A nice little earner

 Tarique Ghaffur - said to have received £300,000 for "being sidelined"

My good friend the committed BNP campaigner Donna Treanor has obtained some interesting information from both the Metropolitan police and also from the Equality and Human Rights commission by means of Freedom of Information requests.

The results can be viewed at the foot of this posting and reveal some illuminating details

The first set of figures show the number of racial discrimination claims logged against the Metropolitan Police over each of the last five financial years and appear to indicate a consistent average of 40 cases a year, primarily brought by Police Officers, but also by Police Staff, Community Support Officers and also a small number by Traffic Wardens

Given the much publicised fact that the total number if ethnic minority officers in the Met only reached 3,000 in 2009, this figure is actually more significant than it first appears particularly in the post Macpherson police force 

More significant than the numbers however, are the figures relating to concluded cases which can also be viewed at the bottom of this posting, these show that only a tiny proportion of cases were actually lost by the Metropolitan Police Service, and of those which were, by far the majority were successfully appealed by the MPS. 

Of the rest a number were withdrawn, suggesting either a change of heart on the part of the complainant or, more likely, their advisers may have warned them there was scant chance of their claim succeeding.      

However, each year a significant number of cases were “settled” to a degree which does not make sense considering that when the MPS fight a case to its conclusion, they stand a statistically good chance of winning.

Settling is, of course, easier, especially when it is only taxpayer’s money which is being shelled out, and who is to know how many complainants have been encouraged in making unfounded claims on the strength of the Met’s penchant for settling out of court rather than fighting as case.

The figures which Donna obtained do not disclose the seniority of those making complaints or the size of the settlements paid out.  However, in view of the fact that former assistant commissioner Tarique Ghaffur accepted a settlement of £300,000 ($475,000) after he claimed he had merely been “sidelined” one can assume the settlements may have been quite generous.

All this at the taxpayer’s expense despite evidence based upon the outcomes of those cases which the Met have contested, that a large percentage of these claims are bogus.
    
The figures relate to just one of the 39 police forces in England, not to mention those in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, together with the various other UK law enforcement agencies,   however, if these results are reflected in other forces and indeed across the public sector it is clear that vast sums are being paid out, not least in undefended settlements.

It should not be forgotten that compensation and out of court settlements are only a part of the cost of these proceedings. If one adds to that the cost of administering, adjudicating and defending such cases it is starkly obvious that the race discrimination industry is a very costly drain on the public purse, and a very unwelcome one in our current age of austerity.

Being the industrious individual that she is, Donna has also obtained a further set of figures by means of Freedom of Information legislation.  These show details of the cases of racial discrimination brought against that insidious government QUANGO the Equality and Human Rights Commission by its own staff.

The outcome of these are rather different than those brought against the Metropolitan police, and suggest to this writer that the EHRC have robustly defended themselves against all such claims and only settled in one case in which they paid out the relatively paltry sum of £2,000, a far cry from Assistant Commissioner Ghaffur’s lottery style winnings.

This is hardly surprising given how embarrassing it would be for an organisation allegedly dedicated to the enforcement of equality to be repeatedly found guilty of discriminating against its staff.

However, notwithstanding the number of cases which have been withdrawn, struck out or won by the EHRC, it is quite remarkable for an organization of its type, set up only four years ago this month that already fourteen members of staff have seen fit to formally raise allegations of racial discrimination against it.

It is debatable as to whether this says more about the organisation or the nature of those it employs.

Once again these cases have been administered, Judged and defended at taxpayers expense, and you can be sure that “Human Rights” lawyers do not come cheap.

As I have pointed out many times on this blog, we are constantly informed that migration to the UK has brought countless benefits, but it is becoming progressively more difficult to identify quantifiable evidence of such benefits.

There is self evidently no benefit to the tax payer in being required to subsidise these cases, and it is an indisputable fact that we would not have to fund these cases were we not living in an imposed multiracial society.

____________________

Click on the images below to enlarge them

No. of Race Discrimination cases brought against the Met in the last 5 years

Concluded Race Discrimination cases

Race Discrimination cases brought against the EHRC

Culture not Colour?

By Tim Heydon

Oswald Spengler and the Decline of the West

Is it about culture and not colour? This is the all-important question. Oswald Spengler thought it was. For him, culture was independent of race. The foundation of his theory that the West is in decline is that cultures are free-floating. They are as it were living things; organic , with a natural life –cycle of birth, growth, decay and death. The West has reached the period in its cultural life-cycle – ‘civilisation,’ when it is naturally in decline. Such a theory runs into difficulties immediately if it is associated with race, because race is not a temporary, changing aspect of human existence.

Spengler’s Theory accords with the Realities of Life

Spengler’s theory of our decline, which is of course a denial of the inexorable march of reason towards the sunlit uplands of utopia envisaged by ‘Progressives,’ does seem to fit into the realities of the world we live in while Progressivism does not. Everything we see about us; ourselves, the plants and animals, the mountains, plains and seas on the earth, the earth itself, the sun and other stars, the galaxy we live in and the very universe itself (according to some astronomers at least ) – they are all at some stage of the same kind of cycle. So the thought arises: why on earth is human culture supposed to be different? This thought is purely intuitive, of course. Nevertheless it shouldn’t be dismissed on that account. It fits into an overwhelming pattern of reality and because it does, the onus of proof is on those who believe in Progressivism. And there is little in modern human history to give comfort to the notion that in a secular world we are all getting morally better and better. Au contraire. The idea that human beings have somehow managed to escape the bonds of the natural doesn’t seem to be scientific; It is a form of faith: it’s religious – but religion without spirituality and therefore without the necessary motivation.

There is much which appears to support the Idea that Culture is unconnected to Race

If culture is unconnected to race, which is considered to be unimportant, it is easier to be thought of as English or Scots or Welsh or Irish or whatever regardless of one’s racial origin. In support of the idea of the exclusive importance of cultures is the fact that there have for example been several civilisations /cultures in the British Isles although the racial character of its people has remained remarkably unchanged throughout recent millennia, at least until very recently. This is despite the perversion of history visited on us by those eager to deny it. These cultures have ranged from that of the shamanistic hunter –gatherers of the Palaeolithic to the paganism of the Druids and the Germanic gods and then on through the Medieval Christian civilisation to Renaissance / Reformation Christianity and so to the debased secular ‘culture’ of ‘modernity’ which is built round belief in nothing – literally.

Agriculture came from the Near East

Furthermore, the major changes in culture which have occurred in Britain have not been the result of the kind of mass invasions which some people think are the sole reason for cultural / civilisational change. As noted above, until very recently there has been little alteration in the racial makeup of the inhabitants of these islands. This is true regardless of the relatively minor influxes of other peoples (such as Germanic / Norse settlers or the Huguenots) who were mostly in any case virtually identical racially and culturally. The arrival of farming which signalled the Neolithic era, a truly momentous cultural event which radically changed the lives of humanity forever, came with a few settlers from the Continent having spread from the Near East.

‘The English have two books; Shakespeare and the Bible. England made Shakespeare, but the Bible made England’ - Victor Hugo

Much later, Christianity, earth-shakingly important culturally as well as religiously, arrived thanks to the efforts of a few missionaries from the Continent and Ireland, also having spread from the Near East.

Classical Learning strengthened by Scholars from Byzantium.

Classical learning, the civilisation of Greece and Rome was salvaged in Europe during the so-called Dark Ages by Monks and the teaching reforms of Alcuin in the Carolingian Renaissance. Islamic Scholars contributed something to the transmission of such works as those of Aristotle. But the most significant impact of the classics on the West arose through the arrival in Italy of Christian scholars fleeing the Islamic takeover of Constantinople. This arrival proved a decisive shot in the arm for Classical learning in the West.

The Importance of Protestantism

Protestantism, which did much to shape the native British, helping to give them their once - characteristic attributes of decency (good manners, respectability), modesty (‘British understatement’), emotional restraint ( reserve, undemonstrativeness, ‘stiff upper lip’), stoicism, hard work (the Protestant work ethic) and self reliance (through the ‘priesthood of all believers,’ ‘ we are captains of our souls’ ), though it had forerunners in Britain flowered on the Continent and came here from there. These gifts of Protestant Christianity also included assumptions of individual autonomy which, together with a sturdy lack of whole-hearted reverence for power inherited from their Saxon forebears, lay behind the growth of the democratic traditions of the British. And we have all come across members of other races who, at least when they interact with the native population, seem to be just like them culturally.

Political Correctness is Foreign

This country is now dominated by Political Correctness. This ideology is a function of Continental Philosophy which arrived in Britain principally via the USA.

So those who believe that it is Culture, not Race that matters – they have strong Case, don’t they?

___________________

Culture not Colour? Part 2

Oswald Spengler: Cultures are the Products of Particular People. ‘Mankind’ has never discovered anything.

So is it culture rather than race that matters? From the foregoing, so it seems. But look a little deeper and a different picture emerges. To go back to Oswald Spengler; although he denied the role of race in the creation of cultures, he also denied the ‘Progressives’ view that the historical reality is that there is one ‘mankind’. For Spengler, ‘Mankind’ is a zoological concept. ‘Mankind’; he wrote, ‘has never discovered anything.’ History concerns only the particular; particular groups of men living at particular times in particular places. It is they who have history and produce a culture. Universal mankind does not differ and therefore does not have history. This view is in fact compatible with the proposition that race and culture are inextricably intertwined.

It’s ‘Culture’ that counts is a ‘Nurture’ Theory

The first thing to notice is that in the context of the nature / nurture debate, the idea that it is culture, not ‘skin colour’ ie race that counts is a nurture theory. Nature is more or less ignored. But why should it be? We know for example, that IQ is 83% - 8 4% heritable in European adults. The high heritability of IQ suggests that IQ is largely determined by genes. (Richard Lynn, ‘Race Differences in Intelligence’ p28 ). IQ accurately predicts socio-economic status and a swathe of behaviours such as drug addiction, crime, single parenthood and smoking. Nature is it seems highly important in determining intelligence and all that flows from it in what might be termed as personal culture in a broad sense. So why not the culture of a nation? And why not then in high culture as well as the culture of everyday living?

The Dismissal of a Red Herring: ‘Skin Colour’

But what about Races? How far are they different through genetic inheritance, and does this affect culture? First though, let’s dispose of the red herring of ‘skin colour.’ Taken at is own value, skin colour per se can’t simply be dismissed as some would like it to be. Our skin colour is a function of the latitudes we live in. It is a characteristic which marks us out as people of the North, and the North West in particular, helping to make us as much a part of the fauna and flora of these islands as any native plant or animal; a feeling which is a deep part of our culture. For here is where our ancestors had their time, here are our roots. This is where we belong and our skin colour helps to tell us that and binds us to those who share this inheritance. It is not only USA blacks coming back to Africa who need and are entitled to their roots.

Apart from this feeling which suffuses the sensibilities of the native British whether they know it or not, skin (and eye and hair colour and other aspects of our looks) is otherwise an intrinsic part of our culture. There are innumerable allusions to it in our language. In ordinary speech one can be a pink and white rose, or tall dark and handsome (meaning dark haired). One can be fair-skinned or have fair hair, but also, ‘that’s fair’ we say, meaning that it is just. In an old usage it means ‘beautiful’. ‘Fair’ in all these linked senses comes from Old English ‘faegar’ meaning ‘pleasing’ or ‘attractive’. Our skin colour too leads on to myriad other aspects of culture. For example, our paleness suits restrained colours in our clothing while the dark skins of other races are best set off by brighter colours.

Skin Colour is the Outward and Visible Sign of Interior Differences

John Baker FRS was an Oxford Biologist whose book ‘Race’ published in 1974 remains a standard work on the subject. It was praised by the Nobel Laureate Sir Peter Medawar in the following terms; ‘No Book known to me tries to encompass everything relevant to the idea of race with such thoroughness, honesty, serious and decency.’ Prof. Arthur Jensen of UCLA said of it: ‘A most impressive display of profound scholarship and vast erudition. .. As a noted biologist, Baker provides the essential basis upon which any objective, rational and scientific discussion of racial differences must proceed.’ Recent DNA and gene expression studies have confirmed the reality of race beyond all reasonable doubt.

John Baker FRS on ‘Skin Colour’ and its Link with mental / temperamental Characteristics

Here is what Baker had to say: ‘The question arises why so many people say or imply that the races differ only in skin colour, when this is obviously untrue.(Emphasis added). Those who minimize racial differences, by speaking as though the only distinction between a European and (for instance) a Chinese or a Negro were of skin colour, appear unwittingly to admit that recognition of the more fundamental differences that actually exist might affect people’s views on the ethnic problem; for it might be regarded as unlikely that such differences could co-exist with exact similarity in the parts of the body concerned with thought and feeling.’

And those physical differences and differences of thought and feeling certainly exist. ‘The idea that the existence of manifold physical differences between certain ethnic taxa makes it probable that there are also inborn differences of mental potentiality, is by no means confined to persons trained in biological science. As Professor H J Muller has written, ‘to the vast majority of geneticists it seems absurd to suppose that psychological characteristics are subject to entirely different laws of heredity or development than other biological characteristics….Psychological comparisons of fraternal and identical twins have provided one type of empirical evidence in support of this conclusion.’ (‘Race’ pp182, 183)

Baker and J Phillippe Rushton

Baker goes in to some detail on the subject of the physical and mental differences between the races, relating them to the civilisations they have respectively produced, or in the case of negrids, have not produced. So too does J Phillippe Rushton who is Professor of Psychology at the University of Western Ontario. In the latter’s book ‘Race, Evolution and Behaviour,’ (P5) we find a table in which the physical characteristics of three main racial groups are linked to their respective mental and temperamental characteristics under the heading ‘More than Skin Deep’:-

Average differences Among Blacks, Whites and Orientals

Click to enlarge

Rushton’s Newtonian synthesis and the r-K Life History Theory

It has been Rushton’s achievement to bring together various lines of thought and the results of hundreds of studies pursued by many others as well as himself into a theory of racial development in what Richard Lynn, Emeritus Professor of Psychology at the University of Ulster described as a ‘Newtonian synthesis’ worthy of a Nobel Prize. The differing data about the various races are explained by applying to them the r-K Life History Theory first promulgated by the Harvard University biologist E O Wilson. This is now ‘a basic principle of modern evolutionary biology’. Every species of plant or animal, including human beings can be placed on the r-K scale. The r-strategy (for ensuring gene survival) involves having more offspring (like frog spawn or turtles), maturing earlier, having smaller brains and providing less parental care. The K end of scale means having fewer offspring, maturing later, having larger brains and providing more parental care. Human beings are the most K species of all. Among humans, Orientals are the most K, Blacks the most r and Whites fall in between’.

Why did northern peoples develop their K strategy? As human beings spread out of Africa, ‘their bodies, brains and behaviour changed. To deal with the colder winters and scarcer food supply of Europe and North East Asia, the Oriental and White races moved away from an r-strategy towards the K- strategy. This means more parenting and social organisation which requires larger brain size and a higher IQ’ (‘Race, Evolution and Behaviour’ p 89). K –strategy has many implications for human beings. For example; larger –brained babies require wide hips to be born. So Whites cannot run as fast as Blacks with their narrower hips. Blacks have more testosterone than Whites, so they are more capable of explosive action than are Whites – hence their success in sprint running, boxing etec. And so on.

The Implications of Baker, Rushton et al for Civilisation / Culture

It should be obvious from the above that race differences will lead inexorably to differing kinds of society and levels of culture /civilisation based on the differing characteristics of the races. It comes as no surprise that Orientals – mainly the Japanese, Chinese and Koreans - have a reputation of being extremely conformist, hard –working and (compared to other races) docile and law abiding. Likewise it is no surprise that sub-Saharan Africans have never achieved any kind of higher culture. As for Whites, we are not on average as intelligent in some respects anyway as Orientals, but we can comfort ourselves with the thought that our greater individuality and dynamism combined with our still-high intelligence has led us to be the world’s great inventors, innovators and discoverers.

Conclusion: It’s not Skin Colour / Race or Culture

We have seen how this country has taken on board key cultural influences from abroad (a fact, incidentally, which negates the idea that we need to import millions of foreigners in order for our culture to be ‘enriched’). But we have also seen that white people in general (like the other races) have powerful innate characteristics. Our own race partakes of these and, it is reasonable to think, has bred its own variety in these islands. Without outside influences these characteristics would tend to produce a particular type of society and culture in the circumstances in which our race has found itself historically. So the conclusion we draw is that our present culture is the product of our own racial characteristics and cultural tendencies reacting in a unique way with cultural influences from abroad to produce a civilisation, something new, which is our own. This civilisation which we have created would not exist if we were not the people that we are. But neither would it exist without those imported cultural influences. Race has been a necessary cause although not a sufficient one in the production of our culture, just as it has been a necessary cause in the production of all civilisations.

What about the USA?

But some may point to the USA and say; ‘Here is a society which is founded, not on race, but on ideas only: it is a cultural country, a ‘credal’ nation’. Aping the supposed superiority of the USA was Gordon Brown’s idea when he tried to redefine Britain as being founded on ‘fairness’. (Hilariously, he was immediately jumped on by an Asian pressure group which accused him of ‘racism’ in suggesting that ‘fairness’ was a particularly British characteristic). It lies behind Cameron’s pushing his ‘core principles‘ of ‘Britishness’ such as freedom of speech, the rule of law and democracy. (His own version of these characteristics which excludes the BNP as far as possible, naturally.) He has not been jumped on – yet.

But no society can exist only on ‘ideas’. Gordon Brown may have a Doctorate in History (albeit on Scottish Trade Unionism) but he seems not to have realised that the USA was always far more than the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution. It was from the first a North European, Christian and specifically Protestant country.

Now that it is in the process of reinventing itself away from these characteristics, it is also in the process of falling apart socially and perhaps, eventually, politically as well. The idea that it will be much the same as it always was when the White population becomes a minority in the not too distant future is a pipe dream, nothing more. The innate characteristics of its new population will determine its character in the future, not its written constitutional documents (which can be made to mean anything) or ‘culture’.

And the same is true of Britain. The USA will survive longer than this country, because it is vast and can accommodate difference better than we can. What is to become of this tiny, crowded country when the native British are a minority in it? One thing is certain. It will no longer be British in any meaningful sense. The outlook is grim. Is the best we can hope for to be another, larger Lebanon?

Changing Attitudes – Changing Races

By Mister Fox

From the early 1950s a new intellectual orthodoxy was being introduced through the culture. and it was dominated by the Neo-Marxists and Freudian in the US. Dissenters were pathalogised as paranoid or racists with connotations of mental illness. Thus began a move to dehumanise “Whites” so that no evil done to us is wrong, and there are many evils being done to us. (1)

The influential academic books beginning in the early 1950s attributed the blame for everyone not combining as a whole to us and begun their research from that prejudice. They assumed that people like me are prejudiced, yet they are not; people like me they thought jump to conclusions, but they do not; our way of thinking has no evidence, theirs was reason; we were frightened of change, they were ushering it in.

They think that in life you get to know people and find that some will be alright, some will not. They think we are terribly unjust and that if we were tolerant we should get to know the “other”and get on with them which we do in our personal lives. However, in heavily mixed areas this line of reasoning is not valid and only applies in limited circumstances because the “other” stick with their own kind.

We are supposed to pretend that the “other” are not different, but their different features betoken a different heritage; a different heritage betokens a different culture; and a different culture betokens a different mental furniture. Blacks know they are descended from slaves and this informs their outlook, their behaviour, their attitudes towards us. The wise and experienced judge people on their appearance,body language and how they are looking at you and deal with them accordingly.

They addressed "human kind" as two different species: wicked racist Whites and the saintly “other”, bearers of virtue and diligence. Attributing virtue to the “other”excuses our rulers fawning on them; Pretending the “other” are harmless makes people feel safe.

In his introduction to the 1998 reprint of the 1948 study Negroes in Britain by Kenneth Little, Leonard Bloom declared: Little wrote “... they are rejected by the host population and that causes ambivalence about the self, with personal and social maladjustment.”. There from the beginning was the bias against the host population (Whites) for harming the “other”. This now being done to us. (2)

There is a lot of peculiar sexual behaviour now which relates to my first point as well as the second. Our manners are degraded and we are becoming lawless. We have to value ourselves. Its not so much feeling good about ourselves as having a sense of responsibility for what we have inherited. We see the symptoms that are around us in public social life in conquered peoples. Native Indians and Aborigines went to pieces. We are becoming maladjusted.

The Picture Post of 2nd July 1949 popularised this attack on our communal integrity in an article: "Is there a British Colour Bar?” The titular rhetorical question was answered with a simile from a popular film: Invisible, but like Wells' Invisible Man it is hard and real to the touch … and it is when you get lower down the scale you find that it hits the hardest Yet despite the insignificant proportion of people from overseas, prejudice and discrimination existed.” The post thought this was because of ignorance.

The title of “Colour Prejudice in Britain” by Anthony Richmond proclaims the author's prejudices and “Under Siege”, with an introduction by John Pilger, castigates us as wicked racists for trying to conserve our communal integrity. These malicious academics were denying us our need to have territory

Changing our attitude of looking down on other racial groups has caused the opposite and now Muslims look down on our women as recent exposes In The Times and The Mail of Muslims gang raping young White girls show: ” Police and social services have fuelled a “culture of silence” which has “allowed hundreds of young white girls to be exploited by Asian men for sex … prosecutions for grooming young White girls aged between 11 and 16 were used by “men of Pakistani heritage.” The police and social workers have been aiding and abetting Muslims to rape young White girls.

In 17 court cases since 1997 where groups of men were prosecuted, 53 of the 56 people found guilty were Asian, 50 of them Muslim, while just three were white.

Experts were quoted as saying that the statistics “represent a mere fraction of a tidal wave of offending” in counties across the Midlands and the north of England which has been going on for more than a decade.

Chief Inspector Alan Edwards of West Mercia police was quoted saying: "White girls are being passed around and used as meat …. stop this type of crime you need to start everyone talking about it but everyone's been too scared to address the ethnicity factor …". No one wants to stand up and say that Pakistani guys in some parts of the country are recruiting young white girls and passing them around their relatives for sex, but we need to stop being worried about the racial complication." In Wrexham raping young White is carried out by by Iraqis.

Parents must gather their courage and teach their children to avoid people from ethnic groups to save their children. It is state education that sets the children up for this by constantly praising ethnics. (3)

This will get much worse as the evil elites import ever more Muslims. In 2000 The Guardian predicted a white minority Britain by 2100, thus tacitly accepting our replacement. Around 8 years ago The Birmingham Post quoted a former senior Central TV official as saying we must prepare people for Muslims to become the majority. In a radio interview Jans Orbeck former Swedish PM admitted Muslims would take over.

It’s when one enters Africa and Asia in Britain that one walks into the academics dream - “race replacement”. One gets a clear view of the future as Enoch and Chris Pary saw it. (4) Some areas are 25 to 30% vibrant though it’s much more in some areas. They are changing our territory to suit their cultural prejudices. Within a few yards on Spittal Hill in Sheffield there are two shops named after Malcolm X! It is this ceding of territory to the colonialists that demonstrates to them the weakness and effeteness of our rulers. Alternating governments are but aspects of one elite and have been acting illegally under the UN Genocide Act which nullifies any obligation to maintain the multi-racial state.

Trainee teacher are taught that only whites are racist and White children labelled as “racists” as young as five. The thing that really is socially constructed in Britain today is the school subject of history. A fifteen-year old correspondent had this to say about state education :

"In Year 3 we learnt about the Great Fire of London and Henry the 8th with his array of wives. Besides, it was nothing serious as you're only 8 years olds in Year 3. Throughout my time in secondary school I've heard many the history teacher denounce the BNP and British patriotism whilst proclaiming that "communism works in small communities".

Of course it's not on the syllabus, but the teachers are left unburdened to make their wild remarks which go unchallenged - that's where most of the anti-British sentiment comes from. Apart from that, none of the GCSE exams in the course I'm taking are anything to do with Britain, we look at America mostly, with a slight twinge of the Russian Revolution and Hitler's rise to power, which, as you can imagine, portrays Trotsky and Lenin as saviours come to liberate their country from the boundless tyranny of Tsar Nicholas II (it's all Stalin apparently, without him we'd be living in a one-world stateless utopia by now!), whilst illustrating Hitler as some sort of Nationalist lunatic blaming the immigrants for all of Germany's woes, foaming from the mouth as he personally beheads and thereafter eats Jewish children for fun."

The consistent underlying theme is to render “Whites” a non-people with this ideological interpretation presented as fact: “Vikings come from a similar racial background, but the Britons of the period had already been interbreeding with Europeans, Moors and probably a good few Arabs, so the Vikings, on their separate branch of development would have had a bit of spice to add to the genetic mix.”

So what? What is that supposed to suggest that it is alright to dispossess us now? I use no scientific supports for my views. My arguments are based on the common human nature - of all peoples, throughout all time: the need to belong to a people have territory to call one's own and the instinct to put their own people first.

It is a natural part of human being and arises from emotion. This has been broken down by elites who are against their own people. A quick example of outside groups being given priority over the indigenous people, is the recent decision to give gypsies preferential service for unemployment benefits. Many, like students, go along with the hegemonic ideology and don't questioned it.

What pupils and students are programmed to do is oppose new British-revivalist thinking with the standard orthodox ideology they are taught. People imbibe it without being aware and use it to stop new ideas. Whether they know it or not they are protecting the "hegemonic" elites from criticism and demonstrations.

You can see the ideology is out of kilter with reality by going round places like Brixton or Bradford but these programmed people believe what they are told by the elites through education and the media. This new patriotic thinking requires independence of mind, thinking for oneself and collating the evidence from field study and that is scary.

Ideology is a political system of abstractions which lead to a goal(utopia) and have an enemy who are held to the cause of the problems that the ideologues want to solve. to the Nazis it was jews, to multi-racialists it is us Whites.

If, for example, a White employer wanted to sack a recalcitrant "ethnic" worker that employes could be prosecuted and fined for "racism". Is that is building equality?

I make no scientific claims as they just start a debate not answer the question. We have beliefs to guide us on conserving our homogeneity and our ethnicity - shared culture, religion and ancestors. I believe we have a duty to conserve what we inherit from our ancestors and a responsibility to pass it on to our descents. At present our children are being dispossessed and disinherited and that is morally evil.

The basis on which elites take large sums of money in tax and pay it out in benefits is that those who benefit are people like us. When society becomes diverse, lifestyles become more differentiated, then it becomes immoral to sustain the universal welfare state, as it loses its legitimacy. People ask, ‘Why should I pay for them when they are not like me and do not belong here by ancestral prescription and inherited shared values? Progressives want diversity but they undermine the moral consensus on which sustains a welfare state.”

This is not some innocent move to multi-racial heaven on earth but a permanent scapegoating of Whites and we have to defend ourselves. Even if we were once immigrants that does not mean we should sit back and allow new immigrants to push us out. The Anglo Saxon ethnic-cleansing of Celts is a historical lesson on what the elites are inflicting on our children. To prevent us saving our people we are demonised as racists. That is not socially constructing reality but persecuting innocent people in the homeland they have emotionally bonded with over 1500 years.

To an extent "Reality" is determined by ruling elites but when they directly try to change inbuilt human nature we get the evil genocides as with Pol Pot, Mao, Stalin etc.

We must ask ourselves with whom do I belong? With whom do I share mutual obligations? Our affinities extend out from our families and communities, to the nation, Europe then the Anglosphere but not beyond. That view is opposed to the orthodox universalist one which sees us as obligated to all human beings and misappropriates tax payers money for their fellow elites in the third-world. We have natural bonds with our families, a responsibility for them and a duty to them. We also have a duty to pass on what we have inherited to our children, as they, in turn, will have a duty to their children. We owe a debt to our ancestors who bequeathed to us our nation and culture, and we must honour that.

Our loyalties begin with affection within families and this emanates outward to neighbourhood and nation. Men and women are distinctive sexual beings within their inherited collective identity. We belong to our kin, above strangers, and this affects the type of community we create.

The family, community and nation, are parts of a natural, organic state as opposed to an artificial one based on planning. The modern world is dominated by artificial empires, Global corporations and bureaucracies, which treat human beings as abstract entities. However, tribalism is re-emerging and the future belongs to these human scale structures which develop over time, not instant and artificial creations. Each man and woman are part of a continuity. The individual dies, but descendants live on.

We must keep our land because we are emotionally bonded with it and it contains the remains of many of our ancestors. That makes it sacred to us, but our nation is our people and one of the earliest definitions of a nation, as defined by the Romans who called the various Germanic travelling tribes "nations" - is that a nation is a people that can move from place to place and still be who they are. The Goths lived in north Africa at one time - but they were still the integral Germanic nation.

We need to re-sacrilise our territory by burying our people in our soil as it strengthens our emotional bonds with our territory. There was a suburb article “How can we honour the dead?” by Dr.John Casey in the third edition of The Salisbury Review in 1983.

We have to be public spirited and do things for our group. Its alright to object to ethnics getting preferential treatment but we have to go beyond moaning and break ground, become the driving force behind a new and powerful movement on the front line. People don't vote for moaners but the confident with a vision of a better future for their people. It is natural to follow the stronger more dominant force and that is why we need to project confidence in ourselves and what we have to offer.

We have to recover aspects of our past and reconstitute ourselves: what traditions to be continued, what rejected; which to re-link to, what to create.

We are morally obliged to put our people first, as we do with our families, even when foreigners are more in need of our help. Supporting outsiders against our own people is morally wrong.
________________

(1)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/8237330/Poor-white-boys-score-worse-grades-than-deprived-black-Chinese-and-Asian-classmates.html

(2)

http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/crer/

http://www.gold.ac.uk/media-communications/staff/ahmed/

http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/routledge/01419870.html

http://www.leeds.ac.uk/history/race.htm

(3)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1344218/Asian-sex-gangs-Culture-silence-allows-grooming-white-girls-fear-racist.html

http://shropshirepatriot.blogspot.com/2010/12/claim-60-victims-of-muslim-paedophile.html

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-derbyshire-12137400

(4)

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article673612.ece

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HP7fETsKYkA

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-fw0rUJbE9k

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-433497/Widow-Enoch-Powells-Rivers-Blood-speech-really-did-exist.html

Surviving Enoch's Prophecy

By Mister Fox

People are too frightened to speak about what is being done to them and their families or express their fears for the future. If they live near immigrants they blot anxiety out and pretend everything is alright. If someone gets mugged or raped nearby they are relieved because it did not happen to them. They avoid subways and many other hides for muggers that the planners built into their stupid housing schemes. You only have to go a couple of miles from affected areas and people are oblivious to what is happening because the elites are browbeating them into thinking things are fine. If they have had experience of the reality when they go to unaffected areas they won't speak about it for fear of condemnation. They are frightened to look into the future and what natural care they have for their children has to be repressed.

As Enoch put it:"Have you ever wondered, perhaps, why opinions which the majority of people quite naturally hold are, if anyone dares express them publicly, denounced as 'controversial, 'extremist', 'explosive', 'disgraceful', and overwhelmed with a violence and venom quite unknown to debate on mere political issues? It is because the whole power of the aggressor depends upon preventing people from seeing what is happening and from saying what they see."

There are characteristic features of invasion: immigrants and their descendants are taking over our communities and our religious symbols are being replaced mainly by Muslim symbols: churches converted to mosques and Christians forbidden to wear crucifixes at work! Contemporary elites must know what Sharia Law is and are aware of the widespread child-rape of young British girls by Muslim communities yet they are delivering our women into servitude under Sharia Law. Many evil Judges campaign for it. In December 2008 the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Phillips, told the London Muslim Council he was willing to have Sharia law in this country, so long as it did not conflict with the laws of England and Wales , or lead to the imposition of severe physical punishments. In the same month evil Lady Butler-Sloss, England 's first female Appeal Court judge, called for ministers to change the law for Muslims, so that a decree absolute could not be issued by a civil court until evidence had been obtained of a Sharia divorce. Delivering women to Sharia Law is a cruel wicked act. This is encouraged by dishonourable Christian leaders like the Archbishop of Canterbury. (1)

Enoch warned of The Enemy Within and that our internal enemies could not believe their luck with mass immigration. It gave them the forces of revolution. It is not outside forces that threatened us but traitors who pretend to act in our interests while they surrender us to Islam. This process can be researched under under "Eurabia". The Revolutionary Vanguard is not poised to strike but in power!

What was to come was predicted by Enoch who saw similar symptoms in Northern Ireland: “Yet even though that picture is dark and darkening, there is one factor which has not yet been injected... That factor is firearms and explosives. With communities which are so divided nothing can prevent the injection of explosives which we know perfectly well from experience in other parts of the United Kingdom and the world. At first there will be horrified astonishment, and inquiry as to what we have done wrong that such things should be happening. Then there will be feverish endeavour to find methods to allay the supposed grievances which lie behind the violence. Then follows exploitation by those who use violence of the ascendancy they have thus gained over the majority and over authority. The thing goes forward, acting and reacting, until a position is reached in which—I shall dare say it—compared with those areas, Belfast today will seem an enviable place.” (2)

The open war begun on July 2005 when Young Muslims blew up London buses. There are hundreds of investigations being undertaken into Muslim "terrorists" but the elites are still importing them at half a million a year!(3)

Enoch warned: “Then there are the 'no-go' areas ... areas in the United Kingdom where the Queen's writ does not run ... If these areas were described as what they are—namely, pockets of territory occupied by the enemy, as surely as if they had been captured and held by parachute troops—then perhaps it would be realised how preposterous is the situation. In fact the policy of refraining from the re-establishment of civil government in these areas is as wise as it would be to leave enemy posts undisturbed behind one's lines.” (4) This situation has been brought mainland Britain by the elites.

The same corrupt elites have passed race laws and established a totalitarian bureaucracy under the doublespeak title of Equalities and Human Rights Commission to suppress the rebellion of indigenous people and to allow immigrants to replace us. Even during the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq the elites were encouraging them to immigrate. What would people have thought during the last war if 1500 Germans a week were being allowed into the country?

To prevent the masses realising what is happening the elites invent misleading terms for terrorists like “ Un-Islamic activity” when it is a war carried out against us from within.

The EU is importing hostile Muslim youth to Europe – prepare for the racial-civil wars of Europe. Nothing happens in politics by accident, and this is the greatest treason in history.

Roughly 80% of the population are opposed to immigration and always have been and for over thirty years this has been shown in opinion polls!. Recently Gordon Brown admitted there is a consensus among mainstream parties in favour of immigration. The dominant political elites are at war with the native population. Immigration has no legitimacy and we have both a moral and legal duty to reverse it. Its complicated by each different group hating each other - Somalians hating West Indians; Pakistanis hating Indians; West Indians and Somalians hating Asians; Indians hating West Indians; Poles hating Russians and Latvians. There are historical examples of one group invading but our contemporary situation is several ethnic groups deliberately brought here and all waging war against us in different ways. Yet each way clearly shows the nature of the attacks which are masked by terms like “Black on White crime but are actually race wars against Whites. The number of White woman assaulted, raped and murdered by Blacks is so high it can only be described as a Race War. The widespread gang-rapes of White girls often as young as 12 by older Muslims is an act of War by different means – guerrilla war. (5)

There has been much censorship to impose the dispossession on native people. Like China our elites use official censorship to prevent rebellion through the internet! An Internet censorship bill passed the House of Commons allows government to restrict and filter any website that is deemed to be undesirable for public consumption." This is not through the Lords yet but as they are placemen it will probably go through.

The Sunday Times ( London ) June 11, 2006 reported that Rear Admiral Chris Parry, a senior military strategist has warned that “Europe, including Britain , could be undermined by large immigrant groups with little allegiance to their host countries—a “reverse colonisation” as Parry described it. These groups would stay connected to their homelands by the internet and cheap flight. The warnings by Parry of what could threaten Britain over the next 30 years were delivered to senior officers and industry experts at a conference ... “Globalisation makes assimilation seem redundant and old-fashioned … the process acts as a sort of reverse colonisation, where groups of people are self-contained, going back and forth between their countries, exploiting sophisticated networks and using instant communication on phones and the internet.” Lord Boyce, the former chief of the defence staff, welcomed Parry’s analysis. “Bringing it together in this way shows we have some very serious challenges ahead,” he said. “The real problem is getting them taken seriously at the top of the government.” How have the decadent, emasculate authorities responded?

Chief of the Armed forces, General Sir David Richards, launched an organisation for Muslims in the armed forces - The Armed Forces Muslim Association. How many al-Qaeda supporters are in the British military? There are at least 8 in the police and the police refuse to remove them!(6)

The violent ethnic cleansing of Whites in Zimbabwe and South Africa is beginning here. Because the media keep the truth from the public we only find it on the fringes: I got this revealing information from Jack Black’s “I am an Englishman” blog.

http://www.iamanenglishman.com/rogues_gallery.php

It becomes obvious if you research the real figures that we Whites are victims of a vicious race war.

I had correspondence from a young man who was a firm supporter of multi-racialism until the EDL demonstration against the Dudley mosque and went to look. When he got within a quarter of a mile he was issued with a Dispersement Order by the police. Later as he made his way back he encountered roving gangs of young Muslim males tooled up with knives and Machetes hunting anyone white with a short haircut or union flag on their clothing. The elites have created open warfare throughout Europe but the media suppress that knowledge and mislead people into thinking things are working out.

The police attack the EDL with truncheons funnelling them into tight wedges as at Hillsborough. In Leeds they continued to attack them while they were falling over each other. Just in case anyone was in any doubt whatsoever about the double standards and discrimination afforded to the white, Christian population of this country two EDL supporters staged a rooftop protest against Dudley mosque being foisted on local people over the Bank Holiday Weekend. They were charged with offences including Burglary, intent to cause Criminal Damage and Incitement of Religious Hatred.

They appeared in court one with broken arm sustained during or after arrest, the other a black eye. Witnesses confirmed they made no attempt to resist arrest and the police were extremely 'heavy handed'. Yet when Muslims chased the tough-guy police calling them cowards and poofs they ran away. (6)

Those who believe in civil disobedience be careful: In “Scared Yet,” on the “England Expects” blog, Libertarian Party leader Ian Parker-Joseph revealed that the M.O.D. were asking military personnel: “Will you open fire on UK citizens?… In a stunning conversation with a friend, who is a serving member of the Armed Forces, over the weekend, it was revealed that transfers to regiments and other units in the UK on home duties are being undertaken by the MOD based upon whether an individual was prepared to ‘open fire’ on UK citizens during civil disturbances.” This is corroborated by Dr. Richard North who revealed that the M.O.D. was buying up “unusually large quantities of tear gas and other riot equipment.”

We are part of a wider genocide: In Britain members of the ruling elites have admitted it. Andrew Neather admitted it and Migration Watch had secret government documents released under the freedom of Information Act are bases for another Nuremberg trial! Imposed Multi-Racialism with the admitted intention of the physical destruction of Whites is an organized crime against humanity. The humiliation, dispossession and gradual destruction of Whites, from Canada to Sweden to Africa is : The largest campaign of ethnic cleansing in recorded history.

The lessons we derive from the foregoing are firstly, the need to move close together. In a sense we are pioneers in our own country and need to relocate and form new communities of self defence. In view of the tyrannical power over the internet our enemy government are going to take we need to develop lines of communication between our communities. If large roads become impassable use bicycles especially with carriers.

Muslim vigilantes drive around an area just outside the territory they are taking over and threatening dissolute types like alcoholics, drunks and prostitutes as they clean up the area for their people to move into. They also claiming territory by opening mosques which, as well as cultural and community centres, are ideological training grounds for street soldiers. The imposition all over the country of no-go areas is prohibiting Whites from entering their territory. Like us they need areas of their own where they can bring their children up within their own cultural womb so they make life difficult for resident Whites to drive them out and, as the police and council authorities are on their side against local Whites, the Whites move out. This is euphemistically called “White flight.”

Alternating governments are aspects of one elite and have been acting illegally under the UN Genocide Act which nullifies any obligation to maintain the multi-racial state. In 2000 The Guardian predicted a white minority Britain by 2100, thus tacitly accepting our replacement. Around 8 years ago The Birmingham Post quoted a former senior Central TV official as saying we must prepare people for Muslims to become the majority. Jans Orbeck former Swedish PM admitted Muslims would take over.

Now this will surprise many but the key to our survival is by co-operating with other endangered groups like the Jewish communities. In January 2009 Muslims marched through European cities chanting “Jews to the gas” but the media played it down thus allowing it to fester. The difficulty at the moment is that Jewish people still think White Christians are their enemy but mass immigration of Muslims has changed everything. The historical difficulties between our two peoples is not so important while Muslims physically attack Jews in France and Malmo, Sweden and Norway and take our countries off us. As an expedient we have to co-operate for our common defence. The elites are made up of both White and Jewish people and both are destroying their people.

The Financial Times of 21 November 2003 reported that the EU's racism watchdog shelved a report on anti-Semitism because it found Muslims and pro-Palestinian groups were perpetrating most racist attacks. The report, "was judged inflammatory" and buried. "The decision not to publish was a political decision." The page from the paper is no longer available online! (7) This same EU has developed The European-Mediterranian Partnership to encourage mass Muslim immigratiomn and replace European peoples and culture by mass immigration of Muslims and a policy of Islamification. This partnership of the EU and Arab countries around the Mediterranean surrounds Israel with hostile countries, gives millions to Palestinian organisations as well as encouraging the mass immigration of Muslims into Europe and replacing indigenous Europeans as well as replacing our culture by an official programme of Islamification. Don't take my word for it research it for yourselves.

Recent figures from the Department of Education reveal that 43.1 percent of primary school pupils and 30.3 percent of secondary school pupils speak English as their second language.

These are mainly “eastern European immigrants and a rising birth rate among non-English-speaking Asian families.” They will be exaggerating eastern European immigration to hide the Third World aspect of the invasion.

For example, Bradford, which is being colonised by Pakistanis has had over 1,200 new non-English-speaking school children arriving in the last 12 months. There are nearly a million schoolchildren in Britain who do not have English as their first language. This causes English-speaking parents to withdraw their children and move to “English” schools.

The ethnic cleansing of non-Muslims in Luton shows police complicity. The Muslims target people from all races and are trying to ethnically clear West Indians in Bury Park by throwing bricks through their windows. The police have been ignoring it, but TV showed a residents meeting with episcopalian Bishop Blake asking the police what they were going to do about it. The police have “Hate Crime officers” to harry and persecute any who try to oppose what Muslims are doing!

See - Bedfordshire on Sunday 13/01/2008 and Luton on Sunday 16/01/2008

As far back as 1954 Judge William Clothier called on the government to send immigrants back. He was presiding over a trial of a Black immigrant who tried to drive A White tenant out. Whites are the main sufferers in the whole immigration saga.

How are we to cope with this?

We begin by asking ourselves questions. Will our children get a better education away from immigrant schools? Will they be safer from the knife and gun crime perpetrated by immigrants? What influence could we exert from outside? Is it worth risking getting mugged or stabbed on the tube commuting to city jobs? Businesses are cheaper to run outside cities.

As a supplement to political activism we need to be part of and represent our communities. To provide help and advice to those affected by the anti-White policies of the elites, tap into the problems of local people and open advice surgeries. This will take time and money but we represent our community not the Established elites. Rather than trying to take the elites at their own game, fight on our own ground. Help those who get displaced by immigrants, those who the state discriminate against. Don't just tell their stories, represent them.

Promote the work on the main website and involve the loyal bloggers in countering the biased media representation, showing what it is to be part of a community-based movement. Concentrate energy on things we can change, for this is going to be a long haul. We are already being ethnically cleansed and must not passively submit and must take control by moving out and rallying ourselves and, like Jewish people do, boycott immigrant shops and use only our own. Get children educated in white schools or Home School so they don't get brainwashed, de-cultured or turned into sexual perverts by State education.

They are our children and our responsibility and we should be planning a decent future for them. One day the children will want children and there'll be nowhere safe to go. We have to get involved in every aspect of life - local organisations, folk societies, school governors and home schooling and start our own credit unions. We need to form committees like alternative councils with proper banking and verified officers and proper banking to counter having our communities taken off us.

To be practical we must consider the logistics we will need. The arteries of goods and supply are now housed in large warehouses near motorways and hence to outlying areas. This is something for us to do when the race war breaks into organised fighting. There are fields and allotments to buy in the country. It would be a bit like the “Dig for Britain” campaign in the Second War all available land was utilised for growing food.

We must stop squandering money on the shallow distractions the media and adverts encourage, like expensive and unnecessary cosmetics. Young White women are naturally beautiful and don’t need to slap this expensive rubbish over their faces nor do you have to squander your resources on clubbing, booze and dope. We are misled by politician, football, TV, and adverts for shallow re-assurances like –have your boobs expanded. They are constantly advertising marked-up cosmetics. Save the money and invest in your communities and future generations. Set out to be economically powerful and through communal credit unions open your own shops.

A related problem is the serious financial problems in the EU and our massive debt indicates we might go the way of Greece.(8) This is a major major issue. Economics brings down systems faster than grievances about social policy. For they put up with anything if they have cash and this is how welfare entitlements are used to manage the population. A breakdown in the single currency would unleash powerful political forces. The global market is to the detriment of workers in the advanced nations - global corporations use labour from the cheapest labour markets. Immigrants have been used as cheap labour since immigration started and that is why the NHS and London Transport brought them in. It saved them improving conditions and paying a reasonable wage.

We are in the position immigrants were when they first came. They worked hard and pooled resources to start buying houses, first, in run down areas like Upper Parliament Street in Liverpool and Chapletown in Leeds which had been fashionable large houses in the inner cities. The working classes had been moved onto large estates and the middle classes were in the suburbs. The immigrants began penetrating the centres of cities like London which are the most economically and culturally important.

They have been putting down roots and encourage their children to study for the professions and get into positions of influence and jobs that yield a pension because they believe in building for the future not escape from life. We have to think communally and build up the strength of our communities as mutual support structures like extended families.

The ownership of land gives power to these rival communities. When the authorities bend the rules to allow them to take things off us they are allowing new people to take over. The authorities over ride local communities to give power and influence to immigrants by preferential planning permission.

The new Planning Guidelines state that the interests of ‘Travellers’ should take precedence over our( settled) communities. They already have priority for getting their children into popular schools and treatment on the NHS. Now, they are to be enabled to build caravan sites on green belt land, and this dispossesses people remote from immigrant areas.

An idea was put forward in The Spectator of 17th December 2005 by Conservative philosopher Roger Scruton: “Neighbours should club together to buy small parcels of land from any desperate farming neighbour, thereafter renting it back to him at a peppercorn rent. This we have done in our neighbourhood, so saving ourselves both from travellers and agribusiness, by injecting needed capital into a family farm… If we wish to retain our countryside, it is up to us who live there to make the necessary sacrifices.” This applies to forming collectives to buy property in our towns and cities.

There is a positive, wholesome vision in this which offers a proper future for the children. It is one of rebuilding our communities and offering preference in housing and employment to our own people as a matter of priority because they share our ancestory. We must start a fund like The Jewish National Fund to restore British neighbourhoods. We should invite our diaspora: Australians, Canadians to return. As they themselves are victims of Ethnic Cleansing Zimbabweans and South Africans should be asked to return to Britain for their sake as well as ours. The government won’t like it but as they are trying to destroy us we must ignore them.(9) We need to discuss our mutual safety with Jewish communities and found a community defence force to protect our people based on the Jewish community defence force the CST.

(1)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/8671753.stm
http://www.meco.org.uk/
(2)
Speech in the House of Commons on the consequences of immigration (24 May, 1976), published in A Nation or No Nation? Six Years in British Politics (Elliot Right Way Books, 1977), p. 161.
http://www.democracyforum.co.uk/ukip/73828-paul-weston-ukip-candidate-english-genocide.html
http://www.newnation.vg/forums/showthread.php?p=327340
(3)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQELHJx8Vf0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fHZYXOm898Q
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5AxSeZCVB50
(4)
Speech in the House of Commons on the consequences of immigration (24 May, 1976), from A Nation or No Nation? Six Years in British Politics (Elliot Right Way Books, 1977), p. 161.
(5)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/shropshire/8662674.stm
(6)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8688501.stm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-nqxP2bpF7I
(7)
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/french-jews-flee-to-israel-as-racist-attacks-mount-612757.html
http://tinyurl.com/2auobz9
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/06/world/europe/06iht-06europe.19125259.html
(8)
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/comment/edmundconway/7742164/Behind-the-drama-in-Europe-lies-a-global-crisis.html
(9)
http://sarahmaidofalbion.blogspot.com/
http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/datablog/2010/may/19/hate-crime-bnp-data
http://thegreenarrow.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=mrfox&action=display&thread=6041
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7XcSQJSOab8
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wJdSk1m-2dY&feature=fvw

Changing Reality - By Mister Fox

By Mister Fox

Two surprising articles about race and the First World recently appeared in the world’s media: the first in Britain and the other in Russia. Both revealed startling truths which are worth considering in detail.

In Britain, Rod Liddle wrote the wrong thing on his Spectator blog about two black youths who conspired to push a pregnant woman into a canal as part of a failed murder plot: “The overwhelming majority of street crime, knife crime, gun crime, robbery and crimes of sexual violence in London is carried out by young men from the African-Caribbean community. In return for all this crime, the black community has given Britain ‘rap music, goat curry and a far more vibrant and diverse understanding of cultures which were once alien to us’. For which, many thanks.”

The Thought Police immediately stepped in to suppress this way of thinking. The Thought Police have been described as an “ideological caste” because they are an elite who hold power and grant patronage to people who say the right things and destroy those who transgress. (Where is Ron Atkinson the former manager and TV football pundit?) To get into power say the right things; to stay in power, say the right things.

In response to Mr Liddle’s comments, Diane Abbott, MP for Hackney, retreated into history to try to denigrate his accurate comments by comparing him to fascist leader Oswald Mosley.

Yet on her blog, Ms Abbott once admitted: “Sadly 80 percent of gun crime in London is ‘black-on-black,’ often involving boys in their teens. As a black woman and the mother of a teenage son, this is frightening and wholly unacceptable.”

So frightening and unacceptable that Ms Abbot sent her children to a fee-paying school rather than to a local state secondary. In her own words, “too many black boys were unsuccessful within inner-city state schools.”

Ministry of Justice figures for 2007/2008 claim that only 2.2 percent of Britons aged ten or above are black, yet 14 percent of criminal cases tried in a crown court involve black suspects. For some crimes, the figures are even more alarming. One controversial report conducted by Scotland Yard last year found that more than half of teen knife crime offences in the capital involve black suspects.

Two years ago the Commons home affairs committee warned of a “serious crisis” among Britain’s young black community.

The public are given a false view of reality so that they cannot make a mature decision on the important topics of the day. Democracy is only possible when adults make mature decisions based on the facts.

Yet the Western media deny the public the facts and thereby have corrupted the political process. How many Europeans have ever heard of the Knoxville murders when a gang of blacks brutally murdered an innocent white couple? The case contained horrific details and if the races of the perpetrators and victims had been reversed, the whole world would know about it.

In that case, Hugh Christopher Newsom, Jr., 23, and Channon Gail Christian, 21, were both raped and murdered after being kidnapped early on the morning of January 7, 2007. Five blacks were arrested and a grand jury indicted four on counts of murder, robbery, kidnapping, rape and theft.

Three of those arrested, Letalvis D. Cobbins, Lemaricus Davidson and George Thomas, have been convicted on multiple charges including several counts of felony murder. Another has been convicted of federal charges as accessory after the fact to carjacking.

According to the testimony of the Knox County Acting Medical Examiner Dr Darinka Mileusnic-Polchan at the subsequent trial of Eric Boyd, Newsom was repeatedly raped with an object and then blindfolded, gagged, arms and feet bound and his head covered. Barefoot, he was either led or dragged outside the house to a set of nearby railroad tracks. He was shot in the back of the head, the neck, and the back, and his body then set on fire.

Christian’s death came only after hours of sexual torture, medical examiner Mileusnic-Polchan testified. Christian suffered horrific injuries to her vagina, anus and mouth. She was not only raped but savaged with “an object,” possibly a broken chair leg, the doctor testified. She was beaten in the head. Some type of chemical was poured down her throat, and her body, including her bleeding and battered genital area, likely scrubbed with the same solution – all while Christian was alive, the forensic expert said. She was then “hog-tied,” with curtains and strips of bedding, her face covered tightly with a small trash bag and her body stashed inside five large trash bags before being placed inside a large trash can and covered with sheets. Christian died slowly, suffocating, the medical examiner said.

Despite these horrific details, the international press, including CNN, have ignored the story. In Britain, only one paper, The Daily Mail, in Britain dared mention it: “Ironically, the case has now generated more publicity surrounding the furore over whether or not political correctness was behind the US media’s decision to largely ignore the story than it did for the murders themselves.” The same article quoted conservative commentator Michelle Malkin — herself of south east Asian extraction — as saying, “This case – an attractive white couple murdered by five black thugs – doesn’t fit any political agenda. It’s not a useful crime. Reverse the races and just imagine how the national media would cover the story of a young black couple murdered by five white assailants.”

The worst of it is that there have been similar cases in Tottenham, North London which were also hushed up by the media – “The savage path from Knoxville to Tottenham Hale.” Media blackouts such as these undermine democracy and prepare the way for a totalitarian society as they deny all people — black and white – the knowledge necessary to make correct political choices.

The Neo-Marxists are trying to change our perception of reality like the Soviet Union did to its subjects. The Soviets made a distinction between “Pravda,” the truth which is ideologically correct, and “Istina,” the objective truth. The multiracial ideologues view “Istina” as heresy and try to impose ideological truth on people who generally understand reality by common sense, experience and tradition from their parents and community.

The ideologues think they are pursuing a higher truth that leads to the multiracial utopia via the totalitarian doctrine called political correctness. As in Soviet Russia reality has to be described as they would like it to be, not as it is.

Jules Margoline lived through Soviet totalitarianism and is quoted in The Black Book of Communism: “It’s the need to tell an endless series of lies to save your life, to lie every day, to wear a mask for years and never say what you really think. In Soviet Russia, free (?) citizens have to do the same thing. Dissembling and lies become the only means of defence. Public meetings, business meetings, encounters on the street, conversations, even posters on the wall get wrapped up in an official language that does not contain a word of truth. People in the West can’t possibly understand what it is like to lose the right to say what you think for years on end . . .”

For years, people who have been oppressed or pushed out have cowed when expressing their grievance and begin: “I’m not a racist, but …” In other words, they are frightened to openly express their victimisation.

The persecution of Western patriots is prefigured in Vassily Grossman’s Everything Flows. A former party worker relates the media attacks on the Kulaks as “the enemies of the people … these words started to have an effect on me … at meetings and on special courses of instruction, and in radio broadcasts, at the cinema, writers and Stalin himself, all hammered home the same message: the Kulaks are parasites, they are burning brain and killing children … they must be exterminated … it was as if I was bewitched, and it seemed to me that all the world’s woes were the fault of the Kulaks and were they exterminated, the peasants would find happiness.”

Nowadays this process is being used against any patriot who does not want his or her country turned over to the Third World.

This reversal of reality — where the supposedly ‘Free West’ has become totalitarian and the former Soviet Union ‘free’ was aptly demonstrated by the second article under consideration.

In December 2009, Pravda, the former Soviet propaganda sheet, lamented the totalitarian state in which westerners live: “Throughout the totalitarian West, the Marxist internationalist elites, while busily flooding their countries with tens of millions of Third Worlders, have introduced specific measures to keep the native populations down and in check … Hate Crimes Laws. These laws state that a crime is not just a crime if we can find a deeper motive, such as hate of a specific race, sex, religion or sexual orientation … A murder is not just a murder if hate is involved and ‘minorities’ lives are worth more than whites! If the local jury trial is considered too lenient, then the globalist elites of the west can try the person again for ‘hate’ … In America, anti-white violence is exploding. An average of 12 people per day are killed by illegals and three times more whites and Asians are killed by blacks than vice versa. The same can be found in England ….

“When five blacks kidnapped a white couple, raped and murdered the man, than kept the woman for further rapes and poured bleach down her throat to kill her, there was no hate crime, even though those five became the idols of black racist groups in America. Nor when Mexican gangs ethnically cleanse one street after another. When Islamic Pakistanis in England beat an Anglican priest almost to death, in front of his church and screamed how they were going burn down the church … no hate crimes. When Islamic Turks murdered the white, Christian boyfriend of a Turkish girl, in Germany … not a hate crime. When Arabs and Pakistanis in Athens attack and burn Greek Orthodox businesses … not a hate crime. When the director van Gogh is brutally murdered by an Islamic assailant … not a hate crime. However, his Dutch film, showing the plight of the women under Islam, beat and abused, well, most definitely that is a hate crime … We must face the reality that those of us of European ethnic background who reside in the West are no longer living in free societies. We exist inside regimes that believe in our extermination, regimes that do not admit that we exist as a people.”

Like the Kurds in Turkey, we are forced to send our children to schools where the existence of our people as an independent entity is denied. If we do not do so, we run the risk of the government that hates us stealing our children and having them be brought up by strangers.” Family Courts often sit in camera!

In Florida, Teah Wimberly, 16, was recently charged with murdering Amanda Coll, a friend and classmate at Dillard High School in Fort Lauderdale. They were 15 at the time of the shooting. Ms. Wimberly, apparently wanted a lesbian relationship but was rebuffed. On 12 Nov of last year, police say, Wimberly took a .22-caliber handgun to school and shot Collette.

This case is being kept quiet, unlike when Matthew Shepard was murdered in Wyoming or when James Byrd was dragged to death in Jasper, Texas. The latter two incidents got massive publicity in the states. Why so? Because they belong to privileged identity groups. Shepard was homosexual and two men beat him to death for it; Byrd was black and three white supremacists chained him to a truck, and dragged him through the streets of Jasper and beheaded him.

The ‘hate crimes’ law signed recently by President Obama was called the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act. Like our oppressive Race Acts, this does not oppose hate, but “Whites.” It is part of the change from the individual rights of traditional liberals to the “group rights” of the “Cultural Marxist” which emerged in the 1960s. The law actually gives preferential treatment to other ethnic groups over whites by creating classes of victims and perpetrators, as if some victims of violent crime are better than others or some perpetrators worse.

Wimberly wasn’t charged with a hate crime because she’s the right sexual orientation — lesbian. Had she been a heterosexual teen who shot a lesbian, it would have publicised incessantly.

Type Kriss Donald into a search engine then, Stephen Lawrence then Damilola Taylor. We are being discriminated against by the law and the media. If people knew what was really going on in our countries there would be public demonstrations and that is why the crime figures have to be doctored: white crime is emphasised while ethnic attacks on whites are played down or not reported.

Trevor Phillips has admitted the facts. “…what we need to do is stop people being shot and ending up dead in gutters at the age of fourteen or fifteen. Who are the people to whom that is happening? Way, way disproportionately black people. I think you will find that amongst the black community in this country there is more keenness for tough and active measures to rein in the gunmen than amongst anybody else, because they are the victims.”

The failure to openly discuss this serious issue to which Mr Phillips alludes to is part of the multiracialists’ mentality. Suppression of truth, totalitarianism and a quest for a multiracial utopia go together. They are indivisible. Because it is so unnatural the truth has to be hidden.

The hiding of reality from the public began with multiracialism in 1948 and is part of the multiracialists’ outlook.

Two days after the Empire Windrush docked on the 22 July 1948 with 790 West Indians, J.D. Murray and ten other Labour MPs wrote to Labour Prime Minister Clement Atlee, asking for legislation to prevent an influx.

Atlee replied that he thought they would “make a genuine contribution to our labour difficulties at the present.” Yet in private Atlee’s cabinet held three discussions about immigration.

The first debate on immigration in the House of Commons on the 5th of November 1954 called by John Hynd, Labour MP for Sheffield (Attercliffe), show that these symptoms of social collapse had been evident for over 50 years.

“One day recently 700 embarked from Jamaica without any prospect of work, housing or anything else,” he noted. He also said the colour-bar in Sheffield dance halls because of knife fights was justified. Both Hynd and another Labour MP James Johnson called for a committee of enquiry to be set up.

Other speakers repeatedly asked the Government to take action. But Henry Hopkinson (C), Minister of State at the Colonial Office, fobbed them off by telling them “the matter is receiving urgent attention.” He did however admit that he had received many letters from worried MPs on both sides.

In around 1979 a Metropolitan police report on mugging was withdrawn to prevent a clamour for control of immigration or even a white backlash.

In 1959 a report from both the London Metropolitan Police and West Midlands Police expressed concern at the growing number of crimes of violence being carried out by some newly-arrived West Indians. The rate per head of population was four times that committed by indigenous people.

An excellent series in The Times during January 1965 titled “The Dark Million” showed what the official attitude was. The author wrote: “Back in June (1964) a senior civil servant talked to me about a particular aspect of the problem that has since taken some people by surprise. I had asked why figures were not available to give a nationwide picture of the problem.

“I was told: ‘We haven’t tried to find out. It may be as things get more critical, and they are getting more critical, it will be decided that we should do so. It will be a political decision. One of the things about statistics is that people asked what they are, then again in three months time what they are, and then you have a problem on your hands. People start to keep the score, and you have a crisis. If, as, a result, they know that such-and-such is happening in Wolverhampton, they say what is the Government doing about Wolverhampton. It is a matter of judgement as to when you start taking that line and say something should be done. It is a matter for central Government’.”

You only have to go three miles from an inner city and people do not know what is really happening. They believe the media and have the understanding of the world of children. Their reality has been changed.