a huge obstacle to preventing and then reducing the levels of legal/illegal immigration. We are also extremely vulnerable to fraudulent claims submitted under various pieces of human rights laws and codes. All and any legislation which prevents us from deporting immigrants and imposing strict border controls must be rescinded.
You mention forced marriages yet I find no mention of Pakistan or other Third World states. In what sense are these girls who are forced into marriages by Pakistani immigrants ‘British’? They may have acquired a British passport but then as you have conceded they and their families cannot speak ‘the same language as those living there’ and do not want to integrate. By what measure can these people be properly considered to be British? I note that you say that these immigrants do not speak ‘the same language as those living there’. There is something evasive about this, a deliberate lack of clarity. You avoid saying that these immigrants are unable to speak English confining yourself to the fact that they are unable to speak ‘the same language as those living there’. Your failure to identify English as the critical language which these immigrants must learn leaves open the possibility that the language spoken by the people ‘living there’ might not be English but some language from the Indian sub-continent which the new batch of immigrants from, say, Somalia, cannot speak. This is yet another reason why multiracialism is so disastrous: it creates barriers and suspicion; it destroys any sense of community.
There is an insuperable problem for your multiracial utopia, or rather a series of problems that very few people will state publicly and that will bedevil your plans. I speak for myself here – so others may disagree with me – though I suspect that many people will share my views. You want openness. Here it is: I do not want to live in a community where I am confronted with hordes of black and brown faces on the streets of our towns and cities; I do not want to socialise with non-white immigrants; if by mistake I walked into a pub full of non-whites, I would leave immediately; I do not want to have to work with these people if it can be avoided; I avoid non-white immigrants at every possible opportunity (if dealing with them is unavoidable, I am polite no more no less); I do not want my children to have to endure the presence of huge numbers of non-white immigrants in their schools; I do not want to be preached to by diversity propagandists, telling me against all the evidence and the screams of my soul that diversity is some kind of blessing (it is nothing of the sort). Diversity is bestial, hateful and loathsome: it is a psychological weapon of war which has been deployed against the white peoples of the world in order to undermine their natural sense of racial and cultural separation, their identity, their natural and proper sense of superiority across the entire spectrum of human endeavour. Diversity is a collectivist refuge for the failure, the loser, the envious and the nation hater-killers.
God bless England, Ireland (both sides of the border), Scotland and Wales.
Yours sincerely
Frank Ellis
David Cameron and real ‘Scandal’ of the Universities
Political Correctness and the Death of Academic FreedomBy Tim Heydon
Nowhere is the sinister effect of the imposition of false ‘Equality’ in the snuffing out of liberty more obvious than in the groves of academe. If the supposed repositories of the disinterested pursuit of truth aren’t safe, no one is. One might think. But it was in fact the universities which first surrendered to the insidious doctrine of Political Correctness and precipitated what became known as the ‘Cultural Revolution’.
False Equality is the Bedrock of Leftism
The idea that all are actually and really equal regardless of social class, race, culture, religion or any other factor and ought to be treated such is the bedrock of modern Marxist leftism. Without this denial of truth, the claim that any social inequality is evidence of ‘oppression,’ such as David Cameron’s claim that the scarcity of black faces in the student intake at Oxford is 'shocking', begins to fall apart and with it the whole house of cards that is modern leftist theory.
That is why the mounting evidence for inherited personal and racial differences is so bitterly resisted by the forces of left-liberalism, in the universities as elsewhere. As Glayde Witney remarked in his 1995 Presidential address to the American Behaviour Genetics Society, in severe cases, this attitude includes an unbending intellectual absolutism akin to medieval scholasticism. ‘It is lethal to honest science,’ he said.
The Real Oppression is of Us
The real oppression is of those who must live under leftist policies which are designed to right wrongs which don’t exist because they are the products not of environment but of inheritance, thus denying those who deserve it because of their superior intelligence and other characteristics of their rightful rewards. The fact that only one Afro Caribbean was admitted to Oxford might be be attributable to cultural factors. But linked with this and far more importantly, the non-appearance of Afro-Caribbeans is really attributable, not to any great injustice, but largely to the low average IQ’s of Afro- Caribbeans in general. The mean IQ of blacks in the Caribbean itself is 70, ie the mental ability of the average white 11 year-old, but there is evidence of selection for intelligence in immigrants, producing a mean IQ somewhat below 86. (The mean IQ of sub-Saharan blacks in Britain, the first generation of which have a higher level of university graduates than Afro-Caribbeans, is 86. The IQ of whites in Britain is 100. Richard Lynn, The Global Bell Curve p88.)
Cameron’s implication that something must be done to rectify the ‘injustice’ of low black presence in Oxford will, if other such instances are anything to go by, result in real injustice by ending in discrimination against those who deserve a place at Oxford by virtue of their superior abilities and achievements but who are not Afro-Caribbean or simply Black.
When a Professor threatened a Student with Death : Cornell University and the Cultural Revolution
In his highly influential book, ‘The Closing of the American Mind,’ Allan Bloom, a Professor of Philosophy at Cornell in the USA when that University was the scene of gun-toting ‘revolutionaries’ in the 1960’s, recounted what happened when he confronted the University’s Provost over an incident where a black student’s life had been threatened by one of the academic staff for refusing to join in a demonstration:-
Black Radicals, Guns, Ideology and Weakness
‘He, of course, fully sympathised with the young man’s plight. However …..there was nothing he could do to stop such behaviour in the black student association. He personally hoped there would soon be better communication with the radical black students (this was before the guns emerged and permitted much clearer communication)......He added that no university in the country could expel radical black students, or dismiss the faculty members who incited them because the students at large would not permit it.’
The Rule of Fear and the Destruction of Freedom
‘Obvious questions were no longer obvious: Why could not a black student be expelled as a white student would be if he failed his courses or disobeyed the rules that make a university community possible? Why could not the Provost call the police if order was threatened? Any man of weight would have fired the professor who threatened the life of a student. The issue was not complicated. Only the casuistry of weakness and ideology made it so. Ordinary decency dictated the proper response. No one who knew or cared about what university is would have acquiesced in this travesty.. (Alan Bloom, ‘The Closing of American Mind’pp316 /7)
Political Correctness and Terror triumph over the free Pursuit of Truth and Justice
The anti-democratic , anti-free-speech capitulation to ideology and the fear-driven surrender to the potentially violent forces of the left shown by Cornell University’s Provost on that occasion and by others like him round about the same time have marked the attitude of the Universities in the USA , in Britain and elsewhere in the West ever since. True, guns are no longer in evidence because the revolution has triumphed. But ideology and fear have seen to it that dissent from approved political thinking (Political Correctness) continues to be snuffed out. Here is a list of Academics who have dared to raise their heads above the Parapet and who have suffered as a result, either through losing their jobs or facing other disciplinary action including being gagged when they talked about race or other related matters:-
Academic Persecution in the USA and Canada
Larry Summers(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_Summers)
James WatsonWatson is the Nobel-prize-winning co-discoverer of the structure of DNA who suggested in 2000 that dark- skinned people had stronger libidos than lighter-skinned ones. Extracts of melanin - which gives skin its colour – had been found to boost subjects' sex drive. "That's why you have Latin lovers," he said. "You've never heard of an English lover. Only an English patient." On October 25, 2007, Watson had to resign from his position as head of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in New York after he was reported as saying ‘I am inherently gloomy about the prospect of Africa (because) all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours – whereas all the testing says not really.’ Watson had apparently made similar remarks about women, without it seems quite realising how much such suggestions are a heresy against the Cult of Equality, punishable by excommunication.
Kevin B. MacDonaldMacdonald is a professor of psychology at California University, Long Beach. Using evolutionary psychology, he has developed a theory of Judaism as a "group evolutionary strategy." According to this theory, traits attributed to Jews such as higher-than-average verbal intelligence and ethnocentrism have eugenically evolved to enhance the ability of Jews to conspire to out-compete non-Jews for resources while undermining the power and self-confidence of the white majorities in Europe and America whom, he insists, Jews seek to dispossess, working indirectly through such ideologies as neo-conservativism which, like Freudian psychoanalysis and Marxism, uses arguments that appeal to non-Jews, rather than appealing explicitly to Jewish interests.
MacDonald questions claims that racial differences are unimportant or illusory and that racial and cultural assimilation will be an easy process.] He believes that blacks and Latinos are by and large genetically intellectually inferior to whites and Asian. He stated in connection with mass immigration that:
‘The alternative (to having an ethno state from which non- Europeans are excluded) faced by Europeans throughout the Western world is to place themselves in a position of enormous vulnerability in which their destinies will be determined by other peoples, many of whom hold deep historically conditioned hatreds toward them. Europeans' promotion of their own displacement is the ultimate foolishness—an historical mistake of catastrophic proportions.’
Many may think that this sums the situation up very neatly. Unsurprisingly in the present climate, the University Senate and his colleagues in the university’s psychology department have formally dissociated themselves from his work. The Senate described his views as Anti-Semitic and white ethnocentric. Apart from this condemnation on the grounds of Political Correctness, no substantive criticism of the correctness of his opinions appears to have been offered. Apparently, while Macdonald’s work may be described as ethnocentric and anti-semitic and justify attempts to gag and to possibly to remove him from his post; that Jews are anti –white and ethnocentric is either dismissed out of hand or is beyond criticism.
Arthur Jensen
Jensen is a major proponent of heriditarian position in the nature / nurture debate. He concluded from his studies that the Head Start programmes designed to boost African-American IQ scores had failed, and that this was likely never to be remedied, largely because, in his estimation, heritability of IQ was over 0.7 of the within-race IQ variability, and the 0.3 left over was due to non-shared environmental influences. (J Philippe Rushton has established that there have been no black gains in reading and mathematics in five decades . The vast amounts of public money poured into this scheme on the assumption that American blacks are equally intelligent to whites and other races, has been largely wasted.
After Jensen’s paper was released, students and faculty staged large protests outside Jensen's University of California Office at Berkeley. He was denied reprints of his work by his publishers and was not permitted to reply in response to letters of criticism—both extremely unusual policies for their day.
Jensen's 1998 ‘The g factor: The Science of Mental Ability’ suggests that a genetic component is implicated in the white-black difference in IQ .
In 2005, Jensen's article, co-written with J Philippe Rushton named ‘Thirty Years of Research on Race Differences in Cognitive Ability", was published in the APA journal Psychology, Public Policy and Law. They present ten categories of evidence in support of the notion that IQ differences between whites and blacks are partly genetic in origin.
Glayde WhitneyGlayde Whitney was a behavioural genetics and psychology professor at Florida State University. Whitney drew the wrath of the liberal establishment when in his Presidential address to the Behavior Genetics Association in 1995 he suggested that there was a need to investigate the possibility of genetic factors behind the high incidence of black crime in America.
Whitney caused further controversy when he wrote a sympathetic foreword to David Duke’s autobography, ‘My Awakening’. He described it as ‘’a painstakingly documented, academically excellent work of sociobiological-political history ... provid[ing] on the order of a thousand references and footnotes.’ He wrote," I discovered that Duke's 'racism' was not born of hatred, but of science and history. In reading Duke's work, Whitney noted, "As the hard scientific data came in, it became more certain that genetic differences (heredity) played a large role in the discrepancy. But in public it became politically incorrect to even to acknowledge that there was a difference."
Whitney argued that opponents of genetic research into racial differences are positioned against the scientific tradition of open inquiry, maintained even when one detests another's subject. When he received death threats he stated that "races are different for many genetic systems that influence everything from behavior and psychology to physiology, medicine and sports [...] Screaming nasty words does not change the reality." Whitney's views regarding race and intelligence prompted the Florida Senate to pass Resolution 2742 in 1999, "condemning the racism and bigotry espoused by Florida State University Professor Glayde Whitney."
J Philippe Rushton
Rushton is Professor of Psychology at The University of Western Ontario. His book ‘Race, Evolution and Behaviour’ which applies the r-K life-history theory to racial differences in IQ and other racial traits was greeted with widespread hostility and criticism, such as that of Robert Sussman the Editor of the American Anthropologist. When he refused to place ads for the book in the Magazine, Sussman said in explanation that
‘This is an insidious attempt to legitimize Rushton’s racist propaganda and is tantamount to publishing ads for white supremacy and the neo-Nazi party. If you have any question about the validity of the “science” of Rushton’s trash you should read any one of his articles and the many rebuttals by ashamed scientist’.]
(Hmm. Sussman’s main complaint seems to be ideological rather than scientific, doesn’t it?).
Nevertheless, Rushton was backed by some of the most eminent Academics in the field including Hans Eysenck, one of the most influential psychologists of the later twentieth century who was his doctoral supervisor at the University of London and who said of him that he ‘ is widely known and respected for the unusual combination of rigour and originality in his work... (and commenting on Rushton's book Race, Evolution and Behavior) ... Few concerned with understanding the problems associated with race can afford to disregard this storehouse of well-integrated information which gives rise to a remarkable synthesis.’ (http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/stalkers/jpr01.html)
Academic Persecution in the UK
Chris Brand
Brand was a lecturer in Psychology at Edinburgh University. After an almost year-long investigation by the University, he was sacked from this tenured post which he had held for 27 years because of his views on Race, IQ and women and because of remarks he made about paedophilia. His 1996 book ‘The g Factor: General Intelligence and Its Implications’ led to accusations of ‘scientific racism’ and sexism and his lectures were protested and closed by the Anti Nazi league of Edinburgh. Brand describes himself as a ‘race realist.’ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Brand
Geoffrey SampsonSampson is Professor of Natural Language Computing in the Department of Informatics, University of Sussex. He was elected as a Tory to Wealdon District Council in 2001. In 2002 he resigned having been attacked by Labour Party and Lib Dem ministers and councillors for publishing an article on his website, ‘There's Nothing Wrong with Racism (Except the Name)’. The Conservative Party Central Office endorsed his resignation saying that it was "in the best interests of all concerned ...the Conservative party is opposed to all forms of racial discrimination".
Satoshi KanazawaKanazawa is an evolutionary psychologist at the London School of Economic. He got himself into serious trouble when he published a paper alleging that African states were poor and suffered chronic ill-health because their populations were less intelligent than people in richer countries. Kanazawa was accused of ‘reviving the politics of eugenics’ by publishing the research which concluded that low IQ levels, rather than poverty and disease, are the reason why life expectancy is low and infant mortality high. His paper, published in the British Journal of Health Psychology, compared IQ scores with indicators of ill health in 126 countries and claimed that nations at the top of the ill health league also have the lowest intelligence ratings.
‘The Guardian’ said that ‘the reaction to Kanazawa's paper would ’reopen the simmering debate about whether academics are entitled to express opinions that many people may find offensive’. No surprise there. The Guardian will always be opposed to the expression of the truth if it is less than flattering to some non-white male group which will be ‘offended’ by it. Apparently truth should be concealed or never revealed or isn’t truth, if this is the case. It’s called sweeping unpleasant facts under the carpet; deliberately ignoring the elephant in the room, etc etc. If you buy The Guardian, you won’t get the truth. So why bother?
Kanazawa survived, quite possibly because, not being white, he was held to be less guilty than if a white person had made the same arguments.
Armand Leroi
Leroi is Professor of Evolutionary Developmental Biology at Imperial College, London. He attracted much hostile attention when in 2005 he published an article ‘A Family Tree in every Gene’ which underlined the importance of gene expression in confirming the reality of Race. Naturally, any scientific work which serves to deny that race is merely a ’social construct’ must be not just wrong, but evil, because leftist ideology says it is. So far, Leroi has survived academically.
Frank EllisFrank Ellis is the lecturer in Russian and Slavonic studies at Leeds University who dared to support the ‘Bell Curve’ theory. This theory of course holds that black people are less intelligent than whites – enough to have Ellis figuratively burned at the academic stake. But Ellis also believes that women did not have the same intellectual capacity as men and backed the 'humane' repatriation of ethnic minorities. Whilst the University appeared initially to have tried to back Ellis, in the end, it seems, it failed to hold out against the pressure from protesting students and teaching staff. Ellis ‘took early retirement.’
David ColemanColeman is University Professor of Demography at Oxford. He lists his interests as ‘the causes and consequences of low fertility and the ageing of populations in the developed countries; international migration; the demographic transition to low birth and death rates in the third world; problems of excessive or inadequate rates of population growth and policy responses to them’. His researches include ‘the comparative demographic trends of the industrial world, particularly the reasons for the persistence of substantial international differences in birth and death rates and in family structure. .. Also immigration trends and policies and the demography of ethnic minorities and. .. housing policy.’
Coleman’s warnings about the immigrants’ takeover of Britain through their differential birthrates have, like the work of the other academics mentioned here, attracted hostile criticism from the usual quarters. Like the others mentioned above he has been the victim of academic gagging.
Richard Lynn Richard Lynn, Emeritus Professor of Psychology at the University of Ulster is currently probably the most prominent British Scientist in the field of IQ and other racial differences. Among his writings are ‘ IQ and the Wealth of Nations (Human Evolution, Behaviour and Intelligence)’ co-authored with Tatu Vanhanen), ‘The Global Bell Curve’ and ‘Race Differences in Intelligence.’
It is no coincidence that Lynn’s prominence in this field arose after his retirement from the University with the honorific title ‘Professor Emeritus’. As with the others mentioned here (those who have not been sacked, that is) Lynn was gagged from discussing racial matters whilst actually in post. Like J Philippe Rushton, he has only managed to get his work known through small private Publishers.
Academic Persecution Elsewhere
An example is:-
Helmut NyborgNyborg, Professor of Developmental Psychology at Aarhus University is probably Denmark’s best know and most controversial Psychologist. He has identified a 5-point average IQ difference in favour of men. Through research, Nyborg has also concluded, inter alia, that white people tend to be more intelligent than blacks.
In 2005, Nyborg published his paper, ‘ Sex-related differences in general intelligence g, brain size, and social status’. Even though this passed peer review in an expert scientific journal, Aarhus University investigated accusations of scientific fraud in the results. The resulting report concluded that there although there was some statistical errors (which were not in fact of major significance in the results) there was no evidence of fraud.
Notwithstanding this, the University reacted to the report by suspending Nyborg in 2006.
And so on and on.
What do we gather from all of this? That the claims of Academic Freedom are dead in the era of Political Correctness. And that If highly important and respected Scientists like those mentioned above can be attacked, sacked, vilified and silenced in the way they have been for pursuing lines of research which conflict with the prevailing Marxist ideology, it is certain that there are many, many more in the shadows who substantially agree with their views but who lack their courage and determination, preferring a quiet life and living with the perniciously evil lie of ‘equality’. Even given the understandable fears of what that the truth of race differences have led to in the light of the horrific history of Nazi Germany, what we have now is censorship and oppression, pure and simple and the result is not the oppression of women and/or minorities but the oppression of the rest.
This is totalitarian Left-Liberalism in action..
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)