Another South African Hate Crime

It was just two sentences long and consigned to what is effectively the “It’s an odd word” section on page 18 of this morning’s London metro. Out of interest I measured the article and it was 1.2 inches by 2.5 inches, and that included the headline ‘Boy 12 “is boiled to death”

That was how one London paper saw fit to report the trial of the three men charged with the torture, rape and murder of the Viana family in October last year.

One can only imagine how many pages the western media would dedicate to the trial of three white South Africans accused of a similar crime. However, in this case in common with 99.9% of all such interracial murders. the victims were white and the accused black. This does not suit the narrative which the old media are determined to follow, and is therefore such cases are embarrassments, which they seek to under play or deliberately fail to report.

 

The three accused Sipho Mbele, David Motaung and Patrick Petrus Radebe, who had worked for the family, smiled and sniggered as the crimes, to which they have confessed were detailed.

The court heard the gang lay in wait for Tony Viana 53, to arrive home, then they attacked him with golf clubs and a panga / machete before tying him up.

Shortly afterwards Mrs Geraldine Viana and the couple’s 12 year old son Amaro returned and were also attacked by the gang. Amaro was also tied up and together with his father was forced to watch while all three men rapedd his mother in turn, restraining her by variously standing on her head or forcing a pillow over her face.

After raping Mrs Viana the gang murdered her and her husband. Such rapes and murders are now commonplace in South Africa, however, what the killers did next was what made this crime particularly heinous.

Amaro Viana had watched as his mother was raped, he has witnessed his parents being slaughtered, he knew the men who did it and could identify them, they decided he had to die.

However, they didn't just kill him, they didn't even show him the mercy of shooting him, execution style through the back of the head, as the killers of three year old WillemienPotgieter did to her after killing her family. Instead the things which took twelve year old Amaro's life took him to the bathroom, filled the bath with scalding hot water and held him under water until he stopped struggling.

As a parting act, the killers disembowled the family dog.

This was no “bungled burglary”, this was no “robbery gone wrong, this was another hate crime, but it was only a white boy they boiled to death, so hate crimes charges were never brought.

Report http://www.news24.com/SouthAfrica/News/Robbers-drowned-boy-12-in-boiling-water-20120725

Related:
Mike smith gives his view on this case on his blog, which can be read by clicking here

Click here to hear Dr. Gregory Stanton, President of Genocide Watch, speaks at a news conference held at the Transvaal Agricultural Union in Pretoria, regarding the current situation in South Africa, on 26 July 2012

 

White Girl Bleed a Lot - Book Review

 

By Tim Haydon

‘No Part of this book may be reproduced in any form … The only exception is by a reviewer, who may quote excerpts in a review’.  So runs the first page of ‘White Girl Bleed A Lot’, the explosive  book by the award-winning American Journalist, Colin Flaherty.

As this is a Review, here is an Extract:

‘Race riots are back.

‘Along with widespread racial crime and violence.

‘In hundreds of episodes in more than 50 cities since 2010, groups of black people are roaming the streets of America – assaulting, intimidating, stalking, threatening, vandalizing, stealing, shooting, stabbing, even raping and killing.’

Flaherty makes this point by detailing many of these episodes.  One of his chief complaints is that they aren’t normally reported by the media, not in the national media or even in the local media in the cities or areas where they occur.  Or if they are, the story is that there was nothing much to worry about because

‘Flash mobs, young people, gangs, people with no direction or good parents, they did it’

But as for race?  Nobody knew nuttin about nuttin’ see?’

Or if they did, it was ‘racist’ to mention it.

 For example, a sopping wet journalist apologist for black violence, one Emily Guendelsberger was seriously hurt when a black crowd of thousands roamed Philadelphia (where the previous two years had seen dozens of episodes of racial mob violence, all with same characteristics).

In the Guendelsberger incident they had descended on ‘an urban enclave of upscale bars and restaurants and shops with mayhem on their minds.  Running  through the streets, assaulting people in restaurants, stealing their phones and purses, pulling people off bicycles, and always violence, lots of violence.’

But it wasn’t racist violence when they attacked Guendelberger because her  brown boyfriend was also assaulted, although’ not as badly as she was.  This ‘proved’ her point that race had nothing to do with it.  Anyone who thought differently was ‘racist’ and ‘creepy,’ she said.

A Racist Fact

Several on-line commentators wondered why she couldn’t acknowledge the racial component of the mob.  Replied one: ‘Unless you’re pointing that out to show how whites have oppressed blacks, acknowledging that fact is racist.’

They weren’t riots – some other description is used – and/or they were ‘traditional’.

Thus in Peoria, Illinois, once a byword for middle America (hence the famous phrase, ‘will it play in Peoria?) when on the 4th of July a black mob of thousands in a housing ‘project’ (ie publically owned housing estate) blocked a fire truck’s  access to a fire and threw exploding, industrial –type fireworks and bottles at  police and firemen; when 60-70 African-American youths marched down one of the side streets to the 4-lane main drag, yelling threats to white residents, such as ‘we need to kill all the white people around here’; when 20 black women threw rocks at houses and attacked a man, according to the information officer, these were not race riots because as Flaherty puts it, ‘the people doing the rioting did not say it was.  Or something like that.’

The police had to fire nearly 200 pepper balls in order to gain control of the crowd and ‘every officer said pretty much the same thing – that it was chaotic and like a riot….every officer received bruises and burn marks.’  But the Police Information Officer said that ‘Revellers there have traditionally held private fireworks displays on the fourth and previously made targets of the police and passers by’.

A Beef about this Book

Oh.  ‘Revellers’ attacking the police and passers by is traditional.  So that’s all right then.  As Flaherty says, ‘I say rioters. You say revellers.’  ‘But’, Flaherty goes on, ‘the video tells another story’.  And here we have a beef about this book.

In the absence of news reports, or truthful ones, Flaherty backs up his undeniable case that there are widespread black-instigated race riots in the USA by referring to videos on You Tube and elsewhere on the internet which tell the real story.  (How the power of the internet is undermining the lies and distortions of the traditional MSM!!!!).  But until you buy the book you are unlikely to find this out, which is a great shame.  As is stated in the opening pages, ‘Because links to videos and pictures are such an important part of this book, this book is best viewed on E-reader.’

Never mind though.  Such is such is the power of the rata-tat-tat of so many incidents of shocking proportions detailed all over the USA, representing untold numbers of others, that one puts up with the inconvenience of finding the videos in question on line.  But be warned.

Attacking the Weak

Flaherty identifies a disturbing characteristic of these riots.  They focus on the weak.  Lone White Men, Women, Gays and others.  The upscale Philadelphia area mentioned above is a favourite of Gays.  While the White weak are especially at risk, others also suffer.  South Philadelphia High School is 70% black and 18 % Asian (In USA terms this means mostly orientals like Chinese, Vietnamese etc)

A Department of Justice report found that a contingent of largely black school officials dismissed ignored and even encouraged attacks on Asian students by Black students.

For years, Black students systematically beat and harassed Asian students on a daily basis.  In December 2009, 30 Asians were attacked sending 13 of them for emergency treatment.  School officials told local news outlets that the attacks were in no way racial.  The (mostly black) school authorities handed pamphlets to the Asians instructing them how to avoid antagonising their black schoolmates with racist behaviour - !!!

A Descriptive, not an Explanatory Book

Flaherty does not intend this book to be explanatory.  He merely presents a picture of what is happening.  But explanations for the explosion in race riots are implicit. In particular there is the power of modern communications.  Not only does the Internet carry reports and videos of the race riots which the liberals who run the newspapers and TV and Radio Channels choose to ignore, downplay, minimise or misrepresent, but the riots including the black flash mobs which are terrorising and robbing the citizenry, stores and restaurants of the USA are organised using their new social networking tools such as Twitter and Facebook.

Modern communications which have enabled tendencies to crystallise in mob form are probably at least part of the explanation as to why these phenomena  have surfaced in recent years in such spectacular fashion.  The same thing happened with the Riots in Britain recently.

Moral Collapse and the Victim Culture

Other implied causes include the malign and manifold influences of the post-1960’s moral collapse (eg illegitimacy among blacks is now 70%.) Then there is the growth of the victim culture which has been encouraged by guilt–ridden liberal /left whites and which has fostered a sense of grievance and entitlement.  This is despite the fact that blacks in America  have been favoured  over whites for nearly half a century with ‘quotas, set–asides, lower standards for blacks, training reserved for blacks, efforts to recruit blacks not matched by efforts to recruit whites, race-norming of tests, banding and recentering.’  (Michael Levin, ‘Why Race Matters’, 2005, P232).

Left/Liberal ‘Anti-Racism’ Denies, Excuses and Encourages Black Wrong Doing

Linked with the victim culture is the tolerance of black wrong-doing which Flaherty decribes. It is  born of the belief that it is the product of social ie white ‘oppression’.  Obviously, if you have a weak personal moral compass in a secular environment where right and wrong are relative, are told that you are oppressed and that your bad behaviour is the fault of others, you will find no great internal impediment to indulging in that same bad behaviour.  As for external constraints; these are non-existent for all practical purposes.  White leftist /liberals will excuse your behaviour and hysteria about ‘racist’ thinking, will help you to get away with it. Somehow leftists / liberals excuse it on racial grounds whilst at the same time managing to deny that it has anything to do with race.

Poverty is to blame?  Not Really

A further implicit reason, often quoted by leftists, is ‘poverty’.  But poverty is not of itself a cause of criminal behaviour.  Nor is the gap between rich and poor.  Crime was virtually non-existent by modern standards in England and Wales in the early 20th century although there was widespread poverty and the gap between rich and poor was infinitely higher than it is today.  (In 1921 there were 103,000 recorded crimes, pop. 37,886,689; In 2001 there were 5,200,000 recorded crimes, pop. 53,137,000.  Quoted by Peter Hichens, 2003 p 14: A Brief History of Crime).

If in general Blacks, who have been the beneficiaries of the racial discrimination (‘affirmative action’) in their favour for generations as noted above have not heaved themselves out of ‘poverty’,  this is because use with a mean IQ of 85 (Whites 100) and other characteristics they are not capable of anything else and have only themselves  to blame.

It’s Easier to Blame Whitey than to confront the Truth

This though is an uncomfortable fact that blacks would for understandable reasons rather not confront, preferring to blame Whitey.  Whitey of course, or its cringing, dominant left-liberal political class, is only too happy to agree with this fiction. (Who are Blacks going to blame when Whites are in a minority in the USA? The Jews?).

Other ethnic minorities though, such as the Jews (also heavily discriminated against historically) and the East Asians whom Blacks are inclined to torment and who started off in the USA in the 19th Century as indentured labourers with a social standing not much above slaves, do very well socio-economically.  In any case, the poverty of Blacks is entirely relative, consisting of a standard of living which would be thought of as great wealth by most of the world’s population.

The Black Poor will always be with us and so will Black Resentment and Violence - if Liberals do not see Reason

Jesus said ‘the poor are always with us’.  And because on average they lack the intellectual wherewithal and other personal characteristics necessary to succeed in a modern economy, blacks in general will always be poor, relatively speaking.  Or, if you like, the poor will always include a hugely disproportionate number of blacks.

Thus in the unlikely event that they learn to accept the realities of their condition, as we all have to, there will always exist a capacity for black resentment of more successful ethnic groups and so black violence.  Lies and excuses on their behalf will only succeed in deepening their frustration and distress.

The racially -determinedl socio-economic hierarchies that naturally develop in racially mixed societies with all their attendant social stresses is one of the key arguments against the existence of such societies.

A call for balance, a call for truth

Please click here to visit YouTube and rate this video and then please share it as widely as you can

_____________

Hat Tip Mister Fox

The Double Standards of Hate

The Following letter appeared at Courier.co.uk this morning 

Sir, — In 1993-94, the black teenager Stephen Lawrence and white teenager Richard Everitt were murdered by young 'racist gangs' in London but there the resemblance ends.

Vast media publicity followed Stephen's case, the Home Secretary visited, a monument was erected and a judicial inquiry denounced the police as ''institutionally racist''.

Two men have now been convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment while the judge demands the other attackers be punished because they engaged in a ''joint exercise''.

Eleven Bengali youths — one aged 20 — were arrested over Richard's killing but only two came to trial with no calls for the rest to be prosecuted on a ''joint enterprise'' basis.

One was found guilty of violent disorder and served 18 months while the other served 11 years for what the trial judge described it as a ''wholly unprovoked racist murder''.

There was no visit by the Home Secretary, no monument, no judicial inquiry, no interest shown by his local MP and a code of omerta from the metropolitan leftist media.

(Dr) John Cameron.
10 Howard Place,
St Andrews.

Here is the Link:  http://www.thecourier.co.uk/Opinion/Readers-letters/article/20174/january-9-similar-racist-murders-but-different-approaches.html

For the sake or racial equality, readers may consider that Dr. Cameron's letter deserves a wider circulation.

_______________

Further information on the murder of Richard Everett can be found at the I am an Englishman blog (one of the valuable resources in Britain today) by clicking here.

Police : Salford killing "was a Hate Crime"

Manchester police have just announced that they are treating the murder of Indian Student Anuj Bidve who was shot dead in Salford on Boxing Day as a Hate Crime.

How odd, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it current police procedure to fall over each other in theiur rush to dismiss all possibility that any murder is a "hate crime" within moments of arriving at a police scene, and before they have had a chance to determine anything?

Oh no, silly me that is only current police procedure when the victim is white and the suspects aren't!!

A crime against the state

My friend the Green Arrow and others have written a number of articles on The British Resistance Site regarding the recent Internet sensation featuring a young mother secretly filmed on a South London tube expressing her views on issues of immigration and nationality.  Links to the various articles at the British Resistance  can be found at the bottom of this posting.

The woman in question has been charged with an extraordinarily Orwellian sounding “racially aggravated public order offence” and has been remanded in custody without bail pending psychiatric reports.

This event and the reactions to it both by the police, the judiciary and the general public tell us a great deal about the country we are living in.

One of the things which we in the West once found most frightening about the Old Soviet Union, about Nazi Germany before that and indeed of some of the worst third world dictatorships, was that people could be locked up for expressing the wrong views.  That now happens here.

It was once considered noble to state that "I may detest what you say, but would defend to the death your right to say it". Today just to express such a view renders one subject to the suspicion of holding unacceptable views.

We now live in a country where someone can be imprisoned for saying stuff.

Worse than that, all the little Twitter-Nazis on the internet are cheering. 

Meanwhile, there isn't a journalist or a mainstream politician with the guts or the honour to speak out against our slide into totalitarianism.

As a society, whatever our politics, we should all find this very frightening.

_____________________________________________ 

Links to related postings at the British Resistance
  
Hats off to the Lady on the Tram
Emma West, truth or Racial Harrassment
British First say: Release Emma West Immediately
Kelly Hollingsworth, Emma West and the Rest
Nationalists Vow “Direct action” over Emma West Incarceration

'Race Hate' Gang in Temple Bar orgy of Violence

At least the Irish press reveal the truth - Report

Minority Feelings and Violent Facts

The Following article By John T Bennett appeared yesterday on the American Thinker Website

Minority Feelings and Violent Facts

By John T Bennett

What is the most important thing about mobs of black teens attacking and seriously injuring innocent pedestrians and businesses?  The feelings of teenagers who share the race of the attackers, according to Chicago's local CBS affiliate.

That's right: Mobs of teenagers have unleashed terror in the streets of Chicago and other cities in "flash mobs," and the best thing CBS in Chicago has to say about that is that black teenagers are worried about racial profiling.

George Orwell would shudder after reading this headline: "Some Worry Mob Attacks Are Encouraging Racial Profiling."  In the story, a journalist interviews young black teens hanging out at North Avenue Beach, the scene of one of the mob attacks.  We learn that some in this group "feel targeted as potential troublemakers because of recent attack mobs in the city."  No one is alleging that profiling has occurred as a result of the flash mobs, just that it might, and that possibility bothers some teenagers.  That's the subject matter of an entire news story in our post-racial America.

The subjective opinions of black teens matter as much as those of all other teens.  But do those feelings matter enough to warrant a news story?  Compare the triviality of that story with the full scope of flash mob attacks in Chicago:

In early June, witnesses reported that "gangbangers" were pushing people off their bikes at a Chicago beach.  One witness told NBC local that "[t]hey were being rude and abusive and throwing trash around and defecating" and beating people.  Also, in just one weekend in early June, twelve attacks involving large groups of "young men" were reported.  These attacks in the normally placid North Side gained attention.  The chosen victims: a 68-year-old white doctor, a 34-year-old white insurance salesman, a Thai man, a Filipino nursing student, and a 42-year-old Japanese doctor.  All were either beaten, robbed, or both.  Those arrested: three young black men, a fact we only know because of mugshots since it is the official policy of the Chicago Tribune to censor the race of criminal mobs in its journalism, if not its commentary section. 

These attacks might just seem like fun and games, but now some of the attackers are armed.  In two incidents the first weekend in June, 8 to 15 teens boarded a bus without paying and "began hitting people," according to the Chicago Tribune.  Three of those teens are charged with armed robbery, one with unlawful use of a weapon.  A week later, a boy with no race was attacked by "a group of seven male teens," all "black," according to news reports, and one with a handgun.

There were also flash mob robberies in January 2011 when mobs of teens raided and robbed at least three stores.  In February, Loyola University Chicago warned students and staff about "flash mob offenders" stealing from retail stores near campus.  In April 2011, a group of 70 "youths" invaded a McDonald's and "created a disturbance" according to a news report.  So there is a troubling trend towards mob violence perpetrated by black teens.  Despite all of this, of all the topics CBS Chicago could have chosen, they chose to ruminate about the feelings of young black teens.

The problem with the CBS story is that there will be no corresponding story about victims' feelings.  There certainly will be no similar story about the subjective opinions of non-blacks regarding predominantly black mobs.  It's not just that there is a double standard; it's that there is a suffocating level of deception involved in these news stories.

How did we reach the point where the only group whose feelings need to be consulted are minorities?  Liberalism.  Part of liberalism is the notion that minorities need special help, attention, and heightened sensitivity.  Along with that, liberalism promotes white guilt and the peculiar desire to "help people" at any cost.  The result is that the media gives credence and coverage to mere feelings when real people are being attacked.  Of course, the worse the violence gets, the more sensitive we'll have to be.  The flash mobs and mob attacks will require the utmost sensitivity from us, as they are only going to increase.  They've already occurred in Atlanta, Kansas City, Boston, Nashville, Charlotte, St. Paul, Minnesota, Washington, D.C., Las Vegas, Columbia, South Carolina, and even in Iowa on what was called "beat whitey night."

We face the nightmarish reality of low-level ethnic conflict.  If these violent mob attacks worsen, they will be a precursor to severe racial tension.  These flash mobs already constitute the worst acts of racist violence in recent American history.  Now, how do we go from that reality to a story about black teens' feelings?  The answer is that society has twisted priorities about race and social responsibility.  Given the white guilt saturation that young people receive in our educational system, it's easy to see why the media would give such frivolous treatment to flash mobs.  One of the great successes of modern liberalism is that it has constrained our public debate about racial issues.  A sheep-like media, craven politicians, and thoughtless academics have all failed in their duty to grapple with this social problem.  With enough layers of guilt piled upon us, we can't even see the problem staring us in the face.  The media is creating an atmosphere of passive ignorance towards racial violence, and that ignorance places all of us at risk.

If there was this level of racial tension and violence in a situation where the races were reversed, there would be a nationwide clamor for healing, compensation, and awareness. Instead, we're treated to sappy stories about teenagers' feelings. "Some Worry Mob Attacks Are Encouraging Racial Profiling," says the news. One waits for the article entitled "Some Worry Mob Attacks Are Encouraging Anti-white Violence."

__________________

Click here for the source article with 96 comments

A hate crime seven years on

Tomorrow marks the seventh Anniversary of what may well have been the most vicious and brutal racially motivated murders to have ever taken place on British soil. It was a crime involving cruelty which to this day still shocks and a victim who must rank among the most innocent to have suffered in such a way.

Yet it is a crime of which few ever speak and of which many know nothing at all. It was a crime which shamed our nation, not only because of the violence and horror involved, although that must certainly shame all decent men, but more shameful still was the manner in which our leaders and the craven media sought to shy away from it, hide it and pretend it never happened.

The crime of which I speak was the racially motivated torture and murder of 15 year old Scottish school boy Kriss Donald by a group of Asian men

The brutal details of the crime are heart rending. The following comes from an article I wrote in 2008 called “The Lost Boys”.

Kriss Donald died on a cold March day in 2004, on a patch of waste ground, near a walkway, behind Celtic Supporters club in the Pollockshields area of Glasgow, and his last hours on this earth were not kind ones.

As was later described in court, this defenceless, slightly built, 15 year old schoolboy experienced extreme terror and pain, before his young life was snuffed out by the violent men who had randomly selected him as the victim of their ugly racial hatred.

It was Kriss' fatal bad luck that he innocently crossed the path of racially motivated Asian killers Daanish Zahid, Imran Shahid, Zeeshan Shahid, Mohammed Mustaq, and their accomplice Zahid Mohammed (who later told the court that, seeing revenge for some earlier slight by a white person, the gang of thugs drove around the area looking for anyone young and white in order to "chop them up and take their eyes out and stab them"). Kriss was out walking with his friend Jamie Wallace, when a group of Asians leapt out of a Mercedes, attacked them both, dragged Kris into the car, and drove off. As Jamie escaped, he heard one the kidnappers say. "You'll be next".

As he was being driven away, Kriss, who was a mere child, was heard to call out “what have I done? I'm only 15!” and we can only imagine the terror that 15 year old youngster experienced whilst held captive, and presumably threatened and abused, over the following hours while he was taken on a 200 mile journey before being brought back to Glasgow. When his assailants were unable to find a suitable house to take him to, they pulled up on waste land where they would take his life. Dragging their slight and terrified prey out of the car, Kriss's killers beat him, causing internal injuries, including damaged organs and at least one smashed rib, before holding him over a log and stabbing him 13 times, dousing him with petrol, and then whilst he was still alive set him alight before leaving him to burn to death.

Kriss died a terrible death, apart from the internal injuries and stab wounds, his young body suffered 70% burns, and for no reason other than because he was white. It has been established beyond question that Kriss was an entirely innocent victim, chosen randomly because of the colour of his skin.

The racial motive was made quite clear in court when Advocate deputy, Mark Stewart, asked Mohammed, if it was it an Asian boy, a Chinese boy, a black boy they sought? Mohammed replied "A white boy".

There are allegations that Kriss's murder was even more terrible than I have described but even based only on what was revealed in court, Kriss Donald's murder must rank amongst the most cruel and brutal ever to have occurred in Britain, I know of no hate crime to match it for savagery

Yet, whenever our media mention hate crimes, we only ever hear two names, Anthony Walker and Stephen Lawrence, the sole two totem victims of the anti-racist movement, being the victims of white on black violence (or allegedly so in the case of Stephen Lawrence). However, of Kriss Donald there is never a mention.

The Walker and Lawrence killings were awful crimes, but both died swiftly, Walker from a single blow, and Lawrence by two stab wounds, whereas Kriss was terrorised for hours and then tortured and then set alight. It should also be remembered that the racial motive in the Lawrence killing remains alleged, as no one have ever been convicted of his murder.

Our nation has created memorials to Walker and Lawrence. On 2 April 2008, the Crown Prosecution Service announced a legal scholarship in Walker's memory. The scheme will offer one place in CPS Merseyside to a trainee solicitor who wants to become a fully-fledged solicitor or barrister. It is open to any black or ethnic minority person who has secured or intends to apply for a place to study full-time. Meanwhile Stephen Lawrence has been the subject of numerous plays TV dramatisations and documentaries a shining educational center in his name, paid for at tax payer's expense, was constructed in Deptford, and each year the Stephen Lawrence prize for architecture is awarded.

But for Kriss Donald, as with Ross Parker, a 17 year old white youth killed in a racially motivated attack by an Asian gang wielding hammers in Peterborough three years before (and ten days after the twin towers fell), and all the other white victims, no monuments have been constructed, no scholarships awarded and no heart wrenching TV documentaries made.

Our leaders do not mourn them due to the colour of their killers, the media will not celebrate their lives or speak of their potential because they were white

They would have us forget Kriss Donald, pretend he never died or maybe that he never lived. However, though they rule our country they can not rule our hearts, so please, at some point tomorrow, take a moment to remember Kriss and all the other victims of what has been done to us.

__________________
Related Posts

The Lost Boys: http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2008/04/lost-boys.html
White Boys in the Jungle: http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2008/06/white-boys-in-jungle.html
Green Arrow: Where is the Kriss Donald Memorial? http://isupporttheresistance.blogspot.com/2008/06/where-is-kriss-donald-memorial-centre.html
________
Hat tip: Mister Fox

Blood Stained Nation

Teen age Keith Lewis, attacked together with

his 90 year old grandmother in Zululand

The bloodshed continues in South Africa and the last fortnight has been no different. As is so often the case it is the weak, the old and the very young who are its victims. Like all brutes who run when confronted by someone who can fight the sadistic killers of South Africa revel in the brutalisation of those less able to defend themselves.

The latest farm murder was particularly savage as the following report from South Africa's News 24 confirms:

Grisly farm murder scene 'indescribable'

Pretoria - The son and the sister of a man who was gruesomely stabbed to death and assaulted with a shovel along with his girlfriend have described how the couple's bloody bodies were found.

Deon van Staden, 51, and Babs Strecker, 73, were murdered on Friday evening on their smallholding in Madikwe Village in Bethanie, North West, by someone who presumably knew them.

"The shovel still lay close by," said Mabel du Plessis, 61, from Silverton, Pretoria, on Wednesday.

Du Plessis said her brother, who serviced engineering machines, was still sitting in his fallen chair on the kitchen floor when he was found.

"He was full of knife wounds and he was stabbed with a shovel at the back of his head and on his body.

"It looked like Babs tried to run to the bedroom because her feet were still lying in the kitchen doorway and she was also stabbed numerous times and hit on the back of the head with a shovel," said Du Plessis.

A man who came to deliver wooden poles to her brother found their bodies.

Deaan van Staden, 30, who arrived on the scene shortly after the police, said his father and Strecker were busy playing a board game when they were attacked.

"What I saw, was indescribable. My father just sat in the chair on the ground.

"I don't know anymore, I don't know anymore," he said softly.

Full report

A further Farm murder occurred Limpopo and involved the Uncle of an Afrikaner trace union official.

Solidarity official's uncle dies in attack

Frik Hermann the 78-year-old uncle of Solidarity's deputy general secretary, Dirk Hermann, was killed in a farm attack which occurred earlier this month .

A Limpopo police spokesperson confirmed that Mr Hermann's body was found on his farm near Alma in Limpopo on Tuesday February 9th.

He was found by a friend with his hands tied behind his back. He had been dead for a few days.

Meanwhile in Zululand

Grandmother survives brutal attack

90 year old Vivienne Tillett attended by a doctor

Two men entered a Mtubatuba home and went on a spree of wanton violence, attacking 90 year-old granny Vivien Tillett and grandson Keith Lewis.

Minutes after leaving his house in Mtubatuba on Thursday night, Keith Lewis’ family was brutally attacked. His 90 year-old mother, Vivien Tillett, and son Keith Jnr, were both severely beaten by unknown attackers. Just after 8:30pm, Lewis left his family locked inside the house when he went to a garage up the road. Two male intruders broke the locked gate, entered the house and attacked Keith with sticks. A shot was fired, which grazed his face and then the blows started to rain down on him while the young man was trying to defend himself. Knowing his fragile grandmother was in her room, Keith fought back with everything he had. One of the intruders hissed at Lewis that they were going to rape his grandmother and then kill her.

Keith escaped and ran for help, hoping the two men would follow him and leave his grandmother alone. He ran outside up the dirt road towards town and waved down a police vehicle. Horror awaited father and son as they got home. Lewis Snr’s elderly mother had been dragged from her bed into the backyard. Beaten over the head, ribs broken and arm sprained, Tillett was lying helplessly in a puddle of blood in the dark, waiting for her family to return. The perpetrators were nowhere to be found. Doctor Jorgenson and helpful neighbours Peter and Alan Harrison spent the whole night with the family. No arrests have yet been made.

More whites murdered in the last fortnight

Guest house owner brutally murdered

Mrs, 65 year old Johannesburg guest-house owner, Georgie Jacklin brutally killed Friday Feb 4 2011, he mutilated corpse dumped in her bloodied bed-clothes at a field near Viljoensdrif outside Sasolburg, Free State. two residents came across her mutilated body in a veld near the Vaal River. Her head was caved in with a concrete-block, plastic cabling tied up her mouth, her teeth were bashed out, her nose was broken and her bed-clothes she was found in, were soaked in blood. The police discovered that the concrete-block she was murdered with, ‘had been neatly washed off and placed back at the entrance of her guest house.’ They also discovered her blood at the front door. She was identified by her daughters Vanessa Jacklin-Levin and Natalie Jacklin-Chetty and their dad Normand as the Sasolburg police station.

Court Stenographer Executed

Doris de Jager, the Johannesburg High Court stenographer in the Agliotti and Selebi cases was killed execution style by four-member gang. Ms, de Jager, 50, was murdered in the driveway of her Ridgeway home on Saturday Feb 5 2011 by one of a gang of four black men who waited for her return from shopping on Saturday with her daughter Margie, 21. Nothing was stolen and the car was not hijacked.

Builders mutilated corpse found.

The badly mutilated body of 66 year old Afrikaner builder Ettienne Gert Coezter, 66, was found dumped in Soshanguve township on January 29th, three days after he went missing from his home in Claremont, Pretoria? Three black colleagues at the construction company in Capital Park were arrested for his murder. All three male suspects are from Soshanguve. They are scheduled for a remand appearance soon, he said. Mr Coetzer was assaulted, throttled to death and then his body was dumped without any identification. His torched truck was found Saturday-morning along the Rosslyn road north of Pretoria. One of the three suspects ‘was like a son to him,’ said the victim’s shocked son Mark, 39.

_______________
Hat tip: Dina, Jenny, JP and Birdman

Update on the Shane McClellan race hate attack

Last year I posted a couple of articles (here and here) regarding the case of white US teen Shane McClellan who was the victim of a vicious race attack during which he was kidnapped, beaten tortured and racially abused. Amazingly, given the racial element of the attack, one of his assailants has been convicted. However, predictably, the US media is struggling to find ways of excusing the brute for his behaviour.

The Following report comes from V-Dare

Guilty in Seattle: Somali Gets Hard Time for Anti-White Attack

By Brenda Walker

I suppose it was something of a victory for sanity and justice that a Somali immigrant was convicted of a hate crime against a white teenager, particularly since the victim was initially doubted by locals. After all, 16-year-old Shane McClellan (pictured) said he had been tortured for hours by two men who had shouted, “The white man has kept us down,” and “This is for enslaving our people.”

A crime like that runs counter to the liberal narrative. Immigrants are highly regarded as a victim group, incapable of racist hate, goes the stereotype.

On the contrary, Somalis residing in America have distinguished themselves as few others have for their extreme anti-social behavior, including gang crime, violent jihadism and constant demands for special treatment for their Islamic practices.

Local media struggled to frame the brutal crime in a way that would exonerate the convicted Somali perp. The Seattle Times chose the booze:

Man sentenced in W. Seattle attack on teen blames it on Four Loko, Seattle Times, January 21, 2011

The Four Loko made him do it.

Ahmed Mohamed, who was sentenced Friday to nearly six years in prison for the attack last year on a West Seattle teen, claimed the caffeine-infused energy beer he drank for the first time the night of the assault was partially to blame.

Continue reading this report at V-Dare by clicking here
__________
Hat Tip: Dr. D

Rape and Reality in the USA

Pan Atlantic Show trials - Part Two

Early last year I wrote an article entitled “Blood Sacrifice Denied”, in which I reported on the outcome of the trial of two white American teenagers charged with the racially motivated killing of a Mexican illegal immigrant. At the time I expressed the view that the verdict, both boys were acquitted of all charges, including murder and “ethnic intimidation” but convicted of simple assault, sat fairly with the evidence given in court, whilst denying a blood sacrifice to satisfy the various race hate groups and anti white media pundits who had laid siege to the court throughout the trial.

In saying this I had underestimated the vindictiveness and racism of the current US Department of Justice which, despite the jury’s verdict proceeded to bring federal civil rights charges against the two young men.

As a result, last week the race hate groups, such as the Hispanic “La Raza” (The Race) who had stood pumping the air with their fists outside the court, got what they wanted when Derrick Donchak and Brandon Piekarsky were convicted of what the media is predictably choosing to call a “hate crime”.

However, as evidence of the lengths to which the US department of Justice were prepared to go in order to obtain a conviction against Donchak and Piekarsky it should be noted that they have, in fact been convicted under a statute of the Federal Fair Housing act.

The particular statute in question makes it a crime to “use a person’s race, national origin or ethnicity as a basis to interfere, with violence or threats of violence, with a person’s right to live where he chooses to live”

One can only assume that this charge was based on the fact that one of the people involved in the two part brawl which led to Luis Ramerez death, not incidentally one of those convicted, told Ramerez to “go back to Mexico". A statement which, given that Ramerez was an illegal immigrant amounts to little more than advising a law breaker to stop breaking the law. How exactly does telling an illegal immigrant to return to his homeland differ from telling a robber to stop robbing?

This was an outrageous act on the part of the US Department of Justice, who, as you may recall recently dropped a case of illegal voter intimidation against the New Black Panther party, after the case had in fact been won. The DOJ under arch Obama crony Eric Holder have reacted in a manner which would be unthinkable had the races been reversed, as is so often the case, merely to placate left wing activists and illegal alien support groups.

Furthermore, for no other reason than pure visceral racial bias, have chosen to disregard the patent fairness of the original jury’s verdict.

The details of the incident during which Ramerez died, strongly mitigate against the original charge of murder and despite one statement, made by a third party, provide no conclusive evidence of racial bias on the part of either defendant, but, hey why let facts get in the way of a good “hate crime” prosecution?

Although there are some differences in the witness statements, they agree on the following:

• The defendants were part of a group, who had been drinking and who came across 25 year old Ramerez alone in a park with his girlfriend’s 13 year old sister.
• The group asked Ramerez what he was doing and this led to a brawl, during which the “Go back to Mexico" comment was made.
• The brawl ceased and the group of white boys began to walk away leaving Luis Ramerez in a sufficiently fit and uninjured state to make a number of cell phone calls.
• Ramerez then pursued the group of white boys and charged at them thus initiating a further brawl. It was during this second brawl that one of the group of white boys (again, not one of the defendants) punched Ramerez causing him to fall and hit his head on the sidewalk (pavement).

Forensic evidence confirmed that Ramerez’s injuries were consistent with a moving head colliding with a stationary object rather than by a moving object colliding with a stationary head as would have been the case had death resulted from kicks to the head as the prosecution alleged. (a more detailed account can be found in this excellent article )

The defendants were correctly convicted of assault during a drunken brawl, albeit they could have claimed that there was a significant degree of provocation on the part of Luis Ramerez.

However, it is inconceivable that a fair trial, as averse to this flagrant travesty of justice, would find that the evidence as produced in court supported either the charges or indeed the conviction.

Also explained in the report I linked to above, there are also questions as to the basis of the Federal Civil Rights charges which were brought, given that civil rights only apply to American citizens and not to illegal aliens, consequently Ramerez had no civil rights to be violated.

However, irrespective of technicalities, this was clearly a show trial leading to a demonstrably unjust outcome. Despite the contrived nature of this prosecution the boys could face life in prison, and that is certainly the sentence which the racists running the US Department of Justice will be pressing for.

Vast swathes of the American public have been bullied and brainwashed to the point where many may no longer be capable of feeling outrage on behalf of white males involved in conflict with non-whites irrespective of the circumstances.

However, in the highly unlikely event that the case were truthfully and fairly reported it should cause all Americans considerable concern at the degree to which the rights of that nations last remaining unprotected group have been eroded by the forces of progressive hatred.

Shane McClellan Hate Crime - an Update

Shane McClellan

Earlier this year I posted an article regarding anti-white hate crimes including the horrific attack on 16 year old Seattle teenager Shane McClellan. The article was entitled Victims of the Silence and addressed how the Mainstream media continues to suppress all news of these crimes. The US media remains silent about the attack on McClellan despite the quite amazing fact that Seattle police have actually brought hate crime charges against his attackers.

Black Conservative commentator Eric Rush addresses this case and the wider topic of the reporting of race issues in America in the following excellent article:

Race and the final conflict

By Eric Rush

WND ran a news piece last week titled "'Hate crime' charges filed over heinous attack," which referenced the case of 16-year-old Seattle resident Shane McClellan, who was abducted by two men on May 25 after one of them asked him for a lighter.

The lighter was a pretext, of course. McClellan was robbed and beaten over the course of several hours, whipped with his own belt, burned with a lit cigarette, doused with a beverage and urinated upon. During the ordeal, the two assailants, members of ethnic minorities, hurled racial epithets at McClellan and taunted him, making it "very clear," as the youth later recounted, that they had attacked him because he was white. One of the assailants was Asian, the other, black.

The WND piece, which also carried my comments, contained several links about the story to local news outlets that cover the Seattle area, but there has not, to date, been one story in the national press regarding the case.

Not one.

Imagine, if you will, the thermonuclear reaction that would have resulted in the national press had this been a young black man who'd had the same thing done to him by two white men. There is simply no disputing that the story would have been national news for months. The Rev. Al Sharpton (whose claim to fame is having been involved in a case in which just such an occurrence was staged) would have jetted to Seattle within hours, as would Rev. Jesse Jackson. They, as well as dozens of other activists and civil rights organizations would, as I said when interviewed by WND, be screaming for the death penalty.

I also believe it bears mentioning, given the current state of affairs, that one of the assailants bears a Muslim name. Whether or not Ahmed Mohamed, who is black, is a practicing Muslim, it is a fair bet that he has at least had some education in traditional Islamic doctrine; more likely, he has been exposed to Nation of Islam dogma, which is fiercely anti-white.

And speaking of anti-white: Another news story that has cyberspace abuzz is that of the Nation of Islam's clown kahuna Louis Farrakhan and members of the New Black Panther Party attending a secret meeting with Iran's President Mahmoud "the missing link" Ahmadinejad in New York last week. It is a sad state of affairs when the black equivalents of the American Nazi Party and the Ku Klux Klan feel comfortable meeting with one of America's sworn enemies on our own soil.

A sad state indeed …

Continue reading Rush's analysis by clicking here

Victims of the silence

Johan Strydom (South Africa) and Shane McClellan (USA)

A few days ago hundreds of mourners gathered to grieve following the death of Johan Strydom, who was murdered at his farm near Parys in South Africa's Free State on the 15th of May. Strydom's popularity in life was clear from the numbers attending his funeral, many standing in the doorway of the overcrowded Dutch Hervormd Church in Parys as there were insufficient chairs to seat them all.

Johan Strydom's funeral

Now further details of the violent nature of the amiable Afrikaner farmer's death after he was hijacked at his farm gate have been revealed. Strydom suffered a burst liver, damage to his skull, and extensive “dragging injuries", following being chained face down behind his truck and dragged around his farm by one ankle. Medical reports reveal that he was alive whilst being dragged.

This is the second incident this year where a white South African has been carjacked, tied behind his own vehicle and then dragged. A young man was the victim of just such an attack only a few moths ago in that increasingly violent country. He survived, but with injuries which will take years to recover, if they ever do.

Unless you live in South Africa, this is most probably the first you have heard of either of these cases, indeed few in South Africa know of the first incident, as it has gone virtually unreported. I only know of it because I was sent photographs of the young man's injuries, which I can not possibly publish here, and which I will probably never forget having seen.

However, as with so many of the horrors which have happened in South Africa in recent years, such as the ghastly, probably muti related, murders of 77 year old Alice Lotter and her 57 year old daughter Helen, who's horrific torture included their genitals being mutilated with shards of broken glass, before, whilst still alive their breasts were cut off and used to write anti-white hate slogans on the walls, news of anti-white hate crime continues to be suppressed.

Compare this with the case of James Byrd jnr. Who was tied to the back of a truck in Texas and dragged to his death in very similar circumstances to the two cases in South Africa this year, the only difference being that Byrd was black and his attackers were white. It was because of the colour combination Byrd's murder became a world wide news story, and “teachable event” in every school across America, and it is equally because of the colour combination that the South African hate crimes are being suppressed.

It is not just news from South Africa which is deliberately not reported, the press is also silent about anti-white hate crimes closer to home. Infamously within the Nationalist community, but almost unknown in the wider US population, the the savage 2007 rape and murder of Christopher Newsom and Channon Christian by five African Americans went almost unreported outside Knoxville where they took place, even while one by one their rapists and killers were tried and convicted, the most recent case ending this month. Similar limited reporting applied to the 2002 slaying of four young whites (a fifth escaped by playing dead) by African American brothers Jonathan and Reginald Carr, or more recently to the killings in Pearcy reported here by Vdare.com

However, these cases only scratch the surface of the epidemic of anti-white hate crimes across America, which the police are not permitted to prosecute as hate crimes, because the victims are from a group denied hate crime protection (white people), and which the media refuses to report outside the local news, if they report them at all.

Only this week Shane McClellan a 16 year old white youth was allegedly kidnapped and beaten for hours by a group of black men, who Shane claims used repeated racial slurs and told him they were doing it because he was white. Maybe that is why the case has hardly been reported outside the local Seattle news.

Shane's father, Tim McClellan said he barely recognized his son after the brutal assault, adding "I didn't know if he was alive or dead,"

Of course, at this stage, allegations remain allegations, however, can you just imagine how those two propaganda organs of which Joseph Goebbels would be proud, CNN and MSNBC, would be screaming had such allegations been made by a black person against a group of whites. (Remember Duke Lacrosse?)

Even when cases do make the national news, such as the carjacking and murder of North Carolina student Eve Carson by two black youths the race of her attackers is treated as incidental. (I wonder how many black women were carjacked let alone murdered by white gangs in recent years? None, I'd guess, otherwise we would certainly have heard of it.)

Likewise, when committed white Obama supporter Kirsten Brydum was shot dead whilst spreading the word of “Change” in a black neighbourhood of New Orleans, in 2008 she was reported as being "in the wrong place at the wrong time". No mainstream news organisation in America would dare to add that any time is the wrong time for a white person, let alone a white woman, to be in a black area – alone or otherwise.

If you lived on a remote Island in the South Atlantic and you read the crime news on the main US news websites, you could be forgiven for believing that violent crime in America was a multi-racial activity, with, if anything, whites being marginally more prone to criminal activity than other races. Indeed, if you ignored the news and formed your opinion of criminal perpetration on the basis of what you see in US Cop shows, you would be led to believe that crime in general is an overwhelmingly a white perpetrator activity.

However, the truth is very different from the carefully nurtured fiction. here are some figures:

In 2006, the incarceration rate in state or federal prison or jail for men was 1,384 per 100,000 residents, for women 134 per 100,000 residents. The rate for white men was 736 per 100,000, for black men 4,789 per 100,000, for Hispanic men 1,862 per 100,000. The rate for white women was 94 per 100,000, for black women 358 per 100,000, and for Hispanic women 152 per 100,000. (i)

Of the 249,400 state prison inmates serving time for drug offenses at year end 2004, 112,500 (45.1%) were black, 51,800 (20.8%) were Hispanic, and 65,900 (26.4%) were white. (ii)

At midyear 2006 more black men (836,800) were in custody in State or Federal prison or local jail than white men (718,100) or Hispanic men (426,900). Black men comprised 41% of the more than 2 million men in custody, and black men age 20 to 29 comprised 15.5% of all men in custody on June 30, 2006. my source, which I have quoted below, and which I am quoting verbatim states "Relative to their numbers in the general population, about 4.8% of all black men were in custody at midyear 2006, compared to about 0.7% of white men and 1.9% of Hispanic men. Overall, black men were incarcerated at 6.5 times the rate of white men. The incarceration rate for black men was highest among black men age 25 to 29. About 11.7% of black males in this age group were incarcerated on June 30, 2006. Across age groups black men were between 5.7 and 8.5 times more likely than white men to be incarcerated." (iii)

As you read that, you can almost hear the cry, “That is because of racism within the legal system and the fact that more blacks live in poverty and social deprivation!”

Wrong on both counts.

The reality is that politically correct law enforcement bends over backwards to avoid racial profiling, as shown by the shrieks of horror by various senior policemen following the new Arizona law requirements to merely check the legal status of suspects. Meanwhile courts in America go to great lengths not to disadvantage black or Hispanic defendants, whereas statistically, black and mixed race juries are significantly less likely to convict black defendants, especially if the victim was white, than white jurors are in the case of white defendants (iv)

The claim that poverty is the reason why more blacks offend also does not stand up to scrutiny. According to the most recent reliable figures (okay Wikipedia) the population of America stands at around 308,672,000 66% of whom (roughly 203,723,520) are white, 14% (about 43,214,080) are African American and 15% (46,300,800) are Hispanic, the remaining 5% being made up of groups such as Asians, Native Americans and Pacific Islanders.

When it comes to poverty the figures state that “only” 8.2% of the US white population live in poverty, compared to 24.7% of blacks. (v) This statistical imbalance is frequently used by liberals to excuse the higher numerical rates of offending amongst blacks and Hispanics. However, this is entirely misleading, and does not make any sense when you actually look at the ethnic make up of those living in poverty.

8.2% of 203,723,520 means that 16,705,328 white Americans are living in poverty, whereas despite the much quoted higher percentage rate 24.7% of 43,214,080 means that 10,673,877 are living in poverty, a significantly smaller number of people.

If poverty was the key to offending you would expect to see whites committing 16 crimes for every 10 committed by black people, however, outside the whacky parallel universe, as portrayed by CBS, that is not what we see.

Likewise, hate crimes are, to a massively disproportionate degree, something which happens to white people, that truth is merely hidden by legal system which refuses to call such crimes by their true name and by a media which fails to report them.

What we see in America we are seeing here in Europe, yet we are not allowed to say so.

We have reached a point in our society where the truth can not be acknowledged if it does not comply with an ideological narrative, despite the fact that the narrative is a lie. It is the silence of the reporters which gives succour to the lie and imperils its victims, for how many lives could have been saved had they had, at least been warned of the danger?

____________________

(i)Source: Sabol, William J., PhD, Minton, Todd D., and Harrison, Paige M., Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 2006 (Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, June 2007), NCJ217675, p. 9, Table 14.
(ii)Source: Sabol, William J., PhD, Couture, Heather, and Harrison, Paige M., Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prisoners in 2006 (Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, December 2007), NCJ219416, p. 24, Appendix Table 9.
(iii) Source: Sabol, William J., PhD, Minton, Todd D., and Harrison, Paige M., Bureau of Justice Statistics, Prison and Jail Inmates at Midyear 2006 (Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, June 2007), NCJ217675, p. 9.
(iv)http://www.scienceagogo.com/news/19980807031456data_trunc_sys.shtml
(v) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poverty_in_the_United_States

____________

Hat Tip: Censor Bugbear, Dina, Jenny and Anon

Have You Tried the BBC Race Bias Test Yet?

Kriss Donald and Stephen Lawrence
BBC Bias in Black and white

From the BNP WEbsite

The BBC has an appalling record for anti-white racist bias in its reporting, particularly when it comes to race hate crime against white Britons — a fact easily and conclusively proven using the BBC website.

The most appalling race hate murder committed in Britain in modern times was undoubtedly that of Kriss Donald in 2004.

Kriss was 16-years old when a Muslim race hate gang snatched him at random from a Glasgow street.

He was taken to an isolated spot where he was sadistically tortured.

He didn’t die from the mutilations inflicted on him with knives but from being set alight.

His murderers were later convicted and sentenced to long terms of imprisonment.

Yet despite the obvious fact that this was Britain’s most appalling racist murder, the BBC all but ignored it — something it most certainly would not have done had the victim been Asian or black.

This is far from being the only racist murder of a white person that the BBC has either censored or ignored.

To establish the extent of the BBC’s racist anti-white bias we invite you to do the BBC Bias Test:

1. Go to the BBC website’s home page here
2. Input the name “Kriss Donald” into the search facility towards the top of the page.
3. Count the number of references to “Kriss Donald” returned.
4. Repeat steps 2 and 3, this time inputting the name “Stephen Lawrence”.
5. Then ask yourself why does the BBC consider one murder so much more newsworthy than the other?

An account of the Kriss Donald murder may be read here

Unlike the BBC, the British National Party believes that crime should be reported impartially, irrespective of the ethnicity of the victim.

First Time Ever BBC Mentions White Murder Victims Is to Attack BNP

BBC reporter Michelle Gribbon accuses BNP of exploiting her cousin's racially motivated murder and then exploits her cousin's racially motivated murder in order to attack the BNP

Click here to read the report on the BBC's distorted and politically exploitative report at the Home the Home of the Green Arrow

_______________________
Related Link:

Racism Cuts Both Ways

Anti white violence in South Africa Continues

Three days of unremitting violence

Youth Survives Panga attack

March 24 Randberg youth survives machete attack when his family home was invaded twice in seven hours.

Source

_______________

Elderly woman viciously assaulted

25 March 2010: "I am just grateful he didn’t rape me,’ said 79-year-old Afrikaner resident of Bloemfontein Mrs Hester Thomas after her attacker stabbed her above the eye, beat her purple and blue, choked her, jumped on her chest and kicked her during a so-called ‘house robbery’ in which very little of any value was actually ‘robbed’. Volksblad journalist Vicüs Bürger reports that this is the third attack on elderly Afrikaners in Bloemfontein within a week. She was admitted to Pelonomi Hospital. The attacker merely ‘robbed’ some meat, cheese and clothing…

News report

_____________

Gruesome attack on Family

23 March 2010: “It was like something from a horror movier,” says Mr. Johan van Vuuren after five of his family members were violently attacked in their parents house in Jagersfontein.

His parents, Boet (80) and Francina (77), brothers Marius (44 - pictured above) and Marthinus (35) and nephew Juan (13) was attacked on Sunday evening in their house in Harrington street, Jagersfontein, by six men armed with spades and knives.

The attackers showed no mercy and left a bloody house behind..

Even Boet and Marius were cruelly assaulted, even though both are paralysed and in wheelchairs due to a marrow virus and a car accident respectively.

Francina van Vuuren remains critical in hospital

News report and here

____________

Elderly couple attacked on farm

25 March 2010: An elderly couple was seriously injured in a farm attack near Nelspruit, Mpumalanga police said on Thursday.

"The couple was found by their gardener when he came to work early in the morning and he went straight to the farm manager who phoned local security and police," said Inspector Dawie Pretorius.

The attack against the 82-year-old woman and 81-year-old man occurred on their farm, "Ooswes", in the Sterkspruit area in Nelspruit around 2am on Tuesday morning.

A group of men smashed through a glass door and attacked them before fleeing the scene with two cellphones and their truck.

The woman sustained serious head injuries and is in a critical condition in hospital.

News report

________________

Hat Tip: Dina and Censorbugbear