A Christmas message of Hope

The following essay in two parts by Tim Heydon was first published at The British Resistance. Tim has kindly given permission for me to republish it here.

A Christmas Message of Hope - Part One
By Tim Haydon

What the End of a Civilisation Looks Like: Britain and the West 2010

It is a truism to say that we live in an increasingly secular society. What those who welcome this present trend do not seem to realise is that it means the end of civilisation as we have known it. And if it were to continue and expand it would ultimately mean the end of any civilisation worthy of the name whatsoever.

A Society cannot survive without agreed Standards of Morality

Why so? Because a society cannot survive if there are no agreed standards of morality, and there can be no such standards without religion. That is because without religion the universe is meaningless. Our lives have no purpose beyond the animal urges endowed us by our genes which are themselves the mere accidental outcomes of physical laws.

In a Meaningless World, No one has the Right to decree Right and Wrong.

And so there can be no binding rules of behaviour on anyone, since if there is no absolute right or wrong, who or what is there to bind? And why should anyone behave in a way another wants him or her to behave? In such a world, if someone says to you, ‘you must behave in such and such a way,’ all one has to do is say, ‘I don’t agree’, because your preference is as good as anyone else’s.

Political Correctness: Merely the Preferences of the Left imposed through Power

That is or should be the end of it, but of course it isn’t, as we are seeing. Because the secularisers have tried to substitute Political Correctness for religion as the basis of morality. Since the nihilism on which Political Correctness is based denies that any one morality is superior to another, this means that their imposition of the morality of Political Correctness is invalid. But they choose to ignore that.

As Nietzsche foretold, what is left without religion is power and the Politically Correct merely impose their own preferences on the rest of us through the exercise of it. Whatever the secularisers might say about religion, they cannot claim that it is self contradictory in the imposition of morality in the way that Political Correctness is.

When there is no Religion and no Right or Wrong. What a Society on the Brink of Destruction Looks Like

In the 1930’s the pioneering Harvard Sociologist and historian Pitirim Sorokin predicted that values in the West would continue to be undermined, would become more and more influenced by relativistic thinking, would lose their binding power and would be .‘ground to dust’ Distinctions between right and wrong, true and false, beautiful and ugly and positive and negative would more and more disappear in the opaque and chaotic world of crumbling ‘sensate ‘ culture as he termed it.

Sorokin’s Chillingly Accurate Prophesy

He has been proved absolutely right. Huge numbers of people are increasingly incapable of telling right from wrong including politicians, judges, journalists and even many clergymen. A quick glance at Modern Art (where Lucian Freud for example depicts human beings as soulless mounds of flesh and Frances Bacon saw them as ugly, tortured and almost dissected, staring into the void), modern music (based round the rhythm of the sex act), modern architecture (which banishes the human and the fitting in favour of deliberately meaningless gimmickry and the celebration of glass, steel and concrete), the cinema and TV, ‘all show that the borderline between the beautiful and the ugly, the positive and the negative have been erased’.

Becoming more and more materialistic

Sorokin also asserted that Man himself in the declining modern world would become more materialistic and less spiritually minded. Science would seek to strip life of its sacred character (think genetic engineering, abortion on demand and ‘designer babies’) and Mankind would become increasingly debased and sensual (Any TV soap and many town centres on a Saturday night are proof of this).

Most people would ‘sink deeper into the muck of the sociological sewers’ and would be ‘progressively destructive rather than constructive, representing in their totality a museum of sociological pathology rather than the imperishable values of the Kingdom of God’ (It is hard to disagree with these remarks given the morality -free wastelands of so many of our towns and cities). The ancient place of true religion in society would be replaced by pseudo religions (such as Political Correctness, Environmentalism, all those little Buddhas used as ornaments, the devotion to ‘Yoga,’ the fawning over Islam etc. )

The Disappearance of Personal Honour and of Duty

Sorokin also predicted that ’contracts and covenants in our age would lose the remnants of their binding power.’ This would make virtually impossible the proper functioning of representative government. (Do you trust our politicians?)

The Rise in Violence and the Loss of Respect for the Law

With the fragmentation of other values, Sorokin predicted that respect for law and civil order would dramatically decrease. Government would turn to its only remaining weapons; naked force and fraud. There would be an increasing war of all against all (such as we are beginning to see in our inner cities), riots, civil disturbances and brutality would become commonplace. (Is this not true?).

The Hollowing out of the Meaning of Words Men once Died for.

Words which previously were meaningful such as ‘freedom’ would gradually lose their definition and become mere fiction. (We can see that in our ‘liberal’ ie ‘free’ society in which people are in reality less free than they have been since Cromwell). Our rights would be alienated. Constitutions would be abolished or used as ‘beautiful screens for an unadulterated coercion.’ (The enforcement of EU membership and mass immigration and multiculturalism on this country by its Political Class speaks for itself);

The Disintegration of the Family

Sorokin also foresaw the attack on the family as an institution and as the fundamental building block of society. The sacredness of the family unit, of husband, wife and children would continue to disintegrate. Genuine difference between marriage and illicit relationships would disappear. (Helped along by the ‘marriage’ of homosexuals). Children would be separated from their parents at an earlier and earlier age (as they are doing through divorce and separation). These trends would continue to accelerate until, he remarks, ‘the family becomes a mere accidental cohabitation for male and female while the home becomes a mere overnight parking place mainly for sex relationships.’ (This state of affairs has already arrived for many).

The Prediction of the Overwhelming of Western Civilisation

Sorokin wrote in the 1930’s that Western culture, as a separate entity, would soon be overwhelmed by a grotesque collage of bits and pieces of every culture on earth (‘enrichment’). Culturally speaking, he thought that our culture would become a bazaar like those of Cairo or Damascus with everything and anything tossed into a muddled heap.

The End of Creativity

Sorokin though that genuine creative thinking in the crippled remnants of Western Society would wither and die. The Beethovens, Newtons, Rembrandts Shakespeares of our former civilisation would be replaced by mediocrities (Tracy Emin, David Hockney etc) vulgar showmen, pseudo-thinkers (Foucault , Derrida, the Frankfurt School etc etc) and the like.

The End of Rising Living Standards

Finally, with the collapse of moral values and ethics and the withering of creativity, Sorokin saw that economic production would eventually decline, and that standards of living would grow worse. With this, security of life and of possessions would fade as would peace of mind and happiness. Violence and criminal activity would grow to terrifying proportions and ever –increasing numbers of people would grow weary from the struggle for existence. (The ultimate decline in living standards Sorokin foretold may or may not be here –watch this space - but the rise in criminality certainly is)

Sorokin’s truly chilling accuracy as to the way our society has evolved (written some 55-75 years ago let us not forget) demands that we take his ideas seriously.

___________________________________________

A Christmas Message of Hope - Part Two

By Tim Heydon

First the bad News : Western Culture is being overwhelmed by Foreign Elements

To recap, in Part One, we saw a truly bleak vision of what a secular world would be like and noted that our present society is already moving into this grim future. Overwhelmed by the sheer flood of foreign elements and incapable of discriminating between what is harmful and what is not, our culture has lost its confidence. It no longer believes in its own superiority and is disintegrating. Weak and ill, it betrays itself. The cultural outlook that dominated the world a mere hundred years ago is in its death throes.

Then the Good News.

Sorokin believed that the drive to materialism which is a function of the internal dynamics of all cultures would serve eventually and inevitably to bring about a change for the better in the West. He wrote, ‘In these conditions the Western population will not be able to help opening its eyes to the hollowness of the declining Sensate Culture and being disillusioned by it…by tragedy , suffering and crucifixion it will be purified and brought back to reason.’

The Future Age

When the West inevitably returns to a more spiritual mode of existence and to absolute values though, what religion will it be that is followed? Will it be Christianity or will it be (God forbid) Islam or some other faith?

The decline in the grip of Christianity on the West since the ‘Enlightenment’ has been driven by a strengthening of the materialist world view of which Sorokin spoke which now dismisses spiritual explanations entirely, believing that whatever cannot be explained by science cannot exist (vide Dawkins). This means (and is meant to mean) that the miracles of Jesus are fraudulent and therefore the story of Jesus as told in the Gospels including the key miracle of his Resurrection is a lie.

Crossan the Arch-Sceptic

The rationalist attack on Christianity by those whose intellectual horizons are defined by an acceptance of a closed system of cause and effect has effectively culminated in the work of John Dominic Crossan, a member of the so-called ‘Jesus Seminar’. In an honest attempt at scholarly enquiry, Crossan concentrated on individual items of the traditions about Jesus and decided whether or not they were genuine in ‘archaeological’ fashion, digging through three ‘layers’ of data to reach the historical Jesus.

The first ‘cosmic’ layer is of pan-Mediterranean models of patronage and clientage and fundamental values . Next comes the mesocosmic layer; Jesus’ immediate historical context, then the microcosmic layer which relates to the literature concerning him. The results are then interpreted in the light of Graeco-Roman history and anthropological models in a way appropriate to the historical contextualisation of the data. This method, so Crossan argues, reveals the historical Jesus.

The Jesus of Crossan

Well, who is the Jesus according to Crossan? He is merely a social and political reformer who posed a threat to the authorities. His burial and resurrection did not happen, although his crucifixion certainly did.
In terms of historical significance, it is the life and mission of Jesus that are important for Crossan. According to him, Jesus’ death was not of the greatest significance. This contrasts with the view of Paul, for whom what was of ‘first importance’ were the death burial and resurrection of Jesus (1 Cor15:3-4).

Crossan ‘s Scepticism Dismantled

Tom Wright exposed Crossan’s approach as circular. He points out that Crossan’s dating of materials results from his understanding of Jesus rather than the other way around. Crossan’s intellectual horizon; his view of the world as a closed system of cause and effect, leads him to the a priori dismissal of supernatural intervention in the world whether working outside the ‘laws’ of nature or within them. Therefore the miracles (except Jesus’s healings, which in his opinion do not in fact contravene the laws of nature) are inventions. These other miracles, the turning of the water into wine; the feeding of the five thousand - they are all fables designed to show Jesus as in some sense a divine being. He was in fact merely a social and political reformer who posed a danger to the authorities. The Passion story, the accounts of the Resurrection - they are fictions concocted to reveal Jesus as fulfilling Old Testament prophecies and to deal with power struggles and other problems in the early church.

Tom Wright gets his teeth into Crossan

However, Tom Wright, the Bishop of Durham who is now Research Professor of New Testament and Early Christianity at the University of St Andrews argues persuasively that if Jesus was merely a social and political agitator it is hardly likely that his followers would have attributed to him the importance that they did, nor having fled when he was arrested would they have come together at a time when their own lives were in peril as his associates unless something momentous (his Resurrection) had occurred.

Wider Intellectual Horizons: The Miracles and Quantum Mechanics.

Ben F Meyer (‘The Aims of Jesus’- Princeton 2002; ‘One of the most important books of its type of the Twentieth Century ‘) rejects Crossan’s out –of-hand denial of the possibility of the miracles. Restricting himself to supernatural intervention working within the laws of nature he bases his opinion on the demonstration of the philosopher Bernard Lonergan’s cognition theory ( ‘A Study of Human Understanding’). Lonergan embraces Quantum Theory which has done away with the seemingly inexorable determinism of cause and effect. It shows that there are a number of possible outcomes for any event.

Amazingly, an observer creates an outcome by collapsing the possibilities through observation. The outcome appears to be more and more likely the more it is expected; in other words, faith orchestrates outcomes; the greater the faith the more likely the outcome. So for example, Jesus could quite conceivably have turned the water into wine or walked on water and have done so without contravening any ‘laws’ of nature.

Meyer holds that the widespread historical assumptions that miracles must be discounted may themselves be discounted as culturally determined and little better than reductionist encumbrances to legitimate historical method.

Crossan’s Methods attacked

Meyer attacked Crossan’s approach (inspecting individual items of the traditions) as refusing to see the wood for the trees. Jesus must be seen as a whole through the narrative of the Gospels rather than in the fragmentary way Crossan espouses which only succeeds in failing to capture the integrity of the portrait of Jesus’ personality and missing the whole point of his story. Meyer also contradicts those who assert that Jesus never made any claims about himself. Drawing on the philosopher Collingwood’s views on intentionality he shows that Jesus demonstrated who he was through his actions.

Meyer and Lonergan

Meyer based his own approach to the study of the question of the historicity of the Gospels on Lonergan. Lonergan’s view is that ‘understanding’ occurs in a three stage process of the experience of sense data, the questioning of the data and the grasping of it as an intelligible unity in an act of insight, followed by a judgement of the truth or falsity of that understanding according to criteria determined by the knower. Only after the completion of this three–stage process of experience, understanding and judgement can the knower can truly be said to ‘know,’ or grasp, the ‘virtually unconditioned.’

Accepting the possibility that the miracle stories are true, Meyer’s conclusions are that the Gospel accounts of Jesus’ own miracles and his Resurrection, as well as his teachings, are correct in all essential particulars.

Further Validations of the Truth of the Gospels by Modern Scholars

These conclusions are supported and extended by the work of Tom Wright (‘The Victory of the Cross’ etc) and by other recent Scholarship such as the textual analyses of Craig Blomberg (‘The Historical Reliability of the Gospels’) and Richard Bauckham (‘Jesus and the Eyewitnesses’ and ‘The Testimony of the Beloved Disciple’. ( Bauckham identifies the ‘Beloved Disciple’ as St John, who wrote or dictated his Gospel and who was present at the Last Supper, the Crucifixion and the Empty Tomb).

The Christmas Message of Hope

The Christmas Message of Hope then is that yes, the Gospel Story has survived the worst that its enemies have thrown at it and has survived more or less unscathed. The historical Jesus is indeed pretty much the person that believers have always thought him to be, the Jesus of faith. And so his birth and his mission really are events we can celebrate.

And because they are real, there is hope for ourselves, our Nation and for our Civilisation.

Multiculturalism

A Poem by Mike Wilson

Come on down you coloured folk –
We’re here to lend a hand.
We’re here to help you get a start,
In this, our own free land.

Just leave behind your petty wars
And a Muslim way of life –
Yes come on down and join the fun,
You can even bring your wife.

We’ll give you houses, jobs and cash,
We’ll give you peace of mind
And we won’t mind if you object
To how we live our lives.

Your women can be covered up
From head to foot, it’s true.
We understand that you must live
As all good Sharia’s do.

We don’t care that you hate us folk,
No we don’t care that it’s true –
We only want to show you love
As all good Christians do!

Our Christian culture is our own
But you must have one too
So we will stop our Christmasses
So you can feel ‘True Blue’.

As Christians all we understand
That we must love all men.
So come on down and bring your creed
And religious intolerance too.

Race and History and the Attack on Our Civilisation from Within

By Mister Fox

Science is supposed be objective and free of the scientist's values, but Franz Boaz turned Anthropology into an ideology: an ideology is a set of ideas that incorporate value judgements. In the Soviet Union everything was presented as they wished it was and not a reflection of reality. All policies were introduced ostensibly for the workers but the elites were rich and lived in exclusive areas like our elites; it explained everything in economic or material terms and other aspects of life are left out.

Ideology is reasoning from the orthodox belief rather than from empirical evidence and the subjects are slotted into it. There are two sides good and bad people like the war with The Devil in Christianity.

Boas changed the object of the racial bias in anthropology from tribes onto Europeans. He taught that theories should be treated as works in progress, until proven beyond doubt. His grounding in the natural sciences made him aware that the difference in the study of humans from geography or zoology was the study of "culture." He did not see culture as linear progression, until it reached the level European civilisation and rejected the attendant notion that those who were behind were inferior.

Boas was the first scientist to state that the White and the Negro were fundamentally equal and he actively supported African American organizations. (1) As an anthropologist he sought to use science, including his studies of tribal peoples, to seek out and document the truth about the significance of race. It was his hope that people could learn to be tolerant of difference, and to see so-called primitives not as inferior or less developed, but as a source of diversity that had much to offer.

Researchers had noted differences in height, cranial measurements, and other physical features between Americans and people from different parts of Europe and to many this showed innate biological difference between races. Boas's primary interest was the study of processes of change; he set out to determine whether bodily forms are also subject to processes of change. This was in his mind when he studied 17,821 people, divided into seven ethno-national groups. The problem with that is diet: the cranials of Japanese immigrants grew bigger because of nutrition. People grow bigger now and there are fewer bandy-legged people because of less rickets.

His 1912, study on the plastic nature of the human body in response to changes in the environment has for the past 90 years been taken as evidence of cranial plasticity but never seriously examined for statistical and biological validity. By using pedigree information in Boas' data, narrow sense heritabilities are estimated by the method of maximum likelihood. In addition, a series of tests and regression analyses are performed to determine the statistical validity of Boas' original findings on differentiation between American and European-born children and the prolonged effect of the environment on cranial form. Results show the relatively high genetic component of the head and face diameters despite the environmental differences during development.

In 2002, anthropologists Corey S. Sparks and Richard L. Jantz, claimed that differences between children born to the same parents in Europe and America were insignificant, and that there was no detectable effect of exposure to the American environment on the cranial index in children. Their results contradicted Boas's findings and showed they could not be used to support arguments of plasticity in cranial morphology.

The ideological approach led to massive damage to our way of life when Margaret Mead adapted her findings to her ideology. Her book Coming of Age in Samoa(1928) undermined Western civilisation. The book is based on nine months of anthropological fieldwork in which she claimed that Samoan teenage girls experienced neither the sexual restrictions nor the psychological problems of Western women. The claim was presented, and widely accepted, as significant evidence in the debate between biological determinism and cultural relativism. Published in 1928, it is one of the most influential books of the twentieth-century.

The book influenced Dr. Benjamin Spock and Bertrand Russell and changed people's attitudes on adolescence and its crises, free love, feminism, sexual diversity, child rearing and libertarian education. The media loved pictures of this young woman scientist and the cover of the first edition had a half-naked couple gamboling hand in hand among palm trees. She used her research as propaganda and following a suggestion by her publisher added chapters on "what all this means to Americans". The result was a change in Western society's self-perception and attitudes to sexuality. She ignored and played down data that did not fit the ideology she wanted. (4)

A follower of Boas was one of the most influential people of the twentieth-century, Claude Levi-Strauss. After the Second War the UN set up a cultural and scientific body, UNESCO. They held a series of conferences to get away from Nazism and return to the values of The Enlightenment. Never again must a people be imprisoned within their culture. (5)

He presented a paper to the UNESCO meeting in London in 1951 and claimed that “a tribe” was no less sophisticated than Westerners. To present them as equal the content of culture must be disregarded and only the structure considered. To explain: a folk story from Africa or anywhere, is equal to our cultural productions like Hamlet because it can be shown that they have similar structures. As someone who has studied scriptwriting, play writing and is familiar with the mythological writings of Joseph Campbell, I am well aware that the enjoyment of a film or play, needs things to occur in the right order. The simplest order is beginning, middle and end. You can not omit the content because then you would not be watching anything. It is the content of Hamlet or Pride and Prejudice that we enjoy. How often do you hear one say: “Wasn't it marvellous the way the film got the chase scene in the right place?”

Levi-Strauss also criticised the way we see everything from our point of view - “Ethnocentrism.” This is seeing our own culture as best and prejudiced to regard other cultures as less advanced than European: yet, it is self-destructive to see other cultures as better than ours. Prejudice had to be destroyed and the method was, not to advocate our reason to others but to adopt their reason.

In Race and History Levi-Srauss denied that the concept of race explains anything and the differences between human groups were because of “ geography and society, not to aptitudes having any clear link with the anatomy or physiology of blacks, yellows or whites.”

“It was not enough to distinguish social heritage from biological, to separate life-styles from all genetic determinism, or biological explanations of culture. One had also to fight against ranking cultural differences hierarchically. The multiple variations of the human race in time and space must not be classified in terms of a sequential movement towards perfection. They were not, as it were, so many markers of a triumphal progression.”

Again, if we read or watch Hamlet or Pride and Prejudice, the vocabulary, dress and manners are strange to us but not the basic human nature of falling in love, wanting status and money. This is not the "one Race" of Progressives, but a common humanity, common to all peoples The difference is not in the structure of their minds but in the content: the propensity to common traits like belonging, loyalty, enmity, grudges etc are directed to their own respective peoples, not all people.

If we go back far enough, everyone came from somewhere else. Such kinship instincts are straight-forward in wild animals but become confused in domesticated animals and humans.

Richard Dawkins argues that altruism towards non-kin is a misfiring of a genetic urge to help bodies that contain a high proportion of our own alleles. Hamilton's rule implies that such misfiring (insufficiently discriminating altruism) on a large scale will cause the very allele for altruism itself to be phased out of the gene pool - and make it genetically advantageous to be an exploiter of others' generosity until such "goodness" disappears as a trait in the population.(6)
That scientific statement is similar to Edmund Burke's definition of a nation as involving a shared identity, history and ancestry, and continuity: “… it becomes a partnership not only between those who are living and those who are dead, but between those who are living and those who are dead, and those who are to be born.”

I see no reason why we should need to demonstrate scientific evidence of our being a race. This our White British country(ies) We have possession by long occupation which is sanctified by time and emotional bonding. We have the opposite imposed on us and it has been discovered that increasing genetic diversity in a population causes altruism to become proportionately less common (Professor Putnam).

Our would-be disposessors use a trick to de-humanise us as "mongrels", "no such thing as the British" or "were all immigrants." It is to reduce us to an "unpeople" and to dispossess us of our country and communities. It prevents the elites having to feel any conscience at their wicked behaviour because we don't really exist and therefore have no claim to the territory. It belongs to anyone and everyone.

The fact that scientists have refrained for decades from describing, defining or categorising people by their morphological characteristics is a reflection of the flight from Hitler that has been imposed than it is a demonstration that race is not a scientific concept. (7)

If we consider the peoples of the world in their native settings, it is easy to define those peoples who are distinctly 'European' or of 'white race'. In doing so, we should not worry that no-one has absolutely white skin, because the term 'white' when used in the context of race is simply a taxonomic term. This taxonomic term refers to the paleness of the skin of people people of white race, it is not a literal chromatological description in the same way that when we refer to negros ('negro' being derived from the root word meaning 'black'), we are describing people who fall into a taxonomic group characterised in part by the darkness of their skin colour. The term 'negro' is again a taxonomic term in this context, and again, not a literal chromatological description.
The defining or racial groups is therefore a matter of taxonomy, i.e. based upon a process of classification, and the discussion of race should not be clouded by the disingenuous use of semantics.

In Race(1974)J.R.Baker classifies human races as animal subspecies are classified. He looked at the nature of civilisation and gave 23 criteria by which civilizations may be identified. He explores the relationship between the biological traits and the cultures of five civilizations. Based on these criteria, Baker declared no indigenous civilisations ever appeared in Africa. He rejected the methodological relivatis used in anthropology since Boas and reverted to hereditarianism and cultural evolution. He used the Latin term stirps for a line of descendants from an ancestor; stock or strain.
When people refer to the 'white race', they usually mean the bulk of the people who form the Caucasian group, but excluding those that have significantly altered characteristics as a result of racial admixture. Albeit that these excluded groups might still fall within the 'Caucasian' group for taxonomic purposes, they would not normally be regarded as 'white' from an ethnic, social or political perspective.

It is not possible for most people to trace each ancestral line back beyond the 1800s, as the first census of England, Wales and Scotland was not conducted until 1801. Beyond this there are only parish records which are very laborious and time consuming to research and which are often incomplete or inconclusive and which can result in a 'dead end' where there was illegitimacy in the family, when a mother's name may be recorded in a birth certificate, but not the father's.
Genealogical records only record genealogy and genealogy should not be confused with genetics.

We should not confuse geography with race. For example the E1b1b1 Haplogroup does originate in North East Africa (Egypt), but that was c. 20,000 years ago during the height of the last ice age, when the climate of Egypt would have been much more temperate than at present and when North Africa was inhabited by people of Cro-Magnon or Proto-European.
As the ice age subsided and the ice sheets retreated northwards, so people from southern Europe migrated northwards and people from North Africa migrated up through the Middle East into the Balkans. The presence of the E1b1b1 Haplogroup therefore provides no conclusive evidence of non-European ancestry, it simply shows that one of a person's ancestral lines originated in Egypt 20,000 years ago.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethnicity

(1) Boas talk on racial equality was delivered in 1911

http://historymatters.gmu.edu/d/5069/

http://science.jrank.org/pages/9228/Ethnicity-Race-in-Anthropology-FRANZ-BOAS-ETHNICITY-CONTEMPORARY-PHYSICAL-ANTHROPOLOGY-CONTINUING-TENSIONS.html

http://www.anthro.fsu.edu/people/faculty/CG_pubs/gravlee03b.pdf

(2). http://classes.yale.edu/02-03/anth500a/projects/project_sites/99_Zheng/kelly1.html

(3) UNESCO http://www.comminit.com/en/node/2471/36

http://portal.unesco.org/en/ev.php-URL_ID=13161&URL_DO=DO_PRINTPAGE&URL_SECTION=201.html

(4) http://imponderabilia.socanth.cam.ac.uk/articles/article.php?articleid=34

(5) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Race_Question

(6) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._D._Hamilton

(7) http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/fury-at-dna-pioneers-theory-africans-are-less-intelligent-than-westerners-394898.html

http://books.google.co.uk/books?id=kslga1MfT1gC&printsec=frontcover&dq=frank+salter+on+genetic+interests&source=bl&ots=yJMz1C7DN6&sig=eYYboaR-f5bUGd6YO2x3wwt78lw&hl=en&ei=FSPlTK8PzIWFB9mBsdsM&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CBYQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q&f=false

http://www.opensourcebuddhism.org/matcphilosophy-group6-relativism-abe-paper.htm

Another SA farm couple murdered

Within a few short hours of reporting the brutal murder of Mpumalanga farmer Tolstoy Schoeman and the attack on his wife, I have been notified of a further fatal attack of a South African farming couple the day before the Schoeman killing.

Mr. Casper Aucamp (55) and his wife Daleen (52), who have a game farm outside Thabazimbi in Limpopo, had been shopping with their three daughters in Rustenburg the previous day. On their return to their farm, Vandas, on Wednesday they were apparently overpowered and murdered whilst busy unloading Christmas presents. Mr. Aucamp's toolkit, which he always had in the back of his vehicle, and a pool of blood at the entrance of the house indicate that on their arrival they were attacked.

Their bodies were found in the boot of the burnt out remains of their vehicle on a deserted gravel road about 25 km outside Dwaalboom on Thursday.

When their parents hadn't contacted them to let them know they were safely home, they began to be very concerned, according to the youngest daughter, Ms. Leonie Mans (24). She had her sister contacted a neighbour to go and investigate but apparently the farm gates, house doors and windows were closed. The sisters went to the farm themselves and asked the gardener where their parents and the vehicle were and were told that they'd gone to buy feed in Dwaalboom.

A family friend phoned and told them that there was a burnt out Land Cruiser on the road outside Dwaalboom. When they arrived at the scene the police were already busy with an investigation. They knew immediately it was their parents' vehicle but only later did the police phone them and inform that there were two bodies in the boot. The sisters identified their parents by their jewellery. According to the police it would appear they were dead when the fire started. The case is being investigated. The police confirm that there was blood found at the entrance to the house, have not yet confirmed whose it was, and as yet no arrests have been made.

As is so often the case, this killing has not, as yet, been reported in the English language media, and I would like to thank Heather for providing the translation of the Afrikaner report which can be found here.

___________
Hat tip: Heather

Farmer strangled, wife beaten and robbed

A badly beaten Mrs. Schoeman in Hospital

An elderly South African farmer, 86 year old Tolstoy Schoeman was beaten and strangled to death by intruders at his farm near Badplass in Mpumalanga, shortly after midnight on Thursday .

The killers who were armed with a panga and a knife then severely beat Mr. Schoeman's 65 year old wife Güdryn before driving her to an ATM about 5 km outside of town where they forced her to withdraw cash. The killers then rolled the car and fled.

The amount of blood at the scene showed that the victim put up quite a fight before he was overpowered, tied up and strangled with his track suit pants.

Tolstoy Schoeman had farmed in the area for 46 years and had helped in building up the local town. His traumatised widow remains in hospital.

News report

Mr. Schoeman's death brings the total number of South African farmers and their families murdered since the end of Apartheid to at least 3,132, although some believe the number is as high as 3,700. Although the actual figures are covered up by the South African police and a controlled international media, it is widely estimated that the total number of South African whites murdered since 1994 is in excess of 35,000.
___________

Thanks to Mulder and Heather for this information

Breaking News - Dream Act fails to pass the Senate

Obama's lame duck Democrat administration's attempt to sneak the so called "Dream act" through the senate hidden in the provisions of the innocuous sounding "Removal Clarification Act of 2010" in their dying days of power has been blocked by the US senate.

Had the act passed this would have been the first stage in ultimately granted full US citizenship to the offspring of hundreds of thousands, if not millions of illegal immigrants.

The 55-41 vote effectively kills the DREAM Act for the year and, possibly, for the rest of President Obama's term.

Immigration or Invasion

By Mister Fox

The Mass immigration of aliens since 1948 is justified by deceitful arguments that they bring economic benefits. But only for the elites – the rest are pushed out of employment and their communities, their children disinherited. It is advanced behind Utopian ideals and unrealistic plans for a one-world of one people but in practice, Global capitalists are importing cheap labour. Free trade has been promoted as a panacea since Richard Cobden's speech of 1846 as: “drawing men together, thrusting aside the antagonism of race”, and creed, and language, and uniting us in the bonds of eternal peace”. In practice it is a policy that allows completely open economic borders, whereby cheap foreign goods can flood into the country unchallenged and undercut the wages of our own people and decimate the economic livelihood of the nation. Of course there will be those that profit from cheap labour, cheap imports and the peddling of third world goods on an open market. This country is governed for business interests not the nation as a whole and they defend their interests against critics with the Trotskyite term "racist"!

We get alarm stories of how the government has lost control of its borders but what is happening is what they want to happen. Opponents speak of it as an invasion or colonisation. But which is it?

The replacement of a people is not painless but causes great misery and suffering and people who inflict misery and suffering on innocent people are evil and the distinction between an invasion or immigration, depends three factors: the strength or treason of the ruling elite plus numbers of the incomers and how they behave towards the hosts when they are in. These are present in most of my example.

A precedent from history is the internal conquest of Rome in 376 by Goths after weak Emporer Valens had allowed them to settle. This is how demography works: if there had not been so many with strength from numbers they would not have rebelled

The Goths had been displaced by Huns and asked the Romans for asylum. The Romans allowed them in and when they were provoked by offensive Roman officials, revolted. Roman historian Ammianus explained the folly: “The affair caused more joy than fear and educated flatterers immoderately praised the good fortune of the Prince, which unexpectedly brought him so many young recruits from the ends of the earth...”

Pat Buchanan gives pertinent examples in Death of the West. When Mexico got independence in 1821 when it had got independence and invited Americans to settle in Texas, its northern province. They applied two conditions: the Americans must swear allegiance to Mexico and convert to Catholicism, like our facile citizenship tests. But when the Americans were a sizable majority of ten to one they begun to think about independence as European Muslims are. The catalyst came under tyrant General Santa Anna - the Americans rebelled and took that part of Mexico for America. Now Mexicans are pouring into America and taking it back! (1)

Bishop Ali Nazir has exposed how Muslims take over areas of our country and keep us out. (2)

The same behaviour can be seen in Tamils in Sri Lanka, Tebet where China have invaded, in Hawia where most of the original people have been displaced as also happened in South America and the West Indies. What happened to Native Americans is well documented as is the displacement of Aborigines and Maoris.

This behaviour of invaders whether invited or not goes back as far as recorded history. Take our own country. Julius Caesar invaded Britain in 53AD with a small Roman force and realised the Britons were not easy so the Romans withdrew to Gaul. They needed more men for full-scale invasion.

Caesar returned the next year bringing 30,000 soldiers. The Britons delayed by not fighting the Romans as they landed which allowed them to establish themselves. Then they fought British tribes one at a time. Caesar neglected Gaul and they rose up so Caesar had to withdraw to put down the rebellion.

The Britons aided their Celtic kinfolk in Gaul in their fight to defend their territory. Emperor Claudius decreed they should feel the might of Rome.
The Romans invasion of AD 43 was to to take over the island. Emperor Claudius sent an army of 40,000 men. Many tribes realised the power of this army and soon made peace but some took on the might of the Roman army. These clashes lasted for many years in parts of Britain. Rivalry led to war and to the Romans war could only end with the submission or destruction of their foes. In Europe, whole tribes of Gauls, Britons and Germans were killed or enslaved. After the Gauls surrendered Caesar took 50,000 slaves with as many killed. The Gallic warlord Vercingetorix honorably surrendered but was kept in chains for six years before being ritually strangled in the arena. Caesar boasted of killing five million Gauls - an act of genocide.

In Briton the Iceni tribe, an ally of the Romans, was driven to rebellion by the cruelty of the Roman governor. Their tribal lands were seized and people enslaved. Boudicca, their Queen, was publicly whipped while her daughters were raped by Roman slaves. .

The Celts had coinage no written language, and were divided. The Romans had a developed culture, organisation and great self-belief.They came to conquer and take the people under their authority. It is in this sense that people speak of Liberty: Liberty from foreign yolk and the creative security of living amongst your own folk in your own culture. Compared to the Romans the Celts were disunited. They shared basic race with the Romans but were ethnically different and followed different religions which increases conflict as it does with the rival White and Muslim comminities now.

An ethnicity is a group whose members belong together through a common heritage, usually a common language, a common culture which is a shared religion and sense of common ancestry and awareness of a group's distinctiveness from others. Patrick J.Buchanan describes it as a “blood and soil” nation.(3)

Civilisation broke down after the Roman army left and to defend themselves from Vikings, the inhabitants brought in European mercenaries. These were Angles and Saxons from northern Germany. To begin the Anglo Saxons were allowed to bring their families and got paid with land which they could farm then when they were strong enough the Anglo Saxons took the territory. This is a parallel with how contemporary elites are allowing our territory to be taken and our children dispossessed.

The Anglo Saxon invasion was the most thorough case of ethnic cleansing in this country until 1948. DNA evidence shows that in some parts of the country up to 90% of the inhabitants were displaced. The Anglo Saxons re-named roads and places which shows dominance.

The Viking raids finally became a “Great Army” in 865 AD. It landed in East Anglia and Northumbria and Mercia had fallen by 875 with only Wessex left. The Vikings attack Wessex in 878. By 1016 the Vikings ruled under Cnute. Once again on Cnut's death the country broke down into competing Earldoms under weak king Edward the Confessor. When he died Harold became King.

The Tower of London was built to emphasise the new rulers power and dominance. William had castles. The new landowners built magnificent castles that proclaimed their authority to be obeyed like Warwick and Windsor that survive. Now it is fabulous and dominant mosques and culture centres.

The landed gentry were replaced by Normans who took the best land and any women they wanted: the Anglo Saxon people became their serfs. Only one Anglo-Saxon Bishop was left in office.

We are not supposed to defend ourselves but Muslims are allowed to develop militant and terrorist networks against us. The enemy within, The Equalities and Human Rights Commission have made it illegal for an ethnic or racial nationalist political party to exist in Britain but allow other ethnic groups right of association. (4)

The elites are oppressing us as conquerors do so immigrants replace us. Contemporary Politics is based on racism - the global Establishment pushes relentlessly to displace, dispossess, deracinate the peoples' of Europe THAT is racism. It treats us as not a real people, not worthy of consideration, subhuman.We must be proud of our "racialism" of defending ourselves against dispossession and of being determined to live!

These are the instructions of Bedfordshire Police to officers on anti-terrorist courses:

''UK’s Bedfordshire Police’s rules regarding terrorists and dangerous criminals If they’re non-Muslim.

Consider the most opportune time of day to be able to arrest suspects with minimum resistance. Apply all necessary force to enter the premises and arrest suspects accordingly. If they’re Muslim:

Community leaders must be consulted before raids into Muslim houses.
Officers must not search occupied bedrooms and bathrooms before dawn.

Use of police dogs will be considered serious desecration of the premises.
Cameras and camcorders should not be used in case of capturing women inappropriately dressed.

If people are praying: home officers should stand aside and not disrupt, They should be allowed the opportunity to finish.

Officers should take off their shoes before raiding a Muslim house.
The reasons for pre-dawn raids on Muslim houses needs to be clear and transparent.

Officers must not touch holy books or religious artefacts without permission.

Muslim prisoners should be allowed to take additional clothing to the station.''

Our culture is being changed.

Anjem Choudary has said that under sharia law in Britain people who commit adultery would be stoned to death, adding that “anyone who becomes intoxicated by alcohol would be given 40 lashes in public”. He described an Army homecoming parade a: “vile parade of brutal murderers”.(5)

Meanwhile evil Harriet Harman brings in discriminatory laws and praises immigrants who exploit us by sending money to their own countries.(6)

The huge increases in migrants over the last decade were part of a secret plan by ministers to change the population to "rub the Right's nose in diversity", according to Andrew Neather, a former adviser to Tony Blair, Jack Straw and David Blunkett. It was done behind our backs to "open up the UK to mass migration." They deceived people with false arguments that immigrants are bringing economic benefits.

A Swedish government minister showed in a radio interview that they are allowing Muslims to take over their country. It's betraying the indigenous population especially the women: The Utopian fantasy depends on not seeing Muslims as human like us and wanting revenge for historical reasons against their Christian rivals. “We must be open and tolerant towards Islam and Muslims because when we become a minority, they will be so towards us.”

Immigrants are consciousness of their strength and knowingly taking our territory and establishing their symbols of conquest like mosques and education centres. These are bulkheads and used to develop a new generation of street soldiers with the right mentality.

The important point in assessing the true nature of immigration is how are the immigrants behaving: this is not to be seen as on a par with our people's criminal behaviour because the immigrants treat us as other and also have grudges against us for the way we treated them when we were conquerors. It is not the fault of poor whites but they are the only ones the immigrants can get as the elites are happily rich in safe places.

The other way of assessing whether this is immigration or invasion is to consider their attitude to us. The widespread mass child-rapes of our young girls is guerrilla warfare: fighting us by other means.

In Pakistanis in Britain: The Second Generation Allison Shaw studied the Pakistani community in Oxford(1988) The third generation of British Pakistanis is now grown up and claiming our territory and taking young British women as booty. Shaw shows the relative loyalties to one's own kind of the Pakistanis and the English. The Pakistanis are extended families, the English atomised and anomic.

From Alison Shaw, A Pakistani Community in Britain (Blackwell Ltd., Oxford, 1988):

[p.157]

[…] These young men are westernized in that they are fluent in English, interested in western music and Sport, and comfortable in English company, where they move with a sophistication that their parents lack. What does this imply about their attitudes to their family and biradari?

It is striking that young men such as these retain very strong social and financial links with their families; even those who live and work away from Oxford come home whenever they can and hope to get work locally when the opportunity arises. These young men tend to spend their leisure time with each other and their peers within the community rather than with English friends and also participate in family and community social events.

[p.171]

A woman gave this account of the punishments for failing to follow rules:

The Prophet Mohammed was out walking one day when he saw a woman in torture, hanging by her hair, but still alive. A little further on, he saw a woman being hung by her breasts and then he saw a woman being put into a huge fire, screaming. Horrified, he asked Allah, ‘Why are these women being tortured like this? Please let them go free!’ But Allah replied, ‘The first woman used to tantalize men with her hair, the second used to reveal her breasts to strange men and the third slept with a man who was not her husband. That is why I cannot set them free.’

At the same time it is considered that women must be protected because they are the dependants of men. .

The corollary of this is that a woman who is ‘outside’, among men, unprotected, is ‘free for anyone to take.’ Western women in particular appear to break all the rules of purdah. They are regarded as sexually promiscuous, moving freely from one man to another, behaving and dressing in order to provoke men. A woman out alone is in effect asking for sexual relations with a man. Rape, young and older men have insisted, is always the woman’s fault, because it is the natural result of a woman dressing provocatively and being out alone. In this view, western women are simultaneously exciting and despised for having no sense of shame and being ‘used by more than one man; like prostitutes’. ’

[p.173]

One young man said:

The point is, English girls don’t mind; there’s no restriction for them. In fact, they chase you and laugh at you if you don’t go with them. It was like that at school: the girls chasing men. I know I shouldn’t have, it’s against our religion, but how could I refuse? It’s natural for a man to feel like that; you can’t really avoid it. I blame the western system.

Almost all of the unmarried men among the young adults surveyed above have had clandestine relationships with English girls, yet do not feel that this contradicts their acceptance of an arranged marriage or the Islamic moral code. It is tacitly accepted by most men and women that men will have girlfriends because ‘men are like that’ and because English girls are easily available ...


I would like to thank the owner of the blog http://songlight-for-dawn.blogspot.com/ for introducing me to the books of Alison Shaw

http://songlight-for-dawn.blogspot.com/

(1)Death of the West.Patrick J.Buchanan.

http://www.stewartsynopsis.com/death_by_blackness_files/Deathofthewest.htm

(2 http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article3176455.ece

(3) State of Emergency.Patrick J.Buchanan (Thomas Dunne Books)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KEO1yqJVXEU

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npbpK4yQ4tg

http://www.vdare.com/fulford/100513_fulford_file.htm

(4) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12014807

5.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXjOd4A63Ak&feature=player_embedded

6.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1337876/Harman-praises-hero-immigrants-send-welfare-handouts-home.html#ixzz17t6BLwTq

http://fred.wheatonma.edu/wordpressmu/mdrout/category/battle-of-brunanburh/

http://www.bing.com/search?q=Sex+in+Rochdale&src=IE-SearchBox&FORM=IE8SRC

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article2237940.ece

Some EU schemes for the destruction of Europe - Planned Economic Union With Africa

By Mister Fox

The document I reproduce here is evidence of the Crimes against Humanity being perpetrated by EU officials most of whom are unelected and a self-serving elite.

At the recent Joint Summit in Tripoli, Jose Manuel Barroso, the President of the European Commission announced EU plans for an economic union of the EU with Africa by 2050. (1)

Such a union will almost certainly involve a 'single market' with the free movement of goods, services, capital and labour across of our national borders: the importation of Africa into Europe. One billion people will be able to come and live in the UK if they so choose. This is the free movement of people. A necessary component of Globalism. It ensures as Marx said a “reserve army of labour”, cheap labour as we are returned to days of poverty and exploitation like in Victorian times. Its truly sickening to see Western elites like Blair and Livingstone apologise for historic slavery while import cheap labour. Many of whom work for little pay and in sweatshops. These are truly evil elites.

This is most of Jose Manuel Barroso's opening speech:

We can build on the Joint Africa-EU Strategy as a political framework that allows us to project our common values, and jointly pursue our common interests in a changing world.

Africa is on the move for peace and prosperity. For sure, many serious problems persist – poverty, human rights, conflicts - but you are addressing them and we are your partners in this effort.

In the past twenty years, the number of armed conflicts has decreased by over a third. With the consolidation of the African Peace and Security Architecture, the African Union and African regional communities are now better equipped to bring peace and stability to the continent. I would like to commend the work of the African Union and of its Commission.

Also, Africa's economic growth has been impressive: per capita GDP increased annually by 6% between 2006 and 2008. And Foreign Direct Investment inflows to Africa have been rising strongly since 2002.

The overarching priority for the EU, as set out in our Europe 2020 reform strategy, is growth. This strategy specifically refers to Europe's relations with Africa, and to how we can translate our political objectives into concrete action over the next decade.

Achieving the Millennium Development Goals and effectively reducing poverty continues to be our end goal, and I firmly believe that these are still attainable by 2015. The European Union remains deeply committed to this objective, and just recently in New York I had the opportunity to announce, on behalf of the European Union, an MDGs initiative of €1 billion to help those countries most in need ...

We have come to Tripoli to identify sustainable solutions to today's challenges. These solutions will bring our peoples, our businesses, our cultures and our youth closer together.

We have come to Tripoli with the fascinating long-term perspective of a Euro-African economic area in mind – an area which will provide opportunities for 2.5billion citizens by 2050....

The EU is already closely cooperating with Africa in renewable energy technology, including transfer and training through its Energy Facility which is currently implementing 62 projects in 34 African states worth €400 million, with a contribution from the Commission of €180 million.

Jointly, we can promote sound conditions for investment and growth, foster regional and continental energy interconnections, boost energy trade and improve energy security.

That is the goal of the new Africa-EU Renewable Energy Cooperation Programme launched in Vienna this September, which will be supported by fast-start climate financing in its start-up phase ...

My second example is trade and regional integration. Both are powerful catalysts for peace, stability, growth, jobs and prosperity.

Regional integration is an essential vehicle for economic growth and this is as true in Europe as it is in Africa.

Currently only a tenth of Africa’s trade is within Africa itself. The European Commission is committed to assisting African economies to remove bottlenecks which hamper integration and trade, like country and regional infrastructure, interconnectivity, services and regulatory aspects.

Regional Economic Communities are true engines of this process, and we follow with great interest the current efforts for streamlining and harmonizing their agendas, as in the Tripartite Initiative in Eastern and Southern Africa.

We also hope to conclude the Doha Development Agenda. The economic gains that Africa stands to reap from the DDA are huge. An ambitious trade result, with a supportive domestic policy environment, is estimated to offer gains of approximately 5% of income in developing countries, which would lift some 300 million people out of poverty by 2015. This is much more than all development aid combined can ever achieve.

That is why we are also engaging in Economic Partnership Agreements with five regions in Sub-Saharan Africa. We see them as a way to support socio-economic development, regional integration and the integration of Africa in the global economy.

However, market access alone is not enough; supply-side constraints need to be addressed in order to enable African countries to take advantage of trade opportunities, in particular addressing the lack of infrastructure, and we are giving this a higher priority in our relations with Africa.

Aid for Trade is key in this respect, and the European Union is the biggest provider of Aid For Trade in the world, delivering more than €10 billion in 2008.”

The trick is to dehumanise us so that we no longer think of ourselves as a people to make it easier to replace us if we think immigrants have as much right to be here as us when they clearly do not. They have a different, even oppositional heritage. The aim of the EU is misappropriate taxpayers money by using it for schemes that benefit he elites. They are impoverishing us by transferring our money to the Third World with an enormous redistribution of wealth, but plenty of profit for the ruling bankers and business elites. Wealth equalisation of the masses is the basis of communism and so it can be honestly stated that some peer reviewed scientific studies are "leftist"as they knowingly sacrifice the truth for a cause that has its roots in Comunism.

Bankers make enormous profit from the transfer process and corporations get mineral rights. Many EU officials are bankers and former Communist officials.

The practical effects such as the importation of aids are never considered. Only one view is allowed and that is the one that serves the interests of Global capital: business and the banks.any fears that these importations might not work are oppressed by law as "hate" or "prejudice."

We are trained to think mongrels with no right to our own existence, unlike Tibetans and everyone else in the world. That is to treat us as Subhuman, Untermenschen.

We are dismissed us as mongrels, which is a racial insult. This faux Pas presupposes the existence of races. Otherwise how could one be "mixed race"?

There is the classic deconstruction argument. We are all immigrants or there is no such thing as the British race. That is to dehumanise us; the British do not exist, therefore no crime can be committed against them and they can have no rights or legal defence in situations involving “Race”. This is "intellectual genocide" the mental act of destroying a group in the minds of individuals, a necessary pre-requisite to physical genocide. It facilitates our replacement in our own country by an imported “reserve army of labour,” as Marx put it.

This tactic is used alongside its counterpart which is destroying the basis for British national pride. Once a people have lost confidence in themselves and pride in their achievements and identity they can be swept away. Every aspect of Britain life is being degraded and our roots cut. Confidence is the single most potent defence, because a nation with a strong national pride can withstand any battlefield defeat or invasion and bounce back. The people of Japan are an example of a people massively bombed, invaded, humiliated and bankrupted. But they became one of the richest nations, whereas Germany, bereft of self-worth, went in for temporary material prosperity but allowed itself to be colonised and their industry and technology is being taken from them. Japan has a very distinct national identity and are largely free of immigrants, their strength is based upon a common heritage that they value and don't undermine.

This is the process whereby all the factors which provide a source of national identity and pride have been undermined. Anything and everything that gives the British people some cause for pride and contentment has been attacked, closed, sold off, privatised, re-written or modernised out of existence. We have had Rolls Royce, Rover, Jaguar and all that advanced technology sold by the elites and now part of the pride and heritage of rival nations like China and India. In just the last few days they decided to sell off the Search and Rescue function of the RAF and Royal Navy as well as the scrapping of the RN's Harrier's and the Ark Royal. The constant destruction of our way of life and the beacons of excellence that inspired us leaves us with nothing to look up to.

Excellence is being replaced by celebrity or notoriety; bad manners or people who swear on TV don't get sacked, they get their your own series! They can abuse and insult a man's grand daughter in public and get paid millions and a film career. The elites stick together as we see from the “celebrity” of traitor Piers Morgan.

Chris Ofili is described as a great British artist. His most important "work",for which he was paid several hundred thousand pounds of taxpayers money to aquire his masterpiece for the nation, is a piece of MDF upon which he put ELEPHANT DUNG!

Needless to say he has been awarded the ludicrous Turner Prize! This British(?) painter incorporates his Nigerian cltural heritage, like elephant dung.. He apparently, uses this ingredient in all his work. The first was illegally smuggled in from Africa but now he is obliged by London Zoo. He dries it in an airing cupboard. Obviously he was one of anti-British Saatchi's Young British Artists and has removed to Trinidad.

The above enables the elites to import unassimilable aliens and destroy the homes and communities of the indigenous British without pangs of conscience: We don't exist or are thoroughly evil and deserve this for our past history: they do not admit that they share this past and continue to profit while making us pay for the Empire.

This has been going on for a long time and the Government misappropriates tax payers money to put their schemes into action. Why are calls for control of immigration treated with such vehement approbation? Because our elites follow an ideology that is at odds with reality and tells them that immigrants are better than us and enrich us. To the innocent people who think this is an accident, I quote Dele Oguntimojou an African lawyer working in London: ”(you) do not know how the youth in the poor African village is being seduced by lush advertising to shed his native dress for blue jeans; to retune his ears from the traditional hi-life to the drum and bass of hip-hop and Brit pop. Even now the British Council is busy across Africa training the next generation of immigrants in the language of the destination country." (3)

There is the health problem and political elites who bring this on innocent people are irresponsible and wicked. Record numbers of tuberculosis infections are being fuelled by immigration, Andrew Lansley, the Health Secretary, admitted. TB cases is caused by immigrants encouraged to Britain from countries where the disease is common, such as sub-Saharan Africa. There are about 350 deaths here every year.

Figures published in November by the misnamed Health Protection Agency show that it is particularly prevalent in inner city areas of London, Birmingham, Leeds and Manchester.

Lansley told the House of Commons: 'The rise has occurred mainly in people infected in countries where TB is common who go on to develop active TB later in life.'

The Government are to give councils more powers to monitor public health and more taxpayers money. No wonder the corrupt elites have saddled us with such debt – to finance their crackpot immigration and distribution of wealth schemes.

Lansley added that the Government was funding a charity called TB Alert to raise awareness of the problem among health care professionals in London.

Britain has one of the highest rates because of immigration when it had nearly been eradicated. The number of cases of resistant TB that cannot be treated with antibiotics doubled in the last decade.

Cases of HIV in the UK are higher than ever. Between 1995 and 2006, the rate of infection of Black Africans in the west Midlands increased 100 times, compared to a two times increase among white people, a three times increase among black Caribbeans and a six times increase among other mixed ethnic groups.

AIDS Treatment Update magazine of May 2006 reports the cost of treating someone with HIV in the UK was about £16,000 per year. That is now higher but shows that northwest England NHS carries a debt of at least £107 million a year because of importing immigrants with Aids.

The figure is likely to be far higher in the Southeast than those cited for the North-West, where most of the African invaders live - the total misuse of taxpayers money to treat the imported HIV epidemic will be thousands of millions of pounds. This could be used for the education of our own people or to prevent local community being closed which are so important to elderly people and cutting our armed forces and police forces to leave us unprotected while the elites live in safe areas or gated communities.

The mass immigration policies followed by decades of Labour and Tory regimes has imported incurable and deadly diseases into Britain and the EU is making it worse throughout Europe.

Sub-Saharan Africa has 67% of global cases of HIV and Aids, but now people are encouraged to migrate between continents it is being spread. This is the distribution of deadly diseases!

It is evil to inflict this on the innocent British people.

This has all been done by deceiving the population and has no moral or legal legitimacy: we are morally and prudentially right to reverse the process as Queen Elizabeth I did in 1601 when she deported the (Blackamores). (4)



(1) http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/10/697

http://www.ansamed.info/en/libia/news/ME.XEF82614.html

http://www.neurope.eu/articles/63210.php

http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-327846/Barroso-faces-new-EU-team-scandal.html

http://www.eeas.europa.eu/euromed/index_en.htm

(2)

http://euroafrica-ict.org/2010/06/08/3rd-euro-africa-cooperation-forum-on-ict-research-%E2%80%93-new-event-sponsor-ministry-of-employment-and-the-economy-of-finland/
http://europafrica.net/jointstrategy/

http://press.grenoble-em.com/TPL_CODE/TPL_ARTICLE/PAR_TPL_IDENTIFIANT/995/31-news.htm

(3) Salisbury Review. Spring 2003. Vol 21. No3.
(www.salisbury-review.co.uk)

http://ec.europa.eu/commission_2010-2014/andor/headlines/articles/2009/12/20091207_en.htm
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2009/dec/22/hiv-aids-black-african-immigrants-uk

(4) http://www.prometheism.net/articles/racereality.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Baker_(biologist)

The joys of Diversity

This elderly gentleman is an ex-serviceman of making the mistake of going out wearing an RAF jacket. As a result he was attacked by non-white thugs who shouted at him 'Bomb the soldiers! Death to the soldiers!'

The pensioner, who is too afraid to reveal his name was punched and headbutted by two Asian or mixed-race attackers leaving him with bruising, black eyes and an injured nose.

Full news report

___________________
Hat Tip: Runic

Some EU schemes to Islamify Europe

By Mister Fox

This is not a titillating novel nor a light read but a serious attempt to uncover EU schemes to destroy our European civilisation and replace it with islam. I have put lots of links because I want others to research this too and I hope write up what they find.

There were a series of secretive European Union-agreements with ten European and North African Countries. It is a series of meetings from The Barcelona Agreement to the Euro Mediterranean Declaration of 1995. The following is an abstract with links so readers can check my sources and I hope pursue their own research and writing.

The Euro Mediterranean Declaration was agreed by the EU, Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Egypt, Jordan, the Palestinian Authority, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey and Israel and comprises(1) comprehensive political partnership, among other things about:

Establishing a free trade area and economic integration to begin in the year of 2010
Considerably more money for the partners
Cultural partnership.
Respect for Islam Is Guaranteed by the EU

Multiculturalism is to be respected in order to promote tolerance between different ethnic groups in society. The importance of a resolute common campaign against racism, xenophobia and intolerance is emphasized. This was predicted by Vladimir Bukovsky from secret documents he filmed in The Kremlin

Close mutual European-Muslim influence on radio, television, newspapers and magazines is to bring about cultural understanding. The EU will actively promote such mutual influences. Youth exchange is one of the instruments for cooperation between future Euro Mediterranean generations. Barcelona declaration adopted at the Euro-Mediterranean Conference [27-28/11/95] Secret EU-deals with 10 Asian and North African countries (2)

The EU Offers the Populations of 9 Muslim Countries Free Movement of Goods, Services, Capital and People into the EU.

In return for concrete political and economic changes the EU offers integration in the expanded internal market of the EU and the possibility to obtain free movement for goods, services, money and people.

Association agreements have been made with all partner countries except Syria Euro Mediterranean Foreign Minister Conference in Naples 2.-3.12.2003. (3) This document should give you an idea of who runs the EU.

Admitting Turkey (4)

Interestingly this account was published by the EU-commission 6 days before the Foreign Minister Conference was held! (5)

Confirmed by the Danish Prime Minister on 29.08.06 in correspondence. However, the Prime Minister twice refused to inform why he, our governments and the media have kept absolutely silent about the Euro Mediterranean Project.

Three weeks after the terror attack in 2001 on the WTO Center in New York, the EU submitted to Islam, and the Euro Mediterranean Project is now being used as a means of attracting Muslims into Europe: “ 'The ministers declined as both dangerous and unfounded any connection between terror and the Arab and Muslim world. In this context the importance of the Barcelona Process was emphasized by everybody as a suitable and recognized instrument to promote a dialogue between equal partners and civilizations.

The ministers agreed to work on deepening the on-going dialogue between the cultures and civilizations, especially wanting to direct attention towards youth, education, and the media”.
Extract from the- Euro Mediterranean Foreign Conference in Brussels on the 5th and-6th of October 2001:

“The ministers declined as both dangerous and unfounded any connection between terror and the Arab and Muslim world. In this context the importance of the Barcelona Process was emphasized by everybody as a suitable and recognized instrument to promote a dialogue between equal partners and civilizations.

The ministers agreed to work on deepening the on-going dialogue between the cultures and civilizations, especially wanting to direct attention towards youth, education, and the media”

The European Union and the European Council Want to destroy our respective ethnic identities:

“Cultural policy must avoid the popular distinction between 'them' and 'us', even mentioning 'the other' , as this opens the gate for imposing collective identity on the individual”.

Traugott Schoefthaler, head of the Anna Lindh Foundation, a Euro Mediterranean propaganda organisation. (6)

'Identity is the root of all conflicts'

According to the World Culture Forum Alliance, founded by the Ford Foundation, which is inextricably tied to the US Council on Foreign Relations and the CIA. The EU and the European Council are also attached to the WCFA. (7)

We are being educated from our 'stereotypes and prejudices' towards Islamic culture which is the program of the Euro Mediterranean propaganda apparatus: the Anna Lindh Foundation. this was founded by the Arab League, the EU, European Council, and UNESCO (8):

“We will tackle stereotypes and prejudices and ignorance and change the daily 'news journalism' to portray every-day life of ordinary people, which can create identification and fascination – and intercultural understanding. We will tackle our stereotypical images of people from foreign cultures and make new experiments with pictures in public places, in the media, and advertising.

And we will have common projects with people from other cultures. We will develop the intercultural skills of journalists, school pupils and artists and exchange people from these groups with (muslim) colleagues. We will manage art and cultural productions. We will train the school teachers and influence their education to be multicultural.

And we will influence the curricula of the schools to become multicultural by means of revision of existing textbooks and educational materials.

They arrange giant Muslim Youth Festivals like the 'Images of The Middle East', which lasted 6 weeks in 2006 in Denmark.

A Speech by the head of the 'Danish Center for Culture and Development' (CKD) which is run by the Danish Foreign Ministry on the 13 of May 2005 in Rabat. (9)

Olaf Gerlach Hansens speech in Rabat, Morocco 13. June 2005 (10)

The EU have cooperation agreements with the Islamic Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, which states in article 5a of its charter, is to disseminate Muslim ways of thinking and living through the world. (11)

The British Council is in the thick of deculturing us as usual. (12)

The Euro Mediterranean Project is a Globalising movement towards the One-World State:

"When limitless continental democracies and cooperative assemblies are possible global democracy is just around the corner.” (13)

We are under attack by 'utopians' who are destroying our civilisation and way of life for a new world Marxist-like to rise from the ashes which will take a totalitarian state run by unaccountable police to force people to integrate.

Our Politicians fantasise that Western ambitions are the same as Islam's which is the aim of the 'Holy' Quran:

“Our obligation to the values that mean most to us – freedom, tolerance and justice – has grown even stronger and deeper since the London bombs. So has our relationship with the Islamic world, which also shares our common ideals, today.”

As Margaret Beckett, the UK's Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs put it in the Danish paper Jyllands-Posten on the July 7 2006:

“Our obligation to the values that mean most to us – freedom, tolerance and justice – has grown even stronger and deeper since the London bombs. So has our relationship with the Islamic world, which also shares our common ideals, today.’”

The Media is managed :

“The Freedom of expression is central to the values and traditions of Europe. But its preservation depends on responsible behaviors by individuals.

By extension, we do not believe the media should be regulated from outside, but rather that you find ways to regulate yourselves.

In considering the question of self-regulation, I would also ask you to think about the need for monitoring from within your own professional bodies. I am convinced that will have a significant impact.” (14)

Declared Benita Ferrero Waldner, European Commissioner for External Relations and European Neighborhood Policy. This meeting was to selected media representatives from all over Europe. Benita Ferrero-Waldner. Intercultural dialogue: the media’s role Speech/06/321 (15)

'We will identify a nucleus of journalists and analysts around which to develop a structured, sustainable system of information exchange and publication focused on North-South understanding.'

Where do they learn to use the media for propaganda?

In 2005 the Audio Visual Observatory of the European Council held a Symposium in Moscow to learn all the tricks from the Russians, who have great experience in this field.

1. http://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/customs/customs_duties/rules_origin/preferential/article_783_en.htm

http://siad.wordpress.com/2007/09/29/eurabia-our-liking-for-submission/


2. http://www.docstoc.com/docs/49795376/Bringing-the-Euro-Mediterranean-Partnership-Closer-to-the-People

3. http://euro-med.dk/?p=1212

4. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Accession_of_Turkey_to_the_European_Uni

http://ec.europa.eu/enlargement/questions_and_answers/turkey_en.htm

5. http://eeas.europa.eu/asem/meetings/index_en.htm

6. http://www.humanrights-observatory.net/revista3/DialoguetoHospitality_Schoefthaler.pdf

7. http://www.culturalprofiles.net/laos/units/752.html

8. http://www.euromedalex.org/about

9.
http://www.dccd.dk/DCCD/cku.nsf/doc/olafg.hansensspeechjune2005rabat?OpenDocument

10. http://www.sam.gov.tr/perceptions/volume13/autumn/OguzURAS.pdf

11. http://www.isesco.org.ma/english/charter/charter.php?idd=TDD_REF

12. http://ec.europa.eu/ewsi/en/events/details.cfm?ID_ITEMS=16709

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-10920747

http://www.ameinfo.com/154244.html

http://www.britishcouncil.org/lebanon-arts-culture-new-writing-literature.htm

13. http://fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/attachments/euromed_en.pdf
http://www.fra.europa.eu/fraWebsite/attachments/Pub-racism-marginalisation_en.pdf
http://ec.europa.eu/ewsi/UDRW/images/items/docl_12892_168517401.pdf

14.
http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=SPEECH/06/321&format=HTML&aged=1&language=EN&guiLanguage=en

15. http://www.eeas.europa.eu/euromed/media/index_en.htm