Please spread this story as widely as possible, people need to know how much censorship and media distortion goes on.
__________
Hat Tip: The British Resistance
Friday, 21 January 2011
Thursday, 20 January 2011
Acts of War - part 2
By Mister FoxThe American pastor Terry Jones who recently threatened to burn a copy of the Koran has been banned from Britain. A Home Office spokesperson said the government opposes extremism in all its forms. This is a lie because there was a covenant between the British government and Muslim terrorists as I will show. They claim to believe in freedom of speech and democracy but only if you say and think what they want you to. If you think for yourself or dissent you will be oppressed by he state.
The term “racism” is used to pathologise people who oppose being pushed out of their communities by the masses of immigrants the elites are importing. It implies there is something wrong in our minds. It is as if we have caught a disease and they must stop it spreading. They use pejoratives to put us in quarantine, to keep others away from us and contain the spread of something considered dangerous. They are now investigating 3-year olds for signs of this illness developing. (1). They want to know how it we caught it and they warn others to take precautions against catching it.
The elites use words ideologically and label people as haters, racists – use words as weapons. They give opponents a bad name like warning people of a dog that bites so no one will touch it.
They have conflated hatred with prudence. If one does not want too many immigrants in they are accused of hating them. If you object to masses of foreigners immigrating they say its because you are xenophobic. This is to suggest you are some horrible person who hates them all. This cows people and instead of parents using their traditional inherited prejudices to warn their children to keep away from ethnic minorities in the wake of widespread Muslim gang rapes of young girls they condition them to think the ethics are all nice and benefiting their lives.
People should realise these definitions like “racist”, “xenophobe” or “hater” are not some objective truth but ideologically-loaded words coined by interest groups to get people to surrender to immigrants who are being used to undercut the wages of indigenous people and make the elites feel morally superior even though they themselves live apart from it. It works like a censor in the head to stop certain natural thoughts and behaviour traits. The term “racism” is used by people to control us or to silence our objections to being pushed out of our communities. It was made up by somebody.
The “experts” and Establishment intellectuals describe the violated girls as vulnerable to shift the focus on to the victims instead of the perpetrators - to exonerate Muslims; but these rapes of young girls are attacks on them, not self-inflicted. The focus must be kept on the attackers and not let the duplicitous elites pass it from their pets to raped young girls.
It is an indictment on us as a whole that these young girls are out wandering around and not being protected.
In a recent essay I referred to the academics who changed our ethnocentrism to other centrism: the shift of focus from ourselves to looking up to other ethnic groups and immigrants as bearers of virtue and cultural enrichment who are improving our lives or coming to look after us. This is at the root of this Act of War because to Muslims we are “other” or the “out group”. They dehumanise us with terms like infidel and kuffar.
These abuses would not happen if we had retained our traditional prejudices against foreigners and if we asserted ourselves. Instead all we have is girly and corrupt elites covering up for the alien child-rapists. Once this came out after years of covering it up the elites immediately started trying to deceive us by talking it away and trying to say “Whites" are as bad when this is actually ethnic guerrilla war on our communities by a rival community.
We have to work on regaining our confidence and value our selves, our culture, history and traditions not apologise to outsiders. Our customs, notions of right and wrong were inherited and passed down as moral guidance by the parents but have been taken out of their hands by the state. Where the parents should be advising their children to keep away from ethnics the schools are telling them to mix with them and there lives will be improved. That is why these children go with Muslim: they have been trained to think they are nice and bringing enrichment: the teachers are destroying the children's natural defences. The parents are unsure of themselves because the advice they get from “experts” contradicts their own common sense.
Some think we need a philosophy. Well, here is a brief interlude. We do not only have rights we have duties that go with them. The colloquial expression “by rights” retains this sense. People say “By rights you should receive or do so and so.” It means “By all that is right” which includes obligations. Rights did not just mean rights to do things it also included duty. These were passed down through the ancestors so we derive our rights and responsibilities from our ancestors as members of the British or, English, Scottish, Welsh and Ulster family of nations. These are not the universal abstractions that progressives use they are concrete and specific to us. They evolved with the nation like the language. Our ways, customs, mores were inherited from within our nation and are different from other European nations but run parallel with them. The universal idea that what suits us is applicable in Africa, say, is ludicrous because they have different ways, customs etc. In fact it insults them, as it implies there ways are inferior and they need ours.
The corollary to this arrogance is the way the elites want give to immigrants what is ours. They did not bring their own houses, money and maternity wards with them so they are being given what is ours by inherited right. They are also assuming authority over us in the police, law, and bureaucracy; this also takes our responsibility off us by giving them our roles.
The welfare of these young girls is being abandoned by those responsible for it like the police and social services and far from feeling guilty to immigrants, we we must assume responsibility and protect our young girls. When did the disgusting NSPCC speak for them?
These girls have been corrupted and sexualised by modern commerce; by the media.
Dereliction of duty applies in general and is a failure to fulfill our obligations to our own people.
There is another imported evil - the terror threat. The same type of people who are raping our girls are posing a threat of terror to us so what do the authorities do? They notify community leaders before they raid looking for explosives.
On 17th January 1999 The Sunday Times reported: That "around 2,000 Muslims attend training camps around Britain to study Holy War. They were held at weekends in Birmingham and London. Recruits were taught hand-to-hand combat and survival techniques for civil strife. For weapon training and military training in the Yemen and Afghanistan. How do the Security Services deal with this? They ignore it and harass the “far-right”.
The Daily Telegraph of August 10th 2010 revealed that the new security "strategy to tackle extremists is to focus on white racists.” Needless to say this was announced by Shalid Malik the Communities Minister. Scotland Yard warned last month that such groups could be planning a terrorist "spectacular" to stoke up racial tensions. This was a clear indication of the new tactics. Commander Shaun Sawyers, signalling the complicity of the security services with Muslim extremists and that they can carry on developing their terror structures because security services would focus on “Whites. (3) The impression given is that Muslims can carry on developing terror networks because we are equating "far-right extremists" with you to divert the public gaze.
The Met's counter-terrorism command has increased the number of officers in a special unit monitoring Right-wing extremists because of "the threat". Yet they have at least 8 members of al-Queda in the police service!
Just as blaming the violated girls by labelling them “vulnerable” the Security Services attack people as “racists” or “far-right extremists” to take the public eye off Muslim extremists. To put it bluntly they are supporting a war for the ownership of our homeland and excusing the violation of young White girls. (4)
Birmingham journalists covered up Muslim involvement in the Birmingham Street Battles of August 2009 after an EDL anti-extremist demo and blamed the EDL as “far-right extremists”. These Birmingham journalists also cover up terrorist cells in Birmingham.
Eight young Muslim terrorists from Birmingham, London and Luton on active service were arrested in Aden in December 1998, planning terror attacks against British targets. The security services then claimed they had no idea that Muslim street soldiers were being recruited in British mosques and trained in terror camps! Do we believe them?
The state alliance with Muslim terrorists.
Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga, told an Italian newspaper in 2008, that the government of Italy in the 1970s agreed to allow Arab terrorist groups freedom of movement in the country in exchange for immunity from attacks. The government of Prime Minister Aldo Moro reached a "secret non-belligerence pact between the Italian state and Palestinian resistance organizations, including terrorist groups." According to the former president, it was Moro himself who designed the terms of the agreement with the foreign Arab terrorists. "The terms of the agreement were that the Palestinian organizations could even maintain armed bases of operation in the country, and they had freedom of entry and exit without being subject to normal police controls, because they were 'handled' by the secret services." As Interior Minister, Cossiga said that he learned PLO members in Italy had diplomatic immunity as representatives of the Arab League. "The Palestinian organizations could even maintain armed bases of operation in the country."
The British had a similar deal with Muslim terrorists. In 1988, Omar Bakri Mohammed admitted there was a deal between British Secret Services and Muslim terrorists. He stated: “I work here in accordance with the covenant of peace which I made with the British government when I got asylum … " see Al-Sharq Al-Awsat of 22 August 1998.
The Bishop of Rochester related how at a dinner the Algerian foreign minister revealed that when the Algerians warned the government about the terrorists they were harbouring in London they were told they are “freedom fighters.”! (5)
Islamist ideas are spread through Islamic study centres attached to our universities. Professor Anthony Glees revealed eight universities — including Oxford and Cambridge — have accepted more than £233.5 million from Saudi and Muslim sources since 1995, spreading radicalism and creating two separate identities and sets of allegiance. The education system is being used to brainwash our children to excuse and encourage Muslim terrorism.
There are several examples of how the elites submit to the threat of Muslim terror. They abandoned the bribery investigation into the arms deal between Saudi Arabia and BAE systems when the Saudis threatened that, if the case was not dropped: ‘British lives on British streets’ would be at risk” - former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles. (6)
Muslim terrorists were welcomed into Britain and financed by state benefits. They needed to answer no questions and needed to show no papers and this began under Thatcher lived in a gated community. They got free education, free health care even when they openly developed terrorist cells and trained bombers for active service in other parts of the world. These are boosted by a deceitful system called “Asylum.”
Few have any legal entitlement to enter this country but are allowed to stay and provided extra benefits we do not get like free cars, mobile phones and decorated houses even after the London bombing of 7/7. Without this encouragement al-Queda could not have got into the West to launch bombing attacks like those in London and Madrid. It is truly ludicrous to think the authorities do not know what is going on.
We have people just strolling into the country. There are illegal immigrants driving round untaxed and the police allow them to. Our diabolical elites have given up controlling our country and protecting people and allow immigrants to do what they like to us. We have to look into ourselves to find the weakness, then draw strength and confront the terrorist communities and protect these young girls. The elites won't - they will form committees, appoint officials even a government minister to pretend they are doing something, but will not stop it. What is wrong with us to allow outsiders to come into our country, plant bombs, rape our children and do nothing about it?
We have been mislead by the elites to think everything is hunky dory but we are realising now that it is far from that. The elites are more “vulnerable” than ever now because so many of their machinations have been exposed.
________________
The term “racism” is used to pathologise people who oppose being pushed out of their communities by the masses of immigrants the elites are importing. It implies there is something wrong in our minds. It is as if we have caught a disease and they must stop it spreading. They use pejoratives to put us in quarantine, to keep others away from us and contain the spread of something considered dangerous. They are now investigating 3-year olds for signs of this illness developing. (1). They want to know how it we caught it and they warn others to take precautions against catching it.
The elites use words ideologically and label people as haters, racists – use words as weapons. They give opponents a bad name like warning people of a dog that bites so no one will touch it.
They have conflated hatred with prudence. If one does not want too many immigrants in they are accused of hating them. If you object to masses of foreigners immigrating they say its because you are xenophobic. This is to suggest you are some horrible person who hates them all. This cows people and instead of parents using their traditional inherited prejudices to warn their children to keep away from ethnic minorities in the wake of widespread Muslim gang rapes of young girls they condition them to think the ethics are all nice and benefiting their lives.
People should realise these definitions like “racist”, “xenophobe” or “hater” are not some objective truth but ideologically-loaded words coined by interest groups to get people to surrender to immigrants who are being used to undercut the wages of indigenous people and make the elites feel morally superior even though they themselves live apart from it. It works like a censor in the head to stop certain natural thoughts and behaviour traits. The term “racism” is used by people to control us or to silence our objections to being pushed out of our communities. It was made up by somebody.
The “experts” and Establishment intellectuals describe the violated girls as vulnerable to shift the focus on to the victims instead of the perpetrators - to exonerate Muslims; but these rapes of young girls are attacks on them, not self-inflicted. The focus must be kept on the attackers and not let the duplicitous elites pass it from their pets to raped young girls.
It is an indictment on us as a whole that these young girls are out wandering around and not being protected.
In a recent essay I referred to the academics who changed our ethnocentrism to other centrism: the shift of focus from ourselves to looking up to other ethnic groups and immigrants as bearers of virtue and cultural enrichment who are improving our lives or coming to look after us. This is at the root of this Act of War because to Muslims we are “other” or the “out group”. They dehumanise us with terms like infidel and kuffar.
These abuses would not happen if we had retained our traditional prejudices against foreigners and if we asserted ourselves. Instead all we have is girly and corrupt elites covering up for the alien child-rapists. Once this came out after years of covering it up the elites immediately started trying to deceive us by talking it away and trying to say “Whites" are as bad when this is actually ethnic guerrilla war on our communities by a rival community.
We have to work on regaining our confidence and value our selves, our culture, history and traditions not apologise to outsiders. Our customs, notions of right and wrong were inherited and passed down as moral guidance by the parents but have been taken out of their hands by the state. Where the parents should be advising their children to keep away from ethnics the schools are telling them to mix with them and there lives will be improved. That is why these children go with Muslim: they have been trained to think they are nice and bringing enrichment: the teachers are destroying the children's natural defences. The parents are unsure of themselves because the advice they get from “experts” contradicts their own common sense.
Some think we need a philosophy. Well, here is a brief interlude. We do not only have rights we have duties that go with them. The colloquial expression “by rights” retains this sense. People say “By rights you should receive or do so and so.” It means “By all that is right” which includes obligations. Rights did not just mean rights to do things it also included duty. These were passed down through the ancestors so we derive our rights and responsibilities from our ancestors as members of the British or, English, Scottish, Welsh and Ulster family of nations. These are not the universal abstractions that progressives use they are concrete and specific to us. They evolved with the nation like the language. Our ways, customs, mores were inherited from within our nation and are different from other European nations but run parallel with them. The universal idea that what suits us is applicable in Africa, say, is ludicrous because they have different ways, customs etc. In fact it insults them, as it implies there ways are inferior and they need ours.
The corollary to this arrogance is the way the elites want give to immigrants what is ours. They did not bring their own houses, money and maternity wards with them so they are being given what is ours by inherited right. They are also assuming authority over us in the police, law, and bureaucracy; this also takes our responsibility off us by giving them our roles.
The welfare of these young girls is being abandoned by those responsible for it like the police and social services and far from feeling guilty to immigrants, we we must assume responsibility and protect our young girls. When did the disgusting NSPCC speak for them?
These girls have been corrupted and sexualised by modern commerce; by the media.
Dereliction of duty applies in general and is a failure to fulfill our obligations to our own people.
There is another imported evil - the terror threat. The same type of people who are raping our girls are posing a threat of terror to us so what do the authorities do? They notify community leaders before they raid looking for explosives.
On 17th January 1999 The Sunday Times reported: That "around 2,000 Muslims attend training camps around Britain to study Holy War. They were held at weekends in Birmingham and London. Recruits were taught hand-to-hand combat and survival techniques for civil strife. For weapon training and military training in the Yemen and Afghanistan. How do the Security Services deal with this? They ignore it and harass the “far-right”.
The Daily Telegraph of August 10th 2010 revealed that the new security "strategy to tackle extremists is to focus on white racists.” Needless to say this was announced by Shalid Malik the Communities Minister. Scotland Yard warned last month that such groups could be planning a terrorist "spectacular" to stoke up racial tensions. This was a clear indication of the new tactics. Commander Shaun Sawyers, signalling the complicity of the security services with Muslim extremists and that they can carry on developing their terror structures because security services would focus on “Whites. (3) The impression given is that Muslims can carry on developing terror networks because we are equating "far-right extremists" with you to divert the public gaze.
The Met's counter-terrorism command has increased the number of officers in a special unit monitoring Right-wing extremists because of "the threat". Yet they have at least 8 members of al-Queda in the police service!
Just as blaming the violated girls by labelling them “vulnerable” the Security Services attack people as “racists” or “far-right extremists” to take the public eye off Muslim extremists. To put it bluntly they are supporting a war for the ownership of our homeland and excusing the violation of young White girls. (4)
Birmingham journalists covered up Muslim involvement in the Birmingham Street Battles of August 2009 after an EDL anti-extremist demo and blamed the EDL as “far-right extremists”. These Birmingham journalists also cover up terrorist cells in Birmingham.
Eight young Muslim terrorists from Birmingham, London and Luton on active service were arrested in Aden in December 1998, planning terror attacks against British targets. The security services then claimed they had no idea that Muslim street soldiers were being recruited in British mosques and trained in terror camps! Do we believe them?
The state alliance with Muslim terrorists.
Former Italian President Francesco Cossiga, told an Italian newspaper in 2008, that the government of Italy in the 1970s agreed to allow Arab terrorist groups freedom of movement in the country in exchange for immunity from attacks. The government of Prime Minister Aldo Moro reached a "secret non-belligerence pact between the Italian state and Palestinian resistance organizations, including terrorist groups." According to the former president, it was Moro himself who designed the terms of the agreement with the foreign Arab terrorists. "The terms of the agreement were that the Palestinian organizations could even maintain armed bases of operation in the country, and they had freedom of entry and exit without being subject to normal police controls, because they were 'handled' by the secret services." As Interior Minister, Cossiga said that he learned PLO members in Italy had diplomatic immunity as representatives of the Arab League. "The Palestinian organizations could even maintain armed bases of operation in the country."
The British had a similar deal with Muslim terrorists. In 1988, Omar Bakri Mohammed admitted there was a deal between British Secret Services and Muslim terrorists. He stated: “I work here in accordance with the covenant of peace which I made with the British government when I got asylum … " see Al-Sharq Al-Awsat of 22 August 1998.
The Bishop of Rochester related how at a dinner the Algerian foreign minister revealed that when the Algerians warned the government about the terrorists they were harbouring in London they were told they are “freedom fighters.”! (5)
Islamist ideas are spread through Islamic study centres attached to our universities. Professor Anthony Glees revealed eight universities — including Oxford and Cambridge — have accepted more than £233.5 million from Saudi and Muslim sources since 1995, spreading radicalism and creating two separate identities and sets of allegiance. The education system is being used to brainwash our children to excuse and encourage Muslim terrorism.
There are several examples of how the elites submit to the threat of Muslim terror. They abandoned the bribery investigation into the arms deal between Saudi Arabia and BAE systems when the Saudis threatened that, if the case was not dropped: ‘British lives on British streets’ would be at risk” - former ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles. (6)
Muslim terrorists were welcomed into Britain and financed by state benefits. They needed to answer no questions and needed to show no papers and this began under Thatcher lived in a gated community. They got free education, free health care even when they openly developed terrorist cells and trained bombers for active service in other parts of the world. These are boosted by a deceitful system called “Asylum.”
Few have any legal entitlement to enter this country but are allowed to stay and provided extra benefits we do not get like free cars, mobile phones and decorated houses even after the London bombing of 7/7. Without this encouragement al-Queda could not have got into the West to launch bombing attacks like those in London and Madrid. It is truly ludicrous to think the authorities do not know what is going on.
We have people just strolling into the country. There are illegal immigrants driving round untaxed and the police allow them to. Our diabolical elites have given up controlling our country and protecting people and allow immigrants to do what they like to us. We have to look into ourselves to find the weakness, then draw strength and confront the terrorist communities and protect these young girls. The elites won't - they will form committees, appoint officials even a government minister to pretend they are doing something, but will not stop it. What is wrong with us to allow outsiders to come into our country, plant bombs, rape our children and do nothing about it?
We have been mislead by the elites to think everything is hunky dory but we are realising now that it is far from that. The elites are more “vulnerable” than ever now because so many of their machinations have been exposed.
________________
http://davidmartin-hamilton.blogspot.com/2009/08/terror-alliance.html
(1) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1032650/Children-young-reported-racism-Government-funded-group-claims.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1314438/3-year-olds-labelled-bigots-teachers-250k-children-accused-racism.html
(2) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/6000029/Strategy-to-tackle-extremists-to-focus-on-white-racists.html
http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&pagename=Zone-English-News/NWELayout&cid=1248187805699
(3) http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/jul/06/far-right-terrorism-threat-police
(4) http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/Not-just-White-girls-Pak-Muslim-men-sexually-target-Hindu-and-Sikh-girls-as-well/articleshow/7254035.cms
http://www.civilliberty.org.uk/newsdetail.php?newsid=1157
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4097
(5) Melannie Phillips. (2008) Londonistan. p93
(6) http://www.newsweek.com/2008/07/29/gag-order.html
(1) http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1032650/Children-young-reported-racism-Government-funded-group-claims.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1314438/3-year-olds-labelled-bigots-teachers-250k-children-accused-racism.html
(2) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/6000029/Strategy-to-tackle-extremists-to-focus-on-white-racists.html
http://www.islamonline.net/servlet/Satellite?c=Article_C&pagename=Zone-English-News/NWELayout&cid=1248187805699
(3) http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/jul/06/far-right-terrorism-threat-police
(4) http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/pakistan/Not-just-White-girls-Pak-Muslim-men-sexually-target-Hindu-and-Sikh-girls-as-well/articleshow/7254035.cms
http://www.civilliberty.org.uk/newsdetail.php?newsid=1157
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/4097
(5) Melannie Phillips. (2008) Londonistan. p93
(6) http://www.newsweek.com/2008/07/29/gag-order.html
Monday, 17 January 2011
Acts of War
By Mister FoxActs of War are often invasions of peaceful countries but the Muslims raping young White girls must be considered an Act of War as it is carried out by a separate and homogeneous community imported into our country by the deceit of the elites against the interests of the indigenous people.
Can anyone imagine the great Lord Palmerston allowing aliens to gang rape our young girls? In 1850 for the assault on British subject Don Pacificos in Greece, a foreign country, he sent the navy and blockaded their ports Greece was under the joint protection of three powers: Russia and France protested against its coercion by the British fleet and the French ambassador temporarily left London. It was the cause of his declaration that British subjects ought everywhere to be protected by the strong arm of the British government against injustice and wrong; comparing the reach of the British Empire to that of the Roman Empire, in which a Roman citizen could walk the earth unmolested by any foreign power. This was the famous speech Civis Britannicus Sum based on Civis Romanus Sum.
His Gun Boat Diplomacy was to protect British subjects anywhere in the world. The low and worthless rulers we have now even cover up for aliens raping our young girls in our own towns and cities. Just compare girly Michael Gove with this great man. What an embarrassment!
The sight of the elites on Question Time talking away this reality to cover it up was sickening. (1) They unanimously agreed Jack Straw was a racist for hinting that Pakistani males are serial sex offenders against young white girls and would not even discuss the reality. (2) They didn't mention that Pakistani women must be virgins at marriage and risk assault or death if they step out of line. Michael Goves was a prig and the ultra-orthodox Jeanette Winterson made her feminist points. She is a “hater” - but only of fashionable targets like White males. I suggest you read her books of hate to see what she thinks of men. Are these vile, liars and cowards our representatives? Do they speak for us? No, we must protect our people ourselves and campaign to protect young White girls from the alliance of secrecy between the degenerate elites and Muslim child-rapists. When does the fight back start to protect our people - Now Occurrences that could cause us to revolt are first kept quiet but if it comes out they try to nullify its effects. This is why Muslim child-rapists are classed as criminals or we are encouraged to think they are the same as White paedophiles but they are from a different community and never do it to their own only other communities children like whites and Sikhs.
The police and social services kept these activities quiet for years and even tried to sue Channel 4 to stop them exposing it. Colin Cramphorn, CBE, QPM, DL, FRSA, Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police, told a public meeting that we must “learn to live” with the rapes of young White children. Instead of doing their duty to combat crime the local police forces aided and abetted these evil crimes by covering them up.
Cramphorn persuaded channel Four to postpone its investigation Edge of the City as it would "increase community tensions" in the run up to local and European elections in 2004. This was police interference in the political process. This is how the elites stick together against the interests of the people they claim to serve. Channel Four had made the documentary with the co-operation of Bradford Social Services. They showed it after the election. The programme, featured alleged abuses of young White women by older Muslim men. Don't forget it was the corrupt Blackpool police who destroyed the case against two Muslim sickos who are thought to have chopped Charlene Downs up and sold her in Kebab meat. (3)
No wonder they persecute the BNP and EDL but cover up for Muslims military training. (4)
MI5 has been infiltrated by Muslim terrorists. MI5 is responsible for protecting Britain against national security threats yet may have recruited up to six al-Qaeda sympathisers. Six Muslim recruits were expelled including two who had been to training camps in Pakistan. others had unexplained gaps of up to three months unexplained. Two of the men had several weeks training while the other four were identified before they entered training. They are openly giving priority to recruiting Muslims.
In fact the police force admitted they can not or do not want to expel 8 al-Queda agents! Don’t forget that MI5 did not know the 7/7 bombings of London was planned!!! (5)
London is the world centre for Muslim terrorism and this is being encouraged by the police and security services. We can disagree over the motives of our elites but not their intentions: they are encouraging Muslims to take over our country. There have been stories of young Muslims having terrorist training in remote areas in this country? Have MI5 noticed or do they deliberately allow it?
Throughout the 1980s and 90s the police and security services allowed Muslim terror groups financed by Saudi money to develop and to produce literature promoting hatred of Britain and Jewish communities.
Arab banks financed terrorist and anti-Western groups with the authorities allowing it. They even gave safe haven to terrorists wanted in other countries and allowed them to preach violence against us in the streets and arrested Brits who objected. The police protected the terrorists many of whom went on to mount terrorist attacks in other countries like Israel and America.
Abu Hamza, who was a significant figure in global terrorism, was allowed to incite murder and hatred of us and Jews; also, the police and MI5 allowed him to gather a massive stock of weapons for fighting us on our streets and recruit for terror cells.
Three of the London Bombers were influenced by him. To be fair the police did try to prosecute him twice but the CPS stopped it. Who in the CPS stopped it?
It was only when the Americans wanted him extradited did the authorities act as if to prevent him being sent to Guatanamo Bay in 2004. Then, Washington named Abu Hamza as a "terrorist facilitator with a global reach" and he was arrested pending extradition. Five months later, he was charged with 15 UK offences associated with his sermons and information contained in the Encyclopaedia of Afghan Jihad.
Parents have been bullied by the state out of advising their children not to mix with people from other ethnic groups. Further, the state has taken over the education of the majority of children through state education. The elites will try to stop it but we must form Home Schooling networks. In tandem with this the media present ethnics in a good light as bearers of virtue and cultural enrichment. This why we need traditional prejudice passed down from our ancestors: it save innocent people learning the hard way as these young girls have.
This innocence has a jagged edge. As I wrote, like the Soviet Union the elites are trying to bring our perceptions into line with their wishful thinking.
The recent, belated expose of the extent of Muslims gang-raping young White girls has at last brought an evil into the public consciousness. Progressives are trying to remove its sting: nullify it by adapting it to their unworldly ideology. If they do not Whites would start to revolt and there are a lot more of us. Its only by controlling what people are allowed to know that keeps the masses passive; even welfare entitlements and employing a large per cent of the population could lose their force if people knew it was a rival ethnic community that is raping young children.
Some recalcitrant facts could not be swayed away and remain: The Times investigation is based around 56 men convicted in the Midlands and north of England since 1997, 50 from Muslim backgrounds. Muslim men even hang around outside school-gates looking for young White girls to drug and rape but no teacher speaks out.
Former Labour MP Ann Cryer provoked an attempt to hide the truth in 2003 when she said the traditional culture of arranged marriages could have caused a criminal minority of Asian men to target vulnerable young white girls for sex.
No, but the gang raping of minors is criminal and the police and social services aided and abetted these predators by covering up.
Another attempt to falsify reality came from Mohammed Shafiq, director of the Lancashire-based Ramadhan Foundation, said last year: ‘I think the police are overcautious because they are afraid of being branded racist. 'These men are criminals and should be treated as criminals — whatever their race.’ this is the same excuse the Government used for IRA terrorists. That those political terrorists were criminals. We really must not take any notice of this cowardly twaddle.
In the Netherlands young white girls are gang-raped and used for prostitution by Moroccan pimps, known as 'loverboys'. Sweden is the rape capital of Europe – well, the Muslim parts are. (6)
To sample the official “conspiracy of silence” that allows hundreds of vulnerable white girls in some towns to be abused by Asian men: Ajmal Mohamed, a 43-year-old from Blackburn. In 2004, Mohammed, took a schoolgirl to a Manchester hotel room and got her drunk to celebrate her 14th birthday. The child ran away. Police were called, but he denied having sex with her and they issued him with a “child abduction warning letter”. They allowed it to continue. He was never prosecuted.
Two years later, Mohammed took another 14-year-old to a hotel room in Blackpool and did rape this one. When the police arrested him they found the phone numbers of six other vulnerable young girls on his mobile phone. The police who let him off the first time have personal responsibility for the second attack and must be held accountable.
In industrial towns across the North and the Midlands, in just three years 51 people have been convicted in trials involving groups of men who have picked up young girls for gang raping and sexual exploitation. Forty-eight of the offenders were Asian; the vast majority of the victims were white. Recently, in Derby, nine men, eight of them Asian, were sentenced for their parts in a gang that groomed, sexually exploited and in some cases raped 27 local children, 22 of them white.
In 2006, Blackburn’s local paper, the Lancashire Telegraph, launched a “Keep Them Safe” campaign to make the authorities tackle what it called “sexual grooming and abduction - which predominantly involves Asian men”. In article after article, the paper charted locals’ frustration at officials refusal o do what they are paid for and help the girls.
In 2007, the Lancashire Telegraph reported, that some parents had threatened to sue the police for their failure to act. The editor, Kevin Young, said: “This is an extremely sensitive subject, and the Telegraph gave it a lot of consideration before launching its campaign.” They should sue the police for covering the widespread rape of children up.
Like the liars on QT the judiciary takes the side of foreign sex attackers. In October 2007 evil Judge Sir Henry Hodge stopped the deportation of a serial sex attacker because it would breach his human right to a family life. Hodge was an immigration busy trying to destroy our country. The foreigner admitted indecently assaulting 11 women in the previous five years and has committed a string of other offences including robbery, burglary, arson and drugs. But Hodge - husband of paedophile supporting Labour minister Margaret Hodge - ruled he should be allowed to stay because he came to the UK at the age of six and has almost no family left in West Africa. To support his decision, he cited article eight of the Human Rights Act, which gives a person the right to a family life.
That's it! Family life for vile perverts but ruined lives for the victims and no legal catharsis offered.
Another evil judge sentenced Stuart Wood, with previous convictions for violence and indecent assault on young girls, to just seven years for a vicious rape, then praised him for converting to Islam: “You have turned to Islam and this promises well for your future, particularly as you are now an adherent of a religion which respects women and self-discipline.” (7)
Under Sharia Law, rape can only be proven if the rapist confesses or if there are four male witnesses. Women who allege rape, without the benefit of the act having been witnessed by four men who subsequently develop a conscience, are taken as confessing to having sex.
In America Alone Mark Steyn wrote that Europe will need a Balkans-style civil war is the only option for Europe:"Why did Bosnia collapse into the worst slaughter in Europe since the second World War? In the thirty years before the meltdown, Bosnian Serbs had declined from 43 percent to 31 percent of the population, while Bosnian Muslims had increased from 26 percent to 44 percent. In a democratic age, you can't buck demography — except through civil war. The Serbs figured that out, as other Continentals will in the years ahead: if you cannot outbreed the enemy, cull 'em. The problem that Europe faces is that Bosnia's demographic profile is now the model for the entire continent”.
Thailand is degenerate to allow its children to be degraded and we must not compare ourselves to them. Its true that catholic priests abused children and the church covered it up but the problem here is that because it is Muslims doing it to White girls the responsible authorities like the police and social services cover it up.
These girls are being Raped and then groomed for Prostitution. To Muslims Whites are less than human and dehumanised with terms like Kuffar and Infidel. They hook young White girls on drugs and alcohol, and emotionally torture them. This is not about sex: If they wanted sex they could buy the services of prostitutes. They are easy to find and advertise. Why instead of that do they use drugs, alcohol and mental degradation on those girls and pass them around like pieces of meat? It is using our young women as the spoils of war. The deliberate degredation of non-Muslims, unbelievers, infidels? To emphasise the power, the supremacy, of Islam?
Anybody who has looked into the eyes of someone when they howl with pain at the sexual abuse they suffered as a child would know what wicked and despicable people are the scum on Question Time, the judiciary and the police for covering this up. What is clear is that our civilisation is being dragged down to the level of a third-world hell hole of savages. It is plain that Muslims have no place here and must be deported. The authorities are terrified of us revolting and yet they are making that inevitable by their appeasement of the perpetrators of these Acts of War.
____________
(1) Qustion Time http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xd7H96DV3AY&feature=player_embedded
(2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2OvJRMZav8E&feature=player_embedded
(3) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7rHejc7HwwM&NR=1
(4) http://www.google.co.uk/search?rlz=1C1GGGE_en-gbGB408GB408&aq=2&oq=Edge+of+the+City&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8&q=edge+of+the+city+documentary#q=edge+of+the+city+documentary&hl=en&rlz=1C1GGGE_en-gbGB408GB408&prmd=ivns&source=univ&tbs=vid:1&tbo=u&ei=zEYyTauWMs6OjAefi8SyCg&sa=X&oi=video_result_group&ct=title&resnum=2&ved=0CCoQqwQwAQ&fp=22f7fc54a3b4d6f7
http://www.libertiesalliance.org/2010/12/22/tommy-robinson-talks-about-police-tactics-united-kingdom-is-now-an-environment-where-political-dissidents-are-actively-persecuted-who-is-next/
(5) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1550053/Al-Qaeda-supporters-working-at-strategic-sites.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-466832/Eight-Al-Qaeda-fanatics-working-police-dont-dare-sack-them.html
(6) http://fjordman.blogspot.com/2005/02/muslim-rape-epidemic-in-sweden-and.html
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/newsnight/fromthewebteam/2011/01/friday_7_january_2011.html
http://4freedoms.ning.com/group/Sikh/forum/topics/sikh-girls-being-groomed-by-1
http://undhimmi.com/tag/muslim-sexual-grooming/
(7) http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/23782/Sex-attacker-stays-because-of-human-rights
YouTube - Videos from this email
Sunday, 16 January 2011
More enrichment in Plymouth
Victim and attackerPlymouth girl's attacker 'sadistic and evil'
Sabrina Barber's attack was "sustained and savage" the judge said
The leader of a girl gang who burned a teenager with a cigarette, attempted to blind her with eye liner and stamped on her face has been described as "sadistic" by a judge.
Judge Francis Gilbert QC told 16-year-old Sabrina Barber he had never seen such a "sustained and savage assault".
Her victim, Naomi Morrison, 17, was attacked by 10 girls for 90 minutes on Plymouth Hoe in December 2009.
Barber, from Plymouth, admitted causing grievous bodily harm with intent and was detained for five years.
'Savage assault'
Her co-accused, 19-year-old Melissa Rowe, also from Plymouth, was given a 10-month sentence, suspended for two years.
The gang of girls attacked their victim who was falsely accused by one of them of lying about a miscarriage.
Naomi Morrison was attacked for 90 minutes by a gang of 10 girls
Jo Martin, prosecuting at Plymouth Crown Court, said: "Barber toyed with her victim, humiliating, degrading and assaulting her."
She said Barber told Miss Morrison to lie down and "threatened to kill her and stood on her face".
Full Story
______________The leader of a girl gang who burned a teenager with a cigarette, attempted to blind her with eye liner and stamped on her face has been described as "sadistic" by a judge.
Judge Francis Gilbert QC told 16-year-old Sabrina Barber he had never seen such a "sustained and savage assault".
Her victim, Naomi Morrison, 17, was attacked by 10 girls for 90 minutes on Plymouth Hoe in December 2009.
Barber, from Plymouth, admitted causing grievous bodily harm with intent and was detained for five years.
'Savage assault'
Her co-accused, 19-year-old Melissa Rowe, also from Plymouth, was given a 10-month sentence, suspended for two years.
The gang of girls attacked their victim who was falsely accused by one of them of lying about a miscarriage.
Naomi Morrison was attacked for 90 minutes by a gang of 10 girls
Jo Martin, prosecuting at Plymouth Crown Court, said: "Barber toyed with her victim, humiliating, degrading and assaulting her."
She said Barber told Miss Morrison to lie down and "threatened to kill her and stood on her face".
Full Story
Hat Tip: JP
SA farmer dies of his injuries weeks after attack
It has come to my attention via a report on CensorBugbear that 38 year old Kromdraai farmer Jurie Louw died on December 13th following injuries sustained in a violent attack at the end of November.Mr. Louv was attached by an unknown number of assailants with a hatchet and a knobkierie (a round headed wooden club, traditionally used as a weapon by South African tribesmen) on the 27th November. He was found unconscious next to his car on the tar road leading to his farm the next morning and taken to hospital.
Prior to the farmer's death the police recorded the attack as a robbery, although there is no evidence that any property was taken. No arrests have yet been made.
More Anti-White Media lies
From cofcc.org
Next time you see white people on tv risking their lives to feed and rescue black people, remember this hateful anti-white article published in USA Today.
An article in USA Today claims that “both blacks and Hispanics were twice as likely as whites to have performed heroic deeds.” The source for the claim is a Philip Zimbardo, a professor emeritus at Stanford University.
He backs up this claim by saying that blacks and Hispanics are better heroes because they are “discriminated against.” They become heroes by “standing up to discrimination.” Then he follows by saying blacks and Hispanics have “more compassion to others in need.”
According to Zimbardo, these white volunteers rescuing Haitians don’t know what being a real hero is. They have never been discriminated against by the evil white man. I guess that is why so few black Americans volunteered to go to Haiti. They were all too busy being heroes by standing up to the white mans’ “discrimination” in the United States.
The entire article is nothing more than a vicious slur against white people.
This Philip Zimbardo is a fanatical leftist who claims it is discrimination for a landlord not to let someone squat in his apartment for free.
I was discriminated against because I was Jewish, Italian, black and Puerto Rican. But maybe the worst prejudice I experienced was against the poor. I grew up on welfare and often had to move in the middle of the night because we couldn’t pay the rent. – Philip Zimbardo
Zimbardo has made a name for himself advocating his “Luficer effect” theory as to why “good people turn evil.” He claims social conditioning turns people bad, not genetics. This is a major tenant of the social Marxism espoused by the Frankfurt school.
He takes the name of his theory from John Milton’s Paradise Lost, which Zimbardo comically confuses with Old Testament “scripture.” The word Lucifer does not even appear in the Old Testament except for the King James Version, where it is used once. The story he describes as “from scripture” is actually from John Milton’s 17th century epic poem Paradise Lost. Milton re-writes the Devil as a more sympathetic “Lucifer” based on of the Greek deity Prometheus. However, Milton certainly did not advocate any social conditioning psycho-babble.
Full story from USA Today:
New research would seem to support President Obama’s observation Wednesday night in Tucson that “heroism is here, all around us.”Philip Zimbardo, a Stanford University professor emeritus and colleagues used a nationally-representative sample of 4,000 adults and found that 20% qualified as heroes — they had helped during a dangerous emergency, taken a stand against injustice, or sacrificed for a stranger.Obama cited Congressional intern Daniel Hernandez, who helped Arizona Rep. Gabrielle Giffords after she was critically wounded, along with doctors and bystanders after an assassination attempt that killed six others and left 13 wounded.
“Heroes are ordinary people,” says Zimbardo, of San Francisco. “You become a hero by doing an extraordinary deed.”In the study, both blacks and Hispanics were twice as likely as whites to have performed heroic deeds. Zimbardo says they want to do follow-up research on the reasons for the racial/ethnic differences, which he speculates could be attributed to “greater opportunities to respond” or “being discriminated against makes them have more compassion to others in need.”The study, supported by the Center for Compassion and Altruism Research and Education at Stanford, asked participants “Have you ever done something that other people — not necessarily you yourself — considered a heroic act or deed?” Those who answered “yes” selected from a list the actions most similar to their own: helping another person in a dangerous emergency; “blowing the whistle” on an injustice with awareness of the personal risk or threat to yourself; sacrifice on behalf of a non-relative or stranger, such as an organ donation; defying unjust authority; or other.Among the 20% who met the survey definition, 55% had helped someone during an emergency, 8% confronted an injustice, 14% had defied unjust authority and 5% had sacrificed for a stranger.”These are people who did very dramatic things,” Zimbardo says. “They’re everyday quiet heroes.”The survey also found someone is more likely to be a hero if the individual has experienced a personal trauma or disaster; or the individual has previously volunteered in non-threatening settings, such as at a soup kitchen.Social psychologist Scott Allison of Richmond, Va., says Hernandez’ reaction is common among those cited for heroic deeds.”It is part modesty, but what they’re also acknowledging is that it’s the situation that gives rise to heroism more than anything else. We call it a ‘heroic moment.’ The terrible tragedy produced heroic opportunities for everyday people to do something extraordinary,” he says.For the book Heroes: What They Do & Why We Need Them, which Allison co-authored, face-to-face interviews with 450 adults asked them to name their heroes and explain why. The survey produced a pattern of traits common to heroes, including intelligence, courage, charisma and selflessness, he says.”We have a need for heroes because we have a need to be challenged,” Allison says. “We love heroes because of what they offer us — hope for better world.The future is just why Zimbardo says he created the nonprofit Heroic Imagination Project, which has begun with pilot programs for adolescents in the Bay area.”At a very deep psychological level, we all need and want heroes to be special people to inspire us,” he says. “Heroes are really the soul of a nation. They represent what is best in human nature.”
The KJB Story - Introduction
By Alan O'Reilly Introduction
Apologia
Like the Irishman who said, “Before I start speaking, I’d like to say a few words,” this author intends that what follows should be taken as a report. What the recipient does with this report is clearly a personal decision with God.
That said, this author would highly recommend two books on the subject of the King James Bible for further information. They are both obtainable from Chick Publications(1). These books are:
Did the Catholic Church Give Us the Bible? by David Daniels
Final Authority by Dr William Grady
David Daniels is an author, speaker, Bible teacher and evangelist. Dr Grady is an ex-Catholic from New York City who is now an Independent Baptist Pastor.
Why this Message – on a 400 year-old Book?
A simple answer: To inform, edify and provide for possible witness opportunities
A Christian friend recently emailed me an article by Peter Hitchens(2) of The Daily Mail about The Authorized Version. This article is a comment on the 400th anniversary of the 1611 Holy Bible, for which a special trust has been set up with HRH Charles the Prince of Wales as Patron(3). Hitchens says this:
“The Authorised Version tends, in fact, to use good hard, earthy English words: [2 Samuel 18:33] ‘And the king was much moved, and went up to the chamber over the gate, and wept: and as he went, thus he said, O my son Absalom, my son, my son Absalom! Would God I had died for thee, O Absalom, my son, my son!’ [That verse] doesn’t seem to me to be in any way hard for a 21st century person to understand. Indeed, you can hear and feel the woe and regret in it across the centuries, an old man weeping and alone…”
It may well be that items like this in the media will draw the attention of unsaved acquaintances to “the scripture of truth” Daniel 10:21 so that they can then be acquainted with “the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation” Ephesians 1:13.
It is also to be hoped that for Christians receiving this message that the “good hard, earthy English words” of the 1611 Holy Bible will “build you up” according to “the word of his grace” Acts 20:32.
Why this Story – about a 400 year-old Book?
A simple answer: Because of its effect on:
This is an American Independent KJB Baptist pastor quoting The Daily Telegraph, Dec. 20, 1989, no. 41,832, his emphases.
““According to the Prince of Wales…the English language “has become impoverished, sloppy, and limited, a dismal wasteland”…The Prince accused the editors of the [new bibles] of “making changes in the Authorized Version, just to lower the tone, and believing that the rest of us wouldn’t get the point if the word of God was a bit over our heads.” The Prince went on, “the word of God is supposed to be a bit over our heads, elevated as God is.” Never heard it put better anywhere. It will never be said to anybody over here any better…This is the King with the King’s English, and “where the word of a King is, there is power” [Ecclesiastes 8:4a].””
That’s a remarkable effect of a 400 year-old Book on the future king, especially insofar as he appears to think the same about that Book over 20 years later.
The nation’s life
Here are two statements about the effect of the 1611 Holy Bible on the nation’s life.
The first is from the Roman Catholic writer F. W. Faber(5), speaking in the mid-19th century.
“Who will not say that the uncommon beauty and marvellous English of the Protestant Bible is not one of the great strongholds of heresy [Protestant Bible belief] in this country? It lives on the ear like music that can never be forgotten, like the sound of church bells. Its felicities often seem to be things rather than words. It is part of the national mind, and the anchor of national seriousness.”
The second is from the noted historian, Dr David Starkey from his series Monarchy and the episode on King James 1st.
“The King James Version of the Bible, more than any other book, formed the English language and shaped the English mind.”
According to these men, the 1611 Holy Bible principally “shaped the English mind” and was “part of the national mind.” That is a significant effect of a 400 year-old Book during those 4 centuries on the nation’s life.
The nation’s enemies
Charles Chiniquy was a 19th century French-Canadian Catholic priest. He was a Catholic for 50 years and a priest for 25 of those years. After he got saved, Chiniquy(6) issued this solemn warning.
“It is a fact that to-day, almost all over the world, the Church of Rome grants permission to read the Bible…But I will here ask the Roman Catholics, “To whom do you owe that privilege and honour of a Bible in your house? Is it to your Church?” Oh! no, for if your Church could be free to fulfil her own laws you would be sent to gaol; nay you would be burnt on a scaffold for that Bible. But you owe that privilege to the glorious British Protestant flag which protects you – wherever it floats on the breeze, no Pope, no priest will dare to trouble you for that Bible – they let you possess and read that holy book because they cannot help it.”
Chiniquy’s statement indicates that “the glorious British Protestant flag” enabled even Catholics to read what many at the time perceived as the glorious British Protestant Bible. That’s quite an effect of a now 400 year-old Book on the nation’s enemies.
We continue with an outline of how that glorious British Protestant Bible came into being. None can introduce better the overall incentive for the work than the learned men, the King James translators themselves, according to the preface to the 1611 Holy Bible, entitled The Translators To The Reader(7) as the following extract shows:
(To be continued)
_______________Apologia
Like the Irishman who said, “Before I start speaking, I’d like to say a few words,” this author intends that what follows should be taken as a report. What the recipient does with this report is clearly a personal decision with God.
That said, this author would highly recommend two books on the subject of the King James Bible for further information. They are both obtainable from Chick Publications(1). These books are:
Did the Catholic Church Give Us the Bible? by David Daniels
Final Authority by Dr William Grady
David Daniels is an author, speaker, Bible teacher and evangelist. Dr Grady is an ex-Catholic from New York City who is now an Independent Baptist Pastor.
Why this Message – on a 400 year-old Book?
A simple answer: To inform, edify and provide for possible witness opportunities
A Christian friend recently emailed me an article by Peter Hitchens(2) of The Daily Mail about The Authorized Version. This article is a comment on the 400th anniversary of the 1611 Holy Bible, for which a special trust has been set up with HRH Charles the Prince of Wales as Patron(3). Hitchens says this:
“The Authorised Version tends, in fact, to use good hard, earthy English words: [2 Samuel 18:33] ‘And the king was much moved, and went up to the chamber over the gate, and wept: and as he went, thus he said, O my son Absalom, my son, my son Absalom! Would God I had died for thee, O Absalom, my son, my son!’ [That verse] doesn’t seem to me to be in any way hard for a 21st century person to understand. Indeed, you can hear and feel the woe and regret in it across the centuries, an old man weeping and alone…”
It may well be that items like this in the media will draw the attention of unsaved acquaintances to “the scripture of truth” Daniel 10:21 so that they can then be acquainted with “the word of truth, the gospel of your salvation” Ephesians 1:13.
It is also to be hoped that for Christians receiving this message that the “good hard, earthy English words” of the 1611 Holy Bible will “build you up” according to “the word of his grace” Acts 20:32.
Why this Story – about a 400 year-old Book?
A simple answer: Because of its effect on:
- the nation’s leaders
- the nation’s life
- the nation’s enemies.
This is an American Independent KJB Baptist pastor quoting The Daily Telegraph, Dec. 20, 1989, no. 41,832, his emphases.
““According to the Prince of Wales…the English language “has become impoverished, sloppy, and limited, a dismal wasteland”…The Prince accused the editors of the [new bibles] of “making changes in the Authorized Version, just to lower the tone, and believing that the rest of us wouldn’t get the point if the word of God was a bit over our heads.” The Prince went on, “the word of God is supposed to be a bit over our heads, elevated as God is.” Never heard it put better anywhere. It will never be said to anybody over here any better…This is the King with the King’s English, and “where the word of a King is, there is power” [Ecclesiastes 8:4a].””
That’s a remarkable effect of a 400 year-old Book on the future king, especially insofar as he appears to think the same about that Book over 20 years later.
The nation’s life
Here are two statements about the effect of the 1611 Holy Bible on the nation’s life.
The first is from the Roman Catholic writer F. W. Faber(5), speaking in the mid-19th century.
“Who will not say that the uncommon beauty and marvellous English of the Protestant Bible is not one of the great strongholds of heresy [Protestant Bible belief] in this country? It lives on the ear like music that can never be forgotten, like the sound of church bells. Its felicities often seem to be things rather than words. It is part of the national mind, and the anchor of national seriousness.”
The second is from the noted historian, Dr David Starkey from his series Monarchy and the episode on King James 1st.
“The King James Version of the Bible, more than any other book, formed the English language and shaped the English mind.”
According to these men, the 1611 Holy Bible principally “shaped the English mind” and was “part of the national mind.” That is a significant effect of a 400 year-old Book during those 4 centuries on the nation’s life.
The nation’s enemies
Charles Chiniquy was a 19th century French-Canadian Catholic priest. He was a Catholic for 50 years and a priest for 25 of those years. After he got saved, Chiniquy(6) issued this solemn warning.
“It is a fact that to-day, almost all over the world, the Church of Rome grants permission to read the Bible…But I will here ask the Roman Catholics, “To whom do you owe that privilege and honour of a Bible in your house? Is it to your Church?” Oh! no, for if your Church could be free to fulfil her own laws you would be sent to gaol; nay you would be burnt on a scaffold for that Bible. But you owe that privilege to the glorious British Protestant flag which protects you – wherever it floats on the breeze, no Pope, no priest will dare to trouble you for that Bible – they let you possess and read that holy book because they cannot help it.”
Chiniquy’s statement indicates that “the glorious British Protestant flag” enabled even Catholics to read what many at the time perceived as the glorious British Protestant Bible. That’s quite an effect of a now 400 year-old Book on the nation’s enemies.
We continue with an outline of how that glorious British Protestant Bible came into being. None can introduce better the overall incentive for the work than the learned men, the King James translators themselves, according to the preface to the 1611 Holy Bible, entitled The Translators To The Reader(7) as the following extract shows:
(To be continued)
References
(1) www.chick.com/information/authors/
(2) http://hitchensblog.mailonsunday.co.uk/2011/01/the-king-james-version-versus-the-sid-james-version.html
(3) http://www.kingjamesbibletrust.org/
(4) Bible Believers’ Bulletin, Bible Baptist Bookstore, April 1990
(5) The Men Behind the KJV by Gustavus S. Paine, Baker Book House 1977, p vii
(6) Why I Left the Church of Rome by ‘Father’ Charles Chiniquy, The Protestant Truth Society, p 5
(7) http://www.jesus-is-lord.com/pref1611.htm
The Leo McKinstry Article
Thanks to those who drew my attention to the faulty link I posted with yesterday's article.
Here is a better one
Here is a better one
Saturday, 15 January 2011
A little truth amongst the lies
I know that Express journalist Leo McKinstry is not universally popular amongst the nationalist community on account of his frequent condemnations of parties such as the BNP (he'd be unemployable if he didn't). However, I think many of us will find a lot to agree with in his latest article.DENYING AN ETHNIC LINK IN SEX GANGS CASE IS BLINKERED
By Leo McKinstry
THE hypocrisy of the politically correct brigade is truly nauseating. These noisy zealots constantly trumpet their commitment to women’s rights, anti-racism and the protection of the vulnerable.
Yet, suddenly, when confronted with the reality of vicious sexual exploitation of young white girls by Asian men, they drop their supposedly cherished principles.
Instead they either deny the existence of the issue or, even worse, they collude with abusers by attacking those who tell the truth.
In recent days these grotesque double standards have been fully on display in the wake of new evidence about the prevalence of Asian sex gangs within our society.
Last week two Muslim men from Derby, Mohammed Liaqat and Abid Saddique, were jailed for raping several young girls after plying them with drugs and alcohol. The conviction of these two vile predators came on top of a new report from the Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, which warned of the growing incidence of this kind of systematic abuse by Pakistani offenders.
Another study last week, based on an analysis of 17 major prosecutions since 1997 for grooming and sexual exploitation of girls aged 11 to 16, showed that of the 56 men found guilty, 53 were Asian.
Responding to these revelations, the former Home Secretary Jack Straw abandoned the usual conspiracy of denial from the political establishment. In refreshingly frank language, he told the BBC that there was a “specific problem” with some Pakistani men who prey on young white girls because “they think they are easy meat”.
Predictably, Straw’s comments caused a huge storm. Muslim groups called his views “deeply offensive” while MP Keith Vaz said the remarks were “pretty dangerous”. The chief executive of the children’s charity Barnardo’s Martin Narey warned in hand wringing tones about the potential stereotyping of Pakistani men.
Clearly, morality should not be inverted by the dogma of political correctness. In this twisted ideological world, it would seem that the hypersensitivities of an ethnic minority are more keenly protected than the rights of abused girls.
The greatest crime is not the sexual brutality itself but daring to mention the ethnicity of the predators.
Read more
Hat Tip: Runic
Yet, suddenly, when confronted with the reality of vicious sexual exploitation of young white girls by Asian men, they drop their supposedly cherished principles.
Instead they either deny the existence of the issue or, even worse, they collude with abusers by attacking those who tell the truth.
In recent days these grotesque double standards have been fully on display in the wake of new evidence about the prevalence of Asian sex gangs within our society.
Last week two Muslim men from Derby, Mohammed Liaqat and Abid Saddique, were jailed for raping several young girls after plying them with drugs and alcohol. The conviction of these two vile predators came on top of a new report from the Jill Dando Institute of Crime Science, which warned of the growing incidence of this kind of systematic abuse by Pakistani offenders.
Another study last week, based on an analysis of 17 major prosecutions since 1997 for grooming and sexual exploitation of girls aged 11 to 16, showed that of the 56 men found guilty, 53 were Asian.
Responding to these revelations, the former Home Secretary Jack Straw abandoned the usual conspiracy of denial from the political establishment. In refreshingly frank language, he told the BBC that there was a “specific problem” with some Pakistani men who prey on young white girls because “they think they are easy meat”.
Predictably, Straw’s comments caused a huge storm. Muslim groups called his views “deeply offensive” while MP Keith Vaz said the remarks were “pretty dangerous”. The chief executive of the children’s charity Barnardo’s Martin Narey warned in hand wringing tones about the potential stereotyping of Pakistani men.
Clearly, morality should not be inverted by the dogma of political correctness. In this twisted ideological world, it would seem that the hypersensitivities of an ethnic minority are more keenly protected than the rights of abused girls.
The greatest crime is not the sexual brutality itself but daring to mention the ethnicity of the predators.
Read more
Hat Tip: Runic
Friday, 14 January 2011
Updates to South of The Zambizi
A Special Kind of Stupidity
RW Johnson on the South African govt's draft Land Tenure Security Bill
The Arrogance of Reflected Power
Winnie Mandela has been offended
RW Johnson on the South African govt's draft Land Tenure Security Bill
The Arrogance of Reflected Power
Winnie Mandela has been offended
Thursday, 13 January 2011
The 400th Anniversary of the King James Bible - Prologue
"That Book accounts for the supremacy of England” – Queen VictoriaThis post is an outline of an article by Alan O’Reilly written in keeping with this year as the 400th Anniversary of the publication of the King James Bible, http://www.kingjamesbibletrust.org/. The remainder of the article will follow in instalments. It is aimed essentially at Christians but hopefully will be of general interest.
-/-
The KJB Story – 1611 to 2011
Overview:
Introduction
Why this Message – on a 400 year-old Book?
To inform, edify and provide for possible witness opportunities
Why this Story – about a 400 year-old Book?
Because of the effect on the nation’s leaders, life, enemies
The Learned Men
The Hampton Harrier - The King that played the Puritan
High Church, Low Church - White male C of E Protestants
“Hebrew at his fingers’ ends”- Unparalleled scholars
The Critics’ Den
The Huffing King - Tyrant, Freemason, scoundrel, intriguer and worse?
The Awful Apocrypha – in the 1611 1611 Holy Bible (repetition is deliberate)
The PC C of E? - The Anglican compromise – or the Baptist builder?
The KJB or not the KJB? - That is the question – on different KJB Editions
“Understandest…what thou readest?” - Acts 8:30 (No :( )
The Word of a King, Ecclesiastes 8:4
“Give me that Book” - Bunyan, Wesley, Spurgeon, Ryle, Shaw
“God save the king!” - The national anthem and a paratrooper’s farewell
Gone into all the world
________________
The articles will follow shortly
Overview:
Introduction
Why this Message – on a 400 year-old Book?
To inform, edify and provide for possible witness opportunities
Why this Story – about a 400 year-old Book?
Because of the effect on the nation’s leaders, life, enemies
The Learned Men
The Hampton Harrier - The King that played the Puritan
High Church, Low Church - White male C of E Protestants
“Hebrew at his fingers’ ends”- Unparalleled scholars
The Critics’ Den
The Huffing King - Tyrant, Freemason, scoundrel, intriguer and worse?
The Awful Apocrypha – in the 1611 1611 Holy Bible (repetition is deliberate)
The PC C of E? - The Anglican compromise – or the Baptist builder?
The KJB or not the KJB? - That is the question – on different KJB Editions
“Understandest…what thou readest?” - Acts 8:30 (No :( )
The Word of a King, Ecclesiastes 8:4
“Give me that Book” - Bunyan, Wesley, Spurgeon, Ryle, Shaw
“God save the king!” - The national anthem and a paratrooper’s farewell
Gone into all the world
- English time, English longitude, English empire, English text
- The Book That Changed The World – on DVD
- The Queen that Challenged the World – a magnificent painting
________________
The articles will follow shortly
Wednesday, 12 January 2011
Tuesday, 11 January 2011
The politics of Vitriol
Should a crackdown on language include Obama?“They Bring a Knife…We Bring a Gun”
“I don’t want to quell anger. I think people are right to be angry! I’m angry!”
“Punish your enemies.”
“Get in Their Faces!”
Republican victory would mean “hand to hand combat”
“Hit Back Twice As Hard”
“I’m itching for a fight.”
"I know who's a## to kick!"
Sunday, 9 January 2011
Hate and (Media) Lies in America
The controlled media in America continue to exploit the attempted assassination of Arizona Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords at the weekend, during which six people died and a number more were injured. True to type the left have resorted to the politics of the gutter, with the aim of blaming the Tea Party for the shooting and getting a few cheap jibes at Sarah Palin, who they accuse of "creating a climate of hate".
Even Fox News has got in on the act with an attempt to link the shooter, a pot smoking, left wing American flag burner, to American Renaissance, albeit they are rapidly rowing back on that claim as it becomes more obvious that their "evidence" is not what it appears.
However, as usual with the controlled media, what they don't want you to know is covered up, such as the article below, which appeared on the Democrat supporting Daily Kos website just two days before the shooting, showing that, in fact sources on the left were guilty of stirring up feelings against Congresswoman Giffords in the days leading up to the attack.
Even Fox News has got in on the act with an attempt to link the shooter, a pot smoking, left wing American flag burner, to American Renaissance, albeit they are rapidly rowing back on that claim as it becomes more obvious that their "evidence" is not what it appears.
However, as usual with the controlled media, what they don't want you to know is covered up, such as the article below, which appeared on the Democrat supporting Daily Kos website just two days before the shooting, showing that, in fact sources on the left were guilty of stirring up feelings against Congresswoman Giffords in the days leading up to the attack.
Click on the image to see a larger versionGenocide by stealth - Part 3
In the first two parts of this essay I set out to demonstrate that acts have been committed against the white European race, over the last half century or more, which meet at least two of the definitions of genocide as laid out under Article 2 of the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide
Measures have been put in place intended to prevent births amongst white Europeans and which have resulted in the termination or prevention of the birth of, at the very least, tens of millions of white children. Taken altogether across the western world, the number of potential births amongst our ethnic group which have been prevented either by chemical means or by active physical intervention is in the hundreds of millions.
Meanwhile, conditions of life have been inflicted upon us which are already leading to our destruction, at least in part.
That these acts have been committed, that they were deliberate and are resulting in the outcomes I described in parts one and two is self evidently true. Furthermore, the fact that, in combination theses acts, measures and policies have brought us to the brink of a tipping point beyond which, we cannot, as a people, recover, is also beyond question. They have.
It also can not be denied that, although as a people we, native Europeans, have faced war, famine pestilence and catastrophe we have never before come so close to our own annihilation.
What is, however, open to question is why is it happening, who is doing it and what they are actually seeking to achieve.
Up until now I have laid facts before you, however, in an attempt to make sense of those facts I can now only give you my own view, my analysis if you prefer, of what has happened and why.
To the question “Is there a conspiracy to destroy the white race?”, I have to say in my view the answer is considerably more complex than some of my fellow travellers would like to believe. What we face is not a single malevolent conspiracy, but a many headed hydra formed of any number aims ambitions, hatreds and ideologies, all of differing degrees of malevolence, which have come together, on the coat tails of a historical conspiracy, to attack us at a time when we are at the least able to defend ourselves.
Not all which has been done has been with malevolent intent, I rather placed my credibility on the line by linking the contraceptive pill to genocide in an earlier part of this essay, and I know that, on at least one of the other sites where my earlier articles have been republished, some people who have not done what I asked, and viewed these things in context, have mocked me for it. I do not necessarily believe that, in isolation, the pill was developed or legalised with the deliberate intention of damaging the native European race. However, I submit that it has done so, and as I stated previously, its introduction on the scene coincided with other factors which in combination have been unremittingly negative.
The pill, together with abortion, and what one might call “breeding unfriendly” changes to the economic model, have not only speeded up the pace of our decline but they have provided succour to attitudes which were most certainly encouraged with malevolent intent. The pill has been used far less to regulate the size of families as it has been used to put off childbirth, often altogether, and that has been of inestimable damage to us, collectively, as a people.
Some of my critics may wish to argue that the decline of the greatest civilisation the world has ever seen is a worthwhile sacrifice in order to enable a rapidly reducing number of individuals to enjoy the transitory pleasures of a child free lifestyle. However, it is for them to make that case, but at this point I do not buy it.
However, in other areas there is no doubt as to the malevolence of the forces ranged against us. Some of the most savagely malign of those forces exist within the arts and academia, where many do not even attempt to disguise their genocidal intent. Who can forget the words of Harvard Professor Noel Ignatiev, (1) author of “When the Irish became White” and co-editor of the “Race Traitor” magazine, when he said: “The goal of abolishing the white race is on its face so desirable that some may find it hard to believe that it could incur any opposition other than from committed white supremacists.” or “The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race.” and of course: “we intend to keep bashing the dead white males, and the live ones, and the females too, until the social construct known as ‘the white race’ is destroyed--not ‘deconstructed’ but destroyed.”
Ignatiev is not alone, his brand of poison pervades learning institutions throughout the West. Anyone who followed the attempts to rail-road three innocent lacrosse players at North Carolina's Duke University, following the false rape claims of black “exotic dancer” in 2006 as closely as I did, could not fail to be shocked by the levels of mindless, visceral hatred towards white males which exists within American academia. It would be hard to exaggerate how passionately so many eminent members of the Duke faculty, journalists, media talking heads and so called “community organisers” wanted those boys to be guilty. For many, guilt or innocence was not an issue, they simply craved blood in order to slake their hatred.
However, how is it that the views of such unattractive and ideologically diseased individuals such as Noel Ignatiev and so many members of the Duke faculty have gained such purchase and become so all pervading within Western culture? To find an answer to that question we need ton go back a century and a half, or even more, and there we do find a conspiracy.
The conspiracy against Western Christian / capitalist society began in the 19th Century, if not before. It did not start as a conscious attack on white, Europeans, however, it inevitably became one, initially for no other reason than that Western society was white, European, society.
It is at this point in the narrative that I must nod in the direction of those of my critics who accuse me of being an apologist for Zionism, and admit that it is impossible to ignore the Jewish role in the early efforts to undermine Western Society. Jews featured disproportionately amongst those who took Marxist theory forward and set up the great and deadly Communist monoliths which crushed vast sections of humanity, throughout the twentieth century. A significant majority of those who formed the subversive Frankfurt School of thinking in the 1930's, those who developed critical theory and that most evil and damaging of all ideologies, political correctness were Jewish academics and Jewish political thinkers.
It was by no means exclusively Jewish, but it was overwhelmingly so. It is also impossible to dismiss the current role of Jews within academia not to mention the Jewish anti-white propagandists within the media and, of course Hollywood.
However, although it would be ignorant and dishonest to dismiss the role Jews played in the early efforts to undermine Western society and the role which many eminent Jews still play within the massed ranks ranged against us, it is also possible to overestimate their role. When those within the Nationalist community blame all the attacks on the white European race on the Jews and on some vast Zionist conspiracy they are addressing a single, historical and rapidly shrinking foe, while ignoring many far more vicious and, now more dangerous adversaries.
Marxism is at the root of all our problems and it was those early Marxists, Trotskyites, Stalinists, Maoists and sundry Socialists of the late 19th and early 20th centuries in general certainly who set the great ball of anti-white genocide in motion when they set out to destroy Western Capitalism. However, we are certainly not, today, where they once planned to take us.
I would liken the early communist conspirators, malevolent as they may have been, to a deluded scientist who created a faulty chemical weapon, which once injected into its victim takes on a life of its own, driven on mindlessly by the flaws within its design and independent of the plans of its designer.
Those, including many Jews who conspired against our grandfathers imagined that we would today be living under universal Marxist rule, not that we would be facing the prospect of a Universal Islamic caliphate.
I suspect that were those who first sowed the seeds of our destruction alive today, they would look on in horror at the monster they have created, for it will devour them, and their plans no less ravenously than it will destroy us. At the risk of reigniting the anger of my critics against me, I would argue that, whatever, past difference there may have been, now is the time for Jews, together with gays and true feminists to join with White Nationalists, for it is we, not what is coming to ensure their protection, freedom and very existence.
As I say, the aim was to destroy Western capitalism, but with the demise of what was intended to replace it, the agenda has morphed into the destruction of the European race, and without any other ambition, the destruction has become the purpose rather than merely the agent of change.
Before the fall of the Soviet Union the Marxist cause had made huge advances. Nobody living in the 1950's or 1960's would have been accused of being a conspiracy theorist had they claimed that there were people within our society working for its destruction, because there were. Communism made no secret of its sworn aim to dominate the world and, unlike with Islam today, there were no politically correct scruples against acknowledging it.
Marxist theory exercises a powerful pull on the hearts and minds of elite Western Intellectuals. Through their compliance over the decades the Soviet system's tentacles gradually infiltrated the West, gaining control within many of our most powerful institutions, most spectacularly within the media and within education, two areas in which they correctly assessed they could do the most damage to the system they were seeking to overthrow.
Having gained control within the two most powerful means of forming opinion, they set about, first gradually, but later more rapidly, indoctrinating the western public with the aim of making them less willing or able to resist their eventual overthrow, whilst simultaneously removing anyone within the targeted organisation who did not share the approved ideology.
The indoctrination was aimed at undermining senses of patriotism and national identity essential to preserving a culture and it took many forms such as the debasing and re-writing of European history, the debasing and trivialising of our culture.
As first this was viewed as a form of class war, where the original targets were the middle and upper classes who would be annihilated when the workers rose against them, as occurred in Russia.
However, outside Russia the class war was abandoned when the white working classes failed to play the role allotted to them and joined the middle classes as targets for destruction. Race became the new weapon in undermining a culture through national guilt. Anti-racism aimed exclusively at the target race and intent upon instilling a sense of of shame and guilt for a past which had, in fact never taken place, exploited a weakness within a tolerant and benevolent people always anxious to do the right thing and protect the underdog. As a consequence, the dishonest drum beat of “white oppressor”, “black victim” accompanied by the altogether more sensuous “black sexy”, “white surrender” became the constant theme music behind popular culture, throughout the 1960's, 70's and 80's.
This was an even more deadly poison, our enemies knew from history that nothing undermines a society as effectively as does multiculturalism. Hence they cynically recast the melting pot as grail of our age.
Other “isms” were deployed, such as a deceptive form of feminism designed, in the guise of “liberation”, to undermine the family whilst imposing a new sexualised slavery upon women, which sold us aspirations which could only be achieved spread legged and child free. At the same time siren voices convinced young women that a life of unnaturally induced sterility, with abortion as a back up, offered the means of achieving fulfilment. It was in this way that developments such as oral contraception, abortion and social change began to become instruments of genocide.
In few areas has the indoctrination designed at the destruction of Western Society been more cruelly effective than what it has done to women. In a few generations a sex which once valued honour, virtue and motherhood, now finds themselves either grasping at the Muslim veil of their own subjugation or, tragically with some merit, viewed as “easy meat” by our nations new colonisers, leaving many of the most vulnerable in huge danger.
The damage done to the white male was perhaps even crueler, however, I have addressed that subject often in my previous writing, links to which I will add at the bottom of this posting. (2)
Enemies of the West also infiltrated various other areas, such as the law, politics and the security services, but it was within education and within the popular media that they seized their most powerful weapons, and they have used them against us relentlessly for at least half a century
The people responsible for this did not go away when Communism fell, the aim of overthrowing the West and replacing it with a soviet style utopia was no longer an option, but that did not change the aim of overthrowing the West. Indeed, as the years had past a new more anarchistic breed had joined the old Stalinist, for whom the destruction of the West was more important than any subsequent reconstruction.
They had been well schooled in the belief that the West was evil and needed to be destroyed and they saw nothing within the demise of communism to change that belief.
Hence they have continued with their mission of undermining our culture, indoctrinating our people and nurturing new generations of indoctrinators. However, the emphasis had changed, Western society could no longer be destroyed by soviet communism, so anti-racism, multiculturalism and immigration, tools so long used as a means of softening up the culture for its eventual take over, would now become the means of its destruction.
However, we have still but touched on half the picture, acts have consequences which are not always anticipated. A one hundred and fifty year old conspiracy aimed at the converting the capitalist West to Marxism had developed into an exercise of ethnic and cultural cleansing.
In the process Western society's resolve and sense of its own identity had become so undermined that other groups with other even less wholesome aims and agendas began to smell blood in the water, and they in turn began to close in on a weakening prey.
--------------
I had intended this to be the final part of this essay, but I find that I have so much more to say, hence, I will post the final part, together with my conclusions later this week.
__________
Harvard hates the white race (VDare)
(2)
White boys in the Jungle
The Lost Boys
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)