Sunday, 18 May 2008

Another race attack ignored by the media



Does anyone believe for one instant that if a young black man had fallen victim to a vicious knife attack by 10 white youths, been stabbed eight times and left in a serious condition, it would not have been one of the main news stories on all the news channels and National news papers, rather than languishing in the pages of the Barking and Dagenham Recorder ?.

Does anyone believe that had the victim been black and the attackers white the police would not have treated it as a hate crime or faced a public outcry?.

However, once again the victim was white, and as usual the attackers were not, so, as always, it just ain't news.

I guess we should not be surprised given all the other "non hate" and "non newsworthy" crimes against white victims which almost nobody ever heard about.


Full LOCAL news story here

________________________________________

Comment by Alanorei

The following has been added to the comments section by Alanorei, but as it is so well said, I have brought it forward to the main post so it gets the attention it deserves:


Some time ago, a contributor to the then BNP Forum said this:

"The BBC say that a 15 year old white child, who is kidnapped, physically tortured and set on fire whilst desperately clinging for his life, by a gang of sick Asian-Muslim thugs is not news worthy."

Absolutely true. The BBC is thereby acknowledging that non-white (or white foreign, i.e. East European) killings of white Britons are commonplace, while the reverse is uncommon and therefore "newsworthy," on the basis of the old editorial adage that "If a dog bites a man, that's not news. If a man bites a dog, that is news."

What follows is part of a reply the BBC sent to an enquirer asking why the murder of black teenager Anthony Walker in July 2005 received a huge amount of news coverage, while the fatal stabbing at about the same time of white Englishman Richard Whelan by a black assailant received almost no coverage.

The BBC respondent pointed out certain similarities in the crimes, i.e. both victims were young males etc.

The BBC person went on to state: "But in fact the two murders are very different. "As far as I know, from reading the Press Association wires, listening to the police and reading newspaper coverage, the police are not suggesting there was any racial motive in the killing of Richard Whelan."It is this racial element to the crime that makes it different. "Racially motivated murders, I'm sure we are all glad to say, are rare events. They are unheard of in this area of Liverpool. Unfortunately, senseless murders in London are comparatively more common."

Note the tacit admission in the last line quoted. It is certainly borne out by the facts, nationwide. Statistics derived from data on The Green Arrow's Fallen List from January 2005 to the present, show that, allowing for a 86/14 percentage split in the population of white British/others, a non-white or white foreigner is 60 times more likely to kill a white Briton than the reverse.

This result does not include the 27 white Britons murdered on July 7th 2005 by Muslim homicide bombers.

If these killings are included, as I believe they should be, the result is 74:1.

These results, which include accidental killings by dangerous driving and killings of white Britons by foreign whites, agree fairly well with Tony Shell's results for racial homicides over the period 1996-2005, inclusive, which give a 30:1 ratio, BME members against white Britons.

Such violent killings are at present only about 3-4% of all such killings but the percentage will no doubt increase unless government aims for enforced integration (e.g. white English school children having to pretend they are Muslims) are resisted.

Here are the full figures, from January 2005 to the present:

% White Britain 86
% Others 14

Source for the population breakdown is
here

Ratio, BME+white foreign killings of white Britons vs. the reverse: 60

Ratio, including 7/7: 74
Numbers killed excluding 7/7 117
(including 12 killings by foreign whites)
Numbers killed including 7/7 144

Number Non-Brits killed by white Britons 12

The Home Office figures show that
violent killings of all kinds work out at about roughly 1300 a year, so the killings where victim and killer are of a different race (including foreign white) are about 3-4% of the total.

But the statistics don't tell the real story, of the grief suffered by the victims' families. And the above figures do not include the vastly disproportionate plethora of horrible crimes committed against the host white population by BME etc. members that don't result in a death - or the alarming increase in BME on BME killings via gang-related stabbings and shootouts and the abominable 'honour' killings and beatings (making a current bad situation with many lawless whites out and about much worse).

I think my figures roughly accord with Tony Shell's, all things considered. His analysis focuses on actual homicides, rather than including, as I do, accidental deaths by dangerous driving etc. and he does not include the 7/7 deaths. Also, he uses population splits of 94/6 (1996) to 92/8 (2005) and does not include killings by foreign whites, though these are a relatively small number, so far.

All that said, I believe that both sets of figures show a serious, indeed alarming trend, which current government social and domestic policy, as indicated, can and will only make worse.

9 comments:

alanorei said...

Sarah, thank you for this article.

Some time ago, a contributor to the then BNP Forum said this:

"The BBC say that a 15 year old white child, who is kidnapped, physically tortured and set on fire whilst desperately clinging for his life, by a gang of sick Asian-Muslim thugs is not news worthy."

Absolutely true. The BBC is thereby acknowledging that non-white (or white foreign, i.e. East European) killings of white Britons are commonplace, while the reverse is uncommon and therefore "newsworthy," on the basis of the old editorial adage that "If a dog bites a man, that's not news. If a man bites a dog, that is news."

What follows is part of a reply the BBC sent to an enquirer asking why the murder of black teenager Anthony Walker in July 2005 received a huge amount of news coverage, while the fatal stabbing at about the same time of white Englishman Richard Whelan by a black assailant received almost no coverage.

The BBC respondent pointed out certain similarities in the crimes, i.e. both victims were young males etc.

The BBC person went on to state:

"But in fact the two murders are very different.

"As far as I know, from reading the Press Association wires, listening to the police and reading newspaper coverage, the police are not suggesting there was any racial motive in the killing of Richard Whelan.

"It is this racial element to the crime that makes it different.

"Racially motivated murders, I'm sure we are all glad to say, are rare events. They are unheard of in this area of Liverpool.

"Unfortunately, senseless murders in London are comparatively more common."


Note the tacit admission in the last line quoted. It is certainly borne out by the facts, nationwide. Statistics derived from data on The Green Arrow's Fallen List from January 2005 to the present, show that, allowing for a 86/14 percentage split in the population of white British/others, a non-white or white foreigner is 60 times more likely to kill a white Briton than the reverse.

This result does not include the 27 white Britons murdered on July 7th 2005 by Muslim homicide bombers.

If these killings are included, as I believe they should be, the result is 74:1.

These results, which include accidental killings by dangerous driving and killings of white Britons by foreign whites, agree fairly well with Tony Shell's results for racial homicides over the period 1996-2005, inclusive, which give a 30:1 ratio, BME members against white Britons.

Such violent killings are at present only about 3-4% of all such killings but the percentage will no doubt increase unless government aims for enforced integration (e.g. white English school children having to pretend they are Muslims) are resisted.

Sarah Maid of Albion said...

Excellent post Alanorei

In fact you maker the point so well that I have added it to the main post in case anyone misses it.

I hope you don't mind (if you do, let me know and I will remove it)

Sarah

alanorei said...

Hi Sarah

Thank you for your encouraging reply. I am very happy for you to add the material.

The message needs to be conveyed as far and wide as possible.

Sarah Maid of Albion said...

I agree, it needs to published as widely as possible. The figures you are quoting will shock people, but they are accurate.

I posted on the subject back in March in a post entitled "Lies. damn lies, and statistics" where i produced figures showing just how much more frequently whites are the victims of hate crimes.

The police are notoriously reluctant to charge a non-white person with a hate crime.

For instance, it defies belief that the killing of Christopher Yates was not treated as a hate crime, his killers actually shouted out "We have killed the white man. That will teach an Englishman to interfere in Paki business."

However, the killers were not charged with hate crime, because they had also had an altercation with a member of their own race (Asian) and a black man earlier in the day.

Do you think that would have made any difference if the defendants had been white?

alanorei said...

It would have made every difference.

But the attacks earlier in the day actually reinforce the racist nature of the crime:

Criminals: 3 Asian males

Victims:

Asian man - verbally abused

Black man - physically beaten but not killed

White Englishman - murdered

The trend is unmistakeable - except, apparently, to a pc judge.

alanorei said...

Hello again, Sarah

Here are the full figures, from January 2005 to the present:

% White Britain 86
% Others 14

Source for the population breakdown is here

Ratio, BME+white foreign killings of white Britons vs. the reverse: 60

Ratio, including 7/7: 74

Numbers killed excluding 7/7 117
(including 12 killings by foreign whites)
Numbers killed including 7/7 144


Number Non-Brits killed by white Britons 12

The Home Office figures show that violent killings of all kinds work out at about roughly 1300 a year, so the killings where victim and killer are of a different race (including foreign white) are about 3-4% of the total.

But the statistics don't tell the real story, of the grief suffered by the victims' families. And the above figures do not include the vastly disproportionate plethora of horrible crimes committed against the host white population by BME etc. members that don't result in a death - or the alarming increase in BME on BME killings via gang-related stabbings and shootouts and the abominable 'honour' killings and beatings (making a current bad situation with many lawless whites out and about much worse).

I think my figures roughly accord with Tony Shell's, all things considered. His analysis focuses on actual homicides, rather than including, as I do, accidental deaths by dangerous driving etc. and he does not include the 7/7 deaths. Also, he uses population splits of 94/6 (1996) to 92/8 (2005) and does not include killings by foreign whites, though these are a relatively small number, so far.

All that said, I believe that both sets of figures show a serious, indeed alarming trend, which current government social and domestic policy, as indicated, can and will only make worse.

This is why the information should be communicated and I'm happy for you to do so as you see fit.

My earlier post is now on the BNP main site, so that will help circulation as well.

Sarah Maid of Albion said...

I have added that, as it looks quite impressive research.

I was a bit concerned that the Violent crime link appeared to be an Excel spread sheet.

How were you able to validate that?

johnofgwent said...

If anyone does doubt that the reverse would not be given the full "this was a disgusting raciost attack and these white men need to be given a damn good thrashing" treatment,

go read http://tinyurl.com/6xvsta

How much more will it take before attacks on white men are given parity ? How many more sixteen year olds must die horribly on our streets and have the colour of their attackers hidden from public gaze ?

alanorei said...

Sarah

Re: Excel spreadsheet

I think I just followed a Home Office link, or possibly National Statistics online.

It was a while ago that I found the source, so can't exactly recall the details of how I found it. I do know it gets updated year by year.

Also, the Home Office figures in the spreadsheet pretty well agree with the figures for homicide that David Fraser quotes in his book 'A Land Fit for Criminals.'

The HO underestimates a lot of crime but I think they would have to be reasonably accurate where deaths are involved.

Hope this helps.

Many thanks for putting the material up.

Re: the concealment of the race of the attacker, if non-white Briton, it will go on until the media/politician 5th columnists are rowed through Traitors' Gate.