It can be almost guaranteed that any statement or belief which can be deemed to be politically correct is, by the same token, factually incorrect.
Examples can be found in almost every aspect of our society and how we are required to perceive and describe them. It is, for instance, politically correct, and all but mandatory for anyone within the media, law or politics, to insist there is no difference in the rate of street level criminal offending between the races.
As in any totalitarian society it then becomes the role of the state controlled popular media to promote the approved doctrine in the propaganda beamed into the homes of the population by means of misreported news or fictional drama bearing no resemblance to reality, with the effect that, over time, the lie becomes a universally accepted truth.
Indeed, in in their eagerness to obey their orders, the media go even further and if one were to judge by the story lines and portrayals in all popular TV and celluloid drama the vast majority of all street crime, be it mugging, robbery, assault, rape or drug dealing is perpetrated by whites, whereas non-whites more commonly appear as victims or employed in law enforcement. Progressively as people lock themselves away from the frightening reality outside, the pretend world coming in through their TV screens becomes confused with the far less appealing one outside, until it becomes the new reality.
This applies even more invidiously to the constant propaganda aimed at the most vulnerable and receptive amongst us, our children. The makers of the new US TV Childrens' adventure cartoon "Dora the Explorer" brag that their Latina heroine and politically correct plots may "
Change a generation". They will, of course, be changing that generation by making it believe in lies, and what else is that but propaganda?.
This form of reverse reality extends far beyond popular entertainment the tentacles of political correctness have wound themselves throughout all levels of society, especially into government, the media and of course all government funded institutions, which now suffer from what might be termed institutional political correctness. On the face of it, this may not appear too malevolent and there is a temptation to treat the zealots of political correctness with the benign amused tolerance one might grant to an eccentric maiden aunt. That is, until one realises that they are functioning on the basis of what are, in effect a series of untruths and blatant lies and that they are imposing those lies on almost every aspect of our lives.
Gradually these lies have come to dictate official policy within so many areas which directly impact upon our current well being and the very future of our nation.
The police for instance are the organisation tasked with protecting society from criminality, yet they are not permitted to acknowledge, or in many instances even address the truth of the criminality they are confronting. Instead they are required to operate as if within a parallel universe or pantomime, playing lip service to an entirely false reality.
Who can forget when following widespread public concerns about knife attacks on London teenagers, perpetrated exclusively by non-white youths, the London Metropolitan police produced a
deliberately misleading public information film featuring a white boy carrying a knife.
The false reality is even more prevalent within so called “victim support” organisations, who appear to view their role as guardians of the politically correct flame as more important than the safety of those they are supposed to support.
This is not just happening in Europe, in America in the aftermath of the Duke Lacrosse case (the ultimate would be politically correct fairy tale), I recall reading commentary on a rape crisis website based in North Carolina, which made the claim that inter-racial rape was relatively rare, but when it did occur it was predominantly perpetrated by white attackers against non-white victims. I can't link to that web-page as it has since disappeared, presumably someone involved discovered a sense of shame and took it down, however, such blatant lies are commonly made by organisations who claim that their role is to protect the victims of violence.
Clearly, those running such organisations believe it is more important to protect a politically correct fantasy than it is to actually protect women from being raped.
As with the TV shows and newspaper articles full of fictional white racists, muggers and rapists and pretend non-white victims, it is, also politically correct not to notice that what is being said or what is being portrayed is factually incorrect and indeed the exact reverse of the reality all around us.
Not noticing inconvenient facts is another fundamental requirement of political correctness.
Incompetent, under qualified or just plain bad doctors
For instance almost every week another story of medical incompetence involving a doctor who has either
killed a patient by giving them totally the wrong medicine, failed to notice evidence of child abuse,
such as a broken back or missed the fact that a woman had
a toilet brush handle in a body orifice, doctors so incompetent they could not
could not diagnose their way out of a paper bag or so corrupt they have been
selling the body parts of healthy Asian peasants to wealthy, usually Asian, patients, is reported in the media. However, we are supposed to pretend we haven't noticed that, to a vastly disproportionate degree, the majority of these incompetent charlatans are of third world origin.
We are also not supposed to consider it odd when qualification free Home Office Pathologist Dr Mohmed Saeed Sulema Patel is named as “
Freddy Patel” by the newspapers who then go on to refer to him as “British”, or that Nigerian incompetent Daniel Ubani, who recently failed in his legal
attempts to silence the family of a man he killed, is invariably called a German. (Both stories in this week's news)
We are not supposed to notice the connection between third world standards of hygiene in our hospitals and the numbers of immigrants from the third world working in them, when we visit a hospital we must pretend not to see that at least three quarters of the queue in front of us are not of British ancestry. Yet at the same time, despite
case after
case after
case of
malpractice, criminality or
incompetence by immigrant medical staff, we must agree, like obedient Stepford wives, when some brainwashed idiot or state apparatchik claims our health service would collapse without immigrants.
Cults such as Islam are, of course, major beneficiaries of reverse reality, for example who can forget when the last government renamed acts of Islamic terrorism “Anti-Islamic acts”, which is rather akin to calling murder anti-death, or indeed a bunch of fascists “anti-fascists” (more of which later). Meanwhile a vast section of the Muslim community are referred to as a “tiny minority”, whilst their warlike political dogma is called a “Religion of Peace”, it would be laughable, were it not so dangerous to laugh at such things .
Likewise, we are required to believe that militant or extremist Islam does not represent the “real moderate” Islam practised by the “vast majority of peaceful Muslims”. The truth, of course, is that it is the watered
down, milksop, form of Islam, followed by some of those who have come to the West in an attempt to escape the reality of Islam, which bears little or no resemblance to the real thing.
In New York, those the opposing the building of what was initially to be called
the Cordoba mosque – named after the Spanish City of Cordoba, which was at the centre of the first Islamic Caliphait in Europe for over 500 years from the time it was invaded and overthrown by Muslim armies in 711 AD, until it was taken back by the Spanish in 1236 AD - at the site of the September 2001 attacks are accused of intolerance and bigotry, whereas it is in fact those who wish to impose their triumphalist monstrosity on the place where followers of their religion caused such devastation, regardless of the offence and hurt that it will cause who are really guilty of intolerance, bigotry and, I suspect of hatred too.
Political Correctness demands that the intention to build a monument to Islam, named after a great Islamic victory over Christendom at the spot where followers of Islam achieved their greatest and most bloody attack against America must be accepted as the gesture of good will its smirking proponents claim it to be. They know its a lie, we know its a lie, but that's what political correctness is all about.
It is also de rigueur amongst the ranks of the politically correct to claim that the proposed location of the Cordoba mosque is not part of Ground Zero, indeed the ludicrous
Keith Olbermann recently dedicated one of his toe curlingly embarrassing soliloquies to this claim. However, if not an outright lie, to make this dubious assertion requires the application of a significant economy to the truth. In fact the two buildings at 45–47 Park Place and Broadway, which will be demolished in order to build the Cordoba (or Park 51) Mosque were damaged by part of one of the planes during the attack on the World Trade Centre, but did not fall.
It will, therefore, be necessary to destroy buildings which survived the Islamic attack on them in order to build a monument to Islam. Some would argue that the deliberate symbolism of that act is even more malevolent.
Once again, of course, it is necessary to ignore the uncomfortable facts which do not fit the lies of political correctness. For to claim as the apologists for Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, the man behind this plan, that this is a peaceful act of bridge building between Islam and the West, requires the turning of a wilfully blind ear to how it's planned construction is being described in Muslim lands.
As I stated earlier, in almost every way that it is applied, political correctness is the reverse of the truth and as such it is a lie, or more accurately a set of lies. However, it now the set of lies upon which our western societies, most of our laws and all our institutions are progressively becoming based. It is what our media report to us instead of news, it is what our politicians preach to us and use to bully us with, worse than that, it is what our schools teach our children in place of the truth.
There is some debate as to whether Churchill ever really said “In the future the true fascists will call themselves anti fascists”, but whether he did or if it was, as some claim, the prediction of the Italian Communist politician Ignazio Silone, we have unquestionably reached that future but have, in fact, gone much further. It is not only fascists which the rules of political correctness now permit to call themselves anti-fascists, as has most emphatically happened, but in so many ways what is officially described as one thing is in fact the diametric opposite of what it calls itself.
The drive to impose a homogenised mono-culture across the Western world is perversely described as multiculturalism. Our leaders claim to be the champions of diversity, but its policies and aims are entirely the opposite and, in fact, the state will crush any dissent or divergence from the imposed orthodoxy.
This is the age of the universally accepted lie. In this age, white males must, as if by diktat, be condemned as the main perpetrators of racial violence, whereas in truth they are its primary victims. The guilt for slavery must be laid exclusively at the feet of white Europe, however, in terms of world history, our involvement was briefer and certainly less cruel (King Leopold of Belgium notwithstanding) than any other race other than possibly Australian aborigines, Inuits and Melanesians. Meanwhile it was we, of European ancestry, and we alone, who ended slavery, yet now to state that truth is to be accused of hate.
Ah yes, “hate” what does that mean? Hate, in the new world, now means things which it never did before.
Love, if it is not the approved form of love is now ruled to be hatred. To be guilty of hate it is no longer necessary to bear ill will towards any other group, it is required only to love the wrong things, to love one's country, to love one's people, one's race or one's heritage has been redefined as hatred and reviled.
Within this bizarre, false dishonest world which has formed around us, lies are revered and wildly applauded, yet it is entirely possible to be prosecuted for no more than telling the truth.
At the heart of this madness, at the root of the perversion of all that is true is political correctness. To live by the rules of political correctness is to live a lie, for it exists only to distort, suppress and destroy the truth. Those who dismiss political correctness as harmless or benign eccentricity are fools and are doomed.
Our overlords impose the creed of political correctness upon us in order to achieve a political goal which they have never, and will never, dare to let us vote for. It is the blade on the wheels of the chariot leading the invading army, and its purpose is to cut down all opposition and neuter all resistance so that its masters' aims can be achieved.
When the people believe a lie then the liars can succeed, when they can be made to confuse good with evil and evil with good, it is then that evil can triumph, which I fear it almost has done.
A lie is at its most dangerous either when it is falsely cloaked as kindness or when it is so entrenched you can make men fear to disbelieve it, and that is the aim of political correctness. It ranks among the most malign of political weapons ever to be devised by evil men and it is being ruthlessly used against us.
If we do not wake up to the truth of political correctness, then the lies of political correctness will destroy us all, for that is what they are designed to do.
Some while ago I posted a video of Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lakin explaining his reasons for refusing to be deployed to Afghanistan until US President Barrack Obama provide proof that he is eligible to serve in the role of president. That is to say, proves that he is a natural born citizen of America, as required by the US Constitution.
