Showing posts with label anti white racism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anti white racism. Show all posts

Friday, 16 March 2012

South African President Zuma sings "Kill the Boer" at ANC Centenery Celebrations


Note the beaming Malema in the grey suit - supposedly fired by the ANC for anti-white hate speech - alongside Zuma adding his support to this hate speech by the country's leader.

Imagine the white president of any country singing about killing non-whites!


Click here to view this video on YouTube and rate it

_________________________________
Thanks to Laager for pointing me to this video

Saturday, 14 January 2012

RamzPaul Comments on the suspension of Pat Buchanan by MSNBC


Background: Conservative commentator Pat Buchanan has been suspended indefinitely from MSNBC, according to a statement from that network’s President Phil Griffin. An Associated Press article on CBSNews.com blames reaction to Buchanan’s latest book Suicide of a Superpower for his ouster from the cable network, as well as a campaign by the advocacy group, Color of Change.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/01/07/pat-buchanan-out-indefinitely-at-msnbc/

Here is ColorOfChange.org mission statement:

ColorOfChange.org exists to strengthen Black America's political voice. Our goal is to empower our members - Black Americans and our allies - to make government more responsive to the concerns of Black Americans and to bring about positive political and social change for everyone.

_____________________




Saturday, 3 December 2011

"My Tram Experience" in France


Please click here to leave a comment and to spread the link

Hat tip: Anon 03:39

Monday, 2 May 2011

Snapshot on a blood stained month

Death and violence in South African police custody 

In my posting yesterday regarding the murder of South African farmer Andre van der Merwe, I also mentioned the killing of Jeanette Odendaal who was shot in the head by a black South African policeman whilst sitting in her parked car outside a police station.

Apparently Jeanette Odendaal was not the only member of the minority Afrikaner community to come to grief when coming into contact with South African Police in April.

On April 5th Frederick Olivier, a young Afrikaner man who was looking forward to his hoped-for first job at the local gold-mine, was arrested  when ‘police alegedly received a complaint of disturbing the peace.’
He was dumped in the holding cells of Westonaria police station, this was, according to the police for ‘public drunkenness’, the young man was later “discovered hanging in his cell when police officers checked on him.”  The police did not say whether Olivier was in the cell alone that night.

According to Olivier's father Ollie, this version of events makes no sense. His son had bruises on his face which looked as if he had been beaten up. He didn't have those bruises when he was taken into custody by the Westonaria police.  “My son had a bright future ahead of him,” says Olivier. “He was hopeful of getting a job on the mine, where he recently applied, and was supposed to get engaged in September. Why would he do something like this?”

Later that month, on April 21 33-year-old Afrikaner Theuns Potgieter of Silverton went to get two tyres fixed at a Gezina fuel-station he carried his legal handgun In his back pocket. While at the fuel station, a number of police officers arrived. Potgieter was kicked repeatedly in the stomach, handcuffed, his legally-registered gun confiscated. He needed treatment at hospital after his ordeal, which was recorded on CCTV... He was arrested for ‘resisting arrest’ and ‘having an illegal firearm’ .   Images from the CCT Camera shown below, give no indication that Potgieter resisted arrest in any way.


 
Meanwhile on the 27th of April, the day before the shooting of Jeanette Odendaal MornĂ© Pieterse an Afrikaner resident of Welkom  went to Welkom police station, together with his girlfriend to talk to a detective to help with a crime-investigation. Instead he was cursed and beaten instead leaving him with two black eyes.

 A black female clerk in civilian clothes cursed Pieterse's girlfriend, shouting that they would have to contact the detective themselves, and to ‘fkoff’ out of her police station. Then a male uniformed police officer jumped over the counter and beat Pieterse in the face several times. The couple state they then asked other police officials at the station to help them lodge a formal complaint against the cop who had assaulted him – but nobody wanted to help. Eventually the detective they’d enquired after, came to the police station. And then Pieterse was beaten by the same cop again – in front of the detective, who intervened.

Pieterse has lodged a formal complaint at the Virginia SAPS against the Welkom police man.


Other deaths which occurred in April, albeit not with police involvement, included that of Juan de Villiers,  who died protecting his partner Jenny Wilson from attack by intruders at their home in Mayberry Park, Alberton on April 1 2011.  Mr. de Villiers, pictured above with his son Devan, was overpowered and rendered harmless by being tied up, however, the attackers still proceeded to shoot him dead.  Full report at the Afrikaner Genocide archives

As none of the above are members of the South African farming community, these acts of violence will not be  included amongst attacks on farmers, but they serve as further evidence, if any were needed of the ongoing violence against the white South African community.

Full reporting on the above can be found at Censorbugbear and The Long Walk Since Freedom.

___________________________
UPDATE
Censorbugber reports that André van der Merwe may have been alive when dragged behind his truck http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/2011/05/farmer-andre-vd-merwe-dragged-12km.html

Wednesday, 20 October 2010

Pan Atlantic Show trials - Part Two

Early last year I wrote an article entitled “Blood Sacrifice Denied”, in which I reported on the outcome of the trial of two white American teenagers charged with the racially motivated killing of a Mexican illegal immigrant. At the time I expressed the view that the verdict, both boys were acquitted of all charges, including murder and “ethnic intimidation” but convicted of simple assault, sat fairly with the evidence given in court, whilst denying a blood sacrifice to satisfy the various race hate groups and anti white media pundits who had laid siege to the court throughout the trial.

In saying this I had underestimated the vindictiveness and racism of the current US Department of Justice which, despite the jury’s verdict proceeded to bring federal civil rights charges against the two young men.

As a result, last week the race hate groups, such as the Hispanic “La Raza” (The Race) who had stood pumping the air with their fists outside the court, got what they wanted when Derrick Donchak and Brandon Piekarsky were convicted of what the media is predictably choosing to call a “hate crime”.

However, as evidence of the lengths to which the US department of Justice were prepared to go in order to obtain a conviction against Donchak and Piekarsky it should be noted that they have, in fact been convicted under a statute of the Federal Fair Housing act.

The particular statute in question makes it a crime to “use a person’s race, national origin or ethnicity as a basis to interfere, with violence or threats of violence, with a person’s right to live where he chooses to live”

One can only assume that this charge was based on the fact that one of the people involved in the two part brawl which led to Luis Ramerez death, not incidentally one of those convicted, told Ramerez to “go back to Mexico". A statement which, given that Ramerez was an illegal immigrant amounts to little more than advising a law breaker to stop breaking the law. How exactly does telling an illegal immigrant to return to his homeland differ from telling a robber to stop robbing?

This was an outrageous act on the part of the US Department of Justice, who, as you may recall recently dropped a case of illegal voter intimidation against the New Black Panther party, after the case had in fact been won. The DOJ under arch Obama crony Eric Holder have reacted in a manner which would be unthinkable had the races been reversed, as is so often the case, merely to placate left wing activists and illegal alien support groups.

Furthermore, for no other reason than pure visceral racial bias, have chosen to disregard the patent fairness of the original jury’s verdict.

The details of the incident during which Ramerez died, strongly mitigate against the original charge of murder and despite one statement, made by a third party, provide no conclusive evidence of racial bias on the part of either defendant, but, hey why let facts get in the way of a good “hate crime” prosecution?

Although there are some differences in the witness statements, they agree on the following:

  • The defendants were part of a group, who had been drinking and who came across 25 year old Ramerez alone in a park with his girlfriend’s 13 year old sister.
  • The group asked Ramerez what he was doing and this led to a brawl, during which the “Go back to Mexico" comment was made.
  • The brawl ceased and the group of white boys began to walk away leaving Luis Ramerez in a sufficiently fit and uninjured state to make a number of cell phone calls.
  • Ramerez then pursued the group of white boys and charged at them thus initiating a further brawl. It was during this second brawl that one of the group of white boys (again, not one of the defendants) punched Ramerez causing him to fall and hit his head on the sidewalk (pavement).

Forensic evidence confirmed that Ramerez’s injuries were consistent with a moving head colliding with a stationary object rather than by a moving object colliding with a stationary head as would have been the case had death resulted from kicks to the head as the prosecution alleged. (a more detailed account can be found in this excellent article )

The defendants were correctly convicted of assault during a drunken brawl, albeit they could have claimed that there was a significant degree of provocation on the part of Luis Ramerez.

However, it is inconceivable that a fair trial, as averse to this flagrant travesty of justice, would find that the evidence as produced in court supported either the charges or indeed the conviction.

Also explained in the report I linked to above, there are also questions as to the basis of the Federal Civil Rights charges which were brought, given that civil rights only apply to American citizens and not to illegal aliens, consequently Ramerez had no civil rights to be violated.

However, irrespective of technicalities, this was clearly a show trial leading to a demonstrably unjust outcome. Despite the contrived nature of this prosecution the boys could face life in prison, and that is certainly the sentence which the racists running the US Department of Justice will be pressing for.

Vast swathes of the American public have been bullied and brainwashed to the point where many may no longer be capable of feeling outrage on behalf of white males involved in conflict with non-whites irrespective of the circumstances.

However, in the highly unlikely event that the case were truthfully and fairly reported it should cause all Americans considerable concern at the degree to which the rights of that nations last remaining unprotected group have been eroded by the forces of progressive hatred.

Thursday, 30 September 2010

Shane McClellan Hate Crime - an Update

Shane McClellan

Earlier this year I posted an article regarding anti-white hate crimes including the horrific attack on 16 year old Seattle teenager Shane McClellan. The article was entitled Victims of the Silence and addressed how the Mainstream media continues to suppress all news of these crimes. The US media remains silent about the attack on McClellan despite the quite amazing fact that Seattle police have actually brought hate crime charges against his attackers.

Black Conservative commentator Eric Rush addresses this case and the wider topic of the reporting of race issues in America in the following excellent article:

Race and the final conflict

By Eric Rush

WND ran a news piece last week titled "'Hate crime' charges filed over heinous attack," which referenced the case of 16-year-old Seattle resident Shane McClellan, who was abducted by two men on May 25 after one of them asked him for a lighter.

The lighter was a pretext, of course. McClellan was robbed and beaten over the course of several hours, whipped with his own belt, burned with a lit cigarette, doused with a beverage and urinated upon. During the ordeal, the two assailants, members of ethnic minorities, hurled racial epithets at McClellan and taunted him, making it "very clear," as the youth later recounted, that they had attacked him because he was white. One of the assailants was Asian, the other, black.

The WND piece, which also carried my comments, contained several links about the story to local news outlets that cover the Seattle area, but there has not, to date, been one story in the national press regarding the case.

Not one.

Imagine, if you will, the thermonuclear reaction that would have resulted in the national press had this been a young black man who'd had the same thing done to him by two white men. There is simply no disputing that the story would have been national news for months. The Rev. Al Sharpton (whose claim to fame is having been involved in a case in which just such an occurrence was staged) would have jetted to Seattle within hours, as would Rev. Jesse Jackson. They, as well as dozens of other activists and civil rights organizations would, as I said when interviewed by WND, be screaming for the death penalty.

I also believe it bears mentioning, given the current state of affairs, that one of the assailants bears a Muslim name. Whether or not Ahmed Mohamed, who is black, is a practicing Muslim, it is a fair bet that he has at least had some education in traditional Islamic doctrine; more likely, he has been exposed to Nation of Islam dogma, which is fiercely anti-white.

And speaking of anti-white: Another news story that has cyberspace abuzz is that of the Nation of Islam's clown kahuna Louis Farrakhan and members of the New Black Panther Party attending a secret meeting with Iran's President Mahmoud "the missing link" Ahmadinejad in New York last week. It is a sad state of affairs when the black equivalents of the American Nazi Party and the Ku Klux Klan feel comfortable meeting with one of America's sworn enemies on our own soil.

A sad state indeed …

Continue reading Rush's analysis by clicking here

Sunday, 6 June 2010

One third of Afrikaner Nation Destitute

The victims of bigotry, Affirmative Action (so called Black empowerment) and primarily anti- white race hate. The plight of South Africa's Afrikaner community continues to go unreported.


Reduced to living on charity hand outs

Friday, 2 April 2010

First Time Ever BBC Mentions White Murder Victims Is to Attack BNP

BBC reporter Michelle Gribbon accuses BNP of exploiting her cousin's racially motivated murder and then exploits her cousin's racially motivated murder in order to attack the BNP

Click here to read the report on the BBC's distorted and politically exploitative report at the Home the Home of the Green Arrow

_______________________
Related Link:

Racism Cuts Both Ways

Saturday, 21 November 2009

Update on "Racism Alive and Well in South Africa"



Further to the posting earlier this week regarding Vodacom SA's "No Whites" share sale, readers may be interested to know that John who runs the Cape Independence Movement blog has set up a new blog Boycott Vodafone calling for boycott of the Vodafone group until this discriminatory and racist policy is withdrawn.

UPDATE: There is also a Boycott Vodafone Facebook Group

Wednesday, 18 November 2009

Racism alive and well in South Africa


I would like to draw readers attention to an article posted on the Cape Independence Movement Website earlier this week which I feel deserves a wider audience. It appears that the South African mobile phone Company Vodacom, which is now part of Vodafone, are offering selected South Africans the option to buy shares in the company. However, there is a catch, applicants must belong to one of the following groups:

  • Black people (African, coloured, Indian and Chinese) who are natural persons and citizens of South Africa through birth, decent, or naturalisation occurring before 27 April 1994
  • Black Groups ( black companies and black entities, including stokvels) incorporated or formed in South Africa.
  • Black business partners who have been invited to participate.

Vodacom goes on to state that potential applicants are disqualified from purchasing shares:

  • If you are not a black person or a black group as defined in the prospectus.

To quote from the CIM website “they’ve classified people by the colour of their skin. Note how all of a sudden, Asian and coloured people suddenly become “black”. Do you also notice that by classifying everyone as black bar white people they have effectively excluded white people because of the colour of their skins. Sheesh, and there we though racism was well and truly over in South Africa.”

However, as we have long known, anti-white racism is alive and well in South African, it is far more vicious, violent and all pervading than anti-black racism was under Apartheid ( for a start, blacks were not slaughtered in even a fraction of the numbers before 1994 that whites have been since) and yet it is smug with it.

Read the full article here

What do we hear from the sanctimonious world media, which screeches like a demented banshee at the merest hint of white racism, at this clear evidence of corporate racial discrimination? Not the slightest peep!

It seems that not only is anti-white racism alive and well in South Africa, it thrives in the international media as well.

Saturday, 3 October 2009

Breaking their own people down for dispossession.


By Mister Fox

(Article first posted at the BNP site )

In his review of “The Memoirs of Granville Sharp” in The Edinburgh Review, “Capital Punishments”, of July 1821, William Hazlitt rehearsed an anecdote about Prince Naimbanna: “If a man should try to kill me, or should try to sell me and my family for slaves, he would do an injury to as many as he might kill or sell; but if any one takes away the character of Black people, that man injures Black people all over the world; and when he has once taken away their character, there is nothing that he may not do to Black people ever after. That man, for instance, will beat Black people and, and say “Oh, it is only a Black man, why should I not beat him?” That man will make slaves of Black people; for when he has taken away their character, he will say,” Oh, they are only Black people, why should I not make them slaves?”

The word which is used to dehumanise us is “racists”, with today’s teacher trainees being told that “only whites can be racist.” It is not to make us slaves as the prince feared for his people, but is a way of excusing the importation of cheap labour or allowing Muslims to take over our country.

In June 2000, Sir David Calvert-Smith, former head of the Crown Prosecution Service, did that which had so alarmed Prince Naimbanna. He “took away the character” of white people by describing nearly all white people as racist. He was head of the CPS from 1988 till 3rd November 2003 and is heavily responsible for turning the police into a totalitarian force policing opinions instead of crime. In 2005 he led an inquiry for the Commission for Racial Equality into how the police forces of England and Wales dealt with racism within their ranks. The report on the inquiry was given in March 2005. At a press conference Calvert-Smith said they would not be investigating “racism” because it was a “given.” There his prejudice was laid bare.

When the Establishment attack those they hate, they generalize, but when corruption is widespread amongst the Establishment parties as with the expenses scandals, they treat it as an individual matter. Although it is clear that the expenses scandal affects the parties as a whole, the media focus on individuals.

In an article entitled “Why Sir Ian Blair was right in his fight against racism,” in The First Post 3rd December 2008, novelist William Self repeated mindless ideology and slandered a whole people: “The outgoing Metropolitan Police commissioner had the courage to call wider society out on its more revolting prejudices … he confesses to regretting two or three things that he said to the press, his infamous remarks concerning the Soham murders are not among them. According to Blair, his contention that he couldn’t see what ‘all the fuss was about’ — referring to the media circus that got going in the aftermath of Holly and Jessica’s deaths — is something he’s determined to stand by.

“What Blair meant by this — and he was happy to elaborate — was that a disproportionate amount of attention was paid to these particular murders because the victims were young, white girl children, while the media are considerably less exercised by the death of young, black males.”

Has Self not heard of Stephen Lawrence or Damilola Taylor? Well, more than he has Kriss Donald. When it comes to the unfashionable issues, these writers talk in mindless clichés. There is no creativity, no pushing back boundaries when it comes to the Establishment ideology, just robotic repetition.

As for Blair — you would expect that sort of talk from a psychopath who would have an excuse, but these media elites have none. Ian Huntley’s murder of two young girls is not as bad as the imaginary prejudice against ethnics by whites! The elites are prejudiced against whites but that is not “disgusting”? Police Chief Colin Cramphorn once said concerning Muslim child-rape of young white girls that we must learn to live with it! These comments show the underlying hatred the elites have for white people.

The Telegraph of 10th November 2008 shows how these base minded people prop each other up. Sir Ian Blair will receive a pay-off worth up to £400,000 when he stands down as Metropolitan Police Commissioner in three weeks’ time. The additional sum is on top of the estimated £3.5 million pension pot, worth £160,000 a year, which he is set to receive after 30 years’ service as a policeman.
The traditional elites: the Archbishop of Canterbury, Judge Butler-Sloss and Stephan Hickman, QC, are calling for the introduction of Sharia Law. Consider that we’re told that Islam is a ‘Religion of Peace’ — both Tony Blair and Boris Johnson have asserted as much. If you care about the future for women under Islam in the west look up The Despatches programme filmed inside mosques.
A sick judge sentenced Stuart Wood, with previous convictions for violence and indecent assault on young girls, to just seven years for a vicious rape, then praised him for converting to Islam: “You have turned to Islam and this promises well for your future, particularly as you are now an adherent of a religion which respects women and self-discipline.”

Under Sharia Law, rape can only be proven if the rapist confesses or if there are four male witnesses. Women who allege rape, without the benefit of the act having been witnessed by four men who subsequently develop a conscience, are taken as confessing to having sex.

A consequence of the Macpherson Report is the reduction in legal protection for those under suspicion. Ostensibly, the repeal of Double Jeopardy in 2005 followed a marathon campaign by Ann Ming after her daughter was murdered in 1989. This was a convenient case to use because the removal of Double Jeopardy was a recommendation of the Macpherson Report into the murder of Stephen Lawrence and would enable the state to repeatedly try “racists” until they can get a conviction.

Many Labour ministers have extremist links and pasts but the media cover that up. If the media had wanted, they could have exposed Labour, but because they share the same idealogy, they did not. Don’t blindly trust the media but question every statement and look things up for yourselves in search engines.

The Times, in 1954, gives evidence that even then we were being cleansed from our communities. There were 200 a month arriving without work or accommodation which was causing concern in London, Liverpool and Birmingham.

“On Merseyside, where 121 disembarked on Tuesday from the liner Ascania, there is a coloured population of about 10,000. It is estimated that 2,000 of them are receiving public assistance … all the Government departments concerned say they have no means of assessing how many of the immigrants from the West Indies and to a small extent from the African colonies, are drawing welfare allowances. This is because all the immigrants are recorded as British subjects, and have equal claims.”

When public figures make the usual biased pronouncements on us and racial issues, research their hidden agendas. On Radio Four, Simon Hughes stated that they would have to start exposing the BNP’s argument such as exploding their ‘myth’ that asylum seekers get new houses, etc. He claimed this was not true. Not only is it true, but ‘asylum seekers’ get massively preferential treatment. Hughes was deceiving the public and behind his apparently reasonable words wants to submit us to Islam.

Andrew Marr tells us what he thinks should be done to Britons if we object to being dispossessed: “Only people who understand the economic forces changing their world, threatening them but also creating new opportunities, have a chance of being immune to the old tribal chants.

“And the final answer, frankly, is the vigorous use of state power to coerce and repress. It may be my Presbyterian background, but I firmly believe that repression can be a great, civilising instrument for good. Stamp hard on certain ‘natural’ beliefs for long enough and you can almost kill them off. The police are first in line to be burdened further, but a new Race Relations Act will impose the will of the state on millions of other lives too.”

Marr is advocating fascism and “ethnocide.” The present bunch of elites are the most selfish crowd of beggars on horseback ever to attain influence. They browbeat ordinary people into having their communities taken off them but keep asylum centres out of their countryside paradises! David Dimbleby's home was recently described as”palatial” by an interviewer who was only allowed into the converted barn.

Where do Paxman and Andrews Neill and Marr live? Not in the middle of Southall or Brixton! Sometimes they do when they are young like Billy Bragg but when it comes to bringing their children up they move to nice areas.