In Search of Equivalence

Experience has taught me never to accept anything I read in the papers or see on the TV at face value, and never, under any circumstances to assume that what I am being told is the full and unvarnished truth.

This is even more the case with high profile stories which dominate the news day after day and often week after week.

In much of the West, where truth and honour were once held to be so precious, journalism long ago ceased to be about accurately reporting news and instead has become more about creating a narrative, promoting an agenda or in many cases a means of suppressing or misrepresenting real events.

For that reason, in the current environment, the most appropriate response to anything the news media tells us is to ask three questions:

• Why are they telling me this?
• Is it true?
• What are they seeking to achieve?

In recent weeks with the exception of a few days of US election coverage (of which I will have more to say in a future posting) the news has been dominated, virtually to the expense of all else, by stories of long ago child abuse, most of it occurring thirty, forty or even fifty years ago.

None of this is exactly topical, in the first case the main suspect is now dead, and his accusers middle aged women, all recalling events in the 1960’s and 70’s.  The secondary suspects are old and diminished men, their fame a distant recollection even for their most argent fans, their alleged crimes historical events from another time.

Yes, some were one famous, and yes,if true, this may be a news story, but the main news story?, on every broadcast?, night after night, week after week?.  At a time when so much is going on, this is all we hear about?

The second story now appears to have been no story at all but an exercise in massive media fantasy wish fulfilment which fell apart in a mess of lies, false identifications and a flawed liberal, narrative always too eager to accuse rich and powerful white men of heinous acts and exploitation.

The second case has certainly gone very wrong for the BBC, whilst other media outlets, such a s channel four now rush to distance themselves from their earlier breathless reporting of the allegations.

Although under British law, proof of guilt is not predicated upon the number of people who make the same allegation, it does appear there may be some truth to what is said about Jimmy Saville, however, it is now clear that the allegations about poor old Lord MacAlpine are entirely false.

However, even if they has all been true, why were the decades old crimes of dead men and thirty year old allegations against long ago retired politicians the most important news story of the day, for weeks on end, now, all these years later in 2012?

The latest of the allegations may present some clues to what is going on. The, also very dead, heavy set politician Cyril Smith has been posthumously accused of spanking bare bottomed schoolboys during the 1960’s (Such allegations are, of course, all but impossible to prove 50 years later, and in any event according to the Beano, being spanked was an occupational hazard for schoolboys back in the 1960s). Like Jimmy Saville, Mr Smith is no longer here to defend himself, and, therefore, as the matter will never come to court, just about anything can be alleged. 

The media claims that the rumours about Smith have been around for years, but that is what we are told about all the accused, and, of course, there are rumours about most public figures, so why have they all come out now?

Cyril Smith, of course, was the member of Parliament for, …. guess where? …. he was MP for Rochdale.  Rochdale, of course was in the news earlier this year when a gang of Muslim men were convicted of grooming, raping, abusing and prostituting a large number of under aged white girls.  Now isn’t that a coincidence?

Are you starting to get the picture?

There is one very obvious reason that old news and lurid, unproven, and probably unprovable allegations of child abuse by old white men have been dominating the news since September, the media are in search of equivalence.

You can be sure that there are a number of big cases about to hit the courts featuring Muslim males and little white girls, so the press are desperate for news stories about the host community doing the same thing, even very old, and very dubious stories.

Can anyone be in doubt that were a group of  immigrants to be found committing acts of cannibalism the main news reports the next day would be about Sawney Bean and the legends of Scottish cannibal clans in 1500 AD.   

All this nonsense is the smoke screen which will enable the media to say “look, white men do it too!” 

MSNBC - the punishment of thought

It appears that the new policy of US Cable News channel MSNBC is to punish, and where possible suppress. free speech.  Regular conservative contributor, ex adviser to three American presidents and two time presidential election candidate, Pat Buchanan has been permanently suspended and may not be allowed back on air.  MSNBC have taken this action because they do not like what he said in his new book “The Suicide of a Superpower” which analyses and explains the reasons behind the decline of the once great nation of America.

MSNBC President Phil Griffin is quoted as saying : “I don’t think the ideas that Buchanan put forth are appropriate for national dialogue on MSNBC. He won’t be coming back during the book tour.” Asked if Buchanan would be be back at all, Griffin replied “I have not made my decision.”

The Liberal elite in America is outraged that Buchanan's brilliantly researched book directly links the decline in America's power, the dire state of her economy and near collapse of social cohesion on multiculturalism, mass non-European immigration and shrinking of the white majority. These are views which are an anathema to those who currently have their jackboots on the throats of the Western media, and views which they will go to any length to prevent being expressed, especially by individuals with the profile of Pat Buchanan.

To paraphrase George Orwell, we have reached a point within our society where to speak the truth is an act of revolution, it is an act which puts you and your livelihood at significant risk, because, if you speak the truth the liars and the tyrants will try to crush you. It is no longer just the little man, or woman, who speaks out of turn on a tram or a football terrace who they seek to destroy, they are now going after the titans.

However, we have seen it all before, in the last century and further east, in cultures which were our current leaders spiritual homes, where the truth became a crime, as it is now becoming throughout the west.

It seems easy and trite to say that the Soviet Union did not die, it just moved west, but in fact, in many of the ways that matter, that is the truth.  It is the same beast, it wears a different mask, but the same snarling jaws lurk behind it.

Massive Muslim Paedophile Gang Hidden by the Media

From 21st Century British Nationalism

On the 3rd January 2012 in Liverpool Crown Court 21 Muslims allegedly involved in a massive paedophile gang who are alleged to have been targeting primarily white children in the Manchester area were sent for a pre-trial hearing.

We have been informed from sources inside the court that the media have been asked by the Liverpool police to keep this case out of the papers.

Click here to continue reading

___________________________
Hat Tip: Mister Fox

The enemies amongst us

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through...all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.

For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.” - Marcus Tullius Cicero January 3, 106 BC – December 7, 43 BC

-/-

Those words, first spoken more that twenty one centuries ago have been quoted often during the ensuing millennia, and are repeated frequently by nationalists in our own time. We need not question their longevity, for they remain as relevant and as apt today as they did when Cicero spoke them in the first century BC. In fact they are words never more pertinent than today, for our modern society has so blurred the line between honour and betrayal, between truth and between lies that traitors can move more freely, can spread their poison more widely and can have a more devastating effect than at almost any previous time in our history.

It was the traitor who told us we must question our old certainties, but he did so not for the sake of enlightenment but to undermine the bedrock and mortar which maintained our unity and our resolve. With those certainties went our beliefs and our values leaving us adrift and exposed to the dark shapes circling around us, and it was then that the traitor began his real work.

I speak of “the traitor” but he is, in fact legion and has swiftly infected almost every corner of our once great societies.  He comes in many forms, ranging from the true believer determined to destroy Western man for the sake of an ever evolving ideology, they are fanatics yet capable of changing their modus but not their aims following the collapse of the Soviet Union.  At the other end of the scale are effectively, drones, brainwashed into doing what they have been taught to believe is right.  

Between those two extremes are the cynics including politicians and the very rich who gain short term material gain from the joint enterprise, the third world racists who are doing it out of hate, and the white inverted racists, whom Pat Buchanan refers to as "ethno-masochist", people who delight in inflicting harm on their own ethnic group so as to earn what they view as moral credits.     

They are in our police forces, they proliferate in our judiciary and in our institutions, they sit in parliament and they dominate our schools and places of education where they teach lies and half truths in place of history and tell our children to feel shame for their race.

In this article I plan to focus of one of their most deadly manifestations the manner in which they have captured and transformed the Western media and imposed their deformed narrative upon all mainstream sources of information to the point where the media in all its mainstream forms has become one of the most deadly enemies of the West.  Deadly because it is they who inject the poisons and administer the sedatives which render us unable and unwilling to resist what is being done to use.

They are with us twenty four hours a day, creating false realities, forming out opinions and telling us what to think, whilst stealthily terrorizing and intimidating us until we become ashamed and frightened of our natural instincts and progressively secret views and anything which, in another age would have given us courage and prompted us to resist their campaign against us.

Our news men have long ago given up reporting the facts with anything approaching balance , they no longer inform, they indoctrinate.  They have ceased to be reporters and have become propagandists and even more so they have become censors.  Facts and events which if reported could undermine the official message are suppressed, silenced and hurled into the great silent shredder where uncomfortable truths now go to die.

Those events which can not be buried and hidden away are presented as something other than what they are, as with the true nature of the so called Arab “spring” the real ethnic make up of the “English” rioters or the reality of underage sexual grooming in Britain.

A few generations before our own, journalism could still be viewed as an honourable trade, when reporter still viewed their roles as seekers of truth and exposers of wrong doing. There is now no honour left in their murky trade. The truth is now the very last thing they seek and facts are not exposed, they are spun to suit an agenda or to act as modern fables essential to the ongoing indoctrination.

It has reached the point that there is no benefit to be gained from watching a television news broadcast or reading a newspaper unless you accept that a significant part of what is being laid before you is pure fiction and the rest, unless it is ideologically neutral, which very little is, will feature half truths and distortions.  

Briefly we are seeing a shadow of these liars true nature.  This very week the Leveson Inquiry into abuses by the media are beginning to expose the total contempt and disregard for the public endemic within the culture of our newsrooms, however, this is only scratching at the surface of the true iniquity and inherent treachery within the fourth estate.   

The inquiry will not go further than exposing phone hacking and lying about individual victims, it will not examine the role of these creatures in what has been done to our society.  We are only able to read about it because one section of the media are enjoying undermining Rupert Murdoch, who's Fox News organisation is likely to be the only section of the US media to oppose Obama's reelection in 2012.   In any event news reporting is only part of the brainwashing, and in many ways not the most insidious.

Although the vast majority of those reading at this site take an interest in news and current affairs, and many of us spend hours tracking down the truth behind news stories we are a tiny minority. Most of the public, especially the young, take little if any interest in “the news”, however, the media have other and far more powerful means of lying to them, through entertainment and popular drama.

Through TV screens, cinemas, DVDs even the music they listen to and the “popular” internet sites they visit an alternative reality is projected to them which complements and bolsters the fake reality which was taught to them in school.

The alternative reality is effectively a reverse reality where multicultural diversity is cool, desirable and benign, whereas nationalism and any opposition to the third world colonisation of the West is evil, malevolent and ugly.

Non-whites are eternally intelligent. honourable and desirable, or the innocent victims of European prejudice.  If they are not victims they doctors, teachers, scientists, policemen or in other ways heroic, whereas all paedophiles, rapists, serial killers bigots and, of course, all racists are white.

Then we have advertising which is beginning to take on a surreal element reminiscent of 1930’s style soviet Union style propaganda. For instance when happy white families spread Clover butter substitute on their sandwiches while gleefully applauding benign and elderly black musicians and when virtually every commercial for beauty products shampoo or slimming aids, as if by mandate have to feature three females “best friends” of politically correct differing ethnic shades, how do these differ from the images of happy peasants waving their scythes and sickles over a plentiful harvest, which were used by Russian propagandist to disguise a very different and far less attractive reality?.     

Beyond brainwashing the media has a more sinister role in spreading terror and encouraging obedience they do this by ensuring that any transgressors, and any who dare question the new orthodoxy are punished severely, humiliatingly and in public.  When the modern media exposes alleged “ra##ists” like Tiger Woods ex-caddy, or, they hope, John Terry, they are performing the same function as the stocks in medieval town squares, or the show trials behind the old Iron Curtain, their purpose being to scare the public into acquiescence.

To a monumental degree they have been extraordinarily successful in their malevolent scheme.

It has long been clear that the western media are among the greatest enemies of Western society, they are the traitors within our walls, it is they who are beaming their poison and their lies into our homes day after days, brainwashing, and terrorizing us, creating a false reality and hiding the truth from us.

Mass media has the means to create great good, however, it is being use to achieve great evil.

It is the agent which has brought us to where we are and it is the poison which will kill us.  We will not succeed, we will not survive unless be can break its deadly grip on our crippled and dying countries and expose the monsters lurking behind the toxic smokescreen they have created.           
                   
     

The Beeb does it again

See the BBC's latest lying hatchet job on the EDL at the Gates of Vienna by Clicking Here

___________________________
Q: How can you tell a BBC newsreader is lying: A: They are conscious and looking at a camera


___________
Hat Tip: Mister Fox

Whiteout

 

Anyone who has watched the British TV news today or read the papers will know that the censoring has begun.

When the recent rioting broke out, it was so unexpected, and there was such pressure to get film and photographs out and onto our TV screens, that the media did not have time to sanitise the images we were allowed to see in the usual way, therefore, for once, and very briefly, we were afforded a glimpse of the truth.

Now that things have calmed down, it is business as usual and the media is busily re-writing history. Much of the film seen at the weekend has vanished and will never be seen again.  Meanwhile, the focus has been fixed firmly on the small number of white people you have been charged with public order offences.  In fact at least one news report this evening only showed white mugshots.

At the same time film is rapidly vanishing from YouTube, who are doing their usual censorship job.

Therefore it is very important that those of you who did save images or download film which the media let slip through at the weekend, keep them safe, as they may become very rare, and provide some of the only surviving records of what actually happened in London over the last six days.

Pravda (Channel 4) and the UK Police state 2011

 

Alex Thompson reporting from the pretend war zone 

When Asian and Turkish people gather to protect their shops and businesses against rioters, they are praised by the media for "protecting their community".  Meanwhile, white hating liberal's like Christina Odone, a woman's who's one time editorship of the Catholic Herald reduced it to something mostly suitable for lining a parrot's cage, write articles like this, praising the immigrants for, as she puts it, “loving this country more than we do”.

Meanwhile when whites assemble to protect their communities, such as happened in Eltham, they are called “thugs” and “vigilantes”.  Police arrive en-masse and deliberately, albeit relatively unsuccessfully, attempt to provoke violence, in order to cause a "white riot", whilst the lying scum from Channel 4, who had obviously been invited to the show, produce a dishonest and misleading report like this one.      

On the TV news report, it was claimed that white residents "attacked the police" however, despite the presence of TV cameras, this was not shown, in fact apart from close up film of one broken bottle (who knows who threw it, or when), no evidence of violence was shown. It was also claimed that people were shouting "racist abuse" although this was also not shown.

There was no trouble in Eltham, the police attempted to provoke white residents into violence for propaganda purposes, however, apart from, maybe, on frustrated bottle thrower, they did not succeed. Meanwhile so called “journalists” attempted draw an equivalence between the predominantly black rioters, and the peaceful white residents of Eltham.

This is what passes for “truth”, "justice" and “news reporting” in England in 2011. 
__________________

Related (and amusing) article on Simon Darby's site here.

Dishonest reporter attempts to make victim blame whites for all black attack

 

A blatant attempt to bully the witness and distort the news - video.  

When the photo tells the lie

Whoever said 'the camera never lies' had not taken into account the lying scumbag behind the lens or sitting at the editorial desk.  This picture, which appeared above on the front page of the main daily free London paper The Metro and in various other publications, is an insult to the Metro's hundreds of thousands of readers, it is an insult to London and worst of all it is an insult to the fading memory of journalism.

PRAVDA circa 1964 would have been proud of such work, any western newspaper should be ashamed of such a blatant attempt to misrepresent the truth.

   

Toxic Media

So, after 168 years the new world media has destroyed that long established British Institution the News of the World, the final edition of which was published on Sunday. First launched in 1843, the News of the World has been part of British life for generations, and despite its reputation for sex and scandal it has many journalistic achievements to its name, albeit considerably less so in recent years, when, under its final management it changed from a saucy but campaigning tabloid, to something altogether more vindictive and malign.

I was only even an occasional News of the World reader myself, however, given its impressive sales figures, clearly millions of people were readers, and, in any event it is sad to see something which has been around so long being willfully destroyed by what can only be described as malevolence.

For, that, of course, is what happened, the News of the World did not follow the likes of Today or the Daily Sketch, failed news papers which closed due to collapsing circulation.  In terms of sales it was amongst the most successful of the main stream media. That is, it was successful, until the revelations of what its reporters, editors and some of its employees had been up to were revealed and turned the brand from popular to poisonous overnight.

If there is anyone left on the planet who does not know what had been going on at the News of the World the details are extremely distasteful.  When it first became known that some News of the World reporters, and individuals working under contract to the paper, had been hacking into the mobile phone voice mails of celebrities, politicians and royalty, few people apart from the victims themselves were particularly concerned. Rightly or wrongly, we have come to view public figures as fair game, and most people tend to subscribe to the flawed by compelling opinion that such individuals have placed themselves in the public eye, gained considerably from so doing, and therefore, deserve what they get.

However, that all changed when it became clear that the phone hacking extended to people who were not public figures. The mobile phones belonging to missing children were also hacked, the distraught messages from those missing children's parents were listened to and some even deleted in order to make room for more, an act which inevitably gave the parents of at least one missing girl hope their child was alive and listening to her messages, when she was in fact already dead.  The phone of the parents of other murdered children and fallen soldiers, were also being hacked  into, as were those belonging to survivors of terrorism, their private messages listened to in the hope some snippet of conversation could be exploited for news and profit.

For most of us it is hard to comprehend how people could be so callous, how they could have such contempt for the victims of such terrible crimes that they could cynically sit and listen to such tragic messages and then delete them to make room for more. Perhaps, even more cynical, even more heartless were those who paid others to do the hacking and deleting for them.

Tonight allegations of similar acts have been made against other newspapers, including ones which view themselves as more "up market" than the news of the world .  This is hardly a surprise, as one other recent incident confirms.  Whist the revelations about the News of the World were taking place, another story hit the headlines, one which may seem unconnected, but which I think was very much connected. 

29 year old Kia Abdullah is what one might call a westernised lipstick Muslim, she has written a couple of "controversial" novels and is a journalist who regularly contributes to the Guardian.  On July 1st Abdullah wrote a message to her followers on Twitter regarding the death of three young British men who had been killed in a bus accident in Thailand.  She stated that she was unable to feel any sympathy for anyone who had died whilst enjoying a “gap year”, and revealed she had grinned when noticing that two of the victims had “double barreled” names.

Abdullah has come in for a deal of criticism following that Tweet and has quickly issued a career defending apology, claiming she was guilty of ill advised “black humour”. However, Abdullah's real error was that she revealed in public, sentiments which would have elicited empathetic nods and even some laughter, had she instead expressed them within the elitist media circles into which her ideology, race and connections grant her access.

What do these two events reveal to us about the news media and the people who see it as their role to inform the public and form their opinions? Both examples demonstrate a complete lack of empathy with those outside the cozy media tepee.

It is hardly surprising that those working within the media lose any sense of empathy or fellowship for the wider public, a conman will soon learn to despise his victims and likewise a journalist will soon feel contempt for those he or she is employed to deceive.

When one is required to lie to and mislead a group of people on a regular ongoing basis it is inevitable that one will eventually begin to view that group as “the other” and then, eventually as “the enemy”.  It is human nature for people to lose all empathy or common feeling for a group they perceive as their enemies and eventually to cheer and applaud their destruction.

This is, I believe, how much of the Western media view the Western public for whom they write and perform.  How else is it that they can not only have such scant regard for the wellbeing of their readers and viewers, but actively seek to deceive them in ways which can only do harm to them?

The media, together with police and politicians, have for decades actively covered up the extraordinarily disproportionate level of violence perpetrated by newcomers to Britain against the host population, and they have done so in the full knowledge that their actions will lead, and have led, directly to the violent deaths of increasing numbers of indigenous white Britons.

In fact they have gone further than that they have distorted the truth, by means such as for example constantly resurrecting a single seventeen year old, alleged, white on black hate crime in order to portray, immigrants, who they know full well are the overwhelming perpetrators of hate crimes, as the primary victims of hate crimes.

This goes beyond ideology, this behavour reveals a reckless disregard for the well being of those they are slandering, bordering on hostility.

In the same way, for years the media, and their co-conspirators have covered up the abuse and sexual grooming of young white children by Asian males, and have conspired in the vilification and attempted prosecution of anyone seeking to expose these crimes.  Again they have done this bin the full knowledge that their very actions will lead, and have led, to the abuse of countless children, who might otherwise have been protected.

Even when they could no longer cover up the crimes, as I revealed recently the media, en mass, deliberately misrepresented the figures in order to downplay the involvement of the main perpetrators, whilst over exaggerating the involvement of the majority indigenous population.

Meanwhile trained economists working within the media, have actively suppressed evidence of the huge social and economic damage caused by mass immigration whilst promoting highly dubious “evidence” of benefits.

This is not unique to British media, at the present time the US press are deliberately failing to report growing levels of pre-arranged anti-white racial attacks by black mobs. Or when they are reported, all mention of race is omitted and efforts made to mislead reader and viewers into believing the attackers are white.  Meanwhile those rare genuine white perpetrator hate crimes receive coast to coast publicity.    

America, of course, is currently led by the least qualified and most incompetent presidents in living memory, yet he is ferociously protected by the media, who hide evidence of his shortcomings and savage anyone they perceive as a threat to him.

All questions about the president’s eligibility are ridiculed or suppressed by the media.  The White House recently published a document purporting to be the president’s birth certificate, this was accepted, without question by the media.  Since then numerous graphics experts have denounced the document as a fraud,  whilst the single expert wrongly quoted by the media as claiming it to be genuine has been actively prevented from publishing a correction.

However, those members of the public who still naively rely on the legacy media for their news are not permitted to know any of this.

Elsewhere in the world, extremely troubling and potentially dangerous developments are taking place in the Middle East, yet these are presented to a gullible public as optimistic signs of budding democracy, and laughably dubbed an Arab Spring, when little could in fact be further from the truth.

We are again being lulled into a false security, and we should ask ourselves why.  If those behind the microphones and in front of the cameras are supporting what is going on in the Middle East, experience tells us it can not be good for the West.

The Western Media is one of the most dangerous and malevolent forces currently threatening the Western World.  For many millions of people the mainstream media remain the primary source of news and information, and as such the media are the gatekeepers to knowledge. They control what the public are allowed to know, what they are not allowed to know and also what they can be led to believe.

If people are to make wise decisions, we need to know the truth, but if those controlling access to the truth do not have our best interests at heart them we are doomed.

Too many of those working in the media do not have our best interests at heart, they despise us, lie to us and view us with contempt. Many actively wish us ill. Recent revelations about the News of the World and Kia Abdullah’s vindictive tweet, gave us a glimpse of that uncomfortable truth.

Feeding Frenzy in Alaska

US Media descend on Wasilla Alaska

The media feeding frenzy in America over the release of 24,000 e-mails written by Sarah Palin during her period as governor of Alaska has certainly been unedifying.

At a time when the US economy is on the brink of going into free fall, where the true level of unemployment is at least twice the official figure of 9.1% and the country, not unlike our own, has been getting involved in some very unwise conflicts in the Middle East, the American News media is scurrying to Alaska in order to search through thousands of pages in the hope of finding something .... anything ... which they can use to either mock Mrs. Palin, or, if they strike gold, to prove she is a bad person.

Sarah Palin is, of course. a private citizen, she holds no official office and has not declared herself a candidate for any political race. Yet the rapidly shrinking titans of American journalism are frantic to destroy her.

This same media who have refused to investigate the myriad inconsistencies in the current US president's background, who have actively withheld material which might show him in an unfavourable light,* studiously ignored any number of gaffes and blunders he has committed, and accepted without the merest hesitation the highly dubious proof of birth he recently released, is prepared to go to any lengths to investigate and expose every typographical error and unscripted aside committed to e-mail by a woman whom they insist is too dumb to threaten their big eared darling in a future electoral contest.

So afraid are they that they that they might miss the “Gotcha!”e-mail that both the New York Times and the Washington Post have asked their readers to assist them in searching through this treasure trove of electronic trivia in the hope of spotting a Palin tongue slip.   

It isn't only in America where the anticipation is unrestrained. NewsNight's Emily Maitlis giggled like an excited schoolgirl last night when discussing with a US colleague by satellite what potential gems might come to light.

Twenty four hours later, and if this report is anything to go by, things are not looking so rosy for the Palin hating media. So far no smoking gun has been unearthed but instead only evidence of a hard working Governor, who was empathetic towards her staff and generally a pleasant and decent person.  To his credit the Journalist reporting from Wasilla had the good grace to look ashamed. (or is he just grieving for his career?)

Of course, they will find something they can distort and exploit. After all how many of us could survive quite such close scrutiny of two to three years worth of our private e-ail exchanges.

However, this episode together the ongoing, and almost unprecedented campaign of vilification, mockery and blatant distortion which has been waged against Sarah Palin since McCain announced she would be his running mate in 2008, says a great deal more about the US media and the American left wing than it does about Sarah Palin.

It also tells us a lot about the current occupier of the White House, a man who has never had to fight his own battles and who has been protected and shielded by an obedient and entirely dishonest media ever since he stepped onto the political stage. Their determination to crush Sarah Palin is motivated entirely by the threat which they perceive she may pose to him, and they will not stop their search and destroy mission as long as she continues to pose that threat.

At present no other potential challenger is viewed as a threat to Obama, however, should one appear on the scene, they will be treated in exactly the same way.

However, it may be the media has over played its hand and that, finally the American public have started to see through what they are doing.  Let us hope so, if not for Sarah Palin's sake, for America's.     

______________________________

*The Los Angeles Times refused to make public videotape in its possession of Obama speaking at a dinner honouring radical Palestinian Jew-hater Khalid Rashidi (a tape which potentially could have alienated many Jewish Obama supporters and donors in 2008, and in 2012).  Meanwhile John Romano of Yes But However documents CBS's refusal to make public the entire hot mic recordings of Obama talking to donors (what could it be they did not want the public to hear?

_____
Hat Tip Thomas Lifson at American Thinker

BBC Lies of Omission

BBC's report of EDL Leader Tommy Robinson's trial omits certain key details.

Click here to read the details at the New English Review

___________

Hat Tip Mister Fox

An Old Evil Still Craving Blood

A group of octogenarian Kenyan ex-Mau-Mau terrorists have begun a legal action in London's high court, seeking compensation for alleged abuse they suffered in the 1950’s, when Britain was still the colonial rulers, and they were part of a Communist backed insurgency. As this case continues we can be sure there will be some very selective media reporting of details revealed in the high court.

Apart from the couple of left wing historians who are supporting the plaintiffs, and wilfully blind to any facts which conflict with their anti-British prejudice, anyone who has studied the uprising will be nauseated by the obscenity of any member of the Mau- Mau accusing anyone else of an atrocity.

The media sneer that only 32 whites were killed by the Mau-Mau, but fail to mention the tens of thousand of blacks they killed (estimates range from 11,000 to over 100,000) and how they were killed. It is hard to read of incidents such as the Lari massacre, where 120 Christian Kikuyu were either burnt alive or hacked to bits in a single act, which horrifyingly foreshadowed events in Rwanda almost 40 years later, without questioning the humanity of those capable of doing such things.

Of course, we will not hear of that, nor will be hear of the oath taking ceremonies, where the use of victims body parts, usually cut from victims whist they still lived, combined sorcery with a particularly African form of terror.

The Oath taking made the killers all the more deadly. A man who has swallowed the eye plucked from a living child whilst promising to kill for his God, Ngai, will not easily surrender or abandon his deadly cause, and regular exposure to such horrors will inure him to the savagery he must in turn commit.

It is also unlikely, we will hear that the Colonial government were faced with one of the first recorded instances of biological warfare being used by insurgents, when herds of cattle owned by loyal African tribes were poisoned by the insurgents in order intimidate their black owners and punish them from supporting the Colonial government.

In truth, the vast majority of the native Kenyans were loyal to the Colonial government, but every man woman and child was under threat from violent terrorists capable of the most unspeakable savagery.

There may have only been thirty two white victims, but their deaths were marked by inhuman levels of brutal cruelty

Dr Esme Ruck, well known for providing free medicine to Africans, had her unborn child ripped from her belly, her husband Roger was hacked to death with machetes and her six year old son Michael was dispatched amongst his toy trains and Teddy bears, his tiny body partially skinned.

One of Michael’s killers was a man who had worked for the Ruck’s for years, but who had joined in the slaughter knowing what would face him if he didn’t. An incentive reinforced by the fact that a Kikuyu house servant who did not participate was also killed. It is thus that terror begets terror.

Even younger than Michael Ruck was four year old Andrew Stevens who met a similar fate, chopped to death while playing in the family garden a few months later. Unless his parents still live, who still remembers that young life?

Other deaths were just as savage but their victims took longer to die. After being forced to watch the rape and murder of his wife Arundell Gray Leakey was force marched to the lower slopes of Mount Kenya, where the Kikuyu believe Ngai resides. He was then disembowelled and buried upside down, alive.

In another act of unspeakable barbarism, two teen aged boys Geoffrey Danby and Christopher Robin Twohey, 15 and 13 respectively were captured while out riding their bicycles and sexually tortured for some hours before they were killed. To the mau mau a young white boy was a prize to be enjoyed.

A now long neglected gravestone in Nairobi's City Park cemetery (pictured above) is all that now stands testimony to the short lives and cruel deaths of those children. It reads

“In proud and loving memory of two innocent victims, murdered by the mau mau on April 20th 1955, Geoffrey Danby aged 15 years and his friend Christopher Robin Twohey aged 13 years, suffer little children to come unto me”.

You can be sure there will no mention of those two boys or any of the Mau-Mau's other victims in the news reports you will hear about this case.

Thousands of Africans were killed in even crueller ways, the horrors inflicted upon them intended to punish them and terrify others.

What chance is there that the craven, lying, media will publish a word of that? This is not the truth they want to tell, these are not the facts they want the public to know.

When interviewing hate raddled Harvard educated “historian” Caroline Elkins, the author of Imperial Reckoning: The Untold Story of Britain's Gulag in Kenya (a title referenced in some of the pre-prepared signs carried by the plaintiffs) who is supporting the claims of atrocities, and who's "research" effectively led to this case being launched, Channel 4's Jon Snow behaved as if he was in the presence of some great authority on African history and not the politically driven hack many of her contemporaries (and betters) consider her to be.

Tellingly there was mention the serious criticism of Elkin's work has received, such as fellow historian James Mitchell's comment that Elkins “doesn't let facts stand in the way of a good rant.” or David Elstein assessment of her research that that her casualty figures are derived from an idiosyncratic reading of census figures and a tendentious interpretation of the fortified village scheme.

Elkins' Harvard colleague Niall Ferguson, who's acclaimed if chilling series “Civilisation – is the West History?” is currently running on Channel 4 politely described Elkin's book as a highly "sensationalist account of the rebellion". Meanwhile Rutger's university Professor Susan Carruthers accused Elkins of being excessively condescending towards the Kikuyu whilst casting the white settlers as “cartoonish grotesques”

There was of course no mention of that or that demographer John Blacker writing in African Affairs demonstrated in detail that Elkins' estimates of casualties were grossly over estimated.

No doubt both Snow and Elkins would view the attacks by white academics as inspired by racism, however, they are not alone Kenyan historian Bethwell Ogot, currently the chancellor of Moi University, accused Elkins of being ideologically “incapable of seeing atrocities on the part of the mau mau”. Ogot goes on to say of the mau mau:

“..assaulted old people, women and children. The horrors they practiced included the following: decapitation and general mutilation of civilians, torture before murder, bodies bound up in sacks and dropped in wells, burning the victims alive, gouging out of eyes, splitting open the stomachs of pregnant women. No war can justify such gruesome actions. In man’s inhumanity to man there is no race distinction. The Africans were practising it on themselves."

However, such facts will not appear in the media reporting of this case, and probably not in the increasingly truth free environment of a British Court

Yet it is on the politically motivated words of “historians” such as Caroline Elkins that this prosecution and the reporting of it is based.

The truth is that the colonial government were faced with one of the most brutal uprisings in British history, when thousands of innocent citizens under British protection were being slaughtered. However, far from the racist caricatures penned by Ms. Elkins, justice continued to be applied fairly the courts regularly threw out prosecution evidence in one instance 48 men facing the death penalty had their convictions overturned at just one appeal hearing.

Of course the approach taken was tough, it had to be, and there certainly was some mistreatment, however, here we come to another lie which the media and the pretend historians will tell, or more likely, allow to be perceived.

The media will find ways of suggesting that any brutality which captured Mau Mau terrorists did suffer was inflicted on them by white men. In fact the vast majority of all violence on both sides during the uprising was black on black. The mau mau had especially targeted the families of loyal black policemen and soldiers, and some retaliation may have been enacted when they were captured. However, the images of white men torturing blacks which the media is seeking to evoke are complete fantasy.

Of course this is not the first such trial, remember the lurid stories of British soldiers who had supposedly been raping hundreds of Kenyan woman? You perhaps will not remember how quietly those stories were dropped when it all turned out to be a pack of lies.

Our history is being rewritten by charlatanism and people who hate us, this includes the history of our empire, it is done to undermine, to damage and to destroy us. This in itself is a crime, but it is a crime which becomes an obscenity when truly evil men and women, such as those behind the Mau Mau atrocities can come forward claiming compensation and be treated as victims by corrupt historians and a by a debased and lying media.

One rule for them #2

There is a rather shocking news story in Cleveland Texas at the moment regarding the rape of an 11 year old Hispanic girl by anything up to 28 black males. The case is shocking not only because of the horrific nature of the event but because of the reaction of the media and various pundits all busily attempting to defend their own agendas against the indefensible.

Black Community Activist Quanell X has held a rally where he has claimed that the police are actively only arresting African Americans who had sex with the girl, and "ignoring all the white rapists". His argument appears to be that as the girl herself is not black, she couldn't only have been raped by black men, hence there must be another gang of white rapists who the police are refusing to arrest. I guess that must make sense to him.

Mr. 'X' has also claimed he has received death threats, but by all accounts he does tend to say that quite a lot.

Initially much of the media attempted to hide the race of the of the suspects, but when that became impossible, they resorted to stating only that "most of" the suspects were black, with the implication that some were not - albeit no non-black suspect have jet been identified.

Meanwhile, most of the US media continues to hide the ethnicity of the victim, thus enabling them to suggest that the "racial tensions" caused by the alleged crime, are white against black, rather than between the black and Hispanic Communities.

Worst of all have been the attempts to blame the pre-teen victim for what was done to her. This does not just extend to the local community, but even the mainstream media is repeating the claims. Can you imagine an Associated Press report repeating unchallenged allegations, as they have in the video below, that an adult rape victim, let alone a child, "wore make up" and "dressed provocatively" had she not been guilty of the unforgivable crime of being raped by black men?

This standard of reporting continued in the New York Times, who some will recall treated the black stripper and sometime prostitute who falsely accused three white Duke Lacrosse players of rape in 2006, as if she was a virginal and victimised epitome of all virtue, but in this case chose to report unfounded allegations regarding the victim's behaviour. Remember this is an eleven year old child they are describing.

For some journalists no level is too low they will not sink to it.

UK Censors ban reader comments over Warsi Islamophobia remarks

Please spread this story as widely as possible, people need to know how much censorship and media distortion goes on.

__________
Hat Tip: The British Resistance

More Anti-White Media lies

From cofcc.org

Next time you see white people on tv risking their lives to feed and rescue black people, remember this hateful anti-white article published in USA Today.

An article in USA Today claims that “both blacks and Hispanics were twice as likely as whites to have performed heroic deeds.” The source for the claim is a Philip Zimbardo, a professor emeritus at Stanford University.

He backs up this claim by saying that blacks and Hispanics are better heroes because they are “discriminated against.” They become heroes by “standing up to discrimination.” Then he follows by saying blacks and Hispanics have “more compassion to others in need.”

According to Zimbardo, these white volunteers rescuing Haitians don’t know what being a real hero is. They have never been discriminated against by the evil white man. I guess that is why so few black Americans volunteered to go to Haiti. They were all too busy being heroes by standing up to the white mans’ “discrimination” in the United States.

The entire article is nothing more than a vicious slur against white people.

This Philip Zimbardo is a fanatical leftist who claims it is discrimination for a landlord not to let someone squat in his apartment for free.

From Brainy Quotes…

I was discriminated against because I was Jewish, Italian, black and Puerto Rican. But maybe the worst prejudice I experienced was against the poor. I grew up on welfare and often had to move in the middle of the night because we couldn’t pay the rent. – Philip Zimbardo

Zimbardo has made a name for himself advocating his “Luficer effect” theory as to why “good people turn evil.” He claims social conditioning turns people bad, not genetics. This is a major tenant of the social Marxism espoused by the Frankfurt school.

He takes the name of his theory from John Milton’s Paradise Lost, which Zimbardo comically confuses with Old Testament “scripture.” The word Lucifer does not even appear in the Old Testament except for the King James Version, where it is used once. The story he describes as “from scripture” is actually from John Milton’s 17th century epic poem Paradise Lost. Milton re-writes the Devil as a more sympathetic “Lucifer” based on of the Greek deity Prometheus. However, Milton certainly did not advocate any social conditioning psycho-babble.

Full story from USA Today:

New research would seem to support President Obama’s observation Wednesday night in Tucson that “heroism is here, all around us.”Philip Zimbardo, a Stanford University professor emeritus and colleagues used a nationally-representative sample of 4,000 adults and found that 20% qualified as heroes — they had helped during a dangerous emergency, taken a stand against injustice, or sacrificed for a stranger.Obama cited Congressional intern Daniel Hernandez, who helped Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords after she was critically wounded, along with doctors and bystanders after an assassination attempt that killed six others and left 13 wounded.

“Heroes are ordinary people,” says Zimbardo, of San Francisco. “You become a hero by doing an extraordinary deed.”In the study, both blacks and Hispanics were twice as likely as whites to have performed heroic deeds. Zimbardo says they want to do follow-up research on the reasons for the racial/ethnic differences, which he speculates could be attributed to “greater opportunities to respond” or “being discriminated against makes them have more compassion to others in need.”The study, supported by the Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education at Stanford, asked participants “Have you ever done something that other people — not necessarily you yourself — considered a heroic act or deed?” Those who answered “yes” selected from a list the actions most similar to their own: helping another person in a dangerous emergency; “blowing the whistle” on an injustice with awareness of the personal risk or threat to yourself; sacrifice on behalf of a non-relative or stranger, such as an organ donation; defying unjust authority; or other.Among the 20% who met the survey definition, 55% had helped someone during an emergency, 8% confronted an injustice, 14% had defied unjust authority and 5% had sacrificed for a stranger.”These are people who did very dramatic things,” Zimbardo says. “They’re everyday quiet heroes.”The survey also found someone is more likely to be a hero if the individual has experienced a personal trauma or disaster; or the individual has previously volunteered in non-threatening settings, such as at a soup kitchen.Social psychologist Scott Allison of Richmond, Va., says Hernandez’ reaction is common among those cited for heroic deeds.”It is part modesty, but what they’re also acknowledging is that it’s the situation that gives rise to heroism more than anything else. We call it a ‘heroic moment.’ The terrible tragedy produced heroic opportunities for everyday people to do something extraordinary,” he says.For the book Heroes: What They Do & Why We Need Them, which Allison co-authored, face-to-face interviews with 450 adults asked them to name their heroes and explain why. The survey produced a pattern of traits common to heroes, including intelligence, courage, charisma and selflessness, he says.”We have a need for heroes because we have a need to be challenged,” Allison says. “We love heroes because of what they offer us — hope for better world.The future is just why Zimbardo says he created the nonprofit Heroic Imagination Project, which has begun with pilot programs for adolescents in the Bay area.”At a very deep psychological level, we all need and want heroes to be special people to inspire us,” he says. “Heroes are really the soul of a nation. They represent what is best in human nature.”

Hate and (Media) Lies in America

The controlled media in America continue to exploit the attempted assassination of Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords at the weekend, during which six people died and a number more were injured. True to type the left have resorted to the politics of the gutter, with the aim of blaming the Tea Party for the shooting and getting a few cheap jibes at Sarah Palin, who they accuse of "creating a climate of hate".

Even Fox News has got in on the act with an attempt to link the shooter, a pot smoking, left wing American flag burner, to American Renaissance, albeit they are rapidly rowing back on that claim as it becomes more obvious that their "evidence" is not what it appears.

However, as usual with the controlled media, what they don't want you to know is covered up, such as the article below, which appeared on the Democrat supporting Daily Kos website just two days before the shooting, showing that, in fact sources on the left were guilty of stirring up feelings against Congresswoman Giffords in the days leading up to the attack.

Click on the image to see a larger version

Genocide by stealth - Part 3

Part 1
Part 2

In the first two parts of this essay I set out to demonstrate that acts have been committed against the white European race, over the last half century or more, which meet at least two of the definitions of genocide as laid out under Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

Measures have been put in place intended to prevent births amongst white Europeans and which have resulted in the termination or prevention of the birth of, at the very least, tens of millions of white children. Taken altogether across the western world, the number of potential births amongst our ethnic group which have been prevented either by chemical means or by active physical intervention is in the hundreds of millions.

Meanwhile, conditions of life have been inflicted upon us which are already leading to our destruction, at least in part.

That these acts have been committed, that they were deliberate and are resulting in the outcomes I described in parts one and two is self evidently true. Furthermore, the fact that, in combination theses acts, measures and policies have brought us to the brink of a tipping point beyond which, we cannot, as a people, recover, is also beyond question. They have.

It also can not be denied that, although as a people we, native Europeans, have faced war, famine pestilence and catastrophe we have never before come so close to our own annihilation.

What is, however, open to question is why is it happening, who is doing it and what they are actually seeking to achieve.

Up until now I have laid facts before you, however, in an attempt to make sense of those facts I can now only give you my own view, my analysis if you prefer, of what has happened and why.

To the question “Is there a conspiracy to destroy the white race?”, I have to say in my view the answer is considerably more complex than some of my fellow travellers would like to believe. What we face is not a single malevolent conspiracy, but a many headed hydra formed of any number aims ambitions, hatreds and ideologies, all of differing degrees of malevolence, which have come together, on the coat tails of a historical conspiracy, to attack us at a time when we are at the least able to defend ourselves.

Not all which has been done has been with malevolent intent, I rather placed my credibility on the line by linking the contraceptive pill to genocide in an earlier part of this essay, and I know that, on at least one of the other sites where my earlier articles have been republished, some people who have not done what I asked, and viewed these things in context, have mocked me for it. I do not necessarily believe that, in isolation, the pill was developed or legalised with the deliberate intention of damaging the native European race. However, I submit that it has done so, and as I stated previously, its introduction on the scene coincided with other factors which in combination have been unremittingly negative.

The pill, together with abortion, and what one might call “breeding unfriendly” changes to the economic model, have not only speeded up the pace of our decline but they have provided succour to attitudes which were most certainly encouraged with malevolent intent. The pill has been used far less to regulate the size of families as it has been used to put off childbirth, often altogether, and that has been of inestimable damage to us, collectively, as a people.

Some of my critics may wish to argue that the decline of the greatest civilisation the world has ever seen is a worthwhile sacrifice in order to enable a rapidly reducing number of individuals to enjoy the transitory pleasures of a child free lifestyle. However, it is for them to make that case, but at this point I do not buy it.

However, in other areas there is no doubt as to the malevolence of the forces ranged against us. Some of the most savagely malign of those forces exist within the arts and academia, where many do not even attempt to disguise their genocidal intent. Who can forget the words of Harvard Professor Noel Ignatiev, (1) author of “When the Irish became White” and co-editor of the “Race Traitor” magazine, when he said: “The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.” or “The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race.” and of course: “we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed--not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.”

Ignatiev is not alone, his brand of poison pervades learning institutions throughout the West. Anyone who followed the attempts to rail-road three innocent lacrosse players at North Carolina's Duke University, following the false rape claims of black “exotic dancer” in 2006 as closely as I did, could not fail to be shocked by the levels of mindless, visceral hatred towards white males which exists within American academia. It would be hard to exaggerate how passionately so many eminent members of the Duke faculty, journalists, media talking heads and so called “community organisers” wanted those boys to be guilty. For many, guilt or innocence was not an issue, they simply craved blood in order to slake their hatred.

However, how is it that the views of such unattractive and ideologically diseased individuals such as Noel Ignatiev and so many members of the Duke faculty have gained such purchase and become so all pervading within Western culture? To find an answer to that question we need ton go back a century and a half, or even more, and there we do find a conspiracy.

The conspiracy against Western Christian / capitalist society began in the 19th Century, if not before. It did not start as a conscious attack on white, Europeans, however, it inevitably became one, initially for no other reason than that Western society was white, European, society.

It is at this point in the narrative that I must nod in the direction of those of my critics who accuse me of being an apologist for Zionism, and admit that it is impossible to ignore the Jewish role in the early efforts to undermine Western Society. Jews featured disproportionately amongst those who took Marxist theory forward and set up the great and deadly Communist monoliths which crushed vast sections of humanity, throughout the twentieth century. A significant majority of those who formed the subversive Frankfurt School of thinking in the 1930's, those who developed critical theory and that most evil and damaging of all ideologies, political correctness were Jewish academics and Jewish political thinkers.

It was by no means exclusively Jewish, but it was overwhelmingly so. It is also impossible to dismiss the current role of Jews within academia not to mention the Jewish anti-white propagandists within the media and, of course Hollywood.

However, although it would be ignorant and dishonest to dismiss the role Jews played in the early efforts to undermine Western society and the role which many eminent Jews still play within the massed ranks ranged against us, it is also possible to overestimate their role. When those within the Nationalist community blame all the attacks on the white European race on the Jews and on some vast Zionist conspiracy they are addressing a single, historical and rapidly shrinking foe, while ignoring many far more vicious and, now more dangerous adversaries.

Marxism is at the root of all our problems and it was those early Marxists, Trotskyites, Stalinists, Maoists and sundry Socialists of the late 19th and early 20th centuries in general certainly who set the great ball of anti-white genocide in motion when they set out to destroy Western Capitalism. However, we are certainly not, today, where they once planned to take us.

I would liken the early communist conspirators, malevolent as they may have been, to a deluded scientist who created a faulty chemical weapon, which once injected into its victim takes on a life of its own, driven on mindlessly by the flaws within its design and independent of the plans of its designer.

Those, including many Jews who conspired against our grandfathers imagined that we would today be living under universal Marxist rule, not that we would be facing the prospect of a Universal Islamic caliphate.

I suspect that were those who first sowed the seeds of our destruction alive today, they would look on in horror at the monster they have created, for it will devour them, and their plans no less ravenously than it will destroy us. At the risk of reigniting the anger of my critics against me, I would argue that, whatever, past difference there may have been, now is the time for Jews, together with gays and true feminists to join with White Nationalists, for it is we, not what is coming to ensure their protection, freedom and very existence.

As I say, the aim was to destroy Western capitalism, but with the demise of what was intended to replace it, the agenda has morphed into the destruction of the European race, and without any other ambition, the destruction has become the purpose rather than merely the agent of change.

Before the fall of the Soviet Union the Marxist cause had made huge advances. Nobody living in the 1950's or 1960's would have been accused of being a conspiracy theorist had they claimed that there were people within our society working for its destruction, because there were. Communism made no secret of its sworn aim to dominate the world and, unlike with Islam today, there were no politically correct scruples against acknowledging it.

Marxist theory exercises a powerful pull on the hearts and minds of elite Western Intellectuals. Through their compliance over the decades the Soviet system's tentacles gradually infiltrated the West, gaining control within many of our most powerful institutions, most spectacularly within the media and within education, two areas in which they correctly assessed they could do the most damage to the system they were seeking to overthrow.

Having gained control within the two most powerful means of forming opinion, they set about, first gradually, but later more rapidly, indoctrinating the western public with the aim of making them less willing or able to resist their eventual overthrow, whilst simultaneously removing anyone within the targeted organisation who did not share the approved ideology.

The indoctrination was aimed at undermining senses of patriotism and national identity essential to preserving a culture and it took many forms such as the debasing and re-writing of European history, the debasing and trivialising of our culture.

As first this was viewed as a form of class war, where the original targets were the middle and upper classes who would be annihilated when the workers rose against them, as occurred in Russia.

However, outside Russia the class war was abandoned when the white working classes failed to play the role allotted to them and joined the middle classes as targets for destruction. Race became the new weapon in undermining a culture through national guilt. Anti-racism aimed exclusively at the target race and intent upon instilling a sense of of shame and guilt for a past which had, in fact never taken place, exploited a weakness within a tolerant and benevolent people always anxious to do the right thing and protect the underdog. As a consequence, the dishonest drum beat of “white oppressor”, “black victim” accompanied by the altogether more sensuous “black sexy”, “white surrender” became the constant theme music behind popular culture, throughout the 1960's, 70's and 80's.

This was an even more deadly poison, our enemies knew from history that nothing undermines a society as effectively as does multiculturalism. Hence they cynically recast the melting pot as grail of our age.

Other “isms” were deployed, such as a deceptive form of feminism designed, in the guise of “liberation”, to undermine the family whilst imposing a new sexualised slavery upon women, which sold us aspirations which could only be achieved spread legged and child free. At the same time siren voices convinced young women that a life of unnaturally induced sterility, with abortion as a back up, offered the means of achieving fulfilment. It was in this way that developments such as oral contraception, abortion and social change began to become instruments of genocide.

In few areas has the indoctrination designed at the destruction of Western Society been more cruelly effective than what it has done to women. In a few generations a sex which once valued honour, virtue and motherhood, now finds themselves either grasping at the Muslim veil of their own subjugation or, tragically with some merit, viewed as “easy meat” by our nations new colonisers, leaving many of the most vulnerable in huge danger.

The damage done to the white male was perhaps even crueler, however, I have addressed that subject often in my previous writing, links to which I will add at the bottom of this posting. (2)

Enemies of the West also infiltrated various other areas, such as the law, politics and the security services, but it was within education and within the popular media that they seized their most powerful weapons, and they have used them against us relentlessly for at least half a century

The people responsible for this did not go away when Communism fell, the aim of overthrowing the West and replacing it with a soviet style utopia was no longer an option, but that did not change the aim of overthrowing the West. Indeed, as the years had past a new more anarchistic breed had joined the old Stalinist, for whom the destruction of the West was more important than any subsequent reconstruction.

They had been well schooled in the belief that the West was evil and needed to be destroyed and they saw nothing within the demise of communism to change that belief.

Hence they have continued with their mission of undermining our culture, indoctrinating our people and nurturing new generations of indoctrinators. However, the emphasis had changed, Western society could no longer be destroyed by soviet communism, so anti-racism, multiculturalism and immigration, tools so long used as a means of softening up the culture for its eventual take over, would now become the means of its destruction.

However, we have still but touched on half the picture, acts have consequences which are not always anticipated. A one hundred and fifty year old conspiracy aimed at the converting the capitalist West to Marxism had developed into an exercise of ethnic and cultural cleansing.

In the process Western society's resolve and sense of its own identity had become so undermined that other groups with other even less wholesome aims and agendas began to smell blood in the water, and they in turn began to close in on a weakening prey.

--------------
I had intended this to be the final part of this essay, but I find that I have so much more to say, hence, I will post the final part, together with my conclusions later this week.
__________

(1)
Harvard hates the white race (VDare)
(2)
White boys in the Jungle
The Lost Boys

Genocide by stealth - Part 2

In the first part of this essay I argued that vast social changes resulting from deliberate acts by the governments of Europe and all other, one time white, Western nations have succeeded in meeting at least one of the United Nations definitions of what constitutes an act of genocide against an ethnic group.

Easy, free, and officially encouraged access to oral contraception, the legalisation of abortion, effectively on demand, and changes to the economic structure which have forced the average family unit to cease consisting of one breadwinner and one child carer, but instead to become formed of two breadwinners, have resulted directly in a catastrophic reduction in the birth rate among whites of native European origin.

All three changes have resulted directly from deliberate social or economic engineering on the part of post war governments, and it is impossible to argue that a reduction in births was not a primary aim, at least of the first two or that a reduction in births has been a direct result of the third.

Therefore, I would submit for your consideration the fact that, whether through ill will or otherwise, measures have been put in place intended to prevent births within the targeted group. That targeted group being white native Europeans. This means of Genocide is clearly defined in Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide

Meanwhile, as I argued in part one, during the same period, monumental efforts have been made, by those same western governments to increase the birth rate amongst other races and ethnic groups.

Some may argue that counter measures, such as welfare benefits, and, indeed child benefit itself, have been put in place which actively encourage childbirth. However, as the figures clearly demonstrate, they have not had this effect, at least, they have not done so amongst the target group. White wage earners may welcome child benefit, but it is only those whites at the very lowest social levels who might consider welfare benefits an incentive to breed.

On the other hand, given that the welfare state in Britain and similar welfare arrangements Europe are among of the primary incentives for mass inward migration and that it is primarily amongst immigrant families in receipt of welfare and child benefits that a significant growth in birth rates has been seen, far from counterbalancing that damaging effect of other policies, this has, if anything, in fact added to the damage done to the native European people.

That is because, the inward migration honey pot created by a free for all Welfare state is one of the many ways by which a further act fitting the description of genocide has been committed. That is the deliberate infliction on the targeted group of conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.

I would contend that the mass third world immigration into every single Western nation has created conditions which will lead to the destruction of the native European peoples, at very least in part.

How do you destroy a people if not by starving them, shooting them or marching them to death? There are many ways, but you can start by outnumbering them and forcing them out of their homelands. When it happens to other races in other places we call it ethnic cleansing, it is only when it happens to us, here that we call it progress.

Whatever you call it, it is happening, even the media have now been forced to admit that the native white population of Britain will have become an ethnic minority in their ancestral homeland by 2066. Many suspect that estimate is a conservative one, and that is likely to be much sooner than that, in much of England it most certainly will be sooner.

We should not forget that the annual “net” immigration figure, which the government publishes, does not take into account how many of those leaving the country are indigenous Britons who are replaced by immigrants, and the numbers classified as British born who are of foreign ancestry. As a consequence the official figure seriously underestimates the overall demographic change.

London only remains a majority white city if you include the furthest outer suburbs and the fact that non-Europeans are less likely to register on census forms. There is compelling evidence that in reality London has already passed the tipping point and that the native population are already a minority. Whether that is true or not it is certain that it soon will be and that without a shadow of a doubt, with one hundred years of the end of World War II, the descendants of those, the blitz generation, who flocked the streets to celebrate VE day, will be a racial minority in the city they fought to defend.

This will have resulted from a deliberate policy, which was never put to a vote. How is this not ethnic cleansing? How does this not equate to the other great displacements which history now condemns?.

In Birmingham, a city with one of the smallest remaining white majorities in Britain, the change may come even sooner. Certainly the native population have long ago been driven out of vast swathes of that city, as they have in many UK cities, including London.

It is often lamented that the sparrows are vanishing from London, but who dare admit so are the Cockneys?.

If the indigenous population of any other region of the word were being deliberately replaced, the word “genocide” would be on the tofu stained lips of every liberal. The UN security council would be in session and Hoxton high street would echo to the shrieks of horror, as Giles and Penelope recounted tales of vacations in Cairo or Bangkok where the locals had been forced out and replaced by people from Porthcawl and Billericay. However, as it is the people of European origin who are being supplanted its considered acceptable.

The same situation extends across the Western World. In fact European nations, such as Sweden, which have smaller native populations may well become majority non-white before we do. Even in the larger countries the problems associated with mass immigration are becoming obvious, however, their leaders do not see the solution to the problem as stopping immigration, but rather by getting rid of a homogeneous native population. This was made clear by French President Nicolas Sarkozy when he said "the only way to stop the violence and hatred of a multicultural society is through inter breeding between the races", what else was he calling for other than the irradication of the original French people?

This view echoed those expressed by so many of the social elite, and those who see themselves as opinion formers, such as journalist, political commentator and over-paid television personality Andrew Marr when, in a 1999 Guardian article, he encouraged "widespread and vigorous miscegenation”, or race mixing, to make the British public to accept the multicultural 'Utopia' he, and his kind are seeking to force upon us. Marr admitted that this might be “tricky to achieve as public policy”, however, the fact that he viewed miscegenation as the “best option” reveals a great deal about the attitudes of such people. (1)

There is a vast difference between a free society permitting interracial sex and the active promotion of mass miscegenation for a political aim, yet Sarkozy, Marr and the other mixed race proselytisers are too blinded by ideology to that what they are in fact advocating is ethnic cleansing. Or am I being to generous to them?

So, what caused this attitude? A view which would have been so alien to every generation before the 1960's? Why is it considered as acceptable to do to us what would cause shock and outcry were it done to anyone else? The reason is clear, Europeans have been taught to think differently about themselves, and make no mistake, they have been deliberately taught to view themselves in the way they now do.

It may sound bizarre to claim that our media and our educators have created a fake history and then set about brainwashing us into feeling guilt about things which never happened, or which did not happen in the manner in which our children, and indeed most of the post 1960 generations are taught, but that is actually what is happening.

What out children are being taught in school about our history and our society are lies, pure and simple, and that has been the case now for decades.

This is accompanied throughout childhood and into adulthood by a constant barrage of propaganda forced upon us day and night through our entertainment and news media. Not only are we relentlessly confronted with depictions of the same fake history with which our children are being indoctrinated, but also a fake present, depicted in popular drama, entertainment and through the heavily sanitised and selective spin which now passes for news.

The news is arguably more shameful even than the drama, because it pretends to be objective and truthful when it is the exact reverse. Anything which can be spun to support the fantasy of a multicultural Utopia, the perpetual narrative of non-white victimhood or intrinsic white badness is highlighted with great prominence. Meanwhile anything which could undermine the multicultural dream, reveals whites as victims or exposes badness amongst non-whites is distorted, lied about or suppressed altogether.

I could go into great detail on this aspect, but wish to avoid this article becoming overly long, however, it is a subject I have addressed frequently, with numerous articles in previous posting which can be found in the blog archives. However, I have added links to a number of my previous posting on the subject of media propaganda and misinformation at the bottom of this article (2).

Once one appreciates what is happening you are confronted with it relentlessly, but sadly very few actually realise what is happening, it is, after all, what they have always known and what they have been taught to believe. They hardly even notice when they see themselves being replaced, not least in TV commercials, where progressively the average Briton is portrayed not by a white person, or indeed a black person, but by someone of mixed race, with the subliminal message that this is the new reality they should aspire to.

The outcome is the a flabby, bovine, nation of people who care only for trivia and possessions, who actively believe that the history of their race is shameful, that their country owes a debt of guilt to other nations, and crucially, who do not care if their people were to vanish from the face of the earth.

Worse than that, for many, something in their subconscious tells them it might even be racist to care.

And here I have mentioned the word which has become one of the most deadly weapons used against the European race and the most poisonous agent of their destruction.

"Racist", that dishonest, multi-purpose, multiple application little word has been used to bully, intimidate and hector our people for decades now as a means of forcing a cynical political agenda upon us which they would never have achieved democratically. We, the most tolerant and benevolent race on Earth, the people least guilty of racial, tribal or xenophobic animus on the planet, have, exclusively, been so terrorised by that little word to the point where we would rather see our own race destroyed than dare be called it.

If any of us do overcome the terror and speak out against the lies, then laws have been set in place enabling the authorities to hunt them down and prosecute them, cheered on by a baying controlled media.

In Britain, and elsewhere in Europe it has now been established in law that telling the truth can be a criminal offence (and we laughably still call ourselves a free society)

It is all now stacked against us. We are the victims of hate don't you see, we are not, and have never been the main perpetrators.

This is a huge subject, and there is so much more to say. We are assailed on all sides by so many different forces, all seemingly calculated to undermine us as a homogeneous race of people. I could continue for a dozen more postings and still not have covered all issues.

However, I hope that, in these two postings I have been able to demonstrate that over the last half century, measures have been imposed upon the native people of Europe, and, worldwide, upon those of European origin, which fit the internationally accepted definitions of genocide, and which are inextricably leading to the destruction of us as a race. (In some areas, such as South Africa, as I have explained in previous postings we are even further down the blood stained road)

As pointed out in part one of is essay those definitions of genocide are:

• Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the targeted group

As I have stated, deliberate measures have been put in place intended to prevent births amongst us, and which have successfully prevented many millions of births amongst our people. At the same time, deliberate measures, taken by the same governments, have increased the birthrate of non-Europeans by billions (four billion since 1950).

Whilst their numbers grow, ours are shrinking, taken across the western world this has led to the loss of potential lives among those of European origin greater than any previous world war and previous natural disaster other than possibly the black death in the 14th Century, and certainly greater than any previous genocide.

• Deliberately inflicting on the targeted group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.

Mass immigration, never in any state agreed to by democratic vote, is replacing the native peoples of Europe and those of European origin across the planet. Britain and North America are predicted to become majority non-white states at some point between 2050 and 2066, and the same will apply to the rest of Europe, with the possible exception of northern Russia, by the end of the century.

Some would argue that the very replacement of one race or culture with another is an act of genocide in itself. However, in addition, the inevitable mass displacement and interbreeding which is already occurring will further undermine Europeans as a homogeneous ethnic group. (an outcome, some so brainwashed and mired in their foetid ideology actually view as a desirable outcome)

Furthermore, given the evidence that significant numbers of immigrants are actively hostile to the native population and its culture, the effect on the native population when those groups become a majority can only be guessed at .

Meanwhile, for decades now our people have been subject to unremitting indoctrination, propaganda and, many would argue, brainwashing. They have been fed lies and disinformation designed to undermine their sense of identity, their pride in their identity, and ultimately their will to survive as a people.

By means of the above, and many other examples I could point to, conditions have been inflicted upon us which can not fail to bring about our destruction in whole or in part, and, in fact are already doing so.

It is happening, that cannot be denied. I have not made any of this up, I have merely laid the facts before you and the conclusion screams its own name without any prompting from me.

Only two questions remain:

why is it happening? To be truly genocide there needs to be intent. Is there really a mass conspiracy by evil people determined to destroy the white race? The acts are deliberate, but is their inevitable outcome their purpose? Or are there other factors, other agendas and other motives which have brought us to where we are?

It makes little difference to us of course, if you are killed by murder or by manslaughter you are still dead. However, it does change how one judges the perpetrators.

And the most difficult question, what, if anything can be done to change course on what appears to the inevitable road to our destruction?.

I will seek to explore these two questions in the third and final part of this essay.

____________________

(1) http://newsgroups.derkeiler.com/pdf/Archive/Uk/uk.politics.misc/2008-07/msg00247.pdf

(2) Prior articles touching on media lies, disinformation and propaganda
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2008/04/ripped-from-headlines-and-ethnically.html
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2008/05/broken-news.html
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2008/09/age-of-disinformation.html
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2008/04/hoary-old-stereotype-sold-to-us-as-new.html
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2009/09/disinformation-news.html
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2009/09/guess-those-missing-words.html
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2010/08/lies-of-political-correctness.html
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2010/06/bloody-liars.html
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2008/03/lies-damn-lies-and-statistics.html
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/2010/03/claims-reported-as-facts-again.html