Saturday, 13 June 2009

Defying the Sophistry of the Fourth Estate

A better use for the British press

The following article, by George Fanning, appears on the BNP website
_____________________________________________________

THOMAS Carlyle first coined the term “Fourth Estate” in his 1841 book “On Heroes and Hero Worship” to epitomise the power of the establishment print media.

For almost 200 years, this power has been unchallenged and has often framed the parameters of British politics.

During the last few months, the full power of the Fourth Estate has been intensely focused on a single objective - namely, to destroy the electoral potential of a small British political party. Never before in British history have the print media displayed such unified intent or single purpose, and with the triumphant election of two BNP MEP’s, never before have the print media failed so dramatically to achieve their aims.

As democratic nationalists, British National Party politicians can have no possible objection to rigorous scrutiny, tough questioning and critical comment. But deliberate, calculated and malicious falsehoods are in a different category. The increasingly hysterical lies proffered by the despairing print media over recent weeks have included the bizarre and baseless contentions that the BNP is determined to deport all Ghurkhas (The Sun), exclude Jewish people from the party in spite of having Jewish councillors (Daily Mail) and ban Italian restaurants, along with Spanish tapas bars and French bistros!! (The Sun again)

It is a tribute to the force of the BNP’s message that the establishment media dare not criticise the true policies of the party. The media barons are well aware that opposition to mass immigration and Islamification is immensely popular among voters. Not even the most malevolent left wing rag has the courage to mount a spirited defence of the failed doctrine of multiculturalism, still less to argue that the ongoing programme of giant mosque construction contributes positively to the general welfare of the nation.

All the media are terrified of any mention of the incontrovertible fact that the British peoples are destined to become an ethnic minority in their own country before 2075, unless there is a radical change in government policy. The fear that Nick Griffin might speak this unspeakable truth during a live broadcast is what prevents the BNP chairman from being invited onto BBC 1’s Question Time, or Radio 4’s “Any Questions”.

Some of the media smears may even have worked. Establishment commentators have seized upon the argument that the BNP vote increased by a “mere” 17% on a reduced turnout, from 808,200 in 2004 to 943,598 in 2009. What torments the denizens of “Fleet Street” and Whitehall is the well-founded fear that the 943 thousand Britons who voted British National Party on June 4th 2009 might represent only the burnished steel core of BNP supporters. The high priests of the Fourth Estate know full well that the brave 943 thousand are just the determined voters who were prepared to grit their teeth, ignore the avalanche of daily media lies and threats, and defiantly place their ballot cross next to the letters BNP. There is a vast penumbra of millions more British folk who support BNP policies, but have so far proved vulnerable to dissuasion by contrived lie and carefully engineered social opprobrium.

Unfortunately for the proprietors of the Establishment media, their power is now decisively on the wane, eroded by technological advance. It is ironic that the Fourth Estate has achieved this degree of unanimity in their opposition to the BNP exactly at the moment when the internet has forever undermined their monopoly of “truth”. Old fashioned newspapers are shedding employees and closing offices the length and breadth of the country, and the British National Party has only just started to mobilise its internet power against them.

In the years to come, college academics will no doubt study the newspapers’ united campaign against the BNP during 2009 as a singular phenomenon without historical precedent. They will surely view the dramatic failure of that anti-BNP campaign as the moment in history when the awesome power of the print media was broken forever.

Times are indeed changing. The British National Party has proved well capable of using technology to address its audience directly. And henceforth, newspapers and TV stations who stray beyond fair and rigorous scrutiny to traduce the BNP can expect to be excluded from press conferences and subjected to well-organised boycotts and protest campaigns.

An above-averagely talented Sky News reporter admirably summarised the BNP’s remarkable resilience this week. “Defiance”, he said, “is part of the BNP brand”. And he was right. The lies, smears and distortions of the Establishment’s Fourth Estate can perhaps inhibit and constrain the BNP’s growth. But in spite of their titanic efforts, as Thursday’s European election triumph proved, they cannot stem the inexorable rise of our party. The old media and their powerful scheming allies tried their level best - and they failed utterly.

On June 4th, the BNP’s softly spoken truth defeated a banshee chorus of media lies, and there was nothing the Fourth Estate could do about it.


Source

Friday, 12 June 2009

A tragedy which changes nothing

Was justice done?

The three thugs who killed 16 year old Ben Kinsella were today sentenced to life in prison with a requirement that they serve a minimum of 19 years before they can be considered for parole. As Ben's sister, the actress Brooke Kinsella pointed out, nineteen years is only three years longer than young Ben was on this earth, before these animals took his life.

Nineteen years is less than half my life, and I consider myself still young, given the killers' own ages, the eldest of them will be thirty nine when he is eligible for parole, certainly young enough to take more young lives and destroy other families.

If there is any consolation, the brutes were unwise enough to take the life of a much loved child of a large and well connected East End family, and are therefore guaranteed an uncomfortable time in prison.

Ben Kinsella

Whether it was the size of his family, his sister's status as a minor TV celebrity together with family friends, such as actresses Linda Robson and Gillian Tailforth, or the dreadful unprovoked nature of the innocent young boy's murder, but Ben's killing caused a significant reaction when it happened last year.

Hundreds of teenagers marched through London

Last July hundreds of London Teenagers, all wearing white in memory of Ben, marched through London demanding an end to knife crime. An optimist, might hope that such a reaction my have some effect upon the nightmare our society is becoming, however, the almost total absence amongst the marchers of non white faces, or indeed politicians (who would have been there in force had the races of victim and killers been reversed) suggests that such hopes may be futile.

Meanwhile our government continues with the crazy policies which are adding daily to the violence and crime on our streets. How many more children must die before someone with power to change things admits how wrong they have been?

Thursday, 11 June 2009

Mores South African Farm Attacks

Media Expert found Murdered and burnt

June 1 2009 the murdered and partially burnt body of Dr Klaas Jonkheid, 48, a top Afrikaans news media consumer expert was found murdered and torched in a churchyard in Faure in the Western Cape over the weekend. Police confirmed that he had been kidnapped from a farm road at the Spier wine estate near where he had been staying.

Full Story here

Farmer fights off attackers

10 June 2009: Farmer Chris Mare of Brits is recovering in hospital after fighting off a gang of armed robbers with his bare hands – and thus giving daughters SunĂ© and Nicolene, wife Hildegard and son CP the chance to flee from the armed farm attackers.

Full story in Afrikaans

Details in English here

Another Lost boy, another lost son

Ben Kinsella

I had planned to use my own words to comment on today's verdict at the Old Baily, when three young men were found guilty of the unprovoked murder of 16 year old Ben Kinsella. However, nothing I could write would be as eloquent as the words of Ben's mother Deborah Kinsella, read out in court following the conviction of her son's killers.

Therefore, I shall follow the example of my friend the Green Arrow, and let the heartrending words of Ben;s mother pay tribute to her beautiful son.

Deborah Kinsella's statement:

I make this statement and the feelings and emotions are felt by all my family but no amount of words could ever express the daily pain we feel for the loss of Ben.

On 29 June 2008 our beautiful son Ben was brutally and savagely stabbed to death. We as his family have been left devastated and in total despair.

Our whole world has been totally turned upside down. Ben went for a good night out and never came home again.

Ben had only just finished school - a straight-A student, he had a job and had got his place in college (he never learnt of the wonderful exam results he had achieved and worked so very hard for).

Ben loved life, he loved living and he had so much to live for. He knew where he was going and where he wanted to be.

Ben loved nothing more than to make people laugh, he was a fun-loving, happy-go-lucky boy with a heart of gold and would do anything for anyone. A testimony of this was his funeral that was attended by so many friends who filled the church and pavements outside.

Ben loved art and wanted to be a graphic designer, he loved his family, cooking, football, music and girls.

The people who murdered him knew nothing about our Ben, not a hair on his head, a bone in his body, not anything about our wonderful son. They had never met him before or spoken to him - they just cruelly took his life away with knives for no apparent reason.

We had brought Ben up to always walk away from trouble. This sadly cost him his life. He walked away to get safely home and they took advantage of that - he was one boy on his own. It seems unfair their intent was to stab someone that night.

'Boy thing'

We were a big, happy, loving family (we are one down, one missing). We are hard-working and just wanted the best for all our children in life. There are now just three of us at home.

We have had to move house because it broke our hearts to not see Ben in his bedroom curled up sleeping and safe in his bed. We so miss Ben's love and laughter and most of all the boy thing in our family.

Ben was our precious son that we cherished and were so immensely proud of, and by the way we had brought him up.

He had values and respected everyone he met. We as a family will never know the man he would have become, the wife he would have met and the children he would have had.

We cry every day for the loss of Ben, we do not sleep like we did before

This has all now been taken away from siblings, his grandmothers, aunts, uncles, cousins, friends and us.

No parent or sibling should ever have to go through or see what we have seen with our son. He died in front of us, we then had to visit him in a morgue, the undertakers and finally to bury him.

We can now only visit Ben at a cemetery, our beautiful son who so loved life.

We cry every day for the loss of Ben, we do not sleep like we did before. Nearly a year on our nights are still filled with nightmares, of our son's last moments and what he went through that fatal night.

Our lives will never be the same - we have all been so deeply affected.

We as a family will never get over the loss of our Ben. We are just trying to get through it. Our family now face a lifetime of feeling this way.

Nothing we can say or do will ever bring Ben back. All we can hope and pray for is that justice will prevail, maybe then we can find some form of closure to this awful event that has devastated our family's lives.

___________________________________________

Ben Kinsella's killers will be sentenced tomorrow. Despite the fact that they selected Ben, a white boy, for attack "at random", even though he had no involvement in the "disrespectful look" which had angered them, the killers were not charged with a racially motivated crime.

Michael Alleyne, Jade Braithwaite and Kikka Juress

___________________

Note Ben Kinsella should not be confused with Ben Hitchcock, who I wrote about in May, another white youth who's non-white killers were convicted less than two weeks ago.

Wednesday, 10 June 2009

Joey Smith's Victory Song

Click the image (or here) to play Joey's latest release at YouTube

British Nationalist singer Joey Smith celebrates the BNP's success in the European Elections.

Please rate the song and leave a comment for Joey

__________________________________
I regret I am having difficulty uploading videos to this blog at the moment

Tuesday, 9 June 2009

Brain cell free UAF man explains the purpose of the attack


Click here to watch the interview at Derby Patriot


Sometimes our enemies are our best advocates

UAF Thugs attack BNP MEPs

The two newly elected Members of the European Parliament Nick Griffin and Andrew Bron were forced to abandon their press conference this morning when they were attacked by around 100 tax payer funded UAF thugs.

It seems that the unelected UAF intend to ignore democracy and well seek to deny the democratically elected BNP MEP's the right to free speech.

Full story and film here on the Green Arrow blog

It seems the UAF's actions may have backfired, as the vast majority of callers to the BBC were appalled by the attack on Griffin and Bron, more film here at Green Arrow

Also , click here to hear Nick Griffin being interviewed about the attack on the lunchtime news

Monday, 8 June 2009

A battle has been won, but the enemy has not gone away

It was well after 2:00 am, and their masks had begun to slip. After hours of watching so much of that they had spent all their adult lives working for collapse around them, whilst much of what they had fought against was coming to pass, they could no longer even muster a pretence of the much claimed, but long extinct impartiality. Their faces told it all, one had to see the expressions of fury and raw hatred on the faces of the band of hand picked commentators and professional fabricators, chosen to present the BBC's coverage of the 2009 European election results to believe it. They had been crossed and they wanted revenge

Clearly seething beneath his careful coiffer, even veteran anchor in chief, David Dimbleby, who's much admired father must be spinning in his grave, dropped all pretence of neutrality and snarled something barely coherent about “sending Fascists to Europe”, whilst the establishment's favourite Guardianista hackette, Polly Toynbee, bemoaned “a terrible, terrible result”.

Dimbleby had begun snarling earlier when he taunted BNP Leader Nick Griffin with the wish fulfilling lie that Britain was now a mixed race nation, thus seeking to falsely imply that Griffin's expected success would be a hollow one, the cold rage behind his eyes revealing how much he wished his lie were true.

Meanwhile the BBC's bizarre and bespectacled political commentator, Nick Robinson, speaking as if to comfort himself, pointed out that the BNP's vote, “had not gone up since 2004”, dishonestly ignoring what a significant achievement that was, given the relentless media campaign against the BNP and how far other parties votes had dropped, even the victorious Tories only saw their vote increase by 2%. Another BBC apparatchik, it was hard to tell who, as their puffy, red and angry faces were all starting to look alike by that point, accused the victorious Griffin of being “a very bad man!”. The latter words spoken with the arrogant confidence of one who's assumption that his own politically tainted assessment is an acknowledged truth, has never before been challenged.

This display of bitter media disappointment. followed weeks during which such seemingly disparate groups as trade unions, national newspapers and the Anglican church had all come together to condemn a single political party and appeal to the public not to vote for them.

Seldom, has the political bias and commonality of purpose of our nation's establishment and its media been so clearly exposed. They are all, every one of them branches of the same poisonous tree which as spent a quarter of a century, or more. suppressing and vilifying any organisation which has attempted to stand up in defence of the native population of Britain, and they are now furiously spitting blood in their failure to destroy the latest threat to their mission.

They are as mean spirited as they are dangerous, and their dishonesty is massive, they call us “fascists”, yet, anyone watching their behaviour and that of the baying boot boy thugs outside Manchester town hall attempting, unsuccessfully, to prevent Griffin attending the count, would have little difficulty in determining who the true Nazis are. However, it is not only their dishonesty which is massive, their malevolence knows no bounds, and we ignore that at our peril.

They are not alone, be under no illusion, those commentators who snarled and sniped their way through last night's election coverage are merely the ugly, and visible, boil on top of a huge and pustulating abscess, an infection so deeply rooted that it will not be drained easily.

None of us are so naĂ¯ve as to believe that those who have used every dirty trick they know against us, will now think “Oh well we tried, but the better side won”, that is not their way. We have only clambered over the parapet and the real battle has only just begun, if you thought the lies they told about us leading up to the election were bad, just wait for the ones they will tell about us now that we have bested them.

Nobody ever went into Nationalist politics hoping to make money, but that will not stop the press attempting to smear us with some expenses scandal as soon as Nick and Andrew arrive in Brussels. Not only must our boys continue to be squeaky clean, they must be demonstratively more so than anyone else The same media which studiously ignored the UKIP corruption scandals and Old Nigel Grinalot's £2 million of expenses will be waiting for Nick to so much as as accidentally charge the tax payer for a two Euro glass of shandy with his dinner.

If they can't find something they will make it up, hey, its not as if they haven't tried it before!

Believe me, the dirty tricks will come thick and fast, and they will be aimed at both the MEPs and at the party.

The first trick I suspect they will try, and which was set on course by David Dimbleby last night, will be to get someone of mix race origin to die their hair blonde join the party, and then run an expose on the BNP's “hypocrisy” and the BNP must be ready to expose the media's own hypocrisy if and when they do try it.

They will use whatever they can against us, and as we now know, nothing is too low for them.

They will continue to monitor our chat rooms, our blogs and and out discussion boards and seek to twist anything we say. They will try to link any criminal who once knew someone who thought about voting BNP to us, and worse than that, they will try to use against us the laws which they passed for that very purpose. What they tried to do to Nick Griffin and Mark Collett they will try again, and some of us may become casualties.

I do not wish to detract from today's euphoria, it is a euphoria which is well deserved, we have achieved great things in the face of huge opposition. However, that opposition is still there and the next few years will not be easy for any of us, for the enemies ranged against us are legion.

Although we have crossed one difficult ravine, there are still vast canyons ahead and what we face is not for the faint hearted, for as last night's election coverage and this morning's media headlines tell us, we have many enemies, who are very angry and very nasty.

We will prevail because our cause is right and theirs is not, but it will not be easy, and it may not come soon. Enjoy this success but remember, we are in this for the long game.

Saturday, 6 June 2009

Broken Ballot box seals?

We all know this is going to happen, what matters is how often!! Click here to read the story.

In Memory of the ol' First Ammendment

Free Speech? #1

The US company touting itself as the "world's largest out-of-home media" enterprise has banned a national billboard campaign that asks one simple question: "Where's the birth certificate?"

CBS Outdoor, a division of CBS Corp. that sells more outdoor advertising than any other billboard company in North America, refuses to accept purchases of space on any of its 550,000 displays
nationwide.

The billboard campaign was begun last month by Joseph Farah, editor and chief executive officer of World Net Daily, due to his frustration with media colleagues not giving attention to what he sees as critical questions about Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility to serve as president.

"Here we have one of the largest media companies in the U.S. now not only refusing to allow news coverage of a vitally important national question being asked by millions of Americans, but one that won't even permit the purchase of space to raise the question," said Farah. "What is the value of a First Amendment in a country when this kind of self-censorship is at work – self-censorship specifically geared to stifle inquiry and debate about the most powerful person in the country."

A spokesperson for CBS stated that the billboards were "misleading", but failed to say how.
__________________________

Free Speech? #2
In a separate story, it is likely that, withing days the US government is expected to deport Englishmen Stephen Whittle and Simon Sheppard (otherwise known as The Heretical 2) back to Englanistan-obogo, formally known as Great Britain, where they face up to seven years in prison for thought crimes. Mr Whittle and Mr Sheppard, didn't kill anyone, they didn't steal anything, they didn't rape or attack anyone, what they did was write stuff, an activity which can now be a serious criminal offence in the Orwellian state of Englanistan-obogo.

Following their political show trial these two convicted writers fled to the United States and claimed political Asylum, in the belief that America still believed in its First Amendment protection of free speech. Some chance!!!

As Nicholas Stix explains here not only were Whittle and Sheppard the wrong colour, but what they were saying was not the sort of free speech which is protected in Obama's America.


So what do the two stories tell us about the state of the once much revered first amendment to the US constitution? why not ask this guy!

(it seems the First Amendment has gone the same way as Article 2 Clause 5)

South Africa's relentless violence continues

The death of a holy man

Father Ernst Plöchl and his rural mission

A venerated, elderly Cistercian missionary from Upper Austria who had dedicated the last forty years of his life to building up a rural mission in the Griqualand region of South Africa near Kokstad, was found murdered there on Sunday. Authorities said Father Ernst Plöchl, 78, born in Neumarkt im MĂ¼hlkreis in the Austrian district of Freistadt, was killed under circumstances which remain murky. He was either shot to death or strangled, and it’s also not known if anything was stolen or what the actual motive may have been.The priest was widely admired in his hometown for his dedication to try and uplift the poor. A memorial mass is planned in his Austrian hometown on Friday.

A group of friends from Austria has already boarded a flight to South Africa for Plöchl’s mission, known as the "Maria Zell", to investigate the murder, and also to bring his body back to Austria for burial. Information initially given by the South African authorities was confusing: it was at first announced that he had been shot, while the word later was that he had been strangled. His religious order announced Monday that he would be brought back to Austria and buried in his native country.

Pictures of the Maria Zell mission were taken by the Australian-based author Scott Balson, who wrote a book about this entire unique region, its history and its people.

Father Plöchl, right, was found dead on Sunday morning at his lonely outpost of Maria Zell mission, said Father Andreas Rohring, a spokesman for the Mariannhill order. He spoke to Austria's APA news agency. The elderly priest’s murder sent immediate shockwaves throughout Austria, as the ‘socially very engaged’ priest was a much-loved figure in his home country. A memorial mass will be held for him on Friday at Neumarkt-im-MĂ¼hlkreis, his home town, where he is much loved for his dedication to help the poor in South Africa.

The Marianhill missions were founded in South Africa n 1882 by the Rev. Francis Pfanner, then prior of the Trappist (Reformed Cistercian) Monastery of Maria-stern (Bosnia). He landed at Port Elizabeth with thirty-one companions in July, 1880, and settled in a place he called Dunbrody, after an old Irish monastery. This he had to abandon in 1882; and at the solicitation of the late Bishop Jolivet, O.M.I., transferred his community to Mariannhil.

Farming couple survive seige by five attackers

On May 31st, the Day before Father Plöchl's death a middle-aged Afrikaner couple, Koos Dreyer (57) and his 58 year old wife Rea, who own a smallholding Krugersdorp, fought for their lives against at least five attackers who invaded their homestead on Saturday-night. Mr Dreyer was repeated stabbed with a short knife and also chopped in his upper torso with a handmade sword.

The couple were asleep at 1.30am on Saturday when 'at least five men' cut through the electrified fencing around their smallholding and broke into their homestead. Mr Dreyer said he stormed down the hallway when hearing the noise, and one man grabbed his homemade-sword, another grabbed a hockey-stick, and started hammering at him. He fell to the ground while the blows kept raining on him, he said. "I know I had to try and reach my handgun and when they gave me another blow, I playacted by stumbling backwards and falling across the bed to get my gun.' He fired off one shot, but missed. Meanwhile his wife Ria also was grappling with the attackers, throwing them with 'anything at hand', he said. Then Ria managed to get hold of his gun and fired off several shots in the general direction of the attackers. The men fled with the handmade sword and a pair of binoculars in one of Dreyer's farm vehicles. It was however found abandoned about a kilometre down the road at the appropriately named 'Stilhou' street (Standing Still Street) when its automatic theft-prevention device turned it off automatically.

Details taken from http://afrikaner-genocide-achives.blogspot.com/

_______________________________________________

In South Africa 45% of all rape victims are children, and a child is raped ever three minutes, that is 530 children every day.

Full details here

_____________

Truths rewritten

By August Pointneuf

HAMILTON NAKI

Robert McKay, writing in The Times, May 29 2009 says:

THE documentary Hidden Heart looks back at one of the proudest moments in South African history — the first successful heart transplant — and finds that it might also have been one of our most shameful.

While Barnard was whisked off to the US to rub shoulders with movie stars and became famous for his womanising ways as the “doctor of hearts”, Naki was denied an entry in the history books by the apartheid government and ultimately pensioned off as a gardener.

The hype surrounding the movie which incorporated aspects of this man’s life demonstrates, again, a bias towards the contribution of the white man in Africa. Naki was not denied entry into the history books because he was black: It was because he was an ordinary man doing an ordinary, but unusual, job

What is not spelled out, and was certainly obscured by earlier articles in The Economist, The Times and The Telegraph was that Hamilton Naki worked as a technician in an animal laboratory. He never treated a human. He never went to Groote Schuur Hospital where the transplantation was performed, except as a visitor.

Doing this kind of work, day after day, enabled Naki to develop technical skills, but not unique or superior to tens of thousands of others involved in occupations requiring high levels of manual skill. He is said to have been a skilled anaesthetist but this must also be interpreted in the context that he was anaesthetising animals which would ultimately be killed, and those that died under anaesthesia would be considered “bad luck” and disposable.

Hamilton Naki showed himself, over the years, to be exceedingly conscientious and dedicated to his work, arising with regularity in the early hours as was necessary to prepare the laboratory for the day’s experimentation.

There is no evidence that Hamilton claimed to have taken part in the world’s first heart transplant. What was purported to be this evidence was a filmed interview between a reporter and Naki. It will be clear to all who have an understanding of Naki’s accent and Xhosa phraseology (the interviewer was American-English) that the two were speaking at cross purposes. Hamilton was speaking about his work in the animal laboratory. The American reporter was trying to prompt Hamilton into talking about events during the first transplant, which Hamilton did not understand at that date. When the American reporter asked “Did you take the heart out?” Hamilton replied “Yes I (used to) take the heart (s) out (in the animal laboratory)”.

Hamilton’s son, on the other hand, deliberately perpetuated the misinformation, saying that the family should be awarded money for his father’s role in the first heart transplant.

An honorary Master of Science was given to Naki, not as in recognition of academic achievement (because there was none) but because of his conscientiousness and the part that he played (within a team of very many others) in developing transplantation surgery at the University of Cape Town.

The State Award given to Naki by President Thabo Mbeki was entirely unwarranted and does an extraordinary disservice to tens of thousands of other people who have worked carefully and conscientiously during their lives in both the public and private sectors of South Africa. It reflected the distasteful, dishonest and distorted agenda of the Black-propaganda machine, which has now become the heir to the huge existing body of falsified anti-Apartheid propaganda.

This post is not designed to belittle Naki. It is, however, designed to be a vehement criticism and accusation of those who choose to pump untruthful pro-Black propaganda at every level (including those like Robert McKay who hold themselves to be journalists) of culpable dishonesty.

It should be noted that the Times, the Economist and the Telegraph have all retracted their previous articles on Hamilton Naki, and well they should.
__________________________________
August Pointneuf

Monday, 1 June 2009

The fading light of Africa

Robert Mugabe's thugs chanted: 'We will eat your children'

(From the Times June 1 2009)

The invaders came at 11pm. Fifteen of them — singing, chanting and crashing metal objects together by our windows. “Out, out,” they shouted as they surrounded our farm — they certainly wanted us out. They broke into the house and dragged burning tyres through the front door. They invaded the hallway and occupied the courtyard. The flames leapt into the thatch as they pulled the tyres under it, but it did not catch alight.

This was last Tuesday. I called the police but then the invaders took the phone away. Their leader, who calls himself “Landmine”, was armed with a rifle. They pushed us around and raised sticks and said that we must leave. They beat my tonga drum so hard that the cowhide skin broke.

One of them went up to the children, who had been woken by the din. “Josh, Josh, there’s a man in our room,” said Anna, 4. Joshua, 9, told my wife Laura afterwards that the man was making hyena noises. My other son, Stephen, is 7.

Police arrived and the invaders were ushered out. None was arrested, but “Landmine” did return my phone at the request of the police. When the police left, though, the invaders resumed their attack. They did not break in this time, but they made a lot of noise, circling the house like whooping hyenas and shouting before they left: “We will eat the children.”

Continue reading here

Lost horizons - The suppression of a nation's soul

This was a comment left by Harbi at the Home of the Green Arrow, which I felt deserved its own post.

Fifty years ago the peaceful land of Tibet was taken over by a Marxist superstate. Since then millions of migrants have been resettled in Tibet so that now:

  • The Tibetans are a minority in their own country.
  • Their religion has been persecuted and temples destroyed/converted for other uses.
  • Symbols of Tibetan culture are banned.
  • The Tibetan language has been replaced in education.
  • Political dissent is ruthlessly crushed.
  • The beautiful and fragile natural environment of Tibet has been vandalised, looted and polluted.
  • Native Tibetans are discriminated against in employment.
  • Tibetan women are encouraged to have abortions to 'manage' the population.
Does anything sound familiar about this scenario?

Are the Tibetans "racist knuckle-draggers" for protesting about what's happened to them?


Sunday, 31 May 2009

Beneath the rainbow


In 1994, when the Afrikaner president F W de Klerk handed over the management of Africa's strongest Western economy to the tricameral 'black-ruled' new government, the unemployment levels among 'whĂ­tes' in South Africa was about 2%. It was indeed considered a deep disgrace among Afrikaners to be unemployed.

At that point, the Afrikaners also were among the best-educated population group in South Africa, comprised of the largest numbers of educators, medical staffers, government employees and mining/engineering experts in the country - it is fair to say that this relatively small minority group kept the wheels of this powerful economy turning efficiently and smoothly.

Afrikaners also were the largest single group of people to employ the largest number of black people: for instance the country's 85,000 Afrikaans-speaking farmers alone, employed more than 1,3-million black people fulltime - and also housed them and their extended families on their farms: more than 6-million black people were in other words, living on white-owned farms and were reliant on the industry of this handful of Afrikaner farmers in 1994, who only ever farmed on no more than 6% (six percent) of the entire semi-arid South African land surface.
__________________________________

By October 2001 -- when the last census was held in South Africa it became clear how poverty-stricken the Afrikaner nation had already become after only seven years of black-majority rule.

The number of unemployed so-called 'whites' was 430,000 in the 2001 Census - out of their employment-age population of 1,863,607. And these workers were getting very low incomes: of those whites who were were happy to cling onto their jobs in 2001, 237,502 whites (13%) earned less than R1,600 a month - that's $150 a month.

Click here to read the full posting on Censorbugbear

Saturday, 30 May 2009

The future they have in store


We are told that our population is ageing, and it is certainly true that due to healthier lifestyles and improved medical treatment, more people are living into old age than was ever the case. We are also told by our government, that same government which was able to find tens of billions of pounds to support the banks, and tens of billions more to fight wars, which many call illegal, (not to mention the billions which go towards the EU) that we as a nation can not afford to support the growing number of elderly citizens.

They go on to tell us that the only way this country can survive as a thriving economy and continue to afford to support the growing, grey haired, masses is to import millions of immigrants to "boost the economy" and "pay the taxes".

Of course, what they say is total codswallop (says she, once again resisting a more colourful choice of language). This claim is made repeatedly, and I am sure that many otherwise intelligent people accept it as a fact, yet it is both incorrect and it is dishonest.

Firstly to accept this argument requires us to ignore the evidence of our very eyes, in that immigrants have self evidently not “boosted our economy”. As I pointed out in a post I made a few weeks ago, after 10 years or more of mass immigration at levels never before seen in this country, our economy is now in the worst state it has ever been, other than at the end of the last world war. Much good immigration did us!!!!

Many, and I am one of them, have argued that both immigration and pandering to various minority groups was at the heart of the sub-prime fiasco, which brought about the recent financial crisis, however, whatever the cause, even the most passionate multiculturalist can not argue that immigration has made our situation any better.

It can not be disputed that our economy is in a far worse state than it was before the decade long tsunami of immigration we have just lived through, so how exactly has immigration made it any better?!

Secondly, this demented theory that mass immigration is the solution to coping with an ageing population, assumes that all the new arrivals which the establishment is so frantically importing have discovered the secret of eternal youth, and will never, become pensioners themselves.

It is beyond belief that so many fail to see through the dishonesty and basic madness of this argument. This strategy depends on an ever increasing number immigrants providing for an ever increasing number of immigrant pensioners. Very much like the health service, where we are told we need to strip the third world of qualified medical staff in order to cope with the strain caused by ever increasing numbers of third world immigrants.

The indigenous population of Britain is not growing, yet the strain on our services and infrastructure is increasing by the year, and it does not take a genius to work out what is causing it.

The earlier waves of immigrants are now becoming pensioners, each year their numbers grow, and in twenty or thirty years, those arriving now will be joining them. If you believe the crazy argument we are being fed we will then need even more new immigrants to support them., and more again after that. Given that space is finite, do we continue this lunacy until we are required to stand on each others shoulders? And what then? Is this the legacy we want to leave to our children?

Beyond this is the inescapable fact that at the current rate of immigration, immigrants, and their descendants, will have outnumbered the indigenous population within the next fifty, or at the very outside sixty, years. (if anyone reading this has a child or grandchild under the age of 10 they have to accept that, if nothing changes, by the time those children collect their pensions they will will be living in a Britain where white Europeans – let alone white Britons - are in the minority).

That is not a BNP scare story, it is a mathematical certainty, which every politician is aware of but will not admit.

If you are happy with the prospect of Britain becoming a majority non-white nation within two generations, than that is a view you are entitled to, but remember you were never given the option of a vote on it.

However, even if you are one of those who do look forward with pleasure to a time when this country's indigenous population become an ethnic minority, you have to accept that it will not solve the pension problem.

Non-European immigrants have a considerably higher birth rate than Europeans, and there are no political or cultural reasons which suggest that is going to change any time soon, in fact very much the reverse. Hence, as more and more come the faster the population will grow, causing greater stress on the infrastructure, and inevitably creating more pensioners, and more, and more.

To any rational person, this argument in favour of immigration to pay for pensions, services or anything else is total lunacy, which is merely storing up problems for the future.

However, as you must have realised by now, the ideologues who run our country are not rational.

Every main political party in Britain subscribes to the same discredited belief that the insane levels of immigration we have seen are somehow good for the country, not one of them, Labour, Tory or Lib Dem, will do a thing to change the current reality. no matter how mad it becomes. And the same applies to UKIP, they are a single issue, anti-European pressure group, who's policies might effect the number of white, Christian Europeans coming to Britain, however, as far non-European immigration is concerned, UKIP are in bed with the Lib/Lab/Con troika. In any event, a single issue pressure group like UKIP is not going to solve the multiple issue problems we face, particularly one which refuses to acknowledge the main problem.

Do not be fooled, continued mass immigration into Britain is not going to solve the pensions crisis, or anything else, in fact it will make them all infinitely worse. It has not helped us, and it will not help us, it is creating a monster which will destroy our Country's future. If you vote for any of the main parties you will be embracing their failed policies on immigration and the blighted future that will bring.

Do not be lured into voting UKIP either, for they do not offer an alternative. Surely the very attempts by the controlled media to make UKIP seem attractive should warn you it is not in Britain's best interests to vote for them.

If you wish to avoid the nightmare future which will inevitably follow from continued, uncontrolled mass immigration, there is only one option, and only one way to vote on June 4th, and that is for the BNP. If you do not, you will be choosing a future which your children, and your country will not thank you for, worse, they may well curse you for it.

____________________