Many of you will have already seen this elsewhere, but if you haven't you will find it informative.
Here is the link on YouTube please circulate it widely
Monday, 9 April 2012
South African farmer, wife and daughter slain on Good Friday
Naauwhoek Farm
Kimberley - A Northern Cape farmer, his wife and daughter were killed on a farm near Griekwastad on Good Friday
Police were investigating a triple murder after the bodies of Deon Steenkamp, his wife Christelle and 14-year-old daughter Marthella were found at Naauwhoek Farm at around 18:00 on Friday. The victims were all shot.
The bodies were discovered by the couple's 17-year-old* son Don. Censor bugbear reports that Don found his sister still alive and that she died in his arms
Police were investigating a triple murder after the bodies of Deon Steenkamp, his wife Christelle and 14-year-old daughter Marthella were found at Naauwhoek Farm at around 18:00 on Friday. The victims were all shot.
The bodies were discovered by the couple's 17-year-old* son Don. Censor bugbear reports that Don found his sister still alive and that she died in his arms
Marthella Steenkamp, pictured above with her father at a school award ceremony was described as “A beloved star” by the principle of the Bloemfontein Girls High School
____________________Hat Tip: Jenny W and Mulder
*Other reports give Don Steenkamp's age as 15
News Report
And at Censor Bugbear
Wednesday, 4 April 2012
Hunting Mister Fox
By Mister Fox
Further, to the recent posts about my ordeal with The Metroploitan Police Counter Terrorism Unit I have been interviewed by two different officers from the CTU about imaginary links they tried to say I had with a terrorist. In the UK, the Counter Terrorism Command (CTC) are trying to build up a narrative of how the “far-right” are terrorists just like those in the Muslim community. I became ensnared in this effort because a man I never met liked a letter I wrote and posted on Facebook. This was decided on at a meeting between a senior Metropolitan Police officer and a meeting of Muslims.(1)
There is a good reason I know nothing about Anders Breivik, the man who blew up a government building and shot 76 teenage Marxists in Norway. As part of its agenda to invent home-grown “right wing terrorism,” the CTC are trying to fit me up as being an associate of Breivik, whom I’ve never met.
Breivik liked my letter. This was a message I emailed and posted on Facebook about the secret deals between PM Ted Heath and French PM Georges Pompidou to inveigle Britain into the EU. The evidence I cited was obtained by Mrs. Thatcher in a Freedom of Information request and is available to the public on the website of The Margaret Thatcher Foundation. (2)
Initially the Counter Terrorism Officers pursued me like they were hunting an animal and trying to run it into the ground. They were acting on the orders of the Senior Investigating Office. I agreed to co-operate with the officers; I have nothing to hide. However, after the interrogators attempted to twist my statements to implicate me, and demanded I agree with the new twisted versions, I refused to be interviewed further.
I filed a complaint with the Professional Standards Unit of SO15, the home of the Counter Terrorism Command. They carried out an “investigation” that consisted only of asking their colleagues for their views. They never talked to either of my two solicitors who would have borne out my complaint.
As of recently, I have received the results of the investigation led by Police Sergeant Tracey Wignall, who has “responsibility for dealing with complaints and community issues arising from the actions of Counter Terrorism Officers.” The result of her investigation is a whitewash of actual events.
She contradicts herself throughout. She first quotes me writing that : “(I) believe the alleged link to be an outrageous lie.” Later she libels me by writing: ”You also gave brief details of your connection with the individual named in the inquiry.” The letter serves as a justification for the results they wanted to find, not what they actually found.
I responded: “I have no connection with the individual named in the enquiry (Brevik) and I demand the Metropolitan Police cease this libel against me. The fact that I have no connections with him was clear during the interview I recently had with two different Counter Terrorism Officers at the office of my solicitors and the notes my solicitor took will bear that out.”
“D.C. Gatter claimed he had arranged two meetings with me, but he had agreed only to contact me through my solicitor, so that falsehood can easily be disproved. I repeat: he did not arrange a direct meeting with me. If this were true the investigating officer, D.C. Gatter, would have arranged an interview through my solicitor. She confirms that he did not contact her about these imaginary arrangements.
The police don’t want to contact my solicitors because then the whitewash will fall apart. D.C. Gatter was evasive whenever lawyers were present. He refused to tell my first solicitor his collar number, what station he works from and what he wanted; he told my second solicitor that he and his superior were thinking of arresting me “as a suspect under the Terrorism Act.”
Wignall is so afraid my lawyers will tell the truth that she has never asked them for their version of what happened. She claims my first solicitors could not contact me. Of course they could and did. After conversing with D.C. Gatter, my solicitor was so upset by Gatter’s aggressive attitude and advised me to “get on with my life” so I went away for a week to take photographs for an article about conservation and the environment.
The accusation that I have links to Breivik is a deception that shows how desperate the Counter Terrorism Unit are. They badly want to build up a narrative that the “far-right” are equally extreme and terrorists like the Muslim community.
There was no suggestion of this link when I was interviewed by the other police officers in the presence of my solicitor. These two officers were exceptionally courteous and professional. If their colleagues had behaved similarly, there would have been no need for me to warn other innocent people what The Counter Terrorism Unit’s superior officers are attempting.
There are 390 convicted criminals serving in The Metropolitan Police. There are also at least 8 members of al-Qaeda serving in the Met as colleagues of these Counter Terrorism Officers. The police hope to cover up for them and put innocent people in the frame. It also shows the pro-Muslim and anti-British attitude of the Counter Terrorism Unit.
There is a good reason I know nothing about Anders Breivik, the man who blew up a government building and shot 76 teenage Marxists in Norway. As part of its agenda to invent home-grown “right wing terrorism,” the CTC are trying to fit me up as being an associate of Breivik, whom I’ve never met.
Breivik liked my letter. This was a message I emailed and posted on Facebook about the secret deals between PM Ted Heath and French PM Georges Pompidou to inveigle Britain into the EU. The evidence I cited was obtained by Mrs. Thatcher in a Freedom of Information request and is available to the public on the website of The Margaret Thatcher Foundation. (2)
Initially the Counter Terrorism Officers pursued me like they were hunting an animal and trying to run it into the ground. They were acting on the orders of the Senior Investigating Office. I agreed to co-operate with the officers; I have nothing to hide. However, after the interrogators attempted to twist my statements to implicate me, and demanded I agree with the new twisted versions, I refused to be interviewed further.
I filed a complaint with the Professional Standards Unit of SO15, the home of the Counter Terrorism Command. They carried out an “investigation” that consisted only of asking their colleagues for their views. They never talked to either of my two solicitors who would have borne out my complaint.
As of recently, I have received the results of the investigation led by Police Sergeant Tracey Wignall, who has “responsibility for dealing with complaints and community issues arising from the actions of Counter Terrorism Officers.” The result of her investigation is a whitewash of actual events.
She contradicts herself throughout. She first quotes me writing that : “(I) believe the alleged link to be an outrageous lie.” Later she libels me by writing: ”You also gave brief details of your connection with the individual named in the inquiry.” The letter serves as a justification for the results they wanted to find, not what they actually found.
I responded: “I have no connection with the individual named in the enquiry (Brevik) and I demand the Metropolitan Police cease this libel against me. The fact that I have no connections with him was clear during the interview I recently had with two different Counter Terrorism Officers at the office of my solicitors and the notes my solicitor took will bear that out.”
“D.C. Gatter claimed he had arranged two meetings with me, but he had agreed only to contact me through my solicitor, so that falsehood can easily be disproved. I repeat: he did not arrange a direct meeting with me. If this were true the investigating officer, D.C. Gatter, would have arranged an interview through my solicitor. She confirms that he did not contact her about these imaginary arrangements.
The police don’t want to contact my solicitors because then the whitewash will fall apart. D.C. Gatter was evasive whenever lawyers were present. He refused to tell my first solicitor his collar number, what station he works from and what he wanted; he told my second solicitor that he and his superior were thinking of arresting me “as a suspect under the Terrorism Act.”
Wignall is so afraid my lawyers will tell the truth that she has never asked them for their version of what happened. She claims my first solicitors could not contact me. Of course they could and did. After conversing with D.C. Gatter, my solicitor was so upset by Gatter’s aggressive attitude and advised me to “get on with my life” so I went away for a week to take photographs for an article about conservation and the environment.
The accusation that I have links to Breivik is a deception that shows how desperate the Counter Terrorism Unit are. They badly want to build up a narrative that the “far-right” are equally extreme and terrorists like the Muslim community.
There was no suggestion of this link when I was interviewed by the other police officers in the presence of my solicitor. These two officers were exceptionally courteous and professional. If their colleagues had behaved similarly, there would have been no need for me to warn other innocent people what The Counter Terrorism Unit’s superior officers are attempting.
There are 390 convicted criminals serving in The Metropolitan Police. There are also at least 8 members of al-Qaeda serving in the Met as colleagues of these Counter Terrorism Officers. The police hope to cover up for them and put innocent people in the frame. It also shows the pro-Muslim and anti-British attitude of the Counter Terrorism Unit.
______________
(1) http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/jul/06/far-right-terrorism-threat-police
(2) The following documents are copies of the minutes to meetings held between former Prime Minister Edward Heath and French President Georges Pompidou in 1971.
The meetings were held in secret and the minutes were classified until former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was able to have them released under the Freedom of Information Act in 2008/2009.
They contain exhaustive text which will take the reader into the minds of two men who decided the fate of British and French politics between them without reference to the British and French people. The people were never made aware of their plans which led to the steady erosion of British and French sovereignty under consecutive staged treaties that would span 40 years, culminate in The Lisbon Treaty, and would later evidence the total breakdown and disorder of British and French society along with its economic, political, and military powers, and its foreign affairs.
So deep was the conspiracy between Heath and Pompidou, and soon thereafter PM Harold Wilson along with figures then and since of the establishment, that it is inconceivable that their plans were not at any time revealed to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth. However, the outcome of the discussions did not only affect France and Britain’s policies in the decades to come. The policies were adopted as default by other Western European countries with lesser ideological and cultural confidence and significance. France and Britain were the cultural and political locomotives in Western Europe
The Metropolitan Police
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-466832/Eight-Al-Qaeda-fanatics-working-police-dont-dare-sack-them.html
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/mi5-targets-four-met-police-officers-working-as-al-qaeda-spies-7285036.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2081199/Criminal-record-1k-officers-convictions-police.html
(1) http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/jul/06/far-right-terrorism-threat-police
(2) The following documents are copies of the minutes to meetings held between former Prime Minister Edward Heath and French President Georges Pompidou in 1971.
The meetings were held in secret and the minutes were classified until former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was able to have them released under the Freedom of Information Act in 2008/2009.
They contain exhaustive text which will take the reader into the minds of two men who decided the fate of British and French politics between them without reference to the British and French people. The people were never made aware of their plans which led to the steady erosion of British and French sovereignty under consecutive staged treaties that would span 40 years, culminate in The Lisbon Treaty, and would later evidence the total breakdown and disorder of British and French society along with its economic, political, and military powers, and its foreign affairs.
So deep was the conspiracy between Heath and Pompidou, and soon thereafter PM Harold Wilson along with figures then and since of the establishment, that it is inconceivable that their plans were not at any time revealed to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth. However, the outcome of the discussions did not only affect France and Britain’s policies in the decades to come. The policies were adopted as default by other Western European countries with lesser ideological and cultural confidence and significance. France and Britain were the cultural and political locomotives in Western Europe
The Metropolitan Police
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-466832/Eight-Al-Qaeda-fanatics-working-police-dont-dare-sack-them.html
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/mi5-targets-four-met-police-officers-working-as-al-qaeda-spies-7285036.html
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2081199/Criminal-record-1k-officers-convictions-police.html
SO CALLED DEMOCRACY TAKES BRITAIN TOWARDS OBLIVION.
By Mike Wilson
The Greeks apparently invented it and in Britain democracy has been installed since the time of Cromwell. Democracy is supposed to be government elected by the people to run and organize the state for the benefit of the people. At least that is how most of us see it although the pragmatists will probably define it in a way that says the same thing but using language that most people don’t understand. However we define it, democracy is supposed to represent the will of the people of the state. Britain has fought wars to defend democracy and to help others to do the same. So why do we still talk about a democratic government of the UK when it is blindingly obvious that such a government does not exist?
There is no democratic government in the UK and the will of the people has been usurped by foreign interests whose sole intent is to radicalize the country so that it becomes subservient to the will of a foreign power i.e. the European Union of socialist states. Democracy cannot exist when the will of the people is ignored and when the elected government embraces foreign laws to the detriment of the majority of the electorate. Politicians supposedly looking after the interests of the British taxpayer are too busy reaping the rewards of being in office and as a result very few have the interest of the average Briton at heart.
We all remember the fiasco of politicians claiming expenses for things which were undeniably absurd yet such practices are condoned and even encouraged by the mob in Brussels because it keeps those people in positions in order to maintain control over the electorate. Whether someone voted liberal, conservative, labour or anything else it mattered not a jot as the end result was a politician busy buttering his bread at the expense of those who elected him. It is quite obvious to most people that democracy has had its day and that in order to save Britain something else and someone else must come to the fore.
So called democracy has been the downfall of this once great country and the traitors who arranged the alliance with the European Union knew that the majority of people simply did not understand the ramifications of such an event and therefore the people did not voice a strong democratic argument against the proposal. That was then and today it is too late. In fact several years too late as the sixth and final EU treaty formally replaced Britain with the European Union on 1st January 2009. The Treaty "takes primacy" over the British Constitution which it thereby abolished, and with it the nations of Britain and England; it gives the EU the power to close our Westminster Parliament. The Lisbon Treaty was our Anschluss - It took 4 years for the founder of the EEC, Adolf Hitler, to turn Austria into a full police state after he annexed it. Similarly it will take the EU 3-4 years to consolidate its power, and it will then be impossible to get out.
The Conservative, Labour and Lib-Dem parties pass EU treaties, EU laws, EU regulations and EU policy; over 80% of its legislation and policy is the EU's. Our five party leaderships take their orders from the EU, not from the voters, which is why your vote makes no difference, and the reason your wishes are ignored. Democracy is dead in Britain.
Westminster has passed over 300 major laws, like the Civil Contingencies Act, to "harmonise" our laws with the EU's. The loss of freedoms and emerging police state is the result.
They have also passed 120,000 EU regulations; the 10% enforced so far have closed scores of thousands of businesses, from village petrol stations, to big industries like the Rover Car Co, to post offices (EC-9767). When fully enforced most of Britain’s 4.5 million small businesses will have closed, and most of their 13.5 million workers will be unemployed.
Yes, the EU will cause abject poverty, but in Britain alone. These 120,000 regulations do not apply in other EU countries. Nearly all the new "daft" rules, from dustbin over-enforcement to the Intercept Modernisation Bill (spying on our mail, email, phones; EU directive 2006/24/EC; see the Interception Communications Commissioner) to the complete removal of the public's wishes from local planning permission, stem from EU legislation.
The leaderships of the Conservative, Labour, Lib Dem, UKIP and BNP parties are run by placemen loyal to the EU. There is only one British political party - the EU party - we already live in a one party state.
So when you thought that your country was still at the cutting edge of freedom and democracy in this turbulent world, you were wrong. The democracy you thought you had just simply does not exist. You have lost the right to free speech, your towns and cities are filled with rainbow people and those in power have consolidated their position by ensuring that any person speaking out is deluged under the epithet ‘Racist’. The EU is busy determining where in Britain they will build the new slum tenements and towns to house the hundreds of thousands of ethnic persons who will be encouraged to come to do the jobs that the average Britain will not do. You cannot speak out about it because under the ‘ New Democracy’ you will be charged with inciting racial hatred. Yes, it is true, democracy no longer exists in Britain, like most things it is just a distant memory of what we had in the past so forget about voting for your favourite politician and instead go to the pub. The results will be just the same.
South African Farmer Beaten to death
Another farmer has been beaten to death in South Africa. The body of 46-year-old Adriaan Johannes "At" van der Merwe was found on the floor of his study with head injuries on Leeubos farm in Bloemhof, North West Province..
It is believed the attackers had gained entry into Van der Merwe's farmhouse by digging a hole underneath a security fence on Monday evening
It is believed the attackers had gained entry into Van der Merwe's farmhouse by digging a hole underneath a security fence on Monday evening
Source
_____________________
Hat tip Peter and Mulder
Three weeks in England
The following three trials have taken place in the last three weeks - spot the connections
A Tower Hamlets immigration adviser has been jailed for three and a half years after he was found guilty of helping people enter the country illegally using fake identity documents. Mujibur Rahman, 44, of Rounton Road, worked as a registered immigration adviser (cont)
A corrupt legal adviser from Hayes is facing a further three years in prison unless he hands over more than £245,000. Ravi Gupta, 41, of Carlyon Road, was jailed in August after admitting 14 charges of assisting illegal immigration and one of obtaining leave to remain by deception. As an accredited immigration law adviser, Gupta made thousands of pounds supplying clients with fake documents including certificates and pay slips that helped their immigration applications.(cont:)
A Home Office-licensed immigration adviser exposed by Sky News for arranging a sham marriage has been sentenced to seven years in prison for another immigration fraud. Jayesh Patel, 35, was first arrested in May 2010 after he was secretly filmed offering to supply a groom to a Sky undercover reporter for £12,500. Information found on Patel's computer suggested he was also helping migrants obtain visas by inflating their real earnings with bogus salaries and he was re-arrested in September 2011. The Home Office highly skilled migrant scheme was designed to attract talented workers such as doctors or engineers who could contribute most to the UK economy. (Cont)
April 3 2012
A vicar who helped carry out nearly 250 sham marriages, pocketing £30,000 in proceeds, was called ‘disgraceful’ and ‘greedy’ by a judge yesterday. The Rev Brian Shipsides, 56, was jailed for four and a half years for arranging bogus ceremonies for African nationals to marry European citizens so they could stay in Britain (cont)
Related
April 3 2012
A vicar who helped carry out nearly 250 sham marriages, pocketing £30,000 in proceeds, was called ‘disgraceful’ and ‘greedy’ by a judge yesterday. The Rev Brian Shipsides, 56, was jailed for four and a half years for arranging bogus ceremonies for African nationals to marry European citizens so they could stay in Britain (cont)
Saturday, 31 March 2012
George Galloway, Islam and Britain’s Future by Paul Weston
George Galloway has won the seat of Bradford West, much to the apparent shock of the sixth-form student unionists masquerading as adult Labour politicians.
This must make Mr Andrew Neather feel a tad foolish. His proud boast that by importing the Third World Labour would “rub the noses of the right in diversity” appears to have backfired pretty spectacularly.
George GallowayBut Labour have a misguided right to feel shocked. One of the reasons for transforming Britain into a divisive multi-racial country was to ensure Labour’s rule in perpetuity. In the 2010 general election the Conservatives won only 16% of the ethnic vote, whilst Labour won the support of 72% of Bangladeshis, 78% of Afro-Caribbeans and 87% of Africans.
Labour have long pandered to the Muslim vote, for obvious reasons. Muslims wield far more electoral influence than other groups, because they vote who they are told to vote for by the local imam. Jack Straw, for example, was utterly dependent on the Islamic bloc vote in Blackburn, hence his uniformly anti-English sentiment.
But the sheer vacuous stupidity of Labour politicians and their complete inability to absorb the reality of Islam means the Galloway success is only just the beginning. Ken Livingstone will run for Mayor of London on a pro-Islam ticket. Lutfur Rahman, a Muslim with links to hard-line Islamists, is already mayor of Tower Hamlets.
Contrary to the wishful thinking of Labour’s traitor class, Muslims will not vote for them once they become demographically large enough to vote for one of their own — or even for fanatically grovelling Islamic apologists such as the infidel Galloway. So if the Muslim demographic continues to double every decade — as it has since 1960 — then the future of British politics (and Britain) can only become increasingly Islamic.
Also at the Gates of Vienna "Bradford West the future of Europe"
_______________
Hat Tip Mister Fox
_________________________________________
UPDATES
It seems George got a little confused as to which constituency he has been elected MP for. After winning the election in Bradford West, he apparently sent a twitter messages celebrating his "triumph in Blackburn"!!
News Report
Meanwhile, Simon Darby has published a copy of a letter issued by Galloway during the election and posted to households in Bradford which may go a long way to explaining how he won. Of course this has been entirely suppressed by the media. Click here to read the letter
Thursday, 29 March 2012
Book Burning in Texas
"We sincerely apologize for publishing the cartoon and for the harm that decision caused."
The insane are now in charge
Are only non-whites now permitted to speak the truth?
Two main stream articles published this week by members of ethnic minorities tell truths which if a white person told them the shrieks of "racism" would be deafening:
Read the full article at the Daily Rant
"Sharpton and Obama Prostituting Martin Shooting" by Mychal Massie
"Where was Sharpton when Channon Christian, 21, and Christopher Newsom, 23, were kidnapped, brutally tortured, raped, and murdered in 2007? Newsom and Christian had been guilty of enjoying a dinner date and minding their own business, when they were carjacked and bound, then taken to a rented home and horrifically raped, sodomized, beaten, tortured, for hours. According to the testimony of the Knox County Acting Medical Examiner Dr. Darinka Mileusnic-Polchan at the subsequent trial of Eric Boyd, Newsom was repeatedly sodomized with an object and then blindfolded, gagged, arms and feet bound and his head covered. Barefoot, he was either led or dragged outside the house to a set of nearby railroad tracks. He was shot in the back of the head, the neck, and the back, and his body then set on fire.
Channon’s death came only after hours of sexual torture, medical examiner Mileusnic-Polchan testified. Channon suffered horrific injuries to her vagina, anus and mouth. She was not only raped but savaged with “an object,” possibly a broken chair leg, the doctor testified. She was beaten in the head. Some type of chemical was poured down her throat, and her body, including her bleeding and battered genital area, likely scrubbed with the same solution – all while Channon was alive, the forensic expert said. She was then “hog-tied,” with curtains and strips of bedding, her face covered tightly with a small trash bag and her body stashed inside five large trash bags before being placed inside a large trash can and covered with sheets. Channon died slowly, suffocating, the medical examiner said. Didn’t Sharpton, Obama, the race whores think this young couple was worthy of the wall to wall coverage? Didn’t Obama and Sharpton think what was done to them by four black males and an 18 year-old black female warranted their condemnation?
Furthermore, we were told the murders of Christian and Newsom were not racially motivated, they were called a random act. If what happened to that couple was a random act, how in the good name of heaven above can Sharpton, the media, the lawyers and Obama call the Martin shooting racist? Oh, I know, the victims were white.
______________________________
"Where is the black outrage at Thusha's Shooting?" by Nirpal Dhaliwal
Read the whole article at The London Evening Standard"The killing of a known criminal and gang member in Tottenham triggered an orgy of looting; many community leaders leapt to Duggan’s defence. Yet the paralysing of an innocent child hasn’t elicited a peep of condolence from such leaders, let alone outrage at those responsible. And not one pair of Nikes has been stolen in protest.
The two cases highlight the hypocrisy that frames our discussion of race and crime. About a thousand people attended Duggan’s funeral, as though his death were akin to the assassination of Martin Luther King. How many of them will contribute to Thusha’s appeal fund as she contemplates life in a wheelchair?
While there should be concern about and full accounting for any killing by the police, the black community should be more concerned about the chronic degree of gun crime committed by its own members — a primary reason for the police being armed in the first place.
Wednesday, 28 March 2012
Another "White Terrorist" Hoax Collapses
"Brave" judge frees so called "Michigan Militia" - Says not liking cops "doesn’t amount to a conspiracy to rebel against the government"
I wonder who Eric Holder will try to set up next? Be in no doubt, they will be white!
Great Lies of Our time
"The experience of our members in the network is that both victims and offenders come from a wide range of cultural and social backgrounds. – Sheila Taylor, Director, National Working Group for Sexually Exploited Children & Young People
Source
When the terror is the state
A young man was sent to prison yesterday. He has been locked away for eight weeks, not a lifetime in itself, but he now has a criminal record, which will blight his life for years to come.
The unforgiving zealots at the university where he had been studying have kicked him out, so his career plans are wrecked so probably his life is too, after all his picture, and his name were published in every national newspaper and on every TV news bulletin in the nation.
He was not a hero, but a broken boy who cried as he was led away into state incarceration where he will spend the next two month. But let us not judge his tears, would the strongest of us be able to withstand the bile and venom poured upon him by a morally outraged media and the blood baying Twitter nazis who now dictate how people are to think.
And what was his crime? He did not steal, he did not defraud anyone, he did not rape or kill, he did not draw blood, he did not bruise, he did not lay a finger on anyone. His only crime was to say things which we are not supposed to say, and which offended those who passionately seek offence.
For that he must be punished, shamed, humiliated and held up weeping before the nation as an example of what will happen to those who, even when drunk, as he was, dare to misspeak.
Elsewhere as young mother awaits trial for the transgression of daring to say “You're not British, you're black!”
There was a time when what we found most frightening about states such as those beneath the totalitarian fist of Soviet Russia or which were tin pot dictatorships, run by brutal despots, was that people could be locked away because of what they said.
We now live under such terror.
More chilling still are the shrill cheers of those who support the prosecution. To merely read the approving comments beneath the news report of the young man's trial is to hear echoes from another darker place we once thought had disappeared long ago.
“Finally the sentence fits the crime!” Snarls brain dead Olivia from Swindon
“hahahahhahahahhahaha i love it..... u vile rascist little pig ” crowed Arshad from Worster – (clearly enjoying seeing a white man brought low)
“Good, scum like this should have the book thrown at them. ….. He made racist comments” squeaked Anthony from London, the sort of person who, in another life would have sold his mother to the Stasi for misspeaking.
As would Denise from Chelmsford who shrieked with the pride of a Khmer Rouge guerrilla with a baby on her bayonet “The racial comments were disgusting. I'm glad that I was one of the many people who reported him to the police.”
How low has out country sunk that the likes of Olivia, Arshad, Denise and Anthony now tell us how to think.
We are told that this is a free country, that is a joke, we are becoming the terrorist state of which others once warned us, and most frightening is the fact that there are many who welcome it.
_______________________________
Postscript: It is ironic that one of those who reported the offending speech was black footballer Stan Collymore, who said there must be “zero tolerance for racism”, luckily for Stan it appears that intolerance does not extend to black footballers who beat up their girlfriends or go dogging on Cannock Chase. I guess Stan thinks that doing stuff is not as bad as saying it.
We are told that this is a free country, that is a joke, we are becoming the terrorist state of which others once warned us, and most frightening is the fact that there are many who welcome it.
_______________________________
Postscript: It is ironic that one of those who reported the offending speech was black footballer Stan Collymore, who said there must be “zero tolerance for racism”, luckily for Stan it appears that intolerance does not extend to black footballers who beat up their girlfriends or go dogging on Cannock Chase. I guess Stan thinks that doing stuff is not as bad as saying it.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-38874/Ulrika-Ill-forgive-Stan.html
http://news.sky.com/home/article/13005260
Saturday, 24 March 2012
Protecting what? - Update
Six of the men arrested in Oxford earlier this week as part of an investigation into a child sex ring have been charged with offences ranging from rape, conspiracy to rape and having sex with a child to trafficking, arranging child prostitution, supplying drugs and making threats to kill. They are:
Thirty-one-year-old hospital porter Akhtar Dogar
His 30-year-old unemployed brother Anjum Dogar
Twenty-six-year-old security guard Kamar Jamil
Unemployed 26 year old Zeshan Ahmed
32 year old Security guard Bassan Karrar
his unemployed 37 year old brother Mohammed Karrar
Seven other men are on police bail while enquiries continue
Well now that we know their ethnicity, can any one work out how that would have risked identifying their victims as the police said it might?
No? ..... me neither!
__________________________
Hat tip Alanorei
Things which don't exist
Krampus and and English Chinaman
A list of things which don't exist
A Unicorn
A Chinese person of English ancestry
Krampas - the Christmas demon
An Indian person of Irish ancestry
Leprachaun
A Pakistani of Welsh ancestry
Sasquatch
A Bangladeshi of Scottish ancestry
Rainbow Justice
Three young men photographed in South Africa's West Cape last Monday, moments before their agonizing deaths. The men were accused of theft and were beaten and stoned before rubber tires were placed round their necks, further tires were placed on top of them and then set alight.
Two of the men died at the scene, the third died later in hospital.
The full report can be read here, but be warned it contains rather distressing pictures.
Nelson Mandela's ANC dispatched between 20,000 and 40,000 of their opponents in this manner during their struggle against Apartheid.
What a difference five years make
Trayvon Martin in 2007, these are the five year old pictures the media have been using in news reports about the innocent Skittle buying African American boy, shot dead while he was innocently sightseeing in a secure gated community
This is just another a race bating hypocrite
PS: The Hispanic shooter, whom the media so desperately wish was white
The Whole of Zimmerman's 911 call can be heard here, shockingly it shows that all the media have lied and that, in fact Zimmerman stopped following the youth when the police told him they did not need him to
The Whole of Zimmerman's 911 call can be heard here, shockingly it shows that all the media have lied and that, in fact Zimmerman stopped following the youth when the police told him they did not need him to
British Muslims Pray for the killer of Children
Click here to watch Muslims in Britain pray funeral prayer of Muhamed Merah
__________________
Hat Tip: Reconquista
__________________
Hat Tip: Reconquista
Friday, 23 March 2012
Protecting what?
The police in Oxford have arrested a group of thirteen men on suspicion of trafficking under aged girls for the purpose of sex and prostitution. The men are additionally suspected of grooming the children, supplying them with drugs and also of rape.
These activities have allegedly being going on for at least six years, but it is only now that the police have acted.
This is becoming a familiar story in towns and cities across Britain and invariably they involve the same demographic in terms of offender and of their victims.
However, clinging firmly to their politically correct mandate Thames Valley Police refused to reveal the ethnicity of the suspected gang members, saying such information “could result in victims being identified”.
This is an interesting explanation and leaves one wondering exactly what this could mean.
What it certainly does mean is that offenders cannot possibly be white, as whites are still the largest population group in the country and make up around 84% of Oxford’s 153,000 population, revealing that these 13 offenders are white, could not identify the victims even to a sleuth with the skills of Sherlock Holmes .
Indeed, one has to ask how it would be that revealing that the offenders belong to any of the main ethnic groups amongst the immigrant population, would reveal the identity of their victims, given how many there now are in Britain.
This would only be the case if both groups came from ethnicities which do not feature highly in the British population, for instance if some ex-patriot Mongolians had abused a visiting group of Inuit schoolgirls, or alternatively if they hailed from countries with very small populations, for example if some Kiribati Islanders had been trafficking young girls from Oxfords Tuvalu community.
Doesn’t sound very likely does it?.
What does sound a lot more likely is that the police are lying, and that the only thing which revealing the ethnicity of the suspects will identify is …. Their ethnicity.
It is that information, and that information alone, which the police are trying their damnedest to protect.
These activities have allegedly being going on for at least six years, but it is only now that the police have acted.
This is becoming a familiar story in towns and cities across Britain and invariably they involve the same demographic in terms of offender and of their victims.
However, clinging firmly to their politically correct mandate Thames Valley Police refused to reveal the ethnicity of the suspected gang members, saying such information “could result in victims being identified”.
This is an interesting explanation and leaves one wondering exactly what this could mean.
What it certainly does mean is that offenders cannot possibly be white, as whites are still the largest population group in the country and make up around 84% of Oxford’s 153,000 population, revealing that these 13 offenders are white, could not identify the victims even to a sleuth with the skills of Sherlock Holmes .
Indeed, one has to ask how it would be that revealing that the offenders belong to any of the main ethnic groups amongst the immigrant population, would reveal the identity of their victims, given how many there now are in Britain.
This would only be the case if both groups came from ethnicities which do not feature highly in the British population, for instance if some ex-patriot Mongolians had abused a visiting group of Inuit schoolgirls, or alternatively if they hailed from countries with very small populations, for example if some Kiribati Islanders had been trafficking young girls from Oxfords Tuvalu community.
Doesn’t sound very likely does it?.
What does sound a lot more likely is that the police are lying, and that the only thing which revealing the ethnicity of the suspects will identify is …. Their ethnicity.
It is that information, and that information alone, which the police are trying their damnedest to protect.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)