Does anyone believe for one instant that if a young black man had fallen victim to a vicious knife attack by 10 white youths, been stabbed eight times and left in a serious condition, it would not have been one of the main news stories on all the news channels and National news papers, rather than languishing in the pages of the Barking and Dagenham Recorder ?.
Does anyone believe that had the victim been black and the attackers white the police would not have treated it as a hate crime or faced a public outcry?.
However, once again the victim was white, and as usual the attackers were not, so, as always, it just ain't news.
I guess we should not be surprised given all the other "non hate" and "non newsworthy" crimes against white victims which almost nobody ever heard about.
Full LOCAL news story here
Comment by Alanorei
The following has been added to the comments section by Alanorei, but as it is so well said, I have brought it forward to the main post so it gets the attention it deserves:
Some time ago, a contributor to the then BNP Forum said this:
"The BBC say that a 15 year old white child, who is kidnapped, physically tortured and set on fire whilst desperately clinging for his life, by a gang of sick Asian-Muslim thugs is not news worthy."
Absolutely true. The BBC is thereby acknowledging that non-white (or white foreign, i.e. East European) killings of white Britons are commonplace, while the reverse is uncommon and therefore "newsworthy," on the basis of the old editorial adage that "If a dog bites a man, that's not news. If a man bites a dog, that is news."
What follows is part of a reply the BBC sent to an enquirer asking why the murder of black teenager Anthony Walker in July 2005 received a huge amount of news coverage, while the fatal stabbing at about the same time of white Englishman Richard Whelan by a black assailant received almost no coverage.
The BBC respondent pointed out certain similarities in the crimes, i.e. both victims were young males etc.
The BBC person went on to state: "But in fact the two murders are very different. "As far as I know, from reading the Press Association wires, listening to the police and reading newspaper coverage, the police are not suggesting there was any racial motive in the killing of Richard Whelan."It is this racial element to the crime that makes it different. "Racially motivated murders, I'm sure we are all glad to say, are rare events. They are unheard of in this area of Liverpool. Unfortunately, senseless murders in London are comparatively more common."
Note the tacit admission in the last line quoted. It is certainly borne out by the facts, nationwide. Statistics derived from data on The Green Arrow's Fallen List from January 2005 to the present, show that, allowing for a 86/14 percentage split in the population of white British/others, a non-white or white foreigner is 60 times more likely to kill a white Briton than the reverse.
This result does not include the 27 white Britons murdered on July 7th 2005 by Muslim homicide bombers.
If these killings are included, as I believe they should be, the result is 74:1.
These results, which include accidental killings by dangerous driving and killings of white Britons by foreign whites, agree fairly well with Tony Shell's results for racial homicides over the period 1996-2005, inclusive, which give a 30:1 ratio, BME members against white Britons.
Such violent killings are at present only about 3-4% of all such killings but the percentage will no doubt increase unless government aims for enforced integration (e.g. white English school children having to pretend they are Muslims) are resisted.
Here are the full figures, from January 2005 to the present:
% White Britain 86
% Others 14
Source for the population breakdown is here
Ratio, BME+white foreign killings of white Britons vs. the reverse: 60
Ratio, including 7/7: 74
Numbers killed excluding 7/7 117
(including 12 killings by foreign whites)
Numbers killed including 7/7 144
Number Non-Brits killed by white Britons 12
The Home Office figures show that violent killings of all kinds work out at about roughly 1300 a year, so the killings where victim and killer are of a different race (including foreign white) are about 3-4% of the total.
But the statistics don't tell the real story, of the grief suffered by the victims' families. And the above figures do not include the vastly disproportionate plethora of horrible crimes committed against the host white population by BME etc. members that don't result in a death - or the alarming increase in BME on BME killings via gang-related stabbings and shootouts and the abominable 'honour' killings and beatings (making a current bad situation with many lawless whites out and about much worse).
I think my figures roughly accord with Tony Shell's, all things considered. His analysis focuses on actual homicides, rather than including, as I do, accidental deaths by dangerous driving etc. and he does not include the 7/7 deaths. Also, he uses population splits of 94/6 (1996) to 92/8 (2005) and does not include killings by foreign whites, though these are a relatively small number, so far.
All that said, I believe that both sets of figures show a serious, indeed alarming trend, which current government social and domestic policy, as indicated, can and will only make worse.