Sarah Maid of Albion

Two further South African Farm Killings

2012-01-24T14:19:00.000-08:00

Francois du Toit

The following two reports from the Afrikaner media have been kindly translated by HC

FARMER MURDERED AT HOME WITH FAMILY ____________________________________________________________

A farmer, well known in agricultural circles, was shot and killed on his game farm in Roossenekal, Limpopo, yesterday morning.

The wife and two young children of Mr. Francois du Toit (38) were then tied up by the attackers.

Mr. du Toit and his family lived on a game farm which is approximately 30 km outside Roossenekal. His parents live in another house on the farm.

Police spokesperson Lt. Col Ronel Otto, said Mr. du Toit apparently heard something outside the house after 1:00 and went to get a pistol out a safe, by which time three attackers had entered the house. He was shot in the stomach and although he returned shots none of the three were wounded. He was then shot again behind an ear. After this Mrs. du Toit, the couple's son Francois (12) and daughter Stephanie (9) were taken to lapa outside where their hands and feet were bound with cable ties. The attackers stole guns, two pistols, money and cellphones from the house and then fled in two of Mr.du Toit's Nissan Navaras.

At this stage the heavily wounded Mr. du Toit was still alive. Mrs. du Toit, whilst bound, managed to shuffle on the ground to where she could find something to cut herself free and contacted neighbours on the two-way radio. Neighbours attempted to get Mr.du Toit into a vehicle but he died in their arms, a friend said.

The du Toit family were too shocked to talk about the incident. At the time of going to press no arrests had been made.

News report

DAMAGED POTHOLE LEADS TO MURDER OF MAN
_______________________________________________________________

A Pretoria farmer was shot in front of his wife and grandchild whilst he and a friend were changing a flat tyre by the roadside.

Ten days after the murder of Hans Huyser (50) police have not yet taken statements from his wife, friends, granddaughter or nephew who were present when he was attacked.

He and his wife, Cindy (48), granddaughter, Jessica (10) and nephew, Deon Graaff (15) were at Sun City on the 2nd of January, together with friends, Danie (53) and Charmaine Niemand (49).

That evening they returned to Pretoria. The Huysers farm at Onderstepoort and the Niemands live in Petronella.

On the way they hit a pothole and both tyres on the driver's side of the Niemands' Mercedes-Benz were flattened. Messrs. Niemand and Huyser decided to first replace one tyre with the spare wheel, to ride on slowly as long as they could with the flattened tyre, then to change the spare wheel and flat tyre and to ride further with the other flat tyre.

About midnight they had to stop a second time, on the N4 Highway near Brits, to change the spare wheel and one flat tyre.

"We stopped under a light. There was no person nor car there" Mrs. Huyser said. "In the meantime Mr. Huyser's murderers were hiding away like hyenas in the grass and waiting. We would never have got out had I thought it wasn't safe. We stopped in a lightened area."

Mr. Niemand loosened the front wheel's bolts whilst Mr. Huyser jacked the car up. Their wives and Jessica poured cold drinks at the boot (trunk?). Three men jumped over the barricade alongside the road. "When they reached us Hans stood up. One man removed a firearm from his trousers" Mr. Niemand told. "He pointed the firearm at me and pulled the trigger. I ran away. He fired another two shots. I fell in the road and was unconscious a brief while. When I came to, I jumped up and stopped three cars."

In the meantime the man who shot at Mr. Niemand returned to Mr. Huyser who hit him with the jack. He shot Mr. Huyser three times in the upper body.

One man loosened his trouser and told Mrs. Huyser to go and lie in the bushes. She swore at him and ran to her husband.

The men took Mr. Huyser's cellphone and Mrs.Niemand's handbag and walked away.

"Hans looked at me with those blue eyes of his", Mrs. Huyser said. "I helped him to lie down and tried to breathe into his mouth. When the paramedic arrived on the scene she felt his pulse and said he was dead".

Capt Adele Myburgh, police spokesperson in North West, said the police would investigate the allegations concerning statements not taken.

News report
_______________________
Hat Tip: HC and Mulder

A call for balance, a call for truth

2012-01-24T05:59:00.000-08:00

Please click here to visit YouTube and rate this video and then please share it as widely as you can

_____________

Hat Tip Mister Fox

Mister Fox to be interviewed over Brevik case

2012-01-24T00:41:00.000-08:00

Regular blog contributor Mister Fox is due to be interviewed later this week by police investigating the alleged links between so called "right wing groups" and the left wing Norwegian mass murder Anders Behring Breivik.

The confessed killer apparently made reference to Mister Fox's writings, together with that of various other writers, in his long, odd and rambling 'manifesto'.

More details can be found in the comments section beneath this recent posting.

On the assumption that he is permitted to do so, Mister Fox will be posting details of the interview later this week.

Apartheid Truths

2012-01-24T00:22:00.000-08:00

Mike Smith's excellent series of 34 Essays "Opening Pandora's Apartheid Box" exploring the myths, lies and half truths about Apartheid South Africa and which were previously posted to much missed South Africa Sucks have been gathered together and indexed by the South African blogger TIA MYSOA these can be accessed by clicking on the link below:

Opening Pandora's Apartheid Box

I strongly recommend these essays to anyone seeking to know the truth about Apartheid undistorted by the lies and propaganda spread by liberal commentators, dishonest historians and the controlled western media.

__________________________

Hat tip: Laager

A thought for the day

2012-01-23T10:58:00.000-08:00

Just over 70 years ago the world went to war, claiming it did so to save the people of Poland. 39 years ago, the US supreme court passed Roe v. Wade, a single piece of legislation which has already killed more Americans than the total current population of Poland and of the Czech Republic combined.

The death toll from Roe -v- Wade has far exceeded the slaughter which resulted from two and a half centuries of Tatar and Mongol invasions, and may even have caused as great a loss of life as the Spanish flu pandemic of 1918. It is more than double the battlefield casualties of World war I and, by some estimates it is now equal to casualties of World war II. Indeed if you include in the equation the victims of similar legislation, motivated by similar liberal principles, in the western nations who fought in world war two the death toll from both of those great conflicts, which tore the 20^th Century apart, have been well exceeded.

In Britain alone we kill numbers greater than the total population of a city the size of Swindon every year, and have done each year since 1967.

And yet it goes on, industrial level legal genocide, sanctioned and approved by the governments we elect into power

We cannot be forgiven carnage of such magnitude, we will not be forgiven.

Farmer killed, his wife severely injured

2012-01-14T15:35:00.000-08:00

South African farmer Andries du Toit was killed this morning and his wife severely injured during an attack on their farm.

According to police five men entered the Klipplaatdrift property in Ventersdorp at about 4.00am and attacked the couple. A struggle ensued, during which the farmer was killed and his wife severely assaulted.

The attackers then fled

Readers will recall tha AWB leader Eugene Terreblanche was killed in Ventersdorp in April 2010

News report

Farm Tracker
_______________________

Hat Tip: Peter

Updated with victim's name 16 Jan 2011

Time Magazine: How the ANC lost its way

2012-01-14T10:12:00.000-08:00

Thanks to Laager for drawing the latest article on Mike Smith's Political Commentary, which can be read by clicking on this link: Time Magazine: How the ANC lost its way

As Laager says:

Would you believe it?

TIME magazine has published an article critical of the ANC.What white Saffas have been telling the world for the last 17 years is finally making it into the mainstream media.

I suppose they could not live with blinkers on forever. We must be grateful for small victories

RamzPaul Comments on the suspension of Pat Buchanan by MSNBC

2012-01-14T06:33:00.000-08:00

Background: Conservative commentator Pat Buchanan has been suspended indefinitely from MSNBC, according to a statement from that network’s President Phil Griffin. An Associated Press article on CBSNews.com blames reaction to Buchanan’s latest book Suicide of a Superpower for his ouster from the cable network, as well as a campaign by the advocacy group, Color of Change.

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/01/07/pat-buchanan-out-indefinitely-at-msnbc/

Here is ColorOfChange.org mission statement:

ColorOfChange.org exists to strengthen Black America's political voice. Our goal is to empower our members - Black Americans and our allies - to make government more responsive to the concerns of Black Americans and to bring about positive political and social change for everyone.

_____________________

Ramz Paul's Website

Ramz Paul's YouTube Channel

Forbes names world's murder and rape capital its "3rd Most Friendly"

2012-01-14T02:36:00.000-08:00

Friendly locals welcome a visitor to South Africa

A woman is raped in South Africa every 17 seconds, as a nation South Africa has the highest rate of homicide per head of population of any country in the world. 200,000 children a year are the victims of child rape. Genocide Watch has upgraded South Africa to Stage Six out of the eight stages of genocide, after some 40,000 whites, including between 3,000 and 4,000 white farmers have been murdered, many following hours of torture, in the last 17 years.

As is graphically depicted above, in recent years outbreaks of so called "Xenophobia" have seen foreigners slaughtered in increasingly horrible ways, (renewed attacks have occurred as recently as last October when Zimbabweans were driven out of their homes by local gangs and foreign shops were ransacked)

Yet despite all this the prestigious Forbes Magazine have just ranked South Africa as the third most friendly country in the world, ahead of Canada, the USA and The UK. One has to wonder exactly how they are defining the word "friendly" in coming to this decision.

France languishes at Number 15 on the list, despite the fact that, as in Britain, when people are tortured to death in French hate crimes it tends to be immigrants who do it, not the locals. (Germany, Ireland and many other European Countries do not even make it onto the list, although an increasingly Islamic Turkey and crime ridden Mexico do)

Forbes appear to have disregarded a significant amount of data when compiling their list, and swept a lot more under the carpet. But Hey this the brave new world of 2012, little matters like the truth, or indeed public safety, can no loger be allowed to interfere with the promotion of yet another politically correct fantasy.

___________________________

Related: Afrikaner Genocide Museum - WARNING graphic content

76 year old woman stabbed, beaten locked up and left to die - South Africa 2012

2012-01-11T12:55:00.000-08:00

Mrs Pat Joffe, 76, the former treasurer of the South African Rhodesian Ridgeback Dog Club was murdered at her smallholding at Mnandi in South Africa's Eastern Cape, last Friday, January 6th .

At first the police did not bother to report Mrs. Joffe's death to the news media, with the result that friends only became aware of her death following a mention on Facebook. Initially the murder was recorded as a shooting but the coroner has subsequently reported that the old lady was stabbed, beaten and then locked in a bathroom with the key removed, where she was left to bleed to death.

No arrests have yet been made.

Report at Censor bugbear

Gates of Vienna: The End of the Dream

2012-01-10T11:34:00.000-08:00

Gates of Vienna: The End of the Dream:

On May 8, 1945, Soviet troops entered Berlin, quickly wiping out the last German resistance whilst looting and raping amid the ruins of a once-proud city.

To the surviving residents of Berlin, it must have seemed that Götterdämmerung — which was what Hitler had predicted if the German people failed him and the Nazi cause — had indeed arrived. Ten years previously, or even five years previously, it would have been unimaginable that the great and glorious Third Reich would ever come to this.

Western Civilization is rapidly approaching the point when it will have to awaken from its own dream. But the analogy with the end of Nazi Germany is not particularly apt, since the Third Reich existed for a mere twelve years. And the crucial period of modern history, in which Europe was all but destroyed, lasted for only thirty-one years: from June 28, 1914 until the summer of 1945.

Continue reading: Gates of Vienna: The End of the Dream:

__________________
Hat Tip: Runic

MSNBC - the punishment of thought

2012-01-09T15:18:00.000-08:00

It appears that the new policy of US Cable News channel MSNBC is to punish, and where possible suppress. free speech. Regular conservative contributor, ex adviser to three American presidents and two time presidential election candidate, Pat Buchanan has been permanently suspended and may not be allowed back on air. MSNBC have taken this action because they do not like what he said in his new book “The Suicide of a Superpower” which analyses and explains the reasons behind the decline of the once great nation of America.

MSNBC President Phil Griffin is quoted as saying : “I don’t think the ideas that Buchanan put forth are appropriate for national dialogue on MSNBC. He won’t be coming back during the book tour.” Asked if Buchanan would be be back at all, Griffin replied “I have not made my decision.”

The Liberal elite in America is outraged that Buchanan's brilliantly researched book directly links the decline in America's power, the dire state of her economy and near collapse of social cohesion on multiculturalism, mass non-European immigration and shrinking of the white majority. These are views which are an anathema to those who currently have their jackboots on the throats of the Western media, and views which they will go to any length to prevent being expressed, especially by individuals with the profile of Pat Buchanan.

To paraphrase George Orwell, we have reached a point within our society where to speak the truth is an act of revolution, it is an act which puts you and your livelihood at significant risk, because, if you speak the truth the liars and the tyrants will try to crush you. It is no longer just the little man, or woman, who speaks out of turn on a tram or a football terrace who they seek to destroy, they are now going after the titans.

However, we have seen it all before, in the last century and further east, in cultures which were our current leaders spiritual homes, where the truth became a crime, as it is now becoming throughout the west.

It seems easy and trite to say that the Soviet Union did not die, it just moved west, but in fact, in many of the ways that matter, that is the truth. It is the same beast, it wears a different mask, but the same snarling jaws lurk behind it.

The Double Standards of Hate

2012-01-09T10:40:00.000-08:00

The Following letter appeared at Courier.co.uk this morning

Sir, — In 1993-94, the black teenager Stephen Lawrence and white teenager Richard Everitt were murdered by young 'racist gangs' in London but there the resemblance ends.

Vast media publicity followed Stephen's case, the Home Secretary visited, a monument was erected and a judicial inquiry denounced the police as ''institutionally racist''.

Two men have now been convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment while the judge demands the other attackers be punished because they engaged in a ''joint exercise''.

Eleven Bengali youths — one aged 20 — were arrested over Richard's killing but only two came to trial with no calls for the rest to be prosecuted on a ''joint enterprise'' basis.

One was found guilty of violent disorder and served 18 months while the other served 11 years for what the trial judge described it as a ''wholly unprovoked racist murder''.

There was no visit by the Home Secretary, no monument, no judicial inquiry, no interest shown by his local MP and a code of omerta from the metropolitan leftist media.

(Dr) John Cameron.
10 Howard Place,
St Andrews.

Here is the Link: http://www.thecourier.co.uk/Opinion/Readers-letters/article/20174/january-9-similar-racist-murders-but-different-approaches.html

For the sake or racial equality, readers may consider that Dr. Cameron's letter deserves a wider circulation.

_______________

Further information on the murder of Richard Everett can be found at the I am an Englishman blog (one of the valuable resources in Britain today) by clicking here.

Recognition for the British victims of Racial Violence

2012-01-07T08:08:00.000-08:00

Click here to visit Britain First

Massive Muslim Paedophile Gang Hidden by the Media

2012-01-07T07:59:00.000-08:00

From 21st Century British Nationalism

On the 3rd January 2012 in Liverpool Crown Court 21 Muslims allegedly involved in a massive paedophile gang who are alleged to have been targeting primarily white children in the Manchester area were sent for a pre-trial hearing.

We have been informed from sources inside the court that the media have been asked by the Liverpool police to keep this case out of the papers.

Click here to continue reading

___________________________
Hat Tip: Mister Fox

Racist Attacks and Crime: The True Story

2012-01-06T10:30:00.000-08:00

Click here for a report on the true nature of race crime in Britain at The British Resistance site

Brain washing in action

2012-01-06T10:11:00.000-08:00

The Diane Abbott rap

Frank Ellis's reply to Norman Tebbitt

2012-01-05T13:33:00.000-08:00

Anyone who read ex-Tory minister's article in yesterday's Telegraph "The Euro is nothing but a sacred cow its time to take it to the abattoir" may have seen The comment from Dr. Frank Ellis, who as you all know is a regular contributor to this blog.

If you missed it, Frank Ellis's excellent contribution was as follows:

Dear Lord Tebbit

You are quite correct to point out that the EU and its all vile works constitute an article of faith for the BBC and the Guardian-reading classes. But there is another sacred cow that requires to be put to death in the slaughterhouse (not abattoir!) or rather sent for scrap and that is the anti-racist industrial complex. The campaign to eradicate what the left and members of your party call racism has poisoned and blighted England. Today, with the conviction of two defendants in the Lawrence case we were given another reminder of the damage done. Murder is not made more heinous because of a racial motive: murder is murder.

Your party when in opposition in 1999 and led by Hague the room sharer accepted the Macpherson Report and its vicious recommendations in their entirety. When is some politician in your party going to stand up and attack the Nazi-anti-Nazis in the BBC, the universities and especially in the hideous EHRC which hates whites? You mention Enoch Powell. No Tory MP today would be fit to run errands for such an outstanding English patriot. Your party has betrayed England: and all your tough talk about the euro cannot hide the cowardice or the damage being done, already done and with more to come. With luck the euro will collapse and we can start to rebuild.

But the deadly threat to England is not the euro it is multiracialism, mass non-white immigration and a political caste (“Conservative” & Labour) that have conspired to permit England to be overrun with aliens. This is the dagger that will tear England’s heart out and you by repeatedly pulling your punches on mass, non-white immigration and attacking the BNP so as to provide yourself with an insurance policy and to deflect accusations of racism, have made your contribution to this state of affairs. I hope you can live with yourself. I used to admire you Tebbit: now you disgust me.

Frank Ellis (aka Frankly Hellish)

Diane and her Time Machine

2012-01-05T13:13:00.000-08:00

Labour minister Diane Abbott has defended the Tweet she made earlier today when she said "White People love playing 'divide and rule', we shouldn't play their game"

She claims that the tweet wasn't racist and that she was not making generalisations about white people but claims that the tweet "was taken out of context" and that she was actually "referring to the nature of 19th Century European colonialism" which he explains was a "bit much to get into 140 characters.".

Of course nobody would question Ms. Abbott's integrity. Clearly what she meant when she said "We shouldn't play their game" was that black people should not get into time machines, travel back 150 odd years and play games with long dead people.

It makes perfect sense really!

£50 Million

2012-01-04T11:59:00.000-08:00

The police spent £50 Million on the Stephen Lawrence case ($78.2 million)

I doubt they spent £50 thousand trying to find the killers of either Charlene Downs or Gavin Hopley!

________________________________________________

Related but valued so differently

View this at YouTube

Lawrence verdict: this isn’t justice – it’s politics

2012-01-04T11:43:00.000-08:00

By Brendan O’Neill

The cultural elite has exploited and politicised the murder of Stephen Lawrence to a degree that would have made Machiavelli blush

‘Justice has been done.’ So says every newspaper in the land, following the conviction of David Norris and Gary Dobson for the murder of black teenager Stephen Lawrence in 1993. Justice? Are they serious? Judging from the narcissistic catfight amongst various sections of the elite clamouring to claim responsibility for ‘getting’ Lawrence’s killers, involving everyone from tabloid supremo Paul Dacre to Islington’s favourite QC Michael Mansfield to PM David Cameron, this isn’t so much a case of ‘justice has been done’ as ‘justice has been done by me!’. In the Lawrence case, the needs of justice were long ago usurped by the desires of the political and media elites to use this grisly case as a soapbox from which to pronounce their moral superiority in modern Britain

Click here to continue reading at Spiked

The "Right" Candidate is the one who can Win

2012-01-03T13:04:00.000-08:00

What I am about to say will not please many readers, but, in the present circumstances, the best possible outcome of today's GOP primary vote in Iowa would be for Mitt Romney to win and then go on to become nominated as the Republican party candidate for this year's US presidential election.

There is one reason for that, which is that Romney is the only candidate with a reasonable chance of beating Obama, and that is all that matters.

Ron Paul supporters, who view Dr. Paul as the last great chance to save the West, need to wake up to a dose of reality, he might be if he could win, but he can’t win, so he isn’t.

Likewise, members of the “anyone but Romney” brigade need to realise that the only beneficiary of their strategy will be Obama. Not one of the various alternative candidates are serious contenders with the remotest chance of winning in November. Just close your eyes for one moment and try to imagine either Gingrich or Santorum in the White house and the lunacy of that proposition becomes clear. Neither man has the gravitas, or basic attractiveness to appeal to the uncommitted centre and disenchanted Obama supporters who will be essential for victory in the America the Democrats have created.

This is no time for joke candidates. Did they learn nothing from the debacle that was Herman Cain?

As to the other options, Perry briefly looked like a president, but all that fell apart the moment the moment he opened his mouth and although Michelle Bachmann appeared impressive to start with her credibility was swiftly undermined, less by her wild eyes, than by her by her seemingly compulsive proclivity for saying incredibly stupid things.

Romney is the right candidate If America is to survive. He is also the right candidate for Nationalists who need to break a habit of a lifetime and finally unite around someone who can actually win. For too long we have demanded that the "right" leader must have qualities which are almost impossible to achieve. We have to realise that in the real world a cynical and compromised victory is worth a thousand ideologically pure and noble defeats.

Ideological purity is not worth a damn if it can’t achieve power.

Republicans should take a lesson from both the both the British Labour and Tory parties which persisted in appointing ideologically pure losers to lead their parties into electoral defeat. Only blinkered politicians in the Tory party could have imagined that Hague, Duncan-Smith or even Michael Howard were anything other than electoral poison albeit sound on policy.

Likewise, the Labour party had consigned themselves to eighteen years out of power until they eventually bit the bullet and elected the most ideologically impure of candidates Tony Blair. An act which was disastrous for the Britain, but which gave Labour power, and the ability to change the country beyond recognition.

Just imagine what could have been achieved if that power had been used for good.

Thankfully Labour has again embraced defeat with their choice of two more totally useless leaders (the stupidity of choosing the unelectable Miliband brother is risible) the Republicans must not make the same mistake.

If America is to survive and undo that the damage which has been done, it needs to defeat Obama and remove the malevolent Democratic party from power. If the only man who can do that is not ideologically perfect, we are long past the point where that matters.

America, and indeed the West, may not have the time remaining to survive a principled failure.

______________________

Update: From this morning's news I see the latest "Anyone but Mitt" joke candidate managed to force a score draw. It is starting to look more like Obama is safe for another four years every day! If so, America may not survive. Up to you guys!

Boxing Day stabbings: the knife-crime nightmare continues while the numbers jailed for carrying a weapon plummet

2012-01-03T12:39:00.000-08:00

By Richard Barnbrook

The London knife-crime nightmare rages unabated with a double stabbing in Oxford Street in the midst of the Boxing Day sales. A fight in Foot Locker, in full view of shoppers, tragically resulted in a murder when an 18 year-old was stabbed in the heart. A further knifing occurred less than five hours later when a 21 year-old was stabbed in the thigh at Oxford Circus, but the victim fortunately survived.

Only three weeks earlier, on 2nd December, figures released by the Ministry of Justice showed that the proportion of people jailed for carrying a knife in England and Wales had fallen to its lowest level for more than three years. Only just over a fifth- 21%- of offenders convicted of possession of a knife or offensive weapon between July and September 2011 were jailed.

The Metropolitan Police have been increasing the use of ‘stop and search’ in order to deter young people from carrying knives. However, this is clearly not enough to reverse the situation if the courts are not prepared to impose tough sentences on those who are caught, in order to force potential knife-carriers to make a double-take. If they think that they are going to get away with it, then would-be offenders, especially youngsters, will continue to arm themselves because they mistakenly see the carrying of a weapon as a form of protection. And the problem is an ever increasing one: the more people who are seen to get away with routinely carrying knives, the more others will be encouraged to adopt the practice.

In the Legal Aid and Sentencing Bill, the government proposes to introduce a mandatory minimum prison sentence of four months for teenagers aged 16 and 17 convicted of threatening people with knives and 6 months for those aged over 18 years. This may be a step in the right direction, but in my view it’s only a tiny one. For a start, the defendant (aged 16 or over) would need to be shown to have actually threatened someone, so simply carrying a knife would not qualify. Secondly, the likelihood is that the offender would only actually serve half the sentence, which means in practice just two/three months inside. We need to fight fire with fire and send out a much stronger message, with a minimum term to be actually served of at least a year for those under 18 and 3 years for adults convicted for possession of a weapon in a public place. Only when the fear of getting caught outweighs that of being stabbed will the battle even begin to appear winnable.

Meanwhile the tragic toll of those killed and maimed continues. What will it take for the politicians of all parties to get a grip?

Justice Blind, Brainwashed and Bigoted

2012-01-03T10:59:00.000-08:00

So the first of the current batch of show trials has achieved the outcome which our totalitarian rulers desired and for which they abandoned centuries old protections in order to achieve. There are at least two more show trials to come, we can expect similar outcomes.

There was, of course, never a chance that the men convicted at the Old Bailey today of the most exploited murder in recent British history, could ever get a fair trial and that was what the state depended on when they brought this case.

It is clear that enough people in this country are sufficiently brainwashed that juries can no longer be trusted to care about evidence, or, as in this case the a total lack of any reliable evidence, but will now convict on the basis of political correctness alone.

Where are the so called human rights lawyers, who would have been crawling all over such a patently unfair trial had the demographics been otherwise? Clearly it is not human right which interest them it is selective rights

If you support this verdict, and many will, you are a supporter of a vicious dictatorship, which may one day come looking for you, and don't forget it has changed the law to ensure that it can do so again and again and again.

________________

Related: Disposable Double Jeopardy

Note: As the trial has reached its inevitable conclusion I will now accept comments on this subject

Speech delivered by Aaron Kahland at Orania Burgervergadering ( = Citizens meeting)

2011-12-30T03:14:00.000-08:00

By Aaron Kahland, ambassador of Orania in Germany.

I’d like to start by telling you a story from the country where I live, Germany. It is the story of Max Planck, the great German physicist. In 1918 Professor Planck won the Nobel Prize for his work on quantum theory. With this new fame he was asked at universities throughout Germany to give speeches on his discoveries. One evening he was due to give a speech in Munich. On the way there, Planck was having a discussion with his driver and his driver asked him if he had prepared the speech he was to give that night. Planck answered ‘no, I haven’t prepared, I have given this speech so many times that I can tell it by memory.’ His driver responded, ‘I have heard your speech so many times I could probably give it.’ Hearing this, Max Planck thought for a moment and then said to his driver, ‘why don’t we test your theory and you dress nicely and give the speech and I’ll sit in the front of the audience and pretend to be your driver and we’ll see if anyone notices.’

And, according to their plan, when they arrived Planck’s driver got up in front of the audience and gave a speech on very complicated physics in front of an audience of Munich’s scientific community. He delivered it so well that no-one noticed that it was not Planck himself. However, after the speech was given, there was time for questions from the audience. Sure enough someone from the audience stood up and asked a question on Planck’s quantum theory. For a moment the driver stood still and then he slowly shook his head and said, ‘I was led to believe that Munich was a sophisticated and intellectual city. So it surprises me that someone from this audience could ask me such a simple question.’ The driver then pointed to Max Planck in the audience and said ‘Indeed it is so simple that I am confident that even my driver could answer it.’

The reason I told you this story is that today I feel a little bit like Max Planck’s driver because I have been asked to speak a little about Afrikaner history. I am an economist by trade but I shall do my best and hopefully, I can introduce something new to you anyway.

Click here to continue reading at South of the Zambezi

Hat Tip: Laager

Police : Salford killing "was a Hate Crime"

2011-12-29T08:17:00.000-08:00

Manchester police have just announced that they are treating the murder of Indian Student Anuj Bidve who was shot dead in Salford on Boxing Day as a Hate Crime.

How odd, correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't it current police procedure to fall over each other in theiur rush to dismiss all possibility that any murder is a "hate crime" within moments of arriving at a police scene, and before they have had a chance to determine anything?

Oh no, silly me that is only current police procedure when the victim is white and the suspects aren't!!

Merry Christmas

2011-12-24T12:27:00.000-08:00

The "B" word or the "C" word

2011-12-23T16:14:00.000-08:00

Now let me get this straight, it seems that John Terry is in trouble because of what he is alleged to have said.

Apparently, there would have been no problem if he had just used the "C" word. What caused the outrage is that he is alleged to have used the "B" word before the "C" word. So, for John Terry it was the "B" word which was the problem. He could have called the "B" chap a "C" and nobody would have batted an eyelid, it was the "B", if he said it, which caused the rumpus.

Are you with me so far?

However, when it comes to Alan Hansen, he's in trouble because he used the "C" word instead of the "B" word. As a result, outraged black players were twittering angry tweets pompously announcing that they are "B" not "C".

So, if Hansen had used the "B" word instead of the "C" word he would not have got into trouble, yet it was the alleged use of the "B", not the "C" word which got John Terry in trouble. Confusing huh?

In each instance the "B" word is the same word "Black", yet while Terry is condemned for using it, Hansen is pilloried for not doing so.

It would seem that when the thought police want to get you, whatever you do will be wrong. Either that is true or we may reached a point of insanity from which there is no return.

Pour encourager les autres

2011-12-23T13:52:00.000-08:00

It seems one can hardly move at the moment without tripping over a hate crime prosecution, usually a thought crime involving the use of prohibited speech. For instance, the Uruguayan footballer Luis Suarez (above), who now plays for Liverpool, has been banned for eight matches and fined £40,000 ($ 62,496) for using a word which sounds like 'Negro', to serial hate crimes victim Patrice Evra. It mattered not that the word which Suarez used does not have any of the connotations which have been imposed upon it in the West when used in his own homeland, where one of the most revered figure in the history of Uruguayan football is Obdulio Varela, captain of the side that won the World Cup in 1950 whose nickname was "El Negro Jefe", meaning the black boss, the word sounded like a racial insult so poor old Suarez had to pay.

One is reminded of the official in Washington who was forced to resign in 1999 for using the word “niggardly” in a speech. Yes, it really happened!

Of course it appears that any number of words are equally toxic, as ex-football player turned TV commentator Alan Hanson discovered this week when he found himself clinging to his job and forced to issue grovelling apologies on account of having uttered the word “coloured” during a discussion about alleged “racism” in football. Does anyone care to bet on whether whether Hanson will suddenly vanish from out TV screens in they which David Starkey appears to have done since he accused white rioters of adopting black culture

At the same time, the infamous “tram lady” Emma West is spending Christmas on bail following having been secretly filmed failing to express sufficient delight at her enriched multicultural environment, and England football captain John Terry is facing criminal prosecution for allegedly using an unkind word to a black player with whom he was having a heated encounter.

As British readers will also know there is a trial taking place at the Old Bailey, however, for the time being I demur from referring to that, given what happened to Rod Liddle when he did so

However, there is a purpose tor all these trials, the same purpose for which other totalitarian police states and dictatorships have used similar show trials at different times and in different places. When rulers seek to impose unpopular policies on their citizens, they require victims whom they can make examples of, punish, humiliate and destroy so as to frighten the public into obedience, and to silence any objections to what is being done.

These trials, together with the regular press vilification of anyone who ventures into prohibited speech, either by accident or design, are intended to silence dissent, and they are very effective.

Our rulers depend on the fact that few of the public are sophisticated enough to draw a distinction between “racism” and legitimately opposing mass immigration. Of course, it has never been illegal, or indeed racist to oppose mass immigration, but it has always felt as if it was. That, of course, is deliberate, as the establishment, together with their acolytes in the press and entertainment media have done everything in their power to make it feel that way.

Show trials were of course a feature of Nazi Germany, but, as with much else they were perfected to an art form in Stalin's Russia, where, by very publicly eradicating members of the pre-revolutionary Bolshevik party, for made up or ideological crimes, the cunning old monster achieved the dual result of getting rid of potential rivals, whilst at the same time keeping the Russian public terrified and obedient.

Show trials can also be used as racial retribution, such as in South Africa where four white teen aged boys can be convicted of murder and sent to prison on the evidence of the body of someone killed elsewhere, by someone else and at a different time.

However, such trials are intended to placate a racist majority, rather than to intimidate the majority as is the purpose of show trials in the West.

Trials conducted in order to influence the behaviour of the wider public and where the punishment of the defendant is a secondary consideration are nothing new. For instance, as early as 1756, the trial and subsequent execution of Admiral Byng for "failure to do his utmost" to relieve the siege of the British garrison on Minorca” was less about punishing the unfortunate Byng than it was about ensuring that other Admirals would try considerably harder in future.

Likewise the prosecution and swift dispatch of poor shell-shocked wretches, on charges of cowardice, during the so called "Great War" were ruthless and cruel attempts to make other young soldiers view staying in those terrible trenches and fighting that evil and misguided war, slightly less terrifying than running away.

In very many ways the prosecutions of John Terry and Emma West serve a very, very similar purpose. They are show trials, they are exhibitions, they are theatre, they punish, humiliate and usually destroy the offender but they are intended for the audience, the public. They are acts of terror, intended to make us obey.

____________________________________
Pour encourager les autres: "in order to encourage the others" —said ironically of an action (as in a flogging or an execution) carried out in order to compel others to obey or submit

EDL Leader Tommy Robinson attacked by "Youths"

2011-12-23T07:28:00.000-08:00

Earlier this week EDL leader Tommy Robinson was attacked and beaten up by a gang of muslims.

Reports here and here.

_________________________________
Hat Tip: Mister Fox

Richard Barnbrook’s Christmas and New Year Message

2011-12-20T14:17:00.000-08:00

Dear Fellow Nationalists

The end of 2011 and the beginning of 2012 is a good opportunity to take stock.

It is now more than 18 months since the General Election. And some 15 months since I was expelled from the British National Party. We need to ask ourselves, what has been achieved for the nationalist cause in this country in that time?

The last year has not just been a time of stagnation but regression. Yet the dire political situation that the nation finds itself in is worse than ever. And what’s more, as the recession bites, job prospects recede and the pressure on public resources becomes ever more greater, exacerbated by the influx of some 250 000 NET incomers in the last 12 months alone, the smouldering discontent and impatience for change rumbles ever louder. What is needed is a cogent political force to represent this discontent, and it’s needed more so now than ever before.

Looking round at the various nationalist blog sites, written by leading lights in the nationalist cause, it’s patently obvious that we are all singing from the same hymn sheet. What can’t be agreed upon is which church we should all be singing in! Broadly speaking, there is a general agreement on the problems which beset our country: a loud lament about our loss of national identity and cultural heritage, the surrender of sovereignty, deprivation of free speech, social injustice, appalling remoteness of the parasitic politicians, increasing islamification… we all know what we think. What we lack however, is a cohesive political mechanism that enables us to present these views to the electorate, packaged as a viable realistic, electable alternative to vote for at the ballot box. All in all, the public are sympathetic to the policies that we roundly subscribe to. What we need to present to them is ONE united and positive front that can demonstrate a plausible and responsible organisation to implement them.

At the beginning of the year, I personally wrote to Nigel Farage of UKIP, Nick Griffin of the BNP, and Robin Tilbrook of the English Democrats, as well as Tommy Robinson of the English Defence League, inviting them to a meeting to discuss a way forward in which the nationalist parties can co-operate in order to become this united political force, a force that the media can no longer ignore. Now a year has gone by and there’s been no movement in this respect. It’s been another year wasted, for what have we achieved?

How many more years are we going to let pass until we get our act together? 2012 will see the GLA elections in London. I don’t wish to sound like a prophet of doom, but I tell you here and now that on present showings there will be NO nationalist representation on the Greater London Assembly next summer. No nationalist from any of the parties! By each going it alone, instead of co-operating, we are allowing ourselves to be pushed out of the political picture- for good. And meanwhile, our historic. cultural and national heritage is slowly but steadily being annihilated.

Many of you have left one party and joined another; some have come together and started new ones, but this is not the answer. You can have as many new parties as there are stars in the sky and it won’t change the situation in this country one jot. The only answer open to us now is to co-operate and ultimately to unite, painful as this may be to some. There is bound to be resistance by those in the parties’ leadership. So it’s up to the grass roots to force through change.

The greatest victories have always been attained by great sacrifice and so it is today. We have to look at how we can make the best with what we have and struggle to build solutions instead of criticising those who have made mistakes. What’s been said and done has been said and done. We will never move forward with negativity. Now we have to look forward and see what can be rescued from the debris.

The Romans were able to subdue Britain because the Celtic tribes were unable to put their own petty interests before those of the country as a whole and present a united front. We simply cannot afford to make the same mistake again! Because if we do, there will be no future for our children. Britain will soon be changed irrevocably forever unless we work together now to resist it!

With grand hopes for the unity of all nationalist entities and right thinking Britons in the coming year, and wishing you each and all, a peaceful Christmas and a prosperous and successful 2012,

Yours sincerely

Richard Barnbrook

The Sixty Year Experiment.

2011-12-19T11:40:00.000-08:00

By Caratacus

Experiments on humans, animals and plants are highly regulated in civilised nations. Experimenters are bound by rules of morality and ethics. There must be agreement by the subjects. They must be carefully afforded "informed consent", with detailed descriptions of the risks and rewards.

The experimenters have the duty of declaring vested interests. Particularly they must reveal possible personally benefit from the outcome of the experiment.

Experiments are, by convention, given a restricted time frame, for review and reassessment. If it seems that the experiment is not going to be beneficial to humans, plants or animals, that experiment must be curtailed forthwith.

********************************************************************

Since the advent of Homo sapiens, strong biological forces have inexorably separated people into their different "types" by geographical area.

An inherent quality of biology, beyond control, has generated this distinction between humans. These separating paths have lead to the genetic, racial, biochemical and the behavioural varieties of humans.

Progressive separation of humans also drove the divergence which has created the thousands of human languages. Most are now so distant from each other to be mutually unintelligible. People will continue to form enclaves of similar genetic and language groups.

The creation of human bio-diversity has always been inevitable.

*******************************************************

Sixty years ago, the governments of Western Europe began an experiment on their entire human population. It was, and remains, the largest biological experiment ever conducted.

This experimental design was to attempt to reverse human bio-diversity. To do that governments brought, and allow to remain as a breeding sub-set, people of different genes, races, cultures and languages into the geographical boundaries of Britain and Europe.

The political hypothesis was to test whether the distinctions between different varieties of humans, would progressively lessen if brought into Europe. It was guessed that ultimately these varied people (and their varied cultures) would amalgamate seamlessly, to the benefit of all.

The term “integration" was conjured.

It soon became clear that conflict was probable. Aggressive rioting between the races occurred. Integration was not going to work.

Therefore the experiment was modified to test whether intuitive human behaviour could be changed under threat of law. The native populations were ordered not to reveal that they recognised (the obvious) distinctions between the existing inhabitants and the aliens. They were ordered to curtail any discourse amongst themselves, which might emphasise these distinctions.

The term “criminal racism” was invented

Since “integration” had failed the experimental basis was changed again. Instead of integrating, could these differing groups instead function along-side one with the other?

The term "multiculturalism" was coined.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Bizarrely, in an exact parallel, multiculturalism was attempted in South Africa, in an attempt to protect the cultural and genetic homogeny of resident Europeans. The description was "separate development".

The outcome was a cascade of inflamed, ruthless and hypocritical condemnation by the continental Europeans. This attempt at self-protection by a small, minority group was destroyed by bullying.
Ironically the “anti-apartheid movement” was later going to have important destructive sequelae in Europe.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

The Governments of Europe could have only one moral justification this experimentation. That was to ensure the long term safety, well-being and contentment of their populations and their progeny.What mandate did the governments have to commence this experiment, which by its very design would bring disequilibrium and so fear to European Societies?

They had none. The population was not consulted.

Instead in an unbelievable arrogance and opinionated superiority these politicians, amateur scientists that they are, forced into place this massive, irreversible, naïve, rationally indefensible and highly dangerous idea.

***********************************************************************

Synchronous with this experiment on humans was another political experiment on a massive ecological system.

This “good idea” was to play manipulator of the living and to bring the Nile Perch into Lake Victoria Nyanza. That lake had one of the most diverse fish environments on earth.

The perch was surreptitiously introduced in 1954, and more official introductions occurred in 1962 and 1963.

The end result of that experiment was to destroy the highly refined and complex ecology of the second widest body of fresh water in the world.

The experiment so altered the freshwater ecosystem of Lake Victoria that several hundred species became extinct or near extinction. This politically engineered event was likely the largest extinction event amongst vertebrates in the 20th century

The impact on the local economy was the subject of the documentary Darwin's Nightmare.

********************************************************
The analogy between the past destruction of the East African ecosystem and the impending destruction of the European Civilisation should be clear.

Both were based on “Political Good Ideas”.

Both were philosophically and scientifically flawed from foundation.

Both were doomed.

********************************************************

Sixty years ago, the governments of Western Europe embarked on an experiment on their entire human population. It was, and remains, the largest biological experiment ever conducted.

It breaches the most fundamental guidelines of experimentation and transgresses every component of the rules and restraints experimentation.

It has been clear, from the outset that this was not going to afford the Europeans the benefit of greater contentment and greater safety.1

Was the population, the "experimental sample", informed of this? Were they told of the hazards and potential?

The short answer is no.

Was the experiment terminated when it became clear that it was failing?

No.

But there was a parallel subplot which allowed a small group of people, the politicians, to benefit themselves greatly. Immigration has been used to buy politicians power, and bolster their tenure.

This was scientific fraud at its worst, and by its magnitude the most despicable, condemnable and outrageous travesty of a political mandate, contrary to all understandings of democracy, morality and ethics.

This blind endeavour has as much chance of success as a king ordering the retreat of the tides.

For the sake humanity, the survival of the European and God’s wondrous diversity, this experiment must be curtailed forthwith.
_____________________________________________

(1) The Empire Windrush docked in Tilbury on 21 June 1948 becoming a landmark in the history of migration to the UK. On the 22 June 1948 11 MPs wrote to the Prime Minister, Clement Attlee. The letter was signed by JD Murray, CF Grey, James Harrison, Frank Mcleavy, RWG Mackay, T Reid, Louis Tolley, TJ Brooks, JR Leslie, Percey Holman and Meredith F Titterington. They expressed concern that large numbers of "coloured" immigrants might "impair the harmony, strength and cohesion of our public and social life and to cause discord and unhappiness among all concerned."

New Year Resolution by Mike Wilson

2011-12-17T07:27:00.000-08:00

New Year Resolution

By Mike Wilson

The year is coming to an end and now it’s time to make and mend
And make good all that’s gone before and never mind the open door.
It’s time to set our house in order and close the book on rank disorder.
Time to think and time to plan and time to resurrect each man.

We ask ourselves, “What have we done”, and wonder where the year has gone.
And then we find that whilst we mused so many of us were abused
By state and council and by church and end up feeling in the lurch.
So stop your musing, get in line and start to make this life divine.

Defend the rights of common man, stand up, speak out, you know you can.
Demand they change these stupid laws that make a mockery, full of flaws
Of social justice, law and order and whatever else they call disorder.
It’s nothing but a thin disguise to simply qualify all their lies.

We ask for nothing but the truth so we can help our rampant youth
So they may understand the plan which makes a slave of common man.
Self- serving people in the know control our world and make it so
That others who are less observing give in to those who are self serving.

It’s time we voted with our feet and showed the “pollies” that defeat
Will come if they persist in trying to keep the flag of Brussels flying.
Now it’s time for nationhood, a quality that’s misunderstood
By MP’s filling up the ranks and building credit in their banks.

We need to vote for people here who have the nation’s interests clear
And won’t resile from hard reforms that go against the EU’s norms.
So greet the New Year with good grace and have a smile upon your face.
Remember that you have the power to change your world – seize the hour!

Michael Coren with Peter Brimelow (VDare): immigration

2011-12-17T07:14:00.000-08:00

_______________
Hat tip: Mister Fox

Youth charged with killing farmer after "Argument"

2011-12-13T12:04:00.000-08:00

A 17-year-old youth has been arrested for the murder of a farmer in Merweville, in the Western Cape, police said on Tuesday.

Frederick Snyders, 35, and his wife were sitting on their porch when one of their farm workers walked up to them on Monday evening, he allegedly took the deceased's rifle out of his truck which was was parked outside and suddenly fired a shot in his direction, killing him instantly with a single gunshot to his head.

The youth fired further shots at the farmer's wife but missed. According to the report the alleged killer later handed over the rifle to the wife before handing himself over to the police.

The youth apparently worked on the farm at the time of the incident and police believe the motive for this murder was "an argument" between the farmer and the youth on Monday afternoon,

Report

The Conservative Idea of Architecture: Conservation and Restoration

2011-12-13T09:33:00.000-08:00

by David Hamilton (December 2011)

First published by the New English Review

Progressives assume that I am opposed to change. I am not: I suggest change should grow out of what has developed through time not spring out of the blue, as it were, like incongruous eruptions ruining the ambience of whole areas. “You can not turn the clock back”, they moralise. What have clocks got to do with it? That harks back a couple of centuries to when God was seen as the watchmaker who had wound a clockwork universe up and left it to run.

Progressives still see the world as a machine. Le Corbusier thought of building houses as building machines for people to live in. His Villa Savoye is exemplary of his goal to create a house which would be a "machine a habiter," a machine for living (in). Houses that have grown out of tradition have a quality called “homeliness that is in softer interior angles and allows people to enjoy living in them by gathering in some rooms but having rooms to attend to personal business separate. Villa Savoye illustrates Le Couturier’s "five points" of new architecture and is a foundation of modern architecture, and the International style that came to dominate.

Even functional buildings can be awe-inspiring like the Houses of Parliament which was built for debating issues of state; but its design raised above mere function and conveys the solemnity and respect for the business of state. It is more than a square lump of concrete. (1)

There is an affective view of society as an organic arrangement that derives from Aristotle, the first Conservative. In Politics he spoke of the city as a natural community. It is an organic whole rather than a machine and the whole is harmed by destroying parts. In the architectural and town planning context, demolishing fine and beautiful buildings and replacing them with cold and ugly buildings, undermines the quality and identity of the whole town or city. Aristotle described men and women as political animals but, more accurately, they are communal beings and need to belong to a family and community. Contemporary architecture both commercial and domestic is helping break the bonds which create living communities.

Lock’s atomising view of society as an aggregation of independent, autonomous individuals has caused much self-deception because we are not abstract individuals but flesh and blood men and women who need traditional and historic communities; our culture once shaped by religion is now shaped by a Global ideology of Corporatism driven by oligarchs.

People like to describe themselves as individuals because it flatters their egos but in practice they need others: friends, to talk to and to share with, a family to return to when hurt or distressed and a a partner when they leave childhood behind and want children of their own. This is a natural stage in life as they want an external sign of their togetherness and they grow naturally into that state. Architecture is a part of that affective side of life. It is not a distant artistic activity like knocking up a couple of watercolours, it is central to our lives. These are emotional, affective experiences not products of reason.

Within the organism new buildings should be in keeping with the character of the places they are added to; the character, traditions and identity should be honoured and new buildings developed from that. This is applying practical thinking, instead of abstract thinking.

It is part of an understanding of the universe which values the numinous things over the cold and soulless.

The contemporary ethos is secular and nihilistic and people believe in nothing but themselves and self-gratification. We need a belief in service and self–sacrifice, belief in belonging to a greater whole; but what we have is self-fulfilment in things. Into this emptiness pours the gratifications of the selfish and to the powerful their own aggrandisement. This is secular nihilism. Those in authority feel they owe nothing to the past but contempt; the opinion formers and populariser's in the colleges and the media inculcate that negativity into the population. Contemporary architecture is part of that.

The incongruous developments all round St. Paul’s Cathedral undermine the whole and the local authorities knew this when they granted planning permission so we must assume they wanted to degrade St. Paul, a national symbol. If the authorities thought they could get away with it they would knock St. Paul's down for a shopping mall; but it brings in a lot of revenue from tourism.

Our towns and cities are being changed into something completely different without the consent of the people. Cityscapes are ceasing to belong to local people and being turned into futuristic muddles, disjointed from history and traditions with the character changed. This is imposed, but should be democratically voted for.

Restoration House in Rochester is two medieval buildings joined in the late16 or early 17c and is an example of a city mansion. King Charles I sojourned there on the eve of The Restoration, whence its name. It is Miss Haversham’s home, Satis House, in Great Expectations. It was left empty when the owner went bankrupt. The council were going to knock it down for a car park but thankfully a banker rescued it. During a development for apartments next door a Tudor wall was discovered. Immediately the developer demolished about 10m before they could be stopped by English Heritage who listed it as a Grade 2 construction. The developer had not undertaken an archaeological survey which was a condition of the planning consent. This saga is still going on.

Rochester High Street, has wide pavements and old-style lamp posts. It is unique for the absence of the usual High Street retailers. The shops are small and not attractive to national retailers so it has a large number of traditional shops and many are family-owned and offer a personalised service to customers. Rochester High Street is an educational contrast to the mess made of both Chatham and Gillingham High Streets. Gillingham does have a conservation area in Brampton with some fine Georgian houses in Mansion Row; but the changes to Gillingham since the 1970's are depressing.

The old Theatre Royal in Chatham High Street was smothered in polythene and scaffolding for a long time but once the bulldozers had finished it had gone.

Nearly opposite the Old Theatre Royal is a repellent nine-floor Tax Office. This overlooks the river and blights the view. Another monstrosity is the Pentagon shopping centre which holds within its confines, Mountbatten House: another ugly multi-storey building. This hideous thing blocks the view of the river from the top of Chatham Hill. There was a rumour that the same type of bricks used to build Mountbatten House were to be found in the extensions erected on houses owned by councillors. It was empty for a long time after it was built and one wonders why it it was given planning permission.

The centre of Chatham has been carved up by a one way system and many shops are empty as they cannot compete with the out of town shopping centres.

The numinous is a feeling of, or a need for, the sacred, the holy, and the transcendent. This need is the basis of a the yearning for beauty, awe, grandeur in public buildings; in housing schemes it manifests as a need for community, neighbourhood and its concomitant, mutual support. It is in this numinous aspect of life that people seek community and through this identity, a sense of belonging, a connection with their origins and thus happiness. In practice these ideals fall short but they are worth striving for, and give life meaning in what is being made into an empty world.

In Tewkesbury there is a row of restored timber framed buildings on Church Street which were built in 1480. These house a museum named after local writer and early conservationist John Moore, and an open house that people can walk around and get the feel of how a Tudor family lived. The rest, though, are private dwellings and thus a living tradition. This is continuity in practice.

Our cathedrals provide a strong sense of continuity: a thread through history which locates us in space and time. It is well to keep an image of the beauty of cathedrals in mind when viewing Global skyscrapers. The character and identity is in the whole but the parts convey the same. Take the cloisters of Gloucester cathedral where great beauty is created by the beautiful fan vaulting that was developed in the 1300s by the masons. These were completed no later than 1412 and their beauty still transcends and mystifies us. We stand fascinated before it. It provides a spiritual experience in itself. The numinous quality is in the decoration and ornamentation, which was done in the service of something higher, something sacred and transcendent – God.

A commenter remarked that under my ideas the Eiffel Tower would not have been allowed. That maybe so--you can not allow for every possible occurrence, but, there would not be this widespread ruining of the characters, histories and identities of towns and cities throughout the world; the deculturation caused by standardised international buildings. (2)

For a conservative, conservation includes not only the natural environment but also the social community which needs traditional culture as a spine to hold it together. Conservatism is not a body of theory but a disposition to maintain the culture and community of one's society. It is a temperament with an an appreciation of the numinous things in life from religion to meaningful buildings.

Roger Scruton dismissed the organic as a metaphor but language originates in metaphor as we try to describe the world around us and because objects have no intrinsic names. To say the world is a machine is also a metaphor. There is a discernible Traditional Conservative approach to town planning and architecture that we are developing.

American conservatives tend to be more abstract than their British counterparts because their origins were in the dawn of the Liberal era. Brett Stevens of Amerika.org has original views on architecture and conservation which is an American variant but part of the same general movement. (3)

Tradition develops with additions but these should be within pre-existing parameters and should be harmonious and balanced. Contemporary schemes demolish whole areas and break the tradition by not fitting into their surroundings and make whole areas disjointed muddles. This adds to the deculturation of local people who cease to feel they belong. This not the “shock of the new.” This is the dissociation of communities by incongruous building.

When architecture grows from tradition, local people, especially the young, are better adjusted and happier. Conversely, there is a syndrome of social, cultural, political and environmental pressures that are dissociating people from their communal identity, severing them from traditional civilizing structures that their ancestors could take for granted and leaving them feeling out of place and angry towards their social environments.

Those who react to the alienness of contemporary buildings often resort to discussing architecture in aesthetics terms, but it is more than that; it embodies our history and represents where our forebears were born and raised which links local people to their roots; contemporary planning and architecture atomises communities. Our town and city centres are being changed from the welcoming places of historic buildings, into cold, unwelcoming areas. Historic buildings draw one into the culture and community but contemporary buildings repel and push people out dissociating them from the community.

Initially, the modern person was optimistic and had a sense of release from prejudices but this has left people bereft and with a sense of loss. They respond by forming artificial communities like gangs and prey on other people. Modern rationalism and architecture are part of what had liberated people from closed societies but the eradication of old restraints through a vision of a society where the parochialisms and animosities of a world founded upon kinship, village, and church would be abolished, brought loss of culture and community which caused feelings of depression and futility.

History is expressed in traditional architecture: Ghent town hall is on the site where the town's representatives and guild's men met in separate houses until they needed more room for their business when a large town hall was built in 1484. This in turn was considered too small and from 1518 until 1535 a new and much bigger town hall was constructed in late-gothic style. (4)

In 1540 Ghent refused to pay taxes to Charles V for his war with France so he subjected the town to reprisals. One third of the town hall had been erected and it was only from 1572 that they could resume building the town hall. The architectural style had changed by then and several renaissance-style parts were added until the beginning of the 18th century. In 1750 a construction in Louis XV-style was added as the seat of the 'chamber of the poor', then in the early 19th century the staircases in front of the hall were altered for a visit by Napoleon. The building embodies significant events in the town's history.

Throughout the 19th century several renovations were carried out. The original furniture of the various rooms is either still there or is held at the Bijloke museum of Ghent.

I recall an occasion when a Swedish man asked me for directions to Shrewsbury Station. He had been too much with “Bacchus and his pards” but unable to be “charioted” by them wanted to catch a train back to Leeds. I had difficult time convincing him that Shrewsbury station was a railway station - he was convinced that it was a cathedral.

The station is copybook example of appropriate building. It was opened in October 1848 for the first railway from Shrewsbury to Chester. And the architect was Thomas Penson of Oswestry. The building is unusual, in that the station was extended between 1899 and 1903 by the construction of a new floor underneath the original station building, rather than on top.

The style was imitation Tudor, and had carvings of Tudor style heads around the window frames to match the Tudor building of Shrewsbury School which is now used for Shrewsbury Library on the other side of the road. They took care that it fitted in and did not ruin the ambiance of the area as contemporary buildings do. The main building of the station is a Grade II listed building.

A view I have proposed is the rebuilding of certain awe-inspiring and important traditional buildings that have been wantonly demolished. One example is the once grand Euston railway station in London. The proposed new station is appalling and even more grotesque than the last one whereas the original was redolent of grandeur and respect for the tradition and culture it was being added to. It should be restored to what it was. (5)

A short stroll along Euston Road brings us to St. Pancras station which nearly got demolished in 1960s but, luckily, escaped and was renovated in the 2000s at a cost of £800 million. It is adjacent to Kings Cross station and near to the stunningly decorated St. Pancras Renaissance Hotel. These restorations show how respect and pride in the community can be revived. (6)

Berlin Castle is being restored. It has a beautiful baroque-style façade which incorporates the Schlüterhof and the "Kings Lodgings" in the Renaissance-part of the building at the Spree-site. This is the modern age so this is to be converted into a first class hotel with finance from the private sector but it is being recreated not completely lost.

The palace is intended to be the main tourist attraction in Berlin. Dresden Church has been rebuilt as have other historic parts of the city.

Progressives argue that the building of St. Paul’s Cathedral departed from the usual style of churches at the time and caused an uproar. That misses the point which is that was one building by a highly respected architect but the contemporary situation is the character of whole areas being changed by international oligarchs with unelected town planners and local councillors who are elected by a minority of eligible voters changing our urbiscapes into something else. That is not a strange new building but the transformation of London into something different and by imposition not democratic means.

Some European countries have preserved whole medieval towns. Sighisoara is a deeply impressive fortified town in Transylvania, Romania. The town with medieval houses is very important for European culture and history. (7) The defence system was built by medieval guilds consisted of a wall of 930 meters in length, fourteen defence towers and five artillery bastions. Nine towers, two bastions and a part of the precinct wall have been conserved. The Clock Tower became the symbol of the town.

The Council held their meetings there and the local archives and treasury were housed there. The Venetian House, named after the stone window frames built in imitation of Venetian Gothic, are from the 10th century. The Vlad Dracul House, the former Paulini house, seems to be the most ancient civil stone construction of the city. The House With Stag called after stag head fixed to the corner of the building, is a construction specific to the Transylvanian Renaissance and dates from around the 17th century.

This town links Romanians with their origins and affirms their identity. It makes them feel more Romanian. The experience of looking at the Shard, in London, is excitement but that is temporary and on the surface; the experience of looking at say say, Manchester Town Hall, is much deeper. It can range from pleasure or delight to awe and even deeper contemplations of our whole identity and place in our history.

Tallinn in Estonia has a new part and old town which has winding cobblestone lanes, iron street lamps, Gothic spires and medieval markets. It was built between the 13th and 16th centuries when it was a busy member of the Hanseatic trade league. It has colourful, gabled houses, half-hidden courtyards and grand churches. This is within a mainly intact city wall and peppered with guard towers. It links local people to their roots and consolidates their identity. (8)

Freedom Square (Vabaduse väljak) is living continuity of their history. It is from the final days of the Tsars and through Estonia's first period of independence in the Old Town it was a national symbol. It is a focus of civic pride and a popular public meeting place.

Dubrovnik on the Dalmatian coast has had tragedy: although it was badly damaged by an earthquake in 1667, its Gothic, Renaissance and Baroque churches, monasteries, palaces and fountains, have survived; it was damaged again in the 1990s in the war with Croatia and Serbia but is now being restored under the auspices of UNESCO.

Other European master-works and old towns were rebuilt as they had been before they were destroyed such as The Cloth House in Brussels and the old town in Warsaw. We need to begin this process here not to correct war damage but to repair the ruination wreaked by local councils. (9)

Birmingham has never recovered from Manzoni's depredations in the late 50s and I don't think it can without restoring some of the historic buildings that were demolished in the late 50s and early 60s. The old library with its round reading room and The Woodman pub to name but two.

A walk round Gloucester is a mixed blessing: some outstanding buildings of historic import are undermined by having repellent square blocks of concrete that pass for shops interspersed between them. I'm sure demolishing the hideous ones to restore the historic buildings would in turn restore the character and ambience of the city as a whole.

Newcastle seems chopped up. There is little harmony and balance left. This great city like Birmingham had people imprisoned for corruption in rebuilding their cities with buildings that have none of the qualities of grace, charm, grandeur of those they destroyed. A priority in Newcastle should be to rebuild Eldon Square that was demolished for a run-of-the-mill shopping centre.

World-famous historic cities like York and Cambridge have modern shops. Cambridge built the large Grafton Centre outside the city so the two can co-exist; Bristol has Cabot Circus.

In Europe grand and magnificent buildings are part of the identity and history but are also beneficial to the economy because they are also great tourist attractions. The primary motive is economic but the recreated buildings have a beneficial effect because it strengthens local community and identity. The local authorities in Coventry have realised that destroying this once beautiful medieval city for the temporary attraction of shopping malls was a mistake. Well, time to start rebuilding them. They did move several old buildings into one area called Spon Street but they need to restore many of the better ones to the rest of the city to give it some ba.

It would improve the city to demolish most of the concrete shops and offices they have. I had a meeting with the Conservation Officer of Coventry City Council three years ago but he dismissed my idea of rebuilding the many traditional buildings they destroyed -- he might think differently about it now.

____________________________
(1) http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/cas/fnart/Corbu.html
(2) http://www.newenglishreview.org/custpage.cfm/frm/60828/sec_id/60828
(3) http://www.amerika.org/globalism/return-to-beauty/
(4) http://www.trabel.com/gent/gent-townhall.htm
(5) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euston_railway_station
(6) http://www.e-architect.co.uk/london/st_pancras_station.htm
http://www.marriott.com/hotels/travel/lonpr-st-pancras-renaissance-london-hotel/
(7) http://www.vacance-roumanie.com/travel_Romania/sighisoara_Romania.html
(8) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tallinn
(9) http://www.stadtschloss-berlin.de/englisch.html

Recommended reading:

Our Culture, What's Left of It: the Mandarins and the Masses Theodore Dalrymple, 2005
The Quest for Community Robert A. Nisbit, 1953
Rationalism in Politics Michael Oakeshott, 1948

"The Prisoner" Freed on bail?

2011-12-13T07:57:00.000-08:00

There are reports that Emma West "the suspected tram racist" has been freed on bail following a closed door hearing at Croydon Crown court. Whether or not this is true, it was not before the poor woman had spent over a week in prison and been subjected to a frenzy of internet hatred all because she said stuff which the state and a bunch of obedient twitter-stasi disapproved of.

Irrespective of this latest development, which may well have been a result of the level of outrage on the internet regarding Ms.West's treatment, the reaction of the state and a section of the public to the secretly filmed video which was posted to YouTube reveals some very disturbing truths about Britain in 2011.

However, will Emma's children be returned to her?

The following article by Daniel Greenfield was published on the Canada Free Press site on Sunday, whilst Emma West still languished in prison, and examines those truths in a very clear and illuminating manner, its impact is not diminished at all by today's events coming as they did a week too late. I recommend it to you.

The Prisoner

By Daniel Greenfield

Few other places turn out dystopian fantasies quite like the United Kingdom and if the United States has never quite become the chrome skyscraper and flying car utopian wonderland of its utopian fantasies, with its ubiquitous cameras and DNA banks, the United Kingdom seems well on the way to its dystopian destination.

1984, The Prisoner and V for Vendetta are all a train ride away nowadays. Say the wrong thing and you can expect to be wearing a prison suit and nominated for a national run on Two Minute Hate.

Towards the end of last month, the UK launched a nationwide manhunt or womanhunt, in coordination with online activists, Labour politicians and the police to bring the most feared criminal in the islands to justice. The lady, whose last name is appropriately enough West, will be spending Christmas in prison away from her three children. Her crime was to engage in some abrasive taunts with the denizens of the New Britain complete with obscenities and be videotaped doing it.

West was hunted down, tips were solicited from the public, Ed Miliband, the leader of the Labour opposition, who always manages to wear the face of a well-meaning idiot, retweeted the “important appeal” to track down a woman who was threatening the nation by shouting on a tram that the Poles, Nicaraguans and Blacks should go back where they came from.

Needless to say the charming fellows from Hizb-Ut-Tahir, Islam4UK, Muslims Against Crusades or their associated groups rarely have to spend Christmas or Eid in prison no matter how many poppies they burn or how many slurs they shout. Anjem Choudary is not likely to touch off any morality mobs on Twitter. The same people who desperately sought Emma would sneer at the Daily Mail mentality for even acknowledging good old Anjem.

And around a week or so later the very generous Judge Robert Brown freed four Muslim women who beat a native British woman senseless while shouting racial slurs at her, judging that it was only their inexperience with alcohol that led them to misbehave. The Romans used to say In Vino Veritas, but in New Britain if you’re Muslim and drunk you get a free pass on assault.

Emma West shouting, “What has this country come to? A load of black people and a load of ****ing Polish,” merits a nationwide manhunt, but beat a native woman senseless while shouting, “Kill the white slag” and the kindly English judge will be sure to see your side of it. Similarly smash the windows of Jewish stores and you get more judicial kindness, but say the wrong thing about Nicaraguans on a tram and you can expect to be sent to jail for “your own protection”.

For all the shouty “vile racist tram rant” headlines, Emma West cutting loose is a familiar enough experience to anyone who rides the New York City subways. I can’t begin to count how many times a lady or gentleman have gotten up in the car to express their feelings about white people or the devil or the government. And being experienced dwellers in a multicultural city, we know enough to read our books and switch cars at the next station if they become too agitated without anyone being sent off to prison.

There was once a notion that a liberal society would be an open society, but that door has shut some time back as its activists have discovered that the only way to have an open society is to close the door on any populist dissent. Their kind of liberalism is notoriously unpopular and cannot be sustained without control of the media, regular editions of Two Minute Hate and the baton and the prison cell.
The “I disagree with you but will die to defend your right to speak” society is all but dead, and it has been replaced by the “I disagree with you and will sentence you to prison” society.

The “I disagree with you but will die to defend your right to speak” society is all but dead, and it has been replaced by the “I disagree with you and will sentence you to prison” society. Disagreeing with an Emma West is no longer an option. Dismissing her views as garden variety bigotry that is an unfortunate reality no longer passes either. No she must be tracked down and sent to prison.

This really isn’t about bigotry, if it were, then beating a woman senseless while shouting racial slurs at her would not result in a suspended sentence. It isn’t even about race, it’s about a power structure that uses race to cover its own multitude of sins. Multiculturalism has become the metaphor for a changing nation, and while it is as of yet not illegal to oppose change, it can be made illegal to oppose the Broken Britain that it leads to.

The morality mob that went after Emma West showed off the same insecurity that is behind Muslim hysteria over a cartoon of Mohammed. This is not the behaviour of confident people who are secure in their views, it is an outburst of state violence from the 1 percent who are terrified of losing their grip on power.

The dystopian fantasies which imagined that a police state would be the product of some right wing takeover never seemed to anticipate that just as in the east, it would be the left that would resort to it. That is where George Orwell, who came out of the left, proved far wiser than many other writers. The police state is a consequence of the left’s failures, its economic failures and its demographic failures. That is as true in the United States as it is in the UK as it is in Israel and throughout what was once known as the free world.
Multiculturalism and prosperity can uncomfortably exist side by side, but multiculturalism and poverty cannot

Multiculturalism and prosperity can uncomfortably exist side by side, but multiculturalism and poverty cannot. Worse yet when you invite in half the world while destroying your own economy and segmenting what is left into government work, private sector jobs requiring a higher education and the dole, then you create your own nightmares and they will walk the streets and beat you senseless.

Systems like that are inherently unstable, the deeper they go into debt, the more unstable they become and the more the people at the top begin behaving like the crooked heads of bankrupt companies, cooking the books and lashing out violently at anyone who might notice.

Emma West is dangerous in a way that Anjem Choudary isn’t. The day may come when someone like Anjem is the Emir of a truly New Britain, but that day won’t come for a while. The Religion of Peace is not yet a majority in the country. But the people at the top and their cronies do fear that there may be a majority of Emma Wests, if not a majority, then enough to cause them trouble.

West is apolitical, there was no agenda or philosophy on display here, she was saying what so many think. And that is dangerous. The Western left is well aware that beyond its bubble are struggling people dealing with the everyday frustrations that their power and privilege shields them from. These are the people who have not been programmed, but they have been distracted. They are the proles of 1984, the lower classes that no one bothers to closely monitor because they are thought to be incapable of revolution on their own. It goes the extra mile to destroy or suppress their potential leaders and sometimes it sets out to make examples out of people from among their ranks so the proles remember that dissent is punishable.

Gavin Barwell, the allegedly conservative MP for Croydon, praised the power of the social media outsourced police state, and called for a dialogue on “how the evil of racism in our society can finally be eradicated.”

But there really is no need to have a dialogue on the question. Several nuclear wars would do it. Like most human attitudes and feelings, racism cannot be eradicated without also eradicating human beings. And that might be a matter of throwing out the baby with the racist bathwater.

Racism is an aspect of racial identity, just as sexism is an aspect of gender identity, and class resentments are an aspect of class. The attempt to eradicate class by the left has created more inequity, the attempt to eradicate gender identity has been a boom for sexism and homophobia and the attempt to eradicate racism has embedded it even deeper. But the same left which sneers at wars on terror, keeps declaring wars on aspects of human nature and then fails to realize why they may be counterproductive.

Human beings pack along a constellation of identities, and those identities have positive and negative sides to them. A journalist may have a positive identity consisting of his pride in informing the public of important issues and a negative idea which allows him to disdain the public for being so ignorant. The negative side is not particularly attractive and yet it is the natural shadow aspect of his positive side. The two are indivisible.

Click here to continue reading at Canada Free Press

__________

Hat Tip: Mister Fox, Runic, Peter, Bertie Bert at the British Resistance

London twinned with the DRC

2011-12-12T12:26:00.000-08:00

You may not have heard about this, but over the weekend 143 people were arrested on account of a violent riot which took place in Central London. The rioters were protesting in Central London on account of an election result in the (so called) Democratic Republic of Congo, in ....uh ..... Central Africa.

You may not have heard about this as much of the mainstream media appear to have taken a vow of silence over the story, as they always do when events like this cast an unattractive light on their beloved multicultural society.

One can only imagine how differently events would have been reported had a mere 43 white people been arrested for rioting in the nations capital. Their trials would have been daily news fodder for weeks!

Also, as with similar events in the past one has to question why people feel London is an appropriate place to protest against events in third world hell holes which were never even a British colony. It seems that another blessing bestowed by mass immigration is that we must now suffer the unpleasant consequences of events many thousands of miles from our shores.

Report

______________________
Related:

A Congolese Carol

_______________

RamzPaul - My Tram Experience - Emma West and Somalia

2011-12-08T01:10:00.000-08:00

The Truth Exposed

2011-12-06T10:29:00.000-08:00

By Lee John Barnes

We must thank Judge Robert Brown for revealing that white people have no rights or protection in our society.

A gang of Muslim girls who repeatedly kicked a young woman in the head walked free from court after a judge heard they were 'not used to being drunk' because of their religion.

The group screamed 'kill the white slag' while kicks raining in on 22-year-old Rhea Page as she lay motionless on the ground, the court heard.

The attackers - three sisters and their cousin - were told by a judge that normally they would have been sent to jail.

However, he handed the girls - all Somalian Muslims - suspended sentences after hearing that they were not used to alcohol because their religion does not allow it.

Click here to continue reading at 21st Century British Nationalism

News report
_____________________

Meanwhile: "Racist Tram Rant woman", who's children have been taken by the state authorities was remanded in custody until the new year.

Thus stands the state of British Justice in 2011

Our most Precious Commodity – Social Unity.

2011-12-05T10:50:00.000-08:00

By August Pointneuf

Poor, vulnerable Emma West, in her display of agonized stress.

We might not know what the precipitators were but we do know that she was behaving abnormally. A frightened person, frightened for herself and by maternal fear for her child, implanted in an assertively aggressive crowd. She was intimidated by the surrounding alien appearances, by their distinct looks, different dress, foreign voices and, to her, unpredictable behaviour.

She was frightened by being far outnumbered; she was the fearful lone victim in a cascading barrage of screaming paranoiac defensiveness,

Now visualise her instead in a homogenous group: people she was accustomed to and whom she could rely upon to behave predictably. What she needed in her distress was the constancy and the calm equilibrium of a mature society. She could have been with people who did not appear frighteningly different from her culture. Yes, in this context the passengers in that notional tram-of-similar-people would have seen her as behaving waywardly. But Instead of attacking they would have seen her for what she needed, empathy, assistance and compassion. They would have addressed her curious behaviour with calmness. One could have expected these people to accommodate and reconcile what they hoped would be Emma’s temporary aberration. They would have helped her.

Emma West has been accused of “antisocial behaviour”. It is exactly the reverse. She showed, in caricature, the intrinsic mechanism of individuals who attempt to protect and promote their society from forces which they see as alien. That is social behaviour in their terms

Less widely promoted was a counter-attack by MarmiteMan4, young, white and aggressively critical of Emma West.

MarmiteMan4, proudly asserts his fervent, unbridled emotions of youthful enthusiasm. He spouts the beliefs of youth, with proclamation of idealism, and implied defense of the subjugated. It is the spring harbinger of a boy’s social awareness.
It is the social heart of a youthfulness which is yet to reach the patrimonial brain of age.

His divisiveness is not unexpected; it is a natural sub-agendum, which temporally separates youth from age. Youth searches for absolutes: the perspectives of context are the findings of age

The youth-age divide is not harmless. MarmiteMan4 fires the same enthusiasms which propelled the rebellions of recent history.
But it would be expected to resolve. That is the business of the close family and the business of the dinner table shared by the same peoples and a homogenous culture.

How should we interpret the other, more deeply entrenched, social divisions which are apparently irreconcilable?

This cannot be done by looking at them as they are at present. These views and stances have been long incubating, not for years, but generations. What each illustrates, irrespective of the emotive and precipitating causes, is the progressive polarisation of societies. These societies have been confused by the forced juxtapositions of peoples with a variety of origins and beliefs.

There is little point in attempting to rationalize or justify one or the other. Both demonstrate stress, both demonstrate a fragmentation of society. Both demonstrate divergent values, and when viewed alongside one another show how the outcome of political social manipulation will inevitably lead to conflict.

It is possible, of course, for inherently distinct groups of people to reach levels of acceptance of one another and a relative (if impermanent) harmony. But there will always be thresholds at varied levels and to different provocations.

A few overt symbols of one group or the other can rapidly prompt an impulsive and aggressive eruption.

Once one group, or both, is subject to sufficient social pressures – economic or otherwise – and a specific threshold is reached then a feed-back polarisation will intensify unstoppably.

Ultimately all rationale is lost. Crisis is reached. After that there can be no “natural healing”, no spontaneous reversal.

All of this was predictable. Authoritative voices have long been raised against the smug political doctrine of forced “diversity” (or its failed predecessor, forced “integration”).

But these politicians have chosen not to learn. Indeed much of their tactic is founded on divide-and-rule. They seem still intent in their tack despite the onshore winds of increasing social stress which make calamitous internal insurrection now ominous.

Police - " A Crime isn't racist if the victim isn't racist"!!!!!!

2011-12-04T12:16:00.000-08:00

Here is a quote from the police regarding the murder of Danny O'Shea who had his throat cut after being chased by a gang of black "youths"

"We do not know why such a terrible thing happened, but what we do know is that this is not racially motivated as Danny was a popular boy with friends from all cultural backgrounds".

WOW!! does that mean that if Stephen Lawrence had some white friends his killing wasn't racist either??!!!! Why didn't the BBC tell us?

________________________

CORRECTION

I apologise, I misread the article, and note that the statement above was made by Danny O'Shea's mother, not by the police. However a police spokes person did state "I wish to reinforce the family's position that there is nothing to suggest Danny's murder is racially motivated." One has to ask whether the police would have been so quick to rule out a racial motive had a black boy been hunted down and had his throat slit by a gang of whites.

"My Tram Experience" in France

2011-12-03T04:57:00.000-08:00

Please click here to leave a comment and to spread the link

Hat tip: Anon 03:39

Letter to the Home Secretary regarding Emma West

2011-12-02T12:47:00.000-08:00

From: Dr Frank Ellis
To: Theresa May, Home Secretary
Re: The Arrest of Miss Emma West
Date: 2nd December 2011

Dear Home Secretary

I am writing to you to protest the outrageous arrest of Miss Emma West on a charge of allegedly racially abusing Poles and various non-white immigrants. I have to say that I found the video very distressing. It was yet another reminder of the kind of changes that immigrants have inflicted on England. To live in the south-east of England, to have to endure day in and day out the unwelcome presence of millions of non-white immigrants must eventually exact its toll on a member of the white indigenous population. Close and unavoidable contact with blacks is psychologically stressful, culturally repellent, disorientating and often very dangerous. There are no advantages whatsoever, just problems.

There comes a time when a person just cannot take any more. Every day on the BBC and the other monopoly stream media people are told that diversity is a wonderful gift; that immigrants enrich us and so on, ad nauseam. The reality is somewhat different. Immigration is destroying our country and in the process people like Emma West and millions of other white people are being racially, culturally and physically dispossessed and turned into a cowed minority in their own country. Emma West had enough: she speaks for millions of white people.

I cannot see anything in the video that would justify her being arrested. I conclude therefore that the arrest of Emma West was motivated by political expediency and maliciousness. The aim of her arrest was to cow other whites into silence so that they will not speak out against what is happening to England.

Jeremy Hardy (BBC) demands that people who voted for the BNP be executed; Cameron incites hatred and violence towards Nick Griffin MEP by publicly referring to him as ‘a ghastly piece of filth’ and Clarkson says that public sector workers should be executed in front of their families. Clarkson was only being ‘silly’. Is that what Cameron said? And what happens when a young mother speaks for England? You send the useless police, the same cowards who were too frightened to deal with black immigrant rioters in August, to arrest her. Meanwhile the immigrants keep swarming into England, pushing us aside, mocking us and living off the wealth of another nation. And if an Englishwoman protests in language that might be inappropriate in a university seminar (unless you are black and from the hood of course) but summarises the problem in brutally plain English, she is treated as if she is a monster.

Emma West has a son. Her son has been stolen from her. If he suffers any harm from paedophiles, perverts, blacks who hate whites, immigrant doctors who can just about walk and talk - not necessarily decent English - at the same time, you will be responsible. Emma West must be released immediately, reunited with her family and left in peace. Then you can give the order to expel the immigrants. I want my England, my Motherland back. Get on with it.

Frank Ellis

The loss of innocence, truth and justice. Seeing Britain from a distance.

2011-12-02T12:36:00.000-08:00

By Mile Wilson

Throughout the Western world people are under attack from ideologues determined to remove the last vestiges of Western Civilisation as we know it. This ideology from a vicious cadre of criminals infecting the Western world has been developed over the last 50 years in a concerted attempt to revamp our civilisation into a subservient polyglot race. This affects not only Europe but the USA and Australia as well.

So far they have succeeded very well by infecting local politicians with the rewards of office in return for a vote which adds another small piece of the chain on the freedom of Western individuals. The creation of the European Union seemed, at the time, to be a way of improving trade between European nations. Little did we know of the treacherous plan behind it and the sublimation of national governance to a foreign Government centred in Brussels.

Today we can only shake our heads as we see just how far our world has been changed by these criminals. When Enoch Powell gave his rivers of blood speech people thought he was way over the top and he was politically ostracised yet even he would today be stunned by the changes which have occurred in our world. The mass immigration of black people is only one aspect of these changes yet is the one most notably seen. However probably the most insidious is the political correctness apparatus which goes to extreme measures to rescind freedom of speech and freedom of the individual by whatever means is deemed appropriate at the time.

Growing up in Britain just after the war children were cosseted into being children because of what our parents had been through and we were taught right and wrong, good and bad and many of us were innocent and naïve about the ways of the world because in the main our parents wanted to ensure that we never went through what they had to. So our lives were pretty innocent as we were taught that the family was all important, authority was respected in all its forms and education was necessary in order to get a start in life. So most of us did as we were told and followed the same path maybe losing a bit of innocence as we read the “News Of The World” in our teen years and then going on to higher education or learning a trade. None of us realised that momentous events were taking place and even if we had realised it none of us were in a position to do anything about it. Our naivety and our innocence stopped us being aware of these changes until it was too late. Far too late and then when Edward Heath took us into the common market, still then, we did not realise that he had given away our birthright!

We lost our innocence when we were exposed to the bright new media of television and we lost it again when the media machine started to take control of our lives and our minds. Without realising it we were being told what to think, what to buy, how to live and in some cases how to die. Slowly but surely over the ensuing years we have been indoctrinated into the bright new world of political correctness, the rights of the individual and the acceptance of loss of freedom. We know that however we vote in any election we end up with a politician who is bought and paid for by nameless and faceless men in Brussels. We can’t complain about immigration because the immigrant is an individual just like us who has the same rights and freedoms as we do and to complain about it infringes on that individual’s rights and freedom to exist. It does not matter that we are currently drowning in immigrants who exert a tremendous cost on the public purse or on basic resources.

We appear to be powerless to overcome the insanity that has infected this nation where freedom of speech and freedom of the individual have been usurped by the political correctness morons who put us in jail for freely expressing our views. Or the morons who cry shame when we fly the Union Jack or the morons who determine that Christmas carols can’t be sung because it infringes on the rights of illegal immigrants who depend on us for handouts. Or the morons who infect our schools and universities and change history for their own perverse plan. Or the morons who control the rights of students so that teachers are unable to teach properly or the morons who simply want to change our lives because they can.

The older generation still has the values with which they were indoctrinated as children and are still naïve enough, even today, to believe that things will come right in time because they always did in the past. This is probably the main reason why they do not rail against the changes affecting society because they do not see that anyone or anything is behind these changes. They simply believe that society goes through changes and in time will come back to the same values which they have been taught. The younger generation is quite a different aspect altogether. They were brought up in a country where their education was controlled by the new visionaries, where their thinking was already done for them and the media spoon -fed them with the correct points of view. The country that the older generation knew had already ceased to exist and was only found on “ Time Team” or in the pages of “This England” Magazine.

Whether they know it or not the United Kingdom is already welded on to a modified Europe and no matter what the older generation want it can never go back to the glorious days of Great Britain.

We who see from a distance the broken and stolen country that we used to call home can only weep for the past because it has no separate future no separate independence and soon no individual character. Just another European country of indeterminate character where truth, justice and individual freedom only exist in the mind, not in reality.

Authorities take Emma West's children

2011-12-01T22:31:00.000-08:00

"
......We have since learned that since the infamous ‘incident’ on the tram in Croydon, and subsequent to her arrest by the race relations Gestapo, Miss West has had her two young children taken off her by the intrusive and all-powerful social services!

Put this in context: a women mouths off on a tram and she has her kids ripped away from her and she is flung in prison, but a feral hooligan loots and destroys Croydon and gets a slap on the wrist and let off...the injustice is outrageous, don’t you think?"

Continue reading at the British Resistance by clicking here

A crime against the state

2011-11-30T12:44:00.000-08:00

My friend the Green Arrow and others have written a number of articles on The British Resistance Site regarding the recent Internet sensation featuring a young mother secretly filmed on a South London tube expressing her views on issues of immigration and nationality. Links to the various articles at the British Resistance can be found at the bottom of this posting.

The woman in question has been charged with an extraordinarily Orwellian sounding “racially aggravated public order offence” and has been remanded in custody without bail pending psychiatric reports.

This event and the reactions to it both by the police, the judiciary and the general public tell us a great deal about the country we are living in.

One of the things which we in the West once found most frightening about the Old Soviet Union, about Nazi Germany before that and indeed of some of the worst third world dictatorships, was that people could be locked up for expressing the wrong views. That now happens here.

It was once considered noble to state that "I may detest what you say, but would defend to the death your right to say it". Today just to express such a view renders one subject to the suspicion of holding unacceptable views.

We now live in a country where someone can be imprisoned for saying stuff.

Worse than that, all the little Twitter-Nazis on the internet are cheering.

Meanwhile, there isn't a journalist or a mainstream politician with the guts or the honour to speak out against our slide into totalitarianism.

As a society, whatever our politics, we should all find this very frightening.

_____________________________________________

Links to related postings at the British Resistance

Hats off to the Lady on the Tram
Emma West, truth or Racial Harrassment
British First say: Release Emma West Immediately
Kelly Hollingsworth, Emma West and the Rest
Nationalists Vow “Direct action” over Emma West Incarceration

South African farmer killed for a cellphone

2011-11-30T11:36:00.000-08:00

Thomas Ferreira

A Free State family is shattered after their husband and father was shot through the kitchen door of the farm where he grew up.

Mr. Thomas Ferreira (54) owner of the Shell Filling station at Tom's Place outside Bloemfontein and a Bonsmara farmer on the farm Riversford, managed, in his wounded condition to repel his attackers. However he sadly succumbed whilst making a a desperate attempt to get help.

Apparently Mr. Ferreira was killed for the sake of a cellphone, which was the only property stolen.

Miss Michelle Ferreira, the deceased's sister, she came across her brother's body, covered in blood and lying on a pathway, where he had collapsed about 10 metres from his farm workers' dwellings. Despite having been shot three times in his upper body resulting in the loss of a lot of blood, he had managed to negotiate the approximate 500 metres to these dwellings.

His wife, Dr. Marita Ferreira, a lecturer and his daughter Roux-Cil were not on the farm as they spend the week in Bloemfontein. As Mr. Ferreira regularly phoned his wife each night at 8.30 she became worried when he didn't phone and she discovered his phone was off. That was when asked Michelle to go and check up.

Michelle Ferreira said that you could gauge, from the blood-spattered section outside the kitchen door, that her brother had wrestled with the attackers.

Mr. Colin Vorster, a neighbour of Mr. Ferreira's for the past 16 years, saw two unknown men running across his farm and contacted the police, little knowing his neighbour had been murdered. He later praised the quick reaction and help from the Tierpoort police.

So far no arrests have been made.

News report

Thanks to H for the translation

____________________

Screwdriver attack

In a separate farm attack Near Cape Town an elderly farmer and his wife survived an attack by a group of men with knives and screwdrivers who broke into their home in the early hours of last Friday morning.

After tying up the 84 year old woman and injuring the 86 year old man with a screwdriver, the attackers stole a firearm and an amount of cash before fleeing the scene.

The couple received medical attention at the scene.

News report
__________________

Hat tip: Heather, Mulder and Macaw

The net sum of lies

2011-11-26T08:58:00.000-08:00

According to figures just released, despite the government's promise to reduce net immigration into Britain to a somewhat undefined figure of “tens of thousands”, last year in fact saw the highest level of net immigration ever. In total 252,000 more people immigrated into the country than those who emigrated out of it.

Clearly, at this stage the government is not showing any signs of keeping its promise, which, I doubt has come as a huge surprise to most of us.

However, bad as this appears, if one really considers these figures they are actually worse than they seem to be.

For instance, what do they always focus on the “net” figure? The net total only tells us the increase in numbers resulting from immigration, after deducting from the total, those, many of them native Britons who have left the country, most probably because they can no longer stand living in the Multicultural hell hole it has become.

The net figure only matters to those who care only about numbers and who don't give a damn about the ethnic, cultural and racial demographic change which is being imposed on this country.

Of course, in politically correct totalitarian Britain we are not permitted to care about that change to our country, the only sop we are allowed is a limited licence to care about the numbers, not the composition.

In fact the demographic make up of our country did not change by a mere 252,000 in 2010, it changed by at least 591,000, because that is the true “official” number of non-British immigrants who arrived in this country last year. In terms of the destructions of this countries racial heritage that is the figure which matters, or at least it is part of it.

In terms of the “net” figure, the government could well achieve their promise by not reducing immigration at all and merely encouraging half a million native Britons to leave the country each year. That way “net” immigration would be under 100,00 a year. (not too difficult a task given the way things are going!)

The total official immigration figure of between 500,000 and 600,000 a year has remained constant over the last 14 odd years, resulting in a demographic change of well in excess of seven million, not counting the baby bomb which explodes shortly after each year's arrival.

Another interesting feature of the figures was the number of immigrants who allegedly came to Britain to “study”, that number is quoted as 238,000 yes, that is right, 238,000!! Is anyone really dumb enough to believe that almost a quarter of a million people came into the country to study? The government is not that thick, the media is not that stupid, nobody is that dumb! So why do they pretend they are?

An equally interesting figure is the one left after you deduct the number of immigrants who claim they came to “study” and those who claim they came to “work” from the total who came. The figure you are then left with is 179,000 who if they didn't come work or study must presumably have come as dependants, rather like the family of this guy, who's parents are currently being paid pensions by the British tax payer!

Yeah, who's dependants? Ours!

This. In itself, is only part of the picture, the figures relate only to those who moved here officially. Given that the authorities long ago gave up checking that those who come here on short term visas ever get round to leaving, (and just how many do you think dod so?!) we really have no idea how many people are flooding into this country each year. One thing is for certain, it is a lot more than we are told.

We are being lied to about immigration and the effect it is having on this country. Not only are we misled over the true figures, but, despite the evidence all around us, we are also constantly told that it is doing us good.

In which case, why are we broke?

In the face of social and economic collapse, shrill voices from “industry” keep insisting that immigration “benefits” our economy, and that the government's (apparently mythical) plans to cap it will “do damage”. This is of course total codswallop (to use a milder word than I might otherwise have) in truth what curbing immigration might do is deprive “industry” of cheap labour.

Are they saying that all the immigrants who have come in over the last few decades have ceased to be of benefit? Or is it just that they are no longer prepared to work for the sort of wages one can only survive on by living ten to a bedroom, or sleeping in a garden shed in Southall. Hence there is forever a need of new migrants to exploit.

There isn't a politician, commentator or journalist with the courage or the honesty to admit the truth, and while they remain silent it just gets worse. They are pathetic.

Sometimes I just get so bloody angry

mongrel Island?

2011-11-25T13:18:00.000-08:00

As a postscript to August’s excellent article on Liberal democrat candidate Sandy Walkington's deeply bigoted and ignorant comments about Britain, which was posted earlier, I think it is important to make clear that not only are Mr. Walkington’s views flawed and misguided for the reasons which August highlighted so well, but that Walkington's basic premise, that we, the British, are a nation of mongrels is blatantly untrue.

This claim is, of course, made frequently by liberals and multicultural zealots, but it is a lie based on ideological wish fulfillment and pure fantasy exposing a total ignorance of history.

Prior to 1950, Britain was, in fact, one of the most racially homogeneous nations on Earth, even today over 80% of the native population are able to trace their genetic ancestry back by means of DNA at least 15 thousand years, that is to say some sixteen times longer than the indigenous Maori people of New Zealand and roughly as long as the Clovis people of North America.

The “mongrel claim” depends on the hypothesis that previous influxes of immigrants and refugees changed the ethnic make up of the British people. This hypothesis if frankly incorrect. In the main the groups involved were so small in number that they had no perceptible impact on the indigenous population. For example, the very largest group, the French Huguenots, amounted in number to less than a fifth of the current Somali population and there are currently over one hundred times as many people originating from the Indian sub continent (India, Pakistan and Bangladesh) living in Britain today than all the Huguenots who came here in the 16th and 17th centuries.

As the two main invasions of Britain, at least those which occurred prior to the second half of the 20th Century, these did not have the effect the multicultural fairy tale tellers would have us believe. Following the Norman conquest most Norman troops returned home and the only significant interbreeding with our ethnically identical kin the Normans was primarily restricted to our aristocracy.

Some limited interbreeding unquestionably took place following the Roman conquest thousand years before, however, again, unlike today, this was insufficient to have any impact on the native population.

One can dismiss Bonnie Greer’s fanciful claims on the infamous Question Time edition with Nick Griffin, about platoons of Africans arriving with the Roman troops, this is the sort of dubious “history” which usually appears in books with large print, lots of colours and repeated references to “diversity”.

There is no firm historical evidence that African troops accompanied the Roman invaders in any significant numbers if any did at all. If such Africans actually existed, there is no evidence they were not castrated, as was the general fate of freed slaves in ancient Rome, or that they were “Africans” as we would understand the description today, the demographics of much of North Africa were very different than it is in our time.

Finally, there is certainly no evidence any African were “left behind" to mate with the flan haired natives as the disingenuous Miss Greer whimsically suggests.

To be blunt Greer’s claims were laughable and devoid of any historical substance. It is a shameful indictment of our times that no mainstream historian had the guts or the honesty to challenge her.

It may be true that over any milenia Britain became the home of a small number of other Northern European tribes such as Angles, Saxons and Vikings but they were ethnically identical to the Picts and Celts who were before them. Sharing the blood of a small number of identical Northern European tribes does not make us mixed race and most definitely does not make us “mongrels”.

The politically correct Mr.Walkington should remember that the population of Ethiopia, for instance is made up of no less than eighty North African tribes, meanwhile the people of Kenya include some forty ethnically identical East African tribes. If this hypocrite calls us mongrels on the basis that we are made up of half a dozen Nothern European tribes, he is clearly implying that Ethiopians and Kenyans are far more "mongrels" than we are.

How many times would hell have to freeze over before Walkington could bring himself to use a term, which trips so easily off his narrow lips in relation to white Europeans, when describing an African or Asian people?.

Lies such as those parroted by the unpleasant Mr. Walkington are repeated over and over again for ideological reasons, and in order to achieve a political goal. That goal is the destruction of Western Nations states by imposing an alien culture and finally an alien ethnicity upon once homogenous peoples. They form part of an act of deliberate genocide by stealth, which I have described here before, and must be challenged every time they are told..

Walkington lies also when he says he has “no problem” with what he calls “the fact” that in 200 years we will all be coffee coloured. In fact he glories in the prospect, as it is after all the outcome which the political masters he serves are determined to achieve.

But a lie is a lie is a lie. Goebbels may have been correct that if you tell a lie often enough people will come to believe it, however, a lie can never become a truth no matter how often our enemies repeat it.

The views of Sandy Walkington

2011-11-25T10:08:00.000-08:00

Sandy Walkington (right) pictured with Business Minister Vince Cable

By August Pointneuf

Sandy Walkington, liberal democrat candidate for St Albans has said, “We are all mongrels. I mean this country is the most mongrelled (sic) country in the world. In 200 years we will all be coffee-coloured – and I have got no problem with that”.

This grandiloquence and cultured bravado is naïve. Underlying this man’s thesis is a peculiar (in the sense that it is not consistent with the views of humans for millennia past) implied undercurrent of contentment. This contentment seems to arise from the illusion that if there is genetic homogeneity, there will be less strife and consequently the population will be safer, more content, and “happier”.

He is mistaken in believing that stirring genes in a pot of miscegenation will produce a uniform product. At a genetic science level she is wrong, because there will still not be a homogeneity. This is because the different expressions of various gene pools in mulattos will repeatedly force out differences.

Be that as it may, where Walkington’s true innocence lies is that he does not, perhaps cannot, understand that humans slowly acquire the equilibrium necessary for their contentment, dependent upon the context in which they live.

Given similar genetics the prime facilitator to this is the culture that humans evolve around themselves. These are patterns of behaviour of exquisite finesse, which evolve, not over decades and not even over two centuries, but over millennia. It is this common culture, which allows the harmony of understanding within homogenous groups, which permits common perceptions and establishes equilibriums of values. Some groups are highly successful in this cultural evolution. Others fail

What heterogeneous immigration brings is not additional culture, but a vacuum, a tear and hiatus in the existing highly sophisticated and tightly woven culture of the host country.

The world is awash with conflicts; almost all are conflicts of culture, immiscible and unsolvable because each of those cultures has its own strengths, profundity and deeply ingrained evolution. Juxtapose different cultures and conflict is inevitable.

Therefore if this man seeks a peaceful Britain he should be seek to preserve the unitary culture with which the British have been blessed. He should not be preaching a perfidy, and betraying the cultural about which he claims to proudly boast.

As the creators of the greatest empire the world has ever known, the sub-group of Europeans genetically and culturally isolated in their British island, had perfected a homogeneity which allowed them this extraordinary creativity.

What earlier immigrants there were, for by far the greater part, were Europeans with a very similar gene stock. Their ingress into Britain brought with them only a marginally different gene stock and culture, which was proximal enough to the British to harmonise.

The earlier European immigrants were very different from the current Negro and Asiatic immigrants into Britain. The new aliens’ gene pools and cultures are widely divergent from the consistent genotype and coherent culture which is (or was) the British. That these immigrants come with an inherent inability to merge into a stable and successful society is there for all who wish to see. Even the immigrants will be aware of this, which is why they are fleeing from failed nations and patently unsuccessful cultures

The very word homogeneity is derived from genetic consistency. In advocating “multi-culturism” (whatever that might mean, perhaps apartheid?) these political quasi scientists/philosophers run an impoverished, simplified intellect. Sandy Walkington’s intellectual subtlety sits at the level of the pre-school child, who has learned only that mixing all colours together consistently makes a dirty brown.

What bitter irony that the homogenous genetic and cultural equilibrium which was Britain’s is being destroyed by people of his limited insight, and inappropriate power. What an extraordinary, irreversible, experiment he is predicting. What a calamitous failure he is promoting.

The enemies amongst us

2011-11-24T11:32:00.000-08:00

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through...all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.

For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.” - Marcus Tullius Cicero January 3, 106 BC – December 7, 43 BC

-/-

Those words, first spoken more that twenty one centuries ago have been quoted often during the ensuing millennia, and are repeated frequently by nationalists in our own time. We need not question their longevity, for they remain as relevant and as apt today as they did when Cicero spoke them in the first century BC. In fact they are words never more pertinent than today, for our modern society has so blurred the line between honour and betrayal, between truth and between lies that traitors can move more freely, can spread their poison more widely and can have a more devastating effect than at almost any previous time in our history.

It was the traitor who told us we must question our old certainties, but he did so not for the sake of enlightenment but to undermine the bedrock and mortar which maintained our unity and our resolve. With those certainties went our beliefs and our values leaving us adrift and exposed to the dark shapes circling around us, and it was then that the traitor began his real work.

I speak of “the traitor” but he is, in fact legion and has swiftly infected almost every corner of our once great societies. He comes in many forms, ranging from the true believer determined to destroy Western man for the sake of an ever evolving ideology, they are fanatics yet capable of changing their modus but not their aims following the collapse of the Soviet Union. At the other end of the scale are effectively, drones, brainwashed into doing what they have been taught to believe is right.

Between those two extremes are the cynics including politicians and the very rich who gain short term material gain from the joint enterprise, the third world racists who are doing it out of hate, and the white inverted racists, whom Pat Buchanan refers to as "ethno-masochist", people who delight in inflicting harm on their own ethnic group so as to earn what they view as moral credits.

They are in our police forces, they proliferate in our judiciary and in our institutions, they sit in parliament and they dominate our schools and places of education where they teach lies and half truths in place of history and tell our children to feel shame for their race.

In this article I plan to focus of one of their most deadly manifestations the manner in which they have captured and transformed the Western media and imposed their deformed narrative upon all mainstream sources of information to the point where the media in all its mainstream forms has become one of the most deadly enemies of the West. Deadly because it is they who inject the poisons and administer the sedatives which render us unable and unwilling to resist what is being done to use.

They are with us twenty four hours a day, creating false realities, forming out opinions and telling us what to think, whilst stealthily terrorizing and intimidating us until we become ashamed and frightened of our natural instincts and progressively secret views and anything which, in another age would have given us courage and prompted us to resist their campaign against us.

Our news men have long ago given up reporting the facts with anything approaching balance , they no longer inform, they indoctrinate. They have ceased to be reporters and have become propagandists and even more so they have become censors. Facts and events which if reported could undermine the official message are suppressed, silenced and hurled into the great silent shredder where uncomfortable truths now go to die.

Those events which can not be buried and hidden away are presented as something other than what they are, as with the true nature of the so called Arab “spring” the real ethnic make up of the “English” rioters or the reality of underage sexual grooming in Britain.

A few generations before our own, journalism could still be viewed as an honourable trade, when reporter still viewed their roles as seekers of truth and exposers of wrong doing. There is now no honour left in their murky trade. The truth is now the very last thing they seek and facts are not exposed, they are spun to suit an agenda or to act as modern fables essential to the ongoing indoctrination.

It has reached the point that there is no benefit to be gained from watching a television news broadcast or reading a newspaper unless you accept that a significant part of what is being laid before you is pure fiction and the rest, unless it is ideologically neutral, which very little is, will feature half truths and distortions.

Briefly we are seeing a shadow of these liars true nature. This very week the Leveson Inquiry into abuses by the media are beginning to expose the total contempt and disregard for the public endemic within the culture of our newsrooms, however, this is only scratching at the surface of the true iniquity and inherent treachery within the fourth estate.

The inquiry will not go further than exposing phone hacking and lying about individual victims, it will not examine the role of these creatures in what has been done to our society. We are only able to read about it because one section of the media are enjoying undermining Rupert Murdoch, who's Fox News organisation is likely to be the only section of the US media to oppose Obama's reelection in 2012. In any event news reporting is only part of the brainwashing, and in many ways not the most insidious.

Although the vast majority of those reading at this site take an interest in news and current affairs, and many of us spend hours tracking down the truth behind news stories we are a tiny minority. Most of the public, especially the young, take little if any interest in “the news”, however, the media have other and far more powerful means of lying to them, through entertainment and popular drama.

Through TV screens, cinemas, DVDs even the music they listen to and the “popular” internet sites they visit an alternative reality is projected to them which complements and bolsters the fake reality which was taught to them in school.

The alternative reality is effectively a reverse reality where multicultural diversity is cool, desirable and benign, whereas nationalism and any opposition to the third world colonisation of the West is evil, malevolent and ugly.

Non-whites are eternally intelligent. honourable and desirable, or the innocent victims of European prejudice. If they are not victims they doctors, teachers, scientists, policemen or in other ways heroic, whereas all paedophiles, rapists, serial killers bigots and, of course, all racists are white.

Then we have advertising which is beginning to take on a surreal element reminiscent of 1930’s style soviet Union style propaganda. For instance when happy white families spread Clover butter substitute on their sandwiches while gleefully applauding benign and elderly black musicians and when virtually every commercial for beauty products shampoo or slimming aids, as if by mandate have to feature three females “best friends” of politically correct differing ethnic shades, how do these differ from the images of happy peasants waving their scythes and sickles over a plentiful harvest, which were used by Russian propagandist to disguise a very different and far less attractive reality?.

Beyond brainwashing the media has a more sinister role in spreading terror and encouraging obedience they do this by ensuring that any transgressors, and any who dare question the new orthodoxy are punished severely, humiliatingly and in public. When the modern media exposes alleged “ra##ists” like Tiger Woods ex-caddy, or, they hope, John Terry, they are performing the same function as the stocks in medieval town squares, or the show trials behind the old Iron Curtain, their purpose being to scare the public into acquiescence.

To a monumental degree they have been extraordinarily successful in their malevolent scheme.

It has long been clear that the western media are among the greatest enemies of Western society, they are the traitors within our walls, it is they who are beaming their poison and their lies into our homes day after days, brainwashing, and terrorizing us, creating a false reality and hiding the truth from us.

Mass media has the means to create great good, however, it is being use to achieve great evil.

It is the agent which has brought us to where we are and it is the poison which will kill us. We will not succeed, we will not survive unless be can break its deadly grip on our crippled and dying countries and expose the monsters lurking behind the toxic smokescreen they have created.

Archbishop John Sentamu’s Misconceptions about the Nature of Western Economies

2011-11-19T14:44:00.000-08:00

John Sentamu’s article in the Yorkshire Pos (online 5th November 2011) in which he attacks the inequalities of wealth generated by an economic system largely based on the private ownership of the means of production reveals him to be a woefully ignorant commentator, and one who fails to grasp the reasons for the West’s astonishing intellectual and economic achievements. The substance of Sentamu’s article, such as it is, also confirms the sharp decline in the intellectual core of the Church of England’s leadership.

Social, intellectual and economic inequalities that arise from hard work, self-discipline and superior IQ are everywhere to be seen. They are a natural state whereby those endowed with such qualities will rise in social status, if they so wish, and to whom the benefits of wealth will accrue. Nature provides no evidence that all men were created equal or that all men will achieve the same things and reach the same goals. In what is still a largely white country, though mass, non-white immigration is set to reduce whites to a minority in their own country, black failure in education, employment and high levels of representation in crime, confirm that the qualities required for even modest levels of success are largely absent among blacks resident in Britain. Is it this, I wonder, that serves to fuel Sentamu’s resentment of England? Does his apparent concern for the well-being of lower-paid workers mask a racist resentment of conspicuously successful whites? Bear in mind that Sentamu was one of those fellow-travelling, useful idiots who lent his name to the viciously anti-white racist Macpherson Report (1999). Macpherson, Sentamu and all the others involved in the preparation of this hate tract, which had very little to do with a bungled murder inquiry and everything to do with attacking and undermining the institutions of a white nation, bear a large share of the responsibility for the degenerate behaviour of blacks that struck English cities in August 2011.

It does not occur to Sentamu that companies and businesses are founded by ambitious and private individuals whose intention is to create a successful business not a charity. Some of these companies generate huge wealth and their products have immeasurably improved the living standards of millions of people. They exist to make money and profit so that they can meet the demands of investors and so that they can reinvest capital to make more products. A privately owned company that is conspicuously profitable and handsomely rewards its shareholders and Chief Executive Officers (CEOs) will generate envy and resentment, especially among those who regard themselves as the intellectual and moral arbiters of our society. Privately run companies do not have to answer to the outpourings of Sentamu’s poisonous envy presented as concern for the less economically successful.

Sentamu concludes that in those instances in a company where CEOs are paid 300 times more than the least well paid employees - no company is actually cited by Sentamu – that this tells these employees ‘that they are of little value’. It tells employees no such thing. However much he might like to enjoy the same salary and benefits of the CEO the security guard knows that he is incapable of running a major company. If he is convinced that he is as good as his master he can start a business and prove it. Otherwise he must earn his living as an employee. Where large numbers of people come together, as in the workplace, inequalities between and among individuals will be apparent. No employee works to improve the position of others (or of starving Somalis and Kenyans). He strives towards his own ends and from this basic fact of human nature arises, inevitably and desirably, economic and social inequalities and the economic and intellectual progress associated therewith.

Sentamu tells us that: ‘Top pay has been found to bear little or no relation to company performance, but even if it did, isn’t the performance of a company dependent on the work and well-being of all its staff?’ It is obvious that the performance of a company depends, in part, on the work and well-being of employees. Sentamu implies without any evidence that when the gap between senior personnel and junior personnel is large or very large that the morale and well-being of junior staff in some unspecified way suffers. I suggest it does not. It is the nature of envy to which Sentamu implicitly appeals that differences in pay and privileges are most painfully felt among workers and staff of comparable levels. The worker on the factory-floor does not envy the stratospheric pay of the CEO: he envies the slight increase in pay which his more able fellow worker enjoys by virtue of his better and more efficient work rate and ethic. That difference may only be small but it gnaws away at the less well remunerated worker’s sense of self-esteem. This is why unions attract mediocrities who wish to see all the stupid, the able, the lazy and industrious held to the same standard. None must be permitted to shine since this will make the bad and stupid workers confront their inadequacies.

Companies that pay top staff high salaries regardless of results are not necessarily wasting money. CEOs have a symbolic, propagandistic function that companies use to promote themselves. This is especially the case where senior appointments are not made on merit but on considerations of equal opportunities and affirmative action which is then used by the company to trumpet its commitment to racial and sex diversity. Such appointees will be very well paid for doing very little. They are simply window dressing and public relations puppets. Moreover, paying the CEO a vast salary which may or may not be related to his performance signals the power and status of the company itself: it is a message of corporate dominance and power. There is no difference at all between a wealthy individual donating millions of dollars to feed the starving, AIDS-ridden hordes of Africa and a top-listed company paying a CEO a large salary. Both are gestures of power and status designed to impress.

Sentamu worries about the effects of high levels of CEO pay on the morale of lower paid employees. He should ask himself what it must be like for a high-IQ and capable white employee in a top-rated Western company to be passed over for promotion in favour of a low-IQ incompetent black, all done in the name of the false god of diversity. Moreover, if Sentamu is indeed concerned by the lack of any link between pay for CEOs and performance he might like to consider the beam in his own eye. Where, pray tell, is the link between the performance of the Church of England’s leadership, its CEOs, as it were, and the salaries, fringe benefits and pensions that Rowan Williams and Sentamu enjoy? It is quite clear to me, sinner and lover of money that I am that the Church of England has succumbed to heresy. The Church of England openly promotes homosexuality and the ordination of women priests. It does not accept the teachings of Christ and has, on so many indicators, succumbed to the Satanic creed of “do what thou will shall be the whole of the law”. When the Church of England teaches that there are no privileged perspectives it destroys its own authority. If there are no privileged perspectives then sin cannot be condemned, the sinners cannot be punished; there is nothing to worry about when Christians are persecuted by all those nice Muslims or when Muslims try to establish no-go areas in England. Why should any Englishman accept anything said in the name of the Church of England when the church itself rejects Holy Scripture and openly colludes with its enemies and the enemies of England?
Again, and given Sentamu’s concern for what he considers to be the high pay enjoyed by CEOs, I find it strange that he has nothing to say about the grotesque mismatch between the rates of pay enjoyed by senior figures in the public sector and their generally shoddy performance: university vice-chancellors are overpaid bureaucrats and have inflicted long-term damage on their institutions by permitting reckless expansion; social services consistently fail to protect little boys and girls from sub-human perverts and the violently retarded; those charged with securing our borders let criminals and illegal immigrants come and go at their will; and the police are too frightened to act against non-white criminals; NHS hospitals resemble death camps where the old, weak and vulnerable are subjected to selections based on indifference, where they are abused, starved, mocked, dehydrated and, where, far too often, they are exposed to the not so tender mercies of Third Worlders masquerading as doctors and nurses. Local government is yet another example of public sector incompetence. The monopoly enjoyed by local government means that these bodies can impose confiscatory and rapacious levels of council tax regardless of their sub-standard performance and, of course, these councils pay themselves all kinds of bonuses for meeting spurious government targets. If thousands of welfare parasites and immigrants who live on the backs of others live in a particular local authority there is very little chance that those in work and who pay for the flat-screen televisions and trainers coveted by the feckless can change this state of affairs through the ballot box: parasites simply outnumber the responsible hosts; indigenous whites – who supposedly do not exist - have effectively been disenfranchised by immigration. One of the worst examples of overpaid public employees is the BBC. As a body funded by a license fee, a viewing tax, and one that can levy a tax even if you do not watch the BBC, there is an exceptionally powerful case for mandating that the full salary, privileges, pension provisions and any other benefits enjoyed by its senior personnel be published in full every year. Were the BBC a privately funded entity there would be no grounds for such disclosure.

Sentamu’s exploitation of poverty to attack successful companies is the standard method used by Marxist agitators and those who are determined to ignore human nature. People who choose not to eat properly, who smoke, who consider a subscription to satellite television to be an essential item of expenditure rather than proper clothing for their children, women who have child after child to different fathers, who buy expensive consumer trash on a credit card, do not live in poverty: they are stupid, feckless and incompetent. They know that no matter how depraved and reckless their behaviour that welfare payments paid by people in work will secure them a roof over their heads and the misguided sympathy from people like Sentamu. The person who is quite able to survive on a modest income but cannot afford a Mercedes or a long-haul holiday is not poor. It is not a matter of any moral, social or religious concern that that he must do without high-status and conspicuous consumption which others can afford. Third-World immigrants who have entered Britain and who exploit the welfare generosity of this country are not poor. In this country they enjoy a standard of living which would be impossible in the failed Third-World states whence they come. This is why they come here of course. Sentamu, an African, is well aware of this state of affairs. Rather than attacking British companies he should turn his attention to the race war being waged by his fellow Africans against whites in South Africa. Why does the Church of England remain so silent about this genocide by stealthy instalments?

In a still relatively free country, such as England, inequalities of income and social status are inevitable and desirable. Those who have the talents to succeed have a good chance of succeeding. This is why Sentamu hates the Western free market economies since it rewards some and ignores others, highlighting these innate differences. In this world opportunities are never equal and never can be. People who are differentiated by innately superior and inferior levels of intelligence, knowledge and the all-important work ethic will not produce the same outcomes. The more conditions are rendered equal the greater the role played by innate factors. Social mobility cannot be open to all since not all will be able to exploit the available opportunities. Those that can enjoy greater socio-economic status will achieve the rewards which go with such status. Divisions by class and status are normal. If Sentamu wishes to remove these differentiated outcomes he must be party to the destruction of a society which rewards individual achievement.

Sentamu’s vision of a more caring and equal society is one of compulsory equality and even higher levels of taxation to support an ever growing welfare parasite class. I take it for granted that Sentamu’s hideous vision for my country means that immigration controls shall be formally abolished so that millions more indigent and unemployable Africans can overwhelm us. Naturally the indigenous population shall be expected to care for these immigrants and make them feel needed and place them on an equal footing with the English. If we English do make theme feel welcome then obviously we are somehow evil, racist and so on, (→ ∞).

Sentamu states that: ‘Great wealth has for so long been seen as a mark of status’ and that we have to change this state of affairs. To this end, Sentamu proposes two changes. First, those who in his words ‘who have already rewarded themselves most handsomely’ would not be acknowledged in the Queen’s Honours List. Second, he suggest that in order to put a stop to tax avoidance people should be encouraged to tick a box on their tax returns indicating that they have no objection to having the amount they have paid in tax made public.

Sentamu’s first proposal confirms his pitiful understanding of wealth and wealth creation. Wealth creation is inextricably linked to innovation and technological success. It is right and proper that we recognise and reward innovation. Why should a highly successful inventor – there are no highly successful inventors in Uganda – who makes vast sums of money be excluded from being honoured by my Queen? The second proposal has nothing to do with tax avoidance (Sentamu does not seem to grasp the difference between tax avoidance and tax evasion) and everything to do with arousing envy and resentment against those who are successful. Were Sentamu’s proposals to be taken seriously they would lead to a society in which all innovation would cease, or all the innovators would be driven away, and one which would regress to social and economic stagnation and thence to decline. The green pus of envy, the resentment of the successful, which is the hallmark of the social leveller, oozes from Sentamu’s proposals. Sentamu should begin his quest inside the institution that employs him. If he is so concerned about the connection between wealth and status what does he propose to do to reduce the wealth of the Church of England and its drive to maintain its undeserved status, a status based on its loyalty to England which it has now cast aside? Sentamu, the Ugandan, should bear in mind that the Church of England is a Church of England and a Church for England. The Church of England was not intended to minister to the spiritual needs, whatever they are, of the Third World. In any case, Africans prefer sangomas, muti, killing albinos and cannibalism. If that suits them, fine. Just stay in Africa where they and their mumbo-jumbo belong.

Instead of berating his white hosts for their success and wealth, I suggest that Sentamu returns to his native Africa and preaches the gospel of wealth creation to his fellow Africans instructing them that it is a sin to live as international-aid parasites on the donations of the white man. Africans must learn to stand alone or perish. Sentamu should also lecture his fellow Africans that they must put a stop to their selfish and destructive breeding otherwise they will all starve to death. The time will come when even the white man’s agricultural prowess will not be able to feed the billions of clamouring, voracious, black mouths never mind the seething masses of India, Pakistan, China, Central and South America. Sentamu should also start to lecture Mugabe and his fellow Marxist savages, Mandela et al, that dispossessing and murdering successful white farmers is not a very smart move in a continent threatened by the spectre of mass starvation.

Frank Ellis, 13th November 2011

Immigration- now it’s the elderly who are expected to pay the price!

2011-11-09T12:21:00.000-08:00

By Richard Barnbrook

An shock report issued by the newly formed, left-wing pressure group the Intergenerational Foundation, is out to make war on one of society’s softest targets: the elderly.

In their unashamedly ageist attack on senior citizens, whom they consider to be fair game, the Foundation, launched by Labour’s Tessa Jowell, has issued a report that is blatantly draconian and hostile to the interests and well-being of the elderly- all in the name of ’fairness’, of course. The proposal is that because of the current housing shortage, older people should be taxed out of their family homes in order to make room for younger families.

On the surface this might seem to be a sensible suggestion, but when seen in the light of the fact of the net figure of over a quarter of a million immigrants entering the country last year, the implications become far more sinister.

As I have been saying for a long time, large numbers of newcomers need to be both serviced and accommodated somewhere- because it’s a fact of life that you can’t squeeze a quart into a pint pot. (And I make no apologies for using imperial measurement!) So, where shall we put them all? Where indeed! According to the Intergenerational Foundation, the answer’s quite simple- turf out all those lonely oldies living in three bedroom houses and push them into accommodation that is ‘more suited to their needs,’ to make way for younger families! So much for the age-old saying ‘an Englishman’s home is his castle’!

When, oh when will the British public wake up? How much longer will they be prepared to sit back and watch their birthright being stolen before their eyes? Our national sovereignty has been hijacked by Brussels so that we can’t even make our own laws any more. Our politicians ignore our wishes, even though we elected them to represent our interests. Our children are being sold short in the education system, health tourists from abroad exploit our already over-stretched NHS, and our own people can’t get jobs, which are being given to foreign nationals. And now, senior members of society, who deserve respect and the dignity of some space in their declining years, having worked all their lives to earn it, are blatantly being told to move over because they are in the way! Even to make such a pointed and offensive suggestion is indicative of how far some politicians are prepared to go in this full-scale attack on the interests of the people of this country.

The only comfort that I can draw from this disgusting and shameful attack on the elderly is the fact that Tessa Jowell herself is clearly no spring-chicken! In the not too distant future, she may live to rue the day that she affiliated herself with such a barbarous bunch of ageist bigots!

Why the West is Broke?

2011-11-06T04:08:00.000-08:00

Those still baffled as to why the West is sinking into financial crisis, and how it came to pass that all the the nations which were great and rich world powers just a few decades ago are now either bankrupt or deeply in debt to the likes of China, may find an answer in the screen shots below. All of which I took this morning after entering the words "Sending Money Home" into the Google search engine:

Yes that really does say 979 Million results

Given the large number of immigrants who have difficulty with written English, I tried a further experiment.

The second screen shot shows the numbers of results I obtained when I reentered the same words with the assistance of the Google translate facility:

Could this be an answer which the politicians and economists have missed?

The War of the Flea

2011-11-05T11:02:00.000-07:00

Further details at the Internet Movie Database here.

Note: I have not seen this movie, so I can't comment on its quality, and am a little concerned by the statement that it "links what is happening with events in the past", a common ploy for blaming the victim for their own slaughter. However, any movie which addresses the ongoing genocide of white South Africans is important.

South African Farm manager shot dead brother seriously wounded

2011-11-05T09:05:00.000-07:00

Sean Schutte's wounded brother Louis Schutte is transported to hospital by air ambulance after being shot three times by farm attackers.

Earlier this week farm attackers shot a young South African farm manager dead and seriously wounded his brother on a farm near Witsieshoek, close to the border with Lesotho .

Sean Schutte (36) was shot in the heart when he and his brother, Louis, confronted two intruders.

The Schutte brothers pursued them to the Caledon River, where Sean was shot dead and Louis was shot three times in his upper body. The badly wounded Louis was taken to Mediclinic, Bloemfontein, accompanied by his wife Roné.

Mr. Bernard Maree, regional manager and member of the Free State Agricultural Union, said the attackers arrived early in the afternoon on the Alpha Estate owved Mr. Bernard Amm. A domestic worker summoned help.

The Schutte brothers, farm managers on the Estate, followed the men to the river where one of them took out the pistol and fired shots. Maree said the heavily wounded Louis tried in vain to save his brother's life. The attackers fled into nabouring Lesotho.

Miss Roline Pretorius, a long time friend of the Schutte brothers and their family, said it is a tremendous shock for the whole community. Sean graduated Agricultural High School in Jacobsdal. "He was at his happiest on a horse. He was mad about outdoor living and his two children."

Louis Schutte is reported to be in a serious condition.

________________
Hat tip: Heather

News report in Afrikaans

Why I have been so quiet

2011-11-02T10:22:00.000-07:00

I am sorry this blog has been so quiet recently, this has been primarily due to my mood and the fact that I have simply not felt inspired to write for quite some time.

Writing does not always come naturally and I need to feel motivated, which I have been for much of the time since I set this blog up in 2008, but less so in recent months, indeed I am not convinced I have written much of any value since the “Genocide by Stealth “ articles I wrote in the early part of this year.

Since then I have begun to find our predicament progressively more depressing.

Perhaps my lowest point was when that lunatic in Norway went on the rampage and did more damage to our cause than anything since the Oklahoma bombing in 1995, an event, which is to this day a trophy cherished by our enemies as proof, to their minds, that white terrorists can be every bit as blood thirsty and vile as any Islamic Jihadi (worse indeed because they are white).

The murderous monster Breivik has now joined the deluded Timothy McVeigh as a further example to be forever used against us and as means of undermining anyone who opposes the forcible invasion of our homelands, as Breivik has already been used to terrorise and silence the brilliant and vitally important writer Fjordman.

It is difficult to express my dismay at last July’s events, not only for the innocent young live so cruelly cut short by an act of insanity, but also how that insanity will be exploited by those who hate us in order to spur on their genocidal aims.

Why did he do it? Will there always be lunatics like that primed and ready to undermine any good we have achieved?

When we count the enemies of our people, there, at their head must be the likes of McVeigh, Breivik and that senile old idiot who attacked the Washington Holocaust museum in 2009, for all three gave great gits to those who hate us.

Also depressing has been the total disarray into which Nationalism in this country has descended in the last year with the bickering and infighting between different factions. Given that, at the end of it all the status quo seems to be blooded but little changed, it seems all the strife achieved nothing other than to do further damage to our cause.

I don’t believe Nationalism can be unique in attracting people who place greater value on their own trumped up little egos than they do on the future survival of our people, but it often seems that way. There are certainly many who will devote far greater levels of time and effort to fighting fellow nationalists than they ever expend on fighting for our survival.

If we could ever achieve unity we would be formidable. However, could that ever be possible considering the inflated egos, the special interest groups and basic downright stupidity of so many who claim to share our aims?

As I recently commented on another forum, I have a horrible image of the last two white men on earth fighting between themselves, as the dark hoards silently close in around them.

I have also been disheartened by the responses to some of my postings, not so much here, but certainly when I have reposted some articles to sites such as the British Resistance, where, like on so many nationalist blogs, there are a group of commentators who loudly attack any poster who fails to blame every ill which befalls the West upon Israel and the Jews.

One particularly depressing example was when I posted an article about Ilana Mercer’s brave and important book “Into the Cannibal’s pot” exploring the warnings to America which can be seen in the fate of post Apartheid South Africa and exposing the current plight of South Africa's whites. Despite an avalanche of comments almost nobody commented in the book itself but instead commentators indulged in an orgy of Jew bashing all because Ilana Mercer is Jewish.

This knee jerk anti Semitism is so deeply frustrating. Don't these people realise that when they start wittering on about Zogs and goys and Zionist plots they just make us look like cranks and give our enemies wonderful weapons to use against us?

There is merit to the claim that Jews feature strongly among the ranks of our worst enemies, they are disproportionately represented in the areas within education and the media which conspire against the white race and certainly within Marxism, one of the greatest scourges we have faced.

However, it is maddness to suggest that Jews, and only Jews, are behind every ill which befalls us, or that no Jews can be our friend. Furthermore, those who take the side of Islam on the grounds that our enemy's enemy must automatically be our fried, are dangerously deluded.

Likewsie when great and brave men such as Geert Wilders are derided and condemned by Nationalists, simply because he supports Israel, we are rejecting one of the few politicians who are brave enough to literally put their lives on the line for our sake and we need such men

The threats against us are far greater than Israel, George Soros or even some mouldy old protocols, and the ranks of our enemies are much greater than just the Jews. Meanwhile there are many Jews who are our friends, Ilana Mercer is our friend.

It sometimes seems that too many Nationalists allow ideological barriers to blind them to the truth and that in itself could well lead to our destruction.

The reaction to the Canibal's Pot post really made me wonder whether it was worth carrying on and whether the white race actually has a death wish.

However, that is merely one of many issues which have come in the last few month which have left me disillusioned and depressed. Hence I have stopped writing for a while.

I will be back, because I care deeply for this cause, but right now I just don't feel motivated to do so. Sorry

White Genocide in southern Africa: Walkerville Massacre, October 2011

2011-11-02T09:49:00.000-07:00

At the beginning of October I posted an update regarding the murder of the Viana family at their smallholding in Walkerville south of Johannesburg. The story being reported at the time was gruesome enough, Mrs Viana had been raped prior to her murder while her husband and 13 year old son had been tied up and killed. The family dog had also been killed.

Brutal as the crime had been, the police and the media continued to report that the family had been shot dead. However, as more information is coming out, it is becoming clear that, as usual in these circumstances, the police and the media lied, and in fact there was a significant degree of torture in the killings.

Piecing together the various reports, the following appears to be what actually happened.

The family were chased around their home being hacked at with pangas (machetes) as they ran, leaving blood smears and splashes in every room of their house.

Mr Tony Viana was overcome, tied up and then hacked to bits. His 46 year old wife, Giraldine, was raped repeatedly, before having a broken bottle inserted into her vagina. A similar method of torture was used against 76 year old Helen Lotter in a similar killing only last year.

Their thirteen year old son, was tied with his hands behind his back, and drowned in a bath, a bath which by some accounts contained boiling hot water.

The sequence of events is not entirely clear as to whether the child died before his parents or whether he was forced to watch their fate before he too was dispatched.

The family pet was hacked to pieces.

The suspects, are all black Africans, and one of whom is the 20 year old son on a family who had worked for the Vianas for many years.

(Many commentators at this blog are critical of white South Africans who employ black domestic staff in the current climate, however, this ignores the fact that under the racist employment laws currently in force in South Africa, it is all but impossible to employ whites in any capacity)

An equally horrific murder of a family of three was the killing of the Potgieger family back in December 40 year old Attie Potgieger had been stabbed and cut 152 times and took "many minutes to die", his wife and two year old daughter had also been cut, the tiny child finally killed, execution style with a bullet to the back of the head. (shockingly the careless newspaper reporting appears to refer to the little girl as a son)

Massacres such as this are now commonplace in South Africa and the horrors reported here are merely the tip of a huge and bloody iceberg, yet, with a few very rare exceptions the world remains silent. The Western media remains silent, and so do most politicians. Brave Dutch politician Martin Bosma is currently under ferocious attack by the left wing and their craven supporters in media for daring to warn that the Afrikaner people are being destroyed (is Holland the only European nation which still breeds honourable men?) but his is but one voice drowned out by the baying apologists for genocide.

By their silence the western press and our contempt worthy politicians are accessories to what is taking place, I hope they will one day be held to account.

______________
Hat Tip: Dina

A nice little earner

2011-10-18T12:54:00.000-07:00

Tarique Ghaffur - said to have received £300,000 for "being sidelined"

My good friend the committed BNP campaigner Donna Treanor has obtained some interesting information from both the Metropolitan police and also from the Equality and Human Rights commission by means of Freedom of Information requests.

The results can be viewed at the foot of this posting and reveal some illuminating details

The first set of figures show the number of racial discrimination claims logged against the Metropolitan Police over each of the last five financial years and appear to indicate a consistent average of 40 cases a year, primarily brought by Police Officers, but also by Police Staff, Community Support Officers and also a small number by Traffic Wardens

Given the much publicised fact that the total number if ethnic minority officers in the Met only reached 3,000 in 2009, this figure is actually more significant than it first appears particularly in the post Macpherson police force

More significant than the numbers however, are the figures relating to concluded cases which can also be viewed at the bottom of this posting, these show that only a tiny proportion of cases were actually lost by the Metropolitan Police Service, and of those which were, by far the majority were successfully appealed by the MPS.

Of the rest a number were withdrawn, suggesting either a change of heart on the part of the complainant or, more likely, their advisers may have warned them there was scant chance of their claim succeeding.

However, each year a significant number of cases were “settled” to a degree which does not make sense considering that when the MPS fight a case to its conclusion, they stand a statistically good chance of winning.

Settling is, of course, easier, especially when it is only taxpayer’s money which is being shelled out, and who is to know how many complainants have been encouraged in making unfounded claims on the strength of the Met’s penchant for settling out of court rather than fighting as case.

The figures which Donna obtained do not disclose the seniority of those making complaints or the size of the settlements paid out. However, in view of the fact that former assistant commissioner Tarique Ghaffur accepted a settlement of £300,000 ($475,000) after he claimed he had merely been “sidelined” one can assume the settlements may have been quite generous.

All this at the taxpayer’s expense despite evidence based upon the outcomes of those cases which the Met have contested, that a large percentage of these claims are bogus.

The figures relate to just one of the 39 police forces in England, not to mention those in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, together with the various other UK law enforcement agencies, however, if these results are reflected in other forces and indeed across the public sector it is clear that vast sums are being paid out, not least in undefended settlements.

It should not be forgotten that compensation and out of court settlements are only a part of the cost of these proceedings. If one adds to that the cost of administering, adjudicating and defending such cases it is starkly obvious that the race discrimination industry is a very costly drain on the public purse, and a very unwelcome one in our current age of austerity.

Being the industrious individual that she is, Donna has also obtained a further set of figures by means of Freedom of Information legislation. These show details of the cases of racial discrimination brought against that insidious government QUANGO the Equality and Human Rights Commission by its own staff.

The outcome of these are rather different than those brought against the Metropolitan police, and suggest to this writer that the EHRC have robustly defended themselves against all such claims and only settled in one case in which they paid out the relatively paltry sum of £2,000, a far cry from Assistant Commissioner Ghaffur’s lottery style winnings.

This is hardly surprising given how embarrassing it would be for an organisation allegedly dedicated to the enforcement of equality to be repeatedly found guilty of discriminating against its staff.

However, notwithstanding the number of cases which have been withdrawn, struck out or won by the EHRC, it is quite remarkable for an organization of its type, set up only four years ago this month that already fourteen members of staff have seen fit to formally raise allegations of racial discrimination against it.

It is debatable as to whether this says more about the organisation or the nature of those it employs.

Once again these cases have been administered, Judged and defended at taxpayers expense, and you can be sure that “Human Rights” lawyers do not come cheap.

As I have pointed out many times on this blog, we are constantly informed that migration to the UK has brought countless benefits, but it is becoming progressively more difficult to identify quantifiable evidence of such benefits.

There is self evidently no benefit to the tax payer in being required to subsidise these cases, and it is an indisputable fact that we would not have to fund these cases were we not living in an imposed multiracial society.

____________________

Click on the images below to enlarge them

No. of Race Discrimination cases brought against the Met in the last 5 years

Concluded Race Discrimination cases

Race Discrimination cases brought against the EHRC

Cold blooded murder in South Africa

2011-10-16T06:52:00.000-07:00

A 50-year-old man was murdered on his farm in Limpopo, last Tuesday, bringing the number of white South African farmers assassinated since the the ANC came to power in 1994 to at least 3,155, by some estimates the number killed is in fact now closer to 4,000.

The body of Douw Brummer, a well known livestock farmer, was discovered at the farm Goedgedacht, where he reportedly lived alone, in the Dwaalboom area of Limpopo

He reportedly lived alone. He had been shot in the head.

The Transvaal Agricultural Union security representative Pieter Roets said from all the traces it appeared as if the killers were laying in ambush waiting for Brummer. "It was cold-blooded murder,' he said

In addition to the growing numbers of farm killings, it is estimated that some 35,000 south Africa whites have been murdered since the dismantling of Apartheid, however, for warped ideological reasons the Western media continue to suppress the details

___________

News Report: http://www.farmitracker.com/reports/view/1927

Related articles: Are the SA police accomplices to Farm Murders?

Shoot the Whites: New hate Song

Response to Cameron's October (2011) Immigration Speech

2011-10-13T12:00:00.000-07:00

From: Dr Frank Ellis

To: Mr David Cameron, Prime Minister MP

Date: 12^th October 2011 A.D.

Re: The Prime Minister’s Speech on Immigration delivered to the Institute of Government 10^th October 2011

Dear Mr Cameron

Mass immigration is not a natural disaster akin to some tsunami, drought or earthquake that periodically and unpredictably overwhelms a country. Mass immigration is a purely man-made phenomenon which is encouraged openly or covertly by people who benefit from it economically or by people who for ideological reasons wish to see England looking like some failed Third-World state, Pakistan, for example.

Mass immigration, especially mass non-white immigration, poses real dangers for the future of England. The idea that England can survive the mass, continual influx of hundreds of thousands of non-white immigrants is hideously naïve. As the white indigenous people of England are relentlessly displaced by the rapid and aggressive breeding of non-whites, the whole texture and nature of our towns and cities will be changed forever, is already changing, and, in some places, Bradford, Birmingham, whole swathes of London, have already changed for the worse.

I do not regard these huge, unprecedented changes, changes which were imposed on the white indigenous English without any consultation or any regard for England’s future, with no regard for the links to our past and heritage, as in any way beneficial. In every possible regard they are disastrous. As I have made clear to you before the changes brought about by mass, non-white immigration represent the racial, cultural, physical and psychological dispossession of the white indigenous English.

In what way, pray tell, do the indigenous English, especially those left in London, benefit from having their capital, my capital, overrun with non-whites? The short answer is that they do not benefit from being overrun by non-whites. They suffer from overcrowding, reduced quality in public services, noise, freakish behaviour, poor education provision as a consequence of schools overrun with immigrants, exceptionally high levels of crime and corruption and high taxes to pay for foreigners. Moreover, they are daily bombarded with BBC and other state-sponsored propaganda that they should actually be grateful for all these non-white immigrants being here. Furthermore, should the white indigenous English protest about what is happening to their country, they will be vilified as something monstrous when in fact their opposition to being dispossessed is entirely rational and moral, in every way normal. What is not normal, what is perverse, what is most decidedly unnatural is that white politicians such as you Mr Cameron are actively encouraging hordes of non-whites currently resident in England, and others swarming across our borders, to overwhelm our country. Mass, non-white immigration has not delivered a single benefit at all to the white indigenous English.

Your portrayal of the immigration debate as one dominated by extremes is itself extreme (and wrong) and designed to show you as the conciliator, the moderate with sensible proposals when in fact you have a long record of colluding with those who have sponsored mass non-white immigration. Some form of immigration subject to exceptionally tough controls is acceptable but the numbers involved should be very small indeed and it should be made clear that employment in England does not in any way imply a right to permanent residence. There are absolutely no benefits to be derived from the mass influx of unemployable Third-World immigrants. One of the main problems, especially with regard to Indian and Pakistani immigrants is the reliability of any qualifications. In the NHS this can literally be a matter of life and death or lead to operations which are bungled because they are carried out by incompetents. Remember Daniel Ubani, the Nigerian with a German passport? Ever heard of the Indian, Manjit Bhamra?

One of the weak links in your immigration proposal is that you show no understanding of the race factor. Race and race differences matter and they cannot be made not to matter by government diktat. Nor can endless race relations laws and amendments deny the basic consequences of race and race differences. Large numbers of non-whites in a white country will always be a permanent source of tension and very often violence. We see the evidence for this all over the world. That for most of her history our England has been racially homogenous has been a great blessing. Racial diversity is a curse. As the number of non-whites increases, as it has done grotesquely over the last 30 years, so the racial, social and economic stresses become ever harder to hide or to deny. Blacks engaging in looting and rapine are just obvious and visible examples of how mass, non-white immigration has failed and how the white population bears the costs, economic, cultural and psychological.

Immigration is not just about the on-going immigrant threat to England it must also face the problem of those who have come here in large numbers and who have managed to secure a British passport. They have come here and wish to stay because they enjoy a standard of living in a First-World economy that would be impossible in Pakistan or Africa. If the numbers involved were exiguous and all further non-white immigration was almost impossible except for a highly-qualified and suitable few then all the legitimate fears and worries about immigration would disappear. That the rational, logical, healthy and morally reasonable fears of the white English indigenous people with regard to mass, non-white immigration show no sign whatsoever of abating is because the problems associated with mass, non-white immigration – crime, corruption, child abuse, depraved honour killings and forced marriages violence, physical dispossession and overcrowding/overpopulation – are getting worse. On these trends the English will be reduced to a racial minority in their own country some time in this century. Do you really want that outcome for your children Mr Cameron? Immigration policy must therefore deal with two problems: one immediate; the other long term.

The threat posed to England by mass, non-white immigration is largely a consequence of immigrants exploiting legal instruments which oblige us to accept them. The obvious first step is to rescind all legislation that prevents or hinders the expulsion of immigrants. Your view, Mr Cameron, that ‘Britain will always be open to those who are seeking asylum from persecution’ is an outrageous proposition and one that has done so much to make it possible for immigrants to enter England under false pretences. It leaves us permanently vulnerable to events in other parts of the world over which we have no control but which when they lead to political collapse mean that we are obliged to permit hordes of so-called asylum seekers (criminals and illegal immigrants) to enter England and “enrich” us. This is something that must change if we are to have any chance of saving England. Leaving the EU must also be a very high priority.

The immediate problem is to prevent all further immigration. It must be a matter of the highest priority to hunt down, round up and to deport all illegal immigrants. If they have assets these can be seized to cover the costs of deportation. The next step is make it clear to non-whites currently resident in this country, especially blacks, that they shall not be permitted to enjoy any special status merely because they are non-whites. If large numbers of blacks are incarcerated, having been subjected to the due process of English law then that must be seen as an indication of a black predisposition to commit crime not some insidious racist plot as in the Marxist slander of institutional racism. Again, black educational failure reflects low mean black IQ – well documented – not a white conspiracy. Blacks will have to learn to live with their limitations. Whites are not responsible for black failure and the psychological terror aimed at whites, often by other whites, to make white society feel guilty for black failure should be dismissed out of hand.

The next step is to recognise that the welfare state has created a massive parasitic underclass. People who refuse to provide services in return for welfare handouts should be denied any money at all and housed in government hostels where they will receive basic survival provision and no more. This means a bed, basic food and a roof. For those who show willing there will be firmness but fairness and maybe at times some warmth. Those that riot can expect ruthless counter measures to restore order and discipline. Respect, dignity, status, self-esteem, a sense of achievement cannot be donated by charity: they have to be earned. The only politician in England who grasps these facts of life is Frank Field, a very honourable and decent man.

Other measures some of which I noted earlier this year can also be taken. First, long term, every effort must be made to encourage large numbers of non-whites to return to their own countries. Generous financial benefits and inducements can be made to encourage repatriation. Second, under no circumstances must there ever be an amnesty for illegal immigrants. Third, under no circumstances will the creation of an independent Islamic/Muslim state ever be permitted within the territory of the United Kingdom. Fourth, the provisions of Sharia are grossly incompatible with the legal, political and cultural traditions of England and shall not be permitted. Fifth, family migration cannot be used as an excuse to bring relatives to this country. People who cannot bear to be separated from their families should not separate themselves from their wife (wives) in Pakistan. That these individuals are allegedly in search of a better life is an irrelevance, an emotional red herring, and imposes no obligation, moral or legal, on England to end this self-induced separation.

When you say - ‘immigration is not just about people coming to live here for a while. Some will want to settle and then join us as fellow British citizens…’- you ignore one very important consideration. Do I, as a white Englishman, want these people to join me? What happens when I emphatically do not want these people to join me? How can millions of non-white immigrants just ‘join me’? The answer is they cannot and they must not be encouraged to believe that they are welcome to ‘join us’. I do not want to have to endure the psychologically distressing sight of English cities overrun with immigrants. And it is not just the cities that face invasion. The next attack wave to hit white England, currently being planned by your government, is the calculated destruction and concreting of the countryside, including the Areas of Outstanding Natural Beauty (AONBs) and National Parks. The aim here is to impose thousands of non-white immigrants on areas which have so far escaped them. And when your party has managed to tear up the planning laws – not a perfect legal instrument by any means – and given the red light to rapacious developers, what will be the result? The result will be hundreds of thousands of shoddy, high-density, anti-social housing units in the countryside. For the first time there is now the real risk that mosques, hitherto confined to cities, will appear in the countryside. It is a truly dreadful thought. The long term problems will be racial tension, soaring council taxes, more crime, certainly more violent crime and Third-World squalor in England’s ancient shires. And when hordes of blacks imported to Ludlow, Ripon, and why not Witney, as part of government policy, start to engage in a bit of looting and violence, because that is what they do in the hood, the liberals will explain this degenerate behaviour as arising from a lack of opportunities for ‘young black people’ in a market town: the rioters were alienated and misunderstood; it’s not the fault of the ‘young black people’. The final result of permitting the developers to run riot and to build these shanty towns will be the destruction of a priceless asset.

So Mr Cameron: it really is time to stop the talking, posing, the endless consulting and act.

Yours sincerely

Frank Ellis

The Destruction of an African Farm

2011-10-09T05:49:00.000-07:00

Destruction of an African Farm – When the hyenas take over the Pridelands

By Mike Smith
9th of October 2011

The destruction of South African farms after blacks took over is legendary. It has been thoroughly recorded by Dr. Philip du Toit in his book The Great South African Land Scandal which can be read online or Downloaded from this link .

But this is not new. We have seen this destruction ever since Ghana got its independence from Britain in 1957, which lead in an era of decolonisation of Africa by the Europeans.

From Kenya, to Zimbabwe, to Congo to Angola and Mozambique, the same thing has happened everywhere in Africa. As soon as the blacks take over, destruction follows.

Continue reading and view more images at Mike Smith's Political Commentary by clicking here.

________________________
Hat Tip: Laager

The forthcoming Panorama documentary- why I have refused to give an interview

2011-10-05T11:04:00.000-07:00

By Richard Barnbrook

From what I hear, the documentary about the BNP is going to be damning, with the emphasis being on the financial irregularities that have been going on at Head Office.

I understand that a number of high-ranking ex-personnel have given interviews. I myself have been approached by the BBC on several occasions, but I have declined to comment.

The reason for this is two-fold. Firstly, any issues arising specifically from the unpaid printing bills in Barking are ‘sub judice.’ I made my position wholly clear when I submitted my application to the High Court earlier this year. My statement fully outlining the circumstances has been well-documented on the web and I have nothing further to add.

Secondly, regardless of the rights and wrongs committed by the current leadership, (and make no mistake, the wrongs if they are as alleged, can never be justified), the end result of the programme can only be bad in the long term, in so far as the overall impression gained by the public will be a negative one. As far as the casual viewer is concerned, we will all be tarred with the same brush.

Given what would seem to have been a deliberate and indefensible and attempt to bankrupt me, I have no regard left for the current Chairman. On the other hand, I do not wish to actively cause anyone affiliated with the nationalist cause harm. If the Chairman is as culpable as they say, then it is only a question of time. Those who live by the sword shall die by the sword.

I hope that eventually, nationalists will each come to realise that all this negativity and feuding, however justified it may seem in the current circumstances, is only causing harm in the public’s perception and will make the come back, when it happens, that much harder. And I certainly don’t wish to be a part of anything that could hinder that.

South African Family of Three Executed

2011-10-03T11:54:00.000-07:00

A 20 year black man has been arrested for the murder of a white South African couple and their 13 year old son. All the victims, whose bodies were found at their house on a Walkerville smallholding on Sunday afternoon had all been shot dead.

According to a police spokesman "The security door was opened. There was blood on the floor in almost all the rooms."

The body of Giraldine Viana, 46, was found in the main bedroom, she had been raped before being shot dead.

Her husband Tony, 50, was shot dead in the lounge. He was found on his stomach with his hands tied behind his back.

The body of their 13-year-old son Amaro was found in the bath with his hands tied behind his back. He was a Grade 7 pupil at Linmeyer Primary School.

Police believed they were killed on Saturday night.

The suspect is believed to be the son of a domestic worker employed by the Viana family.

Report at Farm Tracker
________________________
Hat tip: LE

The jobs white folk won't do

2011-10-02T07:09:00.000-07:00

One of the great myths of our age, one repeated constantly in every white Western nation, is that immigrants do the jobs which natives of the particular nation, in our case, the English, Welsh, Scottish or Irish, will not do. As such, the implication is given, is that immigrants are essential to the continued well being of the host nation.

What must things have been like before we lazy, work shy, Brits opened our doors and started ushering all these millions of willing dirty job doers in?

Here in Britain, of course, the older readers amongst us will doubtless recall how difficult and unpleasant it was to walk down the pavement during the great street sweeper shortage of 1964. Their parents before them lived for years without tasting a gooseberry or a Cox's pippin during the fruit picker famine in the 1930's

Of course in the early 1950's, most families lost poorly loved ones when thousands of hospital patients died unnecessarily from starvation and neglect, just because there were no nurses to take care of them before the immigrants arrived.

Another thing which I find completely amazing is that there were so many more public toilets in our cities back in the days when nobody was prepared to clean them! Gosh life must have been unpleasant when our grandfathers got caught short!

Of course, as we all know the “jobs white folk won't do” claim is another of the huge lies like “the economic benefits of immigration” and “only white people can be racist” which the promoters of multiculturalism have managed to insert into our folklore.

The fact is that, for a short while after they arrive, some immigrants are forced to do the jobs which:

a) employers don't want to pay a living wage for
b) nobody can afford to do at the salary offered unless they are prepared to live nine people to a bedsit. (or moonlight at Uncle Raj's convenience store)

The other claim, of course, is that immigrants bring skills which the locals don't have. This is an even more dubious claim and often quite a dangerous one, particularly when it comes to the health service, where political correctness requires that we pretend to treat medical qualifications obtained in Kampala or Islamabad as if they are worth more than a diploma in woodwork. Meanwhile the government save money by not having to train our own doctors, as its ministers quietly pay their BUPA subscription, and pray they never get treated by a doctor who qualified in Kampala.

Some of the claims have more merit, such as in relation to the indisputably invaluable Polish plumbers. However, this is only because they possess skills which we have given up teaching our own youngsters. A situation which could be turned round in a year if the government wanted to do so.

As for Indian trained IT workers being better qualified than their UK counterparts is concerned, as anyone who has spent an hour on the phone to Bangalore attempting to solve a Broadband problem knows, that's a joke, they're just a lot cheaper.

In any event as mass immigration has shown us, soon after arrival, far from doing the jobs English workers wont do, immigrants quickly end up doing the vast majority of the new jobs which the growing numbers of Unemployed UK workers would dearly love to do!

The progressive destruction of “Change”

2011-10-02T04:45:00.000-07:00

There he was on stage this week, that rather geeky little man with the disturbing stare who now leads the Labour Party, and he was chanting the same mantra they all keep repeating “I'm up for the fight to change Britain” he hooted in the unattractive nasal way he does, “Britain needs to change”.

They are all so addicted to that little word “change” aren’t they, they flourish it at every juncture and scatter it liberally through any speech, but what do they mean by it?

Look to the definitions of change in any dictionary and what will you find? – “alter, amend, transform, make different, transfer, substitute, replace” – not one of those words guarantees anything good will come from the process, just that it will not be the same when its done.

Death brings change, disease and bad luck bring change, America's flawed Messiah promised “change” and that benighted nation is drowning in those changes as I write. For two generations or more Western politicians have promised change, indeed many have brought change, and how many of those changes are we any better for? Count the good ones on your hand and you'll find you still have fingers to spare.

Is it not true that the real “change” we need is the means of reversing all the ill thought through and many truly malevolent “changes” which have been forced upon us in recent decades.

Another word they all adore is “progressive”. Politicians of all shades, red, yellow, green and blue all claim to be “progressive” and our media murmur the word as if with reverence, but has the “progress” they have brought been for good or ill?

Cancer is progressive, so is syphilis, woodworm, dry rot and dementia, and all of them bring friendlier changes than have the “progressive” politicians and reformers of our age.

But those people never were our friends.

Like the Communist revolutionaries and Frankfurt school plotters who came before them, the malevolent old men who came of age in the 1960's and 1970's and who rule us now, remain fixated with changing the world, and my God they have done so, although not for the better. Our betterment never was their plan. They have brought change in the form only of destruction, and that was, and remains, the whole point. What should replace that which they destroy is less relevant to them, in fact I doubt they even care, they remain obsessed with their all consuming hatred of the once great and powerful West, and that leaves little room for anything else.

It is a strange hatred these old men and women and their unattractive spawn feel for the history of the West inspired as it is by iconoclasm, a desire for anarchy and a deep self-loathing death wish. It is a hatred based on the myths, lies and calumny they have repeated so often they perhaps now even believe it themselves.

As the ugliest girl might hate the prettiest, not for her sins but for her beauty and her grace, they hate us not for our flaws but for our achievements. We achieved what others could not, and in the eyes of the aging 60's revolutionaries that in itself means we are an evil they must destroy.

Theirs is a hatred entirely misplaced. The West, and those of European, particularly Nordic and Anglo Saxon, origin has brought more benefit to humanity than any other group in the history of the world, in fact, by comparison with our contribution that of any other group is reduced to insignificance, assuming they indeed made any contribution at all.

If you look to the origins of any development or movement which has improved the general well being of mankind, you will almost certainly find at its core a white European male, or a white male of European ancestry, the same would not apply to any other group you may wish to name.

Those who hate the West point to the evil we have done, but by any standards the evil is minor when set against the good.

For every weapon which white men created they have made and distributed a million pills which have cured more diseases and saved more lives than died in all the wars in history. For every slave which the white race once owned we were instrumental in the freedom of a hundred others, and every act of brutality we committed have been compensated for by a thousand acts of charity and benevolence.

No other group can even start to claim the same

To an overwhelming degree, white Westerners, especially white western males, have historically been a greater force for good than any other group. However, it is white westerners, especially white men, who have been primarily undermined by the changes imposed upon our societies by, so called, progressives.   It is they, who have given so much, whom the progressives most hate.

Lesser men are marked for what they destroy, not for what they create, for more than half a century lesser men have ruled the West, and we see the trail of their destruction all around us.

The liars in the media tell us the Western Society is flawed and failing, yet it is not western society but its enemies which has brought us to where we are, our fault, if any, is our refusal to confront them or to call them on their lies.

And what lies they told us.

We were told that opening our borders to mass third world immigration would boost our economies and protect our pensions, how that lies has been exposed as the exact reverse has come to pass. Our economies are collapsing, they are in the worst state they have ever been and our once guaranteed pensions have become a fading and distant illusion.

Our services would collapse without immigration they told us, whereas in truth they are now collapsing beneath the ravenous influx which devours them.

We may, some of us feel briefly better off, but that is just an illusion, a temporary high bought on credit, money we borrowed, or which our government did, and its all about to fall around our ears. If you own nothing but debt, you own nothing.

The fabled benefits of immigration have been exposed for the lies they always were, and in the most devastating way. Yet our borders are still open, and still they come.

Meanwhile, other states, the real and only beneficiaries of globalization, and the net exporters of immigrants, rather than importers, states Brazil, China and India boom and thrive at our expense.

We are the “racists” if we resist they chided, whilst they set about producing a hundred thousand books, movies and TV shows depicting us as vile and filled with hate, yet it is we who are the victims of race hate, we who are the main victims of race hate crimes and we who are being driven from our towns and cities, many, such as our capital, we have already all but surrendered. It is we who are being ethnically cleansed.

The single greatest “change” they have brought about is the way they have forced us to give up our homelands to a massive third world invasion, and it is this, above all else, which is destroying us. A few short decades ago all the great powers of this planet were Western powers, we now face a situation whereby it is expected that within twenty to thirty years only 25% of the planet's wealth will be held by the West. That is a great result if you believe in egalitarianism irrespective of merit, but not if you care about the future of the West, or indeed the future of our planet.

The great achievement of the egalitarian lobby will be to have placed 75% of the world's wealth in the hands of totalitarian governments and immensely rich third world plutocrats, for whom human rights is an alien and ludicrous concept.

This is a politically manufactured outcome achieved through the “changes” our leaders have forced down our unwilling throats and by their special brand of “progress” which they beguiled us into believing would improve our lot.

As the west crumbles and declines, how can they still claim that mass third immigration brings us benefit when clear evidence to the contrary is all around us. Yet they still claim it, and crazy as it seems, there are some who still believe it.

It's a lie, and, in most respects, it always was.

The super rich achieve a short term benefit from mass immigration because it depresses the wages they have to pay, a few politicians benefit by virtue of the votes which their imported constituency bring. However, beyond that small and unattractive coterie of corruption and contempt, nobody else benefits in any way.

There is no widespread benefit from mass immigration, it is a vehicle for change that's all was intended for. But of a change which only brings destruction, and the only purpose of which is to replace what was already there, nothing more.

That any good should come from that process was never the plan.

Global Architecture: Incongruous Excrescences

2011-10-01T07:05:00.000-07:00

By David Hamilton
(First published at The New English Review)

One of Edmund Burke's famous quotes from Reflections on the Revolution in France sums up the contemporary official attitude to architecture and planning: “I cannot conceive how any man can have brought himself to that pitch of presumption, to consider his country as nothing but carte blanche, upon which he may scribble whatever he pleases.” This is the universal versus the particular.

I am promoting a Conservative view of architecture and town planning which advocates the design of new buildings by developing from the traditional styles that already exist in diverse towns and cities rather than forcing incongruous buildings into a round hole: the exploitation of cities across the world for a Global style of architecture. There is enough disjuncture in British urbiscapes as it is after the Second World War blitzes and sixty years of depredations by local councils without adding incongruous excrescences to it.

It is difficult to get a hearing for a non-orthodox idea. The Liberal-Marxist online journal Spiked would not use an article I wrote as an alternative view to an article praising The Shard. They complimented it but asked me to chop it down and send it as letter! Why suppress a different point of view? The catalyst was an interesting piece by Tim Abrahams. (1)

Mr. Abraham's essay is enthusiastic about skyscrapers for London and gives an insight the background to the design of The Shard. It was originally planned to be an even taller building but planning permission was refused in 2000. The developers then brought in a new architect, Renzo Piano, to get the project through because Lord Rogers, who Piano had worked with on the Pompidou Centre in Paris, was an adviser to the London mayor, Ken Livingstone, who was keen to change London.

Livingstone had also supported the plans the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea Council had to redesign Sloane Square by creating two large piazzas connected with the buildings on each side of the square to replace the isolated central space. Livingstone also had plans to redesign ten of London's famous Squares. The residents of Sloane Square are highly articulate and professional people and defeated the plan. However ordinary communities have to suffer constant change and being uprooted.

Funding for The Shard is from Qatari Diar Real Estate Investment Company, who, agreed to provide a funding facility to LBQ Ltd, the Jersey registered holding company that is developing the Shard and London Bridge Place. The quantum of the loan is not disclosed.

Karl Sharro, a London based architect also mocked Prince Charles in an article for Spiked. It is a classic of modern ideological thinking and contempt for a country's traditions and the style of architecture that has developed there with the usual mocking arrogance and wild hyperbole. (2)

The Shard will be three times the height of St. Paul's Cathedral, thus cocking a snook at Prince Charles, who is a great lover of the magnificent Cathedral with its prominent dome.

The topic sentences in Mr. Abrahams article were:”the Shard is a feat of engineering and an important reminder that construction is a complex process. The revealing of the innards of the building has captured the imagination of visitors and residents of London: many have been enthralled at realising the process behind building skyscrapers, which are built around a concrete lift core."

When evaluating contemporary buildings reviewers commonly confuse engineering with architecture. The second sentence about “revealing the innards of the building” tells us it is part of a contemporary fashion.

Renzo Piano in naming the building used the term of contempt for “The Shard” coined by English Heritage, the advisory body to the government on historical preservation, his opponents, – The Shard!

Like other new skyscrapers it caters for the new rich. I am no Egalitarian but what we are seeing is the overthrow of local people and their culture and traditions for wealthy people who will not mix with them. The cost for an apartment at the tapered top of the building will be around £10million.

The contemporary fad is not only to build ugly, but silly or just ridiculous buildings that are bizarre and without character. The Selfridges building in Birmingham's Bullring Shopping Centre was voted the ugliest building in the country. It looks like a giant silver slug oozing past the Shopping Centre, and it glowers inhospitably at visitors entering the city.

These excrescences or an unattractive or superfluous addition or feature, have no lineage and grow out of no tradition but seemingly erupt like boils with no relation to the local character or the aggregate of features and traits that form the local ambience of an area and its community. A community no less than an individual has a particular nature from its past, its history, local culture and traditions. These universal buildings are growths that undermine and jar with the local ambience. They usually open with protests from local residents and calls for them to be demolished immediately.

Some examples of Global architecture: Lord Rogers', Millennium Dome (now the 02 Arena) in London, the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in Cleveland, USA, and the Ryugyong Hotel in North Korea - these are buildings which undermine the local character of the different areas and weaken local cultures and traditions and thereby dissociate local people. The Ryugyong Hotel was unoccupied for two decades, might never have been occupied.

It has 3,000 rooms, a series of three grey 328-foot long concrete wings shaped into a steep pyramid, with 75 degree sides that rise to an apex of 1,083 feet, known as The Hotel of Doom (also The Phantom Hotel and The Phantom Pyramid). In 1987, Baikdoosan Architects and Engineers made an optimistic start but over twenty years later, despite North Korea investing more than two percent of its gross domestic product in the project, it was never occupied, opened, nor ever finished.

Global buildings are constructed in diverse communities but share common features: they are extremely expensive, most were thought to be futuristic designs, and they divide opinion amongst local residents, architects, and the wider public. They are neither popular nor respected and are mocked and given nicknames because they do not look like what they are supposed to be. They have the effect of reducing the prestige of a city and making it look odd or silly. They are exciting for a time but it is a temporary excitement, yet the loss of prestige is permanent as the cities become disjointed by piecemeal developments and the local communities dissociated. This is not the grandeur of the great cathedrals, built in a higher cause, the glory of God, which is why they pointed to the heavens; but overstatement, arrogance, built to aggrandize individuals or an architects company or by interest groups to the detriment of a town or city.

Another Global horror is The Cube in Birmingham, the traditional home of both cold and grey as well as silly buildings. It has been said that the architects who designed Birmingham were influenced by the cigarette packets and cigarette lighters they had on their desks because so many of the city's buildings were shaped like cigarette packets and cigarette lighters. The Cube self-promotion blurb bears no relation to the common perception:

“Standing tall on the architectural world stage, The Cube, has transformed Birmingham’s skyline, raised its global profile and signifies a new era in the city’s evolution.”

It is instructive that these buildings always win awards. Just listen to this gushing twaddle: “inspired by the vision of award winning architect, Ken Shuttleworth, this most prestigious landmark building animates the canal side offering cutting edge design and breathtaking views in a designer neighbourhood”... apparently, its “intricate glowing tessellations blanket the exterior facade, to be admired from afar. Inside this fascinating ‘jewellery box”.

Like The Shard it aims for the new elitism – “a rich mix of slick residential apartments, exclusive retail, extensive office space, boutique hotel, private spa, a hi-tech automated car park and the city’s first rooftop restaurant reside.” Upmarket is the American term which refers to what we would in England describe as vulgar: money without taste.

The Cube is seen as “prestigious, world famous architecture such as London’s Swiss building known as ‘The Gherkin’, Hong Kong & Shanghai Bank and 55 Baker Street. A confident statement for a confident city.” To most people it just looks silly.

Architecture gives an impression of a place in people's minds. It makes a statement as they say. Birmingham was voted the ugliest city in the country in a national poll. That followed the city's Bullring Shopping Centre and Central Library being named as the number one and two ugliest buildings in the country. That was the current “Brutalist” library from 1974.

A new Library is being built but this is not so much ugly as ridiculous. It looks like Colditz wrapped in barbed wire. (3) Birmingham, it is said, used to look like Paris until the irrational scheme in the 1950s to make it an international city left it decultured and without an identity - an example to the rest of the country of what not to do.

Manchester is at it too! They have several which exemplify my point about these universal styles disjointing the overall ambience. Islington Wharf is one.

Heron Tower in London is another rupture of the character of the city and our inherited architectural traditions. It dwarfs St. Paul's Cathedral and the little Georgian church of St Botolph, Bishopsgate, and its surrounding churchyard, which are just over the road. It stands next to The Gherkin and The Cheese Grater who stand incongruous in London like The Three Witches from Macbeth.

Architect KPF designed the building which has upset people because it is another one dwarfing St. Paul's Cathedral. It is yet another skyscraper destroying London's character and presenting a muddled and disjointed skyline devoid of charm, grace and beauty but redolent with muddled and incompatible buildings. It has a 70,000 litre aquarium and what is becoming an obligatory shark. If Burj Dubai has gimmicks then these must follow suit.

St Paul's is one of the most beautiful building in London and, despite the high-rise buildings around it, you can still visualise what it would have looked like when it was built - a beautiful big Swan surrounded by ducks. London's officials are allowing the destruction of that.

In March 2007, it was stated that Heron had signed a funding deal with the State General Reserve Fund of the Sultanate of Oman to provide the equity for the development. Skanska, the firm that built The Gherkin, were main contractor.

KPF are an International architectural practice recognised for design excellence and innovation in their buildings throughout the world, with offices in New York, London, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Seoul, & Abu Dhabi

One of the ugliest muddles I have ever seen is St. George's Wharf, in London. How architects can be so crass, planners be so benighted and local councillors so contemptuous of their cities, defeats me. To the contrary, St. George's website rejoices that:

”With breathtaking views and stunning apartments, shimmering on the waterfront with its fantastic architecture and design, St George Wharf is one of the most sought after riverside developments in London! “

The views may well be “breathtaking” but the architecture and design are repulsive.

There have been breaks in architectural styles when a new style takes over throughout history but these excrescences bear no relation at all to precious styles, neighbouring buildings nor the characteristic scale and are destroying the character, ambience and culture our towns and cities.

Jean Nouvel's One New Change in the City is another muddle that is ruining local character by being dumped between two historic Wren churches - St Mary le Bow and St Paul's. (4)

A standard development that has the usual high street shopping malls and a champagne bar which show the lack of imagination of planners, developers and architects. A Victor Heal building was demolished to make way for it. Like the others its has a stunning view, but only from the inside looking out. If any should make a mistake and look the other way they would be appalled.

In an interview with The Guardian, The City of London's planning officer, Peter Rees, said the shopping centre would help confirm that the City has shed its bowler-hatted image. "The City has become a much more rounded place. The quality of food available and the entertainment and leisure facilities have improved, and we're bringing shopping back to the City. It's not just a place to work any longer." It certainly is not just a place to work. It is being turned into a place with diminishing character and identity whose main attraction to visitors now is somewhere to go be disappointed. Whoever thought London was city of bowler-hatted people?

The Strata building plopped in the middle of The Elephant and Castle is out of place, a freak alone in a run down area not regenerating it but mocking it. It would have been better renovating the existing buildings from the 1960s, which are generally sound but neglected.

One Hyde Park cost £500 million and took five years for architects 3XN and AEW to build. It has been described as a:” "Great location but money can't buy you taste!"and derided by Building Design for having "sterile gardens", "desolate spaces" and the "barren feel of a corporate plaza."

BBC's Salford-based regional headquarters by Wilkinson Eyre, Chapman Taylor and Fairhurst Design Group cost £600 million to build and was described by Building Design editor Ellis Woodman: “Visiting Media City UK, it is hard to see how the corporation could set their aspirations any lower. How uncreative can a 'Creative Quarter' be?"

As a reminder of what beauty and grandeur are I have added a view of St. Paul's from down the River Thames showing two of the ugly sisters waiting for the third, Heron Tower, to join them. It shows clearly the ruining of the London skyline. Nearby is a host of threatening cranes: The cranes of destruction.

We have a sense of beauty, balance and harmony from God and these new buildings contravene that. We are being dissociated from our communities in towns and cities by architecture that jars with and offends our inborn need to belong and for the familiar. Contemporary architecture dissociates people and makes them feel out of place in their home towns. Our Urbiscapes are being disjointed by new developments that have no relation to their surroundings or preceding buildings. To Aristotle the golden mean was the desirable middle between the extremes of excess and deficiency. To the Greeks the Mean was an attribute of beauty which, they believed, had three aspects: symmetry, proportion, and harmony. That is a useful way to judge new buildings. I would also look for character, something individual but which nevertheless fits in. Scale is important as our traditional scale here is different from that in other countries. The great buildings were superior to contemporary ones because they made proficient use of decoration and ornament as our Cathedrals and churches show.

What architects need to do, be they international or otherwise, is respect the character of the towns and cities they are designing for and and develop continuity not turn them into characterless muddles with disjunctive buildings nor is it necessary to let architectural anarchy ruin harmony, balance and proportion. The local authorities are supposed to represent their communities not international corporations. I mentioned Aristotle now it is time to mention Plato. What is happening here is as he warned in book eight, chapter four of his famous work The Republic, our democracy is becoming an oligarchy.

I have written previously that: "Local councillors are only elected by a minority of voters and are not therefore fully representative of the public and we need an office appointed by the Crown like a lord lieutenant with responsibility for protecting communities not factions of it. The Office of the Lord-Lieutenant dates from the 16th Century and has the force of tradition behind it at a time when we are victims of unrestrained change for profit at our communities’ expense.”

That was offering a Conservative vision for the future but what can be done now, in practice, is to campaign for a return to local democracy where the elected officials put the interests of their communities first.

____________________

(1) Tim Abrahams is associate editor of Blueprint, the UK’s leading magazine of architecture and design

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/10008/

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/issues/C20/

http://www.europe-re.com/system/main.php?pageid=2616&articleid=13019

http://www.building.co.uk/news/work-begins-to-lift-shard%E2%80%99s-spire-into-place/5025132.article

http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2011/jan/30/shard-renzo-piano-london-bridge

(2) http://karlsharro.co.uk/ambition-architecture.htm

http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php/site/article/7915/

(3) http://www.birmingham.gov.uk/cs/Satellite/library-of-birmingham?packedargs=website%3D4&rendermode=live

(4) http://www.guardian.co.uk/artanddesign/2010/oct/20/one-new-change-st-pauls

http://www.knowledgeoflondon.com/modern.html

The left is re-writing Britain's immigration History

2011-09-27T12:30:00.000-07:00

Click here to read Philip Johnston on how Labour is trying to hide the truth about the explosion in non-EU immigration following the 1997 election.

Please circulate the link

Young South African Farmer (father of two) stabbed to death

2011-09-26T12:05:00.000-07:00

30-year-old Wesley Wood was stabbed to death on his farm in Doringkop just outside KwaDukuza South Africa on Sunday September 18.

It is believed that he had been living back in South Africa for a few years, after spending time in the UK where he met his wife.

Wood and his British wife, together with their two little children aged one and three, had just arrived back home from the beach late on Sunday afternoon when the incident occurred.

Mr Wood's wife Sara was confronted by two black males, she ran into the house and attempted to prevent the men from entering. On hearing the commotion Mr Wood Rushed to the aid of his wife and children but was stabbed to death by the assailants.

The suspects then fled on foot.

Police say the motive for the attack is unknown as the suspects didn’t take anything from the scene.

News report at Farm Tracker

The Moment of Tip Over

2011-09-25T08:32:00.000-07:00

By August Pointneuf

The web pages below reflect a point of tip-over. Contesting the threat to European national cultural values has begun to move from the secret to outward objections.

These tiny cracks presage an irreversible shift. It is now commonplace to hear expressed previous anathema – such as criticism of Nelson Mandela or quoting (and admiring) Enoch Powell.

Academics have refined the term “racism”. In the past this was a “catchall” term, convenient for those who wished to use it as a tool to lever emotions. But escaping this suffocating potion is beginning to be possible. The term “racism” is being liberated. It is becoming recognised that the word “racism” has many interpretations as well as positive values. A new terminology of racism is developing (although confusingly manifold): now some of the components of the term "racism", such as its application to national pride, are no longer pejorative. It is being accepted that racism is not necessarily a denigrator terminology. The word racism is being adopted and returned to polite vocabulary. The meaning is being introverted, and can now denote pride-in-self and an acclamation of communal, national and racial pride. Racism is beginning to be acceptable.

http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/2011/09/holland-fights-back.html
(Holland)

http://leejohnbarnes.blogspot.com/2011/09/germany-commits-national-suicide_19.html
(Germany)
http://waeshael.wordpress.com/2011/09/15/muslim-halal-food-sales-supporting-terrorism/ (France)

(Swiss) MP Oskar Fresysinger.

http://www.brusselsjournal.com/node/490

It is a historical truism that attempts by authoritarian regimes to “suppress” populations, and by that is meant the prohibition of intuitive responses, have always failed, ultimately. The longer it takes the population to escape suppression, the greater the stress and tension build- up within that society. The longer the escape from suppression is delayed so progressively more violent reactions occur as it ends. The “British Spring” is bound to arrive, sooner or later.

It is still a quiet revolution. Therefore the opportunity must be grasped now to steer these revolutionary changes towards a soft landing. In the past, governments in Europe worked hard to intimidate their populations into subservient acceptance of aliens. Once released from these constraints the reactions will not be muted.

The present trajectory of European government policy towards cultural aliens will unswervingly terminate in catastrophe.

When the beaker finally cracks large swathes of the population will begin venting anger. This anger will build, at first, unobserved and subliminal. It will pivot on many types of collateral stresses, some real some imagined. Many of these precipitating stresses – such as joblessness, alien-associated crime, reduced social benefits and increased taxation – can be predicted to surface collaterally,. Intuitive reactions will slowly emerge from these forced suppressions: they will often be outward reactions to seemingly trivial triggers, such as cross-racial flirting and cohabitation, as well as the flaunting of distinctive alien cultural patterns.

Once some display anti-alien behaviour then others will follow promptly. A positive feedback cascade of triumphalism will accelerate matters further. Once that stage is reached there will be a vicious alien counter reaction, multiplying the cascade of aggression and then rapid counter aggression. Ultimately this will likely be so widespread that any attempt to curb it will be un-enforceable.

So widespread will the reaction be that there will be an effective anarchy, characterized by excessive violence using firearms and explosives. Northern Ireland’s past anarchy will pale by comparison.

Governments, of whatever denomination, need to act immediately to mitigate the calamity which they have forced on their populations. Let them not replace their past catastrophic errors with the even worse error of dithering.

Anti-alien parties, now existing, should recognise that they, also, have inherited an obligation to soften the counter-revolution.

Softening the counter-revolution will need humility of governments, to backtrack, and invert previously strongly held views. There will have to be much “tough love”, both from government and population, to reduce bloodshed and shredding of society further. It will take a war-room mentality and steeliness of purpose.

The British and European native populations will need to be actively appeased before the apocalyptic apogee. How can this be done?

It is now mandatory that the British government offer its native populations affirmative acts of substance. These should be directed solely to the benefit of native, Cultural Britons.

Freedom of speech must be reinstated in Britain. If this does not occur then much tension which could have been diluted on the surface will become an aggressive anger underground. The population must be once again permitted to make known their intuitive feelings about the aliens verbally. It will result in anger, fighting and deaths. But it will, at least, allow the native European to perceive that control of expected behaviour has reverted to the level of Everyman. It will act as damage control. It will be a tolerable trade-off against a more brutal war.

A dramatically different immigration policy will be necessary to assuage the British natives’ fear of being outnumbered, and to repair the cultural fragmentation. This will be the only way in which the Britons’ fears of being progressively outnumbered and outvoted can be appeased.

Affirmative actions should be designed to attract Cultural Britons back into Britain. School teachers, health-carers, entrepreneurs and skilled artisans of British cultural decent are now actively excluded from returning to Britain. Britons abroad, of similar background and culture, must be attracted into Britain from the Diaspora. At present there is specific, and legislated, exclusion of Cultural Britons, living in all corners of the earth. Unimaginable to some, but this is the case at present: highly trained whites from the Commonwealth are refused entry because of their area of domicile.

The Irish, with the support of the Irish Department of the Interior, have developed a Certificate of Irish Origin. This is not a passport, but a way of reclaiming an allegiance to and from the Irish Diaspora. An English Certificate of Origin will be an essential tool of this racial re-harmonizing.

Boycotting should cause alien business enterprises to forsake some of their control. This will allow the native British to feel that their world of commerce is no longer being slowly confiscated from them. It will allow that which was so important in past parochial societies to be regained, concepts like the British village postmistress. And of course it will allow the native British to feel that an employment hierarchy is being reopened to them.

Refusal by native British to deal with alien businesses will put a brake on further immigration into Britain. If there are fewer prospects of fortunes, fewer aliens will arrive. This will also gently persuade some aliens to emigrate, and put a brake on what has been an almost entirely one-way flood from failed countries into those European countries which protect their populations by social support mechanisms. It will allow redistribution of social benefits back to the children of the children of the children who made Britain great and prosperous for the very reason of protecting their progeny.

Harsh? Yes, very harsh, but a cruelty to be kind. It is harsh for those aliens who intruded, as immigrants, into a foreign land hoping to escape the failures of their own societies. But they ran the risks of all those who adventure. This has been the risk of all those who have intruded into foreign lands. It is the risk incurred by transgressing into firmly established and different societies, with sophisticated economic-cultural patterns. It is most particularly a hazard wrought by those who attempt to meddle with the long-standing social equilibrium of their destination.

Consider how small were the racial, cultural, behavioural and heritage differences between the German and the Britain. Yet even these minuscule differences, when forced into polarization, precipitated the gore and exsanguinations of horrific proportion and unparalleled self-destruction.
Unless this growing social climate-change is arrested now the portends are a world-wide cataclysm of similar proportion.

For the sake of Universal God, your nation and your people, governments of Britain, do not potter and shuffle and tiptoe now. Have the courage to reverse your arrogant and misguided attempts to engineer your native people, forthwith.

More dishonest "politically correct" casting

2011-09-25T05:27:00.000-07:00

Click here to read "Dolphin Tale" Hollywood Hokum: Morgan Freeman Gets To Play Numinous Negro Yet Again - Paul Kersey examines another example of Hollywood's dishonest, politically correct, "Whiteout" casting decisions

The racial divide, and who is really crossing it

2011-09-24T11:22:00.000-07:00

Despite the intelligent and highly eloquent defence recently presented here by Frank Ellis, I have to admit that I was very ambivalent as to the value of LSE professor Dr Satoshi Kanazawa's controversial research, published earlier this year, into race and attractiveness, and his purported findings that black women were generally found less attractive than women from other racial groups.

Whereas I am a passionate believer in free speech, (as evidenced by the extraordinary length of time I continued to tolerate one particular commentator at this blog) as well as the freedom of academic research, and was outraged by the attacks on Kanazawa and the calls for his dismissal, I failed to see the point of this research and what it had actually achieved.

Research into behavioural issues and the propensities of certain races towards violent crime or irresponsibility in matters of sexual health have merit, as they can be addressed and they inform debate on vital topics such as immigration, justice, health care and, of course the decisions people make in order to protect themselves.

However, research which establishes that one group is less desirable than another seems to me to be rather pointless, after all what can be done with these finding which could be of benefit to anyone?

I suppose, if it were allowed any official credibility, the research could act as a counterbalance to all the contrary research which claims to find that non-whites have a superior ability to whites in in various areas, (such as the bizarre insistence that running is the most skilful of all Olympic sports on account of the fact that blacks are generally rather good at running) however, beyond its “tit for tat” application, and with all due respect to Dr. Kanazawa, what merit there is to his research in this respect continues to escape me.

However, I was reminded of the explosion of outrage which greeted the decision by Psychology Today to publish Dr Kanazawa's findings back in May (since cringingly withdrawn) when I read an article on the American black network site “News One” which declared that there were only '3 “Good” black men for every 100 black women' . The article bemoaned the fact that only around 3% of black men met the criteria which would make them a suitable prospect as a romantic partner for black women. The remaining 97% failed to make the grade for a variety of reasons including lack of education or success and the fact that so many were either in prison, between periods of incarceration, or had fathered a number of children by other woman.

Another significant group of black men were viewed as unsuitable by black women on account of the fact that they are either exclusively or primarily attracted to white women.

In fact the number of black men who effectively reject their own race in favour of white women is becoming a matter of some concern and resentment within the black community in America and is also causing some negative comment amongst the black community in Britain. If one looks at the figures what is happening is quite significant, but not in the way which the media, with its determination to undermine and mock white men, would have us believe.

The common claim within the media and popular culture is that the number of interracial relationships indicates that white women find black men sexually attractive, however, that claim ignores the racial demographic as it still stands in the west, and the sizes of the respective ethnic groups in Western nations. In fact the figures actually reveal something very different than that which the media would like to have us believe.

In America, 8.5% of black men are married to white women, however, given that black males account for around 6% of the US population, whereas white women make up almost 38%, the far less widely publicised statistic is that less than 1% of white women are married to black men. This is a relatively insignificant number, especially considering the amount of propaganda which white women are subjected to. (in fact according to Wikipedia, who are, if anything, likely to exaggerate the figure, only 2.1% of white women are in any form of mixed race marriage, slightly less than white men at 2.3% - this is not the picture we see on TV is it?)

Statistically, it is black men, not white women, who are most enthusiastically spurning their own. So why is this happening?

There is no need to ask why the white woman involved do it, with the exception of a few committed liberal multiculturalists, the vast majority tend to be of the type which would sleep with anything provided it has a pulse or a battery, and in any event, as a percentage of their demographic, they are actually relatively insignificant.

It is when one asks why black men are crossing the racial divide in statistically far more significant numbers that the answer becomes less favourable to the advocates or racial integration, and, sadly, somewhat unflattering to black women.

Popular mythology would have us believe that white women are rushing to embrace multiculturalism, however, in fact only a very small group are doing so, a truer picture is that an embarrassingly large number of black men are rejecting their own race.

Whatever one may think of Satoshi Kanazawa's much condemned research paper, it would seem that by their politically incorrect actions many black men are adding credibility to the most controversial aspects of his findings.

It is also encouraging to know that the situation is not quite as depressing, for white people, as it sometimes appears.

Genocide Watch raises South Africa's Genocide risk status to level 6

2011-09-21T04:14:00.000-07:00

Genocide Watch has explained its reason for raising the genocide risk level to Stage six out of eight potential risk levels. Stage six "Preparation for Genocide" being just one stage below "Extermination".

For the last ten years, since Genocide Watch raised the South African risk level to level 5, the organisation has been particularly concerned by the level of violence and hate crimes perpetrated against the white population in particular the Afrikaner farming community. Since 1994 between 30,000 and 40,000 whites have been murdered in South Africa, over 3,100 of these are farmers, making being a white farmer in South Africa statistically the most dangerous occupation on Earth.

However, Genocide Watch have now raised the level because of clear evidence that the violence against the white community is being deliberately incited. In this respect, they refer to the actions of Julius Malema, president of the African National Congress Youth League, who was recently convicted of hate speech folloing his repeated singing of the ANC song "Kill the Boer".

Click here to read Genocide Watch's explanation for the change to the South African status.

Don't expect to see any mention of this in the western press any time soon.

_________________________
Hat Tip Censor Bugbear Reports ....