tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3373165199675890724.post8451627430771567655..comments2023-10-15T00:20:43.111-07:00Comments on Sarah Maid of Albion: Selective anonymitySarah Maid of Albionhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11685494924450312124noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3373165199675890724.post-59704507996940562602009-03-29T01:10:00.000-07:002009-03-29T01:10:00.000-07:00An excellent piece. Until reading this I hadn't ev...An excellent piece. Until reading this I hadn't even heard of the Reid case, but even though I watch next to no television, I've not been able to escape the reporting on John Worboys, which has featured heavily on Radio 4.<BR/><BR/>Like you, I find it offensive that cases such as that brought by the unnamed female lawyer against Bacon even make it to court, and the fact that the accuser remains anonymous whilst the identity of the accused is made public, is utterly unforgivable. The latter should only be revealed after conviction. If there is no conviction, details should not be released.Durotriganhttp://durotrigan.blogspot.com/noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3373165199675890724.post-7324090279044771452009-03-28T07:16:00.000-07:002009-03-28T07:16:00.000-07:00On the subject of MSM reticence, this post may be ...On the subject of MSM reticence, <A HREF="http://dogwash48.blogspot.com/2009/03/discreet-silence-was-maintained.html" REL="nofollow">this post</A> may be of interest. <BR/><BR/>I am always ready to be proved wrong in asserting that the MSM has been unwilling to cover the arson attack on an East End Sikh temple because the perpetrator is believed to be Black. After all, it's pretty hard to prove a non-occurrence. But I await developments with interest.Edwin Greenwoodhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03639193560457674072noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3373165199675890724.post-26580582701166000482009-03-28T07:13:00.000-07:002009-03-28T07:13:00.000-07:00Well, Sarah, there can only be one simple economic...Well, Sarah, there can only be one simple economic explanation for not printing pictures of the black rapists, killers, etc. It takes more ink to print the picture of a black man than to print the picture of a white man, so the papers hold off in order to save money. Its just that simple. No prejudice, political correctness, no none of that, just simple economics (and anti-white racism!).<BR/><BR/>Very glad to see you back, Sarah.Dr.Dhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18360786634583725263noreply@blogger.com