The guilt of the silent

In an article written for the Home of the Green Arrow, I have again returned to the subject of the South Africa genocide in response to media attacks on Arthur Kemp the South African activist, who is assisting the BNP in the lead up to the European elections on June 4th.

I make no apology for returning so often to this unquestionably disturbing theme. no doubt those who hate me, and I know from my mail box that there are many, will claim I care only because the victims are whites of European origin. However, in truth it is because they are white and of European origin that the world ignores what is happening to them.

If we do not call attention to this relentless bloodshed no one will, and I intend to continue drawing attention to it, until the world turns to look.

The Guilt of the Silent

The picture above shows white crosses on a South African hillside, one for each of the white south African farmers slaughtered in the relentless genocide which has been going on since the end of Apartheid in 1994, ignored by the world's media, blanked by political leaders across the planet and thus unknown by most of the world's people. It is a genocide denied because its victims are white people and the perpetrators are black, hence it is not a truth the world allows to be told.

I have chosen a beautiful picture, dedicated to an ugly truth because I dare not show show you the pictures I would dearly like to. I dare not publish the pictures you need to see, because to do so would be to risk most search engines placing the Green Arrow blog behind a content warning, or even blocking it all together, and also because it would be unfair to force you to view horror beyond anything most of us could imagine, even though it is my duty to inform you of it.

Even the most mild of the images is too horrible to publish without a warning, for it shows a young white schoolboy, a beautiful child of around twelve or thirteen, the same age as my own son. In the picture, the boy is still wearing his school uniform, a striped blazer and tie, and he has been hanged by the neck. In the image I can't show you the child still hangs from the rope which his killers used to strangle the life our of his young body. If you wish to see the image, it is not hard to find, just type “South African Farm Murders” into any internet search engine and you will soon find it, but if you can't bare to do that, I ask you to try and imagine the scene I have just described, we surely, at least, owe the child that.

If you have imagined the scene, I regret I am now going to make it even more difficult for you, because I want you to imagine that this little boy is your own child, and that you were forced to watch him die. Worse than that, you did not just watch him die, you saw him roughly manhandled and mocked as the rope was placed round his neck, and as you watched, his boyish pride crumbled and you heard the child you had loved and nurtured cry out in terror and pain, whilst he called to you, his protector, for the help which you could not give. Then you saw him die, but die slowly, struggling, choking and gasping at the end of a rope, whilst his killers laughed at his pain, and at your distress. And, as you watched this scene from Hell, your only comfort was the knowledge that soon you too would be dispatched, albeit in an even more terrible manner.

I do not ask you to imagine that scene just so as to discomfort you, I ask it because that is what happened.

It did not just happen to one family, torturing, raping and murdering children in front their parents, before then torturing the parents to death is a popular game which the South African farm killers like to play, more popular even than raping and torturing wives in front of their castrated husbands, although that is certainly popular enough, and is recorded repeatedly amongst the thousands of such killings which have occurred in the 15 years since Nelson Mandela ascended the rainbow throne.

However, of all the attacks it seems it is the old who have suffered most frequently at the hands of the monsters responsible for the relentless bloodshed. At least one thousand of those killed were of an age, where in other societies they would have been collecting their pensions and looking forward to their well deserved retirement.

I will not ask you to imagine your own grandmother killed in any of the terrible ways in which so many elderly white South Africans have spent their last hours on earth. However, I can not, with honour, leave you in ignorance of the horrifying methods used in almost all the murders in order to heighten the torment of the victims death agony. Knives, machetes, hot electric irons, boiling water and broken glass, are just some of the weapons which have been employed, and, male, female, young and old, as it is Africa, most victims have suffered sexual violence and humiliation.

Just two months ago, in March, two women were tortured and murdered in a truly dreadful manner. Mrs. Allice Lotter (78) and her daughter Helen (57) of Allanridge in the Free State (South-Africa) were attacked with knives and pieces of glass. After the three terrorists cut the elderly women with their knives, broken glass was forced into their private parts. One of the women’s breasts were cut off, and anti-white slogans were “painted” (with the breasts) on the walls. Just months before that two other women tortured for hours on end with electric irons and boiling water before they too were killed.

This is just the tip of the iceberg, with more and more killings occurring each week. As of this moment, the total number of known South African farm murder victims stands at 3,047, however, the figure may be much higher, given how hard the South African authorities and politically correct media work to suppress news of these attacks. Furthermore. This figure only includes those who have died, and not those who survived despite suffering terrible mutilation and trauma. The figure also only covers the specific category of white farmers, who have fallen victim to a an unquestionable genocide, and does not include the vast numbers of urban white South Africans who are raped and murdered each month by non-whites.

Yet, of all this horror, we read nothing in the press, hear nothing from our politicians and see nothing on our TV screens. Our media and our politicians do not acknowledge these atrocities and do no want us to know about them, because they do not sit comfortably with either their political views or their agenda, and also because, as the victims are white they do not care.

For that, history will surely hold them accountable, at very least as willing accessories to the bloodshed taking place.

I do not need to ask you to imagine how our media would react had over three thousand members of an ethnic minority been tortured to death by whites, in the same time period, in any majority white nation on earth. The media's outrage would be unconstrained, and rightly so, for this amounts to more than one violent, racially motivated, death every second day for fifteen years.

However, this time they were silent, for it seems that, as with every crime, to the fourth estate, genocide only matters when white people do it.

Whilst they remained silent about the South African genocide, just what did the effluent in human form, who's poison which they have the nerve to call 'journalism' dribbles out of those poor man's Andrex substitutes The Guardian, the independent, the Observer and the Mirror choose to write about? What was it that those, politically motivated, white guilt riddled, hacks, who view a white man with a leaflet as more dangerous than a black man with a machete considered more worthy on their newsprint?

For months now they have spent their time telling lies and spreading slander about the BNP, and now some of them have chosen as their target, Arthur Kemp, the ex-South African activist who has been assisting the BNP in the run up to the European elections on June 4th.

Deploying their usual tactics of innuendo and half truths, they seek to imply that Arthur Kemp was implicated in the killing of the South African Communist party and ANC leader Chris Hani in 1993. In Friday's Guardian, Matthew Taylor, slithers through his article, leaving a slimy trail of hints and implications that Arthur Kemp was ... “suspected of” .... “arrested and questioned” .... “a member of” ... “hiss, spit ...slither” ... etc . All designed to imply that Arthur Kemp was somehow involved in a crime for which he was never charged.

(one has to ask how Matthew Taylor or any of the others can claim to know so much so much about what goes on in South Africa, given they failed to notice over three thousand murders)

These so called journalists, who trumpet the unquestioned “innocence” of Muslim terrorist suspects, when they are acquitted by ethnically stacked juries, and who just happened to attend terrorist training camps in Tora Bora and the Brecon Beacons for their relaxation, are seeking to smear Mr. Kemp with in a crime for which he was never even charged, let alone tried, or convicted. These arrogant little demigods have spent so long in their hermetically sealed fantasy world that they actually believe they can produce this transparent propaganda in the weeks leading up to an election they fear their ideological buddies might lose, and yet assume they can retain some credibility.

However, although they may not have noticed yet, their fantasy worlds have begun to crumble , they still pump out the lies, but more and more people are prepared to shout “Liar”, and sometimes, like now, some of us will accuse them of acts far worse than mere lies.

Journalists can hint, they can imply, lie and slander, but, whilst they indulge in their dismal little hate fest what they can never do is wash their own hands clean of their own real guilt.

In Britain the media is guilty of many lies, causing untold damage for which we can hope they will one day be held accountable, yet in respect of South Africa they share the guilt for even more bloody crimes.

Most Western journalists have known about the secret genocide going on in South Africa for many years, certainly any who write or broadcast about Africa, have known what is going on for at least a decade. Yet, for the sake of their agenda they have cynically remained silent, despite the fact that, as they must have known that, had they drawn the world's attention to the horror, they might have stopped it.

For no reason other than the ethnic composition of the victims and perpetrators, of this genocidal slaughter, our media print nothing, say nothing and admit nothing. Yet, they call us racists and bigots, these people who are at a minimum guilty of lying by omission and most surely have the blood of the victims of ethnic cleansing on their hands. For, had they spoken out, as it was their duty to do, some of those lives might have been saved.

By remaining silent they covered up the crimes, assisted the offenders and enabled further crimes to be committed. By pretending it was not happening, they, the British media, were in the room when that little boy was hanged. Those who call themselves journalists share the guilt of those who pushed shards of glass in to the vaginas of elderly ladies before cutting off their breasts, and of those who poured boiling water over other women again, and again and again. Our newsmen are the allies of those who castrated men and raped their wives in front of them, or tied up parents and forced them to watch whilst their children died in agony.

It is a newsman's duty not to create fairy stories for political gain, but to reveal truth to the world . By failing to do so, our newsmen offer succour and support to genocide. Each one of them stands as an accessory who must share the guilt for every decapitation, rape, mutilation, staved in head and broken, tortured body which happened since the day they learnt of the fact and decided to suppress it.

They had the power to change things but did not. They are beyond shame which is no surprise for they do not understand the concept.

Now, these same blood spattered jackals who choose to ignore a genocide, snarl and snap at us and hope that they can bring us down. Yet they are guilty men who will, God wiling, pay for their crimes one day. They know nothing but lies, they are capable of nothing but lies. They can not win, they must not win, they shall not win.

________________________________________

_________

Why Britain banned Savage

Anyone wondering why one of America's most popular radio "jocks" Michael Savage appeared, together with assorted Islamic fanatics and homophobic preachers, on a list of people banned from entry into the UK on account of their views, might benefit from listening to the audio clix excerpt from Savage's radio show.

Savage may not be everyone's cup of tea, and her certainly expresses himself strongly, but what he says is a little bit to close to the truth, and to what is happening in Britain, as well as America for our current government's comfort. That is the real reason he was banned, and why we should all be lobbying for that ban to be lifted.

Click here to listen to Michael Savage on YouTube

A blood sacrifice denied

Derrick Donchak and Brandon Piekarsky

It was with some relief that I note the diversity worshiping zealots in the "lie-a-minute" newsroom at CNN have failed to get their latest blood sacrifice, when two teenagers in Shenandoah, Pennsylvania, were found not guilty of the most serious charges against them in relation to the death of Mexican illegal immigrant Luis Ramirez.

The relief was tinged with anger, when I contemplated what could have been, and how much the likes of CNN wanted it to be. After seven hours of deliberation, the jury found that Derrick Donchak, 19, and Brandon Piekarsky, 17, were guilty of simple assault, but acquitted them of the cart-load of crowd pleasing charges, such as aggravated assault, reckless endangerment and ethnic intimidation piled on them by an obedient prosecution. Madly disproportionate charges which from even a cursory glance at the evidence were patently without merit, and which would never have been brought had it not been politically correct to do so.

Young white men in America now walk an even more precarious path than those in Britain, in that they must live with the daily threat that if they are attacked by a member of an ethnic minority, defend himself and come out on top, they are likely to face charges which could see them spending many years in prison. America may not have yet introduced the crime of racially motivated self-defense, but give them time, and they just might. Would anyone, be truly surprised to find that in ten years or so, the act of expressing a preference for pancakes over fajitas will constitute a chargeable offence?

The predictable white hating activists outside the court could depend upon a sympathetic hearing from a po-faced CNN Anchor woman, as, almost unable to disguise their disappointment, at being denied their feast of teenaged white flesh, they bewailed the "signals" which this verdict sent out. Yet as the ageing hypocrite at the CNN news-desk nodded her over lacquered head in agreement, one could not avoid a feeling of nausea knowing how much these two deeply dishonest people would have cheered the signals sent out, had those young boys been convicted of these outrageously unjustified charges, or if the races had been reversed and illegal immigrants had been acquitted of killing a white man.

There is a temptation to shrug and say "Only in America", but that would be naive, it is now more than possible that a similar case could happen in Britain. We live in a society where at least half the public believe in the parallel realities fed to them by US shows like "Law and Order" and "CSI", or our own PC festival "The Bill" where crime is a predominantly white activity, and that if a white man is attacked by a non-white one, it must somehow be his fault and his attacker must somehow be his victim. More disturbing is the fact that the authorities are tasked with and determined to perpetuate that belief.

Hold your children close and tell them never to be in the wrong place at the wrong time, for if they are you may find yourself losing to a legal system which, when race rears its head, resembles nothing so much as the old East Germany at the height of the Stasi's power.

Update on the Piet Honeyborne murder

I have received some further information on the latest South African farm murder which I posted about on Saturday.

It appears that Bella Honeyborne survived because she had an extra firearm in the bedroom, which she discharged through the window, apparently alerting her husband's killers that she was armed and willing to shoot. (A reason perhaps to reconsider my views on gun ownership?)

It also turns out that Piet Honeybourne survived a near death experience a few years ago having suffered a heart attack following an attack by African bees. He was revived at the time, only to be later slaughtered in his own home, at the dead of night, by up to five attackers.

Although no property was apparently taken, the killing will no doubt again be attributed to "crime" rather than the systematic racist genocide which it clearly is.

These killings continue to be largely ignored by the English language media, so we have to rely on the Africaans press for details.

_____________________________________
I would like to thank to thank those who are keeping me informed with newspaper items and updates regarding there horrific events.

Zimbabwe - a model of cause and effect

ZIMBABWE, A MODEL OF CAUSE AND EFFECT

By Robin Hind

It is now frequently asked from corners of the Western world “When does Zimbabwe return to normal?”

Zimbabwe has returned to normal. From time immemorial Zimbabwe was a Stone Age culture, without a written language, without wheel or shoe. Social order was by primitive law, a melange of practicality, mystic, pragmatism and witchcraft. Maternal mortality was 1:6.

The sole factor, which changed Zimbabwe, was the arrival of white colonists. These colonists alone created a culture which allowed an agricultural and creative productivity supremely beneficial to all the inhabitants. That productivity increased progressively as the number of white colonists increased.

Many who claim knowledge ability respond with “But Zimbabwe is a modern country – look at the high-rise cities, look at the sophisticated population which dresses well, drives expensive vehicles, travel internationally, have their children in top schools”. What these “authorities” fail to comprehend is that what they see now is no more than a relic of a lost past. If an earthquake destroyed the built environment there would be no possibility of the natives rebuilding it. Zimbabweans would return to seeking shelter in grass and mud huts, surviving with a primitive agriculture. The natives cannot even maintain the current infrastructure which decays progressively month by month. The foundation of all past civilisations, which is the provision of clean water and sanitation, has proved beyond the capability of the Zimbabwean government, which has caused thousands upon thousands of deaths from cholera, enteritis and many other water borne epidemics. Not only do the obvious material constructs like roads and railways decay, but so also are the less obvious technical constructs like the aviation and health infrastructures are in downward decay - mostly there is no air-traffic control over Zimbabwe. Almost all hospitals have closed. Law is varied to suit the whim of the headmen.

What about the grand who flaunt their wealth? These are no more than the asset strippers temporarily preening the residua of a failed civilisation. There is not the productivity to support this charade indefinitely and the facade continues to abrade away. Like the teen who steals father’s Lamborghini to impress a girl, so these people continue to try to seduce the West into giving aid and making investment on the basis of claiming ownership of a “civilisation”. But there is no prospect of re-building this nation, unless a form of colonisation returns, of course.

These claims will be difficult to get into the intellects of those who wish not to hear. Some will continue to deny this failure of a race, denying both cause and effect.

One technique of establishing cause and effect phenomena is to remove the hypothetical causative agent and measure response.

In Zimbabwe the colonists were forced to leave and as their numbers lessened so the constructive capability of the nation degraded in parallel. There was an absolute cause and effect relationship. Once a critical threshold of whites had left, agricultural production plummeted and mining in many arenas ceased. In 2008 the school year was “closed”, i.e. literacy ceased being taught. The hospitals closed one after the other and maternal mortality is returning to one death in every six pregnancies. Malaria, polio, typhoid, typhus, plague, meningitis and measles are all returning to pre-colonial levels. Starvation is endemic. Life expectancy is returning to 37 years for males, 34 for females. The statistics of the Stone Age have returned.

For any logician, the cause and effect relationship between the presence of the colonists and the productivity of the country should be indisputable. There are sufficient grounds to reach that conclusion.

However, analytical science requires that any hypothesis of cause and effect be reproducible. How can we reproduce this model? It is fairly simple.

David Bullard was a popular columnist with the Johannesburg Sunday Times, who had been praised by the editor for his objective insight. However, he made the mistake of speculating, in print, what South Africa would have been like had the colonists not arrived. He believed that it would have remained a hunter-gatherer Stone Age society. Needless to say he was dismissed from the Johannesburg Sunday Times. The reasons were not that his logic was at fault but that the black editor denied this logic, denied history and denied reality.

Was Bullard correct? What if there were areas of Africa which had never been colonized? This was exactly the case in parts of Northern Nigeria. These areas had never been colonised and remained as they had been since time immemorial: thick bush, malaria, insufferable temperatures and no productivity. The only trace of the 21st century was the extermination of many wild animals by fire-armed native poachers.

Let us take the experimental model further. What would happen if you put colonists into this Stone Age environment? Exactly that occurred when individuals of white colonist stock, who had been expelled from their farms in Zimbabwe, were invited to begin “developing” this wild bush land. Effectively they had been asked to “colonize”.

What was the outcome? In five years these white farming colonists had turned wild, impenetrable, unpleasant and dangerous bush into productive farms. Sorghum and many other products were now produced in large quantities. Water had been obtained for irrigation, mechanical infrastructure had been introduced and malaria and other diseases were being controlled.

This example, together with the invitation to whites to re-colonise Moçambique and Sudan (and the recent invitation to whites to re-colonize by the Congolese) proves that the white colonists were a sufficient ingredient to create productive civilizations and were the necessary component in sustaining agriculture in these areas. Without them productive civilisation fails.

That Bullard may well have been correct is illustrated by these sequences of events which substantiate the hypothesis that white colonists are necessary if Africa is to thrive. If the country is to return to its past achievements the only practical way is to invite a re-colonization by the erstwhile white Zimbabweans. However they will require a return of the foundations of Western civilisation, such as an enforceable and fair system if justice, reinstatement of their Zimbabwean nationality, and security of ownership.

The cynics will now say that once these colonists have created an infrastructure in any of these black-governed lands the native asset strippers will get active again, destroying exactly as they did in Zimbabwe. Will black Africa again reap without sowing?

Time will execute this experiment also…

A truth only a black man can tell

Katrina looters

Occasionally a black person will tell a truth which, if told by a white, person would immediately result in accusations of racism. It is a brave black person who does so as he will face derision and be called traitor and an Uncle Tom, yet he speaks out because he knows his words tell a story which needs to be told. If only more would do so, the black community might begin to face their problems. Here is a rare example of such a truth.

In a 2005 article in the Jamaican Star written in the days following Hurricane Katrina Leighton Levy wrote:

The Dark side of Black People
By Leighton Levy

LET ME START by saying that if I had my life to live over a thousand times, the one thing I would not change would be my race. I am proud to be a black man. There are times however, when I wish that certain people and I did not share that trait.

For the past few days, the whole world ... well, at least those who have access to satellite and cable television, have been seeing pictures of the virtually total devastation of the cities of the U.S. Gulf Coast by Hurricane Katrina. An estimated 90 per cent of homes in New Orleans have been destroyed by flood waters and more than 100 people have been confirmed dead.

We see people standing on the roofs of their submerged homes desperate to be rescued, others being airlifted to safety, and we have heard tear-jerking stories of families losing their loved ones. But in all of this, we have also seen the really dark side of black people.

The day after the hurricane passed, there were reports of looting but network reporters had been saying that people were looting out of desperation, in search of food and water. A lot they knew.

The pictures I have been seeing are of people - black people - stealing shoes, diapers, and television sets. Not food and definitely not water. Not unless the armfuls of clothing, shoes, and appliances I see people wading through the streets with count as food and water.

Now, if all the looters were looting out of desperation, how desperate were the guy and girls I saw toting several boxes of size 13 Nikes? How desperate was the fellow with the stack of diapers? What, is it that he has several babies at home suffering from loose bowels? What am I talking about, what home? Everything is under water and what isn't, has been totally destroyed.

Plasma TV?

And just what are those guys stealing the plasma television sets going to be watching when there is no power in the entire city?

Desperation? Yeah, right. I am beginning to believe that black people, no matter where in the world they are, are cursed with a genetic predisposition to steal, murder, and create mayhem.

The entire firearm department at a Wal-Mart department store, for example, was cleaned out and the looters used the stolen weapons to rob people. How low is that? Everybody is suffering and the black people would seek to rob people who are suffering just like themselves.

No white looters?

And it has nothing to do with poverty. Where are the white people in all this? I am sure there are poor white people living in New Orleans, Biloxi and the other towns affected by what has been going on. Is it that the media are not showing pictures of them looting and robbing? Or is it that they are too busy trying to stay alive, waiting to be rescued, and hiding from the blacks.

And you know what? Even if the poor whites were looting and robbing, wouldn't it be nice if the blacks could have made them the only ones doing it

Just once, I would like for us blacks to take the high road in situations like this, where instead of showing our darkest side, we put our best foot forward. But I guess that would be too much to ask, too much of a case of wishful thinking.

_______________________________________

Link to Leighton Levy's article: The Dark Side of Black People

Related article: Africa in our midst : Lessons from Katrina

Hat Tip: Ne Ultra

For a Once Great Britain

A poem by Mike Wilson:

FOR A ONCE GREAT BRITAIN

The tide has slowly turned and left its mark
Upon the barefaced beach of hopefulness.
And we who sit and watch with future longing
Are aware that our own fate is still too dark.

For many go about their lives in ignorance
And what is forming round them, they can’t see.
The knowing ones despair of intervention
They are powerless beneath the apathy.

We live our lives in strict conforms and customs
We leave the civil libs. to set the scene.
We let the politicians run the country
We let our land get taken by default.

This once great proud and vital major nation
Is now usurped and tangled from within.
This land that always stood for truth and freedom
Has lost its way and now its light grows dim.

The world we used to know and love is gone
And in its place a maze of mirrors stands
Reflecting all the falsities of Europe
And highlighting false glory through the land.

Reflection on reflection serves no purpose
But gives false hope to those who cannot see.
Why is it only us with age upon us
Can see the truth but yet just can’t break free?

A mind enslaved can glitter with ambition
But is enmeshed with all constraints applied,
And these constraints are nothing but ambition
That chases once again their foolish pride.

Stand back and watch the world like we do.
Stand back and see how lives are twirled and spun.
Stand back and see the mirrors true reflection
Stand back and watch the world as it is run.

Nation states must stand against subversion
And break the hold of apathy and stealth.
Break free from all the paper chains that bind them
Refuse to be the slaves of others wealth.

A terrible crime in Paris

Readers may need to consult the Internet to read details of a trial currently taking place in Paris, because the facts are unlikely to appear often (if at all ) on the BBC. It involves the kidnap and murder of a young Israeli called Ilan Halimi, for who's death 27 people are currently standing trial.

In 2006, Ilan was lured into an apparent honey trap and kidnapped by a black, predominantly Muslim, gang who aptly call themselves "The Barbarians". The 23 year old was then kept alive for three weeks, during which time he was repeatedly tortured and brutalised. The three week ordeal ended with his being left for dead, naked, bound and gagged, on a suburban railway line. Halimi had been repeatedly stabbed and burnt with cigarette butts before being doused with spirits and set alight.

Despite suffering burns to 80 per cent of his body, he was still alive when found by a train driver, but he was unable to speak and died on the way to hospital.

There is a strong belief that this was a hate crime and that Ilan was targeted because he was Jewish, however, the authorities are attempting to present it as a criminal enterprise (sound familiar?) a claim rather undermined by the fact that accused gang members are prone to " shouts of "Allah Achbar" from the dock.

The details are not easy to read, and who knows how the trial will turn our, given some of the insane jury verdicts we have seen recently. However, it is something we need to know about, for it is not the last of such horrors which we in occupied Europe will have to witness.

Ignored by the world, the South African genocide claims another life

70 year old man dead, his 98 year old mother injured, his wife left a widow

Another farmer South African Piet Honeyborne (50), was brutally murdered yesterday morning at 01:00 hrs (1 May) on his farm in the Middelburg district, ą 150 km east of Pretoria. His mother, Gerda Honeyborne(98), was severely injured and traumatized. His wife, Bella, escaped injuries. The family were attacked by up to five of black assailants.

That is the second this week alone, the reports do not confirm whether Mr Honeyborne was tortured before death, although that is usually the case with these killings. The total now stands at 3,047

News link

The forgotten victims of a lie

John Floyd Thomas Jnr.

The pictures above are all of the same man, John Floyd Thomas Jr, they are all mug shots taken over a forty five year period from 1964 until 2009. Now 72, John Thomas, has just been arrested following DNA tests which have linked him to at least 30 rape related murders, carried out in the 1970's and 1980's. However, those crimes could be only part of Thomas' career, police believe that he may in fact be one of the worst ever serial killers in American history.

If he is found to be guilty of the 30 deaths currently linked to him, he would certainly be the most prolific serial killer ever in Los Angeles, a city which is not short of serial killers. However, it is now suspected that that his killing career may have stretched from 1955 until 1996, and the police are looking again at unsolved murders dating back over 50 years, where the victims resemble his alleged choice of victim, elderly white females.

If this is all true, as the LA police strongly suspect, we may wonder why it has taken over half a century to apprehend this man, as his album full of mug shots show us, he has been arrested many times during a lengthy criminal career, yet it seems he may have been able to pursue his grisly and violent hobby unhindered, possibly since the middle of Eisenhower's first term.

Could it be that he wasn't caught because he didn't fit the profile? Might it be that the police were not looking for him because he wasn't the colour that serial killers are supposed to be?

We have all heard the tired old lie that the average serial killer is a white male, it is repeated time and again in newspaper and magazines, on crime shows and in TV dramas, and everyone believes it, however, the problem is it is just not true. Male, he may be, but white, not so much.

The claim wasn't even true when it was first made in the 1940's and related specifically to America, at a time when whites made up 90% of the population, and when, if all was equal, you would statistically expect them to account for 90% of the serial killings, but even back then they didn't. Now sixty years on, when the non-white populations of both America and Europe have exploded, to keep promoting such a misleading stereotype is all but criminal. However, they keep pretending its true, because it is politically correct to do so, indeed, the fat black guy, who has replaced Grissom on CSI Vegas, stated it as a fact just a couple of weeks ago, and there was nobody there to question him.

Of course we know more about the white killers, but that is because the media focus on them, whilst ignoring the legion of black killers who do not fit the profile they like to present. The Sunday Morning Slasher, Coral Eugene Watts is suspected of being America's most prolific serial killer ever, with possibly as many as 80 to 100 victims, however, who has ever heard of him? Likewise Lorenzo Gilyard, Matthew Macon, Shelly Andre Brooks, Chester Turner, Carlton Gary and Andre Crawford, to name but a few, are men would certainly never appear on most popular lists of serial killers, but that's what they are.

Maybe the only one who might appear on that list is Wayne Williams the Atlanta child killer, and he is currently attempting to appeal his conviction on the grounds that “Black me are not serial killers”.

The double standards are stunning, imagine how many movies would have been made if a group of white psychos had murdered up to 87* black people in the 1970's, yet the Zebra killers are mentioned only in a few true crime books (*the confirmed figure is 16, but many believe that the Zebras killed as many as 71 other white victims). Similarly, a movie about the Carr Brothers would have been a box office smash, if only they had been white, but, of course, they don't count as they raped, tortured and murdered their four white victims all in the one night. (yet I doubt that is why the movie was never made)

It would be nice to think that the lie may at last be exposed, as headlines are already beginning to announce John Floyd Thomas as “LA's worst ever serial killer”, but you can be assured that the Community cohesion censors will shut that line down quite soon. However, even if they don't, it is too late for Thomas' 30, or maybe many more, victims, they died before the police knew who they were looking for.

Lies have consequences, and who can say how many of those women would not have died degrading, painful and terrifying deaths had the police not been seeking the PC, role profile perfect, white serial killer? The victims were mostly older women, with names such as Maybelle, Ethel and Elizabeth, not the teen co-eds of popular serial killer fiction, but they had families and loved ones, and has lived through wars, depressions, booms and first kisses, they did not deserve to die as they did.

Although mostly in their 60's many would have had years and probably decades still ahead of them, but instead they became the forgotten victims of a lie. And its a lie which is still being told.

Update to "Political Mightiness - the creation of Zimbabwe"

In response to some questions from our regular and much valued commentator Dr D, Robin Hind has kindly added a great deal of additional information to his earlier post "Political Mightiness - the Creation of Zimbabwe" which can be found in the comments section beneath his original post.

Those interested in the history of Zimbabwe and how it came to its current dire state will find the details of great interest.

Click here to view Robin Hind's article

South African Genocide figure updated

I have updated the total of white farmers murdered in the ongoing hidden genocide to include the tragic death of 71 year old marino wool farmer Klaass Van Wyk who was brutally murdered at his farm in the Sutherland area on April 28.

News link here

Details corrected 02/05/2009

A hint of truth on the 100th Day

The 100th day of the Chosen One’s new reign in America was celebrated in various sections of the UK Press yesterday, in the “right on” London Metro even the daily 118 118 cartoon strip advert got in on the act. This was not a surprise, as readers of the Metro, may have noticed, the 118 118 strip invariably signals its state approved devotion to diversity by ensuring that any group or crowd it depicts includes the requisite quota of ethnic minority figures, so we can guess where the artist's loyalties lie.

In yesterdays cartoon strip, one character mentioned Obama’s 100 day anniversary, to which another responded “He’s achieved a lot in that time”. She did not go on to list any of the “achievements” she had in mind, but the reader was obviously expected to accept without question that there had been a series of them.

It is on the basis of such unquestioning belief that popular wisdom so often trumps a closer analysis of the facts. However, popular wisdom is seldom factually accurate.

This is not to say that there have not been actions during the 100 day Honeymoon, many of them deliberately crowd pleasing, but an act takes more than adoring headlines to count as an achievement, however much the spin doctors might like to pretend it does.

Obama's supporters would doubtless point to the announced closure of the Guantánamo Bay detention centre on Cuba, the banning of so called water boarding as an interrogation technique, and the proposed withdrawal of troops from Iraq as achievements, whereas they are, in fact, actions, crowd pleasing gestures designed to delight both his liberal fan base and closest ideological supporters.

It could be argued that these acts have won America some international friends, however, it is an open question as to how many of those friends were not already anxious to be friends with an Obama lead America, and how many of the others are paying lip service to friendship whilst continuing to plot behind the scenes.

We will have to wait and see whether these gestures have achieved anything, or whether they have actually made America, and, by extension the West considerably more dangerous. It is significant that these were amongst the first acts which Obama took, what does it say about a President that his first priority is to please the likes of Bill Ayres, Michael Moore, George Galloway and the Stop the War coalition?

What is certain is that irrespective of the PR aspects, these acts have done little to address the very real problems facing America. In that respect the Obama administration produced the stimulus package, where, as in Britain, eye watering sums of money were given to banks and businesses out of tax-payers money, leaving the American people hugely in debt and with no guarantee that they will ever get their money back. Other funds have been earmarked for re-generation, but with so many politically correct “non-white, one legged, transgender only” clauses that they are likely to have about as much effect as taking a sherbet hose to a bushfire.

On the plus side, America is now fully on-board with the rest of the world in its efforts to tackle climate change, which, if you are convinced by the science, is certainly a step in the right direction. However, in this the Obama administration benefits from the pig-headed, head in the sand attitude of its predecessor, without who’s intransigent and ill conceived policy, the One would no now be winning plaudits by reversing it. (I take the view, that the potential consequences of the scientists being right are so terrible that they far outweigh those if they are wrong, and as such, we can not afford to take the risk. In any event, the downsides associated with burning both coal and oil are so significant that efforts to find alternatives can only be beneficial, with or without climate change.)

There is little point in saving the world for our children if we destroy the environment they are expected to live in, therefore, I personally support this more, and hence I am prepared add a positive point to Obama’s score card in this respect, whilst appreciating that many of my readers will be less generous.

(NB: I do not plan to respond to comments about climate change, none of us, including scientists on both sides, know enough to be sure who is right)

On Obama’s 100th day the true nature of what he represents and what we will have to face from this administration gave us a glimpse of its ugly face as the House of Representatives passed the latest hate crimes bill. (As if they needed another one). The new hate crimes legislation, as with almost everything else Obama has done exposes the truth of the claim to offer “change” which was repeated ad-nauseam throughout the election campaign. It is now clear that this “change” means to be a bit different to Bush in some respects, but absolutely no different from the madness which has infested US Society for the last couple of decades.

Do not get me wrong, the murder of Matthew Shepherd, after whom this legislation has been named, was a terrible and deeply evil crime, the scum who beat him to a pulp and left him to die, deserve every miserable day they rot in prison for what they did. Anyone who seeks to minimise or justify what was done to Matthew on the grounds of either his sexuality of their religion, do not believe in the same God which I do, and I have no wish to know their God. I differ from many in the Nationalist community in that I do not have an issue with gay people, I believe their lifestyle is their nature and not a choice, they have been part of the human condition throughout history, and are entitled to fully equal treatment within society.

However, the key word here is equality, and it the fundamental lack of equality which makes this bill so objectionable and so unconstitutional (perhaps unsurprising coming from Kenya's favourite son). It is extremely symbolic of the hypocrisy within liberal American society that America's first African American president, has, within his first 100 days presided over legislation which further enshrines discrimination into US law.

This bill and those which went before it only offer protection to selected groups plucked from the liberal lexicon of preferred victims, and as was to be expected, heterosexual white people are not amongst those groups. This is despite the fact that the most powerful man in America is black, whereas, in numerical terms, the largest single group living in poverty and deprivation, and therefore amongst the most vulnerable, are white.

I am not sure that many people in America are aware that a gang of black men could beat and torture a white man to death, as they so frequently do, and there is no way the act could constitute a hate crime under this legislation, even if they shouted “We hate you Honkey” whilst doing so. Whereas, were a white man to call a black man a “black idiot”, the white man could potentially be charged with a hate crime, and almost certainly would he were he to slap the black man's face while saying it.

We in the Nationalist community are frequently accused of hate, however, it is uncomfortable to contemplate the level of hate which must have gone into drafting such inequitable legislation.

The legislation is also inequitable because it applies different values to different victims. How can it be fair to punish someone more severely for hitting a thirty year old man because he is black or gay than for hitting a sixty year old one because they want his pension book? Surely both crimes should be treated equally, and subject to equal degrees of deterrence.

However, this bill has nothing to do with fairness or justice, it's purpose is to bolster a liberal fantasy and to perpetuate the myth that hate crimes are a predominantly white against black / gay phenomenon.

This agenda driven and discriminatory piece of legislation is typical of what we can expect from this administration, which, due to a combination of white guilt and black racism, has transferred the mindset of the humanities department at a second rate university to the White house.

Despite what the 118 118 cartoon strip sought to imply, the Kenyan Messiah's achievements in his first 100 days were more modest than they like to suggest. However, what he did achieve was to show anyone ready to look who he really is, where is is going, and what we can expect from him.

Justice in Wonderland

Imagine if you will that there was an arson attack on a Christian church, and two white Christian boys attacked an innocent Muslim lad who they mistakenly imagined to be responsible, punching him to the ground and kicking out two front teeth.

Of the various sentence options open to the judge, just how likely do you imagine a conditional discharge world be the one he chose? What's that you say? "Snowball's chance in Hell?" yup..... "Bunnies hope in the dog pound?" even better! You are quite right, it would be unthinkable were white boys to get off that lightly.

However, when the roles are reversed and an innocent Christian boy is on the receiving end of a Muslim boot, just guess what happened.

And we are supposed to take these evil old men who call themselves judges seriously, and pretend there is equal justice in this country? Don't make me laugh!

A call to action but is anyone listening?

There is a very disturbing video on the Home of the Green Arrow blogsite, which can be viewed by clicking here. It is a terrifying warning about the seemingly inevitable death of our Western culture as it becomes submerged in an apparently unstoppable Islam.

Whilst, across Europe, indigenous populations are dropping in an alarming and potentially irreversible rate, the Muslim invasion of Europe is expected to double in numbers from its current level of 52 Million to 104 million in a few decades (174 million if Turkey joins the EU). Meanwhile in America, the Muslim population, a mere 100,000 in 1970, is expected to exceed 50 million in thirty years. At this rate Islam's eventual dominance of the West within this century seems a foregone conclusion.

Is this to be our fate, is this really how our story will end?

It certainly feels as if we are facing something which has been long foretold, yet throughout history it has surely been assumed that when mankind faced the many headed hydra of the apocalypse we would put up a fight, rather than meekly surrender to the darkness whilst scoffing a pop-tart and and checking it there is something more interesting on the other channels.

Have we really reached such a point? Have those of European origin, a race who have done more good for the people of this Earth than all the others combined, now chosen to make our exit? For make no mistake that is what it means, the end may take decades, possibly centuries, but from this point forward there will be no going back. No prior race in history has volunteered for its extinction, are we to be the first?

Have the Western nations who's people are responsible for almost every advance in technology, science, medicine, democracy and law, those who's art, culture and literature surpasses anything even dreamed of in the world beyond, the people who fought for a better world on the Western Front, Dunkirk and at Iwo Jima and Gettysburg really reduced to this? Has something occurred to emasculate our race or were we always like this, were the British always lumpen, cowards who only ruled the waves because the toffs bullied them into it, as the new breed of toffs now bully them into embracing their decline? The evidence does not support such a claim, but, if not, what has happened?

We are facing the greatest danger which we, as a people, have ever faced, yet it seems as if either we have not noticed, do not care or are too cowed to acknowledge or face it.

We have faced danger before, but this time our foe is legion, and we face a powerful and well organised enemy within. To say that is not to be alarmist. Nobody will now deny that for the first eighty years of the last century, there were those amongst us working tirelessly for our destruction at the hands of Soviet Communism. Communism has gone away, but those who sought to destroy us have not, they have merely moved on to a new and more deadly attack on the West.

It is no coincidence that the growing threat of Militant Islam coincided with the fall of Communism, they are both designed to achieve for the same terrible outcome, but from where we stand today Islam and indeed multiculturalism in general is the greater threat.

Yet we behave as if we are blind to it, when did we become such fools?

We acknowledged the threat of Communism and stood up to that, why do we refuse to acknowledge or stand up to this even greater peril? Thirty years ago, we would have laughed in the face of any politician who claimed that "the vast Majority of moderate peace-loving communists don't want to bomb us into the stone age", so why do we obediently accept such meaningless platitudes when they are said about Islam?

Do we really believe that if we do not speak the truth it will go away? Be assured it will not.

The reality is with us, it is a terrifying reality and it will soon be too late to reverse it. If we do not do something now we are facing the end of our culture, and the eventual end of our people. Before you scoff, do the maths, if this continues, our fate is inevitable. We may survive in beleaguered pockets across Europe, North America and Australia, but the decline will be unstoppable, and have only one outcome.

I am not speaking of a possible future, but of a certainty, if we do not act to change it. Our last chance is fading, if we do not grasp it now we will never again have that option.

Will you grasp the chance, or will you eat another pop tart and change the channel? If the latter, I recommend that you never look your children in the eyes again, for you will never forgive yourself, as they will one day never forgive you

One time US Presidential candidate arrested in Prague

I see that the right wing US politician David Duke has been arrested in Prague under one of Europe's many laws suppressing free speech. I mention it here, because you probably will not hear much about it on the news. The media are likely to keep a lid on this story in case Duke says something which the authorities do not want you to hear.

Dr. Duke was in the Czech Republic to promote his autobiography "My Awakening", however, he has been accused of either denying the Holocaust or approving of it, the Czech police are not very clear on that point, and seem to think that the two are not mutually exclusive.

Although Dr. Duke once kindly published one of my articles on his website, I am not a committed supporter of all his views, for instance I do not find his belief in a World Wide Jewish conspiracy to be compelling, and I certainly view Islam as a far greater threat to all of us than Israel is, whatever the faults in her foreign policy.

However, I respect his tireless and valuable work on behalf of white Nationalism (which should never be confused with so called "White supremacism", as the media constantly do, so as to disguise its true, and far more benign, message) I also agree with Dr. Duke, that, whilst not personally denying the holocaust, any historical event in respect of which one can be sent to prison for merely questioning it, is inevitably suspicious and likely to involve details which those in power do not wish us to know.

It should be noted that David Duke is an ex-Republican representative for Louisiana and one time candidate to become the Republican Presidential nominee. In addition he was also, at one time the leader of the Klu Klux Klan. However, his involvement with the KKK was over thirty years ago, and we should not forget that some of our recent Home Secretaries were members of the Communist Party more recently than that. However, whilst John Ried's one time Communist Party membership is seldom referred to, and Barack Ombama's long term, and far more recent, membership of a racist church has been long ago forgotten by the press, it is always Dukes, log ago association with the Klan, and only that association which the Media mention in any report about him. Its as if they want to undermine what he says before he says it, which, of course, they do.

Whatever you may think of Dr Duke, it is obvious that those in control are desperate to undermine and, as in the latest incident, silence what he has to say, hence, some may conclude that some of what he has to say may have some merit.

Who's paying the bills?

There is an interesting item on the "Obama for America" expenses disclosure which can be viewed online at the Federal Elections Commission website, under the heading "Disbursements by Payee". If you scroll down about half way, you will see a payment of $688,316.42 to Perkins Coie.

At first sight this payment would appear to be above board, "Obama for America" if, of course, President Barack Obama's election campaign Political Action committee, for whom Perkins Coie are the official legal advisers, as they have been for previous Democratic presidential campaigns, and indeed the Democratic party itself.

However as the letter below, which was sent to Gregory Hollister, a retired Air Force colonel and one of those who issued legal proceedings, demanding that Obama produce evidence proving his eligibility to be the US president, Perkins Coie are also providing other, more personal, services for the chosen one.

The letter is from Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie – top lawyer for Obama, Obama's presidential campaign, the Democratic National Committee and now Obama's Organizing for America organisation – who it now appears is the same Washington, D.C., lawyer defending President Obama in lawsuits challenging his eligibility to be president. Colonel Hollister's lawsuit had just been thrown out by a district judge, on the basis that it had been previously "twittered" (yes the reasons are now getting that bizarre) and Bauer write urging him to drop his "frivolous" suit, and making various threats if he didn't.

Hence it would appear the same Law firm and the same lawyers are acting for Obama in both an official and private capacity.

Now I am sure this is legal, and no doubt Obama thought "Gee these guys know what they are doing. I think I will hire them privately to fight those pesky eligibility suits", and I am sure that Perkins Coie are scrupulous in keeping the funds originating from campaign contributions separate from those set aside for fighting Obama's personal law suits.

However, have I got over sensitive nostrils or does this set up smell rather unpleasant, and don't you hear the words "Conflict of Interest" echoing down the corridors?

It is an old cliche to say that Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and it seems they might need more than one summer's worth when scrutinising the current administration.

The proof of the lie

With today's budget, it is now official, our economy is in the worst state it has ever been in peace time. The only equivalent in our history is the end of World War II, an event which brought to an end Britain's role as a leading world power and effectively forced us to abandon our empire.

Devastating world wars apart, we have never been in such a dire situation, the true levels of which our leaders have only been able to disguise from us by levels of borrowing so huge that they will impact on the prosperity of this country for years to come, and which our children ,and maybe even our grandchildren, will be repaying well into their adult years.

How did we reach this state, and how did it get so bad? What are the factors which have brought us so low?

The press and the politicians are quick to blame the banks and of course, the legendary “greedy bankers", who, of course, certainly played their part in what has happened. However, banks and greedy bankers have been a feature of Western civilisation for centuries, and they have made huge mistakes before, but they never brought us to this pass, what is different now?

Despite the fact that Britain is arguably the western nation worst placed to face the current situation, many will point out that we are in a global recession which has effected most of the world, and to some degree that is certainly true. However, most of the emerging, or recently emerged economies, such as China and India and many of those in Eastern Europe, have been damaged by the knock on effect of what has happened to the major western economies, in Europe and America, those countries which historically created the wealth which supported the rest of the world.

To find the cause of what has happened, it is necessary to look at what has so dramatically changed in those rich Western Nations where the foundations of this catastrophe were first laid, It certainly does not take long to identify one of them.

In the last two decades, the main Western European economies have seen levels of non-European immigration, unprecedented at any point in the history of our continent. Some have compared the degree of demographic change to that following the fall of Constantinople in 1453, however, in fact what is happening now is greater and even more wide ranging than that, we have never seen anything like this.

Meanwhile, America has experienced levels of immigration higher than anything that nation has seen since before World War 1 at the beginning of the last century. However, the great difference between then and now is that the immigration to America in the last twenty years, has not come from other western nations, but primarily from the third world.

It is a self evident fact the single greatest and most unprecedented demographic change to all the main western nations in the period leading up to the worst peace time economic crisis they have faced, is the advent of massive levels of third world immigration.

I, and others, have argued before that there is a direct connection between this crisis and the crazy levels of immigration which have been undemocratically imposed on the West. It is certainly the general consensus that at the root of our predicament is the sub-prime lending fiasco in America, however, what is not admitted is that over 90% of that sub-prime lending was to minorities, in particular immigrant, groups, an insanity mostly forced upon banks by agenda obsessed politicians and PC courts.

However, I have made that argument before, and although I believe clear-eyed historians will take the same view, it is not the purpose of this particular post. The point I am making is a far simpler one, and one which is hard to argue against.

Over the years, those who have supported the insane levels of immigrant colonisation they have forced us to endure have insisted that our economy benefits from immigration, and that we are all better off because of the contribution immigrants have made to our country. They have made those claims over and over again, and we have all heard them, and we all knew they were lies, now we have the proof.

After years during which we have seen a foreign invasion far in excess of anything we have ever experienced in our history we are facing the greatest peacetime financial crisis we have ever experienced. Whether or not Immigrants are part of the cause, their presence amongst us has not made our situation any better, in fact our problems are far worse than we have ever faced before.

Britain has not benefited from immigration, and the nightmare which has been imposed upon us has contributed nothing to our National well-being, arguably it has made our plight infinitely worse.

The main argument in favour of mass immigration, has been proved a fallacy, in fact it has been proved to be a lie. We as a nation are now living with the proof of that lie, we are all poorer for it, and the millions we have let in have not improved our situation.

The lie have been exposed and must never again go unchallenged
___________________________